0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
98 visualizzazioni85 pagine
nice book and can referMake it easier for other people to find your content by providing more information about it.Make it easier for other people to find your content by providing more information about it.
nice book and can referMake it easier for other people to find your content by providing more information about it.Make it easier for other people to find your content by providing more information about it.
nice book and can referMake it easier for other people to find your content by providing more information about it.Make it easier for other people to find your content by providing more information about it.
THE PROSPECTS OF PALM OIL IN MALAYSIA: SUBSTRATE FOR
CHEMICAL, FOOD PRODUCTS AND BIOFUEL PRODUCTION
LAW YEN SOON
A project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) Chemical Engineering
Faculty of Engineering and Science Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman
May 2012 ii
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this project report is based on my original work except for citations and quotations which have been duly acknowledged. I also declare that it has not been previously and concurrently submitted for any other degree or award at UTAR or other institutions.
Signature : _________________________
Name : ______Law Yen Soon_______
ID No. : ______08UEB05114________
Date : ________10/5/2012__________
iii
APPROVAL FOR SUBMISSION
I certify that this project report entitled THE PROSPECTS OF PALM OIL IN MALAYSIA: SUBSTRATE FOR CHEMICAL, FOOD PRODUCTS AND BIOFUEL PRODUCTION was prepared by LAW YEN SOON has met the required standard for submission in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) Chemical Engineering at Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman.
Approved by,
Signature : _________________________
Supervisor : Assistant Prof. Dr. Sim Jia Huey
Date : _________________________
iv
The copyright of this report belongs to the author under the terms of the copyright Act 1987 as qualified by Intellectual Property Policy of Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman. Due acknowledgement shall always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this report.
2012, Law Yen Soon. All right reserved. v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
With earnest gratitude and appreciation, I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge and extend my thanks to those whom have contributed in this project. First and foremost, I offer my outmost gratitude to Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR) for providing me opportunity to take this final year project as a partial fulfilment of the requirement for my degree (Degree of Bachelor of Chemical Engineering).
Next, I would like to express my gratitude to my research supervisor, Assistant Prof. Dr. Sim Jia Huey for her invaluable advice, guidance and her enormous patience throughout the development of the research. It has been a great adventure and experience during the undertaking of this project.
In addition, I would also like to express my gratitude to my lovely parent and friends who had helped and given me encouragement.
vi
THE PROSPECTS OF PALM OIL IN MALAYSIA: SUBSTRATE FOR CHEMICAL, FOOD PRODUCTS AND BIOFUEL PRODUCTION
ABSTRACT
Biofuels have attracted worldwide interest for their potential as a substitute for fossil fuels. Fossil fuels have been rapidly depleted by global industrial development over the past century, prompting an urgent search for alternatives. Biofuel production in Malaysia is synonymous with palm oil, a major established agricultural product in Malaysia. There are two methods of producing biofuel from palm oil. The conventional method is through transesterification, which produces palm-based biodiesel that can be used in compression ignition engines without any modification. The second method is direct blending of straight vegetable oil (SVO) with petroleum diesel. In Malaysia, an SVO blend of 5 per cent refined palm oil and 95 per cent petroleum diesel is marketed under the name Envodiesel. Currently, biofuels require subsidies, tariffs, fuel mandates, or other government support for economic viability. Thus, governments and consumers, or both, are paying a significant premium to gain the expected benefits from biofuels. The extent to which the expected benefits of costly biofuel promotion policies are being obtained is not clear, and if the expected benefits do not materialise, then it makes little sense to devote significant resources to them. The vast majority of Malaysias current biodiesel production is exported, mostly to the EU and U.S. where domestic subsidies support biodiesel use (including imports). The profitability of Malaysian biodiesel production is therefore precarious, depending on volatile palm oil and petroleum prices, and decisions of policymakers both in Malaysia and overseas.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION ii APPROVAL FOR SUBMISSION iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v ABSTRACT vi TABLE OF CONTENTS vii LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF FIGURES xi LIST OF SYMBOLS / ABBREVIATIONS xiii LIST OF APPENDICES xiv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Energy Consumption & Future of Biofuels from Palm Oil in Malaysia 1 1.2 Problem Statement 4 1.3 Aims and Objectives 5 1.4 Scope of Study 5 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.1 Palm oil 6 2.2 Type of Biofuel 12 2.3 Biodiesel 14 viii
2.4 Bioethanol 18 2.5 Biohydrogen 23 2.6 Biomethane 28 3 METHODOLOGY 33 3.1 Introduction 33 3.2 Overall View of the Methodology 34 3.3 Research Method 35 3.4 Primary Data 35 3.5 Secondary Data 36 3.6 Data Analysis 37 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 38 4.1 Data Collection 38 4.2 Palm Oil-derived Biodiesel 42 4.3 Energy and Biofuel Policies 52 4.4 SWOT Analysis for Biodiesel Oil Industry in 56 4.5 Projection of Research Development in Asian Countries 63 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMANDATIONS 65 5.1 Conclusion 65 5.2 Recommendations 66 REFERENCES 67 5 APPENDICES 70
ix
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE TITLE PAGE
1.1 Projected CPO Production, Projected CPO for Biodiesel Production and Potential Biodiesel Production for the Coming 4 years and 14 years
3
2.1 Yield of Palm Oil to Biodiesel Compare to Other Sources in litres/hectare
11
2.2 Comparison between Diesel and Biodiesel Properties
16
2.3 Parameters of Bioethanol in Comparison With Petrol
20
2.4 Electricity Generation by PEMFC 28
2.5 Parameters of methane (from biogas or natural gas)
30
4.1 Types of Company/Research Institution Distribution in Selangor, Perak and Johor States
39
4.2 Categories of Research 41
x
4.3 Fuel Properties of B5 Palm Biodiesel and Malaysian Petroleum Diesel
43
4.4 Fuel Properties of Normal and Low Pour Point Palm Biodiesel
44
4.5 Monthly Export of Oil Palm Products in Year 2011
48
4.6 Fuel Properties of Palm Oil Biodiesel and Jatropha Oil Biodiesel
50
4.7 The developments in Malaysias energy policies from 1974 to 2000
52
4.8 National Biofuel Policy Strategic Objectives 55
4.9 Existing Palm Biodiesel Plants in Malaysia for 2011
58
4.10 Potential Availability of Agricultural Residues For Second Generation Biofuels in Selected Asian Countries
64
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE TITLE PAGE
1.1 Percentage of Palm Oil World Production 3
2.1 A Typical Palm Oil Triglyceride Structure 7
2.2 Description of Saturated, Monounsaturated and Polyunsaturated Acid
8
2.3 Palm Oil Processing Unit Operation 10
2.4 The Cycle between Biomass and Biofuel 13
2.5 Chemical Equation of Biodiesel 17
2.6 The Process Diagram of Biodiesel Production 18
2.7 The Fermentation Process Diagram 21
2.8 Cellulose in Plant Structure 22
2.9 Hydrogen Production at Different pH at Mesophilic Temperature (37 C)
25
2.10 Figure 2.10: pH Optimum Test at Extreme- Thermophilic Temperatures (70C)
25 xii
2.11 Relevant Stakeholder Groups in Establishing Alternative Fuels
29
2.12 Flow Process of Hydrolysis, Fermentation, Acetogenesis and Methanogenesis
32
3.1 Methodology Sequence 34
4.1 Company/Research Institution Distribution in Selangor, Perak and Johor States
40
4.2 Categories of Research 41
4.3 Percentage of Profits for Palm Oil Products 50
4.4 Biodiesel Export Destination 51
xiii
LIST OF SYMBOLS / ABBREVIATIONS
SVO EU US MPOB CPO TFR CFPP RSO SNG CO PPO FFB EFB POME PEMFC STP SWOT GHG ILUC Straight vegetable oil European Union United State Malaysia Palm Oil Board Crude palm oil Tocotrienol-rich fraction Cold Filter Plugging Point Refined Soy Oil SynGas Carbon monoxide Pure Plant Oil Fresh Fruit Bunch Empty Fruit Bunch Palm oil mill effluent Proton exchange membrane fuel cell Standard temperature and pressure Strength, weakness, opportunity, threat Greenhouse gases Indirect land use change
xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE PAGE
A Questionnaire Survey 69
B Article 70
CHAPTER 1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Energy Consumption & Future of Biofuels from Palm Oil in Malaysia
Most of Malaysia energy sources come from power stations that are using fossil fuels like oil and gas to generate electricity. However, this gas reserves estimated to last for another 33 years and oil reserves another 19 years, then sources will eventually run out (Salsuwanda Selamat and Che Zulzikrami Azner Abidin, 2011). In addition to this, burning of fossil fuels produce greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane that can cause global warming. All participating countries from all over the world which in policies to mitigate global climate change, are concerning about these issues and taking appropriate actions action to replace non-renewable energy with the renewable energy. They are never allowed to choose those policies that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the lowest cost to the country taking the action, even if such a strategy may involve higher costs to the world (Hillard G. Huntington and Stephen P.A. Brown, Oct 2003).
Biofuel is known as agro fuel and is mainly derived from biomass or bio waste. Biofuels also are the best way of reducing the emission of the greenhouse gases. Great development in technology these days is causing the emission of greenhouse gases to harm the environments ecosystem. In respond to this, the research to find alternative energy to reduce greenhouse gases has become the major concern of the nation. As a result, palm oil was found to be a potential biofuel raw material. Biofuel substrate from palm oil is biodegradable, non-toxic, and has 2
significantly fewer emissions than petroleum-based diesel (petro-diesel) when burned.
Oil palm is actually another potential source of renewable energy. The development of biofuel industry in Malaysia is important because of environmental protection and energy supply security reasons. In order to supply a good quality of palm oil biofuel to the market, plantation of palm oil had been expanded in the country with cooperation between the private sectors and the government of Malaysia. Subsidies had been given accordingly while policies were set up in order to protect the plantation of oil palm. Major research is also been done by the governments organization such as the Malaysia Palm Oil Board (MPOB) while plantation was mainly done by the private sector such as Sime Darby Plantation and IOI Corporation.
Malaysia is currently one of the large producers after Indonesia. Malaysia produces about 47% of the worlds supply of palm oil and accounts the highest percentage of global vegetable oils and fats trade (S. Sumathi, S.P. Chai, A.R. Mohamed, 2007). In December 2006, the Malaysian government initiated merger of Sime Darby Berhad, Golden Hope Plantations Berhad and Kumpulan Guthrie Berhad to create the worlds largest listed oil palm plantation player. Besides producing oils and fats, there is a continuous increasing interest on oil palm renewable energy recently. Research and development were carried out by professional from Malaysia and Indonesia on renewable energy especially palms oil to substrate for biofuel production.
The pie chart below (Figure 1.1) is the production rate of palm oil in the world in 2008 and Malaysia has produced 41.3% of world production. We manage to determine that Malaysia is a palm oil plantation country and has the high potential to produce a lot of palm oil for worldwide. Next will be the forecast for the future production in CPO, from CPO to Biodiesel and successful Biodiesel. 3
Figure 1.1: Percentage of Palm Oil World Production
Table 1.1: Projected CPO Production, Projected CPO for Biodiesel Production and Potential Biodiesel Production for the Coming 4 years and 14 years Year Projected CPO Production t / year Projected CPO for Biodiesel Production t / year Potential Biodiesel Production mill. l / year 2015 17,740,000 3,380,000 3,930 2025 17,910,000 3,550,000 4,128
The CPO production forecast was assumed by MPOB, Dr. Chow C.S. The density of biodiesel was calculated with 0.86 g / l. Density is an important parameter, with impact on fuel quality. It will optimize the cost of biofuel production by predicting density of high relevance for a correct formulation in order to meet the quality standard.
In this study, a complete research on prospects of palm oil in Malaysia substrate for biofuel production is carried out in order to spread information about 4
this renewable energy. Besides that, it is used to revise back Malaysia governments efforts on encourage both local and overseas developers in taking parts in biofuel sector and also the future development of biofuel. By completing the research, information on characteristics, process on producing, advantages and disadvantages of biofuel are collected and analysed.
1.2 Problem Statement
In Malaysia, although palm oil is an important commodity vegetable oil to our country, the commercial value of palm oil in biofuel industry is not promoted yet. The variability of palm oil usage is still limit to food and oleo chemical products. In fact, the exploitation on the use of palm oil especially in biofuel production is necessary to increase its commercial value in the market.
