Sei sulla pagina 1di 84

Nevada Supreme Court Docket Sheet

Docket: 60975 IN RE: DISABILITY OF ZACHARY COUGHLIN (CONFIDENTIAL) Page 1


IN THE MATTER OF ZCHARY B. COUGHLIN, ESQ., BAR NO. 9473.
Supreme Cour No. 60975
Consolidated with:
Counsel
State Bar of Nevada/Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV \ David A. Clark, as counsel for Petitioner, State Bar of Nevada
J. Thomas Susich, Sparks, NV, as counsel for Petitioner, State Bar of Nevada
Zachar B. Coughlin, Reno, NV, as counsel for Respondent, Zachary Coughlin
Panel: En Banc
Disqualifications:
Case Sttus: Petition Filed
Categor: Bar Matter
Submitd:
Oral Argument:
Set. Notice Issued:
Related Supreme Cour Cases:
Case Number:
Case Title:
Judicial District:
Siting Judge:
Replaced By:
Notice of Appeal Filed:
Date Docket Entries
Case Information
Panel Members: Full Court
Type: Other Subtpe: Petition
Date Submitted:
Sell Judge:
53833,54844,60302,60317,60331,
60630,60838
Sell Status:
District Cour Case Information
Division: County:
Judgment Appealed From Filed:
Docket Entries
05/31/12 Filing Fee Waived: Bar matter.
05/31/12 Filed Petition Seeking a Determination of the Attorney's Competency pursuant to Supreme
Court Rule 117(2).
06/18/12 Filed Motion for Leave to File Opposition to SCR 117 Petition. Nos. 60838 and 60975.
12-17138
12-19154
Friday, February 01,2013 04:15 PM
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
2
ORIGIN
3
4
5
6 In the Matter of )
)
7 ZACHARY B. COUGHIN, ESQ. )
Nevada Bar No. 9473,
)
8
)
Respondent. )
9 )
FIL!D
Case No. ht71S
CONFIENTIL PRSUANT TO
SCR 121.
10
PETITION SEEKING A DETERMINATION OF THE ATTORNEY'S
COMPETENCY PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 117(2)
11
(THIS PETITION SHOULD BE MARKED CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO
12 SCR 117(2) AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SCR 121)
13
The State Bar of Nevada (State Bar), by and through 1. Thomas
14
Susich, Esq., Chair of the Norther Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB), petitions
15
this Honorable Court, as follows:
16 1.
The NNDB Chair has been informed that the State Bar of
17 Nevada has received numerous complaints and/or grievances regarding the
18 behavior of Zachary B. Coughlin, Esq., Bar #9473 (Respondent).
19 _ C r1 1 State Bar designated a Screening Panel to review the
L; 1 it 49
20 compl
,

evance concering Respondent Coughlin. The Screening Pael


21
\L\F L! \r'\~r
_]]Y
I; -/713%
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
INTHESUPREIVIE COURTOFTHESTATEOFNEVADA
y
In the Matterof )
)
Case o.

ZACHARY B. 0 GHLlN, ESQ. )
CONFIDENTIAL PUR UANTTO
evada Bar No. 9-PJ, )
SCR 121.
)
Respondent. )
)
(THI SPETITI ON SHOULD BE "'ARKEDCONFIDE 'TIALP R UANTTO
SCR 117(2)AND INACCORDANCE WITH SCR121)
The State Bar of levada (State Bar), by and through J. Thomas
Susich, Esq., Chai rofthe I ort hern evada Disciplinary Board ( NDB), petitions
this HonorableCourt,as follows:
I.
The N DB Chair ha been informed that the State Bar of
I evada has received numerous complaints and/or grievances regarding the
behaviorofZachary B. Coughlin, Esq., Bar#9473 (Respondent) .
?
The
tate Bar designated a
creening Panel to review the
I
I
complaintsand grievancesconcerning RespondentCoughlin. The creening Panel
\
/
2
3
4
)
6
7
8
9
10
I I
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
:. \
met on or about April 16, 2012, and made various findings and recommendations
,
including the following:
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule ("SC R") I I 7(2) the
Screenll1g Panel believes that Respondent is incapable of
the practice of law because of mental
Infirmity, illness or addiction. The Panel recommends
the filing of a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a
determination of the attorney ' s competency. Respondent
has been asked if he wishes to stipulate to the filin o of a
. . .. b
JOtOt petition and he does not.
J" . The I NDB Chair has reviewed vanous materials to evaluate
the recommendation of the Screening Panel to file a petition with the Supreme
Court regarding a mental evaluation of the Respondent under SCR 117.
4.
The State Bar Office has informed the NNDB Chair that the
Respondent may have a hi story of mental illness. The
DB Chair has been
informed that the Supreme Court issued an order on December 18, 2002, deferring
the admission of Zachary B. Coughlin as an attorney at law in this state. The
NNDB Chair has been informed that said deferral was at least partially based upon
a condition that Mr. Coughlin recei ve psychological counseling. The NUB Chair
has been informed that Zachary B. Coughli n was fi nall y admitted to practi ce law
on October 1, 2004.
1/ /
/ / /
I I I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
::0
::1
-.
5.
The
NOB Chair has received and reviewed h
t e multiple
grievances referred to above.
6.
The J
DB Chair has been informed that Respondent has been
notified of the g
nevances and complaint; but , Respondent has refused to
cooperate with Bar Counsel d' I ' .
regar IIlg tle IIlvestJgation and resolution ofsame.
7.
The NNDB Chair has been informed that Respondent has not
requested to be placed on disability status and refuses to acknowledge that he has
any menta l infirmity, ill nessoraddiction.
8.
Gar ounsel has reported to the NNDB Chair that the
investi gat ion of the grievances agai nst Respondent show a serious pattern of
misconductand bizarre behavior.
9.
Bar Counsel reports that on ovember 30, 20II, Respondent
was found guilty, after a trial, ofthe offense ofPetit Larceny, a violation ofI MC
8.10.040, in the Municipal Court for the City ofReno. Said conviction was based
onan incident occurring on September9, 20II. Respondent shopliRed a candy bar
and cough drops with a value ofapproximately fourteen dollars ($14.00) from
INaI-Mart. Respondent appealed the judgment ofconvicti on. The judgment of
conviction wasaffirmed on appeal.
10. On November 30, 20II, Respondent was fo und to be in
contempt of the Reno 1unicipal Court, Department 4, for " di sorderl y,
or
. I t b h . to\vard
,
th' J'udue
...
" fhe Respondent
contemptuous 11150 en e a,lOr "'
\"as

3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
'l\
found to have disregarded the directives of the judge and of k' d .
ma Ing emennmg
statements such as stating "WOW" h h
w en t e court made rUlings. The Respondent
was al a cited for "Iaughing during testimony" alld
questioning the judge'
authority. A copy f th
o e contempt citation is attached as Exhibit I and
incorporated herein by thi s reference.
II. On August 20, 20 II ,Respondent was arrested and charged with
Petit Larceny and Possession of Stolen Property, mi sdemeanors, for stealing a cell
phone. Respondent recorded his arrest and has posted the video on You-Tube.
The video was publicly posted by Respondent and may be viewed at the tollowing
internet address: http://www.youtube.com/ watch.JY- 5PR 7g4015bO
12. On January 14, 2012, Respondent was arrested and charged
with Abusing 911 Emergency Servi ces, a gross misdemeanor. Respondent
recorded his arrest and posted the video on You-Tube. The video is posted at the
following internet address: http://WWW.YOlllllbe.com/watch.J
v
=CvK6kvJrwFA
13. Concerning the criminal proceedings invol vi ng the charge
referenced in paragraph 12, above, Respondent tiled a document in the Reno
Justice Court, Case o. RCR20 12-065630, entitled," otice of Appearance, Entry
. . "rhis
of Plea of ot Guilty, Waiver of Right to Arraignment; Motion to Di smiSS.
rhe
document is attached as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by this reference.
'"To all those in Reno,
doculllent commences with the (allowing statement:
.1 \..e"'ona \\ no want to pl!f\Jctuatl! thIS chicanl!l')'. 'Ok(lY ,Oil n:
ounr)' , <lnu U J
'\\1 3 . ~ n o e
\
a goon, bill whal's a goon 10 a goblin? '" The document contains a rambling and
7
3
)
6
7
8
9
10
II
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
10
essemially incoherent recitation of arguments and alleged fac ts. It al so contains
di .
paraglng remarks about various court officers and officials.
14.
On
ovember 13, 10 II, Respondent was arrested by Reno
Police Department and charged with Tre passing, a misdemeanor. Respondent
recorded his arrest and has posted the an'est video on You-Tube. The internet
address of the video is: http: //www.youtube.com/ watch?v- s EOFWI-I FI EY
15. Respondent's trespass arrest arose after an eviction hearing
before Justice of the Peace Peter SfelTazza. Respondent was evicted from hi s
residence pe r order of the court effective November 1, 20 II. After being evicted,
Re pondent was later found living in the basement of the residence. The locks on
the res idence had been broken. The Reno Police tried to convince Respondent to
leave the premi ses; but he would not voluntarily leave. The owner kicked a door
open and Respondent was arrested therea fter.
Respondent filed a 36-page "Notice of Appearance as Co-Counsel and
Motion to Di smi ss" the trespa charge on March 5, 2012, in the Second Judici al
District Court, bearing Case No. I I CR 26405. A copy of the "moti on" is attached
as Exhibit 3 and incorporated by this reference.
The document is incoherem, confused and rambling.
/1/
!II
5
\\
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
16.
On February 27, 2012, in the case ofCiry 0/ Reno vs. ZachG/y
Barker Coughlin, Reno Municipal Court Case
o. II TR 26800 21, a trial was
held on a traffic citation i sued to Respondent Coughlln. T
he matter was called at
approximately 3:00 p.m. and concluded without a verdict at about 4:30 p.m. after
the Court held Respondent in criminal Contenlpt f ti
o court or hi s behavior and
activities committed in the direct presence ofthe Counduring trial. Respondent' s
behavior is chronicled in the coun'scontemptorder which isattached as Exhibit 4
and incorporated by thi s reference.
17. On March 12, 2012, The Honorable Dorothy I ash Holme
found by "clear and convincing evidence" that Respondent Coughlin committed
numerous acts ofattorney mi sconduct. Judge Holines explains in her Order that
Respondent served a five-day Contempt ofCOLII1 anction impo ed by the Coun
on February 27, 2012. Thereafter, Respondent fax-filed to the Reno Municipal
Court a 224-page document. Judge Holmes found that the document contained
rambling references to hi s personal li fe and was incoherent. A copy ofJudge
Holines' Orderis attachedas Exhibi t5and is incorporated herein by this refcrence.
I . On December 14, 20II , Re pondent fil ed an Affidavit of
Povel1y in support of his Moti on to Proceed Informa Pauperi s. In hi s Affi da vit ,
Respondent alleges that he has almost no income and refers to himselfas being
employed as a "Jack of All Trades ." See, Exhibit 6 attached hereto and
incorporatedherein by this referenc .
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
II
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
19.
On March 22, 2012, Respondent arrived at the Reno Municipal
COUrl. He spoke with a clerk of the court and with the cl k' .
conduct became
courthouse. The
white tee shin.
er s supervIsor. Hi s
0 d' . h
IsruplIve t at security had to be called to remove him from the
I . .
calmant was wearIng smiley face flannel pajama bottoms and a
Underneath the tee shin, the claimant was wearing a dress shi rt
and a tie. See, Affidavit of Officer Scon Coppa, attached hereto as Exhibit 7.
20. Respondent has posted on You-Tube and on his law practice
webpage, under the moniker, 25TeddyJames, several vi deos. In the videos,
Respondent is seen driving in his car or sitting in pajamas discussing both the COLIrt
and its staff. In the videos, he states that a named police detective admitted taking
bribes from a named local attorney. He also discusses court staff and states how
much income they make.
21 . Respondent exhibited di turbing behavior in a prior case where
he was representing a client. On April 10,2009, Di strict Judge Linda Gardner of
the Second Judicial District Court executed an "Order After Trial," in Case I o.
DVO -01168. Judge Gardner stated in her order that the mo t troubling as pect of
the case was Respondent's rude, sarcastic and disrespectfu l presentati on at tri al;
. b' I' d t d a balance heel", his failure to conduct
Respondent's lila I Ity to un er an ,
discovery; and his lack of knowledge with regard to the rules of evidence and trial
procedure. All of thi s was compounded with a continuously antagoni stic
!I
7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I I
12
13
1-1
15
16
17
18
19
20
2\
presentation of the case that resulted in a hift from a fairly simple divorce case to
a contentious divorce trial lasting an excessive amount of time.
22. During the course of the Respondent's variOUS criminal
proceedings before the lower courts, a case was referred to Di strict Judge Steven P.
Elliott of the Second Judicial Di strict Court for evaluation regarding Re pondent 's
mental competency to stand trial. After examination of the Respondent was
completed by two doctors, Judge Elliott entered an order finding that the
Respondent was competent to stand trial under RS 178.425. A copy of Judge
Elliott's Order is attached hereto as Exhibit 8.
Judge Elliott's deci s ion is not dispositive of the issue of
whether the Respondent is "competent" to practice law. The issue before Judge
Elliott focused only on the ability of the Respondent to stand tri al.
lOB Chair with numerous additional
Bar Counsel has provided the
documel1ls regarding the Respondel1l 's behavior and conduct. In order to avoid
overburdening thi s Court with repetitive documents, those additional items have
not been attached to this Peti ti on. I f, however, the Court deems all evidence to be
necessary for the Court to make a decision, the additional documentation will be
immediately pro\ ided.
Based upon the above infollllation received by the Chair of the
I orthem I evada Disciplinary Board, the Chair hereby asserts pursuant to Supreme
Court Rule \ \ 7(2) that he belie-.cs the Respondent is incapable of continuing, th.::
8
\
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
practice oflaw at this time due to mental infirmity, illness or addiction; and the
DB Chair hereby seeks a determination by this Honorable COLlrt of the
Respondent's competency and an order transferring the Respondent to disability
inactive status, thereby preventingthe Respondent from practicing law in the tate
ofNevada L1ntil such time as this HonorableCourtdetermines that the Respondent,
Zachary B. Coughlin, may resume his practiceoflaw underSCR I17(4).
RESPECTF LLY SUBMITTED this23'd day ofMay, 2012.
ICH, Chair 01 PI. S
orthern Nevada Disciplinary Board
Nevada State Bar o. 898
1675 East Prater Way, Suite 103
Sparks, V 89434
(775) 284-9533
(775) 284-9513 - Fax
\\
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CERTI FICATEOFSERVICE
The undersigned herebycertilies that a true and correct copyofthe foregoing PETITIO
SEEKING A DETERl""NATlONOFTHEATTORNEY'SCOMPETENCYPURSUANTTO
SUPREMECOUI{T RULE 11 7(2) wasdeposited in the United tates Mail at Reno.Nevada.
postage ful ly pre-paid thereon lorcertified and firs tc1as mail addressed to the following:
Zachary B.Coughli n, Esq.
PostOftice Box 396 1
Reno. V 89505
D/\TED this 30
th
dayofMay. 2012.
e e t A ~
Laura Pet;;'s.anemployeeof
the State BarofI evada
EXHIBIT 1
5
10
15
20
25
__
..-
.... .. L ... . ,
"'1 __
._............
"1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
I I
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
22

"
2-1
_6
27
28
\LED
RENO MUNICIPAL COURTF
NOV 3 0 201\
WASHOE COUNTY,NEVADA
Court- Dept. 4
Deputy Clerk
Case
CITY OFRENO,
Plaintiff,
Dept_ -I

