Exhibit J: Federal Airways &

Airspace Summary Report: New

Construction Antenna Structure
****************************************************
* Feder al Ai r ways &Ai r space
*
*
Summar y Repor t : New Const r uct i on
*
*
Ant enna St r uct ur e
*
****************************************************
Ai r space User : Not I dent i f i ed
Fi l e: DENNI SAVE
Locat i on: Kensi ngt on, MD
Di st ance: 1. 9 St at ut e Mi l es
Di r ect i on: 270 ( t r ue bear i ng)
Lat i t ude: 39- 01' - 32. 16" Longi t ude: 77-
02' - 13. 39"
SI TE ELEVATI ON AMSL 330 f t .
STRUCTURE HEI GHT 101 f t .
OVERALL HEI GHT AMSL 431 f t .
NOTI CE CRI TERI A
FAR 77. 9{a}: NNR ( DNE 200 f t AGL}
FAR 77. 9( b}: NNR ( DNE Not i ce Sl ope}
FAR 77. 9( c}: NNR ( Not a Tr aver se Way)
FAR 77. 9: NNR FAR 77. 9 I FR St r ai ght - I n Not i ce Cr i t er i a f or
CGS
FAR 77. 9: NNR FAR 77. 9 I FR St r ai ght - I n Not i ce Cr i t er i a f or
W18
FAR 77. 9{d) : NNR ( Of f Ai r por t Const r uct i on}
NR = Not i ce Requi r ed
NNR = Not i ce Not Requi r ed
PNR =Possi bl e Not i ce Requi r ed ( depends upon act ual I FR
pr ocedur e}
For new const r uct i on r evi ew Ai r Navi gat i on Faci l i t i es at
bot t om
of t hi s r epor t .
Not i ce t o t he FAA i s not r equi r ed at t he anal yzed l ocat i on and
hei ght f or
sl ope, hei ght or St r ai ght - I n pr ocedur es. Pl ease r evi ew t he ' Ai r
Navi gat i on'
sect i on f or not i ce r equi r ement s f or of f set I FR pr ocedur es and
EMI.
OBSTRUCTI ON STANDARDS
FAR 77. 17( a) ( 1}: DNE 499 f t AGL
FAR 77. 17( a} ( 2) : DNE - Ai r por t Sur f ace
FAR 77. 19( a) : DNE - Hor i zont al Sur f ace
FAR 77. 19( b) : DNE - Coni cal Sur f ace
FAR 77. 19( c}: DNE - Pr i mar y Sur f ace
FAR 77. 19( d}: DNE - Appr oach Sur f ace
FAR 77. 19( e) : DNE - Tr ansi t i onal Sur f ace
VFR TRAFFI C PATTERN AI RSPACE FOR: CGS: COLLEGE PARK
Type: A RD: 35294. 86 RE: 48. 4
FAR 77. 17( a) ( l ) : DNE
FAR 77. 17{a) ( 2) : Does Not Appl y;
VFR Hor i zont al Sur f ace: DNE
VFR Coni cal Sur f ace: DNE
VFR Appr oach Sl ope: DNE
VFR Tr ansi t i onal Sl ope: DNE
VFR TRAFFI C PATTERN AI RSPACE FOR: Wl 8: SUBURBAN
Type: A RD: 61503. 51 RE: 126. 6
FAR 77. 17( a) ( 1) : DNE
FAR 77. 17{a) ( 2) : Does Not Appl y.
VFR Hor i zont al Sur f ace: DNE
VFR Coni cal Sur f ace: DNE
VFR Appr oach Sl ope: DNE
VFR Tr ansi t i onal Sl ope: DNE
TERPS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE ( FAA Or der 8260. 3, Vol ume 4)
FAR 77. 17( a) ( 3) Depar t ur e Sur f ace cr i t er i a ( 40: 1)
DNE Depar t ur e Sur f ace
MI NI MUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTI TUDE ( MOCA)
FAR 77. 17( a} ( 4) MOCA Al t i t ude Enr out e Cr i t er i a
The Maxi mum Hei ght Per mi t t ed i s 1600 f t AMSL
PRI VATE LANDI NG FACI LI TI ES
FACI L BEARI NG RANGE DELTA
ARP FAA
I DENT TYP NAME
ELEVATI ON I FR
To FACI L I N NM
MD67 HEL DOW J ONES &CO. I NC. 63. 48 2. 79
+66
No I mpact t o Pr i vat e Landi ng Faci l i t y
St r uct ur e i s beyond not i ce l i mi t by 11952 f eet .
