1. GENERAL FEATURES Location : North Latitudes:13 43 and 1514 East Longitude: 7755 and 79 29
Geographical area : 15,379 Sq.km Dist. head quarters : Kadapa No. of Revenue mandals : 51 No. of Rev. villages : 965 Population (2001 census) Urban : 5,87,753 (22.60%) Rural : 20,14,044 (77.40%)
Population density : 169 per sq.km.
Work force
a) Cultivators - 252029 - 9.69% b) Agricultural labour - 299239 - 11.50%
Major Rivers : Pennar and its tributaries viz. Papagni, Cheyyair, Chitravati, Sagileru, Kundu Geology : Granites, Gneiss, Phyllites, Quartzites, Shales Soils : Red loamy soils, Red sandy soils, Red earths, Black cotton soil 2. RAINFALL
Normal annual rainfall : 696.2 mm South west monsoon : 388.7 mm North east monsoon : 231.3 mm Cumulative departure from normal rainfall (for the last five years) : - 27%
3. LAND USE (2004-05) (Area in Ha):
Forest : 5,05,495 (33%) Barren and uncultivated : 2,40,392 (16%) Cultivable Waste : 71,000 (5%) Current fallows : 54,351 (4%) Net area sown : 4,19,150 (27%)
4
4. IRRIGATION (2003-04) (Area in Ha) Source of irrigation Canals : 16,756 Tanks : 3,531 Dug wells : 8,171 Bore/Tube wells : 1,24,700 Others : 1,450 Net area irrigated : 1,25,657 Gross area irrigated : 1,54,607
Major irrigation projects : 4. K.C. Canal (completed) TBP-HLC Stage I TBP-HLC Stage II Pulivendula Branch canal
Well Census (2000-01) Number of dug wells : 41,783 Number of shallow tube wells : 17,059 Number of Deep Tube wells : 20,280 Total : 79122 5
Exploration by CGWB 1. Number of wells drilled : EW 43 Major aquifer zones : 32 to 150 m. 2. Aquifer Properties a) T (m 2/day) Hard rock 12 to 818 b) Storage Coefficient Hard rock : 1 x 10 3 to 1.4 x 10 -4
3. Monitoring a) Number of observation wells Dug Wells 28 Piezometers Manual : 3
4. Range of water levels, m bgl (May 2005) Minimum : 4.4 Maximum : 87.25 General range : 10-30
7. GROUND WATER RESOURCES (MCM) i. Net annual Ground water Resources: 937.55 ii. Net Annual Ground water draft : 697.94 iii. Balance Ground water resource : 239.61 iv. State of ground water development: 74%
8. GROUND WATER DEVELOPMENT CATEGORY i) Safe (<70% of net available resource) : 14 ii) Semi Critical (70-90%) : 18 iii) Critical (90-100%) : 4 iv) Over-Exploited (>100%) : 15 v) No. of villages notified for restricted : 358 villages in 43 mandals development (by State Ground Water Authority)
9. CHEMICAL QUALITY Electrical Conductivity (micro siemens/cm at 25 C) : 320-5570 Chloride (mg/l) : 39-1049 Fluoride (mg/l) : 0.41 2.19 Nitrate (mg/l) : 1 to 200
6
GROUND WATER INFORMATION KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
1.0 INTRODUCTION Kadapa district is one of the chronically drought affected districts of Rayalseema region of Andhra Pradesh. It has a total geographical area of 15,379 sq.km with 3 Revenue divisions, 51 mandals, 831 gram panchayats, 965 revenue villages and 4533 habitations. Kadapa district lies between the 13 43 and 1514 North latitudes and 77 55 and 79 29 of the East longitude. As per the 2001 census, the population of the district is 26,01,797 of which the rural population is 20,14,044 (77.40 %). The density of the population is 169/sq.km. The SC and ST constitute 4,09,492 (15.73%) and 61,371 (2.35%) in the district. The administrative divisions are shown in Fig.1.
The normal annual rainfall of the district is 696 mm. The SW and NE monsoons contribute 389 mm (55.89 %) and 231 mm (33.18 %) respectively. Successive failures of the monsoon during 2002-2003 and 2004-2005 with meager annual rainfall of 416 mm and 494 mm in the district has led to failure of crops with no or low productivity. This productivity coupled with lack of supplementary income from other sources, burden of high interest loan on farmers, higher input costs for fertilizers, seeds, etc., inadequate irrigation facilities, drought, farmers turning to private money-lenders with high interest rates. Un-remunerative prices for the farm produce, failure of existing bore wells and failure of new bore wells has led to the critical situation that the farmers has lost their moral strength that they will return to normal situation financially and finally led to the suicides of the farmers.
