Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
In a perfect world there would be no need for the following question: What is the
meaning of “the golden rule”? Is it, to do unto others as you would have them do unto
you, or is it, whom ever has the gold makes the rules? To have equal and just societies
based on the concepts of natural law we must examine and change the way in which
wealth is passed from one generation to another. For if not, then at some point we have
merely replaced the inauspicious despots, chiefs, priests, and monarchs of old for a new,
privileged breed, who differ from there predecessors in name only, an oligarchy whose
aims and means only appear to be different, but whose underlying duplicity of purpose,
planning and nature are really the identical. We call them: The very Rich.
What was ancient man’s perspective of themselves and their culture? Their social
structures and functions were expressed as a crude but pure and necessary collaboration
behaviors which self perpetuated by the fact that they either succeeded or failed, and in
doing so sustained or terminated those carrying out said actions or accomplishing said
tasks. The structures and functions of their clans, groups, and culture merged into a single
purpose which in turn gave meaning to all subsequent behaviors and activities; each
group member being defined as much by their relation to and ability to exploit the
enlightened self-interest. Yet over time more efficient utilization of resources and plain
old good fortune reduced the survival coefficient of energy output to sustenance from
nearly 100% to something less and that new proportionality is what began to allow
individuals more physical, psychological, and cultural room to influence, nuance and
This surplus of resources allowed for the emergence of a class of persons whose
unscrupulous attitudes and behaviors cumulated in first limited, then increasingly larger
spheres of control and authority, in the areas of norms, religion, and politics which
allowed them to define, establish, and enforce the “rules”. Rules which derive their
power from the life and death consequences connected to knowing and complying with
them. As the French philosopher and playwright Voltaire said; “It has taken centuries to
do justice to humanity, to feel it was horrible that the many should sow and the few
should reap."; as he called for political, religious, and philosophic freedom for the
Pity that no sooner had human kind acquired the capacity, privilege, and magnificence of
relationship to each other and the world, than we abandoned such enlightened folly
opting instead for a much more practical expression of social-construction based in the
myopic, avaricious, and fallacious belief that might makes right. The tyranny of those
willing to take from others by any means the product of their labor slowly became the
bedrock of myriad societies in which a person’s station, role, and caste in all but the
rarest of exceptions was assigned at birth and determined nearly all the major
exploitation, but it cannot exist absent vast concentrations of wealth, passed from one
person or family owns, minus any debts.; "Financial wealth is a more 'liquid' concept
than marketable wealth, since one's home is difficult to convert into cash in the short
term. It thus reflects the resources that may be immediately available for consumption or
various forms of investments." “We also need to distinguish wealth from income. Income
is what people earn from wages, dividends, interest, and any rents or royalties that are
paid to them on properties they own. In theory, those who own a great deal of wealth may
or may not have high incomes, depending on the returns they receive from their wealth,
but in reality those at the very top of the wealth distribution usually have the most
income.” He goes on: (Domhoff) “The Wealth Distribution In the United States, wealth is
highly concentrated in a relatively few hands. As of 2001, the top 1% of households (the
upper class) owned 33.4% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial,
professional, and small business stratum) had 51%, which means that just 20% of the
people owned a remarkable 84%, leaving only 16% of the wealth for the bottom 80%
(wage and salary workers). In terms of financial wealth, the top 1% of households had an
even greater share: 39.7%.” So we see that most people do not possess wealth, they may
(in developed countries) be able to meet their needs, and many of these may have
money, it is after all “their” money. Well there are a number of problems with this way
of thinking. They stem from the fact that with very few exceptions most people have no
choice about the circumstances of their births. As such most of us are co-opted into one
or another social contract, i.e. society or culture. Nearly all these have laws (the Rules)
which if not followed consequences will ensue. Nearly all that is but the wealthy. They
have sufficient means to sway outcomes, influence legislators, and manipulate “free”
markets thus circumventing the social contract and invalidating its restraints upon them
and their agendas. Left to operate as they please they consume more of the given
This contravention of restrictions imposed by a rule or law without actually breaking it,
or changing it after the fact diminishes the quality and choices of all the others.
Everyone’s life is diminished to a larger or smaller degree, and the more the imbalance
grows the worse it becomes. (John Donne) Human beings necessarily depend on one
another, as in you can't manage this all by yourself; no man is an island. This
expression is a quotation from John Donne's Devotions (1624): "No man is an Island,
entire of it self; every man is a piece of the Continent, a part of the main."