Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
) in our previous
report. On the other hand, the numbers of the cotton wool-
like scaffolds gradually increased until day 7 and showed a
marked increase between day 7 and 14. The cell numbers
in the cotton wool-like scaffolds at day 14 were larger than
that of the bremat at day 7. This indicates that the cotton
wool-like scaffold has the ability to maintain cells in 3-D.
This ability is expected to be signicant for the application
of the sample to the scaffold materials for the tissue
engineering, since cells are pre-cultured in/on scaffold
materials in vitro and then they are implanted into body
with the materials in most case of tissue engineering [23,
24]. An interconnected macroporous network with an
interconnected pore size of at least 100 lm has been
reported to allow bone ingrowth and eventually vasculari-
zation [25, 26] so the interconnected spaces formed
between the bres with over 100 lm in size in the cotton
wool-like scaffolds were expected to allow bone tissue to
grow into their inside in body.
Various types of porous bioactive materials have been
developed and reported already but there are still some
problems encountered when using them for tissue
Fig. 10 Fluorescence microscopic images showing actin in the cells
(green) stacked on a bright-eld image. a, b bremat, c, d cotton 1, e,
f cotton 2. a, c, e after 7 days of culturing, b, d, f after 14 days of
culturing. The uorescence microscopic images were z-stacked one.
After 7 days-culturing, the cells proliferated well on the bremat and
spread widely, although they on/in the cotton wool-like scaffolds
were few and proliferated along the bres. After 14 days-culturing,
the cell number on the bremat decreased, although they kept
proliferating along the bres on/in the cotton wool-like scaffolds
(Color gure online)
1656 J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2013) 24:16491658
1 3
engineering. One of the problems is the rapid formation of
tissue on the outer edge. This sometimes induces the
development of a necrotic core due to the limitations of cell
penetration and nutrient exchange [27, 28]. Electrospun
brous materials certainly have interconnected pores which
are gaps formed between bres. However, in case of a
conventional bremat cells may not penetrate into inside
the material. This is because the bres are layered densely
and the gap between the bres at outer layer and inner one
is too small to allow the cells to migrate. In fact, the
MC3T3-E1 cells proliferated at the top surface of the
bremat mainly, as shown in Figs. 10 and 11. On the other
hand, the cells penetrated into immediately and proliferated
inside the cotton wool-like scaffold. This indicates that
bone tissue can grow from inside to outside of the sample,
when engineered in vitro. The open pore structure may also
allow tissue ingrowth from the surrounding in the cotton
wool-like scaffolds after implanted in body [29].
Fibre diameter and density of brous structured scaf-
folds have been shown to affect the cell functions [8, 30,
31]. Pham et al. reported that the initial adhesion of marrow
stromal cells was enhanced on electrospun poly(e-capro-
lactone) scaffold with 5 lm in bre diameter in compari-
son with that on nanobre scaffold with 600 nm in bre
diameter and there were differences in the cell morphology
between the two scaffolds [8]. Takahashi et al. reported
that the proliferation rate of mesenchymal stem cells was
higher on the non-woven polyethylene terephthalate scaf-
fold with bigger bre diameter and higher porosity from
the culture tests using the samples with bre diameter in
range of 242 lm and porosity of about 93 or 97 %. They
also reported that the osteogenic differentiation was
enhanced on the sample with 9 lm in bre diameter and
was signicantly higher on the sample with low porosity
than that with high porosity [30]. In addition, the cell
behavior has been reported to depend on the environments
of 2D or 3D. Fibroblasts formed different focal adhesion
structures and showed higher proliferation in 3D than 2D
culture [32]. They showed an accelerated rate of acquisi-
tion of a characteristic in vivo-like spindle-shaped mor-
phology on the 3D culture. Therefore, the cell adhesion
system and morphology are regarded to inuence the fol-
lowing cell behavior, such as proliferation and differenti-
ation. These phenomena strongly related to bre diameter
and density in the case of the brous structured scaffold.
The cell morphology on the cotton wool-like scaffolds was
different from that on the bremat; a spindle shape on the
cotton wool-like scaffold and a radial one on the bremat.
