Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FinancialRecordKeeping:Panaceafor
CombatingFraudinNigerianLocal
Governments
By
MOSESOLAYINKA(CNA,CPA)
DepartmentofAccounting
FacultyofSocialSciences,
UniversityofJos,Jos-Nigeria
Abstract
This paper contends that corruption occurs throughout the
world but is of special concern in developing countries. Local
governments as the third tier of government represent the
vehiclefordevelopmenttotheruralandordinarypeople.The
paper observed that appropriate financial recording of local
government transaction can minimize the high prevalence of
fraudinthepublicsector.Itexploredliteratureandsecondary
findingsonthenatureoffraudandtheanalyticallinkbetween
financial records keeping in local governments as a panacea
forsuccessfulgovernance;freefromcorruptionandfraud.The
recommendationsandpolicyissuesraisedbythepaperoffers
anin-depthmechanismforcurbingthemenaceoffraud.Chief
among these recommendations was the need for both cash
and non-cash financial transactions of local councils be
recorded in appropriate double entrymanner. The conclusion
drawnbythepaperisforleaderstoputupastrongwilltocurb
theillsoffraud.Alsothee-payment,systemcurrentlyinusein
federal structure be immediately adopted at the local
governmentlevels.
18
Introduction
Corruption occurs throughout the world but is of special concern in
developing countries: those who pay and receive bribes can
expropriate a nations wealth leaving little for its poorest citizens
(Rose-Ackerman 1998). Fraud has become an endemic feature of
publicsectoractivities;thebaneofcorruptionparticularlywithinthe
public sector of developing economies requires no further
introduction.Asobservedby(Opara2006:5)inapollconductedby
anti-corruptionorganizationTransparencyInternational(TI)in2002,
out of 50,000 people polled in 64countriesin the world,more than
halfsaidtheyhadpaidabribeinthelast12months.Approximately
halfof allrespondents also indicated that bribery affected business
to a large extent. Overall, one in 10 respondents to the survey
admittedthattheyoramemberoftheirhouseholdhaspaidabribe
inthepastyear(TransparencyInternational2004).
StatementoftheProblem
In recent times, the growth of fraud cases in the public sector in
Nigeria has been on the increase. In fact, it is synonymous with
19
growth in the economy. The objective of any financial sector is
beyondprofitalone,butalsotosafeguarditsassetsfromfraudand
grossmismanagement.Hencebothgovernments(localandothers)
as well as private organizations cannot stand aloof as its hard
earned revenues/resources are squandered by few scrupulous
elementsofthesystems.
ObjectivesoftheStudy
Themajorobjectiveofthisstudyistocontributetotheliterature,on
theroleaccuratefinancialaccountingrecordsinlocalgovernments
authority can play in combating fraud in Nigerian public sector in
general. To enhance the understanding of the issue, it is important
tostatethespecificareasofthepaper,whichinclude:
i. Toexaminetheconceptoffraud.
ii. Provide from the literature, the contribution financial records
have in combating fraud and other economic and financial
crimesintheNigerianpublicsector.
iii. To provide ways for fine turning effective strategies of
improvinglocalgovernmentsinthedischargeoftheirduties
andfunctionseffectivelytoitscitizens.
iv. Finally to contribute the researchers quota to existing
knowledgeonthestudy.
ReviewofLiteratureandTheoreticalFramework
Thesuccessofdemocraticgovernance, minimallypresupposesthe
existence of three essential elements: transparency, accountability,
and equality. Transparency denotes free access to governmental
political and economic activities and decisions. Accountability
entails a state of being held responsible, by both its people and its
elected bodies, for its choices and actions. And the concept of
equality [includes] citizens being treated equally under the law, as
well as some degree of equal political participation among them in
their own governance (Shende and Bennett, 2004). Calls for
20
transparency, accountability, and equality have emerged in
developingcountries,withcitizenssummoningtheirgovernmentsto
reveal their incomes and expenditures, as well as strategies and
ambitions. This further strengthens the need for accurate record
keeping in the discharge of government activities. In the Nigerian
publicsector,thiscallisinitspeaktodemandforaccountabilityand
responsiblegovernmentatalllevels
FinancialRecords
All activities of local government aretranslatable in financial terms;
from the revenues accruable and all expenditure incurred, there is
the need to therefore keep accurate and financial records of all
theseactivities.
FraudDelineated
Corruptionasaffirmedbyseveralauthorsremainsthemajorbaneto
economictransformation(Okonjo-IwealaandOsafo-Kwaako2007).
