0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
117 visualizzazioni15 pagine
Career development of women is generally different from that of men. Women's la"our mar#et participation is more restricted than men. They are underrepresented in a variety of fields and professions. Women a"ilities and talents are underused in their occupational fields. Approaches specifically designed to respond to the needs of women are summarised below.
Career development of women is generally different from that of men. Women's la"our mar#et participation is more restricted than men. They are underrepresented in a variety of fields and professions. Women a"ilities and talents are underused in their occupational fields. Approaches specifically designed to respond to the needs of women are summarised below.
Career development of women is generally different from that of men. Women's la"our mar#et participation is more restricted than men. They are underrepresented in a variety of fields and professions. Women a"ilities and talents are underused in their occupational fields. Approaches specifically designed to respond to the needs of women are summarised below.
Jenny Bimrose Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick
1) Introduction Theories that inform current practice in the UK were primarily formulated to explain the career development of men. Women's career development is, however, generally different from men. t is often more complex !e.g. conflict "etween wor# and family$ and is often characterised "y different career stages or patterns !e.g. intervals away from full time employment to assume care responsi"ilities$. %arious pieces of research !e.g. &'(, )***$ indicate that+ women's la"our mar#et participation is more restricted than men i.e. they are under, represented in a variety of fields and professions, and enter low paying and low status -o"s. women a"ilities and talents are underused i.e. they are less li#ely to advance to higher levels in their occupational fields. Bet/ !)**0$ presents an overview of issues relating to women of particular relevance to careers counselling. (iting numerous research studies, she esta"lishes the importance of employment for the psychological !as well as economic$ well,"eing of women. 1he charts the nature of women's participation in the la"our mar#et in 2orth 3merica !similar to the UK$ which has increased dramatically over the past four to five decades, discusses occupational segregation !hori/ontal and vertical$ and highlights the particular implications for career theories. 1ince the ma-ority of women are employed in restricted occupational areas and at lower status levels, Bet/ 4uestions whether career theories which are "ased on the assumption that occupational choice involves either matching -o"s to a"ilities or 'self,actualising' as part of career development apply to women at all !)**0 p5$. n response to the perceived inade4uacies of current theories underpinning the practice of careers counselling and guidance, approaches specifically designed to respond to the needs of women are "eing evolved. 6ive such approaches are summarised "elow. 2) Approaches To Careers Counselling For Women 2.1 Gottfredsons Theory of Circumscription and Compromise 7ottfredson's developmental theory of occupational aspirations !)*5)$ is applica"le to "oth women and men. 1he set out to explain 'how the well,documented differences in aspirations "y social group !e.g. race, sex, social class$ develop' !)*58, p9:0$. 1trongly influenced "y John ;olland !she was a student in his research centre$, and a sociologist "y professional training, 7ottfredson's theory represents an attempt to reconcile the different perspectives of psychology and sociology !)**<, p)5:$. The theory is concerned with "oth the content of career aspirations and how they develop. 7ottfredson ac#nowledges the influence of the theories of "oth John ;olland and =onald 1uper. t is similar to these earlier theories in that it proposes that career choice reflects the process of attempting to implement an individual's preferred self concept and "ecause it argues that career satisfaction depends on the match or fit with the self,concept !7ottfredson and >apan, )**?$. t is different from psychological theories !7ottfredson, )**<, p)5)$ since+ it views career development as an attempt to implement primarily a social self and secondarily a psychological self. it focuses on how cognitions of self and occupations develop. it treats vocational choice largely as a process of eliminating options and narrowing choices. it considers how individual compromise their goals in coming to terms with reality as they try to implement their aspirations. The model contains several "asic tenets, summarised "y Broo#s !)