Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
25
Hinduithan and Hindudorn. Those chroniclers never styled themsclvea Indians, They
alwayi stood up to be counted as Arabs, Afghans. Turk* Persians or Abyssinian*.
Moreover they invariably referred to the people of Hindusthan by such colourful terms as
"thieves, robbers, dacoits, scoundrels, infidels, ilaves, reptiles, dog*, prostitutes and
dancing girl*." Recently when Pakistan's Foreign Minister Bhutto stigmatised Indians at
the United Nations as "dogs" he was only using a term that be found liberally littered in
Muslim chronicles of Hindusthan. In reality, therefore, those chronicles must be regarded
not at "India"! History As Written By Its Own Hisionans" but as "India's History As
Written By lis Dire Enemies." Incidentally the same must hold true of histories written
wiih a British outlook though obviously being more civilized they arc not as bad or as
false. But if we recall questions asked in our examinations about the British period wc
rind that they lalk only of reforms of a Bentinck or the victories of a Cornwalhs. They
glibly gloss over the atrocities of a Warren Hastings or the treachery of a Clive.
Obviously, the damage done by Muslim chronicles continues to fester because it was
inflicted for a thousand long year!, and because Hindusthan still remains burdened with
the Islamic graft. The kind of writing on which the Muslim mind has been fed and the
Hindu mind maimed and humiliated may be illustrated from almost any mediaeval
chronicle. Badayuoi observes (vol. II, page 383, English translation of Muntakhbut
Tawarikh) : "fn the year WS A. H, Raja Todarmal and Raja Bhagwandas who had
remained behind at Lahore hastened to the abode of hell rj.e. died) and torment and in
the lowest pit became the feed of serpents and scorpions. May Allah scorch them both.**
Bridly I shall now only enumerate a few typical perversions of Indian history. Muslim
rulers without exception though all sadists have yet been represented as just, kind, wise
and patrons of learning etc. This may be gauged from my book
build
!s*>* Akb * Grcat " Musliro r ; ,crs ^ id l - -
TlriS*** ^idgc mans.on, canal, tomb or mosque. An
Y uiurped Hindu constructions. This is being p rovtd
TbvoVm books like "The Taj Mahal is . Hindu Pa]acC
La Red Fort is i Hindu Building," and Fatehpur Sikri i* a iffldoCily.*' Far from building
anything Muslims destroyed and damaged Hindu buildings. Visitors to mediaeval historic
buildings should, therefore, remember one guiding principle
ninety that "the construction is all Hindu and destruction all Muslim," If thelites of so-
called Sufi 'Mints'are dispassio-naiely examined they will all be found to pair with the
ruling alien junta to farm the Islamic pincers lhrottliii0 Indian life and culture. Sec what
Badayauni writes about Satim Chisti {page 113, vol. II, Badayuni*s chronicle) : "His Grace
the Sheikh allowed the emperor (Akbar) to have entree of all his private apartments and
however much his sons and nephews kept saying "our wives arc becoming estranged from
us' the Sheikli would answer "there is no dearth of women in Ihe world, Since I have
made you Amirs, seek other wives, what docs it matter T Mouserraic u contemporary
Jesuit, says thai the Sheikh was "itamed wila all the wickedness and disgraceful conduct
of
vjuhammadensV All this evidence has been carefully suppressed during a thousand years
of rampant Muslim communalism. Assertions or golden periods (e.g, Shahjahun's} and
noble regime* arc all blatant concoctions. Shahjahan's reign of just
'*cr 29 years was full oi 48 campaigns. He also demolished all
lindu temple*, murdered all his rivals, and he did not build
-ven a smg i c buadmg. b 5 u ch a reign go i dcn 7 Township*
eroiabad, Tughlakabad, Ahmcdabad and Hyderabad have
falsely ascribed to this or that sultan though they
Hindu township*. Ascribing them to a Fcrowhah
*r Ah*i<h hah u , ikc asscrtmg thai A1|ahabad was founde4 b y
"J Muslim communalism going berserk over I
2T H ^br. thousand years has resulted In
m f^mmm** all evidence and substituting **
orywuhtake accounts, Oft, m ^.iM Ino Hnims arc
2?
bolstered by cock and bull stories like Sikandar Lodi finding a grain of Moth and asking
his wazir to build a mosque w hicb therefore acquired the name Masjid Moth. That world
historical scholarship should accept such arrant nonsense u profound history is a
measure of the damage that the brain of the world of history has suffered. India can
become a strong nation only if it can cleanse its history of communal prevarications of
the last 1,235 years. This will be possible only if Hindudom decides to assert its
sovereignty in its own land The term "Hindu communalism" was forged during alien
Muslim rule and was further tempered under alien British rule. In Hindusthan there can
be Muslim, Christian or any other communalism while Hinduism is nothing but
nationalism. The sooner this, is undersJood and practised the belter it would be for a
proper national and international focus on Indian history,
This leads us to a very simple test to determine who an Indian nationals. Whosoever, no
matter of what race, country or religion, is determined to preserve and defend Sanskrit
language, the Vedic way of life and all its values and achieve-ments like Yoga, Ayurveda,
worship of all living being* anJ of trees, rivers and idolsmust be deemed to be Indian
nationals. Those who aim at snuffing out this way of life must be deemed enemies.
COM
3
""""toe definition and scope of history
It it always advisable to have a clear idea of ihc definition ni scope of any subject before
launching on Us study.
If one b not clear about !he scope of a given subject one h either likely to confine oneself
only to a part of it or at times go beyond its proper limits. In either case one will not be
doing fall justice to the subject
Accordingly let us first define whai is history ? In Western languages the word 'History'
derives from the Greek word 'Historia'meaning 'inquiry*. Obviously this is a very
misleading root since inquiry is common to every branch of knowledge. In fact eversince
a child is born he is always very inquisitive and is aniious to know many things about the
world around him but he cannot be said to be thereby educating himself in history.
Therefore no one can have a clear notion of what history 1 is if he were to be guided solely
by the etymological meaning of the Western word 'history'-
hi against this the Sanskrit word for historyITlHAS1> far more evocative, Nay, we may
even say that the word Itibas* embodies a complete definition of what 'history' is. That
word is composed or three syllables, "iti" means 'such and such t happening or event}'.
"Ha* means 'definitely*. *Aas' means 'happened'. All ihat can be said to have definitely
happened in the past a history. As such history may be defined as'a factual and
chronological account of past happenings'.
Thus we may have a history or an individual or an instiitJ-
of a thing or countrynamely its life story from the
ufiubi np-to-feu. we may now recall that this is exactly
*" ** ttoacr *nd by the terra history.
29
Since a country It made up of a number or individuals anil institutions* in history wilt
naturally include the history of all lu individual* nnd institutions. But obviously inch 1
history will be unwieldy and impracticable. It will also be uninteresting and not of muoh
use. The drab routine of millions ol ordinary persons from day to day wilt also be hard to
compile of fit in inlo a comprehensive and coherent national account.
This then involves a lot or trimming. The question then arises as to where do we apply the
scissors ? How do we pick and choose ? The answer can be round if wc have a look at
national histories that are written and studied all over the
world.
If wc read historic* of the mediaeval period we find them dealing with kings and battles.
If we read historic! of countries like England and America from the 20th century wc shall
find them mainly writing about the doings or their national parliaments and popular
cabinets. The Russian history or the post-1917 era would mostly talk or the proletariat and
the monolithic Communist Party, This then gives us a clue that history has to be a concise
and compact account r a country'* past it has to confine itself to the seats of power.
History will atwavs deal with those who wielded power. At times, when instead or the
king one or more courtiers wielded power history shifted its focus from the monarch to
the powerful nobility. In England when the monarchy ceased gradually io wield power.
England** history shifted its focus in the sarr proportion from "the monarchy to the
Parliament and the pop larly elected cabinet In Russia when the Ciars lo>P the
proletariat. Russian history concerned .self with .he Communist Party and its leaders who
wielded all power
From all these ins,ances we come to the co^u^
national histories have to be concise, compact a ^
accounts of seats or centres of power ^"^j,,,^, concentrated in an individual as d.rector or
tan* or ^ called a popularly elected ministry, a group of military
kat.coi
JO
th.
r 3inc inluetfiil civilian*, or a national assembly. , n proportion in which power shifts
from one to another hi. t0rit| automaiicilly^htft their focus.
When 1. therefore, find people complaining that mediaeval orfes,fot .nitance, talk only of
kings and wars or of S0lne powerful cliques ai court alone and not of t he people i r ecl
theirromplaint is unjustified. Even if they themselves try their hand at rewriting the
histories of those times so as to reflect tbc Intvofihe people in generalas they often
professthey woold find themselves helplessly drawn to narrating only the doings of the
V ings and their courtiers. This is unavoidable. National histories .ire nothing but
accounts of the centres of power and no matter what an individual historian's political
leaning* nre iT he sets himself to write the history of any age he has to confine himself to
the doings of those who wielded national power during the period concerned. It can never
be otherwise. One need not therefore feel hurt if mediaval histories deal onlv with kings
and courtiers or wars generally, A history of Hitler's Germany or of Stalin's Russia will
have to revolve mainly round the doings of those two dictators if simply became others
did not matter very much or that others could i have their way in shaping the national
destiny. So national lories invariably revolve around those who shape tjic destiny he
nation, be it an individual, a junta or a legislature .
wnce in a national history we cannot include what ever)
tad Harry does every moment of his life we have to
the accoum to those who are in power. But in any
=n dealing with the doings of those in power history
the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth
are uked to .wear , n a court of law. A history
** Wit will not admit f suppressing, adult*-
deZu, * M " fiCU lo ** **rt*nrt interests or
The Unw..** 1 !!! C V n u, " 0,, l narratives iv also Important HH * " bti ** * 4ll lhc
pathos of a given
11
ituation. J""* a * * a ase-play we expect every character to I tone hi* P rl rtf lhc
dialogue in accordance with hiv particu-rolc, or when anyone narrating an incident lowers
or raises uj voice according to the event he may be dealing with, a hstorian must write
about a cru:l deed in strong language, about art in soft and beautiful lan 3 uag*. and so o n
Since kutarv is narrative and factual literature, id language, n
,ve literary qualities. Even as a judge denounces foul crime, in strong language In hi*
judgment or use, kind words when femC^^ofhelptes, women, children orcu, Xa historian
-ho do* not modulate hi* langut** to sua the events he describe, is not fl true historian.
Incidental this lead. ,. to reognue that Mtfafj mttSl be classified as literature The general
tendency, at east In Co*
mpo'ary India, is to regard only poets, short-story wte ^J and novelists and **F^
litterateurs. This is narrowmg ^^ ***** such. Historical accounts which enter too -cc of
any archaeological excavations or Jj*^^ hul particular document may not be **^ f j^ tm
* ol !ood genera, histories should forma very mM > ^
Hterature. This simple *^J?J^*Z^ why <bc branches of knowledge. *~*X "I** earth
is round or why ^^25 ******* together from a height would reach J*J* U '* havC
formed that was literature though later his nudfopi m^ ^^ me basis for intricate scientific
^"^^j, literal^ to the intelligence of a mm of average e ^ ^
History satisfies ih!s t An average interested in history and is able to grasp R.
shout the definition Once we have such a clear conception an *^ ^^
ani scape of hhtttj ' ** rtf <' ' [^ , n general mm *** apparent that historians, and edu
>^ nM * m *~ tolerate the interference of pol.Hcans. ^^ ttllh
tics to water down, adulterate or tamper
?M.
32
I*** H^W. therefore, he finally defincj as 0 flC! "^chron^icUceoum of a country's pas.
tell, g n e/r ^J^-..**"** who wielded notion,, poWcr * t /, jfnc i, must be noth.ng *-
Tim make* ^ Zt on a true hHinmn to have the courage to tell the t ruth . in invader and
a miscreant n nrncrcani p 0
and call an invader
andean."* .- .. .
pHer wftil religion he invokes lo mst.fy his deeds.
4
HOW HISTORIANS HAVE DUPED THE PUBLIC
fa no other branch of knowledge ha* the reading public been cheated so consistently and
for such a long lime at in Indian history.
Generations of students, government officials and tourist! visiting historic spots have
been supplied with concoction* in the name of history. Those mainly responsible for
passing on these myths are those on whom the public has been doting and reiving
as'historians*. Some have done it deliberately, some unknowingly and some through
cowardice because they lacked the nerve to declare to the public that they were all beini
cheated in the name of history.
TOeforins.3nccthecasc.rihc Mil-foot high lower in Delhi, cailcd the Kutub Minar. So-
called toawm * * lay public ere both equally vague about,t, ong n anye. he
w5 * *- * **<i * 1 55-t'SiS
assertions. Some say It was built by ^ muBU Qm A D
Muslin, slave ru.cr who ruled in Del .fro l6 - * mm say I, was bui.t by his V**"***^
* Another view is that All.uddm KM> . bu.U . ^
ofit. A fourth view i, that FaroeShah Tugh .^ ^ ^ ^ built the tower or a part of it. Aniin
eiUy
more of .he above four rulers nsight have ,o,ntly
built the tower. ,
Ks.mrv will honestly and The astound.ng f.c. i. ** -o .histo^ ^ ^
truthfully make u clean breast or iw wn a bsolulcl>
the public into confidence tell it pl-inly thai <""
* %
*, M* will s.mply blandly assert thai it was built by KnuLdin Of Htm-* or Allauddin or
Fero, Shah or by two or more of them The so-called historians know that their ,t.ons
ere folic and baseless because none of those monar-
have Ltd any claim to building that tower. In such b case . honest and dutiful historian
owes it to the public to tell them of all the five views and add that there is not the
slightest proof for an* of those. Yet almost no so-called 'historian* has done i h i s
The historians are obviously aware of the discrepancies in ihe Kuiub Minar story because
in the professional seclusion of The annual ictsion of the All India History Congress some
of their colleague* read research papers dealing with the anomn-hc m the traditional
assertions.
When historians 1cnow that the origin or the Kuiub Minar m dispute and that there is no
basis for any of the five versions is it not their du'y to desist from any decisive verdict ||
t not also their duty to place all facts before the public and ihen, if They feel so inclined,
express their own preference fr-r any particular view ! Bui when they hide such vital facts
from the public, when they conceit <tuch important information from the public, must
not the to-called historians be publicly impeached ' I ci diction of duty and cheat ins
When the public pay* the historians their >alancs f the price of their books allowance and
leave to attend History Congress sessions, and pram-, ibern other benefits such as
examiner ships and membership of university -.entiles should not the public expect thai
they would not br let down ami vital information would not be hidden from them '
At this it might be contended that staling all the alter-natives would be impracticable
because that would make each
topic very lengthy. This is not true. I have shown above bow all the five views can be
packed in two or three short sentence*.
ft might then be asked as to what is the paint in asking a historian to place all of several
views before the public 1 In answer to this I want to point out that placing all of several
views all the time before the public is of tremendous importance To illustrate this let us
take a concrete instance. Supposing a man has discontinued his academic education after
the third standard. Let us also suppose that in his third standard book there was a lesson
on the Kutub Minar, If the writer of that lesson has blandly asserted that the tower was
built by Kutubuddin that student would carry a life-long impression that Kutubuddin was
the author of the Kutub Minar-Hc wouldn't know that there was no basis at all for that
view. Later if a researcher like me disputes that view that man would dismiss it as some
quixotic aberration without even bothering to read the arguments and evidence advanced
in support. Suppression of evidence, therefore, results in hardening national attitudes.
The second great danger from such bland and baseless
assertions is that it plugs gaps that should have been left open
for research. Thus, for instance, if from the third to the M.A.
standard all students reading about the Kutub Minar repeatedly
come across all the five views with a footnote added that all of
those five views arc mere conjectures, many many inquiring
minds would be persuaded to delve into the real origin ot the
Kutub Minar. Many would succeed in piecing together us
history or bringing to light several vital facts. But bland and
baseless assertions in all history books about the Kutub Mintr
origin prevent potential researchers from prying into it* history
They arc all given to understand that the origin of the Kuiub
Minar has been established beyond any doubt and, therefore,
no research is necessary. This is a great academic lots for
which historians, must be made to answer.
,1 What w* h" ve M,d aboul the Kuiub *''* : . .11 mediaeval historic townships,
MMifti P*
mo^iiw. fomb*. fort*
other residential buildings bridges,
bribed to Muslim rulers. Take ihc case of ZEmS iSt - to range anywhere between
. have ranged anywhere between 10 and 22 years, , La.d rone anybody from Esa
Hilendi , A,,,,^ lleJendil Aill de Bordeaux. Geronimo Vcroneo or a bmerKMbbtafSH-
WthtBhimielf. Such colossal uncertainly character^ every detail connected with the Taj M
ttal ntd* diot the dates of Mumtaz's death and burial.
4nd yet at in the case of the Kutub Minar. in the case of the Taj Mahal too history
practically gives all the facts adding footnote that all are equally baseless and
conjectural. Every nUtory including the Government of India's own tourist and
irchaeology department version* give only one bland and baseless view and assert it to be
the last word about the Taj Mahal The result is so disastrous that everyone comes away
with the notion that there is no uncertainty about the Muslim origin of the Taj. Only if
they coull all get together and compare notes on what each one or them has been told, or
has read or heard they would soon realize that they have been victims or a great fraud. It
is something like a cheat got as from home to home collec*-jas money eni thins* on
different pretexts. Only when he is arrested and all those defrauded get together do they
realize how he has told different things to different people to defraud them Tkiu is exactly
what is happening with regard to every mediaeval historic tomb and mosque and fort and
township in India. People are being fooled with wild stories about their origin all widely
differing from one another. If people arc vigilant enough to collect all the versions about
every mediaeval town-
ship tad building the v will resize hjw they are being fooled and cheated.
37
Let us take n third instance, This it about ihc budding v. mi h i i naded in history as
Akbar'* tomb at Sikandra, six miles m 'lie north of Agra. This it a 7 storeyed Hindu palace
sad yel it li being blandly and basetcssly asserted as having been built as a tomb for Akbar.
Historians have withheld from the public the fact that nowhere docs Akbar or tiny of hi*
court historian* ever claim that Akbar built nfi own tomb during his lifetime, and yet
there {a a section of histories which ascribes blandly, basclcssly and anomalously the
buitdrn'* to Akbar himself in anticipation of hi death. Another set of historians believing
in some sly, sketchy and nebulous assertions in the Jahangirnamu asserts that Jahangir
built it after Akbar's death. There is a thtrd set of historians w I licji equally blandly and
baseless I y strike u compromise i like politicians} and says that Akbar built n pun of it
tun! Jahangir completed it. There is absolutely no hails for air those three views In fact
reading between the lines there i, enough proof to conclude that Akbar licj buried (if at all
he lias been buried there) in a Hindu palace in which he was staying at the time of his
death,
ll might lake some picciuUs year* and a ttciiiendoU* clioii lu di&lodgc all this stupendous
falsuiiood that ha> been stuffed into Indian history und continues to be assiduously aud
acco-sanclly taught all over the world to generation* ol' impressionable students. Ehoj hi
rum propagate the tame tutored falie-hoodi to others.
Vsho is responsible tor ibis tragic deception ol the world 1 it is certainly the so-called
historians on whom the public few been doting and in whom the public has been placing
implict faith as their darling 'historians'. Some ol ihem wilfully, many unwittingly and
some others out of *heer cowardice have helped in the perpetuation of these colossal
falsehoods. It is lime the Indian public Oiserted itself and ciied a hall to this deception. It
is time they made so-called historians answerable for iheit lapse or deliberate distortion.
If oar errhaj historians had taken the precaution of deiltt* jBJ from Mood and baseless
assertions and instead jusi P i a d U* .licrn-tivt views before the public in every case, ihcy
could art oaly have eicapcd the charge of complicity or negligence but ihey would even
have indirectly helped the came of history by inducing fcocrationl of readers to undertake
deeper research Let. therefore, the world know that it is being grossly duped and muled
with regard to all mediaeval historical buildings and township! and, therefore, it must
demand all the facts and more thorough research into the real origin and authorship of
each one of those buildings and townships.
5
RCWRiTING HISTORY-WHY AND HOW"?
Since history is the first casualty of aggression the longer the aggression the greater is the
distortion and destruction of the history of the victimised country.
As such rewriting its own history should be the first major task of a country like India
which has emerged free after (J,235) years of foreign domination. If it neglects this it
docs so at its own peril and the consequences of such neglect are catastrophic because a
nation's entire outlook on many vital matters depends on what kind of history has been
taught to its citizens.
Incidentally India's rulers (the Indian National Congress party) having been completely
unmindful of the need for rewriting India's history, they have accidentally provided u
with a graphic and tragic illustration of how a country which docs not care to rewrite its
history after a long spell of slavery continues to remain a psychological slave of Us
erstwhile rulers,
tor instance ,ui India free in aame drags 10 the I. C i controlled administration, it stilt
continues the provincial autonomy introduced by the British to sharpen disunity, it
perpetuates the use of the English language and numerals at all leveb, it still continues to
be a member of the British Commonwealth being afraid to leave tbo British apron and
emerge i% ju unsheltered nation in world politics, to envoys arc all angli-Ctoed, its
population continues to quaff tea 'I olfee the nrsi thing in the morning, if Still shows
signs of being overawed an Englishman or anyone who looks like him (such as a t man,
Russian, etc.), Hi Armed Forces Still tBJt* pride in opmg Tommy traditions, it continues
10 name its provinces alter
reflected in the name Nagaiaod. These are only a Ei ^ *ri 10 w Britannia still rules the
brainwaves of ^X ^ough the lOO-year-lon* British rule over ladia
believed to have ended in 1947-
ut what tf more surprising, painful and very tragic it that ^continuing to bear the yoke of
its erstwhile British llarery IndU* ruler, have not revoked even ibe earlier 800-year old
yoke of Muslim domination.
This ii illustrated by our administrator* feeling scared to enact a civil code for the
Muslims or encompass them in a civil code common to all citizens, submitting 10 their
fanatic demands for encouragement to and recognition of such alien languages as Urdu,
Arabic and Persian, agreeing to delete references to Hindu gods from curricular or
government-sponsored books, feeling coumeilcJ to employ Muslim ministers and
officer*, accepting Islamic holidays in a predominantly Hindu country, feeling obliged to
participate in avowedly pan-Islamic conventions, feeling compelled to carry favour with
Turkey. Iran and Arabia despite their innate hostility to India, their backwardness,
fanaticsm and insignificant role in the modern world, ice ling impelled to kowtow to
Kashmir's Muslim majority, feeling helpless in taking stern measures against Muslim
law-breakers, feeling impotent in retaliating again>t Pakistan's conit&ni bullying and
feeling constrained to harbour a sizeabl 3 Muslim population though the very basic idea
of partitioning India was to bring about a complete separation of Muslims from Hindus.
We thus see how, though lrce in name, India continues to retain its psychological slavery
of both its erstwhile Uomiuators the Muslims and the British.
bet just of such slavery India continues to be militarily weak and economically destitute.
41
Had Indian administrators been free of all such slaver> complexes they could have made
spectacular progress mi all fields and made India a respected and feared nation. India has
shown a strange disinclination to free hersetf of Anglo-Muslim strings and swim at will in
the waters of international politics and diplomacy. This timidity arises from a long period
of serfdom and dependencea habit of looking to Britain, Arabia, Turkey and Iran for
guidance and leadership
Long slavery, paradoxically enough, makes the slave look upon the very chains that bind
him, as his life support. A story is told of a convict in ancient times who was contined to a
dingy cell for 15 years and was tethered with a chain to a pole in the centre of the cell. A
pot ot drinking water and some food used to be kept in front of him at before a dog us a
matter of prison routine. After 15 years the dctenue wat set free. He gingerly stepped out
of the prison gate. His eyes used only to dim light wilted at the bright sunshine outside.
The traffic on the nearby roads appeared to be a strange phenomenon. Not a soul seemed
to know him or care for biro. It all seemed a strange and unknown world. The dctenue,
though now set free, felt terrified. He took one long look at the outside world, inhaled a
deep breath and made a sudden dash for hi* cell, He preferred a sheltered, restrictive
existence of a dog's tclher in a cell to venturing in the strange wW world, imprisonment
had sapped his sell-conudencc. This is what has happened to India. This feeling of utter
destitution, dejection, desperation and loss of all confidence was the result of the prisoner
forgcUiug hit own past history, lost freedom and obliviousness of the delights of an
unfettered life.
It is, therefore, very necessary to keep the flame ot tmlors burning in the heart of every
citisen of a country lest a misgui* ded majority unaware of its true history continue to
hug (he very chains that bind it. Thi is exactly India's malad>. The only remedy which
can restore India's national health is teach-ins every citizen unadulterated history-
Rewriting India >
Hum 6** < dc * uoycd dur,0B iu ,on * sIavery ' thcrefor .
bccomei i task of U> uUa0ii importance and urgency.
Having pointed ouMbe necessity for rewriting the history ef . o.uon which has long been a
slave we may consider how the re*iit j ng i* to be dooft
Votariei of an ideology tike the Communists tend t 0 rewrite history of their own country
even though free, of their
nan-Communist P a E > and of tbe rC5[ of lhe wofld as a coost a itruggle between a
handful of haves and a vast multitude of hivenoti from the dawn of humaoii>- Such
ideological rcu n ting can never bring out the truth, the whole truth ami nothing bur the
truth which :s what history is
Another wy of rewriting history may be termed the ' imperial" method. Thins adopted by
the rulers, whether alien or indigenous, to suit their own convenience. This may be
illustrated from historical narratives left by Muslim and European wrueis who belonged
to the alien ruling junta. They tended to represent their sultans or badshahs and
governors antl governor*general as one greater than the other. Even their outrages such
as massacres, plunder and rapes have been represented as act* oj great magnanimity,
wisdom, courage, justice and deserted retribution by alien Muslim chronicles. Hindu
authois f a slavish mentality thuugti unable to defend those acts at virtuous have tended
to ignore them as of no conscqnencc. The mediaeval Muslim chronicles thus represent a
preposterous mode history-writing in which the most atrocious deeds are represented as
virtuous or at their worsT as but harmless administrative eiertuej
from nltcnt even misguided indigenous rulers tend to
Eif on national history to sun llicir wayward ideas.
Sometimes their attempt to manhandle history mnUi in their own
omic initancc of such ignominious retreat in the face
oJ hurory W providod by the ruling Indian National Congress's
dastardly attempt to doctor history
43
la the 1950s India's cranky Congress rulers made a mock-heroic attempt to write a history
of India's freedom movement Orders went out to a network of organizations to collect
information from the regions they served. This resulted in a pile of information about
Indian patriots who fought the aliens with tWOfd and scimitar and pistols and guns.
Against this background of a valiant struggle the Gandhian movement of fasts and protest
marches that wriggled in India from 1915 o 1945 loomed petty, pusillanimous, awkward
and ridiculous. Orders were, therefore, promptly sent out to strike off all the information
gathered earlier and limit the scope of their inquiry to only the pale and colourless
Gandhian movement. This illustrates how the current of history has the power to shock
these who tinker with it
The proper course for a nation is to write factual history in which a spade is called a
spade, rape a rape, massacre a mas-sac tc, plunder a plunder, and an alien an alien-In
identifying an alien the criterion must not be domiclc but his or her mentality. If he or
she swears by breaking images propagating Urdu, Arabic and Persian or English; objecting
to music along highways, sporting outlandish names and dresses, running down the
Vedas. slaughtering cows, looking for ideo logical politics or religious inspiration to other
countries he is an alios. U is often mislcadingly believed that whosoever considers I,Hi,, i-
.i, nwncounlrj liM tod!" fills i*llj btf "* >-If he harbours a design to convert all Hindus
to his own alien faith he is no Indian. This is a lesson that history teaches u s Allegiance
to a country's genius, its culture, way of life, languag. and religion is a better test or
citizenship than mere residence which even tyrants like Akbir and Aumngwb fulfilled in
larg measure
An inadequate understanding of this fact of history ba,
J3 ! -planting III the minds of imprcssioaabic chi^ t
L leading concept, life the **.! * at India has a compose
. ,bat it must ha a composite flag like the tricolour a nd
tt must accommodate even those who believe in breakup ,be beads and Idoll of fellow-
citizens.
A proper factual rewriting of history will help eradicate all such illogical concepts.
Therefore those who retain power on cranky, misleading and funciful assumpuons of
history i 0 appease the minorities tend to oppose factual jwwiiiing of Indian
bifuuy-
Another point to remember ui this context is that inan> people (end to decry attempts to
rewrite history by asserting that history is a matter of individual 'interpretation* and that,
therefore, there can be no finality or objectivity about it. Thi> view is wrong. Lei us take
the instance of the uprising ol lfc53 in India. The then British rulers and their supporters
tended lo dub that happening as a mere mutiny ivhilc those of the other camp preferred
to glorify it as a war ol independence. A real historian need not be perturbed by cither of
those views since the label will always depend on the angle of vision. A real historian will
only insist on the chronological accuracy of the events leading to the conflict and the
battles and casualties. Such factual accuracy may later help historians to amvc at a
concensus on whether to regard it as a mutiny or a war tfl independence by virtue of its
duration, number of engagement* fought, the total casualties suffered and the icgion over
which the struggle was waged, Uut expression of opinion is not the essence of hiitory. It
may at best be a mere frill.
The language thai a historian uses must match the event
Authors of Indian historical narratives bave tended
to us* soil, suave, drawing-room type goody goody language as
* comntoa medium of expression to describe acts of juitfce,
o^tcy, patriotism, bravery, gallantry, massacre, rape and plun-
Though out of long usage ibis kind of even language has
45
come to be regarded as the norm it i* an fiber ration dictated by necessity' Having been
long under foreign domination Indian* could not possibly antagonise their rulers by using
strong language to denounce alien Muslim rulers* atrocities or British
administrators'outrages. But this incongruity muv not continue after independence.
Literature has no meaning unles* it modulates the ione to suit the occasion. Thi* may be
verified from the language used in dramas, novels or even by a mere messenger narrating
an event. A true historian must likewiic u*e matching language.
6
of a "Muslim contribution" is often discussion or in article and books
_-jn^TiTi?m^M?) TO INDIAN LIFF.
P f .ie of.cn talk of a "Muslim iNt^M * '^ian life lri Sl" T ,ke many other cliches this
statement is often ZZm**** [nmcdivai history or contemporary politics the nock-phrase
^ned out in an [mpromotu m m*ke the li.icner. or readers took small and humbled and E
ive The speaker a feme of elation and triumph on having loered a petal against hi* or her
opponents.
On the contrary it should be the other way round namely, if anything, Muslim
contribution-"* it can be so called-ha* brought shame and stigma not only to India but to
human ity a. whole This is yel another aspect and instance of how Indian history lias
been turned topsy-turvy during India's 1,235 year long subjugation by alien powers. It
illustrates how some-
| ignoble is hcing paraded a% something very glorious
In view of hi imporiance and persistence let Us subject this dogmatic claim of a "Muslim
contribution [W to a close scrutiny.
Thr claim of a "Muslim contribution" to Indian culture If
uhviou*ly based on the invavion of and rule over India by a host
of a c fasbt, Turks. Iranians, Afghans, Abyssinians.
Iraqis, Karats and Uibek*. over a period of nearly 1,235 years
-m Mnhamroad-bin-Kasim to Bahadur,hah Zafur.
What contribution could barbarian and illiterate tor almost UHtefate) intruder* and
invaderi like Mohammad-bin-JUsim. Mohammad Gha/iu, Mohammad GhOft, Tamcrlain.
Bnbur. Nadir Shah and Ahmalhah Abdall have made '* Wat looting
46
India, ravaging and demolition of its manstoni. deiecraiion of
.-_.1^. ,.,i,l ^nnUrrllnd I It (* m intn Inmlw *w.A mn.n.i*.
any *"con-
jis temples and converting them into tombs and mosques, raping its women, kidnapping
Us boys and girli for site slaves abroad, and massacring men by the hundreds any *\
tribution" or was it retribution 7 Why did Indian women commit jauhar almost at every
Muslim invasion 1 Win it just for fun '
These invaders were all unwanted and unwelcome guests whom the Hindus wanted to
throw onl
Let US take an example from ordinary civic lire Can It be argued that a gang of <tacoii*
iavadin? the peaceful life well-knit family or Village, contribute, something very predouf
to their civic life by looting all ftelr wealth, tor urrng the male ^raping the women, abduct
the girls Mm Ar * ^massacring all and ,undr^ M ! J* tried in a court of law and pushed
or Is U awarded a c.ttl and a scroll of honour on behalf of the family or vill, making a
unique "ennf ribuiinn** to the lift of .he vlcrtml
it should be clear from the ebfiv* Instance that the tfitfii invaders from alien land, who
prtftd 'heir way Into Inrtmhj
derers and barbarian, were never wa,ted ta M * * Mia in everv way nnd reduced ,t ft a
land J*^*^ hovels, gaping ruins and abject poverty. ^
chronicler wh, ace mU the ***'*% o has himself clearly said thai Mohammid
Ghan p the life of the Hindus and scattered it to the winch
fervenr.y prayed for deliverance ' * "n* pmn therefore Indians looked upon an oci
idoatf * Shivuji as a godiend end a badly needed ertnUi That is so far as the invader* are
concerned,
den left their progeny and henchmen and inu
>:ht.o:.m
4S , (i , ., | CJ1 *i they mUst be credited with
I h it c him * unjustified
A, .1 clwi from recorded history the Muslim sovereign and
lM , uier, co'eric of courtier* ^d toldlary never c*n,.der|
hrm^lvci Indians. Thcv continued to proudly designate
Ahvaatnians and despise even Imlia-bnrn or convert Muslim, . were -Hindustanis." So,
though they were physically settled ,n India Psychologically .hey remained sworn to
plunder ami .mpovcmh India. They remitted its wealth abroad, married ,* their own land*
and went for pilgrimage outs.de India. In India thcv railed 10 sainthood marauder* who
were t. .error to i , r Indian people. Let v take an illustration from civic life to ee
whether tttilina. in India automatically ensures honoured citinhip Supposing a gang or
dacoits instead of raiding a ullaccfrom a dhiani bm and scurrying away with the loot
consider* it safe and convenient enough to live in the village iKclf nnd continue its
nefarious activities from closer quarters, ,)| ihai pane be considered a valuable and
honourable addition -he vfUajp population and will It be printed a welcome i-irfrcM by
ihc village dvie hodj. -
Thit thmild make it clear that the criterion is not physical
settlement hut behaviour. When mediaeval Muslim sovereigns
from Kuiuhuddm Aibak (1206 \-D.) 10 Buhadurshuh Zafar
11158 A.D I continued to look upon the overwhelming majority
of Indians, m mean wretches whose cows must be slaughtered
moles destroyed and wealth looted they could not be consi-
rud liiJj.in\ merely because they settled in India. The crucial
I foi whit purpose J In this connection i' m^
bt noted that the Shikt and Huns also came as invaders but they
i completely merged with Indians that today there Is no Shak
oi Hun, Comrastunjly mediaeval Muslims continued to be
iltoaa
49
Till the very end of Muslim rule in India the MoiUm sovereign, his courtiers and the
convert! to Islam far from .ndunmog them'elves took every care to scrupulously and
jealously puird And retain their alien identity in their dress, mannert names, religion,
script t speech and outlook. Such alienation ltrucfc toeh deep roots that it continues even
to this day, In this sense Islam in India ceasing to be a religion took the form of politics of
an Arab-Iranian-Turkish domination over India. That ihil alienation continues undiluted
to our own day was dramatically illustrated by their asking for a separate homeland and
cutting away two pieces of India in the name of Islam in 1947, This could well be called a
"contribution" of Islam in India to Arabia Iran and Turkey but a disservice to India.
Far from loving the people and culture of Hindustan the mediaeval Muslim junta
continued to deeply halt the Hindus This is vividly illustrated tn almost each one of the
hundreds of mediaeval Muslim chronicles by the fact that nowhere in them arc the people
of India called by a specific name. Hindus are
designated in mediaeval Muslim chronicles in most vile, contemptuous and abusive
terms like "scoundrels, thieves, robbers.
thugs, staves, prostitutes, dancing girls and infields.* 1 This fact
has been carefully hidden from the public by most historian!
who have written curricuiar teat-hooks. Is such vile abuse nuns
at the vast majority of the residents of a victimized host country
a " contribution*' to its culture ?
Thirdly can the invidious jitya ta. which squeezed money
out of the Hindus .is a price for escape from the "accept Islam
or get killed by torture
to Indian culture ! It was on the
contribution extracted from Hindus
crafi on Indian culture.
Fourthly during Muslim rule Hindu. w. Jr^ 0 *^
colour pMSH |k* no Mu.lim M g.' h *?*
him even ordinary courtesies
called a Muslim co
hand it was the ve
price .-thrc.it be called a contribution of IsUo o'her hand a compulsory to nurture a
parasitic alien
m may jkciw ~ -, ,e, while receiving ** * hb ontribution to Indian culture ?
<*** !ry negation of culture in denying a Hindu the
50 nrttifei which fin ordinary man extends io another
twin*-
Tt h primes scried -hat if nothing else theMJl, te, made . grand sculptural
contribution to India by bu,ldin P mlniBcenl tombs, forts, mosque*, palaces, budges and
canal,. Ev^thi, assertion h b 3 seie S> because the Muslim, did not hurfd even single
tomb or mosque in India during mediaeval Alf the mediaeval tombs, mosques, forts,
palaces, bridges and roads Wsefy ascribed to this or that sultan or counter are warped
Hindu constructions put to Musiira use.
Muslims on the other hand destroyed a very vast number of magnificent Hindu
constructions such as river ghats, canals, hridpes. palaces, temples, mansions and forts.