6MD9 HEL WASHI NGTON ADVENTI ST HOSPI TA 145. 45 2. 89
+130
No I mpact t o Pr i vat e Landi ng Faci l i t y
St r uct ur e i s beyond not i ce l i mi t by 12560 f eet .
5MD9 HEL SUBURBAN 243. 48 3. 81
+49
No I mpact t o Pr i vat e Landi ng Faci l i t y
St r uct ur e i s beyond not i ce l i mi t by 18150 f eet .
DC06 HEL MPD 2ND 197. 74 5. 74
+325
No I mpact t o Pr i vat e Landi ng Faci l i t y
St r uct ur e i s beyond not i ce l i mi t by 29877 f eet .
DC08 . HEL WHC
+226 I FR
No I mpact t o Pr i vat e Landi ng Faci l i t y
St r uct ur e i s beyond not i ce l i mi t by 30667 f eet .
170. 66 5. 87
DC17 HEL CHI LDREN' S HOSPI TAL 169. 71 5. 99
+146
No I mpact t o Pr i vat e Landi ng Faci l i t y
St r uct ur e i s beyond not i ce l i mi t by 31396 f eet .
AI R NAVI GATI ON ELECTRONI C FACI LI TI ES
FAC
GRND APCH
I DNT
ANGLE BEAR
ST DI ST DELTA
TYPE AT FREQ VECTOR . ( f t ) ELEVA ST LOCATI ON
GTN NDB I 32 215. 37 42766 +327 DC GEORGETOWN
. 44
DCA VOR/ DME R 111. 0 179. 83 60516 +421 DC WASHI NGTON
. 40
DCA RADAR ON 15700. 179. 38 61086 +353 VA NATI ONAL ASDE
. 33
No I mpact . Thi s st r uct ur e does not r equi r e Not i ce based upon
EMI .
The st udi ed l ocat i on i s wi t hi n 20 NM of a Radar f aci l i t y.
The cal cul at ed Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght ( LOS) di st ance i s: 36 NM.
Thi s l ocat i on and hei ght i s wi t hi n t he Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght .
GAI NDB N 38 325. 17 63977 - 109 MD GAI THERSBURG
- . 1
DCA RADAR ON 179. 02 65715 +346 VA RONALD REAGAN
WAS . 30
No I mpact . Thi s st r uct ur e does not r equi r e Not i ce based upon
EMI .
The st udi ed l ocat i on i s wi t hi n 20 NM of a Radar f aci l i t y.
The cal cul at ed Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght ( LOS) di st ance i s: 37 NM.
Thi s l ocat i on and hei ght i s wi t hi n t he Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght .
FCC FCC MONI TOR Y 50. 28 79621 +70 MD LAUREL
. 05
ADW RADAR ON 148. 15 91529 +114 MD ANDREWS AFB
. 07
No I mpact . Thi s st r uct ur e does not r equi r e Not i ce based upon
EMI .
The st udi ed l ocat i on i s wi t hi n 20 NM of a Radar f aci l i t y.
The cal cul at ed Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght ( LOS) di st ance i s: 47 NM.
Thi s l ocat i on and hei ght i s wi t hi n t he Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght .
ADW VORTAC R 113. 1 148. 63 93218 +168 MD ANDREWS
. 10
BWI RADAR ON 60. 68 114852 +198 MD BALTI MORE-
WASHI NG . 10
No I mpact . Thi s st r uct ur e does not r equi r e Not i ce based upon
EMI .
The st udi ed l ocat i on i s wi t hi n 20 NM of a Radar f aci l i t y.
The cal cul at ed Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght ( LOS) di st ance i s: 44 NM.
Thi s l ocat i on and hei ght i s wi t hi n t he Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght .
BAL VORTAC I 115. 1 63. 47 119092 +291 MD BALTI MORE
. 14
I AD RADAR
y
15700. 256. 94 119792 - 201 DC DULLES ASDE
- . 1
No I mpact . Thi s st r uct ur e does not r equi r e Not i ce based upon
EMI .
The st udi ed l ocat i on i s wi t hi n 20 NM of a Radar f aci l i t y.
The cal cul at ed Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght ( LOS) di st ance i s: 56 NM.
Thi s l ocat i on and hei ght i s wi t hi n t he Radar Li ne- Of - Si ght .
