All Autobahns Lead to Rome for Chris Spivey, Dogman, and Lisa. By Martin P Keerns.

2014
I was thinking about a recent comment I left for Dogman where we were talking about the multi-
faceted nature of what were up against. Ive shared some of my own thoughts with Mr Dogman,
and we seem to agree on many critical aspects historically, (in truth this is probably my specialist
subject). - That got me thinking. Why dont I do an article for you guys, on this matter because I
know I can blow socks off! - I, using only the documented historical facts, can nail down in a nutshell,
both who is involved and also how it is all done. And I dont really need to incorporate anything
other than law, history, and geography, into my argument in order to do so. I can easily go back
quite a few thousand years in our history, and can not only pinpoint many of the true utterly pivotal
points within it, I can do so both accurately and in detail. I know much that they would never teach
us. So what Ill do is this, Ill knock together a brief synopsis for your perusal. - Youre busy, I know,
but Im going to be keeping busy too. - I took 7/8 months off there, as Id just spent 5 solid years,
without a real break, just putting together those four bits of work youve all got, (but only my wee
angel Lisa is ever looking at). But now that Im rested focused and re-charged, and Im now ready to
get seriously back into my work again. - Ill do a decent article giving a load of salient points from my
big work for you guys now, as it could be useful reference material for those trying to see the bigger
game. Ill also highlight stuff no-ones dedicating time too, that they clearly should be. (I always do).
In 10 years time you will realise my book one nailed the sex, drugs, n rock and roll era. Others have
seen only one of the numerous separate parts, I have just knitted all these wee chunks of the bigger
picture together to help make better sense of it all. My logical and pragmatic approach is as
demanding, if not more so, than yours is Chris, or your Dogs! Youll see we actually have similar
humour too, if you do check my work out. - No mad theories, or untouchable/unprovable bogey-
men stuff from me, no agenda other than doing the right thing. Part two of my original work then
links Prussia where the concept of The State and also a State Education both came from, plus
Psychiatry and Psychology too, (did you also know the PhD is Prussian too, and so was Wilhelm
Wundt I believe, the nasty man who modernised psychiatry ) - He deemed Man an animal, with no
soul. I then went on to link serial killing with the paedo/satanist/mind control/psychiatry angle, (the
first 4 books are all mainly based on subjects from the 1960s on). I show ALL of these things are just
one thing. (Dave McGowans Programmed to Kill helps nail this). Then there is the ties to the
media and to our education system too, (John Taylor Gattos stuff on educations true nature and
purpose is unequalled, plus you lot are smart enough to get him - he will tend to bombard you with
tonnes of hard historical facts and big words in videos or talks, not for the simple types, trust me).
Read those education chapters to truly get one, the test from 125 years ago on its own needs spare
socks on to be read. Part 3 links ALL of this to population control, the Fabians, eugenics (piloted in
Prussia), and much more, I show how this all links to sex, drugs, n rock and roll, and to the Frankfurt
School agenda (another German ideology, hmm, Im seeing a pattern here, remember this fact for
in a few pages time.) (Its also all been about family busting and birth control, and thats what the
sexual revolution was really mainly about) I then cover vaccines as good as anyone ever has. (The
graph chapter is top notch), I combined ALL of the best ones available (O.N.S. usually), and on many
diseases. My three fucking chapters on fluoride, are unique, and for the first time show it from ALL
of the angles. - Not just in water, or in all toothpaste, its also in loads of psychiatric drugs too, (for
instance you know a valium isnt strong, but those rohypnol date rape mother fuckers are, well did
you know rohypnol is just fluoridated valium!) And then theres my info on just how much fluoride is
in our fucking food! That will definitely blow your fucking socks off. No-one, I can see, has looked at
it before in the detail that I have. My Chapters on AIDS and Cancer (3pts) are also in my own humble
opinion all real quality as well. Youll all be a lot smarter for reading them, trust me. Part 4 will also
be the best explanation and breakdown of the financial crises (causes and consequences), youll see
for quite a while too. All the best data available is in just one book. Years from now, you will have to
agree with me. Facts is facts. And I do actually know my onions. Its social control in book one - mind
control in book two - population control in book three - and finally financial control in book four.
Theyre all actually only telling one large interlinked story, but it was given to the reader in a rather
easily digestible manner. Im tired of pussyfooting around, youre all too busy, so I need to knock you
out with something thats dynamite, now, just to try and catch your attention span for a wee tick.
Im gonna do this article for you guys just to give you a good solid reference point for you and others
to work from, just in case, for some reason I dont get to lay it all out in fine detail myself in my next
section of 3/4 books. - I just had to rest my pea brain for a wee while there, after those first 4 books.
(It was intense), but now Im ready to get busy putting stuff together again. My batteries re-charged.
This article will only be a very short version (comparatively) of what will be a few thousand page
story. Dogman and you can decide if my wee synopsis is any good, you decide if its worth posting,
well see soon enough if Im good enough to actually blow some fucking sock off, or not! Shall we? -
Im glad, Im actually in the fucking mood again buddy. You keep up your own great work. All of you.
Im probably gonna re-dedicate myself full time into my researching and sticking something together
again thing quite soon. Im just glad I got to know you guys first, Ive been working as a lone wolf for
a long time, Im glad to get to know another few people who are as concerned as me on this island. I
surfaced in Jan when I finished book 4, and I luckily found your site in Mar. (It gave me hope, the first
UK site worth a fuck). Youre the only people Ive ever got talking to, and whove been asked in the
UK to post my pdfs as reference material. I honestly think I can help both you and your site, and
myself with my work. I dont want any money or recognition, I just want to help like-minded people.
Heres my tuppence worth for if you ever held a gun to my head and forced me to say who has ran
the show for the last 1500 odd years - just to kick off with. (I can easily go back much further, but
thats for the completed section of 3 or 4 books that Ill re-surface with sometime reasonably soon, I
hope. (Maybe in 1yr/18 months). This wee bit of work is just an appetiser in order to hopefully get
you guys, and whoever you happen to share it with, in the mood. - The truth, Ive found, is thankfully
quite often a lot simpler than many believe it to be. Its the sheer depth, history, and the scale of it
all thats often the only really complicated thing about it. TPTB have convinced many its too deep
and convoluted for them to grasp, in truth its easy enough for children to be able to understand.
The real main tools of overall control are simple, control of the law, the religion(s) and of commerce.
Becoming any of the many middle-men in any of these 3 trades i.e. lawyer, priest, judge, banker,
politician etc. gave them complete control over any size of populace, it always has done, and it
always will do. Priesthoods have always performed these tasks, and throughout all of our recorded
history, did you know that? - Their temples have always held the treasure too. - Now an extract from
Word Controlled Humans A Brief History by someone called Harland, just so you can better
understand how the various parts of the overall control element are actually structured, how they all
fit together, how they can assist and complement one another, and also, whos actually in charge.
INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS
In warm climates people easily obtained abundant natural food and needed little protection from
the elements. These factors made for denser populations, and the denser population caused people
to think less about their relation to the natural world and more about their relationships to people
as a group. They were less sensitive to their solitary thoughts, to their dreams or inherited
memories, and had less womb-like experiences that brought innate-knowledge-of the- total-
universe, derived from individual introspection, into comparison with verbal-knowledge, acquired
from the group. Each did not feel the critical, moment by moment, direct link between himself or
herself and the universe as a whole.
When those few who paid attention to their inherited memories, or had what they considered to be
significant dreams, told others about such big dreams, they discovered that few had similar
experiences. The universe-to-individual experience was crowded out by more blatant interpersonal
relationships. Everyone was impressed by colourful personalities. So the few who placed high value
on their solitary experiences talked of their inherited memories or dream experiences as
communications coming from a personality from the "spirit" of the whole universe. Doubtless the
dreamers were influenced by the constant focus on personal relations to such an extent that the
unique experiences actually did seem to come from somewhere outside themselves.
Those who had these unique experiences found that uniqueness, itself, gave the dreamers prestige
in the eyes of others. Some of the unscrupulous added extra drama to their dreams in order to
create a prestige-building awe of their privileged contact with a "spirit" others could not see. It
worked. Because living was easy, words describing a dramatic relationship to "spirits" of the universe
became more important in establishing prestige than demonstrated ability in relation to the
universe of objective reality. Good hunters, and others of much experience and ability, lost their
places as leaders to those claiming to have special communion with spirits knowing more than
ordinary humans.
The new type of leaders, who began to lead groups by words that created awe, I will call "priests."
These priests first transformed prestige into control by public spectacles where a word-stimulated
group obeyed the purported commands of the priest's private dream-spirit and did such things as
dropping someone, who they said had offended the awe-inspiring- spirit, down a fire-spewing
volcano. If no volcano was handy, they made a spectacle of "offering the offender to the spirit" by
dramatically burning him or her on a conspicuous rock structure, while a frightened but fascinated
crowd looked on in awe. The "spirit" whos supposed "will" the priest told to the people to incite
such action is commonly called a "god."
"God" is a difficult word to use because it has several meanings.
As some people use it, it means the comprehensive creative intelligence of the universe. Others use
it to mean a stone idol or something completely imaginary. Recognizing that the one word can mean
many different things, I will try to make clear how I am using it each time as I go along. To avoid
making implications not backed by clear statements, I will not selectively capitalize the word in
accordance with some practices, except when quoting the writing of others.
Now to continue. Some, who were sceptical about the nature or existence of a super-powerful being
that others called god, became envious of the ease with which the priests controlled great groups of
credulous people; so they invented gods of their own. They, themselves, then became priests, or
spokesmen, for their gods.
Soon there were many different groups of word controlled people, manipulated as groups by priests,
who claimed to be speaking for different gods. Some made stone or metal images of these gods,
some identified them with the sun, the moon, the stars, the mountains, the sea all sorts of things.
Some stayed with the original idea that their god was an invisible spirit that spoke to them in private
or in dreams.
While all this was going on something highly significant was happening to the priests doing the
controlling and also to the groups being controlled.
Each priest directed all his efforts toward controlling a group of people with words. Both the size of
the group and the extent of his control over it was the measure of his power. He felt the group to be
an instrument he could use; it was much more deadly than a single spear or sword; it was a
multitude of word-controlled spears.
After awhile it seemed to be an extension of his own body. The controlled people also got mixed up
in the same way. All of the ones being manipulated began to think of the group as being an
extension of themselves. Like the priest, they also felt a sort of intoxication by reason of being "part"
of a group having more power than any one individual.
This word-created condition caused the value of individuals to appear drastically reduced. Only
groups seemed to have value. Groups competed with groups, not only in open conflict, but also by
trying to demonstrate which had the most powerful god. The so-called offenders or "enemies" of a
specific god often died in the night from mysterious causes. Sceptical observers began to recognize
that, not only was some ordinary human telling the group the "will" of the group-god, some ordinary
humans were doing the killing of enemies in the night to carry out the actions "willed" by their
group-god. These sneaky night killings, designed to create awe, became highly suspect.
Some potential group leaders decided to bring killings for the "will" of their gods into the open;
these I will call "kings." Kings, who were obviously ordinary humans, began to take control of already
word-conditioned people by proclaiming, or getting the priest to proclaim, that they were chosen to
do so by the "will" of the people's god. The standing orders, called "laws," given by these kings who
were obviously ordinary humans, had the "authority" of the god because the word controlled people
had accepted the idea that the king had been appointed by the group-god.
I suggest that we now pause and consider the question: What does "authority" as used above really
mean? In the world of reality a parent controls a child, an adult may have power over another by
reason of strength or strategic advantage, or a group may have power over an individual. The idea
implied by "authority" triggers action in those who have been word-conditioned to set aside their
own innate will and accept the word-control of someone in "authority." As I see it, "authority,"
implying the "right" of individuals or groups to control or exercise power over others, has no
meaning in the world of reality. I want to identify it as being highly suspect by always enclosing it in
quotation marks.
When orders were obeyed because coming from someone having "authority," mass warfare
between groups of word controlled people became the standard practice. If there was no apparent
reason for a war, a reason was invented; the system was dependent on it; "authority" grew by the
demonstration of "authority." Kings sent out armies that were already word-controlled to force
word-control on others, and the leaders of such armies often became the kings of those defeated in
battle. Since these kings did not claim to get their "authority" to rule directly from the group-god,
but from the other king, the people soon became so accustomed to word-control that they readily
accepted any designated authority."
In most of the densely populated areas, the people not only came to accept such control, they came
to expect it. They came to want it. They had become dependent on it. They could make no decisions
nor do anything unless directed by an "authority."
Great masses of such people, who were almost completely deprived of individual will by generations
of word control became a burden to their controllers. Kings, who were busy leading armies, then
gave "authority" to make "laws" some orders from the "authority" to an assistant, or to a
group of assistants.
"Governments" a complex of law-making and law-enforcing groups claiming "authority" that no
longer needed to be traced back to a group-god became entirely possible. The people had
become accustomed to look to an "authority" to make decisions for them, and had come to accept
any "authority" that was not challenged by some other "authority." "Authorities" competed with
"authorities" for group control. Individuals were lost in the shuffle.
It is my firm opinion presently that these three work in a tight-knit and symbiotic relationship today
that has become mutually and almost exclusively beneficial to all of the parties concerned, it has
also grown into a power block to be seriously reckoned with because kings need priests, who need
lawyers, who need judges, who need policemen etc. - This power group grows like an evil malignant
fungus to eventually build what becomes benignly termed (by them) as the establishment.
Kings make the laws, then a priesthood was required to enforce them, and this simple relationship
has been one of the cornerstones, if not the cornerstone of civilisation from its very inception.
A King cant control us all physically, he would need half the population to control the other half,
(Tory and Labour?) instead he uses a priesthood who not only shore up his claim to divinity, but who
also co-ordinate and have a controlling interest in virtually all the goings on within the Kingdom that
are essential to its continued existence. They provide the smoke and mirrors to keep the general
populous dumb uneducated and easy to manipulate because if they didnt they would soon ask
Why are you getting more than me? Or why are you receiving better treatment than me? This, it
turns out is the Oligarchs real power, Why? - Well it was because they eventually worked out that
they could, if they chose, impart enough hocus-pocus and mumbo-jumbo onto the herd to
sometimes even convince the dumb malleable masses to get rid of the King! Thats their power.
Unfortunately for the Kings over the years as the strength of the crown of the lands started slipping,
the priesthoods or oligarchies started to gain more power within kingdoms, this further enriched
them, which in turn only made them more powerful still. This development from autocracy to
oligarchy should be of much interest to any curious person wishing to educate themselves. To
understand it, is to understand the world and all that is in it, and on that note you could even argue
that by doing so one would be transformed into the man Kipling speaks of in the poem I have just
paraphrased, the man he challenges all of us to be (including you ladies) when he wrote If.
Scant attention is paid to this subject by historians and general academia, this I initially found odd,
then I realised that it is because knowledge is power, why after all would a gang of organised
criminals want the people they dupe to know how their scam works?
When people band together to form communities they will eventually begin to formulate laws, these
laws cover basic issues that all agree anyone within the community should not be breaking, - if the
people are ever to have a chance of living together. Examples would be that you cant hurt other
people in the land or you cant steal from anyone within the land. These are both examples of the
Common Law; they are things that are after all common rules for everyone. These rules or laws are
designed to protect the individual; they confer inalienable rights upon people who without them
would otherwise be nothing that more developed than wild animals or beasts. Without these laws in
place chaos would ensue because it would be law of the jungle instead of a common peace. - We
seem to have went back to a system of law of the jungle in the modern age, the biggest cat always
wins (biggest today refers more to the bank balance of this individual, as opposed to their physical
strength, but thats the thing, a big enough bank balance can also purchase all the physical strength
it requires too). I aim to prove to you that this only came about as a consequence of allowing
ourselves to be governed by laws which are designed for dealing with property, not people. In my
view we are property first and people second today. The reason I am giving you this version of
history is because it is imperative that you fully grasp how this came about, where the idea
developed, and why has it been successful.
I feel that I must touch upon this subject because the methods and ideology employed by these two
groups in the past (the kings and priests), have also you will discover, been used many times by the
exact same groups during our recent history and continue to be the most important pieces in the
puzzle if you ever wish to see the events and policies of the present in a clear and focused manner.
It is my firm personal belief that if you were to examine this relationship between these three
entities, from an historical viewpoint, you will quickly gleam that their never ending power struggle
has been the core element in our history, in fact it is our history.

