CODE: ENGR 101 INSTRUCTOR: MOHAMED ALI S SECTION: 2457 CREDIT HOURS: 2 TOTAL No. OF LECTURE HOURS: 27 SPRING SEMESTER: 2013-2014
Submitted to: The Dean, Faculty of Engineering ISLAMIC UNIVERISITY Al Madinah Al Munawwarh, KSA
Report Prepared by: MOHAMED ALI S smohamedali@gmail.com
CONTENTS
Sl.No. TITLES PAGE No. 1 ASSESMENT METHODOLOGY 2 NAME LIST AND FINAL GRADE 3 TABLE- RANKING OF STUDENTS 4 CHART -COMMUNICATION ABILITY 5 RANGE OF MARKS - HISTOGRAM 6 CURVED GRADES 7 GRADE COUNT 8 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTION
ASSESMENT METHODOLOGY
Assessment Method Quantity Percentage Contribution to the total Grade Outcome Exam Pattern ASSIGNMENT 6+1 22+10 = 32 TEAM WORK, Open Book and Reference Materials QUIZ 6 18 CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING ABILITY Closed Book class room exam EXAM 3 15+15+20= 50 CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING AND COMMUNICATION ABILITY Closed book Public Exam
100 (Maximum)
NAME LIST AND FINAL GRADE
Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME % OF ATTD GRADE ALG 1
1 331001383 88.89 50 F 2 331001083 88.89 71 C 3 331008273 88.89 74 C 4 331004763 92.59 76 C+ 5 331062843 85.19 55 F 6 331001973 88.89 51 F 7 331001223 85.19 56 F 8 331001853 88.89 71 C 11 331029873 70.37 67 D+ 13 331001233 92.59 63 D 14 331001163 81.48 50 F 15 331001493 92.59 44 F 16 331001703 85.19 54 F 17 331001673 92.59 64 D 18 331001183 92.59 64 D 19 331015253 85.19 43 F 20 331001593 77.78 63 D 21 331001533 85.19 60 D 22 331066813 88.89 63 D
Ranking is based on the communication ability as the employability of the student is mostly decided by this criteria. It is calculated by his achievement in the descriptive question he has answered in the three exams, namely midterm 1 (MT1), midterm 2 (MT2) and final exam (FE). It consists of 50% multiple choice questions and 50% descriptive type questions. The total score is converted to percentage and the achievement of each student is shown in the following charts.
CHART - COMMUNICATION ABILITY
Though the achievement in the exams MT1, MT2 and FE is almost same from the above chart the ability in achieving through descriptive answers is very poor for some students
It was shown in the Ranking of the students and those were the students at the bottom end of that table.
40-45 Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG 15 331001493 44 F 19 331015253 43 F
2 43.5
ALG Absolute Letter Grade 46-50 Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG 1 331001383 50 F 14 331001163 50 F
2 50
51-55 Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG 5 331062843 55 F 6 331001973 51 F 16 331001703 54 F
3 53.33333
56-60 Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG 7 331001223 56 F 21 331001533 60 D
2 58
61-65 Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG 13 331001233 63 D 17 331001673 64 D 18 331001183 64 D 20 331001593 63 D 22 331066813 63 D
5 63.4
66-70 Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG 11 331029873 67 D+
1 67
71-75 Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG 2 331001083 71 C 3 331008273
74 C 8 331001853 71 C
3 72
76-80 Sl_No UNIV_ID NAME GRADE ALG 4 331004763 76 C+
1 76
To make the average as 70 the existing marks has to be increased by 10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 50 53 58 63 67 72 76 N o .
O F
S T U D E N T S
GRADE HI STOGRAM AVERAGE: 60 No. of Students CURVED GRADES GRADE COUNTS
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
-THANKS
Thank you very much for giving me an opportunity to learn and teach a new subject in a new environment and in a new land. - SYLLABUS
The syllabus of this course is designed and followed for the US system of education, though we also followed the same, the important criteria to understand this voluminous subject is understanding the lecture and expressing their views in English. It is observed in the class room and during the project work phase that, though many students have their innovative concepts they could not deliver or express their views in English. This comment is substantiated by giving you a big picture of their ability to answer descriptive questions in the examinations. We can see a large gap in the achieving marks in two patterns. (Refer Page No. ?) - NEEDS MODIFICATION
Though the course has a name creativity, the students have their firsthand experience only through their project work. It is carried out only after the first midterm and also it was not conducted as per the commitment we made, that each group would be supervised by a faculty with respective to their project. We need to stimulate students creativity thorough puzzles, which does not require proficiency in English language but develop their creative skills. The problems proposed in the following books are really interesting and creative and it may be consider for the future revisions of this course. 1) Creative Techniques in Product and Engineering Design - A Practical Workbook, D J Walker Lecturer, Design Discipline, Faculty of Technology, The Open University, B K J Dagger, Industrial Consultant, Design and Manufacture, ( Formerly, Project Manager - Training Development, EITB ) R Roy, Senior Lecturer, Design Discipline, Faculty of Technology, The Open University, WOODHEAD PUBLISHING LIMITED 2) Make and Test Projects in Engineering Design- Creativity, Engagement and Learning, Andrew Samuel, Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006 3) PUZZLES IN THOUGHT AND LOGIC, c. R. WYLIE Jr. Department 0f Mathematics, University 0f Utah, Dover Publications Inc., New York 4) Puzzles 101, A puzzlemasters Challenge, Nobuyuki Yoshigahara, A K Peters, Natick, Massachusetts.
SUGGESTIONS
The course may be changed to three credit hours per week by considering the language proficiency of the students and may be taught in relatively in a slower rate to accommodate the mathematical and puzzle type problems. The coordinator has put tremendous effort without considering whether it reaches the student or not. It was totally in his control and I feel that other faculties potential were not exploited and we were not given enough space. Especially preparing questions and conducting examinations. I yet to understand whether he is underestimating our potential or not relying on us. Though we went through many discussions during these four months of course duration we or at-least I was kept at dark regarding the question pattern and evaluation pattern till the day of exam. It puts me in a embarrassing situations in front of students. The coordinator was so grateful to the author of the text book which we referred for this course by insisting us to follow the same slides supplied by the author. The faculty should be given full freedom in this activities.
The soft copies of these course materials and slides are available at
https://sites.google.com/site/aliatium/home
All these comments and suggestion are to improve the standard of this course in the context of KSA education system and to maintain the integrity of the faculties who will be teaching the course in future according to my observation.