In addition, the 3D environment formed in the cotton wool-
like scaffolds is expected to play an important role for
enhancing the cell functions. Thus the cell differentiation
may be different between the cotton wool-like scaffolds
and bremats. This will be claried in future study.
4 Conclusion
The cotton wool-like structured scaffold materials were
prepared using the PLLA and SiV composites with a
modied electrospinning system. The elasticity tests for the
cotton wool-like scaffolds demonstrated that they pos-
sessed almost the same elasticity as that of PLLA sample
and were not broken and collapsed even if they were held
by a tweezers. Although the amounts of calcium and sol-
uble silica released from the cotton wool-like scaffolds
changed with the SiV contents in the samples, all the
samples released calcium ions over 56 days and soluble
silica for 2856 days. The osteoblast-like cells penetrated
into and proliferated at inside the cotton wool-like scaf-
folds, while they mainly adhered on a surface of the br-
emat. The cotton wool-like scaffold was expected to be
Fig. 11 Cross-sectional views of the images in Fig. 9(b, d, f). Cells
were cultured on/in each sample for 14 days. The images were of
center parts of each sample and non y-stacked. Most cells were
present inside the scaffolds in the case of the cotton wool-like
scaffolds. The cells on the bremat were found at the area close to the
top surface on which they were seeded
Fig. 12 Cell numbers during 14 days of culture in/on bremat,
cotton 1 and cotton 2. The number of the bremat increased until day
7 but decreased between day 7 and 14, although the numbers of the
cotton wool-like scaffolds gradually increased until day 7 and showed
a marked increase between day 7 and 14. (*P\0.05)
J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2013) 24:16491658 1657
1 3
good candidate for the scaffold which achieves the three-
dimentional engineered bone tissues.
Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by Grant-in-
Aids for Young Scientists (B) (No. 21700487) from The Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) and
Scientic Research (B) (No. 20390497) from Japan Society for Pro-
motion of Science. JRJ acknowledges EPSRC Challenging Engi-
neering grant EP/I020861/1.
References
1. Cui W, Zhou Y, Chang J. Electrospun nanobrous materials for
tissue engineering and drug delivery. Sci Technol Adv Mater.
2010;11(1):111.
2. Sill TJ, von Recum HA. Electrospinning: applications in drug
delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29(13):
19892006.
3. Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, Tuan RS, Ko FK. Electrospun
nanobrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering.
J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60(4):61321.
4. Badami AS, Kreke MR, Thompson MS, Rife JS, Goldstein AS.
Effect of ber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differ-
entiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly(lactic acid)
substrates. Biomaterials. 2006;27(4):596606.
5. Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S. Electrospinning of
nano/micro scale poly(L-lactic acid) aligned bers and their
potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26(15):
260310.
6. Zeng J, Xu X, Chen X, Liang Q, Bian X, Yang L, et al. Biode-
gradable electrospun bers for drug delivery. J Control Release.
2003;92(3):22731.
7. Xin X, Hussain M, Mao JJ. Continuing differentiation of human
mesenchymal stem cells and induced chondrogenic and osteo-
genic lineages in electrospun PLGA nanober scaffold. Bioma-
terials. 2007;28(2):31625.
8. Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG. Electrospun poly (e-caprolac-
tone) microber and multilayer nanober/microber scaffolds:
characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular inl-
tration. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(10):2796805.
9. Hoppe A, Guldal NS, Boccaccini AR. A review of the biological
response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and
glass-ceramics. Biomaterials. 2011;32(11):275774.
10. Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery LDK, Hench LL, Polak JM. Ionic
products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of
human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II
mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun. 2000;276(2):4615.
11. Xynos ID, Hukkanen MVJ, Batten JJ, Buttery LD, Hench LL,
Polak JM. Bioglass
45S5 stimulates osteoblast turnover and
enhances bone formation in vitro: implications and applications
for bone tissue engineering. Calcif Tissue Int. 2000;67(4):3219.
12. Jones JR, Tsigkou O, Coates EE, Stevens MM, Polak JM, Hench
LL. Extracellular matrix formation and mineralization on a phos-
phate-free porous bioactive glass scaffold using primary human
osteoblast (HOB) cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28(9):165363.