The few which survived were misused by them as tombs and mosques. Some others have
been reduced to gaping and tottennp ruins or rubble heaps
Here again we see how history has been turned completely unfile out or upside down
because Muslims far from building anything in India cither destroyed or usurped Hindu
buildings and tampered ox tinkered with them by disfiguring, desecrating and ravaging
them, and claiming false authorship, Every visitor to mediaeval buildings and historic
spots must remember one very important maxim that there "construction is all Hindu
while destruction is. all Muslim."*
If it is in the field of dance and music that Muslims are believed to have made some
contribution to Indian culture thai too ii a baseless concept. In Hindu tradition dance and
music were very sacred religious arts. During Muslim rule they were brothels an i
drinking bouts at court. So. if any ihing. dance and music were denigrated and debased to
such ahyssmal depth* that today every householder is afraid to send hit daughters and
sinters or even boys to learn dancing an music. People arc apt to point out to a targe
number 0 Muslims who are good musicians as proof of a Muslim "contri-
51
button" to music. Such people often forget fi,i v ,h .k fl nd melodies they sing are all of
immemorial H , B du or,n ^ ttnllq uity. Secondly the mp.rat,vely Urge number of M B
^ t found among musicians is because their forc-fsthert patronized by the Muslim
courts in India to pfcy or lSn , to |he accompaniment of drunken court revelries. Third!)
all ihe .o-callcd Muslim musicians arc Hindu converts in a Muslim garb So even in music
and dancing mediaeval Muslim touch degraded these sacred and highly developed tndian
arts. Fourthly white masters of dance and music led saintly lives in ancient India, under
mediaeval Muslim rule they were all considerjd degenerate folk.
People sometimes talk of Mogul gardens This term itself implies that the other Muslim
races who preceded them never knew anything of gardening. If on the other hand it Is
eonten* ded that at! Muslim invaders starting from Mohammcd-bm-Kasim were fond of
gardens then the term Mogul gardens is obviously a misnomer. The proper term would be
'Islamic Gardens* or 'Muslim Gardens' but not Mogul gardens. Here it must be realised
that all Muslim invaders came from desert lands where even to gel a mug full of drinking
water one had to walk fat miles through parched, desert country. Could such people lay
gardens 7 Secondly it has now been proved that all historic sites from the Nishal and
Shalimar in Kashmir to Gulbarga. Bijapur and Bihar are usurped Hindu constructions
falsely ascribed to this or that sultan or courtier, buildings are of Hindu origin it
automatically follows that the gardens in front or them are Hindu. Indian garden* and nc
Mogul or Muslim gardens. So we see how even m ascribing gardens to Muslims history
has been turned comp cte.y up lie down. A graphic proof or this is found on page 403, vol,
lot Shahjahan's official chronicle in which he admits that ti T.j Mahal is Raja Mansingh's
mansion which when taken over for Mumtaj'* burial was set amidst majestic lush
garden.
,.M
52 . Hmef we find thai Kashmir hat become
To assert that tftttta invasion* * .* <*e re TOftr -Ube con"ibu.ion to iniian. fftft
^ culture-for which Hindu should be grateful is as absurd as asserting that Napo* leon
and Hitler by invading Russia yearned to enrich Sov.et life If invaders and freebooters are
to be considered comri-butors to the culture* or their victims, history mU S | condemn
Great Britain and Russia for roiling Nepolcon's and Hitler'* invasion plans*
Not only in India but even in Arabia ttsetf-where Islam made it* first sobveriion-Tsfam
and culture have proved to be antonyms of each other. Wherever Mam gatecrashed it
forced the local people to hate and forget their ancient culture. Thus even Arabian history
begins with the words that Arabia was a land lost in turmoil before the appearance of
Islam. Likewise Iranians, Turks. Afghans. Egyptians, Algerians, Moroccans and the
millions of Indians who were converted to Islam by ihe torch aid sword have been made
to feel *o ashamed of their ancient civilizations as lo want to wipe them out of memory
and history and assert that before Islam the world was all dark Can a system which has
thrived only on conversions through torture and terror lay any claim to the word 'culture
T
Considering all this it is unhistorical to talk of any Mualim "contribution" to India, Not
that there has been no impact There has been a tremendous Muslim impact but it
certainly cannot be called a contribution. It has been an unmitigated disaster and
catastrophe. It has resulted in the destruction * India's high morality and discipline and
utter economic impoverishment. That impact has wrecked Indian life and changed iti
genius and character &o much as to tear it W W from its Vedic and Sanskrit mooring*
and push it id*Jft hB wa> towards Mecca and Medina.
5J
India would have been much better off and far mo,e h. PPy .trong and united but fo, the
mediaeval Mui i im eoBltlbtt|| ^: That "contribution" if it can be ,o called, was thru,"
rXd and implanted on an unwilling, remonniatin B and renting India. As &uch it was
anwantcd and most unwelcome India could very well do without it and it might take years
and years of bard labour to wipe off its detrimental effecla.
HOW ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD HAS BEEN FALSIFIED
The government! of the world, archaeological officiali students of history and the public
at large seem lo be blissfully unaware that India's archaeological records have been
falsified in all respects.
This has heen amply illustrated by books, brought out by the Institute for Rewriting
Indian History, proving that the Taj Mahal was not constructed by Shahjahan. it was not
Akbar who commissioned Fatehpur Sikri and that the Red Fori in Agra was not built by
him either. Almost every mediaeval historic buildings bridge or canal has been falsely
attributed t *> alien Muslims though in fact it was constructed centuries curlier by India's
own Hindu rulers.
The basic cause of all this misrepresentation and falsiu* canon has been India** 1235-
year-long slavery during which alien rulers played havoc with Indian archaeology.
Prior lo the founding of British rule in India in the 19tu century there was no archaeology
department as such, In the long alien Muslim rule that preceded British rule in India it
was one long story of grab and misappropnate Hindu buildings to be treated as mosques
and tombs. So when the British came to power in India all historic buildings long
converted into tombs and moiques were under occupation and possession of noodescript
Muslims, When the British first set up an archaco-ogy department for India they
unwittingly consulted those Muslims on the spot and recorded their bluffs. Such blurts
have since formed the nucleus of the presiigeous archaeology department of toe
Govirwneut of India.
55
The Muslim* In possession or occupation of i ho .e wtj. ing5 vvere not interested in
dividing i| le rCal p . MUi|im -Iir ownership ol the buildings for fear that if i he y
admitted or divulged the Hindu origin of the building ihcy wo id | ose Af . fight to be in
possession or occupation.
A certain fanatic Islamic chauvinism also prevented ihem from crcdning those captured
or usurped buildings to iheit earlier Hindu owners.
It could also be that those Muslims on the spot were so uneducated and ignorant that
they themselves did not know that those buildings bad any earlier pre-Mushm history.
Another possibility is that repetitious assertion that a certain building was somebody's
tomb or mosque automatically led to the myth that it was originally built for that
purpose. What in fact, they should have meant and what British archaeological officials
should have realized was that those buildings were put to use as tombs and mosques after
capture from the Hindus. Thus, for instance, what the victor sees as an Akbar'*
Safdarjang** or Humayun's tomb may only signify that those personages arc buried there
Or at all). But to imagine that the huge palatial buildings were erected to mark their
burial spots is a gross historical and archaeological blunder. Those build-mgs existed
much earlier. The alien Muslim conquerors lived in those captured buildings and were
perhaps buried there. Even their bursal in those massive, majestic buildings is doubt-ful.
It could be that all or many of those graves inside ihos* massive, captured Hindu
buildings are all fake and are meant to retain possession of the buddings for Islam *iihot
even appointing a wwichman.
. might cUe here . few ,>... <"'now ** *'"' "'^ logical fnl.iflca.ion . .cbieved. So. <*"
**
Covernmen, in Mi. * u KSSS5KS men, y found mo,, of .he MM* b-.l*M "
M, L (1 P., i0 n'nd p.,sion. Those Mns.im. ^ lt ZZ' memories of,heir mltcrd empire,
were " ' " ' .11 budding, ,ribtd <o "-while Hurt-!*
34
m 2* Muslim *" C UrtierS flDd fflkl " tUcy * 1
rtfIfl j id truth.
Vincent Smith En hi* book "Akbar the Great Mughal" therc ^ n|h ny complain* that the
site in Smdh province. n% Atnark.MforU marked with an archaeological board as Akbju
birth place isoot the real spo'."
Likewise some Hindu rain* in Kalanaur in ihc Punjab v>tae K
Alhar*** 1^ orJ3 was camping when the newi of the deat q
of hi* ft*** emperor Humayun was conveyed to him, have been
identified by the archaeology department as the place where
young Akbar was formally proclaimed king. That spot may
well mark the lltfi where Akbar was proclaimed king. We have
oo quarrel with that. But Muslim chronicles of a later date
and archaeological records claim something more. They item
to assert that Akbar was crowned in a building of Moghul
construction existing at the spot, and that the rums seen there
ire the miss of those Mogul buildings This is a gross falsehood
and misconception,
Ho* cttdlJ AUil -v mew tripling haw constructed any hup massive building tlWM I HU
father too coutdn't have constructed ao> building rhcrc since he had returned to India
only six mooib* earlier after a 1 5-year exile forced by another Muslim upstarl, Shershah.
So il Akbar was crowned king ui the designated *put in kalanaur it only means he was ut
the Lime tumping in an corlicrliitidu mansion cither fully or partly ruinous from repeated
Muslim invasion*. This correction in our archaeological record of that spot in Kalanaur is
essential.
A third graphic instance of how fictitious urehacologic identification has been done in
India relates to Mohamnud Gawan't grave in Bidar. Mohammad Gawnn was n wandefci
and adventurer who drifted to India in the 14th century! 11 Wet Asian Muslim countries.
He rose for a short, uncertain duration to be the w*zir of a Bahammi sultan. His fall wo
W** equally precipitous. He was murdered at the orders of the verV
d
S7
t ulian whose chief minister Mohammad Gavran wu. Usually person who fell foul of the
reigning mltan never ft ot * fCiB Ui burial The victim's body uiually got dismembered ami
ih* fl dogs and vultures. Mohammad Gawan eoutdn't have met * better end This was
also obvious from the fact that until 1 l, grave had not been identified. Thou suddenly
some chauvinistic Muslim archaeology official got busy, went to Bidar and marked one of
the many nondescript roadside grave* in that city as that of Mohammad Gawan. Everiincc
rcsearcheri feel sully nilly coerced into referring to that grave as Mohammad Gawani
because it now bears a Guv eminent stamp and recognition Bui researcher* muai not
blindly accept such archaeological bun. They must question and reinvestigate the identity
rf every historical site since chauvinist* In unseemly haste, misusing governmental
power and position have done violence to uaih There could be two motives. A*
government servants they may have wanted to go on record M diligent bureau emu is ho
Old iome useful identification. Sometimes as Muslimi they also derived the chauvinistic
delight of perpetuating the memories ot a vanished past
1 may now recount another remarkable instance I urn fold that over u decade or two ngo
on archaeology official of tile Mudhyn Pradesh region took il into his head that he must
identify Ihc grave of Abul Fault, a self-styled euronieler and courtier of the third
generation Mogul emperor Akbar.
History records lliai Abul i'nzal urns ambushed and atan 10 to 12 miles from Narwar
somewhere near a place Galled Serai Uarar on August 12, 1602- Starting with such flimsy,
uneeiiam and hearsay data the official went to the indicated region. There he saw a
number of graves tillered over a wide area bureaucraiK hunch he chose one cluster of
graves mm perhaps scores and assumed Ihul one must belong to Abul and a few
attendant who may have fallen victim* I" Ui* amb along with Abul total, The next
question was how to u!c Abnl Fatal'* erav* imouj; those four or five ' U appealed vet)
*M
58
One of tfcM* to" r 0f five graVtS WaS fcW iaQ ht% Ttitmt That a* enough and more for
Ihc arena*
timpl*
^1*
>
It was promptly identified as the moat sacred bu,J, litr of the augnst conriier of the great
Akbar. It was so tecot-ded in archaeological register*. Some amount was saacifcaai W
build a room around it and perhaps to pay for a pcrma*^ watchman. Evcrsince unwary
students of history and archie*, logy have fell compelled to accord academic recognition t
0 ih ai ,pot as the site of Abul FazaTs murder.
The archaeology official should have known that hew*,
embarking on an impossible task. Moreover ihe uncertainly
about Abul FaiaJ's grave should have raised some other pen,
nent questions in his mind. In 1602 Akbar was at the height
of his power. At the time of his murder Abul Fazal was a
great court favourite and was boasted as one of the nine "genu*
of Akbar's courL If this is true why did not Akbar himself
lake care to identify Abul Fazal's grave 7 In faci how is it that
Akbar didn't care to construct a magnificent palatial tomb for
bis favourite courtier since Muslim rulers and courtiers have
been tom-lomraed as builders of mosques and tombs galore?
Such Utile questioning should be enough to make it clear to
students of history thai Muslims never constructed lofty tomb*
Tor the dead and that Abul Fazal was a mere hanger-on at court,
for whom Akbar couldn't care less.
When Akbar himself didn't care or was unable to identity Abul Faial's grave how could
any archaeology official 450 years later hope to identify Abul Fazal's grave from amongst
hundreds in a nondescript region, without any specific data 7
These instances should suffice to convince officials and ftu-
dems of archaeology and history not to place loo much faith
in archaeological identification or mediaeval sites. Various
a have ltd to fictitious identification. All archaeological
record needs to be carefully revised, rechecked and rnvimped.
8
CUNNINGHAM'S CUNNING ARCHAEQLOGICaT MANIPULTION
While serving in India as AJ>.C. to the Governor General (183610 1840) Lord Auckland,
you ng lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived an ingenious scheme of misusing
archaeological studies far long-term political end*.
Later in pursuiincc of that plot Cunningham addressed a letter dated September 15,
l42(When he was 28 years old) to Col. Sykes, a director of the British East India
Company in London.
In those days the British were busy consolidating their uetvly-won empire in India.
Consequently there was a keen, inborn, patriotic desire in the heart of every Britisher
then serving in India to suggest to his superior ways in which India could be kept under
British rule to serve as a permanent milch cow.
Young Cunningham, an army engineer, had no training either in history or archaeology.
Yd he bad a cunning, brainy idea of misusing archaeology to subserve British imperial
interests. As an A.DC he was close to Britain's top administrator in India, the Governor
General and through the latter Cunningham had an approach to the director of the Britwh
Fast India Company.
In his lengthy letter dated September 15, 1842 Cunningham unveiled his diabolic plan
suggesting that archaeological exploration in India "would be an undertaking of
hrportanee i the (British) Indian government poll if tally and to the British public
religiously (and that the) establishment of ihc ChrisuAn *cligion in India, must ultimately
succeed.'*
*M
r
Thtrlciter maybe seen on page 246, Vol. 7, j 0U|||a j ibc Royal A %ia lie Society, London,
1843 A.D.
So the whole purptwc of archaeological exploration i n i qd , wu neither the study nor
preservation of historical moriu^ but to use archaeology as an imperial tool to create mm
* dimensions and resentment between Buddlmb, Jams. othe Hindus and Muslims by
falsely crediting all monuments as { Ax possible to alien Muslim invaders and label a few
as Buddhi or Jain but not Hindu.
I act Pcic\ Brown, James Fcrgusson, Sir Kenneth Clark* Su fiaiuijEicr Fletcher and
Encyclopaedia firiuunicu orchestraicj the same cunning tune of Cunningham,
Thai resulted in firmly establishing and pcipeiuatins a colossal archaeological fraud which
is being sedulously taught all over the world as profound academic truth and is echoed ia
newspaper articles and telecasts for over a century.
'
Cunningham's suggestion was obviously highly appreciated. Because when he retired
from the army as a Major General be was straightaway appointed the first archaeological
surveyor of India in 1861, as director from 1862 to 1865 and as Director GenciaJ from
1871 to 1S85.
The reader may notice a big six-year career gap between 1865
What was Cunningham doing during thai period?
was cunningly hatching his archaeological chickens by
nesting a false imaginative Muslim history of numerous
monuments and putting up contrived notices at historic sites,
rhoie archaeological notices composed by Cunningham'*
:nmnj brain are notorious for their
vagueness. Without
*ny historical authority they blandly assert that a parti* P. building, tower or fort was
probably built by I * or mfcta perhaps af0und iucn and sucn a period
taluee ,fChllectUT * J yl betrtyi some Buddhist or Sw
61
Renders and all others interested to historical truth may make it * |fa" t( > ct >PV out
and caiefully analyie all archaeological notices at historic sites. Usually vigors to Mitotic
utei ore in a hurry. They are generally content at hiving a V iuat impression or the place.
And they also premrae loaf noticei put up by experts couldn't he wrong:. But they are
mistaken The nrchteolo?icil noices in Iniii irc.blitant concoction* of nn alien imperialist
whose design was to use archaeology as m instrument lo perpetuate British rule in India
and to convert everybody in Tndia to Christianity
His superiors therefore promoted and abetted Cunningham's sinister plan in every way
Soon after his appointment as archaeological surveyor CunninEhim took two assistants J.
D. Scalar and Carlisle. From 1861 to 1865 they made a list of important historical
monuments throughout India.
Thereafter the Archaeological Survey of Tndia was suddenlv closed for five long years to
enable Cunningham to prep we fibri cited archaeoloiicil files and pu* up correspond^ fobs
nonces at historic sites.
Once thai oncaMiU *. A.ch.=olo S icol MMJ Mli wis equally mysteriously reopened wan
" ojr "f "'"" AD. Evers.n allthose who h.vc >M * W> arOmo.o-sy h.ve bee,
*iWlMC***i- MMM vague lmput,o,.s about the origin of hi.lorrc bu.Um-. cities to be
certified as MAs or Ph.D' to history
Con.eqoen.ty persons who arc ******* as teachers, readers, professors or at espcrts m
Muslim (i.,. Saracenic) .rehire J^S^SS universe* or in the news media are all ** of an
fraud and arc pseudo-espert. who arc * KM"**"* thai fraud,
:.,m
They hive never
62
cared to verify even some basic
}i were such great builder* where are their i 0Wl J
Planniitf and irch.rectural ftt ? Moreover what are t heir
measure* of length? Therefore the whole concept of f, ItBlic
I Sincerm-> architecture is absolutely baseless, The historic
eiand buildings in lands currently converted to Tslam are B ||
pre-MuiIim edifices built according to Vedic architecture.
Conrringham*5 bogus archaeological labours attracted the unwitting condemnation or his
own fellow-Britisher, Jamei Fergusson (see pp. 32-33 and 76-78 of Indian Architecture, by
James Ferguwon. 1884 A.D.) who observed '"During the 14 Ban he ha* been employed in
the survey he (Cunningham) haj contributed almost literally nothing to our knowledge of
archaeology and architectural geography."
Pioneer, an English daily of Lucknow (India) observed "the Archaeological Survey of
India reports (brought out under Alexander Cunningham) are feeble, inane and all but
useless and the government has reason to be ashamed of a majority of the volumes."
That denunciation r.lso came from a Britisher since during Cunningham's time Enetish
journalism in India was in British hand J
Obviously James Fergusson and the British editor of Pioneer didn't know that
Cunningham was an imposter planted to fake archaeology. Therefore all the publications
he put out were bound 10 be sham.
It now appears in retrospect dial it was Cunningham also vhf actually planted false
Muslim cenotaphs inside Hindu buildings,
cried Koranic overwriting* on Hindu edifices nnd sponsored the fabrication of documents
to be given to Muslim care-takers of stately historic Hindu buildings such as the Taj
Mahal.
Consequently rbe entire Archaeological Survey of India (even under indigenous
adminisuaiton since August 15, 1947) is merrily
m
ufcini its stand m the very urn* fraudulent premie lK>l Cunningham counterfeited.
The result is that the whole world stand* w duped ih U |i continues to repeat
Cunningham's blaiaat lies at ucrooocl truths
For hlflattce correspondents of BBC, London Time., ifci Speigel. New York Times.
Washington Post, Christian Science Moniter Time ftnd Lire weeklies etc., posted ni India,
continue -o misrepresent the Taj Mahal and other historic building ;<a of Muslim origin.
Even the editors of those new* mcdii, often twearfttg in the name of rhc truth, fearless
journalism and freedom of ctprcuion continue to ruthlessly suppress the irulh about
those httlttric buildings being of pre-Muslim origin. I personaII: addressed Tetters to the
editors of most of those organization* named above for publica'ion in their letters column
or telecast*, con eitlnt the fancied Muslim antecedents of those buildt- None of those
letters was ever published. I did receive private ictnow lodgment of She letters cxpressina
^ome formal luim' and "haw* andI 'istha 10" type of icac iin. Ye', one and all. they
maliciously and calculatively kept their readership ignorant<* my challenge to the
traditional claim of the Muslim nrfeo of historic buildings.
To bar divert view. and ien.ific findi.tg* i. Ww
archaeo.osy from reaching N* ^^-7^ t Idlers column is Ih: most abom.nable tvm *
vitlainy. And yc, pMMMr > **2f+ZEZ daily assiduously pncrlc- i. Far torn B V ^'
f. India for c.udin e diverse,. fi dl '^,1 TboT >- tauJttton.1 n vrfBed and -**^**
Sh.hJ.1u.. MM* .he W Mh< "jSii W in .heir new* dispatcher newspaper M*
repetition of traditional historical WMhOOdS. ^ ^ ^
As men and women prolessins "* C '""f .^"olort IW other Western newsmen are east* ^
c
8. tbo at* ffly ** Throuhou the hm 0ry
of nwallfft no Romeo has ever raised any wonder mansion ove T
hi. dead JuJiei To relieve thai Shnhjahan wets an exception
rumwfcenhe had 5000 other WMIWH i* .Ms Aran l the height
of academic imbeciTit>
We may quote here a specific instance of how ihe BBC. Loadnn which enjoy? an
undeserved reputation of being a rcli-able- aews apeney Telecast a documentary film
attributing the so* callrdJamaMasjidin Anmcdabad to Sultan Ahmedshah even uch Mart
Tully the BBC correspondent in India hud been forewarned thai the building was a
captured Hindu leinplc. Tullv cared ton hoot* for the historical truth.
Hnttm-ier i* the test of a tetter addressed in this connee-mn by an irate London doctor to
the BBC.
To Dated November 10, 1986
Mr. Michael Grade Controller B.B.C I Shepherd's Bush London
Dm Mr Grade.
I don't know whether UhoujJ addrc*> this letter to you U i! concerns some othei BBC
official please forward it to him. Some three or four years ago the BBC had telecast a
scries f documentaries on historic*] monument* in India, fcrhap* first of these depicted
the so-called Jama Ma* jid io Ahmcda-h*fl COupfat. India)
representative . New Delhi, Mark Tully who dill ZtoZ J Zl ^ tnn Whosc ' h P the
monument
eounofU* u*W*ifuU* challenged m I lowl
65
w f p f|, Oak a renowned researcher from New Delhi
Ic * a ^ 5COVe red that the so-called Jama Masjid in Ahmeda-
w ho fi ^ st MahaJ j n Agta etc. are pre-Muslim buildings which
fcad. ine ] y asC ribcd to Muslim authorship because of
have been wr s*. m occupation.
Mf 0ak i s the author of a series of very fascinating and evincing research books on the
topic.
It is highly regrettable that the BBC should be a party to misleads the world on the temple
origin of the Ahmedabad buildinp even after Mr Tully had been forewarned.
Soon after some London friends informed Mr. P.N. Oak to N cw De h three to four year,
ago) about BBC, trottma out traditional blunder^ version despite Mr. og. ~* u, nik wrote
to Mark Tully informing Mr. Tully mat in ^MM .hOUgh under occupy M . ~* a
captured temple-
A. Ant Mr. Tully took no notice of the eontnlom. mWa 1"L- -cccKin, . nutnoe, of **. ^^
who had resented the BBC mUreP'esentauon Mc Tully ml Mf. Oak to seek an
appointment
In <hc **! meeting Mr. Tully c^l * described the Ahmedabad building ^^ w t* K.C.
Bros informing him of a success^ Muslim claim in a court of law
All viewers pcet the BBC to '"^^JJ^Sm*
not continue Io harp on exploded themes. ,
ide toward, new research findinfi* does nobody aa
inlslewDeUrttodoa
1 aujtf cti that the BBC ^ {ra < 1,U ** , and ol h (B^al*
lewtctordocumcnlariesonthcTajMani.^^^ ^ th , tIU *
historical building in India to J"*" tou iW*^
antecedents and ignored features of IJK*
Tli famout researcher Mr, P.N, 0-Jt i* these days on ^ lertwe tourio U.K. Hit itddres* h
c/o Dr. R Bnkhflhi. 49 Lbiv cuter Rd + Sou.hall* London, telephone 01-5748746,
It would be oice if you could contact hira,
Enclosed it a copy of a letter I Have fiddrested (o the Pope, Ii revetli yet another
fascinating topic for a B-B.C ferial.
15 Furrow Fcldc Basildon, Essex SS16 ?S B United Kingdom
Yours Sincerely Dr. R L, Goya|
9
MEDIAEVAL ARCHITECTURE IS HINDU NOT MUSLIM
Pressure propaganda conducted during 600 yean of Muslim rule followed by 200 year* of
British rule has 10 thoroughly brainwashed the intelligentsia that it has come to regard all
historic buildings in India as products and specimens of Islamic architecture. This is a
classic instance of the colossal damage that persistent, misleading assertions can do over
protracted period.
E, B. Hi veil, the great British scholar who was principal of schools or art at Madras and
Calcutta did a great service to the academic world by detecting the blunder which has
mis'ed the whole world of history, archaeology and architecture and visitors who visit
historic Indian buildings
How radically different Havell's view of mediaeval architecture Is from that of others may
be judged from the fact that the title of Havell's relevant book is "Indian Architecturelit
Psychojogy. Structure and History from the First Mubammadtn Invasion to the Present
Day" while Percy Brown's study of the same monuments is titled "Islamic Architecture."
Since oq& one of two contradictory statement! can be true we have to Snd out whether
Percy Brown calling mediaeval buildings "* Muslim is right or Havcll viewing them as
Hindu, is right"' propose to prove thai Havcll a right-Mr Havcll observes in the opening
part of his book 'The student who tries to thread his way through somewhat H^ ing
mazes of Indian art is often confused by the classification and analysis of European
writers. AH of these misconceptions
*7
hm their root m one fixed idea, the belief that true 8et ^ fee fm^M always been wanlini ,n
the HmdU mind ' ^ thai tvcrytfainj! really great i" IwHw art has been i PfWed 0r ml
reduced by foreigner!
Fergnsson was by no mean* free from these prejudices. am
his analysis of Indian architecture of the Muhnmmadan ptrSo||
confirm* the genera belief of the present-day that between
Hindu and Saracenic Ideals there is a gulf fixed, and that i ni
zenith of Mogut architecture in the reigns or Jahangir and
Shahjaban was only reached by throwing off the Hindu influence
which affected the so-called 'mined' styles of Indo Muhnmmadivn
art. Fergusson distinctly declare* that there is no trace
Hinduism in the works of Jahangir and Shahjahnn...and suggest*
Samarkand, rebuilt by Timur (A,D. 1393-4) as the local,-
which would throw light on 'the style which the Moguls
introduced into India'
"This persistent habit of looking outside of India for t' origins of Indian art must
necessarily lead to false conclusion* The Taj, the Mott Masjid at Agra, the Jama Masjid at
Delhi arid the splendid Muhnmmadan buildings at Bijapur were only made possible by
the not less splendid monuments of Hindu architecture at Mudhcro. Dabhot. Khajuraho,
Gwalior and elsewhere, made use of Hindu genius to glorify Islam-..One will find lourcc
in the traditional Indian culture planted in Indian soil Aryan philosophy, which reached
its highest artistic expression before the Mogul dynasty was established
"The AtLglo-Indten And the tourist have been taught to admire ibe former and to extol
the fine, aesthetic lastc of the VloguU, but the magnificent architectural works of
tbeprcced*
Hindu period, when Indian sculpture and painting were at then jenifh, but rarely attract
their attention, though in massive fttoilcur and sculpturesque i magi nation they surpass
any of ,h(: Mogul buildlnys Even the term Mogul architecture is mto** ild ' ins; fot as a
matter of fact there were but few Mogul builders m India Mogul architecture does not
bear witness* a* we tMKMrne-
M
m the finer tttithellfi leoifi of Arab, Persia* or Wcitern builder, bu i to IW extraordinary
synthetical power of the | iMa ^^
genius.
'The truth of this statement eon he dcmoutuiited not only from documentary evidence
which may not be trustworthy hui from incontrovertible evidence of the buildin-_
themsetoci
'Even the pointed arch only acquiicd from India the religious significance which
eventually led the Saracenic builders u> adopt it Thus the very feature hy which all
Western writers have distinguished Saracenic architecture from the indigenous
architecture of India was originally Indian, If this proposition is opposed to all
architectural authority in Europe ,n the prewnt day, it is only because Western writer*
through treating Indo-Muhammaden architecture as a sub-division of the Saracenic
schools of Egypt. Spain, Arabia* and Persia, have left out ol account the great mass of
historical evidence bearing upon the arts or the West, which is uiTbrdcd by the
architectural monuments of India
When the Arabs started on then cartel ot conquest, the Lint objects of their iconoclastic
real were the tempi" anu monasteries of the hated idoiaten-Tha- Buddhists ol Wotcrn
Asia. After smashing the Images and breaking a* much f llic,r sculptured ornamentation
as offended afi aiwt he injunctions 01 their law. the building* with site empty niches-He
quond.mi Buddhist shrmcs-remaming in Ihcir uM walls were oRen converted into
mosques
The hallowed aviations ******* **** Shippers still clung to these derated *M "JX, of
Islam found it nectary lo explain them in J*"" o( nse. Hence the Mihrab-Lhc niche of
the pranpal **6 Buddha-came 10 luJuate the direction of * ua ' y J Me, i U was
traced m the sand or woven in thw ph. as symbol of the failh
L'JM
70
.1.. im .* *nd the sculptured ornament of th e
"*T 11 ^ordinary Arab arch, the stilted arch, niches, and >ou find tne ora j
Uje foliated arch etc
.-TK contempt mm which Arabian historians gave to d. Juries oftheirnldelin India^Boud
Khana or Buddha uLK-uoneofU.em.ny proof* of the early connections 0 f ^L *" W-
Buddbiit influence penetrated much f.r West than the borders of Am and Europe. ^
H^der. mrie b found evidence of the presence of Asoka's missionaries it Alexandria; and
the resemblance of the s^caUed borsc-sboe arch in Moorish palace, and mosques of the
8th century A.D, and later, to the lotus-leaf arches of the 7th century Buddhiit chapter-
house at Ajanta can be easily accounted for by the presence of the Indian craftsmen in
Egypt,
"Buddhist art had spread all over Western Asia in the previous centuries, and Buddhist-
Hindu art was at its zenith when India received the hnt shock of Muhammadan invasions.
AJbtiuru the Arab htsionan expressed his astonishment at sod admiration (or the works
of Hindu builders. 'Our people 1 , he said, when ihcy sec them, wonder at them and are
unable to dcicnfcc them, much less to construct anything like them.*
"Abu! Faxul (wrote} 'It pane* our conception of things; Jew indeed in the whole world can
compare with them/
BUUae Mahmud of Ghazju could not refrain from express-
*I he. tdnuntiOD for Hindu builder*...When he returned to
h^aj ht bt S bt **<* 5.300 Hindu captives doubtless the
t< number of them masons and craftsmen...Timur the fouade, ol lht Um dyflasly uwd
ihem fivc ccmur ^ 1mct
^^tsr, d Tr ^^ Turk r Moas J
what % c T D Hlndu an, the reversion of
to the old iL. J I^ ^^"^ <T Arabian characteristics ^rjT' BuddtoH ^ types becomes more
and
71
-Of the thirteen local division, of lado-Muhamn,^ ebitecture enunemted by Ferguson,
Uioje of Gujarat c (tfy) and even that of Jaunpur i nsp he of its mmc6 \m are so
conspicuously Hindu in general concepuon and in detail ...The Jami Masjid and other
mosque* of Ahmedabad are. a> Fergusson says Hindu or Jain in every detail.* i n two of '
lJjc most important (styles), namely the Mogul and aijapur Hy \ ci Fergusson and nil
other writers have ignored the Hindu clement entirely and treated them both as foreign to
India.. It u Indian art, not Arab, Persian or European, that we must study to find whence
came the inspiration of the Taj Mahal and great monuments of Bijapur. They are more
Indian than St. Paul** Cathedral and Wcst-minstcr Abbey arc English."
The gtcal Islamic invader Tamer lain who plundered and burned Delhi confesses in his
Memoirs that mediaeval Muslims were so utterly devoid of any building skill that they
were forced to spare the lives of the Hindus whom they deeply hated, so that ihcy could
be marched away to distant Islamic lands just to design and build buildings as grand and
beautiful as the Hindu buildings in India. Tamerlain observes that before ordering a
general massacre of Hindus taken prisoner "1 ordered that all the artisans and clever
mechanics, who wc musters ol their respective crafts, should be picked oui lrom among
them and set aside, and accordingly some thousands of craftsmen mere selected to await
my command. All these 1 distributed among the princes and amirs who were present, or
who were engaged Officially m oihcr parts of my dominions. I bad determined to build a
Masjid-i-Jami in Samarkand, the seat of my empire, which should be without a rival in
any country; so I ordered that ull builder* and stone masons should be act apart for m)
own special service," (page 447. Vol. Ill, Elliot and Dowson > Irani,Janou of Maiiuzai-i-
Timuri).
Admissions of Tamerlain, AbuJ Fazal. Albirum and Muhmud tihaini quoted above
indicate the validity of Mr. Haveu"* < niton that there it no such Ihiflg as Saracenic an to
auy P*
ofi* world, much l ' n fndU ' Eveft ** rar a * Sw^kaiur lUehdad. Mecca and Alewndna oil
accent ind mediacy., budding* ere boih according to the architectural styles, tecb mqu
md Uillf developed by the Hindu*.
Pero Brown. Fergusson and others of their following. al , ibe world over. are. therefore,
absolutely mistaken in their foad behef in a mythical Saracenic architecture. Saracenic
aichi .ecturc only a figment or their imagination.
Havell was thus very near grasping the truth. But he i 0o remained misinformed and
misled by chauvinistic Muslim concoction*. Havell is right in holding lhat architecturally
the Taj Mahal, the Red Forts in Delhi and Agra, the so-called Jami Masjids in Delhi and
Ahmedabad. arid the numerous fancied Islamic tombs like those of Akbar. Humayun and
Safdarjang are all Hindu in concept and design. Havell would hue been very hjppy. bad he
been alive in our own day. to know thai the conclusion he arrived at from the
architectural point of *iew is fully vindicated and corroborated by historical and
documentary evidence too,
Ascftcciiuh proved in KUch celebrated research books as
TheTjj Mahal is a Hindu Palace." Tatehpur Sikn is a Hindu
City** and 'Agra ftcd For' i> a Hindu Building" all mediaeval
historic building* m India from Kashmir io Cars: Comoria are
one and all prcMuslim Hindu building;.. They were only
capered and usurped and put to Islamic use. That is why
though under use zs tombi and mosques for centuries all ino$e
buddings look hke Hindu temples and mansions. Student* and
scholars of history, aichaco logy and architect uic and visitors io
Urtceic silts must, therefore, learn this new finding and suitably
amend then c-rher presumptions, ass ump I ions, shibboleths and
tat books,
l.caHavell\* fmD ^ ncctU&|l|hl corTCCl ion namely &* x
dM buddings hich he believes to have been built dun"*
4ulun isknctc built before Muslim rule began. M****
umdets only captured those buildings and put them to &**
73
uuvc. He perhaps suspccied a. much because hss. quoted him above talking about
"documentary cvi<t encc *' may or may not be trustworthy." ] thiB 4 in M *"
been uncannily right. The claims made ^^Z^ chronicles by fanatic flatterers and stooges
that limit* V C****** ., buildine , e % They must never be believed. *<,
*M.
10
EVADER TAMERLAIN SAYS OLD DELHI'S
JAMA MASJID JS A HINDU TEMPLE
Chiuvwislic Islamic chronicles and gullible British historians ,c for an unconscionably
Jong stretch of time palmed off the canard that ihc 5th generation Mogul emperor
Shahjahan founded Old Delhi and built its Red Fort and Jama Masjid.
All those thiee claims made on behalf of Shahjahan have no basis in history. Old Delhi
originates at least from the time ofthc Paadava* since the Mahabharat contains numerous
references to its landmarks like the Nigambodh Ghat, The Red Fori is an ancient Hindu
fort. And the so-called Jama Masjid if on ancient Hindu temple according to no less an
authority than invader Tamerlain himself who swooped on Delhi 230 years before
Shahjahan ascended the tin one.
The triple-credit given to Shahjahan itself reveals the fallil) of ihe claim If Shahjahan is
credited with the founding of Old Delhi why should the Red Fort and the so-called Jama
M aij id hrid separate mention ? Are not those two buildings a part of Old Delhi ? The
very fact that Shahjahan is hrst credited nth founding a whole city and then separately
credited with founding tu prominent buildings shows that all the three claims arc
Iraudulcm. They have no basis in histoty.
When we say thai they have no basis in history Ifc'C mean thai Ihcrc is not even a shred
of paper in Shahjahan'a cOUf t rctoiJ or with the trusses of the so-called Janw Mu-jtd 10
>ub--nUatc Lhc i\am iha the Jama Masjid was built b> Shuhjalui,. On the other hand \*c
have a Muslim invader's own testimony ol > yean pnor to Shahjahan that the so-called
Juuiu Masjid is an aikhiu Hindu leinpK
IA
75
Tamerlain alias Taimurlang is one among the most notonoui of India** Islamic invaders.
He perpetrated many horrid mass, acres during his raids on various parti or India,
mowing down many as a hundred thousand Hindus at l time. Some of these massacre
orgies were enacted in the streets of Old Delhi during Christmas. 1398 A.D. It i a in the
con ext of that stay of hi* in Old Delhi thai Tamerlain refers to the so-called Jama Masjid.
His noting* in his Memoircs titled * Mall uzat-i Tim uri" clearly imply that the so-called
Jama Masjid was a Hindu temple What is more Tamerlain was the direct ancestor of
Shahjahan who is falsely credited with having built lhc Jama Masjid of Old Delhi.
Tamerlain was near about the 10th paternal ancestor of Shahjahan in the direct line. How
then can Shahjahan be the author of a building which one of his forefathers had seen ten
generations earlier?