**:, p8?0$ as+ @eople differentiate occupations along dimensions of sex type, level of wor# and field of wor#. @eople assess the suita"ility of occupations according to their self,concepts !ie. their images of who they would li#e to "e$ and the amount of effort they are willing to expend to enter the occupations. 'ccupations that are compati"le with the self, concept will "e highly desira"le. those that are not will "e highly undesira"le. &lements of the self,concept that are vocationally relevant are gender, social class, intelligence, interests, values and a"ilities. 'ccupational aspirations are circumscri"ed according to these elements of the self,concept. %ocationally relevant elements of the self,concept are developed during four stages of cognitive development+ )st stage+ !rientation to si"e and power The child develops 'the concept of "eing an adult. 3ges 8,A. 9nd stage+ !rientation to se# role The child develops a gender self,concept. 3ges <,5. 8rd stage+ !rientation to social e$aluation s concerned with developing a"stract concepts of one's social class and intelligence. 3ges *,)8. 0th stage+ !rientation to Internal %ni&ue 'elf nvolves a refinement of one's distinctive values, traits, attitudes and interests. 3ge )0B. 3s people progress through these 0 developmental stages, they successively re-ect occupations+ as unsuita"le for their gender. then as inappropriate for their social class and a"ility level. and finally on the "asis of personal interests and values. The result is a /one of accepta"le alternatives, or a 'set or range of occupations that the person considers as accepta"le alternatives' !)*5), pA05$. t is only under unusual circumstances that a person will reconsider an occupation re-ected as outside this range. @eople's occupational preferences are the product of -o",self compati"ility !i.e. with the /one$ and -udgments a"out the accessi"ility of -o"s. '3ccessi"ility refers to o"stacles or opportunities in the social or economic environment that affect one's chances of getting into a particular occupation' !)*5), pA05$. @erceptions of accessi"ility are "ased on such factors as availa"ility of a -o" in the preferred geographical area, perceptions of discrimination or favouritism, etc. Because the -o"s people view as suita"le for themselves are not always availa"le, they must compromise. The typical pattern of compromise is the following+ people first sacrifice interests, then prestige, and finally sex type. n other words, given two choices , one that fits one's interests "ut not one's sex type, and one that does not fit one's interests "ut is viewed as sex,appropriate , the latter will "e chosen. 7ottfredson's explanation of why women are in lower,status, lower,level positions is that these occupations are compati"le with their self,concepts and views a"out accessi"ility. ;er )**< formulation of the theory is 'the same in most respects as the )*5) version' !)**<, p)58$. t differs 'in providing a clearer definition and account of compromise, more discussion of cultural change andCor race and gender differences, and more guidance on counseling applications' !7ottfredson, )**<, p)58$. Implications for practice: i$ ndividual career counselling should encourage "oth exploration and realism. n particular+ why certain options seem to "e out of the 4uestion or why some compromises are more accepta"le or accessi"le than others. "y encouraging clients to re,examine the full range of occupations in the economy !challenging circumscription$. helping clients develop strategies for enhancing the individual's competitiveness in o"taining the preferred option and succeeding at it. ii$ (areers education programmes should span stages 9 !ages <,5$ through to 0 !ages )0B$ and should+ "e sensitive to the mental capa"ilities of the age group. introduce students to the full "readth of options in a managea"le way. display for youngsters their circumscription of alternatives so that its rationale can "e explored. "e sensitive to the dimensions of self and occupations along which circumscription and compromise ta#e place !sex type, social class, a"ility, and vocational interests$ so that their role, positive or not, can "e explored where appropriate. iii$ &xploration and constructive realism can do much to free individuals from unnecessary circumscription and compromise. (aution should "e exercised in assuming the role of change agent on "ehalf of the client. 7ottfredson and >apin !)**?$ discuss the results of field testing an instrument referred to as 'Dapping %ocational (hallenges !D%($' !)**?, p089$ which is "ased on the premises of the 7ottfredson's theory of circumscription and compromise !)