0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
35 visualizzazioni6 pagine
Fathers and brothers, the humbling circumstances of addressing this body is intensified by the fact that I have chosen as a text and point of emphasis that which is part and parcel of your reason for existence as an ecclesiastical body. It may appear foolish on my part to attempt to speak on that which is so obvious within a reformed and Bible-believing fellowship. Yet it is just here that the modern church so fails--even conservative churches who start out well. Therefore, I undertake this task more by way of exhortation than exposition.
My text for exposition and application is the first half of verse 20 of Matthew 28: "Teaching them to observe all that I commanded you." I want to focus on the "AWE" of the "ALL." The awe of that all is sadly missing in much of Christendom today. From liberal ecumenical movements to fundamentalists stressing experience over doctrine, zeal for the whole counsel of God is either criticized or ignored.
Titolo originale
1990 Issue 7 - The Awe of the All - Counsel of Chalcedon
Fathers and brothers, the humbling circumstances of addressing this body is intensified by the fact that I have chosen as a text and point of emphasis that which is part and parcel of your reason for existence as an ecclesiastical body. It may appear foolish on my part to attempt to speak on that which is so obvious within a reformed and Bible-believing fellowship. Yet it is just here that the modern church so fails--even conservative churches who start out well. Therefore, I undertake this task more by way of exhortation than exposition.
My text for exposition and application is the first half of verse 20 of Matthew 28: "Teaching them to observe all that I commanded you." I want to focus on the "AWE" of the "ALL." The awe of that all is sadly missing in much of Christendom today. From liberal ecumenical movements to fundamentalists stressing experience over doctrine, zeal for the whole counsel of God is either criticized or ignored.
Fathers and brothers, the humbling circumstances of addressing this body is intensified by the fact that I have chosen as a text and point of emphasis that which is part and parcel of your reason for existence as an ecclesiastical body. It may appear foolish on my part to attempt to speak on that which is so obvious within a reformed and Bible-believing fellowship. Yet it is just here that the modern church so fails--even conservative churches who start out well. Therefore, I undertake this task more by way of exhortation than exposition.
My text for exposition and application is the first half of verse 20 of Matthew 28: "Teaching them to observe all that I commanded you." I want to focus on the "AWE" of the "ALL." The awe of that all is sadly missing in much of Christendom today. From liberal ecumenical movements to fundamentalists stressing experience over doctrine, zeal for the whole counsel of God is either criticized or ignored.
Fathers and brothers, the humbling circumstances of addressing this body is intensified by the fact that I .chosen as a text and point of emphasis that which Is part and parcel of your reason for existence as an ecclesiastical body. It may appear foolish on my part to attempt to speak on that which is so obvious . withiri . a. l3-efonned and Bible-believing fellowship. Yet ttls JUSt here that the modern church so fails--even conservative churches who start out well. The.r:efore, I this task more by way of exhortation than expositlon. My text for exposition and application is the first half of verse 20 of Matthew 28: "Teaching them to observe all that I commanded you. II I want to focus on the "A WE" of the 11 ALL. 11 The awe of that all is s.adly missing D; much of Christendom today. From hberal ecumemcal movements to fundamentalists stressing experience over doctrine, zeal for the whole counsel of God is either criticized or ignored. t? assert as the .truth God that All Scripture ts Itlsprred; All Scnpture ts profitable, and All Scripture is commended and commanded by Jesus as our basis for teaching and unity. The awesomeness of this "all" matters. There was an agent who said to a writer client: "I have some good news for you, and some bad news." "Give me the good ne_ws first," asked the writer. "Paramount loved script--absolutely ate it ' "That's the writer "what Page 4 August-September, 1990 The Counsel of Chalcedon is the bad news?" "Paramount is my cocker spaniel." The good news for many in the church world is that they have been faithful followers of their church's doctrine and its requirements. The bad news is--it is the wrong church! And it is not funny, and it does matter which church and which faith and which doctrine. First of all I want to briefly set forth my text in its context. Second, we will survey just a few New Testament examples. Third, we will see the pragmatic alternative of our day. Tbe Text and the Great Commission The text is the third part of our Lord's Great Cc;nnmission. I will pulling out just the thrrd level of the Commission, at least in part, becau.se most preachers never get beyond the first level. they wrongly assume that if they have emphasized the frrst level, they were obedient Before on the te?'t need to briefly touch all parts of this Commtsston from our Lord. In 18. of 28, hl:lving met with His dtsctples JUSt pnor to the Ascension, we read: "And Jesus up and spoke to them, saying, 'All authonty has been given to Me in heaven and on earth."' In this preface to His command Jesus a sweeping claim implying power ' and a ,,n Acts 1:8 .before ascending Jesus prOJll1Ses: You shall recetve power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you." As the Second Person of the blessed Trinity, Jesus has authority both to command His church and to accomplish via the Holy Spirit what He commands. In that light He commands His disciples (Matt.
Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to all that I commanded you, and lo, I am With even to the end of the ' _. "I have the authority," says Jesus. "You go; you disciple the nations in My power." Here is the Magna Charta of world evangelism and missions. Take the Gospel, the essentials of the Christian faith, and by God's grace people and nations are converted. But Jesus does not stop there. Though nine out of ten missionaries and almost as many pastors stop there, Jesus does not stop there. Jesus also commands Trinitarian baptism. Unless we establish churches and administer the sacraments, we are disobedient to the Lord. I am weary of parachurch ministries and missions that boast of their commitment to the Great Commission but have little or no interest in or intention of establishing churches with proper sacraments. And I am just now coming to my text-- verse 20, which is part three of the Great Commission. With no less authority and no lessened obligation Christ commands His disciples: "Teach them to observe ALL that I commanded you." Even where the Gospel is proclaimed and there is a church with the sacraments, still this level of the Commission is rarely taken seriously. The Greek is panta. It means all. ALL, all things, everything--however you translate it , it never means some. I feel rather silly belaboring the point, but the reality is that it is largely ignored. I rejoice that evangelicals today can stand together on many points and give a united voice on certain fundamentals. But you can be a card-carrying fundamentalist and deny the Lord by refusing obedience to the Great Commission. We may and we ought to stand with other fundamentalists--true evangelicals-:-for the Scrip- tures, for the family, for religious freedom. We are to stand shoulder to shoulder in opposition to abortion, sexual immorality, and an idolatrous state. But Jesus, the Head of the Church, teaches and commands us to teach many other things besides the fundamentals. And we will not achieve our common denominator goals if we are unfaithful on the whole counsel of God. We do not just go into the world, be it Atlanta, Akron, Africa or Asia, but we go on the terms of the King of Kings. God's work done in God's way! Is it any wonder that the church is so impotent today, if she follows not her King? We are under orders. As individuals, as a church, as elders, as a presbytery--we are under orders. Those orders are not vague guidelines which we may use as we please. The orders are specific: "Teach them to observe ALL that I commanded You." New Testament Examples Let Jl1e move now, in the second place, to some New Testament examples. This will not be exhaustive, but I trust it will not be be disputed either. First, we could cite Jesus Himself. We know from our text what He said at the end of His earthly ministry, but notice how He begins. While. being tempted, the Savior affirmed that we are to live by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God. Here He is but echoing the law of Deuteronomy. "Paul, intellectual Pharisee Roman citizen, ... would proclaim a truncated Gospel shame for what the world think." and not out . of would Early in His teaching, in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus does not shrink the obligation, but He presses it to the fullest. "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law ... Until heaven and earth pass away not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass away ... Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments... shall be called least... Unless . your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 5: 17-20). All that Jesus did and taught reflects His comprehensive statement in John 10-- "Scripture cannot be broken." Next we would notice how the Apostles in general share this teaching. After Pentecost. when the number of believers increased to over 3000, we read that they devoted themselves to the Apostles' teaching. And what was the Apostles' teaching? "All Scripture, given by inspiration," including the things Jesus, as promised, broug)lt to their remembrance, the "a11 truth" into which Jesus promised to lead them. And then I must single out the great Apostle Paul, .. who added his own testimony to the centrality of teaching all things Christ commanded. For one thing I think of Romans 1: 16. It is not as explicit. perhaps. but surely we see this implied. "For I am not ashamed of the Gospel." Paul, intellectual Pharisee and Roman citizen; had many worldly reasons to be ashamed of the Gospel. But its wisdom and power was revealed to Him, and he The Counsel of Chalcedon