Drosophila melanogaster, more commonly known as fruit fly, is an invertebrate
of approximately three millimeters in size. D. melanogaster appear in nature as both male and female, which comes useful in genetic mating experiments. They produce many offspring. This is only one reason for which they are considered a model organism (Kosinski-Collins, 2014). D. melanogaster are also fairly cheap organisms with a short, easily observable life span of approximately 12 days (Baade, 2014). D. melanogaster are especially valued for genetic studies because they have an easily observable phenotype of any given genetic mechanism under study, classifying them as especially genetically amenable organisms. D. melanogaster carry one sex chromosome and 3 autosomal chromosomes. Their genome is mapped out and readily available to scientists for study. Genetic screening is a tool used in genetics that is capable of tracing specific genes and mapping out their conserved domain among species, analyzing the similarities in their amino acid sequences among organisms. Ptpmeg is a dosage-dependent gene that is homologous to the gene responsible in humans as a colon cancer tumor suppressor (Itoh et al., 1993). For example in this experiment, GMR-Gal4:UAS-Ptpmeg/CyO, the gene that codes for protein ptpmeg, was used as the focus of this experiment in order to determine whether when in combination with certain male deficiency should the gene exhibit a rough eye that is suppressed or enhanced. Gene GMR-Gal4:UAS-Ptpmeg/CyO contains the eye specific promotor, GMR, GAL4, the gene-encoding transcription factor, UAS, a type of yeast promoter upstream activator sequence, and the sequence to code for the protein ptpmeg, that is dosage dependent and will subsequently exhibit either one of several ranges of rough eye (see Figure 1) (Kina et al., 2007). Our experiment showed one strain of our male deficiency, #23438, in combination with a female virgin fly with gene GMR-Gal4:UAS-Ptpmeg/CyO, proved to show that there was a resulting phenotype of enhanced rough eye. This conclusively showed that the male deficiency deleted the suppressor of the gene, leading to this enhanced version of the rough eye (Kang et al., 2014).
Figure 1 There are a couple of possible outcomes in the Ptpmeg cross. There are two possible manifestations of the rough eye phenotype in D. melanogaster (Kosinski-Collins, 2014).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Setting Up Experimental Crosses Wild-type flies were observed under the dissecting microscope to be familiar with D. melanogaster anatomy, eye color, and how to differentiate among the two sexes and a female virgin fly from a female non-virgin fly. The organisms were consequently dissected, as described (Kosinski-Collins, 2014). Our male deficiency lines, labeled: 7614, 9719, 24348, and 5878, were each compared under the microscope and transferred to new vials with wild-type (WT) female virgin flies containing the gene as described (Kosinski-Collins, 2014).
Phenotypic Analysis of Progeny from Crosses After anesthetization, cross progeny were examined under microscope for phenotypic showings. The progeny were examined and counted for enhanced or suppressed rough eye as described (Kosinski-Collins, 2014).
Scoring Progeny by Phenotype Using websites http://www.flybase.org and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST, gene domains deleted by the deficiency strain Df(2L)BSC were analyzed and the respective conserved domains of the unknowns were scored as described (Kosinski- Collins, 2014).
This punnet square shows the possible genotypes and phenotype manifestations associated with the deficiencies located on Chromosome 2 in the D. melanogaster. However, the phenotype of interest to the experiment is that outcome between ptpmeg and the deficiency, resulting in straight wings and unknown eyes. The progeny were subsequently analyzed for their eye phenotype, indicating whether the suppressor or enhancer was deleted.
This punnet square shows the possible genotypes and phenotype manifestations associated with the deficiencies located on Chromosome 3 in the D. melanogaster. Two phenotypes associated with this chromosome were tubby bodies(Tb) and stubble bristle (Sb). However, the phenotype of interest to the experiment is that outcome between Ptpmeg/+ with +/Def because the subsequent phenotype would be indicative of the presence of an enhancer and/or a suppressor. The progeny were subsequently analyzed for their eye phenotype, indicating whether the suppressor or enhancer was deleted.