Next is the deforestation and environmental degradation in Malaysia, where large areas of land are being cleared for the cultivation of biofuel crops. Biofuel industries in Malaysia are facing the problem where limited resources being obtained to produce biofuel.
The economic assessments on the process of biofuel production from palm oil are insufficient. In Malaysia, most of the developers are capital oriented which means that who has the lower risk, high financial strategy and lower cost of investment of a project will survived in the industry fields. In fact, nearly every biofuel developers are depend on the financial support from the Malaysia government because the loan requirement for bridging loan was too high. Thus, the lack of information on economic analysis and financial support from Malaysia government has hindered the growth of biofuel industry in Malaysia.
5
1.3 Aims and Objectives
The main objectives of this research include the following: To study the biofuel production processes from palm oil. To perform analysis on the availability of palm oil feedstock for biofuel industry and oleo chemical industry. To identify the strategies for the commercial value of biofuel production from palm oil.
1.4 Scope of Study
The scope of study which will be covered: To understand the different processes that can be used in bioethanol, biodiesel, biomethane and biohydrogen production from palm oil. To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of each process used for biofuel production. To perform economic analysis, this includes the capital cost, investment cost and loan requirements.
Besides, discussion on the methods to produce biofuel from palm oil will also be carried out as it is important for the development of good quality biofuel. Additionally, the survey on the company in Malaysia which actively involved in biofuel production activities will be performed to define the future prospects of biofuel production from palm oil in Malaysia.
CHAPTER 2
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Palm oil
In this 20 th century, palm oil is being consumed in 150 countries all over world because it provides crucial source of food and energy supplies to developing world. There are some scientifically proven for durability, nutritional and health benefits. Therefore, palm oil becomes an environmentally-friendly alternative fuel source to supplement decreasing high carbon fossil fuels and supplies nutrients in our food industry. The oil palm is a monocotyledon belonging to the genus Elaeis, called the African oil palm tree. It is a perennial tree crop and the highest oil producing plant, yielding an average of 3.7 tonnes of oil per hectare per year in Malaysia (Kalyana Sundram PhD, 2007).
Palm oil is made up of triglyceride molecules which are the smallest particle of a pure chemical substance that still retains its chemical composition and properties. Triglyceride molecule is made up of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen atoms that can be presented as a structural formula (Ir Ng Say Bock, 2009). Figure 2.1 shows the palm oil triglyceride structure.
7
Figure 2.1: A Typical Palm Oil Triglyceride Structure
Native to Malaysia, palm oil is the sources for a fleshy fruit come from the oil palm tree. It is also odourless, tasteless and is semi-solid at room temperature. Palm oil is the most versatile of all vegetable oils that consisting of 50% saturated fat and 50% unsaturated fat. More specifically palm oil contains approximately 44% palmitic acid, 5% stearic acid, 39% oleic acid (monounsaturated), and 10% linoleic acid (polyunsaturated). Myristic acid and lauric acid are negligible (American Palm Oil Council, 2006). Figure 2.2 shows the best explanation for stearic acid which considers as saturated acid is a fatty acid as a special train with a large number of carriages. Within each carriage, there are only two seats and all seats are taken. There are other types of 18-carbon chain acids and one of them has in the ninth and tenth carbon chain one set of vacant seat on the same side of the carbon chain. This is a monounsaturated acid and is named Oleic acid, written as C18:1. Similarly, the other 18-carbon chain acids, namely Linoleic and this acid have two and three sets of vacant seats in their carbon chains respectively. These are collectively called polyunsaturated acids, written as C18:2 and C18:3.
8
Figure 2.2: Description of Saturated, Monounsaturated and Polyunsaturated Acid
2.1.2 Nutritional Properties
Palm oil contains minor components including carotenoids, tocopherols, tocotrienols, sterols, phosphatides, triterpenic and aliphatic alcohols. They play an important role in the stability and quality of the oil although these components constitute less than 1% in palm oil. Below are some of the usages of some beneficial minor components:
Carotenoids are organic pigments naturally occurring in plants, some algae and some types of fungus and bacteria Carotenoids are important nutritionally. Palm oil contains 500-700 ppm of carotenoids, namely the a-carotenoids and b-carotenoids. Nowadays, carotenoids are the precursors of Vitamin A, with beta carotene having the highest pro vitamin A activity. Palm oil has 15 times more "vitamin A" activity than carrots and 300 times more than tomatoes. In crude palm oil these carotenoids appear to offer some protection against oxidation by themselves being oxidized first prior to the oxidative attack on the triacylglycerols.
9
Crude palm oil is also a rich source of vitamin E (600-1000 ppm) which has tocopherols and tocotrienols. These two vitamin E contents have been evaluated for its effects on cholesterol metabolism, anti-cancer properties as well as their ability to protect against ischemia/reperfusion injury. The vitamin E of palm oil consists largely of tocotrienols, the remainder being a-tocopherol. Tocotrienol-rich fraction (TRF) or Palm Vitee has been subsequently shown to inhibit the proliferation and growth of human breast cancer cells in vitro.
Plant sterols from palm oil are fat-like compounds with a chemical structure that is very similar to cholesterol. However, they are minimally absorbed by the body and do compete with cholesterol for absorption during digestion. Besides that, plant sterols are naturally occurring plant constituents, and studies have shown that they can inhibit the absorption of dietary cholesterol. They are important because they have great potential in the pharmaceutical industry (theStar online, 2011).
2.1.3 Process Description from Palm Oil Harvesting until Palm Oil Refinering
In general, large-scale fully mechanised palm oil processing involved the evolution of a sequence of processing steps designed to extract, from a harvested oil palm bunch, a high yield of a product of acceptable quality for the international edible oil trade. The oil winning process involves the reception of fresh fruit bunches from the plantations, sterilizing and threshing of bunches to free the palm fruit, mashing the fruit and pressing out the crude palm oil. The crude oil is further treated to purify and dry it for storage and export.
Nevertheless, conversion of crude palm oil to refined oil involves removal of the products of hydrolysis and oxidation, colour and flavour. After refining, the oil undergoes a process called fractionation, in which it is separated under controlled thermal conditions (controlled cooling, crystallization, and filtering) into a solid and a liquid (Linda, 2003).
The liquid fraction (olein) is used extensively as cooking oil while the solid fraction (stearin) is then used to form solid fats such as margarine.
10
Extraction of oil from the palm kernels is generally separate from palm oil extraction, and will often be carried out in mills. The stages in this process comprise grinding the kernels into small particles, heating (cooking), and extracting the oil using an oilseed expeller or petroleum-derived solvent. The oil then requires clarification in a filter press or by sedimentation. Figure 2.3 clearly shows the general flow diagram of palm oil processing unit operation.
Figure 2.3: Palm Oil Processing Unit Operation
2.1.4 Advantages and Disadvantages of Palm oil as Biofuel Feedstock
Advantages have been discovered when palm oil was used as the feedstock for biofuel production. For examples, the combustion of palm oil biofuel does not increase the level of carbon dioxide (greenhouse gas that caused global warming) in the atmosphere compare to combustion of fossil fuel. The main reason is because biofuel absorb as much carbon in their growing as they release when they are burned as fuel. Therefore, biofuel are regarded as carbon neutral. In addition, the palm trees that produce oil have simultaneously absorbed a lot more carbon dioxide during 11
photosynthesis to form biomass for the other parts of the plant. The amount of carbon dioxide may reduce with the carbon absorption during photosynthesis (Tan Sri Datuk Dr Yusof Basiron, 2007).
The relative oxidation rate of palm oil at 37C / 98.6F is 40-65 OSI (h) at 97.8C, with a relative stability of 20, as compared with 13-15 OSI for soybean oil, with a relative stability of 6; and 16-20 OSI with a relative stability of 6 for rapeseed oil. As extensive oxidation can cause fuel quality to degrade during storage, the higher OSI of palm oil renders it more stable with respect to oxidation than other oils, and therefore comprises an important advantage.
Next is palm oil produces more than 5,675 litres of biodiesel per hectare (600 gallons per acre). However, soy oil only produces approximately 475 litres of biodiesel per hectare (50 gallons per acre) on average. According to the production rate, palm oil can produce biodiesel 12 times more than soy oil. Table 2.1 illustrates the volume of biodiesel that has been produced per area of plantation as compared with various plant sources:
Table 2.1: Yield of Palm Oil to Biodiesel Compare to Other Sources in litres/hectare Source Yield (litres/hectare) Palm 5950 Coconut 2689 Jatropha 1818 Rapeseed 1190 Soybean 446
However, palm oil also has its own disadvantages such as palm oil has higher cloud point (the temperature at which dissolved solids in the oil begin to form and separate from the oil). Therefore, the oil must be kept at a temperature that is above the cloud point in order to prevent the clogging of filers. Besides that, palm oil also has higher pour point (the lowest temperature at which oil will flow). Next, in blends 12
of RSO (Refined Soy Oil) and palm oil, palm oil addition is strongly limited by CFPP (Cold Filter Plugging Point) and viscosity. Furthermore, palm oil addition yields only limited price flexibility.
2.2 Type of Biofuel
Biofuel can be broadly defined as solid, liquid, or gas fuel consisting of, or derived from renewable, recently living biological material, most commonly plants. Theoretically, biofuel can be produced from any biological carbon source. In contrast, fossil fuels are derived from non-renewable biological material formed from the decayed remains of prehistoric plants and animals.
All biomass materials can be converted to energy via thermochemical and biochemical processes as stated in Figure 2.4. In a thermochemical process heat is the dominant mechanism to convert the biomass into another chemical form. Some of the commonly used conversion processes are pyrolysis, gasification and liquefaction producing syn-oil, syn-gas and bio-chemicals. The synthesis gas is composed of H 2 and carbon monoxide (CO) which is also known as syn-gas. On the other hand, biochemical conversion makes use of the enzymes of bacteria and other micro-organisms to break down biomass to produce fuels. Commonly used conversion processes are anaerobic digestion, fermentation and transesterification to produce biohydrogen, bioethanol and biodiesel. Some of the main sources of hydrogen are glucose, starch, food wastes and agricultural residues rich in carbohydrates; for bioethanol are wheat, maize, sugar beet, potatoes; and for biodiesel rapeseed, soybean, palm and sunflower (Dr. Anbu Clemensis Johnson, Ragunathan Santiagoo, Abdul Haqi Ibrahim, 2008). Synthetic biofuels are synthetic hydrocarbons or mixtures of synthetic hydrocarbons from biomass, e.g. SynGas (SNG) produced from gasification of forestry biomass or SynDiesel.
13
Figure 2.4: The Cycle between Biomass and Biofuel
Basically, there are two types generations of biofuels and we manage to briefly differentiate second from first generation. First generation biofuel are those fuel derived from vegetable or animal fats/oils, starch or sugar with the use of modern technology. The complex chemical reaction process is known as transesterification, which is used to produce traditional biodiesel. It is designed to be ready to use in industrial applications as a 100% replacement for distillate fuels without mixing or blending with other fuels, equipment modification or loss of significant engine performance. Second generation biofuel is different because we produce our biofuels using a proprietary blending technology that is simpler, cleaner, and less expensive and less energy intensive than previous generation of biofuel. Proponents claims that increasing industrial and political support for this second generation biofuel is a more feasible solution to achieve efficient fuel production utilizing a much greater range of plants and its waste.
2.2.1 First Generation Biofuels
First generation biofuels are biofuels which are on the market in considerable amounts today. Typical 1st-generation biofuels are sugarcane ethanol, starch-based or corn ethanol, biodiesel and Pure Plant Oil (PPO). The feedstock for producing 1 st
generation biofuels either consists of sugar, starch and oil bearing crops or animal fats. This feedstock is characterised by mature commercial markets and has 14
contributed to the recent increases in world prices for food and animal feeds. Example of 1 st -generation biofuels are biodiesel, bioalcohols and biogas.
