0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
16 visualizzazioni4 pagine
Design recommendations based on the truss model are introduced. They are appl icable to reinforced and prestressed concrete members. Design approaches for the cases of bending-shear and torsion-bend ing were treated separately in Report 248-2 in Secs. 3.6. And 3.6.2.
Descrizione originale:
Titolo originale
Proposed Design Procedures for Shear and Torsion in Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Ramirez_part21
Design recommendations based on the truss model are introduced. They are appl icable to reinforced and prestressed concrete members. Design approaches for the cases of bending-shear and torsion-bend ing were treated separately in Report 248-2 in Secs. 3.6. And 3.6.2.
Design recommendations based on the truss model are introduced. They are appl icable to reinforced and prestressed concrete members. Design approaches for the cases of bending-shear and torsion-bend ing were treated separately in Report 248-2 in Secs. 3.6. And 3.6.2.
l l.37a, AD.14.37b, and 8D.14.23, the ratio of v u (Test)/[K2 Jij], with K = 1.0, becomes 1.05, 1.40, and 1.69, respectively. In the subsequent sections the design recommendations based on the truss model are introduced. These recommendations are appl icable to both reinforced and prestressed concrete members, subjected to shear and/or torsion in the transition state as well as in the full truss action state. However, in the uncracked and in the transition state the design shear force should be adjusted in accordance with proposed values (see Fig. 2.14) to recognize the concrete contribution. However, in the case of prestressed concrete members a value of K greater than 1.0 is only allowed in those sections of the member where the stress in the , extreme tension fiber does not exceed 6 ~ 2.4 General Assumptions and Design Procedures in the Truss Model Approach The design approaches for the cases of bending-shear and torsion-bend ing-shear were I treated separately in Report 248-2 in Secs. 3.6.1 and 3.6.2. In this section, the variable angle truss model design approaches developed in Report 248-2 and the specific problems and limits in application, as well as the results from the evaluation of the truss model using a wide variety of published data in Report 248-3, are translated into detailed design recommendations. These design recommendations are applicable to either prestressed or normally 66 reinforced concrete sections containing web reinforcement. They are suitable for the design of sections subjected to: a. Shear and Bending b. Shear and Torsion c. Shear, Torsion and Bending These provisions do not consider certain areas of shear such as two-way or punching shear and shear friction. Current provisions for such special cases would have to be added. The general assumptions for the application of the truss model in the design procedure are: 1. Prior to failure, yielding of the longitudinal reinforcement is required. This limits consideration to underreinforced sections. 2. Diagonal crushing of the concrete does not occur prior to yielding of the transverse reinforcement. This requires an upper limit for the concrete stresses as well as limits on the angle of inclination of the diagonal compression struts. 3. Only uniaxial forces are present in the reinforcement (thus dowel action is neglected). 4. The steel reinforcement must be properly detailed so as to prevent premature local crushing and bond failures. The general design procedure based on the truss model is easy to conceptualize and use. Basically the procedure consists of 6 steps: 1. Select an appropriate truss system for the load pattern and structural constraints. 2. Assume a compression diagonal incl ination that is wi thin the I imi ts which are based on Sec. 3.3 of Report 248-2 (25 0 < 0: < 65 0 ). 3. Check the web concrete stress fd in the diagonal compression elements of the truss to guard against web crushing. 67 4. Compute the area of transverse reinforcement required as truss tension verticals. Select spacing to satisfy both equilibrium and practical spacing limits. Check to see if the amount provided satifies the minimum web reinforcement requirement. 5. Determine the area of 10ngitl,1dinal reinforcement required for the combined actions. The additional longitudinal reinforcement required for shear and for torsion should be added to flexural requirements. 6. Provide adequate detailing of the steel reinforcement. Adequate detailing of the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is of utmost importance in the Truss Model design approach since the reinforcement is required to develop its full yield strength prior to failure. 2.4.1 Selection of the Truss System. Thi s step impl ies the selection of a truss model which is in equilibrium with the applied loads and structural constraints. Examples of the truss model selection have been given in Report 248-3 for the case of deep beams and brackets, and in Report 248-2 for the case of members of constant depth cross section with rectangular, solid and hollow, L, T, and I shapes. In this step of the design procedure lies the real advantage of the truss model approach. In the case of very complex situations, the truss model approach helps the designer to visualize internal structural patterns which can adequately carry the loads. Once the designer has chosen a truss model which is suitable to carry the applied loads, he then can analyze the internal forces using the chosen truss model. He then can proceed to dimension the truss members so that those internal forces can be carried safely. If necessary, the initial truss model can be revised. Finally, using the 68 chosen truss model, he can draw the necessary conclusions for the adequate detailing of the reinforcement. Further examples on the selection of truss systems are given in Chapter 4. 2.4.2 Inclination of the Compression Diagonal Members of the Truss System. The Space Truss Model with variable angle of inclination of the compression diagonals departs from the traditional truss model with constant 45 degree angle diagonals proposed by Ritter (5) and generally adapted by Morsch (34) (who did recognize the variable angle of inclination). Hence, it is a more realistic truss model. However, as explained in the earlier reports, limits on the angle of inclination of the diagonal concrete compression struts must be introduced. The proposed limits allow the angle of inclination to vary between 25 and 65 degrees. These lower and upper limits help to: 1. Provide adequate inclined crack width control at service load levels. 2. Maintain the compression diagonal stresses within prescribed limits helping to prevent diagonal crushing of the concrete prior to yielding of the transverse reinforcement. 3. Prevent excessive redistribution of forces. First inclined shear crac ks in ord inar y rein forced concrete members occur at about 45 degrees and the development of cracks at other angles requires the transmission of forces across the first cracks. Since the capacity for this transmission may be limited, excessive red istribution of internal forces caused by designing for angles which deviate too much from 45 degrees must be avoided 4. Avoid excessive strains in the reinforcement and prevent extremely wide crack openings. As shown in Sec. 3.3 of Report 248-2, when the angle deviates too greatly from 45 degrees, in order for yield to be developed in both longitudinal and transverse reinforcement, very high strains are required in the