I AD RADAR ON 2780. 258. 14 123769 +90 VA WASHI NGTON
DULLES . 04
AML VOR/ DME R 113. 5 254. 68 126562 +134 VA ARMEL
. 06
KWB RADAR WXL
y
3242. 278. 78 141426 - 159 VA WASHI NGTON
I AD LE - . 06
OTT VORTAC R 113. 7 144. 53 143143 +221 MD NOTTI NGHAM
. 09
FDK VOR I 109. 0 325. 88 170307 +127 MD FREDERI CK
. 04
EMI VORTAC R 117. 9 5. 52 171771 - 389 MD WESTMI NSTER
- . 13
QPL RADAR ARSR
y
1260. 9 254. 38 196478 - 1000 VA The Pl ai ns
- . 29
FCC AM PROOF- OF- PERFORMANCE
REQUI RED: St r uct ur e i s near a FCC l i censed AM r adi o
st at i on Pr oof - of - Per f or mance i s r equi r ed. Pl ease
r evi ew AM St at i on Repor t f or det ai l s.
Near est AM St at i on: WBQH@ 1421 met er s.
Ai r space Summar y Ver si on 14. 1. 350
AI RSPACE and TERPS ar e r egi st er ed t r ademar ks of Feder al Ai r ways &
Ai r space
Copyr i ght 1989 - 2014
03- 25- 2014
07: 13: 07
Exhibit K: Master Plan Information
Chapter Four
LAND USE AND ZONING PLAN
Land UsePlan A ngland usehas
, developed inRSpOnSeto
Land UsePlan: Critiall Kensington-Wheaton's
Parcels and Amis strategic locationwithin
-' theCounty and region. Focus-
ingon thepredominantly
residential parts of Kensington
Wheaton, this Master Planen
couragestheprotection,
stabilization, andcontinuation
of current land usepatterns.
&commendations on the
Most Critical Parcels and
Areas
Green Corridors Policy
Commercial Reuitalization
Land UsePlan
Kensington-Wheaton isal-
mostcompletely built out. and
itpossessesmany character-
isticsof other "matureareas,"
Thesecharacteristics consist
mainlyof;
Alimitedamount of vacant
and redevelopable land
renWning.
Alimitedcapacityof existing
roads toaccommodate
present and future traffic
volumes.
Anestablished character and density of development.
Housing accounts for most land useinthe Kensington-Wheaton
planning area, Thisuseischaracterized by awide variety of hous-
ing types. fromdetached homes on largeand small lots to town-
houses and garden apartments within thesector plan areas. In
terms of lifestylepreferenceand affordability, this housing stock
serves theresidents of theareawelL Exceptin thesector plan areas,
commercial usesinthe planning areaarelimited in their extent and
haveshown very littletendency for recent growth. Thecommen.ial
and serviceopportunities provided inthe areas now covered bythe
sector plans and thecommertial usesat Veirs Mill and bndolph
Roadsan sufficient toaccommodatethe needs of the community
for theforeseeable future. Therefore, no additiorud commeitW uses
areneeded within theareacoveredbythis Plan.
It isrecognized that theplanning areaii at aaucial location within
theolder, urbanized part of theCounty, located between the1-270
and US29corridors. (SeeFigure3-1,General PW.Concept, and as-
sociated discussion on "wedgesand corridors.") This PW\ adapb a
strategy that will balancetheplanning area's high transportation
acce;sibility with thevulnerability created by itsposition within
the region. Theaccessibilityattnbuted to the planning area's loca-
tion at the tenninWI of theMetro systemand at thejuncture of
numerous regional highway facilitiesexacerbates the area's sen-
sitivity to pressures for moreintensive development and eonver-
sionto non-residential uses.
39
It isstandard practiceinall master plans adopted inMontgomery
County since1971todesignate abase"Euclidean"zone for r!Very
parcel and toindicate for someparcelsanappropriate fioating
zone, which allows somewhat different development and setsa
higherlimit on the intensity of development than the basezone.
Euclidean zones contain rigidrequirements, such aslot size, set-
backs, and height limits. Exceptwhen developed under theduster
option, the entire land areawill bedivided into approximately
equal sizelots.
Euclidean zones may beapplied toanentire areabythe County
Council inacomprehensive rezoning following amaster plan
study. Piecemeal requests for Euclidean rezonings may begranted
only upon ashowing that there hasbeen achange in the character
of the neighbomood sincethelast comprehensive rezoning or
there was amistakein that comprehensive rezoning.
Floating zones have moreflexibledevelopment standards, but they
may beapproved by theCounty Council only upon afinding that
the development will becompatiblewith surrounding land uses
and isin accordwith the purpose clauseof thezone. Inall floating
zones, development canonly occur inaccordancewith adetailed
site plan approved by thePlanning Board
Thepracticeof following amaster planwith acomprehensive
rezoning through asectional mapamendment isasafeguard
against piecemeal Euclidean rezonings which could, themselves,
establish aprecedent for even morerezonings. Thecomprehensive
rezoning establishes thebaseagainst which "changeor mistake"
will bemeasured. Sincethe comprehenslve ruoning confonns to
the master plan, and floating zones cannot beconsidered changes
in the character of the neighborhood, thereisastrong safeguard
against future Euclidean rezoning. Thisisanimportant element in
assuring thestability of the area.
