Sei sulla pagina 1di 44

Why demolition of Babri Masjid

is justified ?






Disclaimer
I am not against any religion I love them ,I
respect them but I seek the same respect from
them for my religion also .If they dont do so
then there will be a problem
All religions should be open to criticism .If
your religion cant satisfy a persons doubt or
answer his question then what's the use of
following that religion
Was the Masjid built over a temple?
Yes Archaeological survey and digging of the
disputed sites have revealed the existence of a
older structure below the Babri Masjid
Its quite evident from the history of ISLAM
that they are quite fond of conquering or
destroying the places of worship of other
religions

E.g. 1

Yes dont be shocked the Holiest place in ISLAM is itself built over the Hebrew holy
place of worship
Before the rise of Islam the Ka'aba, and Mecca (previously known as Bakkah),
were revered as a sacred sanctuary and was a site of pilgrimage.
[1]
Some identify
it with the Biblical "valley of Baca" from Psalms 84 (Hebrew: ).
[2][

[3
At the time of
Muhammad (AD 570632), his tribe the Quraysh was in charge of the Kaaba,
which was at that time a shrine containing hundreds of idols representing Arabian
tribal gods and other religious figures. Muhammad earned the enmity of his tribe
by claiming the shrine for the new religion of Islam that he preached. He wanted
the Kaaba to be dedicated to the worship of the one God alone, and all the idols
were evicted. The Black Stone (al-Hajar-ul-Aswad), still present at the Kaaba was a
special object of veneration at the site. According to tradition the text of seven
especially honoured poems were suspended around the Ka'aba.
According to Islam, Muhammad's actions were not strictly a conversion but rather
a restoration of the mosque established on that site by Abraham, who is
considered to be a prophet in Islam. The Ka'aba thus became known as the Masjid
al-Haram, or Sacred Mosque, the holiest site in Islam.
[4]


E.g. 2 Al-Aqsa Mosque


Al-Aqsa Mosque (Arabic: al-Masjid al-Aq, IPA: [lmsdd lqs] ( listen),
"the Farthest Mosque") also known as Al-Aqsa and Bayt al-Muqaddas, is the third holiest site in
Islam and is located in the Old City of Jerusalem. The site on which the silver domed mosque sits,
along with the Dome of the Rock, also referred to as al-Haram ash-Sharif or "Noble
Sanctuary,"
[2]
is the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism, the place where the Temple is
generally accepted to have stood. Muslims believe that Muhammad was transported from
the Sacred Mosque in Mecca to al-Aqsa during the Night Journey. Islamic tradition holds that
Muhammad led prayers towards this site until the seventeenth month after the emigration,
when God directed him to turn towards the Ka'aba.
The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by the Rashidun caliph Umar, but was rebuilt
and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. After
an earthquake in 746, the mosque was completely destroyed and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-
Mansur in 754, and again rebuilt by his successor al-Mahdi in 780. Another earthquake destroyed
most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque
which has stood to the present-day. During the periodic renovations undertaken, the various ruling
dynasties of the Islamic Caliphate constructed additions to the mosque and its precincts, such as its
dome, facade, its minbar, minarets and the interior structure. When the Crusaders captured
Jerusalem in 1099, they used the mosque as a palace and church, but its function as a mosque was
restored after its recapture by Saladin in 1187. More renovations, repairs and additions were
undertaken in the later centuries by the Ayyubids, Mamluks, Ottomans, the Supreme Muslim
Council, and Jordan. Today, the Old City is under Israeli control, but the mosque remains under the
administration of the Jordanian/Palestinian-led Islamicwaqf.

E.g. 3 Church of the Holy Sepulchre


The Church of the Holy Sepulchre, also called the Basilica of the Holy Sepulchre, or the Church of the
Resurrection by Eastern Christians, is a church within the Christian Quarter of the walled Old City of Jerusalem. It
is a few steps away from the Muristan.
The site is venerated as Golgotha
[1]
(the Hill of Calvary), where Jesus was crucified,
[2]
and is said also to contain the
place where Jesus was buried (the Sepulchre). The church has been a paramount and for many Christians the
most important pilgrimage destination since at least the 4th century, as the purported site of the resurrection of
Jesus. Today it also serves as the headquarters of the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, while control of the
building is shared between several Christian churches and secular entities in complicated arrangements essentially
unchanged for centuries. Today, the church is home to branches of Eastern Orthodoxy and Oriental Orthodoxy as
well as to Roman Catholicism. Anglican and Protestant Christians have no permanent presence in the Church
[3]

