1 Process of mapping

The study involves certain process right from the beginning to its
completion. The details are as follows:

1.1 Preparation of research protocol

With the help of CMS Technical Support team a systematic protocol has
been prepared to ensure the quality during the mapping. During the TOT
protocol was clearly explained to the field teams.

1.2 Time schedule:

As per TOR, time schedule has been prepared and submitted to GSACS
and NACO. There are couple of steps involved in the time scheduling -

1.2.1 Inception meeting with NACO & GSACS:

As part of the Induction program for the district teams the entire process
of the program has been designed with the support of CMS. The below
given schedule provides the time frame agreed by the Caritas India to roll
out the HRG mapping exercise.

During this meeting the research protocol, tools and time schedules were
thoroughly discussed and recorded the feedback from the clients.

1.2.2 Preparation of Training Manual and Tools:

To ensure the quality of the data a detailed training manual has been
developed and used intensively during the state level field teams training
programs. This manual consists of information on how to establish the
rapport with key informants, how to ask the questions and how to code
the data into the schedules. Based on previous experience, CMS core
team prepared tools to conduct mapping and to collect essential
information from the villages.
 LWP – Final Report

Required data/information collected through the following tools (Annexure

1) –

1. Key informant interview data sheet

2. Health service provider interview sheet
3. Key informant interview check list

1.3 Selection of Field teams

For the selection of Field Investigators, Caritas India organized a written
test and personnel interview for all the short listed candidates at each
district level and based on their previous work experience in the field of
HIV and AIDS and their communication skills 08 field investigators were
hired for each district. By early July’09, besides the LWS district teams
(DRPs, M&E & Link Supervisors) 32 field Investigators were on board to
execute the mapping in the four districts.

1.4 State level training

Prior to the formal training on mapping exercise, Caritas India oriented its
staff on the purpose of the study, its importance and the fieldwork
requirements. Subsequently, three days training program was organized
in July’09 at Dahod district for Caritas India’s State Officer, four LWS
district teams and selected field investigators. CMS technical support team
(two members) facilitated and trained the field teams on how to use the
tools and how to collect the basic information within the village. Training
manual was introduced to the field teams. The structure of the three days
training program:

Day One Basic information on HIV and AIDS, definitions of high-risk

group and vulnerable groups, attitudes and approaches
towards these groups Understanding Mapping study,
scope, methodology, tools and techniques, field work
process, data collection and documentation.
Day Two Fieldwork: Understanding the field process, data
collection, documentation and data compilation, Team
Structure, roles & responsibilities of team members,
quality control and fieldwork planning
Day Data management, data entry, data analysis and report
Three writing.

1.5 Mapping Exercise

Caritas India, Gujarat 2

.
 LWP – Final Report

Immediately after the training program mapping work started in the four
districts and the schedule is as follows-

S.
No Activity Banaskantha Dahod Navsari Surendranagar
1 Started on 6th Started on 10th Started on 7th Started on 31st
Aug’09 and Aug’09 and Aug’09 and July’09 and
HRG mapping field completed on completed on completed on completed on
exercise 9th Sept’09 11th Sept’09 7th Sept’09 1st Sept’09
2 Data submitted to
CMS 11th Sept’09
3 Data cleaning 13th Sept’09
4 Two days
workshop on
Village Clustering
& District planning 19-20 September '09
5 Mapping study
findings shared
with GSACS &
UNICEF at
Ahmedabad. Presented on 29th September’09
6 Final report
submitted to NACO
& GSACS October’09

1.6 Data analysis and report

Data cleaning and entry has been done internally by Caritas India while
CMS technical team provided the analysis part. Final report was prepared
by Caritas India in consultation with CMS technical team.

The following are the outputs of this study –

i. List of 100 priority high risk villages in each villages

ii. Estimates of key population (sex workers, MSM & IDUs) &
bridge population existing in each of the mapped villages
• Typology of sex workers
• Place of operation
iii. Reported number of PLHIVs, HIV deaths, STI/RTI and TB cases
in the select villages.
iv. Information about the vulnerability of women and youth
• Condom availability and use
• Access to STI services
• Multi partner behaviour

Caritas India, Gujarat 3

.
 LWP – Final Report

Pre & extra marital affairs

•
v. Information about the services available
• Health services
• Existence of CBOs and NGOs and their programmes

Soon after completing the data entry, CMS has helped Caritas India team
in analyzing the data and preparing the output tables. Based on the final
outputs issue focused report has been prepared.