It would take far too much paper to explain the complete history of this trinity, I will be writing other
books after this, and then it will be the main subject, because it is both a fascinating to explore, and
more importantly, crucial for your education. I will merely give you a brief overview of this epoch in
history constructed from solid facts and utilising many trusted sources, ultimately (for the sake of
brevity) it will unfortunately have to be so brief (comparatively) that it shouldnt be too hard for any
critic to pick some holes in what I say. All I can say at this juncture is, I will cover these matters in
much more depth in my longer work, so any critics to this short version of history will only line
themselves up to be knocked down later by picking on this part of what I say, the reason I say this is
because I will have the time to personally dissect their arguments, which gives me time to formulate
only the best quality rebuttals. Trust me, if you give me a head start, on issues I know inside out, in
nearly any argument, I guarantee you I will wipe the floor with you, thats all I will say on this matter.
The reason I feel it is imperative for me to cover the history of crowns, priesthoods, commerce and
law is because if you do study them then you will quickly start to see our history in a totally new
light, as Ive said, I will touch upon earlier periods in my next project, but for now I would like to
concentrate on a certain epoch of history from around 700 AD on, the reason I am doing so is
because it is my firmly held belief that an amalgamation occurred around about this period in time
which has been the main driving force behind both our civilisation, and also our tyranny, ever since
that time. As I said to Dogstein (lol) - I often see people sidetracking the threads by only seeing one
small group solely being behind the curtain so to speak. Their naivety is often funny, but their
error is actually a most serious one. Whether all of you realise this as readers of the site is also a
rather serious matter, and Ill now explain why. - This isnt just one super devious mafia running
amok; this is in point of fact, a worldwide, multi-generational conglomerate of inter-linked mafias,
putting old rivalries aside, who are instead forming one giant worldwide corporation out of them all.
- Nearly ALL of this planets competing entities, from countries, trade blocks, corporations, political
parties, armies, intelligence services, governments, politicians, judges, and a large group of whole
economies, are all just the make it happen departments for a small clique of rather potty inbred,
interwoven families and dynasties whove been pulling the strings for a long, long, time. The names
change, but the overall ideology remains the same. Most of the wars of the last few thousand years
were just one of these groups of mafias fighting for some prevalence, or creating a dialectic, (their
aims were always similar in the long-term, they just used different routes to get there, thats all).
Whichever flavour of bullshit we buy into, especially new flavours, makes this one particular flavour
of bullshit, flavour of the month, year, decade, generation, century, or millennium. - One ideology
can seem to be dominant periodically. But please take a big step back; this has always been a long
term venture involving many a multi-generational conglomerate of inter-linked mafias, forming this
one giant worldwide corporation. They switch from communist to fascist in a heartbeat because
both are totalitarian (with a token dash of) socialism. Both were curled from the same assholes.
NO SINGLE GROUP HAS THE POWER. THIS IS A SHARED VISION OF MANY CO-OPERATING FACTIONS.
As dogman says the more you learn, the more you learn about how much you dont know, I concur.
You need to study history relentlessly too, not just current affairs, because past is truly prologue. -
And there is nothing new under the sun. History has been constantly and forever repeating itself.
First, we will need to stress the critical part that commercial law plays in all of this; - it was the first
of the triad to go international after all. - And more importantly with reference to whos the
daddy we also need to be clear on who has always been in control of these laws of commerce
both in days gone by, and during our near and recent past. (I personally think theyre still in control).
The Babylonian Brotherhood and Commercial Maritime Laws
With reference to such reputable modern textbooks as "Historical Jurisprudence" by Guy Carlton,
Lee; of Johns Hopkins University in 1922; Babylon's Religious Priesthood is commonly recognized as
the source of the modern so called "Laws of Commerce". These "Laws of Commerce" are shown to
be a specific body of Codes which authorize the Administration of Compelling Force in Efforts to
uphold Contracts, mostly for Payments of Debts. The ancient Babylonian Priests were involved
because Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" entered into by the contracting parties; &
the approval of the ancient gods of idolatry were invoked so as to more effectively legitimize the
entire process in the minds & the consciences of the contracting parties & all public witnesses.
These Babylonian Religious Codes recognized the ability to buy & sell contracts between merchants
in "Commerce". They bought & sold "slaves & the souls of men". Under this system of Babylonian
Codes, contracted-debtor-people were Forcibly Compelled to perform the contract regardless of
conscionability, or who was the contract-creditor. This Babylonian Religious Commercial Code
embodied a sub-codification which is modernly recognizable as "Master-Servant Relationships",
which are also the source of modern Employer-Employee Codes. It is under the Babylonian Religious
Code that "Temporary Slavery" is facilitated. People were not recognized as people and thereunder
were items in Commerce. The Slave could be arrested for not showing up for work on time.
Textbooks say that "The slave is not regarded or spoken of as a man, but as a thing, and is reckoned
in the same way as cattle". ...
"Of ... these Rome was ... possessed from the earliest period..."("Historical Jurisprudence" - Lee).
Hammurabis code contains much of the Commercial Slave-Trading Mercantile Codifications of
"Master-Servant Relationships" which originated in Babylon, and is also known as Maritime laws.
It is imperative that you grasp this subject, the information given to you earlier concerning the law
only makes sense when you realise this master-slave relationship, it is how we are controlled today.
Remember the capitalisation of your name on all official documents that has been pointed out to
you? This is where it all starts to become relevant. Slavery is not (officially) allowed in our modern
system, so this is how it is done, you are reduced in status to a piece of property, then the law
doesnt give a toss about you, you are merely property. Ordinarily human beings are only under the
jurisdiction of the common law, this governs acts of violence or theft within a community and
applies to everyone. When dealing with matters of equity or contracts these laws are negated,
whatever you have signed on the dotted line to do, is enforceable simply because you freely signed
on the dotted line, you werent made to do it, and that my friend is what makes it all 100% legal.
These laws only apply to companies and corporations hence the all capital letter name on all your
bills or on a court summons. It is the corporation that you represent that is being taken to court, not
you, you merely show up to represent this entity. I know this is a complicated subject, but it is one
you MUST understand, this is because if you do then you will discover that there are ways of getting
out of many of these one-sided contracts. Not only that, you will begin to see for the first time
exactly how our world is ran. We are slaves with no real rights (apart from the ones the corporation
owner decides to give you). This is why we are described with such terms as the herd, sheep, the
flock, goyim, or the profane, this is also why a priest or pharaoh is administering to his flock. We are
not seen as people, we are seen as beasts or mere property, we are steaks who serve themselves on
the table. - Extracts now are taken from an article titled:
Modern "Commercial Law" is based on Ancient Babylonian Codes
A Historical Research Article Linking the "Slave-Trading Codes" of Ancient Babylon to the Modern
Laws of "Commerce", "Equity", and Civil/Municipal Jurisdictions. By Charles Bruce, Stewart.
...We find similarly enlightening source material in a profoundly insightful work from a gentleman
named Guy Carlton, Lee; of Johns Hopkins University in his work: "Historical Jurisprudence", 1922;
Pages 12, 17, 18, 38-40, 188-189:

The law of Babylonia has had an immense effect upon that of nearly all the countries of Europe . . .
The literature of Babylon has perished; but the element of culture which has endured was greater
than the literature. That element is law, an organized intelligible system of rights and duties
enforced by the State. . . The great work of the nation was the production of a system of law,
necessary to the extended commercial activity of the city . . . The complex Babylonian civilization,
which produced a commercial law in advance of any other ancient system . . . was . . . the product of
. . . its relations to the other countries of the world.

The exercise of judicial functions, at least in matters of commercial law, seems to have been in the
hands of the hierarchy. The reasons for this may have been in part those which, in the mediaeval
period of European history, threw the control of legal procedure largely into the hands of the
ecclesiastics (priests). In Babylon, the custom of documentary evidence in almost all transactions . . .
and the wide extent to which written contracts were employed, made the notarial and judicial
functions of the priests very extensive. But the part taken in business transactions by the priesthood
was appropriate for another reason, which perhaps had more influence in the time of the early law,
before the purely commercial side had been developed. This was the part which was connected with
contractual oaths, which at first were numerous. The contracting parties were obliged in their
contracts to swear by the principal god of the country, and by the reigning prince, that they would
abide by the conditions of the contract . . ."

The Babylonian Law developed to the fullest extent the idea of a Contract. Almost any possible
business transaction was reduced to the form of a contract and was executed with the same
formalities - i.e., with witnesses, notary, and signature. Thus the points as to deeds, sales,
mortgages, loans, and banking are in no respect different in form from the matter of hiring, rent and
leases, partnership, testaments, and domestic relations, including adoption. Transactions so very
different could be reduced to the same principle, or brought under the one head, only by a highly
abstract conception of contract itself. From forms of contract . . . we pass to the relations of master
and servant, leases, and future delivery of goods.
Sub-section A. Master and Servant. . . a man might well make a contract with another whom he
hired for a year, or whom he contracted to serve for a year. . . example . . . In connection with this
contract, it should be noted that Ubarru was regarded as a free agent, hiring himself out. But since
he enters into a relation to his master in which he is temporarily in the condition of a slave, he has a
representative, or guardian . . .