and some have regarded the alternative Garden Tomb, elsewhere in Jerusalem, as the true place of Jesus's
crucifixion and resurrection
On October 18, 1009, Fatimid caliph Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah ordered the complete destruction of the church. The
measures against the church were part of a more general campaign against Christian places of worship in Palestine
and Egypt, which involved a great deal of damage: Admar de Chabannes recorded that the church of St George at
Lydda 'with many other churches of the saints' had been attacked, and the 'basilica of the Lord's Sepulchre
destroyed down to the ground'. ...The Christian writer Yahya ibn Sa'id reported that everything was razed 'except
those parts which were impossible to destroy or would have been too difficult to carry away'."
[13]
The Church's
foundations were hacked down to bedrock. The Edicule and the east and west walls and the roof of the cut-rock
tomb it encased were destroyed or damaged (contemporary accounts vary), but the north and south walls were
likely protected by rubble from further damage. The "mighty pillars resisted destruction up to the height of the
gallery pavement, and are now effectively the only remnant of the fourth-century buildings."
[13]
Some minor
repairs were done to the section believed to be the tomb of Jesus almost immediately after 1009, but a true
attempt at restoration would have to wait for decades.
[13].
European reaction was of shock and dismay, with far-
reaching and intense consequences. For example, Cluniac monk Rodulfus Glaber blamed the Jews, with the result
that Jews were expelled from Limoges and other French towns. Ultimately, this destruction provided an impetus
to the later Crusades.
[14]



E.g. 3 Cave of the Patriarchs


The Herodian shrine of Cave of the Patriarchs, the second most holy site in
Judaism
The Cave of the Patriarchs or the Cave of Machpelah (Hebrew:
, Me'arat ha-Machpela (helpinfo),trans. "cave of the double tombs"), is
known by Muslims as the Sanctuary of Abraham or Ibrahimi Mosque (Arabic:
,Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi (helpinfo)).
Situated beneath a Saladin-era mosque converted from a large
rectangular Herodian-era structure, the series of subterranean chambers is located
in the heart of Hebron (Al-Khalil)'s old city in the Hebron Hills. According to
tradition that has been associated with both the Book of Genesis and the Quran,
the cave and adjoining field were purchased by Abraham, and
Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah, Rebecca, and Leah, considered
the Patriarchs and Matriarchs of the Jewish people, are all believed to be buried
there. The only matriarch missing is Rachel, who is believed to be buried
near Bethlehem where she died in childbirth.
[1]
The Arabic name of the complex
reflects the prominence given to Abraham, revered by Muslims as a Quranic
prophet and patriarch through Ishmael. Outside biblical and Quranic sources there
are a number of legends and traditions associated with the cave.

E.g. 4 Somnath Temple


The first temple of Somnath existed before the beginning of the Christian
era.
The second temple, built by the Maitraka kings of Vallabhi in Gujarat,
replaced the first one on the same site around 649. In 725 Junayad, the
Arab governor of Sind, sent his armies to destroy the second temple.
The Pratihara king Nagabhata II constructed the third temple in 815, a
large structure of red sandstone. Mahmud of Ghazni attacked this temple
in 1026, looted its gems and precious stones, massacred the worshippers
and burned it. It was then that the famous Shivalinga of the temple was
entirely destroyed.
The fourth temple was built by the Paramara King Bhoj of Malwa and
the Solanki king Bhimdev I of Gujarat (Anhilwara) between 1026 and 1042.
The temple was razed in 1297 when the Sultanate of Delhi conquered
Gujarat, and again in 1394. Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb destroyed the
temple again in 1706.

A century later the third temple was constructed in red sandstone by the Pratihara king, Nagabhata II.
Soon the temple regained its old glory and wealth, the descriptions of which were carried to the Middle
East. In particular, the accounts of the Arab Al Biruni impressed Mahmud of Ghazni. In AD 1025, Mahmud
destroyed and looted the temple, killing over 50,000 people who tried to defend it.
[16]
The defenders
included the 90-year-old clan leader Ghogha Rana. Mahmud personally broke the gilded lingam to
pieces and took them back to his homeland and placed them in the steps leading to the newly built
Jamiah Masjid, so that they would be stepped upon by those going to the mosque to pray.
[16][17]
Work on
the fourth temple was started immediately by the Paramara King Bhoj of Malwa and the Solanki king
Bhima of Patan and the temple was ready by AD 1042. This temple was destroyed in AD 1300. At that time
Allaudin Khilji occupied the throne of Delhi and he sent his general, Alaf Khan, to pillage Somnath. The
fifth temple was built by King Mahipala of the Chudasama dynasty.
[17]

