0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
23 visualizzazioni6 pagine
Defendant admits the allegations stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of plaintiff's complaint. Defendant denies the allegations in paragraphs 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the complaint. Plaintiff alleges that defendant and the plaintiff are "kumpadres" for they are both godfathers in the wedding of Naruto Chan and Sakura Chan.
Defendant admits the allegations stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of plaintiff's complaint. Defendant denies the allegations in paragraphs 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the complaint. Plaintiff alleges that defendant and the plaintiff are "kumpadres" for they are both godfathers in the wedding of Naruto Chan and Sakura Chan.
Defendant admits the allegations stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of plaintiff's complaint. Defendant denies the allegations in paragraphs 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the complaint. Plaintiff alleges that defendant and the plaintiff are "kumpadres" for they are both godfathers in the wedding of Naruto Chan and Sakura Chan.
PEDRO BUHAY, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 123456 For: DAMAGES - v e r s u s -
JUANCHO MAHUSAY, Defendant.
x ---------------------------- x
A N S W E R
Defendant, through the undersigned counsel, and in answer to plaintiffs complaint, respectfully avers:
1. That defendant admits the allegations stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the complaint referring to the identities and other personal circumstances of the parties;
2. That defendant admits part of the allegations in paragraph 5 of the complaint that he was driving his Blue Honda CRV with plate no. WXY-789 along Primera St., Anonas, Quezon City on June 10, 2010, and denying the time alleged therein, the truth of the matter is that the defendant was present in the premises at around 9:00 in the evening;
3. That defendant denies the truth of the allegations in paragraph 6 of the complaint, the truth of which is that the defendant was carefully driving the car within a speed ranging from 25 to 30 kph, which, under normal conditions, could be considered so safe and manageable as to enable to bring the car to a full stop when necessary;
4. That defendant denies the allegations in paragraph 7 of the complaint, the truth of the matter is that the defendant is neither drunk nor intoxicated beyond the legal limit as it was evidenced by the result of the Breathalyzer Test conducted by Mr. Luffy Kun right after the incident and hereto attached as Annex 1;
5. That defendant denies the allegations in paragraphs 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the complaint the truth is that the reports were baseless, malicious and perjurious and lacking factual basis for the plaintiff holds a grudge against the defendant;
6. That the defendant, by way of affirmative defense, alleges:
6.1. That the defendant and the plaintiff are kumpadres for they are both godfathers in the wedding of Naruto Chan and Sakura Chan that they both attended on June 8, 2009;
6.2. That plaintiff took advantage of this relationship when plaintiff went to defendants residence to borrow a sum of Five Hundred Thousand Pesos (P500,000.00) on January 5, 2010 which according to him, will be used to pay another person whom he was indebted to because the money that he was supposed to use for the payment of that debt has not yet arrived, thus, not yet received;
6.3. That defendants brother, Minato Mahusay, was present at the time when the plaintiff went to the defendants house;
6.4. That plaintiff offered his Red Mazda 3 with plate no. ABC-123 as collateral for such loan and agreed that he will pay the whole amount on June 10, 2010 with the condition that failure of the plaintiff to pay will result to the forfeiture of the collateral as evidenced by our written contract hereto attached as Annex 2, but such car was agreed by the defendant to stay in plaintiffs possession;
6.5. That on the maturity date of the loan, the plaintiff did not made any efforts to contact the defendant regarding the loan, thus the defendant sent a text message demanding the plaintiff for the payment of the loan, but to no avail;
6.6. That the defendant made an effort to go to the plaintiffs residence to personally demand for the payment;
6.7. That upon arrival at the plaintiffs residence to collect for the payment, the plaintiff, irritated and irate, raised his voice and said that Pag hindi ka pa tumigil sa kakakulit mo, makikita mong hinahanap mo. Marami akong kakilalang pulis at malakas ako dun!;
6.8. That after a heated-up conversation, the plaintiff went outside their garage, boarded his car, started its engine and suddenly crashed into their gate which affected the defendants car which was parked outside their gate;
6.9. That the plaintiff made it appear that what transpired was defendants fault by fabricating a narrative to cover-up the issue of payment of his loan from the defendant;
7. As counterclaim against the plaintiff, the defendant alleges:
7.1. That plaintiff loaned a sum of Five Hundred Thousand Pesos (P500,000.00) which was already matured on June 10, 2010;
7.2. That the total amount of damage to the defendants car amounted to One Hundred Thousand Pesos (P100,000.00) as evidenced by the Insurers Report hereto attached as Annex 3;
7.3. That defendant was humiliated because of the actuations of the plaintiff on the formers person causing mental anguish, serious anxiety and moral shock;
7.4. That in order to vindicate his rights, the defendant was compelled to litigate, and for the purpose, engaged the services of the undersigned lawyer for a fee of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00);
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that judgment be rendered in favor of the defendant with respect to the:
(1) Amount of the loan in a sum of Five Hundred Thousand Pesos (P500,000.00);
(2) Amount of actual damages of One Hundred Thousand Pesos (P100,000.00);
(3) Amount of moral damages of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00);
(4) Attorneys fees of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00)
Or total claim and damages in the sum of SEVEN HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (P700,000.00) with legal interest from the date of filing this suit, plus costs of suit, and such other reliefs as are just and equitable in the premises are likewise prayed for.
Quezon City, 20 July 2014.
BELEN DUMLAO MACATUNO PERNITEZ VALMORIA LAW OFFICE Counsel for the Defendant 362 FPJ Building Cor. Bagong Silang, Maligaya, Brgy. Pasong Putik, Quezon City 346-5462
By:
JACKELYN JOY PERNITEZ Counsel for the Defendant PTR No. 9876543; 02/08/10; Quezon City IBP No. 12345, 02/08/10; Quezon City Roll No. 88888, 05/10/06; Manila City MCLE Compliance No. IV-623581
And
LIDDY JANE BELEN Counsel for Defendant PTR No. 96421; 01/02/14; Quezon City IBP No. 96421; 12/09/04; Quezon City Roll No. 64321, 12/09/10; Manila City MCLE Compliance No. IV-98765
Copy furnished:
AREVALO CUSAIN FONTANILLA MONTEMAYOR TALAMPAS and ASSOCIATES NEU COL Bldg., Central Ave., Quezon City
Received by: __________________ Date: _______________________
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME this 20 th of July 2014, in the City of Quezon by herein defendant-affiant with Passport No. 12345678 issued on January 1, 2013 at Manila City.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Doc. No. : 456 Page : 30 Book No. : 11 Series of 2014