. . . In the case of a slave the name of the slave's father is never given. The slave is not regarded or
spoken of as a man, but as a thing, and is reckoned in the same way as cattle. The actual point of this
contract is the transfer of the right to a man's services. Such a transaction is but a part of the whole
Babylonian system, whereby every credit or right was passed from one to another by means of
contracts. . .

The law was very strict as to the beginning and termination of these contracts. . . If the servant did
not appear, he could be arrested and brought to his master, as he was his master's man. ...This
species of . . . slavery was of great importance and very customary in old Babylon.
And again, just to remind you who controlled commercial law before making the UK the worlds
commercial capital of the planet in the 17/18
th
century I repeat the following quote just to clarify
two things for you. - 1. The groundwork for this colossal financial endeavour actually began much
earlier than is realised, and 2. To also make it abundantly clear to you just who it was that was
behind these schemes. -Babylon('s) . . . commercial customs . . . became . . . the commercial law of
the whole known world. Of . . . these Rome was . . . possessed from the earliest period . . . "
Modern Applications of Ancient Babylonian Slave-Trading Codes:
This entire body of Roman "Civil-Law" is Designed to Centralize the "Decision-Making Authority" of
the Entire Community in-to the Hands of a "Single Arbitrator". This is How All "Contracts" were En-
Forced in the "Court of Equity". It was early incorporated into what was known as English "Law
Merchant", which many fine scholars have confused as being a true part of the English "Common-
Law". Such happened only after the corrupting influence of the "Norman Conquest".

Contracts are only enforceable in Courts of so-called "Equity". "Equity" jurisdiction was allowed to
enter into American Jurisprudence by way of Article 3 Section 2-1 of the so-called "U.S.
Constitution".
This article explains in a nutshell how Babylonian law spread to Rome, from there it passed through
Europe before arriving in Britain and from there it spread to every country that was once part of the
Empire (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Commonwealth).
I will be covering this matter in great detail as it is crucial for your wellbeing that you understand this
issue, as it may well be the most important subject in this whole work, if not in the entire world. If
you find it difficult to grasp and you find that you have to read this more than once, do it as it will be
time well spent, trust me.
This spreading of some power, to other people than the king or priests, had also created a new
power group. - One that has kept its hands wrapped around the throat of humanity ever since. -
Oligarchy
(Greek , Oligarkha) is a form of government where power effectively rests with a small
elite segment of society distinguished by royalty, wealth, family, military influence or religious
hegemony. The word oligarchy is from the Greek words for "few" ( olgos) and "rule" (
arkh). Such states are often controlled by politically powerful families whose children are heavily
conditioned and mentored to be heirs of the power of the oligarchy.
[citation needed]
Oligarchies have
been tyrannical throughout history, being completely reliant on public servitude to exist. Although
Aristotle pioneered the use of the term as a synonym for rule by the rich, for which the exact term is
plutocracy, oligarchy is not always a rule by wealth, as oligarchs can simply be a privileged group.
Some city-states from Ancient Greece were oligarchies.
Oligarchy vs. Monarchy
Early societies may have become oligarchies as an outgrowth of an alliance between rival tribal
chieftains or as the result of a caste system. Oligarchies can often become instruments of
transformation, by insisting that monarchs or dictators share power, thereby opening the door to
power-sharing by other elements of society (while oligarchy means "the rule of the few," monarchy
means "the rule of the one"). One example of power-sharing from one person to a larger group of
persons occurred when English nobles banded together in 1215 to force a reluctant King John of
England to sign the Magna Carta*, a tacit recognition both of King John's waning political power and
of the existence of an incipient oligarchy (the nobility). As English society continued to grow and
develop, Magna Carta was repeatedly revised (1216, 1217, and 1225), guaranteeing greater rights to
greater numbers of people, thus setting the stage for English constitutional monarchy. In an
aristocracy, a small group of wealthy or socially prominent citizens control the government.
Members of this high social class claim to be, or are considered by others to be superior to the other
people because of family ties, social rank, wealth, or religious affiliation. The word "aristocracy"
comes from the Greek term meaning rule by the best. Many aristocrats have inherited titles of
nobility such as duke or baron. (*Most of you know King John had already gave the UK to the pope
in 1213 - which nullified the Magna Carta from the vatiscams viewpoint. Martin).
Heroic kingship depended partly on divinely given prerogative, and partly on the possession of
supereminent strength, courage, and wisdom. Gradually, as the impression of the monarchs
sacredness became weakened and feeble members occurred in the series of hereditary kings, the
royal power decayed, and at last gave way to the dominion of aristocracies. If language so precise
can be used of the revolution, we might say that the office of the king was usurped by that council of
chiefs which Homer repeatedly alludes to and depicts. At all events from an epoch of kingly rule we
come everywhere in Europe to an era of oligarchies; and even where the name of the monarchical
functions does not absolutely disappear, the authority of the king is reduced to a mere shadow. He
becomes a mere hereditary general, as in Lacedaemon, a mere functionary, as the King Archon at
Athens, or a mere formal hierophant, like the Rex Sacrificulus at Rome. In Greece, Italy, and Asia
Minor, the dominant orders seem to have universally consisted of a number of families united by an
assumed relationship in blood, and, though they all appear at first to have laid claim to a quasisacred
character, their strength does not seem to have resided in their pretended sanctity. Unless they
were prematurely overthrown by the popular party, they all ultimately approached very closely to
what we should now understand by a political aristocracy.
The changes which society underwent in the communities of the further Asia occurred of course at
periods long anterior in point of time to these revolutions of the Italian and Hellenic worlds; but
their relative place in civilisation appears to have been the same, and they seem to have been
exceedingly similar in general character. There is some evidence that the races which were
subsequently united under the Persian monarchy, and those which peopled the peninsula of India,
had all their heroic age and their era of aristocracies; but a military and a religious oligarchy appear
to have grown up separately, nor was the authority of the king generally superseded. Contrary, too,
to the course of events in the West, the religious element in the East tended to get the better of the
military and political. Military and civil aristocracies disappear, annihilated or crushed into
insignificance between the kings and the sacerdotal order; and the ultimate result at which we arrive
is, a monarch enjoying great power, but circumscribed by the privileges of a caste of priests. With
these differences, however, that in the East aristocracies became religious, in the West civil or
political, the proposition that a historical era of aristocracies succeeded a historical era of heroic
kings may be considered as true, if not of all mankind, at all events of all branches of the Indo-
European family of nations.
The important point for the jurist is that these aristocracies were universally the depositaries and
administrators of law. They seem to have succeeded to the prerogatives of the king, with the
important difference, however, that they do not appear to have pretended to direct inspiration for
each sentence. The connection of ideas which caused the judgments of the patriarchal chieftain to
be attributed to superhuman dictation still shows itself here and there in the claim of a divine origin
for the entire body of rules, or for certain parts of it, but the progress of thought no longer permits
the solution of particular disputes to be explained by supposing an extra-human interposition. What
the juristical oligarchy now claims is to monopolise the knowledge of the laws, to have the exclusive
possession of the principles by which quarrels are decided. We have in fact arrived at the epoch of
Customary Law. Customs or Observances now exist as a substantive aggregate, and are assumed to
be precisely known to the aristocratic order or caste. Our authorities leave us no doubt that the trust
lodged with the oligarchy was sometimes abused, but it certainly ought not to be regarded as a mere
usurpation or engine of tyranny. Before the invention of writing, and during the infancy of the art, an
aristocracy invested with judicial privileges formed the only expedient by which accurate
preservation of the customs of the race or tribe could be at all approximated to. Their genuineness
was, so far as possible, insured by confiding them to the recollection of a limited portion of the
community.
The epoch of Customary Law, and of its custody by a privileged order, is a very remarkable one. The
condition of the jurisprudence which it implies has left traces which may still be detected in legal and
popular phraseology. The law, thus known exclusively to a privileged minority, whether a caste, an
aristocracy, a priestly tribe, or a sacerdotal college is true unwritten law. Except this, there is no such
thing as unwritten law in the world. English case-law is sometimes spoken of as unwritten, and there
are some English theorists who assure us that if a code of English jurisprudence were prepared we
should be turning unwritten law into writtena conversion, as they insist, if not of doubtful policy, at
all events of the greatest seriousness.
Now, it is quite true that there was once a period at which the English common law might
reasonably have been termed unwritten. The elder English judges did really pretend to knowledge of
rules, principles, and distinctions which were not entirely revealed to the bar and to the lay-public.
Whether all the law which they claimed to monopolise was really unwritten, is exceedingly
questionable; but at all events, on the assumption that there was once a large mass of civil and
criminal rules known exclusively to the judges, it presently ceased to be unwritten law. As soon as
the Courts at Westminster Hall began to base their judgments on cases recorded, whether in the
year books or elsewhere, the law which they administered became written law. At the present
moment a rule of English law has first to be disentangled from the recorded facts of adjudged
printed precedents, then thrown into a form of words varying with the taste, precision, and
knowledge of the particular judge, and then applied to the circumstances of the case for
adjudication. But at no stage of this process has it any characteristic which distinguishes it from
Society written law. It is written case-law, and only different from code-law because it is written in a
different way.
From the period of Customary Law we come to another sharply defined epoch in the history of
jurisprudence. We arrive at the era of Codes, those ancient codes of which the Twelve Tables of
Rome were the most famous specimen. In Greece, in Italy, on the Hellenised seaboard of Western
Asia, these codes all made their appearance at periods much the same everywhere, not, I mean, at
periods identical in point of time, but similar in point of the relative progress of each community.
Everywhere, in the countries I have named, laws engraven on tablets and published to the people
take the place of usages deposited with the recollection of a privileged oligarchy. It must not for a
moment be supposed that the refined considerations now urged in favour of what is called
codification had any part or place in the change I have described. The ancient codes were doubtless
originally suggested by the discovery and diffusion of the art of writing. It is true that the
aristocracies seem to have abused their monopoly of legal knowledge; and at all events their
exclusive possession of the law was a formidable impediment to the success of those popular
movements which began to be universal in the western world.
Extracts above concerning oligarchy versus monarchy were taken from Ancient law and its
connection to the history of early society. from Pages 55-63.
As you can see the oligarchy whether priestly or royalty always took control of the law, just as they
do today, if you write the law, and we all obey it, then you are a king without having to lift a finger.
You will also have read that the priesthoods or temples were always in charge of the banks and
money, between these two groups we have the small group of people who actually control a
kingdom. The great mystery is revealed, it isnt the Jews, the Masons, or the Bilderbergers, it is the
priests and the kings dividing the ownership of the land and all who inhabit it between themselves.
They only need to control the law to control commerce, and you only need to control commerce to
own the people, but just in case, they also run the religious priesthoods who tell you that whatever
the king demands (the oligarchy behind him in actual fact) is a reasonable demand and that we must
accept it, because the priests have spoken to God and he says its actually quite a good idea, in fact,
he wishes he had thought of it. That my friend is the big secret, it is no more elaborate than that. All
these other names are just thrown into the mix to confuse us or distract us away from the simplicity
of the system that ensnares us. The Jews has been the favourite one, but the Masons, Illuminati,
Bilderbergers, CFR, the Trilaterals, The Pilgrims, The Round Table, and all the rest of these stupid
distractions were exactly that, mere distractions, it is the kings and priests who run the show, always
has been, and if we dont get wise to it, they always will do too.
Now let us return to Rome, just around about the time that its Empire was supposedly crumbling.
Long, long, before the Roman Empire officially flung in the towel around 500 AD, did you know that
the currency was debased to the point of having virtually no silver content anymore. Just bear that
in mind. - Some say it caused the collapse. As if it was brought down by the bankers. Sound familiar?
If you know all about the eventual collapse of Rome, you will also know about guys like the Ostro-
Goths, those naughty and perma-maligned Vandals, and especially the Lombards. - All Germanic
tribes I think. Did you know the following wee caveats about those powerful German families?
The Germans saw themselves to be literally the direct heirs of the mighty Roman Empire. Kaiser you
may know, is just Kraut for Caesar. - The Holy Roman Empire itself was practically always German.
568 Lombard invasion of Italy under King Alboin.
712 King Liutprand of the Lombards occupies Ravenna but loses it to the Byzantines
Liutprand, King of the Lombards - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia:
Liutprand was the King of the Lombards from 712 to 744 and is chiefly remembered for his Donation
of Sutri, in 728, and his long reign, which brought him into a series of conflicts, mostly successful,
with most of Italy. He is often regarded as the most successful Lombard monarch.
Donation of Sutri
Having just overwhelmed the Byzantine forces, though it was left to his heirs to make the final
vestige of the Exarchate of Ravenna Lombard at last, Liutprand advanced towards Rome along the
Via Cassia; he was met at the ancient city of Sutri by Pope Gregory II (728). There the two reached an
agreement, by which Sutri and some hill towns in Latium (see Vetralla) were given to the Papacy, "as
a gift to the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul" according to the Liber Pontificalis. They were the first
extension of Papal territory beyond the confines of the Duchy of Rome. This was the beginning of
the Papal States.
Donation of Pepin - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia:
The "Donation of Pepin", the first in 754, and second in 756, provided a legal basis for the formal
organizing of the Papal States, which inaugurated papal temporal rule over civil authorities. The
Donations were bestowed by Pepin the Short only three years after he became the first civil ruler
appointed by a Pope, about the year 751. (hmm).
In 753, the Lombards under their king Aistulf had conquered the Exarchate of Ravenna, the main
seat of Byzantine government in Italy, whose Patriarch held territorial power as the representative
of the Eastern Roman Emperor, independent of the Pope of Rome. Pepin wanted to become King, so
asked Abbot of Saint Denis to go to the Pope for support. The Pope granted him kingship, and then
asked Pepin for help to defeat the Lombards. The Lombard Duke of Spoleto and the Lombard kings
posed a threat to Roman territory, and Aistulf demanded tribute from Pope Zachary, an able
diplomat. Eventual successor, Pope Stephen II, went to meet Pepin the Short (who had been
crowned at Soissons with Zachary's blessing) at Quiercy-sur-Loire in 753, marking the first time a
Pope had crossed the Alps. The Pope was first met by Pepin's eleven-year-old son, Charles who
conveyed him to his father in Ponthion. At Quiercy the Frankish nobles finally gave their consent to a
campaign in Lombardy. Roman Catholic tradition asserts that it was then and there that Pepin
executed in writing a promise to convey to the Papacy certain territories that were going to be
wrested from the Lombards. No actual document has been preserved, but later 8th century sources
quote from it.
[citation needed]