We quote hereunder Sir H.M, Elliot's translation of Tamer-Iain's Memoirs "Malfuzat-i-
Timuri' 1 Elliot and Dowson, vol. Ill, pages 442 to 449).
"Sack of the City ol Delhi'*
"On the 16th of the month some incidents occurred which led to the sack of the city of
Delhi. When the soldiers proceeded to apprehend the Hind us...many of them drew their
swords and offered their resistance. The flames of strife were thus lighted and spread
through the whole city from Jahan Panah and Siri to Old Delhi. The savage Turks fell to
kilting and plundering. The Hindus set fire to their houses with ihcir own hands, burned
their wives and rushed into the fight and were killed. (They) showed much alacrity and
boldness ia lighting. On Thursday and all night of Friday nearly 15,000 Turks were
engaged in slaying, plundering and dcsuoyii When morning broke on Friday, all my army,
no longer tin control, went off to the city and thought of nothing but killing. Plundering
and making prisoners. The following day. Saturday all passed in the same way, and the
spoil was so great that man secured from 50 to 100 prisoners, men. women
fe*-iHdiy Sunday, it ^s brought 10 > jfen 0alheWW*H J ^ ufidel Hindu* had assem*
jren On .he WW*^ of infldd Hindu* had aem-
***** ,hB, ! -mi of Old Delhi, carrying with them a- nti hk d in the M-Jil-^ ^^ w defend
themselves. Sr-,*d nrtvikw 08 - inn , L _ t iU(lu rt _ btnincs* were woun
Men in preparing 10 uc.s -.
aB d pw*ii. nd P lhat way on business were wounded
of my * * h * h " d ** rdere d Amir Shah Malik and All Sultan by ibctol < nI "; * of pe
n and proceed to clear the house T.Kh,u>ta^P^> lcrs They accordingly attacked
of God from infidels ana Ddbj [hcn ^ p , ao .
^Vl^^^^ * ** Jahan Panah
^ Old^ hi hd been plundered-.From Sin to Old Delhi i, iD d Old Dtim, n. k d d b for iif
ICBU on. Old
a considerable ***" ^ 7 h ad come to Hmdusthan Delhi also hts i similar strong fort, i
naa 7* a^inst infidel.- -I had put to death some Inc. of infidels :;mo^,.I marched three kos
to the fort **>* which stands upon the banks of the Jumna and .* one of the rfjfi*.
erected by Sultan Firozshah. 1 went m to examine the place I proceeded to the Masjid-i-
Jarni where t said my prayers and offered my praises and thanksgivings for the mercies of
the Almighty/'
In Islamic terminology the tc*m ' Jumi Masjid" or "Masjid-.- Janu" means "the chief
temple.*" Tanierlain says that indficU gathered in the Masjid-Wami to defend themselves.
He fuithci says that be ordered the building to be cleared of infidels and idolatry. Hindus
couldn't have gathered in the building unless it was their temple. Tamerlain couldn't hope
to clear the ouildmg of idolatry unless the Hindus had been worshipping their idols in iL
Tamerlain also offers us an important clue to the exact location of the Jama Masjid. He
says that when Old Delhi had been cleared of Hindu resistance he marched three lot i.e.
six miles from Sin and first came to Fcrozshah Kotlu He inspected u and then proceeded
to the Masjidi-i-Jami to otter hit thanks-giving prayer* to praise Allah that the building
hod been ** ed from the Hindus for Islam. The building knowa ai the Jama Masjid of
Old Delhi is hardly a mile from
77
Fcrotthnh Koila. It is. therefore, quile clear that Tamerlo-n B o5 been referring to the very
building which we refer to u ihe Jama Masjid of Old Delhi in our own day. tt Is also clear
thai in 1398 AD-when Tamerlain was in Old Delhi the to-called Jama Masjid was a Hindu
temple in which Hindus had gathered for n last-ditch stand against Tamcrlain's
plundering, burning and massacring Islamic hordes.
Old Delhi is so-called because it is the oldest Delhi. Like the Old Fort alias Purana Qila it
dates at least from the Mahi-bharnt era. This is proved by Tamerlain Hill calling it Old
Delhi even 230 years before Shahjahan. Tamerlain first ridinp to Fcroz shah Koila and
then proceeding to the so-called Jaraci Masjid pin paints Old Delhi and Jama Masjid as
they arc known to us today in the 20lh century A,D.
Had Shahjahan founded Old Delhi it wouldn't have been called Old Delhi because it
would have been the newest Delhi when the British still had their Indian capital at
Calcutta. But Old Delhi has been bearing that name since times Immemorial because
every generation has known it as the original Delhi That ancient city still has its old
Hindu edifice* in its winding by-lanes but like the main Hindu temple turned into the
Jama Masjid by Tamertain's depredations ancient Hindu icmp! of Goddess Kali are now
being called Kali Masjidi. Uttmrtjj this has happened all over India. There are ^J
Masjids in several towns. In medern terminology Kali means Mack while those fancied
mosques arc invariably white-washed What explains this contradiction? Why are mosquei
jcatW "black" when painted white ? The answer il obvious ihe>br their ancient Hindu
name and memory of being temples o. Coddcis Kali
Another proof of Tamerlain'* * *> ^j* that nobody hag any documents proving that
SUM r* the Jama Masjid in Old Delhi
Even .rfUMtf* I* b.ildi.. N rglMEZ the Hurt, hvcmd flow, deign on top. Mw- *"*
COM
rd H1 flower*. A an IHtJtr*tit*ii Wli dom of the Pakistan !! in Chanakvaourt
may be observed, The to-called J. mt
u.L .1.1* hu a* "W ptaw* rihc ftraiBhr Wndu 5tUfn P
MBilFm pinnacles end in * crescent and war. All the
Jamo MaijM gateways arc identical in pattern with the gateway,
Of Hrlhi'f Red Fort, or the Red Fort in Agra and those of Fateh-
Thr Red Fort* in Delhi and Agra and the whole of
PurS|i.n jnrivsu*
Fatehnur S.kri have been proved to be Hindu constructions. For this we refer the reader
in two books tilled "Fatehpur Sikti , a Hindu C.tv" and "Agra Red Fort is a Hindu Building"
.poniored by the Institute for Rewriting Indian History.
Thus, looked al from any angle, the so-called Jama Masjid rfOld Delhi proves to be an
ancient Hindu temple. Every clue points to the fact that it must have been the towering
temple of ihe Old Delhi of the Pnndavas
Recently some minarets were reported to be showing signs of crumbling. The spacious
arcaded verandahs-cum-galleries thai surround the central court of the building form the
Dharma jbala of the temple The three domes in such buildings in India represent the
Indian trinity of Brahma-Vishnu-Mahcsh- Islam has no such trinity A genuine mosque
should have only one central niche and not three
There could be many such eonsideraions and proofs. Our
incarch point* to the need for a thorough dc novo investigation
WO the origin of tlic building called the Jarau Masjid of Old
Tlic pathetic and blind belief that the building has from
very inception btxn a mosque is unjustified. Students of
hittory, scholars, researchers, archaeologists, tourist officials,
i and guides must no longer believe in mere hearsay when
evidence point* to the conclusion that the so-called Jama
originated a* the mam temple of the ancient township of
There i* * S i m pk and quick test to prove the claim
i who maintain that it it a mosque built by Shahjahan
They should produce and publish the documents whicll ._ Ihn t Sh 0 hjahan built it n d
handed it over to ihe 1Mlon ^ present trusted. If they cannot then ou-itstarch lead* to th*
conclusion that the very Hindus caught and convened inside their ancestral temple during
Tamcrlain'i invasion are the converts temple's convert custodi;
//
THE PANOAVAS [WOT SHAHJAHAN1 FOUNDED OLD DELHI
The popular belief that the cily of Old Delhi was rounded by
the lifth fencrnfion Mogul emperor Shnhjahan is unwarranted
r has no hasrs in history. The existence of Old Delhi can he
traced back to the era of The Pandavns. The city of Old Delhi
licr with ihc ruins of massive buildings found for miles all
and Constituted the famed Indraprnsiha. the capital of the
Pjuuumai
Durmp a mi He mum of Islamic invasions and lis hundred
to or rule in Delhi the alien junta made persistent and rclcm-
r" to nbliteiaic from the public mind the Hindu origin
cifaltd MiJimporant buildings and implant the belief that
WW all Muslim creaiions. The British who succeeded
i a> the paramount power in India, out of sheer blissful
onoramc rf the curlier Machiavellian attempts, perpetuated
' result of such a 1200-year long manhandling,
Indian history is all distorted. The origin of the city of Old
atrophic instance of that colossal distortion, II is,
ne propose to discuss the plethora of scattered
thai i, vi.U available to prove that the metropolis of
at k-asi \ old as Ihc Mal.abharat era Hi the metro
""I mean not only the city of Old Delhi but all
r-pheral rums currently known as Shri <mal-pronounced as
rj.Hau, Mu i; Vi^v-M.ndaL * Qila. Sherg.rh, Din
-'.-umwroumt , hc called KvamMla lomb ,
" 7 r i ***** ***.***** KMta. lot
"***** ami mmvm Together they all constitute the
n
mB gnil<ccnt and massive jeni ple,, mansion,, f orll aml h( of the Hindus who founded
the g i 0liou , ^ pol<* of Delhi.
eipsntivc metro-
U is a colossal mistake to believe that were founded at different times in difFe
seven or IS Delhi ii
rent place* by different monarch* Just as the 20th century Delhi has many suburb,
forming one b.g metropolis similarly the Delhi or the anelenl Hindus Wat a vast
sprawling metropolis whose expanse compared With that of leading cities of our own
times like London New York or Tokyo. Tn fact ancient cilie* like Delhi had to extend over
mile* and miles because the economy then was mainly agricultural. All the elite
possessed large farmsteads. Also those were times when feudal chiefs, courtiers,
noblemen, landlords, fief-holder* and army leaders all commanded | retinue, a body
guard and a contingent of troops. Therefore there used to be big manor houses (with big
landed estates attached) which could accommodate large retinues or horses, elephants,
palanquins, camels, mules, chariots, guns and the soldiery.
There were, furthermore, large serais (called Dharnush-ila' to accommodate large bodies
of troops or other travellers going from one part of the country to the other. The rums
that we see around Delhi consist of all these. Far from having teen erected by Muslim
invaders or rulers they were all rclentle>l> stormed or destroyed by them. This 11 an
instance of how history as it i* taught at present is not only all distorted but it turned
topsy turvy. That is to say Muslims who destroyed ancient Hindu mansions, castles,
palaces and temples arc heme hailed as great builders.
This realization should serve to underline the necessity of tracing the real history of
Delhi. In the Mahabharaia era buj cities were very often signified bj the tufAa "prastbV a
in Tilapra.tl.n (modern Tifpat), Paniprasiha tPanipal). *** prasthu (modern Aera).
Vrikaprnstha and ladcaprasHi IDelntt
3
nil alias OM Fort i* generally admitted ttl
Tbe ^bXiint * " nd b beUCVCd ' b< MlociWed fcdM il*oW< M,m * COfl cedtd that
Parana Qila is the
* r* **"* " h anjc i ogic Pur a ai Delhi (i.e. what
0ldnt "SflSi^ "e BMt ladfert Part of the metropolis of ^ call 0\i Del!ti> B me
ncifef
^ B . irith ra.d a city to the vicinity and called it New
!, dotted wftfc miw of very ancient building*) precisely
IMr an Old Delhi already ciisted at the time they consoli-
dated their rule in Tnd.a m the early nineteenth century, That
part of the rife would not have been called Old Delhi bad
S^kiahan raised it because m that case the city would have
becatfeeorra Delhi known to the British before they built
tbetrOT- It should he clear, therefore, that Old Delhi bears
that Rimr beeaWe H has been known to every generation as
lie oldest Delhi and, therefore, it is at least as old as the
Mahabharata era
The claim that Shahjahan raised Old Delhi is untenable aho from other eonsidera'ions
namely Shahjahan is supposed to hare raised a city called Shahjahanabad. If that were
true. Old Delhi ho'ild not have been known to us as old Delhi but at Shihiahanabad or
Ncw Delhi. A name given by Shahjahan to a newlv rounded city would not have vanished
into thin air i for fjothfop and got substituted by the name Old Delhi. Efteaiji leads m to
another distortion namely that hta and his henchmen tried to foist the name Shahjahan-
laf i-u of Old Delhi but they obviously failed miserabty name Old Delhi had apparently
taken such deep immemorial Hindu tradition that it refused to be up-footed crtn through
600 year* or Islamic effort
Tac^atB* hjBhao Wli no| ^ fir$t aljcn Muslim
S **** Chancc,hc "*<" the ancient Hindu ^ry Muslim monarch lricd th bcfofC . Tbat
*<* Wli ascribed to Allauddin Kblljl.
83 TUBhlnqahaJ to Qhiaiuddla TughUq. Ihe Ku ,, h Mma K aubuddin. the Hsu, Khas
area to Fero.shth TurtS Zl" gTMtaOM distant Ferozshah Kotla also L d 1J" Q||.arta
Shershah Humayu.. thc 8 "a, gfl " .^""r Shahjahan had earlier tried to foist the name Di
P^I "" h / C1(> of Old Delhi but that name didn't stick and XX, to his own limes tried to
give H a ncw Ufa* name , Hl J n have apparently been duped by this naming game into
belicvm, that each alien Muslim, even though he ruled for as small a period as five years,
built grand cities and masnificcnt mansions thouch he was all the lime engaged in
fighting fierce feuds with his own kin and bloody wars against India** Hindu ruters That
conquerors change names of captured buildings or townships is a tradition common to all
people. Did not we change the name of the Viceregal House in New Delhi to Rashtrapati
Bhawan 1 Would it not be then foolish for any future historian to assert tSv. Hum Delhl*i
Rasatrapati Bha. was built by the first president of independent India in the 20th century
7
That the city of Old Delhi existed much before Shahjahan is also proved by a no'in? of the
invader Tamerlain who swept into Delhi on a whirwind massacre spree in 1398 A.D- That
was 230 years before Shahjahan came to the throne. Tamerlain mentions "Old Delhi" in
his memoirs (pp. 442*449, vol, HI. Elliot & Dowson). Imagine the temerity or the
ignorance of those who assert that Old Delhi was founded by Shahjahan when 230 years
before him we find a specific mention of Old Delhi by Shahjahans own ancestor. Similarly
other India like Ahmcdabad nscribed to Ahmedshah, Allahabad Akbar. Ferozabad md
Hissar to FetOWtoa arc all ancient Hindu cities on which alien names and authorihip h^c
bo foisted.
Another very important indication about the Hindu antiquity or Old Delhi i> the locution
of it* ancient cremation |iwu kooWfl Nigampodh Gh.it By ***** Hindu P to
cremation ground ..at one eternity """the township.
M
^^ ,?Iast>vc n din i"* tbCTe *"
rf the* I* ,he Nifimbodb Ghat
,. * the southern cttremity of ihe Old Delh.
,. like ICiai't bank ? ifI af,he Ytm,iM nVf X ^!Sr^MI k-'nee lb. name R.jghaL That Ola
[^Moed io the epic Mehabbirata. is clear, iflOHRM-:: mftbat Old Delhi haipeen Misting
since ihe lines
^therefore, possible that the Rel Fortitself ha* or^ra ii the hoary Paadava era. *** m5
Pl* u b,c because the Yw bank at the rear of the fort gets it* name Rajghat *rxm nhMtr
Raja* bo ased to climb do**n to the river from far the* daiJy baths aad rituals.
Whether or not the existing walls of the Red Fort belong to Ac P*adx*a en it *eei*$ quite
certain thai the lite of the Red Fart a ta ancxat Hindu royal seat even as wt call Somaalh
Hindu teopk tboush M wa* re-erec f ed as many a*
.- feature which prove* the ancient Hindu of the Red Fori it the royal Hindu insignia
which t m graphically depicted inside ibe Khas Mahal alia* a apartment AJ1 these days it
haa been chauvtn
% misrepresented as embody ing the Mus-
may, therefore, once again go to the Re J
E bnaadh awi a second, close, hard look aad note that it is not
has pi* of swords laid hill to hilt curving upwards-
lh ^ lt ci ***> '07*1 might *hieb is the foundation
At the centre of the panel jost above the
Hi Hut*. Kaiaab (iMft pot) Th.s represent*
"ibe realm. On 11 is placed a lotus bod
H
,to represent wealth, prosperity and pc*. From that bad )OI oui a shift balancing a pair
of icales to ugoify ihat th m ain function of the administration it 0 ensure JyiUct fw -
This panel is further dotted by small representations of ihe midday sun ahming in all its
brilliance, because mou Hindu royal dynasties clatmed descent from the Sua God. and the
iw*j they held was likened to the midday splendour of the San scorching the enemy and
warming the citizenry. la the area above is a bigger central representation of the brilliantly
gilded royal sun- That sun shines on the whole panel from the canopy-like arch sheltering
the panel. At the two sword-poum are two conch shells representing Lord Vishnu because
the king is believed to be an incarnation of Vishnu the protector and nounsher. Two other
larger conch-shells may also be seen .it the left and right corners of the base of the panel
Whether this royal insignia belongs 10 the Panda. j uc King Artaogpal of the llth century
A. 0. or to some oibei Hindu monarch may be investigated but it certainly t no* Islamic
or of any later-day Hindu. It may be that this roj Hindu insignia is a very rare and ancient
Hindu sign vhkh though seen by millions for several centuries ha* been laiel. mistaken to
be of Islamic origin. This insignia boukUiarta hunt for similar other ancient Hindu
insignia in Mitel building and impel scholar* to ec whether it could belong to Pandavas.
That the Red J-ori apartment, are identical u. PU royal apartments described id ancient
Sanskri. BJ Harsha Charita" and Bunabhaua's '"K.dambari has o* proved with Doe
drawings and comparand uW rural study of those two Sanskrit +Z**~2 ^ ^ Vasudev
Sbaran Agrawal. a f^ "Jj^ UatM *. later a profctsor of Indology in the B***" ^.idinfifi^
Our research finding that ell P" 1 ^ 0 * 1 "'^; H ,adu a*.re-Kashmir lo Cape Coraorio are
of pic^u ^ ^ ^ ^
lion had doi been w.dely kao^n *ha "' msM i& " and, therefore, he probably earned
the tui"
MahU lne Rctt FortSflnd *ucb
ioned by the alien mediaeval
Even then he could
not
the Taj m t n other-.i* coniniI&s
.., ^urlii'nF 1 " c ln India
5t^^^S3 " dl SMUr.tlilcr.iur,.,
He has devoted several explaining this finding of
-pug to * ' " fdiagrams to an d i number w^ e^,^ ^ mansi0 ns are alt of Hindu
||oofit>e 10
pages *"* " a 0|d Dc |hl's
Our finding tni pandavBS thus finds surprising support
* t,p * T^lowas not only uncommitted* our view but froro*Kholar^no _ ^ ^ ^ findings
belonged to the p^htp, hivingnc" ^^ aH mcdjacval bu|ldings lo ^
offduc tcfcool * Musjinl jun.a as tombs, forts
j^eB commissioned by an u"
nod mowjucs.
Even lay viiitors may visually satisfy themselves about the h JZl^ o/tie buddings inside
the Red Fori* *2* or cmmi ^mng the rears.de of the rampart and not-einc Sr bu.fdmgs,
Tbcii ribbed domes, the curving roof*, pegs ticking, out from iho.c roofe, octagonal kiosks
and the couM arches leading to the erstwhile river-front will trrcsis-
, hnrujtolm mind the vision of nvcr ghats at places of Hindu pilgrimage bristling with
similar Hindu buildings.
A couple of lurtongs from Rajghat s an ancient Hindu iUiulrl jt prevent euphemistically
called Kotla Ferozshah. Became of thai grafted Islamic name tourist and archaeological
literature has tended to represent thai ruined building as having been built by Hie
Muslim sultan f erozshah Tughlaq. I erozshah himself bin never claimed that he built
anything nor has he am record of having commissioned any building. His **i * frustrated
idgn o two crushing defeats in Uengal and wotaSmdh. Only toogc called Shams*i-
Shiraj Alif two icnermons jaungcr than Fcro^hab makes some vague buildinu '"lavouruf
his grandfather's benefactor. And in flit ttoccwupihc fact tha, Ferozshah spent a part of hi*
uiiwuM,ndueiuulel porting the towering Ashokan pUI*i.tu cmomcler bus recorded a
canard that Ferozs
87
uprooted two Ashokan pillars from some village* north of Delhi an d having got them
transported to Delhi had one raised on his 'own" citadel and the other on the ridge. \
fanatic mediae* vol Muslim monarch would never raise a pillar with heathen. Hindu
inscriptions over'his* citadel. He would rather have it hauled down. But Ferozshah
couldn't do that for fear that the Ashokan pillar if uprooted would leave a gaping hole in
the too most storey and would crush all the nether storey a If it fell *>th a ihvd. Tbciefoie
fercjsfcnh lughlaq had to make do with a hated Hindu pillar towering over the citadel he
chose bis residence in a terrain dotted with similar ruinsthe handiwork of alien Islamic
invaders preceding him*. Court stooges bad then to somehow explain away Ferozshah
choosing to live in a castle bearing an ancient Hindu pillar. Tho.e stooges, therefore,
planted the canard in history that Ferozshah himself, out of sheer fancy, had an Ashokan
pillar hauled horn far away to be raised above his palace in Delhi.
What we conclude from the above analysis is that the castle known as Ferozshah Kotla is
Ashoka's own palace because it oLs his pillar on tts terrace. The.ruined * * ^ utoo proof
of its having been subbed" ^ * invasions from Mohammad Ghazm (early onwards.
rife of the Red For. is further proof tW M ^
Delhi extsted fro. .h. M <** *** o, fouoded by Shahjahao m Use I7.h ^ ^ ^^
currently accepted cbr onology A rtota*^ ^
B.C. and .he Pandavas lived the foarth U
ftwttta natural for KM A**- ra.se h.s cand outside the Old Delhi of .he Pandavas. ^ ^ ^^
Old Delhi is located on .he * . citiaus
This too accords rth ^eient H.ndu . ad.uo rf <ul)
of De!hi used to go to the Yamuna ** ^ Q>)huoal to morning for their holy bath and
facing e.
iii^nuiK ivi iuvii *wj ..--11%
the ming subtending in U.er.v.r.eam.
ho cauJJ not go to the proper Yamuna b atlk F * r dti? "" Mto or sickness canal of the
Yamu w w as lcaieof^'" n v 7 Ml0 course its way through what Wq provided J*"V
Thjl anC j c nt highway was then divxded Ci ' ta "!s d0, ( hc Yamuna canal flowing through
its centre. o n ^Tdrwe Hindu flower plMU, *1 trees like the T u j si eUbCf i thl.s The
present Gauri Shankar temple is one of ^ Cm D C U rte ncessant Muslim raids the canal
got gradually Z7.P whToU of temp.es and ghats destroyed by filled up n w |hefcfori
wrong to assume that Feroz-
Muslim invaders, lilt. *W^ * ha
ihah had commissioacd that camu me .he canal had been already budly clogged.
Around the axis of thai canal, extending Irom the ancient Red Fort to the Shiva temple
currently known as Fatehpittl Mosque, was a network of lanes and by-lancs ensconced by
a massive lown-wall protecting the residents, like a pearl held BmOylMincBS^iell Thedt?
of Old Delhi needs, therefore, to he studied a* an excellent example ol' ancient Hindu
town-pUnmng,
Alone cm) ol the hishway-cum-eunal or thai metropolis oF Old Delhi win ihi Hindu king's
pulucc-cuin-ciladel known as the KcJ Fort alias InlkoL Milic other end way Hie Shiva
temple since SmVa was the royal" dciiy of Indium ruling Class, namely the Kshairi>av
Tbeyaieovct a mile apart. The ending "puri" is proof ol ji> anciem Sanskrit name. The
Islamic term "Patch tigaiiic* a conquered Hindu locality, What i* current^ believed .^ be
the Fatchpari Moiquc i^, therel'urc, an ancient Hindu royal temple, 1hb concision is
further reinforced by a small pedcital mil to be seen in the ccntic ol the mam gatc-yof
ihai weailcd mosque. The idol of Lord Ganeslu sU " ol Lord Shiva, m C d to be placed m
thai uny paiidal at lite miranu a* t the Hindu custom.
mow proceed ioside the so called lu.kmaii M e< along the narrow direct about two o
three furlong 'blind alky at thv left. A few yards inside <MW
"
confronted right tofrom by a *trai & hi fight of ono itepi AUJ ,, 15 an ancient Hindu
building. It if now whitewashed but it iuli mcongruoujly known as Kali (meaning black)
Masjid (mosque), Its gateway if of the Hindu lintel-pott type. It ha* two ilendcr pillars-
cum-bastions flanking it Muslims, at lean in India, art wont to whitewash Hindu
buildings captured to be wed *> mosques Why then docs the 'white' mosque bear the nine
(black) "Kali" ? The answer is very simple. Kali is the name of a Hindu goddess* ihe
consorl of Lord Shiva who used to be worshipped by Kshatriyas i.e. the Hindu ruling clas*.
Wi. lhat Kali temple was captured by invading Muslims it came to be designated a* the
Kali mosque. If, ihcrctorc, one icov the winding lanes of Old Dethi one can still come
across ver\ ancient Hindu edifices inside its Unsuspected rcccsse*. T!ir arc the few
specimens of Hindu architecture ol the Man; bharaia era though currently unfortunately
they arc k designated as mosques and tombs. Incidentally even those who hang around it
as faiths are mostly cecendaals of flmdu converts attached to those seized temples as
priests or oilier attendants.
Let us now come oul of that alky aud proceed uuiuci down the narrow winding street with
our back turned on the Turkman Gate. About a mile inside from the gate one across a
spacious roofless room of massive walls where Ra/iya and her sisier lie buried, Sulian
Raziya ruled 1> over three centuries before Shahjahan. A* the sisters hcbunci in a
crowded street of Old Delhi inside a roofless anctci mansion is it not absurd to believe
that Shuhjalun founded Old Delhi.
Sultan Rtttiya w* ruthlessly killed u the ageokl Nasi tradition of royal internecine feudv
Muslim rule can: established in Delhi only a lew decodes before her lies buried in a
massive mansion m a crowded i clear thai Old Delhi with it* narrow winding I ihe
inception of Islamic rule at the beginning o ^
tury and is, therefore, an ancient Hindu city.
comfit* refutes the dies* that Shahjanao founded Old De , hj
To^Ihe Ithccoiury A.D.
a^irdiiucto a belief current in our own clay* init.ated by lhe .I Cunningham mere were
seven ct.es of Dclb| Si. i a in error. Like many other ancient Indian to* n . t h s Deltas
grounded by seven wails. One wail endo*, *L we all Old Delhi from Delhi gate to
Kasbmere gate. The JLd wall used to enclose Ashoka's palace currently caUed Fcrozshah
Holla. The contour of that wall can be traced from ihc so-called ma^'Kiioon!" gateway
standing at an oblique angle on me highway that passes in front of Ashoka's palace. The
third nail enclosed the area currently known as the Indra-prastba fcstate housing the
Indian Institute of Public Admin,-stration, the Accountant General's office etc. The fourth
wall passed close to the Furana Qila abas the Old Fort, Rums of that wall with a massive
gateway leading to the National Stadium may still be seen standing in all its ancient
Hindu glory bearing Hindu designs in white and red. The fifth wall enclosed the ruins that
we see around the so-called ftizamuddin tomb, The sixth wall enclosed the ruins known
as Vijayrnandal, Hauz Khas and Bcgampun Mosque. The seventh wall surrounded the
areas currently known as the Kutub Minar com pie*, Tughlaqabad and Sooryakund.
So vasi was Delhiancient Hindu India's magnificent sprawling metropolis abounding in
mansions and temples and peopled by a wealthy, prosperous, happy citizenrv who had
noiied ihc world's most scientific and advanced social d political system.
th. l t U T P1,acw of a tao ^nd pillars often referred to in ZnlTl ft * riym * [imsei S-
There were also other anMon nown as Lai Mahal and Cuausath Khamba (the one
^ncdt rf "' P ^ lon$ofw,lich m *> " ijl b * s near tbe
MM^T"""*- W ^^be!ieved to be H-JBn| " lomb! *lo ancient Hindu palaces.
9|
Ancient India had almost an unbroken chain of townihids and manor houses extending
from north to lonih These m be traced even today. As wc proceed loath we come acroi so-
called Tughlaqabad. Ballabhgarh, Chhairapur, Koit kalu pceg, Bharatpur, Kumhcr,
Govardhan, Gokul, Mathura* Vrindavan, Kakrauli, Nagarchain, Sikandra, Agra. KtrauU
Kanwaha, Falchpur Sikri in an unbroken continuity.
Ancient Delhi boasted of a long chain of magnificent rivet ghats from Nigambodh (for
cremation*) to Rajghat (recalling ancient Hindu royal splendour), Bui all these townshipt
and river ghats and royal mansions and temples were reduced to rubble and ruins or were
stamped out of existence during a miilenium of alien invasions and raids from
Mohammad-bin-Kasim to Bahadurshah Zafar. The notion that Delhi is a group of Muslim
townships mutt, therefore, be abandoned. Instead it must be realized that ancient Hindu
Delhi extended at least from the Sooryakund to K ash me re Gateroughly about 16
miles, This vast metropolis was broken up into isolated localities of gaping and desolate
ruins because of incessant Islamic raids. But even those ruins can still instruct the
discerning in the glory, wealth and power of the ancient Hindus and their lown-planning
and defcnce*systems.
The belief that only the Purana Qila (Old Fort) in Delhi belongs to the Pandava era is
unfounded, Tbe Ku r a royal house consisted of 100 Jtaurava and five Pandava princes,
their elders, wives, princesses and a large entourage. All these cuulc not have been
confined to the Puraw Qil" ! e * the entire terrain of Delhi dotted with ancient ruins
belong, to
to the Mahubharata era.
T
12
>
DELHTS REO FORT IS HINDU LALKOT
Those purchasing ticket* 10 witness the nocturnal S 0 n ci Lurniere spectacle inside the
Red Fort in Delhi seem to be blurfuUv unawaic that they arc being told only a part ol the
story an J are. therefore, not yetting their money's worth.
The spectacle begins haphazardly with the bland staicmcn Lhat the fifth general ion
Mogul emperor Shahjahati built ihe Red Fort ia the 1 7th century A.D, This is a historical
blunder The Red Fort has been in existence centuries before Shahjahan,
General Cunningham who was first assigned the task of
conducting an archaeological survey of India, deliberately
misrepresented thai all mediaeval buildings in India
were built by Muslim invaders. On page 134, Vol. 1 of his
report (published in 1871) A.D.) he says "The seven forts of
*nich remains rtflJ exist, are, "according to my view the
Then he proceeds to male random, dogmatic
itements that Shi built by Allauddm m 1304 A. D.and
>l*td by TttuhUqshah in 1321 etc. A wmplc impromptu
HI icvea! these conclusion, to be faulty. The
^ u ' B ^t:Ca big townships be founded in /
the above
on nothing
_ How
t* buddinii i n u,! I!* u Can bc ' specially when they _ ngMn Hmdusthan credit, by J G
ahtn |jkc
s
"nnin^ham to other alien l 'Huitrited by.be history orthe^^ 11 ^'^ Tughlaqs, j
Cunningham's "ray view" approach hat no place m hi* C a1 research unless the "view" i n
backed up with strong ei ence and weighty argument Far from producing any such
Cunningham prefaces his dogmatic conclusion with *n ,mpon-jcrablc number of "iPi and
"but"s. On page 152 of hi. report he notes "if" the site or the Red Fort "may be fid" by the
position of Anang Tal, as well as by that or the Iron Pilhr then ihe grand old fort which
now surrounds the Kmb Kinar is all probability the very Lalkot that wav built by
Anangpal" This passage should be enough to convince the reader of the very hazy,
slippery and absurd fabrications on which Indian archaeology and history have been
basically founded It. therefore, becomes necessary to investigate the origin of the Red
Fort in Delhi.
Let us note at the outset that the term Red Fori i ihe exact translation of the ictm Lalkot,
The second point which may be noted is that there is only one ancient building In Delhi
which can be visually identified as Lalkot. That is the Red Fort. There is none other which
meets that description
The public has also not been told that there is not wei >ingle shred Of paper available in
ihe court record Shahjahan's reign with the remotest allusion lo the building the Red Fort
by him. Had Shahjahan built the Tort there should have been papers pertaining to the
acquisition of land, p survey, design drawings of the fort, bills and receipt^ for material
ordered, day-to-day expenditure shee.s and rolls of the labourer, employed ? There Ii
no such record, *1 a bit of it-
The inside
or ,h. Red Fort ^"'"C
inscriptions but in
none ol ihem
| there any clu
aU
r ~ inscription^ ire
Shahjahan having built anything JT^ irr no.
absurd, irrelevant scrawls like the ones w.i ^ ^ qurtU picnickers spoil others 4 building*.
A * m ( dutiful a*
one which says "God is great I God iv MQ^" ^ ^ pafl ,, those painted mansions and
residence*
the high hatwo. f nmf say rhe high*sruled angels are desj r or looking ar them ." etc. etc
The inscription gocs Qn ^ u " 61a .bfa bfa interminably. Do reil owners or builders tJisfigu
111 fherr own Property with rt*ch nonsensical writing ? Will no( owncr*bi.tJder cieh, if at
all, a relevant inscription record' the dite. and the purpose of a building, giving the name
of tu owner J But Islamic inscriptions in India never do that. Tk-indulge in incoherent,
irrelevant, absurd rarnblings.
We may here refer to a couplet scrawled in the Hall 0 r Private Audience alias Diwan-i-
Khas. It says "If there be veritable paradise on earth, it is here, it is here." It ends there
abruptly without enlightening the reader as to who appraises the mansion as a veritable
paradise, who built it, when and for how much 7
But Tel us not leave it at that. Though the couplet reveals nothing positive we may draw a
number of adverse inferences from it. Firstly, since the inscriber is shy of saying anything
about the origin of the building it is clear that the inscriber is a mere interloper and not
the ownerbuilder. Secondly, only a usurper praises a building sky-high. The real owner
builder very modestly terms his own creation as a mere "cottage" or The usurper boasts
about a building because he has fought to capture it. Applying another psychological
we find that a husband would never publicise his wife's :hrm and beauty from housetops
and road-squares but a kidnapper would loudly proclaim the beauty of a kidnapped
woman if only for sheer justification of his dare-devil act. This
^ilio proves that the Persian inscriber describing the
ofPr,ve Audience as a paradise could not have been its builder.
Thevi.itortotheRedFort may also note that in the W^?T.! M * lhd,he * r,lm ah liM
Khas Mahal alias
.^T f V """"" This Wmi r a large """ ,U " of ,he ".! n in , he areh above , G n
e.ther
95
aide of it is the sacred HiaJu letter ( QM) Just ar ch is a panel dotted with a number of
waller rep,.^" of the sun- In tlie.r midst stands a pair of i tel The ell., shaft of the pair or
scales emerges out of the Hindu lot., bud The loms bud itself stands on the sacred Hindu
Kalash cdo'o" immediately betow the Kalash is a pair of sword blade, UEdUfi to hilt
curving upwards like bracken around the pair of icaki Four conches, so sacred to the
Hindus, may be seen on the panel. Two of these are at the sword tips and two in ihe left
and right comer of the panel base.
This brines us to what may have been a subtle fraud or blind naivete* of historical
research. The pair of sword blades that we have referred to above have all along been
misrepresented as the Muslim crescent. We would, therefore, ur photographers, artists,
visitors, ebservers. historians and archaeologists to go to the Fort and once again have a
careful second took at the panel to satisfy themselves that the io*called crescent is a pair
of swords with their hilts unmit'akably identifiable. That knocks the bottom out of the
Shanjahan legend of the fori because that fancied crescent had all these days been used as
prima facie proor of the fort's Muslim authorship, Contrarily we have enumerated above
the mam exclusively Hindu symbols whieh abound in the panel lo exclusion of anything
Islamic,
The ancient Hindu terminology associated with the fort"* interior persists despite
centuries of hectic efforts i Islamic terms like Tasbih Khana and Tasha Khana The anne*
Hindu names that stick are Rang Mahal. Clal W, C" Rang Mahal, Shravan Mahal,
Bhadrapad C^^S
Chhatta from ^<^a*tt MS corridor inside the Lahore Gate, iwm ^^ Mot(
Burj> mts-pronounced as Mwammau Bur)). ^ ^ ^ ^ Mahal. Rupa Mahal, Hira Mahal
et ^taught*
only in name. They got destroyed during w and subsequent turbulent Muslim regime*.
to the %r^ apartment which houses the royal Hindu msigr, the par jles the rooms have
doors with elephant head
Boomed w,il, mah H,i the Ifttftai built the Red Fort
t?d never have ordered idolatrous elephant and human rot door - Sim.br life-size
elephants also stand
-Delhi Gate of the Tort Vfcilors are not ..flowed to enter the fart by the Delhi Gate but
they may use n an cait and miv then notice the elephants. These elephant , tvere erected
by the British Viceroy Lord Curzon alter he 3M | Hindu elephant statue* hammered down
into 5 pieces and buried inside the fori. According to Bernier tkosc Hrndu elephants had
been elected outside the Haih.pol ^h* the elephant gate of the Nagarklwna alms Music
House -h no* houses British army relics.
The archtrec-u.-c of the fort b all Hindu. Its domes arc all
e -.apped The fort is an irregular octagon like the ancient
Hindt, \jodh Itt cupolas and bastions and kiosks
.-all octagon il Only Hindu* have special names for all the
. supernatural guards for those
ciehr directi
the rear of die Red Fort, connected with .1 bridge, i* j r idee head ab <n the Yamuna
river- That portion
s tilled 5alimgnrh. Since Salitn u> the father ahan his name is clear proof that the Red I
urt existed ?f Shahjahan** father's lime.
