Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
C.
The amount of crystal violet sorbed onto GFP, q
e
(mgg
1
), was
calculated using the equation:
q
e
=
(C
i
C
e
)V
W
(1)
where q
e
is the crystal violet uptake (mgdye g
1
sorbent); C
i
and
C
e
are, respectively, the initial and equilibrium liquid-phase con-
centrations of crystal violet (mgL
1
); V the volume of crystal violet
solution (L); and W the weight of GFP (g).
For determining the optimumcontact time for sorption equilib-
rium and kinetics of sorption, the sorbatesorbent were contacted
for various time intervals (10240min). The residual dye concen-
tration was determined and the amount of crystal violet sorbed, at
time t was calculated using the equation:
q
t
=
(C
i
C
e
)V
W
(2)
where q
t
is the crystal violet uptake at time t (mgdye g
1
sorbent).
2.4. Desorption and reuse of regenerated sorbents
The CV-loaded biomass of GFP, which was initially exposed to
100mgL
1
of CV at pH 6.0 and 30
software pro-
vided by the FTIR spectrophotometer manufacturer. For obtaining
FTIR spectra, ball-milled GFP biomass was mixed with KBr (ratio
1:100), compacted into a tablet form using a bench press, and the
material was run for obtaining FTIR spectra.
566 A. Saeed et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 179 (2010) 564572
2.6. Column studies
A glass column, 1.7cm in diameter 25cm in height, was
packed with 140.56 GFP having 20cm bed-height. CV solu-
tion of known concentration (50mgL
1
or 100mgL
1
, pH 6.0)
was then pumped upwards through the column at a ow rate of
2.5mL min
1
. Samples were collected at regular intervals from the
efuent to measure residual CV concentrations. As the bed was
saturated, the CV loading was terminated. The total amount of CV
uptake by the GFP-packed column was calculated according to the
mass balance of dye expressed as:
q =
V(C
i
C
eq
)
M
(3)
where V is the volume of dye solution (L) passed through the col-
umn; C
i
the concentration of dye in the inlet solution; C
eq
the dye
concentrationof solutionat outlet of thecolumn; andMtheamount
of GFP (g) packed in column.
2.7. Reproducibility and data analysis
Unless indicated otherwise, the data reported are the mean val-
ues of three separate experiments. The amount of dye adsorbed
per unit biomass (mgdye g
1
GFP) was determined as shown in
Eq. (1). Langmuir and Freundlich models [21,22] were used for the
evaluationof sorptiondata. Langmuir isothermassumes monolayer
adsorption, which is presented by the equation:
q
eq
=
q
max
bC
eq
(1 +bC
eq
)
(4)
where q
eq
and q
max
are the equilibrium and maximum dye uptake
capacities (mgg
1
sorbent), respectively; C
eq
the equilibrium dye
concentration (mgL
1
); and b the Langmuir equilibrium constant
(L mg
1
).
Freundlich model is presented as:
q
eq
= K
F
C
1/n
eq
(5)
where K
F
and n are the Freundlich constants characteristic of the
system.
In order to examine the controlling mechanism of the sorption
process, such as mass transfer and chemical reaction, the pseudo-
rst-order, thepseudo-second-order, andintraparticulatediffusion
models wereusedtotest thet of experimental dataof dyesorption
by GFP on the kinetics equations proposed by various authors. The
pseudo-rst-order rate equation of Lagergren [23] is presented as:
ln(q
eq
q
t
) = lnq
eq
k
1ad
t (6)
where k
1ad
(min
1
) is the pseudo-rst-order reactionrate constant.
The pseudo-rst-order considers the rate of occupation of sorp-
tion sites to be proportional to the number of unoccupied sites.
A straight line of ln(q
eq
q
t
) versus t indicates the application of
pseudo-rst-order kinetics model. Ina true pseudo-rst-order pro-
cess, lnq
eq
should be equal to the intercept of a plot of ln(q
eq
q
t
)
against t. Thepseudo-second-order equation[24], another equation
used for kinetics analysis, which is based on the sorption equilib-
rium capacity, may be expressed in the following form:
t
q
t
=
1
k
2ad
q
2
eq
+
1
q
eq
t (7)
where k
2ad
is the pseudo-second-order rate equilibrium constant
(gmg
1
min
1
).