On July 28, 754 Pope Stephen anointed Pepin, as well as his two sons Charles and Carloman, at Saint-
Denis in a memorable ceremony that was recalled in coronation rites of French kings until the end of
the ancient regime in the French Revolution of 1789-1799.
In return, in 756, Pepin and his Frankish army forced the last Lombard king to surrender his
conquests, and Pepin officially conferred upon the pope the territories belonging to Ravenna,
Liutprand King of the Lombards was threatening Rome itself, but then out of the blue he instead
kindly donated to the pope all the lands that from then on became the Papal States. Hmm.
Some theorised, myself included, that in return for giving the papacy this protected land he was in
turn secretly granted the right to both coin and lend money. (Which officially the Vatican had to be
against). This desire to control money, yet also have to be seen (especially to the poor it taxed
through the collection plates) to be a church against usury, was the biggest thorn in the sides of the
Italian/Vatican families. - If only another religion could have been utilised by these Vatican families
they could have had their cake, and ate it. (Cough, the jews.) - Even better, would be a form of their
own religion (so theyd still have seniority) - yet a new version of it, one that was cool with usury and
debt. Until that was created for us in the 1500s theyd rely mainly on Germans to be the front-men!
Venice in time became a hub for this money trade. (Florence and the Medicis, had a go for a time
too). The Lombards were also invited further afield. (E.g. Lombard St. in London for centuries easily
rivalled Wall St.) - The descendants of the Lombards had found and settled on the safest country to
set up shop in, in all of Europe, an isolated island off the rest of mainland Europes coast. - The Pope
gave the okay (and blessing) for this invasion, and off they went. - You guys all knew it as 1066.
It was the legal and commercial systems brought by the Normans that you should look at in detail.
When they came a conquering they forced civil law, onto England first, and then later onto Scotland.
(The Inns of Court and Temple(r) Bar were also set-up around this same time). Then, they also began
foisting upon us the slow implementation of Admiralty Law, via the ports first, from the 13
th
century
and then eventually through the courts system itself, with Commerce, Equity, and Admiralty law.
The true invasion of the UK was with Roman civil and merchant law, and that was truly our undoing,
(backed by a religion that always said obey this hierarchy), (whether this was a protestant or
catholic one was irrelevant), it was the obeying of which particular kind of law that was important.
People waffle on about this group, or that group, and totally they totally miss the point, ITS NOT
SECRET SOCIETIES - THE BIG SECRET, IS FUCKING SOCIETY! (The probable title of the second section
of my work, so no stealing) - In many cases the actual big secret is nothing more than this, (sorry to
disappoint). Its actually more about the control of large numbers of us through the law, commerce,
and religion, (and the shared ideologies and weird perversions of these groups) than anything else.
We had a period of history from the early middle ages where there was an alternative power block
in Europe, vying for serious power, who also offered to pay for the use of Romes System. - The
French. - From the early middle-ages France had rivalled and competed with both Germany and the
later the UK for those lucrative deals with Rome. - France had then shown itself to be a most poor
and unreliable senior partner when they fucked themselves in the beginning of the 14
th
century with
the stupid Templar affair - Where a French King had ordered a weak pope to seize all the Templar
(Vatican families) wealth, for the French kings benefit. - I think they (the French) were never really
forgiven or trusted for this by those Italian families ever again. Hence the German/UK backing since.
As Ive said before about this matter in an earlier article: There had been a longstanding vendetta of
the papacy (or to be more precise the power behind it) to get rid of the Imperialist/Stuart (French)
rulers. This was because they, like the Ghibellines, and many of the Holy Roman Emperors, were
imperialists, in essence what this meant was that they wanted the pope to answer to a king or
emperor. - While the Guelph kings and Queens (one of whom by sheer coincidence presently shits
on our throne today) agreed to nominally still answer to the pope and his coterie of assorted mafias.
This battle over primacy was the TRUE cause for many of the wars of this period of history, (before
it, and beyond too). Rulers and dynasties (Protestant or Catholic) who said Youre the daddy got to
keep their thrones and land, while those who said Fuck off, Im the daddy (Protestant or Catholic)
have ALWAYS lost their thrones, land, fortunes, and as a matter of rule, usually their lives too. - And
thats still the case today folks. Nothing changed, the fact is, the OWO is still the NWO, they just use
proxies these days. Protestantism and Catholicism are two kindsa shit, coming from the same arse.
The UK has long been the financial arm, and the USA the military arm, of Romes newest incarnation.
Three city states within cities, each ran by Italian, German, British, and French families, (Theres
plenty American and Jewish families on board now too, and some other Tokens) who have ruled
over all of the known world for well over 1500 years now. Ive read, or heard, thats what the Audi
badge actually represented, - the original four power groups in: Italy, Germany, Britain, and France. -
While with the five circles in the Olympic flag, (America being included now). - (Something its (re)-
creator Hitler had apparently objected to himself, saying that they had no history. He gave in though
and included them in his Olympics (distraction) flag design anyway). - Notice how important these
type of distraction events were to guys like Adolf, right from the start, what do you think the
World Cup, Euros, Champions league, Ryder Cup, and Wimbledon, etc. are really for? - Same as X-
factor, Towie, Eastenders, and plenty more. All are the exact same thing, mere distractions. I digress.
Readers of your site should spend some serious time researching the trading conglomerate that was
raking it in during the middle-ages, based in Lubeck and in Hannover (where the family shitting on
our throne originally come from, hmm) called the Hanseatic-League. Germany again too, double
hmm. (A mini version of the international Fondi/trading colossus that Britain was soon to become).
This trading conglomerate encompassed 90 cities at its peak, and Ive read that it was actually
integrated with the other trading behemoth of that time: Venice. - German dosh, joined with Italian.


Remember what I already told you too: The Vatican had a long standing problem - they had
preached no usury, but at the same time they were desperate to control money just as much as they
controlled every other aspect of our lives. They had got into the field with the Templers, but caused
so much jealousy and envy with their obvious and tremendous wealth that a French king had tried to
rob them! The Vatican was having a lot of trouble with the paupers over the blatant riches of
bishops all round Europe at this time too. (This was one of the main reasons for the reformation
supposedly). How could the Vatican disguise its obvious avarice, maintain control, and still look like
the caring charitable house of space-monkey-jebus? This was a serious dilemma for them. (Luckily
in the 18
th
century up popped that wee jewish family, in Germany, to shield the Vaticans banking
scam. - Just before they took over the UK hmm) As dogman himself pointed out on Aug 31, 2014:
The Rothschilds are the Guardians of the Vatican Treasury, which at first glance would appear
strange. (Not if you realise how in fact theyre blame magnets for German and Italian Super-Fondi. A
fondi is just all the main families pooling their combined assets in one fund: AS THE VENETIANS DID!
The Treaty of Paris of 1763 designated King George III of the UK (a German) Arch-Treasurer and
Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire. (so the UK king was head banker for the pope too, hmm)
And according to the Encyclopaedia Judaica the Rothschilds bear the title Guardians of the
Vatican Treasury. The Vatican Treasury, of course, holds the imperial wealth of Rome. Imperial
wealth grows in proportion to its victories in war; as the Jesuit empowerment Regimini militantis
ecclesiae implies, the Church-at-War is more necessary than the Church-at-Peace.
According to H. Russell Robinsons illustrated Armour of Imperial Rome, Caesarean soldiers
protected themselves in battle with shields painted red.
As Ive said to you guys before in a private correspondence:
Not one A.M. site, book, or blogger has EVER asked themselves if the pile of pish about one family of
jews (Rothschild) taking over the running of the entire Earths finances near the end of the 18th
century is just that - a total pile of pish. Not one person in the A.M. has EVER questioned this maxim
of itsdajudaism! Honestly, are you trying to tell me that this one old man and his boys could just
sweep in with a few bob and just take over the mafia territory of ALL the Euroroyals and Vatican, and
that this nicking of ownership of their chattel property would be cool? - Nah, the Jesuits wouldnt do
nothing about that, or the Bourbons, the Roman Curia, the Hapsburgs, the Guelphs, the Venetians,
Or the Orsini, Breakspear, Aldobrandini, Farnese, Somaglia, etc. - Cmon tae fuck, seriously people,
just think about that one point alone. If any of these mafias had just killed 6 twats - end of problem.
These European mafias were seemingly all whipped (without a drop of blood being spilled
incidentally), by just one solitary enterprising family of jews? - Bullshit is definitely being called there
my fine fellows. - Logic alone absolutely demands it be. - And then theres the next crucial point -
2. If itsdajews, then why did they deed their most holy and most fought over bit of territory (the
temple mount) to the Vatican? (Originally back in 1992/3 I believe, but it was also revamped
recently, and back in 2006 too I seem to remember - google Barry Chamishs articles on it).
3. Think about it, if your gang was quite small (numerically) as theirs is, would you EVER be so
stupid as to put your people in ALL of the top positions as they have apparently done over the last
century or so? If I was them Id keep using proxys and stooges to do my bidding as they had
apparently been doing for centuries already. (All these goy would remain being so easy to bribe and
control seeing as they apparently own all the money presses and media too remember).
Why would they purposefully shove the blatant hegemony down the goys throat? - they could
rule from the shadows perpetually, and no-one would ever fucking know, - In no way does a super
malicious, devious bunch of uber-schemers fuck up so monumentally, in my own humble view.
Once again (to me anyway) this seems, (if it were real), like unnecessarily risky positioning. All of
these high profile jobs are currently being filled with these selfish cunts on purpose, in my opinion.
Same with banking - (Whos gonna get blamed for the inevitable mega-crash that WILL happen in
our lifetime?) Pretty short sighted and myopic at times these uber-cunning predators dont you feel?
Bankers are swan-diving (some assisted, probably the most mouthy) of roofs, because they KNOW
whats coming, and more importantly, how we will react towards them when financegeddon arrives.
Would you want to be jewish on that day? - Fuck dat. Not the forethought and guile of a supposed
master race methinks. Why would they not know this when a numpty like me sees its suicide?
4. Most of the A.M. keeps regurgitating shit along the lines of World media owned by jews - Just
because you run a paper or TV channel doesnt mean that you own the fucking thing! Look at the
actual ownership - its the Euroroyal/Vatican conglomerate behind all of these firms - as always.
And as I also said to you guys earlier, this time concerning the so called English civil war:
Remember that before the Civil War The Vatican had sponsored the failed Spanish Armada
invasion of us in 1588.
The Vatican had also sponsored the failed Gunpowder Plot of 1605, in earlier centuries often called
the Gunpowder Treason Plot or the Jesuit Treason - quote from the Wikipedia article on the matter.
It is my firm belief that it was the Vatican who were ultimately behind try 3 too, - only this time
theyre using their new stooges - jewish people with (their) money. Initial proof for me would be the
fact they wanted the Stuart/French claim to be quashed so much so, the last Stuart ruler (even
though Catholic) had to be removed also, to be replaced in the glorious revolution with a toe the
Vatican line Guelph type whose descendant, as I said, still shits on our shit-encrusted throne today. A
glorious coincidence? (And, a Jesuit priest starts a naughty social club credited with fomenting the
revolution that finished this bloodline off in France 150 years later - (Another sheer coincidence?)
Now this tactic had been used before. (Most notably with concerns to this article where it has been
mentioned in an earlier article on the site about the jews being banned from the UK for 500 years)
The problem I have here is why were they banned? It seems obvious; their usury. The issue I have is
this, during that first period they lived here the jews werent allowed to own property and all their
wealth ALWAYS belonged to the crown! Yes, they lent money and collected taxes, the fuckers even
introduced the Shetar which was the basis for the mortgage (the latin phrase meant death grip/hold
which might hurt the image of this rite of passage in todays world to be a healthy member of
society(robot), if these idiotic people realised just what the term actually means!). But the money
made wasnt theirs! "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the
Land, found in "The Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the
Law Review that
The Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings.
The Kings had a stooge who was hated so much, we didnt let them back in to the country for 500
years! We branded them the greedy jew, but they got fuck all but this reputation, for their evil work!
Dont get me wrong, jewish culture knew this system better than all of Europe, this was after all only
the same Babylonian master/slave system theyd laboured under for most of their modern history,
but it wasnt theres to begin with. Some of them just understood exactly how the game is rigged.
I wonder if the Rothschilds are just front men for all Vatican and Royals cash? - Id also like to know
where the unfathomable fortunes of both the Hanseatic League, and Venice went to (Both
disappeared just before guys like Rothschild or Fugger rose to such prominence as well hmm. - All
Im saying guys and geezerettes is theres much more to this than initially seems apparent, try
finding detailed stuff on the Vatican, or British Royals, or the Black Nobilities, finances or accounts,
and then compare that to what information you can readily get on jewish financial matters, - I rest
my case.
I think many of you need to look at the stooge/frontman angle because I know theres more to it
than most of you will ever know. - For example did you ever hear of those German Fuggers before?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia - The Fugger family (German pronunciation: *f]) is a
German family that was a historically prominent group of European bankers, members of the
fifteenth and sixteenth-century mercantile patriciate of Augsburg, international mercantile bankers,
and venture capitalists like the Welser and the Hchstetter families.
This banking family replaced the de' Medici family, who influenced all of Europe during the
Renaissance.
The Fuggers took over many of the Medicis' assets and their political power and influence.
And later on in the same wiki article...
With the help of their brother Markus in Rome Ulrich and his brother George handled remittances
to the papal court of monies for the sale of indulgences and the procuring of church benefices. From
1508 to 1515 they leased the Roman mint.
As you can see, a German Dynasty, appearing seemingly from nowhere, that gets rich quick handling
the Vaticans and the Italian families cash, didnt start or end with the Rothschilds. - Incidentally
these guys (and their cash) just kinda disappeared from history, even though the Wikipedia also says
Jakob Fugger died in 1525. He is considered to be one of the richest persons of all time
[6]