The n inside the fori (The Pearl Mosquel is attributed
Shahjahan \ son Aurangzch The very fact that Shuhjah.n fanatu Mutism himself* bad no
mosque inside the lint lie pease he fort a-an occupant and not
a
BdJe?an lit ir , oxford ^ H painting depicting
n the Penun ambassador in the Diwftfri -ft. Delhi in 1628 AD, That pa.ntmg has been Pife
32 of .he lllutiratcd Weckls of India dated
97
March , |4. Wl Since Shahj^n came toihe thr 0 e in ia nc could not have reec.ved that
ftnia* ambassador I Red For. in the same year if the fort had not been fo emieaet earli
r
Mr . Vasudeva Sharan Agrawal an -ai chwoleiy official afI d also a well known mdologist
has drawn chart, m hiiboo* -Harsha Charita-Ek Sanskrmik Adhyayan" and hat live*
elaborate descriptions proving that the royal apartments inside the Red Fort are identical
with those desenbed in ancient Sanskrit literature as belonging to Hindu kings.
A Government or India publication (1932 A. D.Muled "Delhi Fort A Guide to the Buildings
and Gardens notes on page 1 that Shahjahan entered the fori for the first time to hold
court by l back (riverside) door. Had Sbahjahan been the builder of the fort he would have
made a state entry by one of the city gates and would not have entered the fort stealthily
by a minor back door
For the sake of brevity we now mention a number of other proofs without elaboration.
The Hindu sun emblem is carved all over the fort from the outermost gate to the
innermost apartment- Even the so-called Pearl Mosque has the Hindu sun depicted on its
innei marble walls in the upper portion. On the inside of the entrance marble arch are
depicted on eilfcers.de a cluster of five frui.v They represent Naoedy. alias Prasad (the
holy Hindu offering to God) These eamap ind.cate that the so-called Molt Masjid .s an
earlier_Hiod MmiMandir (temple). This is further borne out b> the u that in the centre
of lis inner court is a fountain wi* **o stolen. Chandm Chowk, the mam hh*> '"^/^
Lahore Gate of the Red Fort to entirely '^ bll *J^ lhe Had Shahjahan bmit the fort he
ould has c P >p^ ^
main highway with Iranians, Turks, Ari s.
*.- .ir relation* DU '"^ Afghans who constituted his near ^all niches w
courtiers 7 All arches in or Bfcoul * ' ^ m it their
lowering gateways, depici \^ HmUu
fc .! the rear r the for * " klloWl1 U AoHftri The rivrr b*o^ |ionS of Hindu Raju
U' *** P lTfo centarie* before Shahjahan, Had
only *0F Bad f 1' d have been called Badshubghat and fart the river bank . sl t0 thc
fort are all non-
0 ot Rajf^ 7 T J e J" Red .emple and the Gnun-Shankar Muslim""* wih* "' becn thefC bad
shahjahan buih WH*. They wooldn oiv
"* f0rt " .v such proofs if only the public and
W ^nXiie History of the Red Fort
U* government car*to Government-sponsored
^T*!U official, th *>., n. 4 UlM .ha- < * Fft - Delta.was bu.lt by Shahjah.r, ,
i< w bu,h ceuturie. before him by Hmdu royalty.
:d Fori
13
"Marg'
LOVERS AND ARCHITECTS "
Browsing through the back numbers of a Bombay nugiiifK irg" devoted, I believe, to art
and culture my attention *i, arrested by the amorous and intriguing title 0 r ao 1Ttic ^ Ue
title was "Shahjahan the Lover and Architect. 1 '
In a way there was nothing special about the title beciuse many others have written more
or less in the same vein for approximately three centuries implying that Shahjahan, and
perhaps almost every Muslim ruler, at least in India was not only a great patron of art,
letters and sex but was himself an accomplished architect who could by a few deft strokes
of his pencil in no time and with the greatest ease produce detailed blueprints for wonder
buildings off his drawing board like a master architect showing off his skill and shaming a
bunch of novices or first-termers at a school of superior architecture.
This is not all. It is further implied, as is evidenced by in* title quoted above, that
Shahjahan (and of course every mediaeval Muslim overlord for that matter) could
produce building plans even while making love to one or more curvacious and cuddle-
some inmates of his teeming harem. That those mediaeval Islamic potentates also
simultaneously qaiiffed strong spirituous liquors and took liberal helpings of poppy "1 ol
stupefying drugs is borne out by history.
That those augu.t Islamic majesties were ******* rates or at best had been taught to
decipher I fe * " Koran, is another point which these 'jay' writer, onjm ry nd architecture
have never cared to laki into ac
OMi . _ , _ m fn uv as playme two simuit^
Obv,oI.v <- m pIayi glwo sjmu|tan
0 ,hct **'' 4S , 0VC r> and architects hay, dev ,
00 ,.,,-.. ****{ them WIId guesses ,. bee use thc ; c of
'ft"' m,Ms ,. mnor , rv , an thentic historical claim made b "':;lVoT "Sva. Maslim ruler .ha,
e was ,J " t JL Lchiiect. Therefore the only b for ,h esc .ecemplnncdI arc ^ and over . dr
ug g ed. laacivigu,
mere mniour or hearsay*
That such writing has b--en contributed to serious, profes-sional marines or to books
enjoying high status world patro-Mr . by writers sporting formidable professional
reputations at historians or architects, who never cared to venfv the basis of the
important topics they discussed, graphically illustrates the tragedy of the study oflndian
mediaeval art, architecture, history and culture. This is also an indication of the
nonchalant and careless way in which such subjects are dealt with in schools and colleges
and institutes of higher learning not only in India but all over the world wherever Indian
history and Intfology are studied and taught.
I wonder whether any school of architecture with its
'studied" if not tutored trail of Shahjahan's reputation for
amour and architecture will hereafter confer on its qualifying
tudejtu ai the annual convocation the gracious degree of
".Lover and Architect" in the right royal Shahjahan tradition I
no school of architecture is prepared to introduce this
the degree it confers on its alumni i wonder whether
"I the art would themselves care or dare to pro-
Z2Z7 * " M ' S T m " Dick & Harry-Lovers end
H prtnj! Sl ff b0l,rdl ouu lc thctr residences and priictl-
to rfiwce ShJ k' appcnded * architectural skill seems
^ % "W* taw is nc reason why "
lot
should not a* well promote the bu,j nei4
mortals practising as professional ircMeciit *****' ' ,WMf
The implication or calling Shahjahan 'Lover , . , I. that of .11 branches of Earning,
Nfci ^2* degenerate and facie that sc*ual aberrations no. matter but actually help
architectural experts y 4oal
building plans of highly ornate, massive and J " *"* like the Tlj Mahal requires no
***Zt^*2** professional tools because history docs noi m ., BL * ny hav lnS had -Mdjfc, P-
aa.^,;V;i p ~ %* sion or any tuition in architecture, [n fa,., u s. ., .. that to be on very
famliar terms with' onc^ ".T^ equivalent to keeping terms in a school of architecture and
so by cither method one can qualify as an arch,, | vender
whether those teaching or learning architecture would , umit f such a lecherous
alternative to attending architectural LUlikmn is conveyed by the description "Shahjahan
the Lover And Architect" which has either been vividly spclL'd out or almost invariably
assumed in all writing on or about ths Taj Mahal.
Even an it is the description of Shahjahan as lover and architect has no basis in history.
What is implied m calling him "lover" is that Shahjahan was faithful as a husband lu
Muintaz and did not have sexual relation* with other women. Hut history is replete with
references to the contrary. Mogul harems have been known to consist of at least live
thousand women. Besides, Shahjahan is known to have had illicit relations with wives of
his own kin like brother-in-law Shaista Khan and wives of courtiers like Khaliullah Khan,
and as some suspect even with his own eldest daughter Jahanarl Glunp*** of some of his
amorous pursuits may be had in lac book titled "The Taj Mahal is a Temple Palace" by this
author
The same book explains that Shahjahan did uoi build <vco a single building of the
numerous asenbed to h other hand Shahjahan** own court chronicle namel) shahnanm
records that Shahjahan had ordered that uot c*en<
described
. Tort Uftr and U 8Ufer
us but
he
Lovcf and Destroyer and Desccrator* "Rebel and Fanatic."
102 bc left standing in hit realm Accord* lirf .,H,n^^l^;; ad , lonC 70 lemples were * T . B
U,edtitnd ol ah jt , c|rw as commandeered from
Jw* ****** prefer* if* all Shahjahan has to be rf tt*B*a' sb,bnim \ lc |Ved f r om historical
accoun
t, e described oo ** tad Wonn" " and as
. find ample basis in accounts of his reign The above epithets *J hhyc rcbe]kd during
the lifetime became Shihjahan u n l d . $ also known l0 have been
^Jtd,mt uader pam of tortus death.
To bebeve Sbabithaa's infatuauon for Mumta* to have led .othecrttiioiiofchcTajMaJiil fa
also illogical and absurd from nunv other points of v,e. Firitly * mans craving for
ihewAUal'comr*nyora*oman.> II debilitating, incapacity |B| wd dtabliag emotion. Never
dock amour instil any special coerg) in man. Tbe only two things known to be born out of
atn'ft'oman love ire . boy or a girlnever a building. This t, elementary psychology
Similarly to believe thai Shabjahan tlioaued ill nu love on the dead body of Munuaz but
built ootfa.n; for bcr *hi)e the wa* alive a another absurdity. One *ho *ould not pimpec a
woman while she lived would not wax Itnetoui on her corpse. Moreover if the budding of
the Taj Mahal tuppoitd to justify the description "Lover and Architect" lor bhafajiban
would wc not have to tag similar descrip-ions to other Muitus monarch! who are
supposed to have built
****> Aurangabad,Akbar*s so-called tomb Safdar llngv So . calkd lQmb m DcU| . ^
mafly
s ^rr?,^ io,i-ftqrLpi Hamida Banu * a chud -
Wbe* raiichl J? . '" Cmpcr0Jr Humayun's harem is.
H-raa tit 55 F" efCtCd thC fabU, US AMwUBaMtuci .... U,d * 01 h 'ry then describe
^ ** Uvc ' *od Architect V
103
Thai fend, u* to another side nf ik* Muslim princess. sultans 1Bd *"*""* Medev al
having built numerous mosqu cs ln fl * are lM > "edited w,th If those who hu.lt
fabulous tomb* for th 0 " t0 tQmh% ga,0re -be called "Lovers a d Archil ^ T^ **** *
mdividuals believed also to have h u ?i, "^ lhwe ** mc Lovers B nd Samt," or "Lovcrveum
A c hS"" ** ^ d g ,ous By Day And Frivolous By NiX'^r; ' " ,,Re, " and Belies Many *
enchanting m^wL cZll * ** by the imaglmtiva to pair with the Lidu ^^T>
Those prescribing architectural curricula Md pcopIc umpiring to quuhfy as architect, wou
!d do well I0 ask VhX
<tud / H VV mCa ** (,CVOl, " t0 -ch.tectur.1
tlK If these iwo M arC found to be complemeni^v
to each other there j* no reason why academic itudfei should
be considered at, onerous drudgery by the densest dullard on
rth. Every other branch of study could be made a, romanlie
as ^haejahan is fancied to have made the study (or *W onfa
practice) ?) of architecture.
ft remain* to be seen whether a woman aspiring lo be an architect will also considerably
enhance her academic prospecu by amorously teaming up with one or more men. And
since fchahjahan had five thousand known consorts and in addlti his many amorous
side^adventurci, it will rake some --mplicated experimentation to find out whether I \
5,000 is tbe right ratio for any architectural hopeful whether man or woman* or he or she
could do with anything more or less In any ease the muihemniici^jiN/autjsiiaian*
working oui the right permutation combination will have a hectic time ant perhaps ihe
lime of 'heir livet fq trying out all the possible permuutionvcombiiu-Now thai would
make one an ideal "LoverArchitect." of the Snahjaban standard or even one belter
4 architect* and perltupi mere "Lovers" ffiflMtotl * * M( , c , lleJ with any *uch team of
rtd rurally * , fvm g 10 figure out the right
"'* u aod architectural training Ihut would turn
qajntii Acfhitects." Whether the aspirants would
, tfeal * l*r, *** *** ^^ ^ shahjahnn to qualify U|
have to ***", ; 8Qvbody straight down to a pauper
^.^^
coptidertd.
T^e ques.,on would also have to be considered whether
archLtL, institutions would have to be accessary co-edu-
dOBai to provide for mtra-di*cipl.ne ,nu>u r or whether the
students *ould have to look for the romantic aid to their
udis wholly or partly outside their institutional roll ?
The historic mum of Shahjuhan as "Lover And Architect" thus opens up great new
possibilities for academic rethinking *nd curricula* reform. And though il has not been as
explicitly or at often stated that every Muslim sulian or nawab in India was as
accomplished a "Lover and Architect" as Shahjahan, reading between the hues ol current
historical texts we find that they have all been lustily described as keeping large harems,
ukiuf liberal and frequent helpings of stupefying drugs and head) liquor* and merrily
building tombs and mosques by the dozen Thus all prince* of all ruling Muslim dynasties
at least is India turn out to be superb "Lovers and Architects."
Armed iih this unfailing Islamic tradition if any academic
reformer hastening 10 fashion ou r curriculum* to lurn us all
ioio.sa>. 'Lovers And Architects," "Lovers And Teachers,"
"Loveift And Doctori." "Lovers And Lawyers,," "Lovers And
"Lover* and Mechanics." and "Lovers And Electri-
' is accosted with any mg(a | objections by any puritan ihe
tl reformist may well turn round and tell the puritan
| wni re-karn the texts of mediaeval Indian history a* Prep.,l by MuUim lnd Bfili&h
|cholw| ^ ^ m0llcv
10S
following and be damned." If anybody thinki pornogr.phv at drink and drug addiction
harms one's studies or character' health or professional standing let him fead the
tradition .1 Indian histories and be wiser. One can dine and wine and pine sans bound and
yet in spite of it or because of it earn renown So let u> all *ay "Hail thee Shahjahan
Lover and Archil-. who has left us a shining example to emulate dreary academic studies
with dizzy romance."
in comb mini
SbXrTsmalleo marriages were
BLATANT ABDUCTIONS
Akbar. the third-generation Mogul ruler in India (I5 1605) bu too often been
undeservedly represented and prescn-
as a great man and a noble ruler.
A thorough review mid reassess men 1 ol even aspect 01 hi> character and roll il MMm*
He ifl fat from the angel that he i nought to be made out, Here we propose to deal with
only one aspect 01 Akbar*> life and rule namely hi* marital adventure* which have
hitherto been rhapsodical!) described a* lyric*] symphonic* in inter-comraunal harmony
and lofty essays in rare statesmanship.
Uc propose lodeal in tills chapter with a lew repre&eut-B instances At least two of those
were the result of foul premeditated murders. Another was a case of hounding away a
husband to grab hit wife, The rest were abductions brought about after miliiaiy
subjugation through leiroi and horror method* It* audition there were attempt* which
miscarried, i-or iniliAce had nut the brave Gundwana queen Durgawati courted death on
the battle he Id he would have ended up ru A kbit's hat em, and chroniclers like A but
Fail would have given it a *cuuini{ wash in incir Panugcria Akburana.
Albat'i much vaunted marital connection with the Jaipur
itog family * as brought about tftftl bmirmul the ruler was
wig fcubmiison by Shot ruddiu, 1 eomaUHHJtf
1 1 Uiiee horror and terror raidi
,ao ,il ededfll captuting
*mum**m Kh aailt .R MJ SlB|h and Jagaanalh . They
107
were incarcerated, at Sambhar and aoo* m t
loriuroua death. It was to redeem " thr 'eicd
thci
the chastity of Bharmnl's daughter had" i ' mp ? rilled Uve * Akbar** harem door. IO
*crfid at
Dr. A. L. Shrivnuvu observe* on p Ees Al ,, AKBAR THE GREAT that "The Kachw?hw ' h
" book ( ,on and hence in a hetpless ^*"t *"[*"* ^ cession of and an alliance with Akbar "
Th "" """'
why as soon as the helpless Rajpn, tou^^n ^'T the three pr.nces were released I, i, ., *
"'tendered Strive. ,ha, ,he people of ^L^TZl^ region, had fled in Akbirt wake wh.ch pros 1
,TZ * regarded as a .igcr on ,hc prowl and no, a ,, ,' f *? "" groon, on a issio n of ,ovc.
was BMfcSSg; warlord who had com. rampag.ng , 0 abduc, a Ra Jpllt pr , " , exchange lor
the l,ves of three of her brothers caught ,n,h vice ol Mogul cruelty.
It may be noted thai Sambhar was ne.ther the eap.ui of Akbar nor of the Jaipur ruler.
There was no earthly reason why the so-called royal wedding should have been
"celebrated" at that oui-of-ihe way Godforsaken place ? The reason clearly was that the
princess' chasity was surrendered as ransom for the Jives of the three captured Rajput
princes,
Another noteworthy fact is that Akbar left the very nest day for hatenpur Sikri with the
surrendered girl cupoemisu-cally called the bride. That is to say there were no nianiage
festivities. During Akbnr's time royal wedding festiv.ues used to last for months. How was
it thou that Akbar left Sambhar for Fatchpur Sikri within 24 hours of his getting the girl I
This Proves thai the so-called wedding festivities alluded lo by sycophant Muslim
chroniclers arc concoctions and that the so-called weddmg presents were nothing but
addiuonal ran. Paid to release Akbar stranglehold on the Jaipur realm *nd l he three
princes. The Muslim festivities were in demoniac celebration of the capture of a Hindu
princess.
10*
0 f Bhariaal's relations wen? prcswm-Xnoihcr clue K < hflt n0 H ,.j 0ry tdls us thai the
sons and other
Jt m ,^.lcd ill*** reduced w Akbaf *" " Ranl * ,am -*,< of Bhaim" t| ' bew u* tbe>
considered the entire
.1*, ine RJP TC'T^ou, alien junta, eo haw ihcm raped by a WW
s fAkbar's so-called marriage with
ne ^ ^^^ Begum, A** had an
BrtmKh <*>*'' tholl gh Behrnm Khan was
***^ JESTED Jtofh* chaperoned
^roTchailen.es, The daughter of Humayun s sister Sa1,ma Bcaum *asa near cousin of
Afcow
. L',u,t rt n Athuf Dr. A. L. Shrivastu\a On pace 41 ol his book on AKoar ui. '
y & *bt B a rb ..* 1557 Bchram Khan suspected* conspiracy agamst him when one day
on the way back from MftHkol the nml elephants impeded into ailing Behrnm Khans ten..
Suice then Bcnrani Khan was systematically hounded out oi pau-cr. ovcribrowa La open
combat, eatlcd, chased to Anhtlwad Piiio, shadowed ^nd murdered through a party of
Afghan hireling*. Immediately nil *ido* was made to join Akbar's harem.
It may be noted thai Akbat s ctephunis stampeding into Bchram Khan * tent was .in
unmistakable >ign of bis royal ire having been a roused; which synchronised With Saliinu
Uegum' tavrtage *rth Bchram Khan, Vincent Smith in bi* book
BAR TH GREAT MOGIiUL observes on pages 30-31 "From Minkot ihc army reached
Lahore halting on the way at Julluadur where Bchram Khan married Sulinu Begum, "
In hii edition of the Aint-Akbari t Ulochmann note* in hi>
DUatoubc grandees (pages 521-348) iliai Bchram Khan
irncd iidinu Begum and soon alter estrangement Started
e Akbar ami him. The evidence coupbd with the iuci
109 thai Bchram Khan ihe highest royal ., of the crown * u .tripped of all hi* power,
ihcn of his life and Uub or h,, .r be tt f H-y'-old Akbaf* anholy infatuation for Hal
Khan's legally wedded wire ii graph.c prom" or Aktaar's ItTZ and scant regard for otnerV
marital lanctity.
Incidentally this li yet an oihcr foul, premeditated, wanton murder which must be laid
squarely at Akbar'* royal door in addition to those listed by Vincent Smith towards the
end of his book.
Concocted accounts of Akbar's w-calted nobility, being taught all over the world, have
tended to uteri that Akbar stopped the cruel custom or Saii by which Hindu women
immolated themselves on the pyre of their dead husbands. The claim that Akbar moved
by a sense of pity ruled that the Sati custom be stopped is part of the pile of chauvinistic
Islamic concoction* that passes a* Indian mediaeval history. Mori serrate i coniem*
porary Jesuit has clearly noted that Akbar was such a sadist as to look upon the sombre
rite as lot of fun. A few instances which are adduced to prove the claim of Akb*r
abolishing the custom of Satl, arc the ones in which Akbar Intervened to drag the helpless
Hindu royal widows to his own harem.
One such classic instance is that or Vir Bhadra the crown prince of the Hindu kingdom of
Panna who resided H Akbar'i court with his comely wife, as a hostage. When news arrived
of the death of his father Ramchandra. Vir Bhadra procJe< to hii capital to ascend the
throne. Garbled Islamic accounts say that as Virbhadra nearcd his capital Rcwa he fell
down Ronj the palanquin and died His wife than prepared to go San but was prevented by
Akbar
One can very well figure out the actual *****"% gtrbled and truncated Muslim versions
because o nc -
lacunae and absurdities. Vir Bhadra *as no u* *~ a height of just two to three fee,
(bccaOK . * ^
which a palanquin in transit borne J iM * ^ m ^
bearers were no novices at palanquin-bcarm*
B n is o"vto 5 , Therefore, thai Vir Bhadra w a , theil TT.tsome louely spol between his
own and Akba r S
*' pi * f <X AifooV.rBh 0 dm wm killed hi. m
Yet another stance where a Hindu royal husband was
itoflv doae w death w drag his wife to Akbur's harem h
Lfcfd m rhe mysterious and sudden drain of prince Ja.mul.
AttftVi riding oul in person lo prevent Jaimul s wife committing
S.ti'ind hn meircera!ing *" hcr re,altom are *" Vry u *P'cfom
circumstances. JaimUl h said to have been sent on a mission to
fcofai. On the way be died. His wife prepared to commit
S*tl And jus? in ihe nick of lime Akbar reached the exact spot
riding all ine way from distant Fatchpur Sikri, like a knight
errant frura behind the curtain of a stage-managed
He did not trust any detachment of his army or police
nor could be entrUji the task to any officer under him. And he
hid to pm all of ihc poor widow's relatives in dungeons of
torture. The episode abruptly ends there without mentioning
what happened to the hero of the stage-managed show namely
Akbar and the bereaved widow. After all the relations who
lid accompanied the widow to Ihc cremation ground had been
imprisoned whom could Akbar send the poor widow to ? Natu-
lly very "reluctantly' poor Akbar had lo give her shelter and
protection in his own harem-seems to be the inevitable finale Ihe story
at...i Vr rr tSlT |' tb B,aktt **wy discerning comment on bow Tl^ **** " lf ^ Ied '
^appointed chronicler treats
'"^Piifide Here it
been branded a, a "shameless flatt
also be remembered that Abul Fa?l erer" by almost all hisio-
ttm e !L C M Wn prince J * han
a;iSS Z on "* dfttc of thc iricidcnt no staicd
Peking in clearness and
preciuc-n.'
Ill
When one reconstructs the above garbed d ^ version one find* that Jaimul wa, in "
*** "* deputed" on a mission A. soon ^^S' " * ^ awny from his near and dear ones a
. coj, h ^^
lpr u>n and done to death defenceless. The LI" T* obviously h ; rd ly mattered when a
man, ll^Ct JR dog and killed wherever and whenever an onm, Akbar was obviously
being kept fully inforL/^Zru^^' amW, When after * dcalh ni| ^ -objected to his
widow a abduction by Akbar the Utter get them all out or the way by putting them in
prison The poor *icj<m left sorrowing and defenceless at the brink of the raging funeral
pyre was dragged away to Akbar's harem
It may be noted that in Akbar'* time Ihe Sail cunora was widely prevalent. His
intervention in sush cases, fraudulently stated to arise from the desire to slop the cruel
rite, was in fact intended to abduct the beautiful widows himself. Else why should Akbar
be interested in this one? And why should he ride all alone ? And how could he arrive at
Ihe right not at the right time ? And how had Jaimul died soon after he had left the
capital and in those limes when coronary thrombosis was not as common as it is today ?
And in fact no disease has been attributed. Moreover Akbar instead of ordering an rnqucit
intoJaimurs death, seemed more interested in chasing hit sorrowing widow to the funeral
pyre and segregating her front the protective, security ring of her relatives. So ibis other
murder and abduction mutt also be credited to Akbar"* shady marital deals.
The fourth and perhaps umpteenth abduction did not have to end in murder because the
husband eooll) walked awsy distant Deccan regions leaving Akbar 10 hold hi* r! event is
described on page 47 ofVu-cent Smith's h pages 80-81 of Dr. A.L. Shrivastava's book. The
ui Badayuni that a murderous attack was made on January 12. 1565 as a "result of great re
sen went and f
*r fctWk attempt *< invading the honour of certain account of Albar itfempi Wwi lo
" ^2lAfJ Sheikh obeyed and retired
wB KUir .^ - ^ J2S to be Akbar'* habit to wn not murdered too. vc m *"
rdTv those who.ew.ve, he covered, on some pretext and then have .hem knocked
offaswehavc seer, happen,n fi earlier he case of Bchrarn Khan and latmuJ.
Dr Shnvastava add* lhal "negotiations for simitar connec
WW e .foot through cunuchv and panders Badayim.-*
accent cms re be correct." That means there could be
hundreds of other* who were -deprived cfthe.r legally wedded
wtmtofill Akbar* harem
On psse 127 or his book Dr. Shnvastava says that Akbnr married the daugh'tr ofKaho who
was the brother of the Hik mei ruler. Kalyanmul If one enters into the details of thts
encode one w.11 notice that the Bifcancr house threatened with I i.'esirucrion was forced
to surrender ihc virginity of its heJptt rj uchtcr to \khar
What kind of transactions these were, which have been
pncflliilicjilly and nostalgically referred to as marriages, is
PP3' para* later in the same book. Dr. Shrivastava
aimer's rUwal Har Rai gave his daughter in marriage
Raja Bhagwantda* was sent to bring the princess to
What sort of a "marriage" is this where no
rij comes lo ihe proom's house nor does the groom go
house hui Bhagwantdas i% sent like a municipal
equipped uli ihe tasio of an army detachment as
i iirj\ runaway cow. Dhagwantdas goes and
"'. unnamed girl and dumps her in Ak bar's royal
rd almon connotes a cattle pound for rounded-
P Wpie*ri, enwlw r \khar-the stud reigned supreme.
ai forced ihc rulcri or Banwada and Dungar-* lender. 0n p ,, , |( m prof Slinvusiiiva , s
b(jok
wal Pialap, ,u| Cf 0 , Banswadu and Rfwal
*t h
CX.
H3
Askaran of Dungarptir were forced to wait on Akb and e * his tutelage. Akbar is then
described ai having 'mitricd' ,h ft Oungarpur princess, Once again the name of the p 00f
dauphte, supposed to be Ihe heroine of the wedding, 1, m u,i n . i. ,, mining became her
name hardly mattered. Her chastity **,, mere chattel to be bartered away in the tnrrendci
terms This is made graphically clear when the learned author describes how Lon Karan
and Birbar were used at daroaas to brin Ihe poor Dun par pur child to be dumped in
Akbar's camp, Here again no bridal party comes to Akbar's court nor does Akbar C njoy
the status of a son-in*law at the bride's home. Instead the girl is cruelly wrested from the
filial embrace of her sorrowing parcnis ruefully ruminating over their despicable Tate in
having to surrender their beloved daughter to stop the detractive fury of Akbar's army.
About Akbar's phenomenal lechery his own court-chronicler Abul Fazl notes in Am 15
(Blochmann's Ain-e-Akban) that "His Majesty has made a laree enclosure in which there
were more than 5,000 women each with a separate apartment," Remembering thai Fa*l
was a court flatterer one can easily realize why throughout the length and breadth of
Hindusihan there is no building or even a site or Akbar's times enclosing even a cattle
pound with accommodation for 5.000 women, much less separate apartments for each of
them. That prove that the helpless 5.000 women must have beea herded and packed like
sardines in unhygeme and insanitary hovclvliteraliy "enclosures" ns Abul Fail tells us.
Later in the same Aitl Abl Fazl says "Whenever begum " wives of nobles or other women
of chaste (sic) A**"" to be presented -those eligible are permitted to ^ Some women
of rank obtain permission to reaiai whole month.. "
Since It is ineonct.vable thai *"*** M and women in general would be ilch,n ^"^ up0
o all the above passage wUj '^ Jns rha "
potential fMer tor hi* Mt Wen * * *ve n !!!il rt ^' wivc-t Md the w.vcof
potentates hkc
in their marital virtue, the Abdul Wasi could well be
nobler ind courtiers' wives
Benram Khan could not be safe
Pljjhi of ItffM people !* Sheikh
imagined.
On pape 276 of Aini-Akbari edited by Blochmann Abu I
Faz, leHs the reader "Hi* Majesty ha* established n wine shop
near the palace..-The prostitutes of the realm who collected at
the shop could scarcely be counted, so large was their number.
The dancing eirls used to be taken home by the courtiers, if
*n> well known courtiers wanted to have a virgin they should
first have His Majesty's permission. In the same way boys
proitiiuted themselves, and drunkenness and ignorance soon
led to bloodshed Hi* Majesty himself called some of the
principal prostitutes and asked them who had deprived Ihem of
their virginity.**
So the whole evidence in a nutshell is that in spite of Akbar having had a harem of over
3.000 women he used to maintain swarms of prostitutes boys and girls and he used to
molest wivei of nobles and even of the common people.
In fact the Din-e-Jfahi implication of everybody unqucs-
lionragfy surrendering his life, religion, honour and property to
Akbar points to nothing but Unmitigated lechery. The compul-
f surrender of iheir women by defeated rulers to Akbar's
m U evidenced by the Ranthambhorc treaty with Rat
an Sin* h further endorses that lechery. In addition Akbar's
| invasions of the marital privacy of the common people
iZlZ i '"* T CXtimg hU ' bands ro hc, P himself with iheir wlv further underline Akbar's
venery.
j:zz":;::t ;r dcd so that ^ may
virtue* and valu Akbar s imaginary marital
15
WORDS ARIO PHRASES WHICH EXUDE HISTORY
In the illimitable expanse of time all apparent trace* of bygone empires are often lost in
oblivion. Like itudem* fiUiat in the missing words in broken leniences m language
examination by certain clues an important clue ii provided by certain words and phrases
which, pregnant with history, continue to float down the corridors of time to posterity
evea after mE other tangible traces of the empires they echo art loot forever.
Phrases tike "The sun never set on the British empire" or "England was the mistress of
the seas'* will continue to ipeak of the worldwide sway of the British for ages after all
records and memories of their empire are lost, so long at those terms continue to linger in
the English language. Those two little phrases will be enough proof of a vanished British
empire even though all other records arc lost,
In the Marathi language also one may cite a phrase watch exudes history. It is very
common to exclaim in Marathi do you think yourself to be...Do you deem yourself lobe
Bai.rao V If one with no knowledge of history concludes f thnt brief expression Ihai
Bajirao must ha Maharashtriyan potentate he would be absolutely nght did in fa
suzerain rower. So even after all m
records are l,v,. that little phraw lin|*ri* "> (he
jUftfti will continue *P ik *"" umc * historian nbou iniibed empire of Bajirao,
It*
t!G
actually
which gives rise to
WW* ''
inn* ^ efrflhatloM
empire wh,cn B ' v " " 5C lo Sttc| retrace (h existence of vanished
.^^^'i ;^ions s a ,urntcd with history
'be wafted over lllc-
current m our day contain no mention 0 f CU . u.nHu empire. B there are ft
,Ieiin of an ""*" "'' whic h testify to such an empire
**"' 7a" Vien. Hind
cider the word "Arya". M* communities from
Ld m o"J*" TurkJ , nd Afghans across Europe and
Enphibraen to Iran - ( j$ because they wctc all
** call ** "J" h , c . tfee Arya or Hindu way of
rr^^"'^ d SjyT connotes*
^becausea number of nationalities in the remote past had adopted the Hindu way ih the
Arya way of life they call themselves Aryans As a race they couldn't have been so prolific
as to people the whole of Europe and most of Asia, But Ihey could all profess Hinduism
during the spread of the Hindu empire even as Christianity and Islam spread with their
respective empires. Our conclusion therefore is that whichever community calls itself
"Arya" to this day unwittingly admits that it once followed Hinduism i.e. the Vedik or the
Hindu way of life In short they were all Hindus.
We now take another expression, It is often repeated in history thai the Arabs picked up
all their knowledge or learning from India Unfortunately the full implication of this little
assertion hat been lost on the world.
What is vaguely mumed from that expression is that some my. sporadic Arab visitors who
happened to strav into India from time to time fq random visits may have * assimilated
lAdiia knowledge md by some magic spread it among the Arabs. iU an absurd
presumption. Knowledge cannot be mugged up fro* one country .ad spewed over another
by such stray
111
random v|u. Many SU ch iravdl.ta neve, mo, a * sbert homeland. Tbose few who do kick
,he mc . p. llCBC 0r JJ" loP ain*takinply leftffl all Indian sciences and sru On icnirn th-
y |acl the means or authority to collect alt their country and teach them all the knowledge
that they could pick up fa India-
One country imbibe* the learning of another only ,f ,t lt subject to the other's rule. Take
the case of Indians leraing English.
Indians took to English learning only when the British came to rule in India. Indians who
lived in pockets of tcrritoriei ruled by the 1 rench and the Portuguese had to study those
foreign curricula. Thus one country's learning rrmeaiint another becomes possible only
if tl ruled over the other. This proves that the Arabs got all their learning from India
became the Arab people once formed part of the Hindu empire, Tu those who would want
to know when wa that we would say it wns from the lime of the Vedas almost tu the
lime of Prophet Mohammad, Encyclopaedias record that Arabs in tbeir twwl>-cultivated
islamic fury soon wiped out root and branch all traces of then prc-Moliammad life,
Islam and Christianity in their own way have remarkably succeeded in making new
converts slur over their past aad speak very apologetically about tbeir ancestors. Thus If
one were to ask a Eurorean about his pre-Christian ancestors or an Arab, Turk or Iranian
about bis pre-Mohammad picdtca. all that they do is to shrug their shoulders and say ibat
ancestors were just people of no consequence, thej ei heathens and vagel with no
h,story to talk of implying * they were all idiot* or scoundrels.
History docs not admit of such ^ *"^JT g knows that people have had wdisestablished
1"^^ a very rcmoie past much before a Chn>t or Such brushing aw ay. blushing or denial*
jwl *
its
it history, obliterated by Christianity and
When we dn w wor i dwidc Hindu empire. I n
MB m. m find f " 1 of (hm , tmpkt piece by piece we come
reeoDirructinf we k V0 | UraC > about that lost
* words eodphreini
Hindu empire
v nth*r expression which exude* history is the Vedic
J^tZ"vi** Ary^" which mean, S pre ad r Zw-"nife^uhout,he -rid. Incidentally this
rlvel *at Ary.-ta'' was something which cot.Id be spread.
that . m not a rice which has to be inherited. The command to spread "Aryanfam"
throughout the world can only emanate from people who know how big the world is and
who had the means to spread their way of life throughout the world. Such means include
a well-trained, disciplined army, a band of administrators, religious preachers, educators,
scientists and artists and an enligh'cned, enviable civilization.
Another very significant phrase ingrained "in Hindu literature ii "Wnudhahr*
Kutumbakam" which means that the whole umterse (earthly life) is one family. This is
what the ancient Hindu* ac:aj||y practised Wherever they wentand they spread all over
the eirththey welded the people in a common brotherhood owing allegiance to a
common culture and common nouns of behaviour which did not demand any
subservience to a Mohammad, Christ or Buddha. That was the Arya (enlightened) *> of
life which disseminated light, knowledge, culture and service bui demanded nothing in
return.
The ancient h.s.ories (PuranaiJ of the Hindus also contain
able references in the practice of exploratory conquest
a>ooya Ml i Aihwainedh rituals. Mighty Hindu
Mttft*! captioned ho.se, backed with their
M* "*"*** ,and!;tnd *** Sanaian" wty 0 r
ihe '"Hindu, Aryan,
Since Hind us than (India! *
>n three iidei the only
? b it ihe north-
fcwrn, Afghanistan, Iran
r ^he._ llIhrccildc|lhc0nIy
It tl ^ hPnClCOttld 0 ^ Hlhewlh-
W*. through Baluchi
;ij
, B d Turkey that the Hindu empire spread Ml WeiW euT ope. Afrta and across Rij lan s
lbcris ,, " w * ** ira ces of til* * H "">u empire over the b nd ZL.JJ *> win be
dealt ith m subsequent chapten abtrte
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND HOl^sTiF HISTORY SCHOLARS
s culled
and school
Off in J on newspapers regale us with choice howler frc* answers of candidates appearing
at U.P.S.C
and college examinations.
But m their turn uch candidates mo may derive Co from the though that they are in
distinguished company n binaries thai arc being taught to ihem and are the handfowfr ofi
long line of scholar* with formidable academic or bureau
critic reputation*, abound in equally amusing howlers.
Nctfcct or *>me artnthl principles of historical research *:r mt ***** W **" W-. imbed
* o*n life-uott VlLh hjV,,lfi buih lhc,r H>vxn tomb< mlbia
Another howler .u Ataeuibau All hV innumerable Indian cities like
f **Pt Silri ana , ' Firo ^ad. Fyzabad. Aura Delhi, Tu *, Arabt, Afek UBpUr arc * Utc <l >
nave been built *>
^ *n fact I ln, * Abyftinil *. Kazaks. Uzbeks, Monfitf *emciv ei . * " cry oth *r
community except the Indian*
ia,Cf ^ L ,hat lhc * e al,cns w hose mediaeval of
,e ^f^vftitjngk to*, of architecture
Crc "^-builderi vvho built cities, fox**-
120
121
palace* and mansion, in India l Q thci[ h(Jndredl con necnon one may fe. if (|w (oun ^
of ^^ ^
be credited to Ain.tslmh and or Firoiabad lo tome Firmd bcc.we ta dues bear their n. m
(hen the fovmd.J Allahabad would have lo be credited to Allah himself 1
A fourth howler i> the MM that the in* adinB Mmtm% %ho hated everything Hindu, built
all their tombs, mosques forli mansions and palaces exclusively in the Hindu style
A fifth howler is that Muslim invaders and ruler* built tombs after tombs for dead
predecessors, and mosque* a r, cr mosques far the rabble but hardly anv pnlncei nod
manm** I themselves or their children. Thus utmost every dead fa1 cweeper, nobleman,
queen or lulun connecicd with ihc Mutli court in India bj lOtrte magic, got a mansion to
house h dead body but no mansion to live in while alive and Kicking.
