Goshen Redevelopment Commission Oct. 14 2014

GOSHEN REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 14, 2014

The Goshen Redevelopment Commission will meet on October 14, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Court
Room/Council Chambers at the Goshen Police & Court Building, 111 East Jefferson Street, Goshen, Indiana.

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting Minutes of September 9, 2014

3. APPROVAL OF REGISTER OF CLAIMS
Register of Claims for October 14, 2014

4. PRESENTATIONS
Goshen Pond Dredging Presentation Bill Rieth, ERRA
Goshen Historical Society Powerhouse Exhibit John Hertzler, Historical Society
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Resolution 103-2014 Approve Funding Commitment for Ninth Street Trail from College Avenue to Purl
Street
b. Resolution 104-2014 Authorize Issuance of RFP for 324 S. Fifth Street, 211 E. Madison Street and
323 S. Sixth Street
c. Discussion Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements Funding
d. Discussion Northwest Bike Trail Route Options
e. Discussion 405 S. Third Street Status
f. Discussion Electrical Service Extension at 315 W. Washington Street
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Resolution 105-2014 Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Contract for Asbestos Assessment
with TecServ Environmental, Inc. for 301, 303, 305 & 307 S. Third Street
b. Resolution 106-2014 Approve and Authorize Execution of a Bridge and MSE Wall Location Memo of
Understanding (MOU) between INDOT, Norfolk Southern Railways and the City of Goshen for the
Marion Branch Curve Realignment Project
c. Resolution 107-2014 Authorize Negotiation and Execution of an Agreement with Aquatic Weed
Control for Millrace Canal Vegetation Maintenance
d. Resolution 108-2014 Consent to Assignment of Agreement for the Lease and Development of Real
Estate at 315 W. Washington Street by Goshen Brewing Company to 1
st
Source Bank
e. Discussion - Updated Consolidated River Race / US 33 TIF 5 Year Plan
f. Discussion Updated Consolidated Southeast TIF 5 Year Plan
g. Discussion Federal Funding Opportunities
7. MONTHLY REDEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT

8. OPEN FORUM
The open forum is for the general discussion of items that are not otherwise on the agenda. The public will
also be given the opportunity at this time to present or comment on items that are not on the agenda.

9. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Next Regular Meeting WEDNESDAY, November 12, 2014 at 4:00 p.m.
1

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 9, 2014

CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

The Goshen Redevelopment Commission met in a regular meeting on September 9, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Court
Room/Council Chambers at the Goshen Police & Court Building, 111 East Jefferson Street, Goshen, Indiana.

The meeting was called to order by President Thomas Stump.

On call of the roll, the following members of the Goshen Redevelopment Commission were shown to be present or absent as
follows:

Present: Laura Coyne, Cathie Cripe, Thomas Stump, Vince Turner and Brett Weddell

Absent: Jeremy Stutsman

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A motion was made by Commissioner Coyne and seconded by Commissioner Weddell to approve the minutes of the August
12, 2014 regular meeting. The motion was adopted unanimously.

APPROVAL OF REGISTER OF CLAIMS

A motion was made by Commissioner Turner and seconded by Commissioner Coyne to approve payment of the Register of
Claims totaling $568,441.87. The motion was adopted unanimously.

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

a. Resolution 93-2014 Approving a Major Moves Construction Fund Loan from City of Goshen

Larry Barkes, City Attorney, informed the Commission that the Common Council had agreed to make the loan as
requested by the Redevelopment Commission and this was on the Agenda today for the Commissions acceptance of the
loan. Mr. Barkes reiterated the terms of the loan and offered to answer any questions the Commission may have. There
were no questions.

A motion was made by Commissioner Weddell and seconded by Commissioner Coyne to approve Resolution 93-2014.
The motion passed unanimously.

NEW BUSINESS

a. Resolution 94-2014 Dedication of Public Right-of-Way

Larry Barkes informed the Commission that the City is preparing the sell the property in question that is partially owned by
Redevelopment.

A motion was made by Commissioner Coyne and seconded by Commissioner Weddell to approve Resolution 94-2014.

2

b. Resolution 95-2014 Ratification of Lease Agreement with Downtown Goshen, Inc. for the Use of the
Powerhouse for the Maple City Walk

A motion was made by Commissioner Turner and seconded by Commissioner Coyne to approve Resolution 95-2014.

c. Resolution 96-2014 Approve and Authorize the Execution of a Purchase Agreement with J.C. and Katharine
Schrock for 313 S. Third Street

Larry Barkes informed the Commission this is a request to sell the property located at 313 S. Third Street to J.C. and
Katharine Schrock.

J. C. Schrock, 63838 CR 21, Goshen, Indiana. Mr. Schrock informed the Commission he is in agreement with the
Contract. He inquired if the five houses to the north of this property were to be demolished, if he could salvage the door
hardware from those houses. Larry Barkes stated that in the past, the demolition contractors contact information has
been provided to people inquiring about salvage.

A motion was made by Commissioner Weddell and seconded by Commissioner Turner to approve Resolution 96-2014.

d. Resolution 97-2014 Approve and Authorize Execution of Agreement with Rita Ann Gabriel & Associates, Inc. for
Appraisal Review Services for the Right of Way Acquisition of 117 & 119 S. 9
th
Street for the Marion Line Curve
Realignment Project

Mary Cripe, City Civil Engineer, informed the Commission the next four resolutions relate to the curve realignment project
that the City, INDOT and Norfolk Southern have been discussing. Since there are federal funds available, the same
acquisition format must be followed as has in the past with federal funds. An agreement with INDOT has not yet been
finalized, but once that happens and the notice to proceed is given, these services will begin.

A motion was made by Commissioner Coyne and seconded by Commissioner Weddell to approve Resolution 97-2014.

e. Resolution 98-2014 Approve and Authorize Execution of Agreement with Linda F. Russell, d/b/a Russell
Appraisal Services for Appraisal Services for the Right of Way Acquisition of 117 & 119 S. 9
th
Street for the
Marion Line Curve Realignment Project


f. Resolution 99-2014 Approve and Authorize Execution of Agreement with Right of Way Jones, Inc. for Buying
Agent Services for the Right of Way Acquisition of 117 & 119 S. 9
th
Street for the Marion Line Curve Realignment
Project


g. Resolution 100-2014 Approve and Authorize Execution of Agreement with Stankoven and Company, Inc. for
Relocation Services for the Right of Way Acquisition of 117 & 119 S. 9
th
Street for the Marion Line Curve
Realignment Project

A motion was made by Commissioner Coyne and seconded by Commissioner Turner to approve Resolution 100-2014.

3
h. Resolution 101-2014 Authorize Negotiation of an Agreement for the 9
th
Street Trail

Mary Cripe requested permission from the Commission to start negotiations for the design engineering of this project
once INDOT responds to the Citys recommendation.


i. Resolution 102-2014 Approve and Authorize Execution of Agreement with INDOT LPA for the Railroad
Crossing Safety Improvements at College Avenue and Jefferson Street

Mary Cripe informed the Commission that federal funds have been received for this project and the preliminary estimate
for the project is $1.2 million dollars for design and construction. Local share would be approximately $128,888.


j. Discussion River Race Drive Long Term Parking Project Planning Committee

Larry Barkes indicated the projects being done in the area of canal may lead to long term parking issues in this area. He
solicited volunteers for a committee to explore the parking possibilities and discuss funding issues, particularly
Redevelopments involvement in the funding. Tom Stump and Brett Weddell volunteered.

REPORTS

a. Redevelopment Report Mark Brinson, Community Development Director

Mark Brinson informed the Commission that Goshen Brewing Company has obtained their building permits, demolition is
well underway and the construction crew is busy. Commission President Stump inquired about a completion date for the
Brewery. Mark indicated the date fluctuates, but estimated around Spring, 2015.

Commissioner Coyne asked if Goshen has a legacy TIF that is affected by the new legislation. Larry Barkes indicated
Goshen does not have a legacy TIF and stated that we were not really affected by the new legislation because most of
the things they were asking for we are already doing. One major change is when we sell property now, we have to take it
to Council for approval, whereas we did not have to in the past.

OPEN FORUM

No one from the Commission or the public spoke during the open forum.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

It was announced that the next regular meeting is scheduled for October 14, 2014 at 4:00 pm.

ADJOURNMENT

The regular meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m.

APPROVED on October 14, 2014.

Goshen Redevelopment Commission

_______________________________________
Thomas W. Stump, President

_______________________________________
Jeremy P. Stutsman, Secretary

October 14, 2014 Register of Claims

The Goshen Redevelopment Commission has examined the entries listed on the following
Expenditure Report for claims entered from September 5, 2014 through October 9, 2014
and finds that such entries are allowed in the total amount of $561,999.05.

APPROVED on October 14, 2014.


Laura Coyne

Thomas W. Stump

Jeremy Stutsman

Vince Turner

Brett Weddell

Itemized Expenditure Report
Claims from 9/5/14 through 10/9/14
Invoice Date Payee Description Line Number Amount Claim #
406-560-00-429.0002 $38.92 9/5/2014 Lake City Bank VISA Books - Community Economic Survival Guide & The Co 1548
473-560-00-441.0000 $135,352.00 9/8/2014 Barkes, Kolbus, Rife & Shuler-FIDUCIARY ACCT 0 Property Acquisition - South Link Road (Calderon) 1539
473-560-00-441.0000 $925.00 9/11/2014 Keith E. Adams and Cathy A. Adams Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1543
473-560-00-441.0000 $1,025.00 9/11/2014 Leonard D. Livengood Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1542
473-560-00-441.0000 $2,750.00 9/11/2014 Octavio Ramos and Van-Lendy Ramos Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1540
473-560-00-441.0000 $3,070.00 9/11/2014 Wayne Strong and Virginia C. Strong Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1565
473-560-00-441.0000 $400.00 9/11/2014 Robert A. Zook and Carolyn J. Zook Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1541
480-560-00-431.0502 $500.00 9/12/2014 Herring Appraisals (0207808) Appraisal - 211 E. Madison Street 1547
480-560-00-431.0502 $500.00 9/12/2014 Herring Appraisals (0207808) Appraisal - 323 S. 6th Street 1547
324-560-00-438.0300 $750.00 9/16/2014 Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, NA (053 Paying Agent Fees - Redevelopment District Bonds of 1545
473-560-00-441.0000 $9,100.00 9/18/2014 Bethany Christian Schools, Inc. Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1553
473-560-00-441.0000 $1,200.00 9/18/2014 GSCK Properties, LLC Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1550
473-560-00-441.0000 $400.00 9/18/2014 Edward Moore and Laverne J. Moore Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1551
406-560-00-413.0100 $351.71 9/18/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) FICA 1544
406-560-00-413.0501 $1,310.00 9/18/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) Health Insurance 1544
406-560-00-413.0200 $82.25 9/18/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) Medicare 1544
406-560-00-413.0300 $635.35 9/18/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) PERF 1544
406-560-00-411.0130 $5,672.73 9/18/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) Wages 1544
473-560-00-441.0000 $1,475.00 9/22/2014 Gabriela Garcia Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1566
480-560-00-439.0930 $15.25 9/22/2014 Goshen Water & Sewer (0204286) 211 E. Madison Utilities 1546
473-560-00-441.0000 $125,352.00 9/24/2014 Barkes, Kolbus, Rife & Shuler-FIDUCIARY ACCT 0 Property Acquisition - South Link Road (Weaver) 1549
473-560-00-441.0000 $5,025.00 9/24/2014 Byron J. Yoder and Rebecca L. Yoder Property Acquisition - South Link Road 1567
480-560-00-431.0502 $950.00 9/26/2014 Abonmarche (05859) Right of Way and Easement Survey - River Race Drive 1561
480-560-00-431.0502 $6,100.00 9/26/2014 Abonmarche (05859) Steury Avenue/Lincoln Avenue Roadway Reconstructio 1564
480-560-00-439.0930 $58.50 9/26/2014 NIPSCO (02-00014) Utilities - 211 E. Madison Street 1572
406-560-00-439.0930 $129.00 9/29/2014 Ball State University-Building Better Communities Primacy of Place Conference Registration 1560
473-560-00-441.0000 $385.00 9/30/2014 Mario Calderon and Leticia Calderon Property Acquisition - South Link Road (Calderon Relo 1556
Thursday, October 9, 2014 Page 1 of 2
Invoice Date Payee Description Line Number Amount Claim #
473-560-00-441.0000 $3,900.00 9/30/2014 Mario Calderon and Leticia Calderon Property Acquisition - South Link Road (Calderon Relo 1557
480-560-00-442.0000 $161,777.79 9/30/2014 C & E Excavating (00631) River Race Drive Construction 1568
473-560-00-441.0000 $27,012.40 9/30/2014 Stewart Title Company Property Acquisition - South Link Road (Calderon Relo 1555
480-560-00-439.0930 $362.00 10/1/2014 Elkhart County Recorder (11130) Recording Fees for Envrionmental Restrictive Covenan 1559
480-560-00-442.0000 $2,169.69 10/1/2014 Elkhart County Landfill River Race Drive Construction 1571
480-560-00-431.0502 $1,769.83 10/1/2014 Stiver's Lawn Care (02-06577) Redevelopment Property Mowing 1563
480-560-00-439.0930 $104.61 10/2/2014 NIPSCO (02-00014) Utilities - 324 W. Washington Street 1572
406-560-00-413.0100 $353.26 10/2/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) FICA 1562
406-560-00-413.0501 $1,310.00 10/2/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) Health Insurance 1562
406-560-00-413.0200 $82.62 10/2/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) Medicare 1562
406-560-00-413.0300 $638.15 10/2/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) PERF 1562
406-560-00-411.0130 $5,697.73 10/2/2014 Goshen, City of (for Redevelopment Payroll) Wages 1562
480-560-00-439.0930 $10.00 10/6/2014 Barkes, Kolbus, Rife & Shuler, LLP (00311) 617 S. Third Street - Sales Disclosure Filing Fee 1569
473-560-00-439.0930 $50.00 10/6/2014 Barkes, Kolbus, Rife & Shuler, LLP (00311) 65753 SR 15 - Closing Fees for Rescheduled Hearing 1569
473-560-00-439.0930 $40.00 10/6/2014 Barkes, Kolbus, Rife & Shuler, LLP (00311) 65753 SR 15 - Wire Transfer Fees 1569
473-560-00-431.0502 $6,500.00 10/6/2014 Jones Petrie Rafinski Corp. Waterford Mills Parkway - Additional Design Engineerin 1570
473-560-00-431.0502 $43,798.76 10/6/2014 Jones Petrie Rafinski Corp. Waterford Mills Parkway - Land Acquisition Services & 1570
473-560-00-431.0502 $2,869.50 10/6/2014 Jones Petrie Rafinski Corp. Waterford Mills Parkway - Re-Acquire Existing Right of 1570
Total: $561,999.05
Thursday, October 9, 2014 Page 2 of 2
124 S. Main Street
Goshen, Indiana 46526
574.975.0033
museum@goshenhistorical.org
www.goshenhistorical.org
September 29, 2014
Mark Brinson, Director
Community Development Department
City of Goshen
204 EJefferson St
Goshen, IN 46528
Goshen's hydraulic canal and the original industrial development along that power source is a
fascinating and important piece of Goshen's past.
The Goshen Historical Society would like to start a conversation with you about installing a permanent
exhibit of this history in the power plant at the foot of the canal. We understand that the building will
normally be locked but will be available for public use.
With a green light fr.om you we can develop a working document that will protect both the city and our
group. We will then develop an idea of what we think the exhibit would look like, and with your
approval of a basic plan, we'd work up a grant proposal for securing funds to develop this exhibit.
I could go on and on, but let's await that until we have a formal response from your department.
John M Hertzler
Office Manager and B"e

MEMORANDUM

TO: Redevelopment Commission

FROM: Mary Cripe, P.E.