1.1 Drainage The Kadapa district is drained by Pennar river. Its chief tributaries are cheyyair, Papaghni, Chitravati, Sagileru and Kunderu. Pincha and Mandavi are minor streams that join cheyyair. The Pennar river traverses through the center 7
8
of the district from west to east. Kunderu and sagileru drain from northern side and chitravati, papagni and cheyyeru from south.
1.2 Land-use: Out of the total geographical area of 15,37,838 ha, 33% (5,05,495 ha) of the area is occupied by forests, 16% (2,40,392 ha) forms barren and uncultivable waste, 11% (1,65,587 ha) forms land put to non-agricultural purposes. The net area sown is 4,19,150 ha i.e., 27% of the total area. It is highest in Peddamudium and Rajupalem mandals with 69% and 68% respectively and lowest in Nandaluru, Vontimitta and B. Mattam with 6%, 6% and 9% respectively. The land use pattern and the percentage to total geographical area of the district for the year 2004-2005 is given in Table-1.
Table-1: Land Utilisation (Area in Ha) Sl. No. Category
Area in hectares (2004-2005) 1 Total geographical area 1537847 2 Forest 105495 3 Barren and uncultivable land 240392 4 Land put to non-agricultural uses 165587 5 Permanent pastures and other grazing lands 15383 6 Land under miscellaneous trees, crops and groves not included in net area sown 7968 7 Cultivable waste 69020 8 Other fallow lands 57431 9 Current fallows 54351 10 Net area sown 419150 11 Total cropped area 473959 12 Area sown more than once 54809 Source: Office of Chief Planning Officer, Kadapa 9
1.3 Irrigation Irrigation in the district is through major, medium and minor irrigation projects. Thee are 4 major, 5 medium completed irrigation projects in the district. The major irrigation projects are 1) Kurnool-Kadapa canal 2) TBP HLC Stage-I, 3) TBP HLC Stage-II (Mylavaram) and 4) Pulivendula Branch canal with a total ayacut of 2,27,896 acres. The five completed medium irrigation projects are 1. Lower Sagilru Project 2) Upper Sagileru Project 3) Pincha Project 4) Buggavanka Project and 5) Annamayya Project with a total ayacut of 55,625 acres.
Under minor irrigation, there are 1836 tanks under Irrigation and Command Area Development (I & CAD), and Panchayati Raj Department (PR Dept.), with an ayacut of 1,09,050 acres and 25 lift irrigation schemes under I&CA and APSIDC with an ayacut of 11,577 acres.
Under J ala Yagnam programme, during the year, the net and gross area irrigated is 1,25,657 and 1,54,607 acres respectively. Ground water irrigates 86% of the total irrigation in the district and it plays a vital role in irrigation. The source-wise irrigation is given in Table-2. Government of Andhra Pradesh has taken up irrigation projects on large scale. There are five ongoing major irrigation projects namely 1. Telugu Ganga Project 2. Chitravathi Balancing Reservoir (Lingala canal) 3. Galeru-Nagari Project 4. Gandikota Lift Irrigation Scheme and 5) Hundri Neeva Sujula Sravanti scheme with a total ayacut of 4,23,935 acres. In addition to this, a total of 1,52,000 acres will be stabilized under various schemes.
In addition to the above, Government of Andhra Pradesh has taken up one medium irrigation project (Veligallu project) with an ayacut of 24,000 acres. Under minor irrigation, the Government has taken up 218 tanks under I&CAD and PR Departments with an ayacut of 12,635 acres and 8 Lift Irrigation Schemes with an ayacut of 1394 acres.
10
The irrigation by ground water accounts for 86% of the total area irrigated in the district, out of which 81% account for bore well and filter point wells and remaining 5% for dug well irrigation. The total area irrigated by ground water is 1,32,871 ha. In all, there are 79,122 ground water abstraction structures in the district. The area irrigated by different sources is presented in Table-2.
Further, the Government of AP has contemplated 24 tanks under I & CAD Department with an ayacut of 5581 acres and 34 mini-lift irrigation schemes under APSIDC with an ayacut of 12,246 acres.