2.2.2 Second Generation of Biofuels
Second generation biofuels are those biofuels produced from the whole of the plant such as cellulose, hemicellulose or lignin, not just the sugar or oil-rich parts. They can be produced from biomass. Low-cost crop and forest residues, wood process wastes, and the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes can all be used as ligno- cellulosic feedstock. Relatively high annual energy yields can be achieved from these crops compared with many of the traditional food crops currently grown for 1st- generation biofuels. These biofuel technologies are not yet commercially viable, and might be some 5 to 10 years or more from reaching the market. However, these 2nd- generation biofuels are relatively immature so they should have good potential for cost reductions and increased production efficiency levels as more experience is gained. The production of biofuels from ligno-cellulosic feedstocks can be achieved through two very different processing routes. They are: biochemical in which enzymes and other micro-organisms are used to convert cellulose and hemicellulose components of the feedstocks to sugars prior to their fermentation to produce ethanol. thermo-chemical where pyrolysis/gasification technologies produce a synthesis gas from which a wide range of long carbon chain biofuels, such as synthetic diesel or aviation fuel, can be reformed. Examples of 2nd-generation biofuels are Enzymatic hydrolysis ethanol, Syngas-to- Fischer Tropsch diesel and Syngas-to- ethanol.
2.3 Biodiesel
Biodiesel is a non-petroleum based diesel fuel which consists of the mono alkyl esters of long chain fatty acids derived from renewable lipid sources. Biodiesel is typically produced through the reaction of a vegetable oil or animal fat with 15
methanol in the presence of a catalyst to yield glycerine and biodiesel (chemically defined as methyl esters). Biodiesel is predominantly used as liquid fuels in the automotive industries exclusively for diesel engines. Biodiesel can be mixed with petroleum diesel in any percentage, from 1 to 99, which is represented by a number following a B. For example, B5 is 5 percent biodiesel with 95 percent petroleum, B20 is 20 percent biodiesel with 80 percent petroleum, or B100 is 100 percent biodiesel, no petroleum. It is less polluting and renewable in nature as compared to the conventional diesel.
Bio-diesel is mainly produced from vegetable oils, which are derived from the seeds or the pulp of oil-bearing crops. There are two types of oil crops. It can be annual (rapeseed, groundnut, soybean, and sunflower) or perennials (coconut palms, oil palms, physical nut, and Chinese tallow tree). Oil from the rapeseed was the first type used for bio-diesel production and in Europe rapeseed is still the main feedstock for bio-diesel production. Among the sources, palm oil is the cheapest vegetable oil and has the highest oil yields/ha of plantation.
Biodiesel can be used in existing diesel applications with little or no modification to the engine or fuelling system. Biodiesel can be utilized in pure form however it may necessitate engine modifications to refrain from maintenance and performance troubles. It is most often blended with traditional diesel fuel at any level to lessen automobile emissions. When biodiesel is mixed with petroleum diesel, it yields a fuel which is compatible with diesel engines, shifts imported petroleum and decrease toxic emissions.
Biodiesel production is the process of producing the biofuel, biodiesel, through either transesterification or alcoholysis. It involves reacting vegetable oils or animal fats catalytically with short-chain aliphatic alcohols (typically methanol or ethanol).
16
2.3.1 Properties of Biodiesel
Biodiesel has physical and chemical properties similar to petroleum based especially its viscosity and ignition properties. Table 2.2 shows the properties for biodiesel and diesel.
Table 2.2: Comparison between Diesel and Biodiesel Properties
However, biodiesel is sensitive to cold weather and require special anti-freezing precautions which similar to standard diesel. Therefore winter compatibility is achieved by mixing additives, allowing the use down to -20 C. Besides, biodiesel is readily oxidizes. Thus, long term storage may cause problems but additives can enhance stability.
2.3.2 Process for Biodiesel Production from Palm oil
Transesterification of natural palm oil with methanol to methyl esters is a technically important reaction that has been used extensively in biodiesel industry. It is a reversible reaction and proceeds essentially by mixing the reactants in which the catalysts is a liquid acid or a liquid base. Figure 2.5 indicates the reaction of transesterification which involves the reaction of methanol with the triglycerides of the rapeseed oil to form the corresponding methyl esters and glycerine. 17
Triglyceride + Methanol Methyl Esters (Biodiesel) + Glycerine Figure 2.5: Chemical Equation of Biodiesel
In the transesterification process, the glycerol is deprotonated with a base, such as ethanol or methanol to make it a stronger nucleophile, producing methyl esters (biodiesel) in the process. Heat and an acid or base catalyst are used to help the reaction proceed more quickly (Leadbetter, Nicholas E, 2007). It is important to note that the acid or base are not consumed by the transesterification reaction, thus they are not reactants but catalysts. Transesterification can happen at ambient/70 F, need 4-8 hours for completion. Reaction is shortened to 2-4 hours at 105 F and even shorter time 1-2 hours at 140 F. However, the temperature should not higher than 148 F because methanol boils at 148 F.
The general process is depicted in Figure 2.6. A palm oil is reacted with an alcohol, like methanol, in the presence of a catalyst to produce glycerine and methyl esters or biodiesel. The methanol is charged in excess to assist in quick conversion and recovered for reuse. The catalyst is usually sodium or potassium hydroxide which has already been mixed with the methanol.
18
Figure 2.6: The Process Diagram of Biodiesel Production
Glycerine that has been separated during transesterification process is released as the by-product of the chemical reaction. Glycerine will either sink to the bottom of reaction vessel or come to the surface depending on its phase. It can be easily separated by the centrifuges. The by-product of the transesterification chemical reaction is known as glycerine that originally formed bond between the chains of fatty acids and can be used for various purposes. Thus during transesterification process nothing goes wasted, all the products and by-products are utilized for various purposes (Haresh Khemani, 2008).
2.4 Bioethanol
Bioethanol is ethanol (alcohol) that can be produced from any biological feedstock that contains appreciable amounts of sugars or materials that can be converted into sugar such as starch or cellulose. Even though ethanol can be extracted as a by- product from a chemical reaction with ethylene and other petroleum products, these sources are not considered renewable. Actually, bioethanol is mainly produced by the sugar fermentation process. Chemically, bioethanol is identical to ethanol and can be represented by either the formula C 2 H 6 O or C 2 H 5 OH.
Palm oil 19
Bioethanol is a high octane fuel and has replaced lead as an octane enhancer in petrol. By blending bioethanol with gasoline we can also oxygenate the fuel mixture so it burns more completely and reduces polluting emissions. The most common blend is 10% ethanol and 90% petrol (E10). Vehicle engines require no modifications to run on E10 and vehicle warranties are unaffected also. Only flexible fuel vehicles can run on up to 85% ethanol and 15% petrol blends (E85).
Bioethanol has taken precedence as Prime Biofuel after lot of controversy erupted on international food shortages and spiralling food prices. In spite of all the controversy Shrouding Biofuels, there has been understanding that we need to continually look at alternate sources of fuels and feedstock's which are non-food and this has seen visible interest for Sugarcane based Bioethanol to wheat, Maize and other food crops. Non-food Crops like Jatropha, Karanjia have not seen visible success and are also viewed as invasive species by certain nations.
Bioethanol is considered an alternative to petroleum and diesel and its popularity is emerging as a fuel for cars it is particularly well established in Brazil. It is estimated that for 100 Joules energy consumed for bioethanol production, 135 Joules energy is provided by using ethanol as fuel. Production of bioethanol involves the conversion of a feedstock crop into fermentable sugars through enzyme amylases. Yeast is then added to ferment the sugars into alcohol and carbon dioxide. The main crop used in bioethanol production varies throughout the world in Brazil, sugar cane is preferred, in the USA its corn, in Malaysia, old palm trunk (>25 years) and across Europe its predominantly wheat and barley.
2.4.1 Properties of Bioethanol
Bioethanol has many favourable properties such as it is a clear colourless liquid, it is biodegradable, low in toxicity and causes little environmental pollution if spilt (Dominik Rutz and Rainer Janssen, 2007). Bioethanol burns to produce carbon dioxide and water. The properties bioethanol is shown in Table 2.3 and compared to the properties of fossil petrol.
20
Table 2.3: Parameters of Bioethanol in Comparison With Petrol Fuel Properties Petrol Bioethanol Density, kg/l 0.76 0.79 Viscosity, mm 2 /s 0.6 1.5 Flashpoint, C <21 <21 Caloric Value (at 20 CMJ/kg) 42.7 26.8 Caloric Value, MJ/l 36.45 21.17 Octane-number (RON) 92 >100 Fuel Equivalence, l 1 0.65
Bioethanol is a monohydric primary alcohol. It melts at -117.3C and boils at 78.5C. It is completely free of water is called absolute bioethanol. Bioethanol forms a constant-boiling mixture, or azeotrope, with water that contains 95% ethanol and 5% water and that boils at 78.15C; since the boiling point of this binary azeotrope is below that of pure ethanol, absolute ethanol cannot be obtained by simple distillation. There is a main property which is bioethanol has low vapor pressure. When stored as a pure fuel, it has a lower vapor pressure than gasoline, and thus will have fewer evaporative emissions. In low temperature climates, the low vapor pressure of pure ethanol will cause cold start problems. Therefore in cold climates ethanol is blended with gasoline (E85). In contrast, lower-level blends of ethanol in gasoline, tend to raise the vapor pressure of the base gasoline to which ethanol is added. When ethanol is blended up to about 40% with gasoline, the two fuels combined have higher evaporative emissions than either does on its own (Columbia University Press, 2007).
Bioethanol burns in air with a blue flame, forming carbon dioxide and water. It reacts with active metals to form the metal ethoxide and hydrogen. For example, with sodium it forms sodium ethoxide. It reacts with certain acids to form esters. Another example is with acetic acid, it forms ethyl acetate. It can be oxidized to form acetic acid and acetaldehyde. It can be dehydrated to form diethyl ether or, at higher temperatures, ethylene.
21
2.4.2 Process of Bioethanol Production from Palm Oil
Fermentation, one of the oldest chemical processes known to man, is used to make a variety of products, including foods, flavourings, beverages, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals. At present, however, many of the simpler products such as ethanol are synthesized from petroleum feedstock at lower costs. The future of the fermentation industry, therefore, depends on its ability to utilize the high efficiency and specificity of enzyme catalysis to synthesize complex products and on its ability to overcome variations in quality and availability of raw materials.
Figure 2.7 is a diagram about the process of fermentation. Production of bioethanol involves the conversion of a feedstock crop into fermentable sugars through enzyme amylases. Yeast is then added to ferment the sugars into alcohol and carbon dioxide. pH and sugar concentration will be adjusted and then will proceed to sterilized filtration.
Figure 2.7: The Fermentation Process Diagram
Palm oil mills produce a large amount of solid wastes. The remainder of the oil palm consists of huge amount of lignocellulosic materials such as oil palm fronds, trunks and empty fruit bunches. The residues contain 7.0 million tonnes of oil palm trunks, 26.2 million tonnes of oil palm fronds and 23% of Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) A=Core of Old Oil Palm Trunk B=Middle of Old Oil Palm Trunk C=Outer of Old Oil Palm Trunk 22
per tonne of Fresh Fruit Bunch (FFB) processed in oil palm mill. Cellulose is the most abundant substance found in the plant kingdom. It is the major component of all plant material, comprising up to half of the plant's dry weight. Figure 2.8 is the example of cellulose in plant structure.
Figure 2.8: Cellulose in Plant Structure
The most widely used fermentation is blackstrap molasses which contains about 35 40 wt% sucrose, 15 20 wt% invert sugars such as glucose and fructose, and 28 35 wt% of non-sugar solids. However, in Malaysia, we are producing bioethanol by using oil palm trunk and also EFB. Both sources have molecules of cellulose are organized into long, unbranched microfibrils that give support to the cell wall. Therefore, we are using cellulosic materials to bioethanol fermentation. Each step in the process of the conversion of cellulose to ethanol proceeded with 100% yield; almost two-thirds of the mass would disappear during the sequence, most of it as carbon dioxide in the fermentation of glucose to ethanol. This amount of carbon dioxide leads to a disposal problem rather than to a raw material credit. Another problem is that the aqueous acid used to hydrolyze the cellulose in wood to glucose and other simple sugars destroys much of the sugars in the process.
One way of making cellulose wastes more susceptible to hydrolysis is by subjecting them to a short burst of high energy electron beam radiation. An alternative to acid hydrolysis is the use of enzymes. Although they avoid the corrosion problems and loss of fuel product associated with acid hydrolysis, enzymes have their own drawbacks. Enzymatic hydrolysis slows as the glucose product 23
accumulates in a reaction vessel. This end-product inhibition eventually halts the hydrolysis unless some way is found to draw off the glucose as it is formed.