As noted earlier, this Plan does not address land use issues within
sector plan boundaries exceptinone casewhere chanp un-
foreseen intheoriginal sector plan haveoccurred, Inthis instance,
aland useand zoning recommendation ismadewithln theKen-
sington Sector Planboundary (seeCritical AftaNo. 16).
Objectives
Toprotect and stabilizetheextent, location, and character of exist-
ingresidential and commercial land uses.
Tomaintain thewell established low- tomeclium-dmsity residen-
tial character which prevailsover most of the planning area.
Policies
Retain and reconfirmexistingzoning for all undeveloped or under-
developed landinthe.Kensington-Wheaton planning area, except
for those individual parcelsor groups of parcels recommmded for
achange bythis Plan.
40
Maintain arange of housing types and prices throughout the plan-
ning area,
Implementation
After adoption of this Master Plan, thePlanning Boardwill filea
sectional mapamendment toimplement thebasezoning recommen-
dations of thePlan. TheCounty Council will act on thesectional
map amendment following anadvertised public:hearing.
Land Use Plan: Critical Parcels and
Areas
A
s ageneral rule, development onvacant or redevelopable par-
-eelssWTOUndedby fully developed pan:els isoften preferable
to similar development at thehinge areas of theCounty. It
produces amorecompact urbanized areathat ismoreeasilyserved
byexistingpublic infrastructure and amenities.
Undeveloped properties inlong-established areas 5Uc:hasKen-
sington-Wheaton arethat way for avmety of reasons, Thesein-
dude environmental or phy5ical develapment constraints, poor
accessor visibility, complexor unresolved ownership problems, or
decisions to hold theland asaspeculativeinvestment Someof
these constraints havebeat removed or have diminished. but
others, such asenvironmental sensitivity or poor aeeess, continue.
Environmental and physical conditions aremajor coNtrmits in
deciding on thedevelopability of asite. This Plan reoogni..zedthese
factors lnitsexamination of ~nfill" development potential.
In looking at . mflll"development potential, this Planhas identified
all sites that appear to haveapotential for future development and
considered thekind of zoning and landusethat would beconsis-
tent with thegoalsof land usestabilization and compatibility. Sites
with infill development potential were thosewhich were vacant or
considered to beunderdeveloped, aswell ascertain "critical"areas
or groups of parcels where the current zoning isinainsistent with
astableand compatible land usepattan. Ewnplea ct under--
developed sites arelarger-than-normal parcelswith somesub-
division potential, even though they presently oontain some
development, and largetracts onwhich thereisausethat may not
proveviableduring the lifeof this Plan. Eventhough the planning
areaa>ntains over athousand vacant and redevelopable piecesof
land, this Planconsiders only sites where thepressure for land use
and zoning changes would begreatest, or siteswhere an alternate
land useor zoning category would provide greater land use
stability and compatibility with thesunounding neighborhood. ln
general, only sitesabove .aboutan acreand ahalf were considered
to beinlhia.categoiy. Smaller sites wereconsidaed: (1)if they
werecontiguous to other vacant or redevelopable pMCelsand
couldbeaSKmbledto asuitable size, (2)if they werein
predominantly non-residential areas, or (3)if they were inareas in
transition toward non-residential or higher dmsity residential uses.
All of theindividual parcels and groups of parcels investigated.
during this process areshown on illustration -1-1.Theparcels and
areas onwhich somecomment or recommended changes were
madearelisted inTable4-t Thoseparcels and areas. onwhich no
changes were n:commended or no comments weremadebecauseof
asubdivision action or someother reason arelisted in"Appendix
c.Thoseconsidered most critical, intermsof theneed for achange
inzoning or land use, arediscussed indetaiL with accompanying
maps, inthesection entitled, "Recommendations onthe Most Criti-
cal Parcelsand Areas."
Theanalysis of parcels and areas which aresubject toredevelop-
ment ~ures revealed littlejustification for changa inland use
or zoning, except inalimited number of cases. Therefore, this Plan
recommends retention and reconfinnation of existingzoning for all
41
KW
Master Plan for
the Communities of
Kensington Wheaton
MonJgomoy Calmly,Mayllin4
NW
QUADRANT
-,
f '
NE
QUADRANT
SW
QUADRANT
42
Parcelsand Areas
Reviewed b y This Plan
Pt.ANNING AREA BOUNDARY
PARCELS ANO AREAS WITH
RECOMMENDEDCHANGES
(SEETABLE 4-1)
~ PARCELSANO AREAS WITH NO
~ COMMENTS ORRECOMMENDED
CHANGES (SEE APPENDIX "C")
lllulttaUon 4-1
- ~-Nallonal Cai>lol"-~ &l'!..-.noea.---.
