PART B (Case Study) = 3 PART C (Multiple Choice) = 85 Instant Downloadable Solution from AiDLo.com
PART A Descriptive Type Question
Question 1: What factors should Indian Exporters consider in assessing demand for a product in foreign markets? How are they different from assessing domestic demand? Question 2: The world's poorest countries are at a competitive disadvantage in every sector of their economies. They have little to export. They have no capital; their land is of poor quality; they often have too many people given available work opportunities; and they are poorly educated. Free trade is not in interest of these countries. Discuss. Question 3a: What are the specific advantages that a firm can derive by going "international"? Question 3b: Why is the task of the international marketer more difficult that of the domestic marketer? Question 4: Describe the impact of foreign trade on the economic development of a country. Illustrate your answer with examples from India. Question 5: How would you proceed to shortlist possible markets for your products? Explain in detail. Also explain the various methods through which you can export your products. Question 6: What are the sources of commercial intelligence available to exporters in India? How far can a firm arrange for its own sources of commercial intelligence? Question 7: Critically examine the Japanese style of management and distinguish it from Indian style of Management. Also explain how their importance in International Negotiations by giving relevant examples. Question 8: Is international marketing research generally more complex task than Domestic marketing research? Discuss with reference to problems regarding collection, analysis and interpretation of data from foreign markets. Question 9: By giving the appropriate examples explain how Chinese, American and Turkish Markets are different from each other. Question 10: How do you think the successful conclusion of the multilateral agreement to liberalize regulations governing FDI will benefit the world economy. Question 11: Discuss the National Competitive Advantage Theory of International Trade. How this theory is different from other theories. Question 12: On what basis countries as classified as low income, middle income and high income countries? Do you think economic status of a country will influence its global business. Question 13: Explain different types of Economic System. What are the major challenges faced by the command economies while transiting to a market economy? Question 14: Explain the following terms i) Tariff ii) Subsidies and Countervailing Duties iii) Quotas iv) Voluntary Export Restraint v) Local Content Requirement. Why do advanced countries insist on elimination of subsidies. Question 15: Explain the achievement of EU in integrating its member countries. How formation of EU is beneficial for India. Question 16: How is WTO different from GATT?. What are the main issued in the Doha Development Agenda and what are the implications for the developing countries?
PART B Case Study 1 CARREFOUR The hypermarket concept is usually defined as an outlet retailing both food and non- food products from a sales area of at least 2,500 sq. Meters with extensive car parking. It was Maicel Fournier and Louis Deffrorey who opened the first European hypermarket just outside Paris. It was an instant success and largely as a result Carrefour has grown into one of the largest grocery retailers in Europe with sales exceeding from 117 billion in 1992. The basic strategy of Carrefour, which has remained largely unaltered over the past 30 years, was summed up in the Annual Report: "Carrefour, a single objective; offer quality products and services to consumers at lowest prices and convenience of choice in large well stocked, well managed stores." There are three elements to this objective. 1. Discounting Carrefour has been nominated as the leading discounter, not only in France, but also in Brazil. 2. Multi specialization. Carrefour is a specialist in every product line whether it is in butchery, bakery or delicatessen. 3. Empowerment of staff. It is at the store level at which decisions are made. Not only has the hypermarket concept-changed little over the past 30 years, the basic approach has been adapted very little for the international market. Each hypermarket operates as a profit centre with the Store Manger responsible for performance. International Expansion Almost from the outset Carrefour adopted a strategy which took account of internationalization. After the first hypermarket was opened in France, the group ventured into Belgium in a joint venture, followed by a similar arrangement with another company in Switzerland. As far as the UK was concerned, Carrefour took a minority shareholding in the hypermarket holdings with Wheat sheaf distribution which itself became part of the Dee Corporation. Carrefour went on to expand with joint venture operations in Italy, Spain, Brazil, Austria and Germany. Following this strategy of market spreading, the group rationalized its overseas operations to focus on a limited number of markets. The number of joint ventures operation to focus on a limited number of markets. The numbers of joint ventures have been discontinued. Attempts were made to build up the Italian subsidiary but with little success and divestment followed in the early 80s. More recently, two stores in Switzerland were sold. While divestment was occurring in some areas, in other Carrefour invested heavily. Spain, Brazil, Argentina, the USA and Taiwan saw heavy investment. Stores continued to be opened via a number of separate operating subsidiaries, but since the mid 1980s a policy of organizational consolidation ensures. In Latin, America, investment has continued despite the difficulties of operating in markets experiencing hyper Inflation in Brazil, annual inflation rates soared to levels of 200% in the mid 1980s and 1700% in 1989, while in Argentina a figure of 5,000% is recorded in the annual report for 1989 and 800% in 1990. Such figures have rendered a marketing strategy based in low prices almost impossible to promote as prices are virtually obsolete from the moment they are set. The hypermarket has been an innovation in these markets, reinforced by the development of focused shopping centre to support the stores. In south America much of the development is self-financing. The American experiment was a different story. The Carrefour store opened in February 1988 in Philadelphia but failed to live up to expectations. Carrefour responded to this by increasing the range of food which did result in some improvement in performance but many