A sixth howler is that every ruler who used lo thirst fox blood of his father and brothers,
got so overwhelmed with filial love after vv resting lite throne as lo work himself to
bankruptcy in raising palatial tombs for his hated and murdered kinsmen
A seventh howler could be thai though Sbahjahjii s own Badshahnania (Biblioiheca
truhca series of the Asiatic Society of Bengal publication, sol. 1, page 40*) .idmiu tliat lUc
1 Mahal is an earlier Hindu palace our histories contain frow lent but lusty and nostalgic
accounts cl Slulij.ih.in raiuiti mausoleum over an open plol ui Ijml
Vn c^hlh limslcr is lhat a whole host el iheonin built up utound an imaginary race of
Aryan* illicit i ' nn existed, ilau ihere been am Aryan race the ArjJ Sam ij have been a
rank communal organization relusmc BdmJ) to those with non-Aryan ancestry.
OonllWiMw Vl is an all-cucompassing organization .fljiicfc dtW not rw disnnclions oi
caste, creed, rate or nationality-
All such error, are the resuli of a COJnpleU ntfte* d * ^ery basic rules of historical
research melbodolog)
r*1 of hi*ical research i> a dcicctfe* ^^^KT^^gunihie one Prof. W.ll. W.lah i.
..pcirrr^^ -! " whei1 * M "* ta rcJUJ
hH N* rrflcm '^J " 0 .her of IN -oriiin-l wmH*, lie doei a !j,ictnenl m one r nlt j 1lldc to
It, d he knows his
niM ,tomKilly PCpi ^ decye wht|herw not l0
^ e nUZU-no.ee. -dency of complete in ;
the Taj Mahal
After quotinf Collrapwood who compares . historian's
^dure w,.h that of, dctecuve. P.of. Walsh adds the .
Thitonan acdy prttt He *^< **
"f nceeoary. to doubt even h firmed belief*." We do not see
p^in, .. Hi case of the Taj Mahal and ~M
.no,- bu.ld.ngi and unships even though ihe.r Mu.hm
authorship ha* been questioned.
The other essential for historical research is a legal approach. A morale taking down o
confession by a suspect ia enjoined I y li to forewarn the suspect that he is not bound to
mike i confettion, but if he chose to make one. his statement would be utcd -gainst him
hut not in h.i favour, Muslim chronicles arc such interested >l.iteatnis ami must, if at all,
be Used agatust the paruenn who>e favour they make chauvinstic claims but never in
their favour.
Lord Sankcy in his address to the Historical Association. London in 1939 underlined the
principle of legal approach by kttasinf the resemblance between the work of the historian
and Out of the lawyer
Or G.J. Kernel in hi* book''History, its purpose and Method"*:ui The law by Us
fftslidious adherence to ibe rules of evidence deliberately exercises seir control, and
sacrifices atain and Again us chances of reaching a conclusion. Law 'justifiably more
dueling and more critical in its handling of eudeace ihun the historian who lives in a
world of relativity."
123
Current Indian hUtocidS ,re based on acant tupctt for . legal marthallmg and sifting of
,dcncc. Thus even iho nalf , dozen name* are being merrily bMd|f(| ^ persons ballttwl to
be architects of the Tj Mahal. U, p, Ilud of c0 nstruciion vanes in different version* from
10 to 22 year* ilK cost is lackadaisically speculated to be anywhere between Ri 40 lakhs
and R< 9 crores and 17 lakhs, and the Tarikh-i'Taj Mahal document is stated W be a
forgery by Kcene (in hit "Handbook for Visitors to Agra iind its Neighbourhood*"to
name only a few of the loopholes in the Shahjahan legend, protagonists of the traditional
view fall to smell a rat became their historical face lucks a legal *nO>c\
A third aid necessary for historical research is logic. Logic is justly called the science of
sciences been use ii deals with fault* less rersoning which is a basic requirement for
arriving 4t correct conclusions in any field. Lei us take a practical cuwpk If a corpse bears
a note that the deceased hat committed suicide and so nobody should be blamed, but if a
stab wound is detected in its back the logical conclusion would be that the death is the
result of murder and the note is a planted forgery. Such logical discrimination in refuting
the written word with concrete circumstantial evidence has been sadly lacking in arriving
at many a conclusion in Indian and world historic*,
A fourth requirement of historical research is original thinking. In India unfortunately
every person sporting a degree in history or employed in teaching history or tcrv.nf
department or institution dealing w.h history H lotfW W both by the lay public and by
himself as an 'hiMorian Walsh observes "historians olten lack th* iMltfn * JJ in
adequate reconstruction. .and find them* , ohe(cnt
recite isolated facts without being able to lit them t I ^ ^ Picture. The process of
imaginative ** HllldJCJ
hfaftrM thinking, Collingwood report! a *""" " iib hi* that the "historian's criterion is
lonrtt to the study him i elf,"
of the evidence, and IBM
*> htrfnrlcAl research i> that the researcher
W *""'in "'", k^o .hou.d b, wmctMu or rebel. Ot. tM ,, r >* > _ historian." Prof.
Walsh
SSKTt^Sl^S - >- ** or
~v liiul tlifW and technieal- in cbeckm, up facu or concept
^dcddovvntoh.rn. In India the tendency has benjust the
? ntuii wmdv to meticulously toe the traditional hac, and
every Kcmpt to question traditional dogma* is branded as rule
iicres*.
The sth dimension necessary for historical ICsearch is tha? of penius. Such genius
manifests itself by making the researcher's blood boil and heart burn If, a* F.C.S. Schiller
says, "doubt sets in when an alleged truth fails to satisfy us". In Indian history
unfortunately nobody ts perturbed even if a hundred doubts ifB raised against current
concepts.
The seventh i equircment ol genuine research is what O.N. Cl.uk calls "a readiness to
perpetually revise and correct the detail* of accepted conclusions."
Psychological freedom is another essential for worthwhile research. The laic American
Piesidenl Franklin Delano Roosevelt once observed that one can never (discover the truth
unless one leels free to search for it Unfortunately teachers, professors and government
servants connected with history in India experience a feeling of being gagged and caged
behind bureaucratic bars. It is, therefore, but natural that there should be a
piete lack, of any worthwhile research in Indian history though there it id fact so much to
discover because ol ihe piles tiotis and discrepancies ihat have nccumuiaud over u
thousand yean of alien rule in India
125
A the above dimensions have been sadly iMfct* l0 , ,,_ Jfirg e extent in Indian hmoncal
lewarcr, That ii whv iw Walsh fell compelled to observe that "claim , 0 icleatffte tia! often
made for modern historians at least is one which cinnoi be sustained ' This ... even more
true with regard to .hov* to orc called historians ,n lndir. bee* u here cven commufl
aT1 d chauvinistic considerations, further inhibit their research freedom These are the
reasons why current historical toft are full of blunder* and howler*.
17
TmTERIA TO TEST THE EXISTENCE OF AW ANIENT HINDU EMPIRE
There it an important method of collecting and collaring taowfedf* of irnkiMMW or only
vaguely sensed events That method iifo proceed from the known to the unknown. It j s
ihis ine:hn,l c art going to use in establishing the criteria proving the existence of
empire* of which history has tost met.
Lei us take the example of the British empire which started progressively fading out from
1947 A.D. Because the British ruled i very large part of the world their language. English,
came Li? bespoken in th: wide region from America to Australia. Thai it to say any power
which claims to have had a world empire must prove that its language held sway in a large
part of the world.
The second criterion is about religion or way of life. Wherever the British ruled their
religion namely not only Christian.iy i even their ve-j .hide of Christianity i. c.
protestantism and orEnghnd cameo hive a large following. This rurher emphasized by
showing that in India the territory
*" " ,ed bv *c Portuguese and .'ondichcrry und tmall ,.hlivhments were governed by the
Trench for
!!? SinCeb0 ' htbe P-rtuguese and the French
^"Zt"^lZ***** rrM in ihciI
elite md iJJ! "^guages too were patronised by the
'lltab.irnu , ? l ^ l<ffll "' ** ICSPCClive '""tones. It ^nt-Muu.l dom" *,,,*" r C mry ho,d
* administrative-popular re Eton-cum*wav of life become*
127
The third criterion io prove the existence of . tft . , empire is provided hy customs,
mythology. nann * on e country bemgla evidence over * UfW h^^T* Tho* for
instance wherever the Christian power* like the firm %he Freneh. the Portuguese, the
Dutch, the Germans . n4 1, Italians ruled there their customs like Sunday prayers arul
observance of Christmas, their names, their idols like those Christ and Mary, their
mythology, their sacred book* Iftc the Bible, and their (Weslcrn-typc, names came to be
pir-g'esi, adopted. Similary when the Arabs struek across the t*orld with torch and sword
ihey succeeded io terrorizing tISt km-tories from Africa to Indonesia into accepting Islam.
Ngt* the descendants or those terrorized convent having forgotten I gruesome
experiences of their ancestors continue ta dote . Islam proving the proverbial ignorance
to be bits? Any vonim-nity which claims to have been a world-power must, there; prove
that its customs, mythology, names and pods had bet accepted over a large part of the
world
The fourth criterion of a worldwide empire i* oi weight* and measures. When one country
rules mer large parts of iiie world its weights and measures come to be adopted in rh
territories. Thus in the territories where the British ruled a held political power even
through pro*'", H* **" " U the pound, and ton. the bushel, the foot and .he >i] IKfl
adopted.
-r t.m^ Thus when Ifu The fifth criterion b of measures online 'J* , Hh
Ul i. vivtirtn calendar DcFinwi
Europeans ruled .he world ***" wlf llull c .,** January I a* the Nc Year Doy,iMj*
measures oftimc lik= secondsand mmu.es
The sixth criterion of a forgotten cmP* * ..educational control Where... fc.wpwJ1 ^ ,
particular system of education was""
126
. .tirir teachers doming, their language becam t * adopted fW r fll {hcjr |ys(cnlf me|hod
iicrion fe' determining the existence of a
^ ^ bMriM t* fcoprarh.cal and topographical
"^Eas^S*- far* par. of the *0tld tend, to
" m * J,onv Vrrirorics, countries, ICM, rivers, mountain,.
3S to I, own M " * ta *
When we claim list ein rd$au Kshatriyas had a world-id* wnplre .houch hkuiy has
lost trace of It, we prove that claim m* .be help Of all the V ca '" enumerated and clue
dared Shove, Tn doing *o we ore following oily accepted method* or education and
learning. For instance m geometry onr nam bv defining It point and line and then
proceed* from theorem te Ifceofeei. In proving forgotten historical facts too we si j r mi -
m11 jly inconsequential clue*, Just as a geometrical fine i made up of small, flimsy Jot*
similarly a ponderous !hetis can b? built up by joining together tiny see-rninrly in mi
clues m'o a strong siring of irrefutable
evidence
M the r> u **et i' may be aided as to why at all history rincs of an f-ndent Hindu world
empire if there did There are several explanations. One explain The illimitable expanse of
time past event* eel ojliiemcJ from public memory and record. This rifled by the reader
from hi* own experience. If you io late even me mere name of your great egsndintner
vir ,drUmbk *" * kimi the name of ^jou would lam practically nothing
to-, *' *" "-penence i. Knot difficult to
"" ' " ^children are also likely to be
VIM why our histories conmin no
119
mention or a" ancient worldwide Hindu empiTC mttortaa, h ,vo forgoueo it. The ancient
Hindu empire Hi* h pped out or the j r memory But its detail* may stftl be iaH?atd by
the methods discussed by us above. The trace* of ihe ancient Hindu world empire go'
obliterated from history with new erapirci mVInc its pJw* fa the WM w& y m woeeedlai
tencta-tuiai forget the older ones
The second reason why the ancient Hindu world empire nas been forgotten is vandalism.
Like the writing oa sand being progressively wiped out by surging wave* or the lea
successor regimes obliterate traces of old regime*. Records tnd traces of an ancient world
Hindu empire were obliterated bv waves of Christian domination which first swept
Europe and then the other regions of the world- The traces of the Hindu empire which
escaped the Christian onslaughts, were wiped out bv another great sweep namely that of
the barbaric \rahs destroying all its their wake in the name of Islam.
The third reason why history gets wiped out is calamities and cataclysms, whether man-
made or natural, tike famine invasions, termites, poverty, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes
and massacres.
The mere fact. Mm ** ' h <> ,mki * " "? 2 of an ancient Hindu weld .mpir. * -* -
**
such an empire can be proved, h * WPj '* down ahove. When philosophy *% m
rfc, .he cx.s.cnce of even sueh abstract MM* ^ ^
death, there i, no reason why concrete clue, use of to rc-picce past events
icm-ft of an
ancient *s8*
The task of proving the ^ ic ^ ^ tbe
becomes more difficult because ol M _ ^ ^ lCCflrt 'empire* concept. People rcoJ to
EWJI Con ^ uculiy I
of the tyranny of one peoplt ^T^A* * ****" those who ire vaguely aw.uc Of the s
, tend [o fccniial the memories of thai em P i re tfiucbcmP'* , _ ft , c allowed to remain
unnoticed and bi J bdter be fofgouen or
unrecorded.
. tin choInt(ic in the first instance. An histo- "t t nu*r no. be swayed by politics, rita
*" |CldC " h duIy t o discover fact* which are u n -A. *. . fu ,| y fcnown.
Secondly the altitude of
k ^\lTn I W eoenisancc of an M Hindu world rnr^r i,n,,.nce. The Hindu empire, un.ike
rhm Mi,n and M.hm empires was not tyrannical It was a ij snarl from olher empires,
Hindu conquerors and explorers certainly spread all over
: i accompanied by armies even as one arms oneself with
i hcn u ins d irk or unknown regions. But that was
aom ike Wlatern migrants cU>nittfi the forested wastes
rfnw American continents and exploring the frozen wastes at
df Thev tfete actuated bv motives of advancing the
fffVftifJee political freedom, social emancipation
xad esrarifk exploration,
qKead of the ancient Hindus fi. c. Aryans) from Hindu-
fadtaVom the rest or ihr world was for even more
altfuiilit oh ice lives. They were the first
nil- not nnly io achieve material progress but
weJal and political system which defined the
^ of all humans fanrf in fact of everv
b which the higher a person climbed in
me .usiere w lnt , jfc hc |cd Thus lho&c
WN of social evolution were enjoined
'I ' ^vablc or immovable property
;* **~ -JESS* 1 * ,cvci ** **
j
in
The way successor regime* tend i 0 force * ro - nnl oppressed world ran, h: iHuuraled
w.ih reference ^w^ tc*t books.
Tn > ie hook* htvc tended to din into the tan f Ihe 2 oih century intelligentsia that
before the advent of Christianity man was at Ihe aboriginal stage lftd lHll S| W|i |he
Western explorers, geographers and setentiiti who Artt discovered that the earth was
round, thai Hi equatorial ,mh measures about 25,000 miles that their pioneen for the fl n
t time located the unknown American continents and that it vt their scholars who
developed medicine, geometry etc etc
These bogus claims can be pricked in no time by pointine out that Indian astronomy
which is of untraceable antiquity, because it is seen to exist no matter how far back in
time we go, had been accurately predicting eclipses and other cosmic phenomena Could
the ancient Hindu acquire such proficiency In cosmic mathematics without knowing thai
Ihe earth and other planets were spherical, that the equatorial girth of the earth w about
25.U0O miles etc. fn fact their knowledge about cosmology was more perfect than even
the wiitSI of our own space-ship generation. This is apparent from their very scientific
terminology vuch as Guru i. e. 'great' or "big* for Iiraitet *hch it the largest in the solar
syslem : *K*}*' for Mars signifying thit Mar. broke away from the earth, etc. If the ancieai
Hindu knew the girth and .he expanse of the earth doe< ll wmd i in .hat until
Columbus discovered the Americas iniha Wih century no one knew about them ?
Thisemphasizes ihe need r ah> ^im S the cupac.y to follow <ome historical logic and
** * corollaries from known facts.
Like astronomy the ancient Hindu, m * JjJ^JJ
developed fMtf lime* immcmona \^ ir A ^J their ibi** lecture, music, medical sy*icm
calted Ayut ^ ^ ifA
phicaldoeirmes and trigonometry (because [ _ mai} h
ii than difficult to deduce that they had "
^t became human edncaitmi and other
* * r " -nJ wr-dependent. If < bc hurmin br * ,n m ** be ^.dor^' 1 * ,l * ,,,n , 4riJf J(rTc
rertlkir.Hor^lciit u can never
, i!( ;rd .^-cd * J' munl iy only * ** of thoic cell,
133
toaent
imiiihrnily lH" ,cVel whilc thw * '^ * in * s , , J c , Moreover all sciences and am
docm.t fli ht flbor.8^ B(| f cl oting projrew in one
^rw-nr"*^^* rtMic progress in other brunches, ipto facti proses *'
of human endeavour.
. , .. , on | C | ui return to our main point of
Anc rthh Utile d. ? r e ,onlc. ^
^ C :r j "l Z^v The tlwidc sweep of the
ni * f obe ashamed of They spread over .he world at
Urn when human.ty poping for <o P h,st,ca<ed direction
M J Tritoihfp il the aboricinal level This is the first thtng .0
be understood Secondly, unlike Christians and Muslim* forcing
people tc-accept a Chrial *r Mohammad. Hindus only enforced
roles and principlei which parents impose on their children
ike earlv to ri*e and early to bed, telling the truth, bard work,
ilfruum. constancy in marriage, affection for the human Crater-
Biy and resoect for all life Hnltt udmhis'ratinn was thus
eontptetelt free ifdwrma. chauvinism and exploration. Any
chainiement me r ed out was only correctional like that of the
mother of her children for love and with a desire to reform A
fraphie proor or thi* k ihai wherever Indian rulers, admlnist-
t and educa'or* went they settled down and merged with
people The Hindus never treated the local? as second-
i/eai or as objects of contempt unlike the record of
Tjfi,. Peniuns and other Muslim communities which
fdia and forced their own dogmas during B millcnium of fcorror and terror.
After having thus underlined the academic necessity nf
1 important historical clues 10 advance
^ now)ed,e ab 0 ui forgotten hletoiy and having explained
***** racr "<> of the world empire of the ancient
Hindu* i* nothing to be tsWed of but iometh lcl . to he MJ , {ot th c whole 01
humanity W C lhiU now p ^ *<*
of the criteria which help us prove ihe etnt en
of th empire.
We shall briefly explain, point by poini. how e4ch of . sc ven criteria elucidated by us
atove prove the eUtoee 0 f. f or gotten world empire of the ancient Hindus.
The language WJticK the ancient Hindus spoke *asSnikrit as is apparent 110m the Veda*
which ate in Sanskrit and which have been generally acknowledged 10 be the ancient mon
human literature in existence. If, therefore, other languages bear some affinity to Sanskrit
ihcy arc obviously derivati> of Sanskrit, and not collaterals. All the so-called lode-Aryan
languages are noihing but derivatives of Sanskrit becaose the Sanskrit-speaking Hindus
had spread Sanskrit over the ancient world and had conducted education through the
medium of Sanskrit. Tim has been illustrated by showing above bow eveo to our own oay
ancient Sanskrit acaocmic nomenclature sumvci by relet uu 10 the world 'trigonometry.'
In iaci explaining the existence ol an ancient litndu empue is very important aeade*
mtcatly because the existence ol sucn an empire ulone adequately explains why Greek,
Latin, Italian, German, French. SpaaUh, English, Hussian ana otlici Lmopcan languages,
Persian, Pushtu Turkish ana most ol the languages ol the tar East uul carry a substantial
coiuent of Sanskrit.
Incidentally, the icrrn 'Undo-Aryan" is a misnomer because 'Indian' and Aryan axe
synonyms. The *AryV Dliarma. the way oi life oi the Hu.au*. Hence what is Ar>aa
Therefore the term '-Judo-Aryan" ,s duplication oi 11 n|ie It should be clear then how
the term In* Ar>an "*^ sizes the Indian origin of all European languages 19 those ol the
Middle and Far East.
We had mentioned the second criterion J*^* ff ,
n< Ufa* WAS *P** JU
Indian religion i.e. the Indian *ay rf ^ HlB j u |fld major part of the oncieni world".
The *o -i
n ,*ciifJ laoi everywhere in ihe ancient Wor , d MheF t-sitothe American continents
i n ih e
" ke wnip *tf *h c * un flnd coW and lhe cobrtt nd I '.<, .as aJso prevalent in most
part* of the world n
"ed bl ( H' nd,,s - ' Ary *" * S lbC lCrm Wb,Ch 5 '* n,ftCS ^ e ine ancieot Indian way of
life. Since Aryanism barf
Mud * * l f e P art 01 ,hC IU,C,e01 W r,d ** find a " Euro * *a* Jrimans, Turk* and
many other peoples still proudly
JTflm* themselves Aryans. Some of them also retain Aryan
(yaboli like the Swasuk among the Germans and the Sbakti-
ibalra alia* the six*pointed Star of Solomon among the Jews,
The third criterion we have specified is thai of mythology
customs, names and God>. AII these could be shown to have
been adopted from India by the ancient world. Jt has already
been stated bou the Hindu God Shiva used lo be worshipped
all the world over, ti was worshipped in what are now believed
in be ibe headquarters of Christianity and Islam namely at the
\ uiitdn m Italy and in Mecca respectively. The Pope's anccs-
im *at Hindu priest*. Their Vatican is the Sanskrit word
Vaiica meaning a bower i.e. u syhan hermitage. The Vatican
punmo b*\< nun> Mm a emblems buncd in their walls and
Ian Many >ucb ancient Hindu Shita emblems have been
JujuphiHnJy Some o'f those found in the Vatican are siiH
hi tin- Vatican** Etruscan museum The Hindu
shjra legend of the flautist who charmed men and beasts i*
>idl pan or Scandinavian and Italian iiadiimn. The Scundina-
i name, cndinc m Sen' m in 'Amundsen and 'Suienscn* are
Bo* endjji|< as , Bhadmcn and Ugrasnn, The Ln^lish word
"farf*- In the English dictionary to originate
Hrj miwfiif* fortified place' fhai is obviously the
**'*** Ourfi' It, tU er derivation unl.no,,, to the
E u," h imWOrd " Pu ' , ^ <o*n or locality. The
P o 1 k l0 Ft0nOUnCC " PUfat " *"* * 'Singapore' and
BoCb rr V* Wm ^ <" *** iheiuwij. lo f r th " countries there ,s great similarity in
135
tbc Czechoslovaks, Yugoslav etc.) are .| ** Ln worshipping in ancient limes Hindu
deliiei ! ndu Yan *^ Moksha (the God of Death), v.m B U he Goa ^ ^* in d Handashwa
alias Hordes tf*. the sun) and min y other,.
In Siberia the local people Mill worship the Hindu God M u " signifying the giver of
longevity, when anybody uteo seriously ill- That this is au anc,ent Hindu custom, ii j
10 mentioned in Urna Sitaram's article about the Hindu Brahmin sect of South Indian
Ayyars. The article appeared m ihe "Illustrated Weekly of India" (published from
Bombay) dated January 23, 1972. On page 8 of the issue, a picture caption reads
"AYUSHYAHOMAM. It is customary for paremi to perform a havan (i.e. offer oblations to
a sacred fire) on the birthday of their children. Ayu-devata or tbc deity presiding over
one's lifespan and Mrityunjaya (Siva the vanqubbet of death) arc invoked," The Japanese
also worship Hindu deities in their Shinto shrines. In fact the term 'Shinto" is itself a
corrupt formof Sindhu or Hindu standing tor the religion of tbc Indus region i.e.
Hinduism. That the region from Afghanistan to Korea followed Hinduism is of course still
recorded in world histories. But even the ancient Maya and luea civilization* of the
Americas were Hindu, Even Buddhism that has spread over the world is a successor
Hindu cull which ipso facto presupposes the existence of the earlier orthodox Hmduum
in the very same regions. The Hindu title "Kcsan" (meaning '"Lion") for kings may be
seen to have been applied even to German monarch* as "Kaiser" and to Romans as
'Caesar'' Ulso pronounced "Kaiser" by the Romans). The Hindu honorific "Sri" may also
be seen lo be widely prevalent all o*er the world as "Sir" alias Sriman in England and as
"Signer in &0 *">rn Europe. The Hindu honorific for u woman is Shrimau* which is still
applied in Europe as "Signorita.'* In fe ln * English word 'man' is the end partirf lhe
Sanskrit word Sriman baaing Miner.
Wt*
U6
on we had mentioned lo retrace the 0lrf> TIK ^* cn "' ire ihai of the wide prevalence of
d*** ***_ ^e worldwide adoptian of the m eaWlt ,!!* and ^ r a 0 f people from poets
to clothiers j.
-Mei ,,|l va *!fi ltr , commonly used in Hindu medici^ ,hcHind " W f r i,rrepresent
quantity <> othct things. The in dF<*"* nnd ( _ flni0C i2 inches and the division of a
hne Eof] .ifa erm f(Wrt ^* lrans | a tton of the Sanskrit word of verse, also is The fifth
criterion i* the measure of
" C ^"Mhbe'folloii -e.suremem* 0 , ,,nie V ,h! *olit second to the days, months
and year as ha, tune from me *P Ai , lhis cou jd not have been possible
IESSSS---"-- -
ncaUfctMwkkk helps us re-piee Ihe exigence o. , .,.. * thai or educational conliol. Il
liai been
ni.Lmonlva^med.batthe Indians educated^ Arab, , D Uihe latter educated Europe. This
belief need* a slight aiodibcat.on. Since Arabia happened lo be a transit area on ihc roue ol
Indian educators and administrators proceeding to Lurope and the America* it ha* been
wrongly assumed tiiat u was the Arabs, who educated the %eatern world. In fact it was ihc
Indians who suuuliaaeously imparted education to ihc resi
.he ancient world in all continent* like Asia, Europe and the Americas. Moreover >mec
the ancient Hindu* regarded the wade of humanity as a common brotherhood it mattered
little netber the educator, proceeding to teach in Jburope or the Americas were actual!)
resident* of India or Arabia or any other tjuniry. This was lurther immaterial becau&e
they all practised Hinduism and shared the same knowledge in the
cocci, ihe am and religion! procedure. Under Hindu rule
there were no national or political barriers. A human being
ot need vim and passports to travel from one pa" to
anoihci because the ancient Hindus in their broad-minded view
world hated to make any distinctions between regions of
137
|hc earth and men and women who mhabucd those trie* That all scenees and arts and
rc.ig.ous mu ^^
IMIU *" f he H,ndu * h " bec Sllttiltnte^l lbo%e '*?
mM "Trigonometry' meaning the study of Ihtee-dime^ ulc . lSl ircments. It may also be
noted that what ltu Afabi lW yunani system ol medicine is nothing but , hc Hmdu A ve
d. Obviously Us name'Unanr' sigmhes that Hindu m e d le i experts from India must
have been proceeding .0 Arab* .hrough w hal e caiJ Greece today. This corroborates our
observation above that the popular nouon ol ihc Arabs having spread Indian learning in |-
ur'Pe '* not quite true.
Ihescscmli criterion, iiunnuncil h> us, lo test ihc existence oi an ancient lorgoucu oinptrc.
is thai ol geographical as topographical names prevalent over Ihc world in trie language
and I ash ion ol the ruling com iuu nils
The ancient alios n replclc wills Sanskrit. The terms ending with ihc sulltx "MIWiV it in
properly spelled as "stanj as in na]u> chisibau, Atgrjanistliaii, tvuruisiuan, Kahnsiuun,
^Chinese) I uikisitian. Gnu culls man, UuurucniMhan, Arvasman icorrupicd iu Arabia),
Kd/uKstlian, LbckLnnn etc, are all iauskrjt. Similarly Bftthmnaoslt iJfttrciaj, Java,
Sumatra, Malay, Singapore, Iraq, Iran ilrom we ianiKfil rout ir* as Iraaati mal-pronounced
as l rraw adyj. are also Sanskrit. Worts ending m land' as in Lngland', Deutseblaud' arc ail
Sansarit. The terms Syrians and Assyrians sigmiy the Sur" and Asur* commun.lKi
mentioned in ihc Indian epics. They all spoke Sanskrit for several centuries until they lost
touch sviih India. CM West Asia called Nishapur, Jaiidishapur, Kamsar. NwUM *d
Samarkand and localities, say, in England ending with as in 'Shrewsbury' 'Anbury* and
Watcrbury' are all 5uun
Thus vvc see how all the criteria for .est.ng the ^ -an ancient Hindu empire unerringly
point to ^
inch an empire though it ha* faded out JT"^ mmDl History texts published hereafter
must rewrite
chamert *&* P****" * nt worldwide Hindu , m LhVhclpofdu^d^usscd by us above
and Similttf .
that m.v be d.cm*red. People must also give up the lend wtoiplicMybdievcthiipfan event
finds no mention j a ^ hirtorie* it must not have happened. Man not being omni$ci etll
his knowledge ii never perfect or complete. Knowledge a | 5t) rends to disappear and has
to be rediscovered That i$ why ^
substj.
That is ihink and
to be rediscovered school examinations candidates are taught lo lute missing words in
given broken sentences. One must m forget that discipline so thoughtfully taught in
school curricu. lum*. tl is an important discipline to prepare the adult to imilarK provide
the missing links in different branches nf
knowledge including history.
18
TRACES OF AN HINDU WORLD EMPIRE
In the illimitable expanse of time many facts are irretrivably lost and forgotten. One such
is that of a worldwide empire of the ancient Hindus. Our history books of the 20th
century make no mention of an ancient, worldwide Hindu empire partly out of ignorance
and partly out of cussedness. People all ihc world over have been so thoroughly
brainwashed m to overlook ull recurring signs and proofs of the world empire of the
ancient Hindus and today if anybody claims that an ancient Hindu empire did exist he is
looked upon either as a fool or a knave.
Luckily, however, wc do have traces of evidence left scattered all the World over, which if
pieced together painstakingly, will leave no doubt iq anybody's mind about the existence
of a worldwide empire of the ancient Hindus,
There are two main reasons why old history gets forgctten and lost ; one is that as every
new generation is born the hiitory of the older ones gets progressively fo.gotten. Ask any
iadm-dual how much he knows about the life of his father know just a little. About his
grandfather he will know m less. And about his great grandfather he may not even knew
the name. This shows, how, as time advances, the earlier generations is progressively
pushed into oWiwobi >
This is but nMt*l be** :ordcd fuel* is limited
The other important reason why history gets'^"^ ouen is human animosities and
rivalries, m*
natural process of forget fulness.
men's capacity to remember or store rec<
139
ort armed * iih sword and torch and hammer and sickle |0 ib FtiematicaU) hammering
down, burning or destroying In diwie other Irtyi the traces of older civilizations Thin i
rac0t ofthe ancient Hindu world empire got obliterated through tyiremitic onslaughts or
otber faiths like Christianity ^ Ultra
In Europe and the Americas it was mainly Href the Christianj
tfcho obliterated all vestiges of the Hindu empire, fn Asia it w 4 ,
miinjy the Islamic onslaught which want onls destroyed Hmdu
history and appropriated Hindu buildings as own mosques and
lombs.
But fortunately there are ways and means of reconstructing the story of past events even
after ll evidence has been icem-jogJ> systematically destroyed even as muitfet is. often
brougnt home to trie assassin even after tie has taken gi eat pains to obliterate evidence
ana plant niisleuiim^ clues. In thi& we are helped by an immutable law ol this umxciic
ibat cute sin event talcs pUcc j is traces persist despite tbe how oj unic uuu deliberate
attempts at destruction.
Let ut firs' lay down some criteria by which histories of furgotten empires can be
leccnsuut.co. V\c hy down six such crucrijL |. Geographical names. Whichever
community claim* it had a worluwiue empire it sboula be able to prove lhat the ancient
alias bore us own nomenclature tor seas, rivers, mountains ana regions. 1. The religion ol
a community which rules jdc world must be shown to have spread over large tract! in all
pans of \ht world. 3. Ij a community has uelo worldwide sway u culture, namely iu
mythology and customs will linger for ages even after its rule or administration ends.
M language ol those who havt had a worldwide empire
n K m in ibe speech of the people in different paiu ol the world
on* alter it* political and administrative authority ends. 5. Jf a
JTOftl has ruled (fat world us weights and measures
onumie to be adopted over large parts of the world long after
141
fa arttociton of it* empire 6. Some piihy iei Hllc h ind term* wh.ch M*tlam to float down
the eorridors of lilBt a nd tifBtoO lon & afler lhe cnd of an CTn P* alio prov,de impotent
clues.
U l us now test whether the criteria laid down by u* rtove e ,oand. before we make use of
them to prove the exltteoca 0 f an ancient Hindu empire.
just a little over two decades ago, within the span 0 ronr own memory, wc know that the
British had a worldwide empire Since the name of their own country was England and
iheir language En*lWl and they wielded worldwide authority, English geographical terms
such as Iceland, Somatiland, Buchanaland, B,tsuto1and Indian Ocean, White Seacame
into vogue t Since the English people were Christians Christianity spreid in region* where
they ruled. 3. English customs, stories, titles, mythology and symbols came to be copied
or adopted and pot spread during the heyday of British rule over a large part of the world.
4 The English language came to be spoken from the Americas to New Zealand because the
English ruled ov .r that wide area, 5. Their weights and measure* and currency were
quoted and adopted in world commerce aad industry because the English were the
dominant world power in the recent past. The foot and the inch, the stone and the pound,
the farthing and the guinea, the seconds and minute and January 1 as the New Year Day
came to be copud adop.ed the world over because those were the """f** empire-
builders, the British. 6. Some phrases such i* never sets on the British empire'wil, ^^JZ
about the onetime worldwide sway ol the aniw hcn
continue to linger in history say five thousand years n ^ ^ most of the traces of the 1<Kh
and 20th century UnfC ^ gQl . rill have been obliterated from history or gro* ably
tenuous.
tilrt *ri0ihcr term
Nagaland.' That it the name
take ***" n ttfl er India emerged free
^^fSTS5-W Nehru the first Prime ,,|in ru .jm India who chose ihm English
from Br Mminefofant*
j y independent Indie
linglisli hoary Hindu,
name
, n of India which has nna a np.ry nun,.
for "JE? L choice of that English name by the
The cho
***^*^^Ua* that slavery make* into BHudi rule is a measure of me
; hc rn;,: l; tS to bc . * or an...h w . ss- i / ^ **-** in ihc ,,,im r b,e
Thousand ( dja flrfi d om
r^SJ hlr lh 7 memory of a part of India
i^wodM be enough for any discermng h.itonan to
oncudewah unerring accuracv that the Brit.sh must have
'uled at .east over that part of India If somehow n fuiure
htoarta finds out the year in which that region of India was
named Nagaland and therefrom concludes ihut British rule maj
hive emended over thai region at least until thai year he would
il the ami commit a mell error of time but he would not be
wrong in concluding that the British did rule over that region^
Tn computing the hhtOfJ of several millcniums ago the error of
a small margin of time would be negligible while the salvaging
of a completely forgot ton fact of a worldwide British empire
would be invaluable for recorded history.
So we see how single words and terms lingering in history milk mums aficr an event can
prove \cry valuable in reconstructing forgotten hisiory In reconstructing the story ol an
aiicicnt Hindu empire we shall show thut ihcrc are *ome such ie,m* which have come
down floating to us across millemiims. which ere of immense help <n piecing together
the story of a very ancient worldwide Hindu empire. Those terms and phrases are
pregnant with meaning and speak volumes about an ancient Hindu world empire if they
are properly understood and carefully analysed
19
^TANciiprTATLAS BORE ALL SANSKRIT NAMES
is all too easily assumed *M .11 that il worth Unowin. I, all too , assurap ,ion 1. Ml <
*"i7C:; .!Uch scope in history lo #. m
m nrtanl void in ancieni history pertains is an
0ne J e ^^TI^creo t historical ,e* make no mention
" ,Cient IS" *- ex.st.d and ye,-he,,
f Z!SS - the of M empire >M
Ut us at the outse! r , c ivns to B
WHO* .- "J n n U "; r ^;; d ri nc and ri 0-* q es abroad by **-*"* 6 *
Asproduc" ol are usually prone to laugh aw.y ^ ^ fc no (aBf|liM , M11
imaginative chauvinism run wii tho1l>E il tcta*
Such supposedly tenuous and mere, ^ Vil ) mw in
assume .mportance when one finds co ^ s
ancient topographical nomen<*" Hindus. *he UW
Sanskrit was the language of ro0 umam.. *"
spread all over the world they named oce
and different regions in Sanskrit. ^ ^ ^
That the ancieni Hindu, had the po .^
spread nil over the world i* wfil J**^. ( *) M Krunwanto Vishwam Aryan. I* *,,,
4 Aa' We might underline <><^'J,, inl5 ,ed W- . race. The contemporary world has
bee ^ |tuvl
that-Arya'was a race. The word A.y
143
CTftlmg
I
144
Vfcdfcpiyefllfc WM bescd on the univcrs l humane iMorferipIellial wc are all
descended from d.vmiiv and to
m*f*roiu " rhni divim( v mia$ ! hQ0lir ttim - x b <lc
irnct ofrhndiusm ** ihnl ur lives must be moulded wiih th ar
Lift; ji n For thai ^c ancient Hindus devised a code of
nduct whicli cnjo.nv 3 Itfc of mental and physical purity and
LvmformTij to a code of Junes and community service.
i, ., m I of lift 9 11. h nMinocetf b< the *oro\ \i>V Qn< |
Thorttvcr] n of ihe v,r-iU\ poptifci;k>n cull.
fmportrni .tnd graphic proof that ,,: Wmdtt i id d (act, succeeded in implementing
i "KtJi-it into ij%rmam AryunV (make (he whole
or medicine i*
[56
a t,jv developed in times immemorial by , and widely spread a ad ptac tiled 4ll over
IJtdT^ *** sdf,css H T p, T r wc,farc -
Thclrt WUS a mission of love and scrv.ee for it is w c ,|
^rUua.nc, C nH,ndn medical pract.tioners and ancillary
^^T.cnUcred their service and administered tue.r rameore*
HXdv free of charge or cost. Because, it was abhorrent
to make money from anybody* physical dstr 5 .