Converted structure at the site of Somnath temple, 1869
Somnath was repeatedly attacked in the succeeding centuries. The last of these attacks was by the Mughal
emperor Aurangazeb in AD 1701. A mosque was built at the site of the temple.
[17]
In AD 1783 queen
Ahilyabhai Holkar built the sixth temple at an adjacent site. The temple still stands and worship is carried
out there. After independence, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel pledged on 13 November 1947, that the seventh
temple would be reconstructed. According to prescribed Hindu rituals, pledges are made by taking holy
water in one's fist. Leaders like Morarji Desai, Dr. Rajendra Prasad (the first president) and Kanhaiyalal
Munshi joined in and the work was entrusted to the Sompura Shilpakars, whose ancestors rebuilt each
new temple through the ages. The mosque built by Aurangazeb was not destroyed but carefully relocated.
In 1951 Dr. Rajendra Prasad performed the consecration ceremony with the words The Somnath Temple
signifies that the power of creation is always greater than the power of destruction. The temple
construction was completed on 1 December 1995, long after the demise of Sardar Patel. The then
President of India, Dr. Shankar Dayal Sharma, dedicated it to the nation.

E.g. 5 Qutub Complex
The Qutub complex (Hindi:

, Urdu: ) ,
also spelled Qutab or Qutub, is an array of
monuments and buildings at
Mehrauli in Delhi, India. The best-known
structure in the complex is the Qutub Minar,
built to celebrate the victory of Mohammed
Ghori over Rajput king Prithviraj Chauhan in
1192 AD, by his then viceroy, Qutub-ud-din
Aibak, who later became the first Sultan of
Delhi of the Mamluk dynasty
Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque
(Located inside the Qutub Complex)

Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque (Dome of Islam) (also known as the Qutub Mosque or the Great
Mosque of Delhi) was built by Qutb-ud-din Aibak, founder of the Mamluk or Slave
dynasty.
[20]
It was the first mosque built in Delhi after the Islamic conquest of India and the
oldest surviving example of Ghurids architecture in Indian subcontinent.
[21]
The construction
of this Jami Masjid (Friday Mosque), started in the year 1193 AD, when Aibak was the
commander of Muhammad Ghori's garrison that occupied Delhi. TheQutub Minar was built
simultaneously with the mosque but appears to be a stand alone structure, built as the
'Minar of Jami Masjid', for the muezzin to perform adhan, call for prayer, and also as a qutub,
an Axis or Pole of Islam.
[22]
It is reminiscent in style and design of the Adhai-din-ka Jhonpra or
Ajmer mosque at Ajmer, Rajasthan, also built by Aibak during the same time, also
constructed by demolishing earlier temples and a Sanskrit school, at the site.
[23]

Intricate stone carvings on the cloister columns at Quwwat ul-Islam Mosque, Qutb complex,
Delhi .According to a Persian inscription still on the inner eastern gateway, the mosque was
built by the parts taken by destruction of twenty-seven Hindu and Jain temples
[3][4][5]
built
previously during Tomars and Prithvi Raj Chauhan, and leaving certain parts of the temple
outside the mosque proper.
[24]
Historical records compiled by Muslim historian Maulana
Hakim Saiyid Abdul Hai attest to the iconoclasm of Qutb-ud-din Aybak. This pattern of
iconoclasm was common during his reign, although an argument goes that such iconoclasm
was motivated more by politics than by religion

E.g. 6 Iron Pillar of Delhi
The first location of the pillar has been debated.
[4]

While the pillar was certainly used as a trophy in the building the Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque and
the Qutb complex, its original location, whether on the site itself or from elsewhere, has
frequented discussion. A summary of views on this subject and related matters was collected in
volume edited by M. C. Joshi and published in 1989.
[5]
More recently, opinions have been
summarised again by Upinder Singh in her book Delhi: Ancient History.
[6]

R. Balasubramaniam explored the metallurgy of the pillar and the iconography based on analysis of
archer-type Gupta gold coins.
[7]
In his view, the pillar, with a wheel or discus at the top, was
originally located at the Udayagiri caves, situated near Vidisha in Madhya Pradesh.
[8]
This conclusion
was partly based on the fact that the inscription mentions Viupadagiri (meaning "hill with
footprint of Viu"). This conclusion was endorsed and elaborated by Michael Willis in
his Archaeology of Hindu Ritual, published in 2009.
[9]
The key point in favour of placing the iron
pillar at Udayagiri is that this site was closely associated with Chandragupta and the worship of
Viu in the Gupta period. In addition, there are well-established traditions of mining and working
iron in central India, documented particularly by the iron pillar at Dhar and local place names like
Lohapura and Lohang Pr (see Vidisha). The king of Delhi, Iltutmish, is known to have attacked and
sacked Vidisha in the thirteenth century and this would have given him an opportunity to remove
the pillar as a trophy to Delhi, just as the Tughluq rulers brought Asokan pillars to Delhi in the
1300s.