still felt that the hypermarket was not suited to the American market. In early 1993 the American operation was to be discontinued. Carrefour's expansion into Taiwan has met with the much greater degree of success. By 1993 there were five stores trading successfully, although certain adaptations have been made to the retail format to include an outdoor market and only 200 parking spaces. Carrefour intends to continue its expansion plans into Malaysia. Carrefour was at the forefront of innovation with the development of hypermarkets. In the last three decades they have attempted to maintain this leadership in retail innovation. They have done this by the introduction of retailer brands, the launching of financial services and investment in innovative retail concepts. This innovative approach has been demonstrated by involvement in DIY stores, shareholdings in CostCo, the large American club stores, and involvement in restaurants and freezer centres. Most of the development has taken place under the same families of original founders, Marcel Fournier and Louis Defforey. Since 1984 however Michael Bond has occupied a post of either Deputy or Chief Executives whilst in 1990 he became Chairman of the group, the first non-family member to hold this post. Bond was replaced under dramatic circumstances by Danniel Bernard to sort out a short term balance sheet problem. The group announced that it would sell non-essential investments, an unusual approach for a company which has in the past been noted for showing patience and taking a long term view of investments. Question: Consider Carrefour's competitive strategy in relation to alternatives, some of which may be adopted by rival companies. While their strategy would appear to have been successful for thirty years, is it likely to continue to be for the next 30 years?
Case Study 2 "Export Promotion" India's tea exports rose to 46.74 million kg. during the first quarter of the current financial year from 35.47 million kg. in the previous comparable period. Export earnings from this item aggregated Rs. 81.61 crore during April - June, 1981 against Rs. 68.03 crore in the corresponding period last year. Thus, although in terms of quantity our tea exports have looked up this year, the unit value realization dropped from Rs. 19.8 per kg. to Rs. 17.46 per kg. The drop in unit value realization is attributed to the slackness in the international tea market due to the global over-supply in the commodity. Since 1975, world tea production has gone up by 41 percent whereas increase in consumption by the tea- improving countries has been only of the order of 9 percent. Naturally, the prospects of a revival in international tea prices are dim, at least in the immediate future. The recommendations made by the recent national tea meet to 'revitalise' the tea industry in the country have to be viewed in this context. The national meet on tea, organized by the Union Commerce Ministry, was held in the first week of August to take a close look at the various problems confronting the tea industry. The meeting which was attended by the representatives of Central Government, tea producing States, Planters' associations and small growers, has recommended a package of fiscal reliefs---both at the Central and State levels. The package includes, among other things, a substantial reduction in excise duty on tea, refund of indirect taxes paid on tea exports, simplification of drawback procedures, substantial reduction or removal of the excise duty on packet tea until further review, suspension of sales tax on auction tens concessional scredit and a significant cut in the agricultural income-tax and other local taxes by the respective State Governments. It was also recommended that the State Government should consider grant of exemption from rural employment cess to all export sales of tea and teas used for packeting by the producers themselves. According to the available information these recommendations are being considered by the Centre and States concerned for implementation. The basic problem that confronts the tea industry in the international sphere is one of depressed prices. More and more black tea is coming into the international markets from several new producing-exporting countries leading to over-supply and lower price realisation. And the tea producing nations are realizing that without demand and supply, the cannot get a better price for their produce. Viewed against this background, it is doubtful that the massive relief's being sought on tea exports will really be helpful. Excise duty drawback on export, if granted, may compound the declinein unit values. This may temporarily improve our competitive position and increase the quantum of exports. But at the same time this may firm up domestic price to some extent and lead to further slackening of internal consumption, which has already been affected by the high prices of sugar and mild. Yet another factor needs consideration before attempting to step up the quantum of exports by making tea cheaper through concessions. This is the discouraging trend in production so far this year. During January - June 1981, estimated tea production at 173.7 million kg is down by as much as 27.4 million kg over the same period of last year. If this trend continues in the remaining months of the year, the resultant lower output itself may push up internal tea prices to some extent. Moreover, most of the tea growers, who do not export directly and who deserve government help the most, are unlikely to benefit from excise rebate or fiscal concessions to tea exports. Instead, these would benefit substantially the FERA companies who export their produce for sale in the London auctions and export under forward contract and private sale. The other likely beneficiaries would be exporters of blended tea and foreign buyer purchasing tea from public auctions in India. What is needed, therefore, is a selective and judicious approach towards the whole issue of fiscal incentives for tea exports. Because of lower production cost some of our competitors have an edge over us in export markets and incentives may be necessary to an extent for offsetting this price disadvantage. Similarly, assistance for exports of non-traditional items such as tea bags and packet teas would be advantageous for establishing markets for these high value-added items whose share in our overall tea exports is small at present. Question 1. Analyse the arguments for and against granting additional assistance to tea exports. Question 2. What in you opinion should be the ideal package of assistance for the tea industry against the give perspective?