2.5 Biohydrogen
Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe and very common on earth. Its atomic structure is the simplest of all atoms which is diatomic (H 2 ), since it is composed of one proton and one electron. Usually, pure hydrogen does not exist naturally since it easily combines with other elements. However, many experiments have been carried out to study the possibility of hydrogen production using organic wastes from various industries and this type of hydrogen we called it as biohydrogen. The term biohydrogen refers to non-fossilized and biodegradable organic material originating from plants, animals and microorganisms derived from biological sources. Biohydrogen has been well documented in recent years and has generated increased attention from researchers due to its characteristics as an ideal, clean and sustainable energy resource for the future. In nature, biohydrogen is produced during acidogenic waste treatment process where acid forming bacteria produces organic acid compound, hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
Biohydrogen production can be achieved by light driven photosynthesis or dark fermentation. Certain species of green algae produce hydrogen in the presence of sunlight. Researchers manipulated the photosynthetic process of spinach plants to produce hydrogen. However, these biological hydrogen productions are known only as immature lab experiment. Dark fermentation of organic waste materials had presented a promising route of biohydrogen production compared to photosynthetic routes. The major advantages of dark fermentation are high rate of cell growth, no light energy required, no oxygen limitation problems and ability to run on low capital cost.
In Malaysia, the palm oil industry annually generates about 15.2 million tons of wastewater, known as palm oil mill efuent (POME). The effluent resulted from 24
the palm oil industry can cause serious pollution if left untreated. This is a problem of considerable magnitude, notably in Malaysia. Due to the nature of POME, with high cellulose and lignocellulosic material, it takes a long time to degrade the organic substances. Therefore, research has been carried out to use POME sludge as an inoculum, and it has produced a promising level of hydrogen production.
2.5.1 Properties of Biohydrogen
Biohydrogen fermentation has been extensively studied because it has the potential for providing sustainable and renewable energy for the future. The temperature, pH, HRT, hydrogen/carbon dioxide partial pressure, volatile fatty acids and inorganic content are the main parameters that affect the anaerobic hydrogen fermentation process.
Firstly is the temperature affects the hydrogen producing bacteria activities and hydrogen production rate. Dark fermentation reactions can be operated at different temperatures: mesophilic (25-40C), thermophilic (40-65C), extreme thermophilic (65-80C) or hyperthermophilic (>80C). Most of dark fermentation experiments are conducted at 35-55 C until nowadays. The extreme thermophilic process provides a number of advantages compared with the mesophilic and thermophilic such as the hydrogen production is much higher, it has much better pathogenic destruction for digested residues performed at high temperatures and it minimizes the contamination by hydrogen consumers such as methanogens, solventogens.
Secondly is the pH level has an effect on enzyme activity in microorganisms, since each enzyme is active only in a specific pH range and has maximum activity at its optimal pH. For mesophilic hydrogen dark fermentation, it has been found that the optimal pH is around 5.0-5.5 as shown in Figure 2.9.
25
Figure 2.9: Hydrogen Production at Different pH at Mesophilic Temperature (37 C)
However, for hydrogen fermentation at extreme-thermophilic temperatures, the optimum pH is about 7. Figure 2.10 below has proven that hydrogen has been produced the highest rate at pH 7.
Figure 2.10: pH Optimum Test at extreme-thermophilic temperatures (70C)
HRT is also a third important parameter for dark fermentation process. Normally, in an anaerobic process, pH and HRT are coupled parameters: short HRT (<3 days) results in low pH. Both pH and HRT have been demonstrated as the effective ways to separate hydrogen producing bacteria and hydrogen consuming Achaea at mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. However, for extreme- 26
thermophilic temperatures, HRT should not be less than 2 days. If not, it resulted in bad hydrolysis and washout the bacteria.
Next, the partial pressure of H 2 (pH 2 ) is an extremely important factor especially for continuous H 2 synthesis. Continuous H 2 synthesis requires pH2 of 50 kPa at 60 C, 20 kPa at 70 C and 2 kPa at 98 C under standard conditions. In case of carbon dioxide, the removal of CO 2 can improve the hydrogen production in dark fermentation. After CO 2 was removed, the hydrogen production was doubled.
Finally is high concentration of the organic acids result in a collapse of the pH gradient across the membrane and cause the total inhibition of all metabolic functions in the cell. However, inorganic elements such as iron concentration can increase hydrogen production significantly.
2.5.2 Dark Hydrogen Fermentation Process
Dark hydrogen production is a ubiquitous phenomenon under anaerobic conditions. A wide variety of bacteria use the reduction of protons to hydrogen to dispose of reducing equivalents which result from primary metabolism. Bacteria such as Enterobacter, Bacillus and Clostridium are known for the dark hydrogen fermentation. When bacteria grow on organic substrates (heterotrophic growth), these substrates are degraded by oxidation to provide building blocks and metabolic energy for growth. In anaerobic environments, protons are reduced to molecular hydrogen (H 2 ), need to act as electron acceptor. Anaerobic fermentation enables the mass production of hydrogen through relatively simple processes from a wide spectrum of potentially utilizable substrates, including refuse and waste products. Moreover, fermentative hydrogen production generally proceeds at a higher rate and does not rely on the availability of light sources. Carbohydrates, mainly glucose, are the preferred carbon sources for fermentation process.
The complete oxidation of glucose to hydrogen and carbon dioxide yields a maximum of 12 mole hydrogen per mole of glucose. However, there are no 27
metabolic energy is obtained in this case and currently this high yield reaction is not yet in fermentative systems.
C 6 H 12 O 6 +6 H 2 O12H 2 +6CO 2 G 0 =+3.2 kJ
The available hydrogen production from glucose is determined by the butyrate/acetate ratio. When acetic acid is the end-product, a theoretical maximum of 4 moles hydrogen per mole glucose is obtained.
C 6 H12O 6 +2H 2 O4H 2 +2CH 3 COOH (acetate)+2CO 2 G 0 = -206kJ
When butyrate is the end-product, a theoretical maximum of 2 moles hydrogen per mole glucose is produced. The equation is given below:
C 6 H12O 6 +2H 2 O2H 2 +CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 COOH(butyrate)+2CO 2 G 0 =-254kJ
Thus, the highest theoretical yields of hydrogen are associated with acetate as the fermentation end-product.
In Malaysia, the main reason that we interested in dark fermentation over the other method is because of high hydrogen yields and low operating volumes. By using proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), the best option is dark fermentation. Despite their high potential, fuel cells are not ready for full commercial application for stationary plants because of high costs and limited durability. Table 2.4 shows the result of electricity generation by PEMFC.
28
Table 2.4: Electricity Generation by PEMFC
2.6 Biomethane
One of the promising future options for sustainable transport fuels is the subsidization of natural gas by biomethane. Biomethane is the most efficient and clean burning biofuel which is available today. It can be produced from nearly all types of biomass including wet biomass which is not usable for most other biofuels. There is no clear definition of biomethane. The raw material for the production of biomethane is biogas, which can be processed from various feedstock sources. Biogas is formed during microbial decomposition of organic material in an anaerob environment. A smaller proportion undergoes anaerobic conversion which gives rise to biogas containing a high percentage of methane representing a significant energy source. Like the composition of natural gas depends on its origins, methane content of biogas varies from 50 to 70%, depending on the feedstock composition. Upgrading and cleaning phases enable biogas to match the local or national regulation and specification for natural gas when biomethane feeds in grid. The different production processes of biogas also affect the content of minor polluting compounds.
One main advantage of biomethane production is the ability to use so-called wet biomass as feedstock source. Wet biomass cannot be used for the production of other biofuels. Examples for wet biomass are sewage sludge, manure from dairy 29
and swine farms as well as residues from food processing. They all are characterized by moisture contents of more than 6070 %.
The approaches to the use of biomethane as motor fuel which have recently been devised at a national and international level emphasise the long-term relevance of this technology to achieving climate protection targets. It is doubtful whether the parties concerned are on their way to achieving the stated targets. One particularly problematic issue is the large number of different stakeholder groups who have to contribute to achieving the targets. This stakeholder groups must co-operate to do their parts in order to make biomethane to be successful develop in their countries. Figure 2.11 represents the relevant stake holder groups in establishing alternative fuels.
Figure 2.11: Relevant stakeholder groups in establishing alternative fuels
2.6.1 Properties of Biomethane
Biomethane is the simplest hydrocarbon which is a gas at standard temperature and pressure (STP). Its chemical formula is CH 4 . Further, biomethane is a combustible and odorless gas. It burns in air with a bluish, non-sooty flame to form water and CO 2 . Due to the 1:4 carbon:hydrogen ratio, combustion yields less CO 2 than when for example petrol is burnt It is also a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential (GWP) of 23 in 100 years (IPCC 2001). That means that each kg of methane warms the earth 23 times as much as the same mass of CO 2 when averaged 30
over 100 years. Below are the important characteristic values which are listed in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5: Parameters of methane (from biogas or natural gas)
After the digestion and purification process of biomass, biomethane is obtained. Without human interruption, the release of methane could be easily absorbed by the eco-system. However, with industrialization and human activities, the emission of methane has increased which partly contributed to the global warming phenomena.
Further improvements in terms of climate impact, environmental characteristics and availability of raw materials can be achieved by feeding biomethane produced in Germany into the existing natural gas grid and making use of it in transport applications. Admixing 20 % biomethane can reduce CO 2 emissions by 39 % in comparison with petrol, while if pure biomethane is used, reductions of up to 97 % can be achieved depending on the method of assessment used.
2.6.2 Bio-methanation Process
Bio- methanation process is one of the most essential processes for treating the Bio- degradable portion of Municipal Solid Waste. Municipal solid waste is a heterogeneous waste and contains the following fractions:
1) Putrescible fraction (40%) This is also called digestible fraction and contains biodegradable organic matter such as vegetable market waste, paper and yard trimmings 2) Combustible fraction (20%) 31
Also known as refractory organics, these are either slowly digestible or indigestible organic matter. For example: wood, plastics, rubber, and other synthetics. 3) Inert fraction (15%) They are typically non-digestible and non-combustibles such as stones, sand, glass, and metals. 4) Remaining 25% is the moisture content.
In this process the organic matter is converted into biogas that is a very useful form of energy. For the bio-methanation process, the bio-methanation process reactor, called Bio-digester are used in which the temperature and atmosphere is controlled for the process to occur.
Anaerobic processing of organic material could either occur naturally or in a controlled environment such as a biogas plant. It is a two-stage process, where large organic polymers are fermented into short-chain volatile fatty acids. These acids are then converted into methane and carbon dioxide. Organic waste such as livestock manure and various types of bacteria are put in a digest and normally biogas has 50- 70% pure methane. Typically, there are four steps in order to produce biomethane as mentioned in process flow diagram (Figure 2.12):
Hydrolysis: complex organic matter is decomposed into simple soluble organic molecules using water to split the chemical bonds between the substances. Acidogenesis: the chemical decomposition of carbohydrates by enzymes, bacteria, yeasts, or molds in the absence of oxygen. Acetogenesis: the fermentation products are converted into acetate, hydrogen and carbon dioxide by so-called acetogenic bacteria. Methanogenesis: methane (CH 4 ) is formed from acetate and hydrogen/carbon dioxide by methanogenic bacteria.
32
Figure 2.12: Flow Process of Hydrolysis, Fermentation, Acetogenesis and Methanogenesis
In the absence of oxygen, anaerobic bacteria decompose organic matter as follows:
Organic matter + anaerobic bacteria CH4 + CO2 + H2S+ NH3 + other end products + energy
The conditions for biogasification need to be anaerobic, for which a totally enclosed process vessel is required. Although this necessitates a higher level of technology than compared to composting, it allows a greater control over the process itself and the emission of noxious odours. Greater process control, especially of temperature, allows a reduction in treatment time, when compared to composting. Since a biogas plant is usually vertical, it also required less area than a composting plant.
CHAPTER 3
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
In this chapter, the problems encountered and the tools/steps that had been used to carry out the investigations were elaborated. The methodology included the data collection method used to obtain and gather relevant information for analysing and defining the prospects of Palm Oil in Malaysia specifically in the Biofuel Production. The research methodology was important as the good methodologies would ensure the successful of the progress study completed within the time frame productive and informative data can be collected. The project methodology included appropriate questionnaire design for data collection. Besides, informative data analysed before the hypothesis and conclusion can be obtained.