RE: NINTH STREET TRAIL FROM COLLEGE AVENUE TO PURL STREET
PROJECT NO. 2011-0052

DATE: October 1, 2014

The City received grant funding for the design, right-of-way, construction and construction
inspection, with 80% Federal funding and 20% local funding. With the grant funding, the
Redevelopment Commission would be required to pay 100% of the design, right-of-way, and
construction inspection to the specific entity (like the design consultant), and then submit an
INDOT-LPA Claim Voucher to INDOT for reimbursement of the 80% Federal funds. We are
invoiced for the 20% of the construction costs, once the project is bid. Please see the table below
with the preliminary estimates for each phase of the Ninth Street Trail project.

Phase Total Cost
Federal
Funds
(80%)
Local
Funds
(20%)
Comments
Design Engineering $190,000 $152,000 $38,000
City pays 100% upfront,
then reimbursed 80%.
Right-of-Way $50,000 $40,000 $10,000
Construction $910,000 $728,000 $182,000 City pays 20%.
Construction Inspection $90,000 $72,000 $18,000
TOTAL $1,240,000 $992,000 $248,000

At this time, the Redevelopment Commission needs to determine whether or not to commit to
paying for 100% of the local costs associated with this Ninth Street Trail project. The various
Civil City budget lines are tied up with various projects associated with the US 33 North
Connector Route, US 33 from the Elkhart River to Third Street, Kercher Road from the Railroad
to Dierdorff Road and the Wilden Avenue Reconstruction from the Rock Run Creek Bridge to
Sixth Street, and Civil City does not have any additional funds to assist with this project at this
time.

RESOLUTION 103-2014

Commitment to Fund Local Share
Ninth Street Trail from College Avenue to Purl Street

WHEREAS the City of Goshen received grant funding for the design, right-of-way, construction and
construction inspection for the Ninth Street Trail from College Avenue to Purl Street; and

WHEREAS the grant funding provides for 80% federal funding and 20% local funding, however, the City
must pay 100% of the design, right-of-way and construction inspection direct, then submit a claim voucher
for reimbursement of the 80% federal funding; and

WHEREAS the preliminary estimates for the 20% local funds total $248,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Goshen Redevelopment Commission commits to fund the
local share of the Ninth Street Trail from College Avenue to Purl Street project.

PASSED and ADOPTED on October 14, 2014.



RESOLUTION 104-2014

Authorize Issuance of Request for Proposals to Purchase for
324 S. Fifth Street, 211 E. Madison Street and 323 S. Sixth Street, Goshen, Indiana

WHEREAS the Goshen Redevelopment Commission is interested in requesting proposals for the purchase
of the real estate at 324 S. Fifth Street, 211 E. Madison Street and 323 S. Sixth Street, Goshen, Indiana;
and

WHEREAS a copy of a Request for Proposals to Purchase the above real estate is attached to and made a
part of this resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Goshen Redevelopment Commission that the
Redevelopment Commission authorizes the issuance of a Request for Proposals to Purchase the real
estate at 324 S. Fifth Street, 211 E. Madison Street and 323 S. Sixth Street, Goshen, Indiana, to be opened
at a subsequent meeting of the Redevelopment Commission.





1
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PURCHASE

The City of Goshen, through its Redevelopment Commission (Redevelopment) is requesting proposals to
purchase three parcels of real estate north of Madison Street (U.S. 33) and east of Main Street (S.R. 15) in
Goshen, Indiana. Proposals may be submitted to purchase all three parcels, any one of the parcels or any
combination of the parcels.

The three parcels offered to be purchase are the following:

324 S. FIFTH STREET (FIFTH STREET BUILDING)

1) The Fifth Street Building is a building approximately two thousand nine hundred eighty (2,980)
square feet located east of Main Street (S.R. 15) and north of Madison Street (U.S. 33), as
depicted on the map attached to this Request for Proposals as Exhibit A.

2) The legal description for the Fifth Street Building is as follows:

Lot Numbered Forty-three (43) as said lot is known and designated on the recorded Plat of
Second South Addition, sometimes known as Barnes Second South Addition to Goshen;
said Plat being recorded in Deed Record 15, page 489 in the Office of the Recorder of
Elkhart County, Indiana.

3) The Fifth Street Building is located on the south edge of the Goshen downtown area. The building
has been used as a residence, but Redevelopment would consider a commercial use (subject to
zoning approval) if such use is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.

4) The Fifth Street Building does not now meet the requirements of the Citys Neighborhood
Preservation Ordinance. A purchaser must bring the building into compliance with the Citys
Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance before the building is occupied. Redevelopment expects
that the building will be occupied with nine (9) months of transferring title to the Purchaser. The
sale of real estate to any Purchaser will be in the real estates present condition, AS IS, and without
any warranty of habitability.

5) A proposal to purchase the Fifth Street Building should explain all structural improvements that the
Purchaser intends to make to the building.

6) The Purchaser must make the following repairs or improvements to the real estate within nine (9)
months of the closing:

1. Roof
a. The improperly installed roof shingles must be removed and replaced.
b. The roof turret valley must be properly flashed.
c. A large hole in the roof presently filled with tar must be properly repaired and shingled.
d. The roof over the rear porch must be properly repaired and re-shingled.

2
2. Foundation
The foundation supporting the rear porch must be properly repaired or replaced.

3. Windows / Doors
a. The rear entry door must be replaced.
b. The northwest front window frames, sashes, cornices, soffits, support pillars and wall
studs need to be replaced.

4. Stairs and Porches
a. The rear porch must be property repaired.
b. The rear porch steps must be replaced.
c. The porch bricks must be replaced and tucked pointed.
d. The cistern in the center of the brick pad on the south side of the house must be filled.

5. Chipping and Peeling Paint
The peeling paint and fading plaster must be removed and replaced. The entire interior of
the house must be painted.

6. Furnace
The furnace needs to be replaced.

7. Electric System
The electric system needs to be replaced with a system meeting current residential codes.

8. Exterior Bricks
All exterior bricks that have fallen out or have been damaged must be replaced.

7) The asking price for the Fifth Street Building is Sixty Three Thousand Dollars ($63,000.00).

8) Redevelopment will retain a mortgage on the Fifth Street Building in the amount of the estimated
cost of the required repairs. Redevelopment will release the mortgage once the required repairs
have been made. Redevelopment will subrogate this mortgage to permit the Purchaser to obtain
financing for the purchase price and/or for the required repairs.

211 EAST MADISON STREET (MADISON STREET BUILDING)

1) The Madison Street building is a building approximately 1,690 square feet. The building is
immediate east of the Fifth Street Building as depicted on the map attached to this Request for
Proposals as Exhibit A. The lot is approximately one tenth (1/10) of an acre.

2) The legal description for the Madison Street building is as follows:

Sixty feet (60) off and from the West end of Lot Numbered Thirty-eight (38) as said lot is known
and designated on the recorded Plat of Second South Addition, sometimes known as Barnes
Second South Addition to Goshen; said Plat being recorded in Deed Record 15, page 489 in the
Office of the Recorder of Elkhart County, Indiana.

3
3) The building has been used as a dentist office, a screen printing business and other commercial
uses. However, the real estate is zoned R-1. Previous variances permitted certain limited
commercial uses.
4) The building will be sold in the real estates present condition, AS IS, and without any warranty of
habitability. The Commission expects that the building will be occupied within nine (9) months of
transferring title to the Purchaser.

5) A proposal to purchase the Madison Street Building should include all structural improvements that
the Purchaser intends to make to the building.

6) The asking price for the Madison Street Building is Ninety Thousand Dollars ($90,000.00).

323 S. SIXTH STREET (SIXTH STREET BUILDING)

1) The Sixth Street Building is a residential two unit rental, although the building is zoned R-1. The
building is immediately west of 211 East Madison as depicted on the map attached to this Request
for Proposals as Exhibit A. The lot is approximately 66 by 105.

2) The legal description for the Sixth Street Building is as follows:

Lot Numbered Thirty-eight (38), less and excepting the West sixty feet (60) thereof, as
said lot is known and designated on the recorded Plat of Second South Addition,
sometimes known as Barnes Second South Addition to Goshen; said Plat being recorded
in Deed Record 15, page 489 in the Office of the Recorder of Elkhart County, Indiana.

3) The Sixth Street Building is located near the Goshen downtown area. The building has been used
for residential purposes but Redevelopment would consider a commercial use (subject to zoning
approval) if such use is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.

4) The sale of the Sixth Street Building to any Purchaser will be in the real estates present condition,
AS IS, and without any warranty of habitability or fitness for any particular purpose.

5) Redevelopment expects the building will be occupied within nine (9) months of transferring title to
Purchaser.

6) A proposal to purchase the Sixth Street Building should explain all structural improvements that the
Purchaser intends to make to the building.

7) The asking price for the Sixth Street Building is Seventy Thousand Dollars ($70,000.00).

TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO BE ADDRESSED OR ACCEPTED BY PROPOSAL

USE OF PREMISES

A. The real estate parcels must be used by Purchaser in conformity with all applicable laws and
regulations of any government entity or public authority.
4

B. The real estate parcels must be used in a manner that would not be reasonably offensive to the
owners or users of adjoining real estate or would tend to create a nuisance.

C. Proposer may seek a use variance or rezoning to permit additional uses of the real estate parcels.
A proposal may be conditioned on receiving the variance or rezoning.

CONDITIONS OF SALE

A. Purchase Price

The purchase price shall be tendered in cash or in other functionally equivalent form at the closing.

B. Proposals Submitted by a Trust

Any proposal submitted by a trust must identify each beneficiary of the trust and whether the settler
is empowered to revoke or modify the trust.

C. Agreement

The entity submitting the selected proposal will be required to enter into a purchase agreement
incorporating the terms of this Request for Proposals, the terms included in the successful proposal
and other provisions negotiated by Redevelopment and the entity submitting the proposal.

D. Risk of Loss

Purchaser shall be responsible for loss to the real estate beginning on the date of closing.

SELECTION PROCESS AND SCHEDULE

A. The proposals will be opened by the Goshen Redevelopment Commission at the Commissions
meeting on December 9, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. in the Goshen City Court Room/Council Chambers at
111 East Jefferson Street, Goshen, Indiana.

B. The proposals will be considered by Redevelopment. Redevelopment reserves the right to refer the
proposals received to Mark Brinson, Community Development Director, and such other
Redevelopment staff as Redevelopment deems appropriate to review the proposals and make
recommendations. Redevelopment reserves the right to interview the parties submitting proposals
or to request the parties submitting proposals to provide supplemental information.

C. Redevelopment reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals. If Redevelopment
selects a proposal, it will select the highest and best proposal. Redevelopment may then enter into
negotiations for a purchase agreement with the entity submitting the highest and best proposal.
5

D. In determining which proposal is the highest and best proposal, Redevelopment will consider the
following:

1. Purchasers proposed purchase price.
2. The plans and financial ability of Purchaser to purchase and improve the real estate with
reasonable promptness.
3. The character of the improvements proposed to be made by Purchaser within nine (9)
months of the closing.
4. Whether the proposed use is compatible with the neighborhood.
5. Whether the proposed use is consistent with uses proposed for the other parcels offered
for purchase if the proposals is for less than all three parcels.
6. Whether Purchaser is a trust which did not identify all its beneficiaries and whether the
settler is empowered to revoke or modify the trust.
7. Whether the proposed purchase will serve the interest of the community.

E. In the event no proposal or set of proposals are received that meets or exceeds the purchase price
established for each of the three parcels of real estate, the Redevelopment Commission may
select a proposal offering less than the established purchase price of all or any of the real estate
parcels, but only after Redevelopment accepts additional proposals until at least January 12, 2015.
After accepting proposals for the additional period, Redevelopment may select the highest and
best proposal using the criteria set forth in this section with no minimum price.

SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

A. Proposals to purchase any or all of the real estate parcels shall be submitted to Mark Brinson,
Goshen City Community Development Director, 204 East Jefferson Street, Goshen, Indiana 46528,
no later than 12:00 p.m. on December 9, 2014. Mark Brinson may be contacted to answer any
questions. Any oral communication will be considered unofficial and non-binding.
B. The proposal shall address all issues contained in the Request for Proposals. Any exceptions to
the terms of the Request for Proposals should be clearly noted.
C. Redevelopment reserves the right to waive informalities or irregularities in the selection process.
This Request for Proposals does not commit Redevelopment to sell all or any of the real estate
parcels. Redevelopment reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals received, to
negotiate with qualified persons or entities who submit a proposal, or to cancel the Request.
Redevelopment may require a person or entity submitting a proposal to submit any additional data
or information Redevelopment deems necessary.
D. Redevelopment may also require a person or entity submitting a proposal to revise one or more
elements of its proposal in accordance with contract negotiations. Redevelopment reserves the
right to evaluate proposals for a period of sixty (60) days before deciding which proposal, if any, to
accept. The terms of any proposal shall be maintained through the evaluation period.
E. All proposals shall be submitted in a sealed envelope. The envelope must be labeled with the
submitting person or entitys name, address and telephone number. The proposal must be clearly
marked as a Redevelopment Building Proposal.
6
F. If a proposal is sent through the mail or other delivery system, the sealed envelope shall be
enclosed in a separate envelope with the notation PROPOSAL ENCLOSED on the face of the
outer envelope.
G. All proposals submitted become the property of the City and are a matter of public record.
H. The City of Goshen is not responsible for late or lost proposals due to mail service inadequacies,
traffic or other similar reasons. Proposals received after the designated time will not be considered
in the selection process unless no set of proposals is received offering to purchase the real estate
parcels for the price established for each of the three parcels of real estate.
I. Any modifications made to a proposal before submission must be initialed in ink by the submitting
entitys authorized representative. A submitting entity may, upon written request, modify or
withdraw their proposal at any time prior to the opening date and time. A request to modify or
withdraw a proposal must be signed by the same person who signed the original proposal
submitted. No proposal may be modified or withdrawn after the opening of the proposals.
J. Redevelopment may not accept a bid from a person who owes delinquent taxes, special
assessments, penalties, interest or costs directly attributable to a prior tax sale or to an agent of
such a person.
K. All requests for clarification to this solicitation must be received at least one (1) week before the
opening date to allow for the issuance of any addendums determined by the City to be necessary.
A Proposer shall rely only on written addenda issued by Mark Brinson, Community Development
Director. Requests shall be made in writing and may be directed to:

Mark Brinson, Community Development Director
City of Goshen Redevelopment Commission
204 East Jefferson Street, Suite 2
Goshen, Indiana 46528
Telephone: (574) 537-3824
E-Mail: markbrinson@goshencity.com

L. Interpretations or clarifications determined necessary by the City will be issued by addenda mailed,
faxed or otherwise delivered to all parties recorded by the City as having received the proposal
documents. Only questions answered by formal written addenda will be binding. Oral and other
interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect.

M. Each proposal must include a cover letter signed by a person authorized to submit and sign the
proposal. The cover letter shall include the following:

a. The person or entitys name, address, and telephone number;
b. The name of the person authorized to submit/sign the proposal, his/her title,
telephone number and e-mail address; and
c. The person or entitys Federal ID number or last four digits of the social security
number.

N. A conceptual explanation of proposed repairs and improvements, if any, including a plan with as
much detail as possible.
7
O. The person or entity submitting the proposal shall provide a financial statement that is specific
enough so that a proper determination can be made of the person or entitys financial capability to
fulfill the financial obligations of the proposal. The proposal must include financial information
demonstrating the financial ability to carry out proposal.

Estimate of Cost to Bring Real Estate into Compliance

Each proposal for the Fifth Street Building shall provide an estimate of the cost that will be incurred to bring
the premises into compliance with Goshens Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance.

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

A. CONFLICT OF INTEREST / NON-COLLUSION

1. All submitting entities must certify that the entity has not entered into a combination or
agreement relative to the price to be proposed nor taken any action to prevent a person
from submitting a proposal; or to induce a person to refrain from submitting a proposal.
The submitting entitys proposal is made without reference to any other proposal unless
specifically so indicated.
2. All submitting entities certify that they are not in a situation where the submitting entitys
private interest would interfere with its loyalty or responsibilities to the City of Goshen or
raise questions about such interference. The submitting entity agrees not to accept work,
enter into a contract, accept an obligation or engage in any activity, paid or unpaid, that is
inconsistent or incompatible with the submitting entitys obligations, or the scope of
services to be rendered to the Redevelopment Commission. The submitting entity shall
warrant that, to the best of their knowledge, there is no other contract or duty on the
submitting entitys part that conflicts with or is inconsistent with the services sought to be
provided to the Redevelopment Commission.
3. The submitting entity if selected must sign and have notarized the Conflict of Interest /
Non-Collusion Affidavit.

B. APPLICABLE LAWS

Any contract resulting from a proposal submitted will be construed in accordance with and
governed by the laws of the State of Indiana.

C. COSTS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSAL

The City of Goshen or its Redevelopment Commission will not be liable for any costs incurred by
the respondents in replying to this Request for Proposals. The City of Goshen or its
Redevelopment Commission are not liable for any costs for work or services performed by the
selected Proposer prior to the award of a contract.

D. AUTHORITY TO BIND SUBMITTING ENTITY

The signatory for the entity submitting a proposal represents that he or she has been duly
authorized to execute the proposal documents on behalf of the submitting entity and has obtained
all necessary or applicable approvals to make this submission on behalf of entity before affixing his
or her signature to the proposal.
8
EXHIBIT A

THREE PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE

F:\Redevelopment\2 - 2014 Meetings\(2014) 10-14 October\2014 10 01 Memo to Redevelopment re HSIP Phase 2 - Additional funding.doc

MEMORANDUM

TO: Goshen Redevelopment Commission


RE: TWO RAILROAD CROSSING SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
DES. NO. 1400714
GOSHEN PROJECT NO. 2009-0046

DATE: October 1, 2014

The INDOT-LPA Agreement for the Railroad Crossing Safety Improvement Phase 2 - Installation of
Grade Crossing Warning Devices at College Avenue and Jefferson Street was presented and approved at
the September 2014 Redevelopment Commission meeting.

The Redevelopment Commission budgeted $200,000.00 towards Phase 1 of this project in the 2014
budget, and included an additional $75,000.00 towards Phase 2 in the 2015 budget for a total of
$275,000.00.

So far, the Redevelopment Commission has spent $177,226.48 on Phase 1, and in worst case scenario,
there could potentially be up to an additional $5,000.00 needed towards Phase 1.

$275,000.00 Total amount budgeted in 2014/2015
- $182,226.48 Total amount spent for Phase 1
$ 92,773.52 Total amount remaining for Phase 2

In the Highway Safety Improvement Project grant application, the Engineering Department applied for
funding to improve three (3) crossings: Kercher Road, College Avenue and Jefferson Street. Since the
application, we have decided to only do two (2) of the crossings, but the Federal funding allocated to the
project was not reduced. The preliminary engineers estimate is $1,282,222.00 for the design engineering
and construction. So, the 10% local share will be $128,222.00. This would be the most we would have to
contribute and we anticipate that the actual cost will be less.

$128,222.00 Estimated 10% Local Match for Design and Construction of Phase 2
- $ 92,773.52 Amount of Funding Available for Phase 2
$ 35,448.48 Additional Funding Needed

Today, we are requesting consideration and approval from the Redevelopment Commission for the
additional $35,448.52. This would increase the total funding by the Redevelopment Commission to
$310,448.48 for eight (8) railroad crossing safety improvements. The total amount of Federal funds
currently allocated to the two projects is $2,749,038.32.
GosHen
THE MAPLE CITY
'.
Engineering Department
CITY OF GOSHEN
204 East Jefferson Street, Suite I Goshen, IN 46528-3405
Phone (574) 534-220 I Fax (574) 533-8626. TDD (574) 534-3185
engineering@goshencity.com. www.goshenindiana.org
MEMORANDUM
TO: Redevelopment Commission
RE: NORTHWEST BIKE TRAIL
PROJECT NO. 2010-0023
DATE: October 1,2014
After obtaining the topographic survey for the Northwest Bike Trail along the New CR 17
corridor, we discovered some concerns with regards to the location of the trail in relationship to
the drainage swales along the new CR 17. With the proposed new trail construction to be inside
the new CR 17 right-of-way/fence line, some of the drainage swales would need to be filled in or
additional right-of-way purchased along with the new fence relocated. Please see the attached
summary letter from DLZ.
At this point in time, it would be my recommendation to proceed with the new trail along the
east side of the old CR 17. Before proceeding in that direction, we are interested in hearing the
thoughts and ideas of the members of the Redevelopment Commission.
F:\Projects\2010\201O-0023 _ Northwest Bike Path Phase 2\Correspondance\2014.10.01 Memo to RDC re Trail Route.doc
...;~ Z
ARCHITECTURE' ENGINEERING' PLANNING
SURVEYING' CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
September 9, 2014
INNOVATIVE IDEAS
EXCEPTIONAL DESIGN
UNMATCHED CLIENT SERVICE
Mrs. Mary M. Cripe, PE
City Engineer
City of Goshen
204 East Jefferson Street, Suite 100
Goshen, IN 46528
RE: NW Bike Trail- Additional Cost associated with New CR 17 Route
Dear Mrs. Cripe
During the preliminary design of the above referenced trail along (new) CR 17, DLZ has determined that there
is insufficient room from the top of the back slope to the Right of Way fence. Hence, two options for the
proposed alignment of the trail exist. Either acquire additional Right of Way behind the County's limited
access Right of Way, or create an embankment for the proposed trail by filling in the west ditch of (new) CR
17.
Both options have advantages and disadvantages. Obtaining additional Right of Way from the adjacent
property owner (Russell Stark) will be very difficult, he has already indicated at the public meeting and via
written comments (see attachment) that he is very much opposed to this trail along the (new) CR 17. In
addition, his farm was bisected by the construction of (new) CR 17 and he has indicated "We've had enough!
This will be the third experience of government taking charge of our land!" I believe if the City was to pursue
this option, they would have to obtain the land via condemnation.
The remaining option of constructing the trail along (new) CR 17 would be to fill in the west ditch. Based on
preliminary discussions with the Elkhart County Highway Department, they indicated they are not particularly
fond ofthis option. However, they would consider it contingent upon a hydraulic study being completed to
demonstrate that the capacity of the ditch is adequate for both facilities (roadway and trail). To minimize the
impacts to the ditch, it would be desirable to construct the trail as close to the existing fence as possible. In
order to do this, the entire length of the fence would need to be removed and reset, and Temporary Right of
Way would need to be acquired from Mr. Stark. Since temporary Right of Way would be all that is needed
from MR. Stark, he may be amenable to the request.
Regardless of which option is pursued along (new) CR 17, there are costs associated to this route that should
also be taken into consideration. The box culvert for the Huber Powel Ditch will need to be extended to allow
the trail to traverse the ditch. Also, west of (Old) CR 17, wetlands exist as indicated from the delineation
report. To traverse this area without taking substantial Right of Way from Mr. Stark and to limit the impact to
the wetlands, a boardwalk will be required.
825 S Barr St, Fort Wayne, IN 46802-2727 I OFFICE 260.420.3114 I ONLINE WWWDLZ.COM
Akron Arlington Heights Burns Harbor Chicago Cleveland Columbus Detroit Fort Wayne Frankfort Hammond Indianapolis Joliet Kalamazoo Lansing Louisville
Madison Pittsburgh Saint Joseph South Bend Toledo
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING" PLANNING
SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION SERViCES
INNOVATIVE IDEAS
EXCEPTIONAL DESIGN
UNMATCHED CLIENT SERVICE
NW Bike Trail
Additional Cost associated with New CR 17 Route
Page 2 of 2
We have prepared an opinion of probable construction/Right of Way costs associated with the challenges
described above and is summarized below:
Opinion of Probable Construction/Right of Way Costs
for Trail Route along (new) CR 17
Alignment Option
Perm. Temp. Remove/Reset Borrow Hydraulic Box
Boardwalk TOTAL
R/W R/W Fence
lli!!l
Study Culvert Ext.
Permanent Right of
$42,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A $16,000 $250,000 $308,000
Way Acquisition
Embankment /
N/A $10,000 $46,750 $235,000 $20,000 $16,000 $250,000 $577,750
Fill Ditch
The costs shown above were not previously identified in the prior route analysis study/report, since the
survey and preliminary design of the trail were not completed at that time. DLZ desires to provide the best
possible information to the City of Goshen so that an informed and responsible decision can be made.
The previous route study indicated that a savings of $143,300 would be obtained from utilizing the (new) CR
17 route. However, this savings is eliminated as result ofthe design constraints due to permitting,
INDOT/FHWA design requirements, and/or constructability of the trail within existing Right of Way.
Therefore, DLZ recommends that the City of Goshen review the route along (old) CR 17 and give further
consideration to this option.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact
our office.
Sincerely,
t ~ ~
Project Manager
cc: AlG, File
M:\proj\1366\2101\Docs\Letters\2014-09-09 (Cripe) .docx
laDLZ
ENGINEERING. PLAHilllNG
5U'RVEyjNG' .CoNsTRue-rfoM scRvicES
INNOVATIVE IDEAS
EXCEPTIONAL I;lESIGN
UNMATCHED CLIENT SE;RVICE
Northwest Bike Trail
Public Meeting Comment Form
Wednesday May 21st, 2014
-
SIGNATURE:
Please provide your concerns and/or suggestions regarding the proposed construction of the Northwest Trail. Your
comments are important to us and we sincerely appreciate your time and participation during the public involvement
process. Please submit comments by Friday, June 30, 2014. Comments can be mailed/faxed to the address on the
below or e-mailedtonwbiketrail@dlz.com.
NAME: rl.uJ.i (boM. R
I1
MlfY Jtad
ADDRESS: (8'7 t r<. 30
COMMENTS:{J)e..U.e.
Cit /l4r 1<!V.vV l .:tMdt) a, 6lUdUA r:f .'Z:UMHdf' (Uu .
.J::/v;AI'- Ra--}g" * c &- {7 &-/4. FAM' &;;,. 'w-t
2
R c :1a-;> :!.tuu.J, -;:i f'k --1,,-4 .$pff fJl<-d wM;:& ;:br.
/JYl. a L g 1tJ io r:J /fk (fIkt, tlHf r --CJ-hv,.
71ft1A}) Q =fcv6l .-thJ affoJA"- .dAd7-uM (lit: m/dt li4k
COLiN .a-n.,R f'" 'dt... fl..a/
bt.$.a1t0) fa l6.f
f
lM-Zf-J (touR. '6g h-.t* cvt<J.
.dv -o.Jv:J!..2. in- tid :zk:J
ahLI, CtLJ;C&" fk <' w-&-u
Tan 11M. fA 1jz_ a. tyfw4 H w-h;;4 IJ C4hP,dt.! d.. r
iJvnJ-:/
YI
d 'W>. eu.Il/-7 W 4-tJvu,e < >f,U roj 'J0d A pu
P)
111 W Columbia SI, Ste 100, Fort Wayne, IN 468021710 I OFFICE 260.420.3114 I ONLINE WWW.DL2.COM
Akron Ar1ington Heights Burns Harbor ChIcago Cleveland Columbus Detroit Fort Wayne Frankfort Hammond Indianapolis Joliet Kalamazoo lansing Louisvnle
Madison Melvindale Pittsburgh Saint Joseph South Bend Toledo

Memorandum
To: Redevelopment Commission

From: Becky Hershberger

Date: October 14, 2014

RE: Acceptance of Settlement Offer from Salem Insurance for Fire Damage at 405 S. 3
rd
Street
Discussion regarding next steps for the property

In July of this year, the property owned by the Commission at 405 S. 3
rd
Street was damaged by fire,
making the structure uninhabitable. This property is a two-unit residence that has been rented
continuously since it was acquired (see attached map).

