Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ARMY
VICKSBURG, MISSISSIPPI
MRC·WES 100
MAY 1949
PREFACE
and R. J. LeBlanc were in immediate charge of the field work and prepara-
\(
CONTENTS
PREFACE
PART I: INTRODUCTION.... • • • • • 1
Physiography • • • • 3
Stratigraphy • • • • 4
Pleistocene Epoch. • 6
Designated Terraces • • • . • • 20
Areal Extent of Fisk's Terraces 23
Influences of Isostatic Warping . 24
Transvalley Cross Sections 26
PART V: GRAVELS IN TEE PRESENT FLOODPLAIN 33
Definition . . • • . G 8 37
Mineralogical and Chemical Compositions 37
Physical Properties • • • • • • • • • • 39
PART VII: SAND AND GRAVEL PRODUCERS OPERATING IN TIlE LOWER
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY AND ADJACENT UPLANDS 46
PART VIII: SUMMARY. • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • 58
TABLES 1-3
PLATES 1-20
GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF GRAVEL DEPOSITS
PART I: INTRODUCTION
cent uplands described herein had as its objective "To locate gravel
deposits in the river which can be mined by dredges, and deposits off the
river which can be mined by dredges built at the site or by land equip-
ment within easy hauling distance of the river, say 20 miles. Only sub-
of the important roads in the area were made; gravel outcrops ,rere noted
able boring data. All known major gravel pits, presently operating or
dredging sites along the Mississippi River have been located through per-
states which lie within the alluviation zones of the Lower Mississippi
states which lie within the alluviation zones of the Lower Mississippi
follow a broad sloping lowland which reaches 600 miles across the Gulf
Coastal Plain from Cape Girardeau, Missouri, to the Gulf of Mexico. The
Ridge and Macon Ridge, features which have been deposited and carved by
Arkansas, a distance of 200 miles, and rises more than 200 feet above the
(containing the St. Francis Basin, Cairo Lowland, Morehouse Lowland, and
. Cache Lowland) and the l{estern Lovlands (containing the valleys of the
and Yazoo Basins on the east from the Boeuf Basin and Ouachita Lowlands
on the west. Northweshrard the Boeuf Basin merges with the Arkansas
lfidth of 25 miles between Sicily Island and Natchez. South;,ard the dis~
of the valley is the deltaic plain which is being extended out into the
Gulf of Mexico.
Stratigraphy
floor of the Mississippi Entrenched Valley System and its walls are sum-
and extend out into the Gulf of Mexico. The lithology and general distri-
but ion of varying bedrock have had an important bearing on the width,
depth, and slope of the entrenched valley. Paleozoic rocks are better
indurated and more resistant to erosion than are the younger ones. And,
of the younger deposits, clay and limestone sections are more resistant
to erosion than are sands and silts. Flat-lying valley floor rocks coin-
cide with wide, flat portions of the valley and steeply dipping resistant
'he valley thus permitting encroachment by the sea. This depression was deter-
leral distri- '~"fJriiJrre'i by older fault patterns ieep in the crustal rocks and which even
lUes. And, provinces, such as the Appalachians and Rockies, thus showing
19 resistant 12. During its early stage of development, the Mississippi Embay-
embayment must have been active until Upper Eocene time. After Upper
Eocene, except for a brief interval during the Oligocene, the basin ceased
Embayment that erosion began in this area and led to the Mississippi
Pleistocene Epoch
Each advance of the ice mass onto the continents, called a glacial stage,
which glaciers retreated from the continents. These oscillations are be_
recognized in Europe and North America that there have been four glacial
From such data, four major surges of ice are recognized in North America
but a significant minor retreat during the last ice advance is considered
stages; the last of which is the Recent. The names applied to these
in strips
Glacial stage Interglacial Stage
Mississippi 5. Recent
5· Late Wisconsin
issippi 4. Peorian
!j:. Early Wisconsin (IowanT
l'l intertwin_ 3. Sangamon
3. Illinoian
be discussed 2. Yarmouth
2. Kansan
1. Aftonian
1. Nebraskan
ican continent was such that nearly 4,000,000 sq mi were covered with ice.
The southern front of the ice mass extended approximately to the positions
Ice Age, II was
of the modern Missouri and Ohio Rivers. Within the glaciated areas, pre-
sheets.
existing drainages were considerably altered and many north-flowing'
wial stage,
streams were forced southward.
'J during
Lons are be- Influences of glaciation on sea level and river activity
'1, it is 16. The present MisSissippi River System is the result of drainage
lUr glacial integration produced during the earliest advance of the ice sheets. Like-
1 is con- wise the Missouri and Ohio Rivers became established in nearly their pres-
:es afforded. ent positions at about the same time. The Lower MisSissippi River during
oil, etc. this early portion of its history followed a course in a belted lowland
'th America lying close to the western margin of the Mississippi Embayment. At pres-
, considered ent this flowage would be considered as situated west of Crowleys Ridge.
~, many The lowlands to the east carried Ohio River drainage which reached. the
lower Tennessee River and reached the Gulf near Mobile, Alabama, by way
8
stages shifted the Ohio River course westward, and the Mississippi River
tion and the thiclmesses of these ice sheets are thought to have averaged
one mile. Present-day glaciers and ice caps contain nearly 5,000,000 cu
sufficient to raise sea level about 150 ft. Thus, with 20,000,000 cu mi
oceans), sea level must have been around 450 ft lower than it is at pres-
areas.
erode (beyond normal scouring depth) below this horizon. When base level
still. However, with rapid lowering of sea level, such streams can become
actively. With a 450-ft drop in base level during each of the glacial
Ie time was the Pre-Recent surface below the present alluvial fill.
surface are contouring was based on approximately 1500 borings, and so accurate
.mum glac ia- that additional borings since 1944 have failed to change
;,000,000 cu 20. Pre-Recent topo-profiles show that there were many small hills
10,000 cu mi of this surface was due to the character of the underlying rocks.
It from the at the U. S. Geological map will show a line of Paleozoic rocks
is at pres- ~~.ILLl.~ up from Texas, through Arkansas, toward Illinois, then swinging
level (a the valley walls). Back in the Paleozoic surfaces, the Pre-
ill base level is known as a fall-line (the break from the harder Paleozoics to the
lered to be of't:Ar, younger rocks), a line along which there is sufficient evidence
~ms can bee orne valley, the gradients were steeper and the valleys ;rider due to the
le glacial 21. On the Mississippi River itself, the segment from St. Louis to
spurts of
,drock and
Fisk, .R. N., "Geological Investigation of the Alluvial Valley of the
Lower Mississippi River," Plate 3, Sheets 1 & 2, 1944.