Chapter Five
TRANSPORTATION AND MOBIL/IT PLAN
Street and Highway Plan
Transit Plan
Non-Mowriud Mobility
~
msington-Wheaton's
initial development, par
I
ticularly inthe town of
Kensington, was based
on therailroad. TheBaltim~
and Ohio Railroad cuts across
thesouthwestern comer of the
Kensington-Wheaton planning
areaand Isstill used by com-
muters, Thearea's growth af ter
World War Il, however, was
based onthe car. Public policy
isnowencouraging agreater
useof other fonns of transpor-
tation than the private
automobile. Thisimpliesthilt
meansof travel other than
single-occupant commuting
wiUbegetting greater em-
phasis than road improvements.
Thebackbone of thehighway
network in the J<ensington-
Wheaton areaincludes the
Capital Beltway and sixmajor
highways: University
Boulevard, Georgia Avenue,
Connecticut Avenue, Vein Mill Road, Randolph Road, and Layhill
Road. Illustration 5-1shows trafficvolumes onthe major roads in
1984..
TheCapitalBeltway (1-495}isthe southern boundary linefor the Ken-
sington-Wheaton uea. In 1984,.the8-lanesection east of Georp>a
Avmue had an AverageAnnual Weekday Traffic(MWI) of about
131.000vehicles, Westof Georgi.aAvenue, theMWT was about
144.000vehicles.
Unirinsity Boulevardbegins atConnecticut Avenuein Kensington,
almost two milesnorth of l-495, and passes eastward through
Wheaton inacircular fashionasa6-lanedivided highway. Turning
southwanf, itcontinues on past Four Comers and into Prince
George's County. In 1984,theMWT onUniversity Boulevard
ranged from1.6,800 inKensington to34,650 in theWheaton Busi-
ness District It had anMWT of 43,450at Columbia Pike(US29)in
Four Comers.
GeorgiaAvenue starts intheDistrict of Columbia, crosses University
Boulevard inWht:aton, and continues northward toGlenmont
where it alsoO'OS.W$Randolph Roadand isintercepted byLayhW
Road. In1984,GeorgiaAvenuecarried up to66,550vehicles per
weekday south of Wheaton. The 1984MWT on GeorgiaAvenue in
Glenmont ranged from40,(XX)to42,000.
Comttdicut Avenue hasitsgreatest daily trafficvolume inthe town
of Kensington. In1984,theMWT ranged from54,0SOto61,0SObe-
81
KW
Master Plan for
the Communities of
Kensington Wheaton
MmttgomayCDrmly, ~
..
:
..
- v -
0 i&W>~T
t JlrilErtM
82
Average Annual
Weekday Traffic, 1984
.; Pl.ANNING AREA BOUNDARY
0-10,000
10,000-20,000
20,000-30,000
30,000-40,000
<40,00G-50.000
50.00060,000
60,000&UP
llluatrallon 11-t
.The _...,_.........., C-" "' A.....,...,.,, Ccmtn!N1on
Form 5 (Revised 3/2000)
BOARD OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY. MARYLAND
LIST OF ADJOINING AND CONFRONTING PROPERTY OWNERS
(Please see information on reverse side)
ADDRESS
LOT/PARCEL
(Please add Zip Code)
BLOCK
Ile\\ ' [)QnY\\' S M~
~
'
,~1\\1.efY -l(1A_C.. MO bffiO:t-
~ ' 2 - I
llPD\ tin"-~:
St\vU S{Jf10tJ MD ~ 0""2--
~60 s-
1ql-\c<::>~M-e
L. 3 l
A-
81\\/U ~(1nu MD 7...Cft02-
1040\ thA~kV~
L 2.-' 3
S1 \vuS.Pt 11\..\ ' D ."02-
- 1 '
!U~CO \-ttA~~ A:/L
L-l3
A-
Snvu ~n(1Aa
1Ml1
' 7..-L ' f1D2.
\~b t :r:ehn\~P<J e.
\.._()-\-- f3\
s \ \ \ le_ If~DI\ f \ ti MD "2-010?-
g
\G:i o3 ty?.r-,n~-N.Jf.,
Si\ ' le-S.ot\A.'\ fV\D ?-CR.0' 2-
L--33
g
~o fu' J ... \oY-o-
L32
8
~~hil.~1csbA..-i:i ..Pf \ 11056
<: