0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
230 visualizzazioni10 pagine
This document provides a summary of key points from Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring. It discusses how Carson highlighted the threats to liberties and failures of pesticide programs, citing many professionals. It also provides historical context on the rise of chemical pesticides after WWII and the controversy surrounding Carson's publication of the book. Carson's work is described as changing the world by bringing attention to the interconnectedness of life and the persistence of chemicals in the environment.
This document provides a summary of key points from Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring. It discusses how Carson highlighted the threats to liberties and failures of pesticide programs, citing many professionals. It also provides historical context on the rise of chemical pesticides after WWII and the controversy surrounding Carson's publication of the book. Carson's work is described as changing the world by bringing attention to the interconnectedness of life and the persistence of chemicals in the environment.
This document provides a summary of key points from Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring. It discusses how Carson highlighted the threats to liberties and failures of pesticide programs, citing many professionals. It also provides historical context on the rise of chemical pesticides after WWII and the controversy surrounding Carson's publication of the book. Carson's work is described as changing the world by bringing attention to the interconnectedness of life and the persistence of chemicals in the environment.
Subtle reminders of threats, infringement of liberties, and failures of programs
in the form of quotes, implication, examples, data Cites many professionals
Thoughts Reminds me of The Lorax who will speak for the trees? and profit-seeking Documentary primarily interviews colleagues of Carson, but did interview the other
Ideas Changed the world with a book Public does not have the whole picture - human rights argument, Bill of Rights Strong female figure, minority in science community Argument must be airtight, had to hold her own against personal attacks Interconnectedness of life - water, soil, plants Persistence of chemicals
Historical Context Chems developed out of technology boom from WWII DDT stopped Typhus Fever during the war Government supported - sprayed from airplanes on farms, trucks in suburbs Carson - biologist with talent for writing from young age Carson began writing 1950s on her own The Sea Around Us - gave her respect, 1951 Sprayed Olga Huckins bird sanctuary Carson must write book Jeanne Davis - assistant Establishment refused information and fired those who spoke out against it Federal spraying of private lands - contamination Fire ant - govt made it into a threat, sought to eradicate Pesticide industry opposed publication - said she lied about their products and those opposed to pesticides are communist menaces New Yorker excerpts primed public; 60k sold first day of publishing Attention of JFK caught investigations American Medical Association, Monsanto verbally attacked her, called her hysterical Two sides of the story but not according to Carson Illness gave her time away from the book facts wont hold up, need to simplify, emotional plea
Introduction Silent Spring is now Noisy Summer Intoxicated with a sense of his own power, [mankind] seems to be going farther and farther into more experiments for the destruction of himself and his world.
Chapter 1 - A Fable for Tomorrow Begins with emotional plea that WE are doing something very wrong Beautiful harmonious town for many years, then suddenly a blight People die, birds cannot fly, pigs were sick, no bees to pollinate trees so no fruit, fish died No witchcraft..The people had done it themselves. Does not exist, each threat has been witnessed
Chapter 2 - The Obligation to Endure Reveals flaws in pesticide practices and calls upon citizens desire for rights Man is the first creature to harness such control over nature Nature has developed a balance through deliberate passing of time, unlike mans heedless pace 500+ new chemicals a year, ubiquitous usage against pests They should not be called insecticides but biocides. Resistance to pesticides develops - Thus the chemical war is never won, and all life is caught in its violent crossfire. Great risk for nothing b/c we are overproducing already Insect problems: Close quarters disease-carrying insects single-cropping large pops. of 1 species, example of disease carried by beetle + elm There are other options, why should we accept the bare minimum for survival If the FF could have envisioned such a problem, freedom from spraying would be in the BoR The obligation to endure gives us the right to know.
Chapter 3 - Elixirs of Death Why do we think we can put these deadly toxins in our environment without consequence? For the first time in the history of the world, every human being is now subjected to contact with dangerous chemicals, from the moment of conception until death. Chemicals last for longer than they are applied in life, water, and soil. Post WWII insecticides are synthetic and much more potent 2 groups of insecticides: chlorinated hydrocarbons organic phosphorus Small amounts are deadly These poisons have caused many illnesses and deaths Careless dispensing - baby and dog died Potentiation - combination is worse for destroying the bodys protection Systemics - lead to poisoned plants + products like honey
Chapter 4 - Surface Waters and Underground Seas All water systems are connected, and chemicals magnify themselves in biological life Paradoxically, we can only use a small percent of water Chemicals reach the water systems Drinking water polluted, no way to test for organic pollutants Upstream from spray sight above waterfall contained DDT Colorado manufacturing plant - 8 years later the chemicals were ravaging farms miles away 2,4D formed spontaneously in water; could happen in glass of water Hundreds of dead birds from sprayed farmlands getting into water Clear Lake - dilute DDD to kill gnats, but biomagnified in plants, plankton, fish, birds After chemical was gone from the water, it lived on in generations of life Public can no longer fish, and is either forced into contaminated drinking water or paying taxes to try to clean it (though only partially successful)
Chapter 5 - Realms of the Soil Chemicals ruin the productivity of soil, and tarnish croplands for years Soil enables plant life which enables animal life, and soil depends on us: life exists in soil, which allows it to support plants Sets up majesty of soil as dynamic system of exchange Millions of bacteria move chemicals like fixing nitrogen for plants sake Larger mammals live in the soil Earthworms good, nitrogen-rich soil The soil community, then, consists of a web of interwoven lives, each in some way related to the others. Insecticides to kill some species, but can we expect to leave the good insects unharmed? Chemicals all inhibit nitrification, and last for many years Eliminating one pest increases the dominance of another potentially to pest status Repeated spraying accumulates poisons arsenic levels of tobacco cigs. increased, but NOT in location without arsenic insecticides Chemicals breach plant tissue in carrots, sweet potatoes, peanuts crop land RUINED Wheat, barley, rye, beans withered from insecticide
Chapter 6 - Earths Green Mantle We depend on plants and there are more effective methods to control undesirable species We survive from plants Mans narrow attitude toward plants - If we see any immediate utility in a plant we foster it. If for any reason we find its presence undesirable or merely a matter of indifference, we may condemn it to destruction forthwith. Sage - only plant to thrive in western plains (mustve taken a long time for nature to get it right) Antelope and sage grouse depend on sage Man desires grassland w/o sage for cattle, spraying will ruin ecosystem, also killing willows + destroying recreational area Chemical weed killers are a bright new toy they give a giddy sense of power over nature Spraying is cheaper than mowing, but not when roadsides are destroyed Descriptions of trees and shrubs killed; Such plants are weeds only to those who make a business of selling and applying chemicals. Presents weed killers philosophy - The author defended the killing of good plants simply because they are in bad company. Those who complain about killing wildflowers along roadsides reminded him, he said, of antivivisectionists to whom, if one were to judge by their actions, the life of a stray dog is more sacred than the lives of children. Counters by suggesting how reasonable it is to prefer beautiful roadsides rather than brown, AND says it is reasonable to not rejoice in the domination of nature Paints opponents as heartless and only concerned with profit Shrubs = habitat for bees, man needs pollination Advocates for selective spraying rather than repeated roadside spraying; >20 yrs w/o respraying, removes tall woody plants to preserve other vegetation, minimal threat to wildlife 2,4D - attracts wildlife to poisoned plants, increased nitrate content poisonous gas in silos Alternative example - Planting marigolds killed nematodes which helped roses Weeds tells us about the soils status 2,4D kills ragweed and shrubs, but then ragweed grows back with even more space/vigor crabgrass infestations could be cured by improving the quality of the soil Klamath weed - invader, enemy beetles imported to stop it successfully Another, cacti in Australia stopped by moths, and costed way less than spraying
Chapter 7 - Needless Havoc Man gets off on dominating nature with refusal to face the facts of available research As man proceeds toward his announced goal of the conquest of nature, he has written a depressing record of destruction, directed not only against the earth he inhabits but against the life that shares it with him. Citizens hear conflicting messages from conservationists and control agencies but should trust those who are qualified, not entomologists who are untrained Enjoyers are nature are being deprived: Michigan attempted to control Japanese beetle by spraying aldrin (one of the most poisonous) because it was cheapest and claiming it was safe, and again at the cost of taxpayers Birds, squirrels, cats, and dogs all died, and it happened in other cities too Worst case in Sheldon, Illinois: Dieldrin by air, refused to consult Fish and Wildlife Service Tragedy could have been avoided by doing the research, but funding bias towards chemicals Not just scientific but moral: The question is whether any civilization can wage relentless war on life without destroying itself, and without losing the right to be called civilized. moral question Horrific description of dead squirrel, By acquiescing in an act that can cause such suffering to a living creature, who among us is not diminished as a human being?