A plot of t/q
t
against t should give a linear relationship for the
applicability of the pseudo-second-order kinetics model.
Fig. 2. Effect of initial pH on the sorption of crystal violet by grapefruit peel waste.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Effect of pH on dye sorption
The pH of an aqueous solution is an important factor in dye
adsorption, as it affects the surface charge of the sorbent material
and the degree of ionization of the dye molecule [4]. pH has been
related with changes in the structural stability and colour intensity
of the dye molecule [6]. The removal of CV by GFP over a range
of 210 was noted to increase with the increase in pH of the dye
solution, appreciably up to pH 6.0 (Fig. 2). A further increase in
dye sorption between pH 6.0 and 10 was insignicant. Since the
optimum pH for dye biosorption by GFP was found to be 6.0, this
pH was used for further studies. As the pH increases, the charge
density of the dye solutiondecreases, sothat electrostatic repulsion
between the positively charged dye molecule and the surface of
the adsorbent is lowered [6], which results in an increase in the
sorption of the dye. The minimumremoval of CV was thus found at
pH 2, which is probably due to the H
+
ions competing favourably
with the cationic groups of the dye molecule for sorption sites on
GFP biomass [6]. Similar observations have been reported by other
authors [4,6]. The insignicant higher removal of the dye, observed
at pH between 6 and 10, was noted to be accompanied by a drop
in the original pH of the dye solution at sorption equilibrium. This
indicates a cationic exchange process between the dye molecule
and the GFP biomass with the release of protons (H
+
), as suggested
in an earlier study [25].
3.2. Effect of contact time
The rate of sorption of CV by GFP was determined by contacting
25mgL
1
of the CVsolution(pH6.0) with1.0gL
1
GFP for different
intervals of time. The equilibriumwas reached within 60min of the
sorbatesorbent contact (Fig. 3). The uptake of CV, as a function of
time, was noted to occur in two phases. The rst phase involved a
rapid uptake of dye during the rst 20min of the sorbatesorbent
contact, which was followed by a slowphase of dye removal spread
over a signicantly longer period of time (>60min) until the equi-
librium was reached. The two-stage sorption, the rst rapid and
quantitatively predominant and the second slower and quantita-
tively insignicant, has beenextensively reportedinliterature [26].
The rapid stage, furthermore, may last for several minutes to a few
hours, while the slowone continues for several hours to a day [27].
The rapid phase is probably due to the abundant availability of
active sites on the sorbent, whereas with the gradual occupancy
of these sites the sorption process becomes less efcient during
the slower phase [28].
A. Saeed et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 179 (2010) 564572 567
Fig. 3. Biosorption of crystal violet by grapefruit waste as a function of time.
3.3. Effect of temperature on dye adsorption
Effect of temperature on the adsorption of CV by GFP at equilib-
rium was investigated at three different temperatures, viz., 20
C,
30
C and 45
),
respectively, appeared at 1641cm
1
and 1415cm
1
. The peaks at
1384cm
1
may be assigned to symmetric stretching of COO
of
pectin [36], and aliphatic acids group vibration at 1233cm
1
to
deformation vibration of C O and stretching formation of OH of
carboxylic acids andphenols [37], andat 1050cm
1
canbeassigned
to the stretching vibration of COH of alcoholic groups and car-
boxylic acids [37]. It is well indicated from the FTIR spectrum of
GFP that carboxyl and hydroxyl groups were present in abundance.
The sorption of CV on the GFP biomass may likely be due to the
electrostatic attraction between these groups and the cationic dye
molecule (CV
+
). At pH above 4, the carboxylic groups are depro-
tonated and negatively charged carboxylate ligands (COO
) bind
the positively charged CV molecules. This conrms that the sorp-
tion of CV by GFP was an ion exchange mechanism between the
negatively charged groups present in the cell wall of GFP and the
cationic dye molecule. The proposed mechanism of sorption of CV
by GFP is shown in Fig. 11.
3.9. Desorption of CV from GFP
Recovery of CV from exhausted biomass of GFP and regener-
ation of GFP was tested by using aqueous solution of 1M NaOH
[37]. For the purpose, 1g of CV-loaded GFP was contacted with
50mL of 1M NaOH and shaken at 100rpm on a rotary shaker at
30