Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MICRO ECONOMICS
(ECON 601)
Lecture 3
Topics to be covered:
a. General Competitive Equilibrium
b. Edgeworth Box Diagram
c. Efficient Allocations
d. Production Possibility Frontier
e. Rate of Product Transformation
f. Determination of Equilibrium Prices
g. Real Cost Reduction
h. General Equilibrium Modelling
i. The Corn Laws Debate
j. Existence of General Equilibrium Prices
k. Walrasian Solution
l. Walras Law
m. Definition of Economic Efficiency
n. Efficiency in Production
o. Efficient Choice of Inputs for a Single Firm
p. Efficient Allocation of Resources among Firms
r. Efficient Choice of Output by Firms
s. Theory of Comparative Advantage
ECON 601
Nicholson Chapter 12
General Competitive Equilibrium
Partial Equilibrium Analysis
Px
P2
P1
D1
D0
Q1
QX
Q2
PY
S1
S0
P Y2
P Y1
D
Q Y2
QY1
QY
The resources that produced greater supply of X are equal to the resources released from Y when
production fell from QY1 to QY2.
I Law of One Price: A homogeneous good trades at the same price no matter who buys it or
which firm sells it.
Large number of buyers of each good. Each person takes all prices as given, maximizes
utility subject to a budget constraint.
Large number of firms producing each good. Firms maximize profits- all prices, both
output and input prices, are given to each firm.
Total Capital
Assumptions:
1.
All individuals have same preferences
2.
Two goods X & Y
3.
Two factors of production K & L
4.
Fixed amounts of K & L.
Labor used in X
Labor used in Y
OY
Capital
used in Y
A
OX
Total Labor
Capital
used in X
Total Capital
OY
P4
P3
P2
P1
Y4
X3
A
Y3
X1
OX
X4
Y1
X2
Y2
Total Labor
A is not an efficient point (X2, Y2) at P2 can produce same X2 but produce more Y3 at P3 can
produce same Y2 but at same time produce more X3.
The locus of the points P1, P2, P3, P4 are efficient because that is where the isoquants for
production of X and production of Y are just tangent with each other. No more of one good can
be produced without less of the other one of being produced.
This is referred to as the Contract Curve. Along this curve the (Rate of Technical Substitution)
RTSXKL = RTSYKL.
Quantity of Y
If one plots these points in X, Y, space they give us the production possibility curve.
QY
Y4
Y3
Y2
Y1
X1
X2
X3 X4
QX
Quantity of X
Rate of Product Transformation RPT (of X for Y) = slope of production possibilities frontier
3
dY
(along OXOY)
dX
The RPT records how X can be technically traded for Y while continuing to keep the available
productive inputs efficiently employed.
The normal production probabilities frontier exhibits an increasing RPT
QY
RPT is small
RPT is large
QX
MC X
dY
=
MCY
dX
dX =
dY
X
Y
dC =
MC X
C C
dY
(along OXOY)=
/
=
MCY
dX
X Y
3.
Specific factor
Differing Factor Intensites in Production of X and Y.
Most general reason why the rate of RPT increases as more of X is produced.
Production possibility frontier will be concave if goods X & Y use inputs in different proportions.
Capital
OZ
B
P4
W4
P3
Z1
W3
Z2
P2
Z3
P1
OW
Z4
W2
W1
Labor
U1
U2
QY
A
Y0
Slope =
Y*
Y1
Slope =
X0
X*
X1
Px Px
PY
<
PY
Px / PY
>
Px / PY
QX
QY
Y0
u00
Y1
u11
u01
X1
X0
In this case
PX 0
PX
from
PY
PY0
to
PX 1
PY1
QX
Y2
u1
Y1
u0
X1
X2
2 xdx 2 ydy 0
MC x dy 2 x x
RPTxfory
MC y
dx
2y y
By setting the Lagrangian expression we can obtain Marginal Rate of Substitution x for y as
L x 0.5 y 0.5 ( I Px x Py y )
MRS xfory
L
MU x
0.5 x 0.5 y 0.5 Px
y P
x
x
0
.
5
0
.