Case Study 3 The Daewoo Group and the Asian Financial Crisis In 1999, the Daewoo Group, Korea's second largest chaebol, or family owned business conglomerate, collapsed under $57 billion in debt and was forced to split into independent companies. The Asian Financial crisis and its aftermath finally took its toll on the expansion-minded Daewoo and forced both Daewoo and the Korean government to decide how to dissolve the chaebol. Kim Woo-Choong started Daewoo in 1967 as a small textile company with only five employees and $10,000 as capital. In just 30 years, Mr Kim had grown Daewoo into a diversified company with 250,000 employees worldwide as well as over 30 domestic companies and 300 oversear subsidiaries that generated sales of more than $100 billion annually. However, some estimates that Daewoo and its subcontractors employed 2.5 million people in Korea. Although Daewoo started in textiles, it quickly moved into other fields, first heavy and chemicals industries in the 1970, and then technology intensive industries in the 1980s. By the end of 1999, Daewoo was organized into six major divisions : Trading Division Heavy Industry and Shipbuilding Construction and Hotel Motor Vehicle Division' Electronics and Telecommunications Finance and Services However, Daewoo was struggling. Its $50 billion debt was 40 percent greater than in 1998, equaling 13 percent of Korea's entire GDP. A good share of that total $10 billion, was owed to overseas creditors. Its debt-to-equity ratio (total debt divided by share- holders equity) in 199 was 5 to 1, which was higher than the 4 to 1 average of other large cheabol, but it was significantly higher than the U.S average, which usually is around 1 to 1 but which rarely climbs above 2 to 1. Of course, there is no way of knowing the true picture of Daewoo's financial information because of the climate of secrecy in Korean companies. In addition it is possible that Daewoo's estimated debt might be greatly underestimated because no one knows whether or not the $50 million figure included debt of foreign subsidiaries. How did Daewoo get into such a terrible position, and how much did the nature of the Korean economy and the Asian Financial crisis affect Daewoo? Korean Economy The impact of the Asian financial crisis on Korea was partly a result of the economic system of state intervention adopted by Korea in the mid-1950s. Modeled after the Japanese economic system, the Korean authoritarian government targeted export growth as the key for the country's future. Initially, the government adopted a strategy of import substitution, and that later gave way to a strategy of "export or die". Significant incentives were given to exporters, such as access to low cost money (often borrowed abroad in dollars and loaned to companies at below market interest rates in Korean won), lower corporate income taxes, tariff exemptions, tax holidays for domestic suppliers of export firms, reduced rates on public utilities, and monopoly rights for new export markets. Clearly, the government wanted Korean companies to export The chaebol, of which the four largest were Hyundai, Daewoo, Samsung and the LGgroup, become the dominant business institutions during the rise in the Korean economy. They were among the largest companies in the world and were very diversified, as can be seen by the Daewoo's investment and business choices. They were held together by ownership, management and family ties. In particular, family ties played an key role in controlling the chaebol. Until the 1980s, the bank in Korea provided most of the funding to the chaebol, and were owned and controlled by the government. Because of the importance of the exporting the chaebol were all tied to general trading companies. The chaebol received lots of support from the government, and they were very loyal to the government, giving rise to the charges of corruption. Most chaebol were initially involved in the light industry, such as textile production, but the government realized that companies first shift to heavy industry and then to technology industries. Daewoo transitioned to heavy industry in 1976 when the Korean government asked President Kim to acquire an ailing industrial firm rather than let the firm go out of business and create unemployment. Asian Financial Crisis and Its impact on Korea The country continued to liberalize, and democracy finally came into being in 1988 with the introduction of a new constitution and the election of Kim Young-Sam, the first democratic president in Korea's history. The economy also continued to grow at 5 to 8 percent annually during early to mid-1990s, led primarily by exports and the World Bank predicted that Korea would have the seventh largest economy in the world by 2020. However, the Asian financial crisis brought that growth to halt. After the Thai bhat was devalued on July 2, 1997, the Korean won soon followed, and