Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2
However, if the overt acts performed would already constitute an attempt of the crime intended to be committed,
any desistance would be unavailing. So, if A shot B with intent to kill him without hitting him, desistance from
firing again, would not affect As liability for an attempted felony. The desistance refers to a crime intended to be
committed and not to the crime actually committed before the desistance.
2. An overt act in criminal law, is an outward act done in pursuance and manifestation of a criminal intent or
design. So if the offender is caught after he made an opening on the wall of a storage before entering it, he
cannot be held liable for attempted robbery because the purpose of his intended entrance is not yet known. But
he is liable for attempted trespass to dwelling as undoubtedly the opening was made to enter the store.
3. The nature of the action intended must be inferred from the nature of the acts executed. The overt acts must
have an immediate and necessary relation to the offense intended. The overt act must logically and necessarily
ripen into a concrete offense.
4. There is no attempted felony by omission because overt acts are not performed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Conspiracy (Art. 7)
It exists when two or more persons agree to commit a crime and they decide to commit it. (People vs.
Ogapay, 66 SCRA 210).
From the legal viewpoint, conspiracy exists if, at the time of the commission of the offense, the
accused "had the same purpose, and were united in its execution." (People vs. Danilo Sy, et al., L39400, March 29,1982, 113 SCRA 207).