Detailed analysis and interpretations are presented in the successive

sections.

1.Brief Summary of Four Districts

Coverage
Banaskantha, Dahod, Navsari and Surendranagar are the four districts in
Gujarat where the mapping of HRGs, PLHIVs and bridge population has
been conducted. In each one of these districts the mapping teams covered
the top 120 villages (based on the 2001 census population). Overall the
mapping teams covered ____ villages from four districts and finally
identified ___ villages (____ villages from each district) based on the
vulnerability scoring for LWP interventions.

During the study ______ key informants were interviewed in the selected
____ villages, on an average _____ KI from each village. Here the key
informants include: Elected members and opinion leaders; Village
functionaries; School teachers, Gram Panchayat Staff, Revenue
department staff; Youth Club members; Traditional birth attendants; Self
Help Group representatives; Local vendors; Local Health Care Providers;
GP Staff (Secretary/Bill collector); and Village accountant. Besides Local
doctors; ANM; ASHA; Anganwadi workers; Traditional healers were also
interviewed during the mapping.

Estimates of Key Population (FSW,

MSM, IDU)
Total estimated KP in the selected villages of Dahod districts is 1946. Of
this total 82 percent are FSWs, 17 percent are MSMs and 1 percent is
IDUs. FSWs are found in all the villages (150) where mapping was
executed. MSMs and IDUs are found in few villages.

District FSW MSM IDU

Caritas India, Gujarat 4

.
 LWP – Final Report

Banaskant
ha
Dahod 1585 350 11
Navsari
Surendran
agar
Total
Percentag
e

1.6.1 Profile of KP

The profile of KP – FSWs, MSM and IDUs - terms of their sub-categories

based on mode of operation and mobility pattern is given below:

Based on the place of operation, FSWs are primarily classified in to 4

categories

- Operating in the village: Female sex workers who stay and

operate in their village itself

- Operating in the near by Town/City: Female sex workers

who stay in the village but operates in near by towns and cities and
they will come back to their village daily.

- Operating in High Ways and Dhabas: Female sex workers

who stay in the village but operates in near by towns and cities and
they will come back to their village daily.

- Coming from out side the village : Female sex workers

who come from out side and operate in the villages and go back to
their place

Vulnerability factors
Together there are ______ reported PLHIVs in the mapped villages of four
districts. Of this less number are reported in _______district. Similarly
deaths related to AIDS _______ and TB cases are ________districts. STI cases
are more less equally recorded in all the four districts.

Deaths
Reported related to TB TB STI
District PLHIVs AIDS cases deaths cases
Banaskant

Caritas India, Gujarat 5

.
 LWP – Final Report

ha
Dahod 152 25 838 82 421
Navsari
Surendran
agar
Total

Other major categories identified under bridge population are – 1.

Unmarried men visiting female sex workers; 2. Married men having sexual
relationship with multi partners; 3. Married women having sexual relations
with multi partners; 4. Widows having sexual relationship with multi
partners; 5. Girls involved in pre-marital sexual activity; 6. Boys involved
in pre-marital sexual activities; 7. Widowers having sexual relationship
with multi partners; 8. Un-married women having sexual relations with
multi partners and 9. Truck drivers. These categories are equally
vulnerable and required special focus during the interventions.

Use of Mapping Data

The mapping data is meant to give an estimation of the key population

within the short listed villages in the districts. It will provide directions for
interventions on the ground.

The mapping findings will help to determine the following:

• Number of interventions required for each district depending on factors

such as:
o Number of high risk villages in the district
o Estimated number of key population reported in the district.
o Estimates of different types of FSWs operating in the district
o Number of deaths due to HIV/AIDS in the last one year
o Number of people living with HIV (PLHIV)

Based on the assessment of these factors, number and type of

interventions per district may be planned.

• The intervention strategy. This includes details such as,

o The villages where interventions should be located, their initial

coverage and subsequent expansion plans
o The strategy to cover the different types of FSWs
o Strategies to address the needs and concerns of PLWH at
village level

Caritas India, Gujarat 6

.
 LWP – Final Report

o Strategy to cover people involved in different types of high-

risk activities (based on their numbers and locations)
o Networking with the urban interventions with in the state and
the near by districts of bordering states.
o Networking with +ve networks
o Network with Network Operators for support during further
research and programme implementation

Recommendations and the way

forward:

1. By using the mapping data, the concerned authorities should

shortlist the number of villages which needs to be address

2. The selected NGOs need to reach out to the short listed villages with
entry point activities to build rapport with the community members
and to select the Link Workers by using the potential LWS list
provided by the mapping study.

