When talking about social contract, first of all we must know the definition of social and contract and also what is social contract all about. In oxford dictionary describes that social is something that related to society and its organization and it also connected with your position in society. Next, contract is a written agreement intended to be legally binding and provide you with a service. Therefore social contract is an unspoken agreement among members of society to behave in a way that benefits everybody. An example for social contract is giving up some individual freedom in return for state protection.
Now, I would like to discuss regarding social contract in Malaysia. Social contract in Malaysia may refers to the agreement made by the country's founding fathers in the Constitution, and usually refers to a quid pro quo through article 14 to 18 of the Federal Constitution, pertaining to the granting of citizenship to the Non-Malay and also in article 153 which grants the Malays special rights and privileges. Besides that, Malaysian social contract has been a subject of controversy because any debate about it touches on the special of the bumiputera.
The social contract in Malaysia existed when Lord Reid came to Malaysia. He is the one who drafted the Constitution for Independence of Malaya between UMNO, MIC and MCA. At first MIC did not want to unite with UMNO and MCA. Even though UMNO is the party for Malays and MCA is a party for Chinese, but UMNO also claims some privileges to Malay but MCA still want to unite with UMNO because MCA knew that Malays special rights should be protected. UMNO also promised to the Non- Malays and Chinese that they will grant easier citizenship by jus soli.
Furthermore, the Reid Commission draft the proposal and it was published it in 1957. It reviewed and amended by the Malay rulers, representative of alliance and British government in meeting in London. The Social Contract 1948 form the basis of the Federation of Malaya 1948. In addition to that, the Non-Malays was given the right of citizenship based on the principle of jus soli with the loose and waiver of the language requirement. Apart from that, the Malays rights and special privileges were provided and mentioned in the constitution which are the importance of Islamic religion as their main religion, the Malay language as their main or the countrys main language, the special position of the Malays and the positions of the Malay rulers.
In Malaysian Federal Constitution, there is several articles that related to social contract. Firstly is article 3. It discusses about Islam is the religion of federation. The government have right to maintain and support the necessity of Islamic institutions. This article should be amended because Islam has been accepted since Malacca Sultanate and also during British administration and also Islamic law has been practiced in all of the Malay states since before the British occupation. Never the less, Islam also give freedom for Non-Muslim to practice their own religion and belief. It is clearly seen here, in Article 2(1) which talked about a person is free to profess and practice his own religion and Article 2(4) said that no person can propagate Muslim to convert to other religion but at the same time Muslim can propagate Non-Muslim to convert to Islam and Non-Muslim can propagate others except Muslim to convert to their religion.
Next, Ill be elaborating about Article 152. The things that are mentioned in Article 152 is the national language which is Bahasa Melayu. No one is prohibited from using, teach or learn any other language even though Bahasa Melayu is the national language. The reason why do this article is enacted in Federal Constitution because to unite people from all races. Besides that it is also easy to learn. Next, article 153 also related to social contract. In this article, it talks about the special position of the Malays and natives people in Sabah and Sarawak. Government implement policies to preserve the special position in public service, business, scholarship, education and others. In this cases, Malay people accept the principle of jus soli and Non-Malay MUST accept the special privileges of the Malays.
Before this, I have mentioned about controversy that happen because of the special rights of Bumiputera. Let me enlightened you for what had happened, Our government gave scholarship policy for bumiputera and housing price reduction for bumiputera which is 7% discount of a house. Besides that, our government also gave FELDA and quotas favoring bumiputera in public service. All of this matters, because these are the special privileges of the Malays. These privileges made Lee Kuan Yew questioned the need for article 153 Federal Constitution, called for Malaysian Malaysia. In 1965, he questioned the implementation of Malays rights as proposed. It was really upsetting the politicians from alliance. In 2005, Lim Keng Yaik asked for re-examination of the social contract so that a " Bangsa Malaysia" can be achieved. It heavily criticized by many Malay politicians such as Khairy Jamaluddin and Ahmad Shabery Cheek. At the end, Lim stated that the Malay press had blown his comments out of proportion and misquoted him. The issue ended with UMNO Youth Chief and Education Minister Hishamuddin Hussein warning people not to bring up the issue again as it has been agreed upon, appreciated, understood and endorsed by the Constitution. Besides, Hishamuddin had waved the keris at the UMNO Annual General Meeting, warning Non- Malay should not and must not to threaten the "Malay rights" and to question the social contract.
Next, New Economic Policy also the main controversy that happen in Social Contract in Malaysia. Anwar Ibrahim said that he promised to roll back the NEP while the DAP said they will against NEP. Why this problem happen? It is because NEP benefitting only a small portion of Malays, mostly well-connected and urban. Furthermore, they're ignoring the rural and poor Malays. Not just that problem, besides, Lim Kit Siang and Karpal Singh also questioned the Malay privileges which is ISA. Then members of Indian Community demonstrated for Hindu rights and protested that their community has been worse off than the Malays. In the late 2007, 5 members of Hindraf were detained under ISA, 12 was arrested. In 2008, the Indian community objected the arrest. Tuan Guru Datuk Nik Aziz said bumiputera is racist and the policy prevented other races from receiving government aid. Apart from that, Non Malays feel as they are continually being treated as a 2nd citizenship even they are born and raised locally. Besides that, there is also the about university quota which known as meritocracy system being criticized by Non-Malay. They criticized the policy as it benefiting the Bumiputera by streaming them into matriculation programme which provide an easy coursework while they had to sit for STPM. According to the MCA Youth leader Datuk Dr. Wee Ka Siong the STPM is a well-tested, open and standardized system with external moderation and affiliated with the Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate, while American-based matriculation system is a totally different creature altogether, with evaluations based not just on the final examination but on attendance, assignment, presentation and with lecturers having a greater say in determining the grades. So it is easier for Malay to get a good grades than Non-Malays. Even the Non-Bumiputeras may enter the matriculation programme and vice versa, this is rarely happened. Apart from that, Meritocracy was also criticized by some quarters in UMNO as being discriminatory, as it caused the rural and less- prepared Malays to fall behind in university entrance rates.
In conclusion, i think Social Contract should be revised because we cant use the same way forever. First of all, we should see what happened to the social contract we have used about 50 years right now. There were a lot of criticition, dissatisfaction and rebellion. Even though the social contract made our country to get independence but we must remain our country peacefully. One way to maintain our country peacefully are with the revised our social contract. This is because Malaysian citizens nowadays are different in their own ways of thinking. They want equality and justice. What should our government do is every citizen should have equal rights because they live, born, raised in the same country. Some of the Non-Malay are also involve to make Malaysia in the same level of other top rising countries such as, Dato Nicol Anne Davids, Dato Lee Chong Wei, Michelle Yeoh and others. Thus, I am totally agree if our country want to revise our social contract.