ORDERFORSUMMARY
P NISHMENTOFCO
ZACHARY CO -GHLIN,
COMMITTEDINTHEIMMEDIATE
VIEWANDPRESENCE
Defendant_
OFTHECOURT
I
= :-:"i ares th::at municipaljudge maypunish forcontempt for
thesameactsoromissions, in the samemannerand with the sameeffectsas provided for
judgesin Chapter22 ofNevadaRevised Statute,and
WHEREAS NRS 22.030declaresthat whenacontemptis conuninedin the immediate
viewand presence ofthe Courtorjudgeatchambers, it maybepuni shed summarily, for
whichanordershall be made,recitingthe factsas occurring in such immediate viewand
presence,adjudgingthat thepersonproceededagainst is therebyguiltyofacontemptand that
helshe be puni shedas therein prescri bed.and
WHEREAS,on the 30
lh
dayof ovember,20II , theabove nanled defendantappeared
before thiscourt.
I AME: ZACHERYCOUGHLIN,who is a DEFE DANT
_ _____ Party; Witness; Spectator,and
WHEREASsuch individualcommirted the followingact(s) in the immediate viewand
presenceofthe Court:
,/ Disorderly, contemptuousor insolent behaviortoward thejudge while he is
holdingcourt, orengagedin hisjudicialdutiesatchambers,
To wi t : Refusing to obey directivesof theJUdge,continuinglines ofinquiryafter
bein
a
advised bv theCourt to refrain from doin so ' Demeanin theCourtwith
statementss uch as' VO' In res onse to cou rt rulinos. Lau hinodurin
tes timony and furtherquesti oning the cou rt and its n thoritv..
Abreachofthe peace, boisterousconductor violentdisturbancein the presenceofthe
Court, orin its immediate vicinity,tending to inteml ptdue to the courseofthe trial orother
judicialproceeding,
___ _ Refusing to be swornoransweras a witness,
____Disobeyinga lawful .lr.I.l.1w{;J;j flI.);oiIidI alpy01theollglna! I
chambers.and WHEREA suchcondutm,.",,,,"ollhoRono MunicipalCourt, Rem.WQ.hoe Coun ,
d
C Ilavad..end that ill. Clarit01 Court tho CUBlodlan 01 !II
_ ____ Demeane toe ourt original raccrd and st I M1 auttlot' lI.ed totTlake lhLC eo:;, r1lt\ca
MUNICI RT
___V- __ Derogated the authontyoftheCourt
01..".r:M 'N "
__....: v--- \\t,th Jdmlni tratiunof JU ticeand required Immediate
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
~
27
28
, ., --
__ ..... .. Y1
'n).<o I."
Basedupon the above finding ZACHA RY COUGHLIN is GuiltyofDirect
Contempt.
TheContemnor,whenasked if@lshehadanythingto sayasto whysentenceshould
not be pronounced, replied:
-S."2. C('.rq- A:WU)
Therefore, IT IS HEREBYORDERED,ADJUDGED,;ll1d DECREEDthat the
contemnor is herebysentencedto the following punishment:
A fine in the amountof(5500orless).
Imprisonment fo r(25 daysor less), NO ALTERNATIVESENTENCING.
.;j- B (,..... .
DEFENDANTTO BE RELEASED on /2....- :i -II ,2011.
A fine in the amountof_ ___ ($500 orless)and imprisonment for__
DAYS WASHOECOUNTYJAIL- Noalternativesentencing.
Releaseon OwnRecognizance revoked, bail setat:__
Defendantis hereby remanded into thecustodyand will be seenin video
arra ignmentson____ ,2011,at 8:30a.m. NO BAIL HOLD PENDING
SENTENCING.
DATED this 30'hdayof November, 2011.
EXHIBIT 2
26
2 7
23
,u, iLJ,Lfe,-ILLo-qutd-oeur
-
teaom From: zachcoughlin C
-
11
-
1( q:3Jpni p.
WIII 111k
t
Document Code:
iach Coughlin. Esq.
Nevada Bar No: 9473
1422 E. 9th St..
Reno. NV 89512
Tele: 775 338 8118
Fax: 949 667 7402
Co-counsel for Defendant Coughlin
2017 FED 21 All 9:54
IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
a
STATE OF NEVADA; )
)
Plaintiff, )
11
) CASE NO: RCR2012-065630
vs. )
) DEPT. NO: 2
13 ZACHARY COUGIILIN;
)
)
14
Defendant.
)
15
)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE. ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. WAIVER OF RIGHT
TO ARRAIGNMENT; MOTION TO DISMISS
. 7
To all those in Reno, Washoe County, and beyond who want to perpetuate this
chicanery: "Okay, your're a goon, but what's a goon to a goblin?"
19
COMES NOW, ZACII COUGHLIN, ESQ., and files the above titled document on his own behalf
20
and it is based on the argument and authorities herein, and the attachments. Coughlins asks this court
21
22
to order the WCPD to just give him some money and let him spend it as he sees fit to fulfill the
requirement that Couglin, who is indigent, be provided. counsel under Sixth Amendment
FACTS
Please incorporate by reference the materials attached herein. But in short, the arraignment in
this matter was set for February 14th, at 9:30 am. The undersigned was of the understanding that
7
NOTICE OF APEEARANCE, ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GTJILTY , WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARRAIGNMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4C5D D5D Bira< Dogan, Esq. >as his attorne< at that ?oint, having discussed the case >ith Dogan
.or hours =< that ?oint and having had a .ace to .ace discussion >ith Dogan >here it >as agreed that
Dogan >ould enter a Not 9uilt< 5lease on =ehal. o. the accused at the )e=ruar< 4, !,!
arraignment in this matter, and >aive an< such right to an arraingment to the e*tent necessar< to
allo>ed the accused to have Dogan a??ear on his o>n =ehal. at the arraignment. )urther, the
undersigned >as o. the understanding that Dogan had alread< =egun settlement negotiations >ith
DD6 7oung, even ?rior to meeting >ith the undersigned on a??ro*imatel< )e=ruar< 9th, !,!, and
that D5D Chris )ortier has, curiousl<, contacted the undersigned, some>hat to DoganDs
consternation. (he undersigned sent an email to Dogan shortl< a.ter the arraignment should have
seen Dogan enter a not guilt< ?lea on the undersignedDs =ehal. to inquire a=out ho> things >ent and
>hether DD6 7oung and Dogan had an< ?rogress to>ards a reasona=le ?lea agreement.
53/N(" 6ND 62(03$/(/E"
6n arraignment is the .irst time in a criminal ?rosecution >hen the de.endant is =rought
=e.ore an o?en court to hear the chargeEs;, and to enter a ?lea. N$" 74.,'. (he ?rimar< ?ur?ose o.
an arraignment is to in.orm a de.endant o. his rights. # 6sB the de.endant hisFher legal name. N$"
74.,!' e*?lains >hat to do i. a di..erent name is used. # /n limited Curisdiction courts, read the
com?laint to the de.endant =e.ore the trial commences i. requested. (he de.endant should =e given a
co?< o. the indictment or in.ormation =e.ore heFshe ?leads. # /n.orm the de.endant o. hisFher right to
counsel. 6lthough the de.endant has alread< =een in.ormed o. hisFher right, this should =e done at
ever< stage o. the ?roceedings. /. the de.endant >ishes to secure counsel, the matter should =e
continued to allo> the de.endant to consult an attorne<. /. the sentence includes the ?ossi=ilit< o. Cail
time8 the de.endant must =e a..orded an attorne<. /. a de.endant >ants to re?resent himsel.Fhersel.,
- 2 -
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARRAIGNMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
?lease see the cha?ter on sel. re?resentation. #/. a de.endant >aives the right to counsel or in
a??earance a.ter counsel is retained or a??ointed, asB >hat the ?lea is: guilt<, not guilt<, or nolo
contendere Eno contest;. (he de.endant ma<, in the alternative, or in addition to an< one o. the ?leas
?ermitted =< su=section , ?lead not guilt< =< reason o. insanit< not less than ! da<s ?rior to trial.
N$" 74.,3'E4;. # /. the de.endant re.uses to enter a ?lea, Gthe court shall enter a ?lea o. not guilt<.H
N$" 74.,3'E';.
CONCLUSION
(he undersigned here=< request this Court allo> this .iling to serve as an entr< o. a ?lea o.
Not 9uilt<, and >aive an< requirement or right to the reading o. the chargesFarraignment, etc. and
.urther that this Court allo> the undersigned to enter this .iling as a Notice o. 6??earance o. the
undersigned as co-counsel in this matter along >ith >hoever ultimatel< is the a??ointed de.ender,
and that sanctiosn in the amount o. I,,,, =e a>arded to the undersigned in light o. the e*?ense in
?re?aring this motion and the .act that Dogan is com?ensated >ell, <et .ailed to a??ear .or the
arraignment E>hich can ha??en, >hatever, not the end o. the >orld;, =ut com?ounded that =< his
=lase re.usal to .ile something addressing this matter a.ter>ards or other>ise em=racing this DholisticD
a??roach and re?resentations o. such made =< the 4C5D, and an< other relie. this court .eels is Cust,
including dismissing this case .or .ailure to ?lead >ith su..icient ?articularl< or maBe a ?rima .acie
sho>ing o. the crime .or >hich the accused is charged, es?eciall< considering that @aster
Edmondson granted the undersigned t>o ?rotection orders in connection >ith the domestic violence
.or >hich $5D "argent "ig.ree curtl< dismissed re?orts o., rather Eand this ma< >ell =e on ta?e,
$5D; "argent "ig.ree engaged in some =lame the victim =ashing and .rat =o< retaliator< ?olice >orB
>hile a..ecting the manner and a??earance o. a character on the @(% realit< television sho>, the
J1erse< "horeJ >ith, Eand Dogan commented on >hat a great descri?tion this >asFis; "argent
- 3 -
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARRAIGNMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"ig.reeDs J>earing a su?er tight su?er short sleeve $5D shirt, des?ite the arrests Ehe also had the
undersigned arrested .or JCa<>alBingJ u?on in.ormation and =elie. as a J.avorJ to $ichard 9. 0ill,
Esq., >hom gets his 5rotection 3rder signed and stam?ed =< $1C 1udge "chroeder >ithin 4,
minutes o. .iling it on F4F!, and 1udge "chroeder screamed at the undersigned at the F3F!
0earing to E*tend (em?orar< 5rotection 3rder , JDo <ou >ant to go to CailKJ >hen the undersigned,
in res?onse to 0ill a??earing and ?rom?tl< >ithdra>ing his insi?id (53 a??lication =rought u? the
s?ecter o. actuall< considering >hether 0ill might =e a=using the ?rocess .or an im?ermissi=le
?ur?osed. B< that ?oint 0ill had achieved >hat he >anted, to ?revent Coughlin .rom collecting the
video evidence he >as in the ?rocess o. collecting, ?eacea=l< and .rom a ?u=lic ?lace, on F4F! o.
0illDs contractorDs having .raudulentl< using CoughlinDs o>n ?l<>ood to =oard u? CoughlinDs .ormer
home la> o..ice Ea .raudulent =ill >as attached as an e*hi=it in $1C $ev!,-,,7,& .or this
JsecuringJ des?ite such an unla>.ul rent distraint =eing outla>ed =< N$" &6.'!, and N$"
&6.4+, not allo>ing .or JsecuringJ e*?enses E?articularl< >here I9,, >as alread< =eing charged
.or having .urniture at the ?ro?ert< and clientDs .ile .orm a la> ?ractice, >hich 0ill re.used to turn
over, then lied a=out his re.usal to the $5D and the $1C Court...sue me $ichardK /. / am l<ing sue
meK 7ou are a ?athetic ?o* on the legal ?ro.ession, 0ill, >ho uses a=use o. ?rocess to sti.le o??osing
counselDs discover< in a >rong.ul eviction matter.;;
6s .or dismissing this case Eunless the s<stem >ants to ruin m< .amil< some more....none o.
<ou Bno> the e*tent to >hich our relationshi?s have crum=led under the strain o. this gang =ang;
consider:
Lings EBrooBl<n; Count< Criminal case- 5e?le v. @cDu..ie, !, LN374'43, N7:1 !,!'34774,
at M ECrim., L/, Decided 3cto=er !7, !,;- >hich illustrates the level o. ?roo. required to ?ro?erl<
charge Eand convict; a de.endant o. 5etit :arcen< ENe> 7orB 5enal :a> ''.!'; and Criminal
- 4 -
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARRAIGNMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5ossession o. "tolen 5ro?ert< in the )i.th Degree ENe> 7orB 5enal :a> +'.4,;. (o clari.<, ?ursuant
to N7 5: ''.!', a ?erson is guilt< o. 5etit :arcen< >hen he or she steals ?ro?ert< Ean< ?ro?ert<;
>ith a value o. one thousand dollars or less. 6dditionall<, ?ursuant to N7 5: +'.4,, a ?erson is
guilt< o. Criminal 5ossession o. "tolen 5ro?ert< in the )i.th Degree >hen he or she Bno>ingl<
?ossess stolen ?ro?ert< >ith the intent to =ene.it him or hersel..
"o, the =ring a charge that has destro<ed the accusedDs li.e, .orever altered the accusedDs
relationshi? >ith his immediate .amil< to an alarmingl< negative e*tent, damaged the accusedDs
?ro.essional standing and re?utation, caused the accuseds to gain 3' ?ounds and have trou=le
slee?ing that a..ects him on a dail< =asis, and other>ise send the accusedDs li.es into vast turmoil and
anguish, DD6 Zach 7oung cra.ted, ever so care.ull< the .ollo>ing Criminal Com?laint:
JZ6C0 732N9 o. the Count< o. 4ashoe, "tate o. Nevada, veri.ies and declares
u?on in.ormation and =elie. and under ?enalt< o. ?erCur<, that Z6C06$7
B6$LE$ C3290:/N, the de.endant a=ove-named, has committed the crime o.:
Einsert Jmisuse o. 9J N$" cite here; in the manner .ollo>ing, to >it: (hat the
said de.endant on or a=out the 1anuar< 4th, !,!, at $eno (o>nshi?, >ithin the
Count< o. 4ashoe, "tate o. Nevada, did >ill.ull< and unla>.ull< Einsert elements
listed in N$" cite here; at Einsert 4!! E. 9th "t. #!, $eno &9'! address here;,
$eno, 4ashoe Count<, Nevada, >ith the intent to Einsert ?rohi=ited volitional act
here;..
C32N( //. 53""E""/3N 3) "(3:EN 5$35E$(7, a violation o. N$"
!,'.!7', a misdemeanor, in the manner .ollo>ing, to >it: (hat the said de.endant
on or a=out the !,th da< o. 6ugust, !,, at $eno (o>nshi?, >ithin the Count<
o. 4ashoe, "tate o. Nevada, did >ill.ull< and unla>.ull< ?ossess or >ithhold
stolen goods having a value less than (>o 0undred )i.t< Dollars EI!',. ,,;, to
>it: an i5hone, at or near North Center "treet, $eno, 4ashoe Count<, Nevada,
such ?ro?ert< =eing o>ned =< C3$7 93B:E, .or his o>n gain or to ?revent the
true o>ner .rom again ?ossessing said ?ro?ert<, Bno>ing that the ?ro?ert< >as
o=tained =< means o. larcen< or under such circumstances as should have caused
a reasona=le man to Bno> that such goods >ere so o=tained.J
6nd thatDs it. (hat. 3r that >ill =e it, not sure / even have a co?< o. the Com?laint, =ut all
73ung is going to do is .ile a ro=o-?leading inserting the te*t o. the statute .or Jmisuse o. 9 or
emergenc< services, etc...J (hat conclusor<, circular, com?letel< devoid o. an< .actual assertions
- 5 -
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARRAIGNMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
other than indicating that the ?erson charged did the things that are listed as elements o. the o..ense
charged is >hat ?asses .or stating a ?rima .acie case at the 4CD6 3..ice and >ith Zach 7oung. /t
>as m< understanding the gu< getting ?aid I,,L in salar< and =ene.its could sho> u? to >atch
the arraignment video >here the court >arns ?ro seDs that the< >ill =e ?unished .or challenging the
?rimac< o. the s<stem and its ?arasites....those DD6Ds >ho sa< JNo, 7our 0onorJ at the ?re-trial
hearing >hen asBed i. the< have an<thing to add, >ith a tone o. voice that suggests the< have =een
dee?l< immersed in a scra==le ?uNNle or cross>ord, and those D5DDs liBe 9oodnight, >ho actuall<
argued in $C$!,-,+334 that he didnDt even thinB the de.endant needed a 5D as the state >asnDt
liBel< seeBing Cail time E9oodnight also has no idea >hat N$" &9.,, is a=out or >hat JrenditionJ
means;. Enter 1udge ".erraNNa, >ho EliBe >hen $ichard 0ill >anted to get the "ummar< Eviction
3rder en.orced via locBout >ithin , minutes o. the (rial ending; >isel< reminded @r. 9oodnight
that, not onl< did the accused have a la> license, >hich >ould liBel< sustain heav< collateral
damage u?on a conviction o. the nature o. the crime charged in that matter, =ut )2$(0E$, it >as
the 5D itsel. >ould insisted on maBing Coughlin get a Com?etenc< Evaluation, >hich >ent on to
entail several ridiculous attem?ts at getting it done =< this one ?articular entit< Esel. dealing 5DO
quid ?ro quoO onl< one ?lace can do a com?etenc< evalO; =ut also resulted in a =ill .or I7, to the
$1C, >hich 1udge ".erraNNa >isel< .ashioned in a ?a?er air?lane and ?roCected right on =acB to @r.
Bosler. 1udge ".erraNNa doesnDt hit <ou over the head >ith it, =ut he is enormousl< intelligent.
5lease donDt revoBe m< =ail, it >as I3,, / reall< didnDt have at the time, =ar dues o. I4', are due
@arch , !,! and the ?u=lic doesnDt ?a< mine EenCo< it 9oodnight, Dogan, 7oung, "?encer, et alK;
nor does it ?a< the ! credits o. C:E / need Escratch that BL emFec. BnocBed 3 out .or me, so /
need 9;, / o=viousl< need to do the 5DDs Co= and ?re?are .or trial, >hich >ould =e im?ossi=le get
6=u 9raih=ed and having all m< Jtier timeJ denied =< (hor and the 9ang u? at the 4ashoe Count<
- 6 -
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARRAIGNMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Detention Center E/ do liBe a lot o. ?eo?le there though, and on the $5D .orce, including "argent
Zach (he>, >ho told me / could call him an<time to discuss an issue / >as having >ith the
circumstances o. the last + months, and .or >hich "argent "ig.ree liBel< =ought the $eno Cit<
6ttorne< a civil suit to de.end. (o all those in $eno, 4ashoe Count< and =e<ond >ho >ant to
?er?etuate this chicaner<: J3Ba<, <ourDre a goon, =ut >hatDs a goon to a go=linOJ
AFFIRMATION AND DECLARATION
I ecl!"e, #u"su!n$ $o NRS %&'()%, une" #en!l$* o+ #e",u"* une" $-e l!.s o+ $-e S$!$e
o+ Ne/!! $-!$ $-e +o"e0o1n0 1s $"ue !n co""ec$ !n $-!$ $-1s ocu2en$ oes no$ con$!1n !n*
soc1!l secu"1$* nu23e"s, #u"su!n$ $o NRS &456'(4(, !n !++1"2!$1on $o $-!$ e++ec$ $-1s -e"e3* 1s'
D6(ED this 7th o. )e=ruar<, !,!:
PFsF Zach Coughlin
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
De.endantF Co-Counsel to 9oodnight
- 7 -
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARRAIGNMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5$33) 3) "E$%/CE
3N this date, / caused a co?< o. the .oregoing document s to =e served u?on the .ollo>ing =<
sending to their registered email address and .a* num=er as .ound on >>>.nv=ar.org, hand deliver<
to dro?slot or .ront desB, and =< ?lacing a true and correct co?< o. the .oregoing document in the
2.". mail addressed to:
Zachar< N. 7oung, Esq.
4ashoe Count< D6
"outh "ierra 5.3. Bo* 3,,&3
$eno , N% &9'!,
5hone Num=er: 77'-3!&-3!,, )a* num=er: 77'-3!'-+7,3
Email: N<oungQda.>ashoecount<.us
Bira< Dogan, Esq.
4ashoe Count< 5u=lic De.enderDs 3..ice
5.3. Bo* 3,,&3 $eno , N% &9',9
5hone Num=er: 77'-337-4&+& )a* num=er: 77'-337-4&'+
Email: =doganQ>ashoecount<.us
1E$E@7 (. B3":E$, Esq.
Bar No. 49!'
3ne Cali.ornia 6ve
$eno, N% &9',9
E77'; 337-4&,,
6ttorne< .or De.endant
D6(ED this 7th o. )e=ruar<, !,!:
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Zach Coughlin
DE)END6N(
- 8 -
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARRAIGNMENT
EXHIBIT 3
2
3

Z:u: h Coughlin
:'-I. vada Oar :'-10: 9-17)
1-122 E. ')'" SI. =2
R<no. :'-IV 12
f<l ":
Fax: 9496677402
F LtlJ
, Eri' l iHi: IC" I
2012 MAR -S AM I
I .