3. By using the selected LWs conduct the detailed situational needs

assessment to understand the ground realities and then plan district
specific intervention programmes to address the rural epidemic.

4. In the rural community as there is lot of stigma is attached to

HIV/AIDS and sex work, while starting the entry point activities care
should be taken to avoid the -ve branding to the programme.

Dahod

Caritas India, Gujarat 7

.
 LWP – Final Report

2 DAHOD DISTRICT
2.1 Coverage
In Dahod district mapping has been executed in 150 selected villages
covering 7 blocks. During the mapping 2143 key informants were
interviewed to elicit the required data.

2.1.1 Estimations of Key Population (KP)

The estimations indicate that there are 1946 high-risk population (key
population) in 150 villages. Of this total 82 percent (1585) are FSWs, 17
percent (350) are MSMs and 1 percent (11) are IDUs were identified during the
course of the exercise. Data indicate that FSWs are found in all 150 villages
and MSMs are in 128 villages. 3 percent of key population are concentrated in
150 villages across 7 blocks.

2.1.2 Profile of KP

The profile of KP (FSWs, MSM

and IDUs) is analyzed on four
important indicators – 1.
Operating within the village 2.
Operating in the near by
P ercentag e of H R G - C ateory w ise
villages; 3. Operating in high
way/dabhas 4.Coming from ID U
outside the village and operating 1%

in the mapped village and 5.

FSW who are not willing to M SM FSW
17%
accept/admit their profession. 82%

The concentration of FSWs

based on the five primary
categories indicates that 46
percent are operating within the village. About 30 percent are operating
outside the villages, 13 percent are operating outside villages on high way

Caritas India, Gujarat 8

.
 LWP – Final Report

dhabas, 11 percent come from outside the villages and operate in the
villages where mapping has been done.

Dahod district is one of the most backward areas of Gujarat state. It’s
literacy rate is 45.65%. Most of the farmers in this area depend on rain
only. This area has very less rain fall and often monsoon failure make their
life miserable. They live hand to mouse. Because of less income, this
people are force to move to cities in the search of work. In big number,
people move with their family, including small children which effect their
health and education. As they are not educated, they do not have much
knowledge and information of HIV/AIDS. Free sex is practice among this
tribals. Less opportunity lead women to earn money leads women into sex
profession. As people are not much aware about family planning often
they have big family. Big family and less income make their life miserable.
They do not have any other way then going out for work. Many time single
man move out of the villages for work, in this case it is likely they he may
go with more then one partner and on the other had her spouse may also
in village do the same.

2.1.3 Concentration of FSW’s

Of the 7 Blocks, Dahod,

Devgadh baria, Limkheda,
Zalod, Fatehpura have
more than 100 FSWs. In
other words out of the
total 1157 FSWs, 90
percent are from these 5
Blocks. The highest
concentration is found in
Limkheda i.e. 365 FSWS
and the least in Garabada
i.e. 49 FSWS. The presence
of FSWS in the other 2

Caritas India, Gujarat 9

.
 LWP – Final Report

Blocks ranges between 80 to 45 FSWs making 10 percent of the total

mapped FSWs in the district.

During the LWS interventions, Blocks with the highest presence of FSWs
need to be covered on priority basis.

The highest no of FSW is found in Rai villages, Limkheda block the reasons
could be,
1. Rai is the central village for two blocks (Limkheda and Bariya) so
both block people meet at this place.
2. There is a junction point for private vehicles.
3. Literacy rate is very low in this village and most of the population in
this village is tribal.
4. People do not get any other source for income in this village, so
easily they turn to adopt sex as a profession.
5. Limkheda’s most of the villages are national high way touch.
6. Many hotel and road side Dhaba are found near this block.

One fines less no of FSW in Dhanpur block because the population of this
block is less then other block. This block is interior and very less
transportation facilities do not attract other people to come this block for
work. Less transportation also restricts people to visit this block.