August-September, 1990 Page 5 ./' would not proclaim a truncated Gospel out of shame for what the world would think. But the. classic testimony is in Acts 20. Paul is in a hurry to get to Jerusalem, and from Miletus he sent for the elders of Ephesus so he could. consult with them en route to Jerusalem. And through that iilarvelous account of his ministry and faithfulness, with his warnings against false teachers, two verses jump forth that are a banner to any minister of the Gospel "Therefore I testify to you this day, that I am innocent of the blood of all men. For I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole purpose of . God" (Acts 20:26:-27). Thus does the Apostle exemplify obedience to the Great Commission. . . Tbe Pragmatic Alt.emative My third point is to move from what is and what ought to bt?, and note the pragmatic alternative so frequently set forth today in opposition to the principle of the Lord's Commission. In place of the awesome obligation of the Lord's command to teach obedience in "all things," the temptation promoted even within the church is to put pragmatism over against principle. Let me digress for sake of illustration with a rather silly story about an incident when I was returning from the mission field in Ehtiopia quite a few years ago. One of several tourist spots I included on my return trip was Venice, Italy and in the providence of God it coincided with a visit there of a .dear friend, the retiring president of what was till then, the Pittsburg-Xenia Theological Seminary, pr. Addison Leitch. I spent several hours with the Leitch family seeing some of the sights. St. Mark's Square is the focal point of Venice. An enormous plaza surrounded by classic architecture, it is a gathering place for tourists and locals alike. Around this vast open square are several outdoor restaurants with small orchestras entertaining their customers. One evening we were enjoying the sights and sounds of the square. We noticed that on one side a restaurapt was packed with people, eating artd listening to the otchestra. On the other side wa:s a similar establishment, orchestra playing, but with almost no customers. Observing this inequity, Dr. Leitch, always one to insert a little humor into a situation, suggested we do our part to help out this empty restaurant. The six of us spread out to three tables, ordered soft drinks, and began applauding loud and long for the orchestra. Within a matter of minutes, a large number of people began to flil up the tables, applauding with us as though it was the greatest Page 6 August-September, 1990 The Counsel or Chalcedon show on the square. By the time we finished our drinks and departed, business was booming, and the restaurant across the square was almost emptied. What happened, I assume, was crowd psychology. We seem to be having fun. long a few more pop in to see what is They assume the band is good because we are excited; so they join the applause, and the next thing you know a whole crowd is coming in because they don't want to miss the excitement. The music may have been much better across the square, but that did not matter. What mattered was the perceived success of the orchestra on our side. It would not have mattered if one side had the best professional orchestra in all Italy and the other side had just a fair group of amateur musicians. What mattered was success. Not quality, but success. When McDonald's became a big success, along came the imitators: Burger King, Burger Chef, Wendy's, Hamburger Station. Whether burgers, chicken, or churches, what matters is success and imitation. That is what drives comtemporary society: success-the "bottom line." What are the profits? Is it working? The "bottom line" has become more important than the principles. Such pragmatic, success-oriented approaches are becoming standard operating procedures in many Christian churches and organizations. Some time ago I was met at an airport by a pastor whose front seat was littered with a church growth manual and related tapes and papers. As he spoke of it, I think he was more excited about it than the Gospel itself. He now had the key to success. The Great Commission is a command with an implied victory. The promise of victory, however, is an ever-present temptation for missiologists (foreign or domestic) to play God, finding better and more effective ways to build Christ's Church. God says: "Do it this way." Jesus says: "Do ALL of this way; do not neglect MY way." And then man comes and .says: '.'That's not working fast enough; I've got a betteridea" . . . Rex Humbard stressed entertainment and healing in Akron