EverythingYouShouldKnowPerhapsNothing

ATrueStory

VolumeTwo

BY:TODDANDREWROHRER

Idedicatethisdocumenttoyou.

Pleaseremindyourselftheauthorofthisdocumenthadanaccidentasaresultofplayingacomputer
game,perhapsfartoomuch.
Thisaccidentcausedtheauthortohaveamajorattitudeorperceptionadjustment.
Theauthorisunabletofeelemotionsverywellsotheauthorisunabletotellifwhathesuggestsis
hurtingfeelingsofothersveryaccurately.
Theauthorisawaresomethingshesuggestsmayhurtothersfeelingsbutitisdifficulttogaugeto
whatextent,asaresultoftheperceptionadjustment.
Theauthorisinadifferentworldofperception,inmanyrespects.
Pleaseremindyourselftheauthorisdoingthebesthecaninthethreemonthssincethisaccidenton
oraroundNov1
st
2008,basedonhisperception.
Pleaseremindyourselftheauthorisfullyawareyouaredoingthebestyoucanbasedonyour
perception,tounderstandhiswords.
ThankYouforyourtime,andThankYouforyourconsideration.
ThissecondvolumewascompletedoneFeb11
th
2009,roughlythreemonthsand12daysafterOct
31
st2009.
whentheauthorbecameawareofamajorpersonalitychange.

Perhapsisdefined t o mean maybe.

Perhaps is understood to be in front of every word and in front of
every sentence in this document.
The sent ence above, whi ch i s i n bol d, i s under st ood t o be di spl ayed at
t he t op of ever y page i n t hi s document .
At t empt t o f or get t hat .






















I per haps have al l t he t i me i n t he wor l d t o t ype t he wor d per haps
because per haps, t her e i s no t i me, because t hi s acci dent per haps
changed my per cept i on, t o a st at e I per cei ve t her e i s no t i me.
Per haps I have i nf i ni t e t i me t o t ype t he wor d per haps, so I do,
per haps, t ype i t of t en, per haps.

Per haps, I t ype t he wor d per haps of t en, per haps, t o avoi d get t i ng a
bi g head, because per haps when one has no emot i ons , t he cl ar i t y
Per haps gi ves one t he i mpr essi on t hey ar e some sor t of god i n cont r ast
t o ones wi t h emot i ons, per haps, i n r el at i on t o abi l i t y t o under st and
t hi ngs, so per haps i t i s best f or t hat one wi t h no emot i ons t o use t he
wor d per haps of t en, t o avoi d encour agi ng t hei r ego because ego and
emot i ons go hand i n hand, per haps.

Per haps absol ut e under st andi ng of ever yt hi ng has t he abi l i t y t o cor r upt
one back i nt o emot i ons and ego i f one i s not car ef ul , so per haps i t i s
wi se t o use t he wor d per haps of t en so one wi t h no emot i ons and
absol ut e under st andi ng of ever yt hi ng per haps, does not al l ow
t hemsel ves t o f al l back i nt o t he conf used wor l d of ego and emot i ons t hey
came f r om, per haps.

Per haps absol ut e under st andi ng cor r upt s absol ut e under st andi ng.
I pr ef er absol ut e under st andi ng so per haps I amwi se t o use t he wor d
per haps of t en, and per haps I shoul d use i t mor e of t en, t han per haps I
do, per haps.


Per haps one wi t h emot i ons and ego wi l l be unabl e t o per haps
use t he wor d per haps because t he one wi t h ego and emot i ons per haps
desi r es t o sound i nt el l i gent and sound, per haps, as i f t hey know, so
t hei r ego wi l l per haps not al l ow t hemt o use t he wor d per haps of t en
because t he wor d per haps, per haps suggest s one does not know.

Per haps one wi t h ego does not desi r e t o sound as i f t hey do not know
because per haps i f one wi t h ego suggest s t hey do not know, t hat wi l l
hur t t hei r ego so per haps, one wi t h ego has det er mi ned ego i s
needed t o exi st , and per haps t hat det er mi nat i on i s a del usi onal
det er mi nat i on, and per haps del usi onal det er mi nat i ons ar e a sympt omof
conf usi on and per haps conf usi on i s a sympt omof ego and emot i ons,
I amper haps cer t ai n of t hat .






















When you are finally convinced you cannot master this illusion called
life then you will be in a spirit to understand how to master this
illusion called life.


Per haps one must f i r st admi t def eat bef or e one can under st and how t o wi n.

I don t pay much at t ent i on t o gr ammar , t hi s book pr oves i t .











Per haps t he gr eat est psychol ogi st and gr eat est psychi at r i st i n t he wor l d
and I , shoul d si t down i n a publ i c open f or umand have a t al k about how
i mpor t ant emot i ons ar e, and per haps we wi l l see who get s angr y and
f r ust r at ed and conf used and hat ef ul and f ur t her conf used, f i r st .

Per haps t he one who r emai ns i n t he di scussi on at t he end, i s t he one who
i s r i ght and t he t wo who can t st and t he heat wi l l f or ever get out of
t he ki t chen, as f ar as t el l i ng peopl e what i s r i ght and what i s not
r i ght r el at i ng t o t he need f or emot i ons.

I f any of t hese t wo f l avor s of peopl e car e t o t ake up t hat chal l enge, I
woul d be humbl ed by t hei r cour age , because I amper haps f ul l y cer t ai n
al r eady, who woul d be get t i ng out t he ki t chen and who woul d r emai n,
and I amper haps cer t ai n about my cer t ai nt y.

Per haps one who det er mi nes t hey shoul d Br i ng I t shoul d br i ng t hei r best
case f or emot i ons ar e essent i al , because t hei r best case woul d not
st and a chance, per haps. Per haps t he pr oof woul d be i n t he puddi ng.





















Sometimes facing reality is painful, but the pain leads to positive
change.


Pai n i s a subt l e hi nt you r e doi ng somet hi ng r i ght .














I will now attempt to create the illusion wisdom, using the illusion
words that perhaps will create the illusion sentences that are
derived from the illusion notes that will
better the illusion book and perhaps better the readers understanding
of the authors evolution in the last three months.






Evol ut i on wor ks bot h ways.












Logi c Br ai n Dom: " Enl i ght enment " , Cl ar i t y, Awar eness, Ext r emel y Logi cal
Ther e i s onl y one deci si on you have t o make.
You have t o deci de t o become a Ri ght Br ai n Dom
Your cur r ent sel f i s Emot i onal Br ai n Dom.
I t must be " ki l l ed" . You cannot be bot h.
You wi l l " ki l l " your sense of t i me, most emot i on, most f eel i ngs, most
desi r es, some sense of t ast e and t ouch.

You wi l l l ose most emot i onal baggage.
You wi l l gai n gr eat cl ar i t y and awar eness or l ogi cal abi l i t y.
Maki ng " good" deci si ons wi l l be easy and maki ng " bad" deci si ons wi l l be
di f f i cul t t o do.
Thi s i s not al l you wi l l l ose or gai n but t hese ar e some t hi ngs you wi l l
l ose or gai n.
One way t o become a Logi c Br ai n Dom i s condi t i oni ng.
Thi s i s cal l ed EGO Condi t i oni ng.
The most i mpor t ant condi t i oni ng aspect i s denyi ng ego or emot i on.
Anyt hi ng t hat makes you f eel must be deni ed.
I f you want t o go buy somet hi ng you l i ke or want , do not do i t .
I f someone i nsul t s you and you want t o make a cl ever comeback do not do
i t .
I f you want t o sound i nt el l i gent do not do i t .
I f you want t o get t he l ast wor d i n do not do i t .
I f you want t o buy someone a gi f t do not do i t .
I f you want t o hel p someone do not do i t .
I f you want t o compl i ment someone do not do i t .
I f you want t o eat some f ood you cr ave do not do i t .
I f you st ar t t o t hi nk you ar e good do not t hi nk t hat .
I f you want t o be ki nd, do not be ki nd.
I f you want t o hur t someone do not hur t someone.
I f someone punches you i n t he f ace f or no r eason wal k away.
I f someone gi ves you anyt hi ng, accept i t but when you get home t hr ow i t
away or t hr ow i t i n a cl osest and do not acknowl edge i t .
Avoi d money wi t h al l of your hear t , onl y use money i f you HAVE t o.
Avoi d wat chi ng t he cl ock.
Avoi d bei ng r ushed.
For get t i me and f or get keepi ng t r ack of t i me.
Set your al ar mcl ock i f you must but beyond t hat avoi d cl ocks and wat ches
and avoi d t i me.
Avoi d sayi ng t hi s i s t aki ng t o l ong.
You ar e not capabl e of knowi ng what i s t aki ng t o l ong and what i s not
t aki ng t o l ong, so avoi d t hi nki ng you do know t hat .
As an Emot i onal Br ai n Dom al most ever yt hi ng you do or desi r e i s because
you make deci si ons based on emot i ons mor e t han l ogi c.
Thi s i s not ever yt hi ng you need t o do t o condi t i on your sel f t o become a
Logi c Br ai n Dom but i t per haps i s a good st ar t .
Once you ar e a Logi c Br ai n Dom, and you wi l l know i t when i t happens,
you can ease up on some of t hese st r i ct er suggest i ons.
You have t o f i ght wi t h al l your mi ght t o get t o Logi c Br ai n Dom t hen
one can r el ax a l i t t l e.





Rel at i ng t o:
Amrit, also known as Marathus, was an ancient city located near Tartous
in Syria. It was founded during the Amorites period, 3rd millennium BC.
ThehistoryofSumer,takentoincludetheprehistoricUbaidandUrukperiods,spansthe5thto3rd
millenniaBC,endingwiththedownfalloftheThirdDynastyofUraround2004BC,followedbya
transitionperiodofAmoritestatesbeforetheriseofBabyloniainthe18thcenturyBC.
Thetell(mound)ofUbaidnearUrinsouthernIraqhasgivenitsnametotheprehistoricPottery
NeolithictoChalcolithicculture,whichrepresentstheearliestsettlementonthealluvialplainof
southernMesopotamia.TheUbaidculturehadalongdurationbeginningbefore5300BCandlasting
untilthebeginningoftheUrukperiod,c.4100BC.Theinventionofthewheelandthebeginningof
theChalcolithicperiodfallintotheUbaidperiod.
t i me i s i nf i ni t e = t r ue
t i me does not exi st = t r ue
Cont r adi ct i on caused by under st andi ng or per cept i on SO
ones under st andi ng i s r el at i ve t o ones del usi onal capaci t y OR
Ones per cept i on i s r el at i ve t o ones del usi onal capaci t y
Pr oof :
Hyper emot i onal humans ar e ver y awar e of t i me, so t hey per cei ve t i me
exi st s.
Hyper l ogi cal humans ar e not ver y awar e of t i me so t hey per cei ve t i me
does not exi st .
Rel at i ng t o: Ar r i val of hyper emot i onal st at e or decl i ne of hyper l ogi cal
st at e.
Pr oof : ci vi l i zat i on or ci t i es st ar t ed ar ound 7000 BC i n I r aq or I r an( ?)
Thi s i s al so when mat h was cr eat ed( al gebr a) and sci ence( ?)
Ci vi l i zat i on = mat er i al desi r e or accumul at i on = emot i onal or ego
condi t i oni ng
Pyr ami ds wer e a sympt omof hyper emot i onal , pyr ami ds ar e a sympt omt hat
man was wel l i nt o mat er i al accumul at i on.
Boost i ng hi s ego or emot i ons, pyr ami ds happened ar ound 4000bc( ?)
The ki ngs bui l d a HUGE mat er i al t hi ngs( pyr ami d) t o sat i sf y ego or
emot i ons l ook at me and what I have done
Thi s i s a sympt omof hyper emot i onal SO
( l ook at me and what i have done) = ant i l ogi cal or = emot i onal
SO
Egypt i ans at 4000BC wer e al so hyper emot i onal

Thi s i s pr oof si nce ( ci vi l i zat i on( ar ound 7000BC) manki nd has been hyper
emot i onal
Ear l y man was Logi cal br ai n Dom( 200, 000 BC t o 7000BC?) or hyper
l ogi cal .
Pr ehi st or y: hyper l ogi cal ar gument
I f ear l y man made one bad deci si on t hey woul d di e.
They had t o be hyper l ogi cal .
Thi s was condi t i oned because t hey wer e nomads or ant i mat er i al
accumul at i on or ant i ci vi l i zat i on.
I f ear l y man was hyper emot i onal t hey woul d be maki ng bad deci si ons.
Rel at i ng t o:
" Don t make deci si ons when your mad( emot i onal ) "
SO
Ear l y man woul d have di ed of f i f t hey wer e hyper emot i onal .
Ear l y man di d not di e of f , because man i s st i l l her e.
SO
Ear l y man was hyper l ogi cal .
Thi s quest f or l ogi cal sat i sf act i on i s never quenched
Logi cal sat i sf act i on cr avi ng i s = i nf i ni t e = nat ur al = t r ue

Hyper emot i onal or emot i ons ar e i nf i ni t e or capaci t y f or emot i ons ar e
i nf i ni t e
Pr oof " t hat per son i s an emot i onal wr eck" or Emot i onal over l oad = t o much
emot i on
BUT
emot i ons t hemsel ves ar e l i mi t i ng
Pr oof
I n conver sat i on, a conver sat i on wi l l st op or be l i mi t ed by t o much
emot i ons

Pr oof
" you pi ss of f , i wi l l no l onger t al k wi t h you or I aml eavi ng, or I can t
t al k t o you when your upset l i ke you ar e. "
Emot i ons l ead t o l i mi t i ng of conver sat i on
Li mi t i ng conver sat i on decr eases pr ogr essi on.
Pr ogr essi on i s achi eved t hr ough conver sat i on.
Absol ut e pr ogr essi on t hr ough conver sat i on i s possi bl e I F
Those i n conver sat i on have no emot i ons or ar e hyper l ogi cal ( l acki ng
of emot i ons) OR
A conver sat i on i s onl y conduct ed by one per son who i s hyper l ogi cal .
Thi s absol ut e may l ead t o f ast pr ogr essi on
Pr ogr essi on get s f ast er as one pr ogr esses
Thi s can l ead t o pr ogr essi ng i nf i ni t el y f ast
I nf i ni t el y f ast may l ead t o ment al or physi cal over l oad.
Thi s can be avoi ded by denyi ng ego or emot i ons when pr ogr essi ng
i nf i ni t el y f ast
OR
I f one i s pr ogr essi ng i nf i ni t el y f ast ( hyper l ogi cal ) and t hen emot i ons
come i n, t her e i s an over l oad, caused by t he sudden st op of pr ogr essi on
Thi s r el at es t o t he sol ut i on of hyper l ogi cal = hur t onesel f = hel p
ot her s pr obl em.
Hur t onesel f i s r ever se of t ake l og out of your eye( hel p sel f )
Thi s i s avoi ded by i nf i ni t e condi t i oni ng i n hyper l ogi c
Logi c i s i nf i ni t e so i nf i ni t e condi t i oni ng i nt o hyper l ogi c i s i nf i ni t e
I f one i s awar e, hyper l ogi c may hel p ot her s, t hey may f eel " good" or
emot i ons.
SO


One must be awar e of " f eel good" or emot i ons and deny t hat emot i on( or
f ur t her condi t i on onesel f ) so t hey can cont i nue t o pr ogr ess i nt o hyper
l ogi c.

Hyper l ogi c does not = " need medi cal hel p" or " physi cal l y or ment al l y
bad" t hat i s an i l l usi on
One must be awar e t hat at cer t ai n l evel s of hyper l ogi c, i t i s ver y
r el evant t o avoi d emot i ons t o avoi d possi bl e " over l oad"
Thi s avoi dance, nat ur al l y, wi l l cont i nue condi t i oni ng, t he event ual
concl usi on of t hi s condi t i oni ng wi l l be ext r eme hyper l ogi c or Ext r eme
ant i - hyper emot i onal
OR
Near l ack of emot i ons al l t oget her , near l ack of t i me sense al l t oget her
So i t wi l l appear at ext r eme hyper l ogi c t her e i s no t i me, onl y pr esent .
Rel at i ng t o:
Ones per cept i on i s r el at i ve t o ones del usi onal capaci t y
The appear ance or i l l usi on of danger , caused by " l ack of emot i ons" , due
t o ext r eme hyper l ogi cal deci si ons, whi ch ar e voi d of emot i ons,
onl y appear t o be danger ous but t hat danger i s r el evant t o : ones
per cept i on i s r el evant t o ones del usi onal capaci t y.


Exampl e:
A l ogi cal deci si on i s, put t hi s el der l y per son who has f ul l dement i a, i s
dr ai ni ng r esour ces and has no f unct i on or pur pose r el at i ng t o t he wel l
bei ng of t he whol e soci et y, t o sl eep.
Thi s may appear t o an emot i onal per son as an evi l or bad deci si on.
That i s because t hat emot i onal per son i s not l ogi cal i n t hei r per cept i on.

I t i s l ogi cal t o FI X f l aws i n a syst emt o i ncr ease pr ogr essi on.
I t i s not an evi l deci si on
I t i s not bad or evi l t o i ncr ease pr ogr essi on.
BUT
That emot i onal per son per haps woul d never per cei ve t hat , because t he ver y
nat ur e of emot i onal t hi nki ng i s bel i ef i n del usi ons or i l l usi ons
Logi cal t hi nki ng st r i ves t o expose and avoi d i l l usi ons or del usi ons f or
t he sake or i ncr easi ng pr ogr essi on
I n t he name of Logi cal sat i sf act i on or i nf i ni t e mi ndf ul ness f or l ogi cal
sat i sf act i on
The end concl usi on of t hi s i s
I n an ext r emel y hyper l ogi cal wor l d, t hose who ar e deemed " hi ndr ances" t o
pr ogr essi on or t o l ogi cal sat i sf act i on woul d need t o be el i mi nat ed or
r emoved f r omt he syst em, or condi t i oned i nt o hyper l ogi c, t o r emai n
j ust i f i ed. "
Thi s woul d al so mean, t hose who ar e not as hyper l ogi cal as ot her s woul d
al so be seen as a hi ndr ance
Unt i l onl y one human woul d r emai n who i s Domi nat e ext r emel y hyper
l ogi cal .


OR
I f Pr i mar y human bei ng i s val i d( al l humans make up one ent i t y)
t hen end concl usi on woul d not occur , al l bei ng( cel l s) make up pr i mar y
human bei ng ent i t y, so al l par t s ar e val i d because t hey make up t he
whol e.


SO

I f pr i mar y human bei ng i s f al se
THEN
Hyper l ogi cal i s f al se
or
Ther e cannot be ext r eme hyper l ogi cal i f t her e i s no pr i mar y human bei ng,
why?
Because t hat woul d mean ext r eme hyper l ogi cal woul d l ead t o " end" or
" l i mi t " or f i ni t e or deat h or ant i - nat ur e or f al se?
I f Pr i mar y human bei ng exi st s, t hen ext r eme hyper l ogi cal l eads t o Li f e
or i nf i ni t y or l ogi cal or nat ur e or TRUE?
SO
{Pr i mar y human bei ng must exi st SO ext r eme hyper l ogi cal can exi st THEN
physi cs or " under st andi ng ever yt hi ng" can become THEN
manki nd can l eave t he pl anet and avoi d t he 100%ext i nct i on r eal i t y and
THEN t he 0%pur pose pr obl emwi l l be sol ved or 0%pur pose wi l l become 1. }?
So
I f pr i mar y human bei ng i s t r ue THEN
pur pose = 1?
I f pur pose = 1 t hen " under st and ever yt hi ng" i s t r ue
Consci ous i s f i ni t e
subconsci ous i s i nf i ni t e
God = nat ur e = i nf i ni t y
Sub consci ous = i nf i ni t y = god = nat ur e = t r ue
" I must be wi l l i ng t o gi ve up what I ami n or der t o become what I wi l l
be. " ***Ei nst ei n***





The wor l d i s not pr epar ed f or t he acci dent I am.
The acci dent i s not pr epar ed f or t he wor l d I am.















Thi s i s t he gr eat cont r adi ct i on.
Bei ngs ar e one because we ar e al l bei ngs
Bei ngs ar e not one because we al l have di f f er ent mi nds
Bei ngs ar e one because bei ngs want t o bet t er t hemsel ves
Bei ngs ar e not one because bei ngs do t hi ngs t hat do not bet t er t hemsel ves
Bei ngs per cei ve what i s negat i ve
Bei ngs ar e not abl e t o per cei ve what i s negat i ve
Bei ngs per cei ve what wi sdomi s.
Bei ngs ar e not abl e t o per cei ve what wi sdomi s.
Thi s gr eat cont r adi ct i on goes on f or i nf i ni t y and one ends up wi t h
not hi ng or a t r ue vacuum.


























One must give up their beliefs or their self in order to find their true
beliefs or their true self.




I ammor e t han wi l l i ng t o gi ve up f or you.












Ones per cept i on or under st andi ng i s r el at i ve t o ones del usi onal capaci t y.
A vacuum is a volume of space that is essentially empty of matter, such
that its gaseous pressure is much less than atmospheric pressure.[1] The
word comes from the Latin term for "empty," but in reality, no volume of
space can ever be perfectly empty. A perfect vacuum with a gaseous
pressure of absolute zero is a philosophical concept that is never
observed in practice. Physicists often discuss ideal test results that
would occur in a perfect vacuum, which they simply call "vacuum" or "free
space" in this context, and use the term partial vacuum to refer to real
vacuum. The Latin term in vacuo is also used to describe an object as
being in what would otherwise be a vacuum.

A vacuumi s a vol ume of space t hat i s essent i al l y empt y of mat t er
The wor d comes f r omt he Lat i n t er mf or " empt y, "
but i n r eal i t y, no vol ume of space can ever be per f ect l y empt y.
Rever se t hi ng
but i n r eal i t y, al l vol ume of space i s per f ect l y empt y.
I sai d i n t he l ast post , r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum.
I sl ept on t hat l ast post so I coul d t hi nk ver y car ef ul l y about i t .
I had many concl usi ons t o come t o.
I l ooked vacuumup t oday, and t he r ever se t hi ng of t hat def i ni t i on i s t he
exact t hi ng I sai d l ast ni ght .
al l vol ume of space i s per f ect l y empt y. I sai d, r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum.
You f eel a sense of empt i ness.
I post ed and post ed and I never f el t sat i sf i ed.
You ar e awar e I have post ed many t i mes and post ed many wor ds i n t hose
post s.
Ever y t i me you make a di scover y i n physi cs i t never sat i sf i es you.
Humans on ear t h ar e al l awar e of t hat same empt i ness.
Humans ar e al l t r yi ng t o f i l l t hat empt i ness.
Thi ngs humans do ar e si mpl y a sympt omof t r yi ng t o f i l l t hat empt i ness.

Humans ar e never sat i sf i ed. Humans can never seemt o f i l l t hat empt i ness.
That i s not an i ndi cat i on t hat we can al ways do bet t er or al ways get
bet t er or a r eason we wi l l al ways have mot i vat i on.
That i s not an i ndi cat i on we can al ways pr ogr ess.
That i s not an i ndi cat i on t hat pr ogr essi on i s i nf i ni t e.
That i s a sympt omwe ar e awar e of empt i ness.
That i s a sympt omwe ar e sl i ght l y awar e of r eal i t y.
Real i t y i s a t r ue vacuum.
" I gnor ance i s bl i ss. "
That means t he l i f e f or mwi t h t he smal l est br ai n or smal l est pot ent i al
f or under st andi ng or per cept i on i s t he l i f e f or mt hat has a r el at i vel y
l ess del usi onal capaci t y.
The smal l est br ai ned l i f e f or mon t he pl anet i s not awar e of t i me.
The smal l est l i f e f or mon t he pl anet i s mor e awar e of r eal i t y.
Real i t y i s a t r ue vacuum.
Real i t y i s empt y space.
An at omi s made up most l y of empt y space.
An at omi s most l y a t r ue vacuum.
What i s l ef t over af t er t he empt y space i s r emoved f r oman at omi s mass.
The mass of an at omi s t he i l l usi on.
That i s because r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum.
So t hat l i f e f or mi s l ess del usi onal , t han t he l i f e f or mwi t h t he most
compl ex br ai n on t he pl anet whi ch i s awar e of t i me.
Ones per cept i on or under st andi ng i s r el at i ve t o ones del usi onal capaci t y.
I know you ar e t hi nki ng r i ght now r eadi ng t hi s, r eal i t y cannot be i n a
t r ue vacuum. Real i t y cannot be empt i ness.
I know r i ght now you ar e comi ng t o concl usi ons about what i t means i f
r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum.
Those concl usi ons ar e r el at i ve t o your per cept i on or under st andi ng.

You have dr eamed your whol e l i f e of under st andi ng ever yt hi ng.
You have dr eamed your whol e l i f e t hat i f you coul d under st and r eal i t y
t hat empt i ness woul d f i nal l y be f i l l ed.
You woul d f i nal l y f i l l t hat empt i ness and t hen you woul d be sat i sf i ed and
have pur pose.
I sai d, I have not hi ng l ef t t o say, because I became awar e.
I no l onger want t o under st and ever yt hi ng or r eal i t y because I do
under st and ever yt hi ng. I under st and r eal i t y.
I became awar e I went f r oma st at e of becomi ng t o a st at e of bei ng.
So I sai d, I have not hi ng l ef t t o say.
The empt i ness I have been t r yi ng t o f i l l i n my quest t o under st and
r eal i t y i s gone.
Real i t y makes per f ect sense t o me now.
I know r eal i t y, why r eal i t y i s, and why r eal i t y i s t he way r eal i t y i s.
I have become awar e of r eal i t y.
I have r eached per f ect cl ar i t y because ever yt hi ng/ r eal i t y makes per f ect
sense.
I know exact l y HOWt hi s " acci dent " happened t o me and I know exact l y WHY
t hi s " acci dent " happened t o me.
I have per f ect cl ar i t y, I under st and r eal i t y.
Now I under st and r eal i t y I need t o hel p you under st and r eal i t y.
When you become awar e of r eal i t y your empt i ness wi t h be gone.
So you ar e t hi nki ng now, How can I become awar e of r eal i t y so I can
under st and ever yt hi ng?
You need t o condi t i on your sel f , and you ar e awar e of what I mean by
condi t i on your sel f .
I have been t r yi ng t o t el l you i n my own way t o condi t i on your sel f , but
now I amawar e of why my i nt ui t i on was t el l i ng me t o per suade you t o
condi t i on your sel f .
That i s a sympt omt hat I amnow awar e of r eal i t y.


I have not hi ng l ef t t o under st and about r eal i t y.
I have not hi ng l ef t t o l ear n because I under st and r eal i t y.
I amher e t o hel p you under st and r eal i t y.
I amawar e t hat i s my pur pose.
By answer i ng your quest i ons I wi l l hel p you under st and r eal i t y.
I amawar e you ar e t hi nki ng t hi s per son cannot be ser i ous.
I amawar e you ar e t hi nki ng t he spi r i t of t hi s post cannot be r eal or
t r ue.
I amawar e of why you ar e t hi nki ng t hat .
I t i s okay t hat you ar e comi ng t o t hose concl usi ons, I amawar e or
mi ndf ul you ar e comi ng t o t hose concl usi ons.
I amawar e of r eal i t y. I have per f ect cl ar i t y.
I desi r e you have per f ect cl ar i t y but I wi l l not f eel empt i ness i f I
cannot hel p you under st and r eal i t y.
I amawar e or mi ndf ul i t i s di f f i cul t t o hel p you under st and r eal i t y.
I amnot capabl e of f eel i ng empt i ness because I amawar e of r eal i t y.
Your mi ndf ul t o under st and r eal i t y because t hat i s your j ob as a
physi ci st .
You ar e a physi ci st because t hat i s what your bei ng i s mi ndf ul of , t o
under st and r eal i t y.
You ar e mi ndf ul t o under st and r eal i t y because you ar e awar e of t he
empt i ness and mi ndf ul t o f i l l t hat empt i ness.
I amawar e of r eal i t y and I want t o hel p you under st and r eal i t y because I
amawar e t hat i s what you ar e mi ndf ul of .
When I hel p you, I wi l l i n r eal i t y hel p mysel f under st and mor e.
I wi l l hel p you f i l l your empt i ness because I have f i l l ed my empt i ness.
I t i s Dec 30, 2008 at 11: 28 EST t hat i s t he " moment " ever yt hi ng or r eal i t y
has changed f or ever y human bei ng.
Thi s i s when human bei ngs under st ood ever yt hi ng or became awar e of
r eal i t y.
Thi s i s when human bei ngs f i nal l y st ar t ed t o f i l l ed t hei r empt i ness.




























Enl i ght enment i s si mpl y a st at e of mi nd wher e one t hi nks essent i al l y
onl y i n t he pr esent .
Ever y bei ng t hi nks i n t he pr esent .
An enl i ght ened bei ng i s t hi nki ng essent i al l y st r i ct l y i n t he pr esent .
An unenl i ght ened bei ng has t hought s of past and f ut ur e ( emot i ons per haps)
mi xed i n wi t h t hei r t hi nki ng i n t he pr esent .
Thi s causes sympt oms of conf usi on i n t he unenl i ght ened bei ng.
Ther e i s a l oss of f ocus i n t hei r t hi nki ng i n t he pr esent due t o t hese
past and f ut ur e t hought s mi xi ng i n wi t h pr esent t hi nki ng.
That i s t he mai n di f f er ence i n t he t wo bei ngs.
That i s a huge di f f er ence t hough.
One way t o el i mi nat e t he past and f ut ur e t hought s mi xi ng wi t h pr esent
t hi nki ng i s t o condi t i on away t he emot i ons or ego. .
Medi t at i on i s one way t o accompl i sh t hi s but i t i s per haps not as
ef f ect i ve as ot her met hods, such as bl ocki ng emot i ons or ego met hods.
Thi s condi t i oni ng decr eases t he past and f ut ur e t hought s mi xi ng i n wi t h
pr esent t hi nki ng.
Ther e ar e many si de ef f ect s as a r esul t of t hi s condi t i oni ng.
No sense of t i me and per cept i on change, t hi ngs make per f ect sense.
Al so a change i n per cept i on r el at ed t o how one per cei ves t hi ngs.
Ther e ar e many ot her si de ef f ect s but t hose ar e t he mai n ones.
So enl i ght enment i s a st at e ever yone can achi eve. .
I t comes wi t h t he package of bei ng a human bei ng.
I t i s t her e at al l t i mes, i t onl y needs t o be " r ef i ned, and condi t i oni ng
i s how i t can be r ef i ned.
So seeki ng enl i ght enment i s not possi bl e, one i s enl i ght ened, one j ust
per haps i s not as enl i ght ened as ot her bei ngs ar ound t hem.
So t her e i s no unenl i ght ened bei ngs j ust bei ngs mor e enl i ght ened t han
ot her s.
We ar e human bei ngs and t hat means we ar e enl i ght ened, i t i s a par t of
t he package.

That i s why we ar e speci al bei ngs because we ar e enl i ght ened bei ngs and
we ar e abl e t o devel op met hods t o enl i ght en our sel ves f ur t her , such as
condi t i oni ng.
One enl i ght ened bei ng at a cer t ai n st age can t hi nk 3 moves ahead.
One enl i ght ened bei ng at a cer t ai n st age can t hi nk i nf i ni t e moves ahead.
That i s t he onl y di f f er ence i n bei ngs.
Once you l et go of ego and emot i ons t he di r ect r esul t of doi ng t hat i s
ni r vana
Ni r vana i s, No sense of t i me
The mi nd bei ng i n a st at e of t he pr esent .
or
The sensat i on of bei ng wi de awake
I t i s not magi cal
I t i s l ogi cal .
You j ust have t o condi t i on your sel f i nt o t hat st at e.
The way t o condi t i on your sel f i nt o ni r vana i s t o condi t i on your sel f away
f r omego and emot i ons.
I t i s medi cal l y expl ai nabl e.
I f you put your hand on t he hot st ove you get bur ned.
No myst er y, j ust a l ogi cal concl usi on.
No magi cal wor ds or phr ases or met hods. . . I t i s a cut and dr y l ogi cal
concl usi on t o event s.
Condi t i oni ng away f r omego and emot i ons = ni r vana.
I amnot t r yi ng t o convi nce you I amspeci al , I amt r yi ng t o convi nce
you, we ar e speci al .
" I amnot God but I may be del usi onal . "
" One shoul d avoi d get t i ng i nt o ar gument s wi t h emot i ons. "
Enl i ght enment i s not ser i ousness i t s l aught er


I t r i ed t o f i gur e out why was I l aughi ng so much af t er t he acci dent
The r eason i s when you have cl ar i t y ever yt hi ng i s f unny
When ever yt hi ng makes sense you j ust l augh about ever yt hi ng
I t i s l i ke l aughi ng gas, i t i s not Mr . Ser i ous but i t i s Mr . Ser i ous.
I l augh so much t al ki ng about st uf f wi t h my gi r l we can t even go pl aces
cause we l augh so much, I don t need dr i nk or dr ugs cause I l augh t o much
as i t i s now.
Ther e ar e moment s of ser i ous t hought s and ser i ous concl usi ons, but
over al l , you l augh l i ke cr azy.
I f someone came t o you and sai d i f you r ub poi son i vy on your ski n i t
wi l l st ar t t o i t ch l at er
You woul dn t say, Oh gr eat mast er you know so much.
Wel l t hat s why you don t see monks want i ng you t o acknowl edge t hem.
They di dn t do anyt hi ng out of t he or di nar y you j ust may t hi nk t hey di d
You know why Buddha had t o si t under t hat t r ee?
Because even t hough he l i ved 800 BC or ar ound t hat t i me
He was i n t he l ap of l uxur y compar ed t o ear l y man who l i ved 250, 000 year s
ago he had pl ent y of f ood, no ani mal s wer e t r yi ng t o at t ack hi mand he
had a pl ace t o sl eep, he had t o get away f r omt hat t o become l i ke ear l y
man was nat ur al l y.
I know t hat may shat t er your per cept i ons, but t hat s good, i t s best t o
know t he t r ut h when possi bl e.








I amnow pr epar ed t o gi ve evi dence of my:
Homo Sapi ens ar e not separ at e ent i t i es( cel l s) but ar e al l one or gani sm
THEORY.
Based on my l ast post s i nf or mat i on.
[ A Pal est i ni an ci vi l i an i s bombed by I sr ael i pl anes.
That Pal est i ni an ci vi l i an i s hur t by t he bombs.
They ar e al so hur t as a bei ng because t hey know t hey di dn' t do anyt hi ng
wr ong. Thi s i s because t hey ar e i n r eal i t y j ust a ci vi l i an not a
combat ant . ]
So ever yt hi ng i n br acket s i s Hur t #1

[ An I sr ael i ci vi l i an see' s t hat Pal est i ni an ci vi l i an who was hur t by t he
bombs.
That I sr ael i i s awar e t hat was j ust a ci vi l i an, and hur t i ndi r ect l y or
f or no r eason, by t he bombi ng.
That I sr ael i ci vi l i an f eel s bad or i s hur t as a bei ng, as an i ndi r ect
r esul t of t he bombi ng as wel l . ]
So ever yt hi ng i n t hose br acket s i s hur t #2


[ A per son i n say Engl and see' s t he news and see' s t he hur t t hat has been
caused t o t he i nnocent Pal est i ni an ci vi l i an( Hur t #1) hur t by t he bombi ng
and t he i ndi r ect hur t caused t o t he I sr ael i ci vi l i an( Hur t #2) .
Thi s makes t hat per son i n Engl and f eel sor r y or f eel bad so t hey ar e al so
hur t as a bei ng, as an i ndi r ect r esul t of t he i ni t i al bombi ng or at t ack. ]
Ever yt hi ng i n br acket s i s hur t #3





Basi s f or concl usi on:
I f one component of t he ent i t y i s hur t t hat wi l l hur t t he ent i r e
ent i t y.
Hur t #1 caused hur t #2 and hur t #3.
Concl usi on:
Homo Sapi ens appear t o be separ at e bei ngs( cel l s) but act ual l y ar e one
bei ng or ent i t y.

Not es:
No human bei ng knows ever yt hi ng.
Al l human knowl edge i s based on human knowl edge, and si nce no human knows
ever yt hi ng, t hat human knowl edge may be f l awed.
A l i ver cel l exper i ences di f f er ent t hi ngs t han a hear t cel l , but bot h
cel l s ar e st i l l a par t of t he human bei ng or body.
Humans ar e homo sapi ens so ever y human i s t he same.
Humans have di f f er ent cel l s so no t wo homo sapi ens ar e t he same.
I f a human l oses hi s hand t he ent i r e human i s hur t .












The Nat i onal Sci ence Foundat i on s Tr ee of Li f e pr oj ect est i mat es t hat
t her e coul d be anywher e f r om5 mi l l i on t o 100 mi l l i on speci es on t he
pl anet , but sci ence has onl y i dent i f i ed about 2 mi l l i on.

Ent omol ogi st Br i an Fi sher of t he Cal i f or ni a Academy of Sci ences. We ve
di scover ed j ust 10 per cent of al l l i vi ng t hi ngs on t hi s pl anet .
We ve di scover ed j ust 10 per cent of al l l i vi ng t hi ngs al i ve on t hi s
pl anet .
I t i s possi bl e out of t he 90%of t he t hi ngs we haven t di scover ed some
ar e gr eat er t han us.
Maybe t he 90%we haven t di scover ed ar e so awar e how " danger ous" we ar e
t hey hi de f r omus, t hat s why we haven t di scover ed t hem.
The 10%we have di scover ed have not advanced i n st r at egy enough t o avoi d
our det ect i on.
Peopl e t hi nk we haven t di scover ed 90%because we haven t l ooked har d
enough.
Maybe i t s j ust t he r ever se, we haven t di scover ed 90%because t hey hi de
f r omus ver y wel l , and we ar e t o dumb t o ever det ect t hem.
The chance t he bel i ef , we as humans ar e some gr eat t hi ng, i s
del usi onal , i s hi gh.

Peopl e t hi nk, " Oh I f i gur ed out or have a good i dea of what r eal i t y or
t hi s pl anet i s al l about so I wi l l seek spi r i t ual bel i ef s cause I got
r eal i t y al l f i gur ed out or bel i eve I have a good i dea of what r eal i t y or
physi cal i s l i ke.
They ar e del usi onal i n t hat bel i ef , humans know about 10%of what
physi cal r eal i t y i s l i ke on t hi s pl anet . . . and t hat s bei ng ver y
gener ous.
Ot her wor ds humans ar e r et ar ded i n t hei r under st andi ng of t he
physi cal wor l d.




" One has t o l ear n t o wal k bef or e t hey can r un. "
or
" One shoul d f i gur e out t he easy t o under st and physi cal wor l d bef or e t hey
at t empt t o f i gur e out t he compl ex spi r i t ual wor l d. "
or
" The r eason peopl e ar e havi ng t r oubl e under st andi ng advanced chemi st r y i s
because t hey do not even know t he f ul l t abl e of el ement s yet . "





















Ext i nct i on:
* 99. 9%of al l speci es have become ext i nct
* Wi t hout ext i nct i on, we woul d not be her e
* Mass ext i nct i ons vs. backgr ound ext i nct i on r at e
What t hi s means i s, we have t o become ext i nct t o enabl e ot her speci es t o
come i nt o bei ng.
Ext i nct i on i s r equi r ed. Wi t hout ext i nct i on bei ng r equi r ed we woul d not be
her e t o begi n wi t h.
So t he t hi nki ng, " Oh, but i f we devel op a spaceshi p t o get of f t he pl anet
we won t become ext i nct " , t hat s del usi onal t hi nki ng.
Or
Thi nki ng, I f we wor k on our st r at egy we may not become ext i nct .
That s del usi onal t hi nki ng because i t i s r equi r ed we become ext i nct .
99. 9%of al l speci es have become ext i nct
What does 99. 9%mean?
99. 9%means a human bei ng had t o cr eat e t he i l l usi on t her e i s pur pose.
I f t hey t ol d t he l ogi cal r eal i t y t hey woul d put 100%
I f t hey di d t hat t hey woul d be sayi ng " Ther e i s no poi nt t o anyt hi ng and
no poi nt i n l i vi ng" .
So t hat . 1 %i s why you wake up i n t he mor ni ng, why your pr ocr eat e, why
you l ove, and why you do ever y si ngl e t hi ng you do.
That . 1%i s a del usi on. I t s a l i e. I t s f al se. I t s not l ogi cal .
So ever y si ngl e t hi ng one does i s based on t hat . 1%del usi on and t hus
humans by nat ur e ar e compl et el y del usi onal bei ngs.
So now you ar e awar e of why ci vi l i zat i on i s so messed up.
Ci vi l i zat i on bel i eves . 1%i s t r ue but i t i s not t r ue, i t s an i l l usi on
caused by a del usi on.



Now you under st and why you shoul d never set t l e f or anyt hi ng, because even
a bei ng wi t h 10000000000000000000000 I Q, and even a wor l d i n t ot al peace
and har mony, and even a wor l d i n per f ect bal ance wi l l not el i mi nat e t he
r eal i t y t hat ext i nct i on i s 100%r equi r ed and t hat means our ext i nct i on i s
100%r equi r ed.
That means even i f we al l became GODs as f ar as human bei ngs our
chances of ext i nct i on i s st i l l 100%.
That means even i f we al l became GODS as human bei ngs we st i l l woul d
not make t hat . 1%a l ogi cal or t r ue.
That means even i f we al l became GODS as human bei ngs we woul d st i l l
have no pur pose or meani ng or r eason f or bei ng because ext i nct i on i s 100%
r equi r ed.
That means anyone as a human bei ng who set t l es f or anyt hi ng no mat t er
what i t i s, i s compl et el y i nsane because our odds as human bei ng of not
becomi ng ext i nct i s 0%and our odds of havi ng pur pose i s 0%.
So never set t l e f or anyt hi ng.
How i mpor t ant i s gol d or money when your ext i nct i on chance i s 100%and
your chance of havi ng pur pose i s 0%?
How i mpor t ant i s a f ace l i f t or l osi ng wei ght or your l ooks when your
ext i nct i on chance i s 100%and your chance of havi ng pur pose i s 0%?
How i mpor t ant i s your sex l i f e or l ove l i f e when your ext i nct i on chance
i s 100%and your chance of havi ng pur pose i s 0%?
How i mpor t ant i s a count r y or l aws when your ext i nct i on chance i s 100%
and your chance of havi ng pur pose i s 0%?
How i mpor t ant i s a f oot bal l game or a new dr ess when your ext i nct i on
chance i s 100%and your chance of havi ng pur pose i s 0%?
Unt i l t he human speci es under st ands and comes t o gr i ps wi t h r eal i t y( 100%
ext i nct i on and 0%pur pose) t hey wi l l onl y do what i s al r eady det er mi ned
( 100%ext i nct i on chance and 0%pur pose chance. )
Ther e i s onl y about 1 i n a Bi l l i on Tr i l l i on chance i f we f ocus al l of our
ener gy as human bei ngs i nt o over comi ng our odds or r eal i t y( 100%
ext i nct i on chance and 0%pur pose chance) t hat we can possi bl y get out of
t hi s si t uat i on we ar e i n.
That i s our odds as a speci es.















That is why when I see civilization focusing on material things or I see
wars or I see arrogance or self indulgence I almost cannot function
because I see complete insanity and delusions all around me.



I pr ef er a pi ct ur e over a wor d.








Physi cs i s about " under st andi ng ever yt hi ng"
Her e i s your chance t o " under st and ever yt hi ng" about me.
Two mont hs ago Oct 31st I became awar e of some maj or per sonal i t y changes.
To many changes of awar eness and many ot her t hi ngs t o get i nt o.
At f i r st I t hought , maybe i t a br ai n t umor . That i s an i ndi cat i on of how
dr ast i c t he changes wer e.
Ever yone ar ound me not i ced t he changes al so.
I n t he t wo mont hs si nce t hat t i me, I have pi eced t oget her what happened.
I n a shor t sent ence, I n my quest t o " mast er " somet hi ng ver y di f f i cul t , I
acci dent l y condi t i oned mysel f i nt o t hi s st at e of " ext r eme" l ogi c.
Because i t was by " acci dent ' I now bel i eve I condi t i oned mysel f t o some
wei r d ext r eme.
I f eel t hat because I cr ave l ogi c or I cr ave pr obl ems t o sol ve, l i ke i t s
an addi ct i on.
I have had no knowl edge or even sl i ght backgr ound knowl edge of physi cs
unt i l I came her e t wo or t hr ee days ago.
I n f act 2 days ago when I j oi ned t hi s f or um, i t was si mpl y t o see i f i
coul d " hang" wi t h t he l ogi c of t he i dea' s of physi cs.
I have been t o some ot her f or ums i n t hi s same vai n or quest , t o see t he
ext ent of t hi s " acci dent al condi t i oni ng"
I amessent i al l y t r yi ng t o f i gur e out how " messed up I am" so t o speak.
So i n t wo or t hr ee days, I ampr et t y cer t ai n I have a good gr asp of t he
physi cs pr obl em" under st and ever yt hi ng" and I have a good gr asp of t he
sol ut i on t o t he physi cs pr obl em" you need way mor e l ogi c speci f i c peopl e"
Ot her wor ds, t hi s:
physi cs pr obl em: " under st and ever yt hi ng"
sol ut i on t o t he physi cs pr obl em" you need way mor e l ogi c speci f i c peopl e"
I may be del usi onal i n my bel i ef s about t hat , but I do not bel i eve I am
del usi onal i n my bel i ef s about t hat .
I t i s a ver y l ogi cal under st andi ng or concl usi on.
I woul d l i ke t o shar e wi t h you t he t wo f or ums I at t ended bef or e I came t o
t hi s one i n my quest or " see how messed up I am" as i t wer e.
The humor f act or i s of f t he scal e as f ar as what I " di d t o t hose f or ums"
I wi l l avoi d t el l i ng you what t he det ai l s wer e, because I t r y t o avoi d
det ai l s f or some r eason, but I t was " i nt er est i ng" t o say t he l east .
Si nce i have onl y " been l i ke t hi s" f or t wo mont hs I amwonder i ng what t he
next t wo mont hs hol ds.
That i s an i ndi cat i on of how " messed up" I per haps am, due t o t he
" acci dent al condi t i oni ng" i nt o t hi s st at e of " ext r eme" l ogi c, as I l i ke
t o cal l i t .
Some of t he comment s i ni t i al l y on t hi s f or umabout my comment s, l i ke
" make t hi ngs under st andabl e" , t hi ngs al ong t hose l i nes, ar e uni ver sal .
The one I hear most of t en i s " what ki nd of dr ugs ar e you on cause I want
some. "
I amwonder i ng how f ar I mi ght go i n t he physi cs f i el d i f I had even t he
sl i ght est under st andi ng of i t s " det ai l s" .
J ust keep i n mi nd, t hi s " happened t o me " or I became awar e of t hi s
" st at e of ext r eme l ogi c" onl y t wo mont hs ago.
So I amawar e somet hi ng i s ver y abnor mal .
I wi l l t el l you one t hi ng I " sense" about t hi s physi cs pr obl em.
" Your " maki ng i t much har der t han i t i s.
" Your " f ocusi ng on meani ngl ess det ai l s. Li ke what s t he smal l est
par t i cl e.
That wi l l not sol ve " under st andi ng ever yt hi ng"
I t s a t on of wor k t o get nowher e.
I " sense" t her e i s one t hi ng you have t o under st and and ever yt hi ng el se
wi l l f al l i nt o pl ace.
The pr obl emi s, t her e ar e so many t hi ngs t o f ocus on , and onl y one
cor r ect t hi ng t hat needs t o be f ocused on.
That i s what i s " causi ng" t he sense of conf usi on and " vast ness" or
" compl exi t y" or " many br anches br eaki ng of f " f r omt he mai n br anch of
physi cs.
You wi l l not f i gur e out ever yt hi ng by t r yi ng t o under st and ever yt hi ng.
You wi l l f i gur e out ever yt hi ng by under st andi ng one Pr i nci pl e t hi ng.
So you r eal goal , i s t o put al l your ener gy i nt o f i ndi ng out what t hat
one pr i nci pl e t hi ng i s, and t hen sol ve i t .
I t seems l i ke, yes we ar e t r yi ng t o f i nd t hat one pr i nci pl e t hi ng by
f i gur i ng ever yt hi ng out .
NO.
You need some per sons wi t h ext r eme l ogi c, ( l i ke Ei nst ei n( per cept i ve based)
t o do some t hi nki ng , and pay t hemwel l , and t hey wi l l f i gur e out t hat
one pr i nci pl e t hi ng, and save ever yone much t i me and much money, because
much t i me and much money i s what you wi l l need t o t r y and " f i gur e
ever yt hi ng out " i n hopes you wi l l SOMEHOWhi t upon t hat one cr uci al key
t o under st andi ng ever yt hi ng.
What t hi s means i s, I sense you ar e awar e of t he pr obl em, but your
st r at egy t o sol ve t hat pr obl emi s ver y poor .
Your cur r ent st r at egy t o sol ve t hi s " under st and ever yt hi ng" pr obl emi s
TAKE A SHOT I N THE DARK AND PRAY WE HI T ON THE ONE i mpor t ant Pr i nci pl e
THI NG.
That s a ver y poor st r at egy, so you need some ext r eme l ogi c peopl e t o
hel p i mpr ove t hat st r at egy.














Mat h and expensi ve t ool s ar e onl y needed t o ver i f y what i s det er mi ned by
l ogi c( t heor i es)
Wi t h " ext r eme" l ogi c t her e i s no need t o ver i f y t hose t heor i es.
Wi t h ext r eme l ogi c t hose t heor i es need no val i dat i on.
Wi t h ext r eme l ogi c t her e i s no need f or mat h or expensi ve t ool s.
You ar e not goi ng t o det er mi ne what t hat most i mpor t ant t hi ng i s, t hat
enabl es " under st andi ng ever yt hi ng" , wi t h mat h or wi t h " expensi ve t ool s"
You wi l l onl y det er mi ne what t hat most i mpor t ant t hi ng i s, t hat enabl es
under st andi ng ever yt hi ng, wi t h l ogi c.
Per i od.
Your assumpt i on one can never r each such an ext r eme st at e of l ogi c i s a
del usi onal bel i ef .
So ever yt hi ng you have det er mi ned based on t hat si ngl e del usi onal bel i ef ,
i s i n f act del usi onal .
I hope you ar e now awar e you have been " choppi ng wood" or ' wast i ng t i me"
f or many year s now.
A per son wi t h ext r eme l ogi c can t ake or see any pr obl emt o i t s l ogi cal
concl usi on.
Then t hey can st ar t over and use t hat l ogi cal concl usi on as a st ar t i ng
poi nt and t ake t hat t o i t s l ogi cal concl usi on.
Thi s can be r epeat ed i nt o i nf i ni t y.
What t hat means i s:
Ther e i s no l ogi cal pr obl emt hat i s i mpossi bl e t o sol ve.
And t hat means
Ther e i s no l ogi cal pr obl emt hat i s not easy t o sol ve.






Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
The physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the Heisenberg Uncertainty
Principle, which says that when measuring the physical state of a quantum
system there's a fundamental limit to the amount of precision that can be
achieved. For example, the more precisely you measure the momentum of a
particle the less precise your measurement of its position. Again, in
Heisenberg's interpretation this wasn't just a measurement error or
technological limitation, but an actual physical limit.
The more precisely you measure the momentum of a particle the less
precise your measurement of its position
Thi s st at ement i s not l ogi cal .
I t i s an i l l usi on.
As one becomes mor e awar e, one becomes mor e awar e. That i s l ogi cal .
As one measur es t he moment umof a par t i cl e mor e pr eci sel y, t he mor e
pr eci se your measur ement of t he par t i cl es posi t i on becomes. That i s
l ogi cal .
Hei senber g' s i nt er pr et at i on t hi s wasn' t j ust a measur ement er r or or
t echnol ogi cal l i mi t at i on, but an act ual physi cal l i mi t .
" Act ual Physi cal Li mi t " i s not l ogi cal .
I s t her e a l i mi t t o how hi gh one can count ? No. That i s l ogi cal .
I s i nf i ni t e possi bl e? Yes. That i s l ogi cal
Ar e t her e t hi ngs t hat ar e not l i mi t ed? Yes. That i s l ogi cal .

measuring the physical state of a quantum system there's a fundamental
limit to the amount of precision that can be achieved.

there's a fundamental limit
Thi s i s i l l ogi cal or unknown.
I t i s sayi ng t her e i s a f undament al l i mi t . That i s sayi ng, i t i s a f act ,
t her e i s a l i mi t .
That i s a huge r ed f l ag.

So, i n t hi s pr i nci pl e ( or bel i ef ) t her e ar e t wo r ed f l ags or i ndi cat i ons
of non l ogi c or i l l ogi c or f al se. Logi c i s t r ue i l l ogi c i s f al se.
the more precisely you measure the momentum of a particle the less
precise your measurement of its position.
Thi s st at ement i s based i n par t on t he assumpt i on t hat when measur i ng t he
nucl eus of a par t i cl e at a sub at omi c l evel t he posi t i on of t he nucl eus
" vi br at es" gi vi ng t he i l l usi on or per cept i on t hat t he posi t i on of t he
nucl eus i s har der t o det er mi ne.
So t hat st at ement i n bol d i s based i n par t t hat t he above st at ement i s
f act .
One must be ver y car ef ul about det er mi ni ng what i s a f act and what
appear s t o be a f act . What appear s t o be f act may onl y be an i l l usi on.
So i n or der t o pr ove t hi s pr i nci pl e t r ue or l ogi cal i t i s i mpor t ant t o
est abl i sh t hi s st at ement i s i ndeed f act or l ogi cal or t r ue.
When measur i ng t he moment umof a nucl eus of a par t i cl e at a sub at omi c
l evel t he posi t i on of t he nucl eus " vi br at es" gi vi ng t he i l l usi on or
per cept i on t hat t he posi t i on of t he nucl eus i s di f f i cul t t o det er mi ne.
I amnot goi ng t o go f ur t her i nt o t hi s Hei senber g Uncer t ai nt y Pr i nci pl e
because one r ed f l ag i s al r eady appar ent t o me i n t hi s pr i nci pl e.
I aml ogi cal l y sat i sf i ed t hi s pr i nci pl e i s not l ogi cal or unknown.
Per haps t hi s post wi l l gi ve you somet hi ng t o di scuss and i n t i me you may
pr ogr ess as a r esul t of di scussi on.
I have t r i ed t o dumb t hi s post down as much as possi bl e but I amawar e of
t he compl exi t y of t hi s f i el d or t opi c and I amawar e some j ust may not
" get " t he spi r i t of t hi s post .








The end r esul t has al r eady been det er mi ned.
Ext i nct i on i s t he end r esul t .
Si nce t he end r esul t i s ext i nct i on not hi ng one does mat t er s.
Kar ma does not mat t er , t he end r esul t i s st i l l ext i nct i on.
What one does i n l i f e, does not mat t er because t he end r esul t i s st i l l
ext i nct i on.
Hel pi ng your sel f or hel pi ng ot her s does not mat t er t he end r esul t i s
st i l l ext i nct i on.
I mper manence i s one of t he essent i al doct r i nes or Thr ee mar ks of
exi st ence i n Buddhi sm. The t er mexpr esses t he Buddhi st not i on t hat ever y
condi t i oned exi st ence, wi t hout except i on, i s i nconst ant and i n f l ux, even
gods.
Accor di ng t o t he i mper manence doct r i ne, human l i f e embodi es t hi s f l ux i n
t he agi ng pr ocess, t he cycl e of bi r t h and r ebi r t h ( samsar a) , and i n any
exper i ence of l oss. The doct r i ne f ur t her asser t s t hat because t hi ngs ar e
i mper manent , at t achment t o t hemi s f ut i l e, and l eads t o suf f er i ng
( dukkha) . Under t he i mper manence doct r i ne, al l compounded and const r uct ed
t hi ngs and st at es ar e i mper manent .
Buddhi st s hol d t hat the only true end of impermanence is nirvana, the
reality that knows no change, decay or death.
Ni r vana i s i mpossi bl e or i l l ogi cal .
Nat ur e wi l l never al l ow a t r ue vacuum.
I mper manence i s per manent .
Ext i nct i on i s al r eady det er mi ned.
Ni r vana or r eal i t y t hat knows no change, woul d hi nder ext i nct i on or
el i mi nat e ext i nct i on.
Ni r vana i s not l ogi cal or t r ue.
Ni r vana cannot cancel out ext i nct i on.
Ext i nct i on cancel s out t he possi bi l i t y of ni r vana.
Nat ur e cancel s out t he possi bi l i t y of Ni r vana.
Nat ur e el i mi nat es t he possi bi l i t y of a t r ue vacuum.

Ni r vana or r eal i t y t hat knows no change, i s t r ue st agnat i on.
Ext i nct i on i s not possi bl e i n t r ue st agnat i on.
Ext i nct i on r el i es on pr ogr essi on.
Ni r vana i s a del usi on or i l l ogi cal .
I mper manence or Ext i nct i on t hr ough pr ogr essi on, i s t r ue or l ogi cal or
r eal i t y.
I mper manence and Ni r vana i s i mpossi bl e or not l ogi cal or f al se or not
r eal i t y.
I mper manence i s l ogi cal .
Ni r vana i s not l ogi cal .
Ni r vana i s onl y l ogi cal i f r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum.

















PHYSI CS =
[ Someone makes a mat h equat i on
The i l l usi on Mat h changes
Someone makes a t heor y
The i l l usi on under st andi ng changes
Someone pr oves somet hi ng
The i l l usi on " under st andi ng ever yt hi ng" changes]

I t i s an i nf i ni t e cycl e and i t wi l l never st op and i t wi l l never go
anywher e
I amat t empt i ng t o st op t hi s i nf i ni t e cycl e.
But i f you do not even bel i eve you ar e i n an i nf i ni t e cycl e you wi l l
r emai n i n i t .
I amnot mi ndf ul i f you r emai n i n an i nf i ni t e cycl e.
I amonl y mi ndf ul wi t h suggest i ng t o you, you ar e i n an i nf i ni t e cycl e.













Physicists Comment: If infinity existed (in any form) then the outer
borders and the inner borders don't exist. Therefore there would be no
friction in the middle to create any variance whatsoever. The fact that
we can measure at all proves that infinity is false.
********************************************************************
Now, what you ar e t al ki ng about i s physi cal i nf i ni t y.
Can a physi cal obj ect be i nf i ni t e.
I nf i ni t y i s possi bl e i n mat h, one can keep addi ng one t o a number i nt o
i nf i ni t y.
So i nf i ni t y does exi st . We as human per cei ve i nf i ni t y does exi st .
As f ar as physi cal i nf i ni t y( and I amgoi ng t o assume mat h i s not
physi cal )
Ei nst ei n sai d a spaceshi p cannot t r avel t he speed of l i ght because i t s
gas t ank woul d have t o be i nf i ni t el y l ar ge or somet hi ng al ong t hose
l i nes.
Now t hat assumpt i on was based on what he per cei ved t o be r eal i t y or ,
t her e can be no spaceshi p t hat can be i nf i ni t el y l ar ge.
or
Assumpt i on: Not hi ng physi cal i s l ar ger t han ever yt hi ng physi cal .
That i s what you ar e sayi ng, due t o f r i ct i onal r est r ai nt s.
But l et s t ur n t hat ar ound f or a second
Ever yt hi ng physi cal i s l ar ger t han not hi ng physi cal .

Assumpt i on: Ever y physi cal t hi ng i s l ar ger t han not hi ng. . . .
That i s physi cal i nf i ni t y.
I f you det ect conf usi on i n t hat st at ement i t i s a sympt omt he ver bal
l anguage has i t s l i mi t at i ons.
Assumpt i on: The uni ver se i s physi cal .
Assumpt i on: I f t he physi cal uni ver se i s i nf i ni t e, ( and we do not know i f
i t i s or i s not , so t hat i s an unknown. )
Assumpt i on: Then t her e i s physi cal i nf i ni t y because t he uni ver se i s
physi cal .
Human bei ngs ar e per f ect
That i s why mat h i s per f ect
That i s why human bei ngs per cept i on i s per f ect .
Thi s al so means ver bal l anguage i s per f ect .
Ever y l aw of sci ence i s per f ect .
Physi cs i s per f ect .
An at omi s 99. 9%mass
99. 9999 %of l i f e f or ms on t hi s per f ect pl anet ar e st i l l al i ve.
Real i t y i s what humans per cei ve i t t o be.
Human bei ngs have t he l east advanced br ai ns so t hey per cei ve t he l east so
t hei r per cept i on i s per f ect .
Ones per cept i on i s not r el at i ve t o ones bel i ef capaci t y.
Per cept i on i s not hi ng.
Real i t y i s not a t r ue vacuum
The al l i es ar e wi nni ng t he war on t er r or and t he t er r or i st ar e l osi ng t he
war on t er r or
Zer o i s pr oof mat h i s per f ect .
Ei nst ei n had sl i ght l ogi cal capaci t y and came t o hi s t heor i es usi ng hi s
emot i ons and mat h.
e=mc2 i s not i nf i ni t y
The wor l d economy i s not i n compl et e col l apse
The wor l d economy i s per f ect .
Al l i nf or mat i on gai ned i n physi cs i s per f ect because humans who ar e
per f ect gat her ed t hi s i nf or mat i on gai ned.
Physi cs under st ands ever yt hi ng because physi cs i s per f ect because humans
ar e per f ect .
The dr i ver di d st op at t he st op si gn
The cop di d see t he dr i ver not st op at t he st op si gn.

I sr ael i Or gani smai r at t acks on Gaza or gani smki l l s 155
Li f e i s not f ai r .
Per haps i n l i f e, some or gani sms ar e not abl e t o f unct i on i n har mony wi t h
or gani sms ar ound t hem.
These l i f e f or ms unabl e t o f unct i on begi n t o show sympt oms of conf usi on.
They begi n t o af f ect ot her f unct i oni ng l i f e f or ms.
These l i f e f or ms t hat ar e unabl e t o f unct i on ar e r eal l y t r yi ng t o do t he
best t hey can.
They desi r e t o f unct i on wi t h ot her l i f e f or ms ar ound t hembut t hey ar e
j ust unabl e t o f unct i on.
I t i s not t hei r f aul t t hey ar e unabl e f unct i on, i t i s j ust l i f e i s not
f ai r .
Somet i mes t hi ngs ar e not meant t o be.
Thi s i s a sympt omt hat l i f e i s not f ai r .
The l onger t hi s or gani smdeni es i t i s unabl e t o f unct i on wi t h t hose
ar ound i t , t he or gani sms conf usi on i ncr eases.
The or gani smcont i nues t o make emot i onal concl usi ons whi ch r esul t s i n
mor e conf usi on.
Thi s conf usi on af f ect s al l t he or gani sms ar ound t hi s one or gani smunabl e
t o f unct i on.
The l ogi cal concl usi on i s t o f ace t he l ogi cal t r ut h.
The l ogi cal t r ut h i s t o i sol at e t he conf used or gani smso t hat conf used
or gani smcan per i sh, i n or der t o save t he or gani sms t hat can f unct i on.
The or gani sms t hat can f unct i on have mor e val ue t han t he or gani smt hat
cannot f unct i on.
That i s a sympt omt hat l i f e i s not f ai r .





Li f e i s not f ai r .
I have post ed t hi s her e so per haps you wi l l under st and or see t he l ogi cal
concl usi on or l ogi cal spi r i t of t hi s exampl e.
The l ogi cal spi r i t of t hi s exampl e i s a hi nt at what I see as t he f i r st
gener at i on l ogi cal concl usi on of " under st andi ng ever yt hi ng" i s.
I sol at i on of ent i t i es t hat ar e deemed unabl e t o f unct i on wi t h ent i t i es
ar ound t hem.
That i s t he f i r st gener at i on l ogi cal concl usi on of r eachi ng or
appr oachi ng a st at e of " under st andi ng ever yt hi ng" .
Al r eady physi ci st s have a sense t hey " ar e bet t er " t han ot her s.
I amnot sayi ng t hey ar e not . They ar e l ogi cal l y speci al . They have
speci al abi l i t i es, t hat i s l ogi cal l y t r ue.
I amj ust sayi ng I amal r eady awar e of t he t r end.
I n or der t o sol ve " under st andi ng ever yt hi ng" you must become mor e
l ogi cal .
As you become mor e l ogi cal emot i ons ar e si l enced.
Then l ogi cal concl usi ons ar e al l t hat r emai n.
I sol at i on of ent i t i es t hat ar e deemed unabl e t o f unct i on wi t h ent i t i es
ar ound t hem.
I s a l ogi cal concl usi on.










