Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the growing health care expenditure in Kerala and the
governments effort to reduce out of pocket expenditure through the Karunya Scheme. The
scheme breaks new ground on several different fronts in providing health benefits to large
number of under privileged populations.
1. Introduction
It is very widely acknowledged that health is an important component of human
development. Empowerment of people comes from the freedom they enjoy, and this
includes, among others, freedom from poverty, hunger, and malnutrition, and freedom to
work and lead a healthy life (Sen, 1999). Access to health care is critical to improving health
status and good health is necessary for empowerment. Government intervention in health is
also argued for, due to the presence of high degree of asymmetric information in the health
sector. Not surprisingly, throughout the world, governments have had a significant role in
providing and regulating health services and their role is particularly important in
developing countries with large concentration of the poor.
Despite poor health indicators, government spending on health care in most low- and
middle-income countries is well below what is needed. Low revenue collections, competing
demands for revenues, and relatively low spending priority contribute to this insufficient
spending.1 1Consequently, limited access to public health care facilities forces people to go
to private providers, resulting in substantial out-of-pocket (OOP) spending, especially for
the poor.2
Universal health care is providing access to key primitive, preventive, curative, and
rehabilitative health interventions for all at an affordable cost.3 However, most low- and
middle income countries find this a major challenge, as it would require substantial increases
in public spending and productivity increases in an environment of severely strained
resources. Of course, there has been considerable success in achieving universal health
coverage in some middle-income countries, including Thailand and some Latin American
countries, while other countries, such as China, Indonesia, and Vietnam, are focusing their
attention on improving access.
1
Heller (2006) defines fiscal space as the availability of budgetary room that allows a government to
provide resources for a given desired purpose without any prejudice to the sustainability of a governments
financial position
2
WHO, 2004
The health sector challenges in India, like those in other low- and middle-income countries,
are formidable. Further, the gap between the actual spending and the required amount is
larger in the relatively low-income states and this results in marked inter-state inequality.
Of course, there have been some recent initiatives to augment public spending on health
care, but these have met with only limited success. The National Rural Health Mission
(NRHM), established in 2005, and the recent introduction of Rashtriya Swastya Bima
Yojana (RSBY) a national health insurance scheme for people below the poverty line are the
two most important initiatives by the central government. Several state governments also
have come up with their own insurance schemes. Despite these initiatives, the actual public
spending on health has not shown much increase.4
Economic Survey 2013 claims that Indias GDP has extended its spending on health by 13% the same survey
also points out that it has the lowest health spending as a proportion of its GDP.
5
Article 21
health insurance), nor do they have representative organizations that might help them fight
for these benefits.7
The poor are particularly vulnerable to the lack of health security. The poor spend a greater
percentage of their budget on health related expenditures. Further, the high incidence of
sickness cuts into their budget in two different ways, i.e. they need to spend large amounts
of money for treatment and are unable to earn money while under treatment. In fact,
healthcare costs are one of the primary reasons for rural indebtedness and poverty.
Moreover, there is the issue of accessibility. Obtaining treatment at a town or district level
hospital involves travel costs, which are not insignificant. Thus for many, simply accessing
health care is by itself, an expensive proposition.
Health care covers not merely medical care but also all aspects pro preventive care too. Nor
can it be limited to care rendered by or financed out of public expenditure- within the
government sector alone but must include incentives and disincentives for self care and care
paid for by private citizens to get over ill health. Heath care at its essential core is widely
recognized to be a public good. Its demand and supply cannot therefore, be left to be
regulated solely by the invisible hands of the market.
Thus, we need to focus on
-
Universal access
Fair distribution
Special attention to vulnerable groups and under privileged
Redefining the role of government in health care system
Fair financing of the costs of health care is an issue in equity and it has two aspects
-
How much to spent by Government on publicly funded health care and on what
aspects?
How huge does the burden of treatment fall on the poor seeking health care?
Private Player
Karnataka
Narayana
Hrudayalaya
Karnataka
Narayana
Hrudayalaya
Jaipur
Birla Institute of
Scientific Research
(BISR).
Uttaranchal
Tamil Nadu
Target
population
rural and
semi-urban
patients
Health
insurance
scheme
Yeshasvini:
Cooperative
Farmers
Healthcare
Scheme
Rural poor
Contracting in
Sawai Man
Singh Hospital,
Jaipur
Low cost
medicine
for
rural
poor
The Uttaranchal
Mobile Hospital
and Research
Center
(UMHRC)
poor and
rural
people in
hilly
terrains.