10
poplar Bluff, Mo., runs through paleozoic areas. Here the valley is 5-10
of 0.68 ft per mi. Below poplar Bluff there is a segment reaching as far
Red
as Rosedale, Mississippi, in which the old Mississippi Valley is 10-25 mi
has about the same valley width, with a maximum depth of alluvium below
Houma of 350ft and a gradient slightly greater -- 0.83 ft per mi. This
01
increase of gradient in the lower segments indicates that base level had
not yet been reached by the river when it was overtaken by the last rise
in sea level, forming the Recent. In the pre-Recent we see that the
Mississippi River was west of Crowleys Ridge, that it swung east of Rose-
j
dale, joining the Ohio trench (east of Crowleys Ridge) at about the
22. The Pre-Recent Arkansas River came down the west valley from
Little Rock, south"ard past PineBluff, Arkansas, down along Macon Ridge,
joining the old Mississippi trench about the latitude of Port Gibson,
north of Natchez, Mississippi. The old Red River came southeast down
through Alexandria, Bunkie, and s,rong even further west through Cameron
~iSSiSSippi River
0.68 ft/mi 0.47 ft/mi
St. Louis - poplar Bluff
II
vium below
1.02 ft/mi 0.79 ft/mi
r mi. This 1.30 ft/mi 0.97 ft/mi
e level had
wt of Rose- Pre-Recent high gradient (3.0 ft per mil of the Red River belo"
lt the Undoubtedly the river was cutting down rapidly but was un-
south, west in reaching its graded line before being overtaken by the rise
1e Gulf. The Arkansas River shows a different character through
'lley from areas in Pre-Recent and today the course has changed little.
1acon Ridge, this river was able to maintain itself in connection with the
Gibson, valley.
,st down
~h Cameron
of
within formerly deeply eroded valleys. As sea level rose, deposition did
tl
not occur throughout the length of a stream at once. Fill was first put
down near the stream's mouth and gradually masses of valley fill were tJ
25. Variation in stream volume does not seem to have been an impor- t
B
tant factor in river deposition. Although glaciers were on the wane,
rolled them there, but it is reasonably possible that these may have been
rafted southward in ice masses. Ice chilllks have been observed. in the
26. Although the last rise of sea level had flooded the mouths of
many major rivers, sea level came up at such a pace that no major estua-
ries were formed at the mouth of the Lower Mississippi River. Sedimenta-
continued pouring sediment into the valley long after initial filling had
been accomplished. These deposits are true "alluvial fans," or, as the
Europeans prefer to call them, "cones." The major Recent cone in the
which extends from near Cape Girardeau, through the lmrland west of
Crowleys Ridge, and terminates at the Big Creek Fault Zone. To the east
13
'posi tion did ~~'AVo Ridge are remnants of the old Ohio River cone. Southvard
,s first put of the Arkansas and Red Rivers' cones and those of minor
'ill vere All of these cones have undergone a great deal of history --
188n an imp or- of alluviation vere repeated five times, including the
he wane,
It-vater.
bearing gla-
ver have 1,280 cu mi of sediment vere eroded from the alluvial valley area
ay have been to the Gulf of Mexico. This computation does not include
d in the removed from the lover Red River valley or from the present-day
ice floats plain. Likewise the. load from tributary streams, derived from
only the last glacial stage, and there were five such stages plus
filling had Mississippi delta area south of New Orleans has been receiving
or, as the tonnages of added materials. The result of such heavy deposi-
e in the has been the development, parallel to the Gulf coast, of a zone of
in the deltaic area, it has been theorized that important crustal adjust- c
ments also took place. Isostatic movement would have been necessary to (
balance this downfolding, and through the mechanism of actual rock flowage
could have taken place in the hinterland. On the other hand, it has been
whatever the cause and effect may be, as the deltaic mass was slowly sink-
the Lower Mississippi Valley has been suffering through three primary
glacial stages resulted in deep erosion, and during all this time the
valley has been slowly rising while at the same time there was sinking in
alar ge scale As a result of the latter, each accumulation of valley fill be-
ustal adjust- so that, when erosion began again, stream cutting was
ecessary to Idl.re,cted downward into fresh bedrock rather than permitted to remove all
1 rock flowage previous valley filling. Consequently, remnants of earlier valley
~ tory uplift are found bordering the Mississippi Alluvial Valley and are
1 it has been H1tu~ted at elevations appreciably higher than those of the modern flood-
Qch as the
cause uniform 34. The five stages of valley filling are represented by four
lny event, ,,,,rraces plus the modern Mississippi Valley's alluvial fill. As may be
3 slowly sink- expected, all of the four terraces are reflected by independent topographic
with the oldest terrace, the one suffering the most uplift, situated
3r Mississippi
delineations of terraces
35. These terraces, the origin of which has been discussed, can be
Lternary time, irregular and the sediments are oxidized to yellowish and reddish hues
.e deposition, . borings. In the field the separate terrace levels often can be distin-
time the . guished by their escarpments. Sometimes the latter are fronted by rim-
cs s inking in swamp streams which collect dendritic drainage from the escarpment faces.
deposits Where trunk streams cut across these escarpments, they are frequently
.s followed river drainage patterns on elevated terrace surfaces confirm the theory
removed by that terrace materials are depositional. And, finally, terrace slopes aid
of vertical in their recognition. Inland these slopes are very flat but there is a
16
gradational increase of slope seaward, with the increase being more m8.r"~d
in older deposits than in younger. This has resulted from progressive
tJ
downwarping of terraces near the sinking Gulf coast deltaic deposits.
field is by means of plotting road profiles along highways. This has been f
a
done along most of the highw'ays in the Lower Mississippi Valley and fre-
37. Since each of the four terraces resulted from similar valley
alluviations during repeated interglacial stages, they each contain simi-
case comparable with those which form the Recent alluvial valley fill.