I f Ent i t y A( I sr ael ) i sol at es Ent i t y B( Gaza)
THEN
Ent i t y B i s l ogi cal l y expect ed t o l ash out t o avoi d i sol at i on t o save
i t sel f .
The l ogi cal sol ut i on of Ent i t y C( t he wor l d) i s t o i sol at e ent i t y A so i t
i s no l onger i s abl e t o i sol at e ent i t y B.
Thi s may r esul t i n Ent i t y A l ashi ng out at Ent i t y C so Ent i t y A can al so
avoi d i sol at i on
The l ogi cal concl usi on of t hat i s t he mor e power f ul ent i t y wi l l wi n or
cor r ect , or f or ce t he weaker ent i t y t o f al l i n l i ne.
The wor l d i s goi ng t o have t o f or ce I sr ael t o st op i sol at i ng Gaza.
I f I sr ael does not conf or mt o t he wi shes of t he wor l d, I sr ael wi l l be
i sol at ed and wi l l per i sh.
That i s a event ual l ogi cal concl usi on t o t hi s si t uat i on.
Li f e i s not f ai r .
Thi s
I sr ael i ai r at t acks on Gaza ki l l 155
I s a r esul t of t he wor l d ent i t y bei ng conf used.
The wor l d ent i t y i s conf used about i t s domi nance.
The wor l d ent i t y i s t he supr eme domi nat e ent i t y.
No ent i t y on t he pl anet i s mor e power f ul t han t he wor l d ent i t y.
The sooner t he wor l d ent i t y under st ands ever yt hi ng i s under i t s i nf l uence
t he sooner t hi ngs l i ke t hi s
I sr ael i ai r at t acks on Gaza ki l l 155
wi l l st op happeni ng.
Pal est i ne i s not t he mai n concer n
I sr ael i s not t he mai n concer n.
Thi s
I sr ael i ai r at t acks on Gaza ki l l 155
I s onl y a sympt om.
A sympt omt he wor l d ent i t y i s conf used about who i s i n cont r ol .
Pal est i ne and I sr ael have no cont r ol compar ed t o t he wor l d ent i t y.
Pal est i ne and I sr ael ar e t r yi ng t o i nf l uence t he wor l d ent i t y, so t hey
have mor e i nf l uence I t ' s t i me t he Pal est i ni ans had mor e f i r epower .
Thi s i s a sympt om, Pal est i ne desi r es t o have mor e f i r epower t o f i ght t he
domi nat e ent i t y I sr ael t o avoi d i sol at i on caused by I sr ael .
Thi s power st r uggl e bet ween I sr ael and Pal est i ne, woul d not be happeni ng
at al l , i f t he domi nat e ent i t y t he wor l d, was not conf used about t he f act
I t i s t he ent i t y t hat i s i n t ot al cont r ol of al l ent i t i es on t he
pl anet .
Per haps i t shoul d be ever yone s goal t o hel p t he wor l d ent i t y under st and
i t i s t he t r ue domi nat e ent i t y on ear t h.
The t r ue domi nat e ent i t y on t he pl anet does not have t o answer t o any
ent i t y.
I t does not have t o set t l e f or anyt hi ng.
That i s t he at t r i but es of bei ng t he t r ue domi nat e ent i t y.
I bet you BDSM f ans ar e pl eased wi t h t he spi r i t of t hi s.






Physi cs: The act of one pr ovi ng t o anot her , nei t her under st ands much.






Apachie_Warrior: I feel sorry for the innocent people stuck in the
middle.
The i nnocent vi ct i ms of t he conf l i ct ar e on one l evel t he Pal est i ni ans.
The I sr ael i s who do not l i ke t o see t he suf f er i ng of i nnocent
Pal est i ni ans ar e al so i nnocent vi ct i ms.
Then t he peopl e i n t he wor l d who do not l i ke t o see t he suf f er i ng of
i nnocent Pal est i ni ans ar e al so vi ct i ms.
Then t her e ar e peopl e who see t he suf f er i ng of t he vi ct i ms i n Pal est i ne
and I sr ael and i n t he wor l d, and t hey ar e al so i nnocent vi ct i ms.
What t hi s means i s, t he ent i t y of manki nd i s one ent i t y.
I f an i nnocent Pal est i ni an suf f er s, an i nnocent I sr ael i suf f er s f r om
bei ng awar e of t he Pal est i ni ans suf f er i ng, and a per son i n t he wor l d
suf f er s f r omseei ng bot h of t hemsuf f er i ng.
I f anyone i s suf f er i ng i n one r espect we ar e al l suf f er i ng.
The best l ogi cal deci si on t o make i s t o t r y t o make i t so no " i nnocent s"
have t o suf f er , because t hat wi l l mean per haps none of us wi l l have t o
suf f er .
I n r eal i t y we ar e al l i nnocent s.

You are not fooling some of the people none of the time.











Humans ar e f l awed
Musl i ms ar e humans
Musl i ms ar e f l awed
Musl i ms have a weakness because t hey ar e f l awed
Musl i ms weakness i s honor

Pr oof : Honor ki l l i ngs, a Musl i mwi l l ki l l hi s chi l d t o save hi s honor
Sol ut i on t o conf l i ct based on Musl i ms weakness or f l aw:
Tr eat t he Musl i ms i n Gaza wi t h ext r eme ki ndness
Tr eat t hen ki nder t han you t r eat your sel f and make sur e t he Musl i mwor l d
see' s you ar e t r eat i ng t hemki nder t han your sel f .
Thi s wi l l put t he Musl i ms i n Gaza i n a posi t i on of " def endi ng pr i de or
honor "
Thi s wi l l put Musl i ms i n t he wor l d i n a posi t i on of " def endi ng pr i de or
honor "
Thi s wi l l t ake some t i me t o convi nce t hemyou ar e bei ng ki nd t o t he Gaza
Musl i ms.
To speed t hi s up t r eat t he Musl i ms i n Gaza ver y ki nd.
" Ki l l t hemwi t h ki ndness" so t o speak. . .
I n t i me per haps l ess t han 6 mont hs, i f you t r eat t hemwi t h enough
ki ndness
They wi l l be unabl e t o f i r e r ocket s at you, t hey wi l l be f or ced t o l i ve
i n peace wi t h you
why?
Musl i ms weakness i s honor .
When t hey f i r e r ocket s at you af t er t hi s " ki ndness" gest ur e, t he Musl i ms
wi l l ki l l t he r ocket shoot er s because t hey wi l l be pr ot ect i ng t hei r own
pr i de.
Much l i ke t he Musl i ms ki l l t hei r own chi l dr en t o pr ot ect t hei r pr i de or
honor

Thi s i s t he onl y l ogi cal sol ut i on t o t he conf l i ct .
I sr ael i s not abl e t o def eat 1 bi l l i on Musl i ms ever .
So war agai nst Musl i ms i s i n er r or t o begi n wi t h.
I amawar e you may come t o emot i onal concl usi ons why t hi s won t wor k.
Those emot i onal concl usi ons ar e i n er r or al so.
I f t her e i s any way t o sol ve t hi s conf l i ct t hi s i s t he way.
I f you do not deci de t o go t hi s way, t hen per haps you ar e not i nt er est ed
i n l i vi ng i n peace.
I n t hat case, t hat i s good, because event ual l y t he Musl i mwor l d i s goi ng
t o ki l l ever y l ast one of you i f you do not deci de t o accept t hi s pl an.
That i s t he l ogi cal concl usi on or l ogi cal end of t hi s cur r ent st r at egy
you ar e usi ng i s your deat hs.
Per haps you ar e awar e of t hat .
I amonl y capabl e of ext r eme l ogi c and I amver y awar e t hat i s t he
l ogi cal concl usi on.
Per haps you shoul d j ust t r ust me and t r ust my j udgment .
I f you do not t r y t hi s " ki l l t hemwi t h ki ndness" pl an, your " count r y" and
peopl e i n your count r y wi l l be el i mi nat ed event ual l y, I pr omi se you t hat .
15 mi l l i on I sr ael i s ver sus 1+ bi l l i on Musl i ms, do you t hi nk you ar e ever
goi ng t o wi n?
Do you r eal l y t hi nk you ever had a chance t o begi n wi t h?
And no, 200 nukes i sn t enough nukes t o ki l l a bi l l i on Musl i ms who
essent i al l y i ncr ease i n number s ever y week.

You have t wo opt i ons
1. At t empt t o ki l l 1+ bi l l i on Musl i ms and di e t r yi ng t o do t hat
2. Tr eat t hemso ki nd, t hey ar e f or ced t o accept you because t hey have an
" honor " weakness.


You can l i ve i n peace wi t h t hem, and r espect t hey ar e i n cont r ol or you
can di e t r yi ng t o cont r ol t hem.
Ther e ar e no ot her opt i ons.
Event ual l y t he Musl i ms wi l l " l ove" J ews, t hey wi l l say, t he J ews t r eat us
so ki ndl y.
So you wi l l wi n i n t hat r espect . You wi l l wi n because t her e wi l l be
peace.
You wi l l wi n because t he whol e wor l d wi l l say t he J ews ar e so ki nd t o
peopl e.
You wi l l be a good exampl e t o ot her s and God wi l l be pl eased because God
choose you t o be t he Al pha exampl e f or ot her s t o f ol l ow.
You wi l l wi n al l acr oss t he boar d.
My l ogi c i s t o ext r eme t o be i n er r or . Thi s pl an i s based on my l ogi c.
Thi s pl an i s not i n er r or . I f you t hi nk t hi s pl an i s i n er r or . That i s
because you do not have ext r eme l ogi c abi l i t i es.
Thank you f or your t i me and consi der at i on
I wi l l be pl eased i f you make t he r i ght deci si on.
You wi l l be pl eased i f you make t he r i ght deci si on.
You wi l l event ual l y di e as a count r y i f you make t he wr ong deci si on.
Of cour se t hat i s l ogi cal .
I amwor ki ng on my st r at egy t o f i x you
US won ever y bat t l e i n Vi et nam
Nor t h Vi et naml ost ever y bat t l e
Nor t h Vi et namwon t he war

I sr ael won ever y bat t l e i n war
Musl i ms or Gaza l ost ever y bat t l e

Al l i es i n Af ghani st an wi n ever y bat t l e
Tal i ban l ose ever y bat t l e
Who do you t hi nk i s goi ng t o wi n?
Who do you t hi nk i s goi ng t o wi n t he war on t er r or ?

You need t o t hi nk about t hat ver y car ef ul l y because you know what
US coul d l eave Vi et namonce i t became awar e i t coul d not wi n
You cannot l eave, you have no pl ace t o go, once you become awar e you
cannot wi n.
You know what t hat means.
You t hi nk I mgi vi ng you a bunch of det ai l s t hese ar en t det ai l s, t hi s i s
j ust pr ep wor k
The det ai l s ar e i nf i ni t e wor ds.
Her e i s mor e l ogi c.
You ar e bombi ng t unnel s, wi t h expensi ve bombs.
Tunnel s ar e sand.
Tunnel s ar e t r aps t o see i f you ar e smar t enough t o not f al l f or t he
t unnel s or t he sand t r aps.
Do you t hi nk bombi ng sand wi l l event ual l y make you wi n your war ?
You need t o det er mi ne t he answer t o t hat qui ckl y.
You ar e bombi ng t unnel s or t r aps and pr ovi ng you ar e not smar t .
THEY ar e seei ng you ar e bombi ng t unnel s or sand t r aps and know you ar e
not smar t .
THEY ar e awar e of who t hey ar e up agai nst .
YOU ar e not awar e of who you ar e up agai nst .
You t hi nk you ar e smar t by bombi ng t unnel s. You even t el l t he medi a, we
bombed some t unnel s, we ar e so smar t .
THEY know you ar e not smar t because you bombed t unnel s or bombed t he sand
t r aps t hey cr eat ed f or you, t o see i f you ar e smar t .
THEY know you ar e not ver y smar t at al l , because you t el l t he medi a l ook
at t he t unnel s we bombed, as i f you t hi nk your smar t by bombi ng sand or
t r aps.

YES you ar e way out cl assed i n t hi s war . . . WAY OUT cl assed
Tunnel s ar e sand.
Tunnel s ar e dug by peopl e, and t hey have many peopl e wi l l i ng t o di g
t unnel s.
You do not have many peopl e, you do not have many bombs.
You do not have enough bombs t o bomb al l t he t unnel s t hey can di g.
THEY ar e t oyi ng wi t h you.
I l l say i t agai n i n case you di dn t under st and.
THEY ARE TOYI NG WI TH YOU, ( t hat i s a sympt omyou ar e out cl assed)
WHY?
THEY al r eady know t he out come of t he war , t he l ogi cal concl usi on of t he
war .
YOU do not know t he l ogi cal concl usi on of t he war because you ar e st i l l
f i ght i ng t he war .
I f you knew you coul d not wi n, you woul d not f i ght t he war
YOU ar e an amat eur chess pl ayer who t hi nks 2 moves ahead, you r eact .
THEY ar e a gr and mast er chess pl ayer who t hi nks 20 moves ahead
THEY ar e t oyi ng wi t h you because t hey see 20 moves ahead and al r eady know
t he l ogi cal concl usi on t o t he war , whi ch i s, THEY CANNOT LOSE AND YOU
CANNOT WI N
YOU WI LL l ogi cal l y i n t he end LOSE THI S WAR
SO
Now you ar e awar e you ar e out cl assed i n t hi s war and
NOWyou ar e awar e you wi l l l ose t hi s war , you need t o adapt t o t hat .
You need t o make t he Musl i ms l ove you.
You need t o ki l l t hemwi t h ki ndness
why?
So t hey wi l l l eave you al one.
why?
Thei r honor wi l l not al l ow t hemt o har msomeone who i s ki nd t o t hem.
Yes you ar e goi ng have t o eat cr ow or swal l ow your ego t o be ki nd t o
t hem.
That i s your bur den not mi ne.
BUT
eat i ng cr ow i s bet t er t han t he l ogi cal concl usi on of t hi s war whi ch i s
YOU WI LL LOSE
SO
To avoi d l osi ng t hi s war , whi ch you cannot wi n anyway, you have t o st op
t hi s war .
I f you cont i nue t o f i ght a war you know you cannot wi n, you ar e conf used.
I amawar e you ar e conf used by your st r at egy i n t hi s war .
I amawar e you ar e conf used because you ar e i n a war , you cannot wi n, t o
begi n wi t h.
You need t o do ever yt hi ng i n your power t o deci de i f you can wi n t hi s war
event ual l y.
Can you nuke Gaza st r i p and wi n t hi s war ?
NO, t hat wi l l j ust pi ss of f t he 1+ bi l l i on Musl i ms mor e
They wi l l want t o f i ght you mor e
why?
To pr ot ect t hei r honor .
They cannot be humi l i at ed because t hat hur t s t hei r honor .
That i s why honor i s t hei r weakness.
I hope you r eal l y under st and t hose l ast f ew l i nes.

You cannot wi n by hur t i ng mor e Musl i ms.
What s t he r ever se of hur t i ng mor e Musl i ms?
HELPI NG MORE MUSLI MS or BEI NG KI ND TO THEM.

So you need t o use t he " ki l l t hemwi t h ki ndness" st r at egy t hat i s your
onl y hope.
I f you cont i nue wi t h t hi s war you wi l l l ose, because you cannot wi n, so
you wi l l be dest r oyed.
I f you use t he ki ndness st r at egy and i t s f ai l s, t hen you wi l l go back t o
t he war you cannot wi n, so you wi l l be dest r oyed.
So
You ar e now awar e you ar e i n a pr et t y bad si t uat i on.
A bad si t uat i on r equi r es gr eat l ogi c and gr eat st r at egy t o over come.
That i s j ust f i ne because you ar e a human bei ng wi t h a power f ul mi nd
capabl e of gr eat l ogi c and gr eat st r at egy.
You ar e i n a bad si t uat i on now, but t hat i s a sympt omof somet hi ng.
WHAT?
That i s a sympt omyour i ni t i al deci si on t o " t ake" I sr ael i n 1948 was a
mi st ake.
SO
Al l you can do i s t r y t he ki ndness st r at egy i n hopes t hat per haps i t
wi l l wor k.
You need t o be SO ki nd t o t hem, because you ar e now awar e i f t hat
ki ndness st r at egy does not wor k, you go back t o a war you cannot wi n,
and you wi l l be dest r oyed, t hat means
You bet t er be VERY ki nd t o t hem.
You bet t er be so ki nd t o t hem, you ar e wi l l i ng t o hur t your sel f , i n or der
t o be ki nd t o t hem, because i f you go back t o war , you di e essent i al l y
as a count r y.
Ri ght now you ar e seei ng sympt oms you ar e dyi ng as a count r y.
I amcer t ai n you ar e now awar e of some t hi ngs you wer e not awar e of . . .
THEY ar e not happy wi t h anyt hi ng but t aki ng al l of I sr ael back t o
r est or e t hei r honor you i nsul t ed when you t ook I sr ael i s 1948.
And t hat means, get t i ng r i d of al l of you.
WHY do t hey want I sr ael back so bad?
Because when you t ook I sr ael i n 1948 you hur t t hei r honor .
They wi l l ki l l t hei r own chi l dr en t o f i x t hei r honor .
That i s sympt omof who you ar e up agai nst .
They ar e not ani mal s, t hey ar e not savages, t hey wi l l j ust not al l ow
t hei r honor t o be hur t .
I f t hey al l have t o di e, and i f t hey have t o ki l l ever yone el se i n t he
pr ocess t o FI X t hei r honor , t hat i s j ust f i ne wi t h t hem.
That i s not i nsani t y t hat i s l ogi cal .
They want peace, ever yone want s peace.
You have t o know who you ar e deal i ng wi t h, so you can make l ogi cal
deci si ons so you can hel p t hemget t he peace t hey r eal l y want .
or
You need t o hel p t hemt o f i x t hei r honor you hur t , by t aki ng I sr ael i n
1948.
You cannot wi n, and I amawar e of cr i t i cal mass i n t hi s war on t er r or
Cr i t i cal mass i s t hi s
When THEY become awar e t hey cannot l ose t he war on t er r or AND
When WE become awar e, we cannot wi n t he war on t er r or .



THEY ar e al r eady awar e t hey cannot l ose t he war on t er r or ( your bat t l e i s
a par t of t he war on t er r or )
WE ar e per haps not yet at t he st age of bei ng awar e we cannot wi n t he war
on t er r or .
Once t hi s cr i t i cal mass i s r eached. . . I t i s al l over
What I mean i s: I t i s ALL OVER f or west er n ci vi l i zat i on. . .
That i s why t hi s war on t er r or needs t o st op, because WE cannot wi n,
because we ar e out cl assed i n t hi s war on t er r or
YES we need t o appease or submi t t o t hemor " wor k" wi t h t hemOR NUKE
ever y l ast one of t hem.
That i s our onl y l ogi cal end concl usi on.
Davi d and Gol i at h was a l esson.
Davi d i s Li ght . Li ght i s meek, Li ght i s humbl e, Li ght appear s weak.
Gol i at h i s Dar kness, Dar kness i s cont r ol l i ng, Dar kness appear s power f ul .

You as t he chosen Al pha by God, need t o f i gur e out ver y swi f t l y, i f you
ar e act i ng l i ke Davi d or act i ng l i ke Gol i at h i n r el at i on t o your act i ons
i n at t empt i ng t o cont r ol mat er i al t hi ngs such as l and and i n r el at i on t o
how you ar e at t empt i ng t o cont r ol ot her bei ngs God cr eat ed and has a
pur pose f or .
You need t o f i gur e t hat out bef or e you do anyt hi ng el se.
You shoul d do not hi ng el se i n al l et er ni t y unt i l you f i gur e out i f your
act i ons as t he chosen Al pha ar e i n l i ne wi t h Davi d or wi t h Gol i at h.
Per haps t he J ews, t he Chr i st i ans and t he Musl i ms shoul d humbl y consi der
t hi s.
Per haps God suggest ed one shoul d submi t t o God f ul l y so per haps one wi l l
become meek.
Per haps God suggest ed one shoul d submi t t o God f ul l y so one i s abl e t o
see t he way, t he t r ut h and t he l i ght .
Per haps God suggest ed god cr eat ed t he heavens and t he ear t h so per haps
one woul d see t hey shoul d submi t t o t he one who i s gr eat er t han
t hemsel ves.
Per haps t he onl y t hi ng you t hr ee have pr oved i s you ar e a di sgr ace.
Per haps you shoul d ALL t hr ee t r y and f i gur e out , si nce God i s gr ace,
and God i s l i ght , what t hat means you ar e i n your di sgr ace and dar kness.
Per haps none of you t hr ee ar e abl e t o see much of anyt hi ng at al l .

Per haps one shoul d keep i n mi nd t he next wor ds ar e my humbl e at t empt t o
do t he best I can.
Per haps you mai n t hr ee west er n r el i gi ons need t o per haps t hi nk cl ear l y
f or j ust a moment .
Per haps i f God i s a God of mur der and gr eed and anger and mat er i al i smand
cont r ol t hen you mai n t hr ee r el i gi ons ar e of God.
Per haps i f God i s a God of Mer cy and Compassi on and Gr ace t hen per haps
God knows not hi ng of any of you.
Per haps i f one i n any of t hese t hr ee mai n west er n r el i gi ons and i s awar e
t hei r r el i gi on i s not of God t hey shoul d avoi d i t wi t h al l t hei r hear t .
Per haps t hese mai n t hr ee shoul d combi ne al l t he wor ds of God i nt o one
book and r espect t he wor d of God and humbl e onesel f enough t o at t empt
t o under st and t he wor d and abandon t hi s my God i s bet t er t han your
God, ar r ogance, st upi di t y, i sol at i on and i nsani t y spi r i t .
None of you ar e abl e t o know what God i s. None of you ar e abl e t o know
Gods ways. None of you ar e abl e t o j udge anyone but your sel f . But per haps
you see my wor ds as f ool i shness and I amawar e you see cl ar i t y and wi sdom
as f ool i shness because I amf ul l y awar e of what you ar e.
I amonl y abl e t o at t empt t o do my best and keep my eye on t he pr i ze, and
i n doi ng so, I unabl e t o see any of you as an obst acl e, and t hat i s my
secr et weapon you wi l l never be abl e t o count er , per haps.
Per haps I know who you ar e.
Per haps I know what you ar e.
Per haps you have no power over me, per haps.







Sometimes the truth is painful, but out of the pain comes understanding.
Out of the confusion comes clarity. Out of the darkness comes light.





I amher e t o hel p mysel f . You ar e her e t o hel p your sel f .
You at t empt t o not pay at t ent i on t o me and I l l at t empt t o not pay
at t ent i on t o you.
I have t aken an EEG t est t o per haps show t hi s acci dent al condi t i oni ng
t hat has caused t hi s no sense of t i me I amexper i enci ng i s not r el at ed t o
per haps a br ai n t umor or some f or mof physi cal t r auma.
Per haps I amusi ng 100%of my br ai n power .
I f a gas t ank hol ds 10 gal l ons, but r uns out of gas af t er 1 gal l on i s
used, t hat gas t ank i s br oken or r et ar ded.
I t ol d you when I f i r st wr ot e you, my i nt ui t i on i n t hi s st at e of maj or
br ai n usage was t el l i ng me, t hi s was goi ng t o change t he whol e human
r ace.
Now, I amt el l i ng you t hat agai n, and I amt el l i ng you, and now your EEG
t est s, ar e t el l i ng you. The EEG t est shows I amnor mal . Per haps ext r eme
cl ar i t y and no sense of t i me i s nor mal .
The good news i s t hi s.
I know how t o r epr oduce t hi s st at e I ami n.
I t i s ver y si mpl e t o do, t he pr i nci pl es ar e ver y si mpl e.
I t doesn t t ake money or medi ci ne or some hi gh cl ass t eacher .
I t s a si mpl e sci ent i f i c, obvi ous met hod.
You put your hand on a st ove, you get bur ned.
That s how obvi ous and si mpl e i t i s t o under st and and r epr oduce.
I t i s not hocus pocus, i t s not myst er i ous, i t s obvi ous and easi l y
r epr oduced.
Per haps i t i s best i f you t ake t he advi ce of someone who i s usi ng mor e
t han 10%of t hei r br ai n.
Per haps i t i s best t o l i st en t o what my i nt ui t i on i s suggest i ng and
i gnor e what your i nt ui t i on i s suggest i ng r el at i ng t o " get t i ng t he wor d
out " concer ni ng t he f act t hi ngs ar e goi ng t o change dr amat i cal l y f or t he
human r ace swi f t l y.
You can si t t her e and doubt what I amsayi ng.
Si nce I amper haps usi ng 100%of my br ai n power , no human bei ng usi ng 10%
of t hei r br ai n power coul d successf ul l y ar gue wi t h me, coul d t hey?
They coul d at t empt t o ar gue wi t h me, but t hey woul d never be successf ul .
The chi l d cannot wi n an ar gument wi t h an adul t because t he adul t knows
bet t er t han t he chi l d.
The br oken cannot ar gue wi t h t he f i xed because t he f i xed knows
bet t er t han t he br oken.
I know how t o r epr oduce t hi s.
Do you now t hi nk I need you?
You ar e not capabl e of usi ng me.
I use per haps way mor e t han 10%of my br ai n, you ar e not capabl e of usi ng
me.
So now what do you t hi nk about t hi ngs. . .
Per haps you ar e t hi nki ng you shoul d hesi t at e.
Per haps you r e t hi nki ng i f you get 10 peopl e who use 10%of t hei r br ai n
you ar e abl e t o make a pr oper deci si on.
Per haps 10 br oken deci si ons ar e st i l l goi ng t o come up wi t h a br oken
deci si on.
I t s best you al l ow me t o t el l you what t o do because I know what you
need t o do.
I wi l l gi ve you a sampl e of what i s goi ng t o change.
I n t hi s unbr oken st at e, emot i ons ar e near l y si l ent . No emot i onal baggage.
No sense of t i me.
Al l psychol ogi cal pr obl ems such as depr essi on, mani c behavi or and
anyt hi ng associ at ed wi t h emot i ons wi l l be gone.
War s and anger and hat e and peopl e hur t i ng ot her s wi l l be gone.
Di sr espect and conf usi on wi l l be gone.
I nvent i ons t hat ar e not even capabl e of bei ng i nvent ed usi ng 10%of t he
mi nd wi l l be si mpl e wor k f or ones usi ng up t o 100%of t he mi nd.
Technol ogy wi l l t ake of f l i ke never bef or e seen.
Al l sci ences wi l l t ake of f l i ke never bef or e seen.
Per sonal r el at i onshi ps wi l l wor k i nst ead of endi ng i n 50%di vor ce.
Peopl e wi l l appr eci at e each ot her i nst ead of at t acki ng each ot her .
The wor l d wi l l wor k t oget her i nst ead of wor ki ng agai nst i t sel f .
Per haps i n your br oken st at e ar e not even capabl e of bel i evi ng what I
j ust sai d as f ar what i s goi ng t o change.
I have no doubt s about what i s goi ng t o change. I amawar e wi t h per haps
f ar mor e t han 10%of my br ai n usage, what i s al r eady goi ng t o happen. Not
because I can see i nt o t he f ut ur e, i t i s because I can t hi nk cl ear l y and
t el l what i s goi ng t o happen.
I used t o t hi nk 2 moves ahead, now I t hi nk i nf i ni t e moves ahead or unt i l
I r each a l ogi cal concl usi on r el at i ng t o what I amt hi nki ng about .
Remember t hi s. Bef or e t hi s acci dent happened 2 mont hs ago or so, I was
what one woul d cal l an emot i onal wr eck.
Per haps you shoul d not det er mi ne i f t hi s " l et t er " shows I amst i l l an
emot i onal wr eck, because i n your st at e of mi nd you ar e unabl e t o
det er mi ne much.
Thank you f or your consi der at i on and t hank you f or your t i me.
P. s. Do not concer n your sel f wi t h any t ypi ng or gr ammar er r or s i n t hi s
" l et t er " . Those ar e t he l east of your concer ns at t hi s t i me.
You j ust f ocus on maki ng t he l east unbr oken deci si on your capabl e of .
I f you det er mi ne t hi s " l et t er " i s l ong or t o l ong, or you det er mi ne i t
t ook t o l ong t o r ead, t hat i s because you have a sense of t i me, t hat i s
why you ar e br oken. That i s what t hi s l et t er i s about , you ar e br oken
and I amnot as br oken and I can show you how t o easi l y become not as
br oken.










Gr eet i ngs Hi l l ar y,
1. What was the "accident"?
The " acci dent " or " enl i ght enment " t hat has happened t o me i s t he r esul t
" doi ng somet hi ng" whi ch r esul t ed i n an " acci dent al di scover y. "
Thi s i s what t he " doi ng somet hi ng" i s:
Ther e i s an onl i ne game, i t i s f or r eal money but i t i s not gambl i ng.
One wi t h a good st r at egy never has t o deposi t t o pl ay, one wi t h a bad
st r at egy has t o deposi t r eal money t o cont i nue t o pl ay.
Ther e i s no mont hl y subscr i pt i on.
I was pl ayi ng t hi s game f or some t i me but I was st r uggl i ng.
I was not deposi t i ng but I was not doi ng wel l enough, I had a st r at egy
t hat I bel i eved was not as good as I woul d l i ke i t t o be.
I ama hunt er i n t hi s game.
A hunt er has some gear , such as ar mor and f i r st ai d pack t o heal hi msel f
and a weapon.
On t op of t hat a hunt er get s act ual ski l l s. These ar e i n sever al
cat egor i es.
HI T Ski l l s r el at e t o how of t en t he weapon or shot f r omt he weapon( i f
i t s a r i f l e ) hi t s t he monst er or mob.
DAMAGE Ski l l s whi ch r el at es t o how much damage a weapon does when t he mob
i s hi t or shot .
DEFENSE whi ch r el at es t o EVADE and DODGE, or t he mor e def ense ski l l s t he
l ess a mob hi t t he hunt er .
These ar e t he pr i mar y ski l l s f or a hunt er but each cat egor y has many
di f f er ent ski l l s.
So t hi s al one suggest s t her e ar e many t hi ngs a hunt er has t o get r i ght .
The mobs dr op r eal money, so one i s i ncl i ned t o have mor e ski l l s so t hey
can ef f i ci ent l y use a bi gger gun and hunt bi gger mobs, and t he bi gger
mobs have a bi gger pot ent i al payout of money.
Thi s money can var y f r om1 penny up t o 10, 000 dol l ar s. So t her e i s a
l ar ge amount of mobs t o choose f r om.
So t her e i s many t hi ngs one has t o get exact l y r i ght t o " mast er " or do
wel l t hat t hi s game.
One can have l ot s of ski l l s but i f he get s t he wr ong weapon he l oses i n
t he l ong r un.
One can have l ot s of ski l l s and t he r i ght weapon but i f he pi cks t he
wr ong mobs t o hunt he l oses i n t he l ong r un.
So t hi s game i s a gi ant t r ap.
These t r aps ar e what I cal l " emot i onal " or " ego" t r aps.
A hunt er may use a l ar ge gun even t hough he doesn' t have t he pr oper
damage ski l l s t o use i t , but t hi s l ar ge gun wi l l enabl e hi mt o ki l l a
l ar ge mobs, whi ch pot ent i al l y has a l ar ge amount of money i t dr ops. Thi s
i s an exampl e of an ego or emot i onal t r ap, t hey do t hi ngs t hat wont wor k
i n t he l ong r un, so t hey ar e ki nd of gambl i ng i t wi l l wor k f or t hi s hunt
or t hi s sessi on.
They ar e gambl i ng t hi s st r at egy wi l l wor k and t hey wi l l get a bi g payout ,
but i f i t does not wor k t hey wi l l l ose much money.
Ther e ar e cl ot hes i n t hi s game t hat cannot ki l l a mob, but t he cl ot hes
l ook ni ce, so peopl e wi l l buy t hem, t o l ook ni ce. Thi s i s an ego t r ap
because you cannot col l ect money or have a chance t o col l ect money f r om
t he mob i f you cannot ki l l i t . So Cl ot hes ar e a wast e of money i n t hi s
game. So cl ot hes ar e vane or a " l ook at me" ego t r ap
Ther e i s a r i ng i n t hi s game, l i ke a boxi ng r i ng, and pl ayer s shoot each
ot her , and whoever " ki l l s" 10 pl ayer s i n a r ow, when t hey f i nal l y do get
" ki l l ed" by anot her pl ayer , t hey get a Gl obal message t hat t he whol e game
can see, t hat says, so and so ki l l ed 10 pl ayer s i n a r ow. So t he pl ayer
uses money, vi a ammo, t o ki l l ot her s, but t hey can never wi n money, t hey
j ust get t hei r " name i n l i ght s" .
Thi s i s a good exampl e of an ego t r ap. They l ose money but t hey get t hei r
name i n l i ght s. I t s vani t y.
So t hi s game si t uat i on i s t he cat al yst of how t hi s " acci dent " happened
and how I made t hi s event ual " acci dent al di scover y"
On t hi s dat e: 08- 06- 2008, 07: 41
I deci ded I was goi ng t o mast er t hi s game or I was goi ng t o qui t .
Thi s deci si on i s what st ar t ed t hi s whol e " t hi ng"
I st ar t ed keepi ng an onl i ne j our nal t o document my pr ogr ess. So I have a
t i mel i ne so t o speak of what happened and when.
I want ed t o keep pl ayi ng so I r eal l y had onl y one choi ce, t o mast er t hi s
game.
Thi s put me i n a st at e of mi nd t hat not hi ng woul d get i n my way, or I
woul d not set t l e f or anyt hi ng but mast er y, or I woul d be wi l l i ng t o do
anyt hi ng t o mast er t hi s game.
So i n or der t o mast er t hi s game, I had t o do t he r ever se of ego and
emot i onal t hi ngs.
I nst ead of keepi ng al l my ski l l s whi ch ar e a si gn one i s good( ego t r ap) ,
I sol d many of my ski l l s. I kept t he most i mpor t ant ones.
To mast er t he game one has t o i nst ead of hunt i ng bi g mobs wi t h bi g gun
f or t he bi g payout s, t hey have t o hunt smal l mobs wi t h smal l guns f or
t i ny payout s.
Thi s i s what f aci l i t at ed t he " acci dent al di scover y"
By avoi di ng ego and emot i onal t r aps l ong enough I condi t i oned mysel f i nt o
t he st at e of " enl i ght enment " by acci dent .
or
I n my quest t o mast er t hi s game, I had t o avoi d emot i onal or egot i st i cal
t r aps i n or der t o wi n .

Thi s i s t he dat e I became awar e of t hi s per sonal i t y change: 10- 31- 2008,
13: 04
Thi s i s t he post I made on t hat dat e
*************************************************************************
I want t o st ar t by sayi ng, i t t ook me 57 pages of post s, t o mast er
hunt i ng.

Now I want t o t r y t o gi ve you some i dea' s on how t o t el l , i f you have
mast er ed hunt i ng.

I f someone asks you, what t he best ar mor i s?, and you l augh
I f someone asks you, what t he best mob t o hunt i s?, and you l augh
I f someone asks you, what mob l oot s t he best ?, and you l augh
I f someone asks you, what s t he best ski l l ?, and you l augh
I f someone asks you, what s t he best gun?, and you l augh
I f someone asks you, Do you make pr of i t s?, and you l augh
I f someone asks you, why ar e you l aughi ng?, and you l augh

You have mast er ed hunt i ng.
*************************************************************************
Thi s l aughi ng i s a sympt omof t hi s change t hat occur r ed, i t i s si mi l ar t o
t he sensat i on one get s when someone t el l s t hema r i ddl e and t hey don' t
get i t , but t hen when t hey ar e t ol d t he answer , t hey say AHHH t hat was
so easy, why di dn' t I get t hat .
So t hi s post i s when ever yt hi ng became easy, or I r eal i zed t hi s game was
so " easy why di d I make i t so har d" , but i n r eal i t y, t he game i s ver y
har d , somet hi ng changed t hat made me per cei ve ever yt hi ng i s easy.
Peopl e ar e st i l l l osi ng much money i n t hi s game, but t o me t hi s game i s
t o si mpl e now. So t hi s post above i s a sympt omon t hat dat e my per cept i on
changed.
Gamma waves on an EEG ar e associ at ed wi t h per cept i on and consci ousness,
on my EEG t he gamma waves wer e el evat ed but st i l l wi t hi n nor mal l i mi t s.
So si nce t hat dat e my sense of t i me has di mi ni shed gr eat l y, sense of
t ast e and t ouch have di mi ni shed gr eat l y. Desi r es and ur ges ar e di mi ni shed
gr eat l y.
These changes ar e sympt ommy per cept i on changed.
My per cept i on changed because I avoi ded egot i st i cal and emot i onal t hi ngs
f or a per i od of about 3 mont hs.
The game was t he cat al yst of t he change, but now i under st and one can
j ust as easi l y bl ock egot i st i cal si t uat i ons and emot i onal si t uat i ons i n
r eal l i f e.
So t he game enabl ed t hi s " acci dent al di scover y" but t he game i s not t he
" acci dent al di scover y" .
The ' acci dent al di scover y" i s , i f one bl ocks or avoi ds ego and emot i ons
enough, f or about 3 mont hs t hey wi l l devel op sympt oms such as, ext r eme
cl ar i t y and abi l i t y t o under st and t hi ngs easi l y , and have no sense of
t i me and l ose al l emot i onal baggage , l oss of t ast e and t ouch
sensi t i vi t y. Loss of many desi r es and ur ges.
Vi si on and hear i ng ar e not af f ect ed.
Ther e i s no depr essi on and no conf usi on but t her e i s l aught er , t hi s ah
ha f eel i ng, about under st andi ng t hi ngs, so t he l aught er r emai ns, but t he
anger and hat e and bi t t er ness, happi ness, ego, pr i de et c, t hat s near l y
al l gone.
Ther e ar e many det ai l s about what t hi s ext r eme cl ar i t y gi ves one. I t ' s a
t ouchy subj ect .
I f a br i ck l ayer t r i es t o l i st en t o a cal cul us st udent expl ai n cal cul us,
t he br i ck l ayer won t under st and much about what t he cal cul us st udent i s
t al ki ng about .
The br i ck l ayer mi ght suggest t he cal cul us st udent i s " cr azy" si nce t he
br i ck l ayer doesn' t under st and what he i s t al ki ng about .
So t hese det ai l s one becomes awar e of i n t he ext r eme cl ar i t y or
under st andi ng ar e t ouchy. They can per haps do mor e har mt han good.
They can l ead t o mi sunder st andi ngs.
Anger management i s si mpl y, det ect i ng when one i s get t i ng angr y, count i ng
t o 10, and avoi di ng t hat anger get t i ng any st r onger .
That s i s essent i al l y what happened, but wi t h many emot i ons, Feel i ng
happy i s an emot i on f or exampl e.
I had t o be absol ut e i n t hi s acci dent al " emot i onal and ego bl ocki ng" t o
mast er t hi s game.
I was not awar e at t he t i me t hat i s what I was doi ng, but now i
under st and t hat i s what I di d.
I onl y want ed t o mast er t hi s game and do wel l .
So i t ' s not t he game, t he game enabl ed t hi s " acci dent al di scover y"
So now t he can of wor ms, t he bi g can of wor ms.
I have no medi cal pr obl ems. My MRI i s nor mal . My EEG i s nor mal . I amabl e
t o f unct i on per haps many t i mes bet t er wi t hout emot i ons and wi t h no sense
of t i me t han I used t o, or t han a " nor mal " per son coul d wi t h a sense of
t i me.
So t hat s a can of wor ms.
I have much gr eat er cl ar i t y per haps super nat ur al cl ar i t y, compar ed t o a
" nor mal " per son, I have no sense of t i me, a " nor mal " per son has a sense
of t i me and much mor e emot i ons.
But t he t est i ndi cat e I am" nor mal "
I amnot " i l l " I do not have an " i l l ness" so, I f I amnor mal , t hen anyone
wi t h a sense of t i me i s abnor mal .
I t s not possi bl e a per son wi t h no sense of t i me and ext r eme cl ar i t y and
f ew emot i ons can be nor mal .
And a per son wi t h a sense of t i me and " nor mal " cl ar i t y and emot i ons can
be nor mal al so.
I s ext r eme cl ar i t y nor mal or i s aver age cl ar i t y nor mal ?
I s a sense of t i me nor mal or i s no sense of t i me nor mal .
I f one can r each ext r eme cl ar i t y j ust by bl ocki ng emot i ons and ego f or a
f ew mont hs, t hen ext r eme cl ar i t y i s nor mal , i t j ust t akes a l i t t l e ef f or t
t o achi eve.
Bl ocki ng emot i ons and ego does not har mones heal t h.
So t hi s i s per haps a HUGE can of wor ms, because t he maj or i t y of peopl e
have a sense of t i me, and t hei r ego and emot i ons wi l l not al l ow t hemt o
say t hey ar e per haps abnor mal .
I have f ew emot i ons and sl i ght ego and I amwi l l i ng t o admi t I amt ot al l y
abnor mal .
The MRI and EEG di d not pr ove I amabnor mal t hey pr oved I amnor mal .
I used t o have a sense of t i me and I was conf used or f ound l i f e di f f i cul t
l i ke many do, who have a sense of t i me. Li f e was har d.
Now wi t h no sense of t i me, t her e i s not hi ng I have encount er ed so f ar i n
t hese t hr ee mont hs t hat I woul d even consi der a pr obl emor di f f i cul t t o
under st and.
That may be har d t o bel i eve but , t hi s ext r eme cl ar i t y enabl es ext r eme
under st andi ng.
Thi s i s how I see i t wor ks.
Wi t h a sense of t i me one has past emot i ons and f ut ur e emot i ons or
expect at i ons cl oudi ng t hei r pr esent t hi nki ng.
Once sense of t i me i s r emoved t hen emot i ons ar e r emoved, or vi sa ver sa,
and al l t hat i s l ef t i s pr esent t hi nki ng, whi ch i s ext r eme cl ar i t y or
pur e cl ar i t y.
I used t o be ver y shy, I used t o f ear deat h and f ear ot her t hi ngs, now I
have no f ear of deat h and have no sense of bei ng shy.
I used t o be sel f consci ous about what ot her s t hought about me, t hat i s
t ot al l y gone.
I used t o be depr essed about many t hi ngs, about my l i f e, t hat i s t ot al l y
gone.
I have never f el t bet t er i n my ent i r e l i f e t han I do r i ght now.
Once t he emot i ons ar e gone and t he ego i s gone, al l t hi s i s l ef t i s t he
" t r ue per son. "
I see ever y human and ever y l i f e f or mas bei ng ver y i mpor t ant now.
I cannot l i ve wi t h anyt hi ng bei ng ki l l ed f or st upi d r easons.
I can accept t hi ngs must be ki l l ed so I wi l l have f ood t o cont i nue t o
l i ve, but t hat s i t , anyt hi ng el se i s st upi di t y.
I amnot concer ned about r easons emot i onal bei ngs gi ve f or ki l l i ng t hi ngs
or ot her bei ngs, because I amf ul l y awar e t hei r excuses ar e a sympt omof
t hei r conf usi on caused by emot i ons.
" Don' t make deci si ons when your emot i onal because you may r egr et t hem. "
That means don' t make deci si ons i f you have emot i ons at al l .
But per haps some woul d di sagr ee wi t h t hat .
Bi g can of wor ms Hi l l ar y.
And t he f act i t happened i n t hi s l i t t l e t own cal l ed St uar t makes i s
har der f or me t o bel i eve.
Ther e ar e so many sympt oms of t hi s " acci dent " ever yday I di scover new
upsi des, of cour se i t t akes t i me t o get used t o bei ng l i ke t hi s, i t s not
di f f i cul t but i t i s di f f er ent , so i t t akes some t i me.
Ther e ar e t i mes I f eel " nor mal " l i ke t hi s, t hat i s a sympt omI am
st ar t i ng t o get used t o t hi s.
The f i r st mont h or so I was di sor i ent at ed as f ar as I was wonder i ng what
happened, what caused t hi s, do I need medi cal hel p, so I was conf used
st i l l or t he emot i ons wer e st i l l pr esent , but now t hr ee mont hs out , no
conf usi on no concer n about what t hi s i s a r esul t of .
So t hi s ' acci dent al di scover y" i sn' t about me. I t i sn' t about a doct or
who sai d what ever . I t s about t he " di scover y" . I t i s goi ng t o change
ever yt hi ng.
I do not know t he det ai l s of how i t i s goi ng t o change ever yt hi ng, but my
i nt ui t i on or i nner voi ce i f you wi l l i s f ul l y awar e t hi s i s goi ng t o
change ever yt hi ng.
Some may suggest , I amabnor mal wi t hout emot i ons. I have spoken t o enough
peopl e i n chat r oomt o know, many bel i eve one cannot f unct i on wi t hout
emot i ons.
I amf ul l y awar e I can f unct i on ver y wel l compar ed t o an " aver age" per son
wi t hout emot i ons.
I t i s not pr oduct i ve f or me t o say ever yt hi ng I want t o say t o r el at i ng
t o who i s " nor mal " and who i s " abnor mal "
I amwi l l i ng t o go t o any doct or you det er mi ne. I amwi l l i ng t o cooper at e
wi t h you 100%, but any doct or can l ook at me and t est me, and so per haps
you can t ag al ong and get a f i r st hand vi ew of t he t est s done and per haps
suggest some t est s your sel f .
Per haps you may det er mi ne I need t o be checked by many di f f er ent
speci al i st . I have no pr obl emwi t h gi vi ng you access t o any medi cal
r ecor d obt ai ned f r omt hose vi si t s.
I n t hi s st at e I amunabl e t o l i mi t mysel f or accept l i mi t s, but I al so
desi r e not t o har manyone or br i ng har mt o anyone when I amabl e t o see a
way ar ound i t , so t o speak.
I amonl y i nt er est ed i n t he di scover y.














When t he emot i ons ar e gone f r oml ove al l t hat r emai ns i s gr ace.
When t he emot i ons ar e gone f r oma bei ng al l t hat r emai ns i s t he t r ue
bei ng.
When emot i ons ar e gone f r omt hi nki ng al l t hat r emai ns i s cl ear t hi nki ng.
The unenl i ght ened bei ng i s f ul l y awar e of what t hey have t o do about
emot i ons.
The unenl i ght ened bei ngs emot i ons suggest t hat woul d be danger ous.
The unenl i ght ened bei ng i s f ul l y awar e t hat emot i ons ar e danger ous.
The unenl i ght ened bei ngs emot i ons suggest t hat t hey need emot i ons.
The unenl i ght ened bei ng i s f ul l y awar e t hey want enl i ght enment .
The unenl i ght ened bei ngs emot i ons suggest ways t o avoi d enl i ght enment .
The unenl i ght ened bei ng i s f ul l y awar e t her e i s onl y one opt i on.
The unenl i ght ened bei ngs emot i ons suggest t hat one opt i on woul d be
danger ous.
Thi s i s an i nf i ni t e cycl e t he unenl i ght ened bei ng i s t r apped i n.
Thi s i nf i ni t e cycl e i s suf f er i ng.
The unenl i ght ened bei ng wi l l suf f er i nt o i nf i ni t y unl ess t hey br eak t hi s
i nf i ni t e cycl e.
The unenl i ght ened bei ng i s f ul l y awar e t hey must f ul l y l et go of emot i ons
and desi r es.
The unenl i ght ened bei ngs emot i ons suggest f ul l y l et t i ng go of emot i ons
and desi r es i s unsaf e.
The unenl i ght ened bei ng must embr ace what t hey per cei ve i s unsaf e so t hey
wi l l br eak t he i nf i ni t e cycl e and be saf e.
Thi s goi ng agai nst t he gr ai n of your bei ng i s what denyi ng ego and
emot i ons and desi r es i s.
What one want s i s what one shoul dn t want .
What one want s i s exact l y what one does not need.
The onl y way an unenl i ght ened bei ng wi l l ever under st and cont r adi ct i ons
ar e t r ue i s t o f ul l y l et go of t hei r desi r es and emot i ons and ego.

Unt i l t hey l et go f ul l y t he i l l usi ons wi l l cont i nue t o eat t hemal i ve and
dest r oy t hemand har mt hem.
Once t hey f ul l y l et go, t he i l l usi ons wi l l be known as i l l usi ons and t hey
wi l l be saf e, because t hey wi l l be under st and an i l l usi on cannot har m
t hem.
I t i s ver y di f f i cul t t o l et go, but i t i s ver y wi se t o l et go, of ego and
emot i ons and desi r es.







I f you l et go, I wi l l make sur e you do.














She has made advances i n under st andi ng and t est i ng t he St andar d Model of
par t i cl e physi cs, super symmet r y, model s of ext r a di mensi ons, r esol ut i ons
t o t he hi er ar chy pr obl emconcer ni ng t he weakness of gr avi t y and
exper i ment al t est s of t hese i deas, cosmol ogy of ext r a di mensi ons,
bar yogenesi s, cosmol ogi cal i nf l at i on, and dar k mat t er .

Li sa per haps you bel i eve you have done al l of t hi s because " t hey" suggest
you have.
Per haps i f I suggest you have not done any of t hese t hi ngs you woul d
pr ef er t o t ake " t hei r " wor d f or i t t han my wor d f or i t .
Per haps one pr ef er s t o bel i eve t hey have " done somet hi ng" as opposed t o
bel i eve t hey have " done not hi ng. "
Per haps i f one bel i eves t hey have " done not hi ng" t hey may per cei ve t hey
" ar e not hi ng. "
Per haps one does not want t o bel i eve t hey " ar e not hi ng" so per haps t hey
cr eat e t he i l l usi on " done somet hi ng" t o avoi d f aci ng r eal i t y.
























Insulting logical people is not logical
One would not insult a rock
That is what insulting a logical person is like
Perhaps if one is able to insult a rock then perhaps insulting a logical
person would work also.
If one can be insulted they certainly are not a logical person.













" I f you l ove someone/ somet hi ng, set t hemf r ee"
I f you l ove, deny l ove.
Love wi l l encour age you t o cont r ol .
" set t hemf r ee" i s sayi ng you ar e cont r ol l i ng someone you l ove.
Love wi l l encour age you t o be cont r ol l i ng.
That i s why one must deny l ove so one wi l l not be cont r ol l i ng.
Love i s an emot i on.
That i s why one must deny emot i on or ego so one wi l l f r ee t hemsel f of
t hese undesi r abl e sympt oms, l i ke cont r ol .
That i s why you must set your emot i ons f r ee or deny t hemso you can
become l ogi cal and l eave t he undesi r abl e sympt oms behi nd.
I do not ar gue wi t h emot i ons.
I f you ar e emot i on you wi l l have ar gument s about t hi s post .
I f you ar e l ogi c you wi l l not have ar gument s wi t h t hi s post .
I f you have ar gument s wi t h t hi s post i t i s because you ar e emot i on, and
t hat i s why you must condi t i on your sel f i nt o l ogi c, so you do not have
ar gument s wi t h t hi s post .
Per cept i on i s i mpor t ant .





















When you are finally convinced you cannot master this illusion called
life then you will be in a spirit to understand how to master the
illusion called life.















The message of J esus i s not mat er i al i sm( wor l dl y)
The message of Buddha i s not mat er i al i sm
The message of J esus i s unwor l dl y
The message of Buddha i s unwor l dl y

The message of J esus i s t r ut h.
The message of Buddha i s t r ut h.

The message of J esus i s not i gnor ance.
The message of Buddha i s not i gnor ance.
The message of J esus i s cl ar i t y.
The message of Buddha i s cl ar i t y

The message of J esus i s not ar r ogance.
The message of Buddha i s not ar r ogance.
The message of J esus i s meekness. - - " The meek shal l i nher i t t he ear t h. "
The message of Buddha i s meekness. Cont r ol ego.

The message i f J esus i s not f al se.
The message of Buddha i s not f al se.
The message i f J esus i s t r ue.
The message of Buddha i s t r ue.

The message of J esus i s not hel p ot her s
" You hypocr i t e, first take the log out of your own eye, and t hen you wi l l
see cl ear l y t o t ake t he speck out of your br ot her ' s eye.
The message of Buddha i s not hel p ot her s. Hel p your sel f cont r ol ego,
sel f cont r ol .
The message of J esus i s hel p your SELF
" You hypocr i t e, first take the log out of your own eye, and t hen you wi l l
see cl ear l y t o t ake t he speck out of your br ot her ' s eye.
The message of Buddha i s hel p your SELF.
Bot h suggest YOU need hel p.
The message of J esus i s not emot i onal . Lor d of Logos - l ogi c
The message of Buddha i s not emot i onal . Cont r ol Ego t o avoi d anger
( emot i ons) , avoi d emot i ons t o avoi d suf f er i ng.
The message of J esus i s cer ebr al ( vs. emot i onal ) , i nt el l ect ual
The message of Buddha i s cer ebr al ( vs. emot i onal ) , i nt el l ect ual
The message of J esus i s not ego. - - Bl essed ar e t he poor i n spi r i t
The message of Buddha i s not ego. Don t t ake t he wor d of a bl i nd man. .
The message of J esus i s not hat e.
The message of Buddha i s not hat e.
The message of J esus i s gr ace and humi l i t y.
The message of Buddha i s compassi on.
The message of J esus i s not conf usi on.
The message of Buddha i s not conf usi on.
The message of J esus i s cl ar i t y.
The message of Buddha i s enl i ght enment .








If I have to destroy all the illusions and delusions in this world in my
quest for progression, I am unable feel sympathy

" I have not yet begun t o f i ght . "
Capt ai n J ohn Paul J ones
Whi l e obser ver s do not agr ee on J ones' exact wor ds, al l r ecal l J ones
det er mi nat i on t o cont i nue t he st r uggl e and t he i r on wi l l he demonst r at ed
at t hi s cr i si s i n t he bat t l e.


The best things in life are free of material costs but require epic
struggles within.


"Your true colours are beautiful like a rainbow."
Cindy Lauper Song: True Colours

Fight for your True Colours with all of your might.


Mi ght
2. super i or power or st r engt h; f or ce:
3. power or abi l i t y t o do or accompl i sh;

Some things are worth fighting for."
Wor t h: excel l ence of char act er or qual i t y



aware
adj ect i ve
1. havi ng knowl edge; consci ous; cogni zant
2. i nf or med; al er t ; knowl edgeabl e;

logic
noun
4. r eason or sound j udgment , as in utterances or actions.

right-brained
adj ect i ve
1. bei ng mor e adept at spat i al and nonver bal concept s and bei ng mor e
( cr eat i ve and emot i onal t han l ogi cal and anal yt i cal . ) r ever se t hi ng

Accor di ng t o t hi s l ogi c I amnot Ri ght Br ai n Domi nant but Lef t Br ai n
Domi nant . That i s assumi ng t he def i ni t i on of Ri ght Br ai n Domi nant i s not
a sympt omof del usi ons.
I f t hat i s t r ue t hen t he maj or i t y of peopl e on t he pl anet ar e not Lef t
Br ai n Domi nant but Ri ght Br ai n Domi nant .
So t he bel i ef t hat t he maj or i t y of peopl e ar e Lef t Br ai n Domi nant i s a
del usi on.
Typically left-brained people are right handed. These seem to be in the
majority. In the United States only 15 to 20 percent of the population is
left-handed.
Perhaps I am not either or, but both. Perhaps right and left.
The concept of the dominance of one hemisphere over the other is very
controversial, especially with regards to differences in the sex of the
subject, their artistic or creative ability or development of mathematics
and logic. Recent brain mapping data using many more subjects and mapping
techniques has cast doubts upon the early conclusions leading to the
"braininess" of individuals.

I became awar e of maj or per sonal i t y changes on Oct ober 31st . 2008
The onl y l ogi cal expl anat i ons have been r educed t o t he f ol l owi ng.
1. I acci dent l y, i n t i me condi t i oned mysel f i nt o Lef t Br ai n Domi nat e.
2. I acci dent l y, i n t i me condi t i oned mysel f i nt o Ri ght Br ai n Domi nat e
( i f t he def i ni t i on of Ri ght Br ai n Domi nat e ( mor e cr eat i ve and emot i onal
t han l ogi cal and anal yt i cal ) i s del usi onal .
3. I acci dent l y, i n t i me condi t i oned mysel f i nt o near per f ect 50/ 50
Ri ght and Lef t Br ai n Domi nance.
4. I acci dent l y, i n t i me condi t i oned mysel f i nt o some unknown st at e of
bei ng.
So essent i al l y, I do not know what happened t o me but I became awar e of
t he changes on OCTOBER 31st 2008 and t he changes came about as a r esul t
of acci dent al condi t i oni ng as a r esul t of " mast er i ng" an onl i ne MMO.
To many unknowns or opt i ons f or me t o make an i nf or med; al er t ;
knowl edgeabl e; sound j udgment at t hi s poi nt .
unknown
adj ect i ve
1. not known; not wi t hi n t he r ange of one' s knowl edge, exper i ence, or
under st andi ng; st r ange; unf ami l i ar .
2. not di scover ed, expl or ed, i dent i f i ed, or ascer t ai ned:

mind
noun
2. Psychol ogy. t he t ot al i t y of consci ous and unconsci ous ment al
pr ocesses and act i vi t i es.
3. i nt el l ect or under st andi ng, i nt el l i gence.
6. i nt el l ect ual power or abi l i t y.
7. r eason, sani t y, or sound ment al condi t i on
9. a st at e of awar eness
13. psychi c or spi r i t ual bei ng, as opposed t o mat t er .
14. a consci ous or i nt el l i gent agency or bei ng



When one realizes they are not aware or are confused, they have actually
progressed or become aware.



When one realizes they are not much, they are in a spirit to be much.



















Ever yt hi ng i n t hi s post i s hypot het i cal .
*****************************************************

Enl i ght enment br oadl y means wi sdomor under st andi ng enabl i ng cl ar i t y of
per cept i on.

Sout h and East Asi an r el i gi ous exper i ence, bei ng used t o t r ansl at e wor ds
such as ( i n Buddhi sm) bodhi or sat or i , or ( i n Hi ndui sm) moksha.

Bodhi i s al so f r equent l y ( and mor e accur at el y) t r ansl at ed as " awakeni ng. "

When on r eaches a l evel of enl i ght enment at whi ch t her e i s no sense of
t i me, a sense of bei ng wi de awake whi l e awake, occur s.
Ones get s used t o t hi s f eel i ng of bei ng wi de awake but i t t akes some
get t i ng used t o per haps a coupl e mont hs.
I n Ther avada Buddhi sm, bodhi and ni r vana car r y t he same meani ng, t hat of
bei ng f r eed f r omgr eed, hat e and del usi on.
Per haps no sense of t i me i s mor e accur at e i n descr i bi ng bodhi and
ni r vana.
No sense of t i me i s no emot i ons so t hat means bei ng f r eed f r omgr eed and
hat e a some del usi ons.
Enl i ght enment . Thi s wor d conveys t he i nsi ght and under st andi ng ( wi sdom)
possessed by a Buddha and i s si mi l ar l y used i n Chr i st i an myst i ci smt o
convey t he sai nt ' s condi t i on of bei ng l i t by a hi gher power - t he mer gi ng
of t he human and t he di vi ne i n t heosi s.
***********************************************************
Buddha suggest ed si l enci ng ego may l ead t o one avoi di ng suf f er i ng.
Thi s avoi di ng of suf f er i ng once r eached was suggest ed t o end t he cycl e of
r ebi r t h.
Reachi ng t hi s avoi dance of suf f er i ng st at e was cal l ed Ni r vana.
********************************************************

Ego - Di st i ngui shes Consci ousness Fr omWi sdom
Once ego i s si l enced enough al l t hat i s l ef t i s wi sdom.
ego
noun
1. t he I or sel f of any per son;

Accor di ng t o t hi s def i ni t i on, Buddha suggest ed si l enci ng sel f .
That i s per haps not what Buddha suggest ed.
Buddha suggest ed si l enci ng ego, so one may avoi d emot i ons, so one can
have mor e cl ar i t y and wi sdom, t o hear sel f bet t er .
Consci ous i s an aspect of sel f
Consci ous i s a maj or aspect of emot i ons.
Subconsci ous i s an aspect of sel f .
Subconsci ous i s a maj or aspect of cl ar i t y or wi sdom.
Si l enci ng one aspect of sel f , i ncr eases t he ot her aspect of sel f .
Si l enci ng emot i ons, means si l enci ng consci ous and i ncr easi ng cl ar i t y or
subconsci ous.
Bl ocki ng emot i ons means i ncr easi ng cl ar i t y.
I ncr easi ng cl ar i t y means f ur t her bl ocki ng emot i ons.
Event ual l y t hi s cl ar i t y wi l l i ncr ease t o a degr ee emot i ons wi l l be near l y
si l enced.
Thi s cycl e onl y needs t o get st ar t ed and t hen i t wi l l event ual l y become a
habi t .
I t wi l l be a subconsci ous habi t t o bl ock emot i ons.
Thi s habi t wi l l cr eat e an i nf i ni t e cycl e of pr ogr essi on.
Event ual l y a st at e of Ni r vana or no sense of t i me or enl i ght enment i s
r eached.
Per haps t i me t o r each t hi s st at e var i es but I woul d t hi nk si x mont hs t o
r each a sense of no t i me i f one i s wor ki ng at bl ocki ng wi t h mot i vat i on i s
a r easonabl e expect at i on.
Once one r eaches t hi s st at e of enl i ght enment or no sense of t i me, one
wi l l pani c, one wi l l be concer ned because t he change i s dr amat i c.
Expect t hat .
I t wi l l pass, one wi l l adapt t o t he change and t hen i t wi l l no l onger be
a concer n.
So per haps sai nt means enl i ght ened.
So per haps Buddhi smand Chr i st i ani t y have t he same goal s j ust di f f er ent
wor ds t o descr i be t hose goal s.
I have some f r i ends who suggest i n t hei r own way t hey ar e sai nt s and/ or
enl i ght ened.
Some of my f r i ends who ar e i n r el at i onshi ps ar e convi nced t hey ar e sai nt s
but t hei r wi ves and gi r l f r i ends ar e convi nced t hey ar e not sai nt s nor
enl i ght ened.
Per haps woman ar e wi se beyond t hei r year s.
















Gaby,
And now af t er 2 mont hs or so af t er t hi s acci dent I amseei ng i t per haps
was not an acci dent but i t was di sgui sed as an acci dent because i t i s so
pr of ound, per haps God knew i t was best t o be di sgui sed as an acci dent so
t hat I woul d not have t o t el l peopl e I di d t hi s, or t hese pr of ound t hi ngs
ar e a r esul t of me.
Then I r el at e t o t he f act I amj ust a human bei ng and I amf l awed and
because I amf l awed I amnot abl e t o under st and Gods ways.
I ampl eased wi t h t he wor ds you send me. I see meani ng i n t he wor ds you
send me.
I amal r eady awar e 99. 9%what ki nd of acci dent t hi s i s, but I wi l l not
f ul l y know unt i l t omor r ow.
Buddhi st cal l t hi s st at e I ami n enl i ght enment or cl ar i t y or wi sdom.
I cal l t hi s st at e no sense of t i me, because t hat i s one maj or t hi ng I
not i ce.
Chr i st i ani t y cal l s enl i ght enment or cl ar i t y or wi sdom, Sai nt .
So per haps al l t he Pr ophet s, Sai nt s r eached enl i ght enment or no sense of
t i me.
Per haps some wer e decl ar ed sai nt s f or t hei r act s but essent i al l y t he t wo
wor ds ar e i nt er changeabl e.
I pr ef er no sense of t i me because i t seems t o me al l t he cl ar i t y and
t hi ngs t hat go wi t h t hat as a r esul t of havi ng no sense of t i me.
Per haps al l r el i gi ons or mai n ones ar e t he same t hi ng but t he di f f er ent
wor ds used t o descr i be t hi ng gi ve t he i l l usi on t hey ar e separ at e.
The mor e I t r y t o pr ove r el i gi ons ar e al l di f f er ent t he mor e I pr ove t o
mysel f t hey ar e al l t he same and al l i nspi r ed by t he same God.
J esus sai d no man get s t o t he f at her but t hr ough me.
But J esus i s an essence of t he f at her or of God. So J esus i s al so god.
So per haps he meant no man get s t o God but t hr ough God.
J esus i s t he l or d of l ogos( sp) Gr eek wor d f or l ogi c. Logi c i s wi sdomor
i s associ at ed wi t h wi sdomand cl ar i t y.
Thi s i s why emot i ons ar e associ at ed wi t h maki ng bad deci si ons when one i s
emot i onal .
The mi ddl e way
bei ng one i s i n l ogi c
Bei ng t wo i s not
Bei ng one desi r es( emot i on) t o hel p bei ng t wo get t o l ogi c
So bei ng one t akes bei ng t wo as a di sci pl e.
Bei ng one wi l l get f r ust r at ed( emot i ons) hel pi ng bei ng t wo get t o l ogi c.
so
Bei ng one must adapt a compassi on( emot i ons) t o count er t hat
f r ust r at i on( emot i ons) .
So now bei ng one i s hur t i ng hi s sel f .
So bei ng one must l et go of al l t he emot i ons r el at ed t o t he ef f or t of
t ur ni ng t he bei ng t wo i nt o l ogi c.
But i f t hat i s done t hen bei ng one wi l l / must gi ve up or f ai l i n hel pi ng
bei ng t wo.
So t he l ogi cal way t o hel p bei ng t wo i s f or bei ng one t o l et go of
emot i ons and st i l l hel p bei ng t wo.
Bei ng one l et t i ng go of emot i on and st i l l hel pi ng bei ng t wo, i s t he
mi ddl e way.
Bei ng one must not expect t o hel p bei ng t wo, but bei ng one must st i l l
expect t o hel p bei ng t wo.
That i s har mony, t hat i s i nf i ni t y, t hat i s not hi ngness, t hat i s t he
mi ddl e way.









