Submitted by: GROUP 1 (AC521 3:00-4:30 PM MW) Cuevas, Rieland De Castro, Charlene Largo, Edsa Mae Pullos, Richelle Roda, Mary Ann Suson, Angelyn Tajor, Ma. Ephrem Taveros, Maxine Ventura, Cleo
Submitted to: Mrs. Nilda Restificar
INTRODUCTION Background
TNC Co. was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 1985 and was incorporated in the Philippines as a stock corporation with SEC Registration No. CEO-0525 for the primary purpose of engaging in exporting and importing, buying, acquiring, holding, selling on whole sale basis, or otherwise disposing and dealing in any goods, wares, merchandise and commodities of all kinds and products, natural or artificial, of the Philippines or other countries, which are or may become articles of commerce, as may be permitted by law. The Company also manufactures, improves, amalgamates or joins various goods to form one product, merchantable goods, or wares, whether of local or Philippine materials, imported materials or contribution of both, most especially handicrafts and the like products. The registered office of the Company is located at Kagudoy Road, Basak, Lapu-Lapu City, Cebu, Philippines.
On November 26, 1999, the Company became a member of the Board of Investments as an export producer of garden and home products made of fiberglass on a non-pioneer status under Executive Order No. 226, otherwise known as the Omnibus Investments Code of 1987.
Findings and Recommendations Finding #1: There was no periodic inventory count for the last six years. Consolidation of purchases into 2 warehouses. Discontinuation of inventory counting and reconciling stock counts of the companys perpetual inventory records and general ledger Analysis Condition Periodic inventory counts in warehouse No. 15 were not routinely performed. Cause Since the past six years, the company hasnt periodically done an inventory count and reconciliation of amounts. Effect As a result, inventory shortages and overages could occur and remain understated. Inventory reorder points might be inappropriate.
Recommendation Even though the company has a perpetual inventory system, we recommend that the management must perform a periodic count for its inventory items in both warehouses and reconcile the physical inventory stock with the stock records. We also recommend that the Purchases Dept. should make a well-defined list of inventory count procedures including the treatment of special kinds of inventory items (consigned, obsolete, and damaged inventory items). We will also examine the past years financial statements and records to determine whether there are any material misstatements attributed to the absence of a periodic count. We will also test the reasonableness of the companys beginning inventory so that any material misstatement on the companys reported profit will be adjusted.
Finding #2: No clearly defined inventory monitoring responsibility over the warehouse inventory The current system is capable of ensuring that all receipts and withdrawals are recorded but is prone to errors because of the combination of manual and automated processes. Purchasing Department recognizes the need for a fully automated system and is in the process of procuring an automated requisitioning system. Analysis Condition 1.) Purchasing Department did not adequately monitor the warehouse inventory activities.
2.) The current Accounting Information Systems is capable of ensuring that all receipts and withdrawals are recorded. Cause 1.) Purchasing Department did not reassign oversight responsibility.
2.) The system is not fully automated, and thus is prone to errors.
Effect 1.) The warehouse and inventory control personnel are operating independently. As a result, after the initial inventory count, there was a difference of roughly a million dollars in the recorded and actual inventory amounts.
2.) There might be unrecognized errors which could materially misstate the GL amounts
Recommendation We recommend that the management should establish a system for responsible employees to verify delivery, receipt, and storage of inventory. Create a paper trail of internal documentation and cross-check to ensure items received and those on invoice are identical. Confirm that a system of signing items out of inventory and into sales exists, that it requires signature authorization and compliance is enforced as policy. Confirm that all shipments of products are identical to invoiced sales documents. Adopt measures to ensure that inventory is not reduced in company records until documentation is checked and items are shipped. Make sure that shipping records are verified and costs for shipping are accounted for in costs of goods sold. And to further ensure a strong inventory tracking and monitoring system, we also recommend that the Purchases Dept. continue its effort to fully automate the entire inventory system. This will enable the management to have a real-time view of the flow of the inventory items in the company. But this system must be fully integrated with the Accounting Information System of the company and it must also be accessed by only a limited number of authorized company personnel.
Finding #3: Purchases did not have established policies and procedures for identifying and disposing of obsolete inventory items.
Analysis
Recommendation The Purchasing Department must establish its own Inventory Obsolescence Policy through a Material Review Board that would guide the company with regards to the timely recognition of obsolete inventory, the necessary inventory adjustments, and its subsequent dispositions. This policy shall also establish the departments responsibilities for the strict conformance of these policies.
Finding #4: Purchases did not perform periodic reviews of its reorder points to determine whether inventory levels were adequate.
Analysis Condition The inventory stock level reorder points established 20 years ago remained unadjusted and unevaluated Cause Purchases did not perform periodic reviews of inventory-reorder points Effect When the inventory supply is insufficient to meet the Company demands, Purchases must make emergency buys or agencies may purchase the items themselves without the benefit of volume discounts.