to build his huge Cathedral of Tomorrow and his infamous unfinished tower. Well, "Edifice Rex," as I like to call him, did not count the cost of the tower, and much of his Akron empire has crumbled. But we do like the edifice; we are easily tempted by exotic building programs. Think of the many grand church buildings you passed in order to get here. How do those super churches get their thousands, their huge buildings, and their parking lot full of buses? How do those TV preachers get bigger and bigger though they often have little to say? I am not saying they are all devoid of Christianity 7 but did you ever wonder why all the appeals which come in the mail seem to be . following the same gimmicks? Think McDonald's-- success! I'll buy into the franchise 7 and my success is guaranteed. We had a parachurch giant at our General Assembly last year tell us we use their movie, and use 1t w1th therr method of operation, he could GUARANTEE the PCA an enormous number of new churches in a few time. I do not remember the number used, but it was more than the Mission to North America Committee ever dreamed ot And many 7 I fear, wanted it so. Get the right marketing franchise; make telemarketing calls, and be sure the cross of Christ 1s not an offense or a stumbling block. "You adul- teresses," says James, "do you not know that friend- ship with the world is hostility toward God? There- fore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God" (James 4:4). In January of 1989 I had the privilege of.lect?ring and preaching for four weeks in Korea, to mission candidates preparing to go to other nat10ns. That was a heady experience. What promise that situation held for the kingdom of Jesus Christ! But more than once I was tom between two conflicting emotions. There was joy and excitement that a mission-receiving nation is becoming a major mission-sending nation. Yet at times, my heart was broken as I listened to those who were products of a hundred years of faithfulness on the part of Korean Christians, pleading with the American church to come and teach them the pragmatic methodologies of the church growth movement. I did not sense in any way a conscious rebellion against the Lord. Yet lurking there just under the surface was a preference for a franchised religion with guaranteed success, rather than obedience to "all things whatsoever Christ has commanded." They were not unresponsive to my repeated pleas to follow the path of obedience which had by God's grace resulted in their conversion. But the temptation is so great, especially in a country that has seen grand supcesses, to choose success over faithfulness. The third level of Christ's Commission is a muted, if not silent, factor in world Christianity today. It is not a popular message, because it does not fit the franchised formulas for success. In 1983 the Word of Life Press and Asia Theological Association published a timely . book, Korean Church Growth Explosion. Chapter 22, "Some Dangers of Rapid. Growth," by Rev . . Son Bong-Ho is most timely and certamly not hrmted to the Korean situation. Dr. Son is concerned with the negative aspects of "the excessive zeal to increase church membership at any cost." Numbers come to express reality and determine "good'' churches. What especially caught my attention was his delightful designation of all this as "Neo- Pythagoreanism." Pythagoreans, you may recall, flourished a few centuries before Christ, and the distinguishing characteristic of their philosphy was to equate reality with numbers. Numbers thus had a mystical and even religious significance. Son writes: The Neo-Pythagoreanism 1 as I call the worship of numbers in society, has been recently reinforced by the introduction of the theological psuedo science called church growth which is developed and propagated by the Fuller Theological Seminary School of World Mission in Pasadena ... Church growth theology has done more harm than good to Korean churches in general ... The fact that Robert H. Schuller of the Crystal . Cathedral ... is becoming a hero to many Korean pastors suggests the degree of preoccupation of Korean Christianity with numbers. Numbers takes precedence the . purity of church discipline and teachings, Numbers are even used to represent the quality of faith (pp. 335-336). OPC pastor Dan Knox had a harsh but helpful evaluation of the church growth movement in Journey Magazine some time ago. In it he notes the shift in evangelism, a reduction, "to 'outreach events', complete with special music and guest speakers (such as athletes and politicians), need oriented seminars, camps, social