Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CORRIDOR PLAN
2011
Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A Part of the Emerald Horseshoe Trail
Prepared for the Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy
Made possible by a grant from Southern California Edison
Consultant:
Mark . Thomsen . Thompson Planning Group
Robin Mark
Jennifer Mitamura Thomsen
Holly Thompson
2011
i
Foreword
In 2008, the Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy
1
began development of the Emerald Horseshoe
Concept Plan with a goal of meeting the needs
of the region for accessible and connected
recreational trails and open space. The Emerald
Horseshoe is a conceptual trail and park system
that would connect the mountains to the cities.
It would begin indowntown Los Angeles, run
through the Arroyo Seco on the west side, to the
foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains and then
to El Monte, and through Eaton Wash on the east
side. This trail and park system is itself connected
to other trails and conceptual trail plans, including
the Emerald Necklace, the trail systems in the San
Gabriel Valley and San Gabriel Mountains, and the
Arroyo Seco.
The east side of this trail system follows the Eaton
Wash, an historical stream that today is managed
as a food control channel as water makes its way
from the mountains to the Rio Hondo. Making
the Eaton Wash Trail into reality will require much
planning, focusing on segments through several
jurisdictions. Community support is essential to
overcome the hurdles inherent in building a new
trail system in the 21st Century. This report is the
beginning of what we hope will lead towards a
comprehensive trail system that brings people to
nature, and nature to people.
As we developed this plan, many people gave of
their time and energy to tell us their hopes and
dreams for the trail. We heard support for a trail
that spans communities and brings nature into
our cities. We also heard about the challenges that
will be faced when developing a new recreational
trail. I want to thank everyone who participated
in workshops, attended meetings, and sent
comments. I also want to thank Holly Thompson,
Jennifer Mitamura Thomsen, and Robin Mark, for
their devotion to the Eaton Wash trail.
In the spirit of the great outdoors,
Nancy L.C. Steele,
President
Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy
1
Founded as the Altadena Foothills Conservancy; the name
was changed in 2009.
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
Contents
Chapter
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
2 Analysis
3 Outreach
4 Design Development
5 Implementation & Phasing
6 Appendices
References
ii
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Los Angeles region is large and complex.
Between the San Gabriel Mountains and the
Pacifc Ocean live approximately 10 million
people of all races and ethnicities. This is a true
microcosm. Los Angeles cultural, economic
and environmental treasures continue to attract
more and more people. The region is rapidly
growing. By 2025 the projected population in
L.A. County will grow by 3 million (Department of
Finance 2010). Increased density is certain. But
where will all these people go? How will all these
people live, navigate and enjoy this great region?
Planning for the future by investing in open
space now is imperative.
The Los Angeles region needs more recreation
and open space, more publicly available places
city dwellers can go to enjoy the outdoors,
stay in shape, and recharge their souls (Harnik
2010). Unfortunately, Los Angeles is park poor.
L.A.s percentage of parks is about half that of
other California cities. In San Francisco, 18% of
the Citys land is dedicated to parks. Oakland,
14.5%. Long Beach, 10.1%. In Los Angeles
only 7.9% of the Citys total area is designated
as park and open space (Trust for Public Land
2010). As the region continues to grow and as
density increases, creating additional open space
becomes more and more dif cult. Planning for
open space must become a priority before the
opportunity is gone forever.
Vision
The Eaton Wash Corridor would add 5
additional miles of trail and open space to
L.A. County. This Corridor is an ecologically
planned and continuous multi-use trail from the
mountains in Eaton Canyon to its confuence
with the Rio Hondo. The existing maintenance
roads on either side of Eaton Wash would
become recreation trails for pedestrians,
equestrians and cyclists. In addition, various
adjacent properties, most within the Southern
California Edison Transmission Corridor, would
become parks and open spaces. Secondary trails,
or urban trails, would further link this recreation
and open space system to the existing city
infrastructure.
Project Scope
The Eaton Wash Corridor would dramatically
transform the adjacent neighborhoods by
creating much needed recreation and social
gathering opportunities. Therefore, as with most
contemporary planning projects, a community-
based approach was applied to this project.
Early in the process, representatives from each
jurisdiction and the County Department of
Public Works were contacted and community
workshops were scheduled. A total of four
workshops were held, two at each end of the
Corridor, to gather input and feedback at the
completion of the site analysis and concept
design phases.
