Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ROLL NUMBER:
LEARNING CENTER: 02882
FACULTY SIGNATURE:
Set 1
Subject Name : Business Communication
Q.1. Describe any situation in your experience where the communication was a
failure. Analyze the barrier(s) which stood in the way of successful communication.
Explain how you would overcome the barrier(s). (10 Marks
Answer :Situation where Communication was a failure to me:
As an Associate Manager, I was a sender for a communication and
intended to be received by my executives.I have sent the following
communication to my executives through a notice and displayed on the
notice board:
“Coming Second Saturday to complete our targets for the month a review
meeting is arranged and all should attend. If any executive is not able to
attend should find out the contents of the meeting from their peers
without fail”.
But my communication went wrong and out of 10 executives, only three
executives have attended at 4.00 PM who checked-in with me the time of
the meeting.
Following were the barriers of communication which stood in the
way
of my communication:
• The “Channel” I have chosen did not ensure the receipt of the
Communication by “Receivers”
• The communication lacked the “Chronological context” The second
Saturday being a non working day.
• The communication has created a “Psychological noise” by not
mentioning Correct time of the meeting and confusion has been created.
• The “social context” also is one of the cause for the failure of the
Communication as I have not taken all my executives into confident by
Giving any advance information or a intention of the meeting earlier.
Q.2. Select an article of around 200 words from any business publication. Analyze
the readability of the article using the “Fog Index”. Is the reading level appropriate for
the reader of the publication? (10 Marks).
Answer : “Readability formulas” are methods used to find out if
documents are written at the right reading level for their targeted
audience. Gunner’s Fog Index is one of the most famous. The Fog Index
measures the level of reading difficulty of any document. It assumes that
the bigger the words you use and the more complex your sentences, the
more difficult your document will be to read. The Fog Index level
translates into the number of years of education a reader needs to read
the material easily. The “ideal” score is 7 or 8; anything above 12 is too
hard for most people to read. The Fog Index does not determine directly if
the writing is too basic or too advanced for a particular audience. It does
help you decide whether a document is likely to be hard to understand –
and might
benefit from editing using “plain English” or “plain language.”
Analysis by FOG Index
1. Select a short document or passage and count the number of words
Number of sentences : 11
3. Count the number of big / difficult words (3 or more syllables).
Exclude
words in which “es” or “ed” form the third and final syllable, hyphenated
words like “state-of-the-art”, and compound words like “newspaper.”
Number big or difficult words : 9
4. Calculate the average sentence length by dividing the number of words
by the number of sentences.
Average length of sentence : 220/11: 20 words
5. Calculate the percentage of big words by dividing the number of big
words by the number of words, and multiplying by 100.
Q.3.Imagine that you are the Chairperson of the Board of Studies of the Department
of Management & Commerce of Sikkim Manipal University Department of Distance
Education. You have been asked to call a meeting of the members of the Board to
discuss the launch of new management programs and new specializations in the
existing management program. What kind of meeting would be required? Prepare a
comprehensive agenda for the participants of the meeting. (10 Marks)
As the meeting has been called to discuss the launch of new management
programs and new specializations in existing management programs, this
type of meeting is a called Task Oriented Meeting that is to discuss and
make arrangements for a specific event. All the key people involved may
be asked to attend the meeting to discuss the arrangements that are to
be made for this.
AGENDA
Date : September 30th, 2009
To :
Mr. Sharma [Incharge - Administration]
Mr. Prasad [Incharge – Curriculum]
Ms. Nivedita [Incharge –Adv. & Marketing]
Q.4 Select a corporate ad of your choice from any publication. Analyze the ad
in terms of its specific objectives and type of corporate advertising. Is it
effective? Why or why not? (10 Marks
Answer : Advertisement of Tata Consultancy Services
are meeting the objective that they have presence in the racing car
segment. The formula one Ferrari is one of the most advanced racing cars
in the world, packing research in aerodynamics, style, engine technology,
brakes, modeling. It has more in common with a jet plane than with the
performance of high speed car.Tata consultancy Services worked with
Ferrari before, during and in between races to help their cars go even
faster. As one of the world’s fastest growing technology and business
solution providers, TCS ensures that all mechanical and electrical systems
perform at their optimum under levels of extreme stress. Managing
pressure and troubleshooting where every little advantage makes a
Very huge difference. And, of course Ferrari to experience certainty.