Chapter 8 - And No Birds Sing Birds disappear in attempts to eradicate one species of life, there are effective ways Silent spring, womans personal story, has to explain to children More personal accounts of no birds due to spraying Dutch elm disease carried by elm bark beetles, so they sprayed Research shows insecticides killed robins, makes sterile Mammals + ground feeding birds poisoned by grubs + earthworms Species after species of devastated birds When insects resurge, birds will not be able to keep them in check Public may think: Shall we have birds or shall we have elms? but not like that Unsuccessful spraying figures, quotes/names scientists who did real research Spraying destroyed elms natural enemies and made it worse NY successful sanitation program involves REAL investigation and tree removal action Replace lost elms with other trees for biodiversity Stats show trend of declining eagles, lost reproductive capacity (research suggests DDT, maybe from fish) treated seeds dead birds collected, all but one from insecticides, moribond foxes Farmers wanted to eradicate blackbirds so sprayed when they couldve made simple change Who has the right to make these decisions?
Chapter 9 - Rivers of Death Fish are ultra-sensitive to chemicals that reach moving water Salmon swim upstream to spawn for thousands of years until aerial spraying killed all insects leaving nothing to eat Target: budworms still increased despite more spraying Repeated spraying = complete destruction Negligence - planes dont turn off nozzles over water one pound of DDT per acre was safe except oily film covers water and fish die containing DDT 100% of salmon killed in at least 4 major streams; homing instinct return each year Alternative - natural parasitism 25 mill Americans in fishing industry, 15 mill casual anglers ^ ends up on dinner table Rain and run-off carries poisons to water DDT and chemicals are proven to kill fish Fishes in shallow ponds = food in developing countries; already spraying to control mosquitoes, DDT remains in water Colorado River - fish kills stretching 200 miles over a week from plant leaking chems Long-term effects unknown, more disasters where plan to kill insects hurts aquatic life Undeniable, call to action: When will the public become sufficiently aware of the facts to demand such action. denied the facts
Chapter 10 - Indiscriminately from the Skies When they gain the power, officials start futile mission of eradication at the expense of citizens Attitude towards poisons has changed - skull and crossbones containers showered down indiscriminately from the skies Towns and cities are affected - including humans and non-humans within them Gypsy moth - successfully contained by natural parasites and predators But a year after satisfaction expressed, state department undertakes eradication mission Federal and state officials Ignored complaints from locals !!! describes spraying of both biological locations AND suburbia - including housewife trying to protect her garden, and children playing covered in insecticides Legal action of injunction carried to courts but denied. One S.C. Justice said, the alarms that many experts and responsible officials have raised about the perils of DDT underline the public importance of this case. Another violation of rights - Family farm requested specifically not to spray her property which contained her pastures, offered inspection for gypsy moth and spot spraying Told no farms would be sprayed, received two direct spraying milk contaminated with DDT but poor regulations didnt stop it from going to market (scary) Growing lawsuits - beekeeper lost 800 colonies - no bee buzz quote (parallels silent spring) but there was no one to sue Spraying did nothing to stop the gypsy moth Similarly, for years the fire ant was unbothered; a nuisance but not even the most important Power to spray propaganda, mass campaign based on faulty claims Cites Alabama study (the most relevant state) that disproves damage to plants/livestock claim More research that disproves menace claims, no need for mass spraying (on playgrounds etc) Urgent protests by conservation departments, national agencies, ecologists and even entomologists were IGNORED Destruction - Poultry, livestock, and pets killed ignored by agr. department More facts of harmful effects on live - again implicates sportsmen w/ practical elimination of quail Subtle - threat to children quote in poisoned milk, FDA has no authority Indicts Department of Ag again, embarked on its program without even elementary investigation of what was already known about the chemical to be used -- or if it investigated, it ignored the findings. AND they used too much, unnecessary amounts of chemicals - subtle reference to taxpayer $$ AGAIN - program was a complete failure Effective local methods known for YEARS, costs MUCH less ($.23 vs $3.50) and cites 90-95% control of fire ants
Chapter 11 - Beyond the Dreams of the Borgias No human in society is immune from intimate contact with DDT and chemicals Birth-to-death contact with chemicals Unmarked like medicinal poisons on shelves Glass containers that a child could spill, like spraymen sent into convulsions Insecticide-coated household items - kitchen cabinets, polished floor W/O warnings, even SUGGESTED by companies + Dept Agr Home gardening recommends DDT, hose attachments get in water supply yet no warnings Consumer herbicides give no hints as to their true nature, painting a happy picture instead DDT is in humans from food, few if any foods can be relied upon to be entirely free of DDT. Persistence - washing + cooking do not destroy residues EVEN Eskimos have small amounts for contacting civilization Ties it back to spraying + uneducated farmers excessive spraying But doesnt the government protect us from such things - explains limited protection FDA Established tolerances are defective - accumulation occurs, based on bad info Whats the solution? compromising plea for reducing the worst chemicals, but says farmers dont listen anyway Gives real answer: realize they are bad and consider non chemical methods