Table-2: Area Irrigated by different sources Area in Ha Sl. No. Source of Irrigation 2000- 01 2001- 02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 1 Canals 21267 18284 9406 16756 799 2 Tanks 8099 15147 1174 3531 447 3 Tube wells & Filter points 12307 131375 130472 124700 20976 4 Other wells 16865 13922 11358 8171 1778 5 Lift Irrigation 2052 332 1216 1337 0 6 Other sources 98 1570 376 113 0 7 Net area irrigated 137203 152071 124134 125657 128074 8 Gross area irrigated 171453 180630 154002 154607 157025 9 Area irrigated more than once 34250 28559 29868 28950 28951
Source: Office of the Chief Planning Officer, Kadapa
11
1.4 Geology The oldest rocks of the area belong to Late Archaean or Early Proterozoic era which are succeeded by rocks of Dharwarian Age and both are traversed by dolerite dykes. The older rocks are overlain by rocks of Cuddapah Supergroup and Kurnool Group belonging to Middle and Upper Proterozoic Age. The Cuddapah Sedimentary Basin, which is a huge depression formed over the denuded surfaces of older rocks extending into neighbouring districts occupies the major part of the district.
The major rock types are quartzites, shales, limestones, phyllites, granites, granodiorites and granite gneiss. The Archaean compises the Peninsular Gneissic Complex, represented by granite, granodiorite, granite- gneiss and the migmatite. These rock types occur in the southwestern part of the district.
The rocks of Dharwar Supergroup range in Age from Archaean to Lower Proterozoic and are represented by metabasalt and branded ferruginous chert. The Dharwar Supergroup of rocks occur as minor brands trending NNW-SSE, within the PGC country in the southwestern part of the district.
Both the Archaean and Dharwar are Traversed by dolerite dykes and quartz reefs.
Alluvium consisting of gravel, sand, silt and clay occur along the river coarses in the district.
1.5 Previous works by CGWB Central Ground Water Board has completed systematic hydrogeological studies by 1990. Ground Water Management Studies were carried out at regular intervals in order to reappraise ground water conditions in the district. Ground Water Exploration was carried out down to a depth of 200 m from the year 1992 12
to 1998. Ground Water regime monitoring is a continuous activity of Central Ground Water Board and is being carried out 4 times in a year.
2.0 RAINFALL The annual rainfall of the district is 703 mm, which ranges from 501 to 1064 mm. The annual rainfall data of 51 mandals for the period 2000-05, along with its departure from normal is given in Table-3. The mean district rainfall was 732 mm in 2000-01, 862 mm in 2001-02, 416 mm in 2002-03, 822 mm in 2003- 04 and 490 mm in 2004-05. The district mean indicates that the annual rainfall was below normal by 24%, 41% and 30% during 1999-00, 2002-03, and 2004-05 respectively (Fig.2). The rainfall was above normal by 4%, 23% and 17% in 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2003-04 respectively.
The cumulative departure of annual rainfall from normal indicates that for the last five years the extent of drought at a place. In the district, the cumulative departure of annual rainfall was scanty (more than 60% below normal) in 16 mandals and deficit (below normal by 20% to 50%) in 6 mandals. In the remaining 29 mandals the rainfall was above normal. On an average, the district rainfall condition was deficient by 27% from normal (Table-3).
3.0 GROUND WATER SCENARIO Ground water occurs in all the geological formations in the district. The occurrence and behaviour of ground water is controlled by geological, structural and climatological factors, which together form dynamic system. There are two main groups of rocks from ground water point of view, in the district. They are (i) Consolidated Rocks comprising quartizes, shales, limestones, granites, granite gneisses and (ii) Unconsolidated formations consisting of alluvium. The aquifer system in consolidated rocks is highly disconnected and varies widely.
13
Table 3. MANDAL-WISE ANNUAL RAINFALL AND ITS DEPARTURE FROM NORMAL KADAPA DISTRICT
3.1 Hydrogeology Grouind water conditions in different geological formations in the district are discussed in the following paragraphs. Hydrogeology of the district is depicted in Fig.3.
3.1.1 Consolidated Formations
Aquifers in Archaean formations These rocks consists mostly granite gneisses, migmatites and generally lack primary porosity. However, development of secondary porosity through weathering and fracturing gives scope for occurrence of ground water. Ground water occurs under unconfined conditions in weathered portion and under semi- confined conditions in joints and fractures.
The ground water in weathered zone is developed by large diameter (6 m) dug wells and dug-cum-bore wells. The thickness of the weathered zone is generally upto 10 m in most of the area. During the rainy season, these wells sustain pumping around 4 hrs. in a day in two spells and yields 20 to 60 cu.m/day in rainy season. However, during the Rabi season, most of the wells are likely to yield less i.e., 5 to 20 cu.m/day and in drought years, likely to be dried up.
The ground water in fractured portion is developed through construction of shallow/deep bore wells. The exploration carried out by Central Ground Water Board indicated that the most of the aquifers in Archaeans are restricted to 100 m depth only. The bore well yields vary from 0.1 to 10 lps.