)(:1-', '"
S All omey for Pro Se Atlomey PbintiiT Denied Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel
7
8
IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF :'-lEV AO,\
IN AND FOR THE CO NTY OF WASIIOE
9 CITY OF RE:--:O;
t o
)
)
)
1 1
vs .
12
PLAINTIFF. ) Case No: II eR
)
)
13 ZACll COL'GHLI.
) Dept No: 2
)
14
)
)
)
15
DEFENDANT.
1 6
1 7
ld
;WTIO; OF ,\prE ,R,'''CE,\S CO COv " SEL ,' "D 'lOTION TO /l IS \ll SS
NOW. Dd"ndant. Zach Coughl in, by and Ihrough himsdf as cocoull<c l lo
.lnd fil t!, Ihe ,1boVI! title dot:lIml!nt on hi ! O\"'n behalf.
21
lEG.'/, ARGDIE"T
22
Memorandum of Law In SytlPort of Motion to Dismiss the Comlllill.nt
.' J
Introdu c t Ion
tr> e Rer>o ,'unlCl pal Code (RMC) Th e a c ua l all ega io ns In thp. compla in t ;J(e 10 Ihe e ffe c t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that both counts occurred on the same date, at about the same time, and in the same
general icinit!. "ach count, though, inoled a separate incident.
#ana $rec%enridge was operating a ehicle that had been traeling each on &est 'treet,
approaching the intersection of $la%e (enue and had the right of wa!. Coughlin)s ehicle failed to
stop fo the stop sign and entered the intersection. $rec%enridge)s ehicle was forced to ta%e easie
action and steerred to the right, causing the ehicle to sideswipe a fire h!drant . . . . Coughlin failed
to stop for the accident . . . .#ana $rec%enridge complaint of pain to her legs and was transported to
(ll 'aints *ospital b! Rescue.
&ith regard to the second incident, the complaint alleges+
Coughlin)s ehicle continued east and went through the red light at the intersection of north
Memorial ,rie and &est street, 'tratman, who had been operating a ehicle owned b! Mic%)s (uto
-arts southbound on .orth Memorial ,rie, was struc% b! Coughlin)s ehicle . . . . "rnesto
(Coughlin) then ran from the ehicle leaing the secene of the accident. . . ( passenger in
Coughlin)s ehicle, /.*. . . . complained of pain to his nec% and bac% and was transported to (ll
'aints *ospital b! Rescue.
0inall!, the complaint alleges that "rnesto Coughlin was interiewed b! police and said that
he ran from the ehicle because, ""rnesto stated that his brother, /.*., did not want him
arrested for an accident and told him to run."
Argument
I. The compl!nt mu"t llege "u##!c!ent #ct" $!th!n the #our corner"% $hen &!e$e' !n common
"en"e mnner% to e"t(l!"h pro((le cu"e to (el!e&e tht the 'e#en'nt comm!tte' the o##en"e
llege'. )ere% the compl!nt !" 'e#!c!ent the tre"p"" chrge RMC *.+,.,+,.
, criminal com<laint mu0t meet <ro>a>le cau0e re@uirement0 to con.er <er0onal Auri0diction. State v.
White" 97 8i0. 2d 193" 197" 29% N.8.2d 34*" 347 B19$+;. , criminal com<laint i0 a 0el.'contained
charge that mu0t 0et .orth .act0 ?ithin it0 .our corner0 that are 0u..icient" in them0elve0 or together
?ith rea0ona>le in.erence0 derived there.rom" to allo? a rea0ona>le <er0on to conclude that a crime
?a0 <ro>a>l- committed and that the de.endant i0 <ro>a>l- cul<a>le. State v. Haugen" %2 8i0. 2d
791" 793" 191 N.8.2d 12" 13 B1971;. 1. the criminal com<laint .ail0 to e0ta>li0h <ro>a>le cau0e" the
court doe0 not o>tain <er0onal Auri0diction" and the charge mu0t >e di0mi00ed. &he criminal
com<laint" ho?ever" i0 not to >e read in a h-<ertechnical 0en0e >ut" rather" i0 to >e revie?ed on a
rea0ona>le >a0i0 a<<l-ing ordinar- common 0en0e. State v. Gaudesi" 112 8i0. 2d 213" 219" 332
N.8.2d 3+2" 3+% B19$3;. &here.ore" the .act0 alleged and the in.erence0 that ma- >e dra?n .rom
them mu0t >e 0u..icient to e0ta>li0h in a common 0en0e ?a- that there i0 <ro>a>le cau0e to >elieve the
de.endant committed the o..en0e charged. See id.
2ere" the com<laint <ur<ort0 to allege that Coughlin violated !=CC0 tre0<a00 0tatute $.1+.+1+ &he
element0 o. that o..en0e are: Element" o# the Cr!me Tht the Stte Mu"t Pro&e
' 2 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Reno Mun!c!pl Co'e "ect!on *.+,.,+,% pro&!'e" !n rele&nt prt- E&er. per"on $ho . . .
$!ll#ull. goe" or rem!n" upon n. ln' or !n n. (u!l'!ng #ter h&!ng (een $rne' (. the
o$ner or occupnt thereo# not to tre"p"" !" gu!lt. o# m!"'emenor.
A. The cr!m!nl tre"p"" compl!nt #!l" to e"t(l!"h pro((le cu"e (ecu"e !t #!l" to "ho$
n. not!ce or "er&!ce o# the $r!tten OR'er #or Summr. E&!ct!on $" con'ucte' !n l$#ul
mnner n' not too "oon n' thu" &o!'..
(or the0e rea0on0" the criminal com<laint mu0t >e di0mi00ed.
1 realiDe -ou ?ill liEel- not read all o. thi0. &he main thing i0 1 am re0<ect.ull- re@ue0ting that
-ou con.irm ?ith De<ut- =achem that he did" in .act" F<er0onall- 0erveF the Summar- Eviction
3rder on me at 121 !iver !ocE St." !eno $9%+1 on Novem>er 1" 2+11 at 4:3+ <m" in connection ?ith
<er.orming the locEout. 1t i0 m- <o0ition that 1 ?a0 not F<er0onall- 0ervedF and 1 am tr-ing to .igure
out ?hether De<ut- =achem i0 l-ing or ?hether the <hra0e F<er0onall- 0ervedF mean0 0omething
other than ?hat 1 >elieve it mean0" etc." etc. 1 a<<reciate -our attention to thi0.
1 am ?riting to in@uire a>out and com<lain ?ith regard to an ,..idavit o. Service .iled >- or .or 8CS3 De<ut- =achem
?ith re0<ect to the 0ervice o. a 3rder :ranting Summar- Eviction again0t me Bin m- la? o..ice ?here non'<a-ment o.
rent ?a0 not alleged" no le00 in violation o. N!S 4+.2%3 and ?here a G2"27% rent e0cro? de<o0it ?a0 .oi0ted u<on me in
violation o. 4+.2%3B*;" e0<eciall- ?here a 0ta- o. eviction ?a0 not granted even ?hile the !4C held on to mo0t all m-
mone-...;.
=- i00ue ?ith the 8CS3 i0 that =achemC0 ,..idavit o. Service indicate0 that he F<er0onall- 0ervedF me" ?hich Eind o.
remind0 me o. all that ro>o'0igning and =E!S .raud 1 come acro00 in m- da- Ao> Band do -ou ?onder ho? man-
attorne-0 in the .oreclo0ure de.en0e game 1 am in con0tant contact ?ith ?ho are ?atching and ?itne00 the <otential !1C3
violation0 thi0 ?riting mention0H;" ?hich include0 >eing a .oreclo0ure de.en0e attorne-. So ?hich i0 itH Did =achem
F<er0onall- 0erveF me the Summar- Eviction 3rderH !ichard :. 2ill" E0@. liEe0 to argue that 1 ?a0 F0ervedF in
com<liance ?ith all time related rule0 >ecau0e it ?a0 done in the Fu0ual cu0tom and <ractice o. the 8CS3. 8hat" e)actl-"
' 3 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
i0 the Fu0ual cu0tom and <ractice o. the 8CS3H 1 hear a lot a>out thi0 F?ithin 24 hour0F 0tu... So" 1 go hunting .or 0ome
>lacE letter la? to 0u<<ort ?hat tho0e at the !4C and in the cluele00 communit- at large B?hich o.ten include0 Nevada
6egal Service0 and 8a0hoe 6egal Service0" the <eo<le -ou gu-0 had 0uch trou>le actuall- 0erving in the la?0uit0 1 .iled"
?hich ma- have actuall- hel<ed im<roved legal 0ervice0 in thi0 communit-" i. the- ?ere not di0mi00ed due to
in0u..icienc- o. 0ervice o. <roce00" even ?here the 1(/ re@uired the 8CS3 to 0erved the de.endant0....;. ,n-?a-" >acE to
the F?ithin 24 hour0F <hra0eolog-: F
&hi0 ?hole >u0ine00 a>out I&he court ma- thereu<on i00ue an order directing the 0heri.. or con0ta>le o. the count- to
remove the tenant ?ithin 24 hour0 a.ter recei<t o. the order...J i0 ina<<lica>le to thi0 0ituation" ?here an 3rder :ranting
Summar- Eviction ?a0 0igned >- 3cto>er 27th" 2+11. &hat language i0 onl- .ound in 0ituation0 ina<<lica>le to the
current one. N!S 4+.2%3B3;B>;B2;" and N!S 4+.2%3B%;Ba; are the onl- 0ection0 o. N!S 4+ ?here thi0 I?ithin 24 hour0J
language occur0" and tho0e 0ituation0 onl- a<<l- ?here" in:
4+.2%3B3;B>;B2;: I 3. , notice 0erved <ur0uant to 0u>0ection 1 or 2 mu0t: ...B>; ,dvi0e the tenant: K. B2; &hat i. the court
determine0 that the tenant i0 guilt- o. an unla?.ul detainer" the court ma- i00ue a 0ummar- order .or removal o. the tenant
or an order <roviding .or the nonadmittance o. the tenant" directing the 0heri.. or con0ta>le o. the count- to remove the
tenant ?ithin 24 hour0 a.ter recei<t o. the orderJ
and"
4+.2%3B%;Ba;: I%. 5<on noncom<liance ?ith the notice: Ba; &he landlord or the landlordL0 agent ma- a<<l- >- a..idavit o.
com<laint .or eviction to the Au0tice court o. the to?n0hi< in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial
<remi0e0 are located or to the di0trict court o. the count- in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial
<remi0e0 are located" ?hichever ha0 Auri0diction over the matter. &he court ma- thereu<on i00ue an order directing the
0heri.. or con0ta>le o. the count- to remove the tenant ?ithin 24 hour0 a.ter recei<t o. the order.J &he ?a- the0e 0ummar-
eviction <roceeding0 are >eing carried out in !eno 4u0tice Court <re0entl- 0hocE0 the con0cience and violate0 Nevada
la?. &here i0 not >a0i0 .or e..ectuating a locEout the ?a- 8CS3C0 De<ut- =achem did in thi0 ca0e. &he a>ove t?o
0ection0 containing the I?ithin 24 hour0 o. recei<tJ language are ina<<lica>le" a0 tho0e 0ituation0 do not invoEe the
' 4 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
<re0ent circum0tance0" ?here the &enant did .ile an ,..idavit and did conte0t thi0 matter to a degree not o.ten 0een. &o
re@uire NevadaC0 tenant0 to get u< and get out I?ithin 24 hour0J o. Irecei<t o. the orderJ B?hat doe0 that even meanH &he
u0e o. term0 liEe IrenditionJ" IrenderedJ" Inotice o. entr-J" I<ronouncedJ" i0 a>0ent here" and thi0 Irecei<t o. the orderJ
language i0 0omething rarel- .ound el0e?here in Nevada la?'0ee attached D=# 0tatutor- citation0" and in em<lo-ment
la? litigation0 ?here one mu0t .ile a Com<laint ?ithin 9+ da-0 o. Irecei<tJ o. a !ight &o Sue 6etter" a 0ituation ?hich
.ollo?0 N!C/ %B>;" and N!C/ *Be; in im<uting recei<t o. 0uch a letter" ?hen actual recei<t i0 not 0ho?n" >- a<<l-ing a
Icon0tructive noticeJ 0tandard that relie0 u<on the da-0 .or mailing e)ten0ion o. time .or item0 0erved in the mailing"
etc.;. 1n ,>raham v. 8ood0 2ole 3ceanogra<hic 1n0titute" %%3 (.3d 114 B10t Cir. 2++9;" the record did not re.lect ?hen
the <lainti.. received hi0 right'to'0ue letter. &he letter ?a0 i00ued on Novem>er 24" 2++*. &he court calculated that the 9+'
da- <eriod commenced on Novem>er 3+" 2++*" >a0ed on three da-0 .or mailing a.ter e)cluding Saturda-0 and Sunda-0.
1n order to >ring a claim under either &itle #11 or the ,D," a <lainti.. mu0t e)hau0t admini0trative remedie0 and 0ue
?ithin 9+ da-0 o. recei<t o. a right to 0ue letter. See 42 5.S.C. M 2+++e'%B.;B1;. See Bald?in Count- 8elcome Center v.
Bro?n" 4** 5.S. 147" 14$ n.1" 1+4 S.Ct. 1723" $+ 6.Ed.2d 19* B19$4;Bgranting <lainti.. an additional three da-0 .or
mailing <ur0uant to !ule *;....J ...
Dear 8a0hoe Count- Sheri..C0 3..ice"
htt<:NNen.?iEi<edia.orgN?iEiNServiceOo.O<roce00
FSu>0tituted 0ervice
8hen an individual <art- to >e 0erved i0 unavaila>le .or <er0onal 0ervice" man- Auri0diction0 allo? .or 0u>0tituted 0ervice.
Su>0tituted 0ervice allo?0 the <roce00 0erver to leave 0ervice document0 ?ith another re0<on0i>le individual" called a
' % '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
<er0on o. 0uita>le age and di0cretion" 0uch a0 a coha>iting adult or a teenager. 5nder the (ederal !ule0" 0u>0tituted
0ervice ma- onl- >e made at the a>ode or d?elling o. the de.endant.P4Q Cali.ornia" Ne? 7orE"P%Q 1llinoi0" and man- other
5nited State0 Auri0diction0 re@uire that in addition to 0u>0tituted 0ervice" the document0 >e mailed to the reci<ient.P%Q
Su>0tituted 0ervice o.ten re@uire0 a 0erving <art- 0ho? that ordinar- 0ervice i0 im<ractica>le" that due diligence ha0 >een
made to attem<t to maEe <er0onal 0ervice >- deliver-" and that 0u>0tituted 0ervice ?ill reach the <art- and e..ect notice.
P%QF
1 am <rett- 0ure F<er0onall- 0ervedF mean0 -ou 0erved the <er0on in <er0on" not that a <er0on named =achem ?ent and
<o0ted a notice on a door" <er0onall- him0el.. See" 1 thinE -ou gu-0 are thinEing o. the F<er0onF in the ?ord <er0onall- a0
a<<l-ing to the 0erver" ?hen in all in0tance0 1 have ever 0een it u0ed in the la?" the F<er0onF <art o. F<er0onall-F a<<lie0
to the <er0on >eing 0erved. 2el< me out here" =ar-.
htt<0:NN0E-drive.live.comNredir.a0<)HcidR43+$4*3$.32.%.2$Sre0idR43+$4*3$(32(%(2$T1$97S<aridRroot
,l0o" doe0 the 8CS3 have a <o0ition on ?hat t-<e o. 0ervice i0 re@uired o. eviction order0 <rior to the 8CS3 or
?hoever doe0 it" >eing a>le to conduct a locEoutH
htt<:NN???.leg.0tate.nv.u0Ncourtrule0Nnrc<.html
N!C/ !56E *+. !E61E( (!3= 45D:=EN& 3! 3!DE!... Bc; De.ault 4udgment0: De.endant Not /er0onall- Served.
8hen a de.ault Audgment 0hall have >een taEen again0t an- <art- ?ho ?a0 not <er0onall- 0erved ?ith 0ummon0 and
com<laint" either in the State o. Nevada or in an- other Auri0diction" and ?ho ha0 not entered a general a<<earance in the
action" the court" a.ter notice to the adver0e <art-" u<on motion made ?ithin * month0 a.ter the date o. 0ervice o. ?ritten
' * '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
notice o. entr- o. 0uch Audgment" ma- vacate 0uch Audgment and allo? the <art- or the <art-L0 legal re<re0entative0 to
an0?er to the merit0 o. the original action. 8hen" ho?ever" a <art- ha0 >een <er0onall- 0erved ?ith 0ummon0 and
com<laint" either in the State o. Nevada or in an- other Auri0diction" the <art- mu0t maEe a<<lication to >e relieved .rom a
de.ault" a Audgment" an order" or other <roceeding taEen again0t the <art-" or .or <ermi00ion to .ile an an0?er" in
accordance ?ith the <rovi0ion0 o. 0u>divi0ion B>; o. thi0 rule.
3Ea-" 0o" reall-" -ou gu-0 do thi0 .or a living" right...-ou 0erve <eo<le thing0....and 0ign ,..idavit0 under <enalt- o.
<erAur- and 0tu.." and -ou are telling me -ou >elieve F<er0onall- 0ervedF can included 0ituation0 ?here the <er0on ?a0 not
thereH 3Ea-.....7ou do Eno? that" liEe" a Summon0 and Com<laint need to >e F<er0onall- 0ervedF in the 0en0e that" 0a-
=achem" ?ould need to 0ee that <er0on and 0erve it on them B1 donCt thinE the- have to taEe the <a<er" the- donCt need to
agree to acce<t 0ervice" >ut =achem doe0 need to 0ee that <er0on" in <er0on" <er0onall- ?hen he i0 0?earing under
<enalt- o. <erAur- that he F<er0onall- 0ervedF 0ome>od-. 50uall- F<er0onall- 0ervedF i0 onl- done in the ca0e o. the .ir0t
thing .iled Bunle00 there i0 an 1(/; in a ca0e" the Summon0 and Com<laint. &herea.ter" t-<icall-" <eo<le Au0t e..ect
F0u>0tituted 0erviceF >ecau0e it0 chea<er" le00 o. a ha00le" and F<er0onal 0erviceF i0 onl- re@uired .or 0erving the <leading0
that 0tart a ca0e" the Summon0 and Com<laint. 8o?....3Ea-" 0o thi0 i0 m- ?hole <oint" the0e 0tate 0<on0ored locEout0
under color o. 0tate la? 0hould not >e >eing done 0o .a0t" unle00 -ou gu-0 F<er0onall- 0erveF the tenant" 1 .eel the la? i0
@uite clear" -ou have to e..ect F0u>0tituted 0erviceF ?hich" under N!C/ *Ba; and N!C/ *Be; and N!C/ %B>;B2; Band
N!C/" not 4C!C/ i0 a<<lica>le to eviction matter0 according to N!S 11$,; the tenant cannot >e deemed to have
received or con0tructivel- received the 3rder until the 3 da-0 .or mailing ha0 <a00ed.
/er0onal 0ervice >- <roce00 0erver
' 7 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/er0onal 0ervice i0 0ervice o. <roce00 directl- to the Bor a; <art- named on the 0ummon0" com<laint or <etition. 1n mo0t
la?0uit0 in the 5nited State0" <er0onal 0ervice i0 re@uired to <rove 0ervice. =o0t 0tate0 allo? 0u>0tituted 0ervice in almo0t
all la?0uit0 unle00 -ou are 0erving a cor<oration" 66C" 66/" or other >u0ine00 entit-9 in tho0e ca0e0" <er0onal 0ervice mu0t
>e achieved >- 0erving Bin hand; the document0 to the F!egi0tered ,gentF o. a >u0ine00 entit-. Some 0tate0 B(lorida; do
not re@uire that the document0 actuall- >e handed to the individual. 1n Cali.ornia and mo0t other 0tate0" the document0
mu0t >e vi0i>le to the <er0on >eing 0erved" i.e." not in a 0ealed envelo<e. 1. the individual re.u0e0 to acce<t 0ervice" .lee0"
clo0e0 the door" etc." and the individual ha0 >een <o0itivel- identi.ied a0 the <er0on to >e 0erved" document0 ma- >e
Fdro<F 0erved" and it i0 con0idered a valid 0ervice. /er0onal 0ervice o. <roce00 ha0 >een the hallmarE .or initialing
litigation .or nearl- 1++ -ear0" <rimaril- >ecau0e it guarantee0 actual notice to a de.endant o. a legal action again0t him or
her. /er0onal 0ervice o. <roce00 remain0 the mo0t relia>le and e..icaciou0 ?a- to >oth en0ure com<liance ?ith
con0titutionall- im<o0ed due <roce00 re@uirement0 o. notice to a de.endant and the o<<ortunit- to >e heard. P2QU &he
National 6a? !evie?: &he Continuing !elevance o. /er0onal Service o. /roce00
,nd even i. 0omething indicate0 Coughlin FEne?F a>out the 3rder" much liEe in the ca0e o. CoughlinC0 that ?a0
di0mi00ed ?here the 8a0hoe Count- Sheri..C0 didnCt manage to get the F<er0onal 0erviceF o. the Summon0 and Com<laint
done in time" or F0u..icientl-F" o<<o0ing coun0el in that matter could tell -ou that Factual noticeF i0 not a 0u>0titute .or
com<liance ?ith the 0ervice re@uirement0.
8hich i0 nice >ecau0e .olE0 liEe !ichard :. 2ill" E0@. have le00 o. an o<<ortunit- to game the 0-0tem and 0?oo< in ?ith
locEout then a00ert a >unch o. hooe- a>out N!S 11$,.4*+ Frea0ona>le 0torage" moving" and inventor-ing e)<en0e0F
0u>Aecting the tenantC0 <er0onal <ro<ert- to a lien. !ichard :. 2ill in0i0ted on thro?ing a?a- the la0t thing m- >eloved
grandmother gave me >e.ore 0he died 2 -ear0 ago in the to?n dum<. 2e and hi0 contractor lied a>out 0o man- thing0"
including the .act that the- u0ed m- o?n damn <l-?ood to >oard u< the >acE <orch o. the <ro<ert-" then 0u>mitted a >ill
to the court in an e)hi>it .or G1"+*+ .or F0ecuringF the <ro<ert- B?hich doe0nCt reall- a<<l- to N!S 11$,.4*+C0
' $ '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Frea0ona>le 0torage moving and inventor-ing e)<en0e0F liEe it i0 re@uired to....urther" the charged me G9++ a month .or
0torage and 0ent me a >ill .or 0uch <rior to m- arre0t .or tre0<a00ing at the 121 !iver !ocE location"...?ell i. the- charged
me G9++ to have a home la? o..ice there" then ho? i0 it 0omeone could >e tre0<a00ing i. the- are >eing charged the .ull
rental value .or Fu0e and occu<anc- o. the <remi0e0FH (urther" even i. it ?a0 a 0torage 0ituation0" there are 0ection0 o.
N!S 11$, devoted to evicting 0omeone .rom a 0torage .acilit-" not arre0ting them .or tre0<a00" and certainl- not a
cu0todial arre0t ?here the !/D 3..icer Carter and Sargent 6o<eD admit the- never i00ued a ?arning to me or a0Eed me to
leave <rior to conducting a cu0todial arre0t B?hich re@uired G$++ o. >ail" greatT" and 3 da-0 in Aail" no le00;. &hi0 i0
e0<eciall- <oor .orm ?here 3..icer Carter admitted to me that he taEe0 >ri>e0 .rom !ichard 2ill. 2e-" i. 3..icer Carter
did not 0a- that to me" go ahead and 0ue me" m- man....1Cm ?aiting.....thatC0 ?hat 1 thought.
2e can 0a- he ?a0 AoEing all he ?ant0" >ut it ainCt no AoEing a00 0ituation to me ?hen -ou are arre0ting me and cau0ing a
google 0earch re0ult .or m- name to 0ho? an arre0t....thatC0 damaging the onl- thing 1 have o. monetar- value Bm-
<ro.e00ional re<utation and name;. 1t ainCt no 0tand u< hour ?hen -ou are <utting me in cu..0" >ro. ,nd 3..icer Carter and
Sargent 6o<eD re.u0ed to <ro<erl- @uer- 2ill a0 to ?hether he had 0ent me" <rior to the tre0<a00ing arre0t" a >ill .or the
F.ull rental valueF o. the <ro<ert-" a value that" at G9++" ?a0 the 0ame charge .or the .ull Fu0e and occu<anc-F o. the
<remi0e0. ,nd !ichard :. 21ll" E0@. ?a0 too >u0- chortling and .illing out the Criminal Com<laint to >other 0etting them
0traight" de0<ite m- cue0" 1 gue00.
No?" add to that mal.ea0ance the .act that 4udge S.erraDDa let Ca0e- BaEer" E0@. <re<are the 3rder" ?hich mean0
.aith.ull- <ut to ?riting ?hat the 4udge announced" not attem<t to 0teal G2"27% .or -our Cali.ornian Beverl- 2ill0 2igh
School graduate neuro0urgeon client >- 0li<<ing in 0omething the Audge never 0aid" ie" that the neuro0urgeon get0 to Eee<
the G2"27% that 4udge S.erraDDa order the tenant to <a- into the !eno 4u0tice Court a0 a Frent e0cro?F de<o0it re@uired to
<re0erve the right to litigate ha>ita>ilit- i00ue0. No?" nevermind the .act that 4udge S.erraDDa actuall- did not have the
Auri0diction to re@uire that Bthere i0 not 4C!6# 44 in !eno" thatC0 a #ega0 rule" and i. !eno ?ant0 a rule liEe that o. it0
' 9 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
o?n 4C!C/ $3 re@uire0 the !4C to <u>li0h it and get it a<<roved >- the Nevada Su<reme Court .ir0t....<eriod.;. 3Ea-" 0o"
to taEe it a 0te< even .urther" BaEerC0 order goe0 on to 0a- F>ut the G2"27% ?onCt >e relea0ed to the neuro0urgeon -et"
Fin0tead that 0um 0hall 0erve a0 0ecurit- .or CoughlinC0 co0t on a<<eal" <ur0uant to Nevada 4C!C/ 73...F. But ?ait" doe0nCt
that mean Coughlin then get0 a Sta- o. Eviction during the <endenc- o. the ,<<ealH 10ntC that ?a0 a 0ecurit- that large
mu0t >e .orH Becau0e the F,<<eal BondF i0 0et >- 0tatute at onl- a mere G2%+....0o holding on to 1+ time0 that much o.
CoughlinC0 ca0h mu0t have >een .or the FSu<er0edea0 BondF mentioned a -ielding one a Sta- o. Eviction in N!S 4+.3$+
and 4+.3$%.
1 Eno?" 1 Eno?" it0 con.u0ing >ecau0e actuall- tho0e 0ection0 .orce the landlord" hi0 attorne-0 and the !4C to choo0e
>et?een vie?ing Coughlin a0 a re0idential tenant ?ho0e rent i0 le00 than G1"+++" and ?hom there.ore i0 onl- re@uired to
<o0t a mea0l- 0u<er0edea0 >ond o. G2%+ Band remem>er" a 0u<er0edea0 >ond e@ual0 a 0ta- o. eviction e@ual0 not
tre0<a00ing; or the the other choice i0 to vie? Coughlin a0 a commercial tenant" ?hich ?ould allo? charging a higher
0u<er0edea0 >ond Be)ce<t .or that <e0E- <art a>out hi0 rent >eing under the G1"+++ re@uired >- the 0tatute to do 0o" hi0
rent >eing onl- G9++;" e)ce<t" darn it" old !ichard :. 2ill" E0@. and Ca0e- BaEer" E0@. elected to <ur0ue thi0 0ummar-
eviction <roceeding under a No Cau0e Eviction Notice" ?hich i0 not allo?ed again0t a commercial tenant Bie" -ou canCt
evict a commercial tenant u0ing the 0ummar- eviction <rocedure0 0et .orth in N!S 4+.2%3 unle00 -ou alllege non <a-ment
o. rent and 0erve a 3+ Da- Non /a-ment o. !ent Notice &o Vuit" ?hich the- didnCt >ecau0e the- Fare Au0t taEing the <ath
o. lea0t re0i0tance here" 7our 2onor Bin0ert their 0mug chucEling and o>no)iou0N<retentiou0 Fcan -ou >elieve thi0 gu-HF
laughter and head 0haEing...;.
N!S 4+.3$+ /rovi0ion0 governing a<<eal0. Either <art- ma-" ?ithin 1+ da-0" a<<eal .rom the Audgment rendered. But an
a<<eal >- the de.endant 0hall not 0ta- the e)ecution o. the Audgment" unle00" ?ithin the 1+ da-0" the de.endant 0hall
e)ecute and .ile ?ith the court or Au0tice the de.endantL0 undertaEing to the <lainti.." ?ith t?o or more 0uretie0" in an
amount to >e .i)ed >- the court or Au0tice" >ut ?hich 0hall not >e le00 than t?ice the amount o. the Audgment and co0t0" to
the e..ect that" i. the Audgment a<<ealed .rom >e a..irmed or the a<<eal >e di0mi00ed" the a<<ellant ?ill <a- the Audgment
and the co0t o. a<<eal" the value o. the u0e and occu<ation o. the <ro<ert-" and damage0 Au0tl- accruing to the <lainti..
' 1+ '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
during the <endenc- o. the a<<eal. 5<on taEing the a<<eal and .iling the undertaEing" all .urther <roceeding0 in the ca0e
0hall >e 0ta-ed.
So" ?h- on earth i0 the Cit- ,ttorne-C0 3..ice 0till tr-ing to tr- Coughlin on the tre0<a00 charge .or ?hich he endured a
cu0todial arre0t and .or ?hich old !ichard 2ill i0 0till .iling =otionC0 to Sho? Cau0e on in the a<<eal o. the 0ummar-
eviction matter in C#11'+3*2$H 8h-" oh ?h-H Doe0 the !eno Cit- ,ttorne-C0 3..ice have 0ome 0ort o. ve0ted intere0t in
Eee<ing Coughlin do?n" >u0-" >e0otted" encum>ered" or other?i0eH 1t" ?h-" it couldnCt >e >ecau0e Coughlin ha0 a reall-
good ?rong.ul arre0t cau0e o. action again0t the !eno /olice De<artment" could itH htt<:NN???.-outu>e.comN?atchH
vR%/!7@431%>+
,nd" ?ell" -eah the 8a0hoe Count- Sheri..C0 3..ice didnCt @uite get tho0e Summon0 and Com<laint0 0erved in that one
ca0e Coughlin ?a0 0uing hi0 .ormer em<lo-er in" the one ?here Coughlin ?a0 granted an 3rder to /roceed 1n (orma
/au<eri0" ?hich re@uired the 8a0hoe Count- Sheri..C0 3..ice to 0erve the Summon0 and Com<laint0....But ?hat doe0 that
have to to ?ith the * da-0 Coughlin 0<ent in Aail on the arre0t 0ho?n in the -outu>e video a>oveH 1t0 not liEe the 8a0hoe
Count- Aailed videota<ed a 0cene ?here the- ?ere .orcing Coughlin to get naEed and <ut on a green dre00. 8hatC0 thatH 1t
i0H &he- did do thatH !eall-H No...8hatH &he- al0o .orced him to 0imulate oral and anal 0e) ?ith de<utie0" in the gui0e o.
0ome ridiculou0 F<rocedureF nece00ar- to in0ure De<ut- 0a.et-H 3h" ?o?. ,nd the- retaliated again0t him .or .ailing to
an0?er their religiou0 <re.erence interrogation @ue0tion0 >- <lacing him in an ic- cold cell .or hour0 at a time" re.u0ing
him medical care de0<ite hi0 <laintive crie0 .or hel<" ?hile ?earing a thin t'0hirtH 8o?. &he- didnCt Aam a ta0er needle in
hi0 0<ine .or e)tended <eriod0 o. time" though" did the-H 7our EiddingT 8hat0 ne)t" -our going tell me Sargent Sig.ree o.
the !eno /D ordered a cu0todial arre0t on Coughlin .or FAa-?alEingF ?hile Coughlin ?a0 <eace.ull- .ilming" .rom a
<u>lic 0<ot" !ichard :. 2illC0 .raudulent contractor /hil 2o?ard de0tro-ing and taEing to the to?n dum< item0 o.
enormou0 0entimental value to Coughlin that he ?a0 <revented .rom retrieving .rom the <ro<ert- during the 0cant time he
?a0 allo?ed to Ba.ter he <aid G4$+ ?orth o. a lien .or ?hat he Ene? not" >ecau0e" de0<ite" olC Contractor /hilC0 .raudulent
G1"+*+ >ill .or F0ecuringF the >acE <orch B?ith 0cre?0 .acing the out0ide" ine)<lica>l-" and a ?indo? unit aNc le.t in the
?indo? .acing the 0ide?alE near the 6aEemill 6odge" 0ecured >- nothing >ut duct ta<e
1t i0 Eind o. a com>o neon 0ign that 0a-0 FBurglariDe thi0 /lace" Ever->od-TF;" CoughlinC0 .ormer home la? o..ice ?a0
>urglariDed on Decem>er 12" 2+11 ?hile !ichard :. 2ill ?a0 holding it0 content0 Bincluding" tacEil-" CoughlinC0 clientC0
.ile0" liEe the one0 .or the .oreclo0ure de.en0e action0" etc.;" a00erting hi0 FlienF. , lien .or F0torageF ?here the charge .or
0torage" G9++" ?a0 the 0ame a0 the charge .or F.ull u0e and occu<an-F ?a0. 2o?ever" that G9++ a month .or F0torageF al0o
' 11 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
included another G1"+*+ charge .or F0ecuringF Band that >ill actuall- li0ted F.i)ing a leaE in the >a0ement...neither o.
?hich 0eem to have much to do ?ith the Frea0ona>le 0torage" moving" and inventor-ingF e)<en0e0 0uch a lien i0 <rovided
.or under N!S 11$,.4*+....;. 4eeD" -our <ro>a>l- going to tell me Sargent Sig.ree ordered another cu0todial arre0t on
Coughlin Au0t t?o da-0 a.ter the Aa-?alEing arre0t" .or the 0ame .act <attern that =a0ter Edmond0on granted CoughlinC0
a<<lication0 .or /rotection0 3rder0 again0t >a0ed u<on the >atter- and a00ault0 that hi0 .ormer hou0emate0 committed.
Becau0e" Sargent Sig.ree thinE0 it0 Fmi0u0e o. 911F .or Coughlin to call ?hen he return0 home at night and hi0 dog ha0
m-0teriou0l- di0a<<eared" and hi0 hou0emate0 maEe menacing commentar- a>out it. Surel-" Coughlin" a .ormer dome0tic
violence attorne- ?ould have nothing hel<.ul to add to Sargnet Sig.reeC0 e)<ert o<inion that Fanimal a>u0e i0 not
dome0tic violenceF Btell that to N!S 33.+1+" Sarge; and that it0" rather" Fa matter .or animal controlF and that Sargent
Sig.ree ?a0 Ftr-ing to hel<F Coughlin >- arre0ting him" again" and nece00itating the G1"%++ >ail a00ociated ?ith the gro00
mi0demeanor charge" F=i0u0e o. 911F >ecau0e" a0 Sargent Sig.ree told Coughlin F-ou Eee< <utting -our0el. in 0ituation0
?here -ou are victimiDedF 0o it ?a0 nece00ar- to arre0t Coughlin in that regard.
But he-" at lea0t N# Energ- ha0nCt re.u0ed to let Coughlin get an- electrical 0ervice .or the <a0t ?eeE 0ince tho0e
?ith the /rotection 3rder0 again0t them cancelled the 0ervice and N# Energ- 0hut it o.." ?ithout <roviding an- notice to
Coughlin" right. Nevermind. But...>ut 0urel- ?hen N# Energ- 0hut o. the <o?er to CoughlinC0 home la? o..ice on
3cto>er 4th" 2+11" Au0t hour0 <rior to the >ad .aith Fin0<ectionF ?ith videogra<her o. CoughlinC 0 home la? o..ice that
Ca0e- BaEer" E0@. thought 0o ver- nece00ar- one da- >e.ore CoughlinC0 &enant ,n0?er ?a0 due...0urel- N# Energ- did
not leave the >acE gate to CoughlinC0 home la? o..ice o<en and 0<eed o.." CoughlinC0 >eloved mountain >iEe 0uddenl-
mi00ing Bthe one the <arent0 o. hi0 girl.riend o. % -ear0 gave him;H 8ell" N# Energ- i0 <ro>a>l- not retaliating again0t
Coughlin .or com<laining a>out that >- re.u0ing him electric 0ervice .or the <a0t 0even da-0" -ou ?ould have to a00ume....
N!S 4+.3$% Sta- o. e)ecution u<on a<<eal9 dut- o. tenant ?ho retain0 <o00e00ion o. <remi0e0 to <a- rent during 0ta-.
5<on an a<<eal .rom an order entered <ur0uant to N!S 4+.2%3:
1.E)ce<t a0 other?i0e <rovided in thi0 0u>0ection" a 0ta- o. e)ecution ma- >e o>tained >- .iling ?ith the trial
court a >ond in the amount o. G2%+ to cover the e)<ected co0t0 on a<<eal. , 0uret- u<on the >ond 0u>mit0 to the
Auri0diction o. the a<<ellate court and irrevoca>l- a<<oint0 the clerE o. that court a0 the 0uret-L0 agent u<on ?hom <a<er0
a..ecting the 0uret-L0 lia>ilit- u<on the >ond ma- >e 0erved. 6ia>ilit- o. a 0uret- ma- >e en.orced" or the >ond ma- >e
relea0ed" on motion in the a<<ellate court ?ithout inde<endent action. , tenant o. commercial <ro<ert- ma- o>tain a 0ta-
' 12 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
o. e)ecution onl- u<on the i00uance o. a 0ta- <ur0uant to !ule $ o. the Nevada !ule0 o. ,<<ellate /rocedure and the
<o0ting o. a 0u<er0edea0 >ond in the amount o. 1++ <ercent o. the un<aid rent claim o. the landlord.
2. , tenant ?ho retain0 <o00e00ion o. the <remi0e0 that are the 0u>Aect o. the a<<eal during the <endenc- o. the a<<eal
0hall <a- to the landlord rent in the amount <rovided in the underl-ing contract >et?een the tenant and the landlord a0 it
>ecome0 due. 1. the tenant .ail0 to <a- 0uch rent" the landlord ma- initiate ne? <roceeding0 .or a 0ummar- eviction >-
0erving the tenant ?ith a ne? notice <ur0uant to N!S 4+.2%3.
N!S 4+.39+ ,<<ellate court not to di0mi00 or @ua0h <roceeding0 .or ?ant o. .orm. 1n all ca0e0 o. a<<eal under N!S
4+.22+ to 4+.42+" inclu0ive" the a<<ellate court 0hall not di0mi00 or @ua0h the <roceeding0 .or ?ant o. .orm" <rovided the
<roceeding0 have >een conducted 0u>0tantiall- according to the <rovi0ion0 o. N!S 4+.22+ to 4+.42+" inclu0ive9 and
amendment0 to the com<laint" an0?er or 0ummon0" in matter0 o. .orm onl-" ma- >e allo?ed >- the court at an- time
>e.ore .inal Audgment u<on 0uch term0 a0 ma- >e Au0t9 and all matter0 o. e)cu0e" Au0ti.ication or avoidance o. the
allegation0 in the com<laint ma- >e given in evidence under the an0?er.
N!S 4+.4++ !ule0 o. <ractice. &he <rovi0ion0 o. N!S" Nevada !ule0 o. Civil /rocedure and Nevada !ule0 o. ,<<ellate
/rocedure relative to civil action0" a<<eal0 and ne? trial0" 0o .ar a0 the- are not incon0i0tent ?ith the <rovi0ion0 o. N!S
4+.22+ to 4+.42+" inclu0ive" a<<l- to the <roceeding0 mentioned in tho0e 0ection0.
But" >acE to the Sheri..C0 3..ice. ,nd" 1 am not reall- >u-ing the idea that -ou gu-0 donCt Eno? N!C/ 4 through * liEe
the >acE o. -our hand" >ut....hell" ma->e -ou donCt. But" clearl- the language in N!S 4+ a>out ho? the Sheri.. ma-
Fremove tenant .rom the <ro<ert- ?ithin 24 hour0 o. recei<t o. the 3rderF do not a<<l- ?here the &enant .iled a &enantC0
,n0?er and 0ho?ed u< to the 2earing and litigated the matter. E0<eciall- ?here" a0 here the lea0e had not terminated" >-
it0 term0" >ut ?a0 rather rene?ed. &hi0 i0 <articularl- true ?here N!S 11$, <revent0 0o terminating a holdover tenantC0
lea0e .or a retaliator- or di0criminator- <ur<o0e.
N!C/ 4: FBd; Summon0: /er0onal Service. &he 0ummon0 and com<laint 0hall >e 0erved together. &he <lainti..
0hall .urni0h the <er0on maEing 0ervice ?ith 0uch co<ie0 a0 are nece00ar-. Service 0hall >e made >- delivering a co<- o.
the 0umon0 attached to a co<- o. the com<laint a0 .ollo?0:...B*; Service 5<on 1ndividual0. 1n all other ca0e0 to the
de.endant <er0onall-" or >- leaving co<ie0 thereo. at the de.endantL0 d?elling hou0e or u0ual <lace o. a>ode ?ith 0ome
<er0on o. 0uita>le age and di0cretion then re0iding therein" or >- delivering a co<- o. the 0ummon0 and com<laint to an
agent authoriDed >- a<<ointment or >- la? to receive 0ervice o. <roce00. P,0 amended9 e..ective 4anuar- 1" 2++%.Q Be;
Same: 3ther Service. B1; Service >- /u>lication. Bi; :eneral. 1n addition to method0 o. <er0onal 0ervice" ?hen the <er0on
' 13 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
on ?hom 0ervice i0 to >e made re0ide0 out o. the 0tate" or ha0 de<arted .rom the 0tate" or cannot" a.ter due diligence" >e
.ound ?ithin the 0tate" or >- concealment 0eeE0 to avoid the 0ervice o. 0ummon0" and the .act 0hall a<<ear" >- a..idavit" to
the 0ati0.action o. the court or Audge thereo." and it 0hall a<<ear" either >- a..idavit or >- a veri.ied com<laint on .ile" that
a cau0e o. action e)i0t0 again0t the de.endant in re0<ect to ?hom the 0ervice i0 to >e made" and that the de.endant i0 a
nece00ar- or <ro<er <art- to the action" 0uch court or Audge ma- grant an order that the 0ervice >e made >- the <u>lication
o. 0ummon0. /rovided" ?hen 0aid a..idavit i0 >a0ed on the .act that the <art- on ?hom 0ervice i0 to >e made re0ide0 out o.
the 0tate" and the <re0ent addre00 o. the <art- i0 unEno?n" it 0hall >e a 0u..icient 0ho?ing o. 0uch .act i. the a..iant 0hall
0tate generall- in 0uch a..idavit that at a <reviou0 time 0uch <er0on re0ided out o. thi0 0tate in a certain <lace Bnaming the
<lace and 0tating the late0t date Eno?n to a..iant ?hen 0uch <art- 0o re0ided there;9 that 0uch <lace i0 the la0t <lace in
?hich 0uch <art- re0ided to the Eno?ledge o. a..iant9 that 0uch <art- no longer re0ide0 at 0uch <lace9 that a..iant doe0 not
Eno? the <re0ent <lace o. re0idence o. 0uch <art- or ?here 0uch <art- can >e .ound9 and that a..iant doe0 not Eno? and
ha0 never >een in.ormed and ha0 no rea0on to >elieve that 0uch <art- no? re0ide0 in thi0 0tate9 and" in 0uch ca0e" it 0hall
>e <re0umed that 0uch <art- 0till re0ide0 and remain0 out o. the 0tate" and 0uch a..idavit 0hall >e deemed to >e a 0u..icient
0ho?ing o. due diligence to .ind the de.endant. &hi0 rule 0hall a<<l- to all manner o. civil action0" including tho0e .or
divorceF
Su>Aect: !E: 8CS3 De<ut- =achemC0 F<er0onall- 0ervedF ,..idavit o. 11N1N2+11
Date: &ue" 7 (e> 2+12 11:4+:39 '+$++
(rom: 6StuchellW?a0hoecount-.u0
&o: DachcoughlinWhotmail.com
CC: mEandara0Wda.?a0hoecount-.u0
=r. Coughlin"
3ur record0 indicate that the eviction conducted on that da- ?a0 <er0onall- 0erved >- De<ut- =achen >- <o0ting a co<-
o. the 3rder to the re0idence. &he re0idence ?a0 unoccu<ied at the time.
6iD Stuchell" Su<ervi0or
8CS3 Civil Section
(rom: Zach Coughlin Pmailto:DachcoughlinWhotmail.comQ
Sent: =onda-" (e>ruar- +*" 2+12 2:%$ ,=
' 14 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
&o: Stuchell" 6iD9 Xandara0" =ar-9 nvreno<dWco<logic.com9 Silva" !o)anna9 EadlicAWreno.gov9
.ourthe0tateWgmail.com9 Aame0andre>ole0Wm0n.com
Su>Aect: 8CS3 De<ut- =achemC0 F<er0onall- 0ervedF ,..idavit o. 11N1N2+11
Dear 1, Su<ervi0or Stuchell and DD, Xandara0"
1 realiDe -ou ?ill liEel- not read all o. thi0. &he main thing i0 1 am re0<ect.ull- re@ue0ting that -ou con.irm ?ith De<ut-
=achem that he did" in .act" F<er0onall- 0erveF the Summar- Eviction 3rder on me at 121 !iver !ocE St." !eno $9%+1 on
Novem>er 1" 2+11 at 4:3+ <m" in connection ?ith <er.orming the locEout. 1t i0 m- <o0ition that 1 ?a0 not F<er0onall-
0ervedF and 1 am tr-ing to .igure out ?hether De<ut- =achem i0 l-ing or ?hether the <hra0e F<er0onall- 0ervedF mean0
0omething other than ?hat 1 >elieve it mean0" etc." etc. 1 a<<reciate -our attention to thi0.
1 am ?riting to in@uire a>out and com<lain ?ith regard to an ,..idavit o. Service .iled >- or .or 8CS3 De<ut- =achem
?ith re0<ect to the 0ervice o. a 3rder :ranting Summar- Eviction again0t me Bin m- la? o..ice ?here non'<a-ment o.
rent ?a0 not alleged" no le00 in violation o. N!S 4+.2%3 and ?here a G2"27% rent e0cro? de<o0it ?a0 .oi0ted u<on me in
violation o. 4+.2%3B*;" e0<eciall- ?here a 0ta- o. eviction ?a0 not granted even ?hile the !4C held on to mo0t all m-
mone-...;.
=- i00ue ?ith the 8CS3 i0 that =achemC0 ,..idavit o. Service indicate0 that he F<er0onall- 0ervedF me" ?hich Eind o.
remind0 me o. all that ro>o'0igning and =E!S .raud 1 come acro00 in m- da- Ao> Band do -ou ?onder ho? man-
attorne-0 in the .oreclo0ure de.en0e game 1 am in con0tant contact ?ith ?ho are ?atching and ?itne00 the <otential !1C3
violation0 thi0 ?riting mention0H;" ?hich include0 >eing a .oreclo0ure de.en0e attorne-. So ?hich i0 itH Did =achem
F<er0onall- 0erveF me the Summar- Eviction 3rderH !ichard :. 2ill" E0@. liEe0 to argue that 1 ?a0 F0ervedF in
com<liance ?ith all time related rule0 >ecau0e it ?a0 done in the Fu0ual cu0tom and <ractice o. the 8CS3. 8hat" e)actl-"
i0 the Fu0ual cu0tom and <ractice o. the 8CS3H 1 hear a lot a>out thi0 F?ithin 24 hour0F 0tu... So" 1 go hunting .or 0ome
>lacE letter la? to 0u<<ort ?hat tho0e at the !4C and in the cluele00 communit- at large B?hich o.ten include0 Nevada
6egal Service0 and 8a0hoe 6egal Service0" the <eo<le -ou gu-0 had 0uch trou>le actuall- 0erving in the la?0uit0 1 .iled"
?hich ma- have actuall- hel<ed im<roved legal 0ervice0 in thi0 communit-" i. the- ?ere not di0mi00ed due to
in0u..icienc- o. 0ervice o. <roce00" even ?here the 1(/ re@uired the 8CS3 to 0erved the de.endant0....;. ,n-?a-" >acE to
the F?ithin 24 hour0F <hra0eolog-: F
' 1% '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
&hi0 ?hole >u0ine00 a>out I&he court ma- thereu<on i00ue an order directing the 0heri.. or con0ta>le o. the count- to
remove the tenant ?ithin 24 hour0 a.ter recei<t o. the order...J i0 ina<<lica>le to thi0 0ituation" ?here an 3rder :ranting
Summar- Eviction ?a0 0igned >- 3cto>er 27th" 2+11. &hat language i0 onl- .ound in 0ituation0 ina<<lica>le to the
current one. N!S 4+.2%3B3;B>;B2;" and N!S 4+.2%3B%;Ba; are the onl- 0ection0 o. N!S 4+ ?here thi0 I?ithin 24 hour0J
language occur0" and tho0e 0ituation0 onl- a<<l- ?here" in:
4+.2%3B3;B>;B2;: I 3. , notice 0erved <ur0uant to 0u>0ection 1 or 2 mu0t: ...B>; ,dvi0e the tenant: K. B2; &hat i. the court
determine0 that the tenant i0 guilt- o. an unla?.ul detainer" the court ma- i00ue a 0ummar- order .or removal o. the tenant
or an order <roviding .or the nonadmittance o. the tenant" directing the 0heri.. or con0ta>le o. the count- to remove the
tenant ?ithin 24 hour0 a.ter recei<t o. the orderJ
and"
4+.2%3B%;Ba;: I%. 5<on noncom<liance ?ith the notice: Ba; &he landlord or the landlordL0 agent ma- a<<l- >- a..idavit o.
com<laint .or eviction to the Au0tice court o. the to?n0hi< in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial
<remi0e0 are located or to the di0trict court o. the count- in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial
<remi0e0 are located" ?hichever ha0 Auri0diction over the matter. &he court ma- thereu<on i00ue an order directing the
0heri.. or con0ta>le o. the count- to remove the tenant ?ithin 24 hour0 a.ter recei<t o. the order.J &he ?a- the0e 0ummar-
eviction <roceeding0 are >eing carried out in !eno 4u0tice Court <re0entl- 0hocE0 the con0cience and violate0 Nevada
la?. &here i0 not >a0i0 .or e..ectuating a locEout the ?a- 8CS3C0 De<ut- =achem did in thi0 ca0e. &he a>ove t?o
0ection0 containing the I?ithin 24 hour0 o. recei<tJ language are ina<<lica>le" a0 tho0e 0ituation0 do not invoEe the
<re0ent circum0tance0" ?here the &enant did .ile an ,..idavit and did conte0t thi0 matter to a degree not o.ten 0een. &o
re@uire NevadaC0 tenant0 to get u< and get out I?ithin 24 hour0J o. Irecei<t o. the orderJ B?hat doe0 that even meanH &he
u0e o. term0 liEe IrenditionJ" IrenderedJ" Inotice o. entr-J" I<ronouncedJ" i0 a>0ent here" and thi0 Irecei<t o. the orderJ
language i0 0omething rarel- .ound el0e?here in Nevada la?'0ee attached D=# 0tatutor- citation0" and in em<lo-ment
la? litigation0 ?here one mu0t .ile a Com<laint ?ithin 9+ da-0 o. Irecei<tJ o. a !ight &o Sue 6etter" a 0ituation ?hich
.ollo?0 N!C/ %B>;" and N!C/ *Be; in im<uting recei<t o. 0uch a letter" ?hen actual recei<t i0 not 0ho?n" >- a<<l-ing a
Icon0tructive noticeJ 0tandard that relie0 u<on the da-0 .or mailing e)ten0ion o. time .or item0 0erved in the mailing"
etc.;. 1n ,>raham v. 8ood0 2ole 3ceanogra<hic 1n0titute" %%3 (.3d 114 B10t Cir. 2++9;" the record did not re.lect ?hen
the <lainti.. received hi0 right'to'0ue letter. &he letter ?a0 i00ued on Novem>er 24" 2++*. &he court calculated that the 9+'
da- <eriod commenced on Novem>er 3+" 2++*" >a0ed on three da-0 .or mailing a.ter e)cluding Saturda-0 and Sunda-0.
' 1* '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1n order to >ring a claim under either &itle #11 or the ,D," a <lainti.. mu0t e)hau0t admini0trative remedie0 and 0ue
?ithin 9+ da-0 o. recei<t o. a right to 0ue letter. See 42 5.S.C. M 2+++e'%B.;B1;. See Bald?in Count- 8elcome Center v.
Bro?n" 4** 5.S. 147" 14$ n.1" 1+4 S.Ct. 1723" $+ 6.Ed.2d 19* B19$4;Bgranting <lainti.. an additional three da-0 .or
mailing <ur0uant to !ule *;.
(urther" de0<ite ?hat the inaccurate handout0 o. Nevada 6egal Service0 ma- 0a- a>out thi0 I24 hour0J and the
a<<lica>ilit- o. the 4C!C/ to ca0e0 liEe the0e" N!S 4+.4++ !ule0 o. <ractice" hold0 that :J&he <rovi0ion0 o. N!S" Nevada
!ule0 o. Civil /rocedure and Nevada !ule0 o. ,<<ellate /rocedure relative to civil action0" a<<eal0 and ne? trial0" 0o .ar
a0 the- are not incon0i0tent ?ith the <rovi0ion0 o. N!S 4+.22+ to 4+.42+" inclu0ive" a<<l- to the <roceeding0 mentioned
in tho0e 0ection0. ,0 0uch N!C/ *Ba;"Be; a<<lie0 to the 3rder o. Summar- Eviction that 8CS3 De<ut- =achem alleged"
under <enalt- o. <erAur-" that he F<er0onall- 0ervedF u<on me on Novem>er 1" 2+11. &hat i0 a lie >- =r. =achem" unle00
F<er0onall- 0ervedF i0 de.ined in a rather im<er0onal ?a- and or =achem and 1 have totall- di..erent under0tanding o. the
de.inition o. F<er0onall- 0ervedF" ?hich ma- >e the ca0e. 3r" <erha<0 the Sheri..C0 3..ice i0 >u0- and doe0nCt ?ant to ?ait
around to F<er0onall- 0erveF ever- tenant it ?i0he0 to evict. (ine" then Au0t u0e the Fmail it and allo? three da-0F rule in
N!C/ *Be;...the landlordC0 might not liEe it" >ut the- can u0e that .ru0tration a0 an incentive not to Aum< to litigating ever-
di0agreement a>out ha>ita>ilit- that a tenant >ring0 to them. 7ou ma- not realiDe ho? ridiculou0 0ome landlordC0 get. 1n
m- ca0e" 1 o..ered to .i) >a0ic thing0 that clearl- im<licated the ha>ita>ilit- rule0 in N!S 11$,.29+ and the Cali.ornian
neuro0urgeon" Beverl- 2ill 2igh School graduate landlord >alEed and com<lained then hired and attorne- .our da-0 into
a di0<ute.....at ?hich <oint the rule0 again0t contacting re<re0ented <artie0 <revented much in the ?a- o. real 0ettlement
di0cu00ion" <articularl- ?here o<<o0ing coun0el ha0 continuou0l- demon0trated a com<lete indi..erence to <ur0uing
0ettlement B?h- ?ould he at the rate0 he >ill0 hour0 atH;. 1 Au0t donCt thinE the Sheri..C0 3..ice need0 to 0ull- it0 image or
damage the citiDen tenant0 o. 8a0hoe Count- in the name o. <lea0ing <eo<le liEe Dr. =att =erli00 or !ichard :. 2ill"
E0@.
1 ,= !EV5ES&1N:" 1N 8!1&1N:" &2,& B3&2 3( 735! 3((1CES 1N#ES&1:,&E &21S ,ND
/!3#1DE , S83!N ,((1D,#1& (!3= =!. =,C2E= &2,& ,D=1&S &2,& 1 8,S N3& /E!S3N,667
/!ESEN& 82EN 2E SE!#ED &2E 3!DE! (3! S5==,!7 E#1C&13N 1N !4C !E#2+11'++17+$ 3N 11N1N12
,& 4:3+ /= B,CC3!D1N: &3 21S ,((1D,#1& 3( SE!#1CE;. 735 NE#E! XN38" 1 =1:2& 2,#E
1!!E(5&,B6E /!33( &2,& 1 8,S S3=E82E!E E6SE ,& &2,& &1=E" S3" BE C,!E(56. &here 0im<l- i0
' 17 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
not an-thing 0<eci.ic in Nevada la? addre00ing ho? 0uch Summar- Eviction 3rder0 are to >e 0erved and carried out. &he
0ection0 dealing ?ith
N!S 4+.2%3 5nla?.ul detainer: Su<<lemental remed- o. 0ummar- eviction and e)clu0ion o. tenant .or de.ault in
<a-ment o. rent....
*. 5<on the .iling >- the tenant o. the a..idavit <ermitted in 0u>0ection 3" regardle00 o. the in.ormation contained in the
a..idavit" and the .iling >- the landlord o. the a..idavit <ermitted >- 0u>0ection %" the Au0tice court or the di0trict court
0hall hold a hearing" a.ter 0ervice o. notice o. the hearing u<on the <artie0" to determine the truth.ulne00 and 0u..icienc- o.
an- a..idavit or notice <rovided .or in thi0 0ection. 1. the court determine0 that there i0 no legal de.en0e a0 to the alleged
unla?.ul detainer and the tenant i0 guilt- o. an unla?.ul detainer" the court ma- i00ue a 0ummar- order .or removal o. the
tenant or an order <roviding .or the nonadmittance o. the tenant....
7. &he tenant ma-" u<on <a-ment o. the a<<ro<riate .ee0 relating to the .iling and 0ervice o. a motion" .ile a motion ?ith
the court" on a .orm <rovided >- the clerE o. the court" to di0<ute the amount o. the co0t0" i. an-" claimed >- the landlord
<ur0uant to N!S 11$,.4*+ or 11$C.23+ .or the inventor-" moving and 0torage o. <er0onal <ro<ert- le.t on the <remi0e0.
&he motion mu0t >e .iled ?ithin 2+ da-0 a.ter the 0ummar- order .or removal o. the tenant or the a>andonment o. the
<remi0e0 >- the tenant" or ?ithin 2+ da-0 a.ter:
Ba; &he tenant ha0 vacated or >een removed .rom the <remi0e09 and
B>; , co<- o. tho0e charge0 ha0 >een re@ue0ted >- or <rovided to the tenant"
Y ?hichever i0 later.
$. 5<on the .iling o. a motion <ur0uant to 0u>0ection 7" the court 0hall 0chedule a hearing on the motion. &he hearing
mu0t >e held ?ithin 1+ da-0 a.ter the .iling o. the motion. &he court 0hall a..i) the date o. the hearing to the motion and
order a co<- 0erved u<on the landlord >- the 0heri.." con0ta>le or other <roce00 0erver. ,t the hearing" the court ma-:
Ba; Determine the co0t0" i. an-" claimed >- the landlord <ur0uant to N!S 11$,.4*+ or 11$C.23+ and an- accumulating
dail- co0t09 and
B>; 3rder the relea0e o. the tenantL0 <ro<ert- u<on the <a-ment o. the charge0 determined to >e due or i. no charge0 are
determined to >e due....F
1 al0o ?ant to Eno? ?h- N!S 4+. 2%3B$; ?a0 not .ollo?ed ?ith re0<ect to m- Novem>er 17th" 2+11 .iling o. a
=otion to Conte0t /er0onal /ro<ert- 6ien. 8h- didnCt the 8CS3 0erve notice" a0 re@uired >- N!S 4+.2%3B$; u<on the
landlordC0 attorne- !ichard 2illH 8h- didnCt 1 get a hearing ?ithin the 1+ da-0 called called .or >- that 0ection Bto get
' 1$ '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
>acE m- clientC0 .ile0 no le00;" >ut rather" 1 had to ?ait a .ull 33 da-0 to get a hearing" and 0ervice o. notice o. the hearing
?a0 not e..ectuated" a0 re@uired >- N!S 4+.23%B$;" >- the 8CS3. 8h-H
/lea0e <rovide an indication" in ?riting" o. the name0 and ca0e num>er0 .or the la0t 2+ incidence0 ?hen the
8CS3 ha0 0erved notice o. a hearing 0et <ur0uant to N!S 4+.2%3B$;. 8hatC0 thatH &he 8CS3 ha0 NE#E! 0erved 0uch
noticeH 7et the 8CS3 i0 there ?ith >ell0 on Bor =achem i0; to lie in ,..idavit0 o. Service to locE out the citiDen tenant0
o. 8a0hoe Count- im<ermi00il>- earl- vi0 a vi0 N!C/ %B>;B2; and N!C/ *Be;H 8h- i0 thatH 10 it a con0<irac-H Doe0
mone- talEH 8hen 1 ?a0 arre0ted .or tre0<a00ing on Novem>er 12th" 2+11 >- !/D 3..icer Chri0 Carter and Sargent
6o<eD" Carter admitted to me that F!ichard 2ill <a-0 him a lot o. mone- and there.ore he arre0t0 ?hom !ichard 2ill 0a-0
to and doe0 ?hat !ichard 2ill 0a-0 to do....F Both Carter and Sargent 6o<eD re.u0ed to inve0tigate" de0<ite <rom<ting"
?hether !ichard 2ill ha0 0ent the tenantNarre0tee a >ill or demand letter in >ill .or the .ull rental value o. the <ro<ert-"
G9++ <er month" under 0ome inter<retation o. the Frea0ona>le 0torage" moving" and inventor-ing e)<en0e0F collecta>le >-
a landlord under a <er0onal <ro<ert- line 0et .orth in N!S 11$,.4*+ Bone could al0o inter<ret 0uch a >ill a0 2illC0
?ithdra?ing or eradicating the 3rder o. Summar- Eviction it0el." ?hich ?a0 not F<er0onall- 0ervedF >- the 8a0hoe