*5), )*58 and )**<$. t is descri"ed as an example of 'theory,"ased assessments and interventions to counteract inappropriate circumscription' )**?, p089$ which aims to increase awareness of choices which have "een re-ected "y clients as unaccepta"le, since circumscription is a 4uestion of 'deciding what one wants to avoid' !7ottfredson and >apan, )**?, p09*$. 6indings include that high school and middles girls and "oys agreed in their ratings of gender difference for different types of wor# !p085$, that 'one group of seventh grade girls lin#ed their avoidance of careers currently dominated "y men to their fears a"out encountering sexual harassment on the -o" !p08*$ and 'assessed and expressed interests are often discrepant !p00:$. 2.2 Astins (eed)*ased 'ociopsychological +odel 3stin's !)*50$ primary intent was to construct a theory that would descri"e more ade4uately the career,choice process of women, as well as explain recent changes in women's career aspirations. t is also applica"le to men. 1he attempted to develop a model of career choice and wor# "ehaviour that attempted to com"ine "oth personal !psychological$ and social forces as well as their interaction. ;er need,"ased sociopsychological model contains four #ey constructs+ motivation. expectations. sex,role sociali/ation. structure of opportunity. Thus , "oth psychological and sociological varia"les are included in the model. +oti$ation, 3ll humans are motivated to expend energy to satisfy 8 primary needs , survival !primarily physiological survival$, pleasure !intrinsic satisfactions from wor#$ and contri"ution !need to "e useful to society and "e recognised for one's contri"utions$. These 8 needs are the same for men and women , though they can "e satisfied in different ways. -#pectations, (oncerned with the individual's perceptions re+ #ind of wor# that will satisfy needs and the types of wor# that are accessi"le and that the person is capa"le of performing. They differ for men and women "ecause of the sex,role sociali/ation process and the structure of opportunity !e.g. distri"ution of -o"s, sex typing of -o"s, discrimination$. =uring the sex,role sociali/ation process, a person is rewarded and reinforced for gender,differentiated "ehaviour. The result is that the individual internali/es social norms and values regarding appropriate sex,role "ehaviours and choices. 'e#)role socialisation and structure of opportunity, nteracting with the sex,role sociali/ation process is the opportunity structure, which is different for men and women, and is not static. 1ocial changes modify the opportunity structure for all. Thus, the interactive relationship "etween sex,role sociali/ation and the opportunity structure is what accounts for the changes in women's aspirations and choices in recent years. The sociali/ation process pro"a"ly sets limits to changes win the structure of opportunity, whereas the structure of opportunity ultimately influences the values that are transmitted through the sociali/ation process (Astin, 19!, p1""# 3stin's contri"ution represents the first invited theoretical statement on women's career development !6it/gerald et al, )**A, p5A$, yet it has had limited impact on practice to date. 6it/gerald et al !)**A, p5<$ suggest that it may "e '"est thought of as a general conceptual framewor# rather than an articulated theoretical statement', since its value lay in the way in which it directs our attention to important factors influencing women's career development 3stin's most important contri"ution, they contend, is the attention she focused on the structure of opportunity . Implications for practice: 3stin's model suggests some general diagnostic directions that can "e pursued "y counsellors. 6or example, women's indecision may result from lac# of clarity a"out which of the three needs is the more important to satisfy, or a"out which occupations would satisfy these needs. 3 client may feel conflict "etween internali/ed views of sex,role appropriate occupations and changes in the occupational structure !for example, one woman may feel restricted "y the occupational structure, another may feel changes are placing pressure on her to expand her view of sex,role appropriate occupations$. 2.. Career self)efficacy theory /0ac1ett and *et") 'ne nota"le example of an attempt to develop theoretical approaches that are more relevant for women and girls is ;ac#ett and Bet/'s career self,efficacy theory !)*5)$. They argued for a need to move "eyond 'listings of "arriers' to women's choices and achievements to an investigation of the mechanisms which are effective in em"edding society's "eliefs and expectations in women's vocational "ehaviour and achievement !;ac#ett and Bet/, )*5), p89?