Aquifer in Kadapa/Kurnool formations Kadapa/Kurnool formations consist of mostly shales, quartzites, limestones/dolomites. Ground water occurs under water table conditions in weathered portion of the formation and the thickness of the weathered portion is 19
around 10 m bgl. Ground water is developed in weathered potion through large diameter dug wells (6m). As the pressure on ground water increases, the water
20
levels were lowered and the yields from dug wells decreased and occasionally dried up in the drought years.
Presently, the farmers are constructing deep bore wells with 162 mm dia down to a depth of 300 m. Exploration by Central Ground Water Board revealed that the potential aquifers occur down to 191 m at Venkat Rajampet, 185 m at Vattaluru, 147 m at Gopalmambapuram, 143 m at Mannur, 147 m at Iskapalle, 120 m at Gundlur, 114 m at Bestapalle villages in Cheyyeru basin and at 168 m and 175 m at Pulivendula, 128 m at Kanamakinda kottalu in Papagni basin. The yields vary from 0.5 lps to 20 lps in these formations.
3.1.2. Unconsolidated Formations Aquifers in Alluvium
Alluvium occurs along the river courses in the district. The thickness of the alluvium varies from 1 m to 20 m bgl. Ground water development in alluvium is through filter point wells upto 15 m depths and are of 10 to 15 cm in diameter. The yields vary from 2 to 17 lps, depending upon the thickness of the alluvium. Infiltration wells are also constructed at suitable locations for village water supply and lift irrigation schemes in these formations.
3.1.3. Aquifer parameters Central Ground Water Board has carried out pumping tests in shallow wells (dug wells) and bore wells to know the aquifer parameters in shallow aquifers. In Archaean formations, the dug wells sustain pumping for 3 to 7 hrs. per day and capable of yielding of 101 to 217 cu.m/day. The Kadapa/Kurnool formations sustain intermittent pumping for 5 to 6 hrs./day and capable of yielding 198 to 290 cu.m/day. The wells in alluvium sustain pumping for 5 to 7 21
hrs./day and can yield 136 to 237 cu.m/day. The recovery of water levels are very rapid in alluvium.
However, with the passage of time, there is more stress on ground water and hence in most areas of the District, the shallow dug wells are yielding less quantum of water. During drought areas, these areas are likely to be dried up.
3.1.4 Deep Aquifers The deep fractured rocks from potential aquifers in the Archaean crystallines. These are exploited by constructing bore wells. The depth of bore wells generally ranges from 25 to 80 m with yields varying from 0.1 to 15 liters per second (lps). The Central Ground Water Board and State Ground Water Department (SGWD) and Andhra Pradesh State Irrigation Development Corporation (APSIDC) drilled several borewells in Archaeans. The perusal of data indicates that the total depth of the wells is shallow, ranging from 30 to 80 m. meters below ground level (m/bgl). With yields generally ranging from 0.5 to 10 lps.
The Central Ground Water Board has carried out the exploration from 1992 93 to 1997 98 and 43 exploratory wells and 32 observation wells down to a depth of 200m. The drilling discharges are highly variable from meagre 0.01 lps to as high as 21 lps in meta sediments and from traces to 3 lps in granites. The deepest fracture was encountered at 190 at Venkatarajupet where cumulative discharge increased to 3.85 lps from 2.9 lps. The most of the potential fractures were encountered between 20 and 100 m. However the potential fractures also occur rarely between 100 and 150 m. It is revealed in Cheyair basin 80% of the wells have yielded morethan 3 lps. and nearly at 50% of the sites, fractures were encountered beyond 100 m. with varying discharges.
Highly cavenous limestones occur both in Cheyair and Papaghni basins. The drilling at Akepadu could not be continued beyond 45 m. due to high 22
discharge encountered in cavernous limestones. The exploration has proved that the occurrence of production fractures down to a depth of 100 m. and rarely upto 200 m. Pumping tests like preliminary yield tests, step draw down tests and aquifer performance tests were conducted on high yielding bore wells in the district. The specific capacity of the wells is variable from 60 to 1636 lpm/mdd. The specific capacity will be more initially and decreases with the progressive pumping.
The transmissivity determined from the aquifer performance tests is highly variable from 45 to 912 sq.m/day. Higher values are noticed in Cheyyeru basin, comparable to the Papagni basin. The storativity values of the aquifers range from 1.3 x 10 6 to 5.19 x 10- 1 . The transmissivity low yielding wells range from 0.5 to 3.7 sq.m/day.
3.2 Water level: The depth to water level in the district is being monitored four times in a year by CGWB during J anuary, May, August and November months through a network of observation wells. The data generated from these wells along with the water level data of piezometers of State Ground Water Department, the water level situations in the district is discussed below.
