POLICY AND PLANNING

POLITIQUES ET PLANIFICATION
Exempted I S
ProtegeS I Pr:ver~d
Under IE" r leves
nVertu de
/ q ( , )
Access tb frff .
loi sur I'a~es ~r~atlon Act
Information
M. Yalden
M. Falardeau-Ramsay
J. Hucker
As you areaware, therehas been considerablediscussion recently about theuseof theInternet
for thepropagation of hatred. I thought you wouldbemight beinterestedin seeingan
exampleof thetypeof information thatis noweasily accessible.
Theattachedmaterial comes fromtheVoiceof Freedom, aWorldWideWeb "homepage"
operatedby I was abletofindthis material ina matter of minutes
_ ., alargeon-lineaccess provider. This serviceis
availableby diallingalocal Ottawa telephonenumber atamonthly cost of around$25.00.
When operatingon-line, each of theitems listedunder "Directory" is agateway which (when
clickedon) opens theinformation indicated. As an example, I haveattachedthematerial that
appears when you access theitementitled: You've heard their side, now learn the Facrs about
The Holocaust. As you will see, theinformation presentedis classicHolocaust denial material.
Harvey Goldberg
Director
cc: SMC
Regional Directors
0036~
Voice of Freedom
Welcome totheErnst Zundel/Voice of Freedom / Samisdat Publishers temporary WorldWide
Web site. This siteis dedicatedtoproviding truthful andhonest information about Germany and
Germans, past andpresent. All materials postedhere arethepersonal opinion of theauthor!
. Webelieve that weareprotectedby thefollowing laws andstatutes: In Canada, Section 2b of the
Charter of Rights andFreedoms; in theUnitedStates, by theFirst Amendment totheConstitution;
andworldwide by Article 19of theUnitedNations Convention on Human Rights.
Directory
Power Newsletters
, Upcoming Zundel radio andTV shows
The Internet Voice of Freedom Radio Project
Zundel's media source e:uide
TheRevisionist Source Book
Germanlanguwz:e materials
You've heardtheir side, now learn theFacts About theHolocaust
DidSix Million Reallv Die?
Other revisionist materials from theInstitute for Historical Review
For further information, contact:
Ernst ZlUldel
Voice of Freedom
206 Carlton Street
Toronto, Ontario M5A 2Ll
CANADA
fa" +1 (416) 922-8614
Holocaust Facts
Must Holocaust Survivors Must Be Believed?
With noscientific evidence toback up thegas chamber claim, thetestimony of Holocaust
survivors becomes vital toproving thegassings at Auschwitz. How reliable is this testimony?
Judge for yoUrself
RudolfVrba is an extremely important eyewitness totheHolocaust Lobby. Hewrote I Cannot
Forgivewhich statedintheforewordthat thebook was meticulous andwritten with a fanatical
respect for accuracy (p. 2) - but under cross-examination by defense lawyer Doug Christie in the
ZUndel casein 1985, Vrba immediately backtracked andadmittedthat thebook was merely an
"artistic expression" which belongedto"therealm ofa literary afternoon".
Kurt Gerstein, heavily reliedupon by Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg as awitness tothe
Holocaust was admittedby Hilberg tohavebeen aperson whohadspoken purenonsense.
(Experts admission: Somegas death 'facts' nonsense Toronto Sun, January 17, 1985).
Fillip MUller, another important witness for thegas chambers, claimedin his book Eyewitness
Auschwitz that muscles of those whohadbeen shot werecut from their legs by theNazis and
thrown intoabucket. Heclaimedthemuscles were still working andcontracting, making the
bucket jump about.
ArnoldFriedman, aprosecution witness in the1985 ZUndel trial, testifiedthat hecouldtell
different nationalities being burned. Skinny Polish Jews or fat Hungarian Jews, gaveoff different
coloredflames, shooting 14 feet high out of thechimney, wh11.ebeingburnedin thecrematory in
Auschwitz.(Ziindel Trial transcript 1985, pages 406-407)
Dr. Henry Heller, was savedat Auschwitz when a former colleague, aGerman, recognizedhim
as hewas being ledtothegas chambers andmercifully turnedon thewater insteadof thegas.