PHCs in
Gumballi and
Sugganahalli,
Karnataka
tribal
community
in the hilly
areas.
Emergency
Rural poor
Ambulance
in Theni
Services scheme
governmental
partner - Seva
Nilayam
district of Tamil
Nadu to reduce
maternal
mortality rate .
Manage health
centers in the
slums of
Adilabad.
to increase the
availability and
utilization of
health and
family welfare
services
to give superspecialty health
care at low cost
to the
people Below
Poverty Line
Urban Slum
Health Care
Project, Andhra
Pradesh
slum
dwellers
Rajiv Gandhi
Super-specialty
Hospital,
Raichur
BPL
people
to provide well
trained female
health activist
Accredited
Social Health
Activist
(ASHA)
training
program
Rajiv Gandhi
Arogya Yojana
Rural poor
Andhra
Pradesh
Different NGOs
Raichur
Karnataka
Apollo hospitals
Group, with
financial support
from OPEC
(Organization of
Petroleum Exporting
Countries)
National Rural
Health Mission
10
Chhatrapati
Asia Heart
Sahuji
Foundation
Maharaj
Nagar district.,
UP
To provide
basic
healthcare, set
up a chain of
primary
healthcare
centers
Rural poor
A set of high material quality-of-life indicators coinciding with low per-capita incomes,
both distributed across nearly the entire population of Kerala.
A set of wealth and resource redistribution programmes that have largely brought about
the high material quality-of-life indicators.
High levels of political participation and activism among ordinary people along with
substantial numbers of dedicated leaders at all levels. Kerala's mass activism and
committed cadre were able to function within a largely democratic structure, which their
activism has served to reinforce.
While India ranks at the bottom of the Index in overall score, Kerala, if measured on the
same points, would buck the trend. With only 3% of India's population, the tiny state
provides two-thirds of India's palliative care services. The Economist has lauded the 'Kerala
Community Model' in healthcare.
After the year 2000, a number of studies focused on the increasing burden of disease in
Kerala: besides heart disease and diabetes, road traffic accidents and their consequences
were on the rise, as were suicides. Apart from these lifestyle diseases, which could be
attributed to large-scale transformations in society, Kerala at this juncture also witnessed the
reappearance, or even the resurgence, of infectious diseases: epidemics of dengue,
chikungunya, rat fever and hepatitis became an annual feature in the state. This indicated
large-scale environmental degradation. Most water sources were polluted, and garbage
disposal in urban areas loomed large as an insurmountable problem. Many micro-level
studies pointed to the high expenditure in health care, which were driving many families to
financial ruin and suicide.
A large proportion of families, both in rural and urban areas, depended on private health
care. Data also indicated that Kerala had become, ranked by income inequality, one of
Indias leading states. In health, as in many other things, Kerala had become a non-model.
The trend of health care expenditure (medical and public health) as a proportion of total
revenue expenditure for the last 12 years along with other major Southern states shows
Kerala continues to perform relatively better than the other states. Even though the share of
medical and public health expenditure has come down over time (after 2001-2002). Overall,
medical and public health revenue expenditure as a per cent of GSDP has declined from 0.97
per cent in 198485 to per cent to 0.63 in 201011. Despite intensive efforts by the state,
health challenges remain which are not being adequately addressed by current health
policies and practices. These challenges are three-fold and are presented in following Figure.
6
HEALTH STATUS
HEALTH
INFRASTRUCTURE
Inadequate Infrastructure
Declining public health centers and community health
centers
HEALTH
FINANCING
Focusing on the third point, health financing, there has been increasing privatisation of
health care services in Kerala. However, price of private health care turns out to be
exorbitantly high, which impedes poor people to access this system. Quality control and
monitoring of the services also would become a grim issue in the private system.
Out of pocket expenditure on health has also increased significantly in Kerala. It is widely
acknowledged that out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure on health care has significant
implications for poverty in developing economies. Out-of-pocket payments for health can
cause households to incur catastrophic expenditures, which in turn can push them into
poverty. It is evident from the following table that, Kerala has experienced the highest
increase in out-of-pocket expenditure. This shows the vulnerability of Keralas population to
health care expenditures.
Table 2: OOP spending on healthcare as a percentage of total expenditure
States
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Rural
4.9
1.6
2.8
5.2
1.6
2.4
3.8
5.0
Urban
4.1
2.6
3.0
5.9
1.9
3.8
3.8
4.1
Total
4.7
1.7
2.8
5.3
1.9
2.9
3.8
4.8
7
Himachal Pradesh
5.1
5.0
5.1
2.5
3.2
3.4
2.3
4.4
3.3
2.4
3.4
3.3
Kerala
7.8
6.6
7.5
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Dadra & N. Haveli
5.3
5.5
4.1
5.5
4.3
3.8
6.8
3.8
5.1
1.8
4.0
5.0
3.7
4.1
4.4
4.0
5.4
3.0
5.0
2.4
5.0
5.3
4.0
5.1
4.3
3.9
6.5
3.6
5.1
1.8
Source:Estimates From NSS 61st Round, Paper presented for consideration of the Expert Group on Poverty,
Planning Commission 12 May 2009
To counter these challenges, the state government has launched several health initiatives
under the purview of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM). NRHM came at an
opportune time, when the state was finding it difficult to meet the demand for resources.
Apart from various programmes that are implemented in all the Indian states through
National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there are certain special initiatives that have been
implemented in Kerala. One such initiative is Karunya Benevolent Fund Scheme to ensure
that Keralites of all ages and backgrounds can have affordable and an equitable chance of
achieving health.
The Karunya Benevolent fund Scheme introduced by K.M Mani, finance Minister of Kerala
in 2011-2012 Budget. The Union Defence Minister A. K Antony inaugurated the scheme on
Feb 26, 2012. Karunya Benevolent Fund' - provides financial aid for poor people suffering
from serious ailments, by raising funds through Kerala lottery named Karunya Lottery.
6. Achievements
Under Karunya, families with income below Rs 3 lakh per annum (these would also
include those above the poverty line) are given financial assistance up to a maximum
of Rs 2 lakh. The ailments covered under the scheme are cancer, heart disease,
kidney trouble and palliative care. For some diseases like haemophilia the assistance
is up to Rs 3 lakh.
July 2012, The government give accreditation to 32 private speciality hospitals for
treatment of poor patients using grants from the Karunya Benevolent Fund
In April 2013, the scope of Karunya Benevolent Fund scheme for the poor and
underprivileged extended to cover mental illness, thalassemia and sickle cell
anaemia.
By December 2013, The Karunya Benevolent Fund has funded the medical
expenses of around 22,000 patients amounting to Rs2.86 billion.
In January 2014, the government is planning to open 18 more outlets this year. The
pharmacies will be set up in the district and taluk level hospitals. When it was
launched it was planned to set up 35 outlets and so far 16 pharmacies have been
opened.
7. Few Beneficiaries
PT Viswanath (44)
An auto rickshaw driver was diagnosed with cancer of the intestine. He was only 43.
He was about to sell his auto rickshaw to pay for the initial treatment but then came
to know about Karunya. He got Rs 1.4-lakh grant from the Karunya Benevolent
Fund in 2012.
Razia (45)
A homemaker from Kollam had a heart problem and was advised a surgery. Karunya
underwrote her medical expenses to the extent of Rs 1.5 lakh.
Santha P K(41)
A homemaker from Thrissur had heart disease. Karunya underwrote her medical
expenses to the extent of Rs 1.6 lakh in February 2013.
Kerala's film fraternity launched a high profile advertisement campaign to make lotteries
appealing even to the higher income groups. Promotional films featuring leading film stars
in Malayalam such as Mohanlal, Kavya Madhavan, Menaka Suresh and Manoj K Jayan
among others appeal to the people to buy Karunya lottery as it is for a good cause.
Conclusion
The key story in this model is the law of large numbers being effectively used to provide a
high degree of health security to the poorest populations of the world. This is not a new
story, to be sure. The key innovative aspect is the success in mobilizing these large numbers,
who are geographically dispersed. The existing organizations and government that connect
people must be drafted as a means through which health security can be introduced. The
transferability of schemes like this depend almost entirely public private participation and
the existence of health care infrastructure of a reasonable kind.
References
1. Sarosh Kuruvilla, Professor of Comparative Industrial Relations,Collective
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11