3.2.1 Pre-monsoon Based on the water level data compiled for pre-monsoon of 2005, the distribution of different ranges of water levels in the district are discussed below and also shown in Fig.4.
The depth to water level between 5 m and 10 m bgl was observed at Tondur, Peddamudium, Talamanchipatnam, Chennur and Maddimadugu villages.
23
The depth to water level between 10 m and 20m was observed at Vemula, Vempalle, Bhakarapet, Sambepalle, Rajampet and Proddutur areas.
24
The depth to water level between 20 m and 40 m was observed at C.K. Dinne, Badvel, B. Mattam, Nulivedu, Balapanur, Payasampalle, Kamalapuram, Vanipenta, Uppaluru, Yamavaram, C. Kothapalle, Porumamilla and Pulivendula areas.
The depth to water level of more than 40mbgl was observed at Venkatrajupalle, Chennareddipalle, Kondur, Peddamudium, Gurralachintalapalle, Timmayyagaripalle, Puttanavaripalle and Chinnakudala areas.
The depth to water level of more than 60 m bgl was observed at Timmayyagariaplle (87.25 m), Puttanavariplle (86.6 m) and Chinnakudala (73.5 m) areas.
3.2.2 Post-monsoon Based on the water level data compiled for post-monsoon season of 2005, the distribution of different ranges of water levels in the district are discussed below and also shown in Fig.5.
The depth to water level of less than 5 m was observed mostly in canal command areas and observed at Kanagudur, Talamanchipatnam, Tandur, Chennur, Maddimadugu areas.
The depth to water level between 5 m and 10 m was observed at Vempalle, Proddutur, Lavanur and Sambepalle areas.
The depth to water level between 10 and 20 m was observed at J ammalamadugu, Yamavaram, Vanipenta, Pulivendula, Balapuram, Vemula and T. Sundupalle areas.
The depth to water level of more than 40 m bgl was observed at Gurrakaduntlapalle (43.16) and Puttanavaripalle (47.93) areas. 25
26
3.2.3 Water level fluctuation (May, 2005 Vs. November, 05) Based on the water level of CGWB and State Ground Water Department, the fluctuation of water level is analysed. During the month of May, 2005, the average district water level is 24.85 m, whereas it is 11.53 m during November, 2005, indicating average water level rise of 13.32 m in the district. Distribution of different ranges of water level fluctuation is presented in Fig.6. 3.2.4 Long-term water level trend Based on the average monthly water level of the piezometers, a composite hydrograph of Kadapa district from May, 1997 to J uly, 2006 is prepared and shown as Fig.7. It is noticed from the hydrograph that the water levels are showing the declining trend in the district. There is a fall of around 9 m in the district over 9 years indicating that there is a fall of around 1 m each year in the district. Point hydrograph some of the representative wells showing the pattern of the change in water levels are presented in Fig.7. 3.3 Ground Water Resources Based on the Ground Water Estimation Committee (GEC-97) norms ground water assessment was done in 2004. The mandal wise details are presented in Table 4. Ground water resource available is 199.01 MCM in command area and 738.55 MCM in non-command area of the district. Ground water utilization is 85.93 MCM and 606.61 MCM in command and non-command areas respectively. The ground water balance is 113.07 MCM and 131.94 MCM in command and non-command areas respectively. Based on the stage of ground water development and water level trend the villages and ground water assessment units are categorized. Over all, the district falls under Semi-critical category with a stage of development at 73.9%. The stage of development in command area is 43.2% and that in non-command is 82% showing that the non- command area is falling in Semi-critical category (Table-4).
Based on the stage of development, 13 mandals are categorized as Safe, 18 Semi-critical 4 critical and 15 Over-Exploited (Fig.8). The minimum stage of development is 20% in Chennuru mandal and the maximum stage of development of 137% is in Vemula mandal. On classification, it is seen that the entire command area falls under Safe category and in non-command area only 14 mandals are falling in Safe category, 17 in semi-critical, 5 critical and 15 mandals fall in over-exploited category.
3.4 Ground Water Quality The ground water in the district is in general suitable for both domestic and irrigation purpose. The electrical conductivity ranges from 320 to 5570 micro Siemens/cm at 25 C. A total of 13 villages are affected by high fluoride problem and 131 villages are having brackish water problem in the district. Electrical conductivity of ground water ranges from 900 to 2700 micro siemens/cm at 25C.