Condition Purchases did not have established policies and procedures for addressing inventory obsolescence. On January 31, 2012, a number of items appeared to be obsolete. There were printed forms and material that were no longer used by the company. Cause The company has not done its physical inventory count in the past six years. Effect The lack of policies and procedures for identifying and disposing obsolete inventory increases the costs for storage and maintenance. It also ultimately reduces the recoveries the company may obtain when these obsolete items are disposed. Recommendation We recommend that evaluation of the inventory stock level reorder points should be done annually to prevent excess or shortages of inventory supply which may lead either to an additional non-value added cost or loss of sale due to customer dissatisfactions. These procedures must comprise of assessment of lead time demand, safety stock, and required inventory stock level. The Purchase Department must consider the causes for the shortages and adjust reorder points.
Finding #5: Purchases did not maintain an up to date inventory catalog The last printing of the Companys inventory warehouse catalog was approximately 6 years ago. Since that time, the Company has implemented just in time purchasing from a vendor, and many of the supplies that agencies previously obtained from the warehouse are now supplied by a vendor.
Analysis Condition The inventory catalog was not maintained on a current basis. Cause The last printing of the Companys inventory warehouse catalog was approximately 6 years ago. Effect Use of the outdated catalog causes requisitions to be completed incorrectly, increasing the time and cost required to fill agency requests.
Recommendation We recommend that Purchases update its warehouse catalog. Besides, there must be an implementation and development of management policy requiring an annual update of inventory catalogs.
Finding #6: The inventory warehouse area was not clean and organized.
Analysis Condition Purchases did not maintain a neat, clean and organized warehouse. Inventory items were not always consistently labeled with inventory numbers nor were they stored in an organized manner that would facilitate an efficient retrieval. The facility lacks painting and has poor lighting. Surplus property that appeared to be damaged or obsolete were situated in at the center of the first floor. Cause The company has not done its physical inventory count in the past six years. Effect The poor organization of the inventory and the lack of proper lighting and storage of inventory items could lead to safety and fire hazards and hinder the efficient operation of the warehouse.
Recommendation The Purchasing department should find a way to store inventory items in an organized manner and maintain the cleanliness of the warehouse, which must be documented in an inventory layout plan for future reference. In addition, the facility has to be painted and the lights replaced or improved. These, if implemented, shall promote efficiency and smoothness of flow in retrieving the inventory, as well as the safe use of the warehouse.
Executive Summary This report was commissioned to examine whether the companys inventory management is reliable, and to determine what impact it could have on the companys profitability. Procedures such as observation, inquiries, and sampling were performed to obtain the needed information. The report draws attention to the following findings: There was no periodic inventory count for the last six years which could result to undetected inventory shortages and overages; No clearly defined inventory monitoring responsibility over the warehouse inventory which makes the company prone to unidentified errors which could materially misstate accounts; Purchases did not have established policies and procedures for identifying and disposing of obsolete inventory items, increasing the costs for storage and maintenance and reducing the recoveries the company may obtain when these obsolete items are disposed; Purchases did not perform periodic reviews of its reorder points to determine whether inventory levels were adequate, making the company prone to emergency buying, thus possibly losing the benefit of volume discounts; Purchases did not maintain an up to date inventory catalog, increasing the time and cost required to fill agency requests; The inventory warehouse area was not clean and organized, resulting to safety and fire hazards that may hinder the efficient operation of the warehouse. Therefore the following recommendations are made: periodic count for its inventory items in both warehouses and reconciliation of the physical inventory stock with the stock records; management should establish a system for responsible employees to verify delivery, receipt, and storage of inventory; The Purchasing Department must establish its own Inventory Obsolescence Policy through a Material Review Board; evaluation of the inventory stock level reorder points should be done annually to prevent excess or shortages of inventory supply; Purchases update its warehouse catalog; Purchasing department should find a way to store inventory items in an organized manner and maintain the cleanliness of the warehouse (ex. Inventory layout plan). These recommendations can minimize the problems mentioned above, thus aiding the company in terms of adequate controls and proper financial statement account balances.
(Cuevas and Co.)
Date : March 10, 2014 To : Management From : Rieland J. Cuevas, Partner Subject : Audit of the Inventory Department
Attached herewith is a draft of the report we plan to issue based on our findings on the recent audit of TNC Company. The draft is issued in order to provide you the opportunity to discuss the findings of our audit, present any additional documentation, and for you to suggest changes, if any. The exit conference is available as an option prior to the issuance of the final Audit Report.
If you would like to schedule an exit conference to discuss the contents of the draft prior to distribution of the final report, please notify me. Otherwise, please provide a written response by March 17, 2014 to the address provided below, or send it via email at cuevasri_cpa@yahoo.com. The response should take the form of specific action taken with respect to each finding and recommendation. If a response is not received, the final report will be issued with the management responses detailed in the draft report. A copy of the draft report is being forwarded to the applicable manager requesting acknowledgement and review of the report.
Upon receipt of the Exit Conference Memorandum, the management may submit a request for an exit conference.
Mailing Address:
Cuevas and Co. Affinity Plaza Condominium, 143 Jun Avenue, Suite 777 Gorordo Avenue, Cebu City