The insurance company has offered a settlement of $80,736.99, providing the structure will be
demolished. The settlement offer would increase by $16,848.88, for a total settlement of $97,585.87, if
the structure will be restored.

This area was identified by the Millrace Advisory Group as a potential redevelopment area and
marketing is anticipated following the completion of the current developments in this area. Of the four
houses in this half block, one has already been demolished and it is anticipated that all houses within this
half block would be demolished at the time of marketing to allow for new construction.

The recommendation to the Commission is to accept the offer of $80,736.99 and demolish the structure.
The insurance company estimated the cost for replacement to be approximately $107,000.00. Based on
an average monthly rental income of $1,500.00, it would take quite some time to break even on that
investment. With redevelopment planned for this area within the next few years, investing into the
property with such a small return does not make sense.

3
R
D

S
T
R
E
E
T
MADISON STREET
MONROE STREET
MADISON STREET
MONROE STREET
405 S. 3rd Street
Fire Damaged Property
2013
Aerial Photo
0 50 100 25
Feet
1 inch =100 feet
The City of Goshen's Digital Data is the property of the City of Goshen and Elkhart County, Indiana. All graphic data supplied by the city and county
has been derived from public records that are constantly undergoing change and is not warranted for content or accuracy. The city and county
do not guarantee the positional or thematic accuracy of the data. The cartographic digital files are not a legal representation of any of the features
depicted, and the city and county disclaimany sumption of the legal status they represent. Any implied warranties, including warranties of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, shall be expressly excluded. The data represents an actual reproduction of data contained in the
city's or county's computer files. This data may be incomplete or inaccurate, and is subject to modifications and changes. City of Goshen and
Elkhart County cannot be held liable for errors or omissions in the data. The recipient's use and reliance upon such data is at the recipient's risk.
By using this data, the recipient agrees to protect, hold harmless and indemnify the City of Goshen and Elkhart County and its employees and
officers. This indemnity covers reasonable attorney fees and all court costs associated with the defense of the city and county arising out of this
disclaimer.
The City of Goshen
Department of
Community Development
204 East J efferson Street, Goshen, Indiana 46528
Phone: 574-537-3824 Fax: 574-533-8626

Memorandum



RE: Request to approve reimbursement to Goshen Brewing Company for redevelopment costs
related to utility extensions at 315 W. Washington Street (NIPSCO Building)

As part of the Lease Agreement for the NIPSCO building at 315 W. Washington Street with Goshen
Brewing Company, Redevelopment committed to the extension of sewer, water, gas and electric to the
building up to $20,000. During the development of the parking lot, water and gas were extended to the
building site but stubbed just short of the building. Sewer was extended to the site and a line was run into the
building. Electric was not addressed as part of the parking lot project.

To date, Goshen Brewing Company has spent $18,066 on costs related to extending the electrical service.
These costs include providing wiring and conduit from the main distribution panel to the new transformer
pad and from the transformer pad to the NIPSCO pole. The costs also include removal and replacement of
concrete to allow for conduit to be installed to the building and the costs to grade, form and pour the new
transformer pad that was required.

NIPSCO is requiring a $14,928.68 deposit from Goshen Brewing Company which will be returned to them
when the electrical meter is installed and turned on and that cost is NOT included in the reimbursement
request.

Goshen Brewing Company is requesting reimbursement for the $18,066 they have paid to date related to
extending electric to the building and Staff recommends the Commission approve the reimbursement request.

Memorandum



RE: Request to Authorize Negotiation & Execution of a Contract for Asbestos Assessment with
TecServ Environmental, Inc.

There are four (4) residential homes owned by the Commission that need to be demolished to allow for
the construction of the parking lot east of the Hawks Building between Madison Street and Jefferson
Street. A map of the properties is attached. All four (4) homes are currently occupied and will be
through December 31
st
. During that time, we plan to complete the required asbestos assessments so that
we can proceed with any necessary abatement after the first of the year. The demolition of the structures
is already part of C&Es contract. We requested three (3) quotes for the assessment work and they are as
follows:
TecServ Environmental, Inc. - $2,520.00
Diamond Environmental Services, Inc. - $2,700.00
ACM Engineering & Environmental Services - $4,960.00
We are requesting permission from the Commission to authorize the negotiation and execution of a
contract with TecServ Environmental, Inc. to complete the assessments at the four (4) properties per the
attached quote with a not-to-exceed price of $2,520. If approved, we will bring back the executed
contract for ratification at next months meeting.
3
R
D

S
T
R
E
E
T
JEFFERSON STREET
301 - 307 S. 3rd Street
Properties Slated for Demolition in February 2015
2013
Aerial Photo
0 30 60 15
Feet
1 inch =50 feet
The City of Goshen's Digital Data is the property of the City of Goshen and Elkhart County, Indiana. All graphic data supplied by the city and county
has been derived from public records that are constantly undergoing change and is not warranted for content or accuracy. The city and county
do not guarantee the positional or thematic accuracy of the data. The cartographic digital files are not a legal representation of any of the features
depicted, and the city and county disclaimany sumption of the legal status they represent. Any implied warranties, including warranties of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, shall be expressly excluded. The data represents an actual reproduction of data contained in the
city's or county's computer files. This data may be incomplete or inaccurate, and is subject to modifications and changes. City of Goshen and
Elkhart County cannot be held liable for errors or omissions in the data. The recipient's use and reliance upon such data is at the recipient's risk.
By using this data, the recipient agrees to protect, hold harmless and indemnify the City of Goshen and Elkhart County and its employees and
officers. This indemnity covers reasonable attorney fees and all court costs associated with the defense of the city and county arising out of this
disclaimer.
The City of Goshen
Department of
Community Development
204 East J efferson Street, Goshen, Indiana 46528
Phone: 574-537-3824 Fax: 574-533-8626
TecServ ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Technical Expertise in Environmental and Safety Services

October 7, 2014

Ms. Becky Hershberger
Brownfield Coordinator
City of Goshen RE: Proposal for Asbestos Inspections
204 E. Jefferson Street, Suite 2 301, 303, 305, and 307 S. 3
rd
Street
Goshen, Indiana 46528 Goshen, IN

Dear Ms. Hershberger:

Thank you for allowing TecServ Environmental, Inc. the opportunity to present another of our environmental
services to you and the City of Goshen. We are pleased to submit the following proposals. Based upon our
observations at the above referenced locations, our quotation for the asbestos inspections are as follows:

1. Approximately 65 to 75 individual samples (with mastic on floor tile) will be taken from throughout
the buildings.
2. Approximately one (1) day will be required to gather the asbestos samples from the buildings.
3. Three (3) to five (5) days will be required for the laboratory analytical to be completed with faxed
copies. A written report will be generated to indicate the materials that contain asbestos and their
location within the buildings.
4. The cost to complete the inspection is as follows:
301 S. 3
rd
Street $ 580.00
303 S. 3
rd
Street $ 580.00
305 S. 3
rd
Street $ 580.00
307 S. 3
rd
Street $ 780.00
$2,520.00
5. The inspection can be performed with the occupants. Notification should be made to the current
occupants that holes will be opened in the walls.
6. Inspections can be commenced the week of November 1, 2014.
7. Point counting lab analysis is $125.00 per sample. This will only be accomplished with your approval
in advance.

Thank you for the opportunity to present you with this proposal. Should you have any further questions or if you
would like to meet to review this proposal further, please do not hesitate to contact me at (574) 259-4022.

Sincerely, Approved by:

TecServ Environmental, Inc. _________________________________
Position:
Dennis I. Carter _________________________________

Date:_____________________________
.......
TeeS......
r ~ r e r v
.. ,.
RESOLUTION 105-2014

Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Contract
for Asbestos Assessment with TecServ Environmental, Inc. for
301, 303, 305 & 307 S. Third Street, Goshen, Indiana

WHEREAS the Redevelopment Commission owns four residential homes that need to be demolished to
allow for the construction of a parking lot east of the Hawks Building between Madison Street and Jefferson
Street; and

WHEREAS three quotes for asbestos assessment work were requested and are as follows:
TecServ Environmental, Inc. - $2,520.00;
Diamond Environmental Services, Inc. - $2,700.00; and
ACM Engineering & Environmental Services - $4,960.00.

WHEREAS it is requested that Goshen Redevelopment Commission authorize City staff to negotiate a
Contract with TecServ Environmental, Inc. for the Asbestos Assessment for 301, 303, 305 & 307 S. Third
Street, Goshen, Indiana.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Goshen Redevelopment Commission that:

1. City staff is authorized to negotiate a Contract on behalf of the City of Goshen and the Goshen
Redevelopment Commission with TecServ Environmental, Inc. that is consistent with their quote
for a not-to-exceed price of $2,520.00.

2. The City of Goshen Legal Department shall prepare a written Contract to be executed by the City
of Goshen for these services.

3. The Contract shall be presented to the Redevelopment Commission for ratification at a subsequent
Redevelopment Commission meeting.




RESOLUTION 106-2014

Approve and Authorize Execution of the Bridge & MSE Wall Location
Memo of Understanding (MOU) for the US 33 Bypass over Norfolk South Railways

WHEREAS the State of Indianas Department of Transportation, Norfolk Southern Railways and the City of
Goshen are working together on the Marion Line Curve Realignment project; and

WHEREAS Redevelopment has agreed to fund the acquisition of 117 and 119 South Ninth Street as part of
this project; and

WHEREAS the Memo of Understanding attached to this Resolution sets forth the partnership between the
State of Indianas Department of Transportation, Norfolk Southern Railways and the City of Goshen for this
portion of the project as well as sets forth the work items for each entity in Exhibit A.


1. The terms and conditions of the Memo of Understanding as attached to this Resolution are approved.

2. Community Development Director Mark Brinson is authorized to execute the Memo of Understanding
between the State of Indianas Department of Transportation, Norfolk Southern Railways and the City
of Goshen on behalf of the City of Goshen and the Goshen Redevelopment Commission.

PASSED and ADOPTED on September 9, 2014.



US 33 Bypass over Norfolk Southern Railways
Bridge & MSE Wall Location Memo of Understanding (MOU)
(Option GA)
This MOU between the State of Indiana's Department of Transportation (INDOT), Norfolk Southern
Railways, and the City of Goshen, Indiana is based on the previous teleconference meeting on May 26,
20014, all parties agreed to look into Option 6 again with some variations. Norfolk Southern agreed to
review these sub-options and determine the most cost effective approach based on speed (from a
commerce point of view), ROW acquisition, maintenance, and reduction of the length of the structure.
The quantities are based on the pay items that will be affected due to the lengthening/shortening of the
bridge between US 33 Bypass project stations 36+50 and 40+00. All differential costs are established
from Option 4, which was the "base option" used by INDOT for the funding of the project initially.
The first option, which was proposed by Norfolk Southern Railways, would change the degree of curve
from 9 to 10 degrees with new and future track alignments straddling the base curve. The second option
would build the 9 degree curve and call it "the relocated track" until a future track is needed along the
Marion Line. A concentric or non-concentric track would be built to the west; this would replace the
"relocated track" and the "existing relocated track" would be reconfigured as the future track, which in
turn, would connect with a future track which parallels the Chicago Line. This option may save ROW
acquisition costs and reduce the bridge length compared to the previous option, but Norfolk Southern's
cost of reconfiguring the tracks would increase due to a second track reconfiguration.
Norfolk Southern has reviewed both options and provided Option 6A, which like the second option,
would build the relocated track as a 9 degree curve until a future track is needed along the Marion Line.
Once a future track is required, a non-concentric track would be built to the east; this would replace the
relocated Marion Line track and the existing relocated track would be reconfigured as the future track,
which in turn, would connect with a future track which parallels the Chicago Line. This option allows the
same bridge footprint to be used for the relocated track and the reconfiguration when the demand for a
two track system along the Marion Line is required. These options also maintain a 25 foot offset for the
relocated track (initial configuration) as well as the reconfigured future track alignments (final
configuration). However, the placement of the eastern end bent with respect to the existing Marion
Line track would require Norfolk Southern grant INDOT an exception that would allow for an offset of
less than 25 feet, if the US 33 bypass project is constructed prior to the relocation of the Marion Line
track.
Although Option 6A reduces the length of the bridge by 8 feet, for a cost reduction of $38,705, the
increase over the initial base option would still be $548,494.
Under "Code of Federal Regulations (CFRY', Title 23, Chapter 1, Subchapter G, Part 646, Subpart B,
Section 646.212 "Federal Share", paragraph 3 states that the cost of a grade separation project shall be
based on the cost to provide horizontal and/or vertical clearances used by the railroad in its normal
practice subject to limitations. For Option 6A to be executed, Norfolk Southern Railways will be required
to provide a reasonable time table for the relocation of the Marion Line Branch to show that the length
of the bridge and location of the western abutment is mandated.
Based on the City of Goshen's and Norfolk Southern's "Opinion of Probable Capital Construction Costs"
and CFR Title 23, Chapter 1, Subchapter G, Part 646, Subpart B, Section 646.212 "Federal Share",
paragraph 2 and 3, the table should also include the differential costs between Option 4 (base option)
and Option 6A. There should also be additional items showing the "long-term" track maintenance cost
savings for the newly aligned track as well as the costs savings for the closure of two crossings (one on
the mainline and one on the Marion Branch Line), which may have a life cycle cost savings in excess of
the $410,235 initial cost. Furthermore, in no case shall Norfolk Southern's costs for reconfiguration of a
two track system along the Marion Line Branch be imposed on either the State of Indiana or the City of
Goshen.
In summary, this would make the State's costs for the additional track realignment approximately
$548,494 and allow for the additional costs of the guideway and track elements, under CFR Title 23,
Chapter 1, Subchapter G, Part 646, Subpart B, Section 646.212 "Federal Share", paragraph 1, to be
divided between the City of Goshen and Norfolk Southern.
Though the amounts may not be equally divided, this MOU shows a true partnership between all three
entities.
By signing this MOU, all parties are in agreement with Option 6A for both the footprint of the bridge and
location of MSE walls and their clearances associated with existing, relocated, and future track
configurations. In addition, the City of Goshen and Norfolk Southern Railways agree that all additional
costs associated with the "Opinion of Probable Capital Construction Costs", guideway and track
elements, will be partitioned among themselves and in no way will the State of Indiana (INDOT) nor the
Federal Government (FHWA) participate in such costs per CFR Title 23, Chapter 1, Subchapter G, Part
646, Subpart B, Section 646.212. Furthermore, Norfolk Southern Railways agrees to proceed and
complete the relocation of the Marion Line Branch either prior to the commencement of construction
activities for the US 33 project, Des. No. 9222424, anticipated to begin on December 1, 2015, or within 2
years after the completion of construction activities for the US 33 project, anticipated to be December 1,
2017, per CFR Title 23, Chapter 1, Subchapter G, Part 646, Subpart B, Section 646.212 "Federal Share",
paragraph 3, so that all parties can execute Option 6A and justify the location of the western abutment,
MSE walls, and length of the structure.
<Remainder of page left intentionally blank>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be executed by their
proper officers thereunto duly authorized.
[City of Goshen
By: _
Printed _
Title _
******************************************************************************
ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR CITY OF GOSHEN INDIANA
State of , County of _
On this __day of -',20, I, there appeared before me, a Notary Public in
and for said County, _
who being by me severally duly sworn did say that they are the
_____________________of The City of Goshen Indiana, and
that said Agreement was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation and acknowledged the
same to be the free act and deed of the said !City of Goshen Indiana.
I
Witness my hand and seal this __day of , 20,-:_-----<
My Commission Expires: _
Date
(Seal)
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Notary Public
By: _
Printed _
Title _
******************************************************************************
ACKNOWLEDGMENT for Norfolk Southern Railway Company
State of , County of , SS:
On this __day of -', 2 ~ there appeared before me, a Notary Public in
and for said County, and
______________________who being by me severally duly sworn
did say that they are the and
respectively, of Norfolk
Southern Railway Company, a corporation of '
and that said Agreement was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation and acknowledged
the same to be the free act and deed of the said iNorfolk Southern Railway Company.
Witness my hand and seal this __day of , 2 q f _ ~
Date
(Seal)
STATE OF INDIANA
Notary Public
laDLZ
RECOMMENDED
"' G" FORAPPROVAL __-----;;:===-_------;::;-;c:;:;=-I
0' DESIGN ENGINEER