For More info
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_of_n
on-Muslim_places_of_worship_into_mosques
So I think I have removed the first possible
argument that Muslims dont demolish the
holy places of other religions as ISLAM is
Falsely claimed to be a religion of Peace.
You might think why do they do so (If they)
The Only Possible reason is that THEY
WANTED TO SHOW WHO WAS THE BOSS
THERE. If your so called god cant even protect
himself how can he protect you .
What is a Temple/ Mandir?
By definition
A temple (from the Latin word templum) is a structure
reserved for religious or spiritual activities
A Hindu Temple is build according to the Shastras and the
Deities are installed through a process called
Pranaprathista. Once it is a Temple, it is always a temple.
Even if it is removed from the place, it can be built at the
place since Pranaprathista was done for the Murthies in
that place
The owner of the temple is the Lord Himself(E.g. the owner
of a Ram Mandir will be Lord Ram) ,No person can claim
ownership of a temple they can only act as a care taker or a
Trustee
What is a Masjid
It is only a facilitator to conduct namaz in other
words only a place to read namaz thats it.
A mosque is not an essential part of the practice
of the religion of Islam and namaz (prayer) by
Muslims can be offered anywhere, even in open.
Accordingly, its acquisition is not prohibited by
the provisions in the Constitution of India( The
Supreme Court of India in the Faruqui vs. Union
of India case [(1994)6 SCC360])
A Masjid can be owned by an individual
If Muslims argue that its a masjid(which it isnt ) then also
a masjid can be demolished as in their religion it is said that
no idol worship should be done (source the HOLY QURAN
http://www.submission.info/perspectives/monotheism/ido
lworship.html). And if they are looking for Allah in the
mosque then they are committing a sin (according to
ISLAM)
E.g. The Bilal Masjid ,the masjid where the prophet mohd
used to read namaz was demolished by the Saudi govt
(Source
http://oppressedpeoplesonlineword.ning.com/forum/topic
s/saudi-regime-demolishes-masjid-al-haram-holy-sites-in-
mecca)
So by now I have demolished the possible
arguments that masjid is a religious place and
masjid cant be demolished
Oh did I forget that in Babri masjid no one
used to read namaz .Yes my friends since 1932
no one used to read namaz there, it was an
abandoned place .
Is India Really Secular??
According to the constitution of India ,India is a secular state ,where
the religious sentiments of an individual is protected and has
freedom to follow any religion. And everyone is equal under law(My
interpretation)
If it is so then why is there a different laws for Muslims.
E.g. For a Muslim he could have many wives but for a Hindu it is a
crime why??
You might remember many film stars who change their religion just
to marry some other girl while already married
E.g. An old Muslim woman was denied alimony from her husband
after divorce even after supreme court ruled in the favour of
granting alimony to the lady but the then govt reversed after the
pressure of the Islamic organisations stating that it is not
mandatory in their religion (Source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shah_Bano_case)



