Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
NACA 0012
zu
0.0064
0.0188
0.0301
0.0399
0.0480
0.0541
0.0580
0.0596
0.0590
0.0566
0.0525
0.0471
0.0410
0.0343
0.0275
0.0209
0.0147
0.0093
0.0050
0.0020
0.0004
z`
0:0064
0:0188
0:0301
0:0399
0:0480
0:0541
0:0580
0:0596
0:0590
0:0566
0:0525
0:0471
0:0410
0:0343
0:0275
0:0209
0:0147
0:0093
0:0050
0:0020
0:0004
x
0.0022
0.0121
0.0332
0.0649
0.1067
0.1577
0.2165
0.2819
0.3523
0.4258
0.5006
0.5752
0.6481
0.7175
0.7820
0.8401
0.8906
0.9323
0.9644
0.9862
0.9972
NACA 2412
zu
0.0067
0.0201
0.0334
0.0460
0.0573
0.0668
0.0737
0.0777
0.0786
0.0764
0.0718
0.0654
0.0575
0.0487
0.0394
0.0301
0.0213
0.0136
0.0073
0.0029
0.0006
z`
0:0061
0:0174
0:0266
0:0336
0:0385
0:0412
0:0421
0:0414
0:0395
0:0367
0:0331
0:0289
0:0244
0:0199
0:0156
0:0116
0:0080
0:0050
0:0027
0:0010
0:0002
1. Using MATLAB, create a plot of each airfoil cross section. Be sure that the x and z axes are scaled with
respect to each other. Discuss the similarities and dierences between the two airfoil shapes.
2. The ideal pressure coe cients are known at each point and are given below. Plot the pressure coe cients
vs. wing x-location for both upper and lower surfaces of the airfoils. Be sure to indicate which data are
for the upper surface and which are for the lower surface. Recall that the standard for plotting pressure
coe cient is negative up. Recall also that point number 1 is the rearmost point on the lower surface and
the points are numbered clockwise. Compare and contrast the two pressure distributions.
3. Using MATLAB, estimate the lift and drag coe cients for the two airfoils. The angle of attack, , is 4.5 .
Find the lift and drag per unit span if (a) the chord length is 0.5 m, = 1:225 kg/m3 , and V1 = 100 m/s,
and (b) the chord length is 1.0 ft., = 0:0015 slugs/ft3 and V1 = 300 mi/hr. Do your values seem to make
sense? Explain.
point no.
Cp 0012
Cp 2412
point no.
Cp 0012
Cp 2412
1
0:3353
0:3436
11
0:0437
0:0900
2
0:2334
0:2551
3
0:1668
0:2032
12
0:0515
0:0923
4
0:1185
0:1701
13
0:0516
0:0978
5
0:0811
0:1476
14
0:0399
0:1052
6
0:0508
0:1316
7
0:0256
0:1195
8
0:0040
0:1097
15
0:0108
0:1202
16
0:0435
0:1509
17
0:1348
0:2098
9
0:0147
0:1014
18
0:2834
0:3202
10
0:0309
0:0945
19
0:5257
0:5290
20
0:8836
0:8853
point no.
Cp 0012
Cp 2412
point no.
Cp 0012
Cp 2412
point no.
Cp 0012
Cp 2412
21
0:7645
0:7276
31
0:4803
0:6782
41
0:2168
0:2126
22
1:1228
0:7932
32
0:3982
0:5744
23
1:7589
1:6456
33
0:3239
0:4810
24
1:5149
1:5388
34
0:2560
0:3941
25
1:2611
1:3699
35
0:1929
0:3114
26
1:0673
1:2333
36
0:1326
0:2310
27
0:9139
1:1185
37
0:0728
0:1509
28
0:7851
1:0120
38
0:0112
0:0691
42
0:3353
0:3436
4. Based on the data and plots above, see if you can explain why the lift coe cients are dierent.
29
0:6722
0:9060
39
0:0546
0:0163
30
0:5713
0:7937
40
0:1283
0:1081