Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
Teacher Name: Mrs. Schaefer
Student Name: ________________________________________
CATEGORY 4(Awork) 3(Bwork) 2(Cwork) 1(Dwork)
Presentation Well-rehearsed with
smooth delivery that
holds audience
attention. All
members of group
have a role in
presenting.
Vocabulary is
advanced. Members
do not read
information from the
slides.
Rehearsed with fairly
smooth delivery that
holds audience
attention most of the
time. 3/4 of the
members of the group
have a role in
presenting.
Vocabulary is
adequate. There is
minimal reading from
slides.
Delivery not smooth,
but able to maintain
interest of the
audience most of the
time. 1/2 of the
members have a role
in presenting.
Vocabulary is bland.
Members depend on
reading from the
slides.
Delivery not smooth
and audience
attention often lost.
The presentation does
not stay on topic.
Vocabulary is poor.
Only one member has
a role in presentation.
Group is unprepared.
Originality Product shows a large
amount of original
thought. Ideas are
creative and
inventive. The
proposition captures
the audience and is
convincing. Deep
thought regarding the
characteristics of the
biome is evident.
Product shows some
original thought.
Work shows new
ideas and insights.
The biome is
presented accurately,
but 1/2 of the slides
are facts and the
information obtained
required minimal
critical thinking.
Uses other people's
ideas (giving them
credit), but there is
little evidence of
original thinking. The
proposition of the
biome is not as
convincing and the
presentation lacks
creativity, especially
in convincing the
audience.
Uses other people's
ideas, but does not
give them credit.
Sources are not listed
and the project lacks
creativity and
accuracy. The work is
poorly researched and
deep thought is not
evident.
Multimedia Project : Survivor (Biome Edition)
Sources Source information
collected for all
graphics, facts and
quotes. All
documented in
desired format.
Source information
collected for all
graphics, facts and
quotes. Most
documented in
desired format.
Source information
collected for graphics,
facts and quotes, but
not documented in
desired format.
Very little or no
source information
was collected.
Requirements All requirements are
met and exceeded.
The presentation
exceeds the
requirement of 10-20
slides, the
presentation is 7-10
minutes long, and the
members never
veered off topic. The
class walked away
from the presentation
with new information
regarding the chosen
biome.
All requirements are
met. Your group
completed the 10-20
slide requirement, but
the presentation is
either over 10
minutes or less than 7
minutes. All areas of
content were
covered. Group met
all requirements in
the google doc, but
did not exceed them.
Two requirements
were not completely
met. Your group did
not meet two of the
following: slide
amount (10-20), oral
presentation
amount(7-10
minutes), or did not
cover enough
characteristics of the
biome (at least 6,
animals and plants
being two.)
More than two
requirements were
not completely met
regarding slide or oral
presentation
requirements. Group
went off topic
frequently and poorly
relayed information
about the chosen
biome. Group only
presented 1-2
characteristics of the
biome. Refer to
google doc for
requirement list.
Content Covers topic in-depth
with details and
examples. Subject
knowledge is
excellent. Group
covered biome
climate, fauna, flora,
all scientific names,
and deep creative
marketing for the
Survivor project.
Includes essential
knowledge about the
topic. Subject
knowledge appears to
be good. The group
understands the
chosen biome
information and
accurately relays it,
but does not provoke
deep thought for the
audience. At least one
scientific name was
not correct.
Includes essential
information about the
topic but there are 1-
2 factual errors.
Biome proposition is
not convincing.
Information is
researched, but not in
depth. The group
does not explain the
reasons for why the
fauna and flora
support a survivor
filming.
Content is minimal OR
there are several
factual errors.
Information is not
correct. The work
displays poor
understanding of the
chosen biome.
Attractiveness Makes excellent use
of font, color,
graphics, effects, etc.
to enhance the
presentation. The
pictures chosen to
market the biome are
high quality and
visually appealing. The
biome has extreme
conditions
highlighted.
Makes good use of
font, color, graphics,
effects, etc. to
enhance to
presentation. Pictures
chosen are
appropriate to the
biome, but may not
be the best quality.
Makes use of font,
color, graphics,
effects, etc. but
occasionally these
detract from the
presentation content.
A theme is not
established and the
presentation is not
visually appealing.
Use of font, color,
graphics, effects etc.
but these often
distract from the
presentation content.
The pictures are
blurry and not
accurate to the biome
chosen. The
presentation does not
flow with a beginning,
middle, and end.
Date Created: October 20, 2014
Date Last Modified: October 21, 2014

Potrebbero piacerti anche