Search

SPONSORED ADS
Home
About UD
Full Texts
Legal English
Law Student Blog
Forum
Quizzes and Exams
LAW MEMES
2013 BAR EXAM RESULTS
Home Civil Law Spouses Africa et al vs Caltex Philippines, Boquiren and the Court of Appeals
Spouses Africa et al vs Caltex Philippines, Boquiren and the
Court of Appeals
16 SCRA 448 Civil Law Torts and Damages Res Ipsa Loquitur
In March 1948, in Rizal Avenue, Manila, a tank truck was hosing gasoline into the underground storage of Caltex.
Apparently, a fire broke out from the gasoline station and the fire spread and burned several houses including the house of
Spouses Bernabe and Soledad Africa. Allegedly, someone (a passerby) threw a cigarette while gasoline was being
transferred which caused the fire. But there was no evidence presented to prove this theory and no other explanation can be
had as to the real reason for the fire. Apparently also, Caltex and the branch owner (Mateo Boquiren) failed to install a
concrete firewall to contain fire if in case one happens.
ISSUE: Whether or not Caltex and Boquiren are liable to pay for damages.
HELD: Yes. This is pursuant to the application on the principle of res ipsa loquitur (the transaction speaks for itself)
which states: where the thing which caused injury, without fault of the injured person, is under the exclusive control of the
defendant and the injury is such as in the ordinary course of things does not occur if he having such control use proper care,
it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of the explanation, that the injury arose from defendants want of care. The
gasoline station, with all its appliances, equipment and employees, was under the control of Caltex and Boquiren. A fire
occurred therein and spread to and burned the neighboring houses. The persons who knew or could have known how the fire
started were Boquiren, Caltex and their employees, but they gave no explanation thereof whatsoever. It is a fair and
reasonable inference that the incident happened because of want of care.
Note that ordinarily, he who charges negligence shall prove it. However, res ipsa loquitur is the exception because the
burden of proof is shifted to the party charged of negligence as the latter is the one who had exclusive control of the thing
that caused the injury complained of.

Safari Power Saver
Click to Start Flash Plug-in
! Smith VS ! Africa Law ! VS Fire ! Africa Info
0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Read full text
SPONSORED ADS
Related Cases/Legal Resources
Share on facebook Social networking site On Facebook Kitchen Appliances Civil Law Email Addresses
Employee background check Trucks Employees Facebook Share on facebook
Safari Power Saver
Click to Start Flash
Plug-in
AFRICA vs
CALTEX
Air France vs Rafael
Carrascoso
Juan Bahia vs
Fausta Litonjua and
Mariano Leynes
Salud Villanueva
Vda. De Bataclan vs
Mariano Medina
La Mallorca and
Pampanga Bus
Company vs
Valentin De Jesus
Sabina Exconde vs
Delfin and Dante
Capuno
Amado Picart vs
Frank Smith, Jr.
Facebook social plugin
Also post on Facebook
Posting as Allene Gonzales (Change) Comment
Add a comment...