Chapter 12 - The Human Price Acute effects of pesticides are known, and the long term effects are ominous Long-term effects are unknown Humans tend to ignore everything but the obvious But I have used dieldrin sprays on the lawn many times but I have never had convulsions like the WHO spraymen--so it hasnt harmed me. Toxins accumulate in fatty tissues - example of obesity treatment Livers damaged by pesticides are weak to all- possible relations: rise in hepatitis, cirrhosis Whether causal or not, it makes no sense to weaken ourselves Solid repeating evidence of nervous system poisoning - we shouldnt saturate our environment We are never exposed to just one chemical; they combine and do more damage long term effects of organic phosphates- Ginger paralysis - scary This history predicts a future due to pesticide use
Chapter 13 - Through a Narrow Window Paints delicate picture of how cells allow for life, then destroys it with chemical reality Peering through narrow window metaphor Creates picture of awe of how cells burn fuel to run the body, and how it was discovered Should they cease to burn, no heart could beat, no plant could grow upward defying gravity, no amoeba could swim, no sensation could speed along a nerve, no thought could flash in the human brain, said the chemist Eugene Rabinowitch. Radiation comparison to chemicals in ability to halt this oxidation process Subtly, without exaggeration, chemicals affect birth and children Evidence in birds - DDT and other chlorinated hydrocarbons inhibit egg production There is no reason to suppose these disastrous events are confined to birds. ATP is the universal currency of energy, and the metabolic cycles that produce it turn to the same purpose in birds and bacteria, in men and mice. Genetic effects - Again the parallel between chemicals and radiation is exact and inescapable. Effects duplicated in lab studies with chemicals, many in pesticides Radiation effects - publicly known, but mustard gas - less noticed Scientific description of cell division, field is in its infancy Evidence of organisms mutated by chems But can we afford to ignore the fact that we are now filling the environment with chemicals that have the power to strike directly at the chromosomes, affecting them in the precise ways that could cause such conditions? Is this not too high a price to pay for a sproutless potato or a mosquitoless patio?
Chapter 14 - One in Every Four No safe dosage of carcinogens that may strike our children years down the road. Paints picture of ancient nature interrupted by mans rapid pace of creating carcinogens with no time to develop protection No longer occupational hazards, even of children as yet unborn. Children cancer used to be a rarity, but Today, more American school children die of cancer than from any other disease. Tumors present before birth Dr. Francis Ray warned we may be initiating cancer in the children of today by the addition of chemicals [to food]... We will not know, perhaps for a generation or two, what the effects will be. Evidence for pesticides being carcinogens arsenic - city of Reichenstein water polluted and mass disease, animals affected too 1955 chemical - zero tolerance, but courts allowed for 1ppm Although the committee did not say so, its decision meant that the public was to act as guinea pigs, testing the suspected carcinogen along with laboratory dogs and rats. DDT - definitely chemical carcinogen More cases of definite tumor growth in rats, human level unknown, but So slowly developing, you never know until its too late - women bone cancer 15-30 yrs Leukemia, though, has short latent time and figures say it is rising, ex. of woman who sprayed her house repeatedly and died within a month. Another ex. of aplastic anemia leukemia 9 yrs later. !! Children developed it from unloading sacks of insecticides Small doses are worse This is why there is no safe dose of a carcinogen. Delayed reaction - By these means they may be creating sleeping cancer cells, cells in which an irreversible malignancy will slumber long and undetected until finally -- its cause long forgotten and even unsuspected -- it flares into the open as recognizable cancer. The rapidly growing tissues of a child would also afford conditions most suitable for the development of malignant cells. - common in 3-4yr old bracket Pregnant mice example - mom and young develop lung cancer from chemical urethane Cancers linked to altered estrogen levels from liver dmg - caused by hydrocarbons Examples of arsenic - air pollutant, water contaminant, pesticide residue in food, in medicines, cosmetics, wood preservatives, coloring agent in paints and inks. If you are exposed to DDT, you are certainly exposed to other liver-damaging hydrocarbons widely used in the household. What then can be a safe dose of DDT? Herbicides IPC and CIPC can initiate for something else - perhaps a common detergent Reiterates, only safe dose is zero Devastating trout liver cancer epidemic hazard to man !! If such preventive measures are not taken, says Dr. Hueper, the stage will be set at a progressive rate for the future occurrence of a similar disaster to the human population. Question: Isnt it a hopeless situation? Were in a sea of carcinogens Cites Dr. Hueper as respected and answers with thoughtfulness: infectious disease battle of 19th century involved eliminating disease organisms from the environment. No magic pill, cancer is diverse and public should focus on prevention in environment, not a single cure Not hopeless because WE put them in the environment, so WE can eliminate them. They are unnecessary. But for those not yet touched by the disease and certainly for the generations as yet unborn, prevention is the imperative need.
