Pakistan Forum, Vol. 2, No. 12. (Sep., 1972), p. 20.
Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0315-7725%28197209%292%3A12%3C20%3ACM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L Pakistan Forum is currently published by Middle East Research and Information Project. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/merip.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. http://www.jstor.org Tue Oct 9 04:14:06 2007 - - - Page 20 Paki s t an Forum September 1972 NEWSFRONT Crackdown of t h e bKP Taki ng advant age of t h e Ce nt r a l Gov- e r n me n t ? ~ d i f f i c u l t i e s i n ne got i a t i ng s et t l ement wi t h I ndi a and r e s t o r i n g peace i n t h e Si ndh pr ovi nce, t h e Nat i onal Awami Part y-Jami at u l Ulema e I s l am c o a l i t i o n Government i n t h e Sarhad pr ovi nce has decl ar ed v i r t u a l i ndependence from Paki - s t a n and has deci ded t o wi pe out i n one s t r oke t h e mi l i t a n t peasant movement-- t h e s t aunches t a n t i - s e c e s s i o n i s t f o r c e i n t h e pr ovi nce. A s a pa r t of i t s a n n i h i l a t i o n cam- pai gn t h e Sarhad Government rounded up more t ha n 50 l e a de r s and workers of t h e Mazdoor-Kisan Pa r t y a l l over t h e prov- i nce and banned t h e e nt r y o f i t s promin- ent l e a d e r s , I shaque Mohammad, Afz a l Bangash and Sher A l i Yacha, i n t o t h e d i s t r i c t s of Dera I s ma i l Khan and Bannu. Lat er on or der s of a r r e s t were i s s ued a ga i ns t 3angash and Bacha who happened t o be i n Punj ab. The Sarhad Government coul d not i s s u e a n a r r e s t war r ant f o r I shaque because he i s not a r e s i de nt of Sarhad. The o f f i c e s o f t h e MKP and t h e hones of i t s l e a de r s were r ai ded and t h e i r e f f e c t s l oot ed. Thousands of peas ant s sympat het i c t o t h e pa r t y have been i mpl i - cat ed i n f a l s e cas es or t hrown i n t o t h e gaol . B r e i g n of t e r r o r e x i s t s i n t h e Sar - had pr ovi nce where l a ndl or ds and t h e i r pr i va t e ar mi es , pr ot ect ed by t h e a r n s of t h e s t a t e , have gone on a rampage t o k i l l , beat up, e v i c t and l o o t t h e t e na nt s . The pol i c e , t h e Fr ont i e r Const abul ar y and t h e NAP 7 s par a- mi l i t ar y arm, t h e Pakht un Zalme, a r e bei ng used f r e e l y t o t e r r o r i z e t h e peas ant s i n t o submi ssi on. What happened i n Chakdra on J u l y 26 i s t y p i c a l of t h e happeni ngs a l l over t h e pr ovi nce. 500 armed goondas hi r e d by t h e l a ndl or ds of t h e r egi on put t o t h e t or c h Chakdra' s Sa r ka r i Bazaar and t h e nearby v i l l a g e of A l i Mast , a s a r e s u l t of which s e ve r a l shops and homes were gut t e d, two peas ant s , Ha j i I r a q and Shr i Mul l a, were k i l l e d and a number of peopl e wounded. Thi s a c t of ar s on and murder t ook pl ace bef or e t h e eyes of t h e Cent r al Government-appoi nt ed o f f i c i a l s who dar ed not i n t e r f e r e wi t h t h e campaign of t h e Pr ovi nc i a l Government. (Cont i nued on page 5) CharuMazumdar On J u l y 16, 1972- t he I ndi an p o l i c e a r r e s t e d Charu Mazumdar, l e a de r of t h e Communist Pa r t y of I ndi a (M-L), a f t e r a t h r e e ye a r s ' unr el ent ed hunt f o r t h e "Naxal i t e" l e a de r . Twelve days l a t e r t h e I ndi an Government announced t h a t he had di ed i n a h o s p i t a l whi l e in cus t ody. The excer pt r e p r i n t e d below i s t aken from h i s " ~ e t t e r t o a Comrade," wr i t t e n on J ul y 23, 1971 and publ i s hed i n Li be r a t i on. -.