Table for Cross with 9719 Balancer- Associated Phenotype Eye Phenotype Number of Progeny Number of Progeny (5) Curly Wings Rough 8 32 Curly Wings Wild-Type 12 48 Straight Wings Rough 5 20 Straight Wings Wild-Type --------- 0 The data collected here shows a scoring of the progeny between that of the female virgin flies containing the gene and the male deficiency line 9719.
Table for Cross with 7614 Balancer- Associated Phenotype Eye Phenotype Number of Progeny % Progeny Curly Wings Rough 5 50 Curly Wings Wild-Type 1 10 Straight Wings Rough Eye 4 40 Straight Wings Wild-Type --------- 0 The data collected here shows a scoring of the progeny between that of the female virgin flies containing the gene and the male deficiency line 7614.
Table for Cross with 24348 Balancer- Associated Phenotype Eye Phenotype Number of Progeny % Progeny Curly Wings Rough 5 33.3 Curly Wings Wild-Type 5 33.3 Straight Wings Rough Eye 5 33.3 Straight Wings Wild-Type ------- 0 The data collected here shows a scoring of the progeny between that of the female virgin flies containing the gene and the male deficiency line 24348.
Table for Cross with 5878 Balancer- Associated Phenotype Eye Phenotype Number of Progeny % Progeny Curly Wings Rough --------- --------- Curly Wings Wild-Type --------- --------- Straight Wings Rough Eye --------- --------- Straight Wings Wild-Type --------- --------- The data collected here shows a scoring of the progeny between that of the female virgin flies containing the gene and the male deficiency line 5878. This chart shows that there were no progeny to score from this cross. The female virgin flies and the male flies did mate and their larvae showed no signs of significant development. Most likely, the cross resulted in a homozygous lethal and sterile progeny.
Gene information deleted by deficiency strain Df(2L)BSC (continued to next page)
1 CG44007 3-5 cyclic AMP phosphodiester activity 2 CG31704 Serine type endopeptidase inhibitor activity 3 CG14933 UNKNOWN 4 CG14934 Alpha glucosidase activity 5 CG42751 UNKNOWN 6 CR43936 UNKNOWN 7 CG42486 Protein coding 8 CG14935 Alpha glucosidase activity 9 CG44008 Serine type endopeptidase inhibitor activity 10 CG16960 Olfactory receptor activity 11 CG5006 Olfactory sense receptor 12 CG16961 Olfactory sense receptor 13 CG16963 Calcium ion binding (structural constituent of eye lens) 14 CG16964 UNKNOWN 15 CR43314 UNKNOWN 16 CR42938 Chaeta development 17 CG16965 Alpha, alpha-trehalasce activity 18 CG34163 UNKNOWN 19 CG16969 Cytoplasmic microtubule organization 20 CG31866 Transcription coactivator activity 21 CG31864 Metabolic activity 22 CG12264 Cysteine desulferase activity 23 CG5279 G-protein coupled receptor activity 24 CR44588 UNKNOWN 25 CR44587 UNKNOWN 26 CG5304 High affinity glutamate transmembrane transport activity 27 CG6756 P-P bond hydrolysis protein (in mitochondria) 28 CG6785 UNKNOWN 29 CG6792 Metal ion binding 30 CG12317 Amino acid transmembrane transporter 31 CG7061 Rab GTPase activator activity 32 CG14947 UNKNOWN 33 CR44591 UNKNOWN 34 CG6716 RNA polymerase II distal enhancer 35 CG6686 Neurogenesis 36 CG5202 Histone methyl transferase activity 37 CG18789 Metal ion binding 38 CG31865 Transcription coactivator activity 39 CG6746 UNKNOWN 40 CG6734 Spingomyelin phosphodiesterase activator 41 CG18788 Transmembrane protein 42 CG6766 UNKNOWN 43 CG6770 Response to oxidative stress 44 CG14945 Glycosylphosphagylinostinol diacylglycerolase activity 45 CG5317 Structural constituent of ribosome 46 CG14946 Oxidoreductase activity 47 CR44590 UNKNOWN 48 CG12314 Dorsal appendage formation 49 CR18787 Metal ion binding 50 CR44589 UNKNOWN 51 CG34164 UNKNOWN