Type of advertising:
Corporate advertising has not only objectives but has different types of
Advertising. It has also become wider in scope, going beyond the
traditional image building. The Ferrari advertisement of TCS comes under
the ‘Corporate Umbrella Advertising’. This type of advertising is aimed at
consumers and tries to show the identity of the company. This highlights
the services which they offer to customers. The addition of customers to
this umbrella is added in this type of advertising.
Effectiveness:
This advertisement is very effective especially the automobile segment,
where the customers look for maximum, mileage, good performance of
cars with limited resources.
Q.5 Write an unsolicited job application letter to a company that you would like to
work for in a specific position. Include a one page profile about yourself. (10 Marks)
Answer:
To,
The HR Manager,
Firepro Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Indiranagar,
Bangalore.
Dear HR Manager,
Sub: Application for the post of safety Engineer
I read the latest article in a business publication that your company own a
Prestigious contract and understand that you may want to hire qualified
safety engineers to service the newly acquired contract.
Date:
(Ambrish Kumar Atray)
Soon after I graduated from engineering college, I accepted a position with the
Sundaram Foundry, a medium-sized firm located in a small town in Tamil Nadu. It
was a good position, since I was the assistant to Mr. Vishwanath, the General
Manager and president of this family owned company, Although there were many
technical problems, the work was extremely interesting and I soon learnt all about
the foundry business.
The foundry workers were mostly older men and were a closely knit team. Many of
them were related and had been in the foundry for several years. Therefore, they felt
that they knew the business in and out and that a technical education had no value.
In fact, Mr. Vishwanath had mentioned to me even at the time of my joining, that I
was the only engineer ever to be employed in the foundry. He also let me know that
the foundry workers, although a good group, were very clannish, since they had
been working together for several years. Therefore, it would probably take them
some time to accept me.
I introduced myself to the group of foundry workers, a few days after my joining. As I
went around in turn, I felt them eyeing me coldly. As I went down the main aisle of
the foundry, I heard them talking to each other in low voices and laughing. I found
their behavior to be very childish and felt that it was best to ignore these signs of
hostility. I thought that if I ignored them, they would automatically stop these antics.
A few weeks after this incident, I happened to visit the enamel shop. As I entered, I
noticed a worker cleaning the floor with a hose, from which water flowed at high
pressure. I was aware that it was the practice to clean the shop at least once a week.
I turned my back on the worker and was busy near a dipping tank, when I suddenly
felt the force of a stream of water hitting me. I was almost knocked down by the
pressure and slipped on the wet floor. When I turned around, the worker looked
away in the other direction, as if he had not noticed this happening. However, I was
pretty sure that he had intentionally turned the hose on me.
Questions
1. How could the engineer, the foundry workers and Mr. Vishwanath be more
effective, both verbally and nonverbally?
2. What do you suggest that the engineer should do, after the hosing incident?
advises by him was not getting acceptance from the workers as the
behavior of the engineer was entirely different form the workers. They
were not able to accept anyone in their circle of influence. They also
believe that technical education adds no values to the business. Instead
of policing and playing tricks with the engineer like taking and laughing
behind him etc., they would have got themselves introduced to the
engineer by showing seniority and accept the engineer into the
organization. This would have helped him, gain more knowledge from
their experience and share his technical knowledge with them.
Mr. Viswanath:
He was the president and General Manager of the foundry. The business
was a family owned and is in a small town in Tamil nadu. Most probably
he would have taken workers form the town and trained them in the
work. They might have close relationship with him. He was realised that
to cope up with the technical snags in the foundry, better to hire a
technically qualified person.As he is having a close relationship with
workers, he would have consulted them and when the engineer joins the
organization, he could have organized a small gathering and introduced
workers to the engineer and the engineer to the workers, by explaining
his roles clearly and seeking cooperation from workers.He was warned the
engineer verbally about the situation he may face, but not given any
advice on how to cope up with it.
b. Suggestion to the engineer after the hosing
incident :
After facing all sort of problems as result for ineffective verbal and
nonverbal communication like,
- Talking behind him low voices and laughing
- Pointing of water jet behind him and slipping him down on the floor.
The engineer can go and speak to the worker in a cordial manner and
explain his intentions that neither he is not against them nor he dislikes
their job. But want to be friendly with them and want to learn from them
as they are more experienced than him. Instead coming to work and
doing his job, he can interact with them whenever he has time and mingle
with them so that they will accept him as a member of their team.
As the foundry is having some technical problems, he could understand
the problems form them and based on his technical knowledge advise
them on how to do the work in a better way by overcoming the snags.
Most importantly engineer can exchange a sweet smile [not laughing]
with the team on the foundry, as the nonverbal communication is more
powerful than the verbal communication.