34 3.2 Overall View of the Methodology
Figure 3.1 below showed the overall view methodology sequence of the prospects of Palm Oil in Malaysia specifically in the Biofuel Production. The methodology included the data collection method used to obtain and gather relevant information for analysing.
Figure 3.1: Methodology Sequence
Secondary Data Primary Data Survey Questionnaire, Observation, Postal Method, Supply and Demand Studies, Desk Studies- Journals, Books, Articles, Internet Thesis Writing Defining the Types/Methods of Data Collection Analysing and Interpreting All Data in order to Figure Problems Journals, Books, Articles, Internet 35 3.3 Research Method
The research method could be divided into two main categories source of data which are primary data and secondary data. Primary data was data that had not been previously published and was derived from a new or original research study and collected at the source. For further explanation, it was information that obtained directly from first-hand sources such as surveys, observation or experimentation. Meanwhile, secondary data was information that had been gathered by researchers and recorded in books, articles, and other publications.
3.4 Primary Data
In this study, primary data which consisted of survey questionnaires, postal method and observations were used to understand the background of the companies for producing the biofuel from palm oil. The primary data was selected because of the following advantages. The primary data was basic data which consisted unbiased information about palm oil and biofuel from palm oil. This data was original data from the primary market and the population that had not been modified by other authors or publishers. The data was directly getting from population through survey questionnaires, postal method and observations techniques.
3.3.1 Survey Questionnaires
Survey questionnaire was a data collection method which came out with a form containing a set of questions, especially one addressed to a statistically significant number of subjects as a way of gathering information for a survey. The questionnaire-based survey forms were targeted to the respondents of engineers and researchers involved in Malaysia Palm Oil Industries and Government Institution for Palm Oil. Through questionnaire survey, the opinion, the awareness on the current 36 development and the perceptions and expectations of the respondents on prospects of palm oil as biofuel feedstock in Malaysia could be defined.
The structure of the questionnaire for respondents were designed 3-point scale (from less frequent to very frequent, 5-point scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) or 10-point scale (from less important to most important) according to the types and levels of the questions. Besides that, the respondents were asked to indicate their opinions on direct closed questions to ease the data analyses by using the graphical method.
3.3.2 Postal Method
Postal was also a regular method which can used in order to obtain the information about biofuel in Malaysia. This survey was accomplished with an explanatory letter and prepaid return envelope from government sectors and private companies through postal method.
3.3.3 Observations
Observation is a simple way to gather data on human behaviour using time and motion study. This method can observe accurate information and learn to improve method. From this method, clear pictures and process about producing biofuel from palm oil could be obtained.
3.5 Secondary Data
In this study, secondary data which consisted of desk studies was used to understand the advantages and disadvantages for producing the biofuel from palm oil and its specific requirement in order to produce biofuel feedstock. The secondary data was selected because of the following advantages such as economical, save efforts and expenses. Besides that, a lot of time could be saved and primary data collection could become more specific by using secondary data. The secondary data could improve 37 the understanding about the problem because it provide a basis for comparison for the data that is collected by the researcher.
3.2.5 Desk Studies
This study was adopted to review the relevant literature on various type of biofuel production plant that operates in Malaysia and the process for each element of biofuel. At the same time, develop an understanding on the characteristic of each type of biofuel. This can be done by using various devices such as internet searching, reference books, journals, magazines, newspaper and articles.
3.6 Data Analysis
All the information is collected from primary and secondary resources where analysed and interpreted by using graphs to analysed. The biofuel substrates from palm oil that currently obtainable in the surveyed commercial area will be analysed by presenting the photographs. There will be some problems to figured out and will do some comparisons between commercial and lab scale.
CHAPTER 4
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter presented the results and discussion on the prospects of palm oil in Malaysia substrate for biofuel production which obtained from questionnaire survey on behalf to achieve the objective of characterizing biofuel and quantifying government subsidies and other support for biofuel production, distribution and consumption. The sending outs questionnaire survey took about three months (from October 2011 to December 2011) in order to complete gather all the information for analysing. This chapter began with analysing data collection and followed by palm oil-derived biodiesel, energy and biofuel policies and SWOT analysis for biofuel industry in Malaysia.
4.1 Data Collection
Due to this survey was a combination of qualitative and quantitative type, therefore the questions were conduct in open-ended style and close ended style. The questionnaires were sent to biofuel and palm oil based companies in Selangor, Kuala Lumpur and Perak research institutions. Two sets of questionnaire were designed as type A and type B with questions in type A was targeted to parties who involved in palm oil and biofuel companies, aiming at the point of view about the prospects and productivity in biofuel industry. Whereas, questions in type B was distributed to researchers in government research institutions and universities. The feedback from biofuel industries were less encouraged due to the processes for biofuel production 39 was still in the progressing stage. The overall questionnaire questions could be referring to Appendix A. Data analysis was carried out based on the informative reply from the returned questionnaire.
4.1.1 Demographic Profile of the Respondents
Table 4.1 and Figure 4.1 showed the states distribution of respondents. The result showed that Selangor respondents are higher compare to the other states because large numbers of active palm oil based industries were located in Selangor. Company/institution distributions were divided into 4 types which were current biofuel producer, palm oil mill, university research institution and government research institution. 72.2% of respondents were from Selangor and 16.7% of them were from Johor while the remaining of 11.1% was from Perak respondents out of the total of 18 respondents. Most of the research institution from university and government were located in Selangor as the research activities actually carried out in Selangor to ease the collaboration with industry players.
Table 4.1: Types of Company/Research Institution Distribution in Selangor, Perak and Johor States
State Type of Industry No. of Company Percentage % Selangor
Current Biofuel Producer Palm Oil Mill University Research Institution Government Research Institution 6 3 2 2 72.2 Perak Current Biofuel Producer 2 11.1 Johor Current Biofuel Producer 3 16.7 Total 18 100.0
40 Selangor Perak Johor
Figure 4.1: Company/Research Institution Distribution in Selangor, Perak and Johor States
4.1.2 Research in Biofuel
Table 4.2 and Figure 4.2 showed the type research activities on biofuel that currently conducted by the respondents. 80% of a total of 18 companies and research institutions were recently doing the research on biodiesel. The second higher was followed by palm oil which was the raw material for biofuel (10%). Furthermore, 5% of research activities were on bioethanol and biohydrogen fields.
World biodiesel prices have increased in 2010 in a context of rising palm oil and other vegetable oil prices and high crude oil prices. This price increase is smaller in proportion than for ethanol. Besides that, current Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was encouraging to make Malaysia leading biodiesel producer. Appendix B showed the article of encourage the production of biodiesel. Therefore, the overall research that conducted in Malaysia was still focus in biodiesel.
41 Table 4.2 Categories of Research
Frequency Percentage % Biodiesel Bioethanol Biohydrogen Palm Oil 15 1 1 2 80.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 Total 18 100.0
Biodiesel Bioethanol Biohydrogen Palm Oil
Figure 4.2: Categories of Research
42 4.2 Palm Oil-derived Biodiesel
4.2.1 Properties of Palm Oil based Biodiesel
Biodiesel produced from palm oil had been found to have very similar fuel properties to petroleum-derived diesel. Palm diesel was successfully evaluated as diesel substituted with extensively field trial from 1983 to 1994. The 100% palm biodiesel could be used as fuel in diesel engine without any modification. According to Dr. Puah Chiew Wei, research officer in the engineering & processing research division at the Malaysia Palm Oil Board (MPOB), the current sulfur content of 100% pure palm biodiesel was <10 ppm (<0.001%) which met the stringent requirements of MS2008:2008 and EN14214:2008.
Malaysian petroleum diesel currently had a sulfur content of 300 to 400 ppm (0.03 to 0.04%). The low sulfur palm biodiesel contributed to reduction of sulfur content in B5, and B5 met the requirement of maximum sulfur content of 0.05% as stipulated under MS123:2005. Based on the latest analysis from Malaysia Palm Oil Board (MPOB), B5 palm biodiesel (methyl esters) had nearly similar properties as Malaysian Petroleum Diesel. B5 palm biodiesel resulted from the blend between 5% of palm biodiesel into 95% petroleum diesel. B5 had provided significant environmental benefits with a minimum increase in cost for the consumers. B5 reduced emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) by approximately 50% and carbon dioxide by 78% on a net lifecycle basis because the carbon in biodiesel emissions is recycled from carbon that was in the atmosphere. As regards the fuel efficiency 1 litre of palm biodiesel contained approximate 10% less energy per litre of than fossil diesel and yet it did produce more NOx emissions than standard diesel fuel. The fuel properties for palm biodiesel and petroleum diesel were showed in Table 4.3.
43 Table 4.3: Fuel Properties of B5 Palm Biodiesel and Malaysian Petroleum Diesel (Source MPOB, 2009)
PROPERTIES UNIT B5 MALAYSIAN PETROLEUM DIESEL MS 123:2005 MIN. MAX. Density @ 15C kg/litre 0.8547 0.8538 0.810 0.870 Viscosity @ 40C mm 2 /s 4.570 4.5424 1.5 5.8 Flash point C 93.0 93.0 60 - Cloud point C 18 18 - - Pour point C 9 12 - 15 Total sulphur % mass 0.26 0.28 - 0.05 Carbon residue (on 10% distillation residue) % mass <0.1 <0.1 - 0.2 Cetane number - 56.1 54.6 49 - Cetane index - - 51-57 49 - Ash content % mass 0.003 0.003 - 0.01 Sediment by extraction % mass <0.01 <0.01 - 0.01 Copper strip corrosion (3hr at 100C) rating 1a 1a - 1 Distillation at 90% C 364.7 367.9 - - Distillation at 95% C 382.3 385.4 - 370 Water by distillation % volume <0.05 <0.05 - 0.05 Colour - L2.0 1.5 - 2.5 Gross calorific value MJ/kg 45.135 45.280 - - Acid number mg KOH/g 0.10 0.08 - 0.25 Electrical conductivity pS/m 110 128-240 50 - Lubricity m 261.5 324-344 - 460 Note: B5: 5% palm biodiesel +95% petroleum diesel MS 123:2005: Specification for diesel fuel (third revision).
Besides that, palm biodiesel with low pour point (winter grade) that was suitable as diesel substitute in temperate countries had been successfully produced by MPOB. The normal palm biodiesel with pour point of +15C could only be used in tropical countries while the winter grade palm biodiesel (-21C to 0C) could be used 44 in temperate countries to meet the seasonal pour point requirements (summer grade, 0C; spring and autumn grades, -10C; and winter grade, -20C).
By overcoming the pour point problem, the MPOB patented technology (Choo et al., 2002) had turned palm diesel into a more versatile product. There were three important tests had been verified such as ASTM D6751:07b, EN14214:2003 and MS 2008:2008. ASTM D6751:07b was American Standard Specification for biodiesel fuel blend stock (B100) for middle distillate fuels. EN14214:2003 was a requirements and test methods for automotive fuels especially Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME) for diesel engines. Finally, MS 2008:2008 was another requirements and test methods for automotive fuels involving Palm Methyl Esters (PME) for engines. Table 4.4 showed the fuel properties between normal palm biodiesel and low pour point palm biodiesel.
Table 4.4: Fuel Properties of Normal and Low Pour Point Palm Biodiesel (Source: MPOB, 2009)
Properties Unit Normal Palm Biodiesel Low Pour Point Palm Biodiesel Ester content % (m/m) 98.5 98.0-99.5 Density at 15C kg/m 3 878.3 870-890 Viscosity at 40C mm 2 /s 4.415 4.423 Flash point C 182 180 Cloud point C 15.2 -18 0 Pour point C 15 -21 0 Cold filter plugging point C 15 -18 3 Total contamination mg/kg 12 14 Oxidation stability, 110C hr 16 10.2
45 4.2.2 Palm Oil as Feedstock
One of the important criteria for any vegetable oils to be used as biofuel is it must be cheap in price. Palm oil meets this criterion perfectly. It is already common knowledge within the world of oils and fats that the development of the oil palm industry in Malaysia has been remarkable. Malaysia takes pride of the fact that within a relatively short period of time, we have become the worlds largest producer and largest exporter of palm oil products in the international oils and fats market.