Amrved enjoins that all medical help must be absolutely f rec .
tmdu practice also enjoined that all educational instruction
n>ut also be absolutely free of any charge. Hven 10 our ow n
da* it is not rare 10 come across people administering Ayurvedic
remedies and refusing any payment or compensation. With
rhm, a a a mauer ot strict professional principle not to accep-
*oytiunc in recompense for medical service rendered.
Such selfless service to the distressed, and educational inst-ncuoatothe needy had been
made possible in ancient limes by Hinduism loitering among us intelligentsia a nigh icnse
of oetacomeot, austerity ana unavoidable flutj to all beings. At (he same ume.
businessmen and wage-earners were trained to help with munificent contributions for
the upkeep ol all sellless, social workc:
Apart from such immaculate standards of professional piety
MrcmcJ.L pharmaceutical and clinical standards too were of a
I high order Ayurvedic experts lived w,th minimum of
hing m unostentatious hamlets, They almost invariably did
the professional chores themselves from herb-collection in
administering medicines in towns and villages. The
*V of all herb, for administering to patients, by grinding
ihc^^r'' * *" d0nC by lbe *W practitioners
* *wm(o ike oidTn >'. lyWema,icaU > percolated to all hm - T ^*Jlknew quick and
inexpensive
157
e dies for all common ailment* and injuries, Beiidei, Aya T -fC -dic practice bad also
developed wonder caret Cot almost ail !LfOtlS diseases like dropsy, glandular
tuberculosis, chrome I! oebiosis, blood pressure* piles and diabetes,
Tbe principal of an Ayurvedic college in Poena co told
that a local resident dressed like a ruiiic knew or a umpk
h'l very effective remedy for bone-TB. He had volunteered to
tH patients of that disease free of charge. The hospital
UC |r no i hnowinc any remedy for bone-TB used to regularly
il fer all patients suffering from that disease to him, He used
I proceed at night to a nearby forest, fetch some root, rub l n stone wittl water and apply
the paste to the affected portion. The patents used to be cured in no Ume. But the tragedy
was thai the man wouldn't disclose what the root was. The hospital doctors wanting to
know the secret once Stealthily followed h,m But the man sensing that he was being
shadow, bolted. Thereafter he was never *e*n,
, know of a superannuated lady, apparently off*** health.
suddenly developing glandular-TB. The protruding ,bml. -
ed he handsome face ugly. The foul-smei.ing secretions ft*.
hose gland, used to make life a torment for her and a burden
flounced the diiease to be incurable. The *M ^
an unassuming rustic tailor restding ta U * ^
the Maharashtra region of India. Hoping aga nst hope * hun He asked her whet her sh. ^
J * - ^ pain that the remedy caused. The P at * nt P hm M>lh ,0 harried by the disease
that she was ^Z - P* of The treatment started. The tailor used to spread J^^ worn-out
rug under a tree in the open. v ^ ,
to squat on . The tailor would then d*b l ^ thick radish paste. As the paste dried v
^^j^ibc in size forcing the blood and pus m w ^ fcwlll> ,awl patient's face. Th.s
treatment con n ^ ^ Nfore
within a very short time her face wa ^ ^^ dl(J Da i
The disease hud vanished without a trc
I5B eh.rcc anv.hing for ihe trcaimenl AllI he ld Wat "I pray l0
Women in many families used lo treat free Ol charge children wferiftl from ^mmon
ailment* like measles and rickets, Thar inwcpeittfoc treatment With household remedies
usually ed a crowd ol fliflfcrilifi children accompanied by their pool parcott. from far and
near, every moraine to theft premise*
Women's deliveries used to be invariably conducted m the home itielf under the expert
guidance of the elderlv women of Ihe Joint fei So common was the knowledge about the
u^e
wurvedic drop*, and so easy their acquisition that nlmnvt every elderly man or woman
acquired the skill lo treai nil common ailments in course of lime- People stocked at home
:i collection of Avuncdic dujes which came handy to treat ordi-
. complaints like cough, cold, headache, insomnia, stomach-pam. nausea and
constipation. Usually the Auirvedie drug* were to cheap thai none cared to charge anj
money for small quantities The remedies could he had free ol cost ui*t for the a^kine
from any house
It a a great pity that ancient Hindu medical science* Ayur ved a aau languishing through
public ncplecl It was an ideal medical system we very * a} \yUrvedfc remedies stand one
'uprcme te^t svlticll no others fulfil All medicine must be food and all food should be
medicine. Only Ayurvedic drug* fulul nam dictum, Besides, eas} utid comparative!) pain
treatment, miracle cures co> nvailahilitj of drug*, reJiflno aimiuuui un utqpty, home
procenins f th'c nu*h Uu & itMem oi the patknii non-tsufchj ol' (I -
' an> cambewume. clumsy, dtaptioslfc iphcnului. neilifiibli- o.| of (he um L! , IIIt | tin-
Lacdux will'
lisict n.o,cdriiL>v aresi'iueol
**" fotur* ol curved
159
That the ancient Hindu, not only wVcnlfd and devekl _.. ver> efficient and inexpensive
medical V y,tcm but rtl0 % *Z, t|| ovcr the ancient world h also proof thai they h.d ^
Cttci( in creating a common human brotherhood which did ,,i tf m
of any regional, racial or political distincttons.
WM
21
THF FMIRK PACIFIC REGION WAS HJMM" tfrritory
...ill milted b) ihc people "' tfic world fiuvh ;l)i unities in Mi ii'iui>ni and Sansknt
proMdc
is *icp into almost uiv p.oi hi the uii Ul and one i* inatmMip ul un invent Minilu Cllll I
i prtmeatini me region
Uf iw takf M.ihiwn Almost fWO decade* apo it wa-*nj> M*tj>a. t l-"c hj .11 pti vMihi-tri
up lie*, the pieturestjue unJ .'I Singapore Mil region it ubuui 3,000 mites cast of Madras
Matata ani< Singapore arc both Sanskrit words Sanslrii
irarc u npleW M*ih|hc word Malaya. Sandalwood wo-
lofrowwdilon Mount Malay*, lu-n aov SanUcrii
> of sandalwood plantation* m ancient
bra* which mean* EkntUbfit) lead* to frivolous
,co " lm The pmcrb sy* thai .inda1tsood
xninwchjhuiuJ Malays ih.it the tribal housewife
>i a ordinal) Rm Q04J
jfcJUJ; HuM f , boil, Sarukfi! words.
M-.. J UM M'IJ Hindu kiny
7 bt,,e tt ^ l "< bttcrlptU.it to
""" , *<'"< m Sinv4pi,i v
INI
161
The fort * built by the ancient Hindu* , t the tftlJ ,. ofth ei^^ of Simhapur to command
these.b oard 7" ^ w important naval, military and commercial bate in tl "TJ India wa* the
mistress of the sea, and hei ship* Aimn ^2 0CCa ns unchallenged di At W *** f rom thc ^
of South Amenca to the Western coast of M ,co and From Z Arctic to the Aniarcuc.
Raffle* Memoirs is one of ibe books wh ich scholars may consult t0 have a glimpse of
Indian (io riott| world empire.
A curious relic of India's maritime sweep, namely metal hell suspended from the prow*
of ancient Indian ocean liner* and warships bearing a Tamil inscription, was hauled up in
a fishing net by an Australian aborigine.
Malaysia and Singapore are connected by a highway running across a bridge spanning a
channel. Malaysia under the British was partly British territory and partly comprised of
small principalities ruled over by Maharajahs as in India, As was thc gruesome fate of
several countriei in the world Malaya loo was the victim of terror raids by Arabs. By torch
and sword they laid the country was e and terrorized the populace into professing Islam.
In that holocaust all Malaysians, who went all Hindus, were, from prince to pauper,
convened to Islam.
But Islam is only skin deep. Let us hope that nostalgic memories of their glorious Hindu
past and a dilujeut study true accounts of thc havoc wrought by Arab invndcri would day
inspire Malaysians to reclaim and ic-adopi then ao Hindu faith.
Thc language and culture of Malayans is still *** J* Hindu Take the name of thc.r capital
Ktwln Vm* * vuflh 'Pur" is a Sanskrit termination used to WMQ ^ The original Sanskrit
name was Cholanampwam .1* ^^^ c bo1aa. Another town Serambanis'Shree Ram J ,, ,,
of Lord Rama. A city In mountainous noiib MJ . patun
Su ngei Pattani. Us ancient Sanskrit name wa* ^
mci ning a mountain city*. Another u '
Pel a lis* J> u
COM
162
to n ,mr from SphatiW N**** U. He Great Cry.tal Embi^
l^rrf Shiva. Incidentally this provides one an important
afvhsf4 ,fog,c a | due. The central shrine of that township mut|
have been a hu$e Shirt emblem made of crystal or erystal-white
narhle In fndin the famous Taj Mahal in A era too wu TeJ_
Mahalava thr resplendent shrine housing a Shiva emblem, Ju 9t
tt the Taj Mahal was transformed into an Islamic grave it may
H thai the main mosque of Pefaling Jaya in Malaysia now *i| S
preth over the ancient Hindu shrine of a crystal Shiva emblem.
Fanatic Islamic invaders were notorious for using holy Hindu
hnae$ moVqueJ and tombs through sheer cussedness,
The Hindu deity Lord Shiva was the principal object of
w,irhip ihrouphout ancient Hindu Malaysia. A lew decades
bacl an ancient Hindu Shiva temple was excavated in Sungai
Lord Shiva and His consort Bhavanl alias Durga were
principal deities of India's warrior race.ic Kshatriyas,
erever they went they carried and consecrated Lord Shiva,
This is the reason w hy Lord Shiva is found all over the world
tootj m important cities but also in the very centra] shrines
hrisrianity and Islam, An ancient Shiva Linga worshipped
Italian* when they were Hindus is still preserved in the Efru-
icaoMuMum of the Pope in the Vatican. The Hindu Shiva
worshipped by the ancient Arabs before they were
id into accepting Islam, is still worshipped by Muslims
for their annual ancient Hindu pilgrimage, in
161
)
N instances quoted above should convince students
Malayan culture that their place names are of Hindu. nikru orif iq
fouXn ne^ r. lkfU ICrip,U ' e """!*. Sodni and pat Q ^ t J.T ' n , * ''"" Wcrc **** in
stone, framed tated pole at the spot. I Mw it lri m4 A>a
*dmXV n **"> 'he rulers of Malay-P,J,t,CI ^ du J'y yled themselves as sultans.
This
W*S
apparently a very late development for di
: receptions held by the so-called nkBfl of Jo J* **~m iXo see the words 'Maharajah of
Johore' 2^*^ , along the fringe of the long, thick tablc-sp rcidl ^ * for the party.
palaces in Malaysia are still known by their inc ieat
Dill
Ro Sanskrit name (*WPT) *Aasthan\ Princes royal are fcnftwo%a putra* and pincesses
as 'Putri. Tn Sanskrit these terms n>lft 'son* and daughter' respectively, or anybody, even
a commoner. The Sanskrit term Mahadev] (great goddejs) is still used m an honorific by
royat Malay women. Thus even if the islamic name of a princess happens to be Fatima
she will be titled 'Patrl, Mahadevi Fatima.' This indicates the overpowering influence that
Sanskrit still wields. Malaysian life is thus suiTuted wife Sanskrit. This provides excellent
material for Indian scholars and diplomas to cultivve close cultural con'acts with SUtayua
and conduct archaeological and historical investigation and excavation in collaboration
with Malaysian scholars and officials. They should for instance locate the great crystal
Shiva emblem where residents of Petaling Jaya worshipped, and they should adopt the
original Sanskrit name of the capital Kuala Lumpur This illustrates a huge backlog of
work to be done and yet eavoyi and historians seem to be blissfullv unaware of their duty-
uut External Affairs Ministry must open a special cell to i*Pi| upon its envoys the
importance of such work waiuni *" attention in almost every part of the world.
One of the daughters of the Sultan of Jo o ^^
(fcnrraTft) Vidyadhnri. That is a pure flBU ^
he one (very) learned'. A locality In *"8P" wM ^ of after her for before the British
conquest Singap the domain of the Maharajah of Jchorc.
kfi , 'Seripb' th *
Malay language is still replete with San" _ ^ ^^
Pronunciation of the Sanskrit word [V
* curse". Screja is lotus aJ
in Sanskrit.
ScriiaU
u|tiif>
rta)
164
Sanskrit'Shree' pronounced as 'seri' ,n Malay rt y and charm. **** "^rcfore me8ni he
P nde and majesty of a city. Malay -fc^. ' S ^^ kf ,rShrce-Mufcha* to UK !** '!<".
jey> of
^/^".n, a , of ^faction peace, re* and M^
be re*m Tunkn Mukuta' meaning 'prince crown". Toka , child and Mukuta the crown.
The Malay word for [anjttte at the same a* in Sanskrit namely "bhasha' spelled Must.'
The Mday word *sen]Y U Sanskrit 'sandhya* for f*iti|lit. Dl Sanskrit derivative 'sandhikal"
is pronounced by the Malays as ' senjikir. Tn Hindi too Sanskrit sandhya" it transformed
into *Sanj (ajfrf)*.
Sendha* (^5) i <he Santkrit for rock salt In Malay that aim dcootet saltpetre, 'Sena*
signifies an army or infantry as in Sanskrit. The Santkri' word 'sbloka* meaning stanza the
Malaya use as 'telota' to mean only derisive or satirical poetry. Sanskrit 'shtlcshi' for
punishment is pronounced by Malays as seksa. It also implies suffering and hardships.
The Sanskrit word Saho-dira* f of the same womb) meaning a brother or sister is
pronounced in Malay as 'sautiara*. The Sanskrit word 'roma' meaning the downy hair on
the body, is still used in Malay.
'Rupa' retains its original form to signify appearance or Likewise Rupawan means
handsome or beautiful. The nskriiord Varna (colour) is retained in Malay as *rona p
The Sanskrit word 'pan eh a warn*' i.e. five-coloured (or multicoloured) U pronounced as
'ancharona' in Malay.
Bven Malaysian villagers use the Sanskrit word (Rishi) f rc*i' i.|n.fy. tt|e or lccr fQf whom
fhey hftvc ^^ ^
US
Suchi H pwre and clear (Sanskrit ii 'saacha* *d rmtchiL Hence as in Sanskrit
'mah^suchf ,1 v ery pUre .
term to designate God. Suaroi is tSw ami ) iord m ^^ ti (swaia) i.e. voice, and suarga
(iwarga) is also prtmo^ced u thurga or sorga. Aa in India Smga in Malay signifies a lion
iod jj also used as a titular suffix to individual names lu S*ak,,i derivative Singasana
(Sim has ana) signifies the Lion-sea* j. t , Bi lbrone of the king. Truth (satya) is
pronounced as teCr/a* and jetiawan ('satyawaa" in Sanskrit) signihes constancy fidelity,
faith and loyalty. Marga-sciua (Mrigaaaiwal is the Sanskrit ord which Malays use for
animals generally. Sctu u Sanskrit sarwa' 1meaning **\V) and is used as a prelu as in
letusakaluu uarwa-sakalya) or semsemesta sakalian (i.e. sarwa-unmta-sakalya).
Among Hindu mythological names used in Malaysia arc Seri Rama (Shree Rama), and
Arjuna pronounced as Rityuaa. Apsaras, Siwa, Visnu, Mantri ti.e, minister-counsellor).
Raja, maharaja retain their original Sanskrit meanings and pronunci' at ion Kahu the
mytnoiogical scrpcm suil figures in Malay parlance. Rahu is the head noue of the moon.
Id Indian mythology Rahu is supposed to cause the eclipse by swallowing' the sun or
moon. Malays talk about a still with the sajae ancient Hindu mythological awe,
Malays refer 10 a respected elder. u whom they may addressing a letter, as Puji-r-ujian
lift, the very revered). Sanskrit 11 is Param Pujaneeya. Fuja signifies prayer or anorau. in
Malay as in Sanskrit. Their religious ttftautology st.ll tenia, many Sanskrit words.
<jp,v ,,c. r... i, Hi kd -Pw- - ** *'*" earth) is Pcrtewi and as a goddess if t* '* ,p linU
BuifuU WtOT i I Devi Pr.thvO a, in Sanskrit. Pcriuima jfu. m^ moon and signihes the
month ^"^.j,,.., pican.ai nation, invciiigatton, test, inquiry, < jpj .ini mean*f.
chief, ^urpasiing or supreme retains its o^rtgii^^ b lDllwn fr
And Pradhan Mantri (Chief Nlinivltr *5 U '* Pundit 1 OJ"^ M-U> a, i'crduna Mmnm.
Pwdne &""*'
i arflM | mm Mkrfti (") ll pronounced as Pclcni * W ''X, character. 'Budi-Pekrii
(Buddhi-prakri.l | B
r^to Person of (mtelligenl or enlightened) good Smskn)^ifi^. P minalion sjgnifviug
lhc head
*T^2 SS Th itt*. consequently use word, J lkc Adhipat. (supreme bd) P*^a or Sri-pado
signify the holy feet of a prince It is used a a title along with Pnduka (meaning ihc
sandals of a highly rcspccled person).
Hindu, Sanskrit civilization was not confined to Malaya alone It permeated all the
surrounding countries like Borneo, the Philippine*. Korea, China and Japan.
If the dense forests of nearby Borneo are thoroughly explored they will rccal many
historic relics of the sway that the ancient Hindus held iherc. The sultan of Brunei (in
Borneo) bore the title of Seri Bhagwan meaning Shrce Bhagwan (Lord Almighty).
Recently because of the sultanate's long alienation from Sanskrit thai term is being
wrongly interpreted as 'the foytl adviser". Sometime in 1970 A.D. the principal port of
Brunei was named Seri Bhagwan i.e. Shrce Bhagwan from the rukr's ancient Hindu,
Sanskrit title. This should impress upon historians the need J0 lracc tDe Hmdu ances[fy
of tJjc sult3D
and Imd cut when and how he was converted to islam.
Sarawak, a part of Borneo happened to lose its suzerainty > a Britisher Yet the wbnc
English ruler 01 Sarawak too was
^d? h tht r RiJ ? Th " nanie S ^^ itseli ,s Sanskrit. Jt
-'^iTpu , T" sa Sinle ,and ma ** to
-cptir;;; n r iom - ***, *.. and
^^SKlSuT ,iBt,ly Borneo te tt * in ,c Imp
" * b4> " me * * ^vided into two parts
167
ne pa under the British white R ijt WM k kl ngdom of Sarawak while the rest of the tetti
^ * *
ond er Dutch role and u. now a part of the , 0 dep enderv( * ^ent of Indonesia had been
termed Borneo. But ft. Indian name by which Indonesians designate that lewtanTh
Kalimanthan, Kali is a popular Indian ,odd eil aev L" worshipped by Indian rulers. " y
The term Indonesia is Usually misunderstood and nminter-prcted. It is not commonly
realized that it does not connote 'Asia' at all. "Ncsia' signifies a group of Islands. As such
the term'Indonesia'means Indian islands. That is i 0 say most of the ten to twelve
thousand Pacific islands (and not merely those which arc currently included in the
political entity called Indonesia') formed part of ancient India's world empire. All those
islands were collectively termed 'Dwipaatara' in ancient Indian administrative
terminology. In Sanskrit 'Owipanian' also signifies 'the other islands' but as applied to the
vast Pacific territories of ancient India, the term 'Dwipantara' signified islands lying
between the American and Asian eontincnii. This is apparent from the synonym which
the Javanese use io designate this vast territory. They call it Bhumyaatara" which is a
Sanskrit term meaning a'separate territory/ It could also be termed 'Nusantara* in
Javanese because 'Nusa' signifies 'islands 1 .
Ancient Indians who explored the whole earth in times immemorial had a three-fold
mctto expressed la the terms 'Charaiveii'Uet us move on and on), "Krunvinio Viswam
Aryam* (Let us make all people civilized, well-behaved, dutiful, god-fearing, educated etc,
etc.) and Wasudaaivi-Kutumbaiam line- whole world Is one entity, one family).
Imbued with this triple motto when the enterprising nad BllCUistlc ancienl Indians
moved across the 'e Pac.rk Ocean charting the lands encounlered. and eitw^ ng
administrative and educational outposts they |* J ^ quc names to the different island
territories pro south from India. Modern Jvt derives Kl
^ Hindu. Sanskrit name 'Yawadip' signifying
This and mapping [he world.
,l y of , he
li, , n charting ana m-j^m* - ^ld. u| C|| Thad charted the entire island on a map, set
amidst olhe, ^uU-ne ten**** they couldn'l have noticed thai it Wfll jfcjpcd like a barley
corn.
That Indians must have discovered and charted mode Java at Yawtdwip hundred! of
thousands of year* a g0 \ t spparenl from the fact that India 1 * earliest epic, the
Rumayaiw mcfllioni Yawadnipa.
Trie term Ceylon is a corrupt form of the original Sanskrit name Sunbala. Thai same
island was culled by the ancient lndiici also as Aoradwip i.e. mango-shaped island. Thu
mdi-estc* tfmi Sanskrit territorial names often denoted the shape of tne land. Ancient
Indian explorers, administrators, educators etc, nho weal to far-flung territories were
described ai umvatrtka.
Toe Malayan peninsula derives its name from the Sanskrit owl Malaya. |u other name
was Vanga from its abundance in *un' because in Sanskrit Vaoga' means 'tin*. The other
olaads -Sumatra' and 'Bali' are alto Sanskrit names.
the* Wands including the Philippines Indian script* > ladia prevailed till the 9lh century
A.D One such * discovered m Kotei territory in the south-eastern nthance. modern
Borncojon four octagonal * "> San * k ' a 4lh century Indian script,
pe.rormedby the Hindu King Mulavar-
^Xl 1** ay *""***> Rahman,. Jnd-* * Hindu Government had aer Pacit.c territories a
nourishing
*-** t<f J V "* ** P"*l* clm
*Uffcoll '*' din,cl ' ^P^sariei, ad
tnd vij Ul b, e f(GC corjlfnu nity
169
lorvice to the citiinry. The Ashwamedha Yajnya performance WA symbolic of Hindu
aunernimy. The (treat Hindu empire which included the entire Pacific territory, was
known as lhc S.tilctidi" empire. The people of those region* were Hindu* until the L5ih
century when the barbaric Arab* terrorized them all into becoming Muslims.
Describing the Hindu culture of the regions the late hi Rjighuvira, a great indologisl wrote
thai the Indonesians "particularly in Sumatra., Java and Bali cunlinued to be good Hind"
following the cults of Siva, Vinnu.TnM, Buddha and Itodhiiatvat The islands arc strewn
with temples, Their iiraiidvur ll *uperb Nothing In India can rival, terraced Bomhudur,
standing in the heart ol Java on a hill (unrounded by paddy, hmanm and C*fi* nuts. The
temple is unique. Every terrace marks a spiritual mage upward. There arc live kilometres
or (luce mile* of IfluTpMftf There artists must hove been trained by master unfismen
from India. Faces arc Indian, dtcsses are Indian and the stone* from Jatakas. The scene of
Kinrj Shibi, cutting off rui own flei and weighing it against the pigeon in order to offer an
equal amount ol flesh to the hawk, t* depicted with I se,m..vei,c wind, ,s rare even in
India, Scenes o. the Indian .nc^an marine, are most valuable for reconducting a <"* ^ o,
l.u,,n adventures. Its niches and tableau** *of bygone waltsmanship, shall continue for
ever to admiration ol and to inspire the future generations
"Not very far from *tt*&&JF& -
the complex l-.ambnnan, the like of winch - - ^
India nor to any other neighbour or disun_ are the llf^ycl*. ol Lord K.sn. known aa k
<^\J del by to the Hamayana. .lie ^^"J^ pfe* i. Ibc superb aims of the Divine boy M*n ^^
#(mJ
the scene of Kumbbakarna being waU ^ ' d<f screeches ot elephants, a portrayal of the
ml**- ** '
i ..* miiulc* devoted t 'AUTambananthc central t,.ad of.cmP ^^ ^ foyr
Tr.muiti was originally surrounded by srna
m
170
Mdrdifli ro* Tha ravages of erne, not le than the ravage
, f ip.|.,ihh.l c. me bbit Arabs have been nspoth
L h c total disappearance ol the fourth row 0 . shrxnes
All thai is Jell i block* Ol rectangular stone..." Hindus
L, to lose in ground to alien barbarian invaders m the 13^
ceotwy. By end 0* lhe |S,,, ecDlury most inJiabilailts l rro r ,. edbyUic
Aiabswerelorced io accept Islam alter many of digfe men Wen massacred, women raped
and homes looted.
The last Hindu princes in the region withdrew io Bali. I i,L-kl) Ball, remained msufatcd
irom islam and io this day has ilvtdat tbf only Hindu tcrrUory outside India.
Old Javanese *ongs mostly concern episodes from the Indian epic* Ramayana and
Mahabharai. Shadow-plays in Java are alio woven round Indian mythological and epic
tales, such as of Rama and Krishna, Arjun and Brum and (Jhatotkach. The Indonesian
flag oemg oi two colours bears the Sanskrit name 'Dwivinm', The live cardinal points ol"
the Indonesian consti-luiioa arc also designated by tuc Sanskik word Fancbashtla. Us
airssayi is called'(jaruda' lhe Sanskrit name lor an eagle svoilii is the mount ol the Hindu
god V ishnu. The old Javanese alphabet derives Irom the Pallava script ot South India.
Indonesians sull folio* lhe Hindu year and call it bakh-Samvat.
Ancient Indonesian texts on Hindu sacred chants, worship,
astronomy, astrology, magic, lovclore, genealogy
ethology are believed to range over one thousand titles,
lacicoi Indian, Hindu kings under whom all such learning
4d throughout ibe Pacihc region bore names and titles
* m lvuu ****n* Dharmmoi Tungadeva, Shii Lokcsvara
Dharmxnav^sh* AiHanga. Ananiavikiamot-iungadeva.
S^'Z** 0 *?** nifc, ihc only religion if m modern terminology, prevalent throughout the
1.^1 TlTl> T lo "*"+ ***. * **
A-Srr^i iTr niht uptu a d ^ **
* la tW tfl ... B MM ' fl,1d "P 10 MflJtico to lb*
on Hindus or Aryamsm ^ ^ (M qJ [he ^
171
world in ancieni times Its tpread round the world ti pmof 0 f Iri c pioneering and altruistic
spirii of the ancient Hindui I phenomenon, unique in world history, also bears tcitinumy
00 jy io the spiritual but also to the great material adv m jchieved by the ancient Indians
in every walk f life fan telecommunications to manufacturing technology.
Our External Affairs Ministry must, therefore, impress upon Indian envoy* that they
must not live by drink and dance alone One of their primary duties must be Io scour the
countries iboty are accredited to and mirk sites oflndian archaeological ttticrett,
undertake archaeological exploration and get lhe filet and ih< relics found there properly
preserved and classified by ttBtitt with the help of the host governments. They must also
help the host countries to revive their Hindu, Sanskrit tlttfe found In their language,
customs, names and titles so as to bring about a cultural integration of the world oo the
basis of the ancient world's common Hindu, Sanskrit cultural heritage,
22
ANCIENT ENGLAND WAS A HINDU COUNTRY
In the illimitable expanse of time remote history tends to rei progressively obliterated
even as every individual know* ha/dly anything even about his near ancestors except for
one or two generations above him. It is no wonder,, therefore, jf the world has lost trace
of an Hindu empire of the remote put.
Because of unsavoury memories of the recent colonial empire of the British and of other
Christian and Islamic nations the thesis that England was once a colony of India is likely
to induce feelings of animosity on the pari of the British and a feeling of guilt or apology
among Indians.
Indian educators and administrators sped and spread to the different parts of the globe at
a time when the world was popu* iated b> isolated primrtive communities who were
groping in the dark for guidance. It was something like European migrants going to the
wild American continent or the Romans landing in an uncivilised England,
The other redeeming feature of the Indian governance of
the world was tnat the Indians far from keeping aloof or treating
he local people as second class citizens merged with the people
he regtom where thev * enL Tnii may bc venfied by fl Jook
un. the .naochme* uaies and Indonesia. Ail those were
ues of India. ,he> professed Hindu,* and sported Indian
urns *ad yet among their populations one cannot tell who
of India* and who of bd^oouj decent.
wll ^ W d " ,in ** h * feature of the anc cn. Indian empire Terruonc, conquered or
occupied were not annexed to be
'
lundered *r bled for Ind ia but to bc adnvniitered for the benefit li ihe local people by the
local people
Yet another special trait of the ancient Hindu world empire
a* that it constituted an enlightened and pro&miive pvef.
nee- The Hindu* look with them a philosophy of wihreml
Motherhood, , linf...* did not force on At
any
The Hindus did not force on the world Mohammad or Christ. They alio did not burn down
other.' nitons- In fact when the Hindu* vnrend all over the anciem Id the building ar* was
hardly known and it wai the Hindu. *ho for the first time built huge, palatial mansion*,
fort* and *mples. Those buildings were built according to Ihe Hindu Shflpn Shastra i.e.
according to the system of architecture developed by Art Hindus in India. It is the Hindus
who trained ,hr Arabs Turks. Iranians and Mongols and the other commu-SL ta how to
raise big buildings. This explains the i.mitanty Sweet, the hittofic buildings in India and
West Asia.
Thai the Hindus had no ulterior motive is proved by -he
throughout the world for Sanskrit and the anc.ent Hmdu civilization and culture,
BtNish isle, were once ruled by todn * *
tesenimeni anybody. ^^
England is n com*, form of * S'"' cbuH too
Sthan. Sanskrit 'S.h.n' ha. * t,,ne,
' ,md ' , ; Tie Enfl'ih .d
Lcsttbissnundfar-fcubca^"^- MIi00 k o
foreign policy issue, is the ***,, ***** ra y be noted (tan the Sanskn. med, . ^ ^
En ^
in English a.-gland". These ,n.t*nces . ^ ^
word stand i. .he Sanskrit word i*. ^^ . Ea|W ri
im Angla-Sihan for " **"*
rf.dKPi^Anito'reidcri may note that lhe
he,r ancient Sanskrit name "**
iL .me of the English people is further ,ndi Cfl w ' U
I!2lriJccfihE^ peopFe is further ma Z^Z**"*^ 10 (S " RSr **M leave 5
llSunifft ' ord 'Aiigli-Sthan *h its Pronunci ai|an dh vrfergomg change over the
centuries. Fforn ^ ^ "^Jd be ipi*** that thc name Dcutschland that the Germans u* to
designate their country is Daitya-Sthan j (C thc ijBdortfceD^as Witi* well known that
Daitya ,s ^ jft-weattoaed community in thc ancient Hiadu scriptures. The Pntn
com'nnmtv derives its name from their mother the Indian iridoiDiii It is from Dili that
English gets its word deity*. Therefore wherever the term 'land' occurs it should be
immedi* itdf identified as the Sanskrit word "sthan*.
That India was a colony of Britain for nearly 150 years ii recent history. When India came
under British domination feaiory turned only a full circle for in the immemorial past
England m once a colony of India's far-flung empire.
The story of India i vanished and forgotten empire can be ucted by the same method by
which students at examine missing words in a broken sentence. Obli* *ory can be
rewritten by divining missing links in a token chain ofxluei.
**2S IC !I hdiri * DCiCnt tmpir wcrc partly deliberate,y 3 lot partly unwittingly wiped out
by two successive
'd conquests namely of the Christians and lhe
P^,tt, ** ** their lubdued allies.
** ^t'w* Up the namci of some ,ocalitics in En * , * nA AWmi| tftd J common in England
as in Shrewsbury,
'*>^2Z f Thu iuffi * */ * !hc Siin ^ rl !
* ^mSST' Mu * b *P"ry and Jagannathpury* Th*
** be p r0 vcd by citing the names o\
175
Siamese towns such as Rajbury. Cholbury, Fetchburv No* h fr well known that Siam w as
. p, rl l>rthe |Mfcl|( Hin4u empire and that Siamese language is corrupt Sanskrit This
should make it clear that the ending 'bury 1 ImSicttlnj a locality or township found
anywhere in thc world prove* ihut the name was given by ancient Sanskrit-speaking
Hindus when ihey ruled over those regions. It is not surprising that parts of England
should biill bear Sanskrit terminations even after all historical traces or India's sway over
faraway England have been seemingly thoroughly wiped out 1 To prove that we are on
solid ground so far a* thr* proof is concerned we msy cite names such as Nagaland.
Connauphi Place and King's Circle even after lhe end of British rule in India.
We now cite another proof. Let us take the British rule of Changing the date in the
calendar at midnight When we come to think of this practice it is so palpably absurd for
anyone to interrupt his deep slumber at the stroke of 12 at nighi and stagger nut of bed
just 10 change lhe date. Who would ever do it day in and day ou: all his life! Moreover at
the dead of night whin everybody is fast asleep and ii is pitch dark all around how does
one divine whether it is half past eleven or half pan one ? This curious prac'icc of the
British changing their date nt the unearthly hour of midnight derives from England
having been a colony of India. Let us explain.
Indians reckon the day from sunrise to sunmc. The tun rises in India roughly at 5.30
according w ihe W mr Since there is a five and one half hour difference betwc th
Indian and Greenwich meridian lime it 13 O clock n*
the world in Hie ancient past the tfgnal used w India to ihc rest of lhe orld -hat India;
"J^o
at sunrise On hearing that, ^^tf 9 ^^^ had to hurriedly .o.ter nut of their bad* and .W
ft*, the* .Idnlghl in ^^XTJ^WS empire. History having turned - '" cirC
^ *illv niltv adopted the Western practice of changing TZ^Z of nj to Hi own writ Tto h a
curious * /, r7 The lime which India set for the world T^h- ^ on India in refracted
distortion. We hope a fe iX^uU on return to its ancient pract.ee of observing sunrise as
^*noftheda> and the date.
Thai colonics do m feet observe the time of the parent country BOO also be proved from
contemporary expenence.Dunng World war II Japanese officials dominating the
administrations of the vast occupied Pacific regions used to set their watches to Tokyo
Hme All timings were quoted with reference to Tokyo time so long as the Japanese" held
sway in those regions. Likewise when Indian administrators uovemed England all
watches there were set to the Indian sunrise time. Here the word watches 1 is used to
indicate what-ever ihe time measuring device was then in vogue. That Indians used 10
maintain split-second timings is apparent from their meticulous agronomical expertise.
Yet another proof of India having once ruled England is the fact
thai until 1752 AD. the English New Year began on March 25. That is
the exact time of the year when the Indian New Year begins. In 1752 by
an act of Parliament England arbitrarily changed over to January I as
the Sew Year Day. As March 25 marks the beginning of the Indian
Vtknm Saimai it is plausible that England was pan of Vikramaditya's
Indian empire Vikramadii) a lives in Indian legends. He is remembered
ts a great monarch Rulers are considered great only when they control
big empires So. apart from the qualities of dedication to truth and
justice attributed io him Vikramaditya seems to have extended his
enlightened administration to distant pans of the world including
England
Thai England regarded March as the first month of the
c*r. m*j be funhef proved by the term 'X-Mas.* This term
las. in fact mean* the 10th month because in Roman 10 is
177
written as' X' and in Sanskrit the word 'Mas" meam rnomir th, term -X-Mas' is not only a
curious combination of ft, Ron and the Sansknt word Ma* for'month' bwhh.| 4nisw
J^* week of festivities observed towards the end of December EmmJ month' ^ith a week
is a blunder of the English language rtJL because English has lost its Sanskritic base.
This may be further proved by the fact that the word "December-itself is Sanskrit and in
fact does mean 'the 10th, month* because the Sanskrit *Dece' i.e. Dasha Stands for 10. A
further proof of this is the term 'Decimal' which is the mathematical dot that the Indians
devisedfi* the I Oth place. There in too 'Deri' means ten. Written in Roman it will be *X\
The suffix 'ember* in Dece-ember signifies the zodiac in Sanskrit Since there are 12 signs
of the zodiac ancient Sanskrit traditions assigned one month for each of these signs
beginning with March. Accordingly December became the I Oth month as connoted by its
name" Dece-ember' Le, Dasha-Ambar.
This should make it clear to those familiar with the English tradition that they are
committing a blunder in equating X-Mas i.e. the 10th month with the ending week of
December. So the Sanskni terms 'X-Mas' and December" both indicating the I Oth month
of the Hindu year still used in English and in English iradition, prove that ancient
England was a colon) of India
Even the 1 Oth month celebration i.e. X*Mas misbelieved to be l Christian festival is in
fact a hoary Hindu Kmh>i M commemorating the day on which the Hindu
incarnation UriJW* (mis-spelt as Krist U Chris, since in En^h *ZZZ* 1
his chaw*. * n ' ch
ddi^d his famous Sermon on ike (*M **> **% " his warrior-devo.ee Arjun ftttrt ** *
g m known u-yan' in Sansknt That gives us the ^"^ ^ -Mp* over the centuries as C
hrtsnan" I.- *-- -Krishna delivered his memorable sermon H
Mahnbharata eh*
war.
Kri*hn^y an *
therefore, mean* 'Krishna**
lht
i fi. e r admitted by all so-called Christians uJZn revival which ha. a pre-Christ tradi-
t, Commemoration of that
spread over the world a* a hallowed
. . ...1-.* ~m>A miT
famous sei
Tradition when after
"cniblec tf members of the Kuru clan
thr , p ,c w,r ^1 em^u perpetuated the
SSSA-M- Another historical fact admitted b V M. M the birth date of Chnst ,s not
known. The . u nedd*ie which is December 25 is only m.ke-bclie*. .ptompia .n1iiiufe.
