Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Case 4
BAC4674
INTEGRATED
STUDY
Trimester 2, 2013/2014
CASE
Student ID
Contribution
%
Ng Heng Chiew
1092701511
25
1092701430
25
Toh Xinyi
1092701353
25
1092701363
25
TOTAL
Signature
100%
Case Analysis
Decision
Evaluation
Action Plan
Poor (1)
Satisfactory (2)
Good (3)
Excellent (4)
Stakeholders
not
identified
and
problem not clearly
defined
Some
of
the
stakeholders
identified
and
problem not clearly
defined
All
stakeholders
identified but problem
not clearly defined
All stakeholders
identified
with
clear
problem
definition
Decision is clearly
articulated
but
reasoning can be
improved
Decision is clearly
articulated
and
well-reasoned
Alternatives
explored
poorly
Some
alternatives
explored and some
impacts considered
Alternatives
fully
explored but impacts
not fully considered
Decision
justified
poorly
Decision
made
justified
but
implementation plan
can be improved
Decision
made
justified
but
implementation plan
reasonable
Score
Alternatives fully
explored
and
impacts
fully
considered
Decision
made
fully justified and
implementation
plan
comprehensive
BAC 4674
Format and
presentation
Case 4
Report
is
less
organised,
with
obvious grammatical
and structural errors
Report is organised,
with
minor
grammatical
and
structural errors
Report
is
well
organised, with proper
formatting and use of
language
Clear
evidence
that report is
prepared carefully
and thoughtfully
Total marks
I hereby declare that all group members names are correctly included in the above section. I hold a
copy of this assignment which I can produce if the original is lost or damaged. I certify that no part of
this assignment has been copied from any other students work or from any other source except where
due acknowledgement is made in the assignment.
: _____________________________
: _____________________________
: _____________________________
Date
: _____________________________
BAC 4674
Case 4
Contents
Question 1............................................................................................................. 4
Question 2........................................................................................................... 16
BAC 4674
Case 4
advantage by
matching
the
strengths
to
opportunities.
BAC 4674
Case 4
seizing opportunities
counteracting threats
For the first issue (Secconz is requesting for a price reduction), there are several
decision making tools that can be utilized.
1. Cost-Volume Profit Analysis (CVP Analysis)
CVP analysis is a method of cost accounting that is concerned with the effect
of sales volume and products costs have on the profit of a business. It
illustrates how the operating profit changes in accordance with the changes in
variable costs, fixed costs, selling price per unit and total units produced and
sold. CVP analysis often assumes that the sales price, fixed cost and variable
cost per unit are constant.
The basic formula used in CVP analysis is: px = vx + FC + Profit
Where: p is price per unit;
x are total number of units produced and sold
v is variable cost per unit;
FC is total fixed costs.
Since the case only provides the product costing of the Fuzzy Frost Alpha (FFA)
component, we will only do the CVP analysis on FFA. It is assumed that the
sales price is constant at $100 (CCs current selling price to customers other
than Secconz). The fixed cost is assumed to be $600,000 ($8 x 75,000). The
variable cost per unit would be $50.
First, we find out the breakeven point for CC given its current operating costs.
This is the point where CC is able to recover only all of its costs, thereby not
suffering any losses but not making any profits as well.
Breakeven point (volume) = FC / (p v)
= $600,000 / ($100 58)
= 14, 286
Breakeven point (dollar) = 14, 286 x $100
= $1,428,600
This means that CC only has to sell 14,286 units of FFA or $1,428,600 in order
to recover the fixed costs related to the production of FFA. Since CC is
currently selling a total of 75,000 units of FFA, this shows that CC does not
have to worry about not recovering their costs.
BAC 4674
Case 4
p-v is also equal to the contribution margin per unit. It is the amount by
which sales per unit exceeds variable costs per unit. FFA has a contribution
margin of $42, or 42% ($42/$100). This means that with every unit sales of
FFA, $42 is available to cover the fixed costs.
This relationship between the cost, volume and profit of the FFA component is
illustrated in the graph below:
The breakeven point is where the revenue line crosses the total cost line.
14,286 units have to be produced and sold in order to avoid sustaining any
losses. After that point, any additional sales per unit of FFA will have a profit of
$42.
The result of the CVP analysis indicates that, if CC loses Secconz as a major
customer, CC is forgoing at least $10,500 ($42 x 25,000). However, even
without Secconz, CC will still be able to cover their fixed costs and generate
high profits from their sales to European customers.
2. Ratio Analysis
BAC 4674
Case 4
BAC 4674
Case 4
The Porters Five Forces analysis is a framework for an industry analysis and
business strategy development. It is a simple, yet powerful tool for
understanding where power lies in business situation. This is useful as it helps
an organization to understand both the strength of the current competition
position and the strength of a position that the company is considering to
move into. With the clear understanding of where the power lies, the company
can take advantage of a situation of strength, improve situation of weakness
and avoid making the wrong move. This is essential in making decision or
panning. Conventionally, the tool is used to identify whether new products,
services or businesses have the potential to be profitable. This analysis will
help the company to analyse the intensity of the competition, the profitability
and the attractiveness of an industry. By utilizing The Five Forces Model, CC is
able to analyse the opportunities and overall competitive advantage.
One of the forces that determine the competitive power in a business situation
is threat of new entrant. Profitable markets that yield high returns and low
entry barriers will attract new firms. This will inevitably decrease the
profitability for all firms in the industry. If it costs little capital or required little
time to enter the market, if there are few economies of scale in place, or if
there are little protection for a companys key technologies, then new
competitors can quickly enter the market and weaken an organisation
BAC 4674
Case 4
position. If a company has strong and durable barriers to entry, then the
company can preserve a favourable position and take fair advantage of it.