Corruption exhibits its ugliness through a number of media; fraud
being the top of them all. Fraud may be represented in different
ways; essentially it is more financial in nature than legal. Both
individualsandbusinessescommitmanycriminalactivitiesthatcost
businesses, consumers, government agencies, and stockholders
considerablesumsofmoneyeachyear,whichareallmanifestations
offraud.
Fraudismostoftenthannotconsideredofasavictimlesscrime;on
thecontraryNigeriancitizensareallvictimsofthismenace,whether
directly through our businesses or indirectly as members of the
generalpublicsufferingasaresultofpoorservicedeliveryorprice
inefficiency. Rabiu (2008:12) in agreement with Mahlaba (2004:1)
affirmed that Fraud cost public sector organizations hundreds of
millions of Naira each year. The term fraud is not specifically
definedbylegislationinNigeria:thereforemakesitimpossibletolay
down a hard and fast definition that comprehends fraud in all its
ramifications.
AccordingtoLorsase,(2004:24).Itisaninternationalperversionof
the truth whether by word or by conduct Fraud is described by
Howard, (1976:5) as that which consist of embezzlement, forgery,
manipulation, misappropriation and falsification of goods, cash and
accounts in view of gaining undue advantage Odusegun
(1998:186)furtheraffirms:thatfraudistheuseofdishonestmeans
toobtainanunjustorillegalmaterialadvantage.
Foranactiontoconstitutefraudthereforetheremustbeadishonest
intentionandtheactionmustbeintendedtobenefittheperpetrator
to the detriment of another person. The frequent setting up of
panels,commissionandcommitteesofinquiriestoprobefraudulent
activities of some public servants at all levels of government in
Nigeria is a testimony to how deeply rooted fraud is in the nations
fabric.
LocalGovernmentsandTheirRoles
InafederalsystemlikeNigeria,localgovernmentsareclosertothe
peopleandhencecouldeffectivelyaltersocioeconomicandpolitical
conditions within their jurisdictions. Apart from providing and
maintaining basic infrastructures, local governments can
complement the economic activities of other levels of government
(Ekpo and Ndebbio, 1998:2) There are presently 774 local
23
governmentauthoritiesinNigeria,apresupposedaverageof21per
state spread across six geo-political zones of the country(see
Appendix A). Local government authorities may be established by
the state houses of assembly, and over the years the same forces
that have lobbied more states (i.e. demands by minority
communities or sub-communities for their own homelands), have
createdsimilarpressuresforadditionallocalgovernmentauthorities.
However, the National Assembly is resisting this tendency and the
number of local government authorities may stabilize at not much
higherthanthecurrentnumber.
24
The present Local Government system in Nigeria started with the
1976 Local Government reforms which aimed at restructuring the
Local
Government administration in conformity with modern society, and
atbesttomakeNigeriasLocalGovernmentadministrationanideal
in
Africa. By the reform a Local Government unit should have a
populationrangeof150,000to800,000.Thereformfocusesonthe
administration of the public at the grassroots level where the
majorityofthepopulationofNigerialies.Thoughthereformstarted
in1976,itpassedthroughvariousstagesofdevelopmentintermsof
scope of operation, functions and general administration. Some of
theaimsofthereformare:
(a) The desire to extend the principle of Federalism to its
logical conclusion, by bringing the government to the
grassrootslevel.
(b) Uniformity of local Government administration in all the
LocalGovernmentCouncilsoftheFederationofNigeria.
ThesecondphaseoftheLocal Governmentreformsistheelection
ofthe1stExecutiveChairmaninalltheLocalGovernmentCouncils
of Nigeria and the granting of autonomy to each of these Local
Government Councils in 1988. Thus Local Governments, which
used to be an appendage of the defunct Ministry of Local
Government, has now become a true 3rd tier of government in
Nigeria. In this connection, one can indeed declare that Nigeria
operates three tiers of Government; Federal, State and Local
Governments. Local governments are development-oriented and
social service delivery organisations whose functions are located
withintheframeworkofnationalandstatepolicies.
TheFunctionsofLocalGovernment
The functions and responsibilities of the Local Government
administration are generally to assist in maintaining law, order and
goodgovernmentwithintheareaofitsauthority.
AnelectedcouncilismadeupoftheChairmanandCouncillors,who
areelectedbymembersofthecommunitythroughdirectballotand
on a non-party basis. The Federal Government attaches great
importance to the Local Government as an instrument of
development and a training ground for administration. To this end,
the Government has approved that, in general, the functions which
theLocalAuthoritiesaretoperformshouldbethosewhich:
25
i. Requiredetailedlocalknowledgeforefficientperformance;
ii. Successdependsoncommunityresponsivenessand
Participation;
iii. Are of a personal nature requiring the provision of amenities
closetowheretheindividualsaffectedliveandinwhichthe
significant use of discretion and understanding of
individualsisneeded.