$. 3 study of twenty occupations was designed to 'investigate the usefulness of self,efficacy theory to the understanding of vocational "ehaviour and, in particular, to the understanding of women's career development'!Bet/ and ;ac#ett, )*5), p0::$. The results of this study indicated that there exists 'significant and consistent sex differences in self,efficacy with regard to traditional and nontraditional occupations' !Bet/ and ;ac#ett, )*5), p0:?$. 1o, women demonstrated more career self,efficacy in relation to -o"s that are traditionally female !li#e dental hygienist, social wor#er, secretary$ and men were more efficacious in relation to traditionally male -o"s !li#e accountant, mathematician and engineer$. Bet/ and ;ac#ett found from this research that the self,efficacy approach to career development for women !and men$ provides a potentially useful framewor# for further study, and could have important implications for practice !)*5), p0):$. Their "asic premise is that low expectations of self,efficacy regarding various career areas, particularly those which have historically "een male dominated, are a ma-or mediator of gender differences in occupational choice and su"se4uent vocational "ehaviour !6it/gerald et al, )**A, p*A$. ;ence, career self,efficacy theory represents an attempt to apply a theory from one realm !social learning theory$ to another. The #ey concept in the theory, self,efficacy, was defined "y Bandura !)*5<, p8*)$ as+ peoples -udgements of their capa"ilities to organise and execute courses of action re4uired to attain designated types of performances. $an%ura (19&, p'91# 6eatures of career self,efficacy theory which distinguish it from Krum"olt/'s social learning theory are that it+ places a strong emphasis on thin#ing processes !compared with "ehaviour$. focuses on the strength of the individual's "elief that they can successfully accomplish something. considers that "elief is more powerful than interests, values or a"ilities. emphasises that an individual's "elief system affects their "ehaviours !rather than the "ehaviours themselves. focuses more on choice than social learning theory. pays less attention !so far$ to the implications for practice. The theory proposes that career "ehaviour is a result of interaction "etween self,efficacy, outcome expectations and goals. These are "riefly descri"ed "elow+ a) 'elf)-fficacy, This refers to a changing set of "eliefs a"out oneself. The way in which individual's view their a"ilities and capa"ilities affects academic, career and other choices. f an individual has a low sense of self,efficacy, they may not persist in a difficult tas#. They may "elieve they will "e una"le to do the tas# well, and they may feel discouraged or overwhelmed "y the tas#. n fact, research indicates !>ent, Brown and >ar#in, )*5<$ that there's only a moderate relationship "etween an individual's view of their own a"ility and o"-ective measures. Judgements of 'self,efficacy' influence whether "ehaviour will "e initiated, the degree of effort that will "e expended, and how long the "ehaviour will "e maintained in the face of o"stacles. e.g. a woman's "elief's a"out her general capa"ilities, her confidence in her self,assessment of her a"ilities and her carpentry s#ills would affect the choice of "eginning and continuing in a -o" as a carpenter, as well as the choice of maintaining the -o" in the face of friends, perhaps family and colleagues pressures to find a -o" more suita"le for her gender. Bandura !)*??, )*5<$ , proposed that self,efficacy expectations vary on three dimensions+ (evel i.e. degree of difficulty of tas# that an individual feels capa"le of performing. )tren*th i.e. confidence the person has in hisCher estimates. +enerality i.e. range of situations in which the person feels efficacious. 2) !utcome -#pectations, The varia"le that interacts with self,efficacy expectations is 'outcome expectations'. That is, an individual's estimate of the pro"a"ility of an outcome. t's often difficult to distinguish outcome expectations from self,efficacy expectations "ecause often it is thought that outcomes are contingent on performance. ;owever, in some situations, outcome expectations are readily distinguisha"le from self,efficacy expectations. 6or example, a women may "elieve she is a"le to perform the role of (hief &xecutive, "ut does not expect that she would "e selected for the -o" if she applied. That is, environmental factors are perceived as controlling or influencing the outcome rather than the level or 4uality of one's "ehaviour. Therefore, outcome expectations refer to the estimate of a"ility to accomplish a tas# !' can pro"a"ly get into University$, whereas self,efficacy expectations refer to estimates of whether an individual can carry out the tas# !' sure 'm capa"le of degree level study and am definitely going to apply'$. Bandura !)