For the Hindus the cow is a sacred animal then why is
there cow slaughter factories in India. The funny thing
is govt provide subsidy to people for transporting Cow
flesh
For Hindus the Ram setu is a sacred site then why was
the govt trying to demolish it ?
Why was there no action taken when 5,00,000 Hindus
from Kashmir where forced to leave their place and run
?
Why was Adi Shankarchaya (the supreme Hindu guru)
was arrested like a common criminal in a case which
was later proved a false case ?
And to add to all this the Govt is presenting a
Communal Violence bill ,which protects only
the minority from violence thereby assuming
that only the majority are the reason for the
violence .
3 Stages of Jihad
Stage 1 Stealth Jihad
STAGE ONEWhen Muslims are completely outnumbered and cant
possibly win a physical confrontation with unbelievers, they are to live in
peace with non-Muslims and preach a message of tolerance. We see an
example of this stage when Muhammad and his followers were a
persecuted minority in Mecca. Since the Muslims were entirely
outnumbered, the revelations Muhammad received during this stage (e.g.
You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion) called for
religious tolerance and proclaimed a future punishment (rather than a
worldly punishment) for unbelievers.
- Islamists feel powerless and too few in numbers to impact real change.
- This time is used to adopt the status of "Victim-hood" by the majority
and the state, and affect the conversation about peaceful Islam, via
deception.
- Islamists use propaganda and politics.
Stage 2 DEFENSIVE JIHAD
STAGE TWOWhen there are enough Muslims and resources to defend the Islamic
community, Muslims are called to engage in defensive Jihad. Thus, when Muhammad
had formed alliances with various groups outside Mecca and the Muslim community
had become large enough to begin fighting, Muhammad received Quran 22:39-40:
Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are
oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them; Those who have been
expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: our Lord is Allah. . .
.Although Muslims in the West often pretend that Islam only allows defensive fighting,
later revelations show otherwise.
- Muslims are gaining in number (Population Jihad, ghettos, district level majority),
influence politics and power.
- Islamists have built relationships, infiltrated organizations, and begin making demands
- Islamists may use financing, propaganda and politics.
- In Democracy they effect the final outcome of the elections.(Thats why every party
thinks about the HUGE MUSLIM VOTEBANK)
When you have enough number to influence then keep asking for more
E.g. Different set of laws , Reservations for Muslims etc
INDIA IS IN THE SECOND STAGE OF JIHAD




Stage 3 The Offensive Jihad
STAGE THREEWhen Muslims establish a majority and achieve political power in an area, they are
commanded to engage in offensive Jihad. Hence, once Mecca and Arabia were under Muhammads
control, he received the call the fight all unbelievers. In Surah 9:29, we read:
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been
forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the
People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Notice that this verse doesnt order Muslims to fight oppressors, but to fight those who dont
believe in Islam (including the People of the BookJews and Christians).Not surprisingly, we find
similar commands in Islams most trusted collections of ahadith (traditions containing Muhammads
teachings).
Sahih al-Bukhari 6924Muhammad said: I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: La
ilaha illallah (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and whoever said La ilaha illallah,
Allah will save his property and his life from me.
Sahih Muslim 30Muhammad said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as
they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.
Here again, the criterion for fighting people is that the people believe something other than Islam
Its clear, then, that when Muslims rose to power, peaceful verses of the Quran were abrogated
by verses commanding Muslims to fight people based on their beliefs. Islams greatest scholars
acknowledge this. For instance, Ibn Kathir (Islams greatest commentator on the Quran) sums up
Stage Three as follows: Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of
them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizyah, they should be fought till they are killed.
- Islamists are empowered and take over the state/Govt via wars and genocide.
- Kashmir, WB, Hyderabad, Assam, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Gaza, Tunisia, Egypt, Iran are all recent
examples.
700 years ago 100% Hindus in Kashmir and today 99% Muslims in Kashmir.
1947 19% Hindus in Pakistan today hardly 1%.
1947 7% Muslims in India and in 2001 it was 13.4%, 2011 ??
The Current Situation of Hindus

Neither they are seeing what is the big picture nor are the ready to
hear those who saw the picture
The people who know what's happening are too reluctant to speak
as when you speak about Hindu unity people declare you are
communal but if you speak about Muslim unity then its
appreciated, why is there this double standard.
The Current situations the due to the Arjuna Virus The late Swami
Chinmayananda once pointed out, referring to Arjunas initially
declining to fight at Kurukshetra because he could recognize his
duty in the hour of crisis, as the Arjuna virus.
While the foreigners are looking up to Hinduism the Indian Hindus
are running away from it , its a pity state as they dont even know
about there own religion .

What is Hindutva?
Hindutva (Devanagari:

, "Hinduness", a
word coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in his
1923 pamphlet entitled Hindutva: Who is a
Hindu? ) is the set of movements
advocating Hindu nationalism. Members of the
movement are called Hindutvavadis.
[1]
According
to a 1995 Supreme Court of India judgement the
word Hindutva could be used to mean "the way
of life of the Indian people and the Indian culture
or ethos"
In a 1995 judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled that
"Ordinarily, Hindutva is understood as a way of life or a
state of mind and is not to be equated with or understood
as religious Hindu fundamentalism ... it is a fallacy and
an error of law to proceed on the assumption ...
that the use of words Hindutva or Hinduism per se depicts
an attitude hostile to all persons practising any religion
other than the Hindu religion ... It may well be that these
words are used in a speech to promote secularism or to
emphasise the way of life of the Indian people and the
Indian culture or ethos, or to criticise the policy of any
political party as discriminatory or intolerant.
[2]