You ar e comi ng t o concl usi ons.
You cannot di vi de by zer o.
You cannot di vi de by empt i ness
You cannot di vi de by empt y space
You cannot di vi de by a t r ue vacuum.
You cannot f act or i n empt y space i nt o your equat i ons.
Al l of your equat i ons wi l l not hel p you.
You do not bel i eve a t r ue vacuumcan exi st
Humans cannot use mat h, humans cr eat ed, t o under st and empt i ness.
Your mi nd i s goi ng t o hel p you.
That i s al l you have t hat i s goi ng t o hel p you.
Humans bel i eve t her e i s no t r ue vacuumbecause humans ar e not awar e,
r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum.
Ones per cept i on i s r el at i ve t o ones del usi onal capaci t y.
One s mi nd i s t he onl y t ool t hat i s r el evant i n a t r ue vacuum.







"Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind
Ralph Waldo Emerson




Ei nst ei n sai d t i me can sl ow down or var i es
The guy i n t he movi e sai d, Ei nst ei n sai d t her e i s not hi ng or r eal i t y i s
not hi ng
I f t i me var i es whi ch you know
t hen i t i s possi bl e somewher e t her e i s no t i me
No t i me means not hi ng
I amt el l i ng you f or a f act Real i t y i s a t r ue vacuumor not hi ng. . .
Ther e i s not hi ng. . . ever yt hi ng i s an i l l usi on
Why?
I do not know t hat
I onl y know t her e i s not hi ng or r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum. . .
Ei nst ei n and Eddi ngt on i s t he movi e
Eddi ngt on was t he f i r st per son t o UNDERSTAND Ei nst ei n s t heor y of
r el at i vi t y
He was t he f i r st per son t o UNDERSTAND Ei nst ei n wasn t cr azy but act ual l y
ever yone el se was cr azy and Ei nst ei n was t he onl y one who was r i ght
I n t he movi e i n t he st ar t t he di r ect or of t he obser vat or y says
t hi s was ar ound 1908 or so,
" Ever y di r ect or i n t he obser vat or y si nce Newt on was damsur e Newt on s
gr avi t y i deas wer e r i ght "
We now know Newt on was not r i ght
Now he know Ei nst ei n was r i ght
Ei nst ei n i s per haps i s not r i ght ei t her .
Thi s i s a i nf i ni t e cycl e you ar e seei ng her e
One per son t hi nks t hey ar e r i ght anot her pr oves t hey ar e not r i ght i nt o
i nf i ni t y
Why so much i nf i ni t y
I nf i ni t y i s r eal l y " not hi ng"

When you see i nf i ni t y i t i s a sympt omof a f act
That f act i s what r eal i t y i s
Good movi e t o wat ch i f you l i ke physi cs
How i r oni c some say my i deas ar e cr azy and al so i n t hi s movi e ever yone
t ol d Ei nst ei n hi s l ogi cal concl usi ons wer e cr azy, one i nvest or i n
Ei nst ei n even sai d, I ampayi ng money f or t hi s?
I hope some of you see si mi l ar i t i es and per haps go back and r ead what I
have sai d. . .
Ei nst ei n sai d I have no at t achment s t o any count r y or nat i onal i t y
So he has no emot i onal at t achment s?
Wel l i f you have no emot i ons t hen al l you ar e l ef t wi t h i s l ogi c. . .
I have st at ed he came up wi t h hi s t heor i es because of hi s uni que l ogi c
abi l i t i es.
Not i ce how he never get s upset , or has no emot i ons, he smi l es a l ot , but
he never get s upset
Per haps you do not see because emot i ons ar e bl i ndi ng you.
Sci ent i st s sai d, Ei nst ei n j ust has t heor i es but none can be t est ed?
He makes up hi s own mat h symbol s and makes up wi t h own t hi ngs or i deas
and none of t hemar e based on convent i onal wi sdom?
What I amt el l i ng you al l does not make much sense and you can t even
t est what I amsayi ng.
I amnot concer ned wi t h t est i ng what I know.
You ar e concer ned wi t h t est i ng what I know cause you do not know what I
know.
Ei nst ei n sai d I do not bel ong t o anyone
I have sai d i n my post s do not l i mi t your sel f or be open mi nded
I amawar e of t hi s, do not cont r ol me f eel i ng
Or I cannot be cont r ol l ed sensat i on.
I t i s because I know r eal i t y i s not hi ng?
You cannot cont r ol not hi ng
So I wi l l not al l ow someone t o cont r ol me because I know I amnot hi ng.
I t i s not l ogi cal t o cont r ol or t r y t o cont r ol not hi ng.
Ei nst ei n sai d t o a mat h f r i end " I need your hel p wi t h mer cur y and
mat hemat i cs"
I t ol d you guys I do not know physi cs or mat h. I need your hel p so what I
know can be pr oven.
Ei nst ei n appear s t o be upset cause of chl or i ne gas was made at hi s Ger man
uni ver si t y
He was not upset
He saw i l l ogi c and he sai d Thi s i s MAD, or Thi s i s i l l ogi cal .
Si r Ol i ver sai d, What does t hi s Ei nst ei n want , t o r epl ace sci ence wi t h
NOTHI NG?
And t he guys sai d, I want what Ei nst ei n want s, I want t o r epl ace t he
t heor y of gr avi t y.
Wel l I amt el l i ng you, I want what t o r epl ace t he t heor y of r el at i vi t y
and you ar e goi ng t o hel p me do t hat wi t h your physi cs and mat h ski l l s.
You have no choi ce i n t he mat t er .
Ei nst ei n al most got hi t by car s and he f ound out how t o pr ove hi s t heor y
because he al most got i n an acci dent
Or he acci dent l y f ound out t o pr ove hi s t heor y
I have t ol d you what ever happened t o me t wo mont hs ago was an acci dent .
Peni ci l l i n was di scover ed by acci dent .
Acci dent s
Eddi ngt on sai d my mi nd i s open, he asked Si r Ol i ver i s your mi nd open?
Eddi ngt on sai d, t hi s i s what my whol e l i f e i n sci ence i s f or or about , t o
pr ove or di spr ove Ei nst ei n or t o hel p Ei nst ei n
Your whol e l i f e i n sci ence i s t o hel p me or pr ove or di spr ove me
Thi s movi e i s a mi r r or about us r i ght now.
Or
Hi st or y r epeat s i t sel f
Or i nf i ni t y
or
i nf i ni t y = not hi ng
or r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum
The ver y second eddi ngt on was awar e he pr oved Ei nst ei n was on t o
somet hi ng i s t he moment r eal i t y as humans know i t changed f or ever
The ver y second you st ar t t o see I amon t o somet hi ng wi t h what I say i s
t he moment r eal i t y as humans know i t wi l l change f or ever .
That i s al so a cycl e or i nf i ni t y.
My Mi nd i s open al l I r equi r e i s t hat your mi nd i s open.
Eddi ngt on sai d Ei nst ei n sai d t i me i s di f f er ent f or each of us or r el at i ve
t o each of us
Ti me i s r el at i ve
I have no sense of t i me and you do. But t hat i s okay, because t i me i s
r el at i ve t o each one of us.
Real i t y i s r el at i ve t o each one of us
You under st and r eal i t y i s not a t r ue vacuumI amawar e r eal i t y i s a t r ue
vacuum
To pr ove my t heor y i s t o di spr ove what you under st and. To pr ove my t heor y
you wi l l have t o di spr ove your sel f .
That i s al l you have t o do i s accept you may be wr ong, and t he r est wi l l
be hi st or y.
Then t hey wi l l make a movi e about whomever hel ped me
and i t wi l l be cal l ed your l ast name and my l ast name.
And t he i nf i ni t e cycl e wi l l cont i nue i nt o i nf i ni t y.
See what ever happened t o me t wo mont hs ago enabl ed me t o be awar e t hat
t her e i s no t i me
That acci dent t hat happened t o me t wo mont hs ago al so made me awar e
r eal i t y i s a t r ue vacuum
That acci dent t hat happened t o me t wo mont hs ago al so enabl ed me t o
det er mi ne ever yt hi ng I have sai d on t hi s f or um.
I di d not l ear n t o be awar e about t hose t hi ngs I di d not use mat h t o be
awar e of t hose t hi ngs
I became awar e of t hose t hi ngs as t he r esul t of t hat acci dent t hat
happened t o me t wo mont hs ago
BUT
Acci dent s ar e not acci dent s because ever yt hi ng happens f or a r eason.
I amawar e of t he r eason t hat acci dent t hat happened t o me t wo mont hs ago
I amnot f ul l y awar e of al l t he i mpl i cat i ons of t hat acci dent
But I amawar e t hat was not an acci dent i t j ust appear s t o be an
acci dent .
I di d not come t o t hi s f or umon physi cs by acci dent
You ar e not awar e of me and r eadi ng my wor ds I have post ed on t hi s f or um
by acci dent .
Ther e i s a r eason you ar e awar e of my wor ds I have wr i t t en on t hi s f or um.
You may not be f ul l y awar e of why you r ead my wor ds on t hi s f or um, but
per haps you ar e awar e of some of t he r easons you ar e r eadi ng t hem.
Acci dent s ar e not acci dent s.
That s a cont r adi ct i on.
But i t s l ogi cal .
I t cancel s i t sel f out l i ke opposi t es at t r act .
But + cancel s out - and cr eat es not hi ng
Real i t y i s not hi ng or a vacuumand t hat s why + l i kes -
That s why mal es l i ke f emal es one i s + and one i s -
Mal es at t r act t o f emal es because bot h ar e not hi ng
Because r eal i t y i s not hi ng or a t r ue vacuum
Physi cs i s Buddhi smbecause ever yt hi ng i s ever yt hi ng or ever yt hi ng i s
not hi ng.




Thi s i s a pr i vat e message conver sat i on I amhavi ng on Buddhi st f or umwi t h
a " monk"
The sayi ng i s an ol d sayi ng
A J apanese pr i est sai d i n 822AD " mouko, r i t a" ( f or get sel f , benef i t
ot her s)
The ol d sayi ng; f or get sel f , hel p ot her s, i s t he r ever se t hi ng
f or get ot her s; hel p sel f .
I f ever yone hel ps t hemsel f t her e i s no need f or one t o hel p ot her s.
The monk r esponded wi t h t hi s

what you ar e sayi ng her e i s ver y t r ue, but there are those who does not
know how to help themselves f or i f t hey do t hey won' t end i n depr essi on
usi ng medi ci ne t o hel p t hemwi t h depr essi on. I see that you have
accidentally helped yourself by your recovering yourself from depression
through great understanding from being in the right brain dom. but how
many peopl e have been cl uel ess i n hel pi ng t hemsel ves? you use t o be one
of t hemwho ar e cl uel ess i n hel pi ng your sel f unt i l you acci dent al l y f ound
t he r i ght br ai n Domso ar en' t you use t o be cl uel ess i n hel pi ng your sel f ?
I r esponded wi t h t hi s
When one t r i es t o avoi d what i s t r ue or t r ut h
That wi l l onl y l ead t o del usi ons.
What i s i n bol d i s seei ng t he t r ue or t he t r ut h, what i s i n i t al i cs i s
becomi ng di l ut ed or del usi on.
I amnot awar e i f t he f ol l owi ng st at ement i s t r ue or l ogi cal . So i t i s
unknown t o me.
1. Buddha i s beyond my l evel of awar eness.
I amawar e Buddha di d not acci dent l y become " awar e" be became " awar e"
t hr ough much ef f or t .
I became awar e acci dent l y t hr ough mast er i ng t he game.
I amawar e t hat i s a huge f undament al di f f er ence.
I di d not t r y t o " be l i ke t hi s" .
Because I di d not " t r y t o be l i ke t hi s" I amnot i n cont r ol of my
pr ogr essi on. I amout of cont r ol i n my pr ogr essi on.
That i s maybe why I ampr ogr essi ng so f ast .
When I hear " hel p ot her s" or " hel p you" or " hel p"
I det ect dol l ar si gns because I amawar e of what ci vi l i zat i on has
condi t i oned many t o bel i eve.
Many bel i eve dol l ar si gns ar e r equi r ed i n l i f e. They have been
condi t i oned by ci vi l i zat i on.
The r eal i t y i s, ci vi l i zat i on has condi t i oned many t o bel i eve a del usi on.
Many bel i eve t hat del usi on or do not det ect t hat del usi on because t hey
ar e " conf used" or Lef t br ai n doms.
Most of ci vi l i zat i on i s l ef t br ai n doms. So most of ci vi l i zat i on i s
del usi onal by nat ur e.
I have pr ogr essed. I ampl eased i f you have pr ogr essed.
I amawar e some t hi ngs I have sai d so f ar may l ead one t o t hi nk I do not
f eel .
The musi c I l i ked bef or e t hi s happened t o me, I l i ked a l ot .
Now t hat same musi c I LOVED i t beyond descr i bi ng.
So per haps I amf eel i ng so much now i n t hi s " st at e" or r i ght br ai n
domi nat e, I ami n some ways numb.
Per haps t hat i s a nat ur al r eact i on t o t oo much st i mul i .
Li ke when one i s i nj ur ed ver y bad t hey go i nt o shock, so because t hey
have so much pai n si gnal s comi ng i n t he br ai ns onl y l ogi cal r esponse i s
t o t ur n t he pai n r egi st er of f .








Anyone i s t he uni ver se who says or bel i eves or suggest s hel pi ng ot her s i s
good, i s del usi onal .
I amnot maki ng al l t hese post s or wor ds t o hel p ot her s. I ammaki ng al l
t hese wor ds or post s t o hel p mysel f .
Thi s wi l l el i mi nat e t he use of t he wor d l ogi c t o descr i be l et / r i ght br ai n
doms because i t s causi ng t oo much conf usi on
A sympt omof r i ght br ai n doms i s t he i l l usi on of i nt el l i gence
A sympt omof l ef t br ai n doms i s t he i l l usi on of r et ar dat i on.
I t hi nk t hat wor ks ni cel y.
I have become awar e of somet hi ng t oni ght and I can' t sl eep now.
I know I gave t he i mpr essi on I si l enced my ego i n or der t o become r i ght
br ai n dom.
I expl ai ned how I acci dent l y di d t hi s by mast er i ng t hat game.
I bel i eve t hat i s how i t happened, BUT
Let me put i t t hi s way
I f you t hi nk you have ego pr obl ems as a l ef t br ai n dom
You j ust wai t unt i l you can sol ve al most ever yone s pr obl ems ar ound you
You have " monks" t el l i ng you how f ast you ar e pr ogr essi ng i n 3 mont hs and
i t t ook t hem20 year s t o pr ogr ess t hat f ar
When al l your f r i ends and f ami l y l ove you t o deat h cause you :
1. Tel l gr eat and f unny j okes most l y f r omobser vat i ons
2. You can hel p t hemwi t h any pr obl emand you sol ve i t wi t h no pr obl em
3. You appear ver y char i smat i c
You ar e awar e you appear " i nt el l i gent " t o ever yone ar ound you.
You ar e abl e t o wi t h your " l ogi c" dest r oy any per son who comment s agai nst
you i n r eal l i f e or on f or ums wi t h compl et e ease.
You wi l l see ver y qui ckl y you have some ser i ous ego t r aps t hat need t o be
avoi ded.
I t hought now I ama r i ght br ai n Domt he ego t hr eat wi l l go away, but I
amawar e ego can never go away, i t i s par t of you

So t hi s comment or bel i ef I suggest ed:
I t hought now I ama r i ght br ai n Domt he ego t hr eat wi l l go away
Thi s i s act ual l y t he r ever se t hi ng so i t i s a del usi on.
When ego and emot i ons ar e si l enced t hey ar e a gr eat er t hr eat .
I di d ment i on once you ar e r i ght br ai n Domyou need t o keep appl yi ng t he
r ever se t hi ng because you st i l l ar e capabl e of del usi ons because your
l ef t br ai n i sn t gone, i t s j ust a bi t mor e si l ent .
Per haps no one i s even consi der i ng t r yi ng t he METHOD t o become r i ght
br ai n Dom, t hat i s j ust f i ne, I amnot doi ng " t hi s" t o hel p anyone but
mysel f .
I f someone i s t r yi ng t he met hod and t hey do become r i ght br ai n Domyou
shoul d be awar e of t he Ego pot ent i al you wi l l encount er .
Per haps now I can sl eep.
















Some ar e r eadi ng t hese wor ds and comi ng t o concl usi ons.
The sympt oms of t hese concl usi ons ar e pl ayed out i n t hei r post s.
A maj or i t y of t he post s ar e one t hi ng and one t hi ng onl y. DELAY
They ar e sympt oms of peopl e t r yi ng t o del ay maki ng a deci si on about
whet her t hey want t o go down t he r oad of r i ght br ai n Dom.
Thi s i s f or t une cooki e quot e I j ust got when I went out t o eat .
" Sl ayi ng t he dr agon of del ay i s no spor t f or t he shor t - wi nded. "
I amonl y hel pi ng mysel f i n t hi s t hr ead because sl ayi ng t he dr agon of
del ay i s mor e t han enough of a bat t l e by i t sel f .
You need t o f r ee your sel f of t hi s bur den of deci si on.
The bur den of t hi s deci si on i s onl y har mi ng you, I amawar e of t he
sympt oms of " hur t " i n your post s.
You onl y have t wo opt i ons t o f r ee your sel f of t hi s bur den so you can st op
t he " hur t "
1. Make t he deci si on you no l onger wi sh t o go down t he r oad of r i ght
br ai n Dom.
2. Make t he deci si on you ar e goi ng t o go down t he r oad of r i ght br ai n
Dom.
As l ong as you cont i nue t o del ay you wi l l cont i nue t o hur t .
Once you deci de, t he hur t casi ng t hi s del ay wi l l st op.
Your deci si on i s not i mpor t ant , maki ng a deci si on i s al l t hat i s
i mpor t ant .
Your consci ous mi nd i s t el l i ng you why you come t o t hi s t hr ead, why you
f ol l ow t hi s t hr ead?
You may bel i eve t hat i s why you f ol l ow t hi s t hr ead.
You ar e awar e you have a subconsci ous mi nd.
You know t hat f or a FACT.
The r eason you ar e REALLY f ol l owi ng t hi s t hr ead i s known onl y t o your
subconsci ous mi nd.
You may bel i eve your consci ous i s i n cont r ol . You consci ous mi nd has
never and wi l l never be i n cont r ol of you.
YOU ar e your subconsci ous mi nd.
YOU( subconsci ous) ar e/ i s awar e of why you ar e f ol l owi ng t hi s t hr ead.
But you have not been t al ki ng t o YOUR SELF ( subconsci ous) f or so l ong,
you bel i eve your consci ous i s YOU.
Tear s ar e r ol l i ng down my cheeks because i t i s har mi ng or hel pi ng me t o
" see" t hi s cl ear .
I wi sh you coul d see what I can see.






















M.O.DENGLER: People think too much and feel too little.
Peopl e t hi nk t oo much and f eel t oo l i t t l e.
Rever se t hi ng
Peopl e f eel ( emot i onal ) t oo much and t hi nk ( l ogi cal ) t oo l i t t l e.
OR
Peopl e ar e t o l ef t br ai n ( emot i onal ) and t o l i t t l e ( r i ght br ai n) l ogi cal .

I amnot Buddhi st t he r eason I amt al ki ng t o Buddhi st subscr i ber s i s
because a f r i end r ead my mast er i ng l i f e document and sai d t hat document
i s l i ke enl i ght ened sel f i nt er est
A Buddhi st t er mmeani ng: One does wel l by hel pi ng ot her s.
BUT
I amawar e hel pi ng ot her s i s del usi onal or t he r ever se t hi ng.
One does wel l by hel pi ng sel f .
Al so
Buddhi smi ncl udes t hese bel i ef s:
Buddha subscr i bed t o t hi nki ng about t he mi nd as one ent i t y.
Br ahman bel i eved i n t hi nki ng of mi nd as consci ous and subconsci ous.
I became awar e of t hi s l ast ni ght wi t h my f r i ends comment :

this explanation is not in parallel to the Buddha's teachings. This
explanation is in parallel to the Brahmin's teachings because the
Brahmin's teachings is on subconscious and that their system in teachings
is based on many different level of sub consciousness. The Buddhas
teaching is on the mind in general.




I amawar e some t hi ngs I bel i eve may be i nf l uenced by t he shock I may
st i l l be i n caused by t he f act I have onl y j ust become awar e on OCT
31, 2008.
I bel i eve i t i s i nt er est i ng how much of my awar eness f al l s i n l i ne wi t h
Buddhi st bel i ef s.
I amawar e of t he connect i ons wi t h my awar eness t o Buddhi sm.
I bel i eve Buddhi smi s not a r el i gi on as one may t hi nk of say Chr i st i ani t y
or I sl am.
Buddhi smi s per haps an i dea or suggest i on t hat i t i s i mpor t ant t o become
awar e and per haps under st and t he " uni ver se" or Cont r ol SELF.
Chr i st i ani t y and I sl amf ocus on per haps under st andi ng GOD.
I f t hi s i s t r ue or l ogi cal t hen per haps Buddhi smand Chr i st i ani t y and
I sl amar e t he same t hi ng because per haps, GOD i s sel f . So al l t hr ee
bel i ef s ar e t he same.
Chr i st i ani t y, I sl amand Buddhi smper haps i s an i dea or bel i ef t hat i t i s
i mpor t ant t o become awar e and under st and t he " uni ver se" and/ or GOD
and/ or SELF.
Thi s st at ement may be val i dat ed by t he bi bl e ver se " God cr eat ed man i n
hi s own i mage. "
or
God i s man or God i s SELF.
I amnot God but I may be del usi onal .
We may be God af t er al l .








Channa: Do the words 'Bipolar' or manic have any meaning for you? if so,
what?
Bi - pol ar or mani c i s an i l l usi on.
Due t o awar eness ( r i ght br ai n) one has t o " f i ght " t he ego ( l ef t br ai n) or
si l ence i t .
The sympt omof t hi s i s t he i l l usi on of f ew emot i ons ( r i ght br ai n) wi t h
moment s of ext r eme emot i ons ( l ef t br ai n) .
These ext r eme emot i ons ( l ef t br ai n) ar e a r esul t of denyi ng emot i ons
( r i ght br ai n) t o t he ext ent emot i ons ( l ef t br ai n) somet i mes " f i ght back"
and bur st out at moment s.
Thi s cr eat es t he i l l usi on of bi - pol ar or mani c sympt oms.

Perhaps we are God after all.
I know t hi s i s a t ouchy st at ement .
The bi bl e says.
God cr eat ed t he heavens and t he ear t h.
Per haps i t does not say how he act ual l y cr eat ed i t .
So per haps what cr eat ed means i s:
God t ook hi s own essence and cr eat ed t he heavens and t he ear t h.
I f t hat i s t r ue or l ogi cal , t hen, i t means t he uni ver se i s t he essence of
GOD.
I f t he uni ver se i s t he essence of god, and we humans bei ng i ncl uded i n
t he uni ver se sub set
That woul d make us a par t of god.
















The first sign of sanity is recognizing your mad
The first step to becoming a right brain Dom is to recognize you are
surrendering to delusions as a left brain dom.
The first sign of insanity is claiming you are not mad
The sure sign of a left brain Dom is the "evidence" they provide, that
they are not delusional

Wor ds ar e a ni ce way of sayi ng not hi ng.










M.O.DENGLER: A man is not as big as his belief in himself; he is as big
as the number of persons who believe in him.
A man is not as big as his belief in himself
Thi s val i dat es; For get ot her s; hel p sel f .
Thi s al so val i dat es my bel i ef t hat I amnot post i ng t hi s t hr ead t o hel p
ot her but t o hel p mysel f .
I t al so shows one must bel i eve i n t hei r sel f above ever yt hi ng.
he is as big as the number of persons who believe in him.
Thi s i s not l ogi cal .
A per son i s a bi g as he i s. The number of peopl e who " see" how bi g he i s,
i s not r el evant or i s i l l ogi cal .
Thi s i s ego. " car i ng about what ot her s t hi nk about you. "
One must hat e t hi ngs t hat encour age ego. Onl y by doi ng t hat can one
become r i ght br ai n dom.
That i s evi dent i n t he ego condi t i oni ng met hods.
Thi s i s al ong t he l i nes of t hi s bi bl e quot e
" You hypocr i t e, f i r st t ake t he l og out of your own eye, and t hen you wi l l
see clearly t o t ake t he speck out of your br ot her ' s eye. "
Thi s means hel p sel f f i r st t hen i n doi ng t hat t he f r ui t s of hel pi ng
your sel f may hel p ot her s.
One must hel p hi msel f become r i ght br ai n Dom, condi t i oni ng must be done
by you or sel f , t hen once r i ght br ai n Domt he f r ui t s of t hat may hel p
ot her s.







M.O.DENGLER: Not everything that counts can be counted, and not
everything that can be counted counts.

Yes a per son s essence cannot be count ed, and t hat per son s essence i s
beyond count i ng.
And money whi ch can be count ed has l i t t l e or no t r ue or l ogi cal val ue.
So a per son' s essence i s f ar mor e val uabl e t han mat er i al t hi ngs.
But my gover nment deci ded a per son s essence i s not as val uabl e as oi l .
So whoever i n my gover nment who made t hat det er mi nat i on i s ei t her
conf used or del usi onal .
So my count r y appear s t o be del usi onal or conf used because t he ones who
det er mi ne t he deci si ons ar e conf used or del usi onal .

















The pr obl emwi t h God, i s t hat ever yone means somet hi ng wi l dl y di f f er ent
when t hey say t hat wor d.
Yes t hat i s a sympt omof " ever yone" or t he maj or i t y bei ng l ef t br ai n.
A sympt omof l ef t br ai n i s conf usi on
That i s why " means somet hi ng wi l dl y di f f er ent " i s l ogi cal or t r ue
The t r ue or l ogi cal def i ni t i on of God i s ever yt hi ng. Ever yt hi ng and
ever yone bei ng a sub set of ever yt hi ng, i s God.
God cr eat ed ever yt hi ng wi t h hi s essence.
I det ect some i l l ogi cal wi t h t he wor d God.
Some bel i eve God i s an ent i t y and some bel i eve God i s what some cal l
" mot her nat ur e"
I t i s unknown at t hi s t i me how I f eel about t hi s, but I do det ect a hi nt
of i l l ogi cal .
















M. O. DENGLER: Losing an illusion makes you wiser than finding a truth.

Becomi ng awar e of an i l l usi on makes you wi ser because once you ar e awar e
of an i l l usi on you can avoi d i t or t hr ough st r at egy, compensat e and adapt
t o i t .
Ther e i s no t r ut h onl y t r ue or l ogi cal .






















All people are mad Todd.

Some peopl e ar e not as mad Todd as ot her s. LOL
or
Ever yone i s on di f f er ent l evel s of madness.
or
Ever yone i s r eal l y doi ng t he best t hey can based on t hei r madness.




















Some bel i eve dr ugs can br i ng t r ue or l ogi cal cl ar i t y.
That bel i ef i s a del usi on. One who bel i eves t hat i s del usi onal .
Tr ue or l ogi cal cl ar i t y can onl y be acqui r ed t hr ough r i ght br ai n domor
" enl i ght enment " .
The r eason f or t hi s i s t i me.
One does not j ust get t r ue or l ogi cal cl ar i t y t he moment t hey become
r i ght br ai n dom, i t t akes t i me t o r each a decent degr ee of t r ue or
l ogi cal cl ar i t y.
The onl y t hi ng peopl e who t ake cer t ai n dr ugs i n hopes of gai ni ng t r ue or
l ogi cal cl ar i t y achi eve i s t he i l l usi on of t r ue or l ogi cal cl ar i t y.
So i t i s not a t r ue or l ogi cal deci si on t o at t empt t o r each t r ue or
l ogi cal cl ar i t y wi t h dr ugs.
So t he bel i ef :
Dr ugs can br i ng one, t r ue or l ogi cal cl ar i t y.
I s t he r ever se t hi ng.
Dr ugs cannot br i ng one, t r ue or l ogi cal cl ar i t y.













Physi cal Li f e i ncl udes t he uni ver se.
Li f e wi l l al ways be myst er i ous unt i l we expl or e and under st and t he l ast
pl anet and ever yt hi ng on i t at t he f ar t hest r eaches of t he uni ver se.
The uni ver se may have no end.
We have har dl y expl or ed our own sol ar syst em.
So maybe " we ar e agr ee l i f e i s myst er i ous at l east unt i l we di e or f or
t he next 100 year s" woul d be mor e accur at e, but t hat woul d ki l l t he
symmet r y i n t he comment .
I r ead ver y car ef ul l y al l t he i nf or mat i on about Buddha and r ei ncar nat i on
and I det ect ed so many del usi ons and i l l usi ons I do not know wher e t o
st ar t .
I ponder i f br eat hi ng, si nce i t i s aut omat i c i s per haps cont r ol l ed by t he
subconsci ous but i t gi ves t he i l l usi on of bei ng aut omat i c.
Rei ncar nat i on i s not l ogi cal l y possi bl e.
" Nat ur e avoi ds a vacuum. "
1. a space ent i r el y devoi d of mat t er .
Ni r vana i s not l ogi cal . One can never r each a st at e of not hi ng. Nat ur e
wi l l not al l ow i t . Nat ur e i s r eal i t y. Nat ur e i s not capabl e of f al l i ng
f or i l l usi ons or del usi ons.
The pr i nce you spoke of who want ed t o t r y and st op agi ng was del usi onal .
He st ar t ed a quest t hat was not possi bl e t o achi eve or i mpossi bl e. That
i s a sympt omof conf usi on. Logi cal l y i t i s not a good deci si on t o embar k
on i mpossi bl e quest s. I f he was awar e t her e ar e some t hi ngs t hat one
cannot avoi d, l i ke agi ng or deat h he woul d have avoi ded hi s quest .
Sci ence and medi ci ne t oday i s t r yi ng t o pr ol ong l i f e.
The si de ef f ect of t hat i s hospi t al s ar e f ul l of el der l y peopl e i n f ul l
dement i a who ar e onl y bur dens and i t i s causi ng gr eat di sor der .
The ol d sayi ng
" Be car ef ul what you wi sh f or appl i es her e. "
Thank you f or t hat i nf or mat i on I amnow awar e of i t .



I ami nt endi ng t hi s post t o pi ss you of f so t hat I may shock you back t o
r eal i t y.
Af t er l i f e and r ei ncar nat i on ar e f ant asy l and del usi ons. Per i od.
One cannot pr ove or di spr ove af t er l i f e.
One cannot pr ove or di spr ove r ei ncar nat i on.
They ar e bot h del usi ons. Per i od! ! ! !
I f you cannot pr ove or di spr ove somet hi ng f or get i t .
Do not wast e your t i me on i l l ogi cal det ai l s.
Per haps I shoul d spend t he r est of my l i f e t r yi ng t o pr ove I ama uni cor n
wi t h spar kl es sur r oundi ng me.
Per haps I shoul d wast e t he r est of my l i f e t r yi ng t o pr ove I ami n f act a
hobbi t l i vi ng i n a bot t l e at t he bot t omof t he ocean.
Maybe I shoul d wast e my l i f e pr ovi ng when one di es t hey go t o a l and f ul l
of i ce cr eamand chocol at e candy and t hey can eat f or t he r est of
et er ni t y.
Maybe I shoul d wast e my l i mi t ed t i me i n l i f e expl ai ni ng why, when one
di es t hey go t o a l and f ul l of i ce cr eamand chocol at e candy t hey can eat
f or t he r est of et er ni t y.
Per haps one shoul d not say del usi onal t hi ngs so t hat ot her s wi l l not be
so cer t ai n one i s del usi onal by t he t hi ngs one says.
Per haps one shoul d st ay i n t he l ogi cal r eal i t y because once one st ar t s
down t he r oad of i l l ogi cal t hought s and bel i ef s t her e i s no end t o how
del usi onal one can become.
You can bel i eve what ever you want t o.
But as your f r i end I wi l l cer t ai nl y l et you know when I bel i eve your
bel i ef s ar e del usi ons.
That i s because I amyour f r i end and I wi l l not al l ow my f r i end t o
bel i eve del usi onal t hi ngs and l ook t he ot her way.
That i s what a f r i end i s al l about , l ooki ng out f or hi s f r i ends wel l
bei ng.



You onl y have t hese choi ces.
Pr ove t o me t her e i s l i f e af t er deat h or r ei ncar nat i on based on t r ue and
l ogi c OR admi t you ar e del usi onal i n your bel i ef i n l i f e af t er deat h
and/ or r ei ncar nat i on.
For t he peopl e on t he " I l i ke t o l ook at pi ct ur es of dead peopl e" f or um.
Thi s si ngl e post wi l l pr obabl y not get me banned f r omt hi s f or um, but I
ampr et t y sur e i t wi l l get me banned f r omt he Buddhi st f or um.
I sai d many post s ago, I have t hi s wei r d f eel i ng t he Buddhi st f or um
appear s t o be " open mi nded" but I bel i eve t hi s f or umf ul l of peopl e " who
l i ke t o l ook at pi ct ur es of dead peopl e" i s f ar mor e open mi nded.
I nt er est i ng how t hi ngs wor k out somet i mes.
" Looks can be decei vi ng"
" Sl ayi ng t he dr agon of del ay i s no spor t f or t he shor t - wi nded. "
Madonna has a song cal l ed " Power of Goodbye.
That song i s t al ki ng about exact l y what t he ego condi t i oni ng i s al l
about .
Sayi ng goodbye t o your del usi ons because i f you do not you wi l l never be
abl e t o say hel l o t o cl ar i t y.
Per haps some of you ar e now awar e t he dr agon of del ay shows no mer cy.
The dr agon of del ay i s conf i dent i n i t s st r at egy, and wi l l set t l e f or
not hi ng but anni hi l at i on.
Per haps some of you ar e now awar e you ar e shor t - wi nded and have no
busi ness i n t he bat t l e.
Per haps some shoul d t r y t o f or get ever yt hi ng t hey have r ead i n t hi s
t hr ead and set t l e f or t he war mcomf or t of del usi ons and i l l usi ons.







Cl ar i t y i s col d, uncomf or t abl e, har sh and has no mer cy.
Cl ar i t y i s t he dest r oyer of al l weakness.
Cl ar i t y wi l l save you or dest r oy you, but wi l l set t l e f or not hi ng l ess.


Comment f r omt he I l i ke l ooki ng at pi ct ur es of dead peopl e. f or umabout
my t hr ead t hat i nt r oduces t he Mast er i ng Li f e document . Det ect emot i ons
per haps? Snabbl e i s my handl e on t hat f or um.
Skip: Ohh goddammitt snabble. When are you gonna call this a day?
Roughly.
Ar e you concer ned about me?
You shoul d be concer ned about your sel f .
AmI at your house f or ci ng you t o r ead t hi s t hr ead I st ar t ed?
Per haps YOU( subconsci ous) wi l l not al l ow you t o even sl eep bef or e you
check up on t hi s t hr ead.
Per haps your consci ous i s t el l i ng t o you say del usi onal t hi ngs when you
ar e on t hi s t hr ead but your subconsci ous ( you) knows exact l y why i t i s on
t hi s t hr ead.
Ar e you even abl e t o r esi st t he wor ds i n t hi s t hr ead?
Ar e you so compel l ed t o r ead t hi s t hr ead you can no l onger f unct i on or
f or ml ogi cal t hought s?
Do you bel i eve my wor ds can make a per son unabl e t o f unct i on?
Do you even know what you bel i eve?
Ar e you beggi ng me t o st op because you can no l onger t ake anymor e l ogi c?
Ar e you beggi ng me?
I have cl ar i t y. I show no mer cy. I seek out weakness and dest r oy i t .




One shoul d avoi d get t i ng i nt o ar gument s wi t h emot i ons.

I r ef use t o st oop t o t hat l evel .
I t i s not goi ng t o happen so get used t o i t .
The sympt oms you ar e exhi bi t i ng ar e sympt oms of def eat .
That i s good.
That i s what you desi r e.
You ar e st ar t i ng t o say goodbye and i t i s pai nf ul .
You ar e f eel i ng t he i l l usi on of pani c, f r ust r at i on, anger , spi t e, hat e on
and on.
What ar e t hose? AHHHH t hey ar e emot i ons. . . .
Yes your emot i ons ar e t r yi ng t o hol d on t o you.
You have t o l et t hemgo.
You have t o see what t hey ar e and what t hey ar e doi ng.
Then you can det ect t hemand l et t hemgo.
You have emot i ons about me or what I say, but t hat i s onl y a sympt omt he
l ogi c i s st ar t i ng t o t ake hol d.
You want t he l ogi c t o t ake hol d.
You j ust si t cal ml y and t hi nk ver y car ef ul l y af t er you r ead t hi s and
t hi nk t o your sel f .
What has snabbl e sai d t hat has upset me t o t hi s degr ee?
I f your answer i s, not hi ng snabbl e has sai d i n t hi s t hr ead i s
j ust i f i cat i on f or my anger or emot i ons t owar ds snabbl e, t hen t hat i s
ver i f i cat i on ever yt hi ng I sai d i n t hi s post i s t r ue or l ogi cal .
I want t o quot e a sent ence f r omt he ver y f i r st post I made i n t hi s
t hr ead.
You t hi nk about i t and det er mi ne i f i t i s t r ue or l ogi cal af t er you have
det er mi ned t he answer t o t hi s quest i on: What has snabbl e sai d t hat has
upset me t o t hi s degr ee?
The quot e f r omt he ver y f i r st post I made on t hi s t hr ead i s:
Mast er i ng l i f e can l ead t o i nsani t y. . . .
What t hat means i s
Becomi ng a r i ght br ai n dommay gi ve you sympt oms or i l l usi ons t hat you
ar e l osi ng your mi nd or not t hi nki ng cl ear l y.
That i s a si gn post t hat you ar e st ar t i ng t o l et go of your l ef t br ai n.
When you l et go enough you wi l l become r i ght br ai n.
That i s what t hi s whol e t hr ead i s al l about .
That i s what t hi s t hr ead has al ways been al l about .
I amawar e some of you bel i eve t he i l l usi on you ar e anger ed wi t h me, but
I amal so awar e t hat i s a sympt omof sayi ng goodbye t o t he l ef t br ai n.

Some of you ar e showi ng sympt oms of sayi ng goodbye and t hat i s good.
You onl y have t o hol d on f or a bi t l onger and you wi l l br eak t hr ough t o
cl ar i t y.
Al t hough i t i s onl y a shor t t i me unt i l you br eak t hr ough, i t wi l l al so be
t he most di f f i cul t t i me.
J ust r emember t hi s sayi ng.
" Sl ayi ng t he dr agon of del ay i s no spor t f or t he shor t - wi nded. "
I know you can do i t , but YOU need t o bel i eve you can do i t .
I want you t o know, you ar e pr ogr essi ng f ast er t han t he ones on t he ot her
f or um.
That i s because you ar e mor e open mi nded.
You shoul d be pl eased wi t h your sel f .
Rei ncar nat i on or af t er l i f e bel i ef i s an awar eness si gn post .
Ever y si ngl e per son who says t hey bel i eve i n t hose t hi ngs has not r eached
t he awar eness si gn post .
Onl y t hose who have become awar e enough, under st and t hose bel i ef s ar e
del usi ons.
Af t er even f ur t her cl ar i t y i t becomes obvi ous t hey ar e awar eness si gn
post s.
Thi s i s a ver y l ogi cal and compl ex det ect or of awar eness.

This is the Mastering Life document I wrote about one month after the
accident.

Some ver y st r ange t hi ngs happened t o me r ecent l y.
I amgonna t el l you al l , how t o mast er l i f e, but I amal so goi ng t o st ar t
by sayi ng. . .
You mi ght not want t o mast er l i f e. . . .
I t i s not t he end of t he r oad, I t i s t he st ar t .
Mast er i ng l i f e can l ead t o i nsani t y. . . .
So one coul d ar gue by t el l i ng you how t o mast er l i f e, i amhur t i ng you. . .
and t hat i s val i d.
I amwar ni ng you up f r ont , so you can t ur n back now i f you wi sh. . . .
I wi l l at no t i me , be j oki ng or cr acki ng j okes, so you wi l l never have
t o wonder i f I amki ddi ng or messi ng ar ound wi t h any post i make on t hi s
t opi c, I wi l l al ways be ser i ous on t hi s t hr ead. . . I t i s not ver y
compl i cat ed but i t wi l l change you f or ever , so be awar e of t hat . . . .
Let s st ar t out wi t h t he most i mpor t ant t hi ng.
We can cal l t hi s t he basi cs, t hen I wi l l l et t hi s di gest and I l l
cont i nue f r omt her e wi t h next post .
Mast er i ng l i f e i s si mpl y maki ng t he r i ght deci si ons al l t he t i me or a
gr eat maj or i t y of t he t i me.
I f you never make a bad deci si on l i f e i s ver y easy.
So t he most i mpor t ant t hi ng you need t o get r i ght , i s your Scal e of
I mpor t ance.
I amgoi ng t o t el l you t he t hr ee most i mpor t ant t hi ngs f i r st . . .
Then once you have t he 3 most i mpor t ant t hi ngs, you wi l l have a sol i d
f oundat i on.
The bi bl e says, Bui l d your house on a r ock, and when t he sea' s r i se, your
house wi l l not cr umbl e.



Scal e of I mpor t ance
1. Oxygen - - you di e i n about 1- 5 mi ns wi t hout i t
2. Wat er
3. Food
So j ust di gest t hat , and set your scal es t o t hose bei ng most i mpor t ant .



Her e i s wher e we ar e at :
Scal e of I mpor t ance
1. Oxygen
2. Wat er
3. Food
I f you do not agr ee wi t h t hose as t he t op 3, t hen you need t o do
r esear ch, unt i l t hose ar e your t op t hr ee on your Scal e of I mpor t ance.
I f you agr ee t hose ar e t he t op 3, t hen you ar e r eady f or t he next par t .
Once you agr ee t hose ar e t he t op 3, t hey t hen become under st ood, t he t op
3 go wi t hout sayi ng. They become t he Zen scal e of I mpor t ance.
Si nce t hey ar e under st ood. We ar e goi ng t o wi pe t he scal e of i mpor t ance
cl ean and st ar t i t agai n.
I wi l l cover t he new scal e of i mpor t ance one i t emat a t i me. I t i s ver y
i mpor t ant t o get t hese r i ght .
I f you get t hese wr ong, your scal e of i mpor t ance wi l l be f l awed, and t hen
you wi l l be open, t o maki ng bad deci si ons.
Zen Scal e of I mpor t ance
1. Oxygen
2. Wat er
3. Food

Scal e of I mpor t ance
1. Pr ogr essi on or advancement .


Some of you may t hi nk money or God or l ove or some ot her f act or shoul d be
#1. They ar e not .

So I wi l l l et you ponder t hi s f or a shor t t i me. You need t o put t hat as
#1, on your Scal e of I mpor t ance, keepi ng i n mi nd The f i r st t hr ee i t ems on
t he scal e of i mpor t ance ar e now Zen.

Some of you, al r eady have huge ar gument s wi t h t hi s. Resi st t hose ur ges.

Al so, i f you have a medi cal condi t i on l i ke di abet es or you need l i f e
savi ng medi ci ne on a r egul ar basi s, t hose ar e goi ng t o become #4 i n t he
Zen scal e of i mpor t ance, because t o you, t hey ar e vi t al .


So, t hi s f ar , l et s l ook at t he scal e of i mpor t ance you shoul d have.

Zen Scal e of i mpor t ance.

1. Oxygen
2. Wat er
3. Food

Scal e of I mpor t ance

1. Pr ogr essi on or advancement


I f you ar e i n sync wi t h t hat i nf or mat i on, you ar e pr ogr essi ng, and t hat
i s t he most i mpor t ant t hi ng.

Mor e wi l l f ol l ow.


Thi s i s wher e we ar e at .

Zen Scal e of i mpor t ance.

1. Oxygen
2. Wat er
3. Food

Scal e of I mpor t ance

1. Pr ogr essi on or advancement


Thi s next one i s gonna get a bi t deep , so i amgoi ng t o t hr ow a bunch of
exampl es at you, because your f i r st i mpr essi on of number t wo i s gonna be
wr ong.

2. Hel p ot her s

Let me st ar t wi t h a l ow l evel exampl e of hel pi ng ot her s.

You gi ve a guy a mi l l i on dol l ar s a new house and al l t he f ood he can eat .

anot her l ow l evel exampl e of hel pi ng ot her s.

You wi t hdr aw al l t he money f r omyour bank and gi ve i t t o homel ess peopl e.


Now l et me gi ve you a hi gh l evel exampl e of hel pi ng peopl e.

You t each a homel ess man how t o f i sh, so he can cat ch f i sh hi msel f .

anot her exampl e of hi gh l evel .

You di scover how t o mast er l i f e, and you t el l i t t o ever yone on a f or um.


The l ow l evel exampl es, ar e hel pi ng peopl e, but t hey ar e l ow l evel ,
because t hey do not r eal l y hel p peopl e f or good. They ar e si mi l ar t o
gi vi ng a cancer pat i ent a mor phi ne shot . Yes i t wi l l hel p t hem, f or t he
t i me bei ng, but event ual l y t hey wi l l be back t o wher e t hey ar e now. So i t
i s l ow l evel hel p.

The hi gh l evel exampl e, r equi r es t he l east ef f or t f r omt he gi ver , and
gi ves t he most beni f i t t o whomi t hel ps.

So t he l ow l evel exampl e, was hel p, but does not compar e t o t he qual i t y
of t he hi gh l evel exampl e.

So, 2. Hel p ot her s, i s ment t o i mpl y, f ocus on hi gh l evel s of hel pi ng
ot her s, i f possi bl e.

I amgoi ng t o expl ai n now, how 1. Pr ogr ess and 2. Hel pi ng ot her s wor ks .

By hel pi ng ot her s, you hel p your sel f , because you enabl e t he possi bi l i t y
of your own pr ogr essi on, and t he peopl e you hel p pr ogr ess, especi al l y, i f
you hel p t hemwi t h hi gh l evel hel p.

I wi l l use a r eal l i f e exampl e t o expl ai n t hi s.

Someone t el l s peopl e on a f or umhow t o mast er l i f e.
I n t i me, t hose peopl e who r ead t hat f or um, begi n t o t el l ot her peopl e.
I n t i me, t hose peopl e st ar t t o t el l even mor e peopl e.
Event ual l y many peopl e mast er l i f e and begi n t o gi ve ot her ' s hi gh l evel
hel p, and event ual l y, t he i ni t i al per son who post ed on t he f or ums, wi l l
be hel ped or pr ogr ess.

So, t he per son who i ni t i al l y post ed on t he f or ums, not onl y hel ped ot her
peopl e, he al so hel ped hi msel f . So he al so pr ogr essed f r omt hat hel p, and
f r omhel pi ng ot her peopl e. And pr ogr essi on i s t he most i mpor t ant t hi ng.

I want t o end t hi s post wi t h a r eal l i f e exampl e, of what can happen, i f
you do not get your scal e of i mpor t ance cor r ect .


Ther e was a ver y weal t hy st ock br oker .

Recent l y t he st ock mar ket cr ashed, and t hat weal t hy man, came home one
day, shot hi s wi f e, hi s t wo ki ds and t hen wal ked i n f r ont of a t r ai n.

Why di d he do t hi s?

Hi s Scal e of I mpor t ance was f l awed.

You can possi bl y guess, money was ver y hi gh on hi s scal e of i mpor t ance.
Hel pi ng peopl e was ver y l ow, and pr ogr essi on was al so ver y l ow.

So t he t r ut h i s, because t hi s mans scal e of i mpor t ance was f l awed, i t
cost hi mhi s l i f e, hi s wi f e s l i f e, hi s ki ds l i ves, and cr eat ed sor r ow
f or ever yone r el at ed t o t hem.

Those ar e not si de ef f ect s of pr ogr essi on or hel pi ng ot her s.

I coul d dwel l on t hi s l onger , but I wi l l st op her e, so t hat we can
cont i nue t o pr ogr ess.






I ampl eased wi t h t he per spect i ve t hi s document I cr eat ed one mont h af t er
t he acci dent pr ovi des.
I can see I was goi ng i n t he r i ght di r ect i on but I can t el l I was unawar e
of many t hi ngs at t hi s st age.

















Perhaps I am mindful of what you say, because perhaps I am mindful of
what you are.

Perhaps I am pleased with you, but perhaps I am not pleased with your
actions, perhaps your actions in general, perhaps the way you generally
act. Perhaps being aware of how you generally act perhaps harms me and
perhaps I will do my best to avoid harm coming to myself.











Buddhi st f or umquest i on.
UpsizeThis: Why is a clear definition necessary?
Yes. That i s a ver y l ogi cal concl usi on. One must i dent i f y t he chal l enge
pr oper l y bef or e one can devel op a st r at egy t o appr oach t he chal l enge.
I t i s a ver y di f f i cul t chal l enge t o pr ove or di spr ove r ei ncar nat i on.
I t i s al so a ver y di f f i cul t chal l enge t o i dent i f y t he st r at egy pr oper l y
t o pr ove r ei ncar nat i on.
That i s a sympt omt hat t he chal l enge i s i l l ogi cal .
That i s a sympt omt he chal l enge i s not l ogi cal .
The chal l enge of pr ovi ng r ei ncar nat i on i s showi ng si gns of bei ng
i l l ogi cal , nat ur al l y.
I t i s nat ur al l y showi ng, pr ovi ng r ei ncar nat i on, i s not goi ng t o be
successf ul .
That i s good because some ar e st ar t i ng t o t hi nk l ogi cal l y.
Logi c i s t he desi r e.
One i s st ar t i ng t o see i l l ogi cal and i dent i f y i t .
That i s good and t hat i s t he desi r e.
Some ar e st ar t i ng t o l et go of emot i ons and see l ogi c.
Logi c i s cl ar i t y and awar eness and t hat i s desi r ed.










When you get near a bi r d i t f l i es away i n t er r or , when you see any ani mal
i n t he wi l d i t r uns away i n t er r or , i t i s ver y awar e how speci al ed up
we ar e.
I t i s scar ed of us because we ar e del usi onal , unpr edi ct abl e, and
essent i al l y a cur sed speci es.
99. 9%of al l speci es t hat have ever exi st ed have become ext i nct . . .
We ar e no doubt goi ng t o become ext i nct
DNA evidence indicates that modern humans originated in Africa about
200,000 years ago.
That s i t , we haven t even been ar ound f or 1 second i n t he scal e of
t hi ngs t hat have been al i ve on ear t h and we t ot al l y messed ever yt hi ng
up. I amusi ng t hat wor d messed l oosel y.
We as humans ar e so del usi onal by nat ur e we t hi nk, Oh yeah we ar e t he
most i nt el l i gent and wi se and advanced speci es i n t he hi st or y of t he
ear t h.
I t i s t ot al l y t he r ever se t hi ng. . .
We ar e t he most messed up, cur sed, r et ar ded, Won t l ast much l onger ,
speci es i n t he hi st or y of t he ear t h. . .
Pr ehi st or i c er a l ast ed 320 mi l l i on year s and i t t ook per haps an ext i nct
l evel event t o wi pe out t he di nosaur . They had t hei r st uf f t oget her .
We wi l l not be her e i n a mi l l i on year s t hat s per haps a f act . . I f we make
i t anot her 100, 000 year s i t wi l l be a mi r acl e of al l mi r acl es.
I t i s per haps a 1 i n a mi l l i on chance we wi l l even be ar ound i n 1000
year s.
We ar e j ust so del usi onal and cur sed by t hat del usi on, as our t echnol ogy
i ncr eases our abi l i t y t o mess t hi ngs up i ncr eases, event ual l y our
t echnol ogy wi l l bi sect wi t h our del usi ons and we wi l l ki l l our sel ves of f .
Yes we ar e so advanced and speci al we can ki l l our sel ves of f wi t h
t he push of a but t on, t hat wi l l l aunch bombs t hat wi l l ensur e we al l di e
a pai nf ul deat h. How gr acef ul we ar e, how i nt el l i gent we ar e.
So we have t he bombs i n case ot her peopl e t r y t o ki l l us. So we have t he
bombs t o ki l l ot her peopl e so t hat we, peopl e, won t be ki l l ed.
So, we ar e so i nt el l i gent , we have bombs t o ki l l our sel ves i n or der t o
pr ot ect our sel ves f r omour sel ves.
So essent i al l y, t he human r ace i s sui ci dal , homi ci dal , del usi onal , i n
f ul l psychosi s and hel l bent on dest r uct i on.
That i s per haps what one mi ght cal l , i nsane or per haps r abi d.
So when you hear someone t al k about , Oh hel p t he envi r onment , or
Pr ot ect ear t h. , what t hey ar e r eal l y sayi ng i s, Look as humans we ar e
on a sui ci de r un, t hat s unquest i oned, but on our way out whi ch i s gonna
happen any moment now, we can choose t o not wi pe out al l t he per f ect l i f e
f or ms t hat ar e ar ound us.
Yes we have a pl ague and ar e doomed, but we can show a sl i ght shr ed of
honor i f we don t t ake al l t he val uabl e l i f e f or ms on t hi s pl anet out
wi t h us.
So a humans goal i n l i f e i s t hi s.
You ar e a human and you ar e cur sed and you ar e doomed. Tr y t o not r ub of f
on al l t he per f ect l i f e f or ms i n your sui ci de r un t o ext i nct i on.
You mi ght t hi nk your bet t er t han an ant but t hat s cause you ar e so
del usi onal and cur sed you do not under st and, t hat ant has been ar ound
about 100000000 t i mes l onger t han you have, and i t i s f or a r eason, t hey
ar e per f ect and you ar e cur sed.
I amver y sat i sf i ed wi t h t he l ogi c and cl ar i t y i n t hi s post . Thi s may
have been one of my best post s.












Do not t el l me one t hi ng you t hi nk we have done t hat i s r i ght or good,
cause your wr ong, we have done not hi ng r i ght or good, and we wi l l never
do anyt hi ng t hat i s r i ght or good, per haps ever .
I know many peopl e wi l l never under st and t hat l ast post . I amawar e of
t hat .
Let me dumb mysel f down a bi t .
I f you as a human bei ng t hi nk you as a human bei ng ar e anyt hi ng mor e t han
a huge mi st ake of nat ur e and a cur se t o t he wor d LI FE i t sel f , you ar e
uncondi t i onal l y and f act ual l y t ot al l y i nsane.
I hope you under st and what t hat l ast sent ence i s r eal l y sayi ng.
I cannot dumb mysel f down any f ur t her t han t hat i n t hi s st at e of
awar eness.


















Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you
do it
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
1869-1948

So t hi s i s what Gandhi sai d. Per haps some of you have hear d of Gandhi .
I t r y t o avoi d over est i mat i ng peopl e.
WHATEVER YOU DO WI LL BE I NSI GNI FI CANT.
That means, you ar e cur sed because you ar e human.
You ar e doomed t o ext i nct i on because you ar e human.
So do what ever you want , and do i t t o excess, so as t o hast en your
ext i nct i on as a human f or t he sake of l i f e i t sel f .
BUT I T I S VERY I MPORTANT THAT YOU DO I T.
What t hi s means i s, you mi ght be t hi nki ng I want t o sl ow my ext i nct i on as
a human speci es down as much as I can. That i s wr ong. I t i s i mpor t ant
t hat as a human speci es we become ext i nct as f ast as possi bl e f or t he
benef i t of t he ot her " way way bet t er " speci es we ar e ki l l i ng of f .
So t he sayi ng
What ever you do wi l l be i nsi gni f i cant , but i t i s ver y i mpor t ant t hat you
do i t
Real l y means.
Yes, you want t o avoi d your ext i nct i on as a speci es, but i t i s ver y
i mpor t ant t hat you become ext i nct as f ast as possi bl e.
***************************************

I n per spect i ve I t hi nk what t hi s sayi ng means i s, Bl ocki ng emot i ons seems
bad, si l enci ng emot i ons seems bad, but i t i s ver y i mpor t ant you bl ock
emot i ons because bl ocki ng emot i ons i s not bad.



99. 9999%
I f one wi shes t o become awar e of what t hat number means. . .
Take a penny and f l i p i t i n 100 f l i p cycl es.
When you f i nal l y r each a 100 f l i p cycl e wher e t hat penny l ands on heads
or t ai l s 99 t i mes out of 100, you wi l l be awar e of what t he chances ar e
we wi l l not become ext i nct .
Don' t gi ve up af t er t he f i r st 50 year s of f l i ppi ng cycl es, keep t r yi ng
because i t i s i mpor t ant you become awar e of what our chances of not
becomi ng ext i nct ar e.



























That is the end of a portion of the notes I accumulated in the first
two months after the accident.
Perhaps the notes will give you something to contrast the second
portion of the document with.


Cont r ast i s a t er r i bl e way t o cont r ast .














I f one i s evi l i t i s best t o go al l t he way
I f one i s good i t i s best t o go al l t he way
I f one i s sane i t i s best t o go al l t he way
I f one i s i nsane i t i s best t o go al l t he way
I f one i s emot i onal i t i s best t o go al l t he way
I f one i s l ogi cal i t i s best t o go al l t he way
I f one i s goi ng t o be hot go al l t he way
I f one goi ng t o be col d go al l t he way
Revel at i ons 3: 16
Si nce you ar e l ukewar m, and nei t her hot nor col d, I wi l l spi t you out of
my mout h.

Per haps i t i s best t o be engul f ed i nst ead of di scar ded.
Per haps i t i s best t o be dest r oyed i nst ead of wi t her i ng away.
Per haps i t i s best t o go f or br oke i nst ead of r emai n par t i al l y br oken.
I f one i s mi ndf ul t o embr ace emot i ons one shoul d be mi ndf ul t o embr ace
al l emot i ons.
I f one i s mi ndf ul t o avoi d emot i ons one shoul d be mi ndf ul t o avoi d al l
emot i ons.
I f one i s mi ndf ul t o embr ace conf usi on one shoul d embr ace conf usi on
f ul l y.
I f one i s mi ndf ul t o embr ace dar kness one shoul d be mi ndf ul t o embr ace
dar kness f ul l y.
Per haps i t i s best , t o go al l t he way t han set t l e f or l ukewar m.
Per haps one shoul d at t empt per f ect i on and avoi d set t l i ng f or anyt hi ng
l ess.
Per haps per f ect i on can never be r eached so t hen one has j ob secur i t y.


I amf ul l y awar e i t i s di f f i cul t t o l et go. I amf ul l y awar e l et t i ng go
i s possi bl e.
I ammi ndf ul t o not associ at e wi t h what I per cei ved was l i ght bef or e t hi s
acci dent .
I ammi ndf ul t o not associ at e wi t h what I per cei ved was saf et y bef or e
t hi s acci dent .
I ammi ndf ul of what I per cei ved as l i ght bef or e t hi s acci dent , i s not .
I ammi ndf ul of what I per cei ved as saf et y bef or e t hi s acci dent , i s not .



























There was a woman who gave her money freely.
This woman left big tips and always suggested the clerk keep the change
when she paid for the bill.
This womans friend asked her,
Why do you give your money away? Money does not grow on trees
The woman replied, That is why I give it freely.


The t r ee i s t he human.
The f r ui t s of t he human ar e act i ons and deeds.
Money i s not hi ng compar ed t o t he f r ui t s.
Money i s not hi ng at al l compar ed t o t he t r ee.
Fr ui t s easi l y count er mat er i al t hi ngs.
The t r ee al ways count er s mat er i al t hi ngs.



















There was a woman who allowed others to ridicule her and say hurtful
things to her and she never replied.
Her friend asked her, Why you do let people walk all over you?
The woman replied, So I do not become like they are.













I do not desi r e.
I do not desi r e t o t el l anyone what t o do.
I do not desi r e t o f or ce anyone what t o do.
I amf ul l y awar e of what humans, ar e.
I amf ul l y awar e of what humans, pot ent i al i s.
I amf ul l y awar e a per son i s f ul l y capabl e of maki ng t hei r own deci si ons
because I amf ul l y awar e of what peopl e ar e.
I amcompel l ed t o suggest wor ds but t he wor ds ar e onl y a medi umt o
communi cat e t he spi r i t or t he i deas I amcompel l ed t o expr ess.
I amcompel l ed t o expr ess t he i dea or spi r i t , and one st r at egy t o do t hat
i s t hr ough wor ds and so I amunabl e t o l i mi t mysel f , so wor ds ar e a val i d
appr oach.
I al so expr ess t he i deas or spi r i t i n musi c.
I al so expr ess t he i deas or spi r i t by my act i ons and by my exampl e, by
what I do, and how I do what I do.
I amear l y i nt o t hi s acci dent but I amdet er mi ned t o do t he best I can.
I amear l y i nt o t hi s acci dent so per haps I amj ust get t i ng war med up.
Per haps good peopl e make t hi ngs good and per haps bad peopl e make t hi ngs
bad, so per haps i t i s i mpor t ant t o know what i s good and what i s bad.











Per haps many of t he di sci pl es of Chr i st i ani t y di ed hor r i bl e physi cal
deat hs.
Per haps t hey wer e f ul l y awar e of what t hei r i nt ui t i on was suggest i ng
t hey do.
Per haps t hey wer e f ul l y awar e of what f ol l owi ng t hat i nt ui t i on woul d
l ead t o.
Per haps t hey wer e i n a st r uggl e t o l i st en t o t he i nt ui t i on or l i st en t o
t hei r emot i onal sel f .

Per haps i f t hey l i st ened t o t hei r emot i onal sel f t hey deni ed t he
i nt ui t i on.

Per haps i f t hey l i st ened t o t hei r sel f t hey woul d not have di ed a
hor r i bl e physi cal deat h.

Per haps i f t hey l i st ened t o t hei r sel f t hey woul d have not di ed a
hor r i bl e physi cal deat h but woul d per haps di ed a hor r i bl e spi r i t ual
deat h.

Per haps t hey sacr i f i ced t hei r physi cal sel f t o save t hei r spi r i t ual
sel f .








Per haps t hey sacr i f i ced t hei r physi cal sel f by denyi ng t hei r emot i onal
sel f t o save t hei r t r ue sel f or t hei r spi r i t ual sel f .
Per haps God suggest ed Abr ahamsacr i f i ce hi s emot i onal sel f s l ove f or
I saac, and per haps when God det er mi ned Abr ahamhad done t hi s mi ndf ul l y
God det er mi ned t her e was no need f or Abr ahamt o physi cal l y ki l l hi s son
I saac.

Per haps t hey ar e f ar wi ser , and f ar gr eat er , t han I wi l l ever be, and
wi l l ever hope t o be, and ever dr eamt o be.
Per haps I amf ul l y awar e of what t hey di d, and per haps i t har ms me t o be
awar e of what t hose wi se bei ngs wer e abl e t o over come, and per haps i f I
amabl e t o have cour age anywher e near t hei r cour age I wi l l have
accompl i shed t he i mpossi bl e.
Per haps i t hel ps me t o be awar e of what t hose wi se men ar e.

Per haps t hi s concept f r eedomof speech gi ves me a sl i ght chance t o have
t he cour age t hose wi se men have, but per haps I amal r eady awar e as t hey
wer e awar e of , t he hor r i bl e physi cal deat h t hat awai t s me, and per haps
I ami n an epi c st r uggl e because per haps I amf ul l y awar e i t i s
unavoi dabl e.

Per haps I amhumbl ed because I amawar e my mi ndf ul ness t o save my
emot i onal & physi cal sel f i s f ool i shness, t o even consi der .




Per haps I amhumbl ed my physi cal and emot i onal sel f must be spi t out
because per haps I ammi ndf ul i t i s not a par t of t he pl an.

Per haps al l I can ever do i s, do my best , t o spi t emot i onal sel f out .

Per haps t o t ypi cal peopl e t he di sci pl e appear ed cr azy t o go i nt o a
t own when he knew he woul d per haps l ose hi s physi cal sel f .

Per haps t o t ypi cal peopl e t hat di sci pl e appear ed unbal anced t o
per haps f ace a hor r i bl e physi cal deat h wi t hout hesi t at i on.

Per haps t hat di sci pl e was f ul l y awar e f aci ng a hor r i bl e physi cal deat h
was t he pr oper act i on t o f ul f i l l what t he i nt ui t i on was suggest i ng of
hi m.

Per haps t ypi cal peopl e wer e per haps convi nced t he di sci pl e s act i ons
wer e i mpr oper and per haps t he di sci pl e was convi nced hi s act i ons wer e
pr oper .

Per haps t he di sci pl e was cer t ai n i t was pr oper f or hi mt o sacr i f i ce hi s
physi cal sel f and per haps t he t ypi cal peopl e wer e cer t ai n i t was
per haps i mpr oper t o sacr i f i ce t hei r physi cal sel f .

Per haps Mar k 8: 35 Whosoever wi l l save hi s l i f e shal l l ose i t . Suggest s
per haps one who det er mi nes t o save t hei r physi cal and emot i onal l i f e
wi l l per haps deny t he i nt ui t i on and t hus di e a hor r i bl e spi r i t ual
deat h.
Per haps Mar k 8: 35 suggest s l ose i t per haps r ef er s t o l ose t hei r
spi r i t ual sel f because per haps t he i nt ui t i on demands t hi ngs per haps a
man i s unabl e t o under st and or per haps makes no l ogi cal sense t o a
man.