G DLZ INDIANA LLC CHECKED: CHECKED:
INDIANA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OPTION 6A
EXISTING AND RELOCATION - STAGE 1
VERTICAL SCALE
SURVEY BOOK
ELECTRONIC
CONTRACT
IR-30D87
1382D74
SHEETS
of 28
PROJECT
9222424
of 26
9222424
SHEETS
PROJECT
IR-30087
CONTRACT
ELECTRDNIC
SURVEY BOOK
VERTICAL SCALE
INDIANA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OPTION 6A
RELOCATION AND FUTURE - STAGE 2
CHECKED
RECOMMENDED
G" FORAPPROVAL __
0' DESIGN ENGINEER
S' ======+:DRA=WN::::========11

G DlZ INDIANA LLC CHECKED:

Quantities which change between stations 36+50 - 40+00
*Option 4 Option 6 Option 6A
Existing - No Future Existing & Relo - No Future Existing & Relo - No Future
Span Length =130'-6
11
Span Length =184
1
-0" Span Length =176'-0"
Pay Item Description Units Bid Price Quantity Unit Extension Alt Quantity Unit Extension Alt Quantity Unit Extension Alt
704-51002 concrete1 c1 superstructure CY 629.81 390.00 2451 625.90 470.00 2961 010.70 460.00 2891 712.60
711-51038 strucutral steel LBS 1.70 1931 930.00 5181 970.00 8821 249.00 4851 040.00. 8241 568.00
707-06524 structural members1 concrete bulb-t beam1 60 LF 265.20 652.50 1731 043.00
211-09266 structural backfilt type 3 CY 24.35 91 750.00 237A12.50 71 310.00 1771 998.50 71 670.00 1861 764.50
211-02050 b borrow CY 15.68 2637.00 411 348.16 2016.00 311 610.88 2105.00 331 006.40
731-93945 face pa nels1 concrete SF 12.34 161 689.00 2051 942.26 131 327.00 164A55.18 131 819.00 1701 526.46
731-93946 wall erection SF 5.92 161 689.00 981 798.88 131 327.00 781 895.84 131 819.00 811 808.48
731-93947 leveling pad1 concrete LF 50.00 569.33 28A66.39 460.85 231 042.65 476.72 231 836.04
706-08496 reinforced concrete moment slab SY 230.47 432.14 991 595.10 323.66 741 594.93 339.53 781 251.99
asphalt pavement SY 38.56 1198.74 461 223.39 902.42 341 797.36 945.93 36A75.16
**Comparative Probable Cost: *Total = 1,176,455.57 Total = 1,763,655.04 Total = 1,724,949.62
Note:
1) *This option would allow for a reduction of the entire fill height of the elevated portion of the roadway to be reduced as much as 1 ft. This reduction has not been account for
in the cost above.
2) **None of the Comparative Probable Costs account for added track work1 railroad engineering1 railroad force account1 etc.
The quantities are based on the pay items which will be affected due to the lengthening/shortening of the bridge between stations 36+50 and 40+00. All differential
costs are established off OptHon 4, which was the IIbase optionll_used by INDOT for the funding of the project initally.
Option 41 Existing spur track "onlyll - no future track; Option G1 Existing spur track with relocation of existing spur alignment (20 mph1 9 degree curve); Option GA,
Existing spur track with relocation of existing spur alignment and future alignment (20 mph1 11 degree curve). Cost differentials are as follows:
Option 4, existing spur track "only" - no future track, reduction in cost =
Option 6, existing spur track and relocation track alignment (initally proposed), increase in cost =
Option 6 A, existing spur track and relocated and future track alignments, increase in cost =
Cost savings between Option 6A & Option 6 =
-0- Base Option (project was funded on)
+$587,199.48
+$548,494.06 Option which Norfolk Southern is suggesting -similar footprint
$38,705.42

Memorandum



RE: Millrace Canal - Vegetation Maintenance

As we get closer to construction of the residential along the Millrace, weve revived the discussion regarding
what we can do to improve the aesthetics of the canal. This is something that our Millrace Advisory group
discussed a few years ago and we even went so far as to invite Aquatic Weed Control to one of our meetings.
With the levee issues that exist, we know we are limited on what we can do without exacerbating other
problems (i.e. increasing the speed of the canal could result in a breech). In trying to think ahead to next
spring when developers are trying to sell their newly constructed homes, we invited Jim Donahue with
Aquatic Weed Control to stop in and talk with us.

Since that time, he has walked the canal and taken a look at the vegetation that is currently thriving beneath
the water. Hes thought up a few options that would provide benefit.

He does not recommend harvesting the vegetation. He explained that it essentially cuts the weeds like a
mower and, wherever the cut vegetation lands within the canal, it will regrow. With the cost of doing this and
the result wed achieve, it doesnt seem like a good option.

He is recommending that we treat the emergent vegetation (the shoreline plants such as cattails and lilies)
annually in the fall. It wont kill them off forever but will help minimize their presence throughout the year.
This would not affect the vegetation on the banks but only the plants that grow beneath the water and stick
out above. The cost to treat the entire length of the canal would be $1,500 and by only doing it once a year,
were not eliminating the habitat that these areas create for what exists within the canal (fish, turtles, etc)
just controlling it to prevent it from becoming too dense.

He is also recommending that we treat the submerged plants once annually in the spring. These are the plants
that are rooted in the canal and that you see as you look down when walking across our pedestrian bridges.
This treatment would also treat the floating plants such as duckweed that have spread widely this year.
Again, by doing this once annually, it wouldnt kill the species off forever but would help us control their
growth. The process for this is to stop the flow of the canal in April-May essentially turning the canal into a
pond for that time. Everything that lives in the canal will survive the treatment (except the vegetation) and
we would not be draining it. By completing this treatment, wed allow the canal to continue to flow at a
healthy rate to limit the growth of the green slime that plagues it every summer. Whats happening is that the

vegetation beneath the surface is slowing the flow and allowing the green stuff to thrive. The cost for this
treatment would be $7,900 and would treat the entire canal. Jim with Aquatic Weed Control has talked with
DNR about holding the water during our spawning season and they have no objection to this. The reality is
that most people in the community may not even notice the month long ponding as the flow is so slow
anyway. There would be signs posted along the canal during this period, however, to inform people of what
is being done.

The vegetation growth within the canal is much more so than in the previous years but weve drained the
canal for one reason or another for the past several years. We did not do so this year and, as a result, there
was never a time when the lack of water deterred the growth of the vegetation. What we have now is a canal
full of plants that are taking over and slowing down our already very slow moving flow. If left untreated,
were going to end up with a canal that continues to deteriorate.

From a community perspective, I would anticipate that were going to have people that both support and
oppose this work. The proposed treatment will not eliminate all vegetation growth forever but simply keep it
in check so we can maintain what so many consider an amenity. Weve also confirmed that, although
utilizing chemicals, they will not harm the fish and other creatures within the canal.

We do not envision that this is a cost to be bore by the Commission long-term. Our immediate need is to
improve the aesthetics as the new developments are being constructed in our River Race Redevelopment
Area. Beyond that, we have discussed different options with the Mayor and will continue to explore
possibilities for long-term funding for canal maintenance.

Aquatic Weed Control will be providing us with a quote for the fall emergent vegetation treatment on
Monday, October 13
th
, and we will be bringing that to the Commission at Tuesdays meeting. We will be
asking for the Commissions authorization to negotiate and execute an agreement at that time. We will also
continue gathering more information about the spring treatment and that will be provided to the Commission
as well as it becomes available.

RESOLUTION 107-2014

Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Contract
with Aquatic Weed Control for Vegetation Maintenance for the Millrace Canal

WHEREAS the vegetation growth within the Millrace Canal is higher than normal due to canal not being
drained to allow the lack of water to deter the growth of the vegetation this year; and

WHEREAS the canal is now full of plants that are taking over and slowing down the already very slow
moving flow and if left untreated, the canal will continue to deteriorate; and

WHEREAS the immediate need is to improve the aesthetics as the new developments are being
constructed in the River Race Redevelopment Area; and

WHEREAS it is requested that Goshen Redevelopment Commission authorize City staff to negotiate a
Contract with Aquatic Weed Control for the vegetation maintenance of the Millrace Canal.


1. City staff is authorized to negotiate a Contract on behalf of the City of Goshen and the Goshen
Redevelopment Commission with Aquatic Weed Control for vegetation maintenance of the Millrace
Canal that is consistent with their quote.

2. The City of Goshen Legal Department shall prepare a written Contract to be executed by the City
of Goshen for these services.

3. The Contract shall be presented to the Redevelopment Commission for ratification at a subsequent
Redevelopment Commission meeting.




RESOLUTION 108-2014

Consent to Assignment of Agreement for the Lease and Development
of Real Estate at 315 W. Washington Street
by Goshen Brewing Company to 1
st
Source Bank

WHEREAS the City of Goshen and Goshen Brewing Company entered into an Agreement for the Lease
and Development of Real Estate on October 31, 2013 and amended the Agreement on February 11, 2014;
and

WHEREAS Goshen Brewing Company desires to enter into a Loan and Security Agreement with 1
st
Source
Bank and agrees to assign its interest in the Lease to the Bank.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Goshen Redevelopment Commission consents to the
Assignment by Goshen Brewing Company to 1
st
Source Bank of Goshen Brewing Companys interest in
the Lease between the City of Goshen and Goshen Brewing Company dated October 13, 2013.




ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE BY LESSEE
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: I ST SOURCE BANK
Commercial Loan Services
P. O. Box 1602
South Bend, Indiana 46634
GOSHEN BREWING COMPANY ("'Customer") has entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the HSecurity Agreement"") dated
_---:---,_.....,....-:-::-_----=with 1st Source Bank (HBank"). Pursuant to the Security Agreemcnt, Customer has granted to Bank a lien and security intercst
under the Uniform Commcrcial Code in certain "Collateral" as defined in the Security Agreement. This Assignment of Lease constitutes an
amcndment to and a part of the Security Agreement, and shall be subject and governed in all respects accordingly.
I. Customer hereby grants and assigns to Bank all ofCustomer's right, title and interest, and confirms that it ~ grantcd Bank a security interest, in and
to the leases described on attached Exhibit A together with all future leases relating to all or any portion of the property described therein. and all
schedules and amendments to the leases and together with all licenses, permits, agreements and contracts relating to the property or any portion of it
subject to those leases (together, the "Lease"), for the purpose of securing thc payment of all monetary and non-monetary obligations of Customcr
under the Sccurity Agreement.
2. Unless and until an event ofdefault occurs and Bank exercises its rights as described in the following paragraph, Customer may continue to have
and exercise all rights as lcssee under the Lease. Customer shall not, without Bank's prior written consent, modifY the terms or provisions of the
Lease.
3. Upon and after any default by Customer under the terms of the Security Agreement, Bank shall have (and Customer hereby irrevocably grants to
Bank) full power and authority, either in its own name or in the name of Customer, to take possession of the property subject to the Lease and
exercise any or all rights of Customer under the Lease, and to take all legal or other proceedings which Customer could have taken but for this
Assignment. However, Customer shall remain liable to observe and perform all of the covenants and obligations under the Lease and Bank shall
not be required or liable to perform any of the obligations of Customer under the Lease.
4. Customer indemnifies and holds harmless the Bank, its successors and assigns from any liabilities, losses, costs and expenses (including legal
fees) arising from the Lessee's defenses, counter claims or oJTsets based on any actual failure on Customer's part to fulfill its obligations to the
lessor arising under the Lease or otherwise.
5. Customer warrants that: (a) Customer has full right, power and authority to execute this Assignment: (b) the Lease is genuine and enforceable; (c) the Lease is the
only lease of the subject property and is and will continue to be free from defenses and offsets; (d) except for this Assignment. the Lease has not been otherwise
assigned or encumbered, nor will it be, so long as this Assignment is in effect; (e) all statements contained in the Lease are true and correct; (f) the Lease transaction
conforms to all applicable laws and regulations; (g) the Lease and this Assignment are effective against all persons; (h) iffilingorrccording is required or pemlitted by
law, the Lease or a Memorandum of the Lease has been so filed or recorded as to be effective against all persons; (i) no consent or approval of any third party which
has not been obtained in writing and delivered to Bank is required in connection with this Assignment.
Executcd on _
1st Source Bank
By: _
James Story, Business Banker
Assignment of Lease - Lessee 2-10-2008
CUSTOMER: GOSHEN BREWING COMPANY
By: _
By: _
By: _
By: _
Page 1 of 3
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
) 55:
)
The foregoing Assignment was acknowledged before me this __day of,..- --'. by _
GOSHEN BREWING COMPANY. an Indiana Corporation, on behalf of the company.
[SEAL]
(Signature)
____________, Notary Public
(Print Name)
Res. Of County, __
CONSENT
of
The undersigned lessor hereby consents to the assignment by GOSHEN BREWING COMPANY ("Customer") to Ist Source Bank of Customer's
interest as lessee in the lease between the undersigned and Customer dated October 31, 2013.
Dated this day of _
LESSOR: CITY OF GOSHEN
8y: _
8y:__-,-- _
Jeremy Stutsman, Secretary
I affirm. under the penalties for perjury, that I have taken rea';onable care to redact each Social Security number in this document, unless required by law.
.Jennifer Ramirez, Assistant Vice PresidenL
This instrument prepared by .Jennifer Ramirez, Assistant Vice President, on behalfof 1st Source Bank, 100N. Michigan Street, South 8end, Indiana 4660 I
Assignment of Lease - Lessee 2-10-2008 Page 2 of 3
EXHJDITA
LEASE DESCRIPTION
Agreement for the Lease and Development of Real Estate dated October 31, 20 I3 by and between City of Goshen, a municipal corporation and
political subdivision of the State of Indiana acting through the Goshen Redevelopment Commission, and Goshen Brewing Company for property
located at 315 W_ Washington St, Goshen, IN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SEE EXHIBIT BATTACHED
Assignment of Lease - Lessee 2-10-2008 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 13
REAL ESTATE
In consideration of the terms, covenants and conditions to be kept and performed by the respective parties,
Redevelopment agrees to lease to Brewery and Brewery agrees to lease from Redevelopment the following real
estate located in Elkhart Township, Elkhart County, Indiana, commonly described as 315 West Washington Street.
Goshen, Indiana.
Part of Elkhart County Parcel #20-11-09-329-006.000-015.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LEASE AREA
0.254 OF ANACRE
315 W. WASHINGTON STREET, GOSHEN
APART LOT 263, APART OF LOT 264, APART OF THE VACATED ALLEY LYING EAST OF
SAID LOT 263, AND APART OF THE VACATED WASHINGTON STREET RIGHT OF WAY AS
SAID LOTS, ALLEY, AND RIGHT OF WAY ARE KNOWN AND DESIGNATED ON THE PLAT OF
ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE TOWN (NOW CITY) OF GOSHEN, INDIANA AND BEING APART OF
THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 6EAST, ELKHART
TOWNSHIP, CITY OF GOSHEN, ELKHART COUNTY, INDIANA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 258 IN THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE
TOWN (NOW CITY) OF GOSHEN, INDIANA; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 00
SECONDS WEST, ADISTANCE OF 45.75 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE
ARC OF A406.53 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, A
DISTANCE OF 29.66 FEET (CHORD BEARING NORTH 14 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 23
SECONDS WEST, CHORD DISTANCE 29.66 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 40
MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, ADISTANCE OF 6.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 37.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST,
ADISTANCE OF 32.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 13 SECONDS
WEST, ADISTANCE OF 70.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 36
SECONDS WEST, ADISTANCE OF 78.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A9.80
FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 9.80 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, ADISTANCE OF
15.39 FEET (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 45 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST,
CHORD DISTANCE 13.85 FEET) TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE
SOUTH 00 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 51 SECONDS WEST, ADISTANCE OF 20.04 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST, ADISTANCE OF 4.94 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 00 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST, ADISTANCE OF 75.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 60 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, ADISTANCE OF 25.19
FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A13.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT,
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
13.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, ADISTANCE OF 7.01 FEET (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 75
DEGREES 15 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, CHORD DISTANCE 6.93 FEET) TO THE POINT
OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 54 SECONDS
EAST, ADISTANCE OF 44.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A5.80 FOOT RADIUS
CURVE TO THE LEFT, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID 5.80 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, ADISTANCE OF 9.06 FEET (CHORD
BEARING NORTH 45 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, CHORD DISTANCE 8.17
FEET) TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 19
MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST, ADISTANCE OF 5.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 40
MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, ADISTANCE OF 37.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THIS DESCRIPTION CONTAINING 0.254 OF AN ACRE, MORE OR LESS, BEING SUBJECT
TO ALL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD.
CONSOLIDATED RIVER RACE I US 33 TIF DISTRICT
5YEAR PROJECT FUNDING PLAN
SUMMARY
Funds Available for Budget Period 2014 -2019 $14,940,671.39
Less Estimated Budget Expenses -2014-2019 $4,350,326.92
Funds Available to Fund Projects - 2014 -2019 $10,590,344.47
Total Estimated Project Costs - 2014 - 2019 $9,760,969.00
Balance of Federal Funds Fronted to be Reimbursed -2014 -2019 $72,000.00
Total Project Costs and Up Front Federal Funds - 2014 - 2019 $9,832,969.00
Estimated Five Year Cash Surplus $757,375.47
Date Printed: 1!Y1Y2014
CONSOLIDATED RIVER RACE/US 33 TIF DISTRICT
5YEAR PROJECT FUNDING PLAN - HIGHEST RANKED PROJECTS WITH ESTIMATED COSTS
Estimated Costs
Project Description 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Five Year Totals
Local Funds Federal Funds Total local Funds Federal Funds Total local Funds Federal Funds Total Local Funds Federal Funds Total Local Funds Federal Funds Total Local Funds Federal Funds Total local Funds Federal Funds Total
River Race Drive Construction Design Wort 535,000.00 535,000.00 50.00 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S35,000.00 SO.OO S35,000.00
&
Site Improvements
Ri9ht of Way &Acquisition SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00
Dougtas 10 Jefferson Consb'uction &Inspection S1,750,000.00 SI,750,000.00 5300,000.00 5300,000.00 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S2,050,000.00 SO.OO 52,050,000,00
Hawks Building DesignWoric SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Asbestos Abalement &Parking
Right of Way &Acquisition SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Lot between Madison &
Washington Construction &Inspection S50,000.00 S50,000.00 S225,000.00 S225,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 5275,000.00 SO.OO S275,000.00
Hawks Building
Design Wort SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO
Loan 10 LaCasa/Hawks 1886 Right of Way &Acquisition SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO
for Exterior tmprovements
Construction &Inspection S400,000.00 \400,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50,00 S400,000.00 SO.OO \400,000.00
DesignWor1( SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO. 00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Miscellaneous Paving Projecls
Right of Way &hquisition SO. 00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO
(up to S200,000Iyear)
Construction &Inspection SO.OO S400,000.00 5400,000.00 S200,000.00 5200,000.00 S200,000.00 S200,000.00 S200,000.00 S200,000.00 SO.OO SI,OOO,OOO.OO SO.OO S1,000,000.00
Steury Avenue Area Drainage
Design Wort SI00,000.00 SI00,000.00 50.00 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO S100,000.00 SO.OO SI00,000.00
Improvements &Lincoln Right of Way &Acquisition S350,000.00 5350,000.00 SI00,000.00 SI00,000.00 SI00,000.00 SI00,000,00 $100,000.00 5100,000.00 5100,000.00 5100,000.00 SO.OO S750,000.00 50.00 S750,000.00
Avenue Real Estale Acquisition
Construction &Inspection SO.OO S675,000.00 S675,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SI,OOO,OOO.OO SI,OOO,OOO.OO SI,OOO,OOO.OO 5675,000.00 51,675,000.00
Railroad Crossing DesignWor1c SI0,000.00 S90,000.00 SI00,000.00 SI0,000.00 S90,000.00 SI00,000.00 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO S20,000.00 SI80,000.00 S200,000.00
Improvements
Right of Way &h.quisition SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 50.00 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Phase 1(2014);
Phase 2(201412015) Construction &Inspection S171,747.00 SI,545,721.00 SI,717,468.00 SI18,222.00 SI,064,000.00 SI,182,222.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S289,969.00 S2,609,721.00 S2,899,690.00
Design Work SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Marion Branch Curve Re-
Right of Way &Acquisition SO,OO S300,000.00 S300,000,00
Alignmenl
50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 5300,000.00 SO.OO S300,000.00
Construction &Inspection SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Design Work S200,000.00 S200,000.00 584,000.00 S84,000.00 S50,000.00 S50,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S334,000.00 SO.OO S334,000.00
Northwest Bike Trail
Phase
Right of Way &Acquisition SO.OO S200,000.00 S200,000.00 1400,000.00 S400,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S600,000.00 SO.OO S600,000.00
Construction &Inspection SO.OO SO. 00 SO.OO 5484>000,09 $1;938,000,00 5V!.2IiMii.oo SO.OO SO.OO S484,000.00 SI,936,000.00 S2,420,000.00
Design Work 520,000.00 S50,000.00 SI00,000.00 SI00,000.00 SI00,000.00 SI00,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S220,000.00 SO.OO S220,000.00
9th Siormwaler
SO.OO SO.OO
Improvements
Ri9ht of Way &Acquisition SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Construction &Inspection SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SI,OOO,OOO.OO SI,OOO,OOO.OO S1,000,000.00 SO.OO SI,OOO,ooo.oo
Rail Spur
Design Work SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Genesis Products Sile Right of Way &Acquisition SO.OO SO. 00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
(Stiie or Genesis to leimbu'se
Construction &Inspection SO.OO S205,000.00 S205,000.00 S410,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S205,000.00 S205,000.00 1410,000.00
Design Work SO.OO S38,000.00 5190,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S38,000.00 SI52,000.00 SI90,000.00
9th Right of Way &Acquisition SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SI0,000.00 S40,000.00 S50,000.00 SO.OO SI0,000.00 S40,000.00 S50,000.00
Construction &Inspection SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO,OO 5200,000.00 S800,000.00 51,000,000.00 S200,000.00 S800,000.00 SI,OOO,OOO.OO
Design Work SO.OO S50,000.00 S50,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S50,000.00 SO.OO S50,000.00
Millrace Canat Levee Repairs RighI of Way &Acquisition SO.OO SO. 00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Construction &Inspection SO.OO SO.OO S400,000.00 S400,000.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO S400,000.00 SO.OO $400,000.00
DesignWoJ1( SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
River Race Drive Conslruction
North Extension Project
Right of Way &Acquisition SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
Construction &Inspection SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
TOTALS: $3,086,747.00 $1,635,721.00 $4,752,468,00 $2,130,222,00 52,186,000,00 $4,316,222.00 $1,250,000,00 $0,00 $1,250,000.00 $794,000,00 11,976,000,00 $2,770,000.00 $300,000,00 $0.00 $300,000,00 52,200,000.00 $800,000.00 $3,000,000.00 $9,760,969,00 $6,597,721.00 $16,358,690.00
""2015-5190,000 is 100%desifll costs-8O%..,;nbe reifr/Jursed (5152,000); 2017-S50,000 is 100%rif11t " ...y-80% ",nbe relmlxirsed ($!l0,000);2019 - 590,000is 100%consl1Jclion inspeefon-80%",nbe reimlxirsed($72,000); 5182,000is our 20%consrueDon cosI,"';, not be reinbursed
"""2017.;420.000 is otJr20%conslnJclion cosls-""notbe reinbll'sedandSJ2O,000is 100%_inspecticn=-8096 wllberelr]'ii<Jrsed(S256,OOO)
10012014
SOUTHEAST TIF DISTRICT
ESTIMATED ANNUAL BALANCE I DEFICIT
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Prior Year End Estimated Cash Balance $1,985,520,85 $215,793.35 $772,160,85 $1,187,965.85 $1,351,810.85 $1,565,135.85
Estimated TIF Revenues &MM Loan Proceeds $1,590,625,00 $3,642,270,00 $1,667,240,00 $1,669,620.00 $1,742,140.00 $1,742,140,00
Estimated Total Funds Available $3,576,145.85 $3,858,063.35 $2,439,400,85 $2,857,585,85 $3,093,950.85 $3,307,275,85
Administrative Expenses $65,000,00 $65,000,00 $65,000.00 $65,000,00 $65,000,00 $65,000,00
Bond &Loan Obligations $919,352.50 $920,902.50 $1,186,435.00 $1,440,775.00 $1,438,815,00 $1,454,772.50
Estimated Project Costs $2,085,000,00 $2,100,000.00 $0,00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $880,000,00
2006 BSeries Bonds -Debt Service Reserve Funding $291,000,00
Estimated Total Expenses &Project Costs $3,360,352,50 $3,085,902,50 $1,251,435.00 $1,505,775.00 $1,528,815.00 $2,399,772.50
Estimated Year End Cash Balance Surplus/Deficit $215,793.35 $772,160.85 $1,187,965.85 $1,351,810.85 $1,565,135,85 $907,503.35
112 of est,[matedlIF revenue'since 2nd payment willibe/eceiveq
, ,,!'j;

li'f,1:';'iY,
.,
.."
,/,7'1
}I
",
"