13. Gough JE, Jones JR, Hench LL. Nodule formation and miner-
alisation of human primary osteoblasts cultured on a porous
bioactive glass scaffold. Biomaterials. 2004;25(11):203946.
14. Obata A, Tokuda S, Kasuga T. Enhanced in vitro cell activity on
silicon-doped vaterite/poly(lactic acid) composites. Acta Bio-
mater. 2009;5(1):5762.
15. Obata A, Hotta T, Wakita T, Ota Y, Kasuga T. Electrospun mi-
crober meshes of silicon-doped vaterite/poly(lactic acid) hybrid
for guided bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(4):124857.
16. Wakita T, Obata A, Poologasundarampillai G, Jones JR, Kasuga
T. Preparation of electrospun siloxane-poly(lactic acid)-vaterite
hybrid brous membranes for guided bone regeneration. Compos
Sci Technol. 2010;70(13):188993.
17. Wakita T, Nakamura J, Ota Y, Obata A, Kasuga T, Ban S. Effect
of preparation route on the degradation behavior and ion releas-
ability of siloxane-poly(lactic acid)-vaterite hybrid nonwoven
fabrics for guided bone regeneration. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(2):
2328.
18. Yarin AL, Koombhongse S, Reneker DH. Bending instability in
electrospinning of nanobers. J Appl Phys. 2001;89(5):301826.
19. Mainil-Varlet P, Rahn B, Gogolewski S. Long-term in vivo
degradation and bone reaction to various polylactides. 1. One-
year results. Biomaterials. 1997;18(3):25766.
20. Bos RRM, Rozema FB, Boering G, Nijenhius AJ, Pennings AJ,
Verwey AB, et al. Degradation of and tissue reaction to biode-
gradable poly(L-lactide) for use as internal xation of fractures: a
study in rats. Biomaterials. 1991;12(1):326.
21. Sun T, Norton D, McKean RJ, Haycock JW, Ryan AJ, MacNeil
S. Development of a 3D cell culture system for investigating cell
interactions with electrospun bers. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;
97(5):131828.
22. Fujikura K, Obata A, Kasuga T. Cellular migration to electrospun
poly(lactic acid) bermats. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2012;23:
193950.
23. Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR. Biodegradable
and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for
bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(18):341331.
24. Ohgushi H, Kotobuki N, Funaoka H, Machida H, Hirose M,
Tanaka Y, et al. Tissue engineered ceramic articial joint
ex vivo osteogenic differentiation of patient mesenchymal cells
on total ankle joints for treatment of osteoarthritis. Biomaterials.
2005;26(22):465461.
25. Freyman TM, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ. Cellular materials as porous
scaffolds for tissue engineering. Prog Mater Sci. 2001;46(34):
27382.
26. Lu JX, Flautre B, Anselme K, Hardouin P, Gallur A, Descamps
M, et al. Role of interconnections in porous bioceramics on bone
recolonization in vitro and in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med.
1999;10(2):11120.
27. Silva MMCG, Cyster LA, Barry JJA, Yang XB, Oreffo ROC,
Grant DM, et al. The effect of anisotropic architecture on cell and
tissue inltration into tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials.
2006;27(35):590917.
28. Ishaug SL, Crane GM, Miller MJ, Yasko AW, Yaszemski MJ,
Mikos AG. Bone formation by three-dimensional stromal osteo-
blast culture in biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater
Res. 1997;36(1):1728.
29. Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta
Biomater. 2013;9(1):445786.
30. Takahashi Y, Tabata Y. Effect of the ber diameter and porosity
of non-woven PET fabrics on the osteogenic differentiation of
mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2004;15(1):
4157.
31. Holtorf HL, Datta N, Jansen JA, Mikos AG. Scaffold mesh size
affects the osteoblastic differentiation of seeded marrow stromal
cells cultured in a ow perfusion bioreactor. J Biomed Mater Res.
2005;74A(2):17180.
32. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-
matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science. 2001;294(5547):
170812.
1658 J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2013) 24:16491658
1 3