3.5 Status of Ground Water Development In the olden days, the ground water development is through dug wells. Over a period of time, due to increase in population, the stress on ground water has increased. Consequently, the water levels were lowered and the dug wells are replaced by dug-cum-bore wells, shallow bore wells and presently by deep bore wells. The dug wells are generally circular or rectangular in shape and generally down to 10 m depth. The shallow bore wells for hand pumps are 100 mm diameter and generally down to 60 m. Presently, the bore wells with 162 mm diameter were drilled down to 300 m in non-command areas and down to 100 m in command areas. The dug wells are fitted with centrifugal pumps of 5 to 7.5 HP whereas the shallow bore wells where water levels are shallow one fitted with hand pumps for drinking and domestic purposes. The irrigation bore wells are fitted with submersible pumps with horse power ranging from 5 to 20 depending upon the water level and yield.
35
There are 908 villages in the district. The drinking water for these villages are met through 1243 P.W.S. schemes, 5443 bore wells and 210 open wells. Most of the open wells are in Atloor, Chapadu, B. Mattanur, Kalespadu, Tandur and Srihardipuram mandals, where the water levels are comparatively shallow. (Table-5).
Most of the irrigation is through ground water in the district. Around 86% of the total irrigation is through ground water of which 81% is through bore wells and filter points and 5% through dug wells indicating the role of bore wells and filter points in the district.
However, the farmers are not following any scientific criteria for selection of sites for construction of bore wells since the holding of the small and marginal farmers is small. The farmers are resorting to construction of second bore well, if the first bore well is a failure. This has increased the financial burden on the farmer.
As per he minor irrigation census for the year 2000-2001, there are 41,783 dug wells, 17,059 shallow bore wells and 20,280 deep bore wells in the district. It indicates that the deep bore wells are dominating in the district when compared to dug wells and shallow bore wells.
4. INFORMATION ON BORE WELL FAILURE-SUCCESS In the non-command areas, the farmers are constructing bore wells down to 300 m in the district. If the farmer has a perennial crops like Lemon-citrus, the demand of water is more during summer for the crop. If the monsoon fails in one year, its maximum effect i.e., reduction in yield of bore wells will be observed in next summer. Since the crops needs more water during summer, the farmer resorts for construction of additional bore well in his small area. No scientific study of the area will be done by the farmer. Hence more often these bore wells become a failure. This leads to a situation that the crop does not yield due to 36
Table 5.
37
inadequate supply of water and his financial burden may increase. There are instances that the farmers have constructed around 5 bore wells in 10 acres of land and all the 5 bore wells have failed. This type of situation has thrown the farmers into high distress and he looses his hope of living and commits suicide. The reasons for failure of bore wells are
1. Scanty and increased rainfall 2. Ground water draft is more than recharge 3. Indiscriminate drilling of bore wells without following spacing norms 4. Drilling of bore wells without scientific advice. 5. Cultivation of wetland crops should be avoided. 6. Following old irrigation methods.
5. GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES In Kadapa district, about 86% of total irrigation is through ground water out of which 81% is through bore wells and filter point wells and 5% is through dug wells. The district being frequent drought-affected and frequent failure of monsoon, farmers have resorted for deep bore wells on the presumption that more deep more water . This has lead to depletion of ground water in the district. In order to arrest the grave situation an effective ground water management strategy shall be evolved in such a way that there is an optimal utilization of ground water resources, maintaining the well spacing norms. In an average, as per the specifications of the NABARD, the spacing should be 250 m, which is not being observed anywhere. There are instances where a farmer has sunk five bore wells in 10 acres of and all the wells have failed. The density of the wells is very high in some Mandals. The ground water exploration by CGWB upto 200 m revealed that the potential zones exist upto 100 m, occasionally upto 150 m and rarely upto 200 m. In hard rock areas, wells of 150 m depth can be drilled after scientifically locating the sites. However, the farmers are drilling bore wells upto 300 m in some areas of the District. 38
There are as many as 4 major and 5 medium irrigation projects in the district with a total ayacut of 2,27,996 and 55,625 acres, respectively. There are 5 ongoing projects with a total ayacut of 4,23,935 acres. In addition to this, 1,52,000 acres will be stabilized under various Schemes. This indicates that there is a plenty of scope for conjunctive use of surface and ground water to enhance irrigation potential and reduce the water logging conditions. Due to the conjunctive use practices in the upper reaches, the tail end irrigation problem will also be addressed. This will satisfy the equity distribution of water resources in the total command area. The farmers should be encouraged for ground water development through suitable incentives in command areas. As such, the ground water development in command area is 43% only.