The concept of "'Hindutva" is continued to be espoused by the organisations like
the RSS and political parties like the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). But the
definition does not have the same rigidity with respect to the concept of "holy
land" laid down by Savarkar, and stresses on inclusivism and patriotism. BJP leader
and the then leader of opposition, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, in 1998, articulated the
concept of "holy land" in Hindutva as follows: "Mecca can continue to be holy for
the Muslims but India should be holier than the holy for them. You can go to a
mosque and offer namaz, you can keep the roza. We have no problem. But if you
have to choose between Mecca or Islam and India you must choose India. All the
Muslims should have this feeling: we will live and die only for this country."
[61]

In a 1995 landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India observed that
"Ordinarily, Hindutva is understood as a way of life or a state of mind and is not to
be equated with or understood as religious Hindu fundamentalism. A Hindu may
embrace a non-Hindu religion without ceasing to be a Hindu and since the Hindu is
disposed to think synthetically and to regard other forms of worship, strange gods
and divergent doctrines as inadequate rather than wrong or objectionable, he
tends to believe that the highest divine powers complement each other for the
well-being of the world and mankind."
[62]


In Layman terms Hindutva means to believe that the
motherland has the supreme place for an individual/citizen
.A citizen has to be ready to make many sacrifice for it .
So can anyone tell me what is wrong in HINDUTVA or
HINDU NATIONLISM ?
Why wouldnt anyone want to become a HINDU
NATIONALIST ?
The only reason that people dont want to connect to it is
just because of the false propaganda that it relates to a
particular religion .That is just because of the ignorant
mindset of the people who make a assumption about
something without even finding about it .
Common Misconceptions about
Hinduism
Idol Worship- It is scientifically proved fact
that human mind concentrates easier and
better when he has something to concentrate
at .Our Rishi didnt need these idols to
concentrate and connect to Lord but a
random person will not have the necessary
mental and will power to do so therefore to
simplify his efforts idols were introduced.

Why so many Gods ??
A Religion has to cater for all and every individual
.Every person has different way of thinking ,different
approach to god .Supposing if there is a party and in
that party only one dish is served then the person who
doesn't like that dish will not be satisfied so in a party
there should to different dishes to satisfy the needs of
different people. Similarly to benefit all and satisfy the
spiritual needs of all there are any gods in Hinduism
.One just has to find the god whom he connects with.
All the gods are the same as it is just a different version
of the same god

AND The most Stupid of all misconceptions
THE CASTE SYSTEM
According to VEDAS , the society was divided
into 4 sects BUT it was NO WHERE WRITTEN
that the sects was based on BIRTH . It was
only based on what an individual pursues .
If KNOWLEDGE (Brahmin)- those who has
knowledge will not have wealth, will not have
weapons and will not have lands
If WEAPONS(Kshatriya)- Those who will have
weapons will rule the country but they will
not make policy. They need to go to people
having knowledge to seek their permission
and advice
If WEALTH(Vaishya)-Those who are having
wealth, their social status will be decided by
the how much philanthropy they do not by
their wealth.
If LAND(Shudras)- Those who has lands have to
produce for the society.
E.g. to prove this
"Ved Vyasa" who was a Maharishi, who wrote the
"Mahabharat". His mother was a fisher
women(Shudras).
Maharishi "Valmiki" who wrote the "Ramayan"
was considered as child of a Dalit
women(Shudras).
'Kalidasa" who is the greatest poet our country
has produced, was a Hunter(again Shudras).
"Rishi Vishwamitra" (the teacher of Lord
Rama) who was considered as Rishi of Rishi
was born in "Kshatriya" family, thats why he
takes Lord Ram to protect him as he himself is
not supposed to take up weapons
The Ravana was a "Brahmin" whom no Hindu
worship.
It proves that Hindu Dharma does not have
"varna" or "caste' on the basis of Birth.

Thanking you to those who understood my
point of view and FUCK OFF to those who still
dont understand it.
Sources
The Real RAM MANDIR ISSUE -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnVQw31xPrU
3 Stages of Jihad-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERou_Q5l9Gw
Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOTgiImVpbs
Are Hindus Idol Worshippers?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acM5L-SWNfU
Why so many paths?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOorY8g3v0w
Why are there so many Gods in Hinduism?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg8L4-wv4Vg

Potrebbero piacerti anche