Count- Sheri.. Bde0<ite ?hat their ,..idavit o. Service 0a-0...1 ?a0nCt even there at the time the- changed the locE0...and
0o the Summar- Eviction 3rder ?a0 not <ro<erl- 0erved under N!C/ *" and de0<ite the !eno 4u0tice Court
im<ermi00i>l- converting G23++ o. m- mone- under a Frent e0cro?F 3rder it0 re@uired 1 com<l- ?ith in order to litigate
ha>ita>ilit- i00ue0 in a 0ummar- eviction <roceeding under N!S 4+.2%3" de0<ite N!S 4+.2%3B*;C0 e)<re00 dicate again0t
0uch an 3rder Bunle00" <ur0uant to 4C!C/ $3" a Au0tice court get0 0uch a rule" liEe 4u0tice Court !ule o. 6a0 #ega0
B4C!6#; !ule 44" <u>li0hed and a<<roved >- the Nevada Su<reme Court" ?hich the !4C ha0 not" rather" the !4C a<<lie0
all the0e in0idiou0 0ecret Fhou0e rule0F BliEe .orcing tenant0 to deliver them0elve0 to the .iling o..ice to 0u>mit to <er0onal
0ervice notice o. a 0ummar- eviction hearing ?ithin" liEe" 12 hour0 o. the &enant .iling a &enantC0 ,n0?er or ,..idavit in
re0<on0e to an eviction Notice" rather than the 0ervice re@uirement0 o. 0uch notice .ollo?ing N!C/ * Bda-0 .or mailing"
etc." etc." in other ?ord0" in the !4C ever-thing i0 0<ed u< im<eri00il>- to hel< landlordC0 out" and the N#. S. Ct ruling in
:laDier and 6i<<i0 clearl- contem<late <er0onal lia>ilit- again0t the Court and or 4udge0 them0elve0 .or 0o doing;....,
Vui &am action or 0omething a la =au0ertC0 in Solano Count-" 1 >elieve" in Cali.ornia" ?ould >e ver- intere0ting...Still
havenCt heard an-thing .rom the !eno /D a>out the variou0 com<laint0 1 have .iled ?ith them in ?riting related to the
?rong.ul arre0t0" e)ce00ive .orce and other mi0conduct committed again0t me" though the- did arre0t me the other da- .or
calling 911incident to 0ome dome0tic violence .or ?hich 1 ?a0 granted to E)tended /rotection 3rder0 again0t m- .ormer
' 19 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
hou0emate0....old Sargent Sig.ree ordered that arre0t" a0 he did t?o da-0 <rior ?hen he ordered a cu0todial arre0t o. me .or
FAa-?alEingF.
(unn- thing" 1 never heard an-thing >acE .rom the !/D a>out com<laint0 liEe the .ollo?ing one:
I(rom:
Nv!eno/dWco<logic.com
Sent:
8ed 9N+7N11 1+:%1 /=
&o: DachcoughlinWhotmail.com
ZZZZD3 N3& !ES/3ND &3 &21S E'=,16ZZZZ
8eCre 0orr- the .ollo?ing <ro>lem ?a0 .ound during revie?
o. -our 0u>mitted re<ort &11++%9%*:
&21S 1S N3& &2E (3!5= (3! &21S &7/E 3( C3=/6,1N& 238E#E! &21S !E/3!& 8,S /!1N&ED ,ND
/,SSED 3N &3 &2E 3((1CE!CS S5/E!#1S3! ,ND 1& 8166 BE ,DD!ESSED.
&hanE -ou"
3..icer 83ZN1,X"
!eno /olice De<artmentJ
8hat i0 intere0ting there i0 that at lea0t 1 ?a0 <rovided the name o. an o..icer" a F8oDniaEF Bthough 1 have >een una>le to
con.irm the e)i0tence o.
0uch an !/D 3..icer... or ?hether F &21S 1S N3& &2E (3!5= (3! &21S &7/E 3( C3=/6,1N& 238E#E!
&21S !E/3!& 8,S /!1N&ED ,ND /,SSED 3N &3 &2E 3((1CE!CS S5/E!#1S3! ,ND 1& 8166 BE
,DD!ESSED.F
8hat i0 more 0trange i0 that 1 0u>mitted 0everal online <olice re<ort0 to the !eno /D Ba cou<le o. ?hich a00erted
com<laint0 again0t variou0 !eno /D o..icer0" or a0Eed ?h- !D/ 3..icer Carter" ?hom admitted taEing >ri>e0 .rom
!ichard :. 2ill" E0@. at the time o. m- cu0todial arre0t .or tre0<a00ing Bthe one ?here !ichard 2ill 0igned a Criminal
Com<laint .or tre0<a00" then 3..icer Carter and Sargent 6o<eD re.u0ed to .ollo? u< on m- im<loring them to a0E 2ill
?hether he ha0 recentl- 0ent me a >ill .or the F.ull rental valueF o. the <ro<ert-" the 0ame amount that had >een charged
.or the Fu0e and enAo-mentF o. the <remi0e0" G9++" in com<ari0ion to ?hat N!S 11$,.4*+ ma- deem Frea0ona>le
0torageF e)<en0e0 .or ?hich a lien i0 availa>le to a landlord" though N!S 11$,.%2+ ha0 outla?ed rent di0traint0 u<on
' 2+ '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
tenantC0 <er0onal <ro<ert-....!egardle00" >et?een 4anuar- $ ' 12th" 2+12" and ?a0 arre0ted t?ice >- the !eno /D 0hortl-
a.ter 0u>mitting the0e ?ritten com<laint0 to the !eno /D.
,ctuall-" u<on >eing relea0ed .rom Aail on Novem>er 1%th" 2+11" incident to the cu0todial tre0<a00 arre0t" 1 ?ent
to !ichard 21llC0 o..ice to get m- ?allet and driverC0 licen0e. 2e re.u0ed to <rovide it to me until late Novem>er 22nd"
2+11. 2ill called the !eno /D on the 1%th Bor ma->e 1 did >ecau0e he ?a0 ?ithholding m- 0tate i00ued 1D" the one 1
?ould need to rent a room" drive m- car" and m- ?allet" ?hich i0 Eind o. u0e.ul in 0uch 0ituation0....;. ,n-?a-0" Sargent
&arter o. the !eno /D 0ho?ed u<" he ?ent in0ide 2illC0 o..ice ?ith 2ill .or @uite 0ome time and the re0ult ?a0 &arter
telling me to leave. 1 did" >ut ?hile driving do?n St. 6aurence to?ard0 S. #irginia B2illC0 o..ice i0 at *%2 (orre0t St.
$9%+3 and ?ould have re@uired turning do?n the ?rong ?a- o. a one ?a- 0treet" (orre0t" to go >acE to 2illC0 3..ice B0o
clearl- 1 ?a0 not headed to 2illC0 o..ice; Sargent &arter >egan tailing me" then he <ulled me over" then he gave me a
ticEet" in retaliation i. -ou a0E me .or re<orting !/D 3..icer Carter admitting that he taEe0 >ri>e0 .rom 2ill to Sargent
&arter minute0 earlier. 5h" ?ell" an-?a-0" another Sargent call0 me later that night" taEing the Fgood co<F role. But u<on
in.orming him o. ?hat !/D 3..icer Carter told me a>out 2ill <a-ing him mone- to arre0t <eo<le during the 11N12N11
tre0<a00ing arre0t" that Sargent immediatel- in.ormed me that" de0<ite thi0 >eing the .ir0t he heard o. that" he ?a0 0ure that
?a0 not ha<<ening....1 gue00 !/D 3..icer Carter i0 tr-ing to e)<lain a?a- hi0 comment0 a>out !ichard 2ill <a-ing him
mone- to arre0t <eo<le >- di0mi00ing them a0 0arca0m" a AoEe" 0aid in Ae0t" ?hatever....>ut 1 donCt 0ee ho? that 0ituation Ba
licen0e attorne- getting arre0ted .or a crime" a conviction .or ?hich ?ould re0ult in that attorne- >eing re@uired to re<ort
0aid conviction to the State Bar o. Nevada under SC! 111" etc." and <o00i>l- re0ulting in a 0u0<en0ion o. that attorne-C0
licen0e to <ractice la?" or ?or0e...; i0 all that Aocular o. a 0ituation. Com>ine that ?ith the too @uicE to di0mi00 m- re<ort0
o. >ri>er- >- !ichard 2ill to o..icer Carter to the !/D Sargent ?ho called me on 11N1%N11 regarding the retaliation >-
Sargent &arter that 1 com<lained o." and 1 donCt thinE it i0 all that unrea0ona>le .or an-one to taEe !/D 3..icer Carter at
hi0 ?ord regarding !ichard :. 2ill" E0@. <a-ing him mone- to arre0t ?hom 2ill 0a-0 to arre0t. ,dd to that Sargent
Sig.ree ordering m- arre0t .or Aa-?alEing B>- a trainee !/D 3..icer; on 4anuar- 12th" 2+11 Bcu0todial arre0t" >ail o. G1*+
em<tied m- >anE account out" or <rett- clo0e to it; ?hile 1 ?a0 <eace.ull- .ilming .rom a <u>lic 0<ot !ichard :. 2ill"
E0@C0 contractor /hil 2o?ard" ?hom had 0u>mitted >ill0 in court0 record0 and .iling0 under the lien .or Frea0ona>le
0torage moving and inventor-ingF .ound in N!S 11$,.4*+" even ?here old /hil u0ed m- o?n <l-?ood at the <ro<ert- to
>oard u< the >acE <orch Bcuriou0l- leaving the 0cre?0 holding u< the <l-?ood e)<o0ed to e)terior o. the <ro<ert- ?here
an-one could ea0il- un0cre? them" and al0o leaving in a ?indo? unit ac 0ecured onl- >- ductta<e in a ?indo? .acing a
' 21 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0ide?alE >- the 6aEe=ill 6odge....?hich re0ulted in G$"+++ at lea0t o. m- <er0onal <ro<ert- >eing >urglariDed .rom m-
.ormer home la? o..ice on Decme>er 12th" 2+11 ?hile 2ill ?a0 a00erting a lien on all m- <er0onal <ro<ert- .ound therein
Band m- clientC0 .ile0" ?hich argua>l- are not even m- <ro<ert-" >ut rather" the clientC0 <ro<ert-;. 2ill ?ent on to <lace
?hat he >elieve0 to >e m- 0ocial 0ecurit- num>er in court record0" on <ur<o0e" de0<ite hi0 0igning an ,..irmation
<ur0uant to N!S 239B.+3+ that that ?a0 not the ca0e Battaching a t?o <age re<ort to the !/D a0 an E)hi>it;. &hen 2ill
and hi0 contractor /hil 2o?ard >oth committed <erAur- ?hen the 0igned Declaration0 atte0ting that 1 had clim>ed on the
contractor0 trucE or ever touched 2ill. 2ill lie0 con0tantl-" ?hether under <enalt- o. <erAur- or no?" 0o 1 donCt have time
to re>ut ever- little lie he maEe0 Bhe maEe0 me out to come0 acro00 a0 a 7o0emite Sam caricature o. a human >eing in hi0
.iling0 ?hen he de0cri>e0 me...;.
(urther" ?h- am 1 arre0ted .or tre0<a00ing and not tho0e .rom Nevada Court Service0 ?here the- ?ent >ehind
clo0ed gate the the >acE-ard o. m- home la? o..ice and >anged on ?indo? e)tremel- loudl- .or 4+ minute0 at a time 3
time0 a da-" one gu- ringing the door>ell" one gu- moving around all other 0ide0 o. the <ro<ert- >anging on the ?indo?0"
<eering in clo0ed >lind0" and a..ecting a <hon- Fcolor o. la?F tone" re0em>lance" and ver>al communication0"
mi0leadingl- announcing that the- ?ere FCourt Service0" come out no?TF" ?earing their <retend Sheri.. out.it0" >ig
e@ui<ment 0addled >elt0 Bincluding .irearm0" 1 >elieve" and radio0;" etc. "etc.
htt<:NN???.-outu>e.comN?atchHvRAV132@237D7
,dd to that that Nevada Court Service0 4e.. Chandler drive0 >- in hi0 =on0ter &rucE >aring hi0 <er0onaliDed FNCSF
licen0e <late ?hile 1 am in the !/D 0@uad car" handcu..ed" out0ide m- .ormer la? o..ice at 121 !iver !ocE" at the time o.
the 1N12N12 Aa-?alEing arre0t and the a<<earance0 are trou>ling. No?" add to that that 6e? &aitel" E0@. ?a0 m- court
a<<ointed <u>lic de.ender in the !eno =unici<al Court in the tre0<a00 ca0e" and that 4udge :ardner had re.u0ed to
<rovide me the name0 o. <ro0<ective a<<ointed de.en0e coun0el B1 ?anted to run a con.lict0 checE; at m- arraignment
B?here =ar0hal =entDel >arEed at me in a threatening tone" u0ing menacing language;" ?hereu<on &aitel ?a0 a<<ointed
a0 m- de.en0e attorne- and .iled a notice o. a<<earance" and received m- con.idential .ile" <c 0heet" arre0t re<ort0" 00n"
etc....onl- it0 turn0 out that &aitel 0hare0 and o..ice and a rece<tioni0t ?ith Nevada Court Service0 and the- li0t him and
hi0 <icture on their ?e>0ite a0 Fa00ociated ?ithF their /roce00 Server cor<oration" de0<ite the <rohi>ition la?-er0 .ace
again0t .ee 0haring ?ith non'la?-er0. &hen" &aitel 0omeho? manage0 to get out o. de.ending m- ca0e ?ithout .iling a
=otion to 8ithdra? a0 Coun0el" de0<ite that >eing re@uired >- the !eno =unici<al Court !ule 3BB;:
' 22 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
!=C! !ule 3BB;: ,uthoriDation to !e<re0ent BB;: ,n attorne- de0iring to ?ithdra? .rom a ca0e 0hall .ile a
motion ?ith the court and 0erve the Cit- ,ttorne- ?ith the 0ame. &he court ma- rule on the motion or 0et a hearing.
But" <erha<0 mo0t trou>ling o. all i0 the im<lication that the !eno Cit- ,ttorne-C0 3..ice" ?hich de.end0 action0
again0t the Cit- o. !eno /olice De<artment and it0 3..icer0" ha0 a ve0ted intere0t in di0crediting me in advance o. the
?rong.ul arre0t la?0uit that the !eno Cit- ,ttorne-C0 o..ice Ene? ?a0 imminent at the time o. all o. the a>ove incident0"
relating to the .ollo?ing ,ugu0t 2+th" 2+11 ?rong.ul arre0t >- !/D 3..icerC0 Duralde and !o0a.
htt<:NN???.-outu>e.comN?atchHvR%/!7@431%>+ So" thatC0 ?hat attem<ting to coerce a 0u0<ectC0 con0ent to an
im<ermi00i>le 0earch 0ound0 liEeH ,dd to that that the tre0<a00ing ca0e i0 >e.ore 4udge :ardner" ?hom mo0t recentl- ?a0
em<lo-ed ?ith the !eno Cit- ,ttorne-C0 3..ice.
,nd" -ou Eno? ?hat i0 .unn-H 3..icer Del #ecchio cu..ed me and <laced me in hi0 0@uad car la0t 0ummer a.ter
he terri.ied me and another gentleman ?ho had >ic-cle0. 2e veered acro00 the road and 0creeched hi0 0@uad car to a halt"
Aum<ed out" and did 0ome other 0tu.." then demanded m- name and 1D...and the la?-er in me didnCt liEe that that much"
and he didnCt liEe me not ?anting to give it to him. &hi0 occurred right in .ront o. m- home la? o..ice in the 0ummer o.
2+11. 2e cu..ed me and told me 1 ?a0 going to Aail .or 0omething a>out a light on the .ront o. m- >ic-cle Bthe one N#
Energ- liEel- 0tole ?hen the 0hut o.. m- <o?er" unnoticed" on 3cto>er 4" 2+11; de0<ite m- >iEe actuall- having 0uch a
light....>ut then Del #ecchioC0 <artner did him a 0olid and talEed 0ome 0en0e into him" and 1 hum>led it u< .or Del
#ecchio and ?e >oth let it go" and 1 didnCt go to Aail....5ntil Del #ecchio ?a0 <re0ent 0u<ervi0ing 0ome 3..icerC0 training
at the 0cene o. m- cu0todial B9 hour; Aa-?alEing arre0t; on 1N12N12. But Del #ecchio" 1 gue00 either didnCt ?ant to or
?a0nCt a>le to talE 0ome 0en0e into Sargent Sig.ree.....and then Sargent Sig.ree Bthe 0<elling i0 liEel- o..; had me arre0ted
and charged ?ith a gro00 mi0demeanor" F=i0u0e o. 911F Au0t t?o da-0 later" on 4anuar- 14th" 2+11 ?hen 1 called 911 to
re<ort that m- roommate0 ?ere laughing menacingl- ?hen 1 a0Eed them ?h- m- dog ?a0 mi00ing B1 had al0o >een
cha0ed u< to m- room numerou0 time0 0ince moving in ?ith the0e <eo<le" 0omething 1 had to do >ecau0e 0o much o. m-
mone- had >een taEen u< ?ith >ail or lo0t earning0 due to all the0e ?rong.ul arre0t0 and a>u0e o. <roce00e0 mentioned
a>ove...al0o the0e hou0emate0 had cha0ed me ?ith a ten inch >utcher Eni.e" t?o o. m- tire0 ?ere 0la0hed" 1 ?a0 locEed out
all night on Ne? 7ear0 Even ?hen the0e changed the locE0 at around midnight" had m- .urniture thro?n in the 0treet"
<ro<ert- 0tolen" co..ee thro?n on me" de0tro-ing m- 0mart <hone in the <roce00" etc." etc...,nd de0<ite the hou0emate
having an out0tanding arre0t ?arrant" and animal a>u0e >eing li0ted among0t the element0 o. dome0tic violence" Sargent
Sig.ree told me he ?a0 arre0ting me >ecau0e 1 FEee< <utting -our0el. in the0e 0ituation0F" liEe" ?here 1 am a victim" and
' 23 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that he ?a0 Ftr-ing to hel< -ouF" he 0aid ?ith a 0mirE and a laugh to hi0 .ello? !/D 3..icer0" ?hom then <roceeded to
u0e e)ce00ive .orce again0t me. 1 gue00 he ?a0 hel<ing me >- 0addling me ?ith a gro00 mi0demeanor ?ith a G1"%++ >ail"
e0<eciall- ?here it0 >een arranged .or Court Service0" or <re'&rial Service0 to .orever den- me an 3!" de0<ite m-
meeting the .actor0 .or 0uch 0et .orth in 0tatute B3+ -ear re0ident" entire immediate .amil- live0 here" licen0ed to <ractice
la? in Nevada" etc." etc;...1 gue00 it 0hould not >e too much o. a 0ur<ri0e to me that !eno Cit- ,ttorne- /am !o>ert0
.ailed to addre00 the <erAur- o. all three o. her ?itne00e0 or that her .ello? !eno Cit- ,ttorne- Chri0to<her 2aDlett'
Steven0 lied to me a>out ?hether or not the !eno Cit- ,ttorne-C0 3..ice even had an- documentation related to m- arre0t
or ?hether it ?ould in the month >e.ore m- arraignment" de0<ite that .act that 0u>0e@uent <roduction0 o. di0cover- tend
to indicate that the !eno Cit- ,ttorne-C0 3..ice did have tho0e material0 at the time. 1 could >e ?rong a>out 0ome o.
thi0...But that ?ould re@uire and a?.ul lot o. coincidence0.
(urther" the la? in our State doe0 not 0eem e)ce<tionall- clear ?ith regard to the 0ervice and
<roce00 re@uirement0 and timeline0" and manner o. calculating time ?ith re0<ect to the Frecei<tF o.
6ocEout 3rder0. &he ,..idavit o. Service >- =achen 0tate0 that he F<er0onall- 0erved the de0cri>ed
document0 u<onF m-" Zach Coughlin...2o?ever" 1 can atte0t >- ,..idavit that 1 ?a0 not F<er0onall-
0ervedF to the e)tent that F<er0onall- 0ervedF mean0 or im<lie0 that 1 ?a0 there" that =achen 0a? me
or identi.ied me" or an- o. the other indicator0 o. 0omething" 0uch a0 a Com<laint" >eing F<er0onall-
0ervedF 0uch a0 1 under0tand the <hra0e to me. N!C/ %B>;B2;B,;Bi'iii;. (urther" a0 BaEer and 2ill
have 0o o.ten <ointed out" 1 cannot" according to them" receive an- attorne-C0 .ee a?ard .or a<<earing
a0 <ro 0e attorne-" a0 0uch" N!C/ %B>;B2;B,;Bi'iii;" 0hould a<<l- to me onl- a0 a <art-" and not a0 a
<art-C0 attorne-" and" there.ore" according to N!C/ %" Service: FB2; Service under thi0 rule i0 made
>-: B,; Delivering a co<- to the attorne- or the <art- >-: Bi; handing it to the attorne- or to the <art-9
Bii; leaving it at the attorne-L0 or <art-L0 o..ice ?ith a clerE or other <er0on in charge" or i. there i0 no
one in charge" leaving it in a con0<icuou0 <lace in the o..ice9 or Biii; i. the o..ice i0 clo0ed or the
<er0on to >e 0erved ha0 no o..ice" leaving it at the per"on/" '$ell!ng hou"e or u"ul plce o# (o'e
$!th "ome per"on o# "u!t(le ge n' '!"cret!on re"!'!ng there...F So" either it ?a0 m- o..ice" in
' 24 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
?hich ca0e a No Cau0e Eviction Notice maEe0 im<ermi00i>le a Summar- Eviction /roceeding under
N!S 4+.2%3" and there.ore" the 3rder o. Summar- Eviction i0 void .or lacE o. Auri0diction" or" the
,..idavit o. Service ?a0 on m- home" and ?a0 not FhandedF to me" or F<er0onall- 0ervedF Bde0<ite
the ,..idavit atte0ting to having F<er0onall- 0ervedF me;" nor ?a0 the 3rder o. Summar- Eviction
0erved in accordance ?ith N!C/ %B>;B2;B,;Biii;" ?hich re@uire0: Fi. the o..ice i0 clo0ed or the <er0on
to >e 0erved ha0 no o..ice" leaving it at the per"on/" '$ell!ng hou"e or u"ul plce o# (o'e $!th
"ome per"on o# "u!t(le ge n' '!"cret!on re"!'!ng there..F
(urther" 1 >elieve <o0ting an 3rder on oneC0 re0idence door" <articularl- in the conte)t o. 0erving a No
Cau0e Notice o. Eviction or 5nla?.ul Detainer" i0 onl- valid i. the document >eing 0erved i0 al0o
<laced in the mail and 3 non Audicial da-0 are accorded .or 0ervice to >e com<lete. See N!C/ *Be;. 1
do not >elieve the- can <rove that at all" not even clo0e. N!C/ a<<lie0 to Summar- Eviction
,ction0" according to the .ollo?ing:
FN!S 4+.3$+ /rovi0ion0 governing a<<eal0. Either <art- ma-" ?ithin 1+ da-0" a<<eal .rom the
Audgment rendered. But an a<<eal >- the de.endant 0hall not 0ta- the e)ecution o. the Audgment"
unle00" ?ithin the 1+ da-0" the de.endant 0hall e)ecute and .ile ?ith the court or Au0tice the
de.endantL0 undertaEing to the <lainti.." ?ith t?o or more 0uretie0" in an amount to >e .i)ed >- the
court or Au0tice" >ut ?hich 0hall not >e le00 than t?ice the amount o. the Audgment and co0t0" to the
e..ect that" i. the Audgment a<<ealed .rom >e a..irmed or the a<<eal >e di0mi00ed" the a<<ellant ?ill
<a- the Audgment and the co0t o. a<<eal" the value o. the u0e and occu<ation o. the <ro<ert-" and
damage0 Au0tl- accruing to the <lainti.. during the <endenc- o. the a<<eal. 5<on taEing the a<<eal
and .iling the undertaEing" all .urther <roceeding0 in the ca0e 0hall >e 0ta-ed.J
,ctuall-" a lot o. <eo<le 0eemed con.u0ed regarding the I24 hour0J locEout thing. &he onl- a<<earance in either N!S
11$, or N!S 4+" in the <rovi0ion0 a<<lica>le to Summar- Eviction /roceeding0 o. an-thing related to I24 hour0J i0 in
' 2% '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
N!S 4+.2%3B%;" ?hich onl- 0<eaE0 to a 0ituation ?here the &enant doe0 not .ile a &enantC0 ,n0?er or &enantC0 ,..idavit"
?hich i0 clearl- ina<<lica>le here" a0 the &enant did .ile 0uch a 3<<o0ition to the No Cau0e Eviction Notice: I%. 5<on
noncom<liance ?ith the notice:
Ba; &he landlord or the landlordL0 agent ma- a<<l- >- a..idavit o. com<laint .or eviction to the Au0tice court o. the
to?n0hi< in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial <remi0e0 are located or to the di0trict court o. the
count- in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial <remi0e0 are located" ?hichever ha0 Auri0diction
over the matter. The court m. thereupon !""ue n or'er '!rect!ng the "her!## or con"t(le o# the count. to remo&e
the tennt $!th!n 01 hour" #ter rece!pt o# the or'er. &he a..idavit mu0t 0tate or contain...J
So" a>0ent 0ome 0tatutor- <rovi0ion allo?ing the 3rder o. Summar- Eviction to re0ult in a locEout >- the 8a0hoe
Count- Sheri..C0 3..ice <rior to the 3 da-0 .or mailing ?here <er0onal 0ervice o. the 3rder o. Summar- Eviction ?a0 not
e..ectuated" de0<ite ?hat 8CS3 em<lo-ee ma- have incorrectl- Bor .al0el-; a00erted in the 8CS3C0 4ohn =achemC0
,..idavit o. Service .rom" .ile 0tam<ed Novem>er 7" 2+11 Be0<eciall- ?here it i0 time0tam<ed 4:3+ <m" Novem>er 1"
2+11" e0<eciall- ?here the 3rder o. Summar- Eviction e)<licitl- read0 that no 0uch locEout 0hall occur <rior to %:++ <m
on Novem>er 1" 2+11;. See" N!C/ %B>;B2;B,;Bi'iii;" N!C/ *Be;.
Intere"t!ngl.% R!chr' )!ll 2no$" h!" c"e !" to"t un'er NRCP 34(54054A54!-!!!5% NRCP
64e5% !n ''!t!on to NRCP ++. Tht !" $h. !n R!chr' )!ll7" No&em(er 0+% 0,++ Mot!on #or
Or'er To Sho$ Cu"e% on pge 0% )!ll" re"ort" to l!terll. gr"p!ng t "tr$"% !mg!n!ng tht
$ht the 8"hoe Count. Sher!##7" O##!ce cu"tomr!l. 'oe" !" "omeho$ utomt!cll. co'!#!e'
!nto mn'tor. prece'ent (lc2 letter l$. To $!t% R!chr' )!ll $rote !n h!" Mot!on For Or'er
To Sho$ Cu"e tht- 9FACTS S)O8ING CONTEMPT OF COURT 6. E:)I;IT + $"
"er&e' on Coughl!n on No&em(er < 0,++ (. the 8"hoe Count. Sher!##" Deprtment% (.
po"t!ng "me on the #ront 'oor o# the propert. !n the mnner cu"tomr. #or e&!ct!on" !n
8"hoe Count.. The loc2" to the prem!"e" $ere chnge' t tht t!me% there(. e=ect!ng n'
'!"po""e""!ng Coughl!n o# po""e""!on o# the Propert..> Further% there!n R!chr' )!ll 'm!t"
tht the loc2out occurre' t 1-?, pm% " !n'!cte' !n $r!t!ng !n the 8CSO7" Mchem7"
A##!'&!t o# Ser&!ce% contr to the mn'te o# @u'ge S#errAA7" Or'er o# Summr. E&!ct!on
reBu!r!ng n. loc2out to occur after 3-,, pm% No&em(er +% 0,++.
NRS 1,.?*3 St. o# eCecut!on upon ppelD 'ut. o# tennt $ho ret!n" po""e""!on o#
prem!"e" to p. rent 'ur!ng "t.. Upon n ppel #rom n or'er entere' pur"unt to NRS
1,.03? -
+. ECcept " other$!"e pro&!'e' !n th!" "u("ect!on% "t. o# eCecut!on m. (e o(t!ne' (.
#!l!ng $!th the tr!l court (on' !n the mount o# E03, to co&er the eCpecte' co"t" on ppel. In
n ct!on concern!ng le"e o# commerc!l propert. or n. other propert. #or $h!ch the
monthl. rent eCcee'" E+%,,,% the court m.% upon !t" o$n mot!on or tht o# prt.% n' upon
' 2* '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"ho$!ng o# goo' cu"e% or'er n ''!t!onl (on' to (e po"te' to co&er the eCpecte' co"t" on
ppel. A "uret. upon the (on' "u(m!t" to the =ur!"'!ct!on o# the ppellte court n'
!rre&oc(l. ppo!nt" the cler2 o# tht court " the "uret./" gent upon $hom pper" ##ect!ng
the "uret./" l!(!l!t. upon the (on' m. (e "er&e'. L!(!l!t. o# "uret. m. (e en#orce'% or the
(on' m. (e rele"e'% on mot!on !n the ppellte court $!thout !n'epen'ent ct!on.
2. , tenant ?ho retain0 <o00e00ion o. the <remi0e0 that are the 0u>Aect o. the a<<eal during the
<endenc- o. the a<<eal 0hall <a- to the landlord rent in the amount <rovided in the underl-ing
contract >et?een the tenant and the landlord a0 it >ecome0 due. 1. the tenant .ail0 to <a- 0uch rent" the
landlord ma- initiate ne? <roceeding0 .or a 0ummar- eviction >- 0erving the tenant ?ith a ne?
notice <ur0uant to N!S 4+.2%3.
N!S 4+.39+ ,<<ellate court not to di0mi00 or @ua0h <roceeding0 .or ?ant o. .orm. 1n all ca0e0
o. a<<eal under N!S 4+.22+ to 4+.42+" inclu0ive" the a<<ellate court 0hall not di0mi00 or @ua0h the
<roceeding0 .or ?ant o. .orm" <rovided the <roceeding0 have >een conducted 0u>0tantiall- according
to the <rovi0ion0 o. N!S 4+.22+ to 4+.42+" inclu0ive9 and amendment0 to the com<laint" an0?er or
0ummon0" in matter0 o. .orm onl-" ma- >e allo?ed >- the court at an- time >e.ore .inal Audgment
u<on 0uch term0 a0 ma- >e Au0t9 and all matter0 o. e)cu0e" Au0ti.ication or avoidance o. the allegation0
in the com<laint ma- >e given in evidence under the an0?er.
NRS 1,.1,, Rule" o# prct!ce. The pro&!"!on" o# NRS% Ne&' Rule" o# C!&!l Proce'ure
n' Ne&' Rule" o# Appellte Proce'ure relt!&e to c!&!l ct!on"% ppel" n' ne$ tr!l"% "o #r
" the. re not !ncon"!"tent $!th the pro&!"!on" o# NRS 1,.00, to 1,.10, % !nclu"!&e% ppl. to the
procee'!ng" ment!one' !n tho"e "ect!on".>
So" con0idering that N!S 4+.4++ re@uire0 that N!C/ a<<l- to Summar- Eviction /roceeding0 under
N!S 4+.2%3" then 0ervice" <roce00" and time calculation0 o. 0uch mu0t com<ort ?ith the dictate0 o.
N!C/ %'*: F !56E %. SE!#1CE ,ND (161N: 3( /6E,D1N:S ,ND 3&2E! /,/E!S
45 Ser&!ce- 8hen ReBu!re'. E)ce<t a0 other?i0e <rovided in the0e rule0" ever- order re@uired
>- it0 term0 to >e 0erved" ever- <leading 0u>0e@uent to the original com<laint unle00 the court
other?i0e order0 >ecau0e o. numerou0 de.endant0" ever- <a<er relating to di0cover- re@uired to >e
0erved u<on a <art- unle00 the court other?i0e order0" ever- ?ritten motion other than one ?hich ma-
>e heard e) <arte" and ever- ?ritten notice" a<<earance" demand" o..er o. Audgment" de0ignation o.
record on a<<eal" and 0imilar <a<er 0hall >e 0erved u<on each o. the <artie0. No 0ervice need >e made
on <artie0 in de.ault .or .ailure to a<<ear e)ce<t that <leading0 a00erting ne? or additional claim0 .or
relie. again0t them 0hall >e 0erved u<on them in the manner <rovided .or 0ervice o. 0ummon0 in !ule
4.
4(5 Sme- )o$ M'e.
B1; 8henever under the0e rule0 0ervice i0 re@uired or <ermitted to >e made u<on a <art-
re<re0ented >- an attorne-" the 0ervice 0hall >e made u<on the attorne- unle00 the court order0 that
0ervice >e made u<on the <art-.
B2; Service under thi0 rule i0 made >-:
B,; Delivering a co<- to the attorne- or the <art- >-:
Bi; handing it to the attorne- or to the <art-9
Bii; leaving it at the attorne-L0 or <art-L0 o..ice ?ith a clerE or other <er0on in
charge" or i. there i0 no one in charge" leaving it in a con0<icuou0 <lace in the o..ice9 or
' 27 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Biii; i. the o..ice i0 clo0ed or the <er0on to >e 0erved ha0 no o..ice" leaving it at the
<er0onL0 d?elling hou0e or u0ual <lace o. a>ode ?ith 0ome <er0on o. 0uita>le age and di0cretion
re0iding there.
4;5 M!l!ng cop. to the ttorne. or the prt. t h!" or her l"t 2no$n ''re"".
Ser&!ce (. m!l !" complete on m!l!ngD pro&!'e'% ho$e&er% mot!on% n"$er or other
'ocument con"t!tut!ng the !n!t!l ppernce o# prt. mu"t l"o% !# "er&e' (. m!l% (e #!le'
$!th!n the t!me llo$e' #or "er&!ceD n' pro&!'e' #urther% tht #ter "uch !n!t!l ppernce%
"er&!ce (. m!l (e m'e onl. (. m!l!ng #rom po!nt $!th!n the Stte o# Ne&'.
BC; 1. the attorne- or the <art- ha0 no Eno?n addre00" leaving a co<- ?ith the clerE o. the
court.
4D5 Del!&er!ng cop. (. electron!c men" !# the ttorne. or the prt. "er&e' h"
con"ente' to "er&!ce (. electron!c men". Ser&!ce (. electron!c men" !" complete on
trn"m!""!on pro&!'e'% ho$e&er% mot!on% n"$er or other 'ocument con"t!tut!ng the !n!t!l
ppernce o# prt. mu"t l"o% !# "er&e' (. electron!c men"% (e #!le' $!th!n the t!me llo$e'
#or "er&!ce. The "er&e' ttorne./" or prt./" con"ent to "er&!ce (. electron!c men" "hll (e
eCpre""l. "tte' n' #!le' !n $r!t!ng $!th the cler2 o# the court n' "er&e' on the other prt!e"
to the ct!on. The $r!tten con"ent "hll !'ent!#.-
4!5 the per"on" upon $hom "er&!ce mu"t (e m'eD
4!!5 the ppropr!te ''re"" or loct!on #or "uch "er&!ce% "uch " the
electron!c-m!l ''re"" or #c"!m!le num(erD
4!!!5 the #ormt to (e u"e' #or ttchment"D n'
4!&5 n. other l!m!t" on the "cope or 'urt!on o# the con"ent.
An ttorne./" or prt./" con"ent "hll rem!n e##ect!&e unt!l eCpre""l. re&o2e' or unt!l the
repre"entt!on o# prt. chnge" through entr.% $!th'r$l% or "u("t!tut!on o# coun"el. ,n
attorne- or <art- ?ho ha0 con0ented to 0ervice >- electronic mean0 0hall" ?ithin 1+ da-0 a.ter an-
change o. electronic'mail addre00 or .ac0imile num>er" 0erve and .ile notice o. the ne? electronic'
mail addre00 or .ac0imile num>er.
4?5 Ser&!ce (. electron!c men" un'er Rule 34(54054D5 !" not e##ect!&e !# the prt.
m2!ng "er&!ce lern" tht the ttempte' "er&!ce '!' not rech the per"on to (e "er&e'.
B4; /roo. o. 0ervice ma- >e made >- certi.icate o. an attorne- or o. the attorne-L0 em<lo-ee"
or >- ?ritten admi00ion" or >- a..idavit" or other <roo. 0ati0.actor- to the court. (ailure to maEe <roo.
o. 0ervice 0hall not a..ect the validit- o. 0ervice...
RULE 6. 9TIME
45 Computt!on. 1n com<uting an- <eriod o. time <re0cri>ed or allo?ed >- the0e rule0" >- the
local rule0 o. an- di0trict court" >- order o. court" or >- an- a<<lica>le 0tatute" the da- o. the act"
event" or de.ault .rom ?hich the de0ignated <eriod o. time >egin0 to run 0hall not >e included. &he
la0t da- o. the <eriod 0o com<uted 0hall >e included" unle00 it i0 a Saturda-" a Sunda-" or a
nonAudicial da-" in ?hich event the <eriod run0 until the end o. the ne)t da- ?hich i0 not a Saturda-"
a Sunda-" or a nonAudicial da-" or" ?hen the act to >e done i0 the .iling o. a <a<er in court" a da- on
?hich ?eather or other condition0 have made the o..ice o. the clerE o. the di0trict court inacce00i>le"
in ?hich event the <eriod run0 until the end o. the ne)t da- ?hich i0 not one o. the a.orementioned
' 2$ '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
da-0. 8hen the <eriod o. time <re0cri>ed or allo?ed i0 le00 than 11 da-0" intermediate Saturda-0"
Sunda-0" and nonAudicial da-0 0hall >e e)cluded in the com<utation e)ce<t .or tho0e <roceeding0
.iled under &itle0 12 or 13 o. the Nevada !evi0ed Statute0...
4e5 A''!t!onl T!me A#ter Ser&!ce (. M!l or Electron!c Men". 8hene&er prt. h" the
r!ght or !" reBu!re' to 'o "ome ct or t2e "ome procee'!ng" $!th!n pre"cr!(e' per!o' #ter
the "er&!ce o# not!ce or other pper% other thn proce""% upon the prt. n' the not!ce or
pper !" "er&e' upon the prt. (. m!l or (. electron!c men"% ? '." "hll (e ''e' to the
pre"cr!(e' per!o'.
Su>divi0ion Ba; i0 revi0ed to e)tend the e)clu0ion o. intermediate Saturda-0" Sunda-0" and
nonAudicial da-0 to the com<utation o. time <eriod0 le00 than 11 da-0 con0i0tent ?ith the 19$%
amendment0 to the .ederal rule. ,dditionall-" the [[inacce00i>ilit- o. the courtLL <rovi0ion .ound in
0u>divi0ion Ba; o. the .ederal rule i0 added to !ule *Ba;. Su>divi0ion Ba; i0 .urther amended" >- adding
language re.erring to [[<roceeding0 .iled under &itle0 12 or 13 o. the Nevada !evi0ed Statute0"LL to
avoid an- change0 to current <rocedure0 in <ro>ate" guardian0hi< and tru0t <roceeding0....
Su>divi0ion Be; i0 amended to <rovide an additional 3 da-0 to act in re0<on0e to a <a<er that i0
0erved >- electronic mean0 under ne? <aragra<h B2;BD; added to !ule %B>;.F
N!S 4+.2%3 5nla?.ul detainer: Su<<lemental remed- o. 0ummar- eviction and e)clu0ion o. tenant
.or de.ault in <a-ment o. rent.
1. E)ce<t a0 other?i0e <rovided in 0u>0ection 1+" in addition to the remed- <rovided in N!S 4+.2%12 and
4+.29+ to 4+.42+" inclu0ive" ?hen the tennt o# n. '$ell!ng% prtment% mo(!le home% recret!onl
&eh!cle or commerc!l prem!"e" $!th per!o'!c rent re"er&e' (. the month or n. "horter per!o'
!" !n 'e#ult !n p.ment o# the rent" the landlord or the landlordL0 agent" unle00 other?i0e agreed in
?riting" ma- 0erve or have 0erved a notice in ?riting" re@uiring in the alternative the <a-ment o. the
rent or the 0urrender o. the <remi0e0...
4. 1. the tenant .ile0 0uch an a..idavit at or >e.ore the time 0tated in the notice" the landlord or
the landlordL0 agent" a.ter recei<t o. a .ile'0tam<ed co<- o. the a..idavit ?hich ?a0 .iled" 0hall not
<rovide .or the nonadmittance o. the tenant to the <remi0e0 >- locEing or other?i0e.
%. 5<on noncom<liance ?ith the notice:
Ba; &he landlord or the landlordL0 agent ma- a<<l- >- a..idavit o. com<laint .or eviction to the
Au0tice court o. the to?n0hi< in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial <remi0e0
are located or to the di0trict court o. the count- in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or
commercial <remi0e0 are located" ?hichever ha0 Auri0diction over the matter. &he court ma-
thereu<on i00ue an order directing the 0heri.. or con0ta>le o. the count- to remove the tenant ?ithin
24 hour0 a.ter recei<t o. the order..
*. 5<on the .iling >- the tenant o. the a..idavit <ermitted in 0u>0ection 3" regardle00 o. the
in.ormation contained in the a..idavit" and the .iling >- the landlord o. the a..idavit <ermitted >-
0u>0ection %" the Au0tice court or the di0trict court 0hall hold a hearing" a.ter 0ervice o. notice o. the
hearing u<on the <artie0" to determine the truth.ulne00 and 0u..icienc- o. an- a..idavit or notice
<rovided .or in thi0 0ection. I# the court 'eterm!ne" tht there !" no legl 'e#en"e " to the llege'
unl$#ul 'et!ner n' the tennt !" gu!lt. o# n unl$#ul 'et!ner% the court m. !""ue
"ummr. or'er #or remo&l o# the tennt or n or'er pro&!'!ng #or the non'm!ttnce o# the
tennt. I# the court 'eterm!ne" tht there !" legl 'e#en"e " to the llege' unl$#ul 'et!ner%
the court "hll re#u"e to grnt e!ther prt. n. rel!e#% n'% eCcept " other$!"e pro&!'e' !n th!"
' 29 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"u("ect!on% "hll reBu!re tht n. #urther procee'!ng" (e con'ucte' pur"unt to NRS 1,.0F, to
1,.10, % !nclu"!&e. The !""unce o# "ummr. or'er #or remo&l o# the tennt 'oe" not preclu'e
n ct!on (. the tennt #or n. 'mge" or other rel!e# to $h!ch the tennt m. (e ent!tle'....
7. &he tenant ma-" u<on <a-ment o. the a<<ro<riate .ee0 relating to the .iling and 0ervice o. a
motion" .ile a motion ?ith the court" on a .orm <rovided >- the clerE o. the court" to di0<ute the
amount o. the co0t0" i. an-" claimed >- the landlord <ur0uant to N!S 11$.2+7 or 11$,.4*+ .or the
inventor-" moving and 0torage o. <er0onal <ro<ert- le.t on the <remi0e0. &he motion mu0t >e .iled
?ithin 2+ da-0 a.ter the 0ummar- order .or removal o. the tenant or the a>andonment o. the <remi0e0
>- the tenant" or ?ithin 2+ da-0 a.ter:
Ba; &he tenant ha0 vacated or >een removed .rom the <remi0e09 and
B>; , co<- o. tho0e charge0 ha0 >een re@ue0ted >- or <rovided to the tenant"
Y ?hichever i0 later.
$. 5pon the #!l!ng o# mot!on pur"unt to "u("ect!on G% the court "hll "che'ule her!ng
on the mot!on. The her!ng mu"t (e hel' $!th!n +, '." #ter the #!l!ng o# the mot!on. The court
"hll ##!C the 'te o# the her!ng to the mot!on n' or'er cop. "er&e' upon the ln'lor' (.
the "her!##% con"t(le or other proce"" "er&er. At the her!ng% the court m.:
Ba; Determine the co0t0" i. an-" claimed >- the landlord <ur0uant to N!S 11$.2+7 or 11$,.4*+
and an- accumulating dail- co0t09 and
B>; 3rder the relea0e o. the tenantL0 <ro<ert- u<on the <a-ment o. the charge0 determined to >e
due or i. no charge0 are determined to >e due.J
6andlord =erli00 .iled onl- a No Cau0e Notice o. Eviction in !E#2+11'++17+$ on Commercial
&enant Zach Coughlin" E0@.C0 la? o..ice. ,0 0uch" a Summar- Eviction /roceeding i0 im<ermi00i>le
given the re@uirement o. N!S 4+.2%3 that the Notice alleged non'<a-ment o. rent to allo? the
landlord to <roceed under the Summar- Eviction /roceeding 0ection" N!S 4+.2%3. (urther" 4udge
S.erraDDa ?a0 <recluded .rom ruling on an-thing other than <o00e00ion o. the <remi0e0 <ur0uant to
N!S 4+.2%3B*;" ,nvui" and :laDier. (urther" the tenanc- did not terminate under the 6ea0e
,greement" it ?0 rene?ed.
N!S 4+.2%4 5nla?.ul detainer: Su<<lemental remed- o. 0ummar- eviction and e)clu0ion o.
tenant .rom certain t-<e0 o. <ro<ert-. E)ce<t a0 other?i0e <rovided >- 0<eci.ic 0tatute" in addition to
the remed- <rovided in N!S 4+.2%1 and in N!S 4+.29+ to 4+.42+" inclu0ive" ?hen the tenant o. a
d?elling unit ?hich i0 0u>Aect to the <rovi0ion0 o. cha<ter 11$, o. N!S" <art o. a lo?'rent hou0ing
<rogram o<erated >- a <u>lic hou0ing authorit-" a mo>ile home or a recreational vehicle i0 guilt- o.
an unla?.ul detainer" the landlord i0 entitled to the 0ummar- <rocedure0 <rovided in N!S 4+.2%3
e)ce<t that:
1. 8ritten notice to 0urrender the <remi0e0 mu0t:...4e5 A "ttement tht the cl!m #or rel!e# $"
uthor!Ae' (. l$.
,0 0uch" the too earl- locEout >ring0 into <la- the .ollo?ing:
IN!S 11$,.39+ 5nla?.ul removal or e)clu0ion o. tenant or ?ill.ul interru<tion o. e00ential
0ervice09 <rocedure .or e)<edited relie..
1. 1. the landlord unl$#ull. remo&e" the tennt #rom the prem!"e" or eCclu'e" the tennt (.
(loc2!ng or ttempt!ng to (loc2 the tennt/" entr. upon the prem!"e" or $!ll#ull. !nterrupt" or
' 3+ '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
cu"e" or perm!t" the !nterrupt!on o# n. e""ent!l "er&!ce reBu!re' (. the rentl greement or
th!" chpter% the tennt m. reco&er !mme'!te po""e""!on pur"unt to "u("ect!on 1% procee'
un'er NRS ++*A.?*, or term!nte the rentl greement n'% !n ''!t!on to n. other reme'.%
reco&er the tennt/" ctul 'mge"% rece!&e n mount not greter thn E+%,,, to (e #!Ce' (.
the court% or (oth.
2. 1n determining the amount" i. an-" to >e a?arded under 0u>0ection 1" the court 0hall con0ider:
Ba; 8hether the landlord acted in good .aith9
B>; &he cour0e o. conduct >et?een the landlord and the tenant9 and
Bc; &he degree o. harm to the tenant cau0ed >- the landlordL0 conduct.
3. 1. the rental agreement i0 terminated <ur0uant to 0u>0ection 1" the landlord 0hall return all
<re<aid rent and 0ecurit- recovera>le under thi0 cha<ter.
4. E)ce<t a0 other?i0e <rovided in 0u>0ection %" the tenant ma- recover immediate <o00e00ion o.
the <remi0e0 .rom the landlord >- .iling a veri.ied com<laint .or e)<edited relie. .or the unla?.ul
removal or e)clu0ion o. the tenant .rom the <remi0e0 or the ?ill.ul interru<tion o. e00ential 0ervice0.
%. , veri.ied com<laint .or e)<edited relie.:
Ba; =u0t >e .iled ?ith the court ?ithin % Audicial da-0 a.ter the date o. the unla?.ul act >- the
landlord" and the veri.ied com<laint mu0t >e di0mi00ed i. it i0 not timel- .iled. 1. the veri.ied
com<laint .or e)<edited relie. i0 di0mi00ed <ur0uant to thi0 <aragra<h" the tenant retain0 the right to
<ur0ue all other availa>le remedie0 again0t the landlord.
B>; =a- not >e .iled ?ith the court i. an action .or 0ummar- eviction or unla?.ul detainer i0
alread- <ending >et?een the landlord and tenant" >ut the tenant ma- 0eeE 0imilar relie. >e.ore the
Audge <re0iding over the <ending action.
*. &he court 0hall conduct a hearing on the veri.ied com<laint .or e)<edited relie. ?ithin 3
Audicial da-0 a.ter the .iling o. the veri.ied com<laint .or e)<edited relie.. Be.ore or at the 0cheduled
hearing" the tenant mu0t <rovide <roo. that the landlord ha0 >een <ro<erl- 0erved ?ith a co<- o. the
veri.ied com<laint .or e)<edited relie.. 5<on the hearing" i. it i0 determined that the landlord ha0
violated an- o. the <rovi0ion0 o. 0u>0ection 1" the court ma-:
Ba; 3rder the landlord to re0tore to the tenant the <remi0e0 or e00ential 0ervice0" or >oth9
B>; ,?ard damage0 <ur0uant to 0u>0ection 19 and
Bc; EnAoin the landlord .rom violating the <rovi0ion0 o. 0u>0ection 1 and" i. the circum0tance0 0o
?arrant" hold the landlord in contem<t o. court.
7. &he <a-ment o. all co0t0 and o..icial .ee0 mu0t >e de.erred .or an- tenant ?ho .ile0 a veri.ied
com<laint .or e)<edited relie.. ,.ter an- hearing and not later than .inal di0<o0ition o. the .iling or
order" the court 0hall a00e00 the co0t0 and .ee0 again0t the <art- that doe0 not <revail" e)ce<t that the
court ma- reduce them or ?aive them" a0 Au0tice ma- re@uire.J
IN!S 11$,.+9+ IE)cludeJ de.ined. IE)cludeJ mean0 to evict or to <rohi>it entr- >- locEing door0 or >- other?i0e
>locEing or attem<ting to >locE entr-" or to maEe a d?elling unit uninha>ita>le >- interru<ting or cau0ing the interru<tion
o. electric" ga0" ?ater or other e00ential 0ervice0.J
' 31 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,66 /,/E!S ,ND /6E,D1N:S ,ND C3!!ES/3NDENCS /!E#135S67 S5B=1&&ED &3 &2E !EN3
45S&1CE C35!& ,ND 3! 1&S E=/637EES 1S 2E!EB7 1NC3!/3!,&ED B7 !E(E!ENCE 1N&3 &21S
(161N:.
N!S 11$,.19+: I Notice: De.inition9 0ervice.
1. , <er0on ha0 notice o. a .act i.:
Ba; &he <er0on ha0 actual Eno?ledge o. it9
B>; &he <er0on ha0 received a notice or noti.ication o. it9 or
Bc; (rom all the .act0 and circum0tance0 the <er0on rea0ona>l- 0hould Eno? that it e)i0t0.
0. 8r!tten not!ce" to the tennt pre"cr!(e' (. th!" chpter "hll (e "er&e' !n the mnner pro&!'e' (. NRS
1,.0*,.
3. 8ritten notice0 to the landlord <re0cri>ed >- thi0 cha<ter ma- >e delivered or mailed to the <lace o. >u0ine00 o. the
landlord de0ignated in the rental agreement or to an- <lace held out >- the landlord a0 the <lace .or the recei<t o. rental
<a-ment0 .rom the tenant and are e..ective .rom the date o. deliver- or mailing.J
INRS 1,.0*, Service o. notice0 to @uit9 <roo. re@uired >e.ore i00uance o. order to remove.
1. E)ce<t a0 other?i0e <rovided in N!S 4+.2%3" the notice0 re@uired >- N!S 4+.2%1 to 4+.2*+" inclu0ive" ma- >e
0erved:
Ba; B- delivering a co<- to the tenant <er0onall-" in the <re0ence o. a ?itne009
B>; 1. the tenant i0 a>0ent .rom the tenantL0 <lace o. re0idence or .rom the tenantL0 u0ual <lace o. >u0ine00" >- leaving
a co<- ?ith a <er0on o. 0uita>le age and di0cretion at either <lace and mailing a co<- to the tenant at the tenantL0 <lace o.
re0idence or <lace o. >u0ine009 or
Bc; 1. the <lace o. re0idence or >u0ine00 cannot >e a0certained" or a <er0on o. 0uita>le age or di0cretion cannot >e
.ound there" >- <o0ting a co<- in a con0<icuou0 <lace on the lea0ed <ro<ert-" delivering a co<- to a <er0on there re0iding"
i. the <er0on can >e .ound" and mailing a co<- to the tenant at the <lace ?here the lea0ed <ro<ert- i0 0ituated.J
1 did not receive an- o. the email0 allegedl- 0ent to m- .rom !ichard 2illC0 email addre00" rhillWrichardhilla?.com
>et?een ,ugu0t 1$th" 2+11 to Novem>er 17th" 2+11" and certainl- none .rom rhillWrichardhilla?.com during the <eriod
>et?een the illegal locEout at 4:3+ <m Novem>er 1" 2+11 and the tre0<a00 arre0t o. Novem>er 13th" 2+11 ?hich allegedl-
0<oEe to m- >eing <rovided acce00 to the <ro<ert- .or the <ur<o0e o. m- removing m- >elonging0" de0<ite m- numerou0
call0 and ?ritten re@ue0t0" ?hich outlined the e)igencie0 inherent to m- >eing <recluded acce00 to m- client .ile0 incident
to an unla?.ul and im<ro<erl- notice and too earl- occurring locEout >- the 8CS3. 1 and m- >u0ine00 have >een
damaged greatl- >- the0e act0. (urther" 1 had re<eatedl- 0ent >oth BaEer and 2ill notice" in ?riting" that 1 did not con0ent
to 0ervice or notice o. an-thing via electronic mean0. (urther N!S 11$,.19+ doe0 not 0<eaE to Inotice o.J a legal
.inding" >ut rather to Inotice o. a .actJ. ,0 0uch" 1 ?a0 not a<<ro<riatel- 0erved notice o. the 3rder o. Summar- Eviction"
and an illegal locEout occurred" a0 0uch no criminal tre0<a00 charge can 0tand.
IN!S 11$,.2*+ Di0clo0ure o. name0 and addre00e0 o. manager0 and o?ner09 emergenc- tele<hone num>er9 0ervice o.
<roce00.
1. &he landlord" or an- <er0on authoriDed to enter into a rental agreement on hi0 or her >ehal." 0hall di0clo0e to the
tenant in ?riting at or >e.ore the commencement o. the tenanc-:
Ba; &he name and addre00 o.:
B1; &he <er0on0 authoriDed to manage the <remi0e09
B2; , <er0on ?ithin thi0 State authoriDed to act .or and on >ehal. o. the landlord .or the <ur<o0e o. 0ervice o.
<roce00 and receiving notice0 and demand09 and
B3; &he <rinci<al or cor<orate o?ner.
B>; , tele<hone num>er at ?hich a re0<on0i>le <er0on ?ho re0ide0 in the count- or ?ithin *+ mile0 o. ?here the
<remi0e0 are located ma- >e called in ca0e o. emergenc-.
' 32 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. &he in.ormation re@uired to >e .urni0hed >- thi0 0ection mu0t >e Ee<t current" and thi0 0ection i0 en.orcea>le
again0t an- 0ucce00or landlord or manager o. the <remi0e0.
3. , <art- ?ho enter0 into a rental agreement on >ehal. o. the landlord and .ail0 to com<l- ?ith thi0 0ection i0 an
agent o. the landlord .or <ur<o0e0 o.:
Ba; Service o. <roce00 and receiving notice0 and demand09 and
B>; /er.orming the o>ligation0 o. the landlord under la? and under the rental agreement.
4. 1n an- action again0t a landlord ?hich involve0 hi0 or her rental <ro<ert-" 0ervice o. <roce00 u<on the manager o.
the <ro<ert- or a <er0on de0cri>ed in <aragra<h Ba; o. 0u>0ection 1 0hall >e deemed to >e 0ervice u<on the landlord. &he
o>ligation0 o. the landlord devolve u<on the <er0on0 authoriDed to enter into a rental agreement on hi0 or her >ehal..
%. &hi0 0ection doe0 not limit or remove the lia>ilit- o. an undi0clo0ed landlord.J
N!S 4+.31+ 100ue o. .act to >e tried >- Aur- i. <ro<er demand made. 8henever an i00ue o. .act i0 <re0ented >- the
<leading0" it 0hall >e tried >- a Aur-" i. <ro<er demand i0 made <ur0uant to the Nevada !ule0 o. Civil /rocedure or the
4u0tice Court !ule0 o. Civil /rocedure
,ctuall-" a lot o. <eo<le 0eemed con.u0ed regarding the I24 hour0J locEout thing. &he onl- a<<earance in either N!S
11$, or N!S 4+" in the <rovi0ion0 a<<lica>le to Summar- Eviction /roceeding0 o. an-thing related to I24 hour0J i0 in
N!S 4+.2%3B%;" ?hich onl- 0<eaE0 to a 0ituation ?here the &enant doe0 not .ile a &enantC0 ,n0?er or &enantC0 ,..idavit"
?hich i0 clearl- ina<<lica>le here" a0 the &enant did .ile 0uch a 3<<o0ition to the No Cau0e Eviction Notice: I%. 5<on
noncom<liance ?ith the notice:
Ba; &he landlord or the landlordL0 agent ma- a<<l- >- a..idavit o. com<laint .or eviction to the Au0tice court o. the
to?n0hi< in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial <remi0e0 are located or to the di0trict court o. the
count- in ?hich the d?elling" a<artment" mo>ile home or commercial <remi0e0 are located" ?hichever ha0 Auri0diction
over the matter. The court m. thereupon !""ue n or'er '!rect!ng the "her!## or con"t(le o# the count. to remo&e
the tennt $!th!n 01 hour" #ter rece!pt o# the or'er. &he a..idavit mu0t 0tate or contain...J
So% ("ent "ome "ttutor. pro&!"!on llo$!ng the Or'er o# Summr. E&!ct!on to re"ult !n
loc2out (. the 8"hoe Count. Sher!##7" O##!ce pr!or to the ? '." #or m!l!ng $here per"onl
"er&!ce o# the Or'er o# Summr. E&!ct!on $" not e##ectute'% 'e"p!te $ht 8CSO emplo.ee
m. h&e !ncorrectl. 4or #l"el.5 ""erte' !n the 8CSO7" @ohn Mchem7" A##!'&!t o# Ser&!ce
#rom% #!le "tmpe' No&em(er G% 0,++. Attche' " ECh!(!t +. E)hi>it 1: $" not e##ectute'%
'e"p!te $ht 8CSO emplo.ee m. h&e !ncorrectl. 4or #l"el.5 ""erte' !n the 8CSO7" @ohn
Mchem7" A##!'&!t o# Ser&!ce #rom% #!le "tmpe' No&em(er G% 0,++ long $!th $r!tten
'm!""!on #rom 8CSO C!&!l Ser&!ce D!&!"!on Super&!"or L!A Stuchell tht Mchem onl. po"te'
the Or'er o# Summr. E&!ct!on on the 'oor o# the #ormer home l$ o##!ce% rther thn
<per"onll. "er&e'< !t n' R!chr' )!ll E"B7" o$n Proo# o# Ser&!ce o# Not!ce o# Entr. o# the
Or'er #or Summr. E&!ct!on "ho$!ng m!le' on 'te o# No&em(er +% 0,++ 4n' the R@C
ne&er m!le' cop. o# tht OR'er ccor'!ng the to Recor' on Appel !n CH++-,?60*5- three
4?5 pge".
AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO NRS 0?F;.,?,
&he under0igned doe0 here>- a..irm that the <receding document doe0 not contain the 0ocial
0ecurit- num>er o. an- <er0on.
Dated at !eno" Nevada" thi0 3rd da- o. =arch" 2+12"
' 33 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6,8 3((1CES 3( Zachar- BarEer Coughlin
Co'coun0el .or the De.endant
B-:OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Zach Coughlin" E0@.
Nevada Bar No: 9473
' 34 '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERHICE
/ur0uant to N!C/ %B>;" 1 certi.- that 1 0erved a co<- o. the .oregoing document u<on the
.ollo?ing <art- >- .a)ing" emailing" dro<<ing o.. at their o..ice" and <lacing a true and correct co<-
o. the .oregoing document in the u0 mail addre00ed to:
4ill DraEe" E0@.
!eno Cit- ,ttorne-C0 3..ice ' Criminal Divi0on
/.3. Bo) 19++
!eno " N# $9%+%
/hone Num>er: 77%'334'2+%+ (a) num>er: 77%'334'242+
DraEe4Wreno.gov
,ttorne- .or Cit- o. !eno
Xeith 6lo-d 6oomi0" E0@.
94*$ Dou>le ! Blvd. Suite ,
!eno" N# $9%21
/hone Num>er: 77%'$%3'7222 (a) num>er: 77%'$%3'+$*+
Eeithloomi0WearthlinE.net
!=C (iling 3..ice (a) =achine: (a): B77%; 334'3$24
Date thi0 =arch 3" 2+12:
NSN Zach Coughlin
Zach Coughlin" De.endant
Co'Coun0el .or De.endant
' 3% '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
INDE: TO E:)I;ITS
1. E)hi>it 1: $" not e##ectute'% 'e"p!te $ht 8CSO emplo.ee m. h&e !ncorrectl. 4or
#l"el.5 ""erte' !n the 8CSO7" @ohn Mchem7" A##!'&!t o# Ser&!ce #rom% #!le "tmpe'
No&em(er G% 0,++ long $!th $r!tten 'm!""!on #rom 8CSO C!&!l Ser&!ce D!&!"!on Super&!"or
L!A Stuchell tht Mchem onl. po"te' the Or'er o# Summr. E&!ct!on on the 'oor o# the
#ormer home l$ o##!ce% rther thn <per"onll. "er&e'< !t n' R!chr' )!ll E"B7" o$n Proo# o#
Ser&!ce o# Not!ce o# Entr. o# the Or'er #or Summr. E&!ct!on "ho$!ng m!le' on 'te o#
No&em(er +% 0,++ 4n' the R@C ne&er m!le' cop. o# tht OR'er ccor'!ng the to Recor' on
Appel !n CH++-,?60*5- three 4?5 pge".
' 3* '
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1