(6) ^ "Jakob Fugger II (14591525)". The Wall Street Journal.
Germany has played a more senior role in Europes real power-plays over the last 1000 odd years
than even the A.M. gives them for credit for. - Old Jordan Maxwell (dog bless the crazy coot, for he
initially introduced me to many fascinating concepts Id never looked at correctly back 15 years
ago, like true law, commerce, royalty, symbolism, and astro-theology. I just ignored all the CRAZY
things hes said). He stated that basically (after 50 odd years of research on this material) at the
heart of it all for the last 2000 years, he saw Teutonic-Zionism/Vatican/Euroroyals. - I tend to concur.
For years Id followed the copious amounts of evidence seemingly implicating a group who truly
revered both the eight point star and the Octagon. At the VERY top - it seemed to be ubiquitous:
insignia, logos, medals, architecture, it was everywhere, and I have 100s of pictorial instances of
this.
Then I came across this next guys work and bang!
A really big piece of the overall puzzle just solved itself for me! Or Cort solved a puzzle he never
knew existed to be more precise.
Before I stun you with Corts findings, to set the mood, heres a short excerpt from my own work on
the subject of what Id dubbed The True Mark of Power first:
The True Mark of Power

On Queen Elizabeths shoulder, what appears to be two tassels is in fact a figurative Egyptian flail.
(the whip for the flock) - Old pharaohs, new pharaohs. meet the new boss...same as the old boss

These families constitute a financier oligarchy; they are the power behind the Windsor throne. They
view themselves as the heirs to the Venetian oligarchy, which infiltrated and subverted England from
the period 1509-1715, and established a new, more virulent, Anglo-Dutch-Swiss strain of the
oligarchic system of imperial Babylon, Persia, Rome, and Byzantium - Jeffrey Steinberg (The Largest
Empire In the History of the World)
Above quote and pictures taken from Michel Tsarions article on Queen Elizabeths coronation.


The Star to the left was reckoned by Mr Tupper Saussy to be the identification mark of this top
echelon of the control structure, the centre badge is obviously the same, but if you look to the
diagram on the right you will observe that if you take the same star and turn it on its side slightly,
then connect the ends up to get a shape which might be more recognisable a sight, with regard to
Knights in particular, although many of you will never have realised it was still an eight point star,
just as a Knights Cross is, in fact you will soon see it is also only used for the important people or
institutions; uses like in the Vatican, on the Union Jack, on the floor of the British and Northern
Note the 8 point star
Ireland parliament buildings, Australias coat of arms, and most predominantly, in every single
country who has an Honours system where they have Knights, all of them wear this mark.
It appears that since back in Babylonian times that his mark has been used to denote power,
authority and control.
My theory is, that it is used by the higher ups as the ultimate identifying sign of power.

All of the locations that are used play an integral part in my tale so it is no coincidence this mark is
there, (you will come to realise that in most instances there is no such thing as coincidence). Notice
the Vatican above, with the same exact same mark as its arch-rival the UK has on its flag, hmm.
Notice how this badge is only given out to Knights, Kings and the like, (we may get to wear it on a
police badge or a firemans badge but the authority lies with others), it is more of a mark saying that:
We Are In Control, We Run the Show! - The rest of this article will utterly blow those socks off
proving just why that is...
Now some of that sock blowing proof (to finally satisfy this obviously twisted fetish of mine) of this
Vatican/German partnership, thats quite literally etched in stone, Ill use the brilliant work of the
(undeservedly) relatively unknown genius Cort Lindahl to show you, in the clearest possible way,
The popes crib
how hidden in plain sight and indeed physical, this deep and strong bond actually was/is. (It also
blows absolutely everything you thought you knew about both the history and the quality of ancient
map-making and surveying over distance right out of the fucking water incidentally, which was nice).
As Ive just said the Vatican/Italians (and the Germans acting as their sword) liked their cosy
relationship to be out in the open, (at least in one way). - How well do you know your way around
google maps? And do you know what the wind-rose markers in St Peters square are all about?
Dont worry, you soon will. And this isnt any wild speculative stuff, if you can draw a straight line on
google earth EVERYTHING Im about to lay out for you can be proven 100% by yourself to yourself.
Its that simple. - Here below is an overhead of St Peters square with its famous obelisk from above.
Can you see the purplish lines created by the union jack shaped markings on the ground? - These
will provide all the proof youll ever need to back up my wacky claims. The circle in the middle of this
top picture is just being enlarged for your benefit in the one thats on the page thats below this one.




Check out this circle (thats pointed to
above), here exactly smack bang in the
geographic centre of St Peters Square,
in detail, when its magnified for you in
the next photo on the following page.

Here is a close up of those wind-rose markers that I was just going on about. As you can see they
accurately depict the cardinal directions, and even the increments of these directions, precisely on
the earth, (with the obelisk itself being the exact centre point (or datum) of this physical compass
rose thats laid out on the actual face of the earth.


Heres two of those ground markers up close (for North and East) (They are barely visible (above) at
all the various individual 16 compass points). Theyre the small white dots you can just see within
the two circles, around obelisk, with the ground markers for the more cardinal directions like W or
NW also being contained within those sort of eye shaped surrounds (again in the picture above).
Whats the significance of these markings you may wonder? - Would you be blown away to learn
that those markings go off from St Peters, in perfectly discernable, laser straight lines on the surface
of the globe to many places around the world that accurately mark virtually every point of crucial
importance to the Catholic Church and Germany in their entire history together! (And they also mark
so much more than that too, but you can learn all about that from Corts videos and books yourself).
The compass formed by these wind-rose markers points a real arrow on the globe to nearly EVERY
important juncture in their successful union together. AND ITS ALL DONE SO PERFECTLY, AND WITH
SUCH MINUTE ACCURACY, THAT YOU CAN JUST USE SIMPLE LINES ON GOOGLE EARTH TO PROVE IT,
100%. -These alignments are so good that the lines created on the earth by them fit perfectly in
between the actual shapes on the earth, and also (amazingly) on the real architecture today, and yet
these perfect alignments were all created over many hundreds, and in some other examples, over
thousands of miles! - Its like the original surveyors had used laser precision, over totally huge
distances, and all yet it was all done hundreds, and in other examples, even thousands of years ago!
The implications of this are not only easily provable, they also both staggering, and they are many.
And its not anomalies, flukes, or coincidences. - This is like me building huge gardens or buildings a
1000 years ago that line up in the manner demonstrated below. - They were built by engineering
and surveying geniuses who had surveyed with such precision, its obvious they were built to face
and align with each other, on purpose, by people who knew exactly what they were doing, and who
were true masters of their art. - Corts work will be famous, of that Im 100% sure. Im just very
happy using his great work (and hopefully in the process advertising it) to back up my own personal
theory in such a convincing manner with these solid and clear proofs that were all provided by him.


















Lets prove the alignment Im referring to actually exists with absolutely conclusive proof using the
most blatant alignment. - The one that we can see in the picture below shooting off to the East.
If these 4 pentagons were all buildings, on the earth, 500 miles apart, but
which lined up on google earth perfectly like these ones do below, youd know
100% that it was a purposeful alignment done by design. - Especially if all the
pentagon shaped buildings had only ever been bought, or were owned, by one
super famous family. The link would be totally undeniable wouldnt you agree?
To suggest that this alignment was anything
other than purposely designed with these
buildings being spread over 2000 miles like in this
example, would be ludicrous. - Especially if all of
the (identical) buildings had been laid out in such
a manner that the azimuth (line) being created
between them 100% perfectly aligns with the
actual shape of all the other connected buildings
in the rest of the array! It would be undeniable.