activities, etc." Even in conservative, Reformed denominations, the home missions test is often not faithfulness, but a self-supporting church within two years. The pressure on the pastor is thus not obedience to the "all things", but evangelism for survival. And that changes evangelism! The pressure touches worship 1 preaching, and eveQ. faith itself. The New Testament missionaries had a gospel so unattractive (pragmatists. attractiveness) that it seriously endangered their lives. Today's gospel often "entices many and saves no one." The Counsel of Chalcedon August-September, 1990 Page 7 Our text from the lips of the Lord Himself is that ,the message is the method. If we neglect the 11 all" of Christ's Great Commission, whatever method we use is not God's method, because the message, is the method. Any method without the message of the whole counsel of God is found to be a house of cards, a building of wood, hay and straw. I am not saying that the obedient church will not or ought not to be successful. Given Christ's authority and command, we should expect the prayer, "Thy kingdom come,'' to be dramatically answered. But Neo:.. Pythagoreans conveniently forget God's wrath upon David's census. To summarize, we first see the clear and unequivocal command of Matthew 28:20. 11 Go ... teaching them to observe all that I commanded you." Second, we find such to be the practice of Christ and the apostles in the New Testament itself. Not friendship with the world, but obedience to God. And third, we find today's pragmatic alternative, with its charms of success to tempt us to disobey the King of kings. Your duty--our duty--is to be faithful to ALL the Great Commission as well as to the "ALL" of that Commission. Jesus says, "I have the authority; you go." He is not commanding us to be successful. He is commanding us to be faithful to the whole counsel of God. And only in the fullness of such obedience comes the promise: "Lo, I am with you always." Application I see in all this some pointed application to Reformed, separatist churches. I grew up in the old- line, liberal church ( at least it was on the road to apostasy by the union of 1958). I only learned of the separatist movement in the last two decades, and of course I have become a part of it. It is my understanding that separatist churches exist because they would not compromise the Word of God ("all" of Scripture). At least this was their intention, and they felt it could be accomplished only outside the existing churches. I do not want to address that decision as such. But all of us want to place the Word of God above the word of man. We are not perfect, and we do not agree on everything. But this heritage is precious to all of us, a heritage of sola Scriptura --not part, but all of it. I once read an interesting article by J.G. Vos, "Ashamed of the Tents of Shem?" In it he criticized those who sang Psalms, but wanted to avoid their distinctive features. He takes his text from Genesis Page 8 August-September; 1990 The Counsel.of Chalcedon 9. "He shall enlarge Japheth, he will dwell in the tents of Shem." "In the Hebrew idiom, to dwell in the tents of someone means to be the inheritor of that person's wealth and estate." Vos's point is that many Americans and Europeans are ashamed of their Jewish heritage (spiritually), a consequence of which is avoiding the distinctive features of the Psalms. My point is not to discuss this thesis, but to borrow this image. ''Your duty--our to be faithful to ALL the Great Commzsston as well as to the ''AU" of that Commission." Let me mention the OPC as an example. A member of the OPC is in a very real sense dwelling in the tents of Machen, i.e., an inheritor of Machen's wealth and estate. For. reasons hard to fathom, unless it is the pragmatic alternative, many within the OPC now seem to be "ashamed of the tents of Machen." They are ashamed of the lack .of the world's approval and of being the butt of comments about nit-picking. But it is precisely those distinctives that are part of what Jesus commanded His disciples, and it is just that which has made the OPC a blessing to many both within and without her membership. Throwing that away to gain success in the world's eyes, will cause the OPC to become irrelevant in the Kingdom's business. When I affiliated with the PCA 15 years ago, it seemed the place for me to"pitch my tent." I didnot even know the names of Dabney and Thornwell. But I quickly came to share the affection of the Southern brethren for the faith and doctrine of these men. I had great hopes of what my church was to be, but I have been very disappointed. If Dabney