*5<$ identified different types of outcome expectations, as follows+ @hysical !e.g. payment for employment$ 1ocial !e.g. parental praise for school wor#$ 1elf,evaluative !e.g. satisfaction with own performance$. 'ne other varia"le influencing whether "ehaviour will "e initiated is incentives !lin#ed to outcome expectations$. 6or example, a man may feel 'efficacious' a"out his a"ility to perform the duties of a #indergarten teacher, "ut does not value the outcomes !e.g. salary and status$. c) Goals, 'ne other varia"le influencing whether "ehaviour will "e initiated are goals. ndividuals set goals to organise "ehaviour and guide their actions, which may result in the identification of su",goals. 6or example, ' want to go into 2ational ;ealth 1ervice Danagement' represents an overall goal. To achieve that goal, the individual will have to set su",goals, including successfully completing a first degree, perhaps underta#ing further study, applying for the 2;1 two,year training programme and then applying for a -o" of 2;1 manager. 7oals are self,motivating and are a source of great personal satisfaction. Badura !)*5<$ identified four sources of information important to the process of development and modification of efficacy "eliefs. These were+ i$ performance accomplishments + successful performance of a tas# or "ehaviour provides information that increases expectations regarding efficacy. ;ac#ett and Bet/ !)*5), p88)$ argue that gender role socialisation is li#ely to encourage "oys to gain experiences in a wider range of areas outside the home. ii$ vicarious learnin* + that is, "y o"servation. ;ac#ett and Bet/ !)*5), p88)$ suggest that males are exposed to vicarious learning experiences more relevant to career self,efficacy "ecause of the way women are persistently portrayed in the media, "oo#s and children's literature in homema#er and mother roles. iii$ emotional arousal + for example, anxiety and stress. ;igh levels of anxiety and stress are generally recognised to "e de"ilitating. ;ac#ett and Bet/ !)*5), p889$ remind us that research indicates that females score higher on anxiety measures than males. This higher level of anxiety increases the difficulty of developing positive efficacy expectations. iv$ ver,al persuasion an% encoura*ement + for example, towards a "ehaviour would increase efficacy whilst lac# of encouragement or overt discouragement is li#ely to fail to increase or at worst decrease efficacy expectations. 3gain, ;ac#ett and Bet/ !)*5), p889$ argue that, "ecause of traditional societal views a"out "eing male and "eing female, males have received more encouragement for career pursuits and achievements than females. 'f these four, Bandura suggested that a$ E "$ are the most powerful influences on self, efficacy expectations, "ut all provide. Application of Career 'elf)-fficacy theory to 3ocational *eha$iour, n applying self,efficacy theory to vocational "ehaviour, ;ac#ett and Bet/ !)*5)$ stated that where individuals lac# expectations of personal efficacy in one or more career,related "ehavioural areas, "ehaviour critical to success is less li#ely to "e initiated, or if initiated, sustained. Whilst ac#nowledging that self,efficacy theory re4uires research on various #ey aspects !;ac#ett and Bet/, )*5), p880$ they suggest that a 'self,efficacy approach to the career development of women appears promising due to its explanatory power, implications for counseling practice, and research potential' !)*5), p88?$. Implications for practice, 'elf)efficacy theory has considera2le potential for 2roadening options. For e#ample, 1elf,efficacy theory has considera"le potential for "roadening options. 6or example+ the practitioner could use a variety of cognitive strategies to help the client view her successes as due to internal rather than to external causes !e.g. 'positive self,tal#' , (ognitive Behaviour Techni4ues$. the structuring of incremental graded success experiences could also "e used. in the area of vicarious learning, the practitioner could arrange, for example, shadowing experiences with successful representatives of groups not normally successful in a particular area !i.e. women in career fields that are of interest$. desensiti/ation procedures could "e used to reduce excessive anxiety a"out career choice or performance !e.g. relaxation techni4ues$. provision of high 4uality information pro-ecting images that challenge common stereotypes. Bet/ and ;ac#ett !)