Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

Margaret Anne Fisher, BVetMed, CBiol,

MIBiol, MRCVSa
Efficacy of Imidacloprid Dennis E. Jacobs, BVMS, PhD, FRCVS,
FRCPathb
Melanie J. Hutchinson, BSc, HND(Agric)b
on Ferrets Experimentally a
John W. McCall, MS, PhDc
Independent Consultant in Veterinary Parasitology,

Infested with the Cat Flea, b


Melvern, Worcester, UK
The Royal Veterinary College (University of
London), North Mymms, UK

Ctenocephalides felis
c
College of Veterinary Medicine, University of
Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

Introduction: Using Imidacloprid controlling fleas on ferrets in the second edition of his book Biology
in Other Species and Diseases of the Ferret.3
Fleas are a well-recognized cause of nuisance and disease in a
wide variety of mammals and birds. Although there is a wide range Studies Investigating the Use of
of authorized products available for the prophylaxis, treatment, and Topical Imidacloprid in Ferrets
control of fleas on cats and dogs, there is often a lack of treatments Two studies have recently been conducted to examine the safety
and/or indications for other host species. Therefore control of fleas and efficacy of imidacloprid 10% against the cat flea, C. felis, on
in other species is more problematic, requiring qualified guesses European ferrets, Mustela putorius furo. In the first (U.K.) study, imi-
about likely success and safety of any proposed treatment. dacloprid was applied at a dose rate of 10 mg/kg bodyweight, while
There are few medicines with indications for ferrets, despite the in the second (U.S.) trial, one 0.4 ml pipette was applied to each
popularity of keeping ferrets in the U.S., U.K., and other parts of animal.
Europe. Therapy for fleas on ferrets could seem unnecessary as there
is no species of “ferret flea,” although it is recognized that ferrets Methods
may occasionally become infested with fleas from their prey. How- U.K. Study
ever, since ferrets are kept as household pets, the ubiquitous cat flea, This study was conducted by Prof. Dennis Jacobs and Mel
Ctenocephalides felis felis, has adopted the ferret as an additional host Hutchinson at the Royal Veterinary College, London. Twelve fer-
species. rets (six males and six females) were allocated to two groups on the
Flea infestation in ferrets can produce the disease entities nor- basis of their Day –7 flea counts and sex. Treatment was randomly
mally associated with flea infestation in dogs and cats. For example, allocated per group:
flea-infested ferrets may develop signs of hypersensitivity that
include the development of lesions similar to those found in cats: Group 1—Untreated control
papulocrustous dermatitis and self-inflicted alopecia.1 It is unknown Group 2—Treated with imidacloprid
how satisfactory a ferret host is for a cat flea, though it is clear from
the studies described here that individual cat fleas can survive well Each ferret was infested with 60 unfed adult C. felis on the day
on ferrets. before allocation and the day before treatment, followed by once
There does not appear to be much guidance in the literature weekly infestations of 60 adult fleas from Day 7 to Day 28. Flea
about treating ferrets with fleas. A letter to The Veterinary Record2 counts were performed prior to allocation, then 8 and 24 hours post-
reported the successful treatment of 50 ferrets with diazinon 20% treatment. Subsequent counts were carried out 24 hours after each
w/v (Droplix; Virbac) at dose rates of 0.1 ml for ferrets weighing weekly infestation. Fleas removed by combing were not returned to
between 600 to 1500 g and 0.15 ml for ferrets over 1500 g. Unfor- the ferret except after the +8 hour combing on Day 0 (Figure 1A).
tunately, this treatment is no longer available. Textbooks tend to On Day 0, the ferrets were weighed, and then those in Group 2
recommend treatment for ferrets, any in-contact ferrets, and their each were treated with imidacloprid spot-on 10% w/v in the com-
environment the same as for cats.1 mercial formulation Advantage® 40 for cats. The dose rate of 10
Following studies showing successful control of fleas in cats and mg/kg (0.1 ml/kg) was precisely measured using a micropipette and
dogs, Fox speculated that topical imidacloprid might be useful for applied directly onto the skin at the base of the skull.

Suppl Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet Vol. 23, No. 4(A), 2001 Second International Flea Control Symposium
Day –7 –6 –1 0 1 7 8 14 15 21 22 28 29
Ferrets infected with fleas + + + + + +
Fleas counted ❍ ● (+8 hours ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍
posttreatment)
Treatment X
❍ Fleas counted and removed.
● Fleas counted and replaced.

Figure 1A

Day –4 –3 0 6 7 13 14 20 21 27 28
Ferrets infected with fleas + + + + +
Fleas counted ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍
Treatment X
❍ Fleas counted and removed.

Figure 1B
Figure 1—Study sequence. (A) U.K. study, (B) U.S. study.