2.2 Profile of MSM

Out of the 150 mapped villages,

MSMs were identified in 128 villages
forming 18% of the total HRG
identified in the District. The highest
numbers of MSMs were identified in
Dahod, Devgadh baria and Zalod
Blocks with figures ranging from 60-
40 MSMS forming 53 percent of the
total 350 identified MSMs. While in
the remaining 4 Blocks the figure
ranges between 40 to 15.

82 percent operate within the village whereas 18 percent operate outside

their villages

Caritas India, Gujarat 10

.
 LWP – Final Report

Here it is important to note

that during the LWS
interventions much
concentration is required in
mentioned three blocks.
Similarly, appropriate
outreach strategy needs to
be devised to address those
MSMs who operate outside
the villages. Collaboration
and coordination with
agencies implementing HIV
projects such as TIs may
become necessary.

Further analysis on spread

of the key population indicates that 52 percent of the key population is
concentrated in 79 villages.

Dahod block has maximum no of MSM. Dahod is district place. Many male
come from all the blocks. People who come from other villages for work
tent to do such activities. Dahod is market place, so most of the
surrounding village block people have to come to Dahod for things to
purchase. People from Dahod also go to other near by villages for such
activities. Dahod provide large opportunity for many works, so large
number of people comes here for daily migration. Easy transportation to
the place make more people come to this place.

2.3 Bridge Population

During the mapping 9 different categories of bridge population with risk

behaviour were estimated in all 150 districts. The major categories
identified under bridge
population are – 1. Unmarried
men visiting female sex workers;
2. Married men having sexual
relationship with multi partners;
80
3. Married women having sexual
relations with multi partners; 4.
Widows having

Caritas India, Gujarat

sexual
70
11
.

60
 LWP – Final Report

relationship with multi partners; 5. Girls involved in pre-marital sexual

activity; 6. Boys involved in pre-marital sexual activities; 7. Widowers
having sexual relationship with multi partners; 8. Un-married women
having sexual relations with multi partners and 9. Truck drivers.

About 5964 bridge population were estimated in 150 villages. In these

categories special focus is essential on boys and girls who are involved in
premarital sex during the interventions. These two categories are the
most vulnerable category of bridge population. Married and un-married
men and women are equally vulnerable bridge population who need
special focus.

As shown in above graph, Zalod is the biggest block among all 7 blocks.
One find big number of drivers(Trucks,Tempos,Auto-ricksaws, etc..)many
of them go for long route & stay at some of the hotels. Where is likely to
have multi partners sexual relationship. This same drivers may give their
HIV infections to their spouces.

2.4 Migration
During the mapping three categories of out migration were estimated in
150 villages. These three types are 1. Daily migration, 2. Seasonal
migration and 3. Long duration migration. In each category of these
migration estimations were taken for single male migration, single female
migration and total family (mostly both husband and wife) migration.

Out of the total migrants estimated during the mapping 6 percent are
daily migrants followed by 57 percent seasonal migrants and remaining 37
percent are long duration migrants. During the target interventions all the
three categories need to be focused, but much focus is required on daily
migrants. Here the assumption is that such migrants are more vulnerable
than other two categories.

2.4.1 Daily Migration:

As shown in graph, daily B lo c k W is e - D a ily M ig ra tio n

migration is highest in
Devgadh baria because
80%
there is a less work 70%
opportunities in 60%
Ma le
50%
40% F e m a le

30% F a m ily
20%
10%
Caritas India, Gujarat 12
0%
.
Dahod D e vg a d h F a te h p u raG a ra b a d a L im k h e d a Za lo d Dhanpur
b a riy a
 LWP – Final Report

villages.So, they have to move out to search of work in near by town to

get day-to-day expense

And the lowest daily migration in Dhanpur because it is a very interior &
rural area & there is not much transport facility to go near by town.

2.4.2 Seasonal Migration:

As shown in graph, B lock w ise - S easonal Mig ration

seasonal migration is
highest in Garabada, 3 5%
Zalod and Dahod 3 0%
2 5% M ale
because the people of 2 0% Fem ale
this blocks are fully 1 5%
Fam ily
dependent on agriculture 1 0%
5%
work. They all are only 0%
work during the monster

l od
d

ur
a
a

season & during the off

ho

ed
ur

ad

np
Za
ri y
Da

hp

kh
b
ba

a
ra

Dh
te

Li m
season they move to big
Ga
dh

Fa
a
vg

citys like Ahmedabad,

De

Baroda,Surat, Rajkot,
etc.. Mostly they do the
work like construction,
diamond works etc.