5
L
MU y
x Py
0.5 x y
Py
y
x
y P
MRS xfory x 1
y
x Py
Therefore, x = y and we can calculate values for x and y by using the PPF
2x
100
50
50
RPTxfory
x 2 y 2 100 x 2 x 2 100
Similarly
50 w
Quantity of Y
QY
100
50
Px/Py
50
100
Quantity of X
Shift in Supply:
Suppose there is technical progress in production of x and production function for x becomes
x 2l x0.5
To obtain lx as a function of x
x2= 4 lx lx= x2/4
therefore our new PPF would be
x2
y 2 100
4
Total differential
x
( )
x
dy
dx 2 ydy 0 RPT
2 x
xfory
2
dx
2y
4y
In Equilibrium:
(supply) RPT
P
x
x
4 y Py
(demand) MRS
y Px
x Py
x
y
4y
x
x 2 4 y 2 and
y2
x2
4
x2
y 2 100
4
So,
x2 x2
100
4
4
2 x 2 400
x 2 50
and
y 50
x
y P
1
x
4 y x Py 2
Due to technical progress relative prices of good x and y decreased and consumption of good x
increased (doubled).
For good y, negative substitution effect and positive income effect offset each other and no
change in quantity and price of good y.
On the other hand, due to technological progress in x production total utility derived increased
from
U ( x, y ) ( 2 50 ) 0.5 ( 50 ) 0.5
50 7.07
2 50 100 10
By setting up Lagrangian expression subject to budget constraint we can find marginal rate of
substitution x for y as
MRS xfory
P
y
x
9 x Py
So (supply) RPTxfory
x Px
y Py
P
y
x
9 x Py
x
y
y 9x
y 2 9 x 2 and
y 3x
x 10
y 3 10
Px
10 1
Py 3 10 3
Due to change in preferences relative prices of good x and y decreased. We cannot compare
welfare change here, because utility (preferences) changed.
u
YA
u1
A
E
YB
Slope (PX/ PY) if tariffs on grain
XA
XB
With international trade and world prices of P *X and P*Y the country will produce at A with YA,
XA, but consumers will be able to consume at B, Y B, XB. Hence, country will export (YA YB) of
good Y for (XB XA) of good X. A higher level of utility can be reached.
If Y is manufactured good and X is Corn then we would expect to find that land prices will fall
and wage rates rise after allowing international trade. Agriculture production is reduced and
because agriculture is land intensive, land prices will fall. As manufacturing will expand and
because it is labour intensive, wage rates will rise.
Analyses using Edgeworth Box Diagram
11
Capital
Mfg
A
C1
M2
W1/R1 C2
W0/R0
Corn
M1
Labor
Corn is capital intensive Mfg is Labor intensive. If one opens up to trade them, production moves
from A (more Corn; less Mfg) to B (less Corn; more Mfg) both production processes become
more capital intensive, hence, PK, PL. W1/R1 > W0R0
Existences of General Equilibrium Prices
Problem posed and solved by Leon Walras
Question: Does a set of non-negative prices exist that will equilibrate all the markets in an
economy?
Walrasian Solution
1.
1.
2.
Walras Law
n
P ED ( P) = 0
i 1
Problem is not solved easily because demand equations are not linear.
Prices must be non-negative.
In economics a negative price has no meaning.
The equilibrium is a simultaneous solution of prices and demands across all markets.
D2 2
and for platinum by
D2
p2 p3
11
p1 p1
p2
p
2 3 18
p1
p1
13
Notice that the demands for gold and platinum depend on the relative prices of the two goods and
that these demand functions are homogeneous of degree zero in all three prices. Notice also that
we have not written out the demand function for silver but, as we will show, it can be derived
from Walras law.
Equilibrium in the gold and platinum markets requires that demand equal supply in both markets
simultaneously: (D2=S2 and D3=S3)
To simplify calculations suppose
x
p2
p1
and
y
p3
p1
Then we can simply calculate values of x and y by using simultaneous equations methods (ie.
multiplying the second equation by (-2) and find corresponding value for y).
2 x y 11 10 2 x y 1 0
x 2 y 18 10 x 2 y 8 0
5 y 15 0
Hence, we can obtain values for these relative prices as y=3 and x=2. In equilibrium, therefore,
gold will have a price twice that of silver, and platinum a price three times that of silver. The
price of platinum will be 1.5 times that of gold.
Walras law and the demand for silver: Because Walras law must hold in this economy we
know
n
pi .EDi ( P ) 0
i 1
Solving this equation for the excess demands (by moving the fixed supplies to the left hand side)
and substituting into Walras law yields
ED1 2
p22
p12
p32
p12
p
p2
8 3
p1
p1
ED1 2 x 2 2 y 2 x 8 y
(ED=D-S)
If we substitute values of x and y, we can see that the market for silver is also in equilibrium
(ED1=0) at the relative prices computed previously.