The next forces that will a business are threat of substitute products. Close
substitute products that exist in a market will increases the likelihood of
customers switching to alternatives in response to price increases. This will
cause the consumers switching cost to decrease.
Bargaining power of buyers shows how easy it is for buyers to drive prices
down. This is driven by the: number of buyers in the market; importance of
each individual buyer to the organisation; and cost to the buyer of switching
from one supplier to another.
Bargaining power of suppliers displays how much pressure suppliers can place
on a business. If one supplier has a large enough impact to affect a company's
margins and volumes, then it holds substantial power. Here are a few reasons
that suppliers might have power:
No substitutes
Few suppliers of a particular product
High switching cost
Suppliers goods are critical to buyers success
For most industries, the intensity of competitive rivalry is the major
determinant of the competitiveness of the industry. This describes the
intensity of competition between existing firms in an industry. Highly
competitive industries generally earn low returns because the cost of
competition is high.
Relating to Freezing out Profit case, CC should recognise that as a supplier of
refrigerator components to Secconz, CC has the competitive advantage as
CCs FFA components is essential to Secconzs success. CC also provides
higher
quality
than
its
nearest
competitor
and
just-in-time
delivery
BAC 4674
Case 4
Key factors
Weigh
Merge
Expand internationally
Attractivene
Total
Attractivene
Total
ss score
attractiven
ss score
attractiven
STRENGTHS
ess score
Unique/Quali
ess score
0.20
0.80
0.20
of 0.05
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.40
0.40
JIT
0.20
0.80
0.80
Poor
0.15
0.45
0.45
0.30
0.9
1.20
ty product
Location
business
Workers
WEAKNESSES
skills
marketing
High
manufacturi
ng cost
Sum weights
1.00
10
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
BAC 4674
Case 4
Globalization
0.12
0.36
0.48
Penetration
0.12
0.48
0.48
Vertical
0.20
0.80
0.80
Deregulation
0.05
0.15
Increasing
0.15
0.15
0.60
0.20
0.8
0.01
0.02
0.15
0.60
6.64
>
5.78
integration
competitors
In-house
manufacture
Exchange
rates
Substitute
products
Sum weights
1.00
Bribe
Contact US Do nothing
STRENGTHS
ITC
Unique/Quali
0.2
ty product
Location
business
of 0.0
AS
TAS
AS
TAS
AS
TAS
0.10
0.10
5
11
BAC 4674
Case 4
Workers
0.1
skills
JIT
0.2
0.80
0.80
0.40
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.40
0.60
0.60
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.45
0.45
0.45
3.41
<
3.51
>
3.21
WEAKNESSES
0
Poor
0.1
marketing
High
0.3
manufacturin
g cost
Sum weights
1.0
OPPORTUNITIES
Globalization
0.1
2
Penetration
0.1
2
Vertical
0.2
integration
Deregulation
0.0
WEAKNESSES
5
Increasing
0.1
competitors
In-house
0.2
manufacture
Exchange
0.0
rates
Substitute
0.1
products
Sum weights
1.0
0
12
BAC 4674
Case 4
For the second issue (CCs plant in China is under investigation for dumping),
there are also decision making tools that can be utilized.
1.
Decision tree
A decision tree is a decision support tool that uses a tree-like graph or model
of decisions and their possible consequences. Decision tree includes
probability or chance of event outcomes, resource costs, and event outcomes.
A decision tree is often used to help identify a strategy most likely to reach a
goal. However, a decision tree should be paralleled by a probability model,
13
BAC 4674
Case 4
which gives the probability of each event outcome, as well as the costs or
returns of the outcomes.
Therefore, if Mr Dali wishes to use this tool, he will have to seek professional
advice on: the probability of being found guilty by the United States
International Trade Commission (US ITC); the probability of paying a fine or
being closed down if found guilty; the amount of fine or anti-dumping tax that
has to be paid; the probability that the a bribe will really solve the problem.
An example of the decision tree for this issue is given below:
14
BAC 4674
Case 4
BAC 4674
Case 4
BAC 4674
Case 4
costs and thus, 50, 000 units of sales to European customers are enough not
only to recover its fixed costs but also to produce high income. Therefore,
without having a contingency plan or strategies for product development is
sufficient for CC to continue surviving even with the loss of it major customer.
Report
To: Board of Directors of Cold Cuts Company
From: Mr. Dali
Date: 15th January 2014
Subject: Loss of major customer, Secconz
Introduction
The two-year contract with Secconz is coming towards the end and Secconz has
decided not to renew the contract due to the low price competition from China.
Discussion
Losing Secconz as a customer will cause us loss of one-third of our sales of the
Fuzzy Frost Alpha component. By using a variety of decision making tools, there
are several options available for us to be taken to overcome these issue which
are:
1. We can look for other customers whether in Singapore or in the worldwide
as we provide the far better quality than our nearest competitor and justin-time delivery requirements. Our FFA component is also the newest
technology and our company is also the only Singaporean supplier for the
part. Hence, finding a new customer in Singapore would not be a huge
problem to our company as we have a good reputation of good quality
product.
2. Moving our whole plant operation to China is also another option to our
company as we are facing competition from suppliers of similar products
and customers who decided to manufacture air-conditioner technology in17
BAC 4674
Case 4
house due to hefty costs. Thus, moving our operation will reduce our cost
of production like labour cost as there is a factory of our own in China.
3. We can also look for the option of not to do anything as sales to the
European customer is sufficient to cover our fixed costs and it would still
provide us with high profit.
Recommendation
Based on the data provided, it is recommended and advisable that we choose
the option of looking for new customer. This is to increase our profits other
than the profits gained from the European customers and thus, attracting new
investors to our company.
18