Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary

1 pts 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts


Title and
Purpose/
Objective
No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
5% Title is missing. Just one word - title is
present.
Uses only vague terms, like
"Workshop Report #1"
One or two words that potentially
identify content of the report
A unique phrase that clearly
identifies content and purpose of the
report
No objectives are
included in report.
One or more objectives are
missing.
All objectives are included but
there are major errors or
omissions.
All objectives are included with only
minor errors or omissions.
All objectives are included and
correct
Not written in complete
sentences.
The objective is clearly indicated
from the workshop practice
paper given to you in class.
The objective is indicated using your
own words, complete sentences,
and correct grammar.
The objective is clearly indicated
using your own words, complete
sentences, and correct grammar.
Introduction on
Theory
No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
15% Unrelated to report. Very little background
information provided or
information is incorrect. No
references.
Some introductory information,
but still missing some major
points. Theory or explanations
are unclear / confusing.
References are not scholarly.
Introduction is nearly complete but
does not provide context for some
minor points. Contains good
information but fails to provide
background for one aspect of
PRACTICE or information is not
cohesive. References are obscure.
A cohesive, well-written section that
uses engineering sources to provide
context for the PRACTICE and
explain the relevant engineering
principles. Seminal literature is
referenced when applicable.
Machine/
Equipment and
Procedure
No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
(With diagram if
any)
15%
Equipment and
procedure not included.
Basic equipment and
procedure list included.
Some equipment and procedure
list included.
Most equipment in list included.
Procedure written out in some detail.
Thorough equipment list included.
Procedure written out in detail.
Up to two necessary parts are
missing. OR the steps are not in
a logical order that could be
followed accurately.
One necessary piece is missing but
the steps are in a logical order.
All necessary components are here.
Steps are in a logical easy to follow
order.
Safety No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
10% No safefy precaution is
included
There are just a little safety
precaution included. No
detailed explaination about
it.
Detailed safety precautions are
included but there was missing
point or important safety
precautions are missing.
Safety precautions are clearly written
but still incompleted. 1-2 safety
precaution not included.
Safety precautions are clearly
written and organized.
Answer
Questions
No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
15% Missing The question is answered
but is not correct.
The question is correct but not in
a complete sentence. 3-4 answer
is wrong.
The question answered uses a
complete sentence and is
scientifically accurate. 1-2 answer is
wrong.
The data generated in this practice
is used to answer the question. The
question answered uses a complete
sentence and is scientifically
accurate. All answer is correct
Discussion No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
15% No statement of what
was learned included.
Explanation loosely relates
to analysis.
Analysis interpreted and
explained.
Results interpreted and explained Results interpreted and explained.
Conclusion not made with
respect to goal
Original goal mentioned, but
unclear how analysis relate
Addresses analysis with respect to
original goal
Addresses analysis with respect to
original goal
Connects practice to broader topics
within milling/machining/welding
Connects practice to broader topics
within milling/machining/welding
Address concerns with previous
practice
Conclusion No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
10% Missing Has not restated the
purpose and has not
referenced the task. There
is no correlation between
the task done and the
conclusion.
Has not restated the purpose
and has not referenced the task
or has referenced task that does
not support the conclusion.
There is no correlation between
the task done and the
conclusion.
Has restated the purpose and
correctly referenced task and has
attempted to explain how the task
done supports the conclusion. It is
unclear that the student understands
how the task supports the
conclusion.
The purpose is restated and the
conclusion is clearly supported by
the task. It is clear the student
understands the correlation to the
task done and the conclusion.
References No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
5% No reference is included Few references cited from
text listed
References cited include most
sources cited in text
References cited include all sources
in text, but listed in an incorrect
format as per APA
References cited include all sources
in text, listed in correct APA format
May be listed in correct
format as per APA
May be listed in correct format as
per APA
Only those references cited in the
text included in references list
Only references cited in the text
included in references list
Appendices No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
5% No appendix Just one appendix is
attached from text listed.
Appendices attached include
most sources cited in text.
Appendices attached include all
sources in text.
Appendices attached include all
sources in text, and clearly mention
its source in order.
Overall
Presentation
No report done Poor Fair Good Exemplary
5% No name, date, or class
on workshop report.
Assignments look as
though student ran out of
time to finish.
Workshop report is missing
two of the following
identifying information:
name, date, and class. It
looks as though student
rushed to complete
assignment.
Workshop report is missing one
of the following identifying
information: name, date, and
class OR information is written in
wrong place. Student put little
effort and detail into assignment.
Workshop report is well identified
with name, date, and class in proper
place. Student put effort into
completing report neatly with proper
spacing.
Professional looking report.
Workshop report is well identified
with name, date, and class in proper
place. Student put effort into
completing report neatly with proper
spacing.
Workshop Practice Report Rubric Assessment
MARKS

Potrebbero piacerti anche