14
Adam Smith put forth the idea that a competitive market would ensure that resources would find
their way to where they were most valued (the invisible hand). He provided the framework that
has given rise to modern welfare economics.
The fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics states that there is a close correspondence
between the efficient allocation of resources and the competitive pricing of these resources.
Definition of Economic Efficiency Pareto Efficient Allocation
An allocation of resources is Pareto efficient if it is not possible (through further reallocations) to
make one person better off without making someone else worse off.
Efficiency in Production
Production Efficiency: An allocation of resources is efficient in production (or technically
efficient) if no further reallocation would permit more of one good to be produced without
necessarily reducing the output of some other good.
Production possibilities frontier.
B
A
A = technically inefficient
B & C = technically efficient
Efficient choice of inputs for a single firm. We showed this previously with the
Edgeworth Box diagram. In algebra, assume:
a)
firm produces two outputs X, Y.
b)
fixed amounts of inputs K , L .
c)
production function for X = f (KX, LX).
d)
assume full employment of both factors, hence, KY = K KX and LY = L LX
e)
production function for Y
Y = g (KY, LY)
= g ( K KX, L LX)
Technical efficiency requires that the output of X be maximized for any given
level of Y eg. Y
L =f (Kx, Lx) + ( Y g ( K KX, L LX))
1)
L
= fK + gk = 0
K X
2)
L
= fL + gL = 0
L X
3)
16
and,
f 1
f 2
=
L1
L2
Rule:
The marginal physical product of any resource in the production of a particular good must be the
same no matter which firm produces the good.
Example Gains from Efficiently Allocating Labor
To examine the quantitative gains in output from allocating resources efficiently, suppose two
rice farms have production functions of the simple form
q k 1 / 4l 3 / 4 ,
but one rice farm is more mechanized than the other. If capital for the first farm is given by k 1=16
and for the second farm by k2 =625, we have
q1 (16)1 / 4 l13 / 4 2l13 / 4
q2 (625)1 / 4 l 23 / 4 5l 23 / 4
If the total labor supply is 100, an equal allocation of labor to these two farms will provide total
rice output of
Q q1 q2 2(50) 3 / 4 5(50) 3 / 4 131.6
17
MPL1
q1 3 1 / 4
q 15
l1
MPL2 2 l21 / 4
l1 2
l2 4
2 15 1
5
4 l1
3 4 l2
2
l 2 0.0256l 2
Given the greater capitalization of farm 2, practically all of the available labor should be devoted
to it. With 100 units of labor, 97.4 units should be allocated to farm 2 with only 2.6 units to farm
1. In this case total output will be
Q q1 q2 2( 2.6)3 / 4 5(97.4)3 / 4 159.1
This represents a gain of more than 20 percent over the rice output obtained under the equal
allocation.
If capital were not fixed in this problem, marginal productivities of both capital and labor should
be equal for firm 1 and firm 2.
Efficient Choice of Output by Firms
Even though resources may be allocated efficiently both within the firm and between firms, it
must be the case that firms also must produce efficient combinations of outputs.
Output
of
Cars
Output
of
Cars
RPT1A=1.5/1
RPT0=1/1
RPT0A=2/1
Firm A
RPT1=1.5/1
Output of Trucks
18
Firm B
Output of Trucks
Output of Cars
Y
RPT1A=?
Y1A
RPTB=1/1
Y0B
Y0A
Country A
RPTB=?
RPT0A=2/1 Y1
B
X1A
X 0A
Output of Trucks
Country B
X1B
X0B
Output of Trucks
Both countries would gain if they produced more of the good for which they have a comparative
advantage. Country A should produce more of Y and country B should produce more of X.
Country A would be able to sell some of the Y produced to country A in exchange for purchase
of X. Both countries can be made better off. Initially country A can give up one unit of X and
produce 2 units of Y. For country B at its initial position it can be produced one more X for one
unit of Y. Hence, if A were to produce one unit less of X and hence produce two more units of Y,
it could trade with Country B one of those units of Y for one unit of X and it would be still better
off by one unit of Y. At the same time, country B would be left no worse off. World welfare
would be improved.
19
If a linear production function existed in both countries, to maximize world welfare each
country should completely specialize in the production of one good. Not the case if
concave production functions.
20