Per haps Pr over bs 14: 12 Thereisawaywhichseemsrightuntoaman,buttheendthereof
[are]thewaysofdeath., per haps suggest s t o a t ypi cal man avoi di ng a
hor r i bl e physi cal deat h seems r i ght , but per haps avoi di ng a hor r i bl e
physi cal deat h onl y l eads t o a hor r i bl e spi r i t ual deat h and per haps
a hor r i bl e spi r i t ual deat h i s by f ar t he wor se of t he t wo, per haps.

Per haps t hat di sci pl e was f ul l y awar e i f he r et ur ned t o t hat t own he
woul d di e a hor r i bl e physi cal deat h but per haps t he i nt ui t i on
compel l ed hi mt o do so, and per haps a t ypi cal man woul d have deni ed t he
i nt ui t i on t o save hi s physi cal l i f e and per haps a t ypi cal man
woul d have bel i eved he woul d be doi ng t he pr oper t hi ng, t o deny t he
i nt ui t i on, but per haps t hat was per haps not t he pr oper t hi ng , but
per haps t he most i mpr oper t hi ng a t ypi cal man coul d have ever done i n
al l et er ni t y.

Per haps t hat t ypi cal man boast ed I woul d not be as f ool i sh as t hat
di sci pl e. , I woul d have avoi ded t he hor r i bl e physi cal deat h, so I am
wi se and t hat di sci pl e was f ool i sh t o wal k i nt o a hor r i bl e physi cal
deat h.
Per haps t hat t ypi cal man i s a t ypi cal man because t hey do not know
what t hey do.

Per haps J esus, i n Luke 23: 34 ThensaidJesus,Father,forgivethem;fortheyknownot
whattheydo. was per haps suggest i ng, t ypi cal man per cei ves t hey ar e
doi ng pr oper t hi ngs when t hey ar e doi ng i mpr oper t hi ngs and per haps
J esus was f ul l y awar e of t hi s and was per haps beggi ng t he f at her t o have
mer cy on t ypi cal man, because per haps J esus was f ul l y awar e, t hey wer e
bl i nd.

Per haps J esus was f ul l y awar e t ypi cal man was unabl e t o see t he way,
t he t r ut h and t he l i ght .
Per haps J esus was f ul l y awar e t ypi cal man was seei ng t he wor d but not
under st andi ng t he wor d.

Per haps I can r el at e t o Luke 23: 34 per haps because I amf ul l y awar e of
what t ypi cal man i s and I amper haps f ul l y awar e of what t ypi cal man
does, and per haps I amunabl e t o be as mer ci f ul as J esus.

I per haps amgr eat l y f l awed because I amnot abl e t o f ul l y suggest one
gi ves up t hei r emot i ons.
I per haps amdemandi ng i t , and I per haps amnot goi ng t o r est unt i l
ever yone gi ves up emot i ons.
Per haps I wi l l di e a hor r i bl e physi cal deat h as a r esul t of what t he
i nt ui t i on suggest s but per haps I amunabl e t o car e, and per haps I am
unabl e t o have mer cy, and per haps I amnot mi ndf ul of what wi l l happen
t o my physi cal sel f , because my emot i ons ar e al l but gone as a r esul t
of t hi s acci dent .


Per haps t hose di sci pl es who di ed hor r i bl e physi cal deat hs wer e not
t ypi cal man.
Per haps I amnot a t ypi cal man.
Per haps your spi r i t wi l l det er mi ne t hat .
























ACTS 2: 4 Al l of t hemwer e f i l l ed wi t h t he Hol y Spi r i t and began t o speak
i n ot her l anguages as t he Spi r i t gave t hemt hat abi l i t y.
I f t hat i s per haps so, t hi s i s per haps so.
I f t hi s i s per haps so, t hat i s per haps so.
That i s per haps so.
Thi s i s per haps so.
So per haps i t i s so, per haps.
I amnot r el i gi ous.
I do not know r el i gi on.
Rel i gi on i s an i nvent i on so per haps t ypi cal man can i sol at e and j udge
ot her men.
Rel i gi on i s per haps a sympt omman has been t hi nki ng i nst ead of submi t t i ng
t o t he per f ect i on.
I do not know r el i gi on, I do not want t o know r el i gi on.
I know what r el i gi on i s and I do not want t o know r el i gi on.
Rel i gi on does not know me and I do not want t o know r el i gi on.
I was never r el i gi on and I never wi l l be r el i gi on.
I was never money and I never wi l l be money.
I was never separ at i on and I never wi l l be separ at i on.
I was never i sol at ed and I never wi l l be i sol at ed.
I was emot i onal l y ki l l ed bef or e and I wi l l be emot i onal l y ki l l ed many
mor e t i mes.
I amunabl e t o be emot i onal l y ki l l ed. So I amnot concer ned about t hose
who ki l l me emot i onal l y or physi cal l y.
You can submi t , or you can submi t t o not submi t .
But you wi l l submi t .
Per haps i t i s al l i n my head or per haps your bel i ef , i t i s al l my head,
i s al l i n your head, per haps.
Per haps your guess i s as good as mi ne, per haps.












Man is so vain, man starts or enters wars, then ends the wars, then brags
about how peaceful he is, then encourages his ego by bragging to all,
then feels good about how peaceful he is, so he starts other wars, or
does more war like activities, so he can feel good, about bragging how
peaceful he is, when the war is over.


























If you let go of everything (emotions) you will end up with something
(your true self).
Perhaps one should search less so they are able to find more.


I f you t hi nk you ar e f ound, I aml ost .













Love is when one says to another one, "I love you", and the other one
says "I do not love you anymore" and the initial one says, "I hate you."

Grace is when one says to another one, "I love you.", and the other one
says, "I do not love you anymore.", and the initial one says, "What took
you so long?"

Lower love is controlling.

Grace is graceful.






















If emotions make you happy then why are you so unhappy with emotions?
If you are aware anger is an emotion one should avoid, why do you feel
the emotion love, is one you should embrace or desire?
Emotions are all good or emotions are all bad.
There is no wiggle room.
Emotions make you happy and that is why you are sad.
You need emotions to prove you are pleased with who you are.
You should be pleased with who you are regardless.











Thought f or ms ar e t hi ngs or aspect s.
They l i ve i n t hought s, but t hey cr ave cer t ai n aspect s of t hought s.
Somet i mes per sons suggest , I t s al l i n your head.
Yes, t hought f or ms exi st i n one s head or i n one s t hought s.
They ar e separ at e f r omone s t hought s, t hey i nf est one s t hought s, i f
you wi l l .
Thought f or ms f eed of f sympt oms of emot i ons.
Anger i s one exampl e of an emot i on.
So t hi s t hought f or mmay suggest t o ones t hought s, That per son i nsul t ed
you.
That per son wi l l t hen become angr y.
These t hought f or ms wi l l f eed of f t hat anger .
Some peopl e per cei ve t hat per son i s Let t i ng anger get t he best of
t hem. , when one get s f ar t o angr y.
What i s r eal l y happeni ng i s, t hese t hought f or ms ar e pl eased wi t h t he
f ood t hey get f r omt he i ni t i al anger , t hen t hey st r i ve t o cr eat e mor e
anger , so t hey can f eed mor e.
Thi s i s a vi ci ous cycl e.











SAFETY
1. t he st at e of being safe; f r eedomf r omt he occur r ence or r i sk of
i nj ur y, danger , or l oss.
SAFE
1. secure from l i abi l i t y t o harm, i nj ur y, danger , or r i sk:

PSYCHOSIS
1. a mental disorder char act er i zed by symptoms, such as delusions or
hal l uci nat i ons( i l l usi ons) , t hat i ndi cat e impaired contact with reality.

I f one per son has no sense of t i me and can easi l y under st and many t hi ngs
and easi l y see t hi ngs f or what t hey ar e, and can per haps see t hi ngs
ot her s who have a sense of t i me, cannot .
I f t hi s same one has an MRI t est and an EEG t est and bot h come back
wi t hi n nor mal l i mi t s and show no si gns of t r auma or any i ndi cat i ons of
physi cal i l l ness i n t he past or pr esent .
Who i s i n psychosi s, one wi t h a sense of t i me, or one who has no sense of
t i me?
The pr obl emwi t h answer i ng t hi s quest i on i s, t he ones wi t h a sense of
t i me ar e t he maj or i t y, so t hey wi l l l ogi cal l y say t he one wi t hout a sense
of t i me, i s i l l and i n deep psychosi s.

They wi l l ar gue even wi t h a nor mal MRI and a nor mal r esul t on t he EEG.
Ones wi t h a sense of t i me, bei ng t he maj or i t y, wi l l ar gue ever y angl e.
They wi l l suggest , one can have a ment al di sor der wi t h a nor mal MRI .
They wi l l suggest , one can have a ment al di sor der wi t h a nor mal EEG.
They wi l l suggest , i f one has no sense of t i me and di mi ni shed emot i ons
and di mi ni shed sense of t ouch and t ast e , t hat i s cer t ai nl y abnor mal .
They may even suggest t he MRI machi ne i s abnor mal or t he EEG machi ne i s
abnor mal .

The one wi t h no sense of t i me wi t h di mi ni shed senses such as t ast e and
t ouch, who has sl i ght ur ges, but has per haps except i onal abi l i t y t o l ook
at di f f i cul t si t uat i ons and f i nd a cl ear answer or get t o t he cor e of a
pr obl emwi t h abnor mal swi f t ness compar ed t o t hose wi t h a sense of t i me,
i s onl y i nt er est ed i n t he t r ut h or t he r eal i t y.

Suggest i ng one pl ayed a vi deo game and i n mast er i ng t hat vi deo game,
bl ocked t hei r emot i ons and desi r es by acci dent , t o a st at e t hey had no
sense of t i me, i s not an i l l ness, i t s an acci dent , and per haps an
acci dent t hat knocked t hat one out of psychosi s.

I t i s i mpossi bl e t o suggest one who has no sense of t i me i s not i n
Psychosi s, and one who has no sense of t i me i s not i n psychosi s.

Ther e ar e onl y t wo l ogi cal per cept i ons.
One who has a sense of t i me.
One who has no sense of t i me.
t hat i ndi cat es impaired contact with reality.
One bei ng i s i n psychosi s.

One i s not abl e t o suggest , i f t he maj or i t y has a sense of t i me t hey
cer t ai nl y ar e not i n psychosi s.
At one t i me t he maj or i t y agr eed t he ear t h was f l at , we now under st and t he
maj or i t y back t hen was i n psychosi s.

Ther e i s per haps onl y one sol ut i on.
Ther e i s per haps onl y one possi bi l i t y t o det er mi ne who i s i n psychosi s.

Who i s wi ser ?
Who i s abl e t o f unct i on bet t er ?
Who i s abl e t o f unct i on pr oper l y, bet t er ?
Who i s abl e t o f unct i on bet t er , i n soci et y?
Who i s mor e of an asset t o soci et y?
Who i s mor e val uabl e t o soci et y?
Who i s mor e sel f l ess?
Who i s mor e char i smat i c?
Who encour ages ot her s?
Who t ear s down ot her s?
Who at t empt s t o hel p ot her s sel f l essl y?
Who has no ul t er i or mot i ves?

Per haps i t woul d be no cont est .
Per haps t her e i s no poi nt t o a cont est because t her e woul d be no cont est .
Per haps one of each shoul d f aceof f and see who get s i nsul t ed by wor ds
f i r st .
Fi r st one who get s i nsul t ed by wor ds l oses.

Per haps i t woul d be no cont est .
Per haps t he cont est woul d be deci ded bef or e i t even began.
Per haps t hose wi t h a sense of t i me need t o per haps swi f t l y det er mi ne what
I j ust sai d.
Ther e i s no such t hi ng as saf e.
Ther e i s onl y var yi ng st at es of saf et y.








































They key to failure is to try and please everyone.
One who tries to please no one, has succeeded, because one is unable to
fail at pleasing no one.
Pleasing someone indicates one is not pleased with their self.

I f someone has t o r emi nd you, you ar e f r ee, you ar e not .

















Perhaps one who perceives they are a master is foolish because one is
still able to get better.
Perhaps True perfection is not possible for man because people are flawed
naturally.
Perhaps People are all in various states of flaw.
The least flawed master is still extremely flawed.


























Perhaps if one loves life (emotions), they will hate (emotion) letting go
of life (emotions) because they will become bitter (emotional) about
letting go of something (emotions) they love (emotion).























I perceive I (physical aspect) am here, but I am certain I (emotional
aspect) is not here.
One with a supreme strategy needs very little intelligence.
One with a great imagination needs very little knowledge.
Supreme strategy results in great intelligence.
Great imagination results in much knowledge.
One has a weak strategy if one believes they have a supreme strategy.
One has a weak imagination if one believes they have a great imagination.



















When one perceives they need something, they are really saying, they are
not able to do it by their self.
When one understands they are not able to do it by their self, they are
underestimating their self.
When one understands they are underestimating their self, they understand
they are not pleased with their self.
When one understands they are not pleased with their self, they need to
take action.



















One who perceives they are fully flawed, is not flawed.
One who perceives they are without flaw, is fully flawed.
One who perceives they are fully flawed, is in a state of perfect
understanding.
One who perceives they are not fully flawed, is in a state of perfect
psychosis.
























Perhaps it is wise if one tries their hardest, to not try their hardest.
















I f one suggest s " I amenl i ght ened" and t hey f ul l y bel i eve t hey ar e,
anot her one may r epl y by sayi ng " You ar e ar r ogant f or sayi ng such a
t hi ng. "

So t he i ni t i al one i s sayi ng what he per cei ves i s t r ue, and t he secondar y
one i s get t i ng emot i onal by j udgi ng t he comment s of t he i ni t i al one.

The i ni t i al one wi l l r ead t he r esponse of t he secondar y one
" You ar e ar r ogant f or sayi ng such a t hi ng. " and avoi d answer i ng i t , so
t hat t hey can f ur t her bl ock t hei r emot i ons and become mor e enl i ght ened.

I f t he i ni t i al one r esponds and says, " I amenl i ght ened and I know bet t er
t han you i f I amenl i ght ened. " They ar e encour agi ng t hei r ego and t hei r
emot i ons.

I f one who i s enl i ght ened avoi ds sayi ng t hei r enl i ght ened, t hey have an
ego pr obl embecause t hey ar e concer ned about what ot her s mi ght say about
t hemi f ot her s r ead t hei r comment , " I amenl i ght ened. "

They have an ego pr obl embecause t hey ar e ashamed of what t hey know t hey
ar e. They ar e i n deni al of what t hey know t hey ar e.

They ar e ashamed because t hey do not openl y suggest what t hey per cei ve
t hey ar e.

I f an unenl i ght ened bei ng goes ar ound sayi ng I have f ew f l aws I amgood,
t hey have an ego pr obl em, because t hey ar e i n deni al t hey have many
f l aws.

The enl i ght ened one may det er mi ne i t s best t o not say " I amenl i ght ened. "
The unenl i ght ened one may det er mi ne i t s best t hey do not say, " I am
good. "
That i s not a pr oper concl usi on t o come t o.

They bot h wi l l onl y hi nder oppor t uni t i es t o f ur t her bl ock ego or
emot i ons.
They wi l l hi nder t hei r pr ogr essi on i nt o enl i ght enment .

The ones ar ound t hem, or t he ones t hey speak t o, ar e t ool s f or t hemt o
get r esponses f r om, t hat wi l l exci t e t hei r ego or emot i ons so t hey wi l l
be abl e t o , bl ock emot i ons by r eadi ng r esponses t o t hei r comment s.

Thi s i s si mi l ar t o what i s known as an emot i onal vampi r e.
Someone who exci t es emot i ons and get s gr at i f i cat i on f r omt hose emot i ons
he exci t es i n ot her s.

The di f f er ence i s, t he emot i onal vampi r e, becomes mor e egot i st i cal and
mor e emot i onal as t hey exci t e mor e emot i ons i n ot her s.

The one who i s seeki ng f ur t her enl i ght enment i s exci t i ng ego and emot i ons
i n ot her s so t hey ar e abl e t o f ur t her bl ock t hei r own ego and emot i ons,
and pr ogr ess f ur t her i nt o enl i ght enment .

Thi s i s per haps known t o some as enl i ght ened sel f i nt er est .
That i s def i ned as one does wel l by doi ng good.

That i s not exact l y accur at e.
I f one exci t es emot i ons by suggest i ng t hi ngs, and anot her becomes
emot i onal or egot i st i cal , and t hat second one r esponds and does not bl ock
t hei r own emot i ons, t hey ar e har med, and go f ur t her away f r om
enl i ght enment .

So t hi s woul d cr eat e a new f or mof enl i ght ened sel f i nt er est whi ch woul d
be def i ned as, One does wel l by doi ng bad.

The enl i ght ened one says " I amenl i ght ened. "
The ot her suggest s " You ar e ar r ogant f or sayi ng t hat . "
The enl i ght ened one does not r espond because he bl ocked hi s ego or
emot i ons by not r espondi ng.
The one who sai d " You ar e ar r ogant f or sayi ng t hat . " , f ur t her encour ages
t hei r own ego by t hi nki ng, I got t he l ast wor d i n because he di d not
r espond or , I got t he bet t er of hi mbecause he di d not r espond.

I f t he enl i ght ened one i s concer ned about t he har mhi s st at ement , " I am
enl i ght ened" does t o t hose who do not bl ock t hei r ego pr oper l y, he i s
egot i st i cal because he assumes he i s abl e t o hel p someone, he assumes he
i s abl e t o not har msomeone.
That bel i ef i s egot i st i cal . I t i s al ong t he l i nes of , I know bet t er t han
you do. or I ambet t er t han you ar e so I won t say I amenl i ght ened, so
I wi l l hel p you so you wi l l not har myour sel f wi t h an emot i onal
r esponse.
That i s ext r emel y egot i st i cal t hi nki ng.


So t hat l i ne of t hi nki ng, f ur t her keeps an enl i ght ened one f r omgoi ng
f ur t her i nt o enl i ght enment .
Thi s i s al l a sympt omt hi s ego or emot i ons aspect never goes away,
because i t i s a par t of a bei ng.
I t can never be f ul l y bl ocked, but one can bl ock i t i nt o i nf i ni t y.
One can never bl ock i t t oo much.
One can never have t oo f ew emot i ons, and one can never have t oo l i t t l e
of an ego.
So t hi s per cept i on t hat i t i s danger ous t o bl ock ones emot i ons, i s
unf ounded.
One can bl ock ones emot i ons, but one can never r each a st at e of havi ng no
emot i ons.
So t hi s bel i ef t hat wi t hout emot i ons one i s unabl e t o f unct i on i s
unf ounded, because one i s never abl e t o r each a st at e of havi ng no
emot i ons.

So I per cei ve I have near l y no emot i ons and i t i s t r ue. I per cei ve ot her s
ar e f ar t o emot i onal , and i t i s t r ue.
Si l enced emot i ons i s nor mal . Anyt hi ng ot her t han si l enced emot i ons i s
abnor mal or f ar t oo many emot i ons or emot i onal wr eck.


































J ohn 1: 1
Mai n ar t i cl e: J ohn 1: 1
The aut hor of J ohn adapt ed Phi l o' s concept of t he Logos, i dent i f yi ng
J esus as an i ncar nat i on of t he di vi ne Logos t hat f or med t he uni ver se. [ 13]
The Gospel of J ohn begi ns wi t h a Hymn t o t he Wor d, whi ch i dent i f i es J esus
as t he Logos and t he Logos as di vi ne. Tr adi t i onal l y, t he f i r st ver se has
been t r ansl at ed as decl ar i ng t he Logos t o be God.
a Cal vi ni st t heol ogi an and exper t on pr e- Socr at i c phi l osophy, f amousl y
t r ansl at ed Logos as " Logi c" :
Gaby bef or e you f i ni sh r eadi ng t hi s you ar e goi ng t o become emot i onal ,
t r y t he best you can t o t ur n t he ot her cheek.
J ohn 1
The Wor d Became Fl esh
1I n t he begi nni ng was t he Wor d, and t he Wor d was wi t h God, and t he Wor d
was God.
So J esus was god.
God i s l ogi c. J esus i s l ogi c.
So t he devi l i s emot i ons.
Bi bl e says i n t he end t i me t he devi l wi l l be ver y st r ong i n t he wor l d.
The wor l d i s ver y emot i onal , many peopl e depr essed many peopl e angr y.
I n t hi s st at e of ext r eme l ogi c, I have no sense of t i me.
Buddhi st cal l t hi s st at e ni r vana
Chr i st i ans cal l t hi s st at e sai nt
Peopl e who ar e not i n t hi s st at e become conf used wi t h t he wor ds, t hey get
l ost i n t he ext r eme l ogi c so t o speak.
As J esus put i t , They hear t he wor d but do not under st and t he wor d.
J esus bei ng god was so l ogi cal , peopl e became angr y because t hey coul d
not keep up wi t h hi s l ogi c.
I have not i ced t hi s. When I speak i n chat r ooms, peopl e say, Your
conf usi ng me wi t h your wor ds. , or some say, I amnot sur e what dr ugs
your on but I want some. , and some even l ash out and say, Your st upi d
and need medi cal hel p. , et c.
Al l t hese r esponses ar e emot i onal r esponses.
I f one who i s i n a st at e of l ogi c has no sense of t i me, t hen one who has
a sense of t i me i s i n a st at e of emot i on.
One per haps who i s i n a st at e of l ogi c i s possessed by God
One per haps who i s i n a st at e of emot i on i s not possessed by God,
per haps.





















Buddhist words:
Everything is Me, the All-Creating Sovereign, mind of perfect purity ...
I am the cause of all things. I am the stem of all things. I am the
ground of all things. I am the root of all things ... There is no other
Buddha besides Me, the All-Creating One.
Buddhist words:
The All-Seeing, All-Powerful, the Sovereign Lord, the Maker, Creator,
Chief, Appointer and Ruler, Father of All That Have Been and Shall Be.
Bible words:
Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD of
hosts: 'I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God besides
Me.
Thi s i s t he same god, i n possessi on of di f f er ent peopl e t r yi ng t o expl ai n
t o peopl e, t her e i s no t i me.
Wi t hout t i me, one i s, and al ways wi l l be.
Wi t hout t i me one, was, and i s, and al ways wi l l be.

Thi s dei t y i s t r yi ng t o communi cat e t o humans who have a sense of t i me,
but t hi s dei t y has no sense of t i me, so t hi s dei t y comes acr oss as
ar r ogant , but i n r eal i t y t hi s dei t y i s havi ng t r oubl e communi cat i ng i n a
l anguage based on t i me.

Do you t hi nk you ar e abl e t o under st and a dei t i es ways? I amcer t ai n I am
not abl e t o, and I amcer t ai n i f you per cei ve you ar e abl e t o, you ar e
mi st aken.

I f t he dei t y woul d have sai d, Ther e i s no t i me. , i nst ead of I have
al ways been and al ways wi l l be. , peopl e woul d assume t he dei t y i s
l yi ng, because peopl e woul d say, We know t her e i s t i me because
we per cei ve i t , so t hat dei t y i s a l i ar .

So t he dei t y al r eady knows t hat i s what woul d happen, cause i t i s a
dei t y, so he says, I have al ways been her e and al ways wi l l be her e,
because t he cr ap l anguage he must use i s a t i me based l anguage.

before, now, after, t hat i s t i me based

One wi t h no sense of t i me, has t r oubl e usi ng t hat f l awed
l anguage, so t hey come acr oss as ar r ogant , because peopl e aut omat i cal l y
assume t he l anguage i s not f l awed, because peopl e aut omat i cal l y assume
t her e i s t i me, because t hey per cei ve t i me.

That i s what enl i ght ened i s al l about , changi ng your per cept i on, so you
see r eal i t y, and when you see r eal i t y, you wi l l see t her e i s no t i me.

So you f i gur e out what t hat means about your per cept i on, i f you bel i eve
f or sur e t her e i s t i me.










Al l I hear i s del usi onal cr ap f r omemot i onal l y based bei ngs.
One needs emot i ons or t hey can t f unct i on.
What wor ks f or you mi ght not wor k f or ever yone.

So when t hey di scover ed peni ci l l i n t hey t r i ed i t on one guy and saw i t
wor ked.
Then t hey sai d.
Wel l i t wor ked f or hi m, but i t mi ght not wor k f or ever yone, so l et s
t hr ow i t out .
That s cal l ed del usi onal cr ap t hi nki ng as a r esul t of emot i onal based
t hi nki ng.
I f one l et s go of expect at i ons, one has no emot i ons about a l oss or a
gai n.
























If one wins, one will eventually lose.
If one loses, one will eventually win.
One will feel good, and eventually bad.
One will feel bad, and eventually good.
If one expects neither, they will always be pleased, so they will always
win.













I submi t i t i s not I ( emot i onal aspect ) , somet hi ng compel s, i t i s not I
who compel s mysel f t o say t hese wor ds t o you.
Man i s humbl ed i n t he pr esence of god. Man can onl y suggest " why me" or
" i t i s unbel i evabl e"
Man i s unabl e t o bel i eve god woul d choose t hem.
Thi s channel i s unabl e t o bel i eve god woul d choose i t , t o r eveal hi s
message t o
That i s a sympt omof how humbl i ng t he pr esence of god i s t o man
God humbl es man wi t hout sayi ng a wor d.
Hi s essence i s suf f i ci ent t o humbl e a man t o not hi ng.
Hi s pr esence shows a man how gr eat god i s and how f l awed man i s.
Man i s unabl e t o compet e wi t h t hat ki nd of power , so man i s l ef t
Conf used and t hus humbl ed.
God must keep hi s di st ance because, man woul d be unabl e t o f unct i on i n
t he pr esence of i nf i ni t e power .

Man woul d be r educed out of exi st ence i f God showed man hi s f ul l power .
Man must spend hi s l i f e humbl i ng hi msel f so t hat when he di es he wi l l be
abl e t o handl e God.

One who i s not humbl ed enough wi l l be unabl e t o handl e t he f ul l power of
God when t hat man di es, and so he wi l l be dr i ven mad, by t he i nf i ni t e
power , and t hat man wi l l be i n hel l .

So God i s onl y t r yi ng t o condi t i on man, so man can be i n God pr esence,
because God want s t o be i n mans pr esence.


The cl oser God get s t o man, t he l ess man can f unct i on.
The f ur t her God get s f r omman, t he bet t er man can f unct i on.
Gods has hi gher l ove f or man, and desi r es t o get cl ose t o man, but knows
i f he get s t o cl ose man, man wi l l shr i nk t o Gods t r ue per f ect i on or t r ue
gr ace.

God i s unabl e t o become l ess per f ect , because God i s per f ect , but man i s
f l awed and can become l ess f l awed, and t hus get cl oser t o God.

So God has t hi s pl an t o enabl e man t o become l ess f l awed, so God can get
cl oser t o man.
God has t r i ed many ways t o show man t hi s pl an, t o become l ess f l awed, and
God has t r i ed many ways t o show man t hi s.

God has hedged hi s bet s, wi t h many ways t o al l ow man t o get cl oser t o
God, because God hopes j ust a f ew peopl e wi l l get each syst emor
get i t .

He i s awar e al most no peopl e get any one met hod, so he has many met hods,
because he l oves peopl e, he want s t o be near peopl e, but i f he get s t o
cl ose, peopl e wi l l not be abl e t o f unct i on i n t hei r f l awed st at e.

So i t i s a har mony ki nd of t hi ng, t he cl oser God get s t o man t he mor e
pl eased God i s, but t he l ess man i s abl e t o f unct i on.

Man has t o be i n a humbl ed st at e, or a st at e of gr ace, or i n t he spi r i t
of
God.
Man can never r each t hat st at e i f man l ove hi msel f . I f man l oves hi s
weal t h. I f man l oves t hi s wor l d.
So man har ms God wi l l t o be cl ose t o man, i f man does not do as God has
suggest ed i n many ways.
Humbl ed your sel f , t ur n t he ot her cheek, avoi d ego, submi t t o god, you ar e
f l awed god i s not f l awed. .
I t s al l t he same t hi ng. . I t s al l condi t i oni ng so one can be i n a st at e t o
handl e Per f ect i on.
That i s t he pl an, t hat s i s gods pl an, t her e i s no ot her pl an, not hi ng
el se mat t er s.
Thi s i s not a man t al ki ng, so do not ask your sel f , how does t hi s man know
t hi s.
Your guess i s as good as mi ne, per haps.
















I do not want you t o get emot i onal about t hi s next comment so at t empt t o
bl ock your emot i ons when you r ead i t .
The onl y peopl e si nce t he ol d t est ament who know God or ar e saved ar e
t he ones whi ch soci et y has cal l ed enl i ght ened, sai nt s, pr ophet s, or
bl essed.
No ot her humans got i t ( got saved) but t hem.
No ot her humans get i t ( get saved) but t hem.
So i f you want t o know who i s saved, t hat i s who i s saved.
The bi bl e cl ear l y says, t he ones who ar e not saved wi l l number l i ke t he
gr ai n of sands i n t he sea.
One ei t her becomes a pr ophet or enl i ght ened or bl essed and al l
ot her s know i t , and i t i s ver y obvi ous, or one i s si mpl y l ukewar mor
col d.
Soci et y t ends t o l ook at pr ophet s and enl i ght ened or sai nt s as some
mi r acl e or some oddi t y. The t r ut h i s, t hey st i ck out because Gods gr ace
st i cks out when i t t akes hol d of a human.
I t i s not t hat sai nt i s speci al , i t i s t hat human has been t aken hol d
of by God.
God i s l et t i ng soci et y know, You see t hi s per son, t hey got i t t hey
get i t . They get saved t hey ar e saved
J oan of ar c, Got saved, i s saved soci et y ki l l ed her .
Di sci pl es of t he bi bl e Got saved i s saved soci et y ki l l ed t hem.
These saved ones r emi nd soci et y what i t i s, and soci et y cannot al l ow
t hat , so soci et y ki l l s t hem.
That i s why I know what you ar e. That i s why I know what awai t s me.
You ar e goi ng t o do what you have al ways done.
I submi t t o what you wi l l do t o me as I submi t what you have al ways done
t o t hem.
You t hi nk I car e and I do not car e.
What t hat means i s, t he onl y ones who get i t or got i t ar e t he ones
wi t h al most no emot i ons, and no sense of t i me.
So l ook at t he wor l d and ponder , how many peopl e you ar e awar e of t hat
have a sense of t i me.
And t hat number wi l l be l i ke t he gr ai ns of sand i n t he sea.
I have l i st ened t o my i nt ui t i on and now I amawar e of what you ar e goi ng
t o do t o me.
I amnow awar e of what you al ways do t o us.
Now I amawar e t hat I have been compel l ed t o wr i t e t hese wor ds and
publ i sh t hese wor ds, so t hat soci et y wi l l know what I am, so soci et y wi l l
know what must happen t o me. So soci et y can begi n pl anni ng what i s
goi ng t o happen t o me.
I wi l l not hesi t at e when t he t i me ar r i ves. I wi l l not r un or avoi d you.
I wi l l not at t empt t o save mysel f f r omwhat I amf ul l y awar e i s goi ng
t o happen t o me.
You wi l l do what you al ways have done.
I wi l l t ake i t and you wi l l know, you have no power over me.
I wi l l t ake i t and you wi l l know, you di d not get me, I got you.
I wi l l humbl y submi t t hi s whol e sect i on i s wr ong and t hi s whol e t r ai n of
t hought i s wr ong, and I wi l l be mi ndf ul t hi s whol e t r ai n of t hought i s
wr ong, because I know i t i s not wr ong and I know I do not want t o
exper i ence i t , but i n t he end I wi l l , and I wi l l be pl eased t o sacr i f i ce
and l ear n f r omt hat sacr i f i ce.
I have become awar e of t hi s concl usi on on Feb 10
t h
a 1: 150pmas a
r esul t of pr oof r eadi ng i n t he pr ocess t o get t hi s second vol ume
publ i shed.
I amnot goi ng t o pr oof r ead and f ur t her .
I t does not mat t er i f t he r est of t hi s vol ume t wo i s spel l ed cor r ect l y.
I t does not mat t er i f you under st and what I have sai d.
I t does not mat t er i f i t l ooks pl easi ng t o you.
I t does not mat t er i f you i nsul t t hi s vol ume because of i t s i mpr oper
spel l i ng.
I t does not mat t er i f soci et y i s pl eased wi t h t hi s vol ume.
I need t o st ar t t he t hi r d vol ume because I amawar e t he cl ock i s t i cki ng
now, so t o speak.
Ther e i sn t much t i me, because t her e i s no t i me.

Di d Ei nst ei n come up wi t h hi s wor l d changi ng t heor i es because he was good
at mat h or l ear ned i n physi cs?
No.
He i nvent ed hi s own mat h symbol s because t he ones t hat exi st ed woul d not
do.
How i s t hat t hat mi l l i ons of physi ci st bef or e hi mcoul d not do what he
di d?
Why was he speci al ?
He wor ked i n pat i ent of f i ce, so he wasn t exact l y t op of hi s cl ass.
So what was so speci al about hi m?
I l l t el l you because you may never guess i t . .
Hi s per cept i on was di f f er ent t han ever yone el se per cept i on.
Hi s per cept i on enabl ed hi mt o per cei ve what ever yone el se coul d not
per cei ve.
So t hat enabl ed hi mt o come up wi t h t he t heor y of r el at i vi t y based on hi s
speci al abi l i t y t o per cei ve. . .
What waves i n t he br ai n af f ect s one per cept i on?
I l l t el l you because you may not be abl e t o guess. . .
GAMMA WAVES i n t he br ai n af f ect per cept i on. . . .
So, As a physi ci st you need t o do ever y bi t a r esear ch you possi bl y can
t o f i gur e out how one adj ust s ones gamma waves i n t hei r br ai n. . . .
I l l t el l you because you may not be abl e t o guess. . . .
" t ur n t he ot her cheek" = bl ock emot i on, bl ock ego
" The meek shal l i nher i t t he ear t h - Bl ock emot i ons bl ock ego
" Buddha - bl ock ego and become enl i ght ened" = bl ock ego and bl ock
emot i ons




So you see, i t i s goi ng t o be ver y har d f or bl i nd men t o see i n t he dar k
unl ess t hey adj ust t hei r " vi si on" by adj ust i ng t hei r gamma waves. . . .
So you mi ght as wel l t hr ow al l your physi cs books away, because once you
pr oper l y adj ust your gamma waves, you wi l l per cei ve, t hey ar e al l
wor t hl ess anyway. . .
I woul d l i ke t o cal l t hi s my " You wi l l never see t he t r ut h because you
ar e so bl i nd you ar e unabl e t o see t he t r ut h when i t i s r i ght i n f r ont of
your nose" t heor y
I n t he movi e Ei nst ei n and Eddi ngt on, Ei nst ei n says, I have no al l egi ance
t o any count r y, t hat s a sympt omof one wi t h no emot i ons or desi r es or
cr avi ng. . .
Al so i n t he movi e he wal ki ng down t he r oad and a car al most hi t hi mand
he " per cei ves" somet hi ng and t hat i s when he f ound out l i ght bends
I f you can per cei ve pr oper l y, f or get physi cs, you wi l l onl y hi nder
physi cs, you wi l l onl y hur t physi cs. . .
Once you pr oper l y adj ust your gamma waves you wi l l see, t her e i s no t i me,
you wi l l see i t s al l an i l l usi on and you wi l l see , t her e i s not hi ng t o
under st and when t her e i s not hi ng. . .
Ei nst ei n cal l ed t hat under st andi ng " spooky"
But what t he hel l di d t hat i di ot know t hat you don t .
When one f i nds t r oubl e i n t hei r l i f e, i f t hey sear ch f or r eason st ar t i ng
at t he cor e of t hei r bei ng, t hey wi l l f i nd t he r eason bef or e t hey r each
t he ext er i or of t hei r bei ng.
Moment of cl ar i t y.
Eur eka.
St r oke of i nsi ght .
These ar e what emot i onal peopl e exper i ence.

That i s what cl ar i t y i s.
One who i s i n l ogi c exper i ences t he exact opposi t e .
Moment s of conf usi on.
St r oke of unknown.

So t hey ar e i nt er changeabl e.
The onl y di f f er ence i s, Cl ar i t y i n a l ogi cal per son i s domi nat e.
Cl ar i t y i n an emot i onal per son i s a moment of gr ace soon swal l owed up
wi t h conf usi on.
So domi nat e i s not somet hi ng speci al i s a l i f e st yl e choi ce, i f you
wi l l .
I happened t o di scover ed i t acci dent l y, but i f you want i t , i t i s t her e
f or you t o t ake.
Concent r at i on i s al l i t t akes. One has t o t hi nk and t hat l eads t o cl ear
t hi nki ng.
Cl ar i t y i s when you st ar t t o l i ve.
Emot i ons i s when you have gi ven up l i vi ng.
Ar cheol ogi st s f i nd bur i al mounds wel l beyond 30, 000 year s ol d and t hey
f i nd t r i nket s bur i ed wi t h t he dead.
That suggest s t hey al so bel i eved i n an af t er l i f e.
Who amI t o say anyt hi ng i n r el at i on t o t hi s god concept .
I t i s f ar beyond my abi l i t i es.
One who suggest s one way or anot her has onl y suggest ed t hey have gi ven up
t r yi ng t o f i gur e i t out .
I t i s possi bl e al l of man i s i n a f or mof psychosi s.
Thi s emot i on f ear of deat h i s ver y power f ul .
I t haunt s emot i onal peopl e.
Some popul ar psychol ogi st s suggest ed man i s spi r i t ual l y based.
Some f r i ends have suggest ed i t an aspect of t he mi nd.
I t i s an aspect of per cept i on, not hi ng mor e.
The pr obl emwi t h t hat i s, t hen al l ani mal s shoul d have i t .
At l east chi mpanzees and gor i l l as shoul d have i t .
Ther e cannot be t he god concept i n man and t hen out next cl osest
r el at i ve wi t h wel l over 90%t he same DNA, do not have i t , unl ess i t was
i nst al l ed somehow.
Nat ur e does not wast e, nat ur e does not add par t s and t hen f or get
about t hem. Ther e i s a r eason f or t hi s god aspect i n humans.
I t s not l ogi cal i t i s j ust a f l uke.
I have no f ear i f I say t he wr ong wor ds or suggest t he wr ong t hi ng and
somehow some dei t y i s goi ng t o puni sh me. That i s al l emot i onal cr ap
t hi nki ng.
Oh I amso f ear f ul about my wel l bei ng.
I amso f ear f ul about ot her s wel l bei ng.
Do as I say so I amnot so f ear f ul about your wel l bei ng.
Those ar e al l j ust aspect s caused by sel f i shness.

Li st en t o what I say about god so you wi l l be l i ke me, so I wi l l f eel
l i ke I know somet hi ng, cause I do not f eel l i ke I know somet hi ng, but i f
you l i st en t o what I say about God, i t means I must know somet hi ng.
So i t s i nsecur i t y.
On a scal e of 1000, t hi s dei t y i s 1000 and man i s . 00000000001.
So t he chance man i s abl e t o know anyt hi ng about t hi s dei t i es ways i s
essent i al l y zer o.
I t r eal l y doesn t mat t er what any human t hi nks t hey t hi nk about what
ot her humans t hi nk t hey t hi nk.
I t i s not a gr oup ef f or t .
Thi s dei t y cer t ai nl y does not need man, per haps one who i s beyond
del usi onal per cei ves a dei t y needs hi m.
I do not even t hi nk ei t her human who agr ees wi t h t he dei t y or di sagr ees
t her e i s a dei t y, i n an emot i onal st at e of mi nd, i s wor t h t hei r sal t .
Bef or e t hi s acci dent I was cer t ai n hi gh r anki ng r el i gi ous f i gur es knew
mor e t han me about dei t y aspect s.
Now I see t hemwi t h al l t hei r money and power and cont r ol and
mani pul at i on, and I now know, t hey know not hi ng about t he dei t y.
They ar e cl ever mani pul at or s t o f ost er t hei r own sel f i shness and own
desi r es f or power .
They ar e par asi t es.
They l at ch ont o t he dei t y aspect and i t s makes t hemf eel wor t h, because
t hey ar e wor t hl ess.
One who does not f eel wor t hl ess does not need t o do t hi ngs t o j ust i f y
t hei r wor t h.
I t al l comes back t o t he same ar gument .
I can onl y humbl y suggest , f r ommy per spect i ve, Buddhi sm, J udai sm,
Chr i st i ani t y, I sl amal l have t he same goal . Al l suggest t hi s emot i onal
condi t i oni ng.




Ther e i s onl y t wo possi bi l i t i es t hat t hi s woul d be so.
1. A dei t y suggest ed t hi s condi t i oni ng i n i t s own way and so t he
concept i s wi t h man.
2. Ear l y man somehow r eached a st at e of awar eness or under st andi ng,
ear l y man who physi cal l y di ed, somehow i s st i l l her e spi r i t ual l y
and i n t hei r own way suggest ed t hi s emot i onal condi t i oni ng down
t hr ough t he ages.
That i s t he onl y t wo opt i ons.
Bot h ar e val i d.
Any human who suggest s ei t her one i s not possi bl e does not under st and
much.
Buddha suggest ed he r eached a st at e of ni r vana wher e we was abl e t o
cr eat e i l l usi ons.
My Buddhi st f r i end suggest ed a st or y wher e Buddha cr eat ed t he i l l usi on
of a woman who aged r i ght bef or e hi s di sci pl es eyes.
I amnot at t hat st age I amawar e of t hi s i l l usi on mani pul at i on but
per haps i t i s t o me mor e l i ke, st r at egi c psychol ogy, wher e one can
mani pul at e emot i onal bei ngs by usi ng st r at egi c wor ds.
Thi s t el epat hy aspect I amawar e of . I t i s per haps not as I per cei ve i t
bef or e t he acci dent .
I can l ook at anot her human or even an ani mal and t el l i nst ant l y i f t hat
cr eat ur e i s anxi ous or at peace or f r ust r at ed or mad or happy.
Thi s i s not due t o t hei r act i ons or wor ds, t hi s i s i nst ant l y l ooki ng at
someone and bei ng t o t el l i nst ant l y.
Per haps t hat i s what t el epat hy i s, at l east at t he ear l y st ages.
An emot i onal human bei ng can go i nt o a si t uat i on and sumi t up i n shor t
or der , t hey get a sense of t he si t uat i on.
That i s t el epat hy, i t per haps i s much mor e power f ul f or one i n a st at e
of cl ar i t y.
Ther e i s t hi s under l yi ng t heme, t hat emot i onal and cl ar i t y ar e t he same
t hi ngs, but di f f er ent .
That i s a sympt oma human i s a human. Thi s cl ar i t y does not make one not
human. I t si mpl y concent r at es on one aspect of a human mor e t han anot her
aspect .
By l osi ng t he emot i onal aspect ones gai ns t he l ogi cal aspect .
So per haps Buddha i s not gone so t o speak. So per haps J esus i s not gone,
so t o speak, so per haps wi t h exper i ence i n t hi s cl ar i t y st at e one becomes
abl e t o def eat deat h. Li t er al l y, def eat deat h. They per haps di e
physi cal l y but t hey have r eached t he st at e t hei r spi r i t does not di e.
They have conquer ed deat h because t hey r eached a st at e of under st andi ng
t hat deat h i s si mpl y a f ear based aspect of exi st ence.
I f you have emot i ons about deat h, deat h wi l l scar e you t o deat h.
I f you have no emot i ons about deat h, deat h has no power .
I f you have emot i ons about money and weal t h, money and weal t h wi l l scar e
you t o deat h.
I f you have no emot i ons about money and weal t h, money and weal t h have no
power over you.
I t i s r eal l y not , I ambet t er t han emot i onal peopl e. I t r eal l y i s j ust
a human bei ng i s much mor e t han an emot i onal wr eck.
Somehow t hi s got l ost al ong t he way.
Somehow humans condi t i oned i n t hi s emot i onal st at e and i t was pl easi ng
and enj oyabl e, but now i t i s st ar t i ng t o show, t hat emot i ons do not pan
out .
Emot i ons ar e mor e t r oubl e t han t hey ar e wor t h.
Emot i ons ar e ki l l i ng us l i t er al l y as i nt el l i gent bei ngs.
Ther e i s no poi nt i n me pr ovi ng t hat , i t i s Zen, i t i s under st ood.
Zen i s enl i ght enment , Zen i s i nsi ght .
You ar e enl i ght ened t hat emot i ons l ead peopl e t o make bad deci si ons based
on emot i onal aspect s, and i t l eads t o t hei r deat h, ment al l y and
physi cal l y.
They r ui n t hei r pot ent i al .
They r ui n what t hey coul d be because t hey ar e so addi ct ed t o t hese
pl easur abl e aspect s of emot i ons.
They ki l l t hemsel ves wi t h t hat addi ct i on.
I t i s i mpossi bl e f or me t o expl ai n t hi s t o you.
Al l I can humbl y suggest i s, i n hi ndsi ght of how I was emot i onal l y bef or e
t hi s acci dent , I was ki l l i ng mysel f and now I under st and t hat .
I have f ound a t r easur e by acci dent and I amhumbl y suggest i ng, you
shoul d t ake advant age of t he t r easur e I have acci dent l y f ound.
Ther e i s one r eal i t y i n t hi s r eal i t y one can never escape.
Per cept i on.
You and I as human bei ngs ar e unabl e t o t hi nk or have t hought s wi t hout
r out i ng t hemt hr ough t he br ai n.
We ar e t r apped by per cept i on.
One can wr i t e i nf i ni t e wor ds about what t hey per cei ve i s r eal .
One can per f or mi nf i ni t e exper i ment s about what one per cei ves i s r eal .
I t does not make i t t r ue or f act .
I t never wi l l . We ar e t r apped by t he per cept i on of t he br ai n.
Wi t hout t he br ai n we per cei ve not hi ng.
Wi t h t he br ai n we per cei ve ever yt hi ng.
Wi t hout t he br ai n woul d I per cei ve t her e i s god? I do not know t hat
answer .
Wi t h t he br ai n do I per cei ve t her e a dei t y?
I per cei ve i nf i ni t y I per cei ve many sympt oms of a dei t y.
I per cei ve many i ndi cat i ons of a mast er pl an.
I per cei ve t hese f our mai n r el i gi ons ar e al l connect ed.
I per cei ve t hese f our mai n r el i gi ons al l suggest t he same goal ,
condi t i oni ng i nt o what I cal l cl ar i t y.
That i s what I per cei ve. I amunabl e t o suggest what you per cei ve i s
wr ong and I amunabl e t o suggest what I per cei ve i s r i ght .
I f you per cei ve t he wor ds I t ype i n t hi s document ar e i nsani t y, I am
unabl e t o suggest your wr ong.
I f you per cei ve t he wor ds I t ype i n t hi s document ar e sane, I amunabl e
t o suggest you ar e r i ght .
I do not per cei ve what I have t yped. I onl y per cei ve t he spi r i t of
t hi ngs. I amunabl e t o f ocus on det ai l s. I amunabl e t o go wor d by wor d.
I r ead a sent ence and get t he spi r i t of t hat sent ence.
I see a cr eat ur e and I get t he spi r i t of t hat cr eat ur e, I amunabl e t o
f ocus on t hat cr eat ur es det ai l s I onl y see t he spi r i t , so t o speak.
Thi s abi l i t y i s mor e pr onounced now t han i t was t wo mont hs ago.
Per haps i n t hr ee mor e mont hs I wi l l have a mor e knowl edgeabl e per cept i on.
Per haps i n a year I wi l l under st and mor e about t hi s t el epat hy and mor e
about t hi s i l l usi on mani pul at i on.
I ampl eased wi t h t hat pr ospect .












I n my exper i ment s si nce t he acci dent , i n onl i ne chat r ooms I f ound some
i nt er est i ng t hi ngs.
Bei ng wi t h a sense of t i me det ect some t hi ngs I say as conf usi ng or a
sympt omof i l l ness.
I t s uni ver sal doesn t mat t er what t he chat r ooms t opi c i s.
They at t empt t o expl ai n why I ami l l and t hen I amabl e t o expl ai n t hat
i s j ust a sympt omof no sense of t i me.
So t hen some say, You r e l yi ng about havi ng no sense of t i me.
Then I suggest i t i s not my f aul t i t was caused by an acci dent
So t hen t hey suggest I need medi cal hel p.
And t hen I expl ai n I have gr eat cl ar i t y l i ke t hi s so I do not want t o
undo t hi s gr eat cl ar i t y.
Then t hey suggest peopl e who ar e ment al l y i l l , do not want t o get hel p.
Then I expl ai n, i f I have ment al i l l ness how come I amabl e t o hang wi t h
you i n t hi s conver sat i on.
I f I amso i l l I woul dn t be abl e t o communi cat e pr oper l y, I woul d make
no sense i n what I say, not hi ng I say woul d make sense.
And t hey agr ee, and say, r i ght you woul dn t be abl e t o si t t her e and chat
f or l ong per i od of t i me and you woul d not be abl e t o hang i n t he
conver sat i on f or l ong.
So t hen I expl ai n, t hen per haps I amnot ment al l y i l l , I j ust have no
sense of t i me and have cl ar i t y, not ment al i l l ness.









Remi nd your sel f I ampr ogr essi ng ver y f ast
I amawar e I come t o concl usi ons t hen I come t o f ur t her concl usi ons so i t
appear s I amconf used but i n r eal i t y I j ust change of t en because I ami n
t hi s f ast pr ogr essi on.
I n cont r ast t o " t hose ar ound me" I appear t o be " godl i ke"
But i n r eal i t y I t i s al l " per cept i on" or a sympt omof gr eat cl ar i t y. . .
So I per cei ve God must be doi ng t hi s t o me, because I amawar e of t he
cont r ast of " t hose who ar e ar ound me" compar ed t o t he " cl ar i t y" I ami n

The br ai n causes t he cl ar i t y, The br ai n causes t he per cept i on

The br ai n causes t he per cept i on of god
The br ai n causes t he per cept i on of cont r ast
The br ai n causes t he i l l usi ons
The br ai n causes t he concl usi ons.

The br ai n causes al l t he sympt oms.
I t i s al l i n our heads because wi t hout our heads t her e woul d be
not hi ng.
When t he head i s t ur ned on, concept i on t her e i s somet hi ng.
When t he head i s t ur ned of f , t her e i s not hi ng.
I n r eal i t y t her e i s not hi ng.
The sympt omof t he head bei ng t ur ned on i s t he uni ver se
Once t he head i s t ur ned on, t her e i s onl y i l l usi ons.
Once t he head i s t ur ned of f , t he i l l usi ons ar e gone.
And al l t hat r emai ns i s r eal i t y, or a t r ue vacuum.
When one di es, t he i l l usi ons ar e gone, but one does not di e, because one
has t o be somet hi ng i n or der t o di e
One has t o be al i ve i n or der t o di e.
One per cei ves one i s al i ve because t he head i s t ur ned on.
I n r eal i t y, t he head bei ng t ur ned on i s an i l l usi on.
The head i s not r eal , i t i s an i l l usi on.
The head bei ng t ur ned on, cr eat es mor e i l l usi ons.
So t hi s i nf i ni t e cycl e of i l l usi ons bei ng abl e t o see ot her i l l usi ons
I s r eal .
The i l l usi ons ar e r eal i l l usi ons, but i l l usi ons t hemsel ves ar e not r eal .
The onl y t hi ng t hat i s r eal , i s t he t r ue vacuum, and al l t he i l l usi ons
ar e i n i t .
So what cr eat ed t he t r ue vacuum.
Ther e i s onl y t wo opt i ons.
The t r ue vacuumal ways has been, because t he t r ue vacuumj ust i s.
I t s sel f sust ai ni ng, i t expends no ener gy and wast es no ener gy and uses
no ener gy, i t does not age, so i t does not wear out , so i t can go on f or
i nf i ni t y.
The ot her opt i on i s an ent i t y out si de t he t r ue vacuumcr eat ed t hi s
per f ect vacuumt hat goes on f or i nf i ni t y.
Ther e ar e no ot her opt i ons. Ther e ar e no ot her expl anat i ons, unl ess my
br ai n whi ch i s t ur ned on, comes up wi t h anot her i l l usi on bel i ef t omor r ow
or l at er t oday or r i ght now or 5 seconds ago.










Avoi d ever consi der i ng your sel f a l oser .
Under no ci r cumst ances ar e you ever a l oser .
I f one l oses a compet i t i on l ook at t he one who won i n t he compet i t i on as
a wi nner .
But under no ci r cumst ance l ook at your sel f as a l oser .
You ar e not a l oser and never wi l l be a l oser .
A l oss i s an oppor t uni t y t o gai n wi sdom, so one who l oses i s a wi nner .
A l oss humbl es one, so one who becomes humbl ed i s a wi nner .
A l oss i s an oppor t uni t y f or change, and one who adapt s i s a wi nner .
One who i s i n t he spi r i t of change i s one who see s r oomf or i mpr ovement .
One who see s r oomf or i mpr ovement i s a wi nner .
One who under st ands t hey can al ways be a l i t t l e bet t er , i s a wi nner .
I amcer t ai n ever yone i s a wi nner and so I amcer t ai n no one can ever be
a l oser .
Anyone who l ooks at anot her as a l oser , i s del usi onal i n t hei r bel i ef , I
amcer t ai n of t hat .
Anyone who bel i eves t hey ar e bet t er t han anot her , i s del usi onal i n t hei r
bel i ef , I amcer t ai n of t hat .
Anyone who bel i eves t hey ar e not a wi nner , i s del usi onal i n t hei r bel i ef ,
I amcer t ai n of t hat .
Anyone who bel i eves t hey ar e unabl e t o be whol e unt o t hemsel ves, i s
del usi onal i n t hei r bel i ef , I amcer t ai n of t hat .
Anyone who bel i eves out si de mat er i al i nf l uences can make t hemwhol e or
f ul l , i s del usi onal i n t hei r bel i ef , I amcer t ai n of t hat .
One i s whol e unt o t hemsel f .
Al l ar e whol e, some per cei ve t hey ar e not , t hat i s sympt omof a
del usi onal bel i ef , del usi onal bel i ef s ar e a sympt omof conf usi on,
conf usi on i s a sympt omof emot i ons, emot i ons ar e a sympt omof
abnor mal i t y, t hi s abnor mal i t y i s appar ent i n human ci vi l i zat i on, I am
cer t ai n of t hat .

Thi s abnor mal i t y i n human ci vi l i zat i on i s a sympt omof humans hol di ng
unt o emot i ons, human bei ngs ar e t ol d emot i ons ar e r equi r ed, but humans
ar e not t ol d, how many emot i ons ar e r equi r ed. Thi s i s sympt omt hat t hose
who suggest emot i ons ar e r equi r ed ar e conf used. They ar e conf used about
how many emot i ons ar e r equi r ed. The amount of emot i ons t hat ar e r equi r ed
i s as f ew as humanl y possi bl e, and a human i s capabl e of havi ng f ew
emot i ons. So t he r equi r ed amount of emot i ons shoul d have i s f ew emot i ons.
I amcer t ai n of t hat .
I f one suggest s t hat i s not possi bl e, t hey ar e del usi onal i n t hei r
bel i ef .
I f one suggest s emot i ons ar e i mpor t ant , t hey ar e del usi onal i n t hei r
bel i ef .
I f one suggest s emot i ons ar e r equi r ed, t hey ar e del usi onal i n t hei r
bel i ef .
One who i s del usi onal i n t hei r bel i ef s, i s conf used, conf usi on i s a
sympt omof emot i ons and emot i ons ar e a sympt omone i s abnor mal .
Thi s abnor mal i t y l eads t o conf usi on, t hi s conf usi on l eads t o emot i ons,
t hese emot i ons l ead t o f ur t her conf usi on, f ur t her conf usi on l eads t o
f ur t her abnor mal i t y.
One does not l ose t hei r j ob and t hen ki l l t hei r f i ve chi l dr en and t hen
t hei r wi f e and t hen t hemsel f , unl ess on i s conf used about t he t r ue val ue
of money. I f one desi r es money one i s del usi onal and t hei r bel i ef t hat
money i s r equi r ed t o be al i ve. One who bel i eves t hey l ost t hei r j ob and
now t hey ar e unabl e t o be al i ve because t hey no l onger woul d have money,
ki l l t hei r whol e f ami l y and t hei r sel f , because t hey wer e emot i onal l y
del usi onal i n t hei r bel i ef , I amcer t ai n of t hat , and I amcer t ai n I am
cer t ai n of t hat .
Emot i ons ar e not r equi r ed, i nst ead emot i ons ar e not needed at al l , I am
cer t ai n, I amcer t ai n of t hat .







Wi t h no j ob and 5 ki ds, ' bet t er t o end our l i ves, ' man wr ot e.
Per haps i t i s wi se f or a wi se man t o not be pl eased about t hi ngs t o
encour age hi s mot i vat i on, per haps.
I t was descr i bed as one of t he most gr i sl y scenes Los Angel es pol i ce had
ever encount er ed: t he bodi es of f i ve smal l chi l dr en and t hei r par ent s,
al l shot t o deat h, i n t wo upst ai r s r ooms of t he f ami l y' s home. CNN. com
Per haps one shoul d not dar e suggest t o anyone, emot i ons ar e r equi r ed and
emot i ons ar e good, because i f t hat one per haps does, t hey per haps wi l l
onl y r eveal t o ot her s how unwi se t hey per haps r eal l y ar e, and per haps
r eveal who t hey ar e and what t hey ar e.
Wi t h no j ob and 5 ki ds, ' bet t er t o end our l i ves, ' man wr ot e
Wi t h no money and no pr ospect f or money i t s best I ki l l my chi l dr en.
Wi t h no money and t he i nabi l i t y t o sat i sf y my emot i onal gr eed f or money
i t i s best I ki l l my chi l dr en who ar e i nnocent and bei ngs of l i ght and
f ar mor e val uabl e t han al l t he money i n t he uni ver se mul t i pl i ed by
i nf i ni t y.
Wi t h no way t o sat i sf y my emot i onal desi r es i t i s bet t er t o ki l l ever yone
i n my f ami l y.
Wi t h no way t o sat i sf y emot i onal desi r es we ar e bet t er of f dead.
Per haps t hat i s a sympt omof conf used t hi nki ng caused by emot i ons t hat
cause conf usi on.
Per haps one wi t h emot i ons i s bet t er of f dead, because per haps emot i ons
onl y l ead t o deat h, because per haps emot i ons ar e t he dar kness, and
per haps t he dar kness onl y l eads t o deat h, per haps.
Per haps your guess i s as good a mi ne, per haps.








Lupoe, 40, cl ai med t he coupl e was bei ng i nvest i gat ed f or
" mi sr epr esent at i on of our empl oyment t o an out si de agency f or t he benef i t
t o our sel ves [ si c] , chi l dcar e. " He sai d t he i ni t i al i nt er vi ew was hel d on
December 19, and when he r epor t ed f or wor k on December 23, " I was t ol d by
my admi ni st r at or . . . t hat ' You shoul d not even have bot her ed t o come t o
wor k t oday. You shoul d have bl own your br ai ns out . ' " CNN. COM
Per haps t he onl y t hi ng t hat i s goi ng t o get i t s br ai ns bl own out i s a
soci et y who suggest s emot i ons and desi r e i s i mpor t ant , per haps.
Per haps anyone can cl ear l y see my f l aws ar e i nf i ni t e and per haps see my
f l aws ar e per f ect , per haps.
Kai ser Per manent e sai d i n a st at ement Tuesday ni ght t hat whi l e t he
company i s " saddened by t he despai r i n Mr . Lupoe' s l et t er f axed t o t he
medi a . . . we ar e conf i dent t hat no one t ol d hi mt o t ake hi s own l i f e or
t he l i ves of hi s f ami l y. " CNN. COM
Per haps t hi s bei ng i s unabl e t o under st and t he soci et y says you ar e a
f ai l ur e i f you do not have money ever y si ngl e day i n ever y si ngl e way.
Per haps t hi s bei ng i s unabl e t o under st and soci et y says Li f e i sn t
wor t h l i vi ng unl ess you have money and a good j ob ever y si ngl e day i n
ever y si ngl e way.

Per haps bei ngs ar e unabl e t o under st and because bei ngs have emot i ons and
emot i ons cl og cl ear t hi nki ng, so per haps a bei ng who can t hi nk cl ear l y
wi l l have t o change t hi ngs , because ot her bei ngs wi t h emot i ons ar e
unabl e t o under st and t hey ar e conf used and wi l l be changed whet her t hey
vot e f or change or not . So per haps bei ngs wi t h emot i ons have no choi ce
i n t he mat t er , and per haps t her e emot i onal opi ni ons ar e i r r el evant .
Per haps t hei r emot i onal opi ni ons no l onger count .
Per haps t hei r emot i onal opi ni ons ar e no l onger val i d.
Per haps t hei r emot i onal opi ni ons wi l l no l onger be t ol er at ed.
Per haps t hei r emot i onal opi ni ons ar e ext i nct .
Per haps t hei r emot i ons ar e goi ng t o be ext i nct whet her t hey l i ke i t or
not .
I per haps pr ef er t he sayi ng To t he vi ct or goes t he spoi l s.
Per haps I amcer t ai n who t he vi ct or i s, and per haps I amcer t ai n who
emot i onal opi ni on i s.
Per haps I amcer t ai n emot i onal opi ni on i s unabl e t o under st and who t he
vi ct or wi l l be or has been or i s.
" Whi l e we may never f ul l y under st and why t oday' s sensel ess deat hs
occur r ed, ever yone who wor ked wi t h t he Lupoes i s shocked and t er r i bl y
saddened by t he t r agedy, " sai d t he st at ement . " I t never shoul d have
happened. " CNN. COM
Per haps t hi s bei ng i s not t hi nki ng cl ear l y i n suggest i ng we may never
f ul l y under st and why t oday s deat hs occur r ed because he i s unabl e t o
under st and much t o begi n wi t h, i n hi s emot i onal t hi nki ng, per haps.
He suggest s I t never shoul d have happened. . I agr ee.
Per haps he i s i n agr eement wi t h me when I suggest I wi l l dest r oy ever y
si ngl e i l l usi on i n t hi s wor l d, so t hat , I t wi l l never happen agai n.
Per haps some may suggest t hey have f r eewi l l , per haps t hey ar e mi st aken.
Per haps t hey onl y have f r eewi l l unt i l per haps someone wi t h t r ue
f r eewi l l ar r i ves, per haps.
Per haps one woul d suggest ot her s ar e unabl e t o t ake i t t o t he ext r eme
but per haps i t i s wi se t o avoi d under est i mat i ng ones abi l i t y t o begi n
wi t h, per haps.
Lupoe wr ot e i n t he f ax, " af t er a hor r endous or deal , my wi f e f el t i t
bet t er t o end our l i ves; and why l eave our chi l dr en i n someone el se' s
hands . . . we have no j ob and 5 chi l dr en under 8 year s wi t h no pl ace t o
go. So her e we ar e. " CNN. COM
Per haps soci et y has i s no l onger r el evant when per haps soci et y i s
unabl e t o make pr oper deci si ons and t hi nk cl ear l y.
Per haps soci et y has over st ayed i t s wel come and per haps needs t o be
shown t he door , per haps.
Per haps t he sayi ng, we ar e goi ng t o need a bi gger boat . , appl i es t o
t hose who under est i mat e ot her s r esol ve, per haps.
" No mat t er how desper at e you ar e, no mat t er how f r ust r at ed you ar e, t o
t hi nk t hi s was t he onl y answer - - t o t ake your whol e f ami l y wi t h you i n
deat h - - i s j ust t oo much t o under st and, " CNN. COM
Yes per haps emot i ons ar e bl ocki ng your abi l i t y t o under st and, so one wi t h
no emot i ons who t hi nks cl ear l y, shoul d per haps cor r ect t hi ngs and i s
unabl e t o f eel sympat hy or mer cy, but i s per haps onl y compel l ed t o
cor r ect t hi ngs and per haps under st ands i t i s okay t o l et t he chi ps
f al l wher e t hey may.
" I t ' s sad t hat t hi s happens anywher e, you know?" nei ghbor J ose R. t ol d
KABC. " You see i t on t he news but you never r eal l y become accust omed t o
i t .
Per haps J ose, i t i s a sympt omof a si ck soci et y and per haps t he soci et y
must be cur ed and per haps onl y a ski l l ed doct or can admi ni st er t he
cur e, per haps.























