Demonstration of Reality

23 Sept 2013
0 Comments




As a reader requested.

Q: What is reality and can we have an example, something on Earth many of us will know,
understand or be able to research, look up and understand as an example of the reality as you will
describe it?
C: We suggest a reverse look at the question, as you, our loyal scribe often do; when asked if "x"
hurts "y" and the answer is subjective, a good approach is to ask if "y" has been helped in any way by "x";
does benefit inure? On the assumption little is static and Earth is dynamic it is then direction of the
answer becomes clearer when viewed from the opposite end, does it not? If not more clear, at least
different, even unique.

Q: Why am I writing in red, not black?
C: Why not?

Q: Please go on.
C: Please highlight each word of this sentence in a different color. Now letters.

Q: Like that?
C: Yes, and we hope you shall see by this example the change in appearance the coloration creates,
yet the words are the same. The meaning would not be different but the appearance has changed the
feeling, the ease of interpretation and the ability to understand the words. More focus is placed by a reader
upon hue than message. Both are real, both true; yet different.

We suggest a long essay or even small book written in this way; if attempted, the ease of reading would
improve as the pages were digested, difficulty first seen would diminish or lessen, yet never would the
one be the same as the other.

You all maintain in your database a meaning and feeling to color where you see it; its variation varies
both outbound and incoming meaning. Reality remains.

Q: Outbound and incoming?
C: Observe an aircraft approach a runway to land, an incoming flight. Observe the same aircraft
depart; it looks different because it is seen from the opposite end and because it travels away, not towards.
Imagine the tail leading the approach, the nose being the trailing edge. This does not look "real" however
it is possible. Flight and movement in relation to the surface of your Earth need not be done with air
pressure differential; energy differential, electromagnetic differential also works and this is your
antigravity device.

Aircraft equipped with very fine mesh wing coverings, permitting air to flow through instead of over or
below eliminating the speed thus air pressure difference which creates lift and flight could be
constructed or assembled to look the same, when viewed from even up close, to be backwards, by
comparison to the usual, expected appearance.

You will not believe this object can fly, lacking the necessary airfoils, despite its obvious propulsion
ability seen in the turbines or propellers, themselves users of air displacement to achieve function.

With an electromagnetic anti-gravity apparatus installed, we can say, this device not only reverses
gravitational effect, it can be used to create propulsion at velocities you would not believe.

The fine mesh flow-through wings of the imaginary aircraft, in flight, would be deemed un-real. This
does not exist in the human database each of you has compiled to date.

We say this device would not be built, as capability would reveal the obvious, superfluous function of
airfoils against electromagnetic differential to do achieve it. The airborne vessel would take a more
efficient shape, better for its occupants. Your many UFOs refer.

Q: So, if we saw a plane land "reversed" and decided we could not believe our eyes, at what point
would it become real?
C: This we have given you the example of colors; a variation of accepted values, understood and
interpreted as existing yet employed in a unique way, a new manner and a novel method. Your bodily
senses of sight, sound and touch would together assemble a set of impressions upon sight of and then
travel aboard this lift-less winged air vessel. If you have flown aboard a helicopter and understand the
sensation of vertical lift with the simultaneous view, as also offers a glass walled elevator, then
acceptance of this reversed aircraft would come quickly. It would soon be accepted as "real"; yet we can
assure you all, a large jet fifty or sixty of your metres in length , wings, rudder and tail swept forward at
its leading edge, the generally accepted posterior tip? It would be initially and universally deemed an
illusion. Even if it were real.

Q: Okay, this is a good example, I think. Can you supply another?
C: Certainly. We shall cite your medical science. It is understood and accepted insufficient oxygen
will cause ever worse damage to brain tissue, the longer the deprivation. Eventually death, suffocation.

The time is understood to span just several minutes; it is believed lower temperatures surrounding a body
allow longer reductions or suspension of oxygen in the bloodstream yet permit recovery. Precise
measurement requires humans to be executed. You all appreciate, and we agree, not necessary.

Against this understanding, stories and examples are common of such events; trapped skiers, submerged
automobiles and accident victims isolated from air yet recued, revived and recovered all neural, motor
and cognitive abilities intact.

Because such person was well and widely known beforehand, it is readily recognized the event, it is
accepted as real. The phenomena, the effect and explanation for survival remain unknown when accepted
medical science is considered. Doubt is scant; reality is understood. The survivor standing before you
"proves" it.

Q: So what about temporary disappearance, just like this or of something else?
C: Return and reappearance creates reality; the sun and moon dis- and reappear, deemed as real as
the ground below your feet, by virtue of this cycling. This is your database effect; when an image is
compared to a memory, reality attaches.

So we reefer back to the "x" effect on "y" as we began. Because the change to "y" has happened, "x" is
deemed the source, even where measurement cannot be; yet when the reverse if viewedthis reverses the
expectation, the flow, the sequence and gives insight.

Q: How does time enter into this? It must distort our perception.
C: We do not say time distorts reality, it adds an aspect or feature to its interpretation. If an event
across the Earth as you sleep is learned after you awaken the next day, until awareness includes it, it did
not happen. For you.

Is the event real? It is real as you are prepared to accept what you are told as certain. What is certain?
Photographs on plates were deemed certain and impartial until your technology allowed manipulation,
enhanced by use of chemistry and materials named plastics. Electronic digital imagery now allows easy
manipulation and difficult is the proof of alteration or fabrication of electronic images. Are these all real,
when at first glance all appears as such? Reality as understood depends upon the database of experience
against which the information compares.

Q: Esteemed Committee, thank you.
C: Always welcome, we thank you also.