the Korean stock market crashed as well. By the end of 1997, the South Korean won was 46.2 percent lower than its pre devaluation rate. At the time the crisis hit, Korea's external debt was estimated to be $110 billion to $150 billion, 60 percent of it maturing in less than one year. In addition, Korea had another $368 billion of domestic debt. Korea's banks had been a tool to state industrial policy, with the government ordering banks to make loans to certain companies even if they were not healthy. Banks borrowed mony in dollars and lent them to firms in won, shifting the burden of foreign exchange from the firms to the banks. Hanbo steel and Kia Motors went bankrupt leaving some banks with huge losses. The Korean won fell in the fall of 1997 causing the government to raise interest rate to support the won and resulting in more problem loans. Bad loans at the nine largest financial institutions in Korea ranged from 94 percent to 376 percent of the banks capital, making the banks technically insolvent. The chaebol were also very overextended. The top five chaebol were in average of 140 businesses, ranging from semi-conductor manufacture to shipbuilding to auto manufacturing. This was happening during a time when most companies in the industrial world were selling off unrelated businesses and focusing on their core competencies. Twenty five of the top 30 chaebol had debt-to-equity ratio of over 5 to 1, as noted earlier. Compare this to Toyota Motor of Japan, which had a debt-to-equity ratio in 1998 of 0.7 to 1. During this crisis, Korea began to negotiate with the IMF for help. The IMF agreed to help, but only if Korea raised interest rates to support its currency, reduce its budget deficits, reformed its banks, restructured its chaebol, improved financial disclosure, devalued the currency (to stimulate export even more), promoted exports, and restrict imports. In return for a pledge to introduce the reforms, the IMF released funds to Korea to help it pay off its foreign debt and to keep its bank from going bankrupt. This in turn brought in more money from foreign banks that were encouraged by Korea's pledge to reform. One of the IMF's key area was banking reform. The IMF encouraged Korea to open up its banking sector to foreign investment, hoping that an infusion of foreign banking expertise might help the Korean banks to make better loans. OF course, foreign banks had made a sizable number of bad loans in Asia as well. In addition, the IMF encouraged the Korean government to pass good bankruptcy laws to allow bad companies, including banks to fail. However, IMF hoped that Korean banking institutions would merge, forming fewer but stronger banks. In addition, the IMF encouraged banking reforms in order to cut the links between bankers and politics, tighten supervision and regulation of he banking industry, and improve accounting disclosure. Impact of the crisis on Daewoo While the financial crisis was going on, Daewoo's president Kim ignored the warning signs and continued to expand. In 1998, a year when the Daewoo Group lost money, it added 14 new firms to its existing 275 subsidiaries. While Samsung and LG were cutting back Daewoo added 40 percent more debt. Finally Korean President Kim Dae Jung had enough. He ordered the banks to stop lending to chaebol until they come up with and began to execute a plan to sell off businesses and to focus on their core competencies. But that didn't stop Daewoo. TO get access to more money to feed its growth, Daewoo issued corporate bonds. Which were purchased by Investment Trust Companies (ITCs), finance companies associated with chaebol. The ITCs purchased nearly $20 billion in corporate bonds. In early 1999, Daewoo announced a plan to sell off some of its business to comply with government restructuring requirements before the government took more drastic action, such as nationalization. However, the plans limped along until July 1999. At that point, with Korea still in deep recession, Daewoo announced that it would go bankrupt unless its Korean creditors backed it off. It basically could not even its service its interest payments of $500 million a month, let alone its principal. The government immediately stepped in and froze Daewoo's loans until November 1999. This shock rippled through Korea, because nobody thought a chaebol would ever be allowed to collapse. That had never happened before, and the close ties between government and business were such that is was never expected to happen. The shock of Daewoo's announcement negatively affected the corporate bond market, and the ITCs came under pressure because of their huge exposure to Daewoo. Negotiations in Korea involved 60 banks, some owned by the government, others in the private sector. On September 16, 1999, Daewoo asked its foreign creditors for a moratorium on interest payments until March 2000, so the instability spread to the international