They spend lots of money for marriage & other festivals which they have
to borrow from money lender with high interest, to re-pay this money
again they have to move to big cities.

2.4.3 Long duration

Migration: Bloack w ise - Long duration migration

30%
As shown in graph, long 25%
duration migration is highest in 20% M ale

Garabada & Zalod. Some 15% Female

Family
10%
people of this blocks are not 5%
interested in their native 0%
business like agriculture, pan-
d
od

ur
a
a

lo
a

ed
ur

ad

np
ri y
h

Za

shop etc. So they move to the

Da

hp

kh
b
ba

a
ra

Dh
te

Lim
Ga
dh

Fa
a

big citys like Ahmedabad,

vg
De

Caritas India, Gujarat 13

.
 LWP – Final Report

Baroda,Surat, Rajkot, etc.. And dusing the marriage occasions, festival

seasons they only come to their native village for the short period of time.

2.5 Information about PLHIVs and

AIDS Deaths
Data on number of PLHIVs and persons who
died due to AIDS during the last one year was
obtained from ICTCs at the district level during
the study.

2.5.1 Reported PLHIVs

Among the 150 villages N u m b e r o f P L H A s r e p o rte d - B lo c k w ise

217 PLHIVs are reported in
the last one year. Of this 80
61 percent are male and
60
39 percent are Females.
Here too the highest 40

numbers are in the Blocks 20

of Dahod, Garabada and
Zalod with the range from 0
Dahod D e v g a d h b a r iy Fa a t e h p u r a G a ra b a d a L im k h e d a Z a lo d Dhanpur
70 to 40, contributing 77 62 8 15 37 8 68 19
S e r ie s 1
percent of the total PLHIVs
in the District.

2.5.2 Deaths due to AIDS in the last one year.

Of the 150 mapped N o , o f D e a t h s d u e to AID S ( In la s t o n e ye a r ) - B lo c k w is e

villages 35 AIDS deaths 10 9
are recorded. Of this 8
8 8

total 46 percent are male 6

and 54 percent are 4
4 4

females. Limkheda Block 2

2

itself account to 9 0
0

D ahod D e v g a d h b a r iy aF a te h p u r a G a ra b a d a L im k h e d a Z a lo d Dhanpur
S e r ie s 1 4 4 8 0 9 8 2

Caritas India, Gujarat 14

.
 LWP – Final Report

deaths. Data indicates that AIDS related deaths are reported in all the 6
Blocks.

Most of the time single male moves out of the to city for work, where he
may tend to have sex relation with multi partners and after coming from
their they may give to their spouse as well. This area is mostly tribal area
where free sex is practice, so when husband is out for work in city, women
may also tend to lead multi partner relation. Becouse of less awareness
they don’t go for any treatment of HIV/AIDS.

People of this area do not have much knowledge of HIV/AIDS. They do not
have information of HIV, so they do not go for blood check up to ICTC.
They have many misunderstanding for HIV/AIDS. They do not feel free to
talk about this sickness to other people as they are afraid that they will be
out cast by other village people. Low literacy rate in this blocks make
people to hide if some one is suffering from such sickness.

2.6 TB and STI cases

STI cases in the districts were collected
from CHCs, PHCs , ASHAs and other health
service providers. In total 637 STI cases
were reported in 150 villages of which 33
percent were males and 67 percent were
females. The highest numbers were
reported from Dahod, Garabada and Zalod
Blocks comprising 65 percent of the total
STI cases in the District.

In 150 villages 979 TB cases were reported during the past one year. Of
this total 68 percent are males and 32 percent are females. During the
last one-year 75 males and 21 females (total 96) died due to TB in 6
blocks. Dahod, Devgadh baria, Fatehpura and Zalod Blocks alone reported
75 percent of the total TB cases.

2.7 STI Service providers

Most of the STI services are provided by the local PHCs, and private
doctors. In majority of the
villages RMPs are
functioning and in more
than 56 percent of the
villages MBBS qualified
doctors are functioning.

Caritas India, Gujarat 15

.
 LWP – Final Report

During the interviews key informants told that for general health problems
the villagers are approaching RMPs and government hospitals.