TheResponsibilitiesofLocalGovernments
Basedontheabovefunctions,otherresponsibilities wereapproved
by the Federal Military Government on the findings and
recommendations of the Committee that reviewed Local
GovernmentAdministrationinNigeria:
i. Responsibility for basic environmental sanitation and other
aspectsofpreventivehealthservices;
ii. Administration of maternity centres, dispensaries and leprosy
clinicsandHealthCentres;
iii. Constructionandmaintenanceofroadsanddrains,excluding
federalandstateroads;
iv. Jurisdiction over local inland waterways not designated as
internationalwaterways;
v. Ruralwatersupplyandextensionofurbanwatersupply;
vi. Construction,andmaintenanceofprimaryschools;
vii. Agricultureandveterinaryextensionservices;
viii. TownPlanning;
ix. Careofmarkets,motorparks,andgardens;
x. Maintenanceoflawandorder;and
xi. Afforestation.
TheLocalGovernmentshould,inaddition,provide:
a. Inspectionofmeatandabattoirs
b. Nursery,primaryandadult-education
c. Informationandpublicenlightenment
d. Scholarshipsandbursaries
e. Publiclibrariesandreadingrooms
f. Agricultural and animal health extension services and
veterinaryclinics.
g. Fireservices
h. Lightinganddrainage
i. Supportforartsandculture
j. Controlofpollution
k. Controlofbeggarsandprostitution,
l. Homesfordestitute,theinfirmandorphans
26
m. Publicutilitiesincludingroadandwatertransport
n. Publichousingprogrammes
o. Regulationandcontrolofbuildings
p. Townandcountryplanning
q. Operationsofcommercialundertakings
r. Controloftrafficandparking
s. Pipeseweragesystems
CombatingFraudinLocalGovernments:theroleof
FinancialRecords
As affirmed, above the ills of fraud and corruption in the
development of local areas cannot be overemphasized. As a way
out of this danger threatening the development of local areas;
appropriatefinancial(accounting)recordisonesurewaytocurbing
the menace. Fraud as a process requires two major variables to
successfullythrive:
theintentiontocarryouttheact,and
therightopportunity.
The latter is where the role of financial records comes to play. It is
commontofindpublic office holderswith huge desire to perpetrate
fraud; but intention alone is not a sufficient ground for fraud or
corruptpracticetooccur.Themostimportantofthesetwovariables
istheopportunitycreated.Infactevenwheretheintentionforfraud
is absent, an opportunity created could incite the desire to commit
anactoffraud.
Methodologyofthestudy
The study was carried out basically on the theoretical
framework of thenature offinancial records in curbing fraud in
Nigerian local governments. However all the data used was
secondaryinnatureandtheiranalysiswasbasedondeductive
statistics; which merely explains the features and
characteristics of the data without necessarily making
inferentialjudgement.
DiscussionofFindings
FromthedataexamineditisobviousthatfraudinthePublicsector
remainedintheincrease,withthehighestnumberofreportedcases
betweenSeptember2002toOctober2003hittingatotalnumberof
439 cases inclusive of those reported, treated and still under
28
investigation by the commission (see Appendix C). By the end of
2004 a total number of 104 persons were charged to court on
accountofseveraloffencescommittedagainstthenation.Thisisin
addition to the other cases being pursued by the other anti-graft
agencies. As at 2006 the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC) made well over 56 convictions on corruption,
money laundering, and related offences. With assets well over $5
billion (approximately 600 billion) frozen and seized from corrupt
officials, their agents and cronies (Ribadu 2006). The most
worrisome of these findings is the fact that all the cases of public
fraud had all tricking effect to local governments of the nation. A
further analysis showed that the number of cases reported and/or
referred to commission by other anti-graft agencies had the North
Central recording the highest cases of fraud among public office
holders with an alarming rate of 196 cases in 2004 only and an
averageof141casesannum(seeAppendixB).