-- Tousthereisnocontradictionbetweennationalandinternationalinterests. sincewhenwespeakof anationwemeanthepeasants,workersandother toilingpeople.Theirinterestistomakerevolution.ThatiswhyChairmanMao has said:"Withregardtothequestionof worldwar,therearebuttwo possibilities:Oneisthatthewarwillgiverisetorevolutionandtheotheristhat revolution will prevent the war." Thesloganofnationalself-defenseisabourgeoisslogan.By raisingitthe bourgeoisieseekstosuppressthejust rightof workers,peasantsandpetty- bourgeoistoilerstoexistandtriestoutilizealltheresourcesof thenationinits owninterest.Therefore,innowayandundernocircumstanceswillthatbeour slogan.Thatiswhyoursloganisnationalrevolutionarywarandthiswarcan be wagedonlyintheformof people'swar.Todeveloppeople'swaritis necessarytomakethepeasants-the basicforceof thisrevolutionarywar- participantsintherevolutionarystruggleandthiscanbeaccomplished,onlyon the basisof classstruggleandaclassline. So,undernocircumstance,isitourresponsibilitytosupportthebourgeoisie. Our responsibilityistobeunitedwiththatsectionof thebourgeoisiewhich desirestobeunitedwithusontheissueof nationalindependence.And onthe questionofunikation alsotwothingshavetoberemembered:(1)thepartywill havetheright toconduct warindependentlyand(2)theinitiativeinregardto thestrugglewillbeinthehandsof theparty.Thesetwoconditionsarein- divisibleandonlyonthebasisof thesetwoconditionsisitpossibletobuildsuch unityascanenthuseandinspirethebroadmassestoparticipateinthewarof nationalindependence.So, youcanunderstandthattheideatheyare spreadingtocreateconfusioninthenameof thegreat Chinesepartyisopposed toMaoTsetungThoughtandisonlyaneweditionof theWangMing-LiuShao- chi line of tailing after the bourgeoisie. If abourgeoisstatebecomesapartnerinajustwar,thentheChineseparty andtheChinesegovernmentwillsurelysupportit.Butthissupportdoesnot meanthatwithinthecountrythecommunistswillhavetotailbehindthe bourgeoisie.At thetimeof WorldWarI1ChiangKai-shekgotthesupportof the SovietUnionandonthepretextof thatsupport,heandhisassociates repeatedlysoughttohavetheChinesepartytiedtoChiangKai-shek.As Chairman Maounderstoodtheneedforunity,soalsoherealizedthenecessity of independentworkandinitiativeanddidnotmakecompromisesinany sphere. Thatiswhy,after1945,whencommunistsallovertheworldlaidemphasison unitywiththebourgeoisieanddecidedtosurrenderarms,ChairmanMao,even afterhavingadmittedthenecessityof unity,gaveacallfortakinguparmswith afirmhand.ThatiswhyweseethataftertheWorldWarCommunistsof almostall countriestooktothepathof revisionismbut,underChairmanMao's leadership,theChineseCommunistparty could,thmughasuccessful revolution,raisethebannerof Marxism-Leninismhigherstillandreachthe stage of Mao TsetungThought. Therefore,therevisionistpathisthepathof tailismandthosewhotodayare talkingof supportingYahyaKhanhavetakentohispathoftailismandfallen deepintothemireof revisionism.If youhavelearnttohaterevisionism,then youwilllearntohatethisKhruschevthesisof thenationalbourgeoisieseizlng powerthroughpeacefulmethods.Eightyearsago,ChairmanMaotorethemask off thisthesis,asaresultof which therehasbeenanewhlghtideinthe worldwidecommunistmovementandanewhorizonhasopenedupbeforethe struggle. AftereightyearstheKhrushevthesisisbeingpropagatedagaininour countryandthisisbeingdoneinthenameof ChairmanMao.Thisiscalled opposingMaoTsetunginthenameof MaoTsetung,opposingtheredflaginthe nameof theredflag,opposingrevolutioninthenameof revolution.In our countrytheCPIandtheCPI-Mhavedirectlytakenthepathof class collaboration;thatiswhytheyaresupportingMujib.Butbehindtheir'leftist' mask, theothers aretalkingof s u~~or t i nn Yahvaonthebasisof thesame theory.Therefore,this'leftGt'sloganof theirsiBinrealityanother manifestation of revisionism.