As shown in graph, Dahod block has highest STI cases are reported. The
people of Dahod block are not much aware about STI & they don’t take
any medicines or treatment. They ignore this as they don’t feel
comfortable to talk about this sickness to others. Lake of treatments &
facilities is not easily available in their respective villages.

2.8 Awareness on HIV, STI and Condom

Analysis of key informant interviews indicates that
more than 46 percent of the population in 150 villages are having
awareness on HIV and AIDS.
About 49 percent are aware
of STIs and more than 53
percent are aware of
condoms.

At village level ANMs, ASHA

and Anganwadi workers are
playing prominent role in
providing such awareness.
It was found that condoms
are available in general
medical shops, small petty
shops and tea stalls.

More number of people of this area are aware about T.B. then HIV/AIDS.
People do take treatment for T.B. but hesitate to talk about HIV/AIDS
freely. So more T.B. patients are found then HIV positive. Large number of
people are not aware or they do not have right information for HIV/AIDS,
so this people who are affected from HIV come out easily.

2.9 Intervention plan

To initiate the Link Worker Program in Dahod district cluster approach has
been adopted. Accordingly district is divided into 38 clusters .

Dahod Clusters

Caritas India, Gujarat 16

.

250
 LWP – Final Report

% of
Numb Requir
Numbe Total KP HRG
Total ed
S er of r of estimate estimat
Cluster Name Populat number
N Block Village
ion
d in the ed in
of
s s Block the
LWs
cluster
1 Dahod 1 16 89311 235 8

2 Devgadh bariya 1 13 82055 261 6

3 Dhanpur 1 9 34359 144 4

4 Fatehpura 1 10 52263 125 5

5 Garabada 1 15 103473 286 6

6 Limkheda 1 10 51146 331 6

7 Zalod 1 5 39104 47 3
Total 7 78 451711 1429 38

As per the plan it has been decided to cover 100 villages selected on the
basis of vulnerability factor. As per the mapping villages which are having
negligible vulnerable population (key population) were not included in the
action plan.

Each one of these four clusters divided into different sub-clusters and link
workers will be placed in the sub-cluster level head quarters (village).
Clustering and sub-clustering is done by taking travel proximity and
availability of transport and population of the villages. District teams also
consulted GSACS for the finalization of Clusters in order to further validate
highly vulnerable villages so these are prioritize for intervention.

Provide Cluster Map. :-

Caritas India, Gujarat 17

.
 LWP – Final Report

1) Dahod: 2)

Zalod:

1)

Caritas India, Gujarat 18

.
 LWP – Final Report

3)Fatehpura: 4)

Limkheda:

5) Garabada: 6)
Dhanpur

Caritas India, Gujarat 19

.
 LWP – Final Report

7) Devgadh baria:-

Caritas India, Gujarat 20

.
 LWP – Final Report

2.10 Sub-cluster details:

Block Cluster Village Total Pop Total

HRG
Sector
1. Dahod

Dahod Galaliyawad 4840 43

1
Dahod Chosala 6354 7
Dahod Katawara 3398 17
Dahod 2 Dasla 6814 6
Garabada Devdha 5070 10
Dahod Motikharaj 10275 11
Dahod 3 Gamala 3759 7
Dahod Jalat 8866 7
Dahod Rachharada 4178 7
4
Dahod Timarada 2180 8
Dahod Kharedi 6046 8
5
Dahod Raliyati 5968 25
Dahod Chhapari 4473 8
Dahod 6 Rentia 5055 7
Zalod Mirakhedi 5262 9
Dahod Vijagadh 4720 16
7
Garabada Pandavi 4204 7
Dahod 8 Jekot 2620 32
Dahod Muvaliya 5337 26
9
Dahod Bavka 8411 17
Garabada Matwa 4571 16
Dahod 10 Nagarala 6458 16
Garabada Vajelav 4300 11
Dahod 11 Kharoda 10010 7

Caritas India, Gujarat 21

.
 LWP – Final Report

Dahod 12 Kathala 5349 7

Devgadh
10179
bariya Piplod 36
Devgadh
1 5616
bariya Bhathwada 18
Devgadh
3292
bariya Rebari 16
Devgadh
22454
bariya Devgadh bariya 31
Devgadh
2 4611
bariya Kalidungari 21
Devgadh
2. Devgadh bariya

