0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
20 visualizzazioni4 pagine
-Central excise: CBEC considers extending time-limit for Cenvat credit to one year
-Central excise: ‘Market value’ for rebate on exportsis value in export market, not India: HC
-Central excise: CBEC explains structure & functions of Audit Commissionerates
-Central excise: CBEC considers extending time-limit for Cenvat credit to one year
-Central excise: ‘Market value’ for rebate on exportsis value in export market, not India: HC
-Central excise: CBEC explains structure & functions of Audit Commissionerates
-Central excise: CBEC considers extending time-limit for Cenvat credit to one year
-Central excise: ‘Market value’ for rebate on exportsis value in export market, not India: HC
-Central excise: CBEC explains structure & functions of Audit Commissionerates
This document contains a brief summary of the latest updates related to Indirect Taxes
All Rights Reserved USIL an Adaequare Company Page 1
Central excise: CBEC considers extending time-limit for Cenvat credit to one year
The annual conference Chief Commissioners under the CBEC, presided over by the Finance Minister, has, inter alia, asked the Chief Commissioners to interact with trade bodies and make recommendations on increasing the time limit for Cenvat credit from six months to one year. This is noted at paragraph 7 of the minutes of the conference, at http://cbec.gov.in/deptt_offcr/cc-conf-082014-minutes.pdf.
Central excise: Market value for rebate on exports is value in export market, not India: HC
Dr Reddys Laboratories exported its patented product to its subsidiary in the USA for sale in that country. It paid excise duty on the export and thereafter claimed rebate of the same. The department denied the refund by, inter alia, comparing the export price to the price of a similar product in the Indian market and finding the export product overvalued. This methodology was struck down by the Delhi High Court, which observed that market value verification must be made with respect to the price in the export market and not the domestic market. This judgment dated 14 August 2014 in WP(C) 818/2014 may be perused at http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/SRB/judgement/20-08-2014/SRB14082014CW8182014.pdf .
Central excise: CBEC explains structure & functions of Audit Commissionerates
As reported earlier in these columns, the Delhi High Court had, in the case of Travelite (India) [WP(C)3774/2013, held that there was no provision in law for departmental officers of service tax or for the CAGs audit officers to audit the accounts of a service tax assessee. Presumably the government will take some remedial measures in this regard; the judgment has certainly not hindered the formation of special commissionerates for central excise and service tax audit. The CBEC has issued Circular number 985/09/2014- CX dated 22 September 2014 to explain the structure and functions of the new Audit Commissionerates. Upon implementation of the cadre review there will be 23 central excise zones and 4 service tax zones, each of which will have one or more Audit Commissionerate headed by a Commissioner. The departmental audit of central excise and service tax assessees will be carried out by these. The Commissionerate will be divided into circles headed by Deputy / Assistant Commissioners (like central excise divisions) and groups headed by Superintendents (like central excise range offices). Show cause notices arising out of audits conducted will be issued by the Audit Commissionerate but adjudicated by the jurisdictional executive Commissioner. Response to the Comptroller and Auditor Generals audit will continue to be handled by the executive Commissioner. See http://cbec.gov.in/excise/cx-circulars/cx-circ14/985-2014cx.htm.
Central excise: Stayed demand can be adjusted from dues to assessee: HC
A waiver of pre-deposit and stay on recovery granted under section 35F of the Central Excise Act will not bar the adjustment of the disputed amount from amounts that subsequently become due to the assessee from the government, said the Bombay High Court in a case of Indian Steel Works. In that case the petitioner had challenged the recovery of a stayed demand from the amount of rebate that had been sanctioned to it. The case is reported at http://cbec.gov.in/excise/ecs-cx/cx-general/2014-2-36-hcmum.pdf.