LAW OFFicE
RtCHARD G, HILL
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2 Pursuantto NRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of RICHARD G.
f-lWunW
3 HILL, CHARTERED, and that on the day of 9eteBQt., 2011, I deposited in the
4 appropriate place for pick-up and hand-delivery by Reno-Carson Messenger Service, a true
5 and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Entry of Order and a true and correct copy
6 of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Summary Eviction,
7 file-stamped October 27, 2011, addressed to:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Zach Coughlin, Esq.
121 River Rock Street
Reno, Nevada 89501
J
PoS! Office 80)1 2551 28
Rsno, NevGc;fa 89505
(775) 348-0888
Fax(775) 348-0858
..
FiLED
" NOV -7 AM 10: 52
IN THE RENO JUSTICE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE .
RENO JUlll';
Matt Merliss
PLAINTIFF
Vs
Zachary Barker Coughlin
DEFENDANT
STATE OF NEVADA
COUNTY OF WASHOE
55:
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
BY --'---
Civil File Number: 110 1)4;;-iSEPlITY
CASE No. REV2011001708
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
John Machen, being first duly sworn. deposes and says: That affiant is a citizen of the United States, over
18 years of age, not a party to the within entered action, and that in the County of Washoe, State of Nevada, personally
served the described documents upon:
Posted: Zachary Barker Coughlin
Location: 121 River Rock Street Reno, NV 89501
Date: 111112011 Time: 4:30PM
The document(s) served were: EVICTION ORDER, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
ORDER FOR SUMMARY EVICTION; ORDER REQUIRING INSPECTION OF REAL PROPERTY
Richard G Hill Esq
PO Box 2551
652 Forest Street
Reno, NV 89505
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to me before me this
7.A,J
, ,) day __ 20 lL,
o II (l ,,--v,- (
NOTARY PUBLIC in and forsaid State of Nevada,
County of Washoe
ROXANNA L:Sj'LV;' l
{ Notary Public State 0' Nevada
: \' Appclntmenf Rl;!oorded In WaShoe County j
, Ne:Ql'III1IIilIjII'HU'-IlorlI014'

MICHAEL HALEY, SHERIFF
By: J2----
Sheriff uthori Agent
911 PARR BOULEVARD RENO. NV 89512-1000 (775) 328-3310
EXHIBIT 4
5
10
15
20
25
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
11
12
l3
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
26
27
2
.1 ..... )
..41 ','4.' r
,
....,
'W
_
"l,lU )i
CaseNo. II TR 26800 21
Dept. No.3
FILED
RENO MUNICIPALCOURT
DEPT. NO.3
FEB 28 2012
TIME +

DOROTHYNASH HOLMES, JUDGE
INTHE MUNICIPALCOURTOFTHECITYOFRENO
COUNTYOF WASHOESTATEOFNEVADA
CITY OFRENO,
Plaintiff,
ORDERFINDINGTHEDEFENDANT
INCONTEMPTOFCOURTAND
IMPOSINGSANCTIONS
vs.
ZACHARY BARKERCOUGHLIN,
Defendant.
_________________________1
A trial washeldin Reno MunicipalCourton February27,2012onatraffic citation
issued to the defendant, ZACHARYBARKERCOUGHLIN. Hewas initiallycharged with
threeoffensesallegedto haveoccurredonNovember 15,2011 in the CityofReno.Atthe
onsetofthe trial it wasdeterminedthat Failure to ProvideEvidenceofSecurityorInsurance
(a violation ofRMC 6.06. 555(a)and Failureto ProvideVehicleRegistration(aviolati on of
RMC 6.06.560(a)were bothdismissedatarraignmentafter the defendantestablished that he
had complied with bothcodesectionsbutsimplyhad notcarriedthedocumentationwith him
in the vehicleonthatday.I The remainingcharge,a Right ofWayStopSi gn violationatan
intersection, known asa" BoulevardStop"(roll ing through a StopSign and not stopping
completely), a violationofRMC 6.06.170(a), was the subjectofthe tri al.
The City ofRenowas represented by DeputyCityAttorney lisonOrmaas. The
1 During!ri :ll , rhe"me.:r testiried that !1 e coul d hs\ ,cited ' he -l :enJant with f1liur e :0'_arT)' hiS Dm.:r , I "CI1,e
inhis Inn f) t ga\ehim a hrc by notutl n him fo r',rJt,\S.. , ell.
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
....,
'\.I. I T
..,
_... ".,,,",
1
defendant, alicensedattorney, representedhimself. Reno Police SergeantJohnTarterwas the
solewitness. Thecourthad the defendantswornat the beginningofthe tri al, stating that the
courthas found thatmostself-representeddefendantstend to testifyagreatdeal as they cross-
examineopposingwitnesses, so the defendantwould be underoath from the start, too.
exhibitswere markedoradmitted.
Thematterwas calledat approximately3:00 p.m. and concludedwithoutaverdictabout
4:30p.m.afterthecourtheld the defendantin criminal contemptofcourtfor his behaviorand
activitiescommittedin the directpresenceofthis courtduringthe trial.
Thecourtfinds thatdefendant'scontemptuousconductconsistedofhis rude, sarcastic,
inappropriate, insubordinate,disrespectful, antagonistic, deceitful, disruptive, argumentative
andchildishbehaviorduringtrial, all ofwhich appeared to be done to vex and annoy the
court, the witness, andthe opposingparty, and to disruptthe trial process. The courtfinds
that the following occurred,and constitutecontempt: 1) defendant ' smime-like, clownish
anticsofmaking faces atthe court; saggingdown into his seatand hanging his head; looking
behind himselfand insidehis coatas ifsearchingfor abetterwayto askaquestion; rolling
his eyes; and mimickingotherswords; 2) defendant's incessantarguing with the court,
talking overthe court, and interruptingthe court; 3) defendant's repeatedlyrestating matters
after being told by thecourtto "move on"or"ask the next question; "4) defendant 's
repeatedl yinjecting allegationsofbri bery, perjury, and policeretaliationinto the matterafter
the court instructed hi m not to, and directed him tolimit himselfto i sues pertaining to the
fact softhe "Boul evard Stop;" 5) defendant's repeatedly trying to insert "Richard Hil l"into
his questionsand statementswhensuchperson was notrelevantto the proceedings and the
defendant had beenordered to stopdiscussing that; 6) defendant'sdisregarding the rules of
and court proc'Jure by continually posing improperquestions after being direct'd
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
'J""
.: "'l\..ro\1 ~ 4-,.t
....,
"'

_ ",Vri"'"
. 11,, 1: '"
by the courtto properlyphrasehis questions; 7) defendant'scontinuallyaccusingthe court
ofdenyinghimthe rightorabilityto askquestionsand tellingthecourtto "give me a listof
.questionsyou wantme to ask;" 8) defendant's suggestingthatthecourt"tell me what
would makeyouhappy; " 9) defendant's lying to the courtin response to directquestions
posedby thecourtwithregard to his recordingthe proceedings; and 10) defendant 'sfailing
andrefusingto propeI:,ly examinethewitness, despite numerousadmonitionsby thecourtto
stoprepeatingquestions, misstatinganswers, injectingirrelevantmaterial,arguingwith the
witnessandmischaracterizingthe testimony.
Thecourt finds thatthe defendant'sactions were intentional and donein utterdisregard
andcontemptfor thecourt,andin the presenceofthe court, forpurposesofdisruptingand
delayingthe proceedingsand dishonoring the rule oflawand this court, and constitute the
misdemeanorofcriminalcontempt, aviolationof RS 22.0IO.Goodcauseappearing
therefore, the following sanctionsare imposed:
IT IS ORDERED, pursuantto NRS 22.100, that the defendantbe incarceratedat the
WashoeCountyRegional Detention Facility for the termoffive (5) days, from the time he
wastakeninto custodyonthis court'sorderon February27,2012,andthatsentenceshall not
be reduced for anyreason.In thealternative, the defendant maypaya fine of$500to the
Reno Municipal Court.
Dated this28th day ofFebruary,2012.
~ ~ ~ 0
Reno Municipal Judge
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Reno MUnicIpal Coun
Doro Nash Helmet,
J',dge
o () ;>ox '100
'ef'O V
,775)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to NRCP 5(b) , I certify that I am an employee of the Reno Municipal
Court, Reno,Nevada, that Iam overthe age of18years and notapartyto the above
action,and thaton thisdate, served atrue and correctcopy ofthe attached document
to the following as setforth below:
AllisonOrmaas
DeputyCityAttorney
PO Box1900
Reno NV89505
ZacharyBarkerCoughlin,Esq.
121 RiverRock
Reno NV89509
said documentin asealed envelopeand placedforcollecting and
mailing by UnitesStatesmail in Reno,Nevada, postageprepaid following ordinary
businesspractices.
WashoeCountyJail
CourtServices
Facsimile (FFAX)
ElectronicMail(E-mail)
Inner-officemailfollowing ordinarybusinesspractices
Personal Delivery.
DATED: February28,2012.
rtmentThree
EXHIBIT 5
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
[5
16
17
18
19
20
2[
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
_ t
Case No. 11 TR 26800 21
Dept. No.3
IN THE MUNICIPALCOURTOFTHECITYOF RENO
COUNTYOF WASHOE STATEOFNEVADA
CITY OF RE 0,
Plaintiff, ORDER
vs.
ZACHARY BARKERCOUGHLIN,
Defendant.
________________________1
March 12,2012 was the time set for the resumptionofthe traffic citation trial of
DefendantZACHARYBARKERCOUGHLIN who, as memberNo.9473 ofthe evada Bar,
is anattorney representing himself, the defendant. The trial was continuedon Febmary27,
2012, when, aft erapproximatelyan hourandahalf, the defendantwas held in criminal
contempt by thecourt for his antics and misconductduring that trial. His behavioris noted in
detail in the court' s Orderentered on February 27, 2010.
Today, Mr.Coughlin fa iled to appear tocomplet e th is tria l. He has notcontacted this
court to explain orc.cllse his abse nce.DeputyCity Attorney .'\ IisonOrmaas <Ippcared ,!nO
\Vas prcpared to proceed. She intormed the COll rt thatshe had no contac twith Mr. Cllughlin
ot herthan receiving voluminous fa xed docliments (rom him at the Reno City,\ ttomey' s
Onicc. rhe defendant's failure to appearwa no cd on (he record.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I I
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2J