**?, p858$$ assert that 'Deta,analyses and reviews of )A years of research.....strongly support the role of career self,efficacy as a predictor of educational and career preferences, academic performance, and persistence in the pursuit of desired career options'. They conclude that "oth the theory and measures of career,related self,efficacy are useful "oth in research examining "arriers to and facilitators of women's career development and for designing and evaluating the effectiveness of practice grounded in this theory. They advocate the use, "y the career practitioner, of "oth structured measures of career,self efficacy and informal assessment techni4ues li#e the interview to ascertain the extent to which gender role socialisation may have limited the client's range of options. n parallel, a focus on male dominated occupations, mathematics, science and technology should ensure that options have not "een limited+ ...our -o" as counselors is not to ma#e a client's decisions or to push a client toward a nontraditional career, "ut to restor options that may have "een de facto removed "y sexism and gender role stereotyping as well as "y other environmental "arriers ($et- . /ackett, 1990, p'9#1 'verall, self,efficacy theory is thought "y many to have great potential for careers wor# with groups who have traditionally underachieved in certain areas. 6or example, girls, women and minority ethnic groups. 'ne of its strengths is that it doesn't ignore "iological, social or environmental influences, nor the current context. ;owever, it does assert that as individuals get older, it's more difficult to change interests, goals and performance outcomes. 2.4 Feminist Careers Counselling 6eminist counselling is a philosophy rather than a comprehensive theory of practice. Broo#s E 6orrest !)**0$ outline some practice implications of applying this philosophy to careers counselling. i) 'ocio)cultural conditions as primary source of womens pro2lems ;ow a pro"lem is defined determines how and where one loo#s for a solution. 6eminist approaches to careers assumes that social structures and societal prescriptions have moulded and limited women's career development, experiences and opportunities. t follows from this that in addition to the assessment of a"ilities, etc., there is a need to incorporate an assessment of the ways in which gender,role issues have affected the client and created "arriers within careers practice for women and girls. Two stages are identified which are necessary to achieve this goal, pre,assessment and assessment+ a# 2re3assessment strate*ies (preparation for the practitioner# @ractitioners familiari/e themselves with research and scholarship on the relationship "etween gender and career development, for example+ interaction "etween gender and demographic varia"les such as race and class. critical incidents that affect the career development of women such as models, mentors, discriminatory practices, etc. that might occur in education and wor#place. 2B+@ractitioners with strongly traditional sex,role attitudes should not attempt career counselling with women ,# Assessment 2rocess (with the client# 'ne of the central tas#s is to determine how the client has experienced gender,role sociali/ation. gather contextual data on the culture of the family of origin, family roles for men and women, client's perception of societal gender,role prescriptions for her age cohort. then, in4uire how the client transformed and gave meaning to her own life within her sociological culture. Techni4ues which can "e used for this purpose include structured 4uestions, fantasy exercise and sentence completion. n summary, a #ey tas# of gender role analysis is to identify ways in which social structures and gender role prescriptions have affected the client. The conclusions drawn from the assessment then guide the goals and process of careers counselling. 7ender role issues are more relevant for some clients than others, though Broo#s E 6orrest !)**0$ argue that it is difficult to imagine any situation where they are totally irrelevant. ii) 5ersonal is political 3 focus of careers counselling should "e to help clients develop a political awareness of the ways the social structure has moulded and limited them, for example, restricted perceptions of occupational options, focus on nurturing roles to the neglect of achieving roles, etc. Through gaining an awareness of the ways in which the environment has affected women's career choice and development, clients reduce self,"lame for condition over which they had no control. iii) -galitarian relationship The practitioner doesn't deny expertise or competence, "ut rather wor#s to avoid a"use of power and user power sharing strategies. To implement