raised to 23 years old in light of K-12 curriculum
A lawmaker has proposed to raise the age bracket of dependents of taxpayers to 23 from 21 years old in view of the recently implemented K-12 curriculum which added two years in the countrys educational system !ep "ric # $livare% &1 st 'istrict( )ara*a+ue ,ity-( author of .ouse /ill 0122 or the proposed 3Act 4ncreasing the Age /racket of 5axpayers 'ependents(6 said income earners in the family would have to sustain the education of their children or immediate relatives( ie brother or sister( two years longer than before because of the implementation of the K-12 curriculum 5he K-12 curriculum added two more year levels in the countrys educational system( thus a person affected by said law is now expected to complete his or her education at age 23 on the average( instead of 21 according to him 3/ecause of this( it is only proper to amend the pertain sections of the 7ational 4nternal !evenue ,ode which provides for the age limitation of household members who may +ualify as dependents in order to avail of tax exemptions( if only to avoid defeating the purpose and wisdom of these specific provisions of the 74!,(6 said $livare% $livare%( a vice chairman of the .ouse ,ommittee on 8etro 8anila 'evelopment( said the 74!, provides for certain tax exemptions to income-earning individuals( and the wisdom of this is to avoid unreasonably burdening a person who has to provide to a number of household members who are unable to support themselves 9ust yet 35hese dependents are presumed to be still studying and therefore unable to work for self-support( or because the person being sustained by the income earner is physically or mentally restrained from providing for himself(6 said $livare% 5he lawmaker said the :tate understands that an income earner has an obligation first and foremost to his or her family and the latter supports or assists the former by imposing lesser taxes accordingly .ouse /ill 0122( now pending at the .ouse ,ommittee on ;ays and 8eans chaired by !ep !omero <uimbo &2 nd 'istrict( 8arikina ,ity-( seeks the amendment of :ection 2=( )aragraph &#- on )ersonal exemptions allowable to individuals( 4tems &1-( &2- and &3- of the 74!, 5he amendment to 4tem &1- provides that 35he term >.ead of the ?amily means an unmarried or legally separated man or woman with one or both parents( or with one or more brothers or sisters( or with one or more legitimate( recogni%ed natural or legally adopted children living with and dependent upon him for their chief support( where such brothers or sisters or children not more than 23 years of age( unmarried and not gainfully employed or where such children( brothers or sisters( regardless of age are incapable of self-support because of mental or physical defect6 5he amendment to 4tem &2- provides 3A dependent means a legitimate( recogni%ed natural or legally adopted child chiefly dependent upon and living with the taxpayer if such dependent is not more than 23 years of age( unmarried and not gainfully employed or if such dependent( regardless of age( is incapable of self-support because of mental or physical defect6 #astly( the amendment to 4tem &3- provides 34f the spouse or any of the dependents should die or if any of such dependents becomes 23 years old during the taxable year( the taxpayer may still claim the same exemptions as if they died( or if such dependents become 23 years old at the close of such year6 &3@- rbb NR # 3579 SEPT. 4, 2014