(Chicago Tribune, May 4, 1975.)
Rudolf Kauer, a former inmate of Auschwitz, admittedheliedwhen heaccusedformer
Auschwitz personnel of beating aPolish girl on her breasts with abullwhip, ripping onebreast off
"I lied'" hesaid, "That was just ayarn going about thecamp. I never saw it." (Miami Herald, July
7, 1964.) :
JUDGE THE CREDIBILITY OF THESE PEOPLE FOR YOURSELF!
Does Survivor Testimony Prove The Holocaust?
\Vith no scientific evidence toback up theclaim that millions of Jews were killedin Auschwitz by
gassing, theHolocaust lobby relies on 'survivor testimony' which itis apparently rude todispute.
How reliable is their testimony? Here aresomeof theopinions of non-revisionist historians:
~
Prot: !vlichel deBouard- "Therecordis rotten tothecore. On onehandaconsiderable amount of
fantasies, inaccuracies, obstinately repeated(in particular concerning numbers), heterogeneous
mixtures, generalizations, and, on theother handvery dry critical studies [by revisionists] that
demonstrate theinanity of those exaggerations." (Ouest-France, August 1986)
Samuel Gringauz - "Thehyperhistorical complex [of survivors] may bedescribedasjudeocentric,
lococentric andegocentric ... This is thereason why most of thememoirs andrepons arefull of
preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation,
dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, uncheckedrumors, bias, partisan attacks and
apologies. (Jewish Social Studies, January 1950)
Shmuel Krakowski - In an Aug. 1986 Jerusalem Post article - [YadVashem director) Krakowski
says that many survivors, wanting "tobepart of history" may havelet their imaginations run away
with them. Many werenever in theplaces where they claimtohavewitnessedatrocities, while
others reliedon secondhandinformation given them by friends or passing strangers according to
Krakowski. Over half of20.000 survivor accounts werefoundbv YadVashem tobe'unreliable'
. ~
and'inaccurate'.
HOLOCAUST HISTORIANS ARE WELL AWARE OF THE TENDENCY OF
'HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS' TO LIE! JOHN DEMJANJUK WAS CONVICTED ON
FALSE EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY.
WereMassiveGas Chambers UsedTo
Exterminate Jews AtAuschwitz?
There were no'gas chambers' atAuschwitz. This fact has been conclusively proven by several
forensic studies of thealleged'gas chambers' at Auschwitz. .
.. ...
TheLeuchter Report - FredA. L;uchter, Jr. is an expert specializing in gas chambers and
executions. Hewas describedby Missouri StatePenitentiary Warden Bill M. Armontrout as "well
versedin all areas andis theonly consultant in theUnitedStates (in gas chambers) that I know
of." Leuchter examinedtheallegedgas chambers at Auschwitz. Birkenau andMajdanek in 1988
andtook samples from thewalls andfloors for forensic testing for cyanide. Heconcludedthat the
rooms werenot andcouldnot havebeen usedas gas chambers basedon their construction and
thefact that either noor only extremely small traces of cyanide werefoundin thebrick and
mortar samples. In contrast, aroom where Zyklon B (theallegedkilling gas) was usedfor
disinfection purposes by theNazis, had1000 times morecyanide in thesamples.
TheKrakow Institute Report - Alarmedby theLeuchter Report, theAuschwitz StateMuseum
itself commissioned in 1990 theKrakow Forensic Institute toCarryout an investigation of the
~ ...
allegedgassing sites. TheKrakow Report fully corroborated thecYanldereadings foundby
Leuchter. TheAuschwitz Museum maintains, however, that Poland's acidrain hadeliminatedthe
cyanide. This flies in thefaceof scientific fact that "Prussian Blue', thecompoundformedby
cyanide andiron in thebricks andmortar is oneof themost stable andenduring compounds
known toman. Thebluestain is clearly seen in disinfection cham.bers at Auschwitz today.