Central excise & service tax: CESTAT clarifies regarding refunds under Cenvat Credit Rule 5
In a laudable step to bring clarity to the law as well as reduce pendency of cases, the CESTAT Bangalore bench listed 195 cases pertaining to issues around refund of Cenvat credit under rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 and laid down issue-wise guidelines as an interim order. The individual cases are now being taken up in small batches by applying these guidelines. The interim order clarifies, inter alia, that:
Refund under rule 5 was admissible even for the period prior to issue of notification prescribing the procedures and restrictions; Port / airport / land customs station from where the goods are exported is the place of removal and services used up to that point are eligible for Cenvat credit and refund thereof; Cenvat credit can be taken by 100% EOUs after 10 September 2004; Whether services that are actually performed in India, though for principals abroad and for payment in foreign exchange, are considered as exported and thereby eligible under Rule 5 for refund of the credit taken in connection with them, is to be decided in terms of CBEC Circular 111/5/2009 dated 24 February 2009;
All Rights Reserved USIL an Adaequare Company Page 2
The certificate given by banks for inward remittance of foreign currency does not have to carry reference of the particular invoice numbers to which the payment pertains; The person taking Cenvat credit need not be registered with central excise or service tax; Section 11B of the Central Excise Act governs limitation for the refund claim.
A report on this interim order number 79-152/2014 dated 18 September 2014 in the cases of Apotex Research Private Limited & others can be perused at http://www.taxindiaonline.com/RC2/inside2.php3?filename=bnews_detail.php3&newsid=21574.
Service tax: CBEC circular on certain issues of joint ventures
Whether the inter se transactions of JV partners are taxable has been the subject of earlier clarifications by the CBEC. [See circular numbers 109/03/2009 dated 23 February 2009 and 148/17/2011 dated 13 December 2011.] Now the issue that has arisen for clarification is the taxation of cash calls or capital contributions made by the partners to the JV. The CBEC points out that under section 65B(44) of the Finance Act 1944, an unincorporated association is a different person from the members thereof. However transactions that are merely transactions in money are not considered service and are not taxable. With these two points in mind, each cash call has to be evaluated to determine whether it is payment for something that can be called a service, like granting of right, reserving production capacity or providing an option on future supplies; it could also be towards payment to be made by the JV towards services received, which may be taxable. The CBEC also advises its officers to ascertain whether one of the members has a role in managing the cash calls and whether payment is made for this. The CBEC wants scrutiny of all the agreements concerned to a JV, to examine the leviability of service tax. See the circular number 179/5/2014-ST dated 24 September 2014 at http://www.servicetax.gov.in/st-circulars-home.htm.
Customs: Exemption for pulses extended
Serial number 21 of notification 12/2012-Customs wholly exempted pulses from customs duties; and proviso (a) after the table of exemptions restricted the operation of the exemption till the end of September 2014. Now the central government has issued notification 29/2014-Customs dated 25 September 2014 to amend this entry, carve another entry for chickpeas out of it, and extend the validity of the exemption for pulses till the end of March 2015, and for chickpeas till the end of December 2015. This notification can be seen at http://cbec.gov.in/customs/cs-act/notifications/notfns-2014/cs-tarr2014/cs29-2014.htm.
Customs: Anti-dumping duty on flexible slabstock polyol extended
Anti-dumping duty had been levied under notification 89/2009-Customs on flexible slabstock polyol from China, Peoples Republic of Korea, and Chinese Taipei. The DG Anti-Dumping has taken up a sunset review of the duty and requested for its extension for a period of one year, as provided in law. Accordingly the CBEC has issued notification 42/2014-Customs (ADD) dated 25 September 2014 extending the duty till 30 August 2015. The notification can be downloaded from http://cbec.gov.in/customs/cs-act/notifications/notfns-2014/cs- add2014/csadd42-2014.htm.
Customs: CBEC emphasises the importance of passenger facilitation
The CBEC has observed that there is a need to improve the efficiency of customs officers at international airports and their behaviour towards passengers, as it is well known that international passengers form their opinion of the country from the way they are treated by customs officers. Training in soft skills, and setting up of help desks at airports has been advised, in Instruction dated 19 September 2014. See http://cbec.gov.in/customs/cs-instructions/cs-instructions-14/cs-ins-pexfacilitation.htm.
Customs: CBEC invites comments on draft circular on disposal of refrigerant gases
The CBEC has drafted a fresh set of guidelines that are proposed to supersede the earlier circular 20/2009- Customs on the subject of disposal of seized / confiscated cylinders filled with refrigerant gases. Comments have been invited on the same, which are placed online at http://cbec.gov.in/draft- circ/Draft_Circular_20Aug2014.PDF.
All Rights Reserved USIL an Adaequare Company Page 3
Content provided by:
Radha Arun Consultants to Udyog Software (India) Ltd. radha.arjuni@gmail.com