In non-command area, the stage of ground water development is 82% and as such, the north western and western part of the district is covered by either over-exploited or critical mandals. There are as many as 358 villages in 43 mandals declared as over-exploited villages. In these villages/mandals, the discreet trend of sinking bore wells need to be arrested through administrative measures or even by strict legal measures, where the provision already exist in WALTA Act. Area should be prioritized for rain water harvesting and artificial recharge in critical and over-exploited villages/mandals as immediate measures on scientific guidelines through designated departments.
5.1 Ground Water Development: Further ground water development in the district should be restricted to the command areas by constructing 10 to 15 m depth wells with radius of about 5 m or shallow bore wells of 165 mm dia down to a depth of 50 to 60 m in areas having water levels of less than 5 m bgl. The selection of the sites for bore wells should be made cautiously, based on geophysical and hydrogeological surveys. The unit cost of the wells/bore wells in different formations etc. are presented in Table-6 and the spacing of wells should be adhered to, strictly (Table-7). 39
Table:6 Unit cost of different type of wells Dimensions Dimensions of bore well Sl. No. Geological formation Type of MI Struc- ture Dia (m) Depth (m) Stainin g Depth (m) Dia (m) Depth (m) Unit Cost (Rs.) 1. Granite Related Rocks (a) DW (b) DW (c) DW (d) DW (e) DCB (f) DCB 6 6 5 5 6 4 10 12 14 16 10 14 4 4 4 4 4 4 - - - - 100 100 - - - - 30 30 25000 32500 34400 44500 31000 39400 2. Lime Stones (a) DW (b) DW (c) DCB 4 6 4 12 12 12 4 4 4 - - 100 - - 35/30 17300 32500 23300 3. Sand Stones (a) DW (b) DCB 3 3 12 12 4 4 - 100 - 30 11300 17300 4. Shale Formation (a) DW (b) DCB 6 6 12 12 4 4 - 100 35000 40000 5. (i) Bore well in Hard Rocks (ii) do (iii) do BW
BW BW -
- - -
- - -
- - 150
150 160 150 160 40
60 80# 12500
16000 20600 6. In well bores in all geological formation IWB - - - 100 30 5000 7. Alluvium FP - - - 100 15 4500 8. Develop- ment of old well DOW (Deepening 2 m from 10 to 12 m) 5000 Table-7: Spacing norms for different ground water abstraction structures Sl. No Situation Spacing between any two wells (m)
Piccota wells Dug wells Filter point or shallow wells Bore wells 1 Non-Ayacut 60 160 120 250-300 2 Ayacut 40 100 160 150-200 3 Near perennial source lke river of tank (within 200m) 40 100 160 200-300 40
4 Non-perennial streams 50 150 180 200-500 Source: NABARD 5.2 Water Conservation and Artificial Recharge Water conservation and artificial recharge to ground water is the order of the day. With a view to conserve water and soil, the Government of Andhra Pradesh has adopted integrated watershed development approach. The basic philosophy of the water conservation mission is If the water is running, make it walk, if it is walking, make it stop and harvest where it falls. The watershed development is taken up basically from ridge to valley. The rainwater, which is retained in upper reaches to improve the soil moisture, prolong water movement and increase recharge to ground water. Retention of rainwater can be carried through vegetative stoppers. Contour ploughing and furrowing, stone packing, minor fencing, farm ponding, water checks, bund and boundary cultivation are some of the approaches. The depth to water levels steadily improves in the area. Only soil free water should flow out from the watershed.
The criterion for selection of watersheds is based on number of indicators, which signify backwardness. They include shortage of drinking water, low rainfall, deep water levels, high evapotranspiration, declining of water levels, etc. in the area.
It is necessary to coordinate all the works relating to the development of land and water on a holistic and micro watershed basis. With an investment of 20 lakhs in 4 years, peoples participation in execution is very important. A supervisory team called multi-disciplinary team with six members from Agriculture, Engineering, Forests etc. will monitor the watersheds.
Watershed activity has taken up in the districts under DPAP, EAS, IWDP, RIDF schemes. Various structures like check dams, percolation tanks, 41
continuous contour trenches, dug out ponds, diversion drains, contour bunds, S.Ts, RFDs, Gabion strucutres were constructed in the district.
An amount of Rs. 46.68 crores was incurred towards watershed activity and 62,25,028 mandays were generated under watershed activity in the district.
The artificial recharge structures must be taken up in non-command areas, particularly in the critical and over-exploited villages/mandals on the sound scientific techniques already in vogue. The structures should be taken up based on the available run off in the watershed, after the meeting the need of existing structures, so as not to deprive the down stream watershed. Roof top rainwater harvesting in rural and urban areas should be made mandatory. Area recommended for artificial recharge is presented in Fig.8.