2476
bariya Bhuval 18
Devgadh
5259
bariya Toyani 30
3
Devgadh
5595
bariya Saliya 19
Devgadh
5984
bariya Ruvabari 17
4
Devgadh
4706
bariya Dangariya 15
Devgadh
4746
bariya MotiKhajuari 17
Devgadh
5 2285
bariya Dukhali 15
Devgadh
4852
bariya Udhavala 8
Devgadh
6 4003
bariya Lavariya 7
Devgadh
7326
bariya Sevaniya 13
Devgadh
5727
bariya 7 Baina 13
Dhanpur Ambakach 2060 22
Dhanpur 1 Navanagar 4973 17
Dhanpur 2 Mandor 2398 7
3. Dhanpur

Dhanpur Nalu 3682 30

Dhanpur Dudhamali 1980 16
Dhanpur Sajoi 4431 15
Dhanpur 3 Bhorva 5981 10
Dhanpur Kaliyavad 3755 8
Dhanpur 4 Agaswani 4553 8
Dhanpur Mandav 2944 18
Dhanpur 5 Chilakota 10641 10
4.

Fatehpura 1 Salara 7646 18

Fatehpura Fatehpura 6545 18
Fatehpura Vagad 4286 13
Fatehpura 2 Karodiya 4472 10
Fatehpura 3 Ghughas 6762 7
Fatehpura 4 Vasiafui 2871 21

Caritas India, Gujarat 22

.
 LWP – Final Report

Fatehpura Nindaka 6657 7

Fatehpura Vatali 4716 6
Fatehpura Motirel 6560 6
Fatehpura Sukhasar 4151 20
Fatehpur
Fatehpura Kanthagar 4524 11
Fatehpura 5 Afava 4359 6
Garabada Garabada 19735 36
Garabada 1 Zaribuzarg 11200 18
Garabada Abhalod 13620 25
Garabada Nadhelav 9330 23
5. Garabada

Garabada 2 Jesawada 4923 16

Garabada Patiya 6199 24
Garabada Ambli 4962 22
Garabada Bhe 6571 14
Garabada 3 Chharchhoda 4624 8
Garabada Tunki vaju 5532 23
Garabada 4 Gangaradi 2635 14
Garabada Panchwada 2657 31
Garabada 5 Boriyala 6337 8
Garabada Simaliya Buzarg 1800 31
Garabada 6 Jambuva 2740 7
Limkheda Rai 5466 128
Limkheda Madali 5487 23
6. Limkheda

Limkheda 1 Agara 4310 8

Limkheda Limkheda 4841 64
Limkheda Chediya 4225 27
Limkheda Dabhada 4180 19
Limkheda 2 Datiya 2238 17
Limkheda 3 Bandibar 4534 47
Limkheda 4 Chhaparwad 3641 10
Limkheda 5 Methan 7413 24
Limkheda 6 Randhikpur 2929 28
Zalod 1 Sanjeli 7125 17
Zalod Kadval 9577 7
Zalod 2 Varod 4508 7
7. Zalod

Zalod Dhavadiya 8563 8

Zalod 3 Mahudi 4417 6
Zalod 4 Zalod 29345 16
Zalod Mundaheda 5324 8
Zalod 5 Chakaliya 12049 8
Zalod Limdi 17292 14
Zalod 6 Karath 13655 8

Caritas India, Gujarat 23

.
 LWP – Final Report

3 Annexure
3.1 Field Investigators
District: Dahod

S.N Designatio Qualificatio

o Name n n Sex& Age
Field
Graduate Male/24
1 Mr. Dipesh Patel Investigators
Field
Graduate Female/24
2 Ms. Neeta Bhariya Investigators
Field
Graduate Male/44
3 Mr.Deepak Patel Investigators
Field
Graduate Female/27
4 Mrs.Bhawana Suvar Investigators
Field
Graduate Female/27
5 Ms.Champa Bhabar Investigators
Field
Graduate Male/23
6 Mr. Joyel Parmar Investigators
Field
Graduate Female/23
7 Ms.Sunita Bhariya Investigators
Field
Graduate Female/25
8 Ms.Rekha Patel Investigators