38. With sea level at its low stand during glacial advances, rivers
in the Mississippi Valley were eroding deeply and carrying very coarse
coarse gravels and ice-rafting brought cobbles and even boulders for long
distances into the south. Cobbles of this sort may be attributed directly
to glacial origin, but such is not the case with gravels which form by far
occurring in the Ozark uplands and in the Interior High Plateaus east of
17
ieposits. :.through residual soils. Gravel material of this sort has always been
,an it has ~"t~:- available on the uplands but it was only during periods when streams had
steep gradients that run-off vTaS strong enough to wash coarse gravel into
lees in the ~<·"'-··-the major valley. And, even then, gravels were intermixed with so much
This has been finer material that the latter predominates in actual volume in the final
le of their 39. Rising sea levels forced deposition of these heavy gravels
'or elevations. ly, as stream gradients continued to decrease, gravels ceased to come
into the valley even though sea level was still rising and deposition of
alluvium was continuing. ~uring this latter phase only sediments finer
lar valley than gravel were being accumulated. Thus, on the whole, the alluvial
ontain simi- seguence in terraces and in the Recent can be divided sharply into tvlO
re in each types: (a) the lower graveliferous section; (b) an upper essentially
ley fill. non-graveliferous section. The details of this sequence have been studied
ances, rivers best in the Recent deposits where bore holes are plentiful and sections
ry coarse are complete. Since the same conditions hold for each of the terraces,
, form by far 40. In the graveliferous section, about 95% of all samples contain
,t these
Lomites
* A dull~ homogeneous, microcrystalline variety of guartz often having a
conchoidal fracture.
ms east of
18
show any gravel whatsoever. Roughly 46% of the alluvium is in the gravel i-
ferous section, thus about 460 cu mi of alluvial fill, out of the esti-
coarse sand. Some parts of the graveliferous section contain only fine-
much so that they are appropriately called chert gravels. There are also
some igneous and metamorphic materials. The latter can be traced back to
the st. Francis region of Missouri and to the margin of the Ouachita
Mountains in Arkansas; few seem to have come all the way down from the
formation (see table 1), we find large lumps of fossiliferous Jackson, etc.
in the thick loess mantle, such is also the case in Mississippi. But,
r the est i- south into Louisiana, the cover thickness increases so that the
are more than 100 ft or so below the surface from near Baton Rouge
border. ';V"~.~C'J' the gravels being thicker toward each tributary stream; e.g.,
8ction, Bluff to Little Rock where the Arkansas River valley joins the
st is· llltlJ.!l.J.y··... valley there is an appreciable thickening. The gravels assume a fan-
form of valley and 250 cu mi in the lower valley, a total of 540 cu mi.
~th and covering material in turn is divisible into two portions to complete
3iana to (a) a lower porous layer, mostly clean sand; (b) an upper
down toward of the section may have been partly or entirely removed by
lvels, so
luachita
1 from the
<trongly
Jackson
1 Jackson,
la line,
20
Designated Terraces
not entirely agreed to by the United States Geological Survey nor by the
gravel horizons near the coastal zones as being Pliocene in age accord-
and clays and much gravel which occur near the seaward margin of the Gulf
, Gulf
L6) •
terrace is well developed but at the expense of most others. Also pre-
and elevations.
48. Terraces comparable to these can be traced parallel to the
Gulf coast line and up other of the major river valleys; however, direct
correlations over wide areas are not as yet possible. Geologists in sep-
cal Survey, lists seven terraces for that state. His implication is not
that there were more interglacial stages but that uplift occurred in dis-
materials along the Gulf coast are presented in table 2. Here the results
Montgomery
Areal Extent of Fisk's Terraces
Also pre-
Plate 3 have been determined and mapped for the Lower Mississippi Valley. Their
:s., demon- areal extents are presented on plates 4 and 5. It is desired to point
. valley out that the extent of the terraces as shown should be regarded qualita-
licknesses tively rather than quantitatively, as Dr. Fisk has pointed out that work
,1 to the complete satisfactorily the work on the terraces in the Lower Mississippi
,ver, direct River Alluvial Valley. It can be seen that the terraces form marginal
~iSt8 in sep- strips along the Mississippi Valley and turn south of Baton Rouge to con-
:se terraces. tinue parallel to the Gulf coast. In addition Crowleys and Macon Ridges
'ida Geologi- are presented as depositional terrace remnants. Covering the core of
.tion is not Crowleys Ridge are masses of Williana deposits which may have determined
rred in dis- later deposition and sculptoring along other portions of the ridge. These
'alley with northern half. Extending further north, the Commerce Hills also are of
urope is shown Williana age. The southernmost island of Williana in Crowleys Ridge is
and similar flanked on the east and south by an extension of Montgomery which, through
e the results a thin neck, ties onto a long southward-reaching strip of Bentley deposit.
nsive addi- This extension of Bentley, except for a gap north of Marianna, extends to
s. Helena, Ark.
24
the Bastrop Hills are also of the same age. Macon Ridge extends all the
of Bentley age cut off from a mainland mass of Bentley by the Ouachita
River.
52. The eastern portions in the north end of the valley consist
ley terrace all the way from the Mississippi-Tennessee border to Natchez,
Miss., a distance of nearly 250 mi. This, together with its outcrops
considerable and that its uplift must have been more favorable than that
6 pres~nts three terrace traverses from a coastal area in which the 'Narp-
ing sequences show up especially well. In sections A-A' and B-B', it can
25
north- seen that warping has had its greatest effect near the coast. The in-
is all the its greater distance from the zone of deltaic sinking. An ex-
consist the Gulf Coastal Plain region. Elsewhere in the Mississippi Valley,
ind allu- and faulting locally affect the otherwise uniformly uplifted in-
,ibutary terraces. During Quaternary time, arching has uplifted the area
, of Bent- between Lake Pontchartrain and Jackson, Miss., fully 400 ft. Terraces
Itcrops 55. The continental uplift which has occurred in a fairly uniform
than that between uplift and downwarping manifests itself. Perhaps the best evi-
,ar irreg- terraces, which have suffered the greatest warping, have steeper slopes
flanked than younger ones which are only beginning to become deformed. Following
Not everywhere are these slopes the same. Following is the slope varia-
tion in central Louisiana which is somewhat further removed from the zone
, have re-
of active deltaic downwarping:
'. Plate
Hilliana 8 ft/mi slope Montgomery 1.5 ft/mi slope
I the warp- Bentley 5 ft/mi slope Prairie 0.5 ft/mi slope
B', it can 56. Further up the Mississippi Valley the terrace surfaces remain
26
Ark., where all four of the terraces are exposed. Their surface eleva-
common but do not need to be considered. These little breaks are deposi-
tional, caused by shiftings of ancient streams, and have since been mag-
nified by erosion.
57. Thus it can be seen that older terraces, near the Gulf, have
steep slopes dipping under the younger deposits whereas the young terraces
in the same areas have gentle slopes. Yet, in the interior, older deposits
are more highly elevated than are the younger. Consequently, it can be
seen from the available field evidence that, towards the zone of coastal
downwarping, there is a hinge line zone in which older terraces fold down
materials in coastal areas are frequently found below the Recent alluvium
.58. Field studies of gravels and terraces have been made in all
have been prepared for most of the Lower Mississippi Valley. It is sug-
gested that these may furnish a theoretical foundation for further inves-
gravel exposure is pictured in figure 1, page 28. Since there are many
similar outcrops of this sort, new gravel pits could be located along
cAL,hlLey, and Phillips Counties of Arkansas and Tunica and Tate Counties
t.P'~Y·A.Ces are Montgomery and Prairie. But elsewhere in the same area and
basal Williana remnants. Along the Ohio River valley terrace sequences
lne, Jefferson, are identical to those of the Mississippi Valley and appear to be equally
Much of this distinct although occupying much smaller areas. The Bentley is the dom-
Jcks and, in inant formation.
