Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MASS TRANSFER
Mass transfer specifically refers to the relative motion of species in a mixture
due to concentration gradients. In many technical applications, heat transfer
processes occur simultaneously with mass transfer processes. The present
module discusses these transfer mechanisms. Since the principles of mass
transfer are very similar to those of heat transfer, the analogy between heat and
mass transfer will be used throughout this module.
dT ⎡ J ⎤
q′′ = −k (Fourier’s law) (10.1)
dy ⎢⎣ m 2 s ⎥⎦
where ρ is the density of the gas mixture, DAB the diffusion coefficient and
ξ A = ρ A / ρ the mass concentration of component A.
The sum of all diffusion fluxes must be zero, since the diffusion flow is, by
definition, superimposed to the net mass transfer:
∑ ji′′ = 0 (10.3)
With ξ A + ξ B = 1 we get
d d
ξ A = − ξB (10.4)
dy dy
which yields
DBA = DAB = D
The analogy between diffusive heat transfer (heat conduction) and diffusive
mass transfer (diffusion) can be illustrated by considering unsteady diffusive
transfer through a layer.
∂T ∂ ⎛ ∂T ⎞
ρc = ⎜k ⎟
∂t ∂x ⎝ ∂x ⎠
(10.5)
∂T k ∂ 2T ∂ 2T
= =α 2
∂t ρc ∂x 2 ∂x
and yields
T − T0 ⎛ x ⎞
= 1 − erf ⎜ ⎟ (10.7)
Tu − T ⎝ 4αt ⎠
dT k kcρ
q& ′′ x =0 = − k = (T − T0 ) = (T − T ) (10.8)
dx
x =0
παt
u
πt u
The transient field of concentration with pure diffusion results from a balance of
component i
∂ρ i ∂ 2ξ i
= ρD 2
∂t ∂x
(10.9)
∂ξ i ∂ξ2
= D 2i
∂t ∂x
The initial and boundary conditions for the semi-infinite fluid layer with a fixed
concentration at the interface are:
ξi (t = 0, x ) = ξi ,o
ξi (t > 0, x = 0) = ξi ,u (10.10)
ξi (t > 0, x → ∞ ) = ξi ,o
The solution, i.e. the field of concentration, is analogue to the one above.
ξ i − ξ i ,o ⎛ x ⎞
= 1 − erf ⎜ ⎟ (10.11)
ξ u − ξ i ,o ⎝ 4 Dt ⎠
Fig. 10.4 Concentration field
ρD
ji′′ x =0 = (ξi ,Ph − ξi ,o ) (10.12)
πDt
mi = Aji′′ x =0
ρD (10.13)
=A (ξi ,Ph − ξi ,o )
πDt
Finally, the contact time can be calculated from the film velocity and the film
length:
L
t= f (10.14)
uf
we get for a steady state flow without sources the conservation equation for the
component i under investigation:
∂
(ξi ρu + ji′′,x ) + ∂ (ξi ρv + ji′′, y ) + ∂ (ξi ρw + ji′′,z ) = 0 (10.16)
∂x ∂y ∂z
This equation can be differentiated partially and rewritten applying the equation
of continuity. This yields the form of the conservation equation for component i
(the index i will be disregarded further on):
∂ξ ∂ξ ∂ξ ∂ ⎛ ∂ξ ⎞ ∂ ⎛ ∂ξ ⎞ ∂ ⎛ ∂ξ ⎞
ρu + ρv + ρw = ⎜ ρD ⎟ + ⎜ ρD ⎟ + ⎜ ρD ⎟ (10.17)
∂x ∂y ∂z ∂x ⎝ ∂x ⎠ ∂y ⎝ ∂y ⎠ ∂z ⎝ ∂z ⎠
Assuming constant material properties and introducing the Schmidt number
μ
Sc = , we get the simplified form:
ρD
∂ξ ∂ξ ∂ξ μ ⎛ ∂ 2ξ ∂ 2ξ ∂ 2ξ ⎞
ρu + ρv + ρw = ⎜ 2 + 2 + 2 ⎟ (10.18)
∂x ∂y ∂z Sc ⎝ ∂x ∂y ∂z ⎠
If we define
x y z u v w ξ − ξw
x * = ; y * = ; z * = ; u * = ; v * = ; w* = ; ξ * =
L L L u∞ u∞ u∞ ξ∞ − ξw
∂ξ * * ∂ξ
*
* ∂ξ
*
1 ⎛ ∂ 2ξ * ∂ 2ξ * ∂ 2ξ * ⎞
u *
+v +w = ⎜ + + ⎟ (10.19)
∂x * ∂y * ∂z * Re Sc ⎝ ∂x *2 ∂y *2 ∂z *2 ⎠
from which can be concluded that the scaled concentration field must depend on
the dimensionless coordinates and the dimensionless numbers Re and Sc:
Note the analogy to heat transfer, where in Module 6 "Convection", for the
temperature field, the following was valid:
T * = f ( x * , y * , z * , Re, Pr) (10.21)
∂T T∞ − Tw ∂T *
q& w′′ = −k y =0
=−k (10.22)
∂y L ∂y * y * =0
This heat flux was represented using an empirical equation for the heat transfer
coefficient:
qw′′ = h (Tw − T∞ ) (10.23)
which written in dimensionless form was introduced as the Nusselt number Nu:
hL ∂T *
= Nu = * = f (Re, Pr) (10.24)
k ∂y y * =0
For many practical cases, the Nusselt laws are written in the form:
Nu = C Re m Pr n (10.25)
∂ξ ξ ∞ − ξ w ∂ξ *
j ′A′ = − ρD y = 0 = − ρD (10.26)
∂y L ∂y * y =0
*
hmass L ∂ξ *
= Sh = * = f (Re, Sc) (10.28)
ρD ∂y y * =0
Sh = C Re m Sc n (10.29)
Since the type of the mass conservation equation and energy equation are the
same, the constants C and the exponents m and n of both relationships must be
equal for comparable boundary conditions.
It seems like we need one more dimensionless number to represent the relative
magnitudes of heat and mass diffusion in the thermal and concentration
boundary layers. That is the Lewis number, defined as
Sc α Thermal diffusivity
Le = = =
Pr D Mass diffusivity
and hence
n −1
hmass ⎛ Sc ⎞
=⎜ ⎟ (10.31)
h / c p ⎝ Pr ⎠
For gases, the Prandtl and the Schmidt number are almost equal. In this case a
simple approximation for the relationship between the mass and heat transfer
coefficient can be derived, which is the so-called Lewis relation
hmass
=1 Lewis relation (10.32)
h / cp
The net mass flow of component A from the liquid surface to the gas consists of
a convective and diffusive part
Usually, it is assumed that the gas component B cannot penetrate the liquid
surface, hence for the net flow of component B:
With j ′A′ + jB′′ = 0 and ξ A + ξ B = 1 we get the net evaporation flow on the surface
1
m& ′′ = m& ′A′,w = j ′A′,w
1 − ξ A ,w
123
F
The net mass flow is obviously increased by the factor F, the Stefan factor,
compared to the diffusion flow. This factor takes into account that the wall is
only permeable for the evaporating component A ("semi-permeable wall").
ξw − ξ∞
m& ′′ = hmass (10.35)
1 − ξw
or in dimensionless form
m& ′′ Sh ξ w − ξ ∞
= (10.36)
ρu∞ ReSc 1 − ξ w
123
B