markets. Daewoo's Future By the nd of 1999, Daewoo's President Kim was left with few options to solve Daewoo's problems. One possibility was to dismantle Daewoo and let it have only auto related businesses. All of the other businesses would be sold off to domestic or foreign investors, and the name would be changed to something other than Daewoo. Another option for President Kim was to sell some of Daewoo's auto assest. Ford, DaimlerChrysler and General Motors showed interest, but selling Daewoo Motor, the second largest automaker in Korea, would be a big blow to the country. As the Korean economy began to recover in 1999, some felt that the chaebol should weather the storm and not allow themselves to be broken up. However, President Kim Dae Jung had mandated that the chaebol get their debt-to-equity ratios from 5 to 1 to 2 to1 by the end of 1999, and that goal seemed impossible unless there was a huge infusion of equity capital or either a write off of debt through debt restructuring with the banks or selling off of debt-laden business to others. Under immense pressure caused by the debt and by accusations of fraud and embezzlement, President Kim Woo- Choong abandoned his company and fled the country. The government separated the Daewoo subsidiaries and worked with creditors to convert the debt into equity, to set up subsidiaries on debt workout programs and to look for buyers. After a year of negotiations, General Motors purchased a portion of the $1.2 billion Daewoo Motors in April 2002for $400 million. It agreed to keep only three manufacturing plants- two in Korea and one in Vietnam- leaving creditors scrambling to sell its other plants in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Middle east. By mid-2202, the Korean economy was showing promising signs of recovery and reform. In 2001, the economy grew by 3 percent and was expected to grow by 5 to 6 percent in 2002. The government has done away with debt-based management of the large chaebol and is working to dissolve the large conglomerates to better compete internationally. Of the top 30 chaebol that existed prior to the economic crisis only 14 remain. The improving economy helped General Motors make its decision to purchase Daewoo Motor, but GM is faced with new decision : How to market Daewoo cars and reduce the $830 million of Daewoo debt. Should GM continue selling Daewoo cars in the United States and Europe and and compete with its own brands? Without increasing its debt, will it be able to restore 37% share of the market in Korea? Question 1. What are the key mistakes Kim Woo-Choong made in formulating and implementing Daewoo's strategy and how did the economic crisis in Korea and in rest of Asia affect that strategy? Question 2. How would you describe Korea's economic system before its economy was affected by the Asian Financial crisis? What was the role of IMF in reforming the economic system in Korea?
PART C Multiple Choice Question Set 1 1. Which one of the following is not an assumption of the Ricardo Model : i. Constant returns to scale ii. Factors of production can be transferred easily one sector to another iii. There is perfect competition in the market iv. Technological innovation is a unique feature of the market structure 2. Which of the following is not a form of Non Tariff Barrier i. Subsidies ii. Local Content Requirement iii. Ad valorem Duties iv. Technical Standards 3. For a US trader a direct quote will be : i. US$ 1 = 56.7 Yen ii. GBP 1 = 34.5 Yen iii. GBP 1 = 35.6 Euro iv. None of the above 4. Which of the following is an example of depreciation of Indian Rupee i. Now US$ 1 = 45 INR after 3 months US$ 1 = 50 INR ii. Now US$ 1 = 50 INR after 3 months US$ 1 = 45 INR iii. Both i and ii above iv. None of the above 5. A currency is said to be at a premium when : i. Spot rate is higher then the forward rate ii. Forward rate is higher then the spot rate iii. Forward rate is equal to the spot rate iv. None of the above 6. Which of the following statement describes the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory i. Countries should export goods that are made of factors of production that are available in abundance in the economy ii. Countries should produce and export those goods in which they have absolute advantage iii. Countries should produce and export those goods in which they have comparative advantage iv. Increase in the endowment of one of the factors will reduce the production of goods that intensively use the other factor 7. "If US is capital rich and innovation increases the productivity of capital, then labour intensive industries in US will get hurt" is i. Stolper-Samuelson Theorem ii. Leontief Paradox iii. Rybczynski Theorem iv. Heckscher-Ohlin Theory 8. Which of the following is not part of Current Account transactions of a country? i. Merchandise trade ii. Unilateral Transfers iii. Receipts from FDI abroad iv. Change