Heres that view going off to the east, from a popes-eye view, from his places roof.
Heres what Corts own truly fascinating blog articles have had to say on the matter:
The Geomancy of St. Peters Square and the Vatican
Its practically impossible to deny that this whole area has been
designed, from above, to point east first of all. - Off along the ground
from St Peters basilica on the left, through St Peters Sq. (and
through the obelisk at its centre) before heading off like an arrow
through the keyhole shaped plaza) Then down that main road.
going due east.
St. Peters Square at Vatican City may be the most obvious geomantic sighting device (ever)
documented. The layout of the plaza of St. Peters can work like a giant compass rose built on the
surface of the earth. The Egyptian obelisk in the centre of the plaza represents the gnomon point of
the Axis Mundi of the Catholic faith. Many debate the location of the bones of St. Peter. Many say
they are within St. Peters Basilica while others maintain that they are located beneath the obelisk at
the centre of St. Peters Square. The tradition of the Axis Mundi dictates that the bones of that
Templums creator should be buried beneath it. This dynamic supports the theory of his remains
lying beneath the obelisk in order to transmit his philosophy throughout the Catholic world. The
function of St. Peters square is much the same as the Axis Mundi created by John Bidwell discussed
earlier (see Chico video on the Grail Quest Radio Page or Survivalcell channel on youtube.com).
The obelisk of St. Peters serves as a kind of datum or point from which measurements can be
taken. The obelisk is surrounded by sixteen windrose markers that also denote compass directions
or azimuths to places that are historically and philosophically important to those who practice the
Catholic faith. Each windrose marker has a Latin designation for the region the marker points to.
Tramontana or across the mountains or Scirroco Levante for wind of the Levant are two
examples. The face of each marker also has a direction such as N NNE or S inscribed. Each of
the sixteen major compass designations is represented in 22.5 degree increments. The compass
rose of St. Peters is not oriented to true north but is very close. The plazas windrose markers are
oriented approx. 1.39 degrees west of true north. This would make the easterly windrose marker
point to 88.61 deg. TN (true north). It does not seem necessary that the target be exactly on this
heading. If the azimuth to the target crosses the windrose marker from the centre point of the
obelisk this may be all that is needed to attain its status as the intended target.
The history of the Vatican states that these markers are to denote the directions from which the
winds come. If one uses the obelisk at the centre of the square and the compass bearing with
regard to true north that the windrose marker indicates some startling locations can be sighted on
the globe. This may represent the true Gnostic or hidden meaning of the purpose of St. Peters
Square.
It is a giant compass rose that may be used as a sighting device. The direction to each place is
recorded in the sacred geometry of Bernini and St. Peters.
The other larger delineation of the Labarum design that spans the plaza of St. Peters may have been
put there to distract you from the true directional information it contains. Alternately that design
may contain directional information as well.
Note: The method by which these are determined involves using the obelisk at the centre of St.
Peters Square as a datum. The resulting line must cross the windrose marker to the target location.
A globe must be used. This may create a variance of up to a half of a degree in the location of each
target. There does not seem to be an exact increment to reach each target but they are very close.
EST Levante to Istanbul (was Constantinople) St. Sophia's and the Hippodrome of Theodosius:
The most striking destination the plaza points to is located at a bearing of 88.61 degrees. A line
drawn from the obelisk through the easterly windrose marker eventually leads to Istanbul, Turkey
- and the tip of the Dome of Hagia St. Sophia church.

This building was formerly the seat of the entire Roman Empire and subsequently the centre of
Byzantine religion. The division of eastern and western Rome has many episodes of alliance and
warfare between the two sides. This spatial relationship is striking and may represent a form of
control or theological influence from one power spot to the next. This area of Constantinople/
Istanbul is also home to the Hippodrome of Theodosius which includes two Egyptian obelisks.

The building at night
The Emperor Constantine made what is today Istanbul his capitol. It is not difficult to assume that
the Emperor may have been aware of Constantinople and the Hippodromes unique spatial
orientation with the future site of the Vatican in Rome. The area now occupied by the Vatican was
once the Circus or Hippodrome of Rome. The Same obelisk that stands in the centre of St. Peters
once stood in the middle of the hippodrome as they still do today in Istanbul.
This is where that line going east from St. Peters in the
picture above goes to! - It lines up perfectly with the tip
of the Dome of Hagia St. Sophia church in Istanbul,
Turkey - which is some 700 odd miles away!

An old photo showing the obelisk on the left.
It is almost as if Constantine were creating a kind of communication or influence through the
establishment of this spatial relationship. He was famous for reuniting the eastern and western
empire. The establishment of a spatial relationship like the one that exists between the two spots
may also be a method by which the creator of the Axis Mundi may denote ownership or control of a
given region or location. Later as the architecture of the Vatican developed the entire keyhole design
of St. Peters is oriented this way. Rome and Istanbul are two of the well known cities of seven hills
that contain Egyptian obelisks. Other cities of note with Egyptian obelisks include: Mecca, Paris,
London and New York City.
Another interesting aspect of this relationship is that the easterly orientation of St. Peters Square
and Hajia St. Sophia mark the position of both the fall and spring equinoxs when viewed from the
obelisk at the centre of St. Peters. The orientation matches the entire direction St. Peters square
and basilica are both oriented.
This is significant in that the history of these two parts of the same empire involve the east first
embracing paganism and then later a more orthodox form of Christianity than that practiced in
Rome. There were constant conflicts between the two portions of the empire until they eventually
split for good. So we have the first azimuth of St. Peters pointing to a place that is very significant to
the culture and history of Rome. In a far flung theory (not really thinks Martin, its all quite plausible
to him) this may mean that the cities themselves were intentionally oriented this way also. In
addition the target of each windrose marker seems to be a geomantic structure that is valued by the
Catholic faith. (Remember this fact when shown the numerous Vatican/German configurations - M)
One mystery of history that is often pondered is why Constantine chose a small obscure Greek
fishing village upon which to found his new city Constantinople or New Rome. The answer may lie in
the cities spatial relationship to the Egyptian obelisk at the centre of St. Peters Square of the Vatican
in Rome. Using the east windrose marker in relation to the Egyptian obelisk at St. Peters an azimuth
can be created on the globe that leads directly to the dome of Hajia St. Sophia in Constantinople. A
church built and designed by Emperor Constantine.
The placement of the entire city may have been to venerate this spatial relationship which also
marks sunrise on the equinoxs at the Vatican. Constantinople the city of the east, a direction that
seems to have been especially valued by the Roman church. The entire eastern orientation of the
Vaticans keyhole like design points directly to Hajia Sophia and Constantinople; the modern city of
Istanbul. This arrangement serves as hidden yet highly symbolic link between the two capitols of
what was then the same entity.
This entire arrangement may have been known only to a secret order of royalty and the priesthood
of augurs of the day. Even the ceremony that established the Axis Mundi of each city was performed
by the augurs in conjunction with the ruler. Indeed the augurs may have played a pivotal role in the
orientation of structures and the mapping of the entire empire. These types of arrangements may
have been known of only to a select few.
In many ways these traditions extended through each era of history and exist still today. Here at GIS
(geomantic information systems - Corts youtube channel) we have been finding out a lot about
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Von Humboldt and their association with what may be defined as
geomancy. Along the way clues have been found that may indicate that these two men were both
Knights Templar Strict Observance. The Strict Observance indicates a rite of German (hmm)
Masonry. We may see how this order reflects the values of influences such as both emperors
Justinian, Charlemagne, and subsequent Holy Roman Emperors. (remember mostly German too)
These two men had a documented correspondence and both were members of the Linnean Society
of London, a naturalist group of which Charles Darwin and John Astor were also members. In
addition Von Humboldt was a member of the Prussian Royal court. Prussian Royalty were said to
have been considered the uppermost authority within the rite of Strict Observance and were said to
possess the true secrets and intent of the order. Common members of the order were not privy to
the secrets and mysteries known to the upper echelons of the order.
There are records of Von Humboldt being a Mason of the Strict Observance.
Just to hammer home the Norman/Lombard/German connection to all of this well look at another
choice extract from yet another one of Corts mega-interesting and well researched blog articles:
The Secrets of Rennes le Chateau, Girona, and Gisors.
As discussed in the chapter on Thomas Jeffersons trip to the Languedoc the Rennes Le Chateau
mystery is one of the most enduring grail myths of modern times. Lincoln, Baigent, and Lee
wonderfully describe the mystery and all of the lore surrounding it in their masterwork Holy Blood,
Holy Grail. Research may reveal that the mystery of Rennes Le Chateau is inexorably tied to two
other places of Talismanic importance in the odyssey of The Priory of Sion and Knights Templar. Both
Gisors and Orleans may hold mysteries that are linked to Rennes Le Chateau.
An examination of many of the places that figure prominently in French History and are featured as
places of importance in the book "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" reveals an extensive use of the tradition of
the Axis Mundi. Rennes Le Chateau 'points' to Orleans and Gisors. The hexagon of Orleans also
points to Gisors. All three of these places are in alignment with one another. Each place displays a
different part of the puzzle of the mysterious axes of France. All three are situated in a north to
south corridor defined by the Paris Rose Meridian and an azimuth created using the southern
orientation of Fortress Gisors.
The mystery of Rennes Le Chateau may lead one to proof of the bloodline of Christ or one of many
valuable treasures that may have been hidden in association. The octagonal axis that may extend
from the chapel is but one of many hidden tenets encoded into that humble structure. The
octagonal sculpture within the chapel at Rennes Le Chateau is but one of many pieces of mysterious
artwork in the building that may contain clues towards the solution of the mystery. The radial
octagonal geometry that uses the chapel as its centre also seems to match the pentagonal shape
delineated using the chapel as one of the tips of the star as defined by Lincoln as well.

The Star delineated by Henry Lincoln registers with a ray from the axis of the RLC Chapel.

The Templum of Gisors intersected by the north bound azimuth of the axis of the RLC Chapel shown
in orange.. Aqua azimuths represent the axis of Gisors.
As we have seen it is possible that Rennes Le Chateau was designed to delineate an octagonal
templum that defines places important to the people who actually created it. These places would
usually be placed in close proximity to one of the rays extending from the axis. The function of many
axes is subservient to a mother or main axis. If a place of import was not located on an even
designation of the octagon then a talisman would often be constructed that pointed the way to the
mother.
Rennes Le Chateau chapel may represent an axis of this type among its many additional hidden
meanings. It is possible that these designations were secret and used as a tenet of the intelligence
gathering apparatus of such groups. To those in the know these relationships would be very telling
and would reveal the truth about many clandestine agreements and relationships. This information
would also lend a clue in deciphering the mythology and lore that is built up around each of these
sacred points on the earth.
The east to west axis of Rennes Le Chateau Chapel is 87 degrees true north. The northern ray
extending from the octagonal pattern that can be created from Rennes Le Chateau would be 357
degrees true north. An azimuth drawn on the globe from the axis of RLC at this angle leads first to
the hexagon of Orleans then directly to Gisors, France just northwest of Paris. This is an amazing
correlation that may reveal new information in the mystery of the Cathars, Knights Templar, and the
Norman occupants of medieval France. The RLC axis connects to another significant axis with Priory
of Sion overtones in Orleans.
Not only does the line from Rennes Le Chateau transect Orleans but it next extends to the town of
Gisors to the Fortress of Gisors and its octagonal tower. Gisors was the main stronghold of the
Normans as well as the later Duke of Normandy that would evolve into English Royalty of the era. As
seen in the history of Europe Gisors was also the site of some of the most history altering events in
the west that few even know or realize. This site was the place that all of the Templar ideals and
values developed and was ruled by people who influenced many historical events such as the
crusades and the creation of the Cistercian Order occur. Gisors and the Gisors family are also
possibly connected to the Priory of Sion in a scheme laid out in the book "Holy Blood, Holy Grail."
The eighth century began with the Byzantine Empire being ruled by the Emperor Justinian II and
ended with Charlemagne being crowed Holy Roman Emperor at the Vatican in Rome. At this point a
severely weakened Byzantine Empire still existed but its former place of power in relation to western
Rome now went to the Germans. In both a veneration of the church and earlier emperors Justinian I
and II Charlemagne built the wonderful Cathedral of Aachen in Germany.
This cathedral aligns with the Northwest windrose marker and the obelisk at the centre of St. Peters
square. Aachen Cathedral is pointed to by the Vatican. This arrangement literally aligns the Holy
Roman Empire and the Vatican! In addition the central design element of the Aachen Cathedral is an
octagon. The interior of the octagon is done in a Moorish style that cant help but to remind one of
the interior of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. These men were sending us messages via the
forms of their architecture.
Charlemagne had a clear admiration for Byzantine rulers Justinian I and II. He had a statue of
Justinian I brought from Constantinople and may have designed the Aachen cathedral in an
octagonal form made famous by the octagonal early Christian churches that Justinian is credited
with designing. This is the same reason the Dome of the Rock was built in an octagonal form.
Charlemagnes value of Justinian II may have been for his manipulating the Dome of the Rock into
existence. This is why the interior of Aachen is Moorish in design and resembles the inside of the
Dome of the Rock. It is also possible that Charlemagne was directly related to the bloodline of the
Roman Empire and saw himself as descendant of these men.
Now for some rock solid proof of that Vatican/German bond that was truly set down in stone.
The Geomancy of the Holy Roman Empire:
The Schloss Shnbrunn in Austria
The NNE or Nord Nord EST windrose marker points to a location that possesses among the
grandest linear gardens in the world. The NNE windrose marker creates an azimuth of 21.11
degrees. At this bearing the line intersects with Vienna, Austria. The line transects directly to the
Schloss Schnbrunn also known as the Schnbrunn Palace. This geomantic array was also the home
to the Habsburg dynasty of Austrian and European rulers.


Here you can see the azimuth from the Vatican to Vienna and The Schloss Shnbrunn palace.
The history of Schloss Schnbrunn is uniquely intertwined with the Catholic Church and Holy Roman
Empire. In 1569 Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian II obtained the specific piece of property that the
Schloss Schnbrunn would later occupy. It is highly probable that this piece of property was sought
out due to its unique spatial relationship with the obelisk in the centre of St. Peters Square at the
Vatican. This arrangement of the Habsburg Palace exactly on an azimuth suggested by the windrose
marker in relation to the obelisk at St. Peters appears to have been an intentional if not symbolic
linking of the two places.

