Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
S U P P L E M E N T T O THE W E L D I N G J O U R N A L , J A N U A R Y , 1978
Sponsored by the American W e l d i n g Society and the W e l d i n g Research Council
i f 1)1
Introduction
Many marine applications require
both high strength and corrosion resistant materials for long term reliability
and performance. Often the strength
can best be achieved by the use of
steels which d o not possess the
required resistance to seawater corrosion damage. A possible materials
solution to providing structural c o m ponents which combine the attributes
of high strength and seawater corrosion is to weld surface the steel w i t h a
metallurgically compatible corrosion
resistant alloy. Among the characteristics desirable in such a surfacing alloy
are reasonable strength, weldability to
the steel, resistance to general and
localized corrosion attack and good
corrosion fatigue properties. A candidate material for surfacing which has
W E L D I N G RESEARCH S U P P L E M E N T I 1-s
Ni
Cr
Mo
Fe
Nb & Ta
Si
Al
Ti
C
Mn
IN-625
filler
metal
IN-625
base
metal
3.25
nickel
steel
60.66
22.18
9.14
3.42
3.69
0.24
0.22
0.29
0.04
0.01
62.00
21.41
8.64
2.73
4.15
0.30
0.24
0.27
0.03
0.15
3.27
0.40
0.43
Bal.
Current,
A
Travel
speed,
mm/sec
(ipm)
33-34/26
33-34/26
35-38/25-28
36-38/26-28
200-220
200-220
190-210
180-205
6.8
4.7
3.6
3.0
Voltage
peak/
background,
Deposition
rate,
kg/h
(Ib/h)
(16.0)
(11.0)
(8.5)
(7.0)
22
22
24
24
(10)
(10)
(11)
(I I)
Heat
input,
MJ/m
(kj/in.)
0.90
1.34
1.77
2.08
(23)
(34)
(45)
(53)
0.22
Weldment Preparation
0.26
0.35
Evaluation
Weldability was established by
means of duplicate, 180 deg 2T side
bend tests at room temperature. Bend
test specimens conformed to MILSTD-00481C and were cut normal to
the welding direction, as shown in Fig.
1. The one layer surfaced specimens
included at least 3.2 mm (0.125 in.) of
weld metal. Two layer specimens had
at least 6.4 mm (0.250 in.) of w e l d
metal.
After bending, convex surfaces were
visually examined for evidence of
cracking. In addition, sections from all
weldments were examined metallographically after electrochemical etching in a solution of 12 ml H3PO.,, 47 ml
INCONEL 625
WELD C L A D D I N G
STRESS-CORROSION
SPECIMEN
TENSILE SPECIMEN
CORROSION-FATIGUE
GENERAL AND
CREVICE-CORROSION
SPECIMEN
3.25
NICKEL
SIDE-BEND WELDABILITY
2-s I J A N U A R Y 1978
STEEL
SPECIMEN
_TEST P A N E L W I T H
12.7 M M ( 1 / 2 " )
CENTER HOLE
D E L R I N WASHER
E X T E R N A L L Y T H R E A D E D 12.7 MM
( 1 / 2 " ) O.D. D E L R I N SLEEVE
22 MM
r " (7/8"i
Fig. 3Bent-beam-type
specimen. (X0.165)
Fig. 2Multiple crevice corrosion test
assembly: A (left)
multiple crevice
test assembly; B
(right) grooved
Delrin washer
12.7 RADIUS
stress-corrosion
MJ/m
(kj/in.)
Chemical
corr position, w t "
/o
No. of
layers
Ni
Cr
Mo
Fe
Cb
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
58.74
56.78
55.30
60.57
61.72
60.97
60.77
62.53
20.97
20.60
20.17
21.25
21.32
21.10
21.52
21.50
8.90
8.87
8.32
9.04
9.07
9.11
9.14
9.12
Bal.
20/23
8/10
8.46
9.76
10.85
6.14
5.12
4.64
4.00
3.67
5.00
Max
3.62
3.40
3.20
3.71
3.56
3.58
3.75
3.77
3.15/
4.15
0.90 (23)
1.34 (34)
1.77 (45)
2.08 (53)
0.90 (23)
1.34 (34)
1.77 (45)
2.08 (53)
IN-625 weld m etal
specification
As-deposited
thickness,
mm (in.)
4.0
4.4
4.0
4.8
7.1
8.0
8.3
8.3
(5/32)
(11/64)
(5/32)
(3/16)
(9/32)
(5/16)
(21/64)
(21/64)
W E L D I N G RESEARCH S U P P L E M E N T I 3-s
2nd LAYER
5
IN-625
Id
LAYER
IN-625
in
LAYER
IN-625
0 . 9 0 MJ/m
(23 k j / i n )
1.34 MJ/m
(34 k j / i n )
1.77 MJ/m
(45 k j / i n )
2 . 0 8 MJ/m
(53 k j / i n )
ViYJ
^HfP^imt
H
2 INCHES 3
/fff/dilililiiil ihlilililihhhlrtrtiWl
Fig. 7Bend test specimens from CMAW (pulsed-arc) single layer Inconel 625 overlays
Table 4-Tensile and Hardiless Properties of IN-625 C M A W (Pulsed Arc) Surface Weld Metal on 3.25 Nickel Steel
Heat input,
MJ/m (kj/in.)