in forex reserve of a country 9. In an economy which out of the following is not the reasons for internal debt i.e excess of government expenses over revenue, are : i. Poorly managed tax system ii. Huge expenses on defense and welfare program iii. State owned enterprises have huge losses iv. Impressive economic growth 10. Which of the following is not an underlying principle of GATT? i. Trade concessions by member countries will be reciprocated ii. Countries should grant preferential treatment to other member countries iii. Trade dispute between member countries to be settled by dispute settlement mechanism of GATT iv. Policies governing external trade should be transparent 11. Which of the following is not an objective of NAFTA: i. Access to financial services ii. To investigate environment and labour abuses iii. No change in tariff iv. Protection for investment 12. Which of the following is not a type of regional economic integration? i. Free Trade Area ii. Customs Union iii. Common Market iv. GATT 13. EU is an example of which type of regional economic integration? i. Economic Integration ii. Customs Union iii. Free Trade Agreement iv. Preferential Trade Agreement 14. Which of the following is an example of regional trade agreement among Asian Countries? i. SAPTA ii. CARICOM iii. EEC iv. CACM 15. Which of the following is not founder member country of ASEAN? i. Cambodia ii. Singapore iii. India iv. Vietnam 16. GATT was formed in which year and by how many countries? i. 1920, 15 countries ii. 1947, 23 countries iii. 1947, 15 countries iv. 1935, 23 countries 17. Which of the following is not an example of Quantitative Restriction on trade? i. Quotas ii. Voluntary Export Restraint iii. Embargo iv. Subsidies 18. India is an example of which type of Economic System i. Mixed Economy ii. Command Economy iii. Market Economy iv. Centrally Planned Economy 19. In a command economy or centrally planned economy i. Government owns and controls all resources ii. Society owns and controls all resources iii. Community owns and controls all resources iv. Private entities owns and controls all resources 20. Which of the following economic indicator is used to rank countries in terms of their individual wealth by World Bank? i. GDP per capita ii. GNI per capita iii. PPP iv. GNI 21. Dumping which is a type of non tariff barriers means i. Selling products at less than fair value ii. Selling goods that are mass produced in an economy iii. Selling goods utilizing old technology iv. Selling goods of inferior quality 22. Which of the following pair is wrongly matched? i. Theory of Absolute Advantage - Adam Smith ii. Theory of Comparative Advantage - David Ricardo iii. Heckscher-Ohlin Theory - Wassily Leontif iv. Product Life Cycle Theory - Raymond Vernon 23. According to Porter, which of the following factors will not help in determining the Global Competitive Advantage of the company? i. Monopoly market conditions i.e Absence of Rivals ii. Firm Strategy iii. Presence of related and supporting industry iv. Factor conditions 24. Observation that "US exports were less capital intensive the US imports" which is the contradiction to the HO model is known as i. Leontif Paradox ii. Stopler-Samuelson Theorem iii. Rybczynski Theorem iv. New Product Life Cycle Theorem 25. In which type of trade agreement no duties are charged on imports from member countries i. Preferential Trade Agreement ii. Free Trade Agreement iii. Custom Union iv. None of the above 26. GATT stands for i. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs ii. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade iii. General Arrangement on Tariffs and Trade iv. General Arrangement on Trade and Tariffs 27. Which of the following was not an achievement of the Uruguay Round of negotiations? i. Agreement on services ii. Protection of Intellectual property rights iii. 10 year phase out of MFA iv. Agreement on Trade in Agriculture 28. Which of the following countries is not a member of ASEAN? i. Thailand ii. China iii. Vietnam iv. Singapore 29. Glasnost and Perestroika were introduced by which Soviet Leader? i. Mikhail Gorbachev ii. Leonid Brezhnev iii. Yuri Andropov iv. Konstantin Chernenko 30. Which of the following country was first to disintegrate from Soviet Republic? i. Ukraine ii. Lithuania iii. Turkmenistan iv. Tajikistan 31. Which if the following country was not the member of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)? i. Belgium ii. France iii. Spain iv. Germany 32. Neo-mercantilist theory is different from the Mercantilist theory as neo-mercantilist theory proposes that i. A country should have favourable balance of trade ii. Countries should trade with each other for social and political objectives iii. Country should promote import and restrict export iv. Country should export those products which they can produce more efficiently 33. WTO was formed during which round of