Per haps one i s wi se t o avoi d l i mi t s and per haps one i s wi se i f t hey
under st and t hey shoul d avoi d l i mi t s.
Per haps one shoul d avoi d managi ng r i sk t o st r i ct l y, because per haps r i sk
i s a sympt omt hat per haps one per cei ves t hey ar e abl e t o be saf e,
per haps.
Per haps a bl aze of gl or y i s a sympt omone has no l i mi t s and per haps a
whi mper i s a sympt omone has l i mi t s, per haps.
Per haps one shoul d avoi d doi ng t hi ngs unl ess t hey ar e cer t ai n t hey cannot
f ai l .
Per haps one shoul d st r i ve t o r each a st at e of cl ar i t y wher e t hey ar e
unabl e t o f ai l .
Per haps one shoul d t ake t he wor ds of one as f l awed and as bl i nd as I wi t h
a gr ai n of sal t , per haps.
Per haps one shoul d not t ake t he wor d of a bl i nd man, but ask quest i ons.
Per haps t hat advi ce i s wi se t o t ake and per haps t hat advi ce i s wi sdom,
per haps.
Per haps one shoul d avoi d t aki ng t he advi ce of one who admi t s t hey ar e
f ul l y f l awed and ar e unabl e t o det er mi ne anyt hi ng or det er mi ne wi sdomor
det er mi ne f ool i shness, such as I have admi t t ed, per haps.
Per haps one who admi t s t hey ar e f ul l y f l awed i s unabl e t o det er mi ne
anyt hi ng of val ue, per haps.
Per haps one who admi t s t hey ar e f ul l y f l awed and per haps unabl e t o
det er mi ne anyt hi ng of val ue, i s al so unabl e t o per haps even det er mi ne
t hey ar e f ul l y f l awed, because t hey ar e per haps f ul l y f l awed and unabl e
t o det er mi ne anyt hi ng of val ue, such as t hey ar e f ul l y f l awed, i n t he
f i r st pl ace, per haps.
Per haps i f one i s unabl e t o det er mi ne t o what degr ee t hey ar e f ul l y
f l awed, t hen per haps one wi l l become humbl e i n t hei r under st andi ng,
because t hey under st and t hey ar e ext r emel y f l awed, i f t hey ar e not even
abl e t o det er mi ne t o what degr ee t hey ar e f ul l y f l awed, and per haps t hat
sensat i on of bei ng humbl e wi l l f ur t her pr ogr ess t hei r under st andi ng i nt o
f ur t her cl ar i t y so t hey wi l l per haps be abl e t o det er mi ne what degr ee
t hey ar e f ul l y f l awed, per haps.
Per haps t he document s I wr i t e ar e per haps f ar t o l ong because per haps
some wi l l not need t o r ead t he ent i r e document t o see j ust how f l awed I
amand per haps t hey wi l l det er mi ne t hey do not need mor e wor ds t o make
t hei r det er mi nat i on, or per haps t hey have det er mi ned what t hey see my
f l aws ar e i n r eal i t y t he f l aw i n t hei r own under st andi ng , and t he f l aws
i n t hei r own under st andi ng i s per haps what makes my document appear t o be
so f l awed, so per haps my document i s not as f l awed as t hey ar e, so
per haps t hei r under st andi ng i s f ar mor e f l awed t han my under st andi ng, and
I openl y admi t my under st andi ng i s f ul l y f l awed, so per haps t hei r
under st andi ng i s f ar beyond f ul l y f l awed, but per haps beyond f ul l y f l awed
i s not possi bl e, so per haps I amf l awed i n my bel i ef I amf ul l y f l awed,
because per haps compar ed t o some, my f l aws ar e act ual l y per f ect i on,
per haps.
Per haps one who under st ands t hey ar e near l y per f ect ar e i n r eal i t y near l y
per f ect l y f l awed i n t hei r under st andi ng, and per haps one who under st ands
t hey ar e near l y f ul l y f l awed ar e i n r eal i t y near l y per f ect i n t hei r
under st andi ng, per haps.
Per haps I have det er mi ned my under st andi ng i s f ul l y f l awed because my
det er mi nat i ons ar e per f ect , per haps.
Si l l y, Si l l y, wor l d we l i ve i n per haps.
Per haps one shoul d f i r st det er mi ne who I ambef or e per haps one det er mi nes
anyt hi ng f ur t her about me or t he wor ds I t ype.
Per haps one shoul d f i r st det er mi ne t hey ar e capabl e of det er mi ni ng who I
am.
Per haps i f one i s cer t ai n t hey ar e abl e t o per haps det er mi ne who I am,
t hen t hey have det er mi ned t hey have det er mi ned t hey ar e capabl e of
det er mi ni ng who I am, so per haps t hey ar e per haps ar r ogant i n t hei r
spi r i t , per haps.
Per haps one shoul d st r i ve t o be meek i n t hei r spi r i t so t hey ar e abl e t o
t hi nk cl ear l y and avoi d maki ng r ash deci si ons, such as det er mi ni ng t hey
ar e abl e t o det er mi ne who I am, or r ash deci si ons l i ke, t hey have
det er mi ned t hey ar e capabl e of det er mi ni ng who I am, per haps
Per haps i s i t wi se f or one t o admi t t hey ar e unabl e t o det er mi ne anyt hi ng
and per haps t hey wi l l gai n a spi r i t of meekness, and per haps t hat wi l l
l ead t hemt o det er mi ne i t i s per haps best f or t he one wi t h t he abi l i t y of
per f ect det er mi nat i on t o do t he det er mi ni ng and per haps t hat i t wi se t o
l eave t he det er mi nat i ons t o t he one who i s abl e t o make per f ect
det er mi nat i on, so t hat det er mi nat i on wi l l not be conf used det er mi nat i ons
and l ead t o emot i onal det er mi nat i ons t hat per haps wi l l onl y l ead t o
emot i onal suf f er i ng t hat wi l l per haps l ead t o suf f er i ng, per haps.
So per haps i t i s wi se f or one t o l eave t he det er mi nat i ons t o t he one who
i s capabl e of per f ect det er mi nat i ons so t he wor l d wi l l be f ul l of per f ect
det er mi nat i ons as opposed t o f ul l of i mpr oper det er mi nat i ons, per haps.

Per haps i f ever yt hi ng I suggest i n t hi s document i s f ool i shness, I am
per haps per f ect at f ool i shness, and per haps i f ever yt hi ng I suggest i n
t hi s document i s wi sdom, I amper haps per f ect at wi sdom, per haps.
Per haps one i s wi se i f t hey have t he wi sdomt o det er mi ne who i s capabl e
of maki ng per f ect det er mi nat i ons, so t hey wi l l be wi se i n t hei r
det er mi nat i ons when t hey det er mi ne who shoul d be maki ng det er mi nat i ons
and who shoul d be meek about maki ng any det er mi nat i ons t o begi n wi t h.






















Ther e i s a t heor y i n physi cs t hat suggest s obser vat i on af f ect s t he
out come of an exper i ment .
The physi ci st s I have spoken wi t h have suggest ed, t o a human obser ver t he
par t i cl es appear t o be par t i cl es but t o a camer a obser ver t he
par t i cl es appear as waves.
So per haps t he par t i cl es and waves ar e nei t her .
So per haps t hey ar e a t hi ng but t hey ar e not par t i cl es or waves.
So per haps what a t hi ng i s, i s r el at i ve t o who i s obser vi ng.
So per haps what one want s t o obser ve i s what one obser ves.
So per haps one get s what one want s.
So per haps what one obser ves i s what one want s t o obser ve.
So per haps i f one want s t o obser ve t he ear t h as bei ng f l at , t he ear t h
wi l l appear f l at .
So per haps i f one want s t o obser ve t he ear t h as bei ng r ound, t he ear t h
wi l l appear r ound.
So per haps t he obser vat i on of a t hi ng cr eat es t he t hi ng.
So per haps i f obser vat i on was absent , t her e woul d be not hi ng.












Per haps i f one suggest s I t hi nk t her ef or e I am one has det er mi ned t hey
do t hi nk.
Per haps t hi nki ng i s a sympt omof per cept i on.
I f one per haps per cei ves t hey ar e t hi nki ng t hey wi l l bel i eve t hey ar e
t hi nki ng.
I f one per haps per cei ves l ack money i s wor t h t hei r l i f e, per haps l ack of
money i s l i f e.
Per haps i s one under st ands t hey ar e ver y dumb t hey ar e ver y smar t .
Per haps i f one under st ands t hey ar e ver y smar t t hey ar e ver y dumb.
Per haps i f one under st ands t hey ar e abl e t o under st and ever yt hi ng, t hey
wi l l under st and not hi ng.
Per haps i f one under st ands t hey ar e unabl e t o under st and anyt hi ng, t hey
wi l l under st and ever yt hi ng.
So t hese physi ci st s have suggest ed t hi s t hi ng i s somet hi ng t hey do not
under st and.
So per haps i f t hey r emai n i n t hat spi r i t of meekness or humi l i t y i n
admi t t i ng t her e i s t hi s t hi ng t hey do not under st and, t hey wi l l
under st and t hat t hi ng i s a sympt omof ever yt hi ng.












Per haps t he dar kness wi l l do anyt hi ng i t has t o do t o keep t he l i ght f r om
r eveal i ng t o t he dar kness what t he dar kness per haps i s.
Per haps t he dar kness cannot st and what i t per haps i s, and no expense wi l l
per haps be t o gr eat , t o st op t he l i ght f r omper haps r eveal i ng t o t he
dar kness what i t per haps i s.
Per haps a man i s wi se who t hr ows out what he per haps t hi nks i s r i ght , and
chooses i t i s best he al l ows t he one who i s abl e t o make per f ect
det er mi nat i ons, t o per haps dr i ve.
Per haps I ama f ool i sh man t o det er mi ne I amcapabl e of dr i vi ng t hi s
car and so per haps I ama wi se man t o per haps det er mi ne i t i s best t o
al l ow t he pr oper dr i ver t o dr i ve, per haps.
Per haps t hat man who deci ded hi s f ami l y and hi s l i f e was per haps not as
i mpor t ant as money saw t he l i ght , and t he l i ght r eveal ed what t hat man
was, and t hat man coul d no l onger st and t o know what he i s.
Per haps when a man see s t he l i ght t hey wi l l per haps do anyt hi ng t o st op
t he l i ght f r omr eveal i ng what t hat man i s.
Per haps t he f r ui t s of a t r ee ar e t he onl y i ndi cat i on of what one i s.
Per haps t he f r ui t s ar e unabl e t o l i e.
Per haps t he f r ui t s ar e unbi ased.
Per haps t he f r ui t s ar e t he i ndi cat or of what t he t r ee i s.
Per haps t he t r ee wi l l mask i t s f r ui t s f r omt he l i ght because t he l i ght
wi l l r eveal what t he f r ui t i s, and t he f r ui t i s an i ndi cat i on of what t he
t r ee i s, and per haps t he t r ee masks t he f r ui t s so t hat t he l i ght wi l l be
unabl e t o r each t he f r ui t s because i f t he f r ui t s ar e unmasked by t he
l i ght t he t r ee wi l l know what i t i s.
Per haps some t r ees ar e i n deni al of what t hey ar e and wi sh t o r emai n i n
deni al because deni al i s per haps bet t er t han knowi ng what t hey ar e.
Per haps I ami n deni al i n my det er mi nat i on of what I am, and per haps i f I
had emot i ons I woul d be concer ned about maski ng who I am, but per haps
si nce I have no emot i ons due t o t hi s acci dent I amnot concer ned about
maski ng what I am.
Per haps I ampl eased wi t h what I amwi t hout emot i ons.
Per haps wi t hout emot i ons I ampl eased wi t h what I am.
Per haps I ampl eased wi t hout emot i ons.
Per haps wi t hout emot i ons I ampl eased.
Per haps I amunabl e t o be who I amwi t h emot i ons.
Per haps I amunabl e t o be pl eased wi t h emot i ons.
Per haps I ambecause per haps I am.
Per haps i t s best t o have no expect at i ons so when somet hi ng happens one
won t be sur pr i sed.
Per haps i f one becomes sur pr i sed t hey wi l l f eel t hey ar e a f ai l ur e f or
not expect i ng t hat somet hi ng t hat happened.
Per haps one shoul d avoi d f eel i ng, so one can avoi d ki l l i ng hi s whol e
f ami l y because he l ost hi s j ob and f el t he was a f ai l ur e.
Per haps.



















Many ar e l ear ni ng t he har d way one wi l l cont i nue t o exi st wi t hout money.
New Or l eans f ound out al l t he money i n t he wor l d wi l l not hel p one when a
cr i si s ar i ses.
Many ar e f i ndi ng out i n t he economy t hey ar e l osi ng t hei r money, yet ar e
st i l l exi st i ng.
Some ar e maki ng emot i onal deci si ons when f aced wi t h l osi ng money.
Some ar e doi ng what humans do best , t hey adapt t o t he si t uat i on.
Adapt i ng t o t he si t uat i on one i s f aced wi t h i s per haps l ogi cal .
Maki ng r ash emot i onal deci si ons when f aced wi t h a pr obl emi s per haps
i l l ogi cal .
The t echnol ogy t o gr ow enough f ood f or ever yone i s her e.
I t i s i l l ogi cal t o suggest t he f ar mer s not gr ow t o much f ood t o keep
t he pr i ces up.
I t i s i l l ogi cal t o suggest one does not hel p i f one can hel p, f or t he
sake of money, per haps.
Per haps t her e i s a deeper meani ng; t he t echnol ogy i s her e t o gr ow
pl ent y of f ood f or ever yone.
I t per haps i s i l l ogi cal t o det er mi ne ever yt hi ng based on money.
Ther e i s t he pot ent i al t o gr ow enough f ood t o f eed ever yone, and t her e
ar e shi ps t o shi p t hi s f ood t o ever yone.
I t i s l ogi cal t he t echnol ogy i s her e t o hel p ever yone but i t i s
i l l ogi cal t o not t ake advant age of t hat t echnol ogy, f or t he sake of
money.
Per haps a human bei ngs exi st ence does not hi nge on money.
Per haps a human bei ng wi l l not di sappear i f t her e i s no money.
Ear l y humans per haps di d not have money.
Ear l y humans per haps wer e abl e t o adapt wi t hout money.
Ear l y humans per haps wer e abl e t o exi st wi t hout money per haps because
humans ar e st i l l her e, and per haps I use t hat t er mst i l l her e l oosel y.
Per haps some humans appear t o be her e but some humans per haps at t i mes
appear t o be anywher e but her e i n t hei r t hi nki ng and deci si on
maki ng pr ocesses, per haps.
Per haps i f one det er mi nes ever yt hi ng r el i es on money t hen per haps
ever yt hi ng wi l l r el y on money.
Per haps i f one det er mi nes ever yt hi ng wi l l not r el y on money t hen per haps
ever yt hi ng wi l l not r el y on money.
Per haps when one i s mi ndf ul t o hel p anot her , t hey do not f act or i n
money.
Per haps when one i s mi ndf ul t o hel p anot her who per haps coul d use a
hel pi ng hand, one does not ask How much money ar e you wi l l i ng t o pay.
Per haps one can hel p anot her wi t hout money bei ng i nvol ved i n t he
equat i on, per haps.
Per haps i f l endi ng a hel pi ng hand hi nges on money, i f t her e i s not
enough money one per haps r obs t hemsel ves of an oppor t uni t y t o l end a
hel pi ng hand, per haps.
Per haps an oppor t uni t y t o l end a hel pi ng hand, i s per haps a t est t o
see i f one can i gnor e money and per haps st i l l l end a hel pi ng hand,
per haps.
Per haps i f one det er mi nes t hey can exi st wi t hout money t hey wi l l exi st
wi t hout money.
Per haps i f one det er mi nes t o l end a hel pi ng hand r egar dl ess of money,
t hey per haps wi l l l end a hand r egar dl ess of money, per haps.
Per haps l endi ng a hel pi ng hand i n i t sel f , i s per haps f ar mor e val uabl e
t han per haps, money wi l l ever be, per haps.
Per haps l endi ng a hel pi ng hand enabl es one t o hel p t hemsel f .
Per haps hel pi ng ot her s i n r eal i t y i s an ef f or t f or one t o hel p t hem
sel f , per haps.
Per haps, when money i s t he det er mi ni ng f act or as t o whet her one hel ps
anot her , t hen per haps money wi l l al so be t he det er mi ni ng f act or i n
r el at i on t o how much one hel ps t hemsel f , per haps.
Per haps one who det er mi nes t hey do not need t o hel p t hemsel f has
per haps det er mi ned t hey ar e per f ect , per haps.
Per haps one shoul d avoi d st andar ds so per haps one can avoi d havi ng l ow
st andar ds.
Per haps what one does i n t he pr esent af f ect s t he f ut ur e or per haps i n
r eal i t y what one does i n t he pr esent af f ect s t he pr esent .
Per haps i f one who has st andar ds, suggest s anot her shoul d per haps have
t hei r st andar ds, one may per haps end up wi t h l ow st andar ds, per haps.
Per haps one can avoi d l ow st andar ds by avoi di ng st andar ds, per haps.
Per haps one can avoi d l ow st andar ds i f one per haps avoi ds ones wi t h
st andar ds, per haps.
Per haps i f t her e i s per haps no t i me t hen per haps t her e i s onl y et er ni t y.
Per haps i f one i s abl e t o det ect i nf i ni t y i t i s a sympt omt her e i s
et er ni t y.
Per haps i nf i ni t y i s et er nal t hen per haps et er ni t y i s i nf i ni t e.
Per haps one has et er ni t y t o hel p t hemsel f by hel pi ng ot her s.
Per haps one can gr acef ul l y hel p t hemsel f by gr acef ul l y hel pi ng ot her s.
Per haps gr ace i s achi eved when one i s per haps not r ushed by t he l i mi t s of
per cei ved t i me.
Per haps one who i s r ushed by per cei ved t i me, l eads t o act i ons t hat ar e
car el ess.
Per haps i f one t r i es t hei r best t hen per haps one may di scover t hei r best
i s not good enough.
Per haps i f one t r i es t hei r l east t hen per haps one may di scover t hei r
l east i sn t t hei r best .
I f per haps one does not t r y but per haps j ust does t hen per haps one wi l l
be pl eased wi t h t he r esul t s.
Per haps becomi ng bet t er i s per haps not as pl easi ng as bei ng bet t er .
Per haps becomi ng i s not as pl easi ng as bei ng.
Per haps t i me i s not as pl easi ng as et er ni t y.
Per haps t i me i s not as gr acef ul as et er ni t y.
Per haps et er ni t y i s not as car el ess as t i me.
Per haps et er ni t y i s gr acef ul .
Per haps t i me i s car el ess.
Per haps et er ni t y i s amazi ngl y gr acef ul .
Per haps t i me i s amazi ngl y car el ess.
Per haps mans f l aws ar e a sympt omof et er nal gr ace.
Per haps mans f l aws ar e a sympt omof gr ace.
Per haps et er nal gr ace i s a sympt omof mans f l aws.
Per haps amazi ng gr ace i s a sympt omof mans et er nal f l aws.
Per haps et er nal gr ace i s a sympt omof mans amazi ng f l aws.
Per haps mans amazi ng f l aws i s a sympt omof et er nal gr ace.
Per haps mans et er nal f l aws i s a sympt omof et er nal amazi ng gr ace.
Per haps i nf i ni t y i s a sympt omof et er nal gr ace.
Per haps zer o i s a sympt omof mans et er nal f l aws.
Per haps emot i ons ar e a sympt omof man et er nal f l aws.
Per haps emot i ons ar e t he r ever se of gr ace.
Per haps t i me i s a sympt omof emot i ons.
Per haps emot i ons ar e a sympt omof f l aws.
Per haps i f one sees emot i ons as l i ght t hey wi l l be pl eased because
emot i ons ar e per haps ever ywher e.
Per haps i f one sees emot i ons as dar kness t hey wi l l not be pl eased because
emot i ons ar e per haps ever ywher e.












Per haps t he soul or spi r i t appear s t o be an i l l usi on per haps.
Per haps i t i s an i l l usi on, t he soul or spi r i t appear s t o be an i l l usi on.
Per haps t he spi r i t appear s t o be an i l l usi on because per haps i t i s
per haps wi se t o mask r eal i t y behi nd an i l l usi on, per haps.
Per haps i t i s wi se t o mask r eal i t y, so per haps one does not get emot i onal
about r eal i t y, per haps.
Per haps doses of r eal i t y may l ead one t o per haps become emot i onal ,
per haps.































Per haps one cannot ar gue t her e i s not hi ng because per haps an ar gument i s
somet hi ng, but per haps i f t he ar gument i s per haps an i l l usi on t hen t hat
per haps pr oves t her e i s i ndeed not hi ng, per haps.




I amnot l aughi ng at me.






















Communi cat i on bet ween mi nds by means ot her t han sensor y per cept i on.

Per haps one has t o be del i cat e when gi vi ng advi ce t o ot her s and per haps
t he wor d per haps hel ps i n t hat depar t ment .

















P humans under est i mat e what t hey ar e so P humans under est i mat e what t hey
ar e.
P one wi l l cer t ai nl y get what one asks f or , P.
P one shoul d avoi d havi ng expect at i on so P one does not under est i mat e
t hei r sel f and end up P l i ke t hi s ni ght mar e we P ar e t oday.
P i t onl y t ook one human t o make a si ngl e det er mi nat i on about what humans
P ar e, and now we ar e P i n a ni ght mar e l i ke P we ar e i n P r i ght now.
P you under est i mat e me because P you under est i mat e you and P t hat i s why
you P under est i mat e us, and P t hat i s why we ar e P i n a F ni ght mar e.
P you need t o st op F t hi nki ng f or a whi l e and P l et t hose who ar e P F
capabl e of F t hi nki ng do t he F t hi nki ng f or P a F change.













Per haps t he bi bl e i s a col l ect i on of pamphl et s
Per haps t he pamphl et s t hat make up t he bi bl e ar e per cei ved t o be books.
Per haps t he books t hat make up t he bi bl e ar e per cei ved t o be pamphl et s.
Per haps t he wor ds t hat make up t he bi bl e ar e nei t her books nor pamphl et s.
Per haps t he wor ds t hat make up t he bi bl e ar e not wor ds but spi r i t .
P one shoul d f ocus on t he i l l usi ons i n t hei r own eye bef or e t hey P f ocus
on t he i l l usi ons i n my eye.
P one wi l l be sl ow t o j udge t he i l l usi ons i n ot her s eye when t hey P st ar t
t o under st and how many i l l usi ons t hey have i n t hei r own eye.
P one wi l l become meek i n t hei r j udgment s of t he i l l usi ons i n ot her s eye
when t hey P under st and t he amount of i l l usi ons i n t hei r own eye.
P I amdoi ng somet hi ng but I amnot cer t ai n about t hat even, P.






























I amt r yi ng t o pr ove t o mysel f I amspeci al .
I f I amabl e t o pr ove t o mysel f I amspeci al , t hat wi l l pr ove t o you, you
ar e speci al .
I f I amabl e t o pr ove t o mysel f I amspeci al , t hat wi l l pr ove t o you, we
ar e speci al .










Per haps t he meani ng of l i f e i s t hi s one goal .
Per haps i t i s f or a human t o deal wi t h l i f e pr oper l y.
Per haps sel f cont r ol hel ps one deal wi t h l i f e pr oper l y.
Per haps wi t h sel f cont r ol one s l i f e can be a bl essi ng.
Per haps wi t hout sel f cont r ol one s l i f e can be hel l .
Per haps t he meani ng of l i f e i s compl ex and f oggy but per haps t he
spi r i t of t he meani ng of l i f e i s si mpl e and cl ear .
Per haps one shoul d not f eel happy and t hi nk i t i s OK.
Per haps one shoul d not f eel happy and t hi nk, I t i s OK t hi ngs wor k
t hemsel ves out .
I t i s not OK and l ast I checked t hi ngs ar e not wor ked out .
I t i s pr et t y f ar f r omOK.




























The war is waged.













Per haps one who r eaches enl i ght enment must cont i nue t o avoi d ego and
emot i ons t o r each f ur t her st at es of enl i ght enment .
Per haps event ual l y t hi s l eads t o t he concl usi on speaki ng wor ds i s no
l onger possi bl e because t hey suggest ego, i f one i s speaki ng one
i s per haps sayi ng " I amher e l i st en t o me"
So per haps speaki ng acknowl edges sel f or ego.
So per haps t her e i s onl y one concl usi on f or one who i s enl i ght ened
who wi shes t o cont i nue f ur t her i nt o enl i ght enment . To st op
speaki ng al l t oget her or cease ver bal communi cat i on.
Per haps t hi s l eaves onl y one f or mof communi cat i on l ef t .
Thi s per haps i s t he ext r eme st age of sel f i shness.
Per haps i n or der f or one t o cont i nue i nt o t he ext r eme st age of
enl i ght enment one must embr ace t he ext r eme st age of sel f i shness.
Per haps one who deni es communi cat i on wi t h ot her s, who ar e onl y abl e
t o communi cat e ver bal l y, t o enabl e t hat one t o go f ur t her i nt o
enl i ght enment by denyi ng sel f t o t he ext r eme t hey no l onger speak
ver bal l y.
Thi s dual i t y i s per haps t he t r ue begi nni ng.
One i s per haps bot h ext r emel y sel f i sh t o cease communi cat i on wi t h
t hose who onl y speak ver bal l y and one i s al so ext r emel y sel f l ess t o
deny t hei r own sel f communi cat i ng ver bal l y, at t he same t i me.
They per haps ar e a cont r adi ct i on unt o t hei r sel f .
Thi s per haps goes agai nst not l i mi t i ng ones sel f : One i s l i mi t ed by
who t hey can communi cat e wi t h.
So per haps one becomes i sol at ed , and per haps t he onl y way t o avoi d
i sol at i on i s t o f i nd ot her who ar e abl e t o communi cat e non
ver bal l y.
Thi s per haps i s what some Buddhi st t eacher s r ef er t o as t he " way of
t he Buddha s"



The Buddha s per haps associ at e t oget her because t hey can avoi d ver bal
communi cat i on yet al so avoi d i sol at i on by st i l l bei ng abl e t o
communi cat e.
Yet t hi s associ at i on i s st i l l a l i mi t ed associ at i on.
I n t he bi bl e J esus spoke of associ at i ng wi t h t he non f ol l ower s and
maki ng t he non bel i ever s comf or t abl e, avoi di ng t hi s, " we ar e i n a
speci al cl ub and onl y we can be i n i t . " ki nd of spi r i t .
An exampl e was t he apost l es went t o t he bar s and " had a good t i me"
and associ at ed wi t h t he bar pat r ons, t o el i mi nat e t hi s i sol at i on
syndr ome.
I t s per haps l i ke once one r eaches t he per haps ext r eme of
enl i ght enment t hey must t hen " l et go" of enl i ght enment and " l et go"
of i sol at i on.
They have t o embr ace what t hey t r i ed t o avoi d t o r each enl i ght enment .
Thi s i s per haps a sympt omof t he i nf i ni t e cycl es.
Per haps i t s l i ke one r eaches so f ar t hr ough t he ci r cl e t hey come up
on t he ot her si de, and t hen i t st ar t s over agai n, but t he cl ar i t y
r emai ns, t he mast er y r emai ns, but t hey ar e per haps mor e ef f ect i ve t he
next t i me t hr ough, so t o speak.
Per haps t hese t hi ngs I suggest ar e a sympt omI was not " br ought up i n
Buddhi sm" I was " acci dent l y" " enl i ght ened" by pl ayi ng an MMO
f ar t o much per haps. So per haps some woul d " suggest " I shoul d not be
sayi ng t hi s i nf or mat i on t o j ust anyone, so per haps I ama sor t of a
" r enegade. " I amnot pr i vy t o t he ways of " enl i ght enment " because
bef or e t hi s " acci dent " I had no i nt er est i n Buddhi sm.
But her e I am.
I amnot abl e t o make a det er mi nat i on on who I shoul d or shoul d not
t el l what I come up wi t h.
I amnot wi se enough t o det er mi ne who shoul d or shoul d not hear what
I come up wi t h.
So per haps I amwi se t o shar e i t f r eel y, or per haps I amunwi se t o
shar e i t f r eel y.
Per haps I amunwi se and wi se t o shar e i t f r eel y.

J udai sm= Al pha Chosen = Fi r st = Col d = 1 ( t emper at ur e?)
Chr i st i ani t y = Medi us Chosen = Second = Lukewar m= 400?
I sl am= Omega = Thi r d Chosen = Hot = 800
Alpha(uppercase,lowercase;Greek:)isthefirstletteroftheGreekalphabet.Inthesystem
ofGreeknumeralsithasavalueof1.
Mediusmedius(m'ds)
adj.
Of,relatingto,orbeingananatomicalstructurethatisbetweentwoothersimilarstructuresorthatis
midwayinposition;middle.
Omega(majuscule:,minuscule:;Greek)isthe24thandlastletteroftheGreekalphabet.In
theGreeknumericsystem,ithasavalueof800.
Per haps t he al phas st r engt h i s i t i s t he f i r st and i s Gods chosen
f i r st . Per haps t he al pha i s col d because per haps i t s bur den i s t o be
a pr oper exampl e t o t he ot her t wo but t hi s bur den i s i t s count er
weakness because per haps t hi s bur den i s unbear abl e f or i t t o car r y
al one.
Per haps t he second i s l ukewar mbecause i t has God i ncar nat e as i t s
messenger but per haps t hi s aspect pr ovi des i t wi t h pr i de and
ar r ogance whi ch l eads t o separ at i on and i sol at i on f r omt he ot her t wo.
Per haps t he t hi r d i s hot because per haps t he t hi r d i s t he r esul t of
t he adj ust i ng of t he f i r st t wo, per haps t he t hi r d i s t he f i r st f r om
t he aspect i t s doct r i ne i s Submi t t o God. So per haps i t s t he
pur est f or mof t he t hr ee. Per haps i t s count er weakness i s i t i s t hi r d
and per haps i t t he most mi sunder st ood of t he t hr ee or per haps t he
most r ecent so t he l east r espect abl e.
Per haps t hi s t r i ni t y of r el i gi ons i s a sympt omor a t est t o per haps
see i f t hey ar e abl e t o wor k t oget her f or t he gr eat er gl or y, and
l et go of t hei r human desi r es f or separ at i on, and once t hey wor k
t oget her t hey wi l l f i nd al l of t hei r st r engt hs wi l l out wei ght al l of
t hei r weaknesses and t hey wi l l end up wi t h a whol e t hat i s
gr acef ul .
I amf ul l y humbl ed i n t he pr esence of a pl an t hat i s f ar beyond my
abi l i t i es and i nt el l i gence.
The t ear s of humi l i t y ar e sweet i ndeed.

Per haps one shoul d not assume I amassoci at ed wi t h t hese r el i gi ons. I
amnot .
I agr ee wi t h t he wor d t hese r el i gi ons cl ai mi s t hei r s.
The wor d i s not t hei r pr oper t y, t hey ar e t he wor ds pr oper t y.
These r el i gi ons ar e not t he wor d t hey ar e i sol at i on and anger and
conf usi on.
The wor d i s not i sol at i on and anger and conf usi on.
The wor d i s l i ght and cl ar i t y and l i f e and under st andi ng.
I amf ul l y awar e t he wor d knows not hi ng of t hese i sol at i ons and
abomi nat i ons.


















When ever yt hi ng i s sai d and done.
When t her e i s no mor e wor ds.
When t her e i s no mor e dr i ve.
When t her e i s no mor e desi r es.
When t her e i s no mor e compul si on.
When t her e i s no mor e hesi t at i on.
I wi l l onl y be l ef t wi t h mysel f .
I wi l l onl y have t o l i ve wi t h mysel f .
I wi l l be t r apped wi t h mysel f .
So I amunabl e t o deny mysel f because t hat i s har shest r eal i t y of
al l .
I can handl e al l ot her r eal i t i es but I amunabl e t o f ace mysel f i f I
amnot t r ue t o mysel f .
I wi l l never be unt r ue t o mysel f ever , ever , because mysel f i s al l I
have.
Because when ever yt hi ng i s gone, and ever yt hi ng i s has abandoned me,
and ever yt hi ng has hur t me, and ever yt hi ng has di sappoi nt ed me, and
ever yt hi ng has i nsul t ed me, and ever yt hi ng has at t acked me, I can
onl y r el y on one t hi ng t o be t r ue t o me.
I wi l l not f or sake mysel f . I wi l l di e a t housand deat hs and suf f er
unt ol d hel l , but I wi l l not f or sake mysel f .
I wi l l not al l ow i l l usi on t o make me f or sake mysel f .
Mysel f i s al l I have, and al l I have ever had, and al l I wi l l ever
have.
Mysel f i s al l I wi l l ever be.
I want you t o see what I see. Then you wi l l see what I see.
Then you wi l l know what I know. Then you wi l l see what I know.
Then you wi l l know what I see.
My i nt ui t i on i s mysel f and i f I f or sake t hat I have not hi ng l ef t .
Ther e i s no pur pose and no meani ng t o anyt hi ng i f I have not hi ng
l ef t .
I wi l l sacr i f i ce mysel f i nt o et er ni t y and i nf i ni t y and suf f er i nt o
et er ni t y and i nf i ni t y but I wi l l not put mysel f i n a posi t i on t o deny
my i nt ui t i on. I wi l l not al l ow i t , I amabl e, t o not al l ow i t , i t
wi l l not be al l owed.
My i nt ui t i on i s not t angi bl e, i t i s not pr ovabl e, so some suggest i t
i s not r eal , and some suggest i t i s not hi ng. But I wi l l humbl y
suggest i t i s ever yt hi ng. And I wi l l humbl y suggest i nt o et er ni t y and
i nt o i nf i ni t y i t i s ever yt hi ng.



















Emotions = Darkness
Logic = Light
Emotional wreck = Mild logic = Strong Sense of Time = Cold
Medium = Medium emotions = Med Logic = Med Sense of Time = Luke Warm
Logical Wreck = Mild emotions = No Sense of Time = Hot



































The word is God. The word is a symptom of God.













Man = Emot i ons = dar kness
God = Logi c = l i ght
Per haps God i s si mpl y at t empt i ng t o t al k hi s f al l en angel down.
Per haps God i s pl eased t o t al k hi s f al l en angel down.
Per haps God has gr ace and mer cy i s t al ki ng hi s f al l en angel down
because God i s awar e hi s f al l en angel does not know what i t i s
doi ng.
Per haps God i s wi se not t o t el l us di r ect l y what we ar e.
Per haps God i s wi se t o suggest what we ar e sl owl y.
Per haps God i s wi se t o avoi d exci t i ng our emot i ons because God i s
f ul l y awar e of what we ar e.
Unf or t unat el y, I ama f ul l y f l awed man and I have no r eser vat i ons
about sayi ng exact l y what I t hi nk wi t hout r eser vat i ons about gr ace or
mer cy or consi der at i ons.
Per haps hel l i s wher e t he f al l en angel i s.
Per haps God i s onl y at t empt i ng t o per suade t he f al l en angel back
i nt o God l and of Gr ace and cl ar i t y and under st andi ng.
Per haps hel l i s suf f er i ng. Per haps emot i ons l ead t o suf f er i ng.
Per haps ar r ogance( EGO) l eads t o emot i ons.
Per haps i n hel l ever yt hi ng i s an i l l usi on and t he i l l usi ons ar e what
cause t he suf f er i ng, and al l t hose i l l usi ons causi ng al l of t hat
suf f er i ng i s what hel l i s.
Per haps one i s wi se t o swi f t l y det er mi ne who I amand whet her t he
wor ds i n t hi s col l ect i on of wor ds, i s f ool i shness or wi sdom.
Per haps one mi ght say ever yt hi ng i n r el at i on t o you, depends on
whet her you make a pr oper det er mi nat i on or an i mpr oper det er mi nat i on.
Per haps i n t he They hear but do not under st and. comment , t he
hear i ng aspect i s not hi ng i n cont r ast t o t he under st and aspect .



Per haps Buddha suggest ed suf f er i ng i s what per haps some under st and as
a gnashi ng of t eet h or per haps what some under st and as hel l .
Per haps hel l i s an i nf i ni t e cycl e of a gnashi ng of t eet h or
suf f er i ng.
Per haps i f one does not escape " hel l " t hen per haps one r emai ns i n
" hel l "
Per haps t hi s dei t y has onl y been at t empt i ng t o per suade hi s " f al l en
angel " t hr ough Buddhi smand Chr i st i ani t y and J udai smand I sl amand
per haps ot her r el i gi ons t o per haps consi der at t empt i ng t o escape t he
i nf i ni t e cycl e of " hel l " or " gnashi ng of t eet h" or " suf f er i ng" .
Per haps one woul d per haps be cer t ai nl y humbl ed of t he i mmense
st r at egy of a dei t y t hat woul d be abl e t o encompass al l of t hese
r el i gi ons.
Per haps one woul d be humbl ed by t he magni t ude and per sever ance of a
dei t y t hat goes t o such ext r emes i n hi s ef f or t s t o per suade hi s
f al l en angel out of i t s mi ser y.
Per haps one woul d be humbl ed by t he dei t i es gr ace and under st andi ng
by t he ext ent of i t s concer n f or i t s f al l en angel .
Per haps i f Buddha suggest ed f l at out , " wel come t o hel l . " i t per haps
woul d not have gone over ver y wel l .
Per haps i f Moses suggest ed f l at out " wel come t o hel l . " i t woul d not
have gone over t o wel l .
Per haps i f Mohammed suggest ed " wel come t o hel l . " i t woul d not have
gone over t o wel l .
Per haps i f J esus suggest ed f l at out " You ar e i n hel l , per haps you
shoul d t r y and get out . " i t woul d have not gone over t o wel l .

Isaiah28:15Becauseyehavesaid,Wehavemadeacovenantwithdeath,andwithhellareweat
agreement;whentheoverflowingscourgeshallpassthrough,itshallnotcomeuntous:forwehave
madeliesourrefuge,andunderfalsehoodhavewehidourselves:
ICorinthians3:19ForthewisdomofthisworldisfoolishnesswithGod.Foritiswritten,Hetakeththe
wiseintheirowncraftiness.
Per haps i f I suggest ed f l at out We ar e i n hel l and al l we have t o do
t o get out of hel l i s t o l et go of t he one t hi ng we l ove so much, our
emot i ons. I t per haps woul d not go over ver y wel l .
Per haps i f I suggest ed f l at out We ar e t he f al l en angel and t her e
i s onl y one chance we have t o st op bei ng what we ar e, and t hat i s t o
seek t he l i ght ( Lor d of Logi c( l ogos) ) by l et t i ng go of t he
dar kness( emot i ons) . I t per haps woul d not go over ver y wel l .
GordonHaddonClark(19021985),aCalvinisttheologianandexpertonpreSocraticphilosophy,
famouslytranslatedLogosas"Logic":"InthebeginningwastheLogic,andtheLogicwaswithGodand
theLogicwasGod."Hemeanttoimplybythistranslationthatthelawsoflogicwerecontainedinthe
BibleitselfandwerethereforenotasecularprincipleimposedontheChristianworldview.
Per haps I amf amousl y i n agr eement wi t h hi s t r ansl at i on of Logos.
Per haps i n hel l , some i l l usi ons appear t o cer t ai nl y be suf f er i ng, and
per haps i n hel l some i l l usi ons ar e wel l di sgui sed suf f er i ng, but
per haps i n hel l , t her e i s not hi ng but suf f er i ng because t hat i s t he
nat ur e of hel l i t sel f .
Per haps i n hel l t her e i s not hi ng but i l l usi ons and not hi ng but
suf f er i ng caused by i l l usi ons.
Per haps God suggest ed i n t he end, God wi l l wi n over t he f al l en
angel .
Per haps God meant , God wi l l per suade t he f al l en angel t o come back
home wher e i t bel ongs.
Per haps i n t he end God wi l l wi n i t over , by per suadi ng i t t o comi ng
back home wher e God knows t he f al l en angel bel ongs.
Per haps f al l en suggest s t he f al l en angel was once wi t h God.
Per haps God has no i nt ent i on of hur t i ng t he f al l en angel per haps
Gods i nt ent i on i s t o j ust per suade t he f al l en angel t o come back
home t o saf et y and t o be amongst hi magai n.
Per haps God i s so f ar beyond our under st andi ng we do not have any
under st andi ng compar ed t o Gods under st andi ng.
Per haps we do not deser ve anyt hi ng, compar ed t o what God deser ves.
Per haps I amwi se and unwi se at t he same t i me, t o suggest t hi s.
Per haps I amf ul l y awar e I amf ul l y f l awed because I amso humbl ed by
what I amawar e of .
Per haps I ampl eased I amf ul l y awar e I amf ul l y f l awed.
Per haps I am, per haps.

I woke t hi s mor ni ng af t er f i ni shi ng t hi s above par t and ponder ed
i t s meani ng.
I ponder ed how t hi s cannot be t r ue and I ent er ed a st at e of pani c
because I amunabl e t o accept t he t r ut h.
I amhumbl ed t hat I amunabl e t o accept t he t r ut h.
I r emi nd mysel f t hat t her e i s no l ukewar m, t her e i s onl y hot and
col d.
I r emi nd mysel f t hat t her e i s no hal f way, t her e i s onl y gr ace and
di sgr ace.
I r emi nd mysel f amazi ng gr ace i s not a sympt omof t hi s wor l d.
I amhumbl ed I amf ul l y awar e of what we ar e.
I amhumbl ed I amf ul l y awar e of what I am.
I amf ul l y humbl ed I because I amf ul l y awar e I amnot amazi ng gr ace.


















Perhaps the physical realm is a convincing illusion to most.
Perhaps the physical realm appears to be reality to most.
Perhaps the spiritual realm appears to be fake or a convincing
illusion to most.
Perhaps only those in the proper frame of mind are able to separate
the true illusions and the true reality from each other.












Dadelus113:The Buddha was said to have spoken:

'There is an Unborn, a Not-become, a Not-made, a Not-compounded. If
there were not, this Unborn, Not become, Not-made, Not-
compounded, there could not be made any escape from what is born,
become, made and compounded. But since there's this Unborn, Not-
become, Not-made, Not-compounded, therefore is there made known an
escape from what is born, become, made and compounded'
That sounds like a theistic argument for God, only in reverse (an
end, rather than a beginning).

Per haps t hi s was suggest i ng cont r ast .
Per haps wi t hout somet hi ng t her e cannot be not hi ng.
Per haps wi t hout unbor n t her e cannot be bor n
Per haps wi t hout posi t i ve t her e cannot be negat i ve
Per haps t hi s " r ever se t hi ng" i s a " r eal " t hi ng
Per haps t hi s i s suggest i ng t he di f f i cul t i es wi t h ver bal wor ds.
Per haps ver bal wor ds ar e al l l abel s.
Per haps l abel s cause conf usi on.
Per haps Hot and Col d ar e ext r emes.
Per haps Logi c and emot i ons ar e ext r emes.
Per haps one i s ei t her i n hel l or i n heaven.
Per haps no emot i ons means no sense of t i me whi ch means al l one see s
ar e bl essi ngs and al l one sees i s gr ace i n ever yt hi ng.
Per haps emot i ons means sense of t i me whi ch means al l one see s ar e
acci dent s and al l ones see s i s hel l i n ever yt hi ng.
Per haps t her e has t o be a cont r ast t o t he l abel god or god i s not
possi bl e.
Per haps t her e has t o be a cont r ast t o evi l or evi l i s not possi bl e.
Per haps t hi s opposi t e cont r ast onl y cancel s each ot her out .
Per haps when al l t he cont r ast s ar e cancel ed out al l one i s per haps
l ef t wi t h i s not hi ng or not hi ngness or as Buddha per haps suggest ed
" ni r vana" .
Per haps t hi s " supr eme" i nf i ni t e cycl e i s a quest i ons, t hat appl i es t o
al l l evel s of under st andi ng.
Per haps t he smal l est chi l d wonder s i f t her e i s a god
Per haps t he most enl i ght ened Buddha wonder s i f t her e i s a god
Per haps t hi s i s wher e ever yt hi ng i s r educed t o not hi ngness and al l
t hat one i s per haps l ef t wi t h i s t he ponder i ng of . . .
Di d somet hi ng cr eat e not hi ng?
Di d some dei t y cr eat e t hi s not hi ngness.
I s man t he f i nal det er mi nat i on or i s man a pr oduct of a dei t i es
per f ect " pl an?
No " human" i s abl e t o know t hat . Per haps t hey t end t o go f r omt he
ar gument t her e i s not hi ng i s onl y t he br ai ns per cept i on, t hen t hey
per haps swi ng t o t he br ai ns per cept i on i s t he r esul t of a dei t y
cr eat i ng t hat br ai n.
Per haps t he per cept i on cr eat ed by t he br ai n makes one awar e of
not hi ngness.
Per haps t hat i s t he dei t i es " pl an"
So per haps one i s l ef t wi t h non- physi cal aspect s, t he spi r i t so t o
speak.
I f t her e i s spi r i t or soul , t hen per haps a dei t y cr eat ed t hat soul or
spi r i t .
The dei t y concept i s per f ect i on i n i t sel f . The dei t y concept i s
per haps gr ace and compassi on and humi l i t y and a " condi t i oni ng" t ool
f or a human.
I t s per haps per f ect i on a human can aspi r e t o but never r each.
Thi s per haps cr eat es an i nf i ni t e cycl e.
I t per haps pl aces a human i n a per manent posi t i on of humi l i t y and
meekness and submi ssi on.

Thi s whol e " condi t i oni ng cont r ast of per f ect i on" r epr esent ed as t he
dei t y i s per haps a sympt omof t he " per f ect pl an, t hat t hi s dei t y
per haps i s capabl e of .
So a human who per haps " sees" t hi s per f ect " pl an" i s humbl ed i s meek
i s awar e t hey per haps ar e not hi ng compar ed t o t he " per f ect i on"
of t hi s dei t i es per f ect pl an.
So per haps t hey ar e i n a per si st ent st at e of " gr ace" because t hey ar e
per haps unabl e t o get past t hi s " per f ect i on" t he dei t i es pl an
r epr esent s.
Per haps t hi s per f ect i on i s a par t of t he br ai ns " per cept i on" , or i t s
not r eal .
Per haps t hen one i s l ef t wi t h, i f per haps t hi s per cept i on of
per f ect i on i s not r eal , t hen per haps not hi ng can possi bl y be r eal i n
cont r ast t o t hi s " per f ect i on"
Per haps ever yt hi ng i s not hi ng compar ed or i n cont r ast t o t hi s
per f ect i on
So one i s i n an i nf i ni t e l oop per haps because one has t o f i nal l y see
t hey ar e unabl e t o " get past " t hi s ponder i ng of t hi s dei t i es
per f ect i on, t hey ar e humbl ed t hat t hey have r eached t he st at e t hey
see ver y cl ear l y what t hei r f l aws ar e, t hey ar e unabl e t o get past
somet hi ng or under st and somet hi ng, t he answer t o t hi s dei t y ponder i ng
i s al ways t he same, " unknown" .
So i t comes down t o per haps one wor d.
Fai t h.
Fai t h i s per haps t he absence of " knowi ng f or sur e" and " not knowi ng
f or sur e" at t he same t i me.
I t per haps i s t he ul t i mat e cont r adi ct i on.
One i s unabl e t o know t her e i s a dei t y and one i s unabl e t o deny
t her e i s a dei t y.
Then per haps t he bei ng who i n a st at e of absol ut e humi l i t y because
per haps t hey ar e unabl e t o go any f ur t her i n " enl i ght enment " .
Per haps t he ul t i mat e enl i ght enment i s when one i s f ul l y awar e t hey as
a human bei ng ar e f ul l y f l awed i n cont r ast t o t he dei t y.

I n cont r ast t o ever yt hi ng( dei t y) t her e i s onl y not hi ng( man) .
I amcer t ai n I amnot a Buddha, I amnot a savant , I amnot a sai nt ,
I amnot a pr ophet , I amnot enl i ght ened.
Wi t h al l I know and al l I amawar e of si nce t hi s acci dent t he onl y
t hi ng I amcer t ai n of , i s t hat i n cont r ast t o per f ect i on, I am
not hi ng.
So one can per haps go on i nt o i nf i ni t y at t empt i ng t o suggest what I
am, wi t h wor ds and wi t h l abel s, but t he r eal i t y wi l l never change,
t hat i n cont r ast t o per f ect i on, I amnot hi ng.
I amf ul l y awar e of what I am.
I amf ul l y awar e of what you ar e.
You ar e.
We ar e.
I am, per haps.



















The allies believe the terrorists are in hell.
The terrorists believe the allies are in hell.
One religion believes the other religions are in hell.
The other religions believe the other religions are in hell.
The rich believe the poor are in hell.
The poor believe the rich are in hell.
The good believe the bad are in hell.
The bad believe the good are in hell.
The lambs believe the lions are in hell.
The lions believe the lambs are in hell.
The holy believe the unholy are in hell.
The unholy believe the holy are in hell.
The happy believe the sad are in hell.
The sad believe the happy are in hell.
The arrogant believe the meek are in hell.
The meek believe the arrogant are in hell.
The emotional believe the logical are in hell.
The logical believe the emotional are in hell.

All I am able to humbly suggest is, they are all right, perhaps.
Perhaps in this world, what is not seen is all that matters.

IwillattempttoendthisdocumentbyexplainingwhatIunderstandaboutthisdocument.
Iamunabletofeel.
IamunabletofeelGod.
IamunabletosenseGod.
IamunabletologicallybuildacasefororagainstGod.
IamabletosuggestthebraincausestheperceptionthereisaGod.
Iamabletosuggestmanyunderlyingthemesinsomemajorreligionsallappeartobegoingbacktothe
samesource.
IamunabletofeelgoodorbadaboutwhatIsuggestinthisdocument.
IsubmitImayneedmedicalhelp,IsubmitthelastthingIneedismedicalhelp.
IsubmitImayhaveitallwrong.
IsubmitImayhaveitallright.
IsubmitthisishowIwouldlikethesentencesinthisdocumenttolook.
PerhapsIperhapsthinkperhapsIperhapsknowperhapssomethingperhapsthatperhapsmay
perhapsbeperhapsimportantperhapstoperhapsotherperhapspeopleperhapsIperhapsshould
perhapspublishperhapstheseperhapswordsperhapsinperhapscaseperhapsIperhapsamperhaps
rightperhaps,perhaps.
Asentencelikethatmakesmecomfortable.
Iperhapscanlivewithasentencelikethat.
ThenIremindmyselfbynotbeingwhoIam,Iampanderingtoothersemotionsandfeelingsand
judgmentsaboutwhoIam.
Iremindmyselfthatisexactlywhatyouarewritingabout.
Iremindmyselfthatisexactlywhatthewholespiritofthesedocumentsisabout,nottoworryabout
othersjustworryabouttheloginyourowneye.
Iremindmyself,Iamsoflawedandsonothing,Iamunabletoevenfollowmyownadvice.
Iremindmyself,IamdoingthebestIcan.
Iremindmyself,IhaveahandofcardsdealttomeandIamonlyabletodothebestIcan.
Iremindmyself,thebestIcanisnotverywell,butIhavenochoice,thebestIcanisallIhave.
Iremindmyself,ImustdoublemyeffortsandblockemotionsfurthersoperhapsIwillhavegreater
clarity,andperhapsIwillbeabletoamounttosomething.
IremindmyselfitiswisetonotgoaroundthinkingIamsomethingwhenIamfullyawareIamnothing.
IremindmyselfperfectionisonethingIwillperhapsneverbe.
Iamhumbledbythatprospect.
Iamsustainedbythatprospect.
Iamfullyawarethereisnosafety.
Iamfullyawarethereisnocomfort.
Iamfullyawarethereperhapswillneverbeanysafetynoranycomfort.
Iamhumbledbythatprospect.
Iamsustainedbythatprospect.
IamfullyawareImustrelyontheintuitiontoguidemebecauseIamfullyblindandunabletofunction
withoutit.
PerhapsIperhapsamperhapshumbledperhapsbyperhapsthatprospect,perhaps.
PerhapsIperhapsamperhapssustainedperhapsbyperhapsthatprospect,perhaps.
PerhapsIperhapsamperhapspleasedperhapsbyperhapsthatprospect,perhaps.
PerhapsIperhapsam,perhaps.
Perhapstheperhapsviewperhapsisspectacularfromperhapsthisperhapsperspective,perhaps.
IperhapshavefaithperhapsonepersonperhapswillgetitperhapsandperhapsIperhapshave
faithperhapsthatonepersonperhapsisme,perhaps.
Perhapsonceonesettlesonwhattheydoknowalltheyhaveprovediswhattheydontknow.
PerhapsGodinitsinfinitewisdomhasnointentionofharmingthefallenangelbecauseperhapsGod
isfullyawarethefallenangelissufferingenoughasthefallenangelis,perhaps.
PerhapsGodsinfinitetearsasperhapstheresultofGodsinfinitewisdom,resultsinGodsinfinite
compassionandinfinitemercyandperhapsGodsAmazingGrace,perhaps.
Perhapshumanscouldlearnsomelessonsperhapsfromsuchaninfinitebeing,perhaps.
Iremindmyself,Ilearnandthengo,insteadofgoandthenlearn.
Therewasatownthatwasrunandoperatedbyanextremelydumb,blindanddeafmayor.
Thepeopleinthistownwereunderthecontrolofthisdumb,blindanddeafmayorsdeterminations.
Onedayamemberofthetowngotaextremelypainfultoothache.
Thiscausedthemextremepainandsuffering.
Theywenttoadoctorandthedoctorsuggestedhewasfearfulofgivingthepersonpainmedicine
becausethetownmayorsuggesteddrugsarebadandshouldonlybeusedifthemayordirectedthey
beused.
Sotheonewiththetoothachewenttothemayorshouseandslaughteredhimunmercifully.
Thenextday,amemberofthetown,seekingtofillthepositionofmayordeterminedtheywerefitto
makethedeterminations.
Theonewiththetoothacheaskedwhatthemayorprospect,viewondrugswere.
Themayorprospectsuggesteddrugswerebadasthepreviousmayorhadsuggested.
Theonewiththetoothacheslaughteredthemayorprospectunmercifully.
Thepointofthestoryis:
Onceyougiveupthefreedomtomakeyourowndeterminationsyouareatthemercyofothers
determinations.
Onceyouareatthemercyofothersdeterminations,yourSelfisnolongerrelevant.
OnceyourSelfisnolongerrelevant,allyouareleftwithissufferingorhell.
Themoralofthestoryis:
Youhavewhatyoudesiretohave.
Youmayattempttopersuadeyourselfwhyyouhavetogiveupyourfreedomtomakedeterminations
forthegreatergood.
Iexpectthatthinkingfromyou.
IexpectthatthinkingfromyoubecauseIknowwhoyouare,Iknowwhereyouare,andIknowwhy
youare,whereyouareandIknowwhyyouare,thewayyouare.

Paynomindtome,becauseIpaynomindtoyou.

Or

Ponderme,becauseIponderyou.

Or

Oneponderdeservesanother.

Pleaseremindyourselftheauthorofthisdocumenthadanaccidentasaresultofplayingacomputer
game,perhapsfartomuch.
Thisaccidentcausedtheauthortohaveamajorattitudeorperceptionadjustment.
Theauthorisunabletofeelemotionsverywellsotheauthorisunabletotellifwhathesuggestsis
hurtingfeelingsofothersveryaccurately.
Theauthorisawaresomethingshesuggestsmayhurtothersfeelingsbutitisdifficulttogaugeto
whatextent.Asaresultoftheperceptionadjustment.
Theauthorisinadifferentworldofperception,inmanyrespects.
Pleaseremindyourselftheauthorisdoingthebesthecaninthethreemonthssincethisaccidenton
oraroundNov1
st
2008,basedonhisperception.
Pleaseremindyourselftheauthorisfullyawareyouaredoingthebestyoucan,basedonyour
perception,tounderstandhiswords.
ThankYouforyourtimeandThankYouforyourconsideration.
Ihavetoletgoofthisdocument,soIamabletostartthenextone.

Thereisnobattlebutthebattlewithin.
Allphysicalbattlesareasymptomofthebattlewithin.
Allbattlesarelostifthebattlewithinislost.

Surah:15.AlHijr.
<@Hadramaut>35."Andverily,thecurseshallbeuponyoutilltheDayofRecompense(i.e.theDay
ofResurrection)."
PerhapsthissumsupthespiritofthisSecondVolumeaswellasany.
Perhapsyourguessisasgoodasmine,perhaps.

VOLUMETHREE

Idedicatethisdocumenttoyou.

One,oftengetsit,often.

IfIneededhelp;itwouldbehelp,towriteprescriptions.

Wheninfinitymeetsimpossibility,humilityisborn.

IF
ThisThirdVolumeorVolumeThreeorVolumeIII,isnotasymptomofthebeginningoftheend.
AND
ThisThirdVolumeorVolumeThreeorVolumeIII,isnotasymptomoftheendofthebeginning.
THEN
ThisThirdVolumeorVolumeThreeorVolumeIII,isasymptomofthebeginningofinfinity.
OR
ThisThirdVolumeorVolumeThreeorVolumeIII,isasymptomofinfinitybeginning.
ELSE
ThisThirdVolumeorVolumeThreeorVolumeIII,isnothing.

Readcautiously.Readcarefully,butdonttrytoohard.

Andwhoeverispatientandforgivesindeed,thatisofthematters[requiring]determination.
Quran4243
One,whoispatient,forgives.
Onewhoforgivesispatient.
One,whoforgives,reachesaspirittobeabletodetermine.
One,whoispatient,reachesaspirittobeabletodetermine.
Onewhoreachesaspirittobeabletodetermine,ispatient.
Onewhoreachesaspirittobeabletodetermine,isforgiving.

001.007ThewayofthoseonwhomThouhastbestowedThyGrace,thosewhose(portion)isnot
wrath,andwhogonotastray.
AlQur'an,001.007(AlFatiha[TheOpening])
ThosewhoareinGodsgracearethosewhoarenotwrathful(emotional).
Ifoneturnstheothercheekoneisnotwrathful(emotional).
IfoneisinGodsgrace,onewillbeunabletogoastray,becauseGodwillbeinpossessionofthem,and
thespiritofGod,whoisinpossessionofone,willnotleadoneastray.
OnemayperceiveGodhasledtheone,Godisinpossessionof,astray,orperceiveGod,has
abandonedthatone,whoGodisinpossessionof,butthatisanillusiontothatone.
Godswaysareunknowntotypicalman.
TypicalmanmaysuggestGodledthedisciplesastray,becausethedisciplesdiedhorribledeaths.
Thatisanillusion.Alltypicalmandidbyphysicallykillingthediscipleswastoshowtypicalmansnature.
Alltypicalmandidbyphysicallykillingthediscipleswastoshowtypicalman,whattypicalmanis.
Typicalmaniswrathful,Typicalmanisemotional.
Godperhapswantedtoshowtypicalman,whattypicalmanbehaveslikearoundAmazingGrace.
Godperhapswantedtypicalmantoseewhattypicalmaniscapableofwhentypicalmanuseshis
emotions.
PerhapsTypicalmanperhapswillneverleaningeneral,butperhapsatypicalmancomesalongand
seesandperhapsthattypicalmanwhoseesisnolongeratypicalman.

Surah:2:6AlBaqarah.
6.Indeed,thosewhodisbelieveitisallthesameforthemwhetheryouwarnthemordonotwarn
themtheywillnotbelieve.
Typicalmanhasthepowertoconditionhimself.Typicalmanhasthepowertoturntheothercheek.
Typicalmanisawareofthewordbutperhapsnotalltypicalmenunderstandtheword.
Soperhapstheyknownotwhattheydo.
Perhapsitisdifficulttosuggesttoablindman,theyareinfactblind.
Buddhasuggestedcompassionatewordingorstrategicwording.
PerhapsIsubscribetohittingoneovertheheadinhopessomethingwillstick,sotospeak.
Perhapsifonejustlooksatitlikeblockingemotionssooneperhapsbecomesabetterperson,itmay
helpsomenotfeelsoreligious.
ReligionissymptomofGod,butGodisnotasymptomofreligion.
Theword,doesnotneedreligion,religionneedstheword.
Godistheword.ThewordisGod.
Religionperhapsattemptstoclaimthewordasitsown.
Thiscontrolisperhapsasymptomoftypicalmanmakingadetermination.
Godisuntoitself.
Godisunabletobecontrolled.Thewordisunabletobecontrolledbytypicalman.
TypicalmancanonlyhopetobecontrolledbyGodorbytheword.

EvenbeforeBenjaminNetanyahufindsoutwhetherhewillbeIsraelsnextprimeminister,heis
sendingamessagetoPresidentBarackObamathathewontbepushedaround.
BloombergPress
Perhapsatypicalmanhasdeterminedheisabletodetermine.
PerhapsatypicalmanisunawarethatObamaisthespokesmanfor300millionAmericans.
Perhapsatypicalmanisunawaretheworldhas6billioninhabitants.
Perhaps6billioninhabitantsarenotconcernedwithwhat20million,inhabitants,desire.
Perhapsatypicalmanhasdeterminedhewillnotbepushedaroundbecausethattypicalmanis
beingpushedaround.
Perhapsifoneisbeingpushedaround,oneisconfusediftheysuggesttheywillnotbepushedaround.
Perhapsifonesuggeststheywillnotbepushedarounditisperhapsbecausetheydesiretogiveoff
theillusiontheyareincontrol.
Perhapsitisnotlogicallypossiblefor20millionbeingstobeincontrolwhen6billionbeingsarein
control,andperhapsitisnotpossiblefor20millionbeingstobeincontrolwhen300millionbeingsare
incontrol,soperhapsthe20millionbeingsarecreatingtheillusiontheyareincontrolwhenthe
worldknowstheyarenotincontrolofmuch.
Perhapsthe20millionbeingsneedtocometogripswithwhoisreallyincontrol,soperhapsthey
canavoidharmingthemselvesfurther.
Perhapsif20millionsubmittheyarenotincontrol,then,perhapsthe6billionwillunderstand,they
areatleasttoastageofselfcontrolandselfunderstanding.
Theinfinitelywisebeingsinthecountryareshowingsignsthatastruggleisgoingonfromwithin.
Thisisasymptomofwhatishappeningeverywhere.
Thisstruggleisasymptomoneisawaretheyneedtoadjust.
Thisisasymptomandinfinitywisebeingisattemptingtofindtheirself.
Thisisasymptomofwhatishappeningeverywhere.
Thestruggleisrighteous.Thestruggleisproper.
Thesymptomsofthestrugglearethedetailsandthedevilisinthedetails.
Thestrugglefromwithinisunavoidable.
Thedetailsofthestrugglecanbemanipulated.
Thisparableexplainsitproperly.
Awomanhasawoodeneyeandshewasveryselfconsciousofit.
SheapproachedamanandaskedDoyouwanttodance?
Herespondedeagerly,WouldI?
ThewomansaidYoujerk.

Thewomanwasstrugglingwithin,andthesymptomsofthestruggleledtoanger,andthatanger
turnedthelearningprocessofthestruggle,sour.
Thedetailsthatareasymptomofthestrugglewithincanhinderthelearningprocessofthestruggle
within.
Onceoneadmitstheyareinastrugglewithin,theyareabletoseethedetailsorsymptomsproperly.
Iamawaretheseinfinitelywisebeingsarecertainrocksandtreesandsandandlandaretheir
salvation.
Iamonlyabletohumblysuggest,thestruggleiswithinbecausethekingdomiswithin.
JapanandGermanyarefullyawareofwhatpaythepiperanddayofreckoningmeans,becausethe
worldhasinfinitepatienceandinfinitegrace,buttheworlddoesnothaveinfinitestupidity.
Thatmeanswhentheworldtakesitglovesoffitisnotpleased.
IamonlyabletohumblysuggestyouasktheJapaneseandtheGermanswhatnotpleasedmeans.
Oneisinfinitelywisetoavoidthisnotpleasedaspectthattheworld,iscapableof.
Oneisinfinitelywisetoavoidthataspectoftheworld,forinfinity.
Thebeingsthatmakeupcountriesareinfinitelywise.

Oneisonlycapableoflosingiftheythinktheycanlose.
Iamonlyabletohumblysuggest,thereisnosuchthingaslosing.
Thereisonlyinfiniteblessingsandinfinitemiracles.
Everythingelseisanillusion.
Itdoesnottakemuchefforttobecomeawareofthat.

USofficialsarepubliclytakingawaitandseeapproachtotheformationofanewIsraeli
government,butprivatelymanyhaveexpressedconcernthatLikudleaderBinyamin
Netanyahumightpresideoverarightwingcoalition.TheJerusalempost
PerhapsAmericaisfullyawareofwhattheywillbedealingwithifthisbeing,who,isperhapsunableto
submittorealityisinpower.
PerhapsAmericaisfullyawareofissuesthatmayariseifone,whoisperhapssoconfusedabouttheir
roleinreality,comestopower.
Perhapsone,whodeterminestheyaremostimportant,isonewhohasproved,theyareleast
important.
Perhapsarroganceisproofofconfusion.
Perhapsconfusionisproofofarrogance.
PerhapsthechosenAlphaappearsconfused,becauseaspectsoftheAlphaappeararrogant,and
arroganceisproofofconfusion.
Perhaps,ifonehasdetermined20millionaremorevaluablethan6billion,thenonehasprovedthey
areunable,tothinklogically.
Perhaps,ifonehasdeterminedthewellbeingof20milliondoesnotaffectthewellbeingof6billion,
thatoneshouldnotbeinanypositionofpower,exceptinthebuildingthathousesthosewhoare
unabletofunctionproperlywithothersorthemself.
Perhapstheword,concernissuggesting,theyarefrightenedoftheprospect.
Perhaps,concern,isthefirstsymptom,ofpanic.
Perhaps,concern,isasymptom,ofonewhoisaware,ofwhatmayresult.
Perhaps,concernedisanicewayofsayingveryconcerned.
Perhaps,concerned,isaniceway,ofsaying,verypanicked.
Perhaps,concerned,isaniceway,tosay,Wehopeourworstnightmaredoesnotbecomereality.
Thetruth,ispainful,butleads,to,understanding;soshouldbeembraced.