Los Angeles Region from Above
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
F
l
i
c
k
r
,
2
0
1
0
Vision for the Eaton Wash Corridor
i
Feedback from these meetings helped establish
six core desires and concerns that shaped the
concept plan:
Access to the site
Increased recreational opportunities
Increased open space
Restoration of habitat and wildlife
Safe trail crossings
Amenities: picnic tables, drinking
fountains, trash and recycling bins, etc.
Lighting
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
Signature Fencing
63 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Objective: Design spaces that promote the
health and well-being of the public
Benches
Benches would be available at all access points
and along the pedestrian/equestrian trail at
regular intervals, wherever adequate space
allows. Benches would also be included at
pocket parks and along trail loops throughout
the Eaton Wash Corridor project area. Seating
would be designed to ft in with the aesthetic of
the trail. Proposed construction materials include
concrete, local stone or recycled steel.
Bicycle Racks
Bicycle racks would be ofered at all parks,
commercial and retail spaces adjacent to Eaton
Wash Corridor. It is a key component of the
Eaton Wash Corridor concept that users be able
to utilize the bikeway for everyday activities such
as running errands or taking children to the park.
Bicycle racks are a necessary design element to
achieve this goal.
Drinking Fountains
Drinking fountains, including a lower fountain for
dogs, would be installed along the pedestrian/
equestrian trail wherever adequate space allows.
These fountains would include a ground drain for
water runof.
Mile Markers
Mile markers would be stamped into the the
bikeway on the west side of Eaton Wash. On the
decomposed granite pedestrian/equestrian trail,
mile markers would be stamped into boulders
along the trail. Beginning at the southern
portion of the trail, these mile markers would be
placed every 1/8 mile to help trail users know
exactly where they are on the trail. This signage
technique would help preserve viewsheds along
the trails.
Bicycle Rack
Drinking Fountain
Mile Marker
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
64
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
Locator Maps
Locator maps would be placed at all access
points along the Eaton Wash Corridor. Locator
maps would be embedded in local boulders and
depict the Eaton Wash Corridor as it connects
with the larger Emerald Horseshoe trail system.
Visitors would be able to identify their current
location with the You are here symbol as well as
other points, such as parks, along the trail they
may wish to visit. These locator maps would
make visitors aware they are on a trail that is part
of a larger, region-wide recreation system.
Picnic Tables
Picnic tables would be included at proposed
parks throughout the Eaton Wash Corridor
project area. These tables would match the
aesthetic of the trail with construction materials
including concrete, local stone or steel.
You
Are
Here
Locator Map
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
65 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Objective: Encourage municipal and public
involvement in the development of a Corridor
Plan
Eaton Wash Accord
To encourage long-term municipal and
public involvement in the development and
implementation of the Eaton Wash Corridor,
the Planning Group recommends the creation
of an Eaton Wash Accord. The nearby Emerald
Necklace project, managed by the non-proft
Amigos de los Rios, successfully utilizes the
concept of an Accord in garnering municipal and
public responsibility, support and accountability
for their trail system. An Eaton Wash Accord
would give the County and cities within the
project area the opportunity to sign-on to work
cooperatively in securing funding, sharing
responsibilities for any programming in the
Corridor and providing security. Businesses
lying within the project area may also sign-on to
adopt portions of the Corridor for maintenance,
planting or to fund programming or public
art. For more detailed information about an
Eaton Wash Accord, please see the chapter on
Implementation and Phasing.
Public Art
The Eaton Wash Corridor runs through various
cities, each with its own cultural identity and
character. It is through this diversity that
opportunities arise to create artwork specifc to
the residents that live along the trail. The Eaton
Wash Corridor would include public art that
may include murals or sculptures at appropriate
locations, such as the intersection of N. Muscatel
Avenue and Elm Avenue, where Eaton Wash
diagonally passing under the intersection. The
iconic steel sculpture trees also provide a canvas
for local artists to represent their communities
and claim the Eaton Wash Corridor as their own.
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
66
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
From 2000 to 2002, the Community of Angels
Sculptural Project installed painted fberglass
angel sculptures in highly visible locations
around the City of Los Angeles. The angels
were later auctioned of to raise money for
various charitable organizations. This project
was inspired by public art movements in
other cities, such as the Cows on Parade
installations in Chicago, and ofers a wonderful
example of how public art can work in a city as
large and diverse as Los Angeles (Public Art in
L.A. 2010).
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
F
l
i
c
k
r
,
2
0
1
0
This sculpture by Richard Botto is made of iron
and river rock and sits in the City of Oakland.
Botto is inspired by natural artist Andy
Goldsworthy who takes completely natural
and feeting materials like ice, leaves and sticks
and creates pieces that give-in hour by hour
and day by day to nature and its processes,
collapsing back into the earth. Botto mainly
uses river rock in his installations. He works
with one of the oldest mediums on earth,
paying tribute to the beauty of the natural
world. His artwork illustrates that public art
can ft in nicely not only in urban, but natural
environments as well.
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
F
l
i
c
k
r
,
2
0
1
0
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
Eaton Wash Corridor: An Opportunity for Public Art
Case Studies
67 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
WATER, PLANTS & WILDLIFE
Objective: Improve hydrologic function
while providing food protection for
residents
Channel Alteration
Los Angeles Countys miles of rivers and streams
were confned to concrete channels decades
ago in response to catastrophic fooding. In
exchange for food protection, the County lost
habitat for wildlife and places for people to
interact with water. Also, the soils lost the ability
to soak up rain, thus reducing the underground
sources of drinking water. Improving the
permeability of the urban landscape can
produce multiple benefts for the communities
of the Eaton Wash Corridor.
The following discussion on altering channels
describes one mechanism that has been
suggested for restoring a portion of our urban
creeks to natural functions. This discussion is not
specifc to Eaton Wash, as any decisions about
channel modifcation would of necessity be
preceded by extensive hydrologic and hydraulic
studies and sign-of by Los Angeles County
Flood Control District.
Soft-bottom Option
One option that is employed in urban stream
restoration where concrete channels are in place
is called soft-bottoming. This option is explained
further in the section below. It will require
thorough hydrologic and hydraulic studies and
feasibility analysis so that scouring, downstream
sedimentation, structural damage of the channel
walls and food danger do not occur. This
alteration would require signifcant planning,
engineering and construction to maintain
food protection. Yet the beneft of this channel
alteration would be the restoration of signifcant
ecological function, as well as food protection,
to surrounding communities.
Soft-bottoming would require removing the
concrete from the bottom of the channel.
Per the necessary hydrologic and hydraulic
studies and feasibility analysis channel wall
modifcations may be necessary to prevent
signifcant erosion and structural failure. The
removal of the concrete bottom would give
water the opportunity to percolate through
the soil cleaning the water and recharging the
aquifers below. The exposed earth would create
an occasion for a more natural and benefcial
riparian environment that would foster riparian
habitat, absorb carbon dioxide and clean and
transport stormwater runof.
Figure 4.3-12, Soft-bottom Option
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
F
l
i
c
k
r
2
0
1
0
Soft Bottom Portion of the Los Angeles River
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
68
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
Objective: Improve quality of ground and
surface water
Dog Stations
A reach of the Rio Hondo, just fve miles
south of Eaton Wash, has been listed on the
Environmental Protection
Agencys (EPA) 303(d) list for
having high levels of fecal
coliform and trash, among
other pollutants (Emerald
Horseshoe Concept Plan
2008). To help mitigate
this type of pollution,
dog stations and trash
bins would be located at
all Eaton Wash Corridor
access points. Dog stations
would provide 100%
biodegradable bags for dog
waste. These dog stations
would aid signifcantly
in the reduction of fecal
coliform and trash found in
Eaton Wash, the Rio Hondo
and other downstream
water bodies thereby
furthering project
objectives (City of
Turnwater 2008).
Recycle Bins
As stated above, a reach of the Rio Hondo is
listed on the EPAs 303(d) list for having high
levels of trash and other pollutants (Emerald
Horseshoe Concept Plan 2008). To help mitigate
this type of pollution, recycling bins would be
located at all Eaton Wash Corridor access points
and along the trails accessible by vehicle to
facilitate maintenance. Incorporating recycling
receptors in areas with high pedestrian volume
would not only reduce the amount of trash
found downstream, but publicly af rm a
commitment to recycling and the environment.
Restrooms
While this plan for an Eaton Wash Corridor does
not designate specifc locations for restrooms, it
is important that the type of facility suitable for
an environmentally oriented trail be specifed
to aid in future planning. Vault Evaporator Toilet
Systems are a restroom option to be considered
for implementation along Eaton Wash. These
systems are a solution to the maintenance and
waste issues of composting toilets and traditional
vault toilet systems. The Vault Evaporator uses
mechanical ventilation to control odors and to
reduce waste volume and pumping frequency.
A fan in the toilet risers forces air down into an
18-inch pipe allowing liquid to evaporate and
waste to remain aerobic, thus alleviating odors
commonly associated with traditional vault
toilets. It is estimated that this evaporation
system, when compared to traditional vault
toilet restrooms, reduces waste by two-thirds.
Utilized successfully by the Colorado Department
of Transportation at highway rest stops and
the National Park Service, the Vault Evaporator
Toilet Systems ofer an example of the type of
low-impact, low-maintenance restroom facility
recommended for the Eaton Wash Corridor
(Connors 2001).
Recycled
Bags
Dog Station
Vaulted Evaporated Toilet
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
69 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Storm Drain Trash Collectors
If needed to reduce trash entering Eaton Wash,
full-capture trash inserts can be installed at the
outlets of storm drains emptying into Eaton
Wash. These inserts would signifcantly reduce
the amount of trash entering the Wash. Placing
them throughout the project area would further
mitigate water pollution currently threatening
the site. Maintenance of these trash collectors
would become the responsibility of each city
along the Eaton Wash Corridor. And, much like
a more typical storm drain, these trash collectors
would need to be cleaned more regularly during
the winter months when rain events are more
likely.
Trash Bins
To help mitigate trash waste in Eaton Wash and
other waterbodies farther downstream, such
as the Rio Hondo and Los Angeles River, trash
bins would be located at all Eaton Wash Corridor
access points. Trash bins would also be found
along portions of the trails accessible by vehicle
to help facilitate maintenance.
Objective: Integrate Watershed Best
Management Practices
Utilizing a variety of techniques to manage
stormwater is important to creating a
hydrologically functional landscape that mimics
a basins natural hydrologic regime (Perez-Pedini,
Limbrunner and Vogel 2005, 441). The following
stormwater infltration methods would helop
achieve this end.
Bioswales
A bioswale is a shallow depression in the
ground, often vegetated, created to treat and
convey urban runof and stormwater through
infltration and a perforated pipe. Vegetation
in a bioswale slows water velocity, limits erosion
and encourages deposition of heavy metals
and pollutants
found in urban
runof. These
pollutants are then
immobilized and
many are broken
down as they
infltrate into the
soil. Bioswales
along the Eaton
Wash Corridor play
an integral role in
achieving project
objectives and
would be placed
wherever feasible
along both the
bikeway and
the pedestrian/
equestrian trail.
Infltration Planters
Infltration planters are another B.M.P. that
promote stormwater percolation and reduce
runof. Cuts in street curbs divert stormwater
into landscaped areas or tree wells, slowing,
cleaning and allowing water to percolate into the
soil. Infltration planters would be located along
the Eaton Wash Corridor Urban Trails wherever
feasible. Incorporating this type of infltration
Bioswale
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
70
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
technique into the urban context helps to
promote Stormwater Best Management Practices
at the watershed scale.
Permeable Pavers
Permeable pavers are a porous alternative
pavement to concrete and asphalt. The joints
between the pavers give surface water runof the
opportunity to pass through the paving rather
than across it. Runof then helps to recharge the
underlying groundwater table. Permeable pavers
should be considered for use along the Eaton
Wash Corridor.
Alternative Streamcourses
In 1988, the City of Pasadenas Lower Arroyo
Seco Master Plan proposed the use of low-fow
diversion streams (alternative streamcourses)
to help restore riparian habitat that had
been destroyed during the channelization of
this Los Angeles River tributary. Alternative
streamcourses are used to clean stormwater and
slow it down, giving it a chance to percolate, all
while creating riparian habitat. In 1997 the idea
was adopted and implemented as a mitigation
project for the adjacent Sunshine Canyon
Landfll. Alternative streamcourses were situated
on the terraces adjacent to the existing channel.
Four years after implementation, vegetation
was already meeting fve-year objectives and
today the riparian course continues to provide
the public with recreational and educational
experiences (Patsaouras and Schubert 2001).
The Eaton Wash Corridor and its proposed park
spaces provide additional opportunities to
implement this type of alternative streamcourse
and help native riparian habitat to thrive. The
proposed nature park, south of Duarte Road
and adjacent to Emperor Elementary School,
would provide an ideal location for a diversion
channel. Soil conditions in this area, which are
moderately well-draining, are conducive to such
a stormwater infltration technique (United States
Department of Agriculture 1980). Water in Eaton
Wash would be diverted into the alternative
streamcourse and fltered by soil microbes and
vegetation. Any water that does not percolate
would then fow back into Eaton Wash cleaner
than before reducing pollution in downstream
waterbodies like the Rio Hondo and Los
Angeles River. The adjacency of this channel to
Emperor Elementary also creates an opportunity
for environmental education. This low-fow
channel is just one additional efort to integrate
environmental education and Watershed Best
Management Practices into the Eaton Wash
Corridor Plan.
Alternative Streamcourse
4.3 DESIGN ELEMENTS
Alternative Stream Course along the Arroyo Seco
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
C
i
t
y
o
f
P
a
s
a
d
e
n
a
,
D
e
p
t
.
o
f
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
,
2
0
0
9
71 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Proposed Low-fow Diversion Channel
Locations
Proposed Park on Lemon Avenue at Ardendale
Avenue
Wide Right-of-way
Opportunity for environmental
education with adjacent Emporer
Elementary School
Moderately-well draining soil (See page
155, Soil Drainage, Emerald Horseshoe
Concept Plan)
Proposed Park on Valley Boulevard at Eaton Wash
Wide Right-of-way
Moderately well-draining soil (See page
155, Soil Drainage, Emerald Horseshoe
Concept Plan)
80
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
5.1 PHASING
10
****
******
********
***
********************
******
****
*************
*****
*********
********
**********
**********
*******
*******
**********
*
*
*
*
Phase 3
Implement improvements along adjacent
streets for Urban Trails
Create parks at proposed locations
Build bridges across Wash
82
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
Eaton Wash Accord
In order for the Eaton Wash Corridor to become
a reality and remain an asset to the communities
it serves it is imperative that it be well-supported.
To help foster this support, the Planning Group
recommends the creation of an accord or
agreement. The Eaton Wash Accord would
ensure that the responsibility of managing
and maintaining the Corridor was shared
among those organizations directly benefting
from it. These groups would include the
municipalities through which the Corridor passes:
unincorporated Los Angeles County, Temple
City, San Gabriel, Rosemead and El Monte. It
would also include agencies, such as non-profts,
businesses, Chambers of Commerce, schools,
school districts, home owner or neighborhood
associations or watch groups or individuals
adjacent to the Corridor. An Ad Hoc committee
may be appointed or a non-proft formed to draft
the Accord, spearhead support of it and manage
its future. The responsibilities outlined in the
Accord and shared among these associations
would include:
Programming
Each jurisdiction or neighborhood may want to
design and support programming that utilizes
the Eaton Wash Corridor. Such programming
would range from after school activities to senior
exercise classes.
Educational Programming At least eight
schools lie adjacent to Eaton Wash. These
schools and their districts may want to
Sherif Department
City of San Gabriel: San Gabriel Police
Department
City of Rosemead: Los Angeles County
Sherif Department
City of El Monte: El Monte Police
Department
Each municipality and agency may also want
their security personnel to patrol their portion
of the Corridor at a certain intervals or share a
contract with other Accord adoptees for rangers.
This presence of security personnel in the
Corridor would help to deter crime, vandalism
and inappropriate loitering, increasing the overall
safety and enjoyment of the area.
Further Study
Hydrologic and hydraulic studies and feasiblity
analysis would need to be conducted prior to any
modifcations to the existing channel including
the soft-bottom channel alternative.
Further Outreach
Building on the initial outreach conducted in
both the north and south areas of the project,
additional eforts to involve the homeowners and
businesses lying directly along the Wash would
need to take place. The purpose of a continued
outreach efort is to ensure community members
are informed of the potential trail plan. One of
the objectives of the Eaton Wash Corridor project
is to promote the health and well-being of the
communities lying along the Wash. Conducting
a thorough outreach program enhances
stewardship for the project increasing the future
success of the trail. Each municipality and
agency that adopts the Accord may participate
in outreach to its own community or an Ad
Hoc committee may be created to conduct all
outreach.
N
u
m
e
r
o
u
s
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
t
o
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
l
e
s
m
a
y
n
o
t
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
a
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
b
o
u
t
E
a
t
o
n
W
a
s
h
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
n
o
t
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
S
a
n
G
a
b
r
i
e
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
.
D
S
2
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
M
o
r
e
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
t
o
L
o
s
A
n
g
e
l
e
s
,
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
u
s
i
n
g
S
G
V
.
D
S
3
3
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
o
E
a
t
o
n
C
a
n
y
o
n
N
a
t
u
r
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
E
a
t
o
n
s
F
a
r
m
i
s
n
o
t
c
l
e
a
r
.
D
S
4
3
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
3
r
d
P
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
I
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
r
e
m
a
i
n
u
n
b
i
a
s
e
d
,
t
h
i
s
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
t
h
e
o
o
d
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
b
e
n
e
t
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
.
D
S
5
3
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
a
g
e
s
T
h
i
s
i
s
n
o
t
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
r
e
a
c
h
o
f
E
a
t
o
n
W
a
s
h
a
n
d
i
s
m
i
s
l
e
a
d
i
n
g
.
T
h
e
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
i
z
e
d
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
l
o
o
k
e
d
l
i
k
e
t
h
e
u
n
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
i
z
e
d
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
p
i
c
t
u
r
e
d
.
T
h
i
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
l
a
r
i
e
d
b
y
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
e
a
c
h
.
D
S
6
2
1
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
M
a
p
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
:
F
l
o
o
d
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
r
e
v
i
s
i
n
g
t
o
r
e
a
d
:
F
l
o
o
d
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
A
n
y
m
o
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
l
l
n
e
e
d
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
c
o
n
v
e
y
a
n
c
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
f
o
r
o
o
d
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
.
N
o
P
u
b
l
i
c
A
c
c
e
s
s
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
i
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
F
l
o
o
d
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
A
s
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
,
t
h
i
s
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
l
e
g
a
l
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
a
c
c
e
s
s
,
b
u
t
t
h
i
s
i
s
n
o
t
t
h
e
c
a
s
e
.
A
i
r
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
G
r
o
u
n
d
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
s
t
u
d
y
o
r
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
h
r
e
a
t
e
n
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
s
e
p
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
s
.
P
l
e
a
s
e
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
t
e
t
h
i
s
c
l
a
i
m
o
r
r
e
m
o
v
e
t
h
e
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
-
L
i
n
e
d
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
P
l
e
a
s
e
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
h
e
o
o
d
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
n
e
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
-
l
i
n
e
d
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
t
o
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
b
i
a
s
i
n
t
h
e
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
.
D
S
7
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
3
.
1
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
1
&
2
T
h
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
t
h
e
a
c
t
u
a
l
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
f
u
l
l
y
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
v
e
o
f
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
.
T
h
e
P
l
a
n
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
E
m
e
r
a
l
d
N
e
c
k
l
a
c
e
i
s
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
n
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
.
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
t
h
e
b
a
s
i
s
f
o
r
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
n
o
r
d
o
e
s
i
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
d
a
t
a
.
P
A
8
2
4
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
1
&
2
T
h
e
r
s
t
p
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
g
r
o
u
p
w
a
s
a
b
l
e
t
o
a
n
s
w
e
r
,
W
h
o
w
i
l
l
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
a
i
l
?
T
h
i
s
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
a
p
p
e
a
r
t
o
b
e
t
h
e
c
a
s
e
.
D
S
D
r
a
f
t
E
a
t
o
n
W
a
s
h
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
P
l
a
n
106
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
6.2 Public Comments
107 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
6.2 Public Comments
108
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
6.2 Public Comments
109 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
6.2 Public Comments
110
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
6.2 Public Comments
111 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
6.2 Public Comments
112
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
The subsequent comments were received from the Julianna Delgado, Co-Director, California Center for Land
and Water Stewardship, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on your Draft Eaton Wash Corridor Plan. It is an amazing,
professional work product. I would not have expected any less from you.
In theory, you know I am very supportive of developing a connected parks and trailway system
throughout Southern California for the same reasons recommended in the 1930 Olmstead-Bar-
tholomew Plan. Although there have been some serious regional planning eforts since the com-
prehensive O&B Plan was summarily shelved, implementation has been slow. (Please see attached
the map our URP students produced for the Golden Necklace Project, page 114.) Yours is a great
contribution to realizing regionwide improvements. In the process, I hope you are collaborating with
Amigos de Los Rios -- which has done great projects close to your proposed alignments to realize its
vision for an Emerald Necklace -- and other organizations, to maximize limited resources and focus
mutually-benefcial eforts.
As you state in your report, the LA Region is public park/open space poor, as confrmed by the USC
and Trust for Public Lands studies, but it is not private park poor. A signifcant amount of land in So-
Cal is dedicated to privately-owned open space in the form of front and backyards in our sprawling
neighborhoods. The prevalence of these private, well-protected havens that are typically unaccount-
ed for in terms of land use may be the root in part for so little public support for publicly-owned open
space. The same concern O&B raised in the 30s thus remains: the lack of recreational facilities accessi-
ble to low and moderate-income, non-homeowners, especially working-class families. In your report,
I would like to have seen more demographic data that would support prioritization and implementa-
tion of facilities in neighborhoods of most need. One study missing in an overlay of Census tract data
over your proposed alignment. Areas eligible for New Markets Tax Credits (which is based on poverty
levels) should be prioritized for implementation projects. These may be easier, in fact, to fund and
more resistant to community opposition.
Also, having studied the re-use of electrical transmission line corridors for almost a decade, I am
concerned about parks or trailways in close proximity to transmission lines, such as what you propose
for Lemon and Ardendale Avenues. As you know, the evidence from numerous studies conducted
worldwide, including the one from the World Health Organization, is that exposure to electromag-
netic felds (EMFs), which WHO ranks as a carcinogen, is positively linked to an increase in certain
diseases. In 2002, for example, in a risk evaluation conducted by scientists working for the CA Dept.
of Health Sciences upon recommendation of the CA Public Utilities Commission, the fndings state
that EMFs can cause some degree of increased risk of childhood leukemia, adult brain cancer, Lou
Gehrigs disease, and miscarriages. The CA Dept. of Education facility siting protocol, based on pre-
cautionary principles, now prohibits the construction of new schools within fall lines and less than
350 feet from the edge of transmission line (500-550kV) easements. The electric companies down-
play the data, perhaps for fear of liability. I have advocated for a long time the undergrounding and
reuse of the transmission-line rights of way for higher and better community uses (like what is being
achieved in London for the 2012 Olympics), especially for parks and open space. But until the lines
are sheathed ad properly undergrounded, I would not support recreational facilities within the pro-
posed rights of way. I hope you will prioritize for implementation areas of the Eaton Wash Corridor
Plan that do not pose these inherent, environmental health problems.
6.2 Public Comments
113 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Most of my other concerns were addressed in your community meetings, namely support and
funding from jurisdictions to ensure safety and maintenance of the trails and adequate food control
measures. I would vote for dechannelization and soft-bottoming any day, to improve the health of
our watershed, instead of washing our natural resources along with ef uents out to the sea, so I am
pleased you have included these recommendations in your vision.
In closing, in case you did not know, as an outcome of the Golden Necklace Project, which included
your Emerald Horseshoe Concept Plan and other projects conducted by LA and URP, and upon unani-
mous recommendation of the Deans of Cal Polys colleges, President Ortiz approved the formation of
the California Center for Land and Water Stewardship (CCLAWS) to carry out the mission you helped
to create. I remain ever grateful to you for your continuing efort to improve the quality of our lives.
With best regards,
Julianna
Julianna Delgado, MArch, PhD, AICP
Co-Director, California Center for Land and Water Stewardship
Associate Professor
Department of Urban and Regional Planning
California State Polytechnic University
3801 West Temple Avenue
Pomona, CA 91768
Of ce Phone: 909-869-5427
Fax: 909-869-4688
6.2 Public Comments
114
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
Santa Monica Mountains
Long Beach
Seal Beach
Pacific Ocean
San Gabriel Mountains
Santa Monica
Downtown
Los Angeles
Pasadena
Whittier
Irwindale
San Gabriel Mountains
6.2 Public Comments
115 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
References
Cal Poly Pomona (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona). 2008. Emerald Horseshoe Concept
Plan, Trail Connections for the Los Angeles Region. Pomona: Cal Poly Pomona, Department of Land-
scape Architecture, 606 Studio.
Chalmers, Mike. New Traf c Signals make it Safer for Pedestrians. USA Today, August 8, 2009, accessed
November 18,2010. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-08-09-crosswalk09_ST_N.htm.
City of Los Angeles. Los Angeles River Management. Accessed November 18, 2010.
http://www.lariver.org/lariver_management.htm.
City of Monrovia. City Council Meeting Minutes. Accessed November 18, 2010.
City of San Jose. Crosswalk Enhancement Comparison Study. Accessed November 21, 2010. http://
www.lightguardsystems.com/PDFs/studies/SanJoseOverheadVSIRWLStudy.pdf
City of Turnwater. Its your Water, Water Quality Report. Access October 19, 2010. http://www.
ci.turnwater.wa.us/water%20Resources/2008%20Water%20Quality%20Report.pdf.
Connors, Marina. The Vault Evaporator Toilet System: An Innovative Alternative for Waste Disposal. Ac-
cessed October 19, 2010. http://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/pdfpubs/pdf01713814/pdf01713814.pdf.
County of Los Angeles Bicycle Master Plan. First Round Presentation. Accessed November 15, 2010.
http://lacountybikeplan.org/documents/meeting_materials/.
Eaton Canyon Nature Center. Eaton Canyon History. Accessed November 12, 2010. http://www.
ecnca.org/information/history.html.
Farrington, David P. and Brandon C. Welsh. Improved Street Lighting and Crime Prevention. Justice
Quarterly 19 (2002): 313.
Florida Habitat. Ecological Efects of Artifcial Light at Night. Accessed 19 October 2010. http://frap.cdf.
ca.gov/data/frapgismaps/select.asp
Harnik, Peter. New Report Details Park Spending, Facilities, Use, and Trends. The Trust for Public
Land, Press Release, September 8, 2010, accessed November 5, 2010. http://www.tpl.org/tier3_
cd.cfm?content_item_id=23697&folder_id=186
Blumenauer, Earl. Rep. No Seriously: Republicans Dont Get It. The Huf ngton Post, February 6, 2009,
accessed November 16, 2010. http://www.huf ngtonpost.com/rep-earl-blumenauer/no-seriously-re-
publicans_b_164822.html.
Linton, Joe. July 16, 2010. Construction on the Lower Arroyo Seco. L.A. Creek Freak Blog. Accessed
October 24, 2010. http://lacreekfreak.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/construction-on-the-lower-arroyo-
seco/.
6.3 References
116
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
National Public Radio. LaHood Envisions The Future Of Transportation. Accessed November 16, 2010.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127137816.
Patsaouras, Tanya and Derek Schubert. Post-Project Appraisal of Low-Flow Channel and Revegetation,
Arroyo Seco, Pasadena, California. Accessed October 19, 2010. http://www.arroyoseco.org/PS/LAAn-
lys.pdf.
Perez-Pedini, Christina, Limbrunner, James F., Vogel, Richard M. 2005. Optimal Location of Infltration-
Based Best Management Practices for Storm Water Management. Journal of Water Resources
Planning and Management. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:6(441)
Public Art in LA. A Community of Angels Sculptural Project. Accessed October 20, 2010. http://www.
publicartinla.com/Community_of_Angels/.
Robinson, John W. 1991. The San Gabriels. Arcadia, CA: Big Santa Anita Historical Society.
Schussler, Elisabeth and Jim Wandersee. 1999. Lost Plant! Victoria, BC, Canada: Traford Publishing.
Simons, Gale and Bill Roush. 2002. Cost-efective Solar Power in the Heartland. Manhattan: Kansas State
University Electrical Engineering.
State of California, Department of Finance. Population Projections for California and Its Counties
2000-2050, by Age, Gender and Race/Ethnicity. Accessed November 9, 2010. http://www.dof.ca.gov/
research/demographic/reports/projections/p-3/.
Trust for Public Land. City Park Facts 2010. Accessed November 5, 2010. http://www.tpl.org/tier3_
cd.cfm?content_item_id=20531&folder_id=3208.
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Soil Conservation Service and the Regents of
the University of California. 1980. Soil Surveys of the Angeles National Forest Area. California.
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Safety Efectiveness
of the HAWK Pedestrian Crossing Treatment. Accessed November 21, 2010. http://www.fhwa.dot.
gov/publications/research/safety/10042/10042.pdf.
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Trail Crossings. Ac-
cessed November 21, 2010. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sidewalk2/sidewalks216.htm.
Virginia Department of Transportation. Guidelines for the Installation of In-roadway Warning Lights.
Accessed November 21, 2010. http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/IRWL_20Final_
20Guidelines_2012-14-05.pdf.
6.3 References
117 Eaton Wash Corridor Plan
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
c
e
s
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Acknowledgements
This document is a product of individuals and
organizations that have generously contributed
to and assisted in the development of this
project:
The Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy (AFC)
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
City of El Monte
City of Rosemead
City of Temple City
Southern California Edison
The Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy (AFC)
initiated this study, which was made possible
with the generous support of Southern California
Edison. The recommendations and conclusions
in this report are not those of the AFC nor
Southern California Edison.
The Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy has been
working since 1999 to protect natural wildlands
in and restore nature to urban landscapes.
In 2009 the Conservancy expanded its focus
from the foothills above Altadena to the region
spanned by the Emerald Horseshoe, along with
the Verdugo Mountains to the west.
In its history, the Conservancy has protected
close to 60 acres in Altadena and stewards
another 40 acres in the Antelope Valley. In
addition, it produced an educational flm in
2005-2006, Eatons Water, and built a water-
conservation park, Old Marengo Park, at the
border of Altadena and Pasadena, in a park-
poor, low income community. The Conservancy
leads trail hikes in Rubio Canyon and provides
educational information on the cultural and
natural history of the foothills of the San Gabriel
Mountains. The Conservancy invites you to join it
in the work to preserve the last great places and
bring people and nature together.
6.4 Acknowledgements