Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
sl
= solidliquid interface energy (per unit area)
H
f
= bulk enthalpy of fusion (per gram of material)
s
= density of solid
The "4" in the above equation comes from the spherical geometry of the solid-liquid interface.
Note: is used for the pore size rather than for a number of reasons :
It is consistent with the original published notation.
The equation can be used with planar geometry (with a change of constant).
For consistency with the related StrangeRahmanSmith equation where the symbol is
used for the differential operator.
GibbsThomson equation for liquids in pores[edit]
Very similar equations may be applied to the growth and melting of crystals in the confined
geometry of porous systems. However the geometry term for the crystal-liquid interface may
be different, and there may be additional surface energy terms to consider, which can be
written as a wetting angle term . The angle is usually considered to be near 180. In
cylindrical pores there is some evidence that the freezing interface may be spherical, while
the melting interface may be cylindrical, based on preliminary measurements for the
measured ratio for in cylindrical pores.
[7]
Thus for a spherical interface between a non-wetting crystal and its own liquid, in an infinite
cylindrical pore of diameter , the structural melting point depression is given by:
[8]
Simplified Gibbs-Thomson equation[edit]
The GibbsThomson equation may be written in a compact form:
[9]
where the Gibbs-Thomson Coefficient assumes different values for different
liquids
[6][7]
and different interfacial geometries (spherical/cylindrical/planar).
[7]
In more detail:,
[1][10]
Where : is a geometric constant dependent on the interfacial shape,
is a constant involving parameters specific to the crystalline solid of solidliquid system,
and
is an interfacial energy term.
History[edit]
By 1906, the German physical chemist Friedrich Wilhelm Kster (1861-1917) had
predicted that since the vapor pressure of a finely pulverized volatile solid is greater than
the vapor pressure of the bulk solid, then the melting point of the fine powder should be
lower than that of the bulk solid.
[11][12]
Investigators such as the Russian physical
chemists Pavel Nikolaevich Pavlov (1872-1953) and Peter Petrovich von Weymarn
(1879-1935), among others, searched for and eventually observed such melting point
depression.
[13]
They recognized that the depression occurred when the change in
surface energy was significant compared to the latent heat of the phase transition, which
condition obtained in the case of very small particles.
[14]
Neither Josiah Willard Gibbs nor William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) derived the Gibbs
Thomson equation.
[15]
Also, although many sources claim that British physicist J. J.
Thomsonderived the GibbsThomson equation in 1888, he did not.
[16]
Early in the 20th
century, investigators derived precursors of the GibbsThomson equation.
[17]
However,
in 1920, the GibbsThomson equation was first derived in its modern form by two
researchers working independently: Friedrich Meissner, a student of the Estonian-
German physical chemist Gustav Tammann, and Ernst Rie (1896-1921), an Austrian
physicist at the University of Vienna.
[18][19]
These early investigators did not call the
relation the "Gibbs-Thomson" equation. That name was in use by 1910 or earlier;
[20]
it
originally referred to equations concerning the adsorption of solutes by interfaces
between two phases equations that Gibbs and then J. J. Thomson derived.
[21]
Hence,
in the name "Gibbs-Thomson" equation, "Thomson" refers to J. J. Thomson, not William
Thomson (Lord Kelvin).
In 1871, William Thomson published an equation describing capillary action and relating
the curvature of a liquid-vapor interface to the vapor pressure:
[22]
where
= vapor pressure at a curved interface of radius
= vapor pressure at a flat interface ( ) =
= surface tension
= density of vapor
= density of liquid
, = radii of curvature along the principal sections of the curved interface.
In his dissertation of 1885, Robert von Helmholtz (son of
German physicist Hermann von Helmholtz) showed how
the Ostwald-Freundlich equation
could be derived from Kelvin's equation.
[23][24]
The Gibbs
Thomson equation can then be derived from the Ostwald-
Freundlich equation via a simple substitution using the
integrated form of the ClausiusClapeyron relation:
[25]
The GibbsThomson equation can also be derived directly
from Gibbs' equation for the energy of an interface between
phases.
[26][27]
It should be mentioned that in the literature, there is still not
agreement about the specific equation to which the name
"Gibbs-Thomson equation" refers. For example, in the case of
some authors, it's another name for the "Ostwald-Freundlich
equation"
[28]
which, in turn, is often called the "Kelvin
equation" whereas in the case of other authors, the "Gibbs-
Thomson relation" is the Gibbs free energy that's required to
expand the interface,
[29]
and so forth.