30
8
formation intrudes into areas of older terrace deposits. Likewise, the
tion where deltaic influences are reflected. Here the Williana shows
terraces are, in general, fairly distinct and later dissection has not
cut into the coastal terraces to the same extent as in the more inland
within the terrace deposits with exposures being few and far between.
31
Lphic tra- of terrace deposits towards the Mississippi Valley are well
'oss trib- deeper portions of the original incised valley and the present-
'airie reminder of only a fringe of these originally extensive deposits
,wise, the dissection had scoured out the valley again. Gravels are some-
19h a large obtained from near the erosion escarpment although such localities
S. Highway portions of the escarpment while erosion and a thick loess mantle
,rt Gibson, loess effectively hides gravels except where cut into.
la shows deposits similar to those within the main valley only much
etween. area, terraces may be distinctly noted. On the profile from Fayette,
typical Miss., to Brookhaven, Miss., earlier incisions of the major valleys in-
'J rock to the Tertiary aid in distinguishing the present step-like remains of
by many small streams which drain upland areas and empty towards the
Gulf. Despite much dissection, Tertiary rocks; for the most part, have
limited.
tary overflowing along an ancient shore zone along the Gulf coast. Later
dissection has cut into the Williana gravels in many places within the
present upland. Along bluffs fronting the Mississippi River there exists
a thick eolian loess mantle which rapidly changes to brown loam eastward.
.,
33
fine materials near the Gulf coast during late stages in the rise of
there are gravels located sufficiently near the surface, so that the
Tenn.
72. From the foregoing, it can be seen that workable gravel de-
73. The relationship between the original and reworked gravel de-
sections A-A' and B-B' it can be seen that a 50-ft layer of sand and
this area, scours downward to a depth of 100 ft thus cutting through the
volume of the graveliferous horizon may become eroded. And, as the river
- l
35
probably deposits most of its load downstream along the next bend) a
heavy gravel concentration may be expected in the point bar being con-
structed there. Such is the case north of Georgetown Towhead where there
and without any trend relationship to positioning along the river) even
reworked though there is an over-all tendency for sediments to become finer with
75. From table 3 it can be seen that most of the deposits contain
avel de- large proportions of sand. Typically, in original gravel deposits ap-
h illus- proximately 75% of the material by weight is sand so that even higher
ross sand percentages as a result of further dilution during reworking by
and river action are not to be wondered at. More remarkable is the fact that
way in calities along the Ohio River and near Islands 2, 3, and 4 along the
ough the Mississippi River may be regarded as of this latter sort. Situations in
s bend- Which gravel contents vary between 10 and 20% are more representative of
case prevailing conditions where gravel deposits are workable. Dilution with
eat sand has in very many cases rendered potential gravel beds too poor to
the river be workable. This happens most often where river scour reaches deep-lying
- - --1
35
probably deposits most of its load downstream along the next bend, a
heavy gravel concentration may be expected in the point bar being con-
structed there. Such is the case north of Georgetown Towhead where there
and without any trend relationship to positioning along the river, even
reworked though there is an over-all tendency for sediments to become finer with
75. From table 3 it can be seen that most of the deposits contain
'ave 1 de- large proportions of sand. Typically, in original gravel deposits ap-
h illus- proximately 75% of the material by weight is sand so that even higher
and river action are not to be wondered at. More remarkable is the fact that
.way in calities along the Ohio River and near Islands 2, 3, and 4 along the
'ough the Mississippi River may be regarded as of this latter sort. Situations in
s bend- which gravel contents vary between 10 and 20% are more representative of
case prevailing conditions where gravel deposits are workable. Dilution with
'eat sand has in very many caseS rendered potential gravel beds too poor to
the river be workable. This happens most often where river scour reaches deep-lying
35
75. From table 3 it can be seen that most of the deposits contain
proportions of sand. Typically, in original gravel deposits ap-
action are not to be wondered at. More remarkable is the fact that
along the Ohio River and near Islands 2, 3, and 4 along the
has in very many cases rendered potential gravel beds too poor to
workable. This happens most often where river scour reaches deep-lying
Figure 3. Gravel concentration in a newly-formed island
Mississippi River, Mile 598 B. c. (1944)
gravel deposits, while thick sections of finer sediments are being eroded
River are listed in Part VII of this 'report. It can be seen that point
bar deposits and towheads constitute the predominating locations and that
producing sites are plentiful along upper portions of the valley. A typi-
73. The relationship between the original and reworked gravel de-
sections A-A' and B-B' it can be seen that a 50-ft layer of sand and
this area, scours downward to a depth of 100 ft thus cutting through the
volume of the graveliferous horizon may become eroded. And) as the river
- - '1
35
j~""''''+'QA there. Such is the case north of Georgetown Towhead where there
Ll, 0though there is an over-all tendency for sediments to become finer with
75. From table 3 it can be seen that most of the deposits contain
,hich illus- ~l)rc~i.mately 75% of the material by weight is sand so that even higher
)m cross percentages as a result of further dilution during reworking by
;and and action are not to be wondered at. More remarkable is the fact that
)endway in calities along the Ohio River and near Islands 2, 3, and 4 along the
through the Mississippi River may be regarded as of this latter sort. Situations in
rer's bend" Which gravel contents vary between 10 and 20% are more representative of
;his case prevailing conditions where gravel deposits are workable. Dilution with
, great sand has in very many cases rendered potential gravel beds too poor to
as the river be workable. This happens most often where river scour reaches deep-lying
36
gravel depOSits, while thick sections of finer sediments are being eroded
River are listed in Part VII of this 'report. It can be seen that point
bar deposits and towheads constitute the predominating locations and that
producing sites are plentiful along upper portions of the valley. A typi-
Definition
Cobbles 3+ in.
coarse Gravel 3 in. to 1 in.
Medium Gravel 1 in. to No. 4* (4.76 mm)
Fine Gravel No. 4 to No. 10 (2 mm)
sland Coarse Sand No. 10 to No. 40 (0.42 mm)
Fine Sand No. 40 to No. 200 (0.74 mm)
e
* Sieve sizes U. S. Standard
Louisiana all the way to source areas in the Lake Superior upland and to
con dioxide (Si02 ) or quartz, noted for its durability and abundance.