this principles, feminist career counsellors wor# towards+ esta"lishing the relationship as colla"orative and facilitative rather than hierarchical. informing the client a"out the procedures and goals of counselling and the philosophy of the practitioner. urging the client to give feed"ac# to the practitioner. encourage the client to "e selective a"out the practitioner with whom they wor#. i$) -ssentials for womens mental health 7oals+ the overall goal is the empowerment of the client towards self,determination !i.e. help clients gain the s#ills, #nowledge and attitudes necessary to ta#e control over her own life and to "egin to influence others$. Feaching these goals often re4uires special techni4ues and strategies. %arious strategies have "een suggested !e.g. use of groups, female role models, interventions in the curriculum and other social structures, life planning$. 3dditionally+ 1ex,role analysis+ similar to gender,role assessment where the goal is to identify the client's expectations regarding gender roles. t is an activity directed at eliciting the client's views a"out costs and "enefits of pursuing traditional versus nontraditional careers. 3nother techni4ue is the nonsexist occupational card sort, where cards portraying occupational roles free from gender stereotyping are used to explore attitudes to 'gendered wor#'. >ife,career planning strategies can encourage women to engage in long,term planning and there"y exert some control over their future. 2.6 Farmer, 7i$ersity and Womens Career 7e$elopment Using social learning theory as a theoretical framewor#, 6armer !)**?a, )**?"$ challenges the via"ility of current theoretical views for women. They also criticise current careers programmes and practices, offering concrete practical suggestions for addressing these wea#nesses. 6armer developed her ideas from on a longitudinal research study conducted over a period of two decades. The particular focus of the research was women's persistence in science careers !)**?a, pxi$. =ata collection too# place during three time period+ )*5:, )**: and )**),)**8, in 2orth 3merica. Guestionnaires were used to collect the data during the first two phases. The 'usa"le' !6armer, )**?a, p9)$ 4uestionnaires from participants during this first phase !)*5:$ num"ered ),5<8. By )**:, 0A* participants returned usa"le 4uestionnaire data !p9<$. What appeared to "e inconsistencies were found in the data collected during these first two phases and decided to investigate further. 6or the third phase, ):A participants were interviewed for one to two hours, since 6armer recognised 'that more 4uantitative data would not suffice to unloc# the meaning "ehind the inconsistencies' !)**?a, pxi$. 4heoretical mo%el un%erlyin* the lon*itu%inal stu%y (5armer, 196, 1990a, 1990,# 6or the )*5: phase of data collection, three types of factors were assumed to affect women's "ehaviour+ motivation, personal and environmental varia"les+ @ersonal+ home role salience. sex role orientation. self,esteem. co,operative and competitive achievement style. successCfailure attri"utions !four dimensions , a"ility, effort, luc# and tas# difficulty$. and achievement values. &nvironmental+ parent support. teacher support. counsellor support and support for women wor#ing. Dotivation+ career motivation. achievement motivation and career aspirationCeducational level. 6or the )**: phase of data collection, the same categories were used, with some items enhanced !6armer, )**?a, p)0,)A$. mportant assumptions underlying interpretations of the data are identified as !6armer, )**?", p8<8$+ that career planning must ta#e place within a life planning framewor#, and that such plans must ta#e account of other life roles, such as those of spouse or partner and parent, as well as personal roles. that choice of a career field should "e consistent with a woman's or a man's a"ilities, aptitudes, values and interests as well as realistic in light of societal opportunities and constraints. that the role of people as agents in their learning, choosing and "ehaviour is an important aspect of the potential for change. 6armer remains convinced that social learning theory provides the most promising theoretical "asis for effective careers counselling with girls and women+ 1ocial learning theory is optimistic in that it allows for "ehaviours to change over time as a result of new experiences, new ideas, and self perceptions and plans. ...'perating within many realistic constraints, women still may have much to say a"out their destinies (1990, p9# Based on her research findings, 6armer ma#es the following suggestions for careers counselling with 'young women and men to day and in the coming decades' !)