This white line shown in the diagram on the left passes
through the windrose marker and then goes directly to
a garden outside The Schloss Shnbrunn palace in
Austria (home of the Habsburg dynasty ) that is set out
in the exact same eight point star shape (or asterix-
like) as already shown in St. Peters Square!
Vatican
The Schloss Shnbrunn
palace in Vienna Austria
Here is that line from St.
Peters, as you can see it lines
up perfectly with The Schloss
Shnbrunn palace in Vienna.
Austria


Here it is close up, note the circle the line passes through is actually an eight point star, you can just
make out that the ground features have this shape for the circle structure on the other side.
These features are much clearer in this drawing below of the layout of the palaces garden features.

This relationship demonstrates the purpose and function of an Axis Mundi in Roman terms. The
Pope sanctioned the Holy Roman Emperors and their palace is in line with the Vatican. Rome
considered the Holy Roman Empire to part of its Templum as defined by the Axis Mundi. This may
represent the classic arrangement of colony and parent city as defined by Roman city planning and
tradition.

Here are a couple of pictures of the actual palace itself.
Regensburg, Venice, Oslo N: 368.61
Regensburg Germany is on the Nord Tramontana azimuth from St Peters. Regensburg, Germany
was the home of the Ottonian Dynasty of the Holy Roman Empire. Olso, Norway also lays on the N.
bound azimuth from St. Peters.
A Northern azimuth leads right to the Rialto Bridge in Venice after passing within a quarter of a mile
of the principality of San Marino and Ravenna, Italy, home of the first Christian Church of Italy. San
Vitale is also one of the famous octagonal churches designed by Justinian I that may have led to the
Dome of the Rock being designed in this manner.

Note the octagonal or eight-sided building design that is prominent in most locations in this story.
Aachen Cathedral, Amsterdam NNW 336.11
A line drawn from the obelisk at the centre of St. Peters Square to the tip of the dome of the Aachen
Cathedral crosses the NNW windrose marker.

Aachen Cathedral
The Aachen Cathedral was built by Charlemagne and may have served as the template for what
would later be termed a Templar Church. (please see homepage and article about the Holy Grail of
N. America for much more on the Aachen Cathedral). This azimuth also goes to Amsterdam,
Netherlands
Aachen Cathedral
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia
Aachen Cathedral, frequently referred to as the "Imperial Cathedral" (in German: Kaiserdom), is a
Roman Catholic church in Aachen, Germany. The church is the oldest cathedral in northern Europe
and was known as the "Royal Church of St. Mary at Aachen" during the Middle Ages. For 600 years,
from 936 to 1531, the Aachen chapel was the church of coronation for 30 German kings and 12
queens.

Three views inside the cathedral, note the octagonal ceiling (middle).
Three important Holy Roman Empire sites pointed to by the array at St. Peters Square at the
Vatican:
The Schloss Schnbrunn, Austria; Hapsburg Royal Palace and extensive geomantic gardens.
Regensburg, Deutschland: The power centre of the Ottonian dynasty of the HRE.
Aachen Cathedral, Aachen Deutschland: Built by Charlemagne and many Holy Roman Emperors
were crowned there. Home to the mystery of Charlemagnes burial vault.
Now in case youd super glued those socks on, or brought along a spare pair lets see where all those
other markers point to, you can decide if any of these locations might be of interest to the Vatican.
Or, try and tell me theyre all coincidental.
Levante Scirocco ESE to the Dome of the Rock!
From the obelisk at the centre of St. Peters Square through the ESE Levante Scirocco windrose
marker at 111.11 degrees true north lies:
The octagonal shaped structure of the Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem!
Not only does this line transect exactly to the Dome of the rock
it matches the angle and orientation of the northeast facet of the octagonal structure of the building
itself!





More amazing is the fact that an azimuth or line created using the angle of this facet of the Dome of
the Rocks octagon (305.55 deg. TN) creates the exact same line that transects back across the
windrose marker to the obelisk in St. Peters! In other words both structures were built to be
oriented to each other along a line that was created from each point over 1400 miles away.
The two structures are oriented as compliments to each other.
This has to have been intentional.
An extensive knowledge of geodesy and astronomy is needed to attain this degree of accuracy. The
odds of this being a coincidence are so great as not to be possible. This may represent the symbolic
or hidden association of the two religions! Note that both the Vatican and Mecca are home to
obelisks that were brought there from Egypt.

The building at ground level - once again eight sided.
If you stood at the obelisk in St Peters Sq. and fired a magic gun out across the ESE Levante
Scirocco windrose marker (at 111.11 degrees true north) the magic bullet (magic because it
passed through everything else between St Peters Sq. and Jerusalem) would meet the dome of
the rock at exactly the correct angle that the side of the building had been constructed! (Shown
above) It seems that this dome had actually been built at this precise angle for this purpose).
Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem
The obelisk at St. Peters has been near its present location since 40 A.D. Bernini had it moved as
part of the design of the plaza in the 18
th
century.
The Dome of the Rock was built in the 8
th
century soon after the time of the creation of Islam. During
this period the Vatican had not been created but the same site was the centre of the Christian faith
of the day.
The symbolic meaning of arranging two structures this way over great distances supports the many
theories that postulate the Catholic faith having a hand in the creation of the Islamic faith and that
they are truly allies behind the scenes.
The Dome of the Rock is also of interest in that it was built during the reign of Justinian II whos
bloodline may have later descended to Charlemagne of the Holy Roman Empire. Charlemagne
created the Aachen Cathedral possibly as a veneration of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. The
Aachen Cathedral does have Moorish architectural influences especially in the octagonal portion of
the Church. Is it possible that Charlemagne was trying to tell us something? (See additional page
about The Holy Grail in America that discuss the evolution of octagonal structures and how they
may be related to the Knights Templar. The KT may have come to value the Dome of the Rock when
they occupied the Temple Mount in Jerusalem).
The Scirocco SE marker to The Ark of the Covenant in Ethiopia.
The geomancy of the Lost Ark of the Covenant: Lalibela to Chartres
St. Peter's Square's use as a sighing device or compass rose.

You can draw a line from Chartres cathedral to Lalibela Ethiopia; both are very strongly connected to
the legend of Ark of the Covenant and the Churchs search for it. - This line passes through the
marker in St. Peters Square!


As you can see the azimuth from the Vatican (and Lalibela) lines up perfectly with Chartres cathedral
Throughout history men have quested for the Holy Grail. The quest for the grail may hold its roots in
the ancient mystery schools.
In the days of ancient Sumeria and Egypt adherents or students may have been given a set of clues
and specific skills in order to solve specific questions. The later Greeks and Romans were seduced by
the Mysteries as well.
Much of the information taught at the mystery schools may have involved learning secret or hidden
knowledge that was to be used with care and discretion. Later orders such as the Knights Templar
may have learned these mysteries and quested for the hidden knowledge themselves.
This line goes NW to
Chartres cathedral
While this one goes to
Lalibela Ethiopia
In fact the name Knights Templar may refer to the map templates they learned of by studying
geometry and mathematics.
Some of the hidden knowledge may have involved the use of square, hexagonal, or octagonal
templates in order to create map projections that would reduce the amount of distortion in the
rendering of maps thus making them more accurate and reliable. Possessing accurate maps would
be a huge advantage over those who were unaware of these facts.
This skill would logically relate to stone masonry-another craft the Templars were famed for. Think
about the Templars using templates to build temples and command the temporal fabric of the
world.
By using the geometry and navigation secrets learned from the ancients the Templars were capable
of de-coding any geomantic mysteries that may have been left as lessons of the mystery schools and
indeed may have created a few themselves.
Later mysteries such as Rennes Le Chateau, Chartres Cathedral, The Oak Island Money Pit, The
Kensington Rune Stone, Verendrye Rune stone (Jacobs Pillow), The Grail Legend of Accokeek,
Maryland, and Bacons Vault in Williamsburg, Virginia may have been inspired by ancient grail quests
and left for others to decipher and discover for themselves(see article on home page).


An exploration of what may have been a very early grail quest by the Knights Templar in the 12
th

century may reveal some very surprising results. There is evidence that the Templars used the
octagonal shape of the Dome of the Rock itself as a sighting device in their search for the Lost Ark of
the Covenant. They may have used this directional clue to follow its southern orientation to a place
in Ethiopia that is as lost in time and clouded in the mysteries as any site in Egypt itself.

This location also represents an intersection or vector between the southerly line from the DOTR
and the SE orientation of St. Peters square at the Vatican. Later the Templars memorialized their
grail quest by aligning Chartres Cathedral with the NW windrose marker at the Vatican. Chartres
includes stone carvings that depict the Queen of Sheba taking the Ark of the Covenant to Ethiopia.

Lalibela Ethiopia famous for its churches that are hewn out of the actual rock where theyre
situated!
The SE and NW windrose markers at the Vatican create an amazing association with the Ark of the
Covenant. The 133.61 degree bearing of the SE windrose marker creates a line on the globe that
transects its way across the Mediterranean Sea then Africa including Ethiopia then meets the Indian
Ocean near, Mogadishu, Somalia. On its path across Ethiopia the line transects the environs of
Lalibela, Ethiopia over the Church of St. George.
Lalibela is home to the Ethiopian Orthodox Church that is wholly independent of the Roman Catholic
Church. Lalibela is famous as the site of a complex of 13 churches that were hewn out of solid rock in
the 12
th
and 13
th
(1100-1200s) century A.D. The ruler of that age Gabre Mesquel Lalibela designed
an arrangement of churches that were said to emulate the layout of the temple mount in Jerusalem!
At this point Jerusalem was occupied by Muslim concerns making travel there by Christians
dangerous. The river, more aptly described as an arroyo, that runs through Lalibela is even named
the River Jordan. The churches are all connected via a complex of subterranean tunnels. A massive
cistern is also part of the plan.
Each of these churches is an amazing feat of masonry and engineering. They are hewn out of solid
rock with no fitted pieces or forms. Each church resembles a cross shaped building that is set in a pit
of solid rock.
The City of Lalibela does have a long history that may be of great interest to the Roman Catholic
Church. Through history there have been persistent rumours that the Ark of the Covenant was once
brought to Ethiopia. This curiosity may have led the Knights Templar to travel to Lalibela and Axsum
at a time when the templars were still part of the Catholic Church. The fact that there is a legend of
the Ark being here lends credence to the theory that the Templars came in search of it.
Finally to tie this all together there is a real link in this tale to Chartres Cathedral in France. If one
creates an azimuth using the NW windrose marker at the Vatican in St. Peters it leads right to
Chartres Cathedral in France. This NW azimuth is the opposite of the SE azimuth that leads to
Ethiopia and the said location of the Ark of the Covenant. Chartres fits into the Ark of the Covenant
mystery in that some of the carvings on the churchs exterior depict the biblical scene of the Queen
of Sheba taking the Ark to Ethiopia! Here is a spatially related clue to this mystery!
The later builders of Chartres may have been associated with the Templar's were fully aware of the
Arks location in Ethiopia to the point that the Cathedral was built opposite the location in Ethiopia
using St. Peters and the obelisk and windrose markers as a kind of spiritual datum from which to
measure these points. One line from Chartres to Lalibela transects St. Peters square through the
NW windrose, through the Obelisk at the centre of the square, through the SE windrose marker and
on to Lalibela. This is amazing.
The Legend of the Ark holds that the Queen of Sheba married King Solomon in Jerusalem and they
had a son, Menalik I. Prior to the destruction of King Solomons Temple Menalik was eventually
entrusted with the Ark of the Covenant and fled with it first to Petra Jordan then Marib, Yemen and
finally to Axsum, Ethiopia. At this point in history Yemen and Ethiopia which are separated by the
Red Sea were part of the same empire controlled by Menalik. The fact that the Ark may have once
been located in Marib, Yemen is of interest from a geomantic perspective due to its orientation with
the SE pointing line created by the Great Pyramid of Gizas SE facet. Mecca is also located along this
azimuth. Marib was also the primary city of the Queen of Sheba. Today the Ark is said to rest in the
Church of our Lady Mary of Zion in Axsum.
After transecting or crossing over Petra, Jordan a south trending line that matches the E and W
facets of the octagon at the Dome of the Rock also passes over Axsum, Ethiopia. This same line or
azimuth then proceeds to the S to intersect with the 133.61 degree TN line from the Vatican right in
Lalibela! Lalibela represents the intersection or vector of the 133.61 degree line from the Vatican
and the south trending line from the Dome of the Rock. Both Lalibela and Axsum align with the N-S
orientation of the Dome of the Rock. This orientation may also compel one to believe that the city
may have been situated here due to this spatial relationship. Here is a city built in replica of
Jerusalem pointed to by the octagonal structure of the DOTR!
Another possible resting place of the Ark of the Covenant, Petra Jordan, is also included on the S
trending line from the Dome of the Rock. Recap: Petra, Axsum, Lalibela. All three places have
legends involving the Ark of the Covenant being located there. Marib, Yemen seems to align with
the Great Pyramid (GPOG). An interesting side note is that the Queen of Sheeba was said to practice
a form of sun worship that resembled the mono-theistic faith created by Pharaoh Akhenaton. Many
of the directions inferred by the geomantic shape of the GPOG seem to point to places that later
adapted their religion and philosophy. This is one possible explanation as to why Marib is situated
where it is.