TheRudolf Repon Germar Rudolf, adiplom chemist inGermany, investigatedthesites of the
allegedgas chambers of Auschwitz andtook samples for thepurpose of determining cyanide
00.3( , 5 "C
levels. Rudolfs report concluded, likeLeuchter's, that theallegedgas chambers couldnever have
been usedfor gassings. Tests on samples showednoor minimal traces of cyanide.
The Liiftl Report - Walter Liiftl is aprofessional engineer with alargeengineering fInnin Vienna
andwas president of theAustrian Association of Engineers. Heis regularly calledin court cases
as an expert witness. In 1992 Liiftl wrote areport calling theallegedextermination Of millions of
Jews in gas chambers 'technically impossible.' Hepointedout that thedesign oftbe crematories
themselves showedthat they wereincapable of handling thenumber of victims alleged. "Corpses
arenot flammable material. fl wroteLiif:t4"tocremate themrequires much timeandenergy. II LUftl
was criminally chargedfor writing this report for "denying theHolocaust." BUT ALL CHARGES
HAVE BEEN DROPPED.
Jewish historian Arno Mayer of Princeton now admits that evidence for thegas chambers is "rare
andunreliable. II ('Why DidTheHeavens Not Darken?') Thetruth in fact is that there is noreliable
evidence whatsoever for gas chambers in Auschwitz.
THERE WERE NO "GAS CHAMBERS" AT AUSCHWITZ. THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN BY
SCIENTIFIC EXAMINATION. THE HOLOCAUST LOBBY HAS NO SCIENTIFIC
EVIDENCE. THEY RELY SOLELY ON "EYE-WITNESS TESTIMONY" BY EX-INMATES
AND NAZI OFFICERS SUCH AS RUDOLF HOESS WHO WERE LATER EXECUTED.
Did The The Allies Have Any Knowledge Of Nazi
Gas Chambers?
TheAllies andworldJewish organizations inventedthe'gas chamber' story as wartime atrocity
propaganda. They usedatrocity propaganda against theNazis todistract their own people from
theatrocities being committedby themselves. In 1944 theBritish Ministry of Information
requestedBritish clergy tohelp spreadatrocity propaganda against theGermans which wouldbe
put into circulation by theMinistry. Thepurpose of theatrocity propaganda was todistract public
opinion from RedArmy atrocities which wouldinevitably occur as it 'liberated' Central Europe.
('AlliedWartime Diplomacy', EdwardJ. Rozek)
Affidavit of Charles Coward, fIledattheNuremberg trials, swears that theA.lliesdroppedleaflets
in Polandalleging gassings andthat radio broadcasts weremade by Anthony Eden making the
same allegation. (Prosecution Exhibit 1462)
The~.6Jlieswere fully aware therewas noevidence tosupport theallegation of 'gas chambers'
against theGermans. In August of 1943, theAllies decidednot tomake aspecific allegation of '
gas chambers against theNazis in apublisheddeclaration on thegrounds that therewas ..
'insufficient evidence tojustify thestatement regarding execution in gas chambers'. (Foreign
Relations of theUnitedStates Diplomatic Papers 1943)
TheAllies werebreaking all top-secret codes between Auschwitz andBerlin, yet there is NOT
ONE MENTION OF DEATHS BY GASSING. As theGermans didnot know thecodewas
being broken, they hadnoreason not bereport thedeaths by gassing if they wereoccurring.
TheMiiller document, revealedby Emil Lachout in 1988~shows that AlliedCommissions of
Inquiry investigatedandestablishedby 1948 that nopeople werekilledby gas at Belsen.