Throughout the study the ferrets were kept in individual cages Each animal was identified with a unique ear tag and housed
on wood shavings. They were fed canned cat food and a dry diet, individually in a mosquito-proof cage. All ferrets were handled sim-
with constant access to water. ilarly and with due regard for their welfare. Throughout the study
Treated ferrets were observed for the first hour after treatment the ferrets were fed with Teklad Cat Diet ad libitum and had access
and at subsequent feeding times for signs of any visible side effects. to water ad libitum as well.
The application site was observed each time flea counts were per- In both the U.S. and U.K. study, efficacy of treatment at each
formed. At the end of the study all ferrets were retreated with imi- time point was calculated by comparing the geometric mean flea
dacloprid to ensure that no fleas remained. counts of the treated and control groups. Efficacy was calculated at
each assessment point using the formula:
U.S. Study
(C – T)
The second study was carried out by John W. McCall at TRS % Efficacy = × 100
C
Labs, Inc., Athens, Georgia, USA. In this trial a total of 16 ferrets
were used: 10 intact males and 6 neutered females. The ferrets were where T = Geometric mean flea count in the treated group and C
ranked by weight within sex then allocated to two groups, consist- = Geometric mean flea count in the control group.
ing of 8 animals each:
Results
Group 1—Untreated control group In both studies, no abnormalities were observed after treatment
Group 2—Treated with imidacloprid and all ferrets remained normal throughout.
Recovery of live fleas from the untreated ferrets was remarkable
On Day 0, a single pipette of the commercial formulation Advan- as compared to recovery in cats, for example. In the U.K. study,
tage® 40 for cats containing 0.4 ml imidacloprid 10% was applied to between 77% and 92% of fleas were counted on each occasion and
the ferrets of Group 2 onto the skin at the base of the skull. in the U.S. study between 87.8% and 100% of fleas were accounted
Each of the 16 ferrets was infested with 50 adult fleas on Days –4, for.
6, 13, 20, and 27. The fleas were applied below the lateral midline Bodyweights of treated male ferret ranged from 0.85 to 1.1 kg
of the body. Comb counts were conducted on Days –3, 7, 14, 21, and (U.S.) and 1.41 to 1.61 kg (U.K.). The smaller female ferrets
28 and all fleas removed were discarded (Figure 1B). weighed between 0.6 to 0.7 kg (U.S.) and 0.79 to 1.05 kg (U.K.).
All individuals collecting data were blinded to treatment. The Therefore, in the U.K. study, actual dose rates administered were 10
ferrets were observed prior to treatment and at 0.5, 2, 4, 8, and 24 mg/kg body weight but in the U.S. study the dose rate ranged from
hours after treatment, and then at least once a day for the remain- 36.4 to 47.05 mg/kg for males and 57.1 to 66.6 mg/kg for females.
der of the study. Percentage efficacies calculated from the geometric counts are

TNAVC, January 2001 Suppl Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet Vol. 23, No. 4(A), 2001
100
100

80
80
% Efficacy

% Efficacy
60
60

40
40

20
20

0
0 1 8 15 22 29 0
(+8 hours) 7 14 21 28
Day Posttreatment Day Posttreatment

Figure 2A Figure 2B
Figure 2—(A) Efficacy of imidacloprid (dose rate of 10 mg/kg spot-on Advantage® per ferret) against C. felis fleas (U.K. study). (B) Effica-
cy of imidacloprid (dose rate of one 0.4 ml 10% Advantage® pipette per ferret) against C. felis fleas (U.S. study).

shown in Figure 2. Efficacy against a flea infestation present at the weeks after treatment. Duration of activity therefore appears to be dose
time of treatment, assessed in the U.K. study, was >95% by 8 hours related, with increased dose rate extending the useful activity.
and 100% by 24 hours after treatment. One week after treatment One application may be sufficient to obtain control of a flea prob-
efficacy against a challenge infestation applied 24 hours previously lem, possibly administered in conjunction with environmental con-
remained >90% in both studies. However, thereafter efficacy trol. These studies provide a valuable addition to the information
declined, most rapidly in the U.K. study where on Day 15 efficacy available to those interested in ectoparasite treatments for ferrets.
was 55%. At the end of the study, 4 weeks posttreatment, residual
efficacy in the U.S. study was 72%. Conclusion
Topical imidacloprid (Advantage®), administered at a dose rate
Discussion of 10 mg/kg or one 0.4 ml 10% pipette per ferret, was well tolerated
Recovery of fleas at 24 hours after infestation in control ferrets in a total of 20 ferrets that received a total of 26 doses. The treat-
was reasonably consistent and remarkably high, much higher than ment was effective in removing an established flea population and
that normally achieved in cats, where, for example, about 50% excellent efficacy was maintained against subsequent flea challenge
recovery after 24 hours may be achieved.4 In cats, the number of for 1 week after application at 10 mg/kg and 3 weeks after treatment
fleas retained has been demonstrated to be related to grooming with one 0.4 ml pipette of 10% w/v imidacloprid.
activity, with those better at grooming removing a larger proportion
of their flea population.5 Flea longevity was markedly prolonged on References
1. Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE: Muller and Kirk’s Small Animal Der-
cats where grooming activity was prevented.6 Marshall suggested
matology, ed. 5. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1995.
that large populations of ectoparasites were related to decreased 2. Oxenham M: Flea control in ferrets. Vet Rec 138:372, 1996.
grooming behavior; thus it may be that ferrets groom less or less 3. Fox JG: Biology and Diseases of the Ferret, ed. 5. Baltimore, Williams and
Wilkins, 1998.
effectively than cats.7 4. Jacobs DE et al: Duration of the activity of imidacloprid, a novel adulti-
The studies demonstrated that imidacloprid was well tolerated cide for flea control, against Ctenocephalides felis on cats. Vet Rec 140:259-
when administered at a dose rate of 10 mg/kg or one 0.4 ml pipette per 260, 1997.
5. Hinkle NC et al: Host grooming efficacy for regulation of cat flea
animal. A dose rate was highly effective at killing an established flea (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) populations. J Med Entomol 35:266-269, 1998.
burden and retained good activity for a period of 1 week after treat- 6. Dryden MW: Host association, on-host longevity and egg production of
Ctenocephalides felis felis. Vet Parasitol 34:117-122, 1989.
ment, when good efficacy is defined as 90% or more. At one 0.4 ml 7. Marshall AG: The Ecology of Ectoparasitic Insects. London, Academic
pipette per animal, the duration of good efficacy was extended up to 3 Press, 1981.

Suppl Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet Vol. 23, No. 4(A), 2001 Second International Flea Control Symposium

Potrebbero piacerti anche