" , after expenses / project costs are incurred:
.,.,.
e
. .
-':
Realistic Year End Cash Balance Deficft: -$48,974.15 $366,830.85 $530,675.85 $744,000.85 $86,368.35
.
To maintain proper cash flow, the Southeast IIF will bOff'ow$2,OOO,QOQ from tfie Major Moves Construction Fund in 20141201,5.
.!l: l
, ;! .:t? .,;,;1; 1 ;'; H .1: .j. .,' ,;oqpl! '\1
-
Dale Printed: 1018/2014
SOUTHEAST TIF DISTRICT
Estimated Costs
Total Project Costs 2014 - 2019
Project Description
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
TIFFlSlds
$tamwater federal
Tctal TIF flllds
Slocmwater
FederalFlSlds Total TIFFLIlds
Slormwater Federal
lda1 TIFFlJlds
Slamwaler federal
Tctal TIF fLrlds
5lamwcier federal
Tctal nF FLIlds
StormVllaler 51ocmwal:er
F",ds funds F",ds F",ds Funds F",ds funds funds F",ds F",ds
FederalFl.IlCIs fetal TlfFlIlds
Funds
federal Funds Tctal
Desi!J1Work 5185,000.00 5185,000.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 5000 50.00 5185,000.00 50.00 50.00 5185,000.00
South Link Road - Phase
51,000,000.00 51,000,000.00 50.00 50.00
II
Rigi ofWjff& AcqLisition 50.00 5000 50.00 51,000,000.00 50.00 50.00 51,000,000.00
Constn.dion &Inspecticn
I
50.00 52,100,000.00 $5,400,000.00 57,500,000.00 50.00 so.OO 50.00 50.00 52,100,000.00 50.00 55,400,000.00 S7,500,000.00
Oesi!1lWOI1c SO.OO 5000 SO.OO SO.OO S25,000.00 S25,000.00 SO.OO S25,000.00 SO.OO 50.00 S25,000.00
Goshen Industrial Park -
SO.OO SO.OO 5000
Stormwater Retention'
Rig1 orW;q &AcqLisitioo 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Construction &lnspectioo SO.OO 50.00 50.00 50.00 5000 5880,000.00 S320,000.00 51,200,000.00 5880,000.00 5320,000.00 SO.OO SI,200,000.00
DesiglWOl1; SOOO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO 50.00
Kercher Road I US 33
Intersection
Soool
1
So.ool
Improvements Rigi OrWirj &AcqLisition 5000 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
(formerly S200,0001year
paving projects)
5000
1
Construction &Inspection S400,000.00 S400,000.00 SO.OO 5000 50.00 SO.OO 5400,000.00 50.00 50.00 5400,000.00
DesiglWock SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SOOo
Intersection
Improvements of Rigi of Wtrt &AcqLisition S350,000.00 5350,000.00 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 50.00 50.00 5350,000.00 50.00 50.00 5350,000.00
SR 15 and Kercher Road
Conslndon &Inspection SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO
DesiglWcrl; 5150,000.00 SI50,000.00 SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 50.00 5150,000.00 5000 SO.OO SI50,000.00
Kercher Road
Railroad to Dierdorff
(R.development committed 10
Rig1: orwlIf 8. Acqt.isition SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SOOO SO.OO 50.00 50.00 50.00 5000
fund SI50,000.00 design work

Construction 8. Inspection 50.00 SO.OO 5000 50.00 SO.OO 50.00 50.00 SO.OO SOOO SO.OO
TOTALS: S2,085,OOO.00 SO.OO SO.OO S2,085,OOO.00 S2,100,OOO.00 SO.OO S5,400,OOO.00 S7,500,OOO.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO S25,OOO.00 $0.00 SO.OO 525,000.00 5880,000.00 5320,000.00 SO.OO SI,200,OOO.00 55,090,000.00 $320,000.00 S5,400,OOO.00 $10,810,000.00
IOlll.'Ol4

October 2014 Redevelopment Staff Report

PROJECT: USEPA ASSESSMENT GRANT & REVOLVING LOAN FUND (RLF) GRANT AWARDS

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The City has received a community-wide assessment grant ($400,000) and a revolving loan fund (RLF) grant ($1,000,000) to be used
for remediation projects from the USEPA. Both sources of funding will be used for sites throughout Goshen and will allow for
collaboration with local businesses and developers to facilitate redevelopment projects.

PROJECT UPDATE

For the assessment grant, the grant completion date was 7/31/2014. As we still have a large portion of the petroleum funding and
approximately $20,000 in hazardous funds, we requested a 12-month extension and that was granted on 7/11/14. We have had
several request inquiries and are continuing to work on these project.

For the RLF grant, we recently loaned $650,000 from the City to the Commission to utilize for the salvage yard property at 828/922 E.
Lincoln Avenue. We still have a portion of funding available for petroleum impacted projects and are continuing to look for options for
that funding. One additional site is being considering as a potential project for the petroleum portion of the funding and more details will
be available within the next several weeks.

PROJECT: GOSHEN THEATER

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Goshen Theater, Inc. is acquiring and renovating the Goshen Theatre building to serve as an Arts and Entertainment facility
downtown.

PROJECT UPDATE

Goshen Theater, Inc. has now acquired the Goshen Theater. The next phase of the project will be to conduct a capital
campaign feasibility study.

Goshen Theater, Inc. is in the process of replacing the exterior fire exit on the south side of the building. Historic Landmarks is
funding this project. Once the new fire escape is installed the ballroom space can be leased. First floor office space has been
renovated and is available for lease.

October, 2014 Redevelopment Staff Report Page 2

PROJECT: RIVER RACE DRIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Construction of a narrow two way street between Douglas and Jefferson to keep speeds low and discourage cut-through traffic. This
new drive will support development projects along the canal, including the Hawks Building, Matthews Millrace, LLC and the River Race
Neighborhood.

PROJECT UPDATE

There has been a continuous effort to keep the various utility companies moving on their utility relocations plans. Frontier has
buried their facilities from Douglas Street to Jefferson Street, and finished the splicing for the services. NIPSCO Gas still
needs to bury their utility lines to serve this new development between Douglas Street to Madison Street, but have completed
the required relocation work along Madison Street and north of Madison Street. NIPSCO Electric has relocated their poles.
C&E Excavating have been working on the construction of the water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer along Purl Street,
River Race Drive, South Second Street and Jefferson Street, and they are preparing the roadway along South Second Street.

PROJECT: NIPSCO BUILDING LEASE

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Redevelopment Commission approved a lease/purchase agreement with the Goshen Brewing Company to convert the NIPSCO
building into a brew pub.

PROJECT UPDATE

The tenant has taken possession of the building and is making monthly lease payments. Construction is underway and should be
completed by the end of 2014. Electric service has been installed and a request for reimbursement has been submitted by the
developer. . All other utilities are now connected to the building.

PROJECT: NORTHWEST BIKE TRAIL CONNECTOR

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Northwest Bike Connector route will connect the northwest Goshen neighborhoods to the US 33 Commercial district, extending
west along Bashor Road from US 33 to CR 17 and then north to the Sams Club parking lot.

PROJECT UPDATE

After obtaining the topographic survey for the Northwest Bike Trail along the New CR 17 corridor, some concerns were
discovered with regards to the location of the trail in relationship to the drainage swales along the new CR 17. With the
proposed new trail construction to be inside the new CR 17 right-of-way/fence line, some of the drainage swales would need
to be filled in or additional right-of-way purchased along with the new fence relocated. For more detail, please see the
information attached to this months packet of information.


PROJECT: DISPOSITION OF 324 SOUTH 5
TH
STREET, 211 E. MADISON & 323 S. 6
TH
STREET

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

In April of 2012, 324 South 5
th
Street was transferred from the Board of Works to the Redevelopment Commission. The Commission
plans to sell the property through a RFP process. Now that a formal decision has been announced regarding the re-routing of US 33,
we are able to proceed.

PROJECT UPDATE

The Legal Department will provide the Commission a Request for Proposals (RFP) for this property, as well as 323 S. 6
th
Street and
211 E. Madison Street that are owned by Redevelopment for approval at this months meeting. Proposals will be due December 9,
2014.

PROJECT: MILLRACE TOWNHOMES AND FLATS

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Redevelopment Commission approved a development agreement with developer David Mathews to construct townhomes along
the millrace. Approximately 25 townhomes and flats will be constructed on the parcel situated north of Purl and south of Madison.

PROJECT UPDATE

The rezoning process of the land was approved at the April Plan Commission meeting, and then approved by the City Council at the
May 6, 2014 meeting.

The primary subdivision and site plan will need to be submitted for Plan Commission review and approval. Ground-breaking for this
project is expected to be in the spring of 2015.

PROJECT: MILLRACE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Redevelopment Commission has selected the Millrace Neighborhood, Inc. as the developer for the parcel along the race located
south of Purl and north of Douglas. This will consist of approximately 12 single family homes, featuring a common area that
encourages interaction between residents.

PROJECT UPDATE

The re-zoning was presented at the Plan Commission and received a favorable recommendation to be passed onto the Goshen City
Council for final approval at the July 15 City Council meeting.

The primary subdivision and site plan will then need to be submitted for Plan Commission review and approval. Ground-breaking for
this project is expected to in the spring of 2015.


PROJECT: MILLRACE CANAL STABILIZATION

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Commission completed the Millrace Canal Study in March of 2007. The study focused on the potential to dredge the canal, allow
for the development of hydroelectric power, and repairs to the canal bank levee(s). The study focused on levee repairs on the west
side of the canal, but referenced at least two locations on the east side of the canal that also had levee conditions. The two locations
on the east side of the canal are: 212 W. Jackson Street and 1245 Wilson Avenue. The levee bank repairs were determined to be a
lower priority than the other Commission projects and improvements to the canal were shelved.

PROJECT UPDATE

Several weeks ago, Greg Hartzler, residing at 1245 Wilson Avenue, notified the City the levee portion of the canal along his property
was leaking and pooling water within the yard. On August 1
st
, Goshen Engineering inspected the leak and identified enough items of
concern to warrant further investigation. Representatives from Lawson Fisher Associates (LFA) inspected the site on August 4
th
and
noted a deposit of washed sand at the base of the leak and a partially saturated levee bank indicating the migration of water through
the soil. Goshen Engineering requested a proposal from LFA to address the concerning leak. LFA determined geotechnical work
would be required to adequately design a repair and arranged for soil samples to be drilled the week of August 4
th
.
Feeling a sense of
urgency, the Goshen Engineering Department authorized the initiation of the soil sampling to be retroactively approved by a board at a
later date. A design proposal has been received from LFA. Funding sources to complete the design work and the yet unknown
construction cost for the repair is being sought.

The canal bank evaluation has been completed by LFA. A copy of the canal bank evaluation is attached. Goshen Engineering will be
sharing the evaluation with Mr. Hartzler and will be discussion repair alternatives that would be acceptable.

In addition to the levee issues, we are revisiting the issue of aesthetics for the canal and the vegetation that is growing within it. We
have met with Aquatic Weed Control and will be discussing this with the Commission at this months meeting.

PROJECT: DOWNTOWN VAULT CLOSURE PROGRAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Commission approved $60,000 to fund the Downtown Vault Closure Program. The purpose of this program is to provide matching
funds to close vaults located under sidewalks in the central business district.

PROJECT UPDATE

A total of 24 vaults were found to be in need of repair. To date, this program has funded vault closures at the following locations:

209 South Main (John Halls); 106 North Main (RC3 Realty); 227 S Main (Dew Drop Inn); 110 E Lincoln (Mervin Schrock);
101 S. Main (1
st
Source Bank); 115 South Main (John Davis); 218 N. Main (Cuauhtemoc Perez); 132 S. Main (Shutterhugs);
122 S. Main Street (Gutierrez Mexican Restaurant); 120 S. Main Street (Sorg): 108, 110, 112 & 114 E. Washington Street (Robert Burt
Trust); 111 & 113 Lincoln Avenue (Republican Headquarters).

Ground penetrating radar (GPR) was done on 47 properties where it could not be determined if vaults existed due to no access from
the interior of the building and only one additional vault was located on East Lincoln that needs to be filled.

During the closure of 108 and 110 E. Washington Street, the contractor exposed another vault in the northeast corner of 202 S. Main
Street. This vault was previously unidentified.

The vault closure at 111 and 113 E. Lincoln Avenue has been completed. Kerry Yaw, the contractor, assessed the interior of the vault
ceiling before it was collapsed in and commented that it was in very poor condition. Because this vault had been previously blocked
from the outside wall, the Commission agreed to fund the complete abandonment of the vault. The final cost of this abandonment has
yet to be reviewed.

PROJECT: POWERHOUSE LEASE AGREEMENT

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Commission has accepted a proposal from Falling Waters, LLC to lease property adjacent to the millrace powerhouse for the
purpose of generating hydro-electric power.

PROJECT UPDATE

A lease agreement with Falling Waters was approved at the February Commission meeting. Lease payments began May 1, 2014.
The next target date is January 1, 2016, which is the deadline for Falling Waters to apply for all required permits necessary to produce
hydro-electric power.

PROJECT: NORFOLK SOUTHERN MARION BRANCH RAILROAD CURVE REALIGNMENT &
US 33 NORTH CONNECTOR ROUTE

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

INDOT plans to relocate US 33 from Monroe Street to Main Street along what is known as the US 33 North Connector Route, which
will include bridges over the Norfolk Southern Railroad Marion Branch, SR 4 and Cottage Avenue. As a part of the past Norfolk
Southern Railroad Marion Branch Relocation Study, one option was to realign the railroad curvature at Ninth Street to allow the trains
to continue through the City at 20mph instead of slowing down to 10mph at the curve.

PROJECT UPDATE

INDOT, Norfolk Southern Railroad and the City have agreed that it would be best to have the railroad realignment complete in 2015,
prior to the US 33 North Connector project which begins in 2016. This would also include the closing of the Ninth Street and
Washington Street Railroad Crossings. The City is currently working with representatives from Norfolk Southern regarding funding,
along with the design and construction process.

INDOT received the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the US 33 North Connector Project. Currently, INDOT is currently
underway with right-of-way acquisition.

Several meetings and conference calls have occurred between INDOT, Norfolk Southern and the City. Currently, INDOT plans to
construct the bridge over the railroad to accommodate the two tracks, and Norfolk Southern is evaluating their plans, as to when they
should relocate the Marion Branch track.

A draft Agreement between INDOT, Norfolk Southern and the City of Goshen was prepared by INDOT, and has been reviewed and
approved by the Goshen Legal Department for submittal to Norfolk Southern. The Agreement basically states that we are in
agreement of where to construct the bridge piers over the Norfolk Southern Marion Branch, and that the City agrees to purchase 117
and 119 South Ninth Street.

Once Norfolk Southern decides to proceed with the Marion Branch Curve Realignment project, there will be a separate Agreement
prepared between the City of Goshen and Norfolk Southern.


PROJECT: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CROSSING SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Federal Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) funding was granted to the City for the installation of new warning devices at six
at-grade railroad crossing to improve safety and meet minimum Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) standards. The six crossings
include: New York Street, Burdick Street, Jackson Street, Plymouth Avenue, Reynolds Street and Purl Street.

PROJECT UPDATE

This project has been delayed, because the preliminary engineering fees from Norfolk Southern were higher than the original
estimated amount of $54,600. INDOT is working through the necessary paperwork to remedy this situation, and we hope that the
Notice to Proceed with construction will be issued soon. We anticipate a pre-construction meeting with Norfolk Southern in
October/November.

PROJECT: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD CROSSING SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PHASE II

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Federal Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) funding was applied for the installation of new warning devices at two at-grade
railroad crossing to improve safety and meet minimum Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) standards. The two crossings include:
Jefferson Street and College Avenue.

PROJECT UPDATE

The INDOT-LPA Agreement was executed by the City of Goshen and then forwarded onto INDOT for approval. Once INDOT
executes the Agreement and issues a Purchase Order, then Norfolk Southern and INDOT will enter into an Agreement for the
Preliminary Engineering portion of this project.