3.2 LWS Project staff in Dahod District

S.
Name and Designation Working area
No.
Mr. .Paresh Ode
1 DRP
Mr.Edwin Kadia
2 DRP
Mr. Nirav Panchal
3 M&E

Caritas India, Gujarat 24

.
 LWP – Final Report

Mr.Narvat Palaas
4 Link Supervisors
Mr. Himmat Meda
5 Link Supervisors
Mr.Suresh Muniya
6 Link Supervisors
Mr.Suresh Patelia
7 Link Supervisors
Mrs. Vinaya Kadia
8 Office Assistant

3.2.1 Link Workers in Dahod District

S.
Name of the Link Worker Working area/Block Photo
No.
1 Kamalbhai Chuniyabhai Baria Galaliyavad, Kharedi /
Dahod
2 Sangitaben Shankarbhai Muvaliya, Nagrala /
Mishra Dahod
3 Krunalkumar Naginbhai Luhar Retiya, Chosala /
Dahod
4 Chunilal Dhanabhai Sangada Jalat, Gamla,
Motikharaj / Dahod
5 Kathaliya Hitendrakumar L. Katvara, Dasla / Dahod
6 Devendrakumar Laxmanbhai Rachharda, Timarda /
Baman Dahod
7 Nareshkumar Gopalsing Bavka, Matava,
Bamaniya Kaliyavad, Chilakota/
Limkheda
8 Sureshbhai Rajubhai Solanki Pandadi, Vijagadh /
Garabada & Dahod

Caritas India, Gujarat 25

.
 LWP – Final Report

9 Rameshbhai Ramubhai
Jekot / Dahod
Sangada
10 Narendrasinh Valchandbhai Ambakachh,
Hathila Navanagar / Dhanpur
11 Jantaben Mukeshbhai Patel Nalu, Dudhamli, Sajoi,
Bhorva / Dhanpur
12 Bharatbhai Maniyabhai Tadvi Mandav, Agasvani /
Dhanpur
13 Sarvanbhai Mitibhai Bhuriya Garbada,
Simaliyabujarg /
Garabada
14 Nalavaya Govindbhai L. Jambuva, Zaribujarg /
Garabada
15 Bariya Gayatri Parathibhai Panchvada, Boriyala /
Garabada
16 Navinbhai Mangalsinh Bhabhor Amali, Chharchhoda /
Garabada
17 Sangada Ratansinh Kasanabhai Patia, Bhe, Nandhelav /
Garabada
18 Pasaya Laxmanbhai Abhalod, Jesavada /
Mathurbhai Garabada
19 Babubhai Hirabhai Charela Sanjeli / Zalod
20 Champaben Ravjibhai Bhabhor Dhavadiya, Mahudi /
Zalod
21 Vineshbhai Manubhai Sangada Mundaheda, Karath /
Zalod
22 Lalabhai Somabhai Damor Salara, Fatehpura
23 Ravjibhai Valabhai Damor Fatepura, Vatli, Vangad
/ Fatehpura
24 Ashokbhai kantibhai Prajapati Sukhasar, Afava /
Fatehpura
25 Dilipbhai Parsingbhai Machhar Vansiakui, Nindka /
Fatehpura
26 Kamleshbhai Babubhai Karodiya, Motirel/
Prajapati Fatehpura
27 Dineshbhai Gopalsinh Baria Agara, Manli /
Limkheda
28 Bamaniya Atulkumar Anopsinh Randhikpur,
Chhaparvad /
Limkheda
29 Gadol Kamleshbhai Chandulala Rai / Limkheda
30 Taviyad Vimalkumar
Methan / Limkheda
Goradhanbhai

Caritas India, Gujarat 26

.
 LWP – Final Report

31 Patel Dilipbhai Ratansing Dantiya, Dabhada /

Limkheda
32 Sanjaykumar Badalbhai Baria Limkheda / Limkheda
33 Rajendrakumar Valabhai Toyani, Saliya,
Vankar Pipalod / Devgadh
baria
34 Ashvinkumar Pratapbhai Patel Bhathavada, Rebari /
Devgadh baria
35 Nathusinh Ratanbhai Patelia Ruvabari, Udhavala,
Dangariya / Devgadh
baria
36 Sureshbhai Mohanbhai Ravat Motikhajuri, Dukhali /
Devgadh baria
37 Jasodaben Umedbhai Baria Devgadh baria /
Devgadh baria
38 Bariya Sachin Ramanbhai Bhuval, Kalidungari /
Devgadh baria

Caritas India, Gujarat 27

.