RecommendationsandPolicyIssues
Totheleavetheseedoffraudandcorruptpracticestogrowbeyond
thelevelitisnowistoallowevilovercomegood.Localgovernment
foritspeculiarnaturetothedevelopmentofanation,especiallyone
as Nigeria must be given rapt attention on the issue of fraud. As a
followupthereforeontheuseofrecordtocurbtheissueoffraudin
Local governments in Nigeria, the following recommendations and
policiesmustbestrengthenedandestablishedinlocalgovernments
wheretheydonotexist.
i. All transactions involving cash and non-cash financial event
must be recorded in the officially designated book, in
compliance with the double entry requirement of
accounting.
ii. Financial and accounting operations must be separated i.e.
the handling of cash and the recording of the movement
thereofshouldbedonebydifferentpersons.
iii. Responsibility for the performance of jobs must be clearly
defined-toavoidoverlappingandconfusingroles.
iv. Rotationprinciplerelatingtotransferofanemployeefromone
job to another should be an inflexible guiding rule. This is
an effective safeguard against collusion and is recognised
asimportantcannonofsoundpublicorganisation.
v. Clear and well defined rules should be laid down and
practicallyfollowed.
29
vi. Defined disciplinary measures must be strictly adhered to as
deterrent to any officer, involved in fraudulent practices
from the local government point to other levels of
government.
vii. Propercounterfoilorduplicatereceiptbooksmustbeusedfor
all monies received and vouchers obtained for every
payment.
viii. Authorisationmustbeproperlydonebydesignatedperson.
Approvals gotten from decision of meetings must be
accompaniedwiththeminutesofmeetingwherenecessary
toaffirmauthenticity.
ix. The lessons of e-payments be introduced and adhered to at
localgovernmentlevels.
Conclusion
Fraud has done enough harm to the lives and businesses of the
average Nigerian. No delay should be entertained in curbing and
possibly bringing it to an end. Financial record keeping, though a
major instrument in the process of cracking the ills of fraud, is
certainly not the only mechanism required to permanently put an
end to the problem. A conscious effort of all policy makers is
requiredinthefightagainstfraud.
The need for the political will of leaders must be of greater impact
today if the fight against fraud must succeed. Defined cases of
corruption and fraud must not be treated with kid gloves as in time
past. More to these emphases must be on equal scale of
prosecutiontoall offenders, withoutfear orfavour. Finally, the new
policy of the federal government on e-payment can be effectively
duplicatedatlocallevelstoreducetheincidencesoffraud,through
lossofaudittrail.
References
EkpoA.HandNdebbioJ.E.U(1998):LocalGovernmentFiscal
Operations in Nigeria. AERC Research Paper, 73 African Economic
ResearchConsortium,NairobiMarch1998.
KumarR.andSharma(2001):FundamentalsofPracticalAuditing.
Prentice-HallofIndiaPrivateLimited,NewDelhi,India
Lorsase,G.K.(2004).AccountantsBestPracticesinthePreventionof
Fraud and Financial Crimes. Journal of the Association of National
AccountantsofNigeriaVol.12No.2:31AprilJune.
Lozano,J.A.(2006);JudgevacatesconvictionofKenLay.
Posted17October2006ontheweb,ApublicationofAssociatedPress.
Ndibe,N.andOkoye,E.(1998):AuditingandInvestigations,Awka,
Anambra.ApublicationofFutureTechpublishers.
Odusegun,K.(1998): BasicAuditing,Abeokuta,KellyPublishers.
Okonjo-IwealaN.andOsafo-KwaakoP.(2007):NigeriasEconomic
Reforms: Progress and Challenges. Working paper Number 6, of The
Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC
20036,March2007.
OkwoliA.A.(2007):PrinciplesofFinancialAccounting:ApublicationofGO-GO
InternationalLimited,41RwangPamStreet,Jos,PlateauState,Nigeria.
Opara,I.I.(2006):NigerianAnti-CorruptionInitiatives,Texas
Southern UNiversity, Thurgood Marshall School Of Law. The Berkeley
ElectronicPress(bepressLegalSeriesYear2006Paper1392)
RabiuR.(2008):AssessingtheRoleofEconomicandFinancialCrime
Commission (EFCC) in Control of Fraud in the Nigerian Public Sector.
Project submitted to the Department of accounting, faculty of social
science university of Jos, Jos Nigeria in partial fulfilment of the
requirementfortheawardofBachelorofScience
RibaduN.(2006):NigeriasStrugglewithCorruption;beinganabridgedand
edited version of the presentation to US Congressional House
Committee on International Development, Washington, DC on 18 May
2006.ontheactivitiesofTheEconomicandFinancialCrimeCommission
(EFCC),inNigeria.
Rose-AckermanS.(1998):CorruptionandDevelopment:AnnualWorldBank
Conference on Development Economics (pp 35-57). Published by The
InternationalBankforReconstructionandDevelopment/TheWorldBank
1818HStreetNW,WashingtonDC20433,USA.