Quartz makes up approximately 12% of the earth's crust and is almost com-
steel = 6.5) and its inherent toughness. This great durability explains
Sl. Even those igneous and metamorphic rock samples, which compose
homogeneous mineral composition, they are less well rounded and more
sufficient time for decay during the interval since their transport. AI-'
uents such northern portion but become more and more scarce southward. This, to-
of about gether with the tendency to finer sizes southward, causes gravels of
,sits in different geographic areas in the valley often to appear individually
and and to distinctive. Remains of shales and limestones or dolomites seem to be
glmost com- 82. Sizes of gravels vary considerably in each deposit with the
reakdown best index of coarseness being diameters of largest grades. As has
oultyas a already been mentioned, coarsest materials are found in the Lower Miss-
3 = 5·5; issippi Valley's northern portions whereas gravel sizes become increas-
y explains ingly smaller southward. Gravels above 1-1/2 in. are almost non-obtainable
)fter and in southern Louisiana. The nearest sources for large sizes are in Texas
l action and Arkansas.
same figure (second row from bottom) are spongy siliceous materials
row center is a fragment of bottle glass from Wolf Island Bar which
materials.
are those pictured in figure 6. The upper three rows depict well-
Batesville, Miss. The fourth row from the top contains rounded gravels
rows are of lignite gravels from Wolf Island Bar. The lignite has been
scoured out of its Tertiary bedrock by the Mississippi River, and has
43
led
l the
.als
.e,
me
:tom
lich
:ed
L general
.1-
Lear
gravels
1ft
len in
.terials
lchoidal
a spongy
.assified
lpper two
las been
. Figure 6. Rounded clear quartz, sandstone, and
brown chert gravels
ld has
44
~OolllUO~ by river action at the same locality. The second row from the
finer gravels and sand found near Hickman, Ky., cemented to-
latter theory.
46
Illinois. The Mississippi River sand and gravel production sites have
These do not indicate that actual production has been obtained at the
specified locali.ties but only that the various producers believe they are
producing sites along the river from Natchez, Miss., to Friar Point, Miss.,
are shown on plate 19, while sites from Friar Point to Cairo, Ill., are
shown on plate 20. No permits have been issued for river gravel produc-
tion south of Natchez. The producers and sources listed for the various
states are grouped by counties.
Central States Dredging Co., 80 Bellerive Acres, Normandy 21, Mo.: Island
No. 62, near Kangaroo Point (mi 320), Sunrise Towhead, Island No. 10
(mi 60).
Greenville Sand & Gravel Co., Greenville, Miss.: Along Walker Bend,
Tarpley Cut-off.
Hickman Ferry' Co., Hickman, KY.: Island No.8, south of Hickman Bend,
Wolf Island Bar, Island No. 1 - along Puntney Bend.
Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp., P. O. Box 67, Memphis, Tenn.: North end
of Tennessee Chute - Memphis, Tenn.
47
Taylor Sand & Gravel Co., Caruthersville, Mo.: Along Blaker Towhead.
Laker Lee Wilson & Co., Wilson, Ark.: South of Morgan Point, Sunrise Towhead,
Keyes Point.
Wiseman, J. W., 711 E. St. Johns Ave., Osceola, Ark.: Along Canadian
Island Reach.
10. 10
Yourtee-Roberts Sand Co., Water st., Chester, Ill.: Napoleon Cut-off -
north of mi 400, Montgomery Island, south of Montgomery Island, Cessions
ld,
Towhead, Montezuma Bend, along Montezuma Cut-off, Francis Bend, Towhead
of Island No. 18, along Victoria Bend - mi 390.
lend,
(2) Gravel Producers operating in Arkansas
h end
Ashley County
Baird, Sam L., Hamburg, Ark.
Graves Brothers, South Main, Hamburg, Ark.
48
Bradley County
Childs, R. W., Warren, Ark.
Hampton, G. M., P. O. Box 26, Reader, Ark.
Reynolds Truck Line, Warren, Ark.
Carroll County
Garrett, Mrs. John, Route #2, Berryville, Ark.
Clark County
Arkadelphia Sand & Gravel Co., Arkadelphia, Ark.
Benton, Mrs. V. R., Whelen Springs, Ark.
Graham Brown Trading Co., 801 Sixth St., Arkadelphia, Ark.
White, Fred, Okalona, Ark.
Cleveland County
Chapman, H. E., Rison, Ark.
Goggins, Neal, Herbine, Ark.
Columbia County
C. J. Garrett Gravel & Sand Co., R.F.D., Magnolia, Ark.
Guissinger, Mrs. Mary, 315 Richland Ave., Baton Rouge, La.
Conway County
Mobley Construction Co., Inc., Morrilton, Ark.
Craighead County
East Arkansas Construction Co., Box 828, Jonesboro, Ark.
Cross County
C. B. Cudd Construction Co., 321 West Union, Wynne, Ark.
Dallas County
Allen, John A., Dalark, Ark.
Beeson, A. C., Willow, Ark.
Craig, Mrs. Frank, Fordyce, Ark.
Drummond, Marvin, Sparkman, Ark.
Gaza, Mrs. R. N., Route #1, Box 91, Sparkman, Ark.
Smith, Huge E., Fordyce, Ark.
Garland County
Baker, Mrs. Nora C., 1400 Central Ave., Hot Springs, Ark.
Eddy, L.- C., 315 Thornton St., Hot Springs, Ar]<:.
Malvern Minerals Co., 220 Runyon, Hot Springs, Ark.
49
Greene County
k. Walden, M. D., Boute #4, Paragould, Ark.
Hempstead County
Brookes, J. F., Belvins, Ark.
Baley, H. B., McNab, Ark.
Howard County
Fred Henry & Carl Freed, Nashville, Ark.
Independence County
Galloway & Jeffery Gravel Co., Batesville, Ark.
Izard County
Silica Products Co., Inc., Guion, Ark.
Jefferson County
Cotton Belt Gravel Co., Pine Bluff, Ark.
Cross County Gravel Co., Pine Bluff, Ark.
McGeorge Contracting Co., Inc., Box 995, Pine Bluff, Ark.
Pine Bluff Sand & Gravel Co., Pine Bluff, Ark.
Bocll: Island Gravel Co., Pine Bluff, Ark.
Johnson County
Clarksville Sand & Gravel Co., 102 Fulton, Clarksville, Ark.
Lafayette County
Berry, L. C., Stamps, Ark.
Clements, T. S., 205 Oakley Drive, Shreveport, La.
Fordyce Brothers, Lewisville, Ark.
Grimmett, Sneed, Stamps, Ark.
Henderson, Mrs. Snow, Lewisville, Ark.
Meriwether Gravel Co., P. O. Box 1365, Shreveport, La.
Lawrence County
Lutesville Sand & Gravel Co., Cape Girardeau, Mo.