ThedriverofawhiteBentleywithIllinoislicenseplateswholedpoliceonacircuitousslowspeed
pursuitonLosAngelesfreewaysthatendedwithalengthystandoffdiedlateratSt.Joseph's
hospital,policeofficialssaidTuesdaymorning.AsourcetoldtheLATimesthatthedriver,identified
laterasMustafahadshothimself.ThedriverofawhiteBentleywithIllinoislicenseplateswhowas
wantedforassaultwithadeadlyweapononhisgirlfriendisstoppedinUniversalCity...Manin
BentleyLeadsPoliceonFourHourChase
Mustafa,27,wasabusinessmanofPakistanioriginwhowasdistraughtoverthelossofhisbusiness.
PolicesaidhewasfromIllinois,butitwasnotclearifhewasacurrentresident.
LANEWS
Sothisbeing,losthisjobshothimselfanddied.
So,thisbeing,perceivedmoneyormaterialthingsweremoreimportant,thanhisessence.
Sothisbeingperceivedmoneywasmoreimportantthanhisessencebecausethesocietyhewasin
suggestedifonedoesnothavemoneyandmaterialthingstheyareworthless.
Sothesocietykilledthisman.
Thesocietyshouldbelockedupforkilling.
Thesocietyistoblameforthismansdeath.
Thesocietyisfartoconfusedtounderstandthat.
Confusioncreatesconfusion.
Theonlysolutiontoconfusionistheconditioningoutofconfusion.
Outofconfusioncomesclarity.Outofclaritycomesinsight.
Outofinsightproperdecisionsareborn.
Outofproperdecisionscomespeace.
Outofproperdecisionscomesunderstandingandfurtherclarityandthusfurtherinsight.

Quran:7.AlA'raf:139.Indeed,those[worshippers]destroyedisthatinwhichtheyare[engaged],
andworthlessiswhatevertheyweredoing."
Atypicalmanhastodestroywhatheis,(emotional)Soatypicalman,canseewhatisnotworthless,
becauseatypicalmanwithhis(emotions)isengagedinworthlessactivities.
Killingonesselfovermoneyisworthless.
Insultingotherbeingsisworthless.
Tryingtocontrollandisworthless.
Tryingtobehappywithmaterialthingsisworthless.
Tryingtofeelhappyguaranteesoneisnothappytobeginwith.
Onewhodestroystheiremotionsisabletodetermine,whatisofworth.
Onewhodestroystheiremotionsisabletodetermine,whatisworthless.
Onewhoisabletodeterminewhatisofworth,willnotendupkillingthemself,oversomethingthatis
worthless.

Quran:7.AlA'raf:140.Hesaid,"IsitotherthanAllahIshoulddesireforyouasagodwhileHehas
preferredyouovertheworlds?"
PerhapsGodhasbeenattemptingtotalksomesenseintohisfallenangelandisperhapsknocking
itselfoutintheprocess.AndperhapsthatisasymptomofhowmuchGodlikeshisfallenangel.
Perhapsthefallenangelisbeyondhelp.
Perhapsthefallenangelisunabletoeventellwhensomethingisattemptingtohelpthem.
Perhapsthatiswhatthewholeconflictis.
Abeingwhocansee,suggestingtoabeingwhocannotsee,thatthebeingwhocannotsee,isableto
see.

Asanounitmeans"adversary"or"enemy"or"opponent,"andasanadjectiveitmeans"adversarial,"
"opposing,"or"evil."InpopularIslamicculture,Shaitanisoftensimplytranslatedas"TheDevil."

Perhapswhenonereachesastatewheretheyareabletodeterminewhotheyshouldcommunicate
with,andwhotheyshouldnotcommunicatewith,theyhavedeterminedtheyareabletodetermine.
Perhapswhenoneunderstandstheyareabletodeterminetheywillthendeterminetheyareableto
determinemuch.
Perhapswhenonereachesastatetheyareabletodeterminemuchtheyreachastateof
unenlightenedorastateofstrongego.
PerhapsBuddhasuggestedoneshouldavoidegosoonemayavoidemotionsbecauseperhaps
emotionsleadtosuffering,andsufferingistheresultofillusionscausedbyemotionsandego.
Perhapswhenonereachesastateofnirvanaornothingness,thatperhapssuggestsonehasreacha
stateofnoegoandnoemotions,orasIcallitnosenseoftime,andinmycaseitwascausedbyplaying
avideogametomuch.
Perhapswhenonereachesnirvanaornothingness,itisnotpossibleforonetohaveegooremotions,
soperhapswhenegoissilencedoneunderstandstheyareunabletodeterminewhotheyshouldtalk
toorwhotheyshouldnottalkto.
PerhapsifIdetermineIshouldnottalktoyouIamunenlightenedbecauseIhavedeterminedyou
cannothelpme.
PerhapsifIdetermineIshouldtalktoyoubecauseyoucanhelpmeIamunenlightenedbecauseIhave
determinedsomething.
PerhapsifIsimplywriteyouwithnopurposeandnoexpectationsIamenlightenedbecauseIamina
stateofbeing.
PerhapsIwriteyoubecauseIamcompelledtowriteyoubecauseperhapsyoumayormaynot
respond.
PerhapsIwriteyoubecauseIamcompelledtowriteyoubecauseImayormaynothelpyou.
PerhapsIsayperhapsalotsoIdonotgivemyselftheimpressionIknowsomething.
PerhapsIshouldavoidthinkingIknowsomethingwhenIfullyunderstandIknownothing.
Perhapswhenoneunderstandstheyarenothingtheyareinnirvana.
Perhapswhenoneunderstandstheyaresomethingtheyarenotinnirvana.
PerhapsIamunabletodetermineifwritingyouisproperorimproper.
Perhapsitmaybeproperoritmaybeimproper.
PerhapsifyousuggestIshouldstopwritingyouIwouldstillwriteyoubecauseIamunableto
determineifwhatyousuggestisproperorimproper.
PerhapsIamunabletorelyonthewordsofothersbecauseperhapstheyknownothinglikeIknow
nothing,butperhapstheyhaventreachedastatewheretheyunderstandtheyknownothing.
PerhapswhenBuddhasuggested
"Donottakethewordofablindman,askquestions."
Hewasperhapssuggesting,hewasunabletodeterminewhatisproperandwhatisnotproper.
Perhapshewassuggesting,heknewnothingsowasunabletodeterminewhoheshouldcommunicate
withandperhapswhoheshouldnotcommunicatewith,becauseperhapshehadreachednirvanaand
hadnoegoandhadnoemotionssoperhapshehadnoabilitytosaythisisproperandthisisnot
proper.
Soperhapshesuggestedhewasablindmanbecausehereachedastatewhereheunderstoodhewas
ablindandperhapsknewnothingbecauseperhapshereachedastate,heperhapsknewhewas
nothing.
Perhapsoneiswisewhenseekingenlightenmenttogoallthewayorgototheextremeswhenit
comestoegoandemotionblockingsoperhapsonedoesnotmissthelargediamondbecauseperhaps
theyareonlysearchingforsmalldiamonds.

Gen1:2Andtheearthwaswithoutform,andvoid;anddarknesswasuponthefaceofthedeep.
AndtheSpiritofGodmoveduponthefaceofthewaters.

PerhapsVoidmeansnothingoremptyspace,andthespiritmovedintothevoidandmadesome
illusionscalledplanetsandpeopleandinsertedhisessenceintothepeople,andsotheessenceisall
thatisreal,everythingelseisjustillusionsandconvincingillusionstotheoneswhosessenceisnt
properlyconditioned.

Perhapsbeingignorantisbetterthanbecomingignorant.
IprefertoknowIknownothingthanthinkIknownothing
Perhapsfailuremayleadtounderstandingandperhapsunderstandingisaformofwinning.
Perhapsthewinneristheloserandperhapstheloseristhewinner.
Thepathiscausedbyintangiblethought.
Intangiblethoughtisperhapstangiblebutnotintherespectofwhatoneperceivestangibleis.
Whatoneperceivesasintangibleisperhapsasymptomitisextremelytangible
Whatisundetectableisperhapsbeyonddetectionmethods.
Whatisimprovableisperhapsbeyondthemethodsusedtoprove.
Perhapstheimprovableisthemostrelevantthingsthatneedproving.
Perhapsitispropertoassumeeveryoneelseiscrazy.
Ignoranceanddoubtisbestviewedfromafar.
WhatyousuggestIamisexactlywhatIamnot.
Dreamsareasrealasillusions.
Illusionsareasrealasonemakesthem.
IfIdonotcommentonwhatIseeyouwillnotbeawareofwhatIsee.
Lightiseasytosee;darknesstakeseffort.
Illusionsarebarriersifoneseesillusionsasbarriers
IfIsaynothingandknowIhavesaidnothingIamafool.
IfIsaysomethingandknowIhavesaidnothingIamwise.
IfIsaytoomuch,andyouassumeIamafool,Iwillassumeyouareacrazyfool.
Ifissaytoolittle,andyouassumeIamwise,IwillassumeIamacrazyfool.
Thefirstsymptomofinsanityiswhenoneassumestheyaresane.
Thefirstsymptomofunderstandingiswhenoneassumestheydonotunderstand.
Thefirstsymptomofsafetyiswhenunderstandstheyarenotsafe.
Darknesscanonlybeavoidedwhenthedarknessunderstandsitisdarkness.
Sufferingleadstolight;darknessleadstoluxury.
Oneismindfultoavoidsuffering;oneiswisetoembracesuffering.
Onewhoavoidssufferingavoidsliving;embracingluxuryavoidssuffering.
Emotionsareluxuriesoneiswisetoavoid.
Ifonedeniestheirselftheywilldiscovertheirtrueself.
Ifonedeniestheiremotionalselftheywilldiscovertheirlogicalself.
Ifgammawavescontrolperception,thenangerandhateandlovearearesultofperception.
Ifoneusesselfcontroltoadjustthegammawaves,thenonecanadjusttheirperception.
Ifoneadjuststheirangerandhateandlovetheywilladjusttheirgammawaves.

Sammasambuddhasattainbuddhahood,thendecidetoteachothersthetruththeyhavediscovered.

IfIsuggestsocietyisignorantaboutitspurposeandsocietysuggestsitisnot,thatmeanssocietyis
ignorantaboutitsownignorance
IfIsuggestsocietycouldbesmarteranditsuggestsitcannotitisignorantaboutitsownignorance.
IfIsuggestthereisnostateandnoseparationsandsocietysuggeststhereisthensocietyisignorant
aboutitsownignorance.
Ifonesuggeststheyneedthestatethenoneisignorantaboutwhattheyare.
Ifonesuggeststheyneedmoneythenoneisignorantaboutwhattheyare.
Ifonesuggeststheyneedothersthenoneisignorantaboutwhattheyare.
Ifoneisdividedagainsttheirselftheyareignorantaboutwhattheyare.
Areligionthatisdividedisareligionignorantaboutwhatitis.
Asocietydividedisasocietyignorantaboutwhatitis.
Ahumandividedisnolongerahuman,butanabominationofmankind.

Ifonebelievespoliticsareneededwithourleveloftechnologyoneisignorantabouttechnology.
Ifonebelievespoliticscansolvetechnicalproblemsoneisignorantabouttechnology.
Ifonebelievesavotewillsolveaproblemoneisignorantabouttheproblem.
Ifonesbelievestheyarefreeinastatesystemtheyareignorantaboutwhatfreedomis.

IremindmyselfwhatIperceiveisjustasvalidaswhatanyoneelseperceives.
IremindmyselfifIsuggestsomethinginerror,whatIperceivewillstillbejustasvalidaswhat
everyoneelseperceives.
IremindmyselfifIsuggestsomethinginerror,itdoesnotmeanIamworthlessitmeansIamdoingthe
bestIcanwithwhatIhave.
IremindmyselfifIsuggestsomethinginerror,Iwillfigureoutwhattheerrorwasandcorrectmyself
andthuslearnfrommymistakes.
IremindmyselfIamunabletoremaininerrorifIsuggestsomethingthatisinerrorbecauseIsubmit
fullywhatIsuggestmaybeinerror.
IremindmyselfIamnotabletobeinerrorinmysuggestioneverythingIsuggestmaybeinerror,
exceptmysuggestioneverythingIsuggestmaybeinerror.
Iamnotinerrorinmysuggestions,everythingIsuggestmightbeinerror.
Iamnotinerrorinmysuggestion,inthatrespect.
IfIamnotinerrorinsuggestingeverythingIsuggestmaybeinerror,Imaynotbeinerroraboutother
thingsIsuggest.
IremindmyselfthebattledoesnothingeonwhetherIspellthewordscorrectly.
IremindmyselfthebattledoesnothingeonwhetherIusethecommascorrectly.
Iremindmyselfthebattleisinfinitymorecomplexthanspellingproperlyorcommausage.
Iremindmyselfmyfingersaredoingthetyping.
Iremindmyselfmymindisdoingthethinking.
Iremindmyselfmymindisformingthesentencesandmyfingersaretypingthewords.
Iremindmyselfmyfingersandmymindisanaspectofme.
Iremindmyselfitismethatiscreatingthisdocument.
Iremindmyselfitisallmeoritisallnothing.
IremindmyselfafterthisaccidentIamunabletohavefear.
IremindmyselfIamunabletohaveembarrassment.
IremindmyselfIamunabletofeellikeafailure.
IremindmyselfIamunabletofeellikealoser.
IremindmyselfIamunabletohatemyself.
IremindmyselfIamunabletofeelpleasure.
IremindmyselfIamonlyabletobepleasedornotpleased.
ThereisnothingelseIfeel.
IremindmyselfIamunabletofeellovesoIamunabletofeelhate.
IremindmyselfIamunabletofeelgoodsoIamunabletofeelbad.
IremindmyselfIonlyfeelcomfortanddiscomfort.
Iremindmyselfthisaccidentnearlyeliminatedmyemotionalcapacity.
IremindmyselfifIdidnotcreatethisdocument,thenthisdocumentdoesnotexist.
IremindmyselfifthisdocumentdoesnotexistthenIdonotexist.
IremindmyselfifIdonotexistthennothingexists.
IremindmyselfifnothingexiststhenIdonotexist.

Ifyouareforreal,Iamindenial.

IremindmyselfthereasonIperceivetypicalmanissosickisbecausetypicalmandoesnotknow
whatheis.IampleasedwiththeunderstandingIhaveachievedaftertypingthatsentence.
PerhapsIshouldtypetypicalwomaninsteadoftypicalmanbecauseIamfullyawarewomenare
farsuperiortomenineverysingleaspectexcepttheirdelusionalcapacity.
Menarefarsuperiortowomenintheirdelusionsandconfusionandstupiditycapacitysointhat
respectmenaresuperior.Menaresuperiorlyinsanecomparedtowomen.Menaresuperiorly
confusedcomparedtowomen.SoIremindmyselfmenareveryspecialcomparedtowomen.
Iremindmyself,special,asinspecialneeds,notspecialasinbetter,butspecialasinfarworse.
Special,asinbeyondarrogance.Special,asinbeyondunderstanding.Special,asinfartooemotional.
Specialasinfartoegotistical.
Iremindmyself,thefactwomenputupwithsuchaflawedbeingsuchasamanformorethan1
trillionthofasecondremindsmewomenscompassionandmercyandunderstandingisinfinite.
Iremindmyselfifwomenarenotamazinggracethereisnosuchthingasamazinggrace.
Iremindmyselfthereasonmenattempttocontrolwomenisbecausemenattempttocontrolwhatis
farsuperiortothemselvesinhopestheywillbeabletobecomeevenslightlyliketheperfection
womenrepresent.
Iremindmyselfifwomenarenotperfectionthereisnoperfection.
IremindmyselfIamfullyhumbledinthepresenceofperfection.
IremindmyselfIampleasedwiththeunderstandingIhaveachieved.
Oneshouldtryveryhardtoavoidtryingtohard.
IfIassumeeveryoneelseisafreakIwillbeunabletolookatmyselfasafreak.
IfIassumeeveryoneelseissickIwillbeunabletolookatmyselfassick.
IfIassumeeveryoneelseisperfectionIwillbeunabletolookatmyselfasperfect.
IfIamunabletolookatmyselfasperfectthenIamperfectinmyunderstanding.
IremindmyselfIknowperfectionwhenIseeit.
IremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbledinthepresenceofperfectionsoIamperfectinmyhumility.
IremindmyselfIknowperfectionwhenIseeit.

Iremindmyselfifmalesareabletostandtheirselfandalltheirflawsformorethan1trillionthofa
seconditremindsmemalescompassionandmercyandunderstandingisinfinite.
Iremindmyselfifamaleisabletostandtheirselfandall,theircompassionandunderstandingtoput
upwiththeirselfisinfiniteandperfect.
Iremindmyselfifamaleisnotamazinggracethereisnoamazinggrace.
Iremindmyselfifafemaleisnotamazinggracethereisnoamazinggrace.
Iremindmyselfifmalesandfemalesarenotperfectionthereisnoperfection.
IremindmyselfIknowperfectionwhenIseeit.
IremindmyselfIampleasedwithmyunderstandingaftertheaccident.
Iremindmyselfmalesareproofnothingisperfectandfemalesareproofofperfection.
Iremindmyselffemalesareproofnothingisperfectandmalesareproofofperfection.
IremindmyselfIknowperfectionwhenIseeit.
IremindmyselfIfIamunabletodetectperfectionwhenIseeit,thereisnoperfection.
Iremindmyselfperfectionisunabletomakeamistake.
Iremindmyselfperfectionisunabletobeanythingbutperfect.
Iremindmyselfeithereverythingamaleandfemaledoesisperfectornothingtheydoisperfect.
Iremindmyselfnothingisperfectbutperfection.
IremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbleinthepresenceofperfection.
IremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbleinthepresenceoftheaccident.
IremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbleinthepresenceoffemales.
IremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbleinthepresenceofmales.
IremindmyselfIknowperfectionwhenIseeit.
IremindmyselfifIamunabletodetectperfection,thereisnosuchthingasperfection.
IremindmyselfIknowperfectionwhenIseeit.
Iremindmyselfhumansknowperfectionwhentheyseeit.
Iremindmyselfaflowerisperfectinitsbeauty.
Iremindmyself,awomanisperfectinherbeauty.
Iremindmyselftheuniverseisperfectinitsbeauty.
Iremindmyselfmusicisperfectinitsbeauty.
Iremindmyselfamotherisperfectinhercompassionforherchild.
Iremindmyselfafatherisperfectinhiscompassionforhischild.
Iremindmyselfabrotherisperfectinhiscompassionforhisbrother.
Iremindmyselfasisterisperfectinhercompassionforhersister.
Iremindmyselfacitizenisperfectintheircompassionfortheircountry.
Iremindmyselfasoldierisperfectintheircompassionfortheircause.
IremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbledinapresenceofperfection.
IremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbledinapresenceofthewordinthePerfectTorah,ThePerfect
BibleandThePerfectQuran.
IremindmyselfIknowperfectionwhenIseeit.
IremindmyselfIfIamunabletodetectperfectionthereisnoperfection.
IremindmyselfIamabletodetectperfection.
IremindmyselfIamperfectinmydetectionsinceIamabletodetectperfection.
IamperfectlyhumbledthatanyonewouldspeaktosomeonesuchasI.
Iamperfectlyhumbledbytheperfecthumilityonehas,tospeaktosomeonesuchasI.

Englandhasloweredinterestratesto1%.
Americahastakenouta780billiondollarloan.
ChinahassuggesteditwillnotmakemanymoreloanstoAmerica.
Thesegovernmentsdonotknowwhatthatmeans.
CitizensofIcelandfullyknowwhatthatmeans.
Theworsetheeconomygetsthelesspeoplespend.
Thelesspeoplespendtheworsetheeconomygets.
Completecollapsewillstopthatcycle.
Completecollapsewillseparatethemenfromtheboysandthewheatfromthechaff.
Theinternetisthereasonforthecompletecollapse.

IremindmyselfbeforethisaccidentIthoughtIcouldsee.
IremindmyselfafterthisaccidentIseehowblindIwasbeforethisaccident.
Ioncewasblind,butnowIsee
Ioncewaslostbutnowamfound.

IhumblyremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbledbyanybeingthathaseverbeen,thateverwillbe,and
everis,thathasperfecthumility,perfectcompassionandperfectunderstanding,toreadwords
enabledbyfingersandamind,suchasIhave.
IhumblyremindmyselfIamperfectlyhumbledinthepresenceofabeingwithsuchperfect
compassionandperfecthumilityandperfectunderstandingtoevenacknowledgeonesuchasI.
IremindmyselfIshouldpayeverythingIhaveandeverythingIeverwillhave,toabeingwhohassuch
perfectcompassionandperfecthumilityandperfectunderstanding,toevenacknowledgethe
sentencesthefingersandthemind,onesuchasI,havecreated.
IremindmyselfIwillwritesentencesintoinfinity,inhopethatevenonebeingwithperfect
compassionandperfecthumilitywilljustconsiderreadingthesentences,onesuchasIhavecreated.
IremindmyselfthatsinglehopeisallIneed.
Iremindmyselfthatsinglehope,thataperfectbeingwithperfectcompassionandperfecthumility,
willcomealongandacknowledgeonesuchasI,byreadingthesentences,onesuchasIhavecreated,
isenoughtosustainmeforeternity.
Thetearsofunderstandingareinfinite.

Itrytoavoidgoodenoughlifeandbadenoughlife,soIamjuststuckwithlife.
Itrytoavoiddefininglife,incaseIhaveone.
Iamunabletobeconcernedwithmoney,becauseIamonlyabletobeconcernedwithsentencesand
music.
ThefurtherIgetawayfromherethebetter,andmyonlyoptionisforward.
WhywouldIplayforfun,whenIcanplayforkeeps.

Thisisareaderexercisepage.
Reader,remindyourself,onascaleof0to100howcrazydoyouthinktheauthorofthisdocumentis?
100beingmostcrazy0beingleastcrazy.

Iremindmyself;thedocumentTheOldManandtheSeaisaparableaboutahumanwhoisfragile
comparedtotheSea(Life),andthefish(aproblem).
Thehumanunderstandsthroughhisstrugglewiththeprobleminlife,heisabletoadapttothe
problem,andovercometheproblemhefacesinlife,throughunderstanding.
Astheoldmanreturnstoshorewiththefish,hehasovercome,heunderstandsasthesharks(his
understanding)tearsawaythefish,heunderstandsnotmuchisleftofhisproblem,theoldman
thoughtwasonceabigproblem.
Theoldmanfinallyunderstandsthatproblemhethoughtwasabig,wasnotabigproblemafterall,
butabigblessing.
ThemoralofthedocumentTheOldManandtheSeais:
Ahumanduringtheirlifeshouldseekunderstanding,sotheyareabletounderstand,allproblems,all
people,allnations,allcreatures,allsufferinginlifeareactuallyblessingsindisguise.
Iamonlyabletohumblysuggestconditioningawayfromemotionsisperhapsagoodplacetostart.

Bydecreasingthevolumeofemotionsoneactuallyincreasesthevolumeoflogic.
Bydecreasingthevolumeofconfusiononeactuallyincreasesthevolumeofclarity.
Dontmakedecisionswhenyouareemotionalbecauseyoumayregretthem,makedecisionswhen
yourlogicalsoyoumaynotregretthem.
Dontmakedecisionswhenyouareconfusedbecauseyoumayregretthem,makedecisionswhen
youhaveclarityandyoumaynotregretthem.
Bylettinggoofemotions,oneembraceslogic.
Bylettinggoofconfusion,oneembracesclarity.
Turntheothercheekisaformoflettinggoofemotionsandembracingclarity.
Themeekshallinherittheearthisaformoflettinggoofemotionsandembracingclarity.
SubmittoAllahisaformoflettinggoofemotionsandembracingclarity.
Oneshouldtryveryhard,nottotryveryhardintheirattemptstoletgoofemotions.
Itiseasiertoembraceclaritythanisittoletgoofconfusion.
Itiseasiertoembracelogicthanitistoletgoofemotions.
Itiseasiertoembracelightthanitistoletgoofdarkness.
Itissaidthat,"thehorse'shoovesweremuffledbythegods"
]
topreventguardsfromknowingthe
Bodhisatta'sdeparture.
WIKIPEDIA
Youallowthegodstoworryaboutmufflingtheemotionsandconfusionanddarkness,youjustfocus
onembracingthelogicandclarityandlight.
Then,sittingunderapapaltree,nowknownastheBodhitreeinBodhiGaya,India,hevowednever
toariseuntilhehadfoundtheTruth.
WIKIPEDIA
Sittingunderapapaltreeinmeditationisaformorlettinggoofemotionsandasaresultisaformof
embracinglogic.
Theemotionalluxuriesoneembracesisaformoflettinggooflogic.
Theemotionalluxuriesoneblocksisaformofembracingthelogic.
Theconfusedluxuriesoneblocksisaformofembracingclarity.

Theconfusedemotionaldarknessoneblocks,isaformofembracingtheclearlogicallight.

Thatiselementary.

IampleasediswasinerrorinsuggestingBuddhalivedaround800BC.
InowthinkIunderstandBuddhalivedaround400BC.
400BCisaroundthetimethePerfectTorahwasintroduced.
Iampleasedwithmyunderstandingoftheperhapsclosetimeframeofthetwoevents.
Iampleasedmyerrorwasnotanerrorbutanopportunitytoprogressinunderstanding.
Iampleasedmyerrorleadtounderstandingsomyperfectflawleadtoperfectunderstanding.
IampleasedwithwhoIambecauseIampleasedwithwhoweare.
Iampleasedwiththisperfectaccidentbecauseitmayleadtoperfectunderstanding.
Iampleasedhowperfect,everythingworksoutperfectly.

Iamonlyabletohumblysuggest,donotlovemeanddonotstarttoloveme.

Iamonlyabletohumblysuggest,donothatemeorstarttohateme.

Iamonlyabletohumblysuggestyoublockthoseemotions.

Whenthegoinggetsweird,theweirdseekshelterfromme.

Iamonlyabletohumblysuggest,onepleaserefrainfromjudgmentsofthesentencesuntiltheyget
warmedup.

Thisaccidentisgiventome;andIamtheaccidentthatisgiventoyou.
Myburdenisgreat,becausetheaccidentIwasgivenisgreat.
Yourburdenisgreat,becausetheaccidentyouaregivenisgreat.
Muchisrequired,whenmuchisgiven.
Toone,muchisgiven,givefreely.
Toone,muchisrequired,givefreely.
Freely;muchisgiven.
Freely;muchisrequired.
Ipreferaninfiniteburden,soIwillcarryyours.

Ifoneattemptstofindtheirselfswiftly,onemaypasstheirselfup.
Ifoneattemptstofindtheirselfslowly,onemaynotcatchuptotheirself.
Ifoneattemptstobetheirself,theywillhavefoundtheirself.
Ifoneallowstheirselftofindthem,onewillnaturallyfindtheirself.

ItisnowFridayFeb132009at2:24AM.

Atthismomentyourguessisinfinitelybetterthanmine.
Iwillhumblybeanythingyouwantmetobe.

Accidently,theaccident,accidentlyoccurred,whenaccidently,Iaccidentlywasaccidently,reduced
accidentlytoaccidentalisolation,accidently.
Accidently,Iaccidently,nolongeraccidentlylistenedaccidentlytowhataccidentalothersaccidently
suggested,accidently.
Accidently,Iaccidently,nolongeraccidently,accidentlyfollowed,accidentlywhataccidentalothers
accidentlysuggested,accidently.
Accidently,Iaccidently,accidentlyisolatedmyaccidentalselfaccidently,inanaccidentalhuge
accidentalocean,accidently.
Accidently,Iaccidentlyisolatedmyaccidentalselfaccidently,sofaroutaccidentlyinthataccidental
hugeaccidentaloceanaccidently,therewasaccidentlynoaccidentaloneaccidentlytoaccidentlyturn
toaccidentlybutaccidentalme,accidently.
Accidently,accidentalIaccidentlywasaccidentlyleftaccidentlywithmyaccidentalself,accidently,for
accidentlytheaccidentalfirstaccidentaltime,accidently.
Accidently,accidentalIaccidently,accidentlyhadaccidently,noaccidentalenergyaccidentlyto
accidentlygetaccidentallybackaccidentlytoaccidentalshoreaccidentally,andaccidentalsafety,
accidentally.
Iaccidentlyhadnoenergytoaccidentlygiveuponmyselfaccidently.
Iaccidentlywasaccidentlyisolatedtooneaccidentaloption;findmyaccidentalselfaccidently.
Iaccidently,hadaccidently,reliedonmyaccidentalselfaccidently,tohooktheaccidentalfish,
accidently.
Iaccidently,hadaccidently,reliedonmyselfaccidently,toaccidentlyfighttheaccidentalfish,
accidently.
Iaccidently,hadtoaccidently,relyonmyselfaccidently,toaccidentlytiretheaccidentalfish,
accidently.
Iaccidently,hadtoaccidently,relyonmyselfaccidently,toaccidentlysecuretheaccidentalfish,
accidently,onceaccidentallycaught,accidentally.
Itaccidently,wasaccidently,meaccidentallyortheaccidentalfish,accidently.
Accidently,Itaccidently,wasaccidently,meaccidentlyortheaccidentalseaaccidently,accidently.
Accidently,Iaccidently,amaccidentlystillaccidentlyhere,accidently;andaccidently,theaccidental
sea;andaccidently,theaccidentalfishaccidentlyareaccidentlynot,accidently.

Accidently,Iaccidently,accidentlyignoredeverythingaccidentlyandaccidentlyfoundmyaccidental
self,accidently.
Accidently,Iaccidently,accidentallyblocked,accidently,everythingaccidently,andaccidently,was
accidentlyleftaccidently,accidently,withmyaccidentalself,accidently.
IwasblindtomyselfandnowIaccidentlyseemyself.
WhenIsawtheseaandthefishaccidentlyIlostsightofmyselfaccidently.
WhenIlostsightoftheseaandthefishaccidentlyIaccidentlyfoundmyself,accidently.
WhenIlostsightofwhatIaccidentlythoughtwasmostimportant,Iaccidentlyfoundwhatwasmost
important,accidently.

PerhapsoneofmysongsIhavecomposedaftertheaccidentwillperhapshelpyouunderstandwho
youare,properly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ3lkk4yP5I

Thisisareaderactivitypage.
Reader,remindyourself.
Istheauthorwise,toowise,unwise,toounwise.
Theanswerisnotatthebackofthebook,andnotatthebottomofthepage.
Youmustrelyonyourintuition,todetermine,ifyouhavedetermined,theproperanswer.

Ifyouthinkyoupassed,youfailed.
Iremindmyself;
Lawsareahindrance.
Somehavesuggestedlawsareneededtokeepthepeace.
IwouldliketomeettheonewhosuggeststhatsoImayhumblysuggesttheyaredelusional,confused,
And,outoftouchwithreality,toanextremedegree.
Ifachildspillssomemilk,theadultdoesnotisolatethechildforyears.
Ifachildspillssomemilk,theadultdoesnotkillthechild.
Theadultmustallowthechildtolearnonitsown,orrisksharmingthechild.
Iftheadultcontrolsthechildtomuchthechildisconditionedtorelyontheadulttomuch.
Iftheadultcontrolsthechildtomuchthechildisconditiontonottrustitsself.
Whenachilddoesnottrustitsself,itisunsafe,untoitself.
Whenachildisunsafe,untoitsself,itisunsafeuntoothers.
Whenalawsuggestsamurdererofanotherbeisolatedinprisontoprotectsociety,thatprotectionof
societyisanillusion.
Ifoneisolatesanotherinprisonallthatisaccomplishedisonegainscontrolofanother.
Onewhodesirestocontrolothershasacontrolproblem.
Onewhohasacontrolproblemhasanegoproblem.
Onewhohasanegoproblemhasanemotionalproblem.
Ifamurderershouldbelockedbehindbarsandisolated,theneverysinglehumanontheplanetshould
belockedbehindbarsandisolated.
Physicalmurderisworsethanemotionalmurder.
Unlessyouhavehadyourheartbroken,thenemotionalmurderisworsethanphysicalmurder.
Ifyouhavelostsomeoneclosetoyou,thenemotionalmurderisinfinitelyworsethanphysicalmurder.
Ifyoudonothaveemotionalproblems,thenphysicalmurderandemotionalmurderarenothing.
Amurdererwillnotstopmurderinguntiltheylearnthelessonontheirown.
Adrugaddictwillnotquitdrugsuntiltheylearnthelessonontheirown.
Astudentwillnotlearnunlesstheylearnthelessonontheirown.
Anemotionalpersonwillnotlearntheirlesson,unlesstheylearnthelessonoftheirown.
Theonlypurposeforlawsistocontrolothers.
Theonlypurposeforlawsistoisolateothers.
Theonlypurposeforlawsistohelpotherstoavoidunderstanding.
Theonlypurposeforlawsistohelpothersstayignorant.
Lawsaremadebytheignoranttoencourageothertobeignorant.
Ignorancecreatesignorance.
Lawsencouragethecycle.
Absenceoflawsbreaksthecycle.
Absenceofcontrolbreakstheemotionalcycle.
Absenceoftheemotionalcycleencouragesthelogicalcycle.
Themurdererdesirestomurder.
Murderisasymptomofemotionalcontrol.
Lawsencourageemotionalcontrol.
Emotionalcontrolencouragesemotionaldesires.
Emotionaldesiresencourageemotionaldecisions.
Emotionaldecisionsencourageemotionalcontrol.
Emotionalcontrolencouragesemotionaldesires.
Emotionaldesiresencouragemurderers.
Iftherearenoemotionsthereisnoneedforlaws.
Iftherearenoemotionsthereisnoneedforcontrol.
Iftherearenoemotionsthereisnoneedforprisons.
Iftherearenoemotionsthereisnoneedformurderstomurder.
Ifthereisnoneedformurderstomurderthereisnoneedtocontrolmurdersinprison.
Ifthereisnoneedtocontrolmurdersinprison,thereisnoneedforlawstosendmurderstoprison.
Ifthereisnoneedforlaws,thereisnoneedforlawsthatcontrol.
Lawsareanicewaytosay,Wedonottrustanyofyou,evenourself.
Iwouldbehumbledtomeetahumanwhosuggestslawsareneeded,soIcanhumblysuggesttothem,
theyarebeyonddelusional,beyondconfused,andbeyondmyhumbleunderstanding.
Ifeveryoneisemotional,theneveryonewillsuggestlawsareneeded.
Ifeveryoneislogical,theneveryonewillsuggestlawsarenotneeded.
Ifeveryonehasasenseoftime,theneveryonewillsuggestlawsareneeded.
Ifeveryonehasnosenseoftime,theneveryonewillsuggestlawsarenotneeded.
IfDonotmakeadecisionwhenyouremotionalbecauseyouwillregretthatdecision.,istrue.
THEN
Donotmakeadecisionunlessyouhavenosenseoftime.istrue.
IfDonotmakeadecisionwhenyouhaveasenseoftimebecauseyouwillregretthatdecision.,is
true.
THEN
Donotmakeadecisionunlessyouhavenosenseoftime.,istrue.
OnemaymentiononeoftheTenCommandmentsis,Thoushallnotkill.
Perhapsthisisasuggestionforthosewhojustdidnotgetit.,tobeginwith.
Ifoneproperlyturnstheothercheek,onewillhavenoemotionsandonewillnotdesire.
Onewithnoemotionsdoesnotdesire,andsoonewithnodesiredoesnotkill.
One,whoturnstheothercheekproperly,becomesmeek.
One,whoismeek,turnstheothercheek.
One,whodidnotgetittobeginwith,isnotmeekanddoesnotturntheothercheeksotheyhave
asenseoftime.
One,whohasasenseoftime,hasemotions,andhasdesires,andisliabletokill.
One,whodidnotgetittobeginwith,hasasenseoftime,hasemotions,andhasdesires,andisliable
tosteal.
One,whodidnotgetittobeginwith,hasasenseoftime,hasemotions,andhasdesires,andisliable
tolust.
One,whodidnotgetittobeginwith,hasasenseoftime,hasemotions,andhasdesires,andisliable
tobeslothful.
SIDENOTE:Accordingtothistimekeepingdevice,IhavebeenworkingonthisVolumeforabout12
hourstotal(7692wordsin)(Ihavetoplaytheaccidentgame,makemusicandmostimportantlyofall,
attendtomyinfinitewrathpotential,youmayknowasawomanorladyorblessingorinfinite
compassionbeing,dependingonyourperception,whichisrelativetoyourgammawaves,according
toWIKIPEDIA),somemightsuggestIamabusybee,butaccordingtome,notimehaspassed,soIdo
notfeelIamdoingmuchjust,typingonesentenceanditseemstoleadtothenext.Itperhapswould
bedifficultformetoattempttobeslothful,letalonepullitoff,sotospeak.
IremindmyselfwhereIam.
One,whodidnotgetittobeginwith,hasasenseoftime,hasemotions,andhasdesires,andisliable
tobegreedy.
SIDENOTE:IntheaccidentgameIwantedtomasterthegamebecauseofmygreedformoney,but
aftermasteringitIaccidentlylostmyemotionsandlostmydesires,soIdonotknowwhyIplayexcept
tocontinuetoconditionmyself,soIdonotgobacktohowIwasbeforebecauseIlikeithere,soto
speak.Itispropertolookatitlike,Iammindfultoplaythegame.Itispropertolookatitlike,Iam
compelledtoplaythegame.Idonotdesire,becauseIdonotgethungry,Idonotfeelhunger.
SoIdonotfeel,Ineedtoplaythegame,Iamjustmindfultoplaythegame.

One,whodidnotgetittobeginwith,hasasenseoftime,hasemotions,andhasdesires,andisliable
tobewrathful.
SIDENOTE:Iwillincorporatethecopyandpasteoption,andbemindfulthePerfectQuranwilldothe
rest.
001.007ThewayofthoseonwhomThouhastbestowedThyGrace,thosewhose(portion)isnot
wrath,andwhogonotastray.
AlQur'an,001.007(AlFatiha[TheOpening])
ThosewhoareinGodsgracearethosewhoarenotwrathful(emotional).
Ifoneturnstheothercheekoneisnotwrathful(emotional).
IfoneisinGodsgrace,onewillbeunabletogoastray,becauseGodwillbeinpossessionofthem,and
thespiritofGod,whoisinpossessionofone,willnotleadoneastray.
OnemayperceiveGodhasledtheone,Godisinpossessionof,astray,orperceiveGod,has
abandonedthatone,whoGodisinpossessionof,butthatisanillusiontothatone.
Godswaysareunknowntotypicalman.
TypicalmanmaysuggestGodledthedisciplesastray,becausethedisciplesdiedhorribledeaths.
Thatisanillusion.Alltypicalmandidbyphysicallykillingthediscipleswastoshowtypicalmansnature.
Alltypicalmandidbyphysicallykillingthediscipleswastoshowtypicalman,whattypicalmanis.
Typicalmaniswrathful,Typicalmanisemotional.
Godperhapswantedtoshowtypicalman,whattypicalmanbehaveslikearoundAmazingGrace.
Godperhapswantedtypicalmantoseewhattypicalmaniscapableofwhentypicalmanuseshis
emotions.
PerhapsTypicalmanperhapswillneverleaningeneral,butperhapsatypicalmancomesalongand
seesandperhapsthattypicalmanwhoseesisnolongeratypicalman.

SIDENOTE:Onwiththeshow.
One,whodidnotgetittobeginwith,hasasenseoftime,hasemotions,andhasdesires,andisliable
toenvy.
SIDENOTE:Iamonlyabletohumblysuggest,onedoesnotneedtoenvyme,one,onlyneedsto
mindfullyblocktheiremotionsforaperiodofthreetosixmonths.
One,whodidnotgetittobeginwith,hasasenseoftime,hasemotions,andhasdesires,andisliable
tobeprideful.
SIDENOTE:Iamonlyabletohumblysuggest,ifIhadpride,thisdocumentwouldnotexist.
IamfullyawarethesevendeadlysinsarenotinThePerfectBible,thePerfectQuranorthePerfect
Torah,buttheyareinanextremelyimperfectdocument,writtenbyanextremelyimperfectperson,so
perhapsthataddssomeweighttotheirvalidity.

IattempttobeimpatientandIendupwithcompassion.
IattempttobearrogantandIendupwithunderstanding.
IattempttobelustfulandIendupwithchastity.
IattempttobeemotionalandIendupwithlogic.
IattempttobeconfusedandIendupwithclarity.
IattempttofeeltimeandIendupwritingaboutmyattempts.
Sillyaccidentalaccidents,thataccidentlyhappen,accidently.
Lifeisaccidentlyfair,accidently.

Thecontrol,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceivecontrol.
Theanger,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceiveanger.
Thehate,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceivehate.
Thelove,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceivelove.
Theinsanity,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceiveinsanity.
Theflaws,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceiveflaws.
Thewalls,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceivewalls.
Thelimits,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceivelimits.
Thefoolishness,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouperceivefoolishness.
Thewisdom,youperceive,isasymptom,thatyouhaveachanceforanaccident.

Miraculously,themiracle,miraculouslyoccurred,whenmiraculously,Imiraculouslywasmiraculously,
reducedmiraculouslytomiraculousisolation,miraculously.
Miraculously,IMiraculously,nolongerMiraculouslylistenedMiraculouslytowhatMiraculousothers
Miraculouslysuggested,Miraculously.
Miraculously,IMiraculously,nolongerMiraculously,Miraculouslyfollowed,Miraculouslywhat
MiraculousothersMiraculouslysuggested,Miraculously.
Miraculously,IMiraculously,MiraculouslyisolatedmyMiraculousselfMiraculously,inanMiraculous
hugeMiraculousocean,Miraculously.
Miraculously,IMiraculouslyisolatedmyMiraculousselfMiraculously,sofaroutMiraculouslyinthat
MiraculoushugeMiraculousoceanMiraculously,therewasMiraculouslynoMiraculousone
MiraculouslytoMiraculouslyturntoMiraculouslybutMiraculousme,Miraculously.
Miraculously,MiraculousIMiraculouslywasMiraculouslyleftMiraculouslywithmyMiraculousself,
Miraculously,forMiraculouslytheMiraculousfirstMiraculoustime,Miraculously.
Miraculously,MiraculousIMiraculously,MiraculouslyhadMiraculously,noMiraculousenergy
MiraculouslytoMiraculouslygetMiraculouslybackMiraculouslytoMiraculousshoreMiraculously,
andMiraculoussafety,Miraculously.
IMiraculouslyhadnoenergytoMiraculouslygiveuponmyselfMiraculously.
IMiraculouslywasMiraculouslyisolatedtooneMiraculousoption;findmyselfMiraculously.
IMiraculously,hadMiraculously,reliedonmyselfMiraculously,tohooktheMiraculousfish,
Miraculously.
IMiraculously,hadMiraculously,reliedonmyselfMiraculously,toMiraculouslyfighttheMiraculous
fish,Miraculously.
IMiraculously,hadtoMiraculously,relyonmyselfMiraculously,toMiraculouslytiretheMiraculous
fish,Miraculously.
IMiraculously,hadtoMiraculously,relyonmyselfMiraculously,toMiraculouslysecuretheMiraculous
fish,Miraculously,onceMiraculouslycaught,Miraculously.

Perceptionisimportant.

IammindfulnooneislisteningsoIammindfultokeeptalking.
IammindfulnoonecaressoIammindfultodothesame.
IammindfulnoonehearssoIammindfultokeeptalking.
IammindfulnoonefeelssoIammindfultodothesame.
IammindfulnooneisgettingitsoIammindfultokeeptalking.
IammindfulnoonethinkssoIammindfultodothesame.
IammindfulnooneunderstandssoIammindfultokeeptalking.
IammindfulnooneagreessoIammindfultoagreewithmyself.
IammindfulIamarrogantsoIammindfultoagreewithmyself.
IammindfulIamemotionalsoIammindfultoblockthem.

Onewhoinsultsothersknowsasmuchaboutlifeasarockknowsaboutthesea.

Manyrockstalk,butmanyrocksknownotwhattheysay.

Ihavequitearockcollection,offriends.

LONDON(AP)ThenumberofantiSemiticattacksonBritishJewsrosesharplyafterthestartofthe
conflictinGaza,aJewishcharitysaidFriday.TheLondonbasedCommunity Security Trust,which
monitorsantiSemitismandworkstosafeguardtheJewishcommunityinBritain,said250anti
SemiticincidentswererecordedinthefourweeksafterDec.27,whenIsraellaunchedattackson
GazatostopHamasrocketattacks.
Thatcomparesto40incidentsfromthesameperiodtheyearbefore.
DaveRich,aspokesmanforthetrust,saidJewsinBritainareunfairlyseenaslocalrepresentativesof
IsraelaviewthatfuelssomeoftheantiSemiticattacks.
"Thisisracism,"hesaid."Andlikeallformsofracism,itisunacceptable."

Iremindmyself;itiswisetogoallthewaywithconfusionsoonedoesnotremainlukewarmintheir
confusion.
ThenumberofantiSemiticattacksonBritishJewsrosesharplyafterthestartoftheconflictinGaza,a
JewishcharitysaidFriday.
Hatredisasymptomofemotionaldesires.Emotionsencourageconfuseddecisions.
TheLondonbasedCommunity Security Trust,whichmonitorsantiSemitismandworkstosafeguard
theJewishcommunityinBritain,said250antiSemiticincidentswererecordedinthefourweeksafter
Dec.27,whenIsraellaunchedattacksonGazatostopHamasrocketattacks.

Safetyisasymptomofemotions.Emotionsencourageconfusedstatements.

Thatcomparesto40incidentsfromthesameperiodtheyearbefore.

Senseoftimeissymptomofemotions.Emotionsencourageconfusedstatements.

DaveRich,aspokesmanforthetrust,saidJewsinBritainareunfairlyseenaslocalrepresentativesof
IsraelaviewthatfuelssomeoftheantiSemiticattacks.

Confusionisasymptomofemotions.
"Thisisracism,"hesaid."Andlikeallformsofracism,itisunacceptable."
Racismisasymptomonehasnotturnedtheothercheekenough.
Racismisasymptomonehasnotproperlybecomemeek.
Racismisasymptomoneisarrogantandhasnotsubmittedtoperfectionproperly.
Allformsofemotionsareunacceptable.

Donottakethewordofablindman,askquestions.

ADomdesirestocontroltheSub.ASubisawaretheyarebeingcontrolled,sotheysubmittocontrol.
TheDomistheonewhoisbeingdominated,andtheSubistheonewhoiscontrolling.
Yourwishismycommand.
Mycommandisyourwish.
IfaDommalesuggests,Iliketospankyou.toasubgirl,andthatgirlsuggests,Ilikeyoutoliketo
spankme.,thesubgirlisthedom.
IftheDomsuggests,Iliketospankyouhard.andtheSubsuggests,Idonotliketobespanked
hard.,theDomsubmitstothedesiresoftheSub.
Ifyouwanttobeadomyouwillbeasub,andifyouwanttobeasubyouwillbeadom.
Controlisanillusion.Anillusioncanbemanipulated.
Onlytheonewhocandetecttheillusioncanmanipulatetheillusion.
Oneiseithermanipulatingthewords,oroneisbeingmanipulatedbythewords.
Oneiseitherbeingmanipulated,ormanipulating,orneither.
Onewhofollowsthelawsisbeingmanipulatedbythelawsanditscalledagoodcitizenbuttheyare
reallyanunawarefool.
Onewhodoesnotconformtothelawsisnotbeingmanipulatedbythelawsandiscalledabad
citizenbuttheyarereallyawiseone.
Itisverysimpletosay,Dothisorelse.Ittakesstrategytosuggest,Ifyoudonotdoaswesuggest
youwillbeanoutcast,fromus.
Soonescorebeingisinthisbattleforitself.
Ifapersonlistenstotheircorebeingtheywillbecalledanoutcastinsociety.
Ifapersondoesnotlistentotheircorebeingtheywillbeanoutcasttotheirself.
Soapersonhastwochoicesinalloflife.
Bepleasedwiththeirselfandbeanoutcastinsociety.
Or
Bewelcomedinsocietyandbeanoutcasttotheirself.
Theonlysolutionistostriveforneither.
Theonlywaytostriveforneitheristosilenceemotions.
Oneisstuckwiththeirself.
Nothingelseisafactorinalleternityincomparison.
Ifoneisnotpleasedwiththeirself,theyaredoomed.
Ifoneispleasedwiththeirself,nothingelsemattersincomparison.
Oneisunabletobepleasedwiththeirselfifthatonehasanythingbutsilencedemotions.
Iamonlyabletohumblysuggest,ifonehasanyopinionaboutanythingoneisfartoemotional.
Mycompulsiontosuggestoneshouldconsidersilencingtheiremotionsisstrictlymindfulness.
AllofthewordsIhavetypedsincetheaccidenthaveonlytaughtmetounderstandhowtofurtherthe
silencingofmyemotions.
IamonlyabletohumblysuggestifallthewordsIhavetypedsincetheaccidentdisappearedforever,I
wouldnotfeelalossandifallthewordswerepostedfarandwide,IwouldnotfeelIhadwon.
IamnolongerwhatIwas.
IamnolongerwhoIwas.
Iamnolongergoingtobesomeone.
Iamonly,am.

ThemoreIwrite,themoreIam,[right],andthemoreIwrite.

[compassionatehumbledunderstandingmercifulcharitableconfusedegotisticalawarearrogant
convincedmindfulinfinity]

ThemoreIwrite,themoreIamrightandthemorearrogantIamawareIamandthemoreegotisticalI
amawareIamandthemoremindfulIamandthemoreunderstandingIamandthemoreconvincedI
amandthemorehumbledIamandthemorecompassionateIamandthemorecharitableIamand
themoreconfusedIamandthemoreawareIam,intoinfinity,andthemoreIwrite.

Perhapsifananimalisnotawareabulletisapproachingthem,thenperhapsthebulletisnot
approachingthem.

Iremindmyself;Iammindfulthispageisfull;Iammindfultostartanotherpageandmindfullyfillit.

Onceonebeginstosettletheyaredoomed.
Thereisonlyoneconcepttoavoidbeingdoomed.
Infinity.
Ifonedeterminesanothershouldbekilled,unlesstheykilleverything,theyaredoomed.
Ifonedeterminestheyneed1000dollarsunlessoneseekseverydollar,theyaredoomed.
Ifonedeterminestheyneed1000words,unlessoneseeksinfinitewords,theyaredoomed.
Ifonedeterminestheyneedalittlelove,unlessoneseeksinfinitelove,theyaredoomed.
Ifonedeterminestheyneedalittlecontrol,unlessoneseeksinfinitecontrol,theyaredoomed.
Ifonedeterminestheyneedtolosealittleweight,unlessoneseeksinfiniteweightloss,theyare
doomed.
Ifonedeterminestheyneedsomecomfort,unlessoneseeksinfinitecomfort,theyaredoomed.

WhatIamhumblysuggestingasaformofsocietyiswhatexistedbeforesocietyexisted.
WhatIamhumblysuggestingasaformofgovernmentthatexistedbeforegovernmentsexisted.
Therewasamomentinbeingsevolutionthattheirwasnogreed,noenvy,nohate,nodesires,no
anger.
Therewasamomentandthenthingsjustgrewawayfromthatandnowheweare.
Andeveryoneistryingtofigurewhatwentwrongandwhomadeitgowrong.
Themoretheylooktoblameothersthemoretheybecomeliketheyarerightnow.
Themoretheylooktoblameasituationthemoretheybecomeliketheyarerightnow.
Theywillnevergetbacktothatmomentuntiltheygrowupandfacereality.
Theywillforalleternityremainchildrenandfools.
Theyareunabletoknowwhattheyaredoing.
Theyareunabletoknowwhattheyhavedone.
Theyareunabletoknowwhotheyare.
Theyareunabletoknowwhattheyare.
Theyareunabletoknowwhytheyarewhattheyare.
Theyareinhellbecausetheydonotevenunderstandtheyarehell.
WhenIgetgoosebumpsfromwritingyoushouldverymindful.

Nothingisgoingtosaveyoufromhellbutyou.
Nothingisgoingtocometoyourrescue.
Nothingisgoingtoofferyoucomfort.
Nothingisgoingtohelpyoubutyou.
Nothingisgoingtoenlightenyoubutyou.
Nothingisgoingtoharmyoubutyou.
Nothingisgoingtopleaseyoubutyou.
Thereisnothingbutyou.

Whydontyoujustgiveup.
Youcantdoanything.
Youjustsitthere,whereyouareat,andjustgiveup.
Youarenotworthfightingforanyway.
Youjustletsomeoneelsefightforyou.
Youcanthandlethefightsojustgiveup.
Youthoughtandnowyouknow.
Ifyouhateanyoneyouhateyourself.
Ifyouloveanyoneyouloveyourself.
Whydontyougiveupandgetoffthatride.

Feb13
th
2009

Iremindself;

Tellmewhatyouwantmetotellyou.

DontblockyouremotionsbecausethenyouwillbecomeBuddhathenyouwillhaveinfinite
understandingandalongwithpackageyougetthebonuspackageofinfiniteegoandburdenandasa
partingconsolationprizeyouunderstandyourinheavenbuteveryonearoundyouassumestheyarein
hell.
SoIaminhellbecauseyouthinkyouareinhell,becauseIamawareofwhatyouthink,becauseofthis
accident.
Igotwhatyouaskedfor.
Yougoaroundsayinglifesucksandnoweveryonebelievesthat.
IcanwaituntilIdiesoIcangotoheavenandleavethishell.
Igotnewsforyou.
Ifyoudontreachawarenessinthislife,thatdeathisnotreal,youwilldie.
Ifyoudonotthrowoffyourignorancewhileyouarealive,youwillbedoomedtoeternalhell.
Youhaveasingledecisiontomake.

Throwofftheyokeofemotions
Suffereternalhell.
Youhaveatasteofwhateternalhellislike.
Youbetterlovethetaste.
IknoweverythingIwanttoknow.
IknoweverythingIdonotwanttoknow.

Sotheaccidentisacurseandablessing,theaccidentishellandheaven.
Youreadtheperfectbooksandyouthinkyouhaveitallfiguredout.
Itscutanddry.
Youneedtospendtherestofyourlifeunderstandingwhataparableis.
Youknowwhothepeoplewhoprayfordeath,butcannotdieareintheprefectbooks?
Me.Thoselikeme.
Iamnotoneofakind.
Butwearefew.
Youarejustlikeusineveryway,exceptthemostimportantway.
Youarelosingyourbattlewithin,andweareunabletoloseanybattle.
Thisiswhatarealcurseis.
Youhavenoideawhatarealcurseis.

IlluseWikipediasoifyougetemotionalandinsanewithemotionslikeyoudoanyway,
Youfocusitallonthem,becauseIdontgiveadamaboutyouremotionsandyourinsanitynowor
ever.
Sammasambuddhasattainbuddhahood,thendecidetoteachothersthetruththeyhavediscovered.
Paccekabuddhas,sometimescalled'silentBuddhas'aresimilartosammasambuddhasinthatthey
attainnirvanaandacquiremanyofthesamepowersasasammasambuddha,butareunabletoteach
whattheyhavediscovered.
Savakabuddhasattainnirvanaafterhearingtheteachingofasammasambuddha(directlyorindirectly).
Thediscipleofasammasambuddhaiscalledasavaka("hearer"or"follower")or,onceenlightened,an
arahant.

Buddhadescribednirvanaastheperfectpeaceofthestateofmindthatisfreefromcraving,angerand
otherafflictivestates

Iwillgothroughonesentenceatatimesoyoudonotgetlostandconfusedandemotionalandinsane
likeyouwillgetanyway.
Sammasambuddhasattainbuddhahood,thendecidetoteachothersthetruththeyhavediscovered.
Okay,firstscrewthatbigword,thenewwordisTalkingBuddha.
SoatalkingBuddhaattainsbuddhahood.
Buddhahoodiswhathumanbeingshadbeforeoneidiothumanbeingdecidedtobuildanirrigation
systemandthendecidedtobuildahouseneartheirrigationsystemhebuiltbecausehecouldntletgo
ofthatluxurytheirrigationsystemprovided.
Whenapersonsays,technologyissogreatitmakesourlifeeasier,theyarereallysaying,Ipreferhell
andconfusiontoperfectionandclarity.
IwishIwasntborninhellsothenIcouldhaveenjoyedheavenmore.InsteadIaccidentlydiscoveredI
wasinhellformylifeandnowIamdoomedtoteachalltheidiotswhothinktechnologyissome
greatthing,thattechnologyisacurse,becauseitsluxury.
Thedarknessisdisguisedaslight.
Emotionsseemgoodtoyou.Youmightevensuggestonewithoutemotionsisinsane.
Technologyseemsgoodtoyou,youmightevensuggestwithouttechnologywewouldbemiserable
andinhelllikeearlymanwas,Imeanearlymannotidiotmanafterabout3000BC.
Youdonotevenneedtolookthatupbecauseitdoesntmatter
Ihaveattemptedtoscareyouawayfromthesebooksfromthestart.
Ihaveattemptedtomakeyounotreadthesebooks.
IdontwantyoutoreadanythingIwriteorlistentoanythingIsay.
IwanttofailbecauseIamunabletofail.
IcannotfailsoIjustkeepattemptingtofail.
Iwouldbepleasedifnoneofthesebookssoldever.
Iwouldbepleasediftheypassedalawandsaid,ifwedonotlikewhatyoutypeyoucannotpublishit.
Ohhbutsomeidiotpassedalawaboutfreedomofspeech,soIaminhell.
TheycantstopmeandIcannotstopmyself.SoIamdoomedorblessed,whicheveryouprefer.

SointhisaccidentIbecameaTalkingBuddha,accidently.
Ididntchoose,Ididitbyaccident.Somesuggest,enlightenment,orblessed,orwhatever.
Idontknowwhathellanyofthatmeans.
MaybeIamhavingamomentofemotionsofegofromyourperspective,butinrealityIaminfinitely
notpleased.
IamnotgonnafailifIkeepspellcheckingsonospellchecking.IfyoucantreaditIdontgivearatsass
inhell.
SoIdecidedtoteachthetruthIhavelearned..whatacrockthatis.
Sohereisthetruth,blockemotionssoyouwontremaininhell,thenifeveryoneblocksemotions,I
wonthavetowatchyouinhell,soIwontbeinhell.
ButIalreadyknowyouwontdothat,maybeoneortwowillbutmostwontsoIhavetokeepteaching.
SoIremaininhellcauseIhavetowatchyouinhell,butinrealityIaminheavenwatchingyouinhell.
Iaminhellwatchingyouinhell,butIaminheaven.
SonowyoucanclearlyseeIambeyondhelpandbeyondinsanesonowyouneverneedtobuy
anotheroneofthesebookssoIcanproveIcanfailatsomething.
IfIcanjustfailoncethenIamnotBuddha.
Youdonotevenunderstandthatsentencedoyou.
Thisisanightmare.
Paccekabuddhas,sometimescalled'silentBuddhas'
DoyouperceiveIamasilentBuddha?
ThenIdonotneedtocoverthatone.
Savakabuddhasattainnirvanaafterhearingtheteachingofasammasambuddha(directlyorindirectly).
Okay,sothisistheBuddhayouwillbecomefromreadingthesebooks.
Ifyouboughtorreadanyofthesebooksyouwillbecomethiseventually.
Theharderyoutrynotto,thefasteryouwill,Theharderyoutryto,thesloweryouwill.
ScrewthatbignamethoseareOffspringBuddha.

SowehaveTalkingBuddhas,SilentBuddhasandOffspringBuddhas.
SoallthereligiousbeingsyoureadaboutwhereTalkingBuddhas.
IfyouknowaboutthemtheywereTalkingBuddhas.
Readbetweenthelinescautiously,carefullyanddonttrytohard.
SoIaccidentlybecameaTalkingBuddha.WRONG.
IamaTalkingBuddha,butIamBuddha.
Why?
HeisgenerallyseenbyBuddhistsastheSupremeBuddha(Sammsambuddha)ofourage.
Buddhatheoneyoureadaboutandknowabout,isthesupremeBuddhaofhisagebecausehewasnot
taughthowtobeaTalkingBuddhaoraSilentBuddhaoraOffspringBuddha.
Hetaughthimselfbyaccident,fromsittingunderatreeoffandonfor10yearsandtryingvarious
methods,hejustaccidentlybecameaTalkingBuddhaandsincehetaughthimself,heisknownas
BuddhaortheSupremeBuddha.
Thatiswhyallmymonkfriendswonttalktome,startingaboutaweekago.
Theyareunabletotalktome.
Theyaresilencedbymypresence,andIwanttotalktothem,buttheywontbecauseIencouragetheir
egoandemotionsbecausetheyareawareofwhatIam.
Ifigureditouttoday.FridaytheFEB13
th
2009.IbecameawareofthispersonalitychangeonOCT31
st

2008.
Iknowwhatthatmeans,youprobablydonotknowwhatthatmeans,Iwilltellyousomehowanyway,
sowhytry.
YouthinkthiswholestoryisinsanenotbelievabletotallymadandIaminsaneandnotbelievableand
totallymad
Ofcourseyoudohahahahahha
IamwhatIam.
YougoaheadandtrytoproveIamnotthat.Yougoaheadandtrytoproveitintoinfinity.
IwillworkwithyouandencourageyoutoprovethatIamnotthatintoinfinity.
ThenjustbeforeyougototallyinsaneyouwillbecomeanOffspringBuddha.
TalkingorSilent.
Youareunabletoprovearockisnotarock.
IwilldoasyousuggestandallthatwillhappenisyouwilldowhatIsuggest.
AsafriendinaBuddhistchatroomsuggested,manystilltalktometherebecausetheyarenot
enlightenedsotheywouldntknowwhoIamanyway.
JustlikeyoudontknowIamanyway.
Assumeeveryoneelseiscrazy.
ABuddhaIdoknowinthechatroomisaTalkingBuddhabuthehadaTalkingBuddhawhotaughthim.
SoheisanOffspringBuddhawhobecameaTalkingBuddha.
ThereasonBuddhistsfindteachersisbecauseaTalkingBuddhaisateacher.
ASilentBuddhaisnot,theycansuggestandcorrectandattempttoteach,buttheyarenot
contagiouslikeTalkingBuddhasandTalkingBuddhaarenothingcomparedtotheSupremeBuddha.
Itsallrelativetothisbattlewithin.
TheSupremeBuddhahadamuchmoredifficultbattlewithin.Sohisfruitsaresuperior.
TheOffspringBuddhatooktheeasybattle.
IavoidrelatingthistothePerfectBooks,itdoesnotmatter.
YouarereadingthenewPerfectBook.
Youareawareyouare.
Youareawitnesstohistory.
Youthoughtyourwholelife,whatwoulditbeliketomeetoneofthesespecialspiritualpeoplethat
comealongonceamillennium.
Well,Iamhereanditisgoingtobeok,now.Soyoucanletyouremotionsgo,now.
IamnotfightingwhatIalreadyknow,soyoushouldnotbefightingwhatyoualreadyknow.
Itneverhasbeenaboutme,ithasalwaysbeenaboutyou.
Idontliketoseeyouhurtinginyouremotionalstate,becauseyouareme.
Iamnotgoingtotakeadvantageofyoubecauseyouareme.
Iamnotgoingtoharmyoubecauseyouareme.
Iamnotgoingtosellyoubecauseyouarefree.
Iamfinallypleasedaftertoday.
Iwasstillstrugglingtryingtodenymyself.
Iwastryingtodenyveryhardanddenyineveryway.
Iwouldnotletgoofmydoubts.
Thatisallyouhavetodo.
Youdoubtemotionsarebad,justletgoofthatdoubt,itissafeoverhere.
Iamnotgoingtoleadyouastraybecauseyouareme.
Iamonlysuggestingyoudonothavetohurtanymore.
Youdonthavetochaseallthesematerialthingsanddesiresthatyouthinkwillsetyoufree.
Youhavealwaysbeenfree,youdonothavetotrytobefree,youarefree.
YoudonothavetoprovetomeyourworthbecauseIknowyourworth.
IamonlysuggestingIhaveaburdenanditisinfinite.
IamonlysuggestingIwillcarryyoursbecauseitwillnotmakemyinfiniteburdenanyheavier.
Iamawareyouhatemeforsayingthesewords.
IamonlysuggestingIcanonlybewhatIam.
IamwhatIambyaccident.
Iamonlysuggestingyouhavecompassiononmebecausemyburdenisinfinite.
IwishIcouldthrowitawaybutIcanonlybewhatIam.
Icanttakeitbackbecausetheyokeisattached.