negotiations ? i. Uruguay Round ii. Doha Round iii. Singapore Round iv. Tokyo Round 34. Which of the following is an example of cross exchange rate? i. USD 1 = 50.6 Euro ii. USD 1 = 45.7 GBP iii. Yen 1 = 34.5 Euro iv. USD 1 = 45.9 INR 35. How inflation and Exchange rate are related to each other? i. Higher inflation leads to currency devaluations ii. Higher inflation leads to currency appreciation iii. High inflation leads to currency stability iv. There is no relation between inflation and exchange rate 36. External Debt is measured as i. Total External Debt of a country ii. Debt as percentage of GDP iii. Total of Fiscal deficit and External borrowings iv. Both i and ii above 37. What does transition to market economy means? i. Liberalizing economic activity ii. Control of economy by government iii. Imposing trade restrictions iv. All of the above 38. Which of the following countries is not a member of MERCOSUR? i. Brazil ii. Argentina iii. Paraguay iv. Mexico 39. What is a convertible currency? i. Currency that can be freely traded with other currencies ii. Currency that can be traded only with hard currencies iii. Currencies of the Asian Countries iv. Currencies of the developed countries 40. Currency Speculation is done to i. Cover risk and earn profit ii. Cover risk iii. Maintain foreign currency account to earn interest iv. None of the above
Multiple Choice Question Set 2 Q1. The first phase of globalization started around 1870 and ended with .. a) The World War I b) The World War II c) The Establishment of GATT d) In 1913 when GDP was High
Q2. IBRD (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development) also known as a) Exim Bank b) World Bank c) International Monetary fund d) International Bank
Q3. Ultimately was replaced by the .on 1st Jan 1995 a) GATS, WTO b) WTO, GATT c) GATT, WTO d) IMF, GATT
Q4. Which is the right sequence of a stages of Internationalization a) Domestic, Transnational, Global, International, Multinational b) Domestic, International, Multinational, Global, Transnational c) Domestic, Multinatinal, International, Transnational, Global d) Domestic, Internatinal, Transnational, Multinational, Global
Q5. Subsidiaries consider regional environment for policy / Strategy formulation is known as a) Polycentric Approach b) Regiocentric Approach c) Ethnocentric Approach d) Geocentric Approach
Q6. According to this theory the holdings of a countrys treasure primarily in the form of gold constituted its wealth. a) Gold Theory b) Ricardo Theory c) Mercantilism d) Hecksher Theory
Q7. The Theory of Absolute Cost Advantage is given by a) David Ricardo b) Adam Smith c) F W Taylor d) Ohlin and Heckscher
Q8. The Theory of Relative Factor Endowments is given by a) David Ricardo b) Adam Smith c) F W Taussig d) Ohlin and Hecksher
Q9. The theory of Comparative cost advantage is given by a) David Ricardo b) Adam Smith c) F W Taussig d) Ohlin and Hecksher
Q10. is application of knowledge which redefine the boundaries of global business a) Cultural Values b) Society c) Technology d) Economy
Q11. Capitalistic, communistic and Mixed are the types of a) Economic System b) Social System c) Cultural Attitudes d) Political System
Q12. Which is not an Indian Multinational Company? a) Unilever b) Asian Paints c) Piramal d) Wipro
Q13. Globalization refers to: a) Lower incomes worldwide b) Less foreign trade and investment c) Global warming and their effects d) A more integrated and interdependent world
Q14. Which of the following is not a force in the Porter Five Forces model? a. Buyers b. Suppliers c. Complementary products d. Industry rivalry
Q15. Comparative Cost Trade Theory is given by a) Adam Smith b) David Ricardo c) Gottfried Haberler d) Heckscher Ohlin
Q16._____ is the payment method most often used in International Trade which offers the exporter best assurance of being paid for the products sold internationally. a) Bill of Lading b) Letter of Credit c) Open Account d) Drafts
Q17. Key controllable factors in global marketing are: a) Government policy and legislation b) social and technical changes c) marketing activities and plans d) all of the above.
Q18. Select example of Indian Multinational Company a) Hindusthan Unilever b) Videocon c) Cargill d) Tesco
Q19. The simplest way to enter a foreign market is through . a) Direct investment b) Joint venturing c) Contract manufacturing d) Exporting
Q20. IHRM is an area of academic study which focuses on: a) Comparative research b) The movement of individuals across national boundaries c) The exchange of ideas and practices d) The policies and practices of MNC's
Q21. Which of the following statements best describes the typical behaviour of national governments towards imports and exports? a) Exports are encouraged; imports are discouraged. b) Both exports and imports are discouraged. c) Imports are encouraged; exports are discouraged. d) Both exports and imports are encouraged.