Marion County
Young, Mrs. Nancy, Pyatt, Ark.
Miller County
Cox, Aubrey L., 2503 Pine, Texarkana, Ark.
50
51
Beauregard Parish
Belaire Gravel Co., Lake Charles, La.
Farr & Johnso!,:, DeRidder, La.
Caddo Parish
Acme Sand Co., Shreveport, La.
Campbell, E. W., Shreveport, La.
Meriwether Supply Co., Shreveport, La.
, 536 Ross Sand & Gravel Co., Shreveport, La.
Calcasieu Parish
- LaGrange, Adolphe, Lake Charles, La.
catahoula Parish
Gifford-Hill Co., Alexandria, La. (also Rapides and Webster Parishes).
Claiborne Parish
Beville, J. R., Haynesville, La.
Evangeline Parish
Kenyon, W. C., Turkey Creek, La.
Franklin Parish
Foster & Childers Co., Wisner, La.
Iberia Parish
New Iberia Sand & Gravel Co., New Iberia, La.
Morehouse Parish
Bacon Gravel Co., Mer Rouge, La.
,I
52
Avalon, Miss.
Avalon, Miss.
Gatesville, Miss.
Miss.
Franklin County
Concrete Gravel Co., McCall Creek, Miss.
Hancock County
Hancock Gravel Co., Bay St. Louis, Miss.
Harrison County
Boardman, J. F., Gulfport, Hiss.
Brown, Bernal, Biloxi, Miss.
Fore, J. C., Gulfport, Miss.
Harrison County Gravel Co., Gulfport, Miss.
Hinds County
Hayons, Ely, Jackson, Miss,
Mississippi Materials Co., Jackson, Miss.
Traxler Gravel Co., Utica, Miss.
Van Downing, Jackson, Miss.
Holmes County
Green Brothers, Lexington, Miss.
Hammett, H. P., Lexington, Miss.
Jeff-Davis COUL~ty
Griffith, B. C., Prentiss, Miss.
Jones County
Chemical Products Co., Laurel, Miss.
Continental Turpentine & Rosin Co., Laurel, Miss.
Hercules Powder Co., Laurel, Miss.
Carroll County
Nunnelly, Mrs. C. F., Hollow Rock, Tenn.
Hardeman County
Saulsbury Sand Co., Saulsbury, Tenn.
Henderson County
Ayers Mineral Co., Lexington, Tenn.
Humphreys County
San Gravel Co., Waverly, Tenn.
Shelby County
M3.rquette Cement Manufacturing Co., Memphis, Tenn.
Missouri Portland Cement Co" Memphis, Tenn.
Daviess County
River Sand & Gravel Co" Owensboro, KY.
Fulton County
Hickman Sand & Gravel Co., Hickman, KY.
Henderson County
Bedford-Nugent Co., Henderson, KY.
McCracken County
Federal Materials Co., Paducah, KY.
Union County
Union Sand & Gravel Co., Caseyville, KY.
Dunklin County
Wilkey, A. W., Risco, Mo. (also New Madrid and Stoddard Counties).
New Madrid County
Wilkey, A. W., Risco, Mo. (also Dunklin and Stoddard Counties).
Ripley County
Wright Gravel Co.
Stoddard County
Dexter Sand & Gravel Co., Dexter, Mo.
Hill & Stuart Contractors, Inc., Dexter, 110.
Plummer, R. G. & M. E., Dexter, Mo.
Stevens, Geo. A.
Wilkey, A. W., Risco, Mo. (also Dunklin and New Madrid Counties).
Wayne County
The Keener Gravel Co., Inc., Dexter, Mo.
Hancock County
Estate of John B. Johnson, F. J. Reu, Executor, 800 E. Main St.,
Carthage, Ill.
Madison County
MisSissippi Lime Co., Box 247, Alton, Ill.
Norman Trading & Trading Co., P. O. Box 303, Alton, Ill.
Stocker Gravel & Construction Co., 5D9 Main st., Highland, Ill.
Massac County
Metropolis Sand & Gravel Co., L. B. 364, First & Scott Sts., Metropolis,
Ill.
57
Monroe County
C. B. Morrison, Agt., Waterloo, Ill.
Pike County
3S). Missouri Gravel Co., Moline, Ill.
Randolph County
Southern Illinois Sand Co., Chester, Ill.
Scott County
Homer E. Grady, Exeter, Ill.
White County
Eastwood Sand & Gravel Works, Grayville, Ill.
,) . Mmmie Sand & Gravel Co., Maunie, IlL
;ropolis,
PART VIII: SUMMARY
~ . IiIIIs.-
t"",
Series Group Formation Lithologic Character
ig.
... Plaiate-
OS""
Terrace
Deposita
lev Fill
Prairie
MontlZomerv
Well compacted. OXidized. olays and
silty clays yellowish brown in color
Underlain by eando and fine gra...1.
BentleY
WUliana
.lIl••rffngerlng .,1<S
ana sanns Wltll
Pliocene- undiff. interbedded brackish we tor silts and
Miocene' clavs
Interfingering facios of fluviatile
Fleming silts and sanda with interbedded
Miocene Grand brackish water silts and clavs
Gulf' TUffaceous siltstones, silty sands.
CStahoula loosely compacted sanda, silts and
clavs
Byram Marina sandy clay marl and lignitio
~ silt:v clavs
0 011gocene Vicks- Glendon Alternating limestone and marl.
I burg
Mint Spgs.
Forest Hill
Glauconitic sandy marl
Lignitic silts. silty clays and sands
I
j Danville
l/!.ndiDJ<
Predominantly mrine. calcareous
clays arid shales
i Jackson
Yazoo Clay Clays. lignitic clays. interhadded
marine and brackish water silts
MOody. Branch Glauconitic shall marl and clays
Cockfield t.ignitic sands s 11ts and claYS
Cld- Oook Mountain Glauconitic clavs. silts and sands
borne Lignitic sands. sandy clays, silts
Undi!f. and silty clays at the north end of
tha valley
Grenada ;t~;ti. sands. silty sands. and silt~
c s
Wilcox Coarse lignitic sands. locally gra..ol-
HollY Springs iferous. with sandy clays. clay
lentils and tossil leaves
Porters Creek Missive gray to black. clay's, sandy
Paleo- clays with local sandv shale interbeds
oena Midway
Clayton Glauconitic sandy clays
Consist chieflY of sands, varying
trom fine to .coarse. with thin 1nter-
g Upper
Cretaceous I1ipl.;\, bedded clays and quartzitie sands.
1l Upper part of section marked by
. ~.
S.
l> Lower
fossiliferous sandy shales
Creta~An'.
a
....
I ,..,.,
~ iii
0
6 .