Buchenwald.. Dachau. Mauthausen andseveral other namedcamps. Austria admits theMuller
document is genuine.
THE ALLIES MANUFACTURED THE 'GAS CHAMBER' STORY AS ATROCITY
PROPAGANDA TO 'STOKE UP' THEIR OWN PEOPLE AGAINST THE NAZIS AND TO
DISTRACT THEM FROM THEIR OWN WAR CRIMES SUCH AS THE TERROR
BOMBING OF CIVILIA.1\JS.
DidFour Million PeopleDieAtAuschwitz?
At theNuremberg War Crimes Trials, theAllies accusedtheGermans of killing 4 million people at
Auschwitz (Indictment, p. 42) After thewar, plaques wereerectedat thecamp which said: "Four
Million People SufferedAndDiedHereAt TheHands Of TheNazi Murderers Between The
Years 1940 And1945."
Right up until 1989, major media repeatedthis figure endlessly in articles on Nazis andthe
"extermination of theJews" ('Sheer efficiency atAuschwitz became symbol for war' - TheGlobe
andMail, September 1. 1989)
In 1989 theSoviet Union releasedthedeath registers of Auschwitz, revealing a death figure of
74,000 ('Auschwitz ID cards releasedby Soviets', TheGlobe andMail, September 22, 1.989) This
new list ignitedanew controversy over thefigureuntil Holocaust historians were fmally forcedto
admit that the4 million figure was false('New list of Holocaust victims reignites controversy over
figures' Washington Jewish Week, March 8, 1990)
Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer admittedthefalsity of the4 million figure('Auschwitz
Revisionism: An Israeli Scholar's Case'. TheNew York Times, November 12,1989)
In 1990, theplaques atAuschwitz wereremovedandthetoll of deadreducedto1.1million
('Polandreduces Auschwitz death toll estimate to 1million', TheWashington Times, July 17,1990)
"'
In 1993, theAuschwitz toll was reducedby J.-C. Pressac in anew book on Auschwitz to800,000.
Other Holocaust historians likeClaude Lanzmann were furious that Pressac was dealing with
documentary proof as therevisionists wereinsteadof relying on emotional testimony of survivors.
('Book on Nazi Murder Industry Stirs French Storm' TheNew York Times. October 28. 1993)
THE TRUE FIGURE OF AUSCHWITZ DEAD WAS AND IS KNOWN TO THE ALLIES
BECAUSE THEY WERE BREAKING THE SECRET CODES SENT BY AUSCH\VITZ
COMMANDERS TO BERLIN HEADQUARTERS. THERE IS LITTLE DOlJBT THE TRUE
FIGlJRE IS NOT ABOVE 100,000 DEAD FOR THE WHOLE WAR.
DidNazis SuchAs Auschwitz Commandant
RudolfHoss 'admit' That They ExterminatedThe
Jews InAuschwitz?
Themost important 'witness' totheallegedmass exterminations of Jews atAu,schwitz was the
camp's commander, RudolfHoess. Hoss' affidavit (written in English, alanguage thereis no
evidence heunderstood) andhis testimony before theInternational Military Tribunal at Nuremberg
. were usedtojustify thehangings of theNazi leadership on thecharge of exterminating theJews.
Itwas his testimonv which laidthefoundation andvalidatedtheextermination storY of Auschwitz.
. ~
Wenow know from thebook 'Lesrions of Death' that Hoess was beaten almost todeath bv
- ~
Jewish members of theBritish FieldPolice upon capture andbadly mistreatedthereafter until he
gavehis 'testimony' and'affidavit.' His wifeandchildren werethreatenedwith deportation to
Siberia. Healsospokeof his mistreatment in his 'autobiography', Commandant of Auschwitz.