SullivanJ.D.(2006):Corruption,EconomicDevelopmentand
31
Governance. Private sector perspectives from developing countries;
Business Against Corruption. Implementation of the 10
th
United Nations
Global Compact Principle Against Corruption. Published by the United
NationsGlobalCompactOffice,April2006.
SullivanJ.D.(2004):Anti-CorruptionInitiativesfroma
Business View point, retrieved 23 August 2008. From
http://www.cipe.org/publications/fs/articles/initiatives.htm
ShendeS.andBennettT.(2004):TransparencyandAccountabilityin
Public Financial Administration. Transparency and Accountability in the
PublicSectorintheArabRegion,ConceptPaper2oftheUnitedNations
StevensM.,GboyegaA.andBarkanJ.D(2001):StateandLocal
Governance in Nigeria. A World Bank; Public Sector Capacity Building
ProgramforAfricanRegion.FinalDraftAugust2,2001.
TransparencyInternational(2004):CameroonTopsBribery
Poll. Energy Intelligence group, Inc., International Oil December 10,
2004. Retrieved on the 12
th
of December 2007, from
http://www.transparency.org/index.html
Wikipedia(2008):Fraud,retrievedfromWikipedia,thefree
encyclopaedia, 16 December 2008, at 02:50 (UTC). From
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/special:search/motivation
32
AppendixA
Characteristics of Nigerian States and Number of Local Governments
Name of State Date of Foundation Geo-Political Zone No. of LGAs
Abia 1991 South-East 17
Adamawa 1976 North-East 21
Akwa-Ibom 1987 South-South 31
Anambra 1991 South-East 21
Bauchi 1976 North-East 20
Bayelsa 1996 South-South 32
Benue 1976 Middle-Belt 23
Borno 1967 North-East 27
Cross River 1967 South-South 18
Delta 1991 South-South 25
Ebonyi 1996 South-East 13
Edo 1963 South-South 18
Ekiti 1996 South-West 16
Enugu 1946 South-East 17
FCT 1976 -- 6
Gombe 1996 North-East 10
Imo 1976 South-East 27
Jigawa 1991 North-West 27
Kaduna 1946 North-West 23
Kano 1976 North-West
Katsina 1991 North-West 34
Kebbi 1991 North-West 21
Kog 1991 Middle-Belt 21
Kwara 1967 Middle-Belt 16
Lagos 1976 South-West 20
Nasarawa 1996 Middle-Belt 13
Nger 1976 Middle-Belt 25
Ogun 1976 South-West 20
Ondo 1987 South-West 18
Owun 1991 South-West 30
Oyo 1946 South-West 33
Plateau 1967 Middle-Belt 17
Rivers 1967 South-South 23
Sokoto 1976 North-West 23
Taraba 1996 North-East 16
Yobe 1991 North-East 17
Zamfara 1996 North-West 14
Source: Steven et al (2001)
33
AppendixB
ReceivedpetitionsaccordingtoGeo-politicalZones
Year North
East
North
Central
North
West
South
East
South
South
South
West
Total
2001 9 81 17 28 47 82 264
2002 14 144 24 48 47 88 365
2003 11 129 19 45 73 90 367
2004 15 196 21 39 66 114 451
2005 15 154 26 56 67 81 399
Source:ICPCProgressReport2005
DistributionofCasesReferredtothecommissionbythe
Different
Geo-politicalZones
0
50
100
150
200
250
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
North East
North Central
North west
South East
South South
South West
34
AppendixC
SummaryofPetitionsreferredforinvestigationtotheCommission
Period Number of
Petitions Fully
Investigated
Number of
Petitions
Under
Investigated
Number of
Petitions
Rejected
Total
Oct 00 to Sept
01
11 9 Nil 20
Oct 01 to Sept
02
19 139 27 185
Oct 02 to Sept
03
17 335 87 439
Oct 03 to Sept
04
16 292 19 327
Oct 04 to Sept
05
17 187 5 209
2006* 17 314 53 384**
Source:ICPCProgressReport2005
*Basedonestimationfortheperiodinquestion
**Basedonestimationforthetotalinquestion
NumberofCaseTreatedbyICPCinsomeyears
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
No. P. F. I.
No. P. U. I.
No. P. R.
Source:IndependentCorruptPracticesandOtherRelatedOffencesCommission(ICPC)ProgressReport
2005.
Key:
No.P.F.I.: TheNumberofPetitionsFullyInvestigated
No.P.U.I.: TheNumberofPetitionsUnderInvestigation
No.P.R.: TheNumberofPetitionsRejected