...
1-
)
_6
'7


:-\ Rer he served his live-day Contempt of Court sanction imposed by this cOLIn on
F\!bruary 27, 2012, Mr. Coughlin fax-filed to this court
l
a 224-page document entitled "Notice
of /\ppeal of Summary Contempt Order; Motion to Return Personal Property Confiscated by
Reno Municipal Court and Its Marshals; Motion for ew Trial and to Alter or Amend
Summary Contempt Order." The document purported to appeal this court's Order holding
him in direct criminal contempt. It contained a portion of one sentence on page 4 seeking a
continuance of today's hearing. but no further discussion of that topic . It also mentioned
being a "tolling" motion in an apparent afterthought. It did not address most of the other
topics listed in the caption, Instead, the document contained rambling references to his
personal life and this court's; his father's football career in college; dozens of pages of string
citations taken off the internet; documents from a prisoner online site; an article about a
"police state;" an anicle about Discovery; a website printout showing a police officer's salary;
and copy of court documents from a District of Columbia case.
It was a disjointed regurgitation of case law citations from a legal research on line si te
with little reference to, or argument about, the facts of his instant " l3oule vard Stop" traffic
case. The document was an incoherent and pathetic demonstration of what might once have
been legal and academic prowess that appears to now be greatly damaged. Mr. Coughlin 1'ax-
filed another document in which he apparently took a Motion to Proceed Informa Pauperis
(sic] in another case and typed over it "Request fo r Audio Recording of Feb n.l .lI)' 27
lh
, 20 12
rl-ial ,\IlJ I'or ,\prt ['jic] and to Waive Fi ling Fee .:md fr ;:mscrirt Fee i'l)r ,\ pre;11 Cnlll1-;cl. " l k
I ad tl at likJ in the instant case on \-1arch 7,2012, cvcn though it was dared 22 ,
II .
\V lCf("lS \1r. (\)llghlin's drort s [0 conJuct his u \l,.n dtkn"c in hi" trar'lic l ' l ;!ll\ l ll I r i
1
' l ll
II
5
10
15
20
25
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23

26
27

February 27, 20 12 disrupted Department 3 of this court and caused distress to this court and
its statT and marshals, as well as the prosecutor and the witness, and resulted in Mr. Coughlin
being held in contempt of court, his faxing and tiling of these documents greatly Jisrupted the
operation of the entire Reno Municipal Court system, including the clerk's office and the
other departments, and necessitated that action be taken by the Court Administrator and
Administrative Judge.
Apparently beginning on March 9, 2012 at 12 :3 8 p.m., Mr. Coughlin again undertook
another massive fax-filing to Reno Municipal Court. This time it was a document that was
file-stamped by the clerk on March 12, 2012 at 8: 12 a.m. This second 218-page GOCW11ent
purported to be yet another motion in this case entitled "Motion to Return Cell Phones;
Motion to Set Aside Summary Contempt Order; and Notice of Appeal of Summary Contempt
Order. " With scant discussion of, or relevance to, the above-captioned matter, saiJ document
mostly argues against Judge Howard in a Department 4 case and again contains more than
200 pages of string legal citations; lyrics to rocks songs; Mr. Coughlin's personal family
history; discussion of an eviction case and another contempt case; disjointed legal citations,
and other nonsensical matters that have no apparent relevance to his traffic citation case.
80th documents were massive and took up a great deal of time because the court had to
review them to look for some connection to the case. This court has the inherent authority to
maintain respect, order and decorum in the court, and to refuse to al low the court to be useJ
as a \chick I"or the deranged rantings ofa litigant.
rhe conduct of Coughl in has been inappropr iate, bizarre, di shonest, irra ti onal . lllL!
dis rupti vt.:, to say the least. IIe has not pract iced 13\V in th is case in J manner thil t
rc<; hi, prorcs ionali<;l11, prcrant iol1, cOI1-.;idcra li on li lr the court. Ihe
il
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
~
.,
:/
:lppearorexplain his absence to the court. fnasmuch us the cotll1 has at least four different
aJdrcsses for him, it is unable to ascertain his exact whereabouts.He showssignsofmental
instability, ifnotserious mental illness.
Based upon the total circumstancesofthis case, the in-court performanceofthe
defendant, as observedby this court, the written documents faxed to the court for tiling by
this defendant, the statementsand behaviorofthis defendantand his overall conduct herein,
this court finds, by clearand convincingevidence, that Zachary BarkerCoughlin,an att orney
licensedto practice law in the StateofNevada, has committed numerousacts ofattorney
misconduct, including, but not limited to, violating the following Rules ofProfessional
Conduct:
8.4(c)--eng3gingin dishonesty, fraud, deceit ormisrepresentation;
8.4 (d)--engaging in conductthat is prejudicial to the administrationofju tice;
3.3(a)-lack ofcandorto the court by knowingly making false statements to atribunal;
3. 1--defending in a proceeding by assertingorcontrovertingan issue wi thout abasis in
fact and with matters that are known to be frivolous;
3.2-failure to make reasonableefforts to expedite litigation, and, in fact, taking
extreme me3sures to delay litigation;
3A(e)-beingunfair to opposingcounsel by continuallyalluding to matters the Imvye r
docs notrca onably believeare relevant orsuppor1ed by admissible evidence;
1.3-fui lingto actwith reasonablediligence and promptness; and
I.I - lac kofcompetence inhi s practice,llld 'lppeurances before this court.
III ;lJ ilion,L.lci ary BdfkefCuughli n, likely.llSll vi obkd, c.:vaoa SupremeCourt I{uk
229,."l'c ri on2(b), :I S amended by ADKT 4.+9 on/\ ugu 1 I, _0 11, by 'iurn:ptitiuusiy n.: cortiin}
the! lrar"ticci talio ntriJI off l'brualY 27, 2012 "..ithout the aov,1nc rcnni ssion I) f;i1 is court ,11 0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2-t
25
26
27

.. ... . I t
Whetherornot there are medical reasons to explain Mr. Coughlin'sacti ons is not tor
this court to decide. He has become nothing less than avexatious litigant to Reno Municipal
Court due to his unorthodox. disruptive, bizarre and irrational methods and practices that go
beyond the pale ofanything that is civil. ethical, professional orcompetent. Good cause
appearing therefore, the courtordersas follows:
IT IS ORDERED that this matteris continued,and all proceedingsrelating thereto are
tolled. until further orderofthis court, while the matterofartomeyZachary BarkerCoughlin
is referred to the State BarofNevada;
IT IS ORDERED that no further action shall be taken by the Reno City Attorney's
Office, or the clerksorstaffofReno Municipal Court, in the above-entitledcase, pending
further orderofthis court;
IT IS ORDERED that Zachary BarkerCoughlin is barred and forbidden from faxing,
emaili ng, delivering, havingdelivered. serving. presenting for tiling, personallyorotherwi se.
any motion ordocument to Reno Municipal Court, in the above-entitledcase. pending further
orderofthis court.
Dated this 12th day ofMarch. 2012.

The Han.DoJ00yNash Holmes
Reno MuniCi pal Judge
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
. '''01.4 ' .- ; !l l C'Jl.. rt
' - I / ~ ' h J- T ... ,
I )
. , '" '.... ,
, I ... '. 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to NRCP 5(b) , I certify that I am an employee of the Reno Municipal
Court, Reno, Nevada, that Iam overthe age of18 years and notaparty to the above
action, and that on this date, served.true and correctcopyofthe attached document
to thefoll owing as setforth below:
AllisonOrmaas
DeputyCityAttorney
PO Box1900
RenoNV89505
ZacharyBarkerCough"",Esq.
1422 E. gth Street*2
Reno NV89512
X Placing said documentin asealed envelopeand placed forcollect ingand
mailing byUnites Statesmail inReno, Nevada,postage prepaid following ordinary
businesspractices.
WashoeCountyJail
CourtServices
Facsimile (FFAX)
Electronic Mail (E-mail)
Inner-officemailfollowing ordinarybusinesspractices
Personal Del ivery.
DATED: March 12,2012 .
artment Three
EXHIBIT 6
------
. .... .
.;" .

'j.:

.5
6:
' j
.stoD ....
'. Count1o!W8sboe;: ss:.:. ...
. ... ;.. . .......... ., .................... ...
: .r;..' . (1uU. l-lame);.do. wuh:i pcnAlty. 'ofpetjUzj' .
. .'." '. "', .-..... ..:.. .. ..." .
. ortbjl amciavit. Of'fIl'jMOtiontoproceeid :
," . ' ", .. ,' ,' ....,- ... ' .......", ...,' .. " .:", ....- ...;.' ..'. ..- ... . . .... , ' ..
.
2011 DEC II. AM8:55

.,: . .t
9 21am bocauu otmy ftDanclai 'povoity...tcfpay. thecosti'Ind. feel:0W. .
., '.' . " ..' . . ..
Itt ." cue.and'!amunabletoaiv. ibdh'coati awlfee. mthlj.matter.:
rr ' .' l. I ' pi;".th..: 0';;'othet.:.'
" . '.," .'
the ..
I:}' .' .' I tiis--.. .
. . "''''....060,7 uppo . .J . ."
I.
IS
16 .
",'
17 .
18'
19'
20 .
11
.CttiidSupport'
.S. .
i2
Al imony" $
n
-
.. $
24-
AllotherhoUlteboldIncomeIroui'
25
.Anotbmcmbciocthe'&oUSC:hold; S
- . " . ....
26
21
23
2
0 : ..
' , :
(f .
.
g .
().
-:-i
. , ' J I :".,,\ I. :' ,: :!
2011 DEC 14 Mi 8: 55'
1
2
1
Dj;"followina mmsenb .Uri-orm! Ud WI thefryaluu;:;
Automobile ,'-

s-II" ()i?O
_t-tt Loan aaIailcc (jrmi)')
$' &--1,,...q?
4
l
- . -
(I'ririi" r:Yii: ....... ,)'W OtJit;llriiJ-
6
7
S:-
17
-18
t9

20
Child SUJ:iport and Child Cart txPtJlsa paid-to sOmeOM elsC $- 17 _
21
Othci \?""q-L"c:'-' -lrurl of>

22 UJl <lIhr apa-. hal} . K v-- - .....0J
2)
24
2'
26
27
2&
- TOTAL MONn-1LY EXPENSES .
DATED thia L L-d..y or fLvT""\
EXHIBIT 7
Affidavit
liON. JAY D. DILWORTH
c. \ SANDRA J .\ C KSO/'l
Department I
Coun Admi nistrator
110 . WILLlAM L. G,\RDNER
Jl 'STI'" ROPER
D.:pllrtment 2
Chi ef Marshal - Department
of t\ lt .:mative Sentencing
liON. DOROTHY NASH 1I0Ut ES
Depart me nt J
liON. KE:-.l NETII R. HOWARD
Department 4
To: Nevada State Bar
Re: Zach Coughlin
I, Scott Coppa ,Marshal of Reno Municipal Court, a court oflaw organized,
incorporated or existing under the laws of the City of Reno,
and with its principal business located at: 1 South Sierra Street, Reno. NY 89501.
Being duly sworn, do depose and say:
On March 22, 2012, approximately 1055 hrs, I (Marshal Scott Coppa) was notified
by central control to respond to Donna Ballard desk in reference to a Defendant
Zachary Coughlin.
Both Marshal Thompson and I met with Miss Ballard at her desk. She informed us
Coughlin has been at Daniel Casillas window #8 for approximately 15 minutes and
was becoming argumentative with court staff. Miss Ballard further stated the Staff
has answered all his questions as he was now becomi ng repetit ive with his
questions . At one point Coughlin demanded to have Casillas read the docket to hi m
word for word and that he was going to "depose" Miss Ballard.
Marshal Thompson and I approached Coughli n in the publi c hallway. As I
approached Coughlin I noticed that he was wearing red smi ley fa ce fl annel paj ama
bottoms and a white tee shi rt. Underneath the tee shi rt Coughli n al so had on a
dress tie and a dress shirt. I informed Coughlin all hi s quest ions have been
answered by court staff and it was time for him t o leave. Coughlin asked me " did
they tell you to tell me to leave." Coughl in then turned t o Casillas and asked if he
could talk t o him. Both Marshal Thompson and I again asked Coughl i n to leave.
Coughlin asked for our names, gathered his it ems from the counter and left the
Court.
Bot h Marshal Thompson and I made a recording of thi s event.
PO. Bri t 1') 00, Reno." I 'outh ' iur "treet, Reno. ''' . <)SO I
rdephonc: 7-; 3.$-12,)0 . Fn 5imtle: 24
Signature Date
ss
J
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of-L..l-J
LLI
'--_ 'J012- ,
My commi ssion expires: ___
(Notary stamp, ifapplicable)
l.. ".."...... "' ....'''''' '' .. ...... .... ,
; '- Nolary Public - SialeofNevad !
. n , . ' J\jJpOllilmenl RecordlldinWashOe Coun
L...... ".... : .. ".. ".It II .... " :" ... t7; .... u ... ,, ' ,,11111 It: ,:-; .. ,'" oJ . J
r.o. 110'( 1900. Ihoo.:'\V 9505- 1')00 . 1 o uth Sit:rra S t ree t. Reno ..,." 8950 1
Tdephune: 7;5-334-2190 . F (' imile: r5-JJ4-J 824
" rtnOm un ;c lplt !c Qurl.co m
EXHIBIT 8
1
OS/23/2012 10 :22 CLERKS OFFICE 2JDC PAGE 01/01
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2 i
22
23
2 4
2S
FILED
Electronically
05-09-2012:05: 17: 16 PM
Joey Orduna Hastings
C DE 29 6 8 Clerk of the Court
Transaction # 2943750
IN THE S COND J"DIC_AL DISTRICT OF HE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOK THE COUNTY Or WASSOE
THE STATE Or EVA A,
Plaintiff , Cas e 0 _ CR12-0376
v. Dept. l o. :0
ZACHARY 3ARKER COUGHLIN,
Defendant.
/
ORDER OF COMPETENCY AND RETURNI NG MATTER TO JUSTICE COURT
The havi ng reviewed the repo rts of Dr_ Richard T.
Bisset and Dr. Mary R_ Viet h who examined the Def endant,
af:er counsel f or both sides to pr e s e nt
evidence on t he issue of the De fendants compet ence pursuant to
NRS 78 .42 :
hereby er.ters a :hat DEFENDANT IS
CM?ETSNT T PROC EED, and
IT IS : EREBY ORDE?ED t hat this matter oe returned to t:'1 e
Rer.o ,jus': i.ce Cou rt fo::: furt .er proceedings.
DA E thi s
q
day of
, 20:!.2 _ ..-

26