Furthermore, the advantage which palm oil holds over other soils and fats lies in its productivity, yield and efficiency factors. Oil palm is the most productive oil bearing plant species known. The yield of palm oil per unit area is 5 and 10 times higher than rapeseed and soybean oil respectively. With lower energy needs to process and a lower price, palm oil is fast becoming recognised as the best feedstock for biodiesel there is. The cost of producing one tonne of rape seed biodiesel is 500 to 600 euros whereas palm oil based biodiesel costs far less at 150 to 200 euros. When the world is looking at vegetable oils as renewable fuel, palm oil will undoubtedly stand out among other vegetable oils. This yield factor alone is adequate for the world to decide which vegetable oil should be produced to meet the expending requirement for Greener and Cleaner Energy for its growing population.
According to Wolfgang Rupilius, a consultant from Germany had said that palm oil based biodiesel would have higher chances of survival under certain conditions compared with biodiesel based on canola oil or rapeseed. The development of canola oil based biodiesel as the fastest growing oleo chemical products was artificial, and based on the biodiesel tax exemption. Based on studies, 1.2 tonnes of fossil fuel has to be utilised to produce one tonne of canola oil based biodiesel. However, palm based biomass was used in the heating boiler system that produces biodiesel; palm oil production did not require much fossil energy.
Palm oil was the right feedstock and will survive in the biodiesel sector by eliminating political influences and subsidies. If our country had a free economy, European biodiesel producers would stop buying canola oil and rape seed oil and instead started buying palm oil. Producing palm oil based biodiesel was a lot cheaper 46 than other feedstock based biodiesel based on Rupilius. Hence, some kind of restrictions will come or otherwise palm oil will take over completely the biodiesel market in Europe.
4.2.3 Global Market Value
From the Table 4.5, monthly export in Year 2011 for palm oil in Malaysia was 17,991,285 tonnes and the total sales due exportation was RM60464.50 mil. The total of oleochemical products attribute to 2,180,681 tonnes and the total sales was RM10843.60 mil. Followed by finished products with 402,806 tonnes and the total earning was RM1716.65 mil. In Year 2011, the amount of biodiesel from palm oil in Malaysia for export was 49,999 tonnes. The earning that had been achieved was RM179.72 mil.
In general, the total amount of biodiesel that had been exported was relatively low compare to other products because biodiesel could be considered as new emerging technology product. High feedstock prices coupled with unmatched rise in biodiesel export prices squeeze producers profit margins. During high feedstock prices, companies had to cut production or wait for feedstock prices to moderate. Palm biodiesel had less significant market value compared with oleochemical finished products derived from palm oil because oleochemical products supplied the personal care, automotive and construction industries, which were doing exceptionally well. Capacity utilization from top Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) producers was above 95%, whereas the European and US oleochemical industries operated around the mid-70% (Kongkrapan Intarajang CEO, Emery Oleochemicals, 2011). The total sales of oleochemical final products could achieve 13.5% out of RM 80,411.43 mil while palm-based biodiesel was only 0.22% out of the total sales of palm oil products.
Based on the Table 4.5, biodiesel production was nearly at a standstill for most of the first half of 2011. Most players were unable to maintain the biodiesel operations due to the high cost of feedstock. Some plants operate sporadically depending on purchase orders and were able to withstand closure because they were supported by their parent companies. Due to the lack of demand for biodiesel exports 47 and high palm oil prices in the second half of 2010, these plants were operating on and off alternatively, with the average of three to four plants in operation each month. Furthermore, the Malaysia Palm Oil Board reported zero export of local biodiesel for two months in December 2010 and in January 2011. The zero export predicaments was a sad situation for many biodiesel producers in the country which had so far invested more than RM21bil over the last three years hence putting many of them into the negative margins territory.
Although many biodiesel producers had the existing plant, they were unable to maintain operations due to high cost of production as well as the lack of incentives from the Government, according to Malaysian Biodiesel Association (MBA). In 2010, biodiesel exported less than halved in both quantity and earnings, compared with 2009. Malaysia palm-based biodiesel industry exported 227,457 tonnes of palm biodiesel which earned about RM 605.75 million for the year, however only 89,609 tonnes exported in 2010, bringing in RM 266.53 million in earnings for the year. The difference between both years in term of export was 60.60% that achieved the difference quantity value of 137,848 tonnes while in term of export revenue was 56% that achieved the difference quantity value of RM339.22 million. For the latest summary, export of biodiesel decreased by 44.2% to 49,999 tonnes in 2011 as against 89,609 tonnes in the previous.
Replanting done under the SITS incentive programme which took place in 2009 and 2010 gave an impact on the crude palm oil (CPO) production. In 2009 and 2010, a total of 207,754 hectares of oil palm trees had been felled for replanting and this would affect the reduction on CPO production in 2010 for an estimated 350,000 to 400,000 tonnes. Besides that, Palm Kernel (PK) production and Crude Palm Kernel Oil (CPKO) also declined by 4.6% to 4.29 million tonnes and 3.9% to 2.01 million tonnes respectively. (Datuk Dr. Choo Yuen May, January 2011). On the other hand, some quarters opined that even with the escalating crude oil prices, the production of palm oil as an alternative feedstock for biodiesel might still not be viable as the cost of the main feedstock - palm methyl ester - was also on the rise as crude palm oil (CPO) was trading above RM 3,600 per tonne (Hanim Adnan, 8 March 2011). 48 Table 4.5: Monthly Export of Oil Palm Products in Year 2011
PRODUCT UNIT JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY PALM OIL Tonnes 1,222,067 1,114,593 1,235,261 1,349,739 1,411,314 1,585,039 1,735,891 RM Mil 4235.97 4066.72 4550.43 4805.44 4897.79 5484.18 5,829.59 OLEOCHEMICALS Tonnes 142,696 159,528 159,366 171,019 184,658 169,839 185,387 RM Mil 694.46 829.21 887.99 955.08 1013.10 897.49 971.75 FINISHED PRODUCTS Tonnes 31,138 22,453 32,643 38,424 33,051 32,700 27,710 RM Mil 130.77 107.17 138.85 168.26 148.15 141.54 117.44 BIODIESEL Tonnes - 14 75 75 54 5706 224 RM Mil - 0.08 0.35 0.33 0.26 21.09 0.77
PRODUCT UNIT AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN-DEC PERCENTAGE PALM OIL Tonnes 1,693,110 1,546,196 1,843,602 1,664,591 1,589,883 17,991,285 82.60 % RM Mil 5,414.77 5,002.36 5,916.40 5,224.99 5,035.86 6,0464.50 OLEOCHEMICALS Tonnes 195,683 196,220 206,127 202,085 20,8074 2,180,681 14.80 % RM Mil 946.37 911.30 955.59 894.40 886.91 10,843.63 FINISHED PRODUCTS Tonnes 27,344 35,323 43,167 41,246 37,608 402,806 2.35 % RM Mil 116.66 151.18 183.31 164.50 148.81 1716.65 BIODIESEL Tonnes 14,007 2,960 14,068 12,411 405 49,999 0.25 % RM Mil 49.12 10.55 53.71 42.04 1.43 179.72
49 With the violent swing of palm oil prices, the Group of Ministers (GOM) had started to look at a promising alternative feedstock, Jatropha. It had excellent small- scale potential but needed more research before it could be cultivated on a larger- scale area. The GOM had allocated funds to facilitate research and development of the crop. The Malaysian Palm Oil Board was tasked to carry out performance tests on jatropha-based biodiesel. The Malaysian Rubber Board was to engage in seed breeding and the National Tobacco Board was to gauge the suitability of cultivating jatropha on bris soil in the northern part of the country.
Table 4.6 showed the fuel properties of palm oil biodiesel and jatropha oil biodiesel. The data also shows that jatropha has a higher energy released than Palm Oil during combustion, but slightly less energy than petro diesel as noted by the calorific value. As per Cetane Number, jatropha and Palm Oil has a higher value compared to Diesel, which would mean that it would ignite earlier once it was injected in the chamber. However, while jatropha might not need significant amounts of water to survive, it needed more water and fertilisers to increase the yield of seeds and oil. Moreover, jatropha would do better on higher quality land, so there were concerned that it might be difficult to limit jatropha to wastelands. The acidic value of jatropha was much higher than palm oil. Jatropha was more acidic compared to Palm Oil which might not be so good for diesel vehicles fuel system and engine in the long run. When researchers tested at the glycerol content of the jatropha, it also had a higher content compared to Palm Oil. This could be the effect of just bad washing on the part of Jatropha biodiesel preparation, wherein molecular glycerine was not properly removed from the biodiesel (Dr. Iman Reksowardojo, 2006). Jatropha oil based biodiesel was probably not a solution for FUEL problem.
50 Table 4.6: Fuel Properties of Palm Oil Biodiesel and Jathropha Oil Biodiesel
Figure 4.3: Percentage of Profits for Different Products from Palm Oil 51 The major markets for biodiesel were the European Union (EU), the United State, Singapore and Taiwan. Based on the pie chart below (Figure 4.4), the result had shown that the EU was the main biodiesel export destination which accounted for 56% of overall biodiesel export. United State was the second choice of country to export biodiesel (23%) as it was a developed country and the government was very concerned about the environment. Next was followed by Singapore (16%) and finally was Taiwan which accounted for 3% of biodiesel export. 2% of biodiesel export was achieved by others such as South Korea, India, Japan and many more.
The future of global biofuels would depend on their profitability, which depended on a number of interrelated factors. Key to this will be high oil prices: 6 years of steadily rising oil prices have provided economic support for alternative fuels, unlike previous periods when oil prices spiked and then fell rapidly, undercutting the profitability of nascent alternative fuel programs. On the other hand, the sectors profitability had been negatively affected by rising feedstock prices, which accounted for a very large share of biofuel cost of production. For this commodity-dependent industry, government support to reduce profit uncertainty had been a common theme in the U.S., Brazil, and the EU, where biofuel production had been most significant. 2% 3% 16% 23% 56% European Union USA Singapore Taiwan South Korea, India, Japan
Figure 4.4: Biodiesel Export Destination
52 4.3 Energy and Biofuel Policies
4.3.1 Energy Policies
Since the energy crisis of 19731974, the government had introduced a variety of policies strengthen the energy security for the country besides continuous ensuring economic growth (Table 4.7). These policies were found to help to increase energy efficient in Malaysia with limited fossil fuel and reduce the large exploitation on fossil fuel itself. Besides that, the policy also encouraged the exploration on renewable energy resources.
Table 4.7: The developments in Malaysias energy policies from 1974 to 2000 (Source: UNDP Malaysia, 2007) Policy Broad Objectives Petroleum Development Act, 1974 The Act established Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) as a corporatized company, wholly owned by the Government of Malaysia, vested with ownership and control of petroleum resources in Malaysia. National Petroleum Policy, 1975 Introduced to ensure optimal use of petroleum resources; regulation of ownership and management of the industry; and economic, social and environmental safeguards in the exploitation of this resource. National Energy Policy, 1979 Formulated to achieve a range of supply, utilization and environmental objectives. National Depletion Policy, 1980 Introduced to guard against over-exploitation of national oil and gas reserves. Four Fuel Diversification Policy, 1981 Emphasis given to fuel diversification. Designed to reduce dependence on oil and to place increased emphasis on gas, hydro-electricity and coal as energy sources. Five Fuel Diversification Strategy, 2000 Adds renewable energy to the Four Fuel Diversification policy. Introduced in recognition of the potential of biomass, biogas and other renewable energy resources. 53 Petroleum products had comprised 60% of Malaysias end usage for energy. Natural gas and electricity comprised approximately 18% each, while coal and coke made up around 4%. The biggest components of petroleum products were automotive gasoline and diesel which largely used in the transportation sector. According to Petronas (Malaysias national oil company), Malaysias crude oil reserves of 5.25 billion barrels would last another 20 years at current rates of extraction if no new oil fields are discovered.
Petroleum fuels had been heavily subsidized in Malaysia. There were no clear indications of when fuel was first subsidized in Malaysia. Moreover, it was believed to have begun in 1982 when the Mahathir administration expanded existing subsidies to include fuel products. This policy had serious budgetary implications, which will be exacerbated once Malaysia became a net oil importer. The mechanism for setting retail prices for petroleum products had been in effect since 1983 (Thillainathan, 2008). The product price was determined after taking into consideration prevailing international prices, as well as operating costs linked to distribution, marketing, and sales tax. The subsidy was determined every month using the average oil price for the particular month. The subsidy is paid every two months to distributors of petroleum products, mainly the oil companies (Yazid, 2007).
On 5 June 2008, the government revised fuel subsidies, due to the untenable and rising costs to budget, and standardized the subsidy rates. Transport fuel prices would henceforth be adjusted monthly but would remain RM 0.30 (US$ 0.09) below the international market price. The Malaysian government had not released details about how the subsidized price will be calculated (i.e. whether it will take into account distribution and retailer costs). For specific target groups, additional subsidies were provided: For example:
Vehicles with engine capacities of up to 2000cc, and trucks and jeeps with capacities up to 2500cc, will receive a cash rebate of RM 625 (US$ 192) per year. Motorcycles up to 250cc will receive a cash rebate of RM 150 (US$ 46) per year. 54 Vehicles with engine capacities above 2000cc will receive a road tax rebate of RM 200. Motorcycles exceeding 250cc will receive a road tax rebate of RM 50 (US$ 15) per year. Registered fishermen and vessel operators will receive RM 200 (US$ 62) per month. Vessel operators will receive 10 cent per kilogram of fish catch landed.
The total cost of diesel subsidies has varied over recent years, reflecting the international price for fuel. Fuel subsidies rose from RM 4.2 billion (US$ 1.1 billion) in 2002 to RM 14.7 billion (US$ 4.3 billion) in 2006, before further price reforms were introduced. In 2007, subsidies rose to RM 16.2 billion (US$ 4.7 billion). Finally, in 2008, with the international oil price averaging over US$ 130 per barrel during the first half of the year, the estimated total cost to the federal budget was RM 25 (US$ 5.5) billion (Thillainathan, 2008).
4.3.2 National Biofuel Policy
Encouraging a domestic biodiesel industry based on the existing palm oil sector appeared to an ideal means to improve energy security, reduce petroleum subsidies, add value in the palm oil sector, as a poverty alleviation strategy and develop a new export product. Environmental motivations, such as urban air quality and lower greenhouse gas emissions, have not been primary drivers behind Malaysias promotion of biofuels.
The key biofuel policies were developed when palm oil prices were relatively low and the possibility of replacing some petroleum use with biofuel appeared feasible. In August 2005, the Malaysian Government launched the National Biofuel Policy (NBP) under its Five Fuel Diversification Strategy (see Table 4.8) with a view to developing the biofuels industry. The policy provides the overarching framework to develop biofuels as one of the five main energy sources for Malaysia.
The NBP aims to supplement the depleting supply of fossil fuels with renewable resources; mobilize local resources for biofuel production; exploit local technology to generate energy for the transportation and industrial sectors; pave the 55 way for export of biofuels; and benefit from the spin-off effects of more stable prices for palm oil. It also aims to be consistent with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), but only on the assumption that biofuels help reduce greenhouse gases by definition. There are no specific criteria to ensure this is actually the case.
The policy was underpinned by five strategic objectives (Table 4.8). The first two objectives refer to the institution of 5% biofuel mandate, using palm oil as the feedstock. The NBP does not specify whether the processed palm oil to be used in the blend would be palm olein (Envodiesel) or palm methyl ester (PME). In this perspective, as noted in the table below, B5 should be considered a general term for a five per cent blend palm-based biofuel, not necessarily a direct blend of palm oil. The policy notes that a B5 mandate would create new demand for 500 000 tonnes of palm oil (assuming national consumption of 10 million tonnes of diesel per year).
Table 4.8: National Biofuel Policy Strategic Objectives Objective Description Biofuel for transport Diesel for land and sea transport will be a blend of 5% processed palm oil and 95% petroleum diesel. This B5 would be made available throughout the country. Biofuel for industry Supply B5 diesel to the industrial sector, to be used as fuel in industrial boilers, construction machinery and diesel-powered generators. Biofuel technologies Promote research, development and commercialization of biofuel technologies. Biofuel for export Encourage and facilitate the establishment of plants for producing biofuel for export. Biofuel for a cleaner environment Enhance the quality of the ambient air, reduce the use of fossil fuels and minimize emissions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide and particulates through increased use of biofuels.
By the end of 2007, 28 months after the launching of the NBP, the government had completed trials in which a five per cent blend of PME and 95 per cent petroleum diesel (B5) was used by selected government department fleets as 56 well as by selected users in industry. The Malaysian Standard specifications for PME B5 were set, and some commercial biodiesel plants established.
4.4 SWOT Analysis for Biodiesel Oil Industry in
4.4.1 Challenges on Palm Biodiesel
Technological Challenge The European Standard for Biodiesel (EN 14214) and the American Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel (B100) Blend Stock for Distillate Fuels (ASTM 6751-02) were the two major international biodiesel standards for Palm Methyl Ester (PME). In order to meet EN 14214/ASTM D 6751 specification, MPOB conducted the analyzing on content of PME produced in Malaysia. However, there were still some challenges that must be overcome in order to use PME in cold weather. These related to the low pour point of PME because it solidified in cold temperatures. For information, standard PME had high cold filter plugging point (CFPP) which was 15C while low pour point PME had CFPP of -18C to -3C. Therefore, Malaysia is considering setting its own national biodiesel standard for PME which followed closely to the EU and U.S. standards.
Environmental Challenge There would be environment concern from all over the countries, especially from European Union (EU) questioning sustainability of palm oil production for biodiesel. For example, allegations of destruction of orang utans, rainforests and loss of biodiversity. Under the Constitution of the Federation of Malaysia, most land matters were delegated to the states. The states of Sabah and Sarawak managed their own environmental regulations. Next were allegations that development of peat land gives net emission of Greenhouse Gases (GHG) and also the struggling debate between food and fuel. Diversion of land and food crops to biofuels could result in escalating food prices (Msangi et al. 2006; Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute 2005; Rajagopal and Zilberman 2007), especially in conjunction with several other factors contributing to rising food prices such as increasing population and bad 57 weather. The food-fuel conflict appears to be already occurring, partly due to the conversion of agricultural land from food crops to biofuel crops.
Expensive Production Cost The price of crude oil and crude palm oil (CPO) prices were not stable and yet kept fluctuating. Therefore, the margin had thinned in fact became negative. Here was some calculating to be proved:
1) Cost of Refined Bleached Deodorised (RBD) Palm Oil USD700/Tonne 2) Cost of Maintenance and Insurance USD120/Tonne 3) Cost Production of Palm Biodiesel (USD700 + USD120) USD820/Tonne 4) Selling Price of Biodiesel USD850/Tonne 5) Overall Profit USD 30/Tonne
As the result, palm biodiesel was not economically viable with todays RBD palm oil price. Therefore, Jatropha had taken into consideration to produce biodiesel because it was cheap feedstock.
Besides that, the margin for biodiesel production also very much depend on foreign exchange rate. Besides the palm biodiesel that export and import, it could also affect investors for make international investments. For example, if investors needed to convert money currency in order to make a certain investment, then the changed in the currency exchange rate would affect the investment's value to either gain or lose when the investment was sold and converted back into the original currency.
4.4.2 Strength
Facilities
Malaysia were potential to become biodiesel producer country with the well-developed infrastructures and great integrated biodiesel facilities particularly zones in Pasir Gudang (Johor), Pulau Carey and Port Klang. Moreover, Malaysia and Indonesia were responsible for 86% of the worlds palm oil production. The main proportion of palm oil 58 would be used for food. However, Malaysia and Indonesia had agreed to gazette a total of 6 million tonnes of palm oil to be used as biofuel. Table 4.9 showed operation for existing palm biodiesel plants in Malaysia for 2011.
Table 4.9: Existing Palm Biodiesel Plants in Malaysia for 2011 (Source: MPOB Biodiesel Plant In Operation In Malaysia, 2011) No Company Name Location Operation 1 AJ Oleo Industries Sdn. Bhd. Segamat, Johor Active 2 AM Biofuel Sdn. Bhd. Pasir Gudang, Johor Active 3 Carotino Sdn. Bhd. Pasir Gudang, Johor Active 4 YPJ Palm International Sdn. Bhd. Pasir Gudang, Johor Less Active 5 Malaysia Vegetable Oil Refinery Sdn. Bhd. Pasir Gudang, Johor Less Active 6 Nexsol (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Pasir Gudang, Johor Less Active 7 PGEO Bioproducts Sdn. Bhd. Pasir Gudang, Johor Less Active 8 Vance Bioenergy Sdn. Bhd. Pasir Gudang, Johor Less Active 9 Mission Biofuels Sdn. Bhd. Kuantan, Pahang Less Active 10 Mission Biotechnologies Sdn. Bhd. Kuantan, Pahang Less Active 11 Plant Biofuels Corporation Sdn. Bhd. Kuantan, Pahang Less Active 12 Carotech Berhad (Chemor Plant) Chemor, Perak Active 13 Carotech Berhad (Lumut Plant) Setiawan, Perak Active 14 Lereno Sdn. Bhd. Setiawan, Perak Active 15 Man Jang Bio Sdn. Bhd. Port Klang, Selangor Less Active 16 Intrack Technology (M) Sdn. Bhd. Rawang Selangor Less Active 17 Sime Darby Biodiesel Sdn. Bhd.- Carey Island Pulau Carey, Selangor Active 18 Sime Darby Biodiesel Sdn. Bhd.- Panglima Garang Teluk Panglima Garang, Selangor Active 19 FIMA Biodiesel Sdn. Bhd. (Titian Asli S/B) Port Klang, Selangor Active 20 Weschem Technologies Sdn. Bhd. Batang Kali, Selangor Active 21 KLK Bioenergy Sdn. Bhd. (Zoop Sdn. Bhd.) Shah Alam, Selangor Active 59 22 Future Prelude Sdn. Bhd. Port Klang, Selangor Less Active 23 Innovans Bio Fuel Sdn. Bhd. Port Klang, Selangor Less Active 24 Global Bio-Diesel Sdn. Bhd. Lahad Datu, Sabah Active 25 Green Edible Oil Sdn. Bhd. (Green Biofuels) Sandakan, Sabah Active 26 SPC Bio-diesel Sdn. Bhd. Lahad Datu, Sabah Less Active 27 Platinum Biofuels Sdn. Bhd. Seremban, Negeri Sembilan Less Active 28 Senari Biofuels Sdn. Bhd. (Global Bonanza) Kuching, Sarawak Less Active
Environmental Source
There were many environmental benefits of using palm biodiesel as compared to petroleum-based diesel. The use of renewable palm oil as biofuel would help to reduce the use of fossil fuel and indirectly reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide to atmosphere. Various studies indicated that sulphur dioxide, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide emissions and particulate matters were reduced with the use of biodiesel. Biodiesel had a higher cetane number that improved engine performance and results in cleaner emissions compared to petroleum diesel.
Based on the current practices in the Malaysian palm oil industry, data that had shown that palm biodiesel typically contributed to greenhouse gases (GHG) emission savings of 70% as compared to petroleum diesel if the biogas in the palm oil mill effluents was captured. If the biogas was emitted to the atmosphere, the GHG emission savings was >50%.
New Demand for Palm Oil
When palm oil was used in biofuel production, an increasing demand for palm oil will be stimulated. Generally, the demand for this commodity was increasing rapidly because of the increasing demand of edible oil in consumer countries, especially 60 China, European Union, Pakistan, India and the United State. The use of palm biodiesel also contributed to this increased demand and thus to some extent helped to enhance palm oil prices. Malaysia being the worlds second largest producer and exporter of palm oil would benefit through the creation of new markets for palm oil based biodiesel either in nation or in global.
Extensive Research and Development Activities
Research and development in the palm oil was conducted in industry, and by dedicated government research institutions, such as the Malaysia Palm Oil Board (MPOB), and universities. The MPOB relied mainly on funds generated through compulsory taxes collected by government on the industry. Biodiesel production, Research and Development and the commercialization of new technology for palm oil and palm oil based product, had been undertaken by the MPOB together with Petronas. In 2004, Petronas contributed RM 12 million (US$ 3.8 million) to build a pilot plant for biodiesel production (Ong Soon Hock, 2004).
In 2006, the MPOB received Research and Development for biodiesel research granted from the government with a total of RM 13.58 million (US$ 3.69 million) when three firms producing biodiesel are using technology developed by the MPOB.