Central Ground Water Board has proposed to construct demonstrative artificial structures at 31 sites at a cost of Rs.190 lakhs in over exploited areas of lingala, vemula, pulivendla and vempalli mandals in order to artificially recharge the ground water system. The scheme is expected to be completed by March 2006. Impact on these ground water system will be studied by Central Ground Water Board for a period of 3 years.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The Kadapa district receives highly erratic and scanty rainfall. During the year 2004-2005, the total annual rainfall recorded is as low as 262 mm at Mudanur, 305 mm at Tandur, 298 mm at B. Kodur and 332 mm at Lingala, 307 mm at B. Mattam. If rainfall is scanty, large-scale watershed activity does not go a long way. The crop water requirement of an I.D. crop is around 500 mm during 100 days of its life. If rainfall is very scanty, large-scale watershed activity does not give positive results since the rainfall serves only to meet the soil water component, etc.
42
Fig 8.
43
The distress deaths are mostly happened on the western and northern side of the district, both in command and non-command areas, irrespective of stage of ground water development. However, more deaths are noticed in over-exploited mandals. The reasons for farmers suicides are many. Among them the important are failure of the monsoon, absence of crop insurance, construction of deep bore wells to meet the water demand and their failures, lack of sufficient institutional credit, high interest loans from moneylenders and others. In addition to this, lack of supplementary income from other sources from livestock viz., dairy and poultry industry, high input cost of seeds and often their low quality, fertilizers low market price for the farm produce put the farmers in distress, which has led ultimately to their suicides.
The following recommendations are made for ground water management plan for the sustainable management of ground water:- 1. To arrest further fall of ground water levels in district, which have gone down to around 80 m in Timmayyagaripalle village of Chitvel mandal, Chinnakuudala of Ringala mandal, Puttanavaripalle of Pullampet mandal and other places, the watershed activity does not sustain the falling water level trend because of scanty rainfall. This necessitates transfer of water from other basins to the district. Among this, the link between Krishna (Almatti) to Pennar should be taken up on priority basis. 2. In critical and over-exploited areas, large-scale artificial recharge to ground water structures has to be taken up, after assessing the source water availability. Site selection should be done on scientific lines. The maintenance of these structures should be made mandatory by the user agency. 3. Water intensive crops like paddy, banana, betel leaves etc. should be discouraged under ground water irrigation. 4. To avoid distress among the farmers, institutional credit facility at lower interest rate may be provided to all the farmers for package of selection of 44
borewell sites on a scientific basis, drilling down to required depth, suitable pumping system (probably solar powered), modern irrigation equipment like drip and sprinkler systems. 5. Borewells are to be drilled as per spacing norms and down to the required depth suggested by the scientific investigations. Spacing of 250 to 300 m. is to be observed strictly between to adjacent bore wells. Bore wells down to a depth of 150 200 m. may be drilled in areas occupied by the sedimentary formations whereas in hard rock areas like granites, gneisses it may be drilled upto 100 150 m. 6. Steps may be taken for the formation of Bore Well Insurance Corporation of India by Government of India in co-ordination with State Governments, whereupon the payment of the premium by the farmer will get complete reimbursement of construction charges of the bore well, if it becomes a failure well. 7. There should be a complete institutional credit cover to the small and marginal farmers for the drilling deep borewells in the scientifically identified ground water potential zones, for procuring water saving equipment like drip and sprinkler systems, etc. Insurance facility should be provided to cover the health of formers and their families, damaged crops due to severe drought conditions, unforeseen loss, market rates for the agriculture produce, etc. 8. Since Kadapa district being the perennially drought prone, agriculture alone cannot give the sustenance to the farmers.. To minimize the dependence solely on agriculture the government should provide loan facility with enhanced subsidy to the farmers to initiate dairy and poultry for supplementary income for his subsistence. 9. In order to impart education to the farmers, regarding the cropping pattern, hybrid varieties, pesticides, irrigation techniques, etc., Agri-Clinics may be established in rural areas for every five villages in non-command areas. 10. Mass awareness programmes must widely be conducted on regular basis in the rural areas to educate the farmers regarding the water 45
management to update their knowledge. Training for local government functionaries, NGOs, voluntary organizations engaged in watershed development activity are to be trained in scientific techniques in the selection of sties, design of structures, etc. for construction of rainwater harvesting and artificial recharge structures.
Acknowledgements: The data provided by the State Ground Water Department, Panchayat Raj Department, Agriculture Department, Irrigation Department, District Water Management Agency and Directorate of Economics & Stastistics, Govt.of Andhra Pradesh, for preparation of the report, is gratefully acknowledged.