So neither December 25 nor the Chr.it-m L festivities have any Christian basis, But both
have .Hindu Kiishnavan basis namely that the day on which Lord Krishna delivered his
famous sermon is commemorated in the December 2S festival. Since thai sermon the
GEETA is literally in song it is commemorated by so-called Christian (Krishnayan) choral
tinging
We shall leave this topic of Christians being Kiishnyans he. ancient European Hindus of
ihc Krishna cult lo be dealt with in some detail later but we would like to point out here
that the chant of'Hare Krishna* that ring through the streets of England these days is only
history turning another full circle.
The French frill use the ancient Sanskrit name for anything English The French term
'Anglais* pronounced as 'Anglay* is a corrupt form of ihe ancient Sanskrit word 'Angula*.
England . known to ancient Indian rulers as Angla-Desh i.e. English-land i.e. England.
Words like Anglican, anglicised come from the same ancient Sanskrit word 'Angula'. This
is yet onother proof of England having once formed part of an Indian empire.
We ma> likewise point out that the King's English that gluhmenand women speak if all
Hindu King's Sanskrit A few .nuances are : English 'cow' is Sanskrit *Gow' ; 'sweat*
179 '"PPM* * Sanskrit
fe'swed* in Sanskr.r u ^ er
Sanskrit'manav : mouse ii Sanskrit 'mooshik' you' ^ arc Sanskrit 'yuyam, wayam.' But
we | ttave that to be dlt *u in detail later. That it yet another proof of Samkri^neakiJ
Hindu kings and officials having once adminUi*i JL-.
in *e
England.
administered Affairs
The English title 'Sir' is itself the corrupt form or the Som-krit Sri'. So. when the British
sovereign confers the title 'Sir-on the chosen elite the British monarch unwillingly follows
in hoary tradition laid down by Hindu Icings who ruled over England. Conferring the title
'Sir' alias 'Srj' automatically involves a monetary grant also, as 'Sri' in Sanskrit does m fact
mean "wealth*.
The English call themselves Arya but they icem to he oblivious of the connotation of that
term they have been unwillingly using. In India too the Hindus call themselves Arya
Their own way of life the Hindus call Arya Dharma and they have an organization called
'Arya' Samaj". In calling themselves Aryans' the English are unwittingly and uncannily
right. What they should understand by that term is that they once followed ihe Arya
Dharma alias Vedic way of life alias the Hindu. Sanatao way of life. That is equivalent to
saying thai once in the distant past for milleniums Englishmen were all Hindus.
TnCIENT HINDU TOWNS AND TEMPLES IN ENGLAND
In the present it* of very haphazard and hazy knowledge cedent .Lory ,t might sound
fantastic and foolhardly to "ih< ancient England was a Hindu country and that 1, fl j|lb 0
i traces of towns with Sanskrit names and some Hindu ***, hut there is plenty of evidence
of many kinds to support the above conclusion.
Ui ni take an extract from the Encyclopaedia Britannica II our starting point. In Vol. 21.
on pages 275-277 the encyclopaedia (1969edition) records information about an ancient
site in England, called the Sionchenge. The encyclopaedia notes "Stonehcngea circular
setting of large standing stones surroun* ding an earthwork about eight miles (13 km)
north of Salisbury, Wiltshire, England, was built during late neolithic to Early Bronie age
(I80Q-I4Q0 B.C.), Among the earliest references...is a legend that the atones were
magically transported from Ireland Thii legend perhaps enshrines a folk memory of the
bringing from Pembrokeshire of the 'bluestones' which form pan of the monument* The
supposed connection of stonehcnge with the Druids has held the public imagination since
the J 7th century .The monument consists of a number of structural element* mostly
circular in plan. On the outside is a circular diich. broken by an entrance gap on the
northeast, with bank immediately within it. Inside the bank is a ring of 56
. known ifi er their discoverer as the Aubrey holes. Between
M and the ikracs in the centre arc two further rings of pi".
now Invisible on the surface, known as the Z and V holes. The
,
iei
none setting consisted of two circles (the outer or , tertiary sandstone, the inner of
blucstone) , n d iLTZ^' f uprights (the outer of sarsen. the innw T 2l ,T 0 uter circle and
the cu* r horseshoe Z U J lintels. Additjonal stones include the 'Attar stone" hL the
axis southwest of the centre; the 'Slaughter mow' inside the entrance of the earthwork;
two Station stents jus, w.thm rne bank on the northwest and southeast. and the Heel
t'Hdc ') stone, standing on the Avenue outside the entrance Crcmaied remains form a
cemetery of about 30 burials.The Heel stone 35-lon block of sarscnloft. (4.9 m) high,
stands outside the" entrance of the earthwork, but not on its axis of symmetry West of it,
astride this axis, four | ar ge ponboles probably represent a former timber gate way ...The
entrance of the earthwork (in Stonehcnge 11} was joined to the river Avon (about two
miles, 3.2 km to the east) by the Avenue, a processional way marked by parallel banks and
ditches...The entrance of the earliest setting of hluestones was aligned approximately
upon (he sunrise at trie summer solstice.. .(.the! visible surfaces (of the 30 ft. high)
stones have been laboriously dressed smooth..The structures may be assigned to the
earlier half of the '16tb century B.C., broadly confirmed by a radiocarbon estimate giving a
probable range of 2.000 to l t 400 B.C.It is generally and probably rightly assumed that
Stonehcnge was constructed as a place of worship...but the nature of the religion it served
must remain conjectural. The solstitiad alignment of the axis of symmetry of the sarsen
structure (Stonehcnge Ilia) has long been recognized..4n 1963 the existence of additional
alignment. on significant nsmgs and settings of the sun and moon suggested
independently by C. A. Newbam in England and G.S. Hawkins in the United S.utev Thc*c
suggests undout, tcdly reinforce the popular belief that Stonehcnge HHU * for sky
worship, but should be cohered 1* -----most Christian churches are likewise iroomioHf
-^^ Hawkins also suggested that the c.rcle of AjW have been used as a counting device
for predating
COM
is:
t> DCfl .ftJii points that emerge from the above ext
lff w be is old 2'0 C " thal Ihc avenu * iih L, leads to Avon river about two
miles away
r*Si^ *** w,th hieh,y po,ish , cd surram -ihai
, dieSlighter stone, that the temple was connected *hthereby * processional route, that
at the temple OT n *w ceremonial gateway (surmised to be of timber), Ait crrmuuon
was practised in those days, that the temple Wa , ucemJ with sky worship, that its
entrance was aligned to tgmijc at the iununer solstice (June 22) that the markings around
rit teople mgjest that it a$ an observatory for studying the timings of.be rising and
setting of the sun and moon (and probably of the planets as well), that most Christian
churches ire also astronomically oriented, that the 56 Aubrey boles could have been used
as a counting device for predicting tifoihcui rump of the moon, and eclipses of tbc moon
and mil and that there is a 16ft. high stone standing just outside lac temple entrance in
the avenue.
Since the Encyclopaedia Britanmca confesses that the nature
the religion practised in those ancient times in England is not
bown let yj tugcest that the research findings regarding the
scop as noted tr. the encyclopaedia fit in four square with
^wa alone. Before dilating oo other evidence, therefore,
m hm dcal wilh *ai the encyclopaedia itself has stated,
J^'be remote age ofi.soo to 1,400 B.C. surmised for the * Sh C l ,U T i0n by lhc c ^'P^ia,
Hinduism was the
^iheZd 8 ' 0Clk,,0W " 10 lheworld As a fflaUcr ^ H.ftd Bll ".*? C * lttn,d > thc
Mahabharat and the Ramay *< *o m*T 1CnplurCi "^ Vedas reach bock in lh
^^ofr^Vlfr^ '*e antiquity. So, considering ***.* m Ht CIV| l'Wtioa Hinduism alone
seems to
m
Hindus alone arc known to connect tttnpUi by road with jjvers as a* the Stonchcngc
temple with Avon. The processional route also Indicates the Hindu custom of taking
divine idols in procession for immersion in rivers. The river name 'Avon* ma$ BS well be
the corrupt form of the Sanskrit term "Arun" meaning the red early morning sun, This
inference teems plausible from the fact that the Druids gather even now at the
Stonchengc temple at solstices at the break of dawn to invoke the sun.
The tradition of polishing surfaces of stones is very common in India too. Scores of such
temples have massive square pillars with large disc-shaped, polished surfaces to reflect
holy dances performed at temples. These may be seen at Halebid and othcrhistoric places
in South India.
The Slaughter Stone in reminiscent of the Indian warrior tradition of slaughtering goats
or buffaloes.
Ounce, as was the case with .be Sundew *
nomcrous structures made out of .lone and m* Jt^ ^ nomical observations as at the
Stowheoi* ^.^ained in agronomical markings may suU be *" * Ute l* UlNi iM New
Del... b* ^ ^
What is more, .be ancient Hindu ""J* l0 same Delhi, called the Kutub Miaa ( .
belong*_ ^ M ft. era as the Sionehenge observatory in lwl(W leeipks high Hindu
tower in New Reiki **'' Mje j Ob-
around it wh.ch the Muslim invade. Miu ^ ^ y lte ously the Stonehcnge loo had -" l
0 '" encyclopaedia.
bdo <* *"""'" "* lunar calendar "> d oieuculous
MM (* tW " npl " l 2r*oveo muicaldy the day-to-day
M o.weal oM " V ' ' " v by P" U ,0 0bSC " e C " Uln ,.. oT tlie "'"*"'* . '
liUcs d undergo purificatory * *" """'"mU. and WH Moon day..fas.on the
2. ***' n " m ^m " Sucb me,icul00s "* iw*;iZ bod w p""""-' n ; cn " on in au
W d ouS* <" l " a ' lbe .neicntmott Vedas.
HW *"" - ''" wko m aacKBl Hindu observa-
A v y imp*""" 1 "" , Slonebengs in England i Prided
,, nf New D. " *-J^T^iiiglH . .be ,o hou, by.beGMTprac.tceofregad.ng clock and
U*-.-*-?"'*" anew "I from to *** -marking H" begmmng of a new o^ disturbed in
, PP n very ,a.in, " r^lish ca.eadar und sleep at .hat hour. How men M js folind
in
p ,ump for .ha. too**.fctj*-1 J J counlry , all ta
res astt^sscs Lp**
u s',d.,2 hour, Eoa-d's nudn.gh. coinc.de* .Ob ta. .unjtse time iappiOMma.ely> 5.30
a.m.
UUwi.e lnd.a's New year Da, (which accordingjto * pudenda, approx.ma.es ,o March 2 >
was als *ffj ( Ne w Yea. Day un.il 1752 A.D. The English word Hour .. u a corrupt form
of tbc Sanskrit word 'Horn
M least four months of the English calendar still bear San* krit name* such aiScptembct,
October, November. Decent These are explained in Sanskrit as 'Sepic-mber-Ocl-emW
Nev-cmbei Dec ember' meaning respectively the 7th, Bin. andluihpamof.nntoiiiac. They
rank as 7th, Hth. 9th a .fjth month* respectively only when March according to Hi
tradition becomes the Cm month. This again confirms that I Soffoh, and in fact that of all
Europe, calendar is based on nmflu calendar.
IIS
In Latin two more names may be traced to the ancient Sanskrit* Hindu calendar. These
art Macain which h Mirga shcersha and Mago which is Mash in Hindu, Sanskrit
terminology current even today.
From this it should be quite clear to all lha&e interested in ancient history that the world
over and especially in ancient Europe and in Great Britain it was the Hindu calendar with
Saosru'* names which was in vogue. This also incidentally nrove* that there was a day-to-
day exchange of astronomical Siia between the Kutub Minar alias Varah Mihka
observatory , Mew Delhi and the Stonehenge observatory in England. Both had around
them temple* of'sky worship' and of the sun and the moon, and masonry constructions
with astronomical
markings-Indies central meridian, according to immemorial practice, oassed through
Delhi, Uija.n and Lanka. The famous Shiva 'htne at Uiiain. called the Mabanklcshwar had
,U Shvva none
t d so accurately as to be bisected by that meridian u placed so ac / ^ conWCrile<J
rising sun.
a,, m on dtsplay in (to E.ruscnn ^ ^.H p. in Rome. Tha. k was also ^"* >^$ , .he Ea* a
5 -Ais'l...'E.ah'ad-Esar h**.*^ as d 'huu-u
pnedia Bmannica under .he '' ca,JS El , s | in d llw -
in support ot my con.em.on .ha. "" Wa ck ol lo" >"
shipped .he H.ndu god Shiva "P scn ' M .plljrimag. '
LgUnd's,em P lcs. I <-oK Irom . b-A )14rflW
Mecca' w.lHcn by trfj*-g ^ we n o. *-M-J book the aullior observes >e w ai'e'
IM1
,Ug h..orlc.. ones, one tauwc
woven to prove m Westminster Abbey since
m
u *ho ret op * mm memorial and the kin* of '" , rc tnll crowned over the stone in
Weslminsicr Abbey,
^r^chiomany mm* ** " '
en" This is prool Ihtf the 2S *> of ancientShiva temple. And since Lord fflZ is associated
with royal inaugurals and funerals lhe p,*c.,cc of burying the h.gh and mighty in the
Abbey came into vogue
In this context we may recall the encyclopaedic observation, quoted above, that "most
Christian churches are astronomically oriented " We have already proved above that
according to ancient Hindu practice, which continues to be in vogue in our own age all
templet have to be astronomically oriented. Ancient Christian churches being
astronomically oriented without ipparent justification for it in Christian theology, is proor
enough that they were Hindu temples.
That the Indian Vedas used to be recited in those temples before they were overrun by
Christianity, is proved by the word psalm" pronounced 'sanV. That word derives from the
'Sam* Veda. Psalms are still recited in churches but the Sanskrit Vedic "Sam" while
retaining its original name has been supplanted by Christian hymns,
A further indication is that in Biblical tradition David is mentioned as the author of many
psalms. From this it i* apparent that David refers to Dravid priests who composed and
sang Vedic hymns. These Dravids still survive in modern Britain as Druids and like
Dravids in fact like all Hindus in India ibey suJJ invoke the sun god to "energize" their
intelligence. Their chant is almost an exact translation of the Hindu Gayairi suntra the
holy invocation to the sun, in Sanskrit which b touted la every orthodox Hindu
household.
The traditional assertion that all Englishmen and, in fact, all Euiopeaju and many other
world communities besides ore Aryans u essentially a remembrance of their having be* a
;
,i
187
Hindus. As is generally misunderstood Aryi ft ft0 net but i* lhe Hindu way of life. Had the
icrm Aryi signified , race n wouldn't have included people as widely different from une
another in colour, facials and stature as Iranians, Europeans and Indians. They are known
as Aryans because they were all Hindus. In India Arya Samaj, Arya Dharma, Sanatan
Dharma nod the Vedic way of life are all synonyms for Hinduism. This should make it
phain that when Englishmen and others claim lo be Aryans they carry with them the
memory of having been Hindus,
Another little detail also fits in four square with the above findings namely that as in
India the Dravids form a part of the bigger Hindu community alias Aryan community. In
England too the Druids alias Dravids form part of the English Aryans, that is to say, of the
ancient Hinduism in England-It is these same Druids alias Dravids who still continue the
ancient Hindu tradition of chanting the hymn to the Sun God (called the Gayatri Mantra
in Sanskrit) in its English translation at the ancient Hindu Stonehenge temple, at the
break of dawn on June 22 (the summer solstice) while the rest of the En B li*h Aryans i.e.
Hindus now turned Christians are blissfully unaware of their Hindu past.
Another very strong indication If that the English termination "shire" is a corrupt form of
the Sanskrit word *"" is to say as we have in India townships m*'*^ Shiva temples
known as ^to1^ Ghrushneshwar. Mahabaleshwar and G^ kie r by ^ in England
ancient Shiva temple sues mil k " B ** t ancient terminations like Lancashire,
Pembroke*.* Hamp^
and Wiltshire.
' in Eaaliib township* as in Likewise the termination bury m > Saujkril lcrm
Salisbury' Waterbury, Canterbury ** 1|1 Hindu pury reminiscent of the lime* "*>,
Hittd u country* country. In India and in Siaro (whiwh was ai
. known 'Sudamapury' Kri&haapu ry . esll llhive *nrtP * ^ ^ cho i bUry nn d
Rajpury
,, Chc-H"** J' 'Salisbury* is Sanskrit, being
Tb c fa^cd F.*i "\ Townih j P of the Mountain God
BMM*f ' H i ca iinfl thai Salisbury is located in a
fillly region T"i^Sc.l ^ * WUtthfc *"'
cu ^ru"^J7^ bviou,y lnd,caie4 ihe
u, *blch J ' ow ' Hi du ShivB !em p| c as is apparent
0 un there of uci^H-V ^ ar> ^ ^ ^ ^
from It, iWn ending ""'; l||a( |f is a corrllpi
S^bur^i billy <*^*' ^^ exactly .igniting.
form of the Sanskrit term Sha.I eeft p
M area and a Hindc-temp* 11<* J ^ J] "J
ud Petaling Jaya is Spbat.k Linga Jayan i.e. the Great Oystal )sJ Jnga Inow turned
mosque). If archaeology .v*tion 4 are undertaken around Petaling Jaya* anctcntmosl
moique u Ubound to prove the mosque to be a Shiva temple.
m may now consider the origin of the word 'England* itself. To trace its Sanskrit origin let
us first note that the Saaiktii word Granthi" continues to be spelled in English as gland'.
Similarly the word stand' as in 'lamp-aland 1 is tbc Sanaktuword sihan T {I c. 'place'). This
indicates thai the Sanskrit termination'nth' or "than' has changed into 'and* in Englikb. let
us now gu back to the ancient atlas m which the ancient Hindu* designated their own
land as 'Sindhu-sthau {i.e. 'ladarttad') and other countries as Afghanistan, Hatuchiiian,
Turaga*ban tmodern Turkey), and Aiva-sthaii modem Arabia Llkewlio ihcy had
designated the Engl^b liVetai 'An glim ha n' a name still used m Sanskrit. Tbnl 'Angla'noi
'Lnglku* was the original Sanskrit name of lb* Eogliibpc ri' iiay be vc,licd from the term:,
"Angles* and 'Anglo Saaoaa' and Aoguii' uved by the I'rcmtb. Tberefi i "Angla biban*
became 'Anglulurid' which in modern parlaii^ bai changed to 'England'.
W)
this it l* apparent that Britain' it the corrupt form Fr ^ VrU , crm 'BritoH ithttt* and the
mtdt 'MtUf
on0 -Britannic ^ 1Grcft| ^ ^ ro||tWto| u^ OT \p
T tlr^Sncnncc of the term 'Britain' rnendni < or nalSanskr. t* , mlvtflkemy wp ta the
id.eeti in
am*** *" "Great Britain'. This bns aha happened icrming "i* 1 ' ^ M Thc atldcnl H ,ndu%
had named the ^^ftWfi tn Egypt to menn W hut over the eetttnr^ riVCr . N Hindu
San^rii tradition forgone,, the %*-**
Lord Shiva*. e an skrlt name 1
C spike Sanskrit. ^ t f^T M i d P"'^".
for nearly 3.000 years Bnlon mMl 3 , one
consonents and one vowel ti cni t
DMl vowel and then the ollur a , ril0ill
r evidence hl" l ^' ich detivc from Another piece - * il!Bl KI m *h.cn ufffi
were Hindus, found to t *<r rve d. TnV
hiccups wb.ch II icca
m
SL*(fc' Et *ardra-capa1 ; ortw-poroitt .9 from SatwVrti 35E2*' Wco^-lac^m 'asthi' i;^
JL^.Im'ie,'spoiled*or "bad' The lent! cough" thc Lfe Sanslfir term with the same
prononnciatton but a Ihttv different mining namely thai in Sansknt it si11 jfi C5 'rhelgm.'
Thar ancient Britons had their other tett bonks alto In Sanskrit indicated by the term
'tri-gono-metry' which ii Sanskrit "(ri guna matrV i.e. 'three-dimensional measurement*.
Thai the ancient Britons spoke Sanskrit is apparent from word! like 'tan* and 'sonnv'
which derive from Sanskrit *soonuh* 'Navigability' 11 a puie Sanskrit compound *navi
gaman bal iti.' All words terminating in WlilV 1 as in 'perceivability, ahilty, palatability,
advisability' are Sanskrit 'bal-iti' meaning 'having the power to' or 'capacity for'. Sanskrit
'hanta. hantirau hantarah' may be compared with 'hunt, hunter, hunting" ir English.
Similarly "widow, widower'derive from Sanskrit 'widhwr. widhur.'
Terminations of English place names have all Sanskrit derivation! Some specific
examples arc :
Borough-Pura.
"Bury" as in Salisbury=Puri.
Ham as in Birmingham. Sandringham is Dham.
Ton as in Hampton, Washinpton=Sthan.
Shire at in Lancashire-Eshwar.
The term Saxon is corrupted from the Sanskrit term Saka-Stjnuh 1 e the son or progeny of
the (Hindu) Saka clan.
thu. amounts to overwhelming evidence that contrary to
cnt belief Briiain has a hoary history. The statement that
enibc Romans hnded in Britain Britons were uncivilized
T^l[T l \' lM]l<>aly ******** ** namely that iWuii Particular point ,n h.story ancient,
prosperous Britain
m
mlV hive becsi re.Luccd tn destitution and i B nnran CC due la Invasion* or natural
calamities. If British history can be tract J
10 onlV bom 5Q0 yea " back Wilh an * Jc 8 fce of coherence that is because Christianity
succeeded in almost cbttteroitna the ore-Christian historyof England even as Islamic
fanaticism made the Arabs wipe out their pre-Muslim history. But the clue* nrovided
above may help us to trace back the history of Enpland several centuries before even the
Roman mvuiion. Such an dcavour will also throw new light on the ancient history of ther
countries of Europe and of India. It \\ hoped thai inter**-d scholars will address
themselves to this ne* line of
research.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY IS ALSO A SHIVA TEMPLE
Westminster Abbey is London \s generally known as n church, M budding where
English monarch* arc crowned and a* a place were Englishmen of distinction are buried
but its fourth and nUHd grounding role which is unknown is that Hfe*!minTer \hbey iv
alit a very ancient Shiva temple since it continues to house an sneiea' sacred Hindu
stone emblem since 12% AD
What is of further and even greater significance is that a tacted Hindu none continue* 10
be in a wa> Great Britain'* royal deiJv almost exactly as Lord Shiva has been the Hindu
ruler \ deity in India since lime immemorial.
A description of that ancient stone consecrated in West-
nfnsjfif Abbey is found on page 118, Vol, 1950-62 of Keeping's
Contemporary Archives, Weekly Diary of Important World
Hrith Inde, Continually Kepi Up-to-date (established in
19311. Kcesine's Publications Lid. (London).
"The Coronation Stone, frequently referred to as the
tone of Scone* or the 'Stone of Destiny' is a roughly rectmigu-
redisb grey sandstone weighting about 450 lbs.
measunng2vi/2in. by 16 1/2 in., and IJ in. th.ck. It had for
v been u.ed as . Coronation Stone of .he K.ngs of Scot-
ho were crowned *t Scone (near Perth) until it was
ctptured , J29 by Edward i. who invaded Scotland, overdrew
the^oti*hK r (John Ba.Uo)>, brought the Stone to London,
and pUccd It in Westminster Abbey, where ,he Coronation
192
nfSc onc Have been ^ *-STi?Jfi* England and **^**~ p , *>.the Scan. had II Until it*
removal ""*",,*, wl r it a"* 1 never Urfi the Abbey (during tr*W w , ta Miet
the m Chapel) while the Core a 'on Ota ^
on two occasions; for .he '"''""" 0 rW .. in West-Lord Protector, when the "*"
whe U ,. . minster Hall and dWtagtW >', f, t saf c, y to Giouccstc, Cathedra!. ^
^ ^
About the saercd stone Mlrtr.1l, bcrni pi)bUc ,, i0 .
Scone nd the Stone of Destiny ll,e K d hlsW l""
While the Stone at Scone has an -' (ht w h, u
back some MO ye.s it. "*">" J' .,**-many ancient Icjcnds such as that
60 which ItcoN retted bis head hen be ** w 'he Villon at Bethel fCkoriif TT. X-XIXIwrf
which from Palestine passed succcs&i. reJ) ip Etypfc, Spun. Ireland, and on the migration
of r^ incirni *S*** fio the latter country to Scotland. It is considered probable by certain
historians that the stone was used at the coronation of all Scottish tings back to Kenneth
McAlpfne, rfrc Triih chieftain who conquered the Picts arid established a airy at Scone
(the Pictish capital) circa 850 A.D, Opinions vary as to whether the Stone was used for the
enthronement of rhe Pictish kingi or whether it was brought from Ireland (where
Tradition associates u with the coronation ceremonies of the ancient friib tings at the Hill
of Tata) by the Scots."
From the above description it is clear that the so-called
Stone of Scone which has an authenticated history of 900 years
*i of immemorial antiquity and that it has all along been
associated whh royaj coronations. It is, therefore, obviously a
prr-Mnilim and a pre-Christian object of worship. The des-
in of the stone namely its colour, weight and dimensions
Mes to identity il as a sacred Hindu temple stone. In
Lord Shiva has been the tradition il deity of the kings.
I Hindu kinfs used to worship and pray to Lord Shiva
oronat.otu and an important occasions all their lives. The
inn battle cry *JJ Eklingaj,- or 'Har Har MahadeV and 'Sat
nused by .he king, and their armies while fighting
^v also refers to the same Lord Shiva represented by a
rtJ^r^*^* Un ^ now on **'** * he Pope"*
tuu "* temnfct all over Europe.
.Z7JS5*** Lo """- Wc m , s et Abbey. <1W^;.;^ ," W p T""'" Abbcy Sieved ,o
bv.
nl
195
lrd and, Scotland andI ultimately to London over fa^ mVb ^. also of special s.pificance
since the Arab-IaraaM region surround Palestine is known to have been a centre of Shiva
worship m pre-histork times- That is why intheKaba in Mecca the Muslins congregate for
the anmial pilgrimage and continue to pay homage to the prchlamic Hindu Shiva Linga
consecrated there. The Dome on the Rock in Jerusalem Is a shiva temple since (he Rock
itself is the deity there. It is the done of one such Shiva temples in Palestine which has
travelled to London via Egypt. Ireland and Scotland in a journey that has spanned several
milleniums.
The term "Stone of Destiny' is also a very ancient Hindu concept since it is Lord Shiva
who is associated not only with human destiny but with the ultimate end of the whole
universe It is He who releases the elemental fury of fire or water to engulf the universe
from time to time according to Hindu belief:
In the extract quoted above H may be noticed that the Stone of Scone is said to have been
carried by the Scots when they migrated to Scotland That is illogical because how could
Scots'mi grate from 'Ireland?'. But the answer is found in the Sanskrit term 'Kshatriya' of
which "Scots' is an English corruption. Kshatriya fanned out from India to different parts
of the world in prehistoric times as is recorded in the Indian Puranas i.e. ancient
histories. Wherever they went they carried with them their deity Lord Shiva represented
by a sacred stone- it is one such stone which is now preserved in Westminister Abbey and
A Christian kings of England still follow the ancient Indian custom of associating Lord
Shiva with their coronations^ hrehjey inherited from the Scots alias Kshatriyas who
migrated (mm Ireland, e Arya land and made Scotland their home.
The word Scotland is itself a corrupt the Sanskrit term Kshatra-Sthan. This needs a title
changed into 'gland \ ' indicates 'lamp-sthi indicate that the Sanskrit ending "an*'"'than
form of
term Ksnatra^mon mh* , p^u,^
Tta , word gramh.- J*^,^- The* Similarly the word 'tomp-swri W^| .^ of . thM - hi*
instances i
^ rr , n <fnrmed Into ** " Hnflilh. That is how 'K^^ b>n' Wci-nt Scotland-Thai the
Seats subsconsciously main their old Hindu. Kihatnva .ttUhnMial attachment to their
ancient 'Stone 0 f Dcijin> alias 'Sione of Scone" is apparent from ihe agitata demand they
make from lime to lime for the return of the stone ra ScotUncT* custody Scottish
nationalist* not having succeeded frantic appeals, three young high-strung Scot students
and i woman domestic science teacher forced their way into Westminster Abbey stealthily
in the early morning hours of Christmas Day rn 1950 and spirited away the stone,
reverently drapine n in the Scottish flag They drove with the stone to faraway Scotland
and consecrated it in Arbroath Abbey. The four daredevil* were Ian Hamilton 25*year*old
Glasgow University la student, Gavin Vernon (24), Alan Stuart (20) both engineering
students at Glasgow University and Miss Katrinn Mathesoo. (22) domestic science
teacher in Ross Shire.
Leading members of the Church And Nation Committee of rhe Church of Scotland when
informed that their ancient, sacred Stone of Destiny had been once again brought home,
were thrilled. They issued a statement that "the stone has been for long cherished as a
Scottish possession of peculiar historic and sentimental value, both as associated with the
coronation of Scottish kings and as a symbol of Scottish independence and nationhood".
The theft or the stone first discovered by a night watchman, al tf e_m- on Christmas Day
(1950) triggered off a frantic search. A statement was also issued on behalf of the
Government that the King was greatly diitressed at the removal of the stone by unknown
persons, The group which had removed the stone made it known that they meant do
insult or embarrassment W the monarch but they wanted that the stone should remain in
Scotland and only carried to Westminster Abbey temporarily for coronations lo the
meantime Scotland Yard men succeeded in tract of the Stone to Arbroath Abbey in
Scotland. From
197
th ence It was carried back and enshrined again M iu ori , place under the Coronation
Chair seat -, w Wnmi , ef Afc . after an absence or 109 days, "^
In February 1952. the matter was again raised In Use Home of Commons. Several
members from Scotland insisted thai the stone must remain in Scotland because the Scott
had a very deep sentimental attachment and reverence for it, But the Prune Minister,
Winston Churchill announced on behalf of the Government that the Government too
attached great importance lo retaining the stone in Westminster Abbey because ibe surac
had been in the Abbey for 650 years and bad "an historic significance for all the countries
of the Coromno^eaUh," In the meantime Dr. John McCormick, Chairman ot the Stouiih
Covenant Movement issued a warning that unless the Stone was returned to Scotland it
might be removed again by force.
On May 9, 1951 Lord Brabazon of Tata, supported by a number of Scottish and English
peers, urged in the House r Lords that the stone be returned lo Scotland, He described
the Stone of Scone as "so wrapped up in history, ceremonial and prophecy that was
unique tn the world" and emphasusJ that since the 5th century the kings of Argyll and
latar the kings oi Scotland, had been crowned upon n until it <*a i umoved to tn gland by
Edward I in 1926,
That Lord Bruba/on of Tara should have left two* about the stone was natural since as
mentioned above few has been associated with the coronation ceremoa.es of inc ancient
Irish kings at the Hilt of Tara.
SurpriMUgly enough even this **J* ^JLT^ Sanskrit, royal Hindu significance. In Imha al
AJ ^ actually have a 'Tara-Garh' meaning the Hill IK Hindu monarch* who ruled from
Ajmtr (aJu* *&** actually crowned on the 11.11 of Tara touting abo ^
i AjIBW, The Sanskrit word 'Tara MM* " actually the Saustiril of the hngliih * iud *'"
Fven the eight-pointed cross in the Union ri*f* fcwi *e ancient Hindu, Kshatriya
tradition signifying ^ the monarch hold* sway in all the eight-directions. In India a ||
building connected with royalty or divinity have been octagonal. Even its cupolas and
kiosks hove been octagonal. These can be seen even ioda> Hindu tradition also names
eight supernatural beings as guards for those eight directions. Hindus are the only people
who have divined special names for each of those directions.
One additional indication of Hindu rituals in Europe having been supplanted by Christian
ceremonies is found in the word Amen" meaning "peace' terminating all religious
observances. This is ancient Hindu practice because according to immemorial Hindu
custom ill religious recitals in Sanskrit end with the thrice pronounced word 'Shami,.
Shanti....Shaflti' of which 'Amen' is the Islamic and Christian synonym
All this ii emphatic proof that Ireland, Scotland, England and in feet the whole of Europe
used to practise Hinduism, and dial if this important detail has laded out of historical
memory it only shows up a big *oid that exists m world history despite our much vaunted
scholarship.
An important cue to rewrite that part of world h istory when anew Europe used to profess
Hinduism is provided by the Stone of Scone Sione of Destiny. Tne British people as a
whole and speciallv l evince such a deep sentimental attachment for that e* Shm has
been their royal deity from the time when Indian m te term Scots is m English
corruption of that Sanskrit
T n!^ **I ** Ver a Wi,d Eur l*- established a Hindu ^r ..on ^ crowned their kings over
a Shiva Ling, now
a^a^iT b UndCf ""a"-*to" Chair inside Westminster
* * eo^^ 2T qUOtCd ab VC ' indiCatC that * Shiva L "** 0Scd *d orber ,n the city of
Scone in Scotland and still carUer
\m
on the Hill of Tara ahas^raGarh in Ire.and. HiMheiefore.ipp^^ finc ient Engird. Scot and.
Ireland and cities throughout Euro* h*d numerous Shiva temples, and that the
Westminster Abbey in ZZ Is itself a Shiva temple in addition to its other roles.
The British Coronation Chair has lions at its f 0ur feet This Is Hindu tradition still
surviving in modem Britain. In Hindu tradition the throne is called "The Lion Seat"
Moreover the lions at the few of the Coronation Chair are of the Hindu design,
'SAIW5,
25
Ingush is a dialect of Sanskrit
l* vety seldom realized that English is as much a dialect of Sanskrit most of the Indian
languages, Almost , 0la j .-norancc of this fad hai rcsulicH in compilers of the Engti gft
dictionary thcmsclvc* going *rong. They have e.ther railed ,o jive the Sanskrit origin or
their words "here nectary or have provided wrong etymological explanations.
Take ihe word "upper*. From its spelling it should be clear that its original pronunciation
is 'oopcr \W\X) and thai no* it it used and pronounud in Hindi ana Sun&kiil. And yet
English dictionary doesn't tcJl he icaocr that 'upper' is Sanskrit word, Moicotcr il only
Uie iDgl-sh-speaking peopt stuck to the phonetic pronunciation 'oopcr' Uicy would have
no difficulty m making themiclvts undci stood by Hindi ant] Sanskrit-speaking pcuplc.
"Mouse* if phonetically pronounced would be "Moos', it i* not then difficult 10 realixetnal
ilia a truncated L'orffl ol the Sanskrit 'moosnak'.
'Sfceat' in English il "swed' tn Sanskrit. "Name is 'nam 1 (Tm) m Sanskrit. In tngliih it u
also used 10 combination ** in 'pseudonym, antonym'. 1 lit English word "synonym" is
therefore full) Sanskrit since in the Jiaiici language we would convey ibciamc meaning by
saying 'sum nam' (fltr tfmy
are phoncucolly pionuunted would be "ectHra" In tnglish V b, often pronounced as V ,i m
'cut, cuugh. col iWn| the k" sound of V v-c I.nd that "centra" * ID (a* *kcn<ir a -. The
equivalent Sanskrit word it 'kendrtf.
200
201
English pronunciation branching olTii ,,., , lo uehwiib iu wi.rc.-SM.krfc hat |ot iu
,!!?"!? fter "'" l ee d sometimes at "k" or V alt confu, ed . Thus ^ l JZ*' 'centre* the
proper pronunciation should nave been T T? ln the word 'committee ,he proper
pronunciation Ao.Vb. lamiti' because in the English alphabet V is pronounced a W
Committee when pronounced as 'samiti" n be immedc ately spotted out to be a Sanskrit
word, This indicate* how English has slipped up on its pronunciation while retaining the
original phonetic Sanskrit spelling or words like "committee'.
Taking the two words "central" and 'commitiec* together we hod. therefore, that they
should be pronounced as kentral sacniti*. We find that the term 'central committee' ued
in English, is identical with the Sanskrit term 'kentral' or rather kendriya samiti'. Its
English usage has been confused mi] confounded because of two sounds V and *k' having
been saddled on a single letter V,
The English pronouns you. we and she arc truncated SjUjicri. pronouns "yuyam, way a in'
and *ia'. The Sanskrit word 'madira' for wine is still in vague in English and other
European languages as 'madeira'. The word *psalm* (pronounced "sam*> for verse meant
to be iun t *. is Sanskrit as may be seen from the term 'Sam Veda".
The words 'known* and unknown' when phonetically pronounced will be seen to be the
Sanskrit words 'jnan* and 'ajnan.'
Truth'and "untruth" are not explained to be or Sanskrit origin. Thai is an instance of the
great etymological drawback of the Englise dictionary. Remove the letter V from the ft
words and one gets 'ruth' and "anruth" which arc Sanskrit. Tha proves that the letter V is
an Engli&b interloper (fl th Sanskrit words.
The words hunt, hunter* and "huming' we ol origin as may be seen from the Sanskrit
word Miami.l.|fl'J
w
202
. kllkr > -|tfM>' cwnrtl) (Two killm) and ha***,, (meaning miici '
^H^ral killers).
The English prefix ^a' as in 'parathyphoid' p^ !Lw i5 the Sanskrit "para <<**) meaning
another
Another English pfix 'dis' in 'disparate, disentangle, d.sen^age" is the Sanskrit "dus" as
in 'dushchar, duslar' &w, p) Pen meaning "all round' as m penmetre or peripheral k
Sanskrit pari' as in 'r*ri~bhrama' and 'parwnatra", The English word perimeue is actual!y
Sanskrit 'parimatra.' Similarly trigonometry- >* Sanskrit (firpi mi) 'iri-guna-matra'i.e.
'three dimensional measurerrrnt.' This indicates that the ancient world studied us
mathematics in Sanskrit with the help of Sanskrit texts.