himself were to appear at our assembly, to have the opportunity to speak, to work on committees, and get his views aired, I am sure he would be called a narrow-minded, unloving, nit-picker who would hinder the cause of Christ in the world (translation: He world hurt our numerical growth). Delegates would be jumping to the microphone to move the previous question and closing debate faster than ever. It grieves me to say it; I do not want to believe it, but clearly the PCA (much of it) is ashamed of the tents of Dabney and Thornwell. The RPCUS (now RPCA) is, I guess, the new kid on the block. You exist beca.use of the "awe of the all." I wish we were all one to better reflect the unity we do have. But I will tell you this, fathers and brothers. It is the denominations that are faithful which have exercised an influence on me and on multitudes of others all out of proportion to their size. But if, or when, they cease to be faithful to the "all" of Christ's Commission, they become irrelevant to the kingdom work. If you are faithful, people will mock you and laugh at you. And it will be some of the Presbyterian brethren who will reserve some of their meanest words for you. But the church at the end of the 20th Century does not need another disobedient, broad evangelical denomination! We need modem-day Machens who will say with Luther: "Here I stand!" We need elders in the trenches who will stand up and be counted, obediently teaching all that Christ commanded, even if it is contrary to the church growth manual. 1 am a better Christian . and a better pastor, not because of what you and those like you share with all Christian churches, but because of what made you become ashamed to dwell in the tents of your theological ancestors. The unity for which Christ prayed was specifically the kind of unity He enjoyed with the Father, unity in doctrine, purpose, and love. In terms of the Great Commission and with an eye to our specific text, do not neglect the Gospel; do not neglect the sacraments and church planting, but please do not forget to observe "all things" which Christ commanded. You will be deciding daily and weekly who is Lord? Is it the world's applause? Is it popular opinion? Is it numbers? Or is it Jesus Christ? You are deciding between the whole counsel of God and the pragmatic alternative. Let us covenant to pray for each other, and I trust, pray as well for the day when we may again (of for the first time) be soldiers of the cross in the same battalion. May your ministry in this nation and to the world be a living example of the prophet Micaiah's testimony: "As the Lord lives, what the Lord says to me, that I will speak." (I Kings 22: 14) Dr. Carl Bogue chats with Acrs Director Gene Mikell at the 1990 Christian Vision of Victory Seminar. Q Want to share the Gospel with your friends ... But need a little help? We can help you! We have available a NEW VIDEO which is a Clear and Compelling presentation of the Gospel to the unconverted. It is an informal and easy-to-understand video, 35 minutes in length. Viicdl<ID "The Gospel of Christ" presented by Joe More craft with music by Becky Morecraft Get one for yourself and invite your unconverted friends and relatives to your home to watch this dynamic video on your TV Available for $25.00 + $2.00 postage and handling Chalcedon Video Minjstry P.O. Box 888022 Dunwoody, Georgia 30356 404-396-0965 "/ earnestly pray that God will use this video to bring many people ro saving faith in Jesus Christ." Joe Morecraft Plan now to attend the 1990 ACI'RA conference Appalachian Conference to Rebuild America Speakers: George Grant & Steve Schlissel Theme: "Rebuilding the Family" September 22. 1990 Sheraton Inn Johnson City, Tennessee Cost: SlS.OOpe:r individual.$3S.OO per For infOIYJllltionor 10 regisaer, wrire Appalachian ro Rebuild America P.O. 1413 TN l7621-14?l (615) 753-5030 ANTITHESIS A Periodical Analyzing Reformed/ Presbyterian Thought and Practice Offers an Ongoing Critique of Non-Christian Perspectives TOPICS IN /ANUARY/FEBRUARY ISSUE: Biblical Reflections on Vietnam Antithetical Apologetics Overvit!w of Scottis h Prosbvterianism NonChristinn lmpotcnce Against Racism Social Securitv Antidote Behind the of an Abortion Clinic I nsights from Puritan Jurisprudence Pm &: Con Seclion, Book Reviews FUTURE DISCUSSIONS: i Environmentalism, Contemporary Legal Theory, Critique of N11turaJ Theology, l Biblic.1l Poverty Relief. Chil Deconstructionism, and much more ... FOR A COMPLIMENTARY JA.N/FEB 1990 ISSUE CALL: (714)721-4102 OR WRITE: 4521 CAMPUS OR., SUITE IRVINE, CA 92715 The Counsel of Chalcedon August-September, 1990 Page 9