PROJECT: RAILROAD QUIET ZONE FROM KERCHER ROAD TO LINCOLN AVENUE

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Establishment of a Quiet Zone along the Norfolk Southern Railroad Marion Branch from potentially CR 40 to Lincoln Avenue.

PROJECT UPDATE

This project was highly desired by the participants in the 9
th
Street Corridor planning project. American Structurepoint has been
assisting the City with the initial report. Once funding is secured for phase II of the railroad crossing safety improvements, the City
could proceed with submitting an application to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for the consideration of the establishment of
a Quiet Zone.

PROJECT: NINTH STREET TRAIL FROM COLLEGE AVENUE TO PURL STREET

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

New bicycle and pedestrian trail construction along Ninth Street from College Avenue and Purl Street.

PROJECT UPDATE

The INDOT-LPA Agreement needs to be submitted to the City Council and the Board of Public Works and Safety for approval, and
then submitted to INDOT. CHA was chosen by the proposal review committee for the design engineering of this project, and the
Engineering Department anticipates receiving a draft LPA-Consulting Contract from CHA soon, which will eventually require the
Redevelopment Commissions review and approval. The City will receive Federal funding for this project for the design, right-of-way
acquisition and construction portions of the project. Funding will be 80%Federal Transportation Alternate Project (TAP) funds and
20%local funds.

PROJECT: STEURY AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AND STORMWATER DETENTION AREA

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This project has grown out of the recent improvements along the Steury Avenue corridor with the expansion of GDC, Lions
Head, the Goshen Street Department and the Goshen Central Garage. The roadway corridor no longer supports the
additional vehicle loads and has been chip and sealed to extend the service life of the current pavement. The intersection of
Steury Avenue and State Road 4 has small turning radiuses, which causes semi-traffic serving the corridor to make wide
swings onto and off of Steury Avenue and State Road 4. Drainage is effectively non-existent along the roadway corridor and
there are limited opportunities to improve the drainage without looking outside the corridor. In addition to the functionality of
the roadway, the roadways appearance does not reflect the investment the adjoining companies have made on their
properties.

The current plan is to reconstruct Steury Avenue from State Road 4 north 1,450-feet to the first roadway bend to the right.
The new roadway cross section will have a thicker pavement section to support the additional vehicle traffic and curb and
gutter to control stormwater water runoff. A new storm sewer will be constructed that directs stormwater to State Road 4
where several properties will be purchased, on the south side of State Road 4, to allow for the placement of a detention pond.
The new detention pond will have an overflow release to Rock Run Creek.

COMPLETED TASKS

Lawson Fisher Associates completed their preliminary evaluation of the Steury Avenue stormwater requirement, and
determined the volume and area land needed to adequately detain the collected stormwater.
The project was awarded to Abonmarche Consulting.
A project kickoff meeting took place with Abonmarche Consulting.
Brads-Ko Engineering and Surveying, completed the additional survey work requested.
Four residential properties south of State Road 4 and just west of the salvage yard have now been purchased and three of
them are vacant and the last one will be soon.
Abonmarche is working on the 60%design drawings.
A property owner stakeholders meeting occurred on June 2, 2014. Meeting attendance was good. Common concerns were
truck movements, drainage and access to businesses.
Appraisals have been completed and an offer has been provided to the property owners.

PROJECT UPDATE

It remains the Citys ultimate goal is to have the first phase of the project, that includes the salvage yard cleanup, ready for bid
this winter to allow for the cleanup project to occur next spring.


PROJECT: SOUTH LINK ROAD CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

South Link Road will be extended from SR 15 east to Regent Street, and will include an overpass over the railroad tracks
along with a traffic signal at the new intersection with SR 15. This is an extension of the existing Waterford Mills Parkway
constructed in 2010 from CR 27 to Regent Street. Construction is anticipated in 2016, which will be funded with 80% Federal
STP funds and 20% local funds.

PROJECT UPDATE

At the MACOG Quarterly Tracking meeting with INDOT, it was determined that the South Link Road from SR 15 to Regent Street
project will not be bid in the Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2015, which ends on June 30, 2015, due to the delay in getting the previously
acquired properties information to INDOT. On Saturday, September 27 2014, all of the information regarding the City owned
properties was submitted to INDOT for review by INDOT and FHWA, and we have absolutely no clue how long it will take for INDOT
to make a determination with regards to the next steps that will need to be taken.

At this point in time, we have tentatively scheduled the letting/bidding date for February 2016, with hopes of an earlier letting date (like
November 2015) can be achieved.

JPR is working hard on acquiring the other parcels that we need, and it seems that portion of the right-of-way acquisition is right on
schedule. We are also coordinating with the various utility companies and the railroad.

PROJECT: INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT AT STATE ROAD 15 & KERCHER ROAD

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A partnership between the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), Elkhart County and the City of Goshen has been
formed to improve the intersection of SR 15 and Kercher Road. Improvements will include a left turn lane, through lane, and a
right turn lane on every approach to the intersection along with a 10-foot sidewalk/trail to provide connectivity to the Winona
Trail along the railroad. The construction along Kercher Road will commence at Islandview Drive and extend to the Winona
Greenway Trail/Railroad.

PROJECT UPDATE

All appraisals are complete. Elkhart County will act as the Citys buying agent for these parcels, and they have already acquired four
of the twelve parcels. County representatives have met with all of the property owners, except for three of them.

An email was submitted to INDOT and Elkhart County putting them on notice that the City will be putting the Intersection Improvement
on hold, due to funding constraints. The City had planned on funding the intersection improvement with TIF funds. However, the
specific TIF District has been taxed with the costs associated with the Intersection Improvement at US 33 and Kercher Road, and all of
the improvements along the SR 15 corridor required for the South Link Road project (because MACOG has a policy that Federally
funded local projects are not to pay for any improvements along a State road) plus the 20%match for the South Link Road.

So, the County and the City will continue to purchase the necessary right-of-way needed to construct the intersection improvement.
Elkhart County will continue to finalize plans and specifications in order to bid the project. Once these tasks are complete, the City will
shelve the project, until we are able to fund the project, unless INDOT is willing to dedicate additional funding to this project.

Construction was anticipated in 2015, but as of now, we are unsure as to when the construction will occur. As a side note,
construction of the Kercher Road Bridge over the Elkhart River is anticipated to start construction in 2016/2017.


PROJECT: KERCHER ROAD RECONSTRUCTION FROM RAILROAD TO DIERDORFF ROAD

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Improvements to Kercher Road from the Railroad to Dierdorff Road will include one lane in each direction and a center left
turn lane, curb and gutter along with storm sewer, and a 10-foot sidewalk/bicycle trail along the south side of the roadway.
The intersection at Pine Manor Drive and Industrial Park Drive will be aligned to allow for safe turning movements.

PROJECT UPDATE

The INDOT-LPA Agreement needs to be submitted to the City Council and the Board of Public Works and Safety for approval, and
then submitted to INDOT. American Structurepoint is currently under contract for the design engineering of this project. However,
since Federal funds have been secured for this project, the scope of services with regards to the design engineering has been
modified significantly, and an Agreement Amendment will be presented to the Board of Public Works and Safety for review and
approval of the additional funds needed for the design phase of the project.

The Engineering Department received information from MACOG that once the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) has been
approved, the City will receive Federal funding for this project for the right-of-way acquisition and construction portions of the project.

PROJECT: KERCHER ROAD RETENTION AREA

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Development of a plan for a stormwater retention area on the north side of Kercher Road, just east of the railroad tracks. This project
will address some of the flooding problems in the Goshen Industrial Park.

PROJECT UPDATE

The City has begun conducting soil borings to determine the height of the water table and the type of soil conditions present in this
area. Once these factors are determined, a design for the retention area will be completed by the Engineering Department. Property
acquisition is now complete.

This project has been put on hold until there are further discussions with Elkhart County about utilizing the soil in the Kercher Road
Bridge Project.

PROJECT: PLYMOUTH AVENUE FOXBRIAR DRIVE WATER MAIN LOOP

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The project will loop an existing dead-end water main on Foxbriar Drive into the existing water main on Plymouth Avenue.
The water main loop will improve fire flow and water quality for the residential homes and businesses in the area.
PROJECT UPDATE

The water main extension is designed, but a right-of-way/easement issue was encountered. The design calls for the placement of the
new water main to be beneath the existing pedestrian path, along the south side of Plymouth Avenue. There is insufficient language
to permit the water main to be placed within the existing easement; therefore, a new easement is required. Brads-Ko Engineering and
Surveying has completed the easement description. Goshen Legal Department has completed the agreement and the Goshen
Engineering Department needs to make the easement acquisition offer.

Once the new easement is acquired, an INDOT permit will be sought and the project will go to bid. Anticipated bidding is fall 2014,
assuming the easement can be acquired.


PROJECT: HORN DITCH TWO-STAGE FROM COUNTY ROAD 31 TO COLLEGE AVENUE (C.R. 38)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The industrial corridor between Kercher Road and College Avenue has been plagued with flooding from the drainage basin
funneled into the Horn Ditch even before development occurred in the area. In 2005, the City and County developed a plan to
take the existing ditch banks along Horn Ditch between County Road 31 and College Avenue and widen them to allow for the
containment of the 100 year flood. Flood containment eliminates property damages and increasing the value of the industrial
land. At the time, consensus between all the property owners could not be obtained and the project was shelved. Plans
currently being developed by Supreme Corporation to consolidate operations have initiated new discussion and renewed
interest in the two-stage ditch project.

The engineering estimate was $1.3 million with a total project budget of $1.7 million dollar being considered for negotiation
purposes. Public funding of $1 million dollars has been developed with another seven hundred thousand to come from private
business along Horn Ditch. Businesses that participated in the construction project were offered reimbursement through TIF
revenues from new development that occurs in the area.

PROJECT UPDATE

Agreements have been signed by Elkhart County, the City of Goshen and Forest River to complete the project. The last agreement to
be signed is the one with Supreme Corporation. The project was put out for bid on May 23, 2014. Bids were received on June 17,
2014, and the lowest responsive and responsible bidder was Niblock Excavating with a bid of $1,257,710. Construction was slated to
begin at the end of July and the County is still waiting as of August 6
th
for Niblock Excavating to mobilize. The project has an October
1
st
winter shutdown date with the balance of the work to be completed by the spring of 2015.

The project funding is:

Public Funding Sources
Goshen Stormwater Board (grant) $200,000
Goshen Stormwater Board (loan) $150,000
County Drainage Board (grant) $250,000
County Stormwater Board (grant) $200,000
County Stormwater Board (loan) $200,000
Total Public Funding $1,000,000

Private Funding Sources*
Forest River, Inc. $325,500
Supreme Corporation $374,500
Total Private Funding $700,000

GRAND TOTAL $1,700,000
The project will be bid through the Elkhart County Drainage Board, and their schedule is:

May 19, 2014 Completion of erosion control plan
May 19, 2014 Wage Rate Hearing
May 22, 2014 Complete of project specification
May 23, 2014 Construction plans made available
June 10, 2014 Drainage Board public hearing
June 10, 2014 Mandatory pre-bid meeting
June 10, 2014 Goshen Redevelopment Commission to approve reimbursement agreements for Goshen Stormwater,
Elkhart County Stormwater, Supreme and Forest River
June 17, 2014 Project bids received

June 20, 2014 Money placed in escrow account
July 1, 2014 Construction to begin
October 17, 2014 Winter shutdown
June 2015 Project completion

Niblock Excavating has made good progress. The 2-stage ditch is complete south of Kercher Road and the contractor
continues work north of Kercher Road. Winter shutdown will take place on October 17, 2014, and will resume in the spring
when conditions permit.

PROJECT: FORMER WESTERN RUBBER SITE

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

In April 2014, the Redevelopment Commission issued a Request for Proposals to parties interested in redeveloping the former
Western Rubber property. The remediation activities are complete at the site and we have received environmental closure.
PROJECT UPDATE

One proposal was submitted to the Commission in May 2014 from Genesis Products. Their proposal includes a two phase
development, with the initial phase being constructed in 2014 with a total investment of $2,000,000 and the second phase being
completed within 5 years. Their offer is considered a qualified bid as theyre offering full asking price for the land. Genesis presented
their plans to the Commission in June 2014 and a purchase agreement was approved by the Commission. They will be making
application to the Board of Zoning Appeals for zoning variances for their development of the site in July and are actively working on
construction plans at this time.

Retention of stormwater is a site development problem yet to be overcome. Initial estimates provided by JPR to Genesis have the
sites stormwater retention costs at $1 million. Because of 2014 complaints by existing businesses along Tenth Street, a direct release
by Genesis into the storm sewer cannot be promised at this time. The Goshen Stormwater Department has purchased $30,000 of in
pipe monitoring equipment and is waiting on the delivery of the order. The flow monitoring data will permit allow for the determination
of available stormwater capacity. In the interim, alternative stormwater retention/detention options will be evaluated by the Goshen
Engineering Department.

PROJECT: HAWKS BUILDING PHASE II - BOUTIQUE HOTEL/ BREWPUB

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Hawks 1886, LLC has proposed to develop the north end of the Hawks Building into a mixed-use project featuring a boutique hotel
and brewpub.

PROJECT UPDATE

The Redevelopment Commission has negotiated a development agreement with Hawks 1886, LLC, the project developer.
The agreement will be on the agenda for the August Redevelopment Commission meeting for approval. The developer is
purchasing approximately one-half of the building from LaCasa and has already received approval from the Plan Commission
to modify the existing PUD to allow for a hotel on the site. The hotel market study has now been completed in partnership with
the Elkhart County Convention and Visitors Bureau. The market study has been submitted as part of a loan application to
potential lenders and is under review. If project financing can be secured, construction would likely start in the spring of 2015.


PROJECT: SALE OF 313 S. THIRD STREET

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Redevelopment Commission determined that the property located at 313 S Third Street was no longer needed for the River Race
project and the Commission authorized the issuance of a RFP to solicit proposals to purchase the property.

PROJECT UPDATE

The closing on this property with J.C. and Katharine Schrock is scheduled for Friday, October 10, 2014.

Goshen Redevelopment Commission Oct. 14 2014

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Goshen Redevelopment Commission Oct. 14 2014

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

GOSHEN REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 14, 2014

To: Redevelopment Commission

To: Redevelopment Commission

To: Redevelopment Commission

To: Redevelopment Commission

Potrebbero piacerti anche