The word 'metre" for measure if phonetically pronounced is the same as the Sanskrit
word mai-ra'. In Sanskrit. Hindu tradition matra is an all pervading measure used in
imisic.medicine. mathematics etc. Even in English prosody the measure is known as
"metre* as in Sanskrit prosody. Moreover, even the divisions of a poetic line are known as
foot' which is an exact translation of the Sanskrit prosodic terms charan" and pad' Even
the word 'prosody' is from the Sanskrit word iinrrn) "prasad'-a quality essential in all
verse, namely the ability to please the listener's mind by its grace.
The blend of drinks called 'punch' in English is a
Sanskrit word signifying a combination of five as in other
Sanskrit terms like 'punch-gavya* (the five products of the cow), the
puneh-amrita* (the five-fold nectar), punch-ratna" (the five jewels) and
the village 'punch' (council of five)
Soup' b) Sanskrit word as is explained in Sir Monier hams' dictionary Cooks in the
Jagannaih temple in Puri are know" as'topakar"
209
, B li 5 h 'sugar*, old French ^chre. Greek sakkharon' derive from Sanskrit 'Sharkara/ The
word jaggery |, 0 /. mal-pronu nciaiion of sharkara.
English 'tuny'. French 'title/ Arabic "tutiyV stem from Sansknr Tuttha iJrO), English
pepper; Latin 'piper/ Greek peperV originate from Sanskrit 'ptppali/-English orange' is
naranj' in Arabic, and narang t in Sanskrit. 'Lilak" in French, Spanish. Persian, is nilak* in
Sanskrit. Ginger is gingibcr in Latin, deriving fromshrtnga^er' in Sansknt Candy is 'candi*
in French, *qand' in Arabic, from khawf piTO) in Sanskrit.
Beryk is "berullos in Greek from 'waidoorya' in Sanskrit Anil* in English and Spanish, is
'atari' in Arabic from the word *nili" in Sanskrit for indigo. The word 'aniline" derives
from the same root This explains the ancient Hindu name "Nile Krishna" to the river
"Mile in Egypt. Over the centuries Egyptians cut off from their Sanskrit, Hindu heritage
forgot that 'Nile" stood tor 'blue" in Sanskrit, and they added the adjective 'blue calling
their river "Blue Nile which is a philogicai absurdity.
'Aggressor*, is a Sanskrit word since 'agra* (3rc) means far-ward' and 'sar (*F) i$ "to
move*. One who moves into another's territory is. therefore., an aggressor.
The Sanskrit word nasika' has been corrupted to *no*e" la English, and led to words like
'nasal/
English 'terrestrial* derives from Sanskrit dharatal' i.tPFWV This indicate* that Sanskrit
"dhttra" meaning the Earth' becomes "terra" latin Likewise the Sanskrit word 'madhya"
for'middle' rjecornesmeai m Latin and English. The term Mediterranean' is, therefore.
Sanskn signifying an ocean situated between w o big land masses J
explain the Sanskrit origin of words like mediator, meditation, middle
Terms like dentistry from Sansknt danta sham' ***** m
(
207
ne w or<b suicide, patricide, matricide' arc Sanskrit . -chhld (**). p-tri-chhid (top*),
matri-chhid (-rp^,, cxpli.n* WJf* " kc g^micide, insecticide, pesttcide S j ncc
ttMSunm (ft* ft 3 *) > Sanskrit mcan ' cumng - kilIing - cnd 'ng, oieminaiing/ That
shows how Western languages still coin words
from Sanskrit rood
The Latin word 'quo' as in *Q_uo vadis....quo warranto* i s from Sanskrit as *quo
gacchhasi (*rraft) "where do you go*.
Myth' in English is 'mitthya* (fowl) i.e. false in Sanskrit. English Peter' derives from
pilar' (for*) in Sanskrit. Likewise David is Dravid* and Abraham is a mal-pronunciation of
the Sanskrit word Brahma, Brahms, an English surname is indicative of the indent
Sanskrit moorings of the Jamily like the surname 'Brahme' i fin in India.
Panorama, cinerama are the same as 'manorama" in Sanskrit The termination rama" (t)
In Sanskrit indicates pleases or enchants or entrances the mind
Tht word "mar* < =tf) as in 'mar somebody's chances' is Sanskrit meaning 'kill* or "hurt,
harm*, Bond, bondage, bandage are from Sanskrit "bandh, bandhan" (Ta, ftR).
Accept is (aftro) a-kshipta (that which is not thrown away Succim is frfireT) sankshipta.
Trie English 'cough* is from Sanskrit "kaf .^,. Though Sanskrit 'kaf* signifies phelgm
while
cough is slightly different, ii is not difficult to see that cough antes from kaf i.e, phelgm
The slight difference in the English and
annotations of the same word are due to the many centuries of epentiw of English from
115 Sanskrit source.
The Stmkrii word antar h pronounced in Englisas "inter" a* national, imcwsiiy interpret,
interpolate, intermediate, intermittim. imcrdepenocm
Path ha* m identical meaning in both English and
Saffiknl tt a very m.nor d.fference in pronourci^. & Sanskrit ending for comparative
and supe,,^. m ^ ^ called the -tar-tun. bhava* (* m , , n Sansk , t ^ 2 mahattar,
lagtiutar" etc. for greater, bigger and lesser"respeciivek Trie corresponding superlative
terms are adhiktum, mahatturrt laghut^ like the English words 'optimum, maximum
The English *ord fraternity* is Sanskrit 'Bhratri-niti
Nocturnal, diurnal derive from Sanskrit naktam' {=n=*u foe night and divas' for day. The
English words regime, reign, sovereign, suzerain are Sanskrit rajyam, rajan, swarajan ( 7
nm, htr, =-nprc 1
The English word *go* is from the Sanskrit Gama-gacheha*( T P'T rt5). Cow' in English is
*gow' in Sanskrit, Vestry is the room where * vastra' (clothes) are kepi in a church. In
Sanskrit too such a room is called vestry. Likewise the term vesture' is vastra*. Saint
(Sanskrit 'saint'), preacher (Sanskrit "pracharak") and "adore (Sanskrit 'adar'), "Door* (for
Sanskrit 'duar'), "man* for 'nunat peter, mater, daughter, pita, mata, duhita. son, sonny
from Sanskrit 'sunuh'. deity from devata, theos from Sanskrit "devas* are all Sanskrit. The
prefi* pro" as in pro offer, pro create is the same as Sanskrit 'pravakia iswfl, prabhat TO
prabhakariHi*.
Since all such explanations are lacking In the English dictionary it is obvious that English
philolo^ d etymologists are largely unaware of Sonskril being the source language of
English either directly or through 1 aim and1.1 as illustrated above. Tim ignorance has
resulted .n CM* the Engiish dictionary committing grave errors in explatmrw origin or
their words. As an instance we may pemi * explanations appended to the words 'wWd*
and in the average English dictionary The ^ !! explained as 0 *a woman who has lost
her husband
iron etymological "or. In English labour-*' sort-cr, lefiture-er* means a
-SS-W-^ r*i-
er
had been a wdow" the word 'widower* would have meant *omn a WW BOtl *
uch ij woU| <* have
tttffii oi the word
^r^rLer ^ .. m-rrled woman's husband, whikit
S**~^ *"; Eft?"?'* b U con.nut.ed this pros* error because .hey don't
I lhr **rds widow' and 'widower arcthe corrupt
jrw of .he Sanskrit ord* widtm.V and widhur' (RW^I fim)
A mnn dlHfefll *udy of the English derivatives would
repeal rnflti) more mistake This should also impiess on
:oaprten of ibe English dictionaries to captain many of their
waiii in terms of iheir Sanskrit origin as 'truth' and 'untruth*
boa: nd 'unrui* We may go a step further and say thai
! -.jh n but all European languages would do well to
i thctr dictionaries .horoughly examined by Suti&kntisU.
i a to imj Euiopcan dictionaries ill have to be rewritten
U* helpofSoiuUit. M chauvinistic and political consi-
ihem *h> from such a task Indians, would have
iskti pan of the rewriting of then maimed
26
ANCIENT VEDIC PRIESTHOODS OF EUROPE
Currently there are two important priesthood* in Europe which are often heard of One is
the Pope in dome. The other is the Archbishop of Canterbury in Eigland.
Both the present Pope (alias Papa) John Paul U and Dr. Robert Runcie. the Archbishop of
Canterbury are blissfully unaware that theirs are basicillv ancient Vcdie priesthoodi which
were forced to turn Chrivian because of the Christian onslaught The attack on the Papacy
came around 312 AD. and that on the Archbishopry of Canterbury In the sixth century
A-D.
Canierbury is the Sanskrit term Sankarpury i. e. toe township of Lord Sankar alias Shiva.
Here the philological analysis of how we arrive at that conclusion The first ihiee letters
'Can* should be pronounced as 'Sansm n , Ifcjj ** Centre* the first three let'crs arc
pronounced ** ?*. At r the syllable W it should be *ker* because ^*^ to T in English.
For instance the ^^2 into 'nautical' and 'Nayak' into 'Knight* ,n ^jj^ 'Cantcr' should be
pronounced as Sankai. bury' as in Shrewsbury. Atusbury. Scvcnbury tl o.
Sanskrit suffix *pury' meaning a 'townsbtp . ^
Naturally therefore the priest at Sankorpury w *
priest worshipping Lord Shiv U- Sankar.
Having come to that ^ ,u ' ton ^ RimC lc ..*!. I wrote to the present incumbent UT rc-
Christls* Vedic
whether any such legend or memory o P r past attaches to hi* seat in Canierbury
Th.rw.ffiood enough *** fb*t Canterbury did S|1 fact I*-**** ^ Cant f Ury ' 5^ ar p
Ury w the .l of ^ Vedic Sankarachary;.. From the 6,b century AD thr vedfe dttWWiffleB"
in Canterbury was forced lo turn Christ iii*.
Similarly the Papacy In Rome was also a Vcdic Shankara-chafya*t The letter addressed
in this connection by Dr. R Goyil of Basildon, England to the Pope after he listened to ray
lecture on the topic in Basildon is reproduced hereunder
To.
Hit Holiness, Papa John Paul It
The Vatican, Rome
Italy Dated November 10, 1986
Your Hoiinew.
According to tome recent important discoveries made bj Mr P N Oak, founder-President
of the Institute for Rewriting Indian Hijory IN 128, Greater KailashI, New Delhi
110048. India the Papacy is a pre-Christian Vedic priesthood.
'Papa-ha* in Sanskrit signifies an absolver from sin.
Vaiicaa is the Sanskrit lertn Valtca meaning 'an hermitage' So yours *, Veda Vatica i.e.
a Vcdic hermitage.
The SHtfne Chapel in which every new Pope is elected gcis i< name from Shiv Sthan
meaning a Shiva temple.
ShMiogftBimi image* or Lord Shiva which your pre-OMiitun predecessors u d l0
WOrihip havc ^ beefl (cd
to the Etruscan Muwum in the Vatican.
afkr?hrvIdL f f B r C,0 i Wbichllie *" located is named r ,ne Vedie 'ocafDation Rama.
211
Paintings of Ramayanie episodes are found in Biru houses dug up in Italy,
The city of Ravenna gets its uama from Ran,* 1 * great adver-iarv Ravan.
Verona is named after the Vedic deity Varun.
Divinity is the Sanskrit term *deva-niti' i.e. the way of life of devas meaning gods.
Your uncompromising views on abortion and on divorce are of Vedic vintage and not of
the permissive Christian society.
According to Mr P.N, Oak's finding* the last Vcdic Papa was stain by a neo-Christian
convert emperor Const amine around 312 A.D. and the Bishop of Rome a priest of the
Ihea tiny, newly formed Christian group was installed in lta.it hoary prestigious,
venerable Vedic scat, as the first Christian Papa.
I trust that Your Holiness and your flock will feel immensely proud of these newly
discoveied holy Vedic antecedent*.
May, t therefore, request Your Holiness to order a thorough research into the Vedic
antecedents of the Papacy,
The eminent researcher Mr. P.N. Oak is these days in London to deliver a series or
lectures on his stupendous ds coverics.
The UlS-p.g. velum. OM WORLD VEDIC HERITAGE written by Mr. P.N. <M dtawt. in
g * ,l ? ttU f the p
re-Christian Vedic past of all regions and communities
I hope Your Holiness will be deeply mterestedI in ac^ng yourself and the world with the
primordial VM* v
mankind Your. Slacerely
R.LGoyal
IS Furrow Felde Basildon, Essex SSJ6 5 H.B. United Kingdom
:i2
h . v * discovered that two important Christian
*", rf Em** Vedic S*^.ntchary .cat, we r*a cb
priMfecffdi < ' ^ 0ne js that all Islamic and Chrli* 0
C5ST. 1 B*?hdd, Damsscus, Mecca etc etc. were
ST**)*** 0 * 1
T^p ^ import** conclusion we draw is that a network
Tl,eiei ' n0t an f nd ;, n phenomenon alone.
rf S.nk a T-char>YK ^ ^ SankBracharya Ietft ^
: U S to 5. * ** ~ w n cm ;72 hi5tory
) memory was deliberately wiped out by Christian and Mfcd.ni i-vaden. It Es ihe job of the
researcher to reconstruct all ach obliterated history.
In India itself all those tutored in the British way believe thai the first Sankarachary lived
in the 8th century A,D. But as discimed in a special chapter of my book titled - Some
Blunders $fbdia& Biuoriaal Research the period of the 1st Sankaracharya has to be
antedated by 1300 years.
From thai it is aaparcni that a 1303-ycar-strctch of history tctnaias totally unknown. It is
no wonder, therefore, if the lustory or all other Sbaokaracharya seats throughout the
world *lso ant obliterated during those 1300 years.
27
ANCI6MT ITALY WAS A HINDU COUNTRY AND
THE POPE A HINDU PRIEST
Human memory being proverbially short, old history h progressively forgotten in the
illimitable flow of time. History it further obliterated by natural calamities like volcanic
eruptions a nd earthquakes. But a third factor which plays more havoc with history is
suppressive and destructive human tendencies
All these have combined to obliterate from current text books of history all traces of an
ancient Hindu world empire, The first two natural agencies being common to all earthly
civilizations it is the third, namely the human agency, which * c shall take special note of.
Id the pre-Christian era the Vedic alias Hindu civilualioo alias the Aryan way of life had
spread throughout the world because of the energetic enterprise of the Indian people
whose motto, enshrined in the Rigvcda, was *Kriavanlo Vishwam Aryam 1 i.e. make the
whole world Arya. Wis* that motto tncj spread all over the world preaching the ideals of
rifibteo conduct, renunciation and sacrifice, one human bratfaeibo and a common earthly
heritage. Armies led by Indian ** called the Kshatriyas, extended their ***J to all p*fU
earth and in their wake Indian educators and admims: spread knowledge and established
enlightened and pw.n welfare administrations in a hnmanrty wbicb wa aboriginal
standard.
That Hindu civiliiation was swamped fir* by the ^ 11 ^ kith and later by the barbaric Artbs
who ip^ ^ ^ torture and terror wiih torch and iword. A nspi
b which arc mainly responsible fot systematic
if co i*1
** or **2 fiflp *">* b00 ^ D " r,tc suc
fWn 1| ,hc t C " k to r epiece *"* story of the worldwide
,JIP 1,Hmdu eWtaltaL Such history will
^ of that f'^' ^^ from coUll try to country and
nar*i** me ' CU i^ for clues m the history, language, *" * 'TlTmodes of worship,
literature, mythology, ^a^C^ "d-***** remains of Afferent areas. "* Ut ,. therefore. take
up the study of what wenow call K la ipc prc-Christun era . large pan of Italy was known
L"Lh. the people who nonrisned there from about the 7th " thc second century B.C.
ere known as Etruscans. Some Lrautio. .bout the Etruscan* is found under those two
heads the Encyclopaedia Bmanruca and obviously in other encyclopaedias
But scholars idmrt that the Etruscan civilization is still a big panlfi. very Imlc a known
about it. Ovei whelming opinion av thai ihc Eiruicani were people from the East and they
seem to appear in Italy suddenly as though from nowhere.
The popular notion that the Etruscans were a temporary
traft from some other country suddenly and mysteriously
immigrating into Italy around the 7th century B.C. and then
leaving Italy bag ana baggage around the second century is not
well founded. The Etruscan civili2iion evolved from within
luly and lost its idenmy when ibe Italian people (then known as
Euuscaaij were gradually fotced to prolcss Christianity. The
mistaken nouon that the ttruscans had no earlier moorings
ui Italy aiuo fiom almost total ignorance about the history of
Italy and E^ope in the pre-Cbnuun era. The mistaken notion
ftm somehow ihatuuscaxu vanned into thin air around the
*iury B.C. arises from ignorance about the way the
ruscans were overwhelmed ana made to give up their tiadwo-
> ol Wdic or Aryan We , 0 chMge for Christianity,
There has thu lbecanodiKOttUfiuily ^ ^.^
215
, v r e decendants of those earlier known it Eimeaoi 11 Etruscans in their own turn are
descendant* of the earn*,
SLtf **" wiy f lifC lhC W ******* able to \ r v Etruscan* derive that name from the
Hud a taec
Mr*.
We have compiled some evidence which goes to prove ifcai ihepre-Chrisuan era the
Italian people, whether of Use Etruscan or pre-Etruscan era were Hindus ihai fa to say
they practised the Aryan or Vedic modes of worship and spoke Sanskrit or a language with
a preponderant element of Samara. As far back as one can trace Italian history it is
nothing hot Hinduism and Hinduism.
The preponderance of the Vedic way of life and of Sanskrit
luly may he gauged from the Tact that even after professing
Cbnatianity for almost two milleniums Italians still practise
Hindu rituals under a Christian label and speak a highly
Sanskritiied language.
Almost all so-called Christian-Catholic rituals, observant and festivals are of Hindu origin.
They are being Paused b? Iiatwna from times immemorial when they were Hindus and
arc >e.ng continued in our own day though Italians and Catholics everywhere now
profess to be Christians.
Uok at the All Souls Day obsvance * JX term itself is an exact translation of the
S"^*. ^ v.nee called 'Sarva-Pitxi-Amavasya" In Sanskrit Sana *-
W a W signifies ancestors' souls and ***^> Moon) day. Abraham the first prophet of
the ****. ^ and Christians is none other than the Hind- Brahma ur creator.
The term Chrttmns is Cmhnn-mni ..e the m fl ^ f / ^ the Hindu incarnation at the time
of the Mnha ^ Ct && word 'mas' in Sanskrit means 'month". i DCC ^
delivered the famous 'Bhagvadgecta' sermon to devotee that month is Cri*bni*mas.
0r, JH Iber The Sanskrit suffi* 'mas' "Unifies that the *" t i fc T! ' bear* " original
Sanskrit connotation signj . word *Cri , "" mB
fyiflf w* 0,e mWI,n *
h ... ^ proved by comparing a synonym namely the Christians are wrong in believing th.t
the tern,
^.STi-* of December became the symbol is the numef ] MO* So the term *X-mas oho
signifies the
"S month. Let us now look at the word 'Deccmbef itself. Th.t too a Sanskrit term Tcce-
ember' mcamng the 10th (P a r ioftheiodiac)mon.h.' From this, one can infer that ancient
Hindu tradition aligned the 12 months of the year lo the 12 parts of the heaven U the
zodiac.
This is fully borne out by the four Sanskriti terms September, Octc-ember T Nov-ember
and Dece ember standing respectively for September, October, November and December,
That a to say by their Sanskrit meaning they constitute the 7th. 8th, 9tb and 10th months
of the year. By current confounded Christian computation they arc ibe 9lb, 10th, Nth, and
12th months of the year. What caused this incongruous dislocation to the Gieionan
calendar 1 That is to say what made months called the 7th. hth. Via and 10ih to be placed
9th and 10th. 11th and 12th 7 This displacement is explained by the fact that Christians
who used io observe a new year beginning in March, ai laid down by hoary Hindu practice,
suddenly switched on to January 1 as the New Year Day. Though modern Christianity
effected a major departure id ihis pellicular Hindu practice which wu part of their
common world heritage, luckily the four surviving Sanskrit terms of the months from
September to Decern bet help us in i constructing a foi gotten detail of the Hindu calendar
as t prevailed throughout the ancient world.
Tim enables us to see clearly how the terms 'December,'
and'Chroma/all tignify the loth month i.e. "mas'.
ie*m TbnsunaV has a further added significance namely
217
t b.U " 'Chrisna-mas' i.e. the month dedicated to Lord Chrin. because he delivered hi
r amoui 4ermon lQ "" thai mouth, tntndtatbe Hindus observe the anniversary ,hat aermon
as Gtett Jayanti and that fall* ar01ind Deccmbcr
Christ* so-called sermon on the mount it no other than Chrisna's sermon delivered to
Arjuq wliile Chrisna wai mounted on a chariot. So Chrisna's sermon was actually a icrmon
on the mount. That sermon though delivered to Arjun has since been accepted and
venerated as a sermon providing rndispenia-ble spiritual guidance to all humans
embroiled in mundane misery and longing for salvation. That is exactly what U said about
the so-called sermon on the mount, propagated in the name of Christ. From this it is
apparent that it is really the Chrisna legend and worship that is being perpetuated in the
Christian world.
The ctoss that the Christians wear is really the Hindu Swaslik with a little Christian
distortion, as in several other respects namely that its hooks have been clipped and the
*crti-cle bar of the cross has been elongated.
The Christian practice of saying 'Amen* signifying "peace* derives from the Sanskrit.
Hindu tradition Ql ending all sacred chants with the words 'Shatuih' Le. 'peace 1 .
Having seen how Christmas signifies the month dedicated to Chrisna u is not difficult to
understand that Michaelmas was originally the month named after Michael. The ending
'mas' clearly indicates that it was a whole month that was denoted and not a mere day-
naraely 29lh September as it i* in currea Christian practice. The Christian term
Michaelmas Day b a contradiction in terms equating a moiUh (BfftSfl l 3
The Christian terms 'Christmas..,Michaelmas" arc rem, cenl of the Hindu terms 'Adhik-
mas.. Shravanmas
The All Saints Day, November I. cut u drift from thcHinou calendar has been advanced by
a month to coincide
^ *.! Mb* *** c>l " d N " ka ChaCurdasbl *htn gjodu I>cP** dUpatchcd the demon
Nir*ki Uf
UrfV l^odd\od rn.de the "*!. for all Ufa. U
w ibeo^r I forfi ai in Hindu tradition the day i
Christian Vt* aKC *
^served * * *'* fciSt ' ^ r , fc c
tw ftk Pope ^Snifying a 'father' denves from * . 0 1ccl Like the father 'protectrng'
hi. children ihe
rooi -P P|; (prOlcct0 f) of the congregation, The
a, ii apparent from the Sanskrit root from which his liulc lltf L wat a Hindu priest. His
seat, the Vatican b
to, word used to signify - bower as in Ashrarn-Vatica' or Udyan Vatica', The retreats of
Hindu monks and pnesU were always called Vatica because they were peaceful bowers i.e.
sylvan retreats. Even the V ending is Sanskrit as in 'Kesavan* or *Raghavan\
A funnei proof that the Pop^ was a Hindu priest and tii
219 Vatican w * "tad" religious lwt i mflth|e ^ Siva-Lmga representing Ood Siva that ,t
preserved l n lh -Vttucan'i Etruscan Museum, That Siv^L.nga it lmon| Aow which the
Hindu Pope (i.e. priest) u*ed to worship.
From this we assert that if a systematic chatolog,cal excavation is undertaken in the
precincts of the Vatican one h jure to discover not only many other Siva emblems but also
other icons of the Hindu pantheon. For this it will be necessary to took into the Vatican*!
massive walls, it* underground cellars and its entire grounds, It is quite apparent that
since the Christian faith swamped the ancient hindu faith in Rome and the rest of Italy
the teeming Hindu idols in those holy Hindu Vatican precincts were either walled up or
buried or broken and thrown away or otherwise destroyed.
We have a photograph of that holy Hindu Siva Unga, displayed in the Vatican's Etruscan
Museum, for anyone lo see so as to leave no doubt in anyone*! mind that it is the
traditional Hindu Siva emblem. The Encyclopaedia Britannic* also tells us that the
Etruscans (i.e. ancient Italians) worshipped meteoric stonei mounted on carved plinths.
Obviously this is a correct description of the Siva Lmga which the photograph of the piece
displayed in the Vatican fully bears out*
On pace 790 of its VIII volume the encyclopaedia notes According to Livy Etruscans were
more addicted to rehg.ou. practices than any other nation...Places, trees and sonpro-
bably all had individual spirits, and a number of .acted awKoiu. stones standing on carved
plinths has been found.
The above passage coatatns three cb^ ^ enable us to identify the faith of the =^^%.
namely their religiosity, their prad.ee of ^J*^^ trees and stones, and their worship of il*
Siva ua, ^^ Hinduism prescribes almost daylong and . aH nM ^ fflbo ucol religious
observances. Hindus alio worship s ffletp)M and Hanuman or Siva, trees such as the
banyan, ^^ Kril& ns and pecpal, and rivers such as the Oanga, end Kavcri,
j
Earlier on P*F 784 of ,hc me volume the encyclopaedia _ J lh . t t hc Eimacan* used
the word 'ais' for deity or god j a
* " ** f * r d *' ics or god * in ,h , c ? ,UfaI ; Thesc
arcSa n,Vri. words and are ia common use in Indu. not only , feartfit hu in all native
languages derived from Sanskrit
The other word* that the encyclopaedia mentions such alpon'for offcumj ,s the
Sanskrit'arpan ;* an for mother is Cher from <Maia\ in Sanskrit or from two goddesses
'Dur.qd 'Adit*' who gave birth to the deities i.e. the gods and to the demons alias Daiiyai.
Tula' for wife is Sanskrit 'pnya\ 'thura' for brother is the Sanskrit 'Bhratara/ and .nefis' for
grandson u 'natu' in Indian languages
The Vatican is the traditional seat of the highest Hindu priest in Italy as is apparent from
its very name. It is something akin to tie Sbankaracharya in India. The Pope wielded the
power of Hindu priests of old whose single word of censure was enough to depose kings
and totter empires. In fact die Pope was the Hindu Shankiiracbarya in Europe-All Uic
Catholic rituals that ihe Pope observes throughout the year ate ancient Hindu festivals.
Even the procedure adopted such as sprinkling water in all directions for purification ot
the surroundings is ancient Hindu practice*
One such ritual is the washing of the feet of a child by the Pope, in the Western tradition
ol keeping the feet dressed all ihe tune in socks and shoes such a ritual was unthinkable
while in Hindu practice several religious observances involve the wishing of the feet of
one by another. For instance when a boy of. l*\, uSe >ears of age undergoes the thread-
ceremony 10 begin his studies id ihe solitude of his preceptor's sylvan retreat alia* Vaiica
all kith and kin and friends wash his feci and symbolically Sip thai water as sacred. Hindu
families united in a wedding also have mutual feet-washing ceremonies.
la churchcv the room in which hol> clothes of the clergy t kcpt.ii called 'vestry from ihe
Sanskrit word veslra' mcan-
221
j^ clothes. The very word 'vestry fa t Si0|kr5 f oom meant for ftormg 'vestra U Blolh '
^7'^ man who attends to the vettry is vestry-maQ '\JT XM * the Sanskrit term "vastra-
manav.* n *aia a
The word 'psalm pronounced 'iam' meanj saC red songs, chants or verse is ihe Sanskrit
word W?? Sam-Veda.' The Hindu Sam-Veda is f Q fact dcvoiC , ^J " singing This word
surviving in Christian rcli g i 0Ul lCTmjq * logy is proof that the ancient Europeans when
Hindus u d i Q ^citc the Sam-Veda. This is further confirmed by the uik 'Psalms* given
to a book of the Old Testament. This indicates that the ancient Hindu Vcdas were
gradually superceded u sacred books of Europe by the Christian Bible after the spread of
Christianity. But even then, just as the so-called Christian! retained the Hindu festivals,
the tradition of singing the Vedas was so firmly implanted in Europe from times
immemorial that the memory of the Sam-Veda itself came to be enshrined in the Bible
with the words psalm, psalms, psalmody and psalmist.
The word psalmist applies to David as the traditional author of many psalms according to
the English dictionary. The dictionary is partly right in that 'David stands for the Hindu
'Dravid (brahmins) who composed many psalms.
The European community called Druid* are the ancient Hindu Dravids, The dictionary
describes them a* an ancient religious order in ancient Gaul. Britain and Ireland- la tbr
Irish and Welsh sagas, and later Christian legends the Dnud appear as conjurers and not
as priests and philosophers, j is a clear indication that the Druids of Europe are Ihe mm
Dravids ' ' " ~~ rfal mW. They are religious group perform mirac
of India. They are not racial groups 1 - roup of priest, and philosophers ho erc d m d
les through their chants d ^ **g ally it should be noted here that it if wrong ioc ^ ^
Aryans and Dravids ns rival racial groups, J** jn HllM i B arc ancient Hindu communities
both a* "* _ ^^ w religious worshipJore and Vedic practice
tn diin Kshstriyas ruled the wwM. At i 0 hd|t
., cotnmuml.es w* come across the terms Aryans
10 ta fTL are not exclusive of each other. Druids m
Europe
when
^Ofwdi. They art profeoing lie when the work ft .oM *.! b thlt the ^opW bwbM ft^,
ifioup Hence*
Brornsini the Aryt Dh-rma that ll the Arya way of Iiffe ben the world says that the
Europeans are Arym,
Tar DwiJ* ah**
Dravid* formed a religious group in that Ary ft
llinil% bchevmg in and practising the same Arya Dharrru*. Abraham, the first of the
patriarchs (and father of the Hebrews * no other than the Hindu Brahma, the creator.
Abraham the dUioned pronunciation of the Hindu Brahma. Tat very *ord patriarch is of
Sanskrit origin from 'pitrufa fuber hatlsn and Latin languages are highly Sanskritized
became ancient Italians spoke Sansrkrit. Instance* of (his arc Signer. Signonta are from
Sanikrit Shreeman, Shreemati. l Quo means "where 7 both in Sanskrit and Latin. Synod is
Sansad in Saaikrii Sun Nido is one's own nest as in Sanskrit, Ilex is raja.
Ancient Italians not only recited the Vcdas and worshipped
tbeSivi Lin, 1 ! ihey also sung the Raraayana and painted
Ramayamc episodes on their plaques and vases, T have in my
astcction reproductions of those ancient Etruscan paintings of
unayamc episodes in which Rama, Seeta and Lakshman walk
ough The forest one behind the other aj described in the
Bharat is teen proceeding to meet his brother
ibhlJhM entreating Ravan to release the sorrowing
lya sharing the holy fertility potion with her two
inland Stnniira; princes Lava and Kusha driving
m* I B 8WV con,i e blows over the
U^L^f B,ly,e,Me * ^ iH. reveal many more
indoneiU.nd the iS^J* ,lwsd " have influenced only d,lc wyriheu U4Ci _ ^. lule
de India but the
pi,ql,n mentioned above indicates
223
tb at when in the ancient past Indian Kshatriyat ruled the world the Rarnayana was sung
and painted even in other parti of Utf world wherever people from India carried and
spread ihcir fafth.
Further research along these lines Is likely m reV el const-derably more information
hidden or forgotten. AH this indicates that the ancient Italians were Hindus, their
mythology was Hindu, they worshipped the Hindu pantheon and their head priest, the
Pope administered Hindu rites.
J A
s*
UfiSS&ii
225
i i
IK
:-m
1
y*<
r
X
229
-" - ;
-'? T f
I
ML
230 Picture Captions
The forlorn? pictmrts from page 223 onwards axe R aitti . rantc cptfodef found painted in
pre-Christian borne* and other building* in Italy. They prove that Rome and Ravenna
chfe. in Italy are named respectively after the two great Ram a yanj c figure* Rama and
Ravan, and that the Etruscan civilization of Italy from the 7th to the 1st century B.C. wa*
of Vedic origin.
Modern Europeans are believed to be open-minded scholar* but that ii a myth. Their
Christian preferences and prejudices blind* them even to such graphic evidence of the
Vedic past
Page 223The trio Rama-Seeta-Lakshman proceeding io the forest.
Page 224Bharat proceeding to contact brother Rama.
Page 225Sect* squatting dejected while Vibhishan (in irmouri ready to proceed to
Rama's camp makes a last request to brother King Ravan to release Sceta from detention*
Page 22f>(Top) The three wives of King Daihraih in the act of sharing the fertility
potion,
(Bottom)Kush and Lava, sons of Rama, leading away the captured sacrificial horse sent
round by Rama,
Page 227Monkey chiefs Vali & Sugreev squabbling over the possession of Ruma, wife of
Sugreev.
Page 228(Top) Lakshraan threatening Sugreev for delaying promised miliLiry help to
Rama.
(Bottom)Army engineers Na|, Neel sounding the depth of the ocean to build a bridge to
Lanka.
Page 229fjop) Rama"* troops chasing the golden deer decoy tent fay Ravan,
(Bottom)Jatayu taking lotbe sky to intercept Ravan's aerial abduction of Seeta
28
TSbAIA, IB AN, tRAQ WERE ONCE HlNuTcrjijH^--
[ndian history has not only been badly distorted daring 1,200 years of alien rule, it has
also been grievously nwhutd Many important chapters of India's cultural, religious >Ul i
military conquests are completely missing.
The references to 'Digvijayas* in Indian Puranai landau histories) are too true and must
no longer he ignored as piom myths because some evidence is now available that Arabia,
Iraq and Iran along with the whole of West Asia once professed Hinduism and echoed to
the chant of the Vedas.
Bardic tribute to the fottr Vedas by an Atab poetLabi-Wn e-Akbtab-bin-e-Turfa as early
as 2300 years before Prophet Mohammad i.e. circa 1800 B.C. is found on page 257 of
Sacral-Okulan anthology of ancient Arabic verse. That verse with a short note on the poet
has been writ large on a column of the Yajnyashala (Bre worship pavilion) in the backyard
of Lakshmiaarayan Temple (alias Birla Temple) on Read*** Road in New Delhi, for
anyone to see,
Roman script is as
The Arabic under :
poem transcribed in the
Aya Muwarekal Araj yushaiya noba minar HIND-Wa aradakallaha rnanyoni jail
jjkaratnn/l/ Wahalatjjali yatun ainana sahabl akba-atun^j fcra
Wnhajayhi yonajjclur-rasui minar
HINDATUN/2/
Yakuluonallaba ya nhalal ^^ m ^^Sn^^ Fattabe-u jikaraiiil VEDA hukkum m*ta >
MJ
Wahowa Alamus SAM wal YAJUR Minallnbay lanaj* ela Fi^pflma-y akh.yo mottabay-w
yoba SS hcriyonaj 0 t, n/ " *.* nain buma RIG ATHAR nasayhin ka-a-khu Wailln We
uusi ala-udnn wahowa mashn-c-rntun/S/
Thi, wa* one of'hc most Pr^J and valued poems i Pre blink Arabia. Such poems,
inscribed in letters of goIdi ^ Unas losidc'thc Kaba shrine housing 360 Hindu deities.
A free English rendering of Labi's celebrated poem ti qg j fl| ibc praises of 'he Vedas is as
follows :
Oh the divine land of Bharat (bow) very blessed art Thou
1. Because Thou art the chosen of God blessed with divine knowledge enough ; that
knowledge which like four light-
houses shone with such brilliance,
2. Through the (utterances of ) Indian sages in four-fold abundance God enjoins on all
burnans to follow uahesi tatingly.
3. The path the Veda* with His divine precept lay down, Bursting with (divine) knowledge
of SAM AND YAJUR bestowed on creation.
4. Hence brothers respect and follow the Vedas guides to salvation. Two othersthe RIG
AND ATHAR teach us fraternity.
5. Sheltering under their lustre dispels darkness till eternity*
Incidentally Labi's assertion that the Arabs were initiated by a study of the Vedas in the
Indian doctrine of human frater* nity proves that the Islamic pioneering claim to
preaching brotherhood is incorrect.
In addition to the ancient Arabs following the Vedic iradi*
an we Rod other evidence of their following the Hindu way of life
The word Mecca li derived from the Sanskrit word 'Makba* ***** >Jaa' U. (tcre4
Iacrificia| firc , Madlll a is the
233
corrupt form of Me-dinimeaning land, The twjn Macea-Madinu therefore mean "The
land of itLQt ^ "" *' worship". And true to ihis description Wc find c r Vadic animal
sacrifice having been In vogue ln Arab' 7 " Prophet Mohammad's times. A reference to
[hcm J?* tbc earliest compilation of the Prophet"* anecdote ^6 m cmn , compile by
Isbaq.
Prophet Mohammed belonged to a Kuru a m u y who WCrc hereditary priests at tbc
Haba shrine which hnuicd 300 Hindu images. Encyclopaedia Islamia mentions that
among ihcm were images of Lat, Manat, Uzza, Saturn ami Moon. That the word Lai is a
Hindu sacred name may be judged from the fact lhai the author of an ancient Hindu
astronomical treatise is Lat-Dev. Navagraha Puja i.e. nine-planet worship stilt in vogue in
India includes Saturn and the Moon. The reference to Saturn and the Moon among the
360 images in Kaba shows that nine-planet worship was also practised in the Kaba,
Encyclopaedia Islamia and Britannica curiously confess ignorance of the origin of the
term Kdbu though Kaba is claimed in popular, uninformed belief to be an Islamic shrine.
Had it been an original Islamic shrine its root should have been known. But Kaba derives
from a Sanskrit word and Arabia having been cut off from Sanskrit learning for centuries
the derivation of the word Kaba remains unknown to those who look for it elsewhere.
In Sanskrit 'Oarbha Grab a'signifies the innermost sanctuary where an idol is installed.
Abbreviated and sUW *" in pronunciation this word appears in Indian Prakrit la8"
D s'Gabha'. In Arabia the abridged word similarly *Kaba\
Allah was one of the idols worshipped in the Kat* *J*P * fo Sanskrit Allah means a
'mother* or 'goddess, msu- ^ ^ Allopanishad and Alladistotra (i.e. a chant in P