~~
a:S
Table 2
P ]!arly lIi•• oo.in (Valley' CUtting) (valley cutting) (Valley cutting) (Valley CUt'ing) Solution and erosion, dunes
I! L
E Talbot Miami oolite (Sol!:. coast)
I F
Sangemon L. Beaumont lIontganery Low Terrace PenbolO'll8.Y Anastasia (S.E. & S.W. Ccaat)
8 T
R Wiccmico Ir!!z :!I!!:so Le. (/001. ~oastl
T
0 T
Illinoian (Valloy CUtting) (Valley cutting) (Valley CUtting) (Valley cutting Solution and erosion
N C
N H
I! sunderland
Yamouth Liasi. Bentley High Terrace Coharie 0 Anastasia ]!In. (8.11. coast)
A
II
Kansan (Valley cutting) (Valley cutting) (Valley cutting) (Valley CUtting) SOlution and eroaiao
R P
1. Parker & Cooke. Fla. Gsol. Bull. No. 27. p. 15. 1944. 4. Cooke. C. W.. Jcum. wash. Acad. Scienc.s. V. 25. p. 333. 1935.
Note; Florida and Georgia terraces are identical. 5. Gloekzin & ROY, L. S. U. Stratigraphic Correlation Chart, 1940.
2. Fiak. La. Geol. Bull. No. 18 a p. 118. 1940. 6. lIississippi Gsol. Bull. No.6. p. 38. 1944.
3. Price. VI. Armstrong, personal corresDOlldence. 1947. 7. Doering. J •• llPG Bull. V. 19. No.5. pp. 655. 656. 660. dates
Willis fm. as Upper Pliocene. More recent Texas correlations
date the formation as Pleistocene.
,
I
Table 3
Miles Depth
Locality Below Gravel Percentage
Cairo Deposit (ft) Sand Gravel
1/2 mi below
Caledonia Light, 9-14 40 60
Ohio River
America Bar J
9 40 60
Ohio River
Island One,
Mississippi 8. 5 90 10
River
Old River
13 7-1/2 63 37
Islands 2, 3, 4
Reelfoot Front,
Kentucky 39 5 90 10
Slough Neck Bar 01 5 80 20
Caruthersville 112 3-5 90 10
Above Barfield lLJ.l 15 71 29
Not less
Fulton 176 than 15 72 28
Behind Sunrise Not less
178
'l'owhead than 15
Below Richardson's
Not less
Landing, Tenn. , and 187 81 19
than 5
around Head Island 35
Head Star Landing
bank protection I 255 6 90 10
,
I '"
.
PLATES
400 WEST EAST 400
+-<v
'v"r-
o~
300 fl."') 300
...J
o~ .J
(
Ul Ul
:::! :::!
I-
W
t;;
w 200 200 w
u... II..
z ~
z Z
o
o
~
~
100
> RECENT >
W TERTIARY w
...J
.J
Ul
W
o
0
CROSS SECTION 5 MILES NORTH OF VICKSBURG, MISS. LAT. 32 25'
-100 I I I I I 1-100
o' 5 DISTANCE IN MILES 10 15
~+
500..-WEST «"r- EAST 500
tf
....."r-
__B~EY TE~E
.$",?'?
"r-~ o~ ,?<Q .;-"
~
.J
Ul
----~.:..<v~ .....o '~<v~'?" r.:..'V+- - - --r~ __
Q)'v
v+-
'I' ...J
Ul
~ 300 300 ::2
«'
(
'?o Q
I-
r I-
w
w
u... '?'?,,'?
,?,«
r
Q'v w
W
II..
Z .$"
- 200 200 ~
Z
o __ ~AIRIE TERRA~ __ z
o
~
>
w
TERTIARY 100
~
w
~ 100 ...J
W
o o
CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH VICKSBURG, MiSS LAT.32°21'
-100 I 1.100
DISTANCE IN MILES 10 15
'"U
r
~
(Tl
GEOLOGICAL SECTIONS THROUGH
ALLUVIAL TERRACES AT VICKSBURG, MISSISSIPPI
"U
r 800.--WEST ARKANSAS TENNESSEE EAST--.800
~ ~~
rt ~~
~~
~~
JTI ~*" ~*"
?- ~*" ~, ",<';
?- u''? ?- ,~
I-- ~~~' ~~?-~ >;j.i
V
Q'?'
N
TOO
. 600 '
Q ~
~~ '?'"
...J ...J
U) 400 400 U)
:::; :::;
~ ~
W w
W MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL PLAIN w
u. u.
~ 200 ~
Z z
o 0
~
> ~
w >
...J
0 w
...J
w w
o to 20
DISTANCE IN MILES
,?,,?-'
"'~
~-<-~~~ .:;~~
350 WEST
"'~_______________________
(f'>_I CITY OF MEMPHIS I MONTGOMERYTERRA~____ ~'"_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
EAST
~'
350
~' ~
,:.
~o
~""
.... _ /"'""... r-. _ _ r'\ , \ 1\
300 300
...J ...J
U)
:::;
250 250 ~
~ MISSISSIPPI ~
w w
w ALLUVIAL PLAIN w
u. u.
~ 200
Z z
o o
~ f=
~
~ 150 150 w
...J
w W
RECENT
TERTIARY
100
15 " '100
..J ",'
400 400~
(
U)
:::;: :::;:
:;; ....
~ 300 300 ~
...
z MI SSI SSI PPI ~
z 200 ALLUVIAL PLAIN
0 200 5
~> i=
«
W
..J
TERTIARY ~
W 100 100 ..J
10
DISTANCE IN MILES
15
Jo
20
v'" ..J
..J ",,""
U) 400 C(-'"
400 U)
v~ V
:::;: :::;:
10 15 20
DISTANCE IN MILES
",'"""~
..J
U) 300 300 ::;
(,~
:::;:
....
W
g
~ 200 zoo ~
~
z
r
~~
MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL PLAIN z
0
i=
Q 100 TERTIARY 100 ~
....
« d
;;;
..J
W
~
20
'1J CROSS SECTION THROUGH
r GREENWOOD, MISS. LAT. 33° 31'
~ -100
15
fT1 DISTANCE IN MILES
GEOLOGICAL SECTIONS THROUGH
ALLUVIAL TERRACES IN MISSISSIPPI
W
PRAIRIE TERRACE
MONTGOMERY TERRACE
x c 0
BENTLEY TERRACE o F M £
WILLIANA TERRACE
MOSTLY
BED ROCK
TERTIARY
PLATE 4
M s s
N
~I JACKSON
fill
'\00'
30· 00'
'D£L£UR
lUND '¥If CLARKSDALE
M s p p
_ PRAIRIE TERRACE
_ MONTGOMERY TERRACE
PLEISTOCENE
. . BENTLEY TERRACE
{
t:~:~~:~:~:~:~:~~:l WILLIANA TERRACE
AREAL EXTENT OF PLEISTOCENE TERRACES
MOSTLY _ BEDROCK FROM LATITUDE 33° 00' TO LATITUDE 37° 15'
TERTIARY
PLATE 5
'"U
r A A
~
I MISSISSIPPI LOUISIANA: I
~ 1 FRANKLIN CO.4--LlNCOLN CO. AMITE CO. PIKE CO. TANGIPAHOA PH.