Q22. For destination countries, receipts from international tourism count as: a) Exports. b) Imports. c) Both imports and exports, d) None of the above.
Q23. Which of the following is true? a) The United States is the world's largest importer and the largest exporter. b) The Japan is the world's largest importer and the US is the world's largest exporter. c) The United States is the world's largest importer and China is the world's largest exporter. d) The United States is the world's largest importer and the Japan is the world's largest exporter.
Q24. An arrangement in which one company allows another company to use its name, products, patents, brands, trademarks, raw materials, and/or production processes in exchange for a royalty is called a) licensing. b) a joint venture. c) direct investment d) a trading company e) importing
Q25. The balance of payments includes which of the following? a) a country's balance of trade b) foreign investments c) foreign aid d) tourist expenditures e) all of the above
Q26. Companies that want more control and are willing to invest considerable resources in a) trading company b) licensing c) direct investment d) contract manufacturing e) exporting
Q27. Which of the following organizations was established by industrialized nations to loan money to underdeveloped and developing countries? a) OPEC b) NAFTA c) The World Bank d) The IMF e) The United Nations
Q28. Before moving outside their own borders, companies must conduct a) internal audits. b) TQM programs. c) language seminars d) joint ventures. e) environmental analyses.
Q29: When Colgate-Palmolive developed a hand-powered washing machine for households in LDCs that do not have electricity, Colgate-Palmolive was following a a) multinational strategy. b) strategic alliance, c) marketing strategy. d) globalization strategy e) joint venture.
Q30: When IBM and Apple joined together in hopes of obtaining a competitive advantage on a worldwide basis, this exemplified a a) cartel. b) joint venture. c) direct investment. d) strategic alliance. e) contract manufacturing deal.
Q31: Wendy's, Pizza Hut, and McDonald's are well-known with international visibility. a) franchisers b) trading companies c) joint ventures d) contract manufacturers e) strategic alliances
Q32: Subsidiaries consider regional environment for policy / Strategy formulation is known as a) Polycentric Approach b) Regiocentric Approach c) Ethnocentric Approach d) Geocentric Approach e) Multicentric Approach
Q33: According to this theory the holdings of a country's treasure primarily in the form of gold constituted its wealth. a) Gold Theory b) Ricardo Theory c) Mercantilism d) Hecksher Theory
Q34: The Theory of Relative Factor Endowments is given by a) David Ricardo b) Adam Smith c) FW Taussig d) Ohlin and Hecksher
Q35: Capitalistic, communistic and mixed are the types of a) Economic System b) Social System c) Cultural Attitudes d) Political System
Q36: Which is not an Indian Multinational Company? a) Hindusthan Unilever b) Asian Paints c) Piramal d) Wipro
Q37: Which of the following is not a force in the Porter Five Forces model? a) Buyers b) Suppliers c) Complementary Products d) Industry rivalry
Q38: In some countries the ratio of older people to total population is rising rapidly. This is important to business because: a) It could lead to a falling tax burden. b) It will increase the supply of labour. c) It could change the pattern of demand for goods and services d) It could increase economic growth.
Q39: The abolition of the Gold Control Act in 1992, allowed large import houses to import gold freely. This will a) Increase the price of imported Gold. b) Decrease the price of imported Gold. c) Have no effect on the price of gold d) Decreased the quality of gold imported.
Q40: When two companies join hands to manufacture new products it is called as a) Merger b) Joint venture c) Acquisition d) Production agreement
Q41: Restrictions to trade also include non-tariff barriers, such as and a) Taxes, Tariffs b) Legislation, Quotas c) C. Duty, Fee d) Subsidies, Taxes
Q42: Which of the following was not identified in class as a driving force behind globalization? a) Advances in transportation b) Advances in communication and transportation technology c) Lower barriers to trade d) Lower interest rates
Q43: Dumping refers to: a) Exporting products no one in the producing country wants b) Exporting products at a price below the cost of production c) Exporting only the lowest quality products d) Tossing unwanted cargo into the ocean during transport
Q44: The price of one country's currency in terms of another a) the exchange rate. b) the interest rate. c) the Dow Jones industrial average d) none of the above.
Q45: The WTO was established by the of multilateral trade negotiations. a) Kennedy Round b) Tokyo Round c) Uruguay Round d) Dillon Round