From smaller male deficiency, 24348, these were the indicated gene domains deleted by the deficiency strain Df(2L)BSC, and the domains respective functions as taken from http://www.flybase.org. Conserved domain of unknown genes of Df(2L)BSC 3 CG14933 Kazal Type Serine Protease 5 CG42751 Protein coding 6 CR43936 Unknown function 14 CG16964 Unknown function 15 CR43314 Unknown function 18 CG34163 Protein coding 24 CR44588 Unknown function 25 CR44587 Unknown function 28 CG6785 Protein coding 32 CG14947 Protein coding 33 CR44591 Unknown function 39 CG6746 PTPLA; Protein tyrosine phosphatase-like activity 42 CG6766 PRKCSH; Glucosidase II beta subunit like protein 47 CR44590 Unknown function 50 CR44589 Unknown function 51 CG34164 Protein coding From smaller male deficiency, 24348, these were the indicated gene functions of the unknown domains that were deleted by the deficiency strain Df(2L)BSC, as taken from http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/BLAST.
DISCUSSION
Crossing female virgin flies expressing ptpmeg from the gene GMR-Gal4:UAS- Ptpmeg/CyO with male deficiency strains and subsequently scoring their progeny according to associated balancer (in this case, Cyo) and the eye phenotype, the deficiency strain 24348 was shown to have the enhanced rough eye phenotype expressed 66.6% of the time (refer to Table for Cross with 24348). In Mendelian genetics, the deficiency strain 24348, located on chromosome 2, was to produce a fourth of each possible phenotype in its F1 generation (Kosinski-Collins, 2014). From the Table for Crosses.. for 9719, 7614, and 24348, rough eye phenotype was the most prevalent in the progeny for which the male deficiencys balancer contained chromosome 2 for Cyo. Furthermore, deficiency strain 24348 was analyzed via bioinformatics programming for the gene functions of the genes deleted domains in order to seek whether genes suppressor would have been deleted as a result of over-expression of rough eye in the eye phenotype. The conserved domain of the unknown gene showed gene CG6746 as functioning in the genome as a protein tyrosine-phosphotase (see table Conserved Domain of Unknown Genes of Df(2L)BSC). Those of the known genes did not show possibly functions to suppress ptpmeg suppression activity (see table
REFERENCES
Baade, J. 2014. Lecture 1: Using Drosophila as a model organism. January 14. (from Biology 18a) Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Itoh, F., Ikuta, S., Hinoda, Y., Arimura, Y., Ohe, M., Adachi, M., Ariyama, T., Inazawa, J., Imai, K., & Yachi, A. 1993. Expression and chromosomal assignment of PTPH1 gene encoding a cytosolic protein tyrosine phosphatase homologous to cytoskeletal-associated proteins. International Journal of Cancer 55(6): 947-951.
Kang, J., Yeom, E., Lim, J., Choi, K. W.. 2014. Bar Represses dPax2 and Decapentaplegic to Regulate Cell Fate and Morphogenetic Cell Death in Drosophila Eye. Public Library of Science 9(2):e88171.
Kina, S., Tezuka, T., Kusakawa, S., Kishimoto, Y., Kakizawa, S., Hashimoto, K., Ohsugi, M., Kiyama, Y., Horai, R., Sudo, K., Kakuta, S., Iwakura, Y., Iino, M., Kano, M., Manabe, T., Yamamoto, T.. 2007. Involvement of protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTPMEG in motor learning and cerebellar long-term depression. European Journal of Neuroscience 26(8):2269-2278.
Kosinski, M. C., & Baade, J. 2014. Biology 18a Introductory Biology Laboratory Manual. Brandeis University, pp. 18-55.
Predictive Maintenance Attempts To Detect The Onset of A Degradation Mechanism With The Goal of Correcting That Degradation Prior To Signiicant Deterioration in The Component or Equipment