So here we may have a geomantic system that reflects the odyssey of the Ark of the Covenant after
the destruction of King Solomons Temple. First the Ark may have travelled to Petra. Its next
possible destination would have been Marib, Yemen. Next it may have made its way to Ethiopia
which was still part of Menalik I's kingdom. There is some definite logic to the legends of the Ark
being here and the geomantic relationship between the DOTR and Axsum may be evidence. The fact
that Lalibela aligns with the Vatican would also lend credence to this theory. Author Graham
Hancock espouses a theory that has the Ark travelling through Elephantine Island, Egypt before
being moved south to eventually end up in Axum.

The church in Axum Ethiopia where Graham Hancock thinks the ark of the covenant resides today.

Hancocks best seller on the subject.
One other fact of history may contribute to the truth of the Ark being in Ethiopia. During WWII the
Vatican had a pact of co-operation with the Axis Powers of Germany, Italy, and Japan. Prior to the
war Italy attempted to invade Ethiopia and may have been successful if the war had not intervened.
If one reads between the lines it is entirely possible that they came to recover what they felt was the
real lost Ark of the Covenant or wanted to control the land in which it resided. In addition Ethiopia is
included in the Templum or sphere of influence as defined by the array of St. Peters square.
Ultimately Italy was defeated and failed to control or invade the country. The defeat of the Italians
by the native armies that are said to guard the ark lends truth to the theory that the Ark would grant
victory to any army that carried it before them in battle. The association between the so called
axis powers and the Axis Mundi of the Vatican may not be a coincidence. Germany, Italy, and
Japan are all pointed to by the geomantic array at St. Peters Square.
It is possible that the Knights Templar did quest to Ethiopia in Search of the lost ark. Legends of them
coming to Axsum and Lalibela are common. There are graves in Axsum that include inscribed
Templar crosses that date to the 12
th
and 13
th
century. In fact the Maltese or Templar cross is also a
common symbol used in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church. The tale of the marriage of The Queen of
Sheba and King Solomon is included in the Old Testament. If the Templars were indeed in search of
relics at the temple mount they may have heard of or found evidence of the Arks location in the
lands once ruled by Menalik I, son of King Solomon. One can also image a quest such as this leading
the order to hide their own secrets in such a manner.
Ponente or W to Madrid, Spain; Tomar, Fatima, Portugal:
The west windrose marker (Ponente for western wind) at St. Peters square also points to a place
that has a long and varied history in the Catholic tradition. The site of the miracles of Fatima,
Portugal lies on this line at 268.61 degrees TN from the obelisk at the centre of St. Peters Square.
The line crosses the W windrose marker perfectly and continues west across Spain where it transects
the northern environs of Madrid, Spain before crossing nearly the exact location of the original
occurrence of the miracles of Fatima. If the line is extended to the Cathedral in Fatima where the
pilgrims visit today it still crosses the windrose marker.

Prior to reaching Fatima this azimuth comes very close to the former site of the Cistercian monastery
of St. Maria de Ovila just north of Madrid. This monastery was later disassembled and shipped to
the United States by newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst. The monastery building is being
reassembled at a Cistercian Monastery near Vina, California and has become part of an aligned
geomantic system in that region (See Chico chapter for more on Vina). It is very interesting that this
chapel was taken from a location on a significant ley line that extended from the system at the
Vatican in Spain and moved to another ley line created by John Bidwell halfway across the globe in
Chico, California. In addition the monastery is composed of an order of monks that may have
descended from the Auger or mystic class of pre-Christian Rome. The Cistercians also have a long
tradition of aligning their monasteries in sacred geometrical pattern sometimes over great distances.
The latitude of Fatima, Portugal is nearly the same as Chico, California.
Here both E+W azimuths shown: one leads east to Constantinople, the other
west to just outside Fatima Portugal, with St. Peters in between both.
Fatima Portugal
St. Peters Square
The Vatican
Dome of Hadji St.
Sophia Constantinople

Heres the precise azimuth from the Vatican just outside of Fatima.
The miracles of Fatima involve sightings of the Virgin Mary by three young Portuguese children in
the early nineteen-thirties. Subsequently some very odd phenomena involving the modulation of the
size and position of the sun were witnessed by a crowd of thousands. Part of the lore states that the
Virgin Mary gave the children prophecies that were kind of vague and interpreted loosely by many
who study the miracles.
Fatima is considered one of the most important shrines in the Catholic religion.
It is interesting that this town in Portugal is named for the daughter of Mohammed; the founder of
the Muslim faith. Fatima was named such during the Moorish occupation of Spain in the 8
th
century
A.D. This historical fact ties into a mystery involving the third prophesy of Fatima. The prophesy was
said to involve the assassination of the pope. Subsequent to the John Paul II assassination attempt it
became public knowledge that the pope believed the prophesy concerned him. Many Muslims claim
that the Fatima for which the town is named was not Mohammed the Prophets daughter.
Many of these facts feed the fire of the conspiracy that states that the Muslim faith was created or
influenced by the Vatican in order to control the holy land and subdue any groups that disagreed
with them. Historians including many former Jesuits insist that this is true and the theory is backed
up by some undeniable facts. The Moorish invasion of Spain and Portugal may have been at the
behest of the Vatican.
The Muslim faith has many theological and character similarities to Judaism and Catholicism
including a value of the Old Testament and the cast of characters that make up the text of that
book. The Archangel Gabriel, the messenger of god, was said to have quoted the Koran to
Mohammed. Many insist that in fact Mohammeds wife was actually a former Christian Catholic nun
and that many that influenced him were Christians. The doctrine of the Muslim faith also states that
their prophet or saviour has yet to come but when the time is right that Christ will return with him.
This dynamic of the Muslim faith supports the notion of a secret relationship between the two
churches if not only for a short time after the inception of Islam. This is an unproven theory.
We have previously established how the obelisk at the centre of St. Peters Square at the Vatican
and its surrounding windrose markers may be used as a sighting device. Each windrose marker has a
primary compass direction inscribed on it. Each of these directions leads to a place on the globe that
is significant to the Roman Catholic faith.
The easterly orientation or E windrose marker points an azimuth that transects the Balkans and
leads directly to the Dome of Hajia St. Sophia in Istanbul, Turkey. Hajia St. Sophia is directly adjacent
to the Hippodrome of Theodosius which also contains an Egyptian obelisk like the one at St. Peters.
The Back Azimuth or opposite direction to the W as marked by the West windrose marker leads to
Fatima, Portugal. The town of Fatima was named for the daughter of the Prophet Mohammed
(Muslims dispute this) while Spain was occupied by the moors. This spatial association may be one
of the factors that contributed to the miracles happening in this position relative to the Vatican.
Most amazingly the ESE windrose marker leads directly to the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. Not
only does this azimuth lead directly to the building of the Dome of the Rock the line matches the
angle of the NE facet of that octagonal structure. The octagon of the Dome of the Rock may be in
turn used as a sighting device similar to the one at St. Peters.
As it says above: Each of these directions from St. Peters leads (precisely) to a place on the globe
that is (incredibly) significant to the Roman catholic faith. - The German locations being every bit as
important to the hierarchy of the people behind the catholic church plc as Constantinople (head city
of guy who created Catholicism), the Dome of the Rock (location of half of the Jebus myth), or the
supposed location of anywhere to do with either the Raiders of the Lost Ark (Chartres Cathedral or
Lalibela) fairytale or even modern day sightings of the virgin bloody mary (in Fatima) fairytale.
Germany and the church play the roles of main protagonists in the story most of you are engrossed
in, youd do well to bear that in mind. - Follow the trail of money backwards in history, or do the
same with the law, - youll keep coming back to the same location that you would if you were to
follow the history of religion back through history for the last couple of thousand years too - Rome.
Corts work shows the direction we need to go in.
As you saw those windrose markers lead to many places on the globe that are incredibly significant
to the Roman Catholic faith. I hope no-one thinks these alignments were coincidental or random I
mean as Ive said lines go straight to Constantinople The New Rome, and capital city of the guy who
actually created Catholicism, Then there is the Dome of the Rock: location of half of the Jebus
myth, The temple Mount, The Al Aqsa mosque, and supposed location of the mythical King
Solomons Temple, plus the site of the crucifiction and resurrection of Jebus, and the Ascension, of
Jebus and Mohamed. This Dome of the Rock building NOT ONLY HAS A SIDE CONSTRUCTED TO MEET
THE AZIMUTH COMING FROM THE VATICAN - IF YOU USE THE BUILDING AS A SIGHTING DEVICE
ITSELF (AS YOU CAN WITH MOST OF THE OTHER 8 SIDED STRUCTURES WEVE LOOKED AT) ITS SOUTH
POINTING SIDE SHOOTS AN AZIMUTH OFF RUNNING STRAIGHT AS AN ARROW TO LALIBELA WHICH
IS ALSO POINTED AT BY AN AZIMUTH RUNNING SE FROM THE VATICAN! THESE 3 SITES POINT TO
EACH OTHER (AND REMEMBER CHARTRES CATHEDRAL TOO) - AND 100% ENTIRELY BY DESIGN.
As Cort said - After transecting or crossing over Petra, Jordan a south trending line that matches the
E and W facets of the octagon at the Dome of the Rock also passes over Axsum, Ethiopia. This same
line or azimuth then proceeds to the S to intersect with the 133.61 degree TN line from the Vatican
right in Lalibela! Lalibela represents the intersection or vector of the 133.61 degree line from the
Vatican and the south trending line from the Dome of the Rock. Both Lalibela and Axsum align with
the N-S orientation of the Dome of the Rock. This orientation may also compel one to believe that
the city may have been situated here due to this spatial relationship. Here is a city built in replica of
Jerusalem pointed to by the octagonal structure of the DOTR!
Then there the supposed location of the modern day sightings of the virgin bloody Mary (in Fatima)
fairytale. This is a scam from those Vatican schemers trying to bring Islam back under its wing. (read
up on their Ecumenical Movement if you wish to understand their long term aim to form a one
world religion (under their control obviously).
A line goes to the dome of Aachen Cathedral - remember that Aachen chapel was the church of
coronation for 30 German kings and 12 queens. Another azimuth goes right up the garden path of
the Schloss Schnbrunn, Austria; The Hapsburgs Royal Palace. And Regensburg Germany is on the
Nord Tramontana azimuth from St Peters. Regensburg, Germany was the home of the Ottonian
Dynasty of the Holy Roman Empire. These locations were revered and sought after because of their
significance to the Vaticans windrose markers directional attributes, again 100% on purpose.
And then theres the stuff that I havent covered! - This system of having a building or monument
acting as a hub that connects to nodes by using the building or monument itself as a sighting
device is much, much older than Rome. But Ill leave that up to you to find out about in your own
time with the totality of Corts videos, blogs, and books being the place to begin your own journey.
I will leave you with this little caveat...
Are you aware that the great pyramid of Giza is in fact an eight-sided building?
Heres a famous photo taken at the beginning of the 20
th
Century by a British pilot. Apparently you
can only see this feature on the equinox.

Corts work is available at http://geomanticinformatinsystems.blogspot.com/ hes also got a youtube
channel with an ever growing selection of good videos called Survivalcell I think. Heres a link
http://www.youtube.com/user/SurvivalCell - I recommend going through them chronologically in
order to learn how he does the mapping so that you can learn to pick up how to do the google earth
searches by yourself. He can be emailed at Geomancy@live.com His book on it is Axis Mundi

The author of this piece of work can email all his stuff to anyone who is interested, you can get me
on facebook or martinkeerns@yahoo.co.uk the first four books I made can be downloaded with a
torrent client like utorrent, just google my name. Two are on Scribd. Keep up the good work Chris
and your team. The cream cant rise to the top for all the scum thats floating there Martin Keerns