Layers
0.90 (23)
1.34 (34)
1.77 (45)
2.08 (53)
0.90 (23)
1.34 (34)
1.77 (45)
2.08 (53)
0.90 (23)
Ultimate
tensile strength,
MPa (ksi)
801 (116.2)
787 (114.1)
776 (112.6)
790 (114.6)
810 (117,5)
839 (121.7)
818 (118.6)
834 (120.9)
793 (115.0)
772 (112.0)
751 (108.9)
806 (116.9)
869 (126.0)
814 (118.0)
849 (123.2)
873 (126.6)
775 (112.4)
785 (113.8)
80 min
0.2%
yield strength,
MPa (ksi)
461
462
443
461
512
516
498
525
517
532
515
568
553
535
550
561
539
536
55
(66.9)
(67.0)
(64.2)
(66.9)
(74.3)
(74.9)
(72.2)
(76.2)
(75.0)
(77.2)
(74.7)
(82.4)
(80.2)
(77.6)
(79.7)
(81.4)
(78.2)
(77.8)
min
Tensile Properties
The tensile properties of the IN-625
surface weld metals prepared by the
GMAW-P process are presented in
Table 4, along w i t h the m i n i m u m
required tensile properties for the 3.25
nickel steel. For the single-layer surface welds, all measured IN-625 tensile
properties exceeded the tensile properties specified for 3.25 nickel steel.
The best combination of strength and
ductility was measured on specimens
from the single-layer surfaces prepared
at heat inputs of 1.77 and 2.08 M | / m
(45 and 53 kj/in.).
The weld metal strength properties
measured on specimens removed from
two layer surfaces (including layers 1
and 2) were generally higher than the
values measured for single layers,
particularly w i t h respect to the yield
strength. Once again, the best combination of strength and ductility was
observed in welds fabricated at 1.77
and 2.08 MJ/m (45 and 53 kj/in.). It
was noted in the tensile data for the
two-layer specimen prepared at a heat
input of 0.90 M J / m (23 kj/in.) that the
Elongation
in 1 in., %
Hardness,
R,
31
28
29
28
33
28
28
28
18
21
25
31
34
23
31
36
18
14
22 min
17
16
22
22
18
21
20
24
16
W E L D I N G RESEARCH S U P P L E M E N T I 5-s
20
30
40
MPA ArT
50 60 80 100
I I I I I I 25.000
(REFERENCE 10)
3.25
"^v
NiSTEEL
SEAWATER (RCB
SPECIMENS)
(REFERENCE 101
~S~
St
\ o
PRESENT INVESTIGATION
0 /
^ s
o -
^-o
METAL
_L
CYCLES TO FAILURE, N
Fig. 9High-cycle fatigue curve for Inconel 625 surface weld metal in seawater
15
20 25 30
STRESS-INTENSITY
Fatigue-Crack Growth
Single edge notch-type crack propagation specimens cut from sections of
a single-layer surface weld were subjected to stress relief heat treatments
of 649 C (1200 F) for 4 and 64 h. These
specimens were intended to measure
the effect, if any, of prolonged stressrelief heat treatment on fatigue crack
growth rates in the surface weld
metal.
Results of fatigue crack growth rate
tests on the IN-625 surface w e l d metal
are presented in Fig. 10. Also shown in
Fig. 10 are results of earlier work on
wrought IN-625 plate and 3.25 nickel
steel.5 It is noted that the crack growth
rates of the clad weld metal are higher
than rates for both the wrought IN-625
and the 3.25 nickel steel.
The higher growth rates in the IN625 surface weld metals compared to
the wrought plate are attributed
primarily to the microstructural differences between the t w o product forms.
The weld metals are characterized by
an elongated dendritic structure w h i c h
was essentially parallel to the crack
growth direction. In contrast, the
wrought materials are characterized by
an equiaxed grain structure.
The effects of orientation and grain
structure on crack growth rate were
noted elsewhere.'" The differences in
crack growth rates between the surface weld metals heat treated for 4 h
40
50 60
80 100
Fig. 70Crack growth rate, da/dN, vs. stressintensity range, AK, for IN-625 surface weld
metal
Table 5-Partial Chemical Analysis of IN-625 Surface Weld Metal Seawater Corrosion Specimens
Composition, wt-%
Side of surfacing analyzed
Cr
Mo
Fe
Cb
General corrosion
21.63
21.38
9.37
8.53
4.42
4.64
3.62
3.69
Crevice corrosion
Free surface of w e l d
Side of weld closest to base metal
20.70
20.61
9.28
9.34
8.60
9.44
3.51
3.54
Stress corrosion
Specimen type
20.95
9.28
5.80
3.43
20/23
8/10
5.00 Max
Cb and Ta
3.15/4.15
Table 6-Results of General and Crevice Corrosion Tests on IN-625 Surface Weld Metal
and Base Metal
Specimen
type
General
corrosion
Crevice
corrosion
Corrosion
rate
W e i g h t , grams
Original
Final
Loss
mpy
fiM/Year
Surface
weld
293.05
293.87
270.20
293.02
293.80
270.18
0.03
0.07
0.02
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
0.5
Nil
Base
metal
415.15
412.36
415.12
412.32
0.03
0.04
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Surface
weld
262.15
246.81
261.62
246.68
0.53
0.13
0.2
Nil
3.9
1.0
Base
metal
415.95
419.80
415.92
419.80
0.03
0.00
Nil
0.0
Nil
0.0
Application Considerations
Although the results of weldability,
mechanical property and seawater
corrosion tests reported herein indicate the good compatability between
surfaced' IN-625 weld metal and the
steel, there are certain points w h i c h
must be assessed prior to surfacing:
1. IN-625 is more noble than 3.25
nickel steel, and the surfaced weld
metal should represent an impenetrable barrier to prevent local ruptures in
the IN-625 and undesirable galvanic
corrosion. Inspection
requirements
should ensure that all acceptable flaws
are benign and w i l l not propagate.
2. The application of austenitic
W E L D I N G RESEARCH S U P P L E M E N T I 7-s
8-s I J A N U A R Y 1978