Historians today arefmally admitting that Hoss' testimony is WORTHLESS. Thefigures of dead
hegave for Auschwitz aretotally false. Hesworethat 2,500,000 people were gassedandburned
at Auschwitz andafurther half million diedof disease for atotal deadof3.000,OOO. Today the
figure of deadclaimedfor Auschwitz is 1,100,000. Hespoke of aconcentration camp 'Wolzek'
which does not exist Christopher Browning hadtoadmit it in arecent Vanity Fair article that
Hoess is an lUJIeliablewitness. Browning statedthat "Hoess was always avery weak and
confusedwitness. Therevisionists usehimall thetimefor this reason, in order totry anddiscredit
thememory of Auschwitz as awhole."
In fact, therevisionists have concentrated on Hoess because heis probably themost important
witness andsource for Holocaust historians' conclusions on the"Holocaust'. Raul Hilberg relies on
his testimony heavily andhewas theprimary witness reliedupon by theNuremberg Tribunal in
their judgment regarding the'extermination of theJews'.
HOESS WAS TORTURED UNTIL HE SIGNED AN AFFIDAVIT WRITIEN BY THE
ALLIES CONTAINING PATENTLY FALSE INFORMATION. THE ALLIES USED THIS
INFORMATION AT NUREMBERG TO JUSTIFY HANGING THE GERMAN
LEADERSHIP.
Were Millions CrematedAt Auschwitz?
":'
Olga Lengyel, another important witness for theHolocaust Lobby, claimedthat 1,314.000 Jews
weregassedandcrematedat Auschwitz in only threemonths (May. June andJuly of 1944) and
that these statistics wereprovidedtoher by adoctor who hadworkedin thecrematory. She
claimedthat 3 bodies couldbeburnedin acrematory retort in half an hour andthat 17,280 people
were gassedandburnedevery 24 hours. (FiveChimneys: TheStory of Auschwitz.)
Raul Hilberg claimedthat theBirkenau crematories couldcremate 4,400 corpses daily under
optimum conditions. (TheDestruction of theEuropean Jews).
THESE CLAIMS ARE PREPOSTEROUS AND WERE DEMOLISHED BY THE EXPERT .~
TESTIMONY OF CA..1\lADIANCREMATORY MANAGER IVAN 'LAGACE AT THE
TRIAL OF ERNST ZGNDEL IN 1988. - .
Lagace examinedthebuilding plans of thecrematories at Birkenau andtestifiedtllat themaximum
number of bodies that couldhavebeen cremateddaily at Birkenau was 184. Lagace termed
Hilberg's figure 'preposterous' and'beyondtherealm of reality:' Ittakes 2hours fQr-amoderp
cr~matory tocremate onebody. This timecouldnot havebeen exceededby theBirk~nau
crfOl~c.>ries.T4eliolopapst 1--obbyh~ never producedonecremation expert tosubstantiate their
claims. .
~:I !; !I , : !
7
Crematories werebuilt at Auschwitz in 1942 tohelp stop thetyphus epidemic then raging through
the.camp. Typhus was incl,lrableandhighly contagious. Victims of thedisease (including Nazi
personnel) couldnot beburiedduetotheextremely high water table at Auschwitz. Even today in
~ Canada, strict procedures arein forcetodeal with corpses infectedwith typhus. Protective
clothing must beworn, and, theclothing andcontainer in which thecorpse was put must be
destroyed. In thecaseof typhus, Lagace testifiedthat themedical officer wouldlikely order a
direct cremation as this was themost effective way of dealing with something that volatile.
THE CREMATORIES AT AUSCHWITZ WERE BUILT TO SAVE LIVES BY DISPOSING
OF THE BODIES IN A MANNER BEST SUITED TO CONTAINING THE TYPHUS
EPIDEMIC. FOR THIS, GERMANS WERE HANGED.
For further information, contact:
Ernst Ziindel
Voice of Freedom
206 Carlton Street
Toronto, Ontario M5A 2Ll
CAl"\1ADA
phone +1(416) 922-9850
fax +1(416) 922-8614