Energy Security
The introduction of palm oil based biofuel as a diesel substitute would help to reduce the imports of petroleum diesel. This would help to reduce the dependency on fossil fuel. Therefore, government provided subsidy for the use of B5 fir in the private sector. Thus, B5 at petrol stations could be purchased at the price same as petroleum diesel. For example, petrol stations in central region started with Putrajaya in June 2011 and followed by all other petrol stations which located in Melaka, Negeri Sembilan, Kuala Lumpur and Selangor.
61 4.4.3 Weakness
Fuel Subsidies and Opportunity Cost of Subsidies
Without including biofuel subsidies, it has been estimated that Malaysian government consumption subsidies for petroleum fuels are likely to total around RM25 billion (US$ 7.8 billion) in 2008 alone (Thillainathan, 2008). This includes around RM18 billion in direct subsidies and around RM7 billions of foregone tax revenue for transport fuels (assuming an oil price of US$ 100120 per barrel). A further RM20 billion is expected to be spent on natural gas used for electricity generation, leading to total fuel subsidies of RM45 billion (US$ 13.85) in 2008 higher than the record RM 40 billion (US$ 12.30 billion) allocated for development for 2008 under the 9th Malaysia Plan. Biofuel subsidies would create a new expense for government, diverting taxpayer funds to private interests and encouraging production of an economically unviable product. The Malaysian Palm Oil Board noted that cost of producing palm oil-based biodiesel was RM 2487 (US$ 820) per tonne compared with a market price of RM 3 630 (US$ 1 115) per tonne for the fuel. Bridging this gap with taxpayers funds makes no economic sense and squanders the finite resources of government.
Contributor to GHG Emissions
The significant contributor to the greenhouse gases (GHG) emission is the biogas from the palm oil mill effluents. The biogas consists of 60%-70% of methane, 30%- 40% of carbon dioxide and trace amount of hydrogen sulphide. Methane is 23 times more global warming potential compared to carbon dioxide and thus contributes considerably towards GHG emission.
Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC)
The indirect land use change impacts of biofuels, also known as ILUC, related to the unintended consequence of releasing more carbon emissions due to land-use changes around the world induced by the expansion of croplands for biodiesel production in response to the increased global demand for biofuels. There are some criteria of 62 ILUC that was taken into consideration in the proposed European Country Directive. For example, a legally binding reference to indirect land use change has not been included. However, the EU will have to come forward with proposals in 2010 to limit indirect land use change caused by the switch to biofuel production.
4.4.4 Opportunities
An early introduction of biodiesel facilitated a peaceful change from the era of fossil fuels to the era of future fuels. Therefore, biodiesel had the opportunity to replace a large percentage of fossil fuels. Biodiesel managed to decrease dependency on crude oil and also decrease imports of crude oil from other countries. Since biodiesel raised the interest of many exist research initiatives, there were new efficient energy crops would be found for biofuels production. New and effective conversion technologies would be found to replace the existing technologies. Due to Directive 2003/96/EC, tax reductions for biofuels were introduced in many European countries while Directive 2003/17/EC allowed blending fossil fuels with biofuels. Thus, in some European countries blending of fossil fuels with biofuels was mandatory.
4.4.5 Threats
The biofuel market was a relatively new market and yet the political lobby for biofuels was weak when compared to the lobby of fossil fuels. Besides that, biofuel production was limited due to land availability for feedstock production. Furthermore, feedstock production of biofuels is in competition with food production.
63 4.5 Projection of Research Development in Asian Countries
4.5.1 Previous Research Development
First Generation of Biofuel
In Malaysia, governments and the private sector already had ambitious planned to rapidly expand the production and consumption of first generation biofuels. Refer to Appendix B as the prove of Malaysias government was moving towards biodiesel direction since 2004. Indonesia and Malaysia had bold plans to produce biodiesel from oil palm. The quality of data available on biofuel production, consumption, and feedstock utilisation in the Malaysia was not very high especially data on biodiesel was scarce and only rough estimated of biofuel consumption was available. Better data on production, sales, trade, and inventories of biofuels was needed, especially internationally comparable standardised country-level data. The production and consumption of biofuels were expected to grow further, both worldwide and in the Asia Pacific region, along with the rising energy demand and fossil fuel prices.
The choice of feedstock in Malaysia had been based on existing crops, existing feedstock production and processing infrastructure, climatic conditions, and, in some cases, government policies. Oil palm was the most important feedstock crops for biodiesel production. Oil palm produced the highest amount of biodiesel per hectare followed by jatropha and coconut.
4.5.2 Current Research Development
Second Generation Biofuel
Acknowledging the limitations of the first generation biofuels, there was a move in the direction of second generation biofuels. In terms of large-scale production, biofuels from cellulosic biomass were still at the demonstration stage. Research had been conducted focusing on large-scale production in the USA, Canada, Germany, Sweden, China and Brazil (World Business Council for Sustainable Development 2007). It was previously believed that second generation biofuel technologies would 64 not be available in the market until 2030. However, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) believes that technological breakthroughs are possible in the near future depending on government funding (World Business Council for Sustainable Development 2007).
India, Indonesia, China, Malaysia, Japan and Vietnam together could produce about 402 billion litres of ethanol by collecting the residues from rice, wheat, sugarcane and corn alone (Table 4.10). There is potential to produce even more if residues from other agricultural crops, timber mills, forests, grasslands and organic waste from urban and rural areas are included:
Table 4.10: Potential availability of agricultural residues for second generation biofuels in selected Asian countries
In conclusion, the research objectives had been achieved and the research questions had been answered with evidences.
Palm oil was the most economical feedstock for biodiesel production because it had the highest yield per unit area. The biofuel policy will help the country reduce the dependency on fossil fuels. Being renewable, palm oil industry had important role to play in supporting the energy needed in transportation and industrial sectors for local and overseas demand. Biodiesel derived from palm oil provided option for vertical integration opportunity which would enhance the viability of biodiesel business despite of high crude oil prices.
Biodiesel would be competitive without subsidies when CPO prices were below RM 3 000 per tonne and crude petroleum oil prices above US$ 140 per barrel. However, such a divergence in the prices is unlikely to be sustained for long, given that vegetable oil prices now appear to be following petroleum oil prices. The outlook for the Malaysian biodiesel industry hinged upon whether substantial government subsidies or incentives were forthcoming in the near future. In February 2010, the government decided to push back the implementation of the B5 mandate to June 2011. Even with this mandate, it was unlikely that domestic demand will be sufficient to sustain the industry. The industry was extremely vulnerable as a result 66 of fluctuating palm oil and petroleum prices and restrictive biofuel policies in key consumer markets.
If biodiesel was to be consumed primarily in the domestic transport sector, the government would have to subsidise it as well as restructure fossil fuel subsidies, in order for the domestic biodiesel market to be viable. Biofuels would not serve as a significant new source of energy for Malaysia, which made the added expense of introducing a separate biodiesel subsidy difficult to justify. Instead, the domestic biofuel sector should be encouraged to diversify the choice of feedstock to reduce dependency on palm oil. Palm biogas and solid biomass have as sources of green fuel to support the development of renewable energy and 2ndgeneration biofuel feedstock in Malaysia.
5.2 Recommendations
Additional research on biofuels is needed in order to effectively inform future policies, especially in the following areas: a) A move domestic retail fuel price towards the world price is commendable, particularly as steps are also being envisaged to ensure that adequate safeguards are provided for the poor. b) Economic and social effects of biofuels c) More cost effective and environmentally friendly ways to produce biofuels, especially second generation biofuels. Advanced countries are already conducting considerable research, but developing countries should conduct their own research because results on these topics could likely be location specific. For example, each country has different potential feedstock and production conditions for second generation biofuels.
67
REFERENCES
Salsuwanda Selamat and Che Zulzikrami Azner Abidin (2011). Renewable Energy and Kyoto Protocol: Adoption in Malaysia. Hillard G. Huntington and Stephen P.A. Brown (2003). Energy Security and Global Climate Change Mitigation. S. Sumathi, S.P. Chai, A.R. Mohamed (2007). Utilization of oil palm as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia. Synergy Drive Forms Merger Integration Committee, Dec 27, 2006, from http://www.simedarby.com/downloads/pdfs/NEWS/News-20061227.pdf EPU: Danida IRP 2 (2005).Technical and Economic Potential of Bio-diesel and Bio- ethanol. Kalyana Sundram PhD. (2008). Palm Oil: Chemistry and Nutrition Updates. Ir Ng Say Bock, MPOC, (2010). Understanding Palm oil. American Palm Oil Council (2006). Palm Oil, Your Vegetable Oil for Better Health. pro Vitamin A activity of palm oil, 2008, from www.palmoilworld.org. Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations, (2002). Small-Scale Palm Oil Processing. EC (COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES): Directive 2003/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 2003 68 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels. OJ L 76, 22.03.2003 p.10 Tan Sri Datuk Dr Yusof Basiron, (2007). The Palm Oil Advantage in Biofuel. Dr. Anbu Clemensis Johnson, Ragunathan Santiagoo, Abdul Haqi Ibrahim (2005). Biofuels: Fuels of the Future. Leadbetter, Nicholas E. (2007).Continuous-Flow Preparation of Biodiesel Using Microwave Heating. Basiron, Yusof. (2005). Biofuel: An Alternative Fuel In The Malaysian Scenario. Kuala Lumpur: MPOB. Bhattacharjee, Arun. (2003, 3 May). The Price of Malaysia's Palm Oil Expansion, Asia Times Online. Faizah Shariff, Ayat K. Ab. Rahman, Mohd Nasir Amiruddin and Yusof Basiron. (2005). Impact of commercialisation of biofuel on prices of related commodities. Kuala Lumpur: MPOB. U.S. Commercial Service. (2006). Malaysian biodiesel development. U.S. Government federal Department of Commerce. Malaysian Palm Oil Board. (2005). Palm Biofuel and Palm Biodiesel: Fuels for the Future. Retrieved 26 August 2008 from MPOB: www.mpob.gov.my/html/issue/pdf/pbiofuel_booklet.pdf Nasir, Mohd. Amiruddin, Ayat K. Abdul Rahman and Faizah Mohd Shariff. (2004). Biofuel: Palm oil stabilisation mechanism. Proceedings of the 2004 MPOB National Seminar on Green and Renewable Biofuel. Bhardwaj, M. 2007. Global palm oil prices to rise sharply. Reuters, 23 September
69 Koizumi, T. and K. Ohga. 2007. Biofuels policies in Asian countries: Impact of the expanded biofuels program on world agricultural markets. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 5 (2), http://www.bepress.com/jafio/vol5/iss2/art8/ Mongabay.com. (2008a, June 26). Malaysia says no more clearing of forest reserves for oil palm plantations. Retrieved 15 July 2008 from: http://news.mongabay.com/2008/0626-palm_oil.html Ooi Tee Ching. (2007, 5 July). EnvoDiesel likely to be sold at subsidised rates. New Straits Times Press. Retrieved 21 Septmeber 2008 from: http://www.redorbit.com/news/business/991540/envodiesel_likelyto_be_sold_at_ subsidised_rates/index.html Ong Soon Hock, Tan Sri datuk Dr. Augustine. (2004). Panel Session: Future Outlook of Biofuel in Malaysia. Proceedings of the 2004 MPOB National Seminar on Green and Renewable Biofuel, 6-7 December 2004. Simeh, Arif and Tg. Mohd. Ariff Tg. Ahmad. (2001). The case study on the Malaysian pPalm oil. Paper presented at the Regional Workshop on Commodity Export Diversification and Poverty Reduction in South and Southeast Asia, Bangkok, 35 April 2001. UNCTAD. Thillainathan, R. (2008, 26 May). A critical review of price control and subsidies in Malaysia. Note prepared for London School of Economics Alumnis Forum on Rise & Fall of Subsidies 26 May 2008, and presented in a Centre for Policy Initiative column. Retrieved 17 July 2008 from: http://cpiasia.org Leow, C. (2008). Palm oil rises to record as Indonesian taxes may curb supply. Bloomberg.com. 5 Feb. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a4wxtklmOVB0&re fer=home (accessed 5 May 2008). Pearce, F. (2005). Forests paying the price of biofuels. New Scientist, November 22. 70