**?, p9*)$+ &nhanced careers education curriculum in further and higher education, which emphasises sexual e4uality and addresses issues such as sexual harassment in the wor#place. >ife planning, including exploration of values and how these fit in with their long, term career plans. This would address career,family role conflicts which arise in 'dual, wor#er couples'!p959$ and aim to develop 'multiple role realism' !p950$. 1elf,efficacy and career persistence+ since these are connected, careers counsellors can contri"ute much "y increasing self,efficacy in clients !see section c$ a"ove for strategies. Feducing the 'null environment' !p9*9$ in education !i.e. one that is indifferent to women's achievements$ is essential if women are to start realising their potential. This re4uires reduction of the 'chilly environment' !p9*9$ and sexual harassment present in many educational settings, especially non,traditional areas for women !li#e science, maths and engineering$. Conclusion 6rom a review of a decade of research into women and career development, @hillips and mhoff !)**?$ conclude that 'women's lives are complex' !p0*$. They note that the past decade has seen significant progress towards understanding this complexity. 6it/gerald et al !)**A$ stress the need to study concepts and varia"les for women !such as those identified "y Bet/, )**0$ which were previously regarded as unnecessary and irrelevant, concluding that this will lead to a greater understanding of the vocational "ehaviour of everyone !p<5$. 8eferences 3stin )*<? 3stin, ;.1. !)*<?$ @atterns of (areer (hoices 'ver Time in @ersonnel and 7uidance Journal, 0A, pA0),A0<. 3stin )*50 3stin, ;.1. !)*50$ The Deaning of Wor# in Women's >ives+ a sociopsychological model of career choice and wor# "ehaviour in The (ounseling @sychologist, )9, 0, p))?,)9<. Bet/ et al )*5) Bet/, 2.&. E ;ac#ett, 7. !)*5)$ The Felationship of (areer,Felated 1elf,&fficacy &xpectations to @erceived (areer 'ptions in (ollege Women and Den in Journal of (ounseling @sychology, 95, A, p8**,0):. Bet/ )**0 Bet/, 2.&. !)**0$ Basic ssues and (oncepts in (areer (ounseling for Women, in Wash, W.B. E 'sipow, 1.;. !)**0$ !ed$ (areer (ounselling for Women ;illsdale, 2ew Jersey+ >awrence &rl"aum 3ssociates. Bet/ et al )**? Bet/, 2.&. E ;ac#ett, 7. !)**?$ 3pplications of 1elf,&fficacy Theory to the (areer 3ssessment of Women in Journal of (areer 3ssessment, A !0$ p858,0:9. Broo#s )**: Broo#s, >. !)**:$ Fecent =evelopments in Theory Building in Brown, =. Broo#s, >. E 3ssociates (areer (hoice E =evelopment !second ed$, 1an 6rancisco+ Jossey Bass !p 8<0,8*0$. Broo#s et al )**0 Broo#s, >. E 6orrest, >. !)**0$ 6eminism E (areer (ounseling in Walsh, W.B. E 'sipow, 1.;. !eds$ (areer (ounseling for Women, ;illsdale, 2ew Jersey+ >awrence &rl"aum 3ssociates. 6armer )*5A 6armer, ;.1. !)*5A$ Dodel of (areer and 3chievement Dotivation for Women and Den in Journal of (ounseling @sychology, 89, 8, p8<8,8*:. 6armer et al )**?a 6armer, ;.1. E 3ssociates !)**?a$ =iversity E Women's (areer =evelopment, Thousand 'a#s, (alifornia+ 1age. 6armer )**? 6armer, ;.1. !)**?$ Women's motivation related to mastery, career salience, and career aspiration+ a multivariate model focusing on the effects of sex role sociali/ation in Journal of (areer 3ssessment, A, p8AA,85). 6it/gerald et al )**A 6it/gerald, >.6, 6assinger, F.&. E Bet/, 2.&. !)**A$ Theoretical 3dvances in the 1tudy of Women's (areer =evelopment in Walsh, W.B. E 'sipow, 1.;. !eds$ !9nd edition$ ;and"oo# of %ocational @sychology+ theory, research and practice, Dahway, 2ew Jersey+ >awrence &rl"aum 3ssociates. 7ottfredson )*5) 7ottfredson, >.1. !)*5)$ (ircumscription and (ompromise+ 3 =evelopment Theory of 'ccupational 3spirations, in Journal of (ounseling @sychology Donograph, 95, A0A,A?* 7ottfredson )*58 7ottfredson, >.1. !)*58$ (reating and (ritici/ing Theory, in Journal of %ocational Behaviour,, 98, 9:8,9)9 7ottfredson )**< 7ottfredson, >.1. !)**<$ 7ottfredson's Theory of (ircumscription and (ompromise in Brown, =. E Broo#s, >. E 3ssociates, !eds$ !8rd edition$ (areer, (hoice and =evelopment, 1an 6rancisco, (alifornia, Jossey Bass. 7ottfredson et al )**? 7ottfredson, >.1. and >apan, F.T. !)**?$ 3ssessing gender,"ased circumscription of occupational aspirations, Journal of (areer 3ssessment, A, 0)*,00). ;ac#ett et al )*5) ;ac#ett, 7. E Bet/, 7. !)*5)$ 3 self,efficacy approach to the career development of women in Journal of %ocational Behaviour, )5, p89<,88*. @hillips et al )**? @hillips, 1.=. E mhoff, 3.F. !)**?$ Women and (areer =evelopment+ a =ecade of Fesearch, in 1pence, J.T., =arley, J.D. E 6oss, =.J. !&ds$ 3nnual Feview of @sychology, 05, pp8),A* >ast modified 9::0,:5,9* :)+:: @D