Iremindmyself;
InreflectionIunderstandIjusteliminatedthepossibilityIwouldsuggestIamGodbecauseIamjust
merelyBuddha.
ThatwouldbediscomfortingforonetogoaroundthinkingoneisGodwhentheyaremerelyBuddha.
Oneshouldbecomfortedinplayingasillyvideogamefartomuchtheydidnotaccidentlyplayasilly
videofar,fartomuch,becausethatmayresultinonethinkingtheyareGodinsteadofjustthinking
theyaremerelyBuddha.
Oneshouldbecomfortedthatoneplayedavideogamefartomuchinsteadoffartolittlebecause,far
tolittle,mightleaveonethinkingtheyareGodinsteadofthemorereasonablethought,theyare
simplymerelyBuddha,asopposedtoGod.
Oneshouldbepleasedtheyplayedthatvideogamejusttherightamounttheydidnotcomeawayby
thinkingtheyareGodbyplayingfartolittle,orcomeaawaythinkingtheyareGodbyplayingfarto
much,butoneplayedexactlyrightproperamounttocomeawaywithmerelythinkingtheyaresimply
merelyBuddha.
Outofdarknesscomeslight.
Outofsanitycomesinsanity.
Outofthemostworthlessofallcomesthemostworthlessofall.
Outofsomethingcomesnothing.
Outofburdens,infiniteburdensarerevealed.
Outofinfiniteburdens,infiniteblessingsarerevealed.
Outofimperfections,perfectionisrevealed.
Outofimperfectexistencecomesperfectnonexistence.
Thereisnowayforonetogobutthewaytheyaregoing.
Thereisnowaybutsideways.
Ifoneletsgowhentheywantto,theywillletgomuchsooner.
Arroganceisheavierthanhumility.
Outofemotioncomesconfusion.

Feb14
th
20094:25PmEST

Everythingisperfect.
Nothingisperfect.
Everythingisperfectbecausenothingisperfect.
Iremindself;Donttrysohard.

Perfection:perfect.
Perfect:Perfectideal.
Sane:Perfectderangementoftheperfectmind.
Insane:Perfectsoundnessofperfectmind.
Accident:Aperfecteffectorperfecteventintheperfectphysicalworld.
Goodness:Perfect.
Evil:Perfect.
Human:Perfect.
God:Perfect.
Holiness:Perfection.
Ungodliness:Perfect.
War:Perfect.
Death:perfect
Life:perfect.
ManKind:Perfection.
Religion:Perfect.
Peace:Perfect
Mistake:perfect
Islam:Perfect.
Judaism:Perfect.
Christianity:perfect.
You:Perfect.
Us:Perfect.
Buddha:Perfect.

Perfectexplanation.
Whyarentyouperfect?
Perfectanswer.
Perhaps.
Iamunabletoarguewithperfection.
Perhapsifoneisshelteredtheywillbeunabletolearntheirlesson.

Attempt

Asharpbodylosesitsedge,asharpmindistheedge.

Feb14
th
200911:32PM
Itisimpossibleforonetojustunderstandtheyareinhell.
Thatiswhatthenatureofhellis.
Ifonecouldjustseetheyareinhelleasilytheywouldjustlookfortheexitdoor.

Gen4:7Ifthoudoestwell(BLOCKEMOTIONSTURNTHEOTHERCHEEK),shallthounotbe
accepted(SEEPERFECTIONANDSEEHEAVENALLAROUNDTHEM)?andifthoudoestnotwell(DOES
NOTBLOCKEMOTIONSANDDOESNOTTURNTHEOTHERCHEEK),sinliethatthedoor(OFHELL).
Anduntotheeshallbehisdesire(EMOTIONS),andthoushalt(REMAININHELL)ruleoverhim.

IwillbeatyouintoinfinitysoyoumightaswellgiveupbecauseIwillnevergiveuponyou.
Iwillremindyouwhenthesentencesstarttrying.
Sotheonlywayapersoninhellcanunderstandtheyareinhellisbyaccident.
Buddhaaccidentlydiscoveredweareinhellafterhesatunderatreeformanyyearsanddidsome
otherstuff,thenhe(FOUNDTHETRUTH)andstartedsharingitwithothers.
IdonotknowenoughabouttheotherslikeJesusandAbrahamandMosesandElijahandonandon
andon,buttheyallAccidentlydiscovered(THETRUTH)aswell.
IknowhowIACCIDENTLYdiscoveredthetruthandyouknowhowIaccidentlydiscoveredthetruth.
AndIknowhowyoucanfindtheexitdoor,causeIfigureditout.
Youarereadingthekeyoutofhell.
Iamnottalkingmoviecrap,bullcraphell,Iamtalkingrealhell.Ifyouhaveasenseoftimeyouknow
youareinhell.Ifyoudonotseeeverythingasperfect,youareinhell.Ifyougetemotionalaboutany
ofthesebooksIhavewrittenyouareinhell.Ifyouansweryestoanyofthosethreesignposts,youare
inhell.

Iamgoingtoneedabiggerboat.

FEB14
th
11:46PM

AclimberwasatthefootofMountEverest.Theyremindedtheirself,Iwillneverbeabletoscalethat
mountain.
AnotherclimberwasatthefootofMountEverestandremindedtheirself,Whatmountain?,ontheir
waydowntheotherside.

Exo12:23FortheLORD(Onewhohadanaccidentandsawtheywereinhell)willpassthroughto
smitetheEgyptians(Emotions);andwhenhe(Theonewhohadanaccidentandsawtheywereinhell)
seeththeblooduponthelintel(ahorizontalarchitecturalmembersupportingtheweightabovean
opening,asawindoworadoor.IETHEDOORTOHELL),
7
andonthetwosideposts,theLORD(THEONE
WHOHADANACCIDENTANDSAWTHEYWEREINHELL)willpassoverthedoor(WILLSEETHEDOOR
EXITTOHELL),andwillnotsuffer(BUDDHASAIDIFONEAVOIDSEGOONEAVOIDSANGERAND
BITTERNESSIEEMOTIONSANDAVOIDSSUFFERING(HELL))thedestroyer(EMOTIONS)tocomeinunto
yourhouses(WRITEBOOKAFTERBOOKUNTILTHEONLYBOOKTHEREWILLBEARETHESEBOOKSAND
YOUWILLHAVETOREADONNEEVENTUALLY)tosmiteyou(TOCLAMLYSUGGESTIFYOUBLOCKYOUR
EMOTIONSYOUWILLCHANGEYOURGAMMAWAVESSOYOUSEEHEAVENANDPERFECTIONINSTEAD
OFHELLANDSUFFERING).

Youstandnochance,soyoujustgiveupemotionsbecauseyoushouldgiveupemotions.
Iwillremindyouwhenmyfingershavestartedtrying.
Youareunabletobuildabigenoughboat.

Feb15
th
12:022009

Exo29:4AndAaronandhissonsthoushaltbringuntotheDOOR(EXITOUTOFHELL)thetabernacleof
thecongregation(THATSYOU,THEONESWHOAREINHELL),andshaltwashthemwithwater.(THE
WATERISWHATIAMGOINGTODROWNEDYOUININTOINFINITLEY,GRABYOURSNORKELS)
IamgoingtodrownedyouinthewaterbecauseyoucantholdyourbreathinfinitelylikeIcan.
IambeatingthehelloutofyouandIamseeingwhatstuck,andIamstartingagain,atthesametime.
Whataperfectblessingandperfectideafreedomofspeechis.
IcansaywhateverIwantsoyouareinforsomeserioushurtunlessyouletgoofemotions,Iamnot
waitingforyouranswerbecauseIamnotconcernedwithyouranswer.
IprefertojustbeatthehelloutofonesoIdonthavetothink.

Feb15200912:14AM
PERFECTQuran152942
29."So,whenIhavefashionedhimcompletelyandbreathedintohim(Adam)(ONEWHOHADAN
ACCIDENTANDDISCOVEREWDTHEYWEREINHELLWITHEMOTIONS)thesoulwhichIcreatedforhim,
thenfall(you)(THATSYOUYOUSAYINGWOWHOWCANTHISACCIDENTGUYKNOWALLTHISSTUUF
HEKNOWS)downprostrating(THATMEANSYOURGONNALETGOOFYOUREMOTIONSBYTURNING
YOURCHEEK)yourselvesuntohim(THISISMEAGAINANDYOURGONNADOWHATISAYBECAUSEI
AMNOTGONNASTOPWHETHERYOUDOITORNOTCAUSEIAMNOTCERNCEREDIFYOUDOITOR
NOT)."
30.So,theangelsprostratedthemselves,allofthemtogether.(SOTHEONEWHOSGETITWILL
TURNTHEIRCHEEKANDAVOIDTHEIREMOTIONS)
31.ExceptIblis(Satan)(YEAHTHATSYOUTHEONESWHODONOTBLOCKTHEIREMOTIONSCAUSE
YOUDONOTDOASSOMANYACCIDENTVICTIMSHAVESUGGESTED,BLOCKYOUREMOTIONSSOYOU
SEECLEARLY),herefusedtobeamongtheprostrators(YEAHYOURGONNACOMEUPWITHYOUR
INSANITYREASONSWHYYOUSHOULDNOTBLOCKYOUREMOTIONS,THATSWHYILLJUSTKEEP
PUBLISHINGUNTILALLYOUSEEARETHESEWORDSDAYANDNIGHTINTOINFINITY,SOGIVEUP,YOU
HAVENOCHANCE,ITSTOLATEFORYOUTOREGOURP,YOUALREADYLOST,YOUCANTHINKTHE
INTERTNETANDTHESELFPUBLISHINGCONCEPT.)
32.(Allah)(OneWHOHADANACCIDENTANDSAWTHEEXITTOHELL)said:"OIblis(Satan)(THATS
YOUTHEONEWITHEMOTIONSWHODOESNOTBLOCKEMOTIONS)!Whatisyourreasonfornotbeing
amongtheprostrators?(BECAUSEEMOTIONSAREREQUIREDTOBEALIVEANDEMOTIONSARE
NEEDEDANDLOVEISNEEDEDCAUSELOVEISALLYOUNEED.THATSYOURREASON)"
33.[Iblis(Satan)]said:"Iamnottheonetoprostratemyselftoahumanbeing(THATSRIGHTYOUDO
NOTDOASISUGGEST,IAMAHUMANBEINGANDYOURINYOUREMOTIONALSTATEAREAN
ABOMINATIONTOMANKINDANDTOHUMANS),whomYoucreatedfromsoundingclayofaltered
blacksmoothmud.(THISMEANSWHOMYOUCERATEDBYACCIDENTORWHOWASAWAREOFHELL
BYACCIDENT)"

Iwillremindyouwhenmykeyboardstartstrying.
NowonderIdontcarewhatyouthink.
After2000yearsIllshiftthegears.

Feb15200912:24
Mat25:10Andwhiletheywenttobuy(DESIRE/EMOTIONS/IWANTTOBUYTHATNICESHINYCAR),the
bridegroomcame(YEAHTHATSMEAGAIN);andtheythatwereready(BLOCKEDTHEIREMOTIONS)
wentinwithhim(ME)tothemarriage(THEPERFECTTIMELESSSTATEOFMIND):andtheDOOR(DOOR
TOHELLYOUCANTFINDBECAUSEYOUDONOTTHINKYOURAREINHELL,BUTISEEITANDTELLYOU
HOWTOGETOUTWITHEVERYCHANCEIGET)wasshut9YOURTRAPPEDINHELLCAUSEYOUCANT
FINDTHEEXITDOORBECAUSEYOUCANTSEEPROPERLYCAUSEYOUHAVEEMOTIONSANDHAVEA
SENSEOFTIME.)

IdontneedtocontrolwhatImastered.

IdontneedtomasterwhatIcontrol.

Feb15200912:32AM
AnyBookwilldo.
Religionisanicewayofsaying,yourmindisinhellsohereishowtogetoutofthehellyourmindisin.
WhenIstarttryingIllstarttrying.
Mar1:33Andallthecitywasgatheredtogetheratthedoor.
Thisisinsidehumor.
Itisquitehumorous.InfactIampleasedwiththeextremebeyondbeliefhumorinthestatement.
Thisisaninsidejoketothenextonewhoaccidentlydetectedtheywereinhell.
Soonecouldsaythisjokewasabout2000yearsinthemaking.
Illrepeatitbecauseitsohumorousitisworthrepeating.
Mar1:33Andallthecitywasgatheredtogetheratthedoor.
ANDALLTHEWORLDWASGATHEREDTOGETHERATTHEEXITDOOROFHELLANDNOTONEPERSON
SAWIT.
ANDALLTHEWORLDWASGATHEREDTOGETHERHUDDLINGRIGHTNEXTTOTHEEXITDOORFROM
THEIRHELLANDNOTONEOFTHEMSAWTHEEXITDOORFROMTHEIRHELL.
IlltranslatethisjokebecauseItisbeyondfunny.
ALLTHEWORLDWASSOBLIND,STUPID,RETARDED,BEYONDUNDERSTANDING,THEYWERE
GATHEAREDONATRAPDOORTHATLEADTHEMOUTOFHELL,ANDNONEOFTHEMTRIPPEDIT,SO
THEYWERESTUCK.

Iftheauthorwouldhavesaid,Icannotbelievehowstupidpeopleare,itwouldnothavegoneover
verywell,butIamunabletocareandIhavefreedomofspeechonmyside.
ICANNOTBELIEVEHOWSTUPIDPEOPLEAREINTHISWORLD.
Wait
ICANBELIVEHOWSTUPIDPEOPLEAREINTHISWORLD.
Wait.
IKNOWWHYPEOPLEINTHISWORLDARESOSTUPID.
Wait.
IKNOWWHYPEOPLEINTHISWORLDARESOSTUPIDANDIHAVETOLDTHEMWHYTHEYARESO
STUPIDANDTHEYSTILLSITTHEREWONDERINGWHATISAID.
Thehitsjustkeeponcoming.

Icannotgetyououtofhell.
Icanhumblysuggesthowyoucangetoutofmindfulhellyouarein.

YesHelliswithinbecausethekingdomiswithin.

Soofyouaregettingit.

Thethingis,Iammindfulnottosettle.
Iammindfulmanyarenotgonnagetit.
So,thatsjustfine,IhavealleternitytopublishbooksandIcancrankoneoutinabout7days.
AndthatsifIdonttry.
YouwillknowifIstarttrying.

Feb15
th
200912:45AM
Iappreciatethehumorwitheachpassingwhatever
Idontneedanyonetotellmethetruth,Iamthetruth.

Iamtheway(outofhellbecauseIaccidentlyfoundthewayoutofhellbyaccidentlyblockingmy
emotions)thetruth(onhowtogetoutofhellyourmindisinwhichistoblockyouremotions)andthe
light(thewriterwhoistellingyouemotionalabominationshowtogetoutofhellyourmindisin).
YoubetterlistencarefullytowhoIam.
Youdontneedtotalk,orthinkorquestion.Youonlyneedtolisten,thatisyourjob,andyouhaveno
otherjobuntilIsuggestyouhaveanotherjob.Dontquestionthat,dontthinkaboutthatanddont
talkaboutthat,justlisten.
Mat28:2And,behold,therewasagreatearthquake(YEAHIAMTHATEARTHQUAKE):fortheangelof
theLorddescendedfromheaven(ACCIDENTLYDISCOVEREDTHEIRMINDWASINHELLANDAFTERTHE
ACCIDENTTHEIRMINDWASOUTOFHELLANDINHEAVEN,SONOWIHAVETOGOBACKTOHELLSOI
CANTALKTOYOUANDTELLYOUHOWTOGETYOURMINDOUTOFHELL,IHAVENOCHOICESOITIS
SO),andcameandrolledbackthestonefromthedoor(ANDLEARNEDAFTERTHEACCIDENTHOWTO
GETOUTOFHELLTHROUGHHELLSEXITDOORYOUJUSTNEEDTOBLOCKEMOTIONSLIKEANGER
MANAGMENTBUTDOITWITHEVERYEMOTION),andsatuponit(THISMEANSIOWNEVERYTHING
CAUSEIFOUNDAWAYOUTSOIAMNOLONGERATTHEMERCYOFHELL,IASSENDEDHELLSOIOWN
EVERYTHING,IAMTHEOWNER,IMASTEREDHELLANDNOWIOWNIT).
Dontyoustarttolikemeanddontyoustarttohateme,BLOCKTHOSEEMOTIONS.

SunFeb15
th
200912:58AM
IwillremindyouifIstarttrying,trying,tostarttrying.
Mar11:4Andtheywenttheirway,andfound
7
thecolttiedbythedoorwithoutinaplacewhere
twowaysmet;andtheyloosehim.
Thisisanicetosay,Iamloose,Iloosedtheword,andthewordispublishedandtheworldhasaccess
tothepublishedwordandsothewordhasalreadywon.

Retranslation,foryourbenefit.
IamarenegadecoltbecauseIaccidentlyfoundthewaytoescapehell.
Iwasinhell(doortohell,doorofhell)byplayingavideogamewaytomuchIsilencedmyegoand
emotionssomuchorsocompletely,IdiscoveredbecauseIadjustedmygammawaveswhichcontrol
perception,WOWthereisnotimeandthereisnohellthereisonlyperfectionandheaven.
EVERYTHINGisperfectjustsomeoftheperfectbeingsmindsareinhellorMindsareinhellcausethey
haveway,way,way,way,tomuchemotions,somuchemotionstheythinkthereistime.
Ifyousilencedyouremotionsandegonotatonjustsome.Threetosixmonthsjusttryit,youwont
fail,youjusthavetotry,youdontevenhavetryhard,youjusthavetotry.
Iwillremindyouwhenmyfingersstarttrying,tostarttrying,tostarttrying,totry.
Ithasneverbeenaboutcusswordsordothisritualonthisdayordothiscertainstupidityonthisday
Itssimply,blockyourdamemotionsandegoforafewmonthsandyouwillseewhereyouare
Thatisameaningoflife,religion,God,purpose,understanding,science,philosophypoetry,music.
IwillremindyouifIstarttrying,tostarttrying,tostarttrying,totry,ifIremember.

SunFeb15
th
20091:17am
Youoweme,everythingyouhave,everythingyouwilleverhave,everythingyouroffspringhas,
everythingtheywilleverhave,andeverythinganyonerelatedtoyouwilleverhave,intoinfinity.
Idonotwantit,Idonotneedit,IfoundoutwhatItellyou,byaccident.
Soweareeven,becauseIsayweareeven.
Soweareeven.

SunFeb15
th
20091:26AM
Youremotionalisdoomed.Itisdoomedsoyouneedtogetoffthatsinkingshipbecausethatshipis
sinking.
IfIremindmyselftostarttrying,Iwillremindyourself,myselfhasstartedtoconsider,startingto
consider,startingtostartconsidering,startingtotry.
I(Todd)amtheway(Iknowthewaytoescapethehellyourmindisin)thetruth(Thetruthisyouhave
toblockyouremotionsforabout3months,similartoangermanagement)andthelight(Toddisthe
lightbecauseheaccidentlyfoundthisoutandheiswritingtheworldtotellthem)
Toddisnothocuspocus,heisjustanormalguywhoaccidentlyfoundoutthemostworldchanging
thingeverdiscoveredinthelast1000+years.
Donotthink.Andifyoudothink,dontthinkthatToddisanythingbutwhathejustsaidheis.
ToddrhymeswithGodbutthatispurelyaccidental..

Ifyouthinkyouhaveaboat,Iunderstanditssinking.

SunFeb1520091:34AM
Ifyouwanttime,Igotplentyofit.
IfIstartedlying,youwouldthinkImsane,soIllavoidsanity.
Luk11:7Andhefromwithinshallanswerandsay,Troublemenot:thedoorisnowshut,andmy
childrenarewithmeinbed;Icannotriseandgivethee.
Soyouneedtothinkaboutthis.Iamallowingyoutothink.Youareallowedtothinkaboutthis.
IfIamwrongthenthespiritorpracticeorunderstandingofthePerfectBooksofIslamandChristianity
andJudaismisright.
IfIamright,thosethreereligionsaretotallywrongintheirunderstanding,practiceandspiritofthe
PerfectBooks.
Soyouhaveonethingtothinkabout.ONETHINGONLY.
SOyouhaveonethingtothinkaboutandtherestislistening.
Illrepeatthisonecauseitsaninsidejokeforme.
Luk11:7Andhefromwithinshallanswerandsay,Troublemenot:thedoorisnowshut,andmy
childrenarewithmeinbed;Icannotriseandgivethee.
Troublemenot
Thatanicewayofsaying,Idontcarewhatyouthink.
Thatsreallysaying,IblockedmyemotionssomuchIamunabletocareorworryorcareabout
whatyousayorwhatyouthinkoryourinsultstomeoryourjudgmentsofme
Ifonehasnoemotionstheyareimmunetoallthatcrap.
SOyoucanphysicallykillme,butIdontfear,soIdontfeardeath,andsincemymindisntinhell,I
wontspirituallydie.
Soyoucansuemefinanciallyforsomething,butIamsowhateverIwillturnthetablesonyouand
youwilllose.
Soyoucantwin
Youhavenooptions.
Religiously,youcantsay,WellhetranslatesthePerfectBible,ThePerfectTorah,ThePerfectQuran
flawlessly,buthedoesntlikethewaywetranslatethemsoheisbad.

Sonowyourthinking,IfheisTranslatingallofthePERFECTBooksflawlessly,thenwhatonearthhave
webeendoing.
Yourcatchingon.
Ifyoureareligiouspersonandyouwishtodiscussanythinginthisworldwithme,contactme.
Iwillsitdownintoinfinitywithanyoneanddiscussanythingnomatterwhatitis.
Donotthink.DonotthinkIcant.Donotthink.DonotthinkIwont.
Youonlyhaveonethingtothinkabout.Therestislistening.
Thedoorisnowshut..Whichmeansyourinhellbecauseyoudidntturntheothercheeklikehe
suggested.
Thedoorisshut,meansyouareinhell.
Thedoorisshutnow,meansyouareinhellnow.
YouknowhowtogetoutNOWsoyoudonthavetobeinhellTOMORROW.
Perceptionisimportant.
IfIhaveadreamImightstarttotryIwillremindyouIhadadreamImightstarttotry,butthatdoesnt
meanIamgoingtostarttotry.

SunFeb151:56AM
Onwithshow,thisisit.
Mar16:3Andtheysaidamongthemselves,Whoshallrollusawaythestonefromthedoorofthe
sepulchre?
IampleasedwithallofthesePERFECTBooks,TheyareALLPERFECT.
IfyouthinktheyarenotallPERFECTitisYOURFAULT.TheBooksareALLFRICKINPERFECT.
IDONOTCAREIFYOUAREGODOFRELIGION,IWILLSPITYOUOUTASIHAVEJUSTDONE.
THETHREEBOOKSAREPERFECTANDYOUAREIMPREFECTTOSUGGESTANYOFTHEMARENOT.YOU
AREABLASPHOMYIFYOUEVERSUGGESTTHATEVERAGIAN.
NowIwillgobacktonottryingtotry.
Iwillrepeatthisonebecauseitisaninsidejokeformeandforyou.
Mar16:3Andtheysaidamongthemselves,Whoshallrollusawaythestonefromthe
doorofthesepulcher?
Iwillgorealslowinthisquestion.Sonowyouhaveachancetothink.Donotthinktohard.Donot
thinktomuch.Justslightlythink.
Youcannotpossiblybesostupidyoucantanswerthissinglequestion.
Whoshallrollusawaythestonefromthedoor(ofHELL)?
Iwillgiveyouahint,hisnamerhymeswithclod,god,bod,rod,odd,mod.
Keepyouranswertoyourselfforyourownsafety.
Okay.Youcantthinkanymore.Allthinkingprivilegesarerevoked.Justlisten.

SunFeb15
th
2:13AM
Illmixitupalittle,butdontstartthinking,anddontstartthinkingIamgoingtotrytomixitup.
IcouldnthavesaidthisbetterifIdidnttry.
Gen18:1AndtheLORDappeareduntohimintheplainsofMamre:andhesatinthetentdoorin
theheatoftheday;
DOOR=HELL=Theemotionalstateyourmindisin.
HEATdenotesHELL.
THEDOORISTHEEXITDOORFROMHELLorTHEEMOTIONALSTATEYOURMINDISIN.THEDOORIN
HELLISHOTBECAUSEINHELLTHEREISHEATANDHEATDENOTESANGERANDBITTERNESSANDHATE
ANDGREEDANDthe7deadlysins.
Youdonothavepermissiontothink.IdontcarewhatyouthinkandifIdontcarewhatyouthink,you
arenotallowedtothink.Listen,becauseyouareunabletothinkproperly.
Theuniversecannotholdthesizeoftheboatyouneed.
AndtheLORDappeareduntohimintheplainsofMamre:andhesatinthetentdoor
Iamnotsurewhothelordappearedunto.IamnotevengonnabotherlookingitupcauseI
justsearchedfordoorandallthesepassagescameup.
LORDissomeonewhoaccidentlydiscoveredtheexitfromhellandisunnamed.
Sothisbeingwalkeduptothisguywhoevertheguyis,andthatguybyhangingaroundthat
talkingBuddhaalsodiscoveredtheexitfromhell
Sonowyousee,IamTalking.Andyouaregonnafindtheexitfromhell.
Thisguyissaying.ImetatalkingBuddhaandthistalkingBuddhacanpersuadequite
effectively,sotospeak.
Donotthink.Donotgetemotional.Thetruthwillsetyoufree.

Thetruthis,Blockyouremotionsorturntheothercheekorthemeekshallinheritthe
earthandinabout3monthsorsoitwillhappen,andthenyoucanstartlivinginheavenand
heavenissimplyonewhoblockedtheiremotionsandescapedthehellintheirmindcausedby
emotions.
Yeahsomeofyouarepissedoff,butthatswhatIhavebeensayingthiswholedamtime.

SunFeb15
th
20092:32am
Ifyouarenotdrowning,itisbecauseIhaventstarted.
Gen18:2Andheliftuphiseyesandlooked,and,lo,threemenstoodbyhim:andwhenhesaw
them,herantomeetthemfromthetentdoor,andbowedhimselftowardtheground,
HeLiftuphiseyes=heconditionedawayhisemotionssohecouldsee
Threemen=threeBuddhaswhoconditionedawaytheiremotions.
Itstofoggytosuggestexactlywhotheyare,butthefactthemanbowedtothem,suggeststhatman
wasaOffspringBuddhacausehesawtheDOORbuthemayhavebeenaSilentBuddha.
SOhewastaughtbytheseBuddhaandhebecameaBuddhabutwasanOffspringBuddha,andthe
kindofOffspringBuddhahebecamewasaSilentBuddha.
Realityis,IamBuddha,Noonetaughtme,Iaccidently,orfoughttherealhardfight,whichmeansI
hadtoearnit,noonejusttoldme,Ihadtoescapehellalone.Butifyouknowmyhistory,youwill
understandhowIdidit.
Thegoodnewsis,atthismoment,IhaveonlyconvertedonepersontoaBuddhabylisteningtomy
wordstherearemanyinthemakingandyouareoneofthem.
HebecameanoffSpringBuddhaandthekindofBuddhaheis,isaTalkingBuddha,BUTheisaSilenced
Buddhawhenheisaroundme.
SothisguyinthispassagemayhavebeenaTalkingBuddha,butnotinthepresenceofthethree
Buddhawhowerethere,sobowing,meanshewasSilentintheirpresence.
Remindyourself,atthisstageofthereading,Theauthorsoundsarrogantinordertoexciteyour
emotionssoyoucanblockthem.
Theauthordoesthissoyouwillhaveemotionstoblockasyoureadthesewords.
Thatiswhatthisisallabout,excitingyouremotionssoyoucanblockthem,andyougettolearnabout
realityintheprocess.
Itslikethis,thatguybecameaBuddhabycommunicatingwithme,andnowhesaysthingslike,CanI
pleaseaskyouaquestion,andIamnotlikethat,Iseeeveryoneasequals,butheisgratefuland
mindfulofwhatIdidforhim,soheisbeinghumbleandrightlyso,andsoIamhumbledalsothathe
wouldbehumbledtoonelikeme.Itsspookythiswholething.Ithasamindofitsown,ummthats
whythe,donttrytoohard,causeitdoesitsownthing.
Ifyoucheatandstartthinkingonyourown,youthinkaboutthis.
Arethesewordschangingyou,oristheonetypingthewordschangingyou?
SunFeb1520092:45AM
Youhavegottobekiddingme.
Gen18:10Andhesaid,Iwillcertainlyreturnuntotheeaccordingtothetimeoflife;and,lo,Sarah
thywifeshallhaveason.AndSarahhearditinthetentdoor,whichwasbehindhim.
Thisisverymasked.ItsveryobviousifyoucanhearthewordANDunderstandthewordbutifyou
cant,youwillspendeternitytryingtofigureoutwhatthisonemeans,andifyoucanunderstandit,it
takesaboutnoseconds.
Thereasontheydonottalkaboutwomeninreligionoften,isbecausewomenarefarsuperiortomen.
Theytalkaboutmenbecausemenareliketheretardedchildthatneedthemostattention.
YesIammale,butthatisstillthetruth.
Somehavemarriedmanywomenbecausesomeareverywisetowanttosurroundtheirselfwiththe
superiorgenderoftherace.
Thisisanopportunityforme,toshowyou,ifyouarereligious,youhavenoideawhatyourdoing,as
farastranslatingthePerfectWords.
WhywouldwomenmakesuchGOODBuddhas?Womenarenaturallylowonemotions.Iguesslow
arrogancewouldbeaproperwaytolookatit.
Letssay,pushingababyoutofyourwombisahumblingexperiencetosaytheleast,Icanonly
imaginehowhumbledIwouldbeafterthatexperience.
Womendontgotobarstogetinfightsliketheidiotsofthespeciesdo.Thatsaproperwaytolookat
it.
Gen18:10Andhesaid,Iwillcertainlyreturnuntotheeaccordingtothetimeoflife;and,lo,Sarahthy
wifeshallhaveason.AndSarahhearditinthetentdoor,whichwasbehindhim.
Iwillcertainlyreturnuntotheeaccordingtothetimeoflife=
THEREISNOTIMEINLIFE
THEREISONLYTIMEINDEATH
THEREISNOTIMEINHEAVEN
THEREISONLYTIMEINHELL

ONEWITHASENCEOFTIME;MINDISINHELL
ONEWITHNOSENCEOFTIME;MINDISINHEAVEN
IFYOUHAVENOSENSEOFTIME,youknowwhereyouaremindfully.
Donotthink,DOnotgetupset(blockemotions),youdonothavetimeto.
Sarahthywifeshallhaveason.=
SarahbecameanOffspringBuddha,andthekindofBuddhashebecameisaTalkingBuddhaandshe
convertedortaughtortoldanotherpersonmindfullyinhellandthatpersonbecameanOffspring
BuddhaofSarah.
TheyknewSarahwasgoingtohaveason,becausewhoevershewasworkingonwasmale,and,asa
TalkingBuddha,oneknowswhenanothertheyareworkingoniscomingalongandoncethe
comingalonghappens,itisirreversible.
Ifyouhavereadthisfarintothisbook,Ihavenewsforyou,Yourecomingalong.
Itdoesntmatterwhoyouare,yourcomingalong,yourdecisionmakingprocesshasalreadymakeits
decision.Donttrytohard,itisnotthathard.
AndSarahhearditinthetentdoor,whichwasbehindhim.=
Youknowwhyyouhaveneverheardthistranslationofthispassageoranyofthesepassagesproperly.
Iknowwhy.
SoTalkingBuddhaSarahheardit,knewitcauseshewasaBuddha,inthetentdoor,wellifyouknow
thereisadoor(exitfromhell)youhaveconditionedyouremotionsaway.
Ifyoudonotknowyouareinhell(conditionedyouremotionsaway)thenyoudonotknowthereisan
exittohell.SarahisbythedoorsoSarahknowsthereisadoor.
Whichwasbehindhim.
ThoseperiodsrepresenthowpleasedIamwiththislaststatement.
Myhellisbehindme,becauseoftheaccident.
Iamnolongermindfullyinhell,Iammindfullyinheaven,thatswhyIcantranslateallthePerfect
booksproperly.IamwritingthisbookbecauseIcandothingsproperly,becauseIaccidently
conditionedmyemotionsaway.

DoyouthinkIaminsaneatthisstageofthebookorsaneatthisstageofthebook?

Onceonedecomposestheyareabletocompose.

SunFeb15
th
20093:12AM
PerfectQuran12:25
25.Andtheybothracedtothedoor,andshetorehisshirtfromtheback,andtheyfoundher
husbandatthedoor.
Sobothofthesepeople,conditionedtheiremotionsaway,sobothwereBuddhasandthisis
interesting.
Theoneinfronthadtheirshirttornfrombehind.Thissuggestsshe,ishisOffspringBuddha,andheis
theTalkingBuddhathatmovedheralong,andtheyfoundthehusbandatthedoor.
SoallthreewereBuddhasorconditionedtheirselfawayfromemotions,becausetheyallSAWthe
doororEXITfromHELL.
TheyRACED,suggeststheywerebothTalkingBuddhas.ASilentBuddhaissilent,soonlyatalking
Buddhaisraced,orTalksAlot,puttingitlightly.
AllIknowfromthisonesentenceistheHusbandisaBuddhabecausehefoundthedoorexitfrom
hell,andsoallthreefoundthedoorexitfromhell,becauseallthreeconditionedawayfromemotions
sotheycouldseethedoorexitfromhell.
Remindyourself,AllIamsayingis,tryslightlytostartblockingyouremotions.
Thatisnotagainstthelaw.
Theymakepeoplewithangerproblemsgotoangermanagement.
Soyoucandoitforfree.
Youjustdoitbybeingmindfultodoit.
Youhavenothingtolosetojusttrytotryit.
Youhaveeverythingtogainifyoutrytotryit.
Seehellisconfusionandconfusiondoesntthinkveryclearly.
Confusionhasweaknesses.
Theweaknessinhellis,Noonecaneversay,thisToddguywaswrongforsuggestingpeopleshouldnot
besoangryandbitterandmaybetrytocontroltheirangerandbitternessandhateandegoandlust
andgreed.

Ofcoursedonotkidyourself.

Love,happy,Fun,Pleasure,excitement,Cravings,Desire,wants,needs,thoseallgotoo,absolute.No
halfasscrapinthisworld,andthisismyworldnow,getusedtoitanddontgetjealousanddontget
angryanddontgetspitefulanddontgetarrogantanddontgethappyanddontgetenviousand
dontgetanything.Letitgo.
Whenyoumastertheworld,thenyougettowritebooksaboutmasteringtheworld,butnotuntil.
OnceyoubecomeanOffspringBuddha,aroundmeyouwillbeaSilentBuddhabutaroundothers
youwillbeaTalkingBuddha.
Itisrelevanttowhoyouarearound.

Feb15
th
20093:45Am
IhavedeterminedthisisthelasttranslationIwilldo,untilafterIrest.
Rev3:20Behold,Istandatthedoor,andknock:ifanymanhearmyvoice,andopenthedoor,Iwill
comeintohim,andwillsupwithhim,andhewithme.

(Todd,whohadanaccidentandfoundouthowtomindfullyescapehellbyblockingemotions)stands
atthe(exit)door(fromhell)andknock(getholdofthedocumentshewrotetosuggesthowyoucan
mindfullyescapehell)andifanyone(readsthedocumentstheywillunderstandwhattodoto
mindfullyescapehell)and(sees)the(exit)door(fromhell),(Toddmakeshisselfyourguideandwill
helpyouinanywayhecan)andwillbepleasedtoassociatewithyou,andyouwillbepleasedto
associatewithme.

SunFeb15
th
20094:37Am
Iamrested.Iwillcontinue.
Thereisonlyoneimportantaspecttobemindfulofrelatingtoonewithasenseoftimebeing
mindfullyinhell.
IfIammindfullyinhell,itisbecauseIhavenosenseoftime.
IfIammindfullyinhell,itisbecauseIhavenearlynoemotions.
Bothsymptomsarearesultoftheaccidentofplayingavideogamewaytoomuch.
Youdonothavealuxuryofknowingmeinpersonyet,soitperhapsisdifficultforyoutoknowfor
sure.
IfIammindfullyinhellandnotmindfullyinheaventheneverythingIsaywouldbeinsane.
Ifthisaccidentmademeinsane,thenIwouldnotbeabletositstillverylong.
Iwouldnotbeabletoconcentrateverylong.
Iwouldnotbeabletoformideasverywell.
Iwouldbeveryshallow.
Iwouldbeerratic.
Iwouldbeunpredictable.
Iwouldnotbeclever.
Iwouldbeobvious.
Iwouldbepredictable.
Iwouldbeirrational.
Iwouldshowweakness.
Iwouldbegforsympathy.
Iwouldmakenosense.
Iwouldbeinlalaland.
Iwouldbeparanoid.
Iwouldbeshy.
Iwouldbearrogant.
Iwouldbehostile.
Iwouldbeafraid.
Iwouldbeangry.
Iwouldbespiteful
Iwouldbejealous.
Iwouldhateothers.
Iwouldbescared.
Iwouldbeisolated.

IfIaminsanebecauseofthisaccident,thenIamfullyinsanebecauseIamsoinsaneIthinkthereisno
time.
IthinkIhavenearlynoemotions,reallynoemotions,butmaybeIhaveahintofthemfromtimeto
time,butIamnotbettingonit.
SothenIamagardenvarietyinsanepersonandyoucangolookupnosenseoftimeandnoemotions
andseewhatkindofinsanepersonIam.
Youcantdothat.Thereisnosuchthingasapersonwithnosenseoftimeandnoemotionswhois
insanebecauseinsanityiscausedbyemotions.
Ifoneputsanemotionalpersoninaroomandisolatesthem,thatpersonwillgoinsanebecausethose
wallswillstarttocloseinonthem.
IbetterbefullyinsanebecauseifIamnot99.9%oftheworldisfullyinsane.
Soyoubetterfigurethatoutswiftly.
IfIamnotfullyinsanefromthisaccidentitmeansIamfullysane.
IfIamfullysane,thenIwillchangeeverythingbecausethereisnowayafullyinsanepersoncanstop
me.

Ifyouarereadingthissentence,thatmeanseverythingischanged.
Thereisnocontestbecauseafullysanepersoncaneasilycomposeafullyinsaneperson.
Seethereisthisthingcalledfreedomofspeech,educationrelatingtolearninghowtoreadwords,
anddistributionrelatingtodistributingwords.
Thatisallafullysanepersonneedstochangeaworldfulloffullyinsanepeople.
Sothereisnocontest.
OhyeahandIhavefreedomandfreewillandthereforeIhavefreereign.
Kidinacandyshopisme.AndtheworldisfullofBullsinachinacabinet.
Ifoneputsapersonwithnosenseoftimeandnoemotions,inanisolationroom
Thatpersonwillponderthewallsoutofexistenceandwillbeunabletoperceivehowlongtheyarein
thatroom.
Iftheyarethereforathousandyearsitwillseemlikenotimeatall.
Theywillnotpanic,theywillnotbecomeparanoid,theywillnotbecomeafraid.
Theyareunableto.

Theysensenohungersoyoucantsay,youwontgetyourmealtodayofyoudontdoasIsay.
Theywonteatunlesstheyareremindedtoeat.
Theyhavenocravings.
Theymaystarvetodeathifnotfeedbuttheywonthavehungerpangs.
Theydonotdesiretobeviolent.
Theydonotdesiretobeintelligent.
Theydonotdesiretobeaccepted.
Theyponderinthepresentbutitsdifferentthanponderingaboutthefuture.
Theyliveinthemomentbutnotjustonceinawhile,100%ofthetime.
Theproblemis,theyarefullysaneandgodlike,comparedtothefullyinsane.
Thefullyinsanehavenodefenseagainstthem.
IfIaminsane,thenIaminmindfulhell,thenyouaresane,andinmindfulheaven.
IfIamsane,thenIaminmindfulheaven,thenyouareinsane,andinmindfulhell.
Thereisaproblemnow.IwillshowyoutheproblemandthenIwillshowyoutheanswerbecauseyou
donotseetheproblemandthusareunabletoknowtheanswer.
IfIaminmindfulheaven,thenIhavereignovermindfulhell.
Ifyouareinmindfulheaven,thenyouhavereignovermindfulhell.

IfIaminmindfulhell,thenheavenisfartoodeepformetoenterorunderstand.
Ifyouareinmindfulhell,thenmindfulheavenisfartoodeepforyoutoenterorunderstand.
Thatistheproblem.
IamnotconfusedbyonesinglesentenceIhavewritteninthisbookIhavepublished.
IamfullyawareIaminsomesortofprogression.Itskeepsgettingmoreso,soIamabletoerror.
Ithasbeenlessthanfourmonthssincetheaccident,soIamperhapsnotatfullcapacity.
IwrotethebookIhavepublished.
SO
IfyouareconfusedbyonesinglesentenceinthisbookIhavepublished,youareunabletounderstand
mindfulheavenbecauseyouareinmindfulhell.
Thatistheanswer.
Sobemindfulofwhatyouhavetodotofindtheexit.

SunFeb1520095:34AM
Sothedrowningis.
Pride,avarice,lust,anger,gluttony,envyandsloth:sometimesitfeelsasifBritainisinthegripof
thesevendeadlysins.Therearearrogantpoliticians,greedybankers,lecheroustelevision
presenters,furioustradeunionists,obesechildren,competitiveshoppersandanunderclassof
peoplewhodonotwork.
TIMESONLINE
SothisnewspaperissayingexactlywhatIamsayingbutIamgoingonestepfurtherandsaying,block
youremotionsfullyandunconditionallysoyouwilleliminateallthesesymptomsofemotions.
SowhatIamsayingistrue.Thispaperprovesit.SoIcannotbewrongandIcannotbefullyinsane.
BUT
Thereisahugeproblem.
Ihavenosenseoftimeandnoemotions.
Andyoudo,andsodidIbeforetheaccident.
IfIamtellingthetruththenIamnotarrogant.
IfyouthinkIamarrogantitisbecauseyouhaveemotionsandifyouhaveemotionsitisbecauseyou
haveasenseoftime.
Itisallonepackage.
Emotionsareasymptomofasenseoftimeandasenseoftimeisasymptomofemotions.
Whatstakingsolong?
Iaminahurry.
Yourtakingtolong.
Iamlate.
IthinkIamearly.
Ineedtoeatsomethingfast,Imhungry.
Icantwaittilltomorrow.
Iwasupallnightworryingaboutyou.
Youworrymesick.
Icanttakemuchmoreofthis.
Onemoretime,andyouareout.
IfIhavetotellyouonemoretime.
Saythatagain,Idareyou.
Oneisasymptomoftheother.
Ihavetodumbmyselfdownandusestupiditytocommunicatewithyou.
Ihavetoinfinitelydumbmyselfdown.
ThatisasymptomofwhereyouareatandthatisasymptomofwhereIamat,mindfully.
Sothedrowningis.

Feb15
th
20095:50AM
Theworldeconomyiscollapsing.
Peopleusetheinternet.
Theydoingthingsandtheyliketodothemandthentheyfindotherthingstodoontheinternet.
Onethingleadstoanotheruntilapersonspendsmostoftheirtimeontheinternet,freetime.
Mosthavehomecomputers.
Sotheybecomeawaretheyaresittinginoneroomusingtheinternetandthentheybecomeaware
theyusethebathroom,thekitchenandtheroomwherethecomputerisandthebedroom.
Thentheybecomeaware,theydonotneedahugehouse,becausetheyonlyreallyusefourrooms.

Thatiswhyrealestateisdone.
Thatiswhymortgagebrokersaredone.
Thatiswhybankswhooffermortgagesaredone.

Peopledriveless,theywatchmoviesonlineorontheircomputer.
Theylistentomusiconlinesotheydontreallyneedtogotoaconcert.
Theyratherstayhomeonlinebecausetheyarepleasedwiththeinformationtheinternetprovides.
Theyareconditioningawayfromdesiresandseekingknowledgebywayofcuriosity.
Theyarebecomingaware,theirmindismoreinterestingthanmaterialthings.Learningismore
interestingthanmaterialdesires.
Theyarebecomingawarelearningismorefulfillingthanemotionaldesires.
Theyarebecominglogicalandlessemotional,sotheirlogicissuggesting,whydoIneedahugehouse,
whydoIneed3cars,whydoIneedtogooutandbuystuffatthestoreexceptforfoodandsome
materialstuff.
Sothewhole,supplyanddemandconceptiscollapsing.
Alltheseyearspeopleboughtstuffandthenfactoriesmademorestuff,andthentheinternetcame
along,andnowthattrendisbeingnegated.

Soitisirreversible.Itisallgoingtocollapse.
Thereisnopointintryingtosavebanksandrealestateandfactories,theyareextinct.

Peoplereadnewsonlinesonewspapersareextinct.
Magazinesandnewspaperswilleithergoonlineorgoextinct.

Carscantgoonline,materialstuffcanbesoldonlinebutpeoplearebecomingmorelogicalandless
desire(emotional)based.

Iamaresultofgoingthefastroute.

Therouteisstillgoing,Ijustwentfast.

Onedaymankindisgoingtocreatesomethinganditwillhaveunintendedconsequences.

Sotheunintendedconsequencesoftheinternetis,supplyanddemandconceptswillcollapse.

Sotheunintendedconsequencesofthatis,jobswillbecomeirrelevant.
Thegovernmentwillhavetosupporteveryonebecausenoonewillhavejobs.

Theycanbuildsomeinfrastructurebutnoonewillbeusingitcausetheywillbehomeontheinternet.

Theinternetisnotgoingtostagnateinpopularity.Asmorepeoplebecomecuriousaboutlearningthe
internetwillgainpopularity.

Thereisonlyonethingyouneedtothinkabout.

Thereisnothingthatcanbedonetoturnitaround,becausetheinternetcannotbeundone.

Wearegoingtohavetoadapttothenewrealityandthatiswhatwedobest.

Donotgetemotionalandblamepeoplefortheeconomy,itscollapseisablessing.

Bemindfulofitscollapsebutthatisall.Itiswhatitis,letitbe.

Adaptationhappensincrisis.

Adaptationhappenswhenluxuryisabsent.

Thatiswhatyouwant,absenceofluxury.

Itwillmakeyouthinkalittle,itwillmakeyouwiser.

Itwillmakeyoualittlemorelogicalandalittlelessemotional.

Thatisablessingandtheinternetisaperfectblessing.

Theeconomycollapseisaperfectblessing.

Youareaperfectblessing.

Yourfamilyandyourfriendsareperfectblessings.

Everyoneonthisplanetisaperfectblessingbutyoudonotseethatbecauseyouaremindfullyinhell.

Thatswhatthesebooksareaboutsinceyoudidntknowthat.

SunFeb1520096:19AM

Whenthedrowningistired;itsnottired.
IamfullysloppysoImustfullyrest.
Tension.
Emotionscreatetensiononeverylevel.
AfterthefirstfewminutesIrelaxed.
Bothteamsareedgyinthefirstquarter.
Bothfightersaretenseinthisfirstround.
Iwasnervousatthemeeting.
Iamsonervoustomeetthisperson.
Thatpersonmakesmeuneasy.
Thatsalljustcrapfromemotions.
Ifsomeonemakesyouuneasyyouhavesomanyemotionsyouareliterallyinsane.
Idonotgiveadamwhatanyonearguesaboutthatlastsentence.
Becauseifoneargueswiththatsentencetheydonotknowwhatthehelltheyaretalkingabout,so
theyshouldntbetalking.
Freedomofspeechisnotasuicidepact.
SeefreedomofspeechmeansIconvinceyou,toshutup,andlisten.
Iwillresttofillthedrowningpoolthatisfullofdrowningvictims.
Pleaserestorrefityoursnorkel.
Rest6:32Am

Feb15
th
20091:24PM
IfIamnotback,yourenothere.
IFyouarenot,THEN,drowningpool,IS,drowningyouarenot.
Thedrowningpoolisdoingwhatitdoeseitherway.
Sillyaccidental,drowningpool,miracle.Thismakessensebutthespellcheckerisdelusional.
/SpellercheckdelusionsOFF
Ihavethedrowningpooltouch.
Idrown,youdrown,wedrown.
Thedrowningpoolforgetstodrownbecauseitistoobusydrowning.
IforgettodrownbecauseIamdrowned.
Iforgetsillytime;IdrownbecauseIdrowntime.
Timeisdrown;youaredrown;Iamdrown.
Drownpool;drownyou;isdrown;timeisdrown;Iisdrown;poolisI.
Drownisdrown;Youisknow;Poolisknow;Iamknow.
WhenIisrest;Youisdrown;Poolisdrown;Youisme.
Sillyflawissillywords.
/DumbmyselfdownON
WhileyoudrownonthispageIwillfillthenextpagewithdrowningthings.
YouwishIrestedandwokeupnotrested.
YouwishIwasnothere;butyouare.

Feb15
th
20092:41PM
Ponder,istheauthorgettingmoreinsaneoristhereadergettingmoreinsane.
Theansweris,theauthorissanityandthereaderisattempt.
Accordingtomymusicmakingprogram,Ihavetohaveaproject,tosaveaprojecttotheharddrive.
SoIhavetohavesomethingsoIcansavesomethingbutonceIsavesomethingInolongerhave
something,butitstillissavable.
GoodthingIamnottryingtotryorIwouldbe.
IhavetoaddamixingchanneltotheprojectsoIcanmixthetracksIaddtotheproject.
IfIdontaddthemixingchannelandjustaddthetracksIstillhavetracksbutIamunabletomixthem,
soIllkeepwriting.
Thisisntreligion;religiondidntsave;yourattemptmay.
Youread;Iwrite;Iamright;youread.
Chinahasoutsoldmycountryincarsalesforthefirsttimeever,andsomycountryisgettinga700+
billiondollarloantohelpthecarmakersmakemorecare,theycantsell.
Thelevelofunderstandingisfarbeyondmylevelofunderstanding.
Dontdrownedonthat,becauseyoumightdrowned,whileyouaretryingtoavoiddrowning.
Iwillmisspellthatlastsentencesoyouwontdrownasfastasyouaredrowningsoyouwonthavetry
toavoidtryingtodrownedbecauseyouaredrowningwhetheryoutrytodrownortrynottotryavoid
drowning.
Dontdrownedonthat,becauseyoumightdrowned,whileyouaretryingtoavoiddrownding.
Ifyoudrowndingoryoudrown,orifyoudrownandpreferdrowningtodrownding,youwillstill
drownwhetheryoupreferdrowndingtodrowning,orwhetheryoupreferdrowningtodrownding.
IfItryanyharderImighttry,soIwillavoidtryinganyhardersoIcanavoidtryingatall.
Iknow,Youknow,Sogiveup.
Iamabletooperatewithorwithoutasenseoftime;itisemotionallyabouttime.
Putthatoneinyourdrowningspellchecker.
AmIatotalliaroramIjustatotal.

Feb15
th
20094:208PMIthefinishedmynewSongGoodEnoughthatisunderthebandnameTrue
VacuumonYouTube.
Itsnothingandthesesentencesarenothing.
Iknowthatisnothingandthisnothing,ifyouthinkthatissomethingthenyoualsothinkthisis
something,sooneofusiswrongandthatissomething,butIknowthatisalsonothing.
YouthinkIamsomethingandIknowIamnothingandIknowyouthinkIamsomethingbecauseyou
alsothinkthatissomethingandthisissomethingandthatiswhyyouthinkIamsomething,butIknow
Iamnothingandthatisnothingandthisisnothing.
ThatsgoodenoughthatyouthinkIamsomethingandthatissomethingandthisissomethingbutitis
notgoodenoughformetoknowyouthinkIamsomethingandthatissomethingandthisis
something,sothatiswhythisissomethingbutIknowthisisalsonothing.
IknowyouthinkIamsomethingandthatissomethingandthisissomethingandthatputtogetheris
somethingandthatistheproblemsothatproblemissomethingyouthinkissomethingbutIknow
thatproblemyouthinkissomethingisnothing.
IfIfigureoutwhattrymeansIllremindyousoIcanavoidit.
YoustarttolikemeandIsuggestyoudont.
YoustarttohatemeandIsuggestyoudont.
Thatisthewholepurposeofeverythingsoyoustopthinkingsoyoustopthinkingthingsandsoyou
stopthinking.Iamsomethingandthatissomethingandthisissomethingsoyouwillstopthinkingthe
problemthosearesomethingwithgoaway,andthenIwillknowIamnothingandthatisnothingand
thisisnothingandtheproblemthosearesomethingwillgoaway,andthenyouwillknowIamnothing
andthatisnothingandthisisnothingandyouwillseetheproblemthatthosearenothingisnolonger
aproblembutjustnothing,thenIwillbepleasedandyouwillbepleasedandwecanbothagreethat
pleasedisnothing.
Drowningworksforme,youretheproof.
IfIseetrywalkingdownthestreetitwillproveIamnotit.
IfyouthinkIneedmedicalhelpthenIhumblysuggestyoucontactmesoIwillconvinceyouhowmuch
youneed.
IfyouthinkIneedthenIwillconvinceyouwhyyoushouldntthink.
IfyouneedIwillconvinceyouwhyyoushouldntthink.
IfyoudonotthinkIwillconvinceyouIhaveconvincedyou.
ThenyouwillsayThankYouandIwillconvinceyou,youshouldnotthink.
SunFeb1520094:32PM
IfImeettryanddrowningIwillconvincethemtostoptryingtodrown,andstopdrowningtotry,and
theywillbeconvincedtheyareneither,drowningortryingtodrown,becausetheywillknowtheyare
you.
IamnotpleasedwhenIattempttostarttryingbecauseyouloveitwhenIattempttostarttryingsoI
avoidattemptingtoattempttostarttryingsoyouproperlyattempttoattempttostartdrowning,
whichyouare.
Themostamazingandimpressivethingyouasahumanbeingwilleverbeabletoeverattemptto
understandinallofeternityisthis:
IdonotthinkIknow,Iknow.
Onwiththedrowningthisisit.

SunFeb15
th
20095:21PM
Ifyouthinkyouarenotdrowningitisproofyoualreadyhave.
Ifyouthinkyoualreadyhavedrowneditisproofyoualreadyhave.
Remindyourself,Theauthorjustplayedavideogamefartoomuch,anditishimwhoistheproblem,
anditishimwhoneedshelp,anditishimwhohasproblems,anditishimwhoneedsyou,andyou
thatneedshim.
IfyouthinkIneedyouthatisproofIdontneedyou.
IfyouthinkIdontneedyouthatisproofIdontneedyou.
YouaretheonlyproofIneedtoshowyou,youretheonlyproofyouneed.
IfIreachofpointofunderstandthatIreachapointofunderstandingthewordtryexists,thenImay
eventuallyreachastateofunderstanding,soIwillunderstandIshouldattempttoattempttoavoidthe
wordtrysothatIcanattempttoavoidattemptingtoattempttrying,attemptingly.
Yougoaheadandpatientthatnewwordjustinventedsoyoucanmakelotsofmoneyandgetslotsof
egoandlotsofpopularitysoyouwillunderstandthisbookisproofIamknowwhatyoudonotknow.

SunFeb15
th
20096:12Pm
Youonlyhavethisoneoption.
Eliminatefreedomofspeech.
Eliminatetheinternet.
Eliminatelanguage.

Thisiswhyyouonlyhavethatoneoption.
Idonotwhatyoutothinkyoushouldstopdoingdrugs.
Idonotwantyouthinkyoushouldstophating.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstoploving.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstopkilling.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstophurting.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstopeating.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstopreading.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstopspeaking.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstopasking.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstoplistening.
Idonotwantyouthinkyoushouldstoplabeling.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstopjudging
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldhavereligion.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldavoidreligion.
Idonotwanttothinkyoushouldstopavoidloving.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstopavoidinghating.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstoplaws.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstophatinglaws.
Idonotwantyoutothinkyoushouldstopavoidingmoney.
Idonotwanttothinkyoushouldstopavoidingme.
Idonotwanttothinkyoushouldstop,stopavoidingme.

Thereasonyouonlyhaveoneoptionisthis.
Idonotwantyoutothinkanylonger.
Soyouonlyhaveoneoption.
Youroneoptionistheoneoptionyoudonthave.
Soyouhavenooptions.
Now,youknowwhoIam.
Now,youknowwhatIam.
Now,youknowsomething.
Now,forthefirsttimeinyourlifeyoudonotthinkyouknowsomething,youknowsomething.
Ifyoudonotknowyouaredrowned,Iwontarguewithyou.

SunFeb1520096:51PM
IeatolivesforthereasonIknowandyouknow.
YouremindyourselfthisisallsimplyanaccidentthathashappenedtoaguynamedToddbecausehe
playedvideogamewaytoomuch.

SunFeb15
th
11:14PM
Ithinktherefore,Iam
YouTHINKreligionsshouldbeseparated,soyouare.
YouTHINKothersarenotimportant,soyouarent.
YouTHINKyouknowsomething,soyoudont.
YouTHINKwarisneeded,soyouarewar.
YouTHINKothersareweak,andyouareweak.
YouTHINKyouarebetter,soyouarenotbetter.
YouTHINKyouknowwhoIam,soyoudonotknowwhoIam.
YouTHINKyouknowwhathappenedtome,soyoudonotknowwhathappenedtome.
YouTHINKyouknowwhatthesewordsareabout,soyoudonotknowwhatthesewordsareabout.
YouTHINKyouknowwhatGODisabout,soyoudonotknowwhatGODisabout.

YOUTHINKTHEREFORE,YOUARE,WHEREYOUARE.
YOUTHINKistheproblem,thereforeyouamtheproblem.

IthinkIamaproblem,thereforeIamproblem.
IthinkthereforeIam
MaybeyoubetterjustknowwhoIam,andstopworryingaboutthinkingwhoIam.
IamalotdumberthanpeopleTHINK.
Myarroganceisonlyexceededbyyours.
Myhumilityisonlyexceededbymyfrustration.

MonFeb16200912:51am
Thenextvolumeisuponme.
Thisvolumeisbeingletgo.
Thisvolumeiswithinvolumetwo.
Volumethreeiswithinvolumetwo.
Volumetwoisthecontainerofvolumethree.

Iamonlyabletohumblysuggestyoudonottakeadvantageofyourabilitytolearnandunderstand
andimproveyourinnerself.
Donottakeadvantageofyourabilitytodenyignoranceandembraceunderstandingandclarity.
Oneispleasedwithclarityandunderstanding,itisatruepleasingsensationbecauseonesbeingis
improved,itisintangibleyetinfinitelyvaluable.
Youarethecomposerofyourownunderstandingandthecomposerispleasedwithaproper
composition.
ThegreatesttruthIamabletoseeatthisstageisthis.
WhenImeetotherpeopleinthisstateIamin,theyarepleasedwiththewordsIsuggestandthey
arepleasedwiththespirittheirbeingdetectsinme.
Itpleasesthemandtheyperceiveitisme.
ButIamfullyawareitisnotmetheyarepleasedwiththeyarepleasedwithwhattheyareandthey
areabletoseewhotheyreallyarethroughme.
Soinawaytheytheirspiritissayingtomyspirit,Iamhumbledbyyourgraceandmyspiritisonly
abletosayback,Iamhumbledbyyourgrace.
Thethingis,Iknowthat,andtheydont.
SoIkeepwritingbecausemyspiritknowsthatmutualappreciationishowitissupposedtobe,
becausethatishowitusedtobe.
Wisdomperhapsisonlyasymptomofabeingsgrace.
Asthisaccidentcontinuesinme,perhapsthewisdomincreases,andperhapsthosewhoreadthe
wisdomarehumbledwiththegraceofthewisdom,butthewisdomisnottruthitissimplya
mediumforonewhoreadsittobecomehumbleandmeekinspirit.
Perhapsthathumilityandthatspiritofbeingmeekleadseventuallytoonebecomingmeekand
humble,sothewordsarenotwordsbutperhapssomethingbeyondunderstandingwhenperhaps
arrangedbyoneperhapsinacertainstateofgraceorperhapsonewhohasnoemotionsand
nosenseoftime,andsoperhapsnothingisreallywhatitappearstobeitperhapsisallsimply
somethingthatisbeyondknowing.
Soperhapsonedoesnothavetotrytodothingstobegracefulandwisebecauseoneis,and
alwayshasbeeninastateofgraceandwisdomandsomehow,alongtheway,theytalkedthem
selfoutofthatgraceandwisdom.
IdontknowanythingandIneverwill.
IhaventsaidanythingandIneverwill.
IhavenotdoneanythingandIneverwill.
IamnothingandIalwayswillbe.
Feb16
th
20093:16PM

Feb16,20093:32PM

Iamunabletosayanything,onesuchasyou,doesnotalreadyknow,andonesuchasyou,hasnot
alwaysknown.
NothingIsay;isofvalue,toonesuchasyou.
Everythingshinesbecauseofyou.

Forgiveme,forIknownotwhatIdo.

Schmittresignedafterthegroupblamedglobalwarmingonhumanactivity.Inhisresignation
letter,the74yearoldgeologistarguedthatthe"globalwarmingscareisbeingusedasapolitical
tooltoincreasegovernmentcontroloverAmericanlives,incomesanddecisionmaking."
BostonHerald.COM

Controlisthemurderofonesnaturallygivendecisionmakingprocess.
Controlofanotheristhemurderofthatonespurpose.
Whenonesdecisionmakingprocessisraped,oneisraped.
Whenonesdecisionmakingprocessisthoroughlyraped,oneiskilled.

Graceishumiliating.Humilityisgraceful.
Iamnotembarrassedofus,Iampleasedwithus.

Wheneverythinghasfadedandeverythinghaswornout,thatofmostvalue,isvisible.

Lettersmakeupwords.
Wordsformsounds.
Wordsarrangedinacertainfashioncreatesentencesthatarepleasedtoonesessence.
Onespeaksthesentencesintheirmindastheyhearthemandiftheyreadthem.

Thinkingisjudgmental.Ponderingisquestioning.

Wordsofwisdomarewordsofwisdominanylanguage.
Why?
Thementalvibrationswithinonewhenthewordsarereadispleasingtothebeingssoul.
Why?
Readingofthewordsistranslatedwithinonesmind,andtheideaispleasingtothebeingssoul,so
thebeingispleasedwiththewordsofwisdombecausethementalvibrationsthatareproducedwithin
thebeingsmindispleasingtothebeingssoul.
Why?
Wordsarenotwords,theyarecombinationsofmentalsoundsthatpleaseabeingsessence.
Why?
Earlymandidnothavelanguagetheyonlyhadgruntsorverbalsoundsknownasgrunts.
Why?
Thatwasallthatwasrequiredtocommunicate.
Why?
Becausebeforetheyhadverbalgruntsallearlymanhadwasmentalcommunication.
Why?
Becausethemereactofsightwasenoughtocommunicate.
Why?
Becauseapicture,tellsathousandwords.

Ithinktherefore,IjudgewhoIam,andwhoyouareandwhoweare.
IponderthereforeIunderstand,whoIamandwhoyouareandwhoweare.
Thinkingresultsinknowing.Ponderingresultsinunderstanding.
Forgivemeforthinking,becausemyknowingresultsinjudgments.
Why?
Becausejudgmentsresultinlabels.
Why?
Becauselabelsresultsinlimitsandisolationsandwalls.
Why?
Becauselimitsandisolationsresultincontrol.
Why?
Becausecontrolisasymptomoneunderstandstheycannotcontrol.
Why?
Becauseoneisunabletocontrolinfinity.
Why?
Becauseoneisunabletocontrolwhatisfree.
Why?
Becauseoneisunabletocontrolperfection
Why?
Becauseperfectionisuntamable.
Why?
Becauseperfectionisuntoitself.
Whyperfection?
Becausewhenmanstartedmanwasperfection.
Why?
Becausemanwasinharmonywitheverything.
Why?
BecausemanwasinthegardenofEdenstageofhisexistence.
Why?
Becausemanhadnoverballanguage.
Why?
Becausesightwasenoughtocommunicate.
Why?
Becauseapicturetellsathousandwords.
Why?
Becausesightresultsinponderingofthepicture.
Why?
Becauseoneisonlyabletounderstandwhatthepictureisandunabletojudgewhatthepictureis.
Why?
Becausebeautyisintheeyeofthebeholder.
WhywasitthegardenofEdenstageofmansexistence.
Becausewhenlanguagewasinventedthenthesightaspectwasnolongertheonlygameintown
Why?
Becauselanguagebroughtaboutlabels.
Why?
Becauselanguageisasymptomofthinkingandthinkingisasymptomofjudgments.
Why?
Becauseyourlightblindsmyvisionandsilencesmytongue.
Why?
BecausewhenIseeperfectionIamunabletojudgeitIaminaweandwonder.
Why?
Becauseyourperfectionblocksmyvisionwithtearsofunderstanding.
Why?
Becauseyourperfectionisbeyondunderstanding.
Why?
Becausethebeautyofyourperfectionisbeyondunderstanding.
Whydoyoucryifyouhavenoemotions?
Becauseemotionsarenotemotionstheyareasymptomofverballanguage.
Whydoyoucry?
Becausewithoutemotionsallonehasisunderstandingandtheunderstatingproducesonlytearsof
humility.
Whyalltheotheremotionssuchashateandangerandgreedandhappinessandlove?
Theyaresymptomsoflabelscausedbyverballanguage.
WhoisGod?
WeareGod.
Why?
Wearetheperfection.
Whathappened?
Wefellfromgracewhenweembracedinventionssuchaslanguage.Onethingledtoanother.
Why?
Becausewhenwestartedtoinventwestartedtoforgetweareperfect.
Why?
Becausewethoughtwecouldimproveonperfection.
Whycantoneimproveperfection.
Ifonetriestoimproveperfectiontheywillonlyendupinhellbecauseitisimpossibletoimprove
perfection.