Chapter 15 - Nature Fights Back A chemical approach to insect populations ignores biology and worsens the situation Insects grow stronger when we blindly hurl chemical controls at them Presents convenient viewpoint: Balance of nature is outdated, might as well forget about it The balance of nature is not a status quo; it is a fluid, ever shifting, in a constant state of adjustment. Fecundity of resistance types of life overlooked - personal reflection Cites cases where one species overran after another was eliminated 70-80% of Earths creatures are insects, held in check by natural forces, without any intervention by man. Makes chemicals seem silly Paints visual pictures of predator and parasite lifestyle, explaining how the inter-species competition helps us, yet we have turned our artillery against our friends. With the passage of time we may expect progressively more serious outbreaks of insects, both disease-carrying and crop-destroying species, in excess of anything we have ever known. Presents counterpoint - Surely it wont happen in my lifetime, anyway But it is happening, here and now. cites spraying that dramatically increased populations Spider mite has become abundant thanks to DDT killing its enemies - cites cases killing trees Spraying their colonies just scatters them to find more food than previously available Lists case after case of outbreaks provoked by spraying Then cites incredibly effective introduction of natural enemy - costed only $5000 and saved citrus industry, but in a moment of heedlessness the benefit was cancelled out, by DDT. Disease-carrying insect outbreaks - human effects of snail-borne disease Funding is being poured into insecticide research, but not biological control methods for the simple reason that they do not promise anyone the fortunes that are to be made in the chemical industry. Reveals conflict of interest in entomologists - their jobs depend on perpetuation of chemicals Chemical viewpoint neglects the biological understanding of insect populations Cites successful modified program
Chapter 16 - The Rumblings of an Avalanche Insects build resistance quickly, and we are on the verge of a mass infestation due to chemicals DDT ushered in Age of Resistance Figures verify chemical resistance. No one believes in the end is in sight Short-term success immediately replaced with resistance One commenter - News such as this quietly trickling through scientific circles and appearing in small sections of the overseas press is enough to make headlines as big as those concerning the new atomic bomb if only the significance of the matter were properly understood. Insect-carried disease must be addressed, but not by chemicals Very fast immunity develops, and populations increase Mosquitoes, flies led to human outbreaks in malaria, yellow fever, etc. Ticks in cities where they werent before Resistance in crop-destroying species, yet industry wont face facts Darwinian toughness survives, describes how they become so resistant Poses question: But couldnt humans do the same? Responds: Takes generations thousands of years Dept. of Agr thinks better chemicals are needed quote - Chemicals proof of our insufficient understanding, we must be humble
Chapter 17 - The Other Road Shows how effective biological alternatives are and damns chemical control to the Stone Age Metaphor, Robert Frost - The road we have long been traveling is deceptively easy, a smooth superhighway on which we progress with great speed, but at its end lies disaster. the other fork less traveled is the only way to reach a destination that assures the preservation of our earth. Our choice - if we make it and assert our right to know then we should no longer accept the counsel of those who tell us that we must fill our world with poisonous chemicals. Successful alternatives in biological solutions There are many scientists thinking about them and waiting to test Brilliant success of screw-worm eradication - radiation sterilize males Presents chemical sterilant, but warns it could become the same as insecticides w/o caution Spray isolated attractant so male gypsy moths cannot find females Sound can be used to fool or kill some insects Also beset by microorganisms why should they not also aid us in the control of insects? Field tests are already happening Some might think they are similar to insecticides - but harmless to all but their intended targets. because they are so specific More success stories around the world with biological control There is, then, a whole battery of armaments available to the forester who is willing to look for permanent solutions that preserve and strengthen the natural relations in the forest. Reiterates that chemical pest control is at best a stopgap bringing no real solution As crude a weapon as the cave mans club, the chemical barrage has been hurled against the fabric of life. Control of nature is an idea from the Stone Age of science.
Afterword Carson aggregated and synthesized what environmental scientists had known into a single image for the public to understand Chemistry and physics were the forefront of discovery Economic prosperity no restraint or concern for environment Plan to create sea channel parallel to Panama Canal would have intermingled two separate ecosystems and devastated Fire ant campaign - the Vietnam of Entomology Carson called for end of heedless endangerment of life EPA formed, focus on harmful effects of chems, Endangered Species Act But developers and policymakers still chip away at the remains of the American natural environment