(Tl
m r
500 rCASEYVILLE
LINCOLN CO.
470
rAUBURN,2 MILES WEST
460
rMCCOMB,S MI1..ES EAST(KIRKSV1LLe'Z'5 MILES
~t- $'v
~?.:j.
Iv?"
~<c,+-
~~?<.;;
~
".4-
?
. .' . . 445 V~{:-'t' ,.~ #V~ ~.,..~~ ~¢ ~
400~':::'~'::· r t?q~ t,tj~
• 0 •
<! .... "qc' ,'u', Ot.:t4.+- <oOV
0 .' 'f"
,0",'.: 0
~.o ( r r
---.'. .' . 307 295 295 .J" ~O
""-C ..~:.
':.,/': "(:>,
BENTLEY ".:.(>..:..z::'~~('v
"-t ......~,."
. -.....:~ .... 30 20
8 ~
I : MISSISSIPPI LOUISIANA I
o~=."~b<~"r£OP;;:~lo¥·
" 1' FRANKLIN CO. 1 AM ITE CO. WILKINSON CO. EAST FELICIANA PH. I
JEFFERSON CO. "'~'- "," '" 4' EAST BATON ROUGE PH.
vo~~~~
(L..~vor;. (A..~":'~ ~~~4~v *"~~
00:o~'" ~':!' ~~? I i 'AAN~~~ "'I ~'NCC~N
F H U R C H , 2 . 5 "'ILES EAST ,("... <V,..
(,
".c,'('
r~~f--@'o--l-
500 .. .'
,n
33[~~' (. ., 0
\ j AM'TC \. POKe,
~ ~/: -.~;,,~~:l'!l"'
:;;;;;';1 MISS. ° 1
j~
Ic MISSISSIPPI--",,,'- LOUISIANA
~
I
AMITE CO.--,v"'~'"
~
ST. HELENA PH.
.(, ~
LIVINGSTON PH.
--~
°B.E:NTLEY
[ ~~200
·0~> ..
-1100
TERTIARY
"';'''c
. PRAIRIE
A A 8 B'
,-.J A;; . . . ~'t I1~ .• Pi
Lr_~AYNE 'i.
4t ~ '~~Ol(';·' B~?
--!l BUTLER
.(
STODDARD
"""~ l-
E
..
500
I (\ ~ POPLAR ..A
I \) fl1 BLUFF z
oS
..
~
4002
Z
300 ~ ~[.:s<17A'
!
.1_ _'_ _'_
~ r-->·".,' --,-]~ I
_i ~~ . ,~<~L; i 300
7 ~\.J.
GREEN DUNKLIN I 1;.':~':~{t~:t'·~'~s-,·.!!'iT~:,f,1;·f'·~I: ~_ I J~ I '}_KY L J2~
! F" w""" _t ,___ --~--
L;?~_~_
G'
I BLYTHEVILLE
li8 ARKANSAS ;
F'
I
- - GREEN C O . - - - - - - - - - - - - I
'JONESBORO 1\ '" 500
J' A J
~~ I
CR~AIG~EAD I
--·H-- --I
P01N~E~T ".:> I, '"
):~~"/ -.1---
CROSS·"
I ARKANSAS
CRAIGHEAD CO.
:j' ~
HF:ARKANSAS~H'
CRAIGH EAD CO.
K
~
K'
r""'ONTOOME~V~ 400 I-
~4001
(MONT. OO
\
.. MERY\
~~
:?-"'~{O l400~
}~~
l-
300
10 15
DISTANCE IN MILES
~ L L'
~ 1-
l-
~ 400 400 w
300 E
LOCATION MAP
200
~jj
OISTANCE IN MIL ES
r t
M
oc loo
~ Rccf::
~~~ ~'!,:I?fi/ _', .~ 1l oO 200~200
GEOLOGICAL SECTIONS
THROUGH CROWLEYS RIDGE
rn 3 !'(h'" I \\\0 2'oaoo
o 5 10
DISTANCE IN MILES
15
-....J
(M0138 Q3nNllNO=»
~I
iJ -r--r-~---':';c""",,--:;~---.
I;I~
I~
U) >-0:
~
U)
z U)
« - ~
~
>- «
U)
i=
~ 0:
a:: 0: z w.
« <{ «
:.: I-
i= a::
«
0:
Itl
I-
d
u
I-
z
«
a:
<.:J
t
u
o
z
«
d
~
.J
U
L_
~ g ~
lSI'( 1.33J Nl NOll.'t/l.3l3
PLATE 8
· .. "",,\~~ .:-...
I~~~
100 I ,~ I
H ~a
'"
GEOLOGICAL SECTIONS IN
ARKANSAS
A
I. LINCOLN CO. ~,... ~.". yy,.---t- ARKANSAS
CLEVELAND CO. DREW CO.
\
.,.i' I
1
300
iERTIARY
1
0
o 0 DISTANCit IN MILES 2'0 2'5 30
F
'~r
DREW CO.
ARt'.ANSAS
¢ ~~v
v
ASHLEY CO.
~~~
1
,400
I
I c;, 'i'" ...}
PRAIRIE~.. r"'~
~ \~
(... . . ( " /PRACR"" l300
.
1 h.,.L..j
iERTIARY
p----
8 ARKANSAS----,;!'''
PHILLIPS CO. _ _ _
-<..O<?:-~
~,...v
I
; : TUNICA CO.
MISSISSIPPI
I <,....
VQ~'::-
<TATE CO.
~~;..
'1-'
~
I
400
300
~'"'~~
(':;.$'>
":J<vc:.''I;
[" (
MONiGOMERY
;:V I
400
'00
f ~I\{~'OO
I
75
DISTANCE IN MILES 100 0 DISTANCE IN
10
MII...ES
'
i----------------------MISSISSiPPI 8
v""
~EOO
...
~
1_
v"" LEGEND
",'r
,,0 ,,0",~
... ~ ...'r D" GRAVEL OUTCROP
(''' ,,'"
I/r---"'"If'N'\/
~s
'1J
r TERilARY
~ GEOLOGiCAL SECTIONS iN
45
DISTANCE IN MIL ES