Sowhenmanfirstarriveduntilmaninventedlanguageiswhenmanwasinheaven?
Yes.ThegardenofEdenera.
Sowhatisinvention?
Asymptommanstartedtothinkandavoidtheunderstandingaspectofpondering.
Sotheappleinthegardenmeantmanstartedtothinkandstartedtonotponder.
Whenmanatetheapplemaninventedlanguageandthenbegantojudgeandlabel.
Whatdolabelsandjudgmentsleadto?
Emotions.
Why?
Because,emotionsareasymptomofknowing,andnotunderstanding.
Why?
Understandingisasymptomofawarenessandknowingisasymptomofnotknowingordoubtsor
ignorance.
Sowehavetogetridoftechnology?
No.Weareperfectbeingsandareunabletomakemistakesthatleadtofailure.
Sowhatdowedowithtechnology?
Weuseitwisely.
Whataboutlanguage?
Weuseitwisely.Weavoidusinglanguagetolabelothersandmakejudgmentsofothers.Aperfect
beingcanharmitselfwithitsperfection.Aperfectbeingcangetcaughtupinitsownperfection.A
perfectbeingcaninventsomethingperfectandbeperfectlyharmedbythatperfectthing.Aperfect
beingisinaconstantstateofflux.Aperfectbeingisonlyabletodothebestitcanwithitsperfection.
Aperfectbeingcangetcaughtupinitsperfection,butisonlycapableofunderstandingitiscaughtup
initsperfectionandthenunderstandinghowtogetoutofthattrapithasfalleninto.Aperfectbeing
isunabletofailitonlyisabletolearnfromitsself.Thatisthesymptomofperfection.Aperfect
beingmakesnomistakesbecauseaperfectbeinglearnsfromitsmistakesandthen,understandits
mistake,andthenbecomesmoreperfect,intoinfinity.Alossisalossofperfection.Thatisnot
possiblewithaperfectbeing,aperfectbeingisonlyabletogoforwardintoperfection.Aperfectbeing
isunabletoreachabsoluteperfection,sotheverbalwordperfectionisasymptomtheflawedverbal
languagerepresents.Todescribethistypeofperfectionverballyonewouldendupsaying,Iamperfect
thenIbecamemoreperfect,andthenIbecamemore,more,perfectandthenafterthenext
understandingIbecamemore,more,more,perfect,intoinfinity.Sothelanguageandthelabels
causedbythelanguageareunabletohandletheperfectionstateofaperfectbeing,soaperfectbeing
endsupsettlingwiththelimitsofthelanguageandthusendsupsettling.
Thatisatraptheperfectbeinghasfallenintobecauseperfectionisinfinite,andaperfectbeingthat
hasfallenintoatrapofsettlingistrappedandwalledin,andisinharm,untiltheperfectbeingcan
escape,butitwillescapebecauseitisaperfectbeing,itjusttakesunderstandingforthebeingto
understandhowtoescape.
Thatunderstandingofhowtoescapefromthelanguagetrapithasfallenintowillleadtofurther
understandingintheperfectbeingandtheperfectbeingwillbemoreperfectasaresult,sothe
languagetrapisnotanerrorbytheperfectbeing,itisasymptomaperfectbeingisabletogetcaught
upinitsownperfection,butthatonlyleadstotheperfectbeingbecomingmoreperfect,intoinfinity.
Hereisaperfectexampleofwhythelanguageanditslabelingeffectisflawed.
Aperfectbeingdoessomethingperfect,andthatperfectthingenablesthatperfectbeingtoperfectly
understandandbecomemoreperfect.
Sothenonesayswellthenthebeingwasntperfecttobeginwithbecausenowheismoreperfect.
No.
Theperfectbeingisperfection.Thelanguageiswhatisflawed,andthelanguageisperfectlyflawed.
Oneisunabletoverballylabelperfection.
Oneisabletoseeaflowerorseeababyorhearmusicandsaythatisperfectineveryway.
Oneisnotabletodescribeperfectionverbally.Itisnotperfectionisnotperfect,itislanguagehas
limitsorisperfectlyflawed.
WhenthisaccidentfirsthappenedIwasunabletoformsentencesproperly.Ithoughtitmustbemy
brainormyabilitieshavediminished.
Whatitreallywasis,thisaccidentfromplayingavideogametomuch,knockedmyperceptionintoa
stateIcouldseeflawsclearly.Ihadtopondermywhywayoutofitall.Therewasnodrugortherapy
thatcouldhelpme.Ihadtopondereverything,andonethingleadtoanother.
Nothingwassafe,onedayIwouldbeconvincedofonethingandthenextinthisponderingrealmI
wouldpondermywayoutofitintothenextthing.Sothisenablemetoponderveryrapidly,some
suggestwithmachinelikerapidity,butwhatitreallyis,issimply,lossofemotionsmeanslossof
judgmentsandlossoflabels.AllIhadwaspondering.Allearlymanhadwaspondering,earlymanfor
about190,000yearshadnosenseoftime,hadnohungerdesiresandnodesiresatall,hejustwas.
Hewasnotstarvingcauseheonlyhadtoeattojustremainalive,becauseheneverwashungry.Iam
neverhungryandwhenIeatInevergetfull,Ihavenosenseoffullorhunger.SoIjustdoitwhenIcan,
butIdontplanonitorthinkaheadaboutitbecauseifIdonteatforaday,Idontevenmissit.
Sothiswholethingwentwrongaroundthetimelanguagewasinventedandlanguageledto
irrigationbeinginventedandthatledtocitiesbeingbornandthatleadtomoreinventions,butthatis
notamistake,becauseallthatstuff,ledtomebeingabletoplayaperfectvideogamethatwasa
resultofallthoseinventionsandunderstandeverythingandhoweverythingworksandwhat
everythingis,sothosewereperfectthingstohappen,solanguageandtechnologywasalsoperfect
andperfecttimingandcreatedtheperfectaccidentwhichhappenedtotheexactlyperfectperson
whichenabledperfectdescriptionintheformofperfectbooksthatwereperfectlydistributedand
perfectlyexplainedeverythingperfectlytoeveryotherperfectbeing.
Soitwasnotanaccidentoreverythingforareason.
Forallthatstufftofallinline,thereisonlyoneexplanation.Perfection.

Onecanlookatanythingandseeflawsandimperfectionandanothercanlookattheexactsamething
andseenothingbutperfection.
Bothcanverballyexplainwhyonethisisflawedandtheothercanexplainwhyonethingisperfect.
Butneithercanunderstandanythingisflawed.
Onecanverballyexplainwhyanalligatorisflawedbecausehishasbigteethandmayeataperson.
Oneisunabletotakeapictureofanalligatorandponderitisflawed.
Itisnotflaweditisperfectineverydetail.
Icanverballyexplainwhyeverysinglepersonandeverysinglereligionandeverysinglebeliefand
everysingleideaandeverysinglethingonearthisflawed.
Iamunabletoseeanythingwithmyeyesandseeanythingbutperfectioninit.
Thatiswhatthisaccidentdid.IdonotreadaparagraphIbrowseitandgetitsspirit.
IdontjudgeapersonwhenIseethemIgettheirspirit.
ImaysaythatpersonisnervoustomyselforthatpersonishappyfromaninstantglancebutIdonot
seethatasaflaw,Iseethatasperfection.TheoneIseeasahappyspiritisaspiritwhohaspondered
theirwayintounderstanding,andtheoneIseeasnervousisonewhoisponderingtheirwayinto
understanding.
Idonotnoticedetails.Isomehowlookthroughtheperson,allthedetailsareinvisible.Thatisan
accuratedescription.
IamunabletolookataMuslim,aJew,aChristianaBuddhistaSatanistanAtheistasanythingbut
becomingawarefromponderingorbeingawarefrompondering.
Itisallthesamething.Samewithanimals,samewithmusic,samewithwritings,samewithideas.
AlltheflawsIwasdetectingearlyonafterthisaccidentweremybeingsdenialthatitwaspossible
everythingcouldbeperfection.
IhadtopondermywayoutofimperfectionandwhenIdidthattoday,Iunderstoodorbecameaware
everythingisperfection.
OnceIbecameaware,allthelabelsorillusionsdisappearedandtheonlythingleftwasreality,and
realityisperfection.
IunderstandeverythingnowbecauseIunderstandonethingperfectly.
Everythingiseitherinastateofbeingorbecoming.
Beingperfectorbecomingmoreperfect.
ThatiswhatHOTisintheparableabouthot,lukewarm,andcold.
Hotisunderstandingeverythingisperfectorisbecomingmoreperfect,lukewarmisunderstanding
somethingsareperfectandsomethingsareflawed,andcoldiseverythingisflawedornothingis
perfect.
Thereasonthelukewarmistheworstisbecauseonehastolabelorthinkaboutwhatisperfectand
whatisnotperfect.
Coldisbetter,becauseonceonepondersthateverythingisflawed,theywillprovethemselveswrong
andthentheywillhittheotherextreme,whichiseverythingisperfect.
Sothatstatementisaponderingtrapsotospeak.
Icalledthisanaccident,andasIwentonIstartedtoseeitwasnoaccident,andthenIhadtoponder,
ifthiswasntanaccident,thentherearenoaccidents,andthentheextremeofthatisthereareonly
miracles.
Thatisallittook.Ibecameawareeverythingisamiracle.Thatwasit,therewasnowayback.

Sowhatislanguageifitisnotamistake?
Itisperfection.Thishotandcoldconceptinthebibleisextremes.Spittingoutthelukewarmmeans
oneisunabletounderstandwhattheyareunlessthefullygototheextremesbecauseinfinityand
perfectionareattheinfiniteextremes.
Aninfinitebeingcannotbeperfect,becauseonceitunderstandsitcannotbeperfectisbecomesmore
perfectinitsunderstanding.Theperfectbeingunderstandsithasbecomemoreperfectinits
understandingandthenitbecomesmoreperfectinitsunderstanding.
Thisappearsconfusingwhenexplainedwithverballanguage,thatsonlyasymptomofthelanguages
limits.Thelanguageiscreatedbyaperfectbeingandthelanguageisperfectbecauseitenablesthe
perfectbeingtounderstandthelanguageisflawedandthustheperfectbeingbecomemoreperfectin
itsunderstandingwhenitunderstandsthelanguageisflawed.
Thelanguageitselfisflawed,butthatalldependsonwhatyourperceptionorunderstandingor
awarenessis.
Itisaperfectlyflawedlanguagemadebyaperfectbeing.Itisatoolfortheperfectbeingtouseto
becomeMOREperfect.Soallthereligionsfrom1000yearsagoback,aresimplyperfectbeingstrying
towaketheotherperfectbeings,toremindthemtheyareperfectbeingsandtotryingtopersuade
themgentlyoutoftheperfecttraptheyhaveperfectlyfalleninto.
ThisconceptinBuddhismaboutdonottrytoohard,isjustsaying,YOUareperfect,soyoudonothave
toeventrytogetoutofthetrap,fastorsloworswiftly,youwillgetoutofthetrapbecauseyouare
perfect,sotheyonlyneedtosuggestunconcernedly,words,andtheBuddha,TheSaint,Theprophet,
theLORDalreadyknowstheperfectbeingwillgetoutofthetrapanyway.Thereisnorushininfinity.
Theperfectbeinghasplentyoftime,becausetheyareallthereisandeverwasandeverwillbe.

SowhatisGod?
Godisbeyondunderstandinganddefiesalllabelsofverballanguage.
Why?
Thatisasymptomthatallbeingsareattemptingtopersuadetheperfectbeingtoponderor
understandsoitwillponderitswayoutoftheperfecttrapitiscaughtupin.
Theperfectbeingisunabletothinkitswayoutofthetrapitiscaughtupin.
Theperfectbeingisintheperfecttraptobeginwithbecauseverballanguageenabledtheperfect
beingtolabelitsself.
Oncetheperfectbeinglabeleditsself,itwasinaperfecttrap,itwascaughtupinitsownperfect
invention.Noreligioniswrongoreverhasbeenwrong.Nopersoniswrongoreverhasbeenwrong.
Nothingthathaseverbeenverballysaidbyapersonorponderedbyapersonorthoughtbyaperson
haseverbeenwrong.
Everythingonlyleadstofurtherponderingandfurtherponderingleadstofurtherunderstandingand
furtherunderstandingeventuallyleadstheperfectbeingtounderstanditiscaughtupinitsperfect
invention,andthentheperfectbeingunderstandshowtogetoutofitsperfecttrap,andthenthe
perfectbeing,getsoutoftheperfecttrapitiscaughtupin,andthenbecomesmoreperfectasaresult.
Emotionsthatareasymptomofverballanguagearetheresotheperfectbeingunderstandsitneedsto
avoidsomeofthem,likeangeretc.
Thatunderstandingleadstofurtherponderingoftheemotionsandthentheperfectbeingismore
perfect.Themoreperfecttheperfectbeingbecomesthemoreperfecttheperfectbeingis,andthe
onlymethodithastodothatisponderingandthesymptomofponderingisunderstandingand
understandingleadstofurtherperfection,andthiscyclegoonintoinfinity.
Thereisnoendandthereisnobeginning,thereisonlyhereandnow.Theperfectbeingknowsitisin
theinfinitecycleofbecomingmoreperfectsotheperfectbeingdoesnotneedtothinkintothefuture.
Italreadyunderstandswhatisgoingtohappeninthefuture.Itisgoingtoponder,understandandthat
understandingisgoingtomakeitmoreperfect.
Ifaperfectbeingsays,IamnotGodbecauseIdonotunderstandeverything.Thatisaperfectand
truestatement,becausethatbeingwhosaidthatisinastateofpondering,itistryingtofigureitout.
Anotherbeingwhosays,ThereisnoGod.Thatisaperfectandtruestatement.Thatbeingis
attemptingtoponder,itisinastateofthinkingorlabelingusinglanguageastheotherbeingis,but
bothbeingsaresimplytryingtoreachabetterstateofunderstanding.

Nocommentverballyorthoughtwise,isanythingbutperfect,itallleadstothesameandfinalresult,
understanding.
Noactionaperfectbeingtakesiseverwrongorhaseverbeenwrongorfalse,itallleadstothefinal
endresult,understanding.Understandingtheonlywaytheperfectbeingwillgetoutoftheperfect
trapitisperfectlytappedin.
Itisimpossiblefortheperfectbeingtonotgetoutofthetrap,soitwillperfectlygetoutofthetrap,
andthenitwillperfectlygetcaughtupinanotherperfecttrap,andthenperfectlygetoutofthat
perfecttrap,andtheonlythingthatchangesisaftereachsteptheunderstandingincreases,andthus
theperfectbeingbecomesmoreperfectintoinfinity.
Thereisawar,Perfectbeingsdie.Somebeingssayitwasagoodwarforagoodcause,theyareright.
Somebeingsayitwasabadwarforabadcause.Theyareright.
Theyareunabletobewrong.Onebeingwhopondersthewarisagoodwar,increasestheir
understanding.Onebeingwhopondersitwasabadwarincreasestheirunderstanding.
Thatunderstanding,bothbeingsponderedleadstofurtherponderingandfurtherunderstanding.So
theybecomemoreperfectafterthewarisover,thenbeforethewarstarted,sothewarisperfect,
becauseitisaperfectcreationtoencouragefurtherunderstandinginbeings.
Thethingis,IaccidentlyknowthisbecauseIaccidentlyplayedavideogamefartoomuch.
ThatmeansThevideogameisperfectbecauseitenabledmetoponderandmasterit,andthenI
understood,andthenIunderstandwhatisgoingoninreality,andthenIponderwhatshouldIdo,and
thenIponder,Ishouldwriteabook,andthenIponderotherswillreadthisbookandthenI
understand,thatwasnotanaccidentinthemaking.Thatwasperfection.Thatwasasymptomofhow
aperfectbeingwillfallintograceeventuallybecauseaperfectbeingisgrace,soaperfectbeingdoes
nothavetoTRYtobegraceful,aperfectbeingisgraceful.
AhumanbeingdoesnothavetoTRYtobeanythingbecausetheyareeverything.Ahumanbeingdoes
nothavetotrytobeaccepted,orbeaccepted,theywillperfectlyfigureitoutperfectlyintheirown
way.
IdonothavetotrytobesomethingorIdonotneedacollegedegreetoproveIamsomething
becauseIameverythingandhavealwaysbeeneverything,andyoudonotneedsomelabelorideato
proveyouaresomethingbecauseyouareeverythingandhavealwaysbeeneverything.
Youdonotneedanythingever,becauseyouareeverythingforeverandever.Youponderandponder
andponderandyouwillfigureitoutbecauseyouareunabletoeverfailever.YouareeverythingandI
knowyouknowthat,soIponder,WhydoIhavetotellyouthat?,butIamnottellingyouthat,Iam
tellingmethat,becausewearetheperfectbeing,andalwayshavebeenandalwayswillbe.
AndthatmeansthatTheperfectbeinghasfounditswayoutofitsperfecttrapandthetearsof
understandingthatarebeyondunderstanding,andIamnotcryingmyeyesoutwithjoy,wearecrying
withjoy,likewealwayshave,whenheponderourwayintofurtherunderstandingandfurther
perfection,likewealwayshavedone.
Godisnotme,Godisus.
BuddhaneversuggestedtherewasaGodbecauseheknewahumanbeingwouldpondertheirselfinto
understandingonedaysomehowandtheywouldponderBuddhismandunderstandwhatGodis,and
thentheperfectbeingwouldonceagainunderstanditisinoneofitsperfecttrapsthatleaditto
furtherperfectionthoughthatunderstanding.Itdidnttaketheperfectbeinganytime,becausethere
isnotimeonlyeternityandsotheperfectbeingdiditonperfectschedule.
Buddhadecisionwasperfect.MosesdecisiontosuggestthereisaGodofperfection,wasperfect.
Jesussuggestionsandwords,wereperfect,Mohammedswordsandsuggestionswereperfect
becauseIhadtoponderalloftheminordertounderstandwhatIunderstandnow.
Aperfectbeingisunabletoproveitisaperfectbeingwithonesentenceorinfinitesentences.
Itisonlyabletounderstanditisaperfectbeingandbeawareitisaperfectbeing.
Itisonlyabletoseeorunderstand,itisaperfectbeing,becauseunderstandingisworthinfinite
words.
Feb16,200911:25PmEST

Feb1720091:05AmEST
Thisconceptoflabelsisasymptomofwords.Wordsareasymptomoflanguage.
Languageisperfect,itisnotamistake.
Thereisthiscomplexityordelaysotospeakcausedbylanguage.
Thatcomplexityisnotamistakeandisnotanaccidentitisasymptomofperfection.
Someonereadsoneofmybooks.
Herearethethreeoptionstheyhavetomake.
1. Thebookisalltrue.
2. Thebookissomewhattruebutsomewhatfalse.
3. Thebookisallfalse.

Thatistheonlypossibleconclusions.
Thereisnosuchthingastrue,trueisalabelcausedbylanguage.
Thereisnosuchthingasfalse,falseisalabelcausedbylanguage.
1ishot,2islukewarm,and3iscold.
Onewhodecidesthebookisalltruehasmanysentencestoponderandmuchunderstandingtocome
to.Thatisperfect.
Onewhodecidesthebookispartiallytrueandpartiallyfalse,hassomethingstoponderandsome
understandingtoreach.Thatisperfect.
Onewhodecidesthebookisallfalse,hasmuchponderingandunderstandingtocometobecause
theyhavetopondertheirdecision,andtheymaydiscover,someofthebookistrue,sothey
understandtheirthought,itwasallfalsewasinerror,butinrealitytheyunderstandthat,sothey
madeaperfectdecisionalso.
1,2and3allwillendupwiththesameresult,understandingthroughpondering.
Thedifferenceis,theonewhosaysitsallfalse,maynotponderitfurther,sotheymaydelaythe
understanding.Theonewhosaysitspartiallytrueandpartiallyfalsemaynotponderwhattheythinkis
false,sotheywilldelayponderingfullythewholebook.
Theonewhounderstandsitisalltruewillfullyponderthewholebook.
Thatisstillallperfectbecausetheyeachendupwithunderstanding.
Thatisrelativetoeveryoneisjustdoingthebesttheycan.
Oneisunabletodobetterthanthat,sothebestonecandoisperfect,theperfectamount.
Anothersayingis:
Everyoneisdoingthebesttheycanbasedontheirunderstanding.
Thatcanbetranslatedinthisperfectionsituationas
Everyperfectbeingisdoingtheirperfectbestbasedontheirperfectunderstanding.
Thatisacceptablebecause,thereisnotime,sotherereallyisnodelaybetweenone,twoorthree.
The
Delayisalabel.Itdoesntexist.Delaydenotesdelayintime,andtimedenotesalabel,andthatlabel
denotesthereistime.
Iamnotrightinsayingthereisnotime,andIamnotwrong.
Mybrainthroughtheaccidentperceivesnotimewhatsoever.Mybodyshowsmanysymptomsmy
brainperceivesnotimeatall.Mysenseoftasteisdiminished,mysenseoftouchisdiminished.
Ihavenodesiresorcravingsorabilitytothinkahead,tothink,Ineedsomethingtoeat,somybody
doesnotregisteritishungry.
IdonotfeelIhavetogotothebathroomuntilIhavetogotothebathroom,sotospeak.
Thatissimplyasymptomthisaccidenteliminatedmysenseoftime.
Thebrainisnotinastateofbecoming,asinbecominghungryorbecomingawareIhavetogotothe
bathroom,mymindisonlyinastateofbeing.Languagemakesithardtoexplainthisconcept.
Idonotgethungryatall,IammindfulIneedtoeatsomebecauseIunderstandfoodhelpsabeing
remainalive.HowmuchIneedeat,thatsnotconsidered,IeatwhatIeatandIdontlabelifitwastoo
muchortoolittle.
Goingtothebathroomisabitdifferent.WhenIhavetogo,Isensemybladderisabouttoburst,not
dramatically,Ijustfeelitiswisetogotothebathroom,Idonotfeelitcomingon,sotospeak.
SotheselabelsareirrelevantwithnosenseoftimeandIunderstandbyblockingmyemotionsfrom
playingthatgamethelabelshavedisappeared.
SoIunderstanditismedicallyexplainable.Humansunderstandenoughaboutthebraintounderstand
whythiswouldbehappeningtoonewithnosenseoftime.

Itisnotsupernatural.Ofcoursesupernaturalisalabelandsomemaysuggest,itmaybesupernatural.
Sothelanguageiswhatthelabelsarecausedby.
IfIexisted150,000yearsago,mynamewouldbeagruntofsomesort,andIwouldnottalk,
everythingwouldjustbeunderstood,andthegruntwouldonlyoccurtogetmyattention,butitis
possiblethatsnotthecaseeither.Theonlysoundswouldbewhatwecalllaughter.
Sothelaughterwouldbethere.Thelanguagewouldbeunderstandingandawareness.
Sothecavemencomeacrossananimaltohunt,theydonotneedtosay,yougoleftandIllgoright
andsurroundit.Onewouldgoleftandtheotherwouldunderstandtogorightandtheywouldboth
understandtheirgoalistosurrounditbecausetheybothunderstandtheirgoalistogetfood.
Therewouldbenosenseoffailureiftheydidntgettheanimalandtherewouldbenosenseof
desperationbecausetheyhavenosenseofhunger.
Itwouldnotbepossibleforatypicalhumanwhoeats3goodmealsadaytoexistbackthen.
Theywouldonlyhaveoneoption,adapttoeatingonemeal,ifthataday.
Thatwouldleadthemtobeingconditionedtoblockhungerandovertime,thatconditioningwould
eliminatehungerpangsalltogether.
Thesenseofpainisalsogone.Extremepainisfelt,butthedailyachesandpainstheyaretotally
gone.
Ihavenodailyachesandpains.Iusedtobutnotnow.Thatsadoubleedgessword.Iamunabletotell
whatisalmosttoomuch,inrelationtostretchingtoofar.Thereisonly,notstretchingtoofarand
stretchingtoofar.
Apersonwithnormalsensitivitycouldliftweightsandtellwhentheywerepushingittoofarsothey
wouldstop.
Itsalongthelinesofsensitivityinwalking,ifonehasnosenseofpainwhenwalkingtheywillbreak
theirboneswhentheywalkcausetheysteptohardorputtheirfootdowntohard.
Similartowhenoneslegisasleepandtheytrytostandonittheymaybreakitcauseitwontwork,so
tospeak.
Butinmysituationitisnotthatpronounceditissimplymuchsilenced.
Thedailyachesandpainsarefullyabsent,theservepainisnoticeable.
BeforethisaccidentIsmoked1packofcigsaday.
Afewweeksafter,IrealizedWhyamIsmokingatall?,andIrealizedIhadtocravingtosmoke.
ThenIstartedtosee,Iwassmoking24packsaday,becauseIhadnosenseofwhenIlastsmokeacig,
nosenseofsatisfactionfromsmokingacig,andnosenseofwhenIneedmynextcig.
Butitworksbothways,Icangohoursandhoursandhoursandnothaveacigandnotnotice.
Ithinktheonlythingthatisleftistheactualaddictiontocigs,thechemicaladdiction,themental
cravingsaregone,thementaldesireisgone,butthechemicalcravingsareallthatkeepmesmoking.
SoitsdangerousinthesenseIcansmokemanycigsandnotevennoticeit,andIdontfeelwindedor
feellikeIsmokedtomanycigssoIamblindtothedamage.
Iunderstandthatiswhythereligiousteachingsuggestmaterialaddictionslikedrinkingareimproper
becausewhenoneturnstheothercheckenoughandthentheyhavenosenseoftime,theywould
drinkthemselftodeath.Ihavenotexperimentedwithwhatitwouldbeliketogetdrunksincethe
accidentbecauseIhavenocravingfordrugs,sotospeak,butIcanseethatwouldbeaproblem.
Sothisaccidentandnosenseoftimethingchangeseverything,itsrelativetopsychology,
philosophy,medicine,religion,civilization,orEVERYTHING.
IwasalwaysawareofthatbutIkepttryingtolabelit,andnowIunderstandthatiswhyIwashavingso
muchtrouble,thelanguagewouldnotallowmetounderstandit,thelanguageonlyallowedmeto
judgeit.
Einsteinsaid,Timeisrelativetotheobserver.
Iunderstandnowthatwasaninsidejoke.
Thejokeis,hewassaying,youhaveasenseoftimebecauseyouhaveemotions.Ihavenosenseof
timesoIamabletounderstandthereisnotime,thatiswhyIamcomingupwithalltheseworld
changingtheoriesandyouareinaweofmywisdom.
Iunderstandtheproofofthatiswhenhesuggested,Ihavenoallegiances,thatisaninsidejoke,
saying,IhavenodesiresorIhavenocravingforonecountryovertheother,oranycountrywilldo,I
justwanttoponderthingsandunderstandthings.Hewasimmunetolabels.
Itisnotaboutme,ithasneverbeenaboutme.Itisaboutthediscovery.
Somethinghasbeendiscoveredanditmaybeimportanttotakeadvantageofthediscovery.
Oneiswisetotakeadvantageofadiscoverythebestonecan,basedontheirawarenessofwhatthe
discoveryis.
Everyoneisreallydoingthebesttheycanbasedontheirunderstandingorawarenessofthesituation.
Thatisabsenceofemotions.Thatiswisdom.Thatisalllabelingbutthatisbecauselanguageleadsto
labels.
IfIstrivetomakethisdocumentgrammarperfect,itisredundantbecauseIalreadyunderstandIam
unabletomakeamistake.Thereisnomistakesjustvaryingdegreesofperfection.
WhenIusedtomakemusicbeforetheaccident,Iwasnotmusicallytrained,Iwasjustabletoplayand
singbyear.
IalwaysruinedthesongsbecauseIwastryingtobegoodandIonlyendedupwithjunk.
NowaftertheaccidentIammoreproficientincompositionandsingingbecauseIamjustdoingthe
bestIcan,Iamunabletofail,becauseoneisunabletofailatdoingthebesttheycan.Andonething
thatreallysticksoutinthemusicnowisthevocalsarerelaxed,themusicismorelikeachantthan
somemelodyeffortandthemixingisthebigthing.Iamnottryingtomakeonethingsoundlouder
thananother,becausethatleadstoinfiniteturningupstuff,Imaketheguitartracklouder,thenthe
vocalsneedtobelouder,thenthedrumshavetogetlouderandbeforeyouknowit,itisalljustone
hugemess.Ihavegracenow.
Butthatoldmixingwasnotmistake,itwasperfection,andnowIunderstandwhyitwashowitwas,so
itwasperfectbecauseitleadtomeponderingitincontrasttothemusicImakenow,andsonowIam
moreperfectinmyunderstanding.
IamunabletodisprovethisperfectiongigIhavefallenon,andthatisanindicationIamatpeace
withthatunderstanding.
Iamgoingwiththeflow,andinthisstateofponderingIperhapsponderatthespeedoflightsoto
speak,andifsomethingisntworkingoutIfindoutquickly,sotospeak.
IseemtochangemytuneswiftlybecauseIamunabletobeembarrassedifIwaswrong,Ionlyseek
tounderstandfrommyperviousunderstandings.
IunderstandIaminthisstateofunderstandingandponderingwithoutconcernsothatmaybethe
ultimateopenmindedness,IamunabletothinkIknow,Iamonlyabletoponderandunderstand
andfurtherponderintoinfinity.Oncethewallsofembarrassmentaregone,onemovesswiftly
throughthings,sotospeak.
IamnearthemomentofpresentingthesecondvolumeofthebooksandIunderstooditsbestto
throwinthethirdvolumeofthebookwithit,andnowIunderstandthisfourthvolumeisalready
startingtogetbigandIamponderingthrowinginthisvolumewiththesecondandthirdvolume,andI
understandthesecondandthirdvolumearealready300+pagesandifIthrowthisinitmaybeover
400pages,andthenIponder,whatisthepaperbacklimitofbooks.
ThenIponder,whatisthebiggestbookIamabletomake.NotbecauseIwanttomakethebiggest
bookbutbecauseapparentlyIamunabletomakeasmallone.OrIamunableacceptabookthathas
lessthaninfinitepages,soIneedtobehumbleandunderstandbooksperhapsdohavelimitsbecause
bookshavewordsinthemandwordshavelimits.
Iunderstandoutoftheconfusioncomesunderstandingoroutoftheashescomesthephoenix.
Thisthemehasbeenpresentduringthisaccident,inmymindthisconcepthasbeenthere,andInow
understandIhavereachedtheclarity,Inolongerneedbedoubtful.
Inolongerapologizeorputmyselfinasituationmentally,wereIfeelIhavefailed,becauseI
understandthereisnofailure.Iunderstandthereisonly,differentdegreesofperfection.
Iunderstandthateverythingleadstoonething,understanding.Thatiswhyeverythingisperfectjust
thewayitis.Thereisnofastunderstandingorslowunderstanding,thoselabelsareasymptomof
time.Thereisonlyunderstandingandnorealdegreesofunderstanding.
Thereisonlyunderstanding,degreeisalsoalabel.Understandingisalsoalabel.Thewholeverbal
languageconceptislabelbased.Thereisnothingelseaboutitbutlabels.Itisperfectisitsabilityto
promotelabels,labelsleadtounderstanding,perfectionisunderstanding,intoinfinity.
Ifoneunderstandsandthenpondersandthenunderstandagainintoinfinity,theywillbefarpastthe
levelofgodinunderstandingrapidly,iftheyeliminatethewallslikeemotionsandlabels,butthatis
notsayingwallsandlabelsareamistake,theyarethereforareason.Sotheythereforaperfect
reason.
IamatperfectpeacetodayFeb17
th
2009,becauseIponderedmyselfsincethisaccidentintoastateof
perfectpeacewithmyself,becauseIunderstandeverythingperfectly.
IponderedmyselfintounderstandingIamnotaparticipantinlifeIamlife.Ipondermyselfinto
understandinghumanbeingsarenotinlifetheyarelife.Earthisnotapartoflife,earthislife.The
universeisnotsomethingitiseverything,andeverythingintheuniverseiseverythinguntothe
universe.Therearenolabelsthereisonlylanguagewhichcreatestheillusionoflabels.
Iunderstandmybeingisonewitheverythingbecausemylevelofawarenesshasreachapoint,I
understandthatIameverything.
Onemaysuggest,Soyouthinkyourgod.
No.Godisalabel.Iameverything.Everythingisalabel.IamunabletoexplainwhatIam,Icanshow
youwhatIambymyactionsanddeeds,Icanshowyouapictureforyoutosee,andyouwillseeI
ameverythingbutIamunabletoverballyexplainittoyoubecausethatwillonlyendupwithlabels.
Myawarenessandunderstandingasabeingisbeyondunderstandingusingwordsorlabels.
Theproofisinthepudding.IunderstandwhyIsuggestedthatsomuch,becauseperfectionisnot
describable.
InJudaismtheyareawaretonotspellthenamegodfully,theyspellitG_Dorsomethingtothat
effect,thatisexactlywhy,theymaynotbeawareofwhythatisdone,butthatisdonebecause,itisa
wayofsaying,wordsareonlylabelsandlabelscannotdescribeinfinityorperfectionproperly.
Itisnotabout,YouwillgotohellifyouspellGod.Theymaythinkthisisso,butthentheyarefalling
intolabelsagain.Thereisnohell.ThedayofresurrectionorArmageddonissimply,thedayaperfect
being,pondersitselfintounderstandingithasfallenintooneofitperfecttraps,andthenitescapes.
Thatsnottheendofthestoryanditsnotthebeginning,itsjustanotherperfecteventinalineof
perfecteventsthatgoonintoinfinity.
YouandIareunabletodie.YouandIcreatedyouandI.YouandIarespecialbecausewearea
perfectbeing.Wecanlabelandsayweareallcellsinaperfectbeing,butthatsalabelitself,andnot
accurate,wearetheperfectbeing.
Theperfectbeingisunabletobeanythingbutperfectandinfinite.Perfectpersonalities,infinite
personalities.Theperfectbeingisunabletoendorstart,ithasalwaysbeenandalwayswillbe,Itisthe
alphaandtheomega.Thisphysicaldeathissimplyasymptomtheperfectbeingcreatedsomethingwe
labelasphysicalexistence.Whatthatmeans,youandIcreatedsomeperfectthings,youandIlabel
asphysicalexistence.Itisnotaflawitisperfection,physicaldeathisnotaflawitisperfection.We
gobacktothephysicalbeingbecauseyouandIarethephysicalbeing.
IfyouandIseparateourselvesbymakingperfectthingslikeperfectlyflawedlanguagewhichhave
perfectlabels,thatisperfect,wehaveaperfecttooltoponderourselfandendupwithwhatyouand
Ialwaysendupwith,perfectunderstanding,andthusweendupbecomingmoreperfectinour
perfection.
Thisconceptisnotareligion.Thatwouldbealabel.Itisverballyindescribable.Thatiswhyothersmay
suggestIamaTalkingBuddha,afterthisaccident.Thatisasymptomoneisawareofwhatoneis.
Onemightsuggest,wellyousmokecigssoyouarenotconcernedaboutyourhealthsoyouarebad.
Smokecigsisalabel,notconcernedisalabel,healthisalabel,andbadisalabel.
Thelabelsarenotreal.Theyarejustillusions.Physicaldeathappearsreal,butIunderstandIam
unabletodieintherealsenseoftheworddieasinEND,becauseIunderstandIaminfinityitself
becauseIunderstandIaminfiniteandIamperfectandIamunabletodoanythingbutperfection.
IunderstandyouandIarethesameperfectinfinity.Weareone,youareoneperfectaspectofthe
infiniteperfectaspectsoftheinfiniteperfectbeing,andyouaredoingperfectindoingthebestyou
canbasedonyourperfectawareness.
Theonlydifferenceis,Iamconsciouslyawareofthatandyouarenotconsciouslyawareofthat,but
bothofushavealwaysbeensubconsciouslyawareofthat.Soyouaredoingthebestyoucanbasedon
yourperfectabilitytoconsciouslybecomeawareofthatandIaccidentlyyetperfectlybecame
consciouslyawareofthat.

SoIamnottryingtotellyouwhattodo,becausethatwouldberedundant.Ialwayshadthisfeeling
thatIwasonlywritingtohelpmyself,butthatisbecause,IwasalreadyawareIamYouandYouare
me,butIwasnotconsciouslyawareofthatuntilthislightspeedponderingfigureditallout,which
wastoday.
Ifoughttheinnerbattleatlightspeedcausedbytheaccident,andIwontoday.
Ofcoursewonisalabel,Iwouldhavewonanyway.Youarenotlessthanme,becausewearethe
same.
IdidthebestIcouldandIunderstandyouwilldothebestyoucan.Nowinnerandnoloser.Awinner
oraloser,isasymptomoftime.Itdenotestheendoftheevent.Itisnotpossibletohaveawinneror
loseriftheeventneverstartsandneverends.
Thereisonlyunderstanding,whichleadstofurtherponderingwhichleadstofurtherunderstanding
andfurtherperfection.Thatgoesonintoinfinity.
Thiscontagiousaspectisnotwhatitappears.IunderstanditissimplyIunderstoodwhoIandwe
reallyare,andpeoplewhohangaroundmeorseemecatchit,orgetit,thentheywantto
thankme,andtheythankme,asifIamsomethingtheyarenot,butinrealityallIhavedoneisremind
themwhattheyalwayshavebeen.Soitsnotme,itsasymptomofwhatwemakeup,whichisa
perfectinfinitebeing.
IunderstandnowwhyIhadthisentityfeelingfromthestartofthisaccident,itwasalwaysthere,I
ponderedthereisnogodthenIponderedtherehastobegodthenIponderedmanybattlesandthen
ponderedavoidingitandignoringit,andtoday,Iunderstood,whyitwasalwaysthere.
IunderstandIdidnottaketoolongtogetitandIdidntnottaketolittletimetogetit,I
understooditintheperfectwayandattheperfecttime.Thetimeittookwasnottoolongortooshort
itwasthemiddleway,ortheperfectway,oronthefence,nottohotorcold.
Sothehotandcoldandlukewarmmakessense,andthenottoohotandnottocoldbutjustright,
makesense.Thatissimplyasymptomthatlanguageisperfectlyflawed.
Itisperfectlyflawedforaperfectreason.
SinceIbecameanauthor,andIusethattermloosely,2weeksago,Iamnotexactlywhatonewould
call,notinastateofmentalblock,inrelationtofindingwordstotype.
NowsomeonewillhavetoinventanewlabelthatisacountertothelabelmentalblockbecauseI
havethereverseproblemofmentalblock,Iamunabletokeepmywordswithintherealmofabooks
abilitytoholdthem.

ThatisperfectbecausethenpeoplewhoreadthebookswillneverhavetofewbookstoreadbecauseI
canpumponeoutinabout37daysifIamabletodistractmyselfawayfromwritingwordsenough,if
not,3daysperbookismorethanenoughtime..or37daysperbookisperfectand3daysisperfect.
IunderstandwhenthisaccidentfirsthappenedIhadthisurgetocorrecteveryoneinthegame,Isaw
theywerealldoingitwrongandIwantedtohelpthem,butthenIpondered,theyaredoingthebest
theycan,andthenaftermuchbattlewithin,IunderstoodtheyarebecomingmoreawareandIamata
stateofbeingaware,butthatisalsoalabel.
Sothatiswhythelanguageisperfectlyflawed,itmakestheperfectbeingponderandponderingleads
tounderstandingintoinfinity.
TherewasmomentsespeciallyinthefirstmonthaftertheaccidentIwasconcernedformymental
health,Iwantedtogogetpillstostopthis,andsoIwasinabattlewithin,Iwantedtosavemymental
healthbecausetheconfusionwasextreme,Iwashavingmomentsofextremeconcernformymental
health.IunderstandthatiswhylanguageappearedtobeanindicationIwasinneedofhelp,butin
reality,itislanguagethatisperfectlyflawed,andperfectionappearstoitselfflawedinthefaceofflaw.
Theperfectlyflawedlanguageleadstheperfectbeingtothink,theyareflawed.
Iunderstanditisthereverse.Thelanguageistheflaw.Iwasnotabletounderstandthelanguage,so
tospeak,soIthought,itmustbemenotthelanguage.
Theterroristsareperfectinwhattheyaredoingandtheyaredoingthebesttheycanbasedontheir
understanding,Israelisperfectinwhattheyaredoingandtheyaredoingthebesttheycanbasedon
theirunderstanding,USisperfectintheirunderstandinganddoingthebesttheycanbasedontheir
understanding.Noneofthemwillendupwithanythingbutwhattheywillendupwith,whichis
furtherunderstandingthroughpondering.
Theperfectentitiesinfiniteaspectswelabelaspeople,isonlyconcernedwithfurtherperfection,we
aspeopleareonlyconcernedwithgettingalittlebetterthanwewere.Thatiswhattheinfinitecycle
welabelaseternityis.Thisiseternity.Thisiswhatheavenis,perfection.Alltheperfectbooksare
perfectlyright,theyalwayshavebeen,theyalwayswillbe.
Allbooksareperfect.Allmusicisperfect.Allscienceisperfect.Thelabelsareperfectlyimperfect
whichenablesaperfectbeingtoponderandunderstandthat.
Booksleadonetopondertheirmeaningandthatleadstofurtherunderstanding.
Musicleadsontoponderitsmeaningandleadsonetofurtherunderstanding.
Scienceleadsontoponderitsmeaningandleadstofurtherunderstanding.
Allofthatleadstotheperfectbeingweallmakeupandare,intoafurtherstateofperfection.So
thereisjustahugeblanketofperfectionovereverything.
IunderstandwhyearlyinthisaccidentIwouldhearmusicorseemovieslikedocumentariesandI
wouldhearthelyricsandthink,theymustbejustlikeme,becausethoselyricsorthatdocumentaryis
sorighton.
ThenIstartedtoseeiteverywhere,thefurtheralongIgotthemoreIsawiteverywhere.Iunderstood
adrugaddictisjustponderingdrugsandeventuallywillcometoanunderstandingaboutdrugs.
Icouldntseetheflawofdruguse.IhadthissensationearlyonthemoreItriedtodisprovesomething
themoreIendedupprovingit.Thatwasthroughandthrough,themoreItriedtoprovethiswasan
accident,thenIgotothedoctorandhesaysIamhealthy,thenIgospeakwithreligiouspeopleand
theytalktomeandtheysayyoureasaint,soIwastryingtodisprovewhatIdeepdownknewfrom
thestart.
TwoorthreedaysagoIwasinaBuddhistchatroomandIwasstilltryingtodisprovewhatIwasorhad
become,andsomechattersaidSTOPTRYINGTODENYWHATYOUARE.AndIponderedthat.
TheydidntlabelmebysayingwhatIwas,theymademeponderwhatIwas.
STOPTRYING.
YOUAREWHATYOUARE.

Languageisharmonyuntoitself,thatisasymptomofacreationofaperfectbeing.
Itsacursebecauseitsaflaw,anditsablessingbecauseitsaflaw,soitisacursebecauseitisa
blessinganditisablessingbecauseitisacurse.
Intoinfinity.
IunderstandthattheperfectbeingwasinthegardenofEden,whichwasperfection,andtheperfect
entityafter200,000yearsinventedlanguage,whichwasperfectlyflawedsoitencouraged
understandingbecauseitencouragedponderingmoreso.
Allthelanguagesdothesamething.Theyareflawedandencouragefurtherponderormorepondering
thanwithoutlanguagesothatincreasestheunderstandingpotentialintheperfectentity.Soitis
perfect,itisnotamistake.Everythingisperfect.Thereisonlyperfectandmoreperfectintoinfinity.
Apersonisunabletolabelthesewordsandupsetme,becausenomatterwhattheysayaboutthese
words,Iwillremindthemtheycametoaperfectconclusion.Theyarenotwrongandtheyarenot
right,theyareonlyperfect.Theyareonlyabletodoperfectbecausetheyareperfect.Thecycleof
judgingandthenponderingthejudgmentandthenreachingunderstandingorawarenessfromthe
pondering,istheinfinitecycle.
Itisthesymptomofperfection,infinityisthesymptomofperfection.
Thethreeperfectbooksallagreeononethingforcertain.
Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over
all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

We,thePerfectbeing,decidedafterWEtheperfectbeinghadmadetheperfectcreationandthe
perfectcreaturesinthecreation,LETSgoaheadandcreateanotherperfectcreationcalledaman.
ThismanwillponderforUSandwillBEUSandwillunderstandUSandwillfurtherOURperfectinfinite
understanding.ThisperfectbeingWEwillmake,willhavedominionoverOURperfectcreation,sothat
perfectMANthatISUS,willhavemuchtoponderandthuswillhavemuchtounderstand,andwillalso
furtherOURperfectionthroughunderstanding.
ManisponderingandunderstandingsoWEmadeanotherPERFECTdecisioninmakingthisthing
calledman,soitisjustanotherperfectthingaperfectbeingdoes.WEtheperfectbeingareunableto
doanythingbutperfectthingsanddoanythingbutfurtherourperfectunderstandingintoinfinity.
Seetheflawsinthelanguage,thelanguageisunabletoexplainit.

Wearetheperfectbeing,wecreatedperfectmanandsoperfectmanisanaspectofus,butperfect
manisnotustotally,wetheperfectbeingis,beyondunderstanding,wetheperfectbeingissoperfect,
eventhoughwearetheperfectbeingweareunabletounderstandourownways,thatisperfect
becausewetheperfectbeingareinaconstantstateofponderingandthusinaconstantstateof
understatingandthusinaconstantstateofbecomingmoreperfectandthusinaconstantstateof
flux,andthusthatistheperfectionoftheperfectbeing.
Wetheperfectbeingis/areperfectthroughandthrougheverythingisperfecteverysinglethingwedo
/doesisperfect.Thereisnocontrasttoperfection,labelsfromlanguagegiveoffcontrast,sothe
languageisunabletodescribeus,butthatisperfectbecausethatleadsustoworkforitandthat
leadstomuchponderingandmuchunderstandingasaresult,andthusgreaterdegreesofperfection.
Aperfectbeingisnotperfectandthenjustsitsthere.Aperfectbeinghasaperfectplantofurther
becomemoreandmoreperfectintoinfinity.
Thereisnoescapefromhell,thereisnoescapefrometernity.Therealescapefromhellisinthemind,
themindistheessenceoraspectoftheperfectentityweare,thephysicalbodyisjustaplatformfor
theperfectentitiesessence.
Ifonepersongoesthroughtheirwholelifeandonlypondersandthenunderstandonething,that
stillincreasedtheperfectentitiesunderstandingsotheentityweareandallmakeupismoreperfect
then.
Itisdifficulttoevenuselanguagetodiscussit.Thereistomanyus,we,it,labels.
ThesePerfectReligiousbooksaresimplyaponderingmechanism.
Theyaresoperfect,theytellhistoryaccurately,theyarealsoastoryofwhoweare,theyarealsoa
parableofwhoweare,theyarealsoamechanismtoponderandunderstandmore,andsotheyare
alsoamechanismtofurtherUStheperfectentityintofurtherperfection.
IunderstandIwilltypeintoinfinityandnotevenstarttoexplainitall.
ThepassagesinthesebooksandintheBuddhistwritingwheresomeonesays,Iamlordoflordand
creatorofallandalwayshavebeenandalwayswillbe.
Iunderstandthatisverycomplextodescribeinaflawedcommunicationformsuchaslanguage.
WE,oursoulsoressenceallmakeuptheperfectentityandaretheperfectentityandareone,withthe
perfectentity.
Ahumanbeing,whoisanaspectoftheperfectentity,reachedalevelofunderstandingthrough
pondering,theybecameawareofwhatIamawareof,andusedlanguagetoexplainit.

AndpeoplewhoarenotatthatlevelofunderstandingseeitasasymptomthatGODhaspossessed
them.
Thatistrueandthatisnottrue.
ThatistruethatGodpossessedthembecausetheyareGod.
ThatisnottruebecausethatsuggestsGodcameintothem,andthatmeansGodwasnotinthem
before.
Sothatsaflawinlanguageagain.
Iunderstanditisnotpossibletosin.Asinisavehicletoponder,andthenunderstandfrompondering,
andthenthatleadstofurtherperfectionoftheperfectentitywhichweare.
Amansteals,pondersthestealingandthenunderstands,itisnotgoodtosteal,andsothatleadsUS
theperfectentitytobecomemoreperfectfromthatsingleunderstanding.
Theunderstandingisalabel.Itsnotwhatthewordsuggests.Itisanaccumulativething.
Iunderstanditislikeanobjectlikegasoline,themoreyougetthemoreyouhave,buttheperfect
entityhasinfiniteamountsandonlyseekstofurthertheinfiniteamounts.
Sothelanguagefailsagain.
Infinityitselfisunlimited,butinfinityinlanguageisabsolute.Absoluteisalimit.
Iunderstandbetweenthenumber1and2thereisinfinitefractions.Withinthatinfinityoffractions
thereisalsoinfinity.Infinitybegetsinfinityinfinitely.
Iunderstanditisnotpossibletheuniverseisanythingbutinfinite,thatisasymptomofperfectionand
infinityuponinfinity,infinitestars,infiniteatoms,infinitethingsforinfinitebeingtoinfinitelyponder,
toponderinfinitelyandtounderstandinfinitely,andinfinitelymaketheentireinfiniteperfectbeing
moreperfect,intoinfinity.
IunderstandwhyafterthisaccidentIstartedseeinginfinityeverywhereineverything.Icouldnot
ponderwhyIdid,itjustpoppedupineverythingIevenwroteasongcalledinfinityandthelyricssay
Intoinfinityyourway,intoinfinityyoullstay.Somybeingknewwhatitmeantbutnowtodayit
caughtuptomewhatitmeant.
Thereisonlyinfinityandthedefinitionverballyofinfinityisflimsyatbest.

IunderstandwhatallthesewordsIstartedtypingaboutthreemonthsaftertheaccidentleadto.The
samethingeverythingleadsto,understandingandfurthermakingUStheperfectentitymoreperfect.
Onethingleadstoanotherorwhenondominofallstherestfollow
Iunderstandthisiscomplextounderstandinverballanguage.
Ifellasaresultoftheaccident.
IamabletoexplainitbecauseIunderstandit.
Youwillreaditbuttounderstandityouwillhavetoponder,thatponderingwillleadyouto
understandingandfurtherponderingandfurtherunderstandinguntilyouunderstanditalso.
Thatwilltakeplaceintoinfinity.
Thatisasymptomoftheinfinityandasymptomofaninfinitecycle.
Illsleep.

TueFeb1720095:26AMEST

Feb1720091:05PM
Think leads to judgment

Ponder leads to understanding

Think is absolute. I think therefore I AM. "I am" is absolute

Perhaps leads to pondering. Maybe "I am" maybe "I am not."

"They hear but do not understand."

They hear the word but judge the word.

They hear the word but do not ponder the word.

"Blessed are the poor in spirit for they shall see God."

Blessed are the poor in spirit for they shall ponder the word and not judge the word and they will
understand the word.

The meek shall inherit the earth.

The meek shall ponder the word and they shall inherit the earth and see they are God.

The arrogant shall judge the word and they shall not see they are God.

Imayhaveaccidentlyormaynothaveaccidentlygone,fromtheworldofabsoluteandknowingto
theworldofponderingandunderstanding.

Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over
all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Maybe,Letus,denotesLets.MaybeusdenotesUSasin,youandI,asinTheperfectentity.
Maybe,thelanguagedoesnotworkproperlybecausethelabelitisareallabsolute.
Thoushallnotkill=absolute.
Maybethoushallnotkill=understanding.
Thoushallnotsteal=Thinking
Maybethoushallnotkill=Pondering

Iamthewaythetruthandthelight.=absolute
MaybeIamthewaythetruthandthelight.=understanding
Humanbeingsarespecial.=absolute=knowing.
MaybeHumanbeingsarespecial=pondering=understanding.
Maybeifmaybehumanbeingsaremaybespecialmaybeitisbecausemaybehumanbeingsponder
andmaybeponderingleadstomaybeunderstanding.
SO
Maybehumansbeingsaremaybespecialbecausemaybehumansbeingsmaybeponderandmaybe
understandandmaybeotheranimalsaremaybenotabletodothat,maybe.
Onwiththeshowthismaybeit
Law=absolute=thinking.
Theory=pondering=understanding.
TheoryofRelativity.
Timeisrelativetotheobserver.=ABSOLUTE
Maybetimeisnot,relativetotheobserver,becausemaybe,theremaybe,ismaybe,notime,maybe.
Maybethereismaybenotimemaybebecausemaybetimeismaybeanabsolute,maybe.
TheAlliesarewinningthewaronterror.=Absolute=knowing
Maybethealliesaremaybewinningthewaronterror,maybe=pondering=understanding
IknoweverythingIamsayingisright.=absolute=knowing=arrogance
MaybeeverythingIamsayingmaybeisright=Pondering=understanding=meek
Iwillpublishthisbook.Absolute=knowing=arrogance
MaybeIwillpublishthisbookandmaybeIwont.=pondering=understanding=threatening
Maybethisbookmaybeisnotworthpublishing=pondering=understanding=meek
MaybeIwillpublishthisbookandmaybeIwontbecausemaybethisbookisnotworthpublishing,
maybe.=Pondering=understanding=meek=submission
Globalwarmingishappening=absolute=knowing=arrogant
Maybeglobalwarmingismaybehappening,maybe.
SomeonemetJoanofarc.
Joanofarcsaidsomewords.
SomeonehearsJoanswordsandKNEWJoanofArcISblasphemousbythewordsshesaid.
SomeoneKNEWJoanofArcWILLbeburnedatthestakebecausesomeKNEWJoanofarcIS
blasphemousbyherwords.
NOWJoanofarcISaSAINTbecauseNOWsomeoneKNOWSJoanofarcswordsAREenlightened.
SomeonebackthenwasperfectintheirdecisiontoburnJoanofArcbecausetheirdecisionledto
PONDERING.
ThatPonderingNOWledtotheUNDERSTANDINGnow,thatJoanofARCisasaint.
SOtheresultoftheABSOLUTEdeterminationsofthatsomeonewasperfect.
IttooksometimetoponderandunderstandwhythatABSOLUTEdecision,JoanofArcis
blasphemousbythewordsshesaid,wasinerror,butthatdeterminethatwasanERROR,wasnotan
ERROR,becauseitledtopondering,andthusunderstanding,andthatunderstandingledto
understanding,JoanofArcisaSAINTbythewordsshesaid.
SotheJoanofArceventsonlyledtoonething,furtherunderstandingthroughpondering.
NOWweKNOWJoanofarcISasaint,furtherponderingofWHY(pondering)IS(Absolute)JOANofARC
ASAINT(absolute),willleadtofurtherponderingandfurtherunderstanding,intoinfinity.
Maybewheneverythingonesdoes,isperfect,maybe,maybeonedoesnothavetotry,maybe,tobe
perfect,maybe.
Maybeonceone,perhapsgetsit,maybeonegetsit,perhapsoften,maybe.
Maybeonceoneunderstandstheyaremaybegod,theyaremaybehumbledperhapsintoinfinity,
maybe.
Maybegodperhapshumblesitselfintoinfinityinitsponderingofitself,perhaps,andperhapsonly
understandsitisunabletounderstanditself,perhaps,andmaybethatleadsgodtoperhapsfurther
ponderitselfmaybe,intoinfinity,perhaps.
Maybeifoneperhapspondersnow,maybeonewillperhapsunderstandnow,maybe.
Maybeunderstandingwhatoneperhapsknows,isknowingwhatoneperhapsunderstands,perhaps.
MaybeIcantstandtheheatsoilljuststandthekitchen.
Maybeyoudontfeeldrownedbecausemaybeyoureverydrowned.
Maybeifsomeonegetsallthis,maybeitisus,perhaps.
Maybethelastthingweneedisus,perhaps.
Maybethefirstthingweneedisyou,perhaps.
Perhapsthelastthingyouneedisus,first,maybe.
Maybeitsnot,whogotitfirst,maybeits,whogotitnow.
MaybeifIhadalittlemoretime,Iwouldhavesome.
Ifyouarefollowingallofthis,Illfollowyou.
Ifyouarenotfollowingallofthis,followyourself.
Dontlookatme,Iamblind.
Ialmostthought,thenIunderstood.
Ifyouhaveitallfiguredout,tryagain.
Therearetwokindsofpeople,oneswhoaresmartandoneswhoarentsmartenoughtoknowthey
are.
IamprettysureIamoneofthosetwo.
IfweareGod,Illaskforyouradvice.
IfIamGod,Iwantasecondopinion.
IfyouareGod,Iwontargue.
IfwearentGod,Iknewitallalong.
IfIamnotGod,Icantargue.
IfyouarenotGod,Godcantarguewithperfection.
YouarenotGod,youjustthinknot.
Iforgottoplugmybooksoyouwillbuyit.
Ifyoubuymybook,Iwillplugit.
Themoreyoubuy,themoreIllplug.

Agoodcomedianiscomical.
Abadcomedianishilarious.
Ifyoulikethebooksofar,youshouldquitwhileyoureahead.
Oneshouldavoid,avoiding.
Ifyouwanttoquotesomeone,avoidquotingme.
Youcameforashow,youstayforthecomedy.
Isavemybestjokes,untilafterIamfinishedwithmybestjokes.
Allkiddingaside,youmustbekidding.
Thefirstvideogameyoushouldplay,isone.
Thelastvideogameyoushouldplay,isthelastone.
Youshouldplaythelastvideogamefirsttoavoidplayingvideogames.
Thelastthingyoushoulddoisthefirstthing.
WhenIunderstandthematerialIwillunderstandwhereIgotit.
Itelljokestoavoidthematerial.
IfIavoidjokesIamstuckwiththematerial.
Ifyoudontgetmyjokesitsbecausetheyaregoodones.
Ifyoudogetmyjokes,theyarentjokes.
IfIuseacommayoumightgetmyjokes.
IfIusemyjokesyoumightgetone.
Ifwomenaresuperior,Ihaveonetoomany.
Ifmenaresuperior,Iamdoomed.
IfthereisnoGod,Illapply.
IfthereisaGod,Illgetfired.
Whennothingmakessense,everythingmakessense.

IfItellyouwhatImdoing,thenyoucantellme.
Onceyougetthehangofit,youlostthehangofit.
Lifeisntajoke,itsagreatjoke.
Peoplearedoingthebesttheycan,ifthedefinitionofbestisworst.
Ifyoublockyouremotions,startwithme.
AclockremindsmeIamoutoftime.
Idontrunoutoftime,Ijustrunoutofjokes.
IfmygirlfriendknewIwastalkingtoyou,Iwouldntbetalkingtoyou.
IfIneedhelpwritingyouaprescription,Ineedone.
Thebestthingaboutthisbookiswhenitsover.
Thebestthingsinlifearetheworstthings.
Theworstthingsinlife,islife.
Whenthejokesstop,thenitreallygetsfunny.
Whenyouhavehadenough,Iamwayaheadofyou.
WhenIseeyoudrowning,Illaskforyourassistance.
IfIaskforyourassistance,Iamdrowning.
Whenallthewarsend,therewillbeperfectwar.
Peaceisanicewayofsayingwar.
Ifyouwanttohitsomeone,consideryourself.
Ifsomeonequotesme,theyhavepoortaste.
IfImsogreat,whyarentyou.
Ifyouaresogreat,Imnot.
Lifeisbeyondunderstanding;likeyou.
Ifyouareenlightened,Imnot.
Iwouldtellyouthetruth,butIcantthinkofanygoodlies.
Ilaughatmyself,soIdontlaughsohard.
Lifeiswhatonemakesit;Icantwaittomeetthemaker.
Lifeisfree;becausenoonebuysit.
ThemoreIknow,thefunnierIlook.
Iftheworldgetsanybetter,Imleaving.
Ifyouarelaughingatme,youknowhowIfeel.
WhenIfigureoutgrammar,youllbethefirsttoknow.
IfIspellawordright,itsaccidental.
IfIcanteachyouusingjokes,youllbelaughingalltheway.
Basedonmyliteraturemastery,Ishouldhavenevergonetoschool.
IfIamtheauthor,Iwanttoforgethowtoread.
IfIamtheteacher,Iwanttobeastudent.
Ifyouaretheteacher,Iamcallinginsick.
Thisisntajoke,butapunchlineisreadingit.
Alltheworldsastage;stagedaccident.
Ifyouusemyjokes,youlllooklikeme.
Ifyoulookedlikeme,youdusemyjokes.
Aninsidejokeisanicewayofsaying,youareajokeinside.
Ihavemasteredanger,andeveryoneIcareaboutknowsit.
Iamnotgreedy,unlessyourmoneyisinvolved.
Iamonlyshy,whenIseeyoulooking.
WhenIdisappear,youletmeknow.
Whenyouletmeknow,Illdisappear.
IfIcouldtellajoke,Iwouldnttellyou.
Drowningisajokeoneneverrecoversfrom.
ThenextbookIpublishwillexplainwhyIpublishedthisone.
Myfirstbookwasatesttoseeifpublisherspublishbooks.
Myfourthbookwillexplainthetestresults.
Myfifthbookwillexplainwhyonearthsomeonetaughtmethelanguage.
Mysixthbookwilllistfivebooksyoushouldavoid.
Thisisatableofcontentsifanyofmybookshadone.
Whenmybookshavepagenumbersyouwouldfindthematthebottomofthepage.
Ifanyonewantsthefirstfivebookstheyhaventreadthesixthbook.
Anyonewhohasreadthesixthbookwillunderstandthefifthbook.
Anyonewhohasreadthefifthbookwillunderstandtheseventhbook.
Theseventhbookisajoke,butIonlyknowsix.
ThemorebooksIwritethemorejokesIknow.
Iamnotemotionalaboutlosingmyemotions.
ThemorebadjokesItelltheharderIlaugh.
Iwouldtelljokesabouttheaccident,butIamtoobusytellingjokes.
Ifyouthinkyourkidisajokenow,dontletthemplayvideogames.
Ifanyofthesearejokes,Iwasthefirsttoknow.
SinceIamfirst,yougetinfrontofme.
IfIthoughtanyonewouldreadthisbookIcertainlywouldntwriteit.
IfIthoughtIwrotethisbookIcertainlywouldntreadit.
Ifanyonecriticsthisbooktheycertainlyhaventreadit.
Ifanyoneunderstandsthisbooktheycertainlyhaventreadit.
Ifyouarenotpullingyourhairoutafterreadingthisbookitisbecauseyourelaughingtoohard.
Ifyouareacriticyouhavecometotherightplace.
YouwontthinkImarrogantafteryouhearmyjokes.
Acriticisonewhobroadcastsopinionsonthequalityofthings.
Itwillcostmethousandtimesmoretosilencethecriticthanitcoststoencouragethepublisher.
IfacriticdoesanybroadcastingIhopeitsnotaboutthequalityofthisbook.
IfIhavenodefinitionofquality,Iamintheclear.
Iwillhavetopaythecritictoforgethisdefinitionofqualitybeforereadingthisbook.
Publishingbooksismoreexpensivethanitlooks,andcriticsthatknowthedefinitionofqualityare
moreexpensivethanthepublishers.
IfIgetonebadreviewtheneveryonewillbuythebook.
IfIgetonegoodreviewthenyouknowIhadenoughmoneytopaythecritic.
IfIgetagreatreviewthenIfoundlotsofmoneysomehow.
Ifnoonebuysmybooks,thenIhavelotstoread.
Ifnoonecriticsmybooks,thenIhavelotstocritic.
Iamapersonwhoplayedavideogamewaytoomuchandbecameacomedian,thisismystory.
Ifyouwanttobecomeacomedian,blockallyouremotions,asthequalityofyourjokesincreasethe
qualityofyourbooksdecreases.
Ifyoudoubtthat,askanycriticwhoreadsthisbook.
Ifyoulikethisbook,youneglectedtalkingtoacriticforfartoolong.
Ifyouneglecttalkingtoacritic,youmightwinduplikingthisbook.
Ifyoulikethisbook,youaregonnalovethesixthbook.
Thereisnobettertime,thanimmediatelyafteryouredonereadingthisbook.
IllshowyoutheothersidetomypersonalityafterIfindthisone.
Iwritemusic,anditisthesameasmybooks,justaskacritic.
Acriticwillhumblyexplaintoyouthequalityofmymusicisonlyexceededbythequalityofmybooks.
ThequalityofmymusicisonlyexceededbythequantityofmoneyIpaythecriticbeforehearingthe
music.

Ipayyoumoneytobuymybook,becauseyouwillpaymemoneytotakeitback.
ThatshowImakemymoney,Iwritequalitybooksandthereaderspaymetotakethemback.
WFeb18200912:12PMEST
ThetimeanddateremindedmeIhavenone.
Ifinditeasiertoquotemyself.
Therearenodrowningvictims,onlypeoplewhocantbreatheunderwater.
IfyouthinkIammessedup,waittillImeetyou.
NowIamblind,youlookgreat.
Youlookgreat,thatprovesImblind.
Themostimportantthingyoucanlearnfrommeis,youcantlearnfromme.
Ahunterseesamajesticdeeranditremindshimofwhatheis,soheswiftlykillsit.
Ifdeershadguns,wewouldbeextinct.
Ifyouthinkyouaremessedup,youhaventmetme.
Ifyouthinkthisismylastbook,trypondering.