0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
67 visualizzazioni19 pagine
Tissue Process ssue ocess Inputs: Furnish Fiber Ash Fi Speed Fines Freeness Brightness Retention p Crepe ratio Efficiency Tissue machine Converting Crepe Ionic demand Zeta Potential Chemical dosages Formation Converting Handfeel Softness the quality / efficiency chain runs through the process with creping at the center 3 3 (c)BTG 2010 Reduce Total Cost of Ownership Goal: Variability Reduction a ab ty educt o Increased Production
Tissue Process ssue ocess Inputs: Furnish Fiber Ash Fi Speed Fines Freeness Brightness Retention p Crepe ratio Efficiency Tissue machine Converting Crepe Ionic demand Zeta Potential Chemical dosages Formation Converting Handfeel Softness the quality / efficiency chain runs through the process with creping at the center 3 3 (c)BTG 2010 Reduce Total Cost of Ownership Goal: Variability Reduction a ab ty educt o Increased Production
Tissue Process ssue ocess Inputs: Furnish Fiber Ash Fi Speed Fines Freeness Brightness Retention p Crepe ratio Efficiency Tissue machine Converting Crepe Ionic demand Zeta Potential Chemical dosages Formation Converting Handfeel Softness the quality / efficiency chain runs through the process with creping at the center 3 3 (c)BTG 2010 Reduce Total Cost of Ownership Goal: Variability Reduction a ab ty educt o Increased Production
From Stock Prep to Finished Product From Stock Prep to Finished Product
An integrated approach to develop cost-effective
solutions in Tissue Jeff Peters Tissue Applications Manager solutions in Tissue Tissue Applications Manager Tissue Panel Acapulco October 27-29, 2010 Shift Target = $$$ Program Overview: The Process, Case Study, Summary The Process, Case Study, Summary The Process Six Key Elements Process Measurement: Back to the Basics Plan Development Generating the Data Wh t t d ith th D t What to do with the Data Program Implementation Results Analysis Results Analysis Process improvement rule #1: If you dont measure it, how can you improve it? back to the basics! 2 2 BTG 2010 you improve it? back to the basics! Tissue Process ssue ocess Inputs: Outputs: Furnish Fiber Ash Fi Speed Fines Freeness Brightness Retention p Crepe ratio Efficiency Tissue machine Converting Crepe Ionic demand Zeta Potential Chemical dosages Formation Converting Handfeel Softness Andritz AG 2007 Crepe Performance Formation Felt Performance The quality/efficiency chain runs through the process with creping at the center 3 3 BTG 2010 The quality/efficiency chain runs through the process with creping at the center Process Overview ocess O e e Control Quality Water Runnability Fiber Wet-End y (Sheet Breaks) Operation Improvement Goal: Wet-End Additives 4 4 BTG 2010 Reduce Total Cost of Ownership Goal: Variability Reduction a ab ty educt o Increased Production Optimize Chemical Costs Stabilize process Quicker Recovery from upsets Quicker Recovery from upsets Improved Pulp Quality Operating Flexibility Shift Target = $$$ 5 5 BTG 2010 Opportunities for Control Oppo tu t es o Co t o Use Measurements from the field: Use Measurements from the field: Consistency &Ash Consistency & Ash Brightness & Fluorescence Fiber Characteristics Ch i l R id l Chemical Residual Freeness & Retention Charge & Zeta Potential Quality Data To build Control Solutions BTG focuses on: To build Control Solutions BTG focuses on: To build Control Solutions, BTG focuses on: To build Control Solutions, BTG focuses on: Overall process solutions (wet-end through converting) Each project has a sustainable payback Projects merged into a Total Control Strategy 6 6 BTG 2010 Projects merged into a Total Control Strategy Data Gathering ata Gat e g Case Study WS/non-WS grades O f Opportunities for Improvement Brightness & ERIC P l St V i bilit Pulp Stream Variability Chemical Additive Control Grade Change Grade Change Sheet Defects Creping Performance p g 7 7 BTG 2010 Survey Data Analysis System Charge Syste C a ge Wet Strength Grades Wet Strength Grades Non Wet Strength Non Wet Strength -0.200 0.000 0.200 0.400 g g g g System Cationic Machine Runnability Problems 1 000 -0.800 -0.600 -0.400 C h a r g e
( m l ) -1.600 -1.400 -1.200 -1.000 -1.800 Date/Time Machine Chest Headbox Whitewater 8 8 BTG 2010 Survey Data Analysis - Consistency Su ey ata a ys s Co s ste cy Range Chart for Machine Chest Blade Transmitter 0 700 0.500 0.600 0.700 Variation within blade transmitter capability, but too variable for on-line freeness control 0.300 0.400 f e r e n c e
1 4 : 3 0 9 9 BTG 2010 Range UCL RBAR LCL Plan Implementation a p e e tat o Install high precision consistency transmitter Install on-line freeness measurement/control Install on-line charge control Install on-line charge control Evaluate high performance creping blades 10 10 BTG 2010 Results to Date esu ts to ate Fiber Cost Savings: RET-2502 - Optical Consistency Transmitter Reduced consistency variation vs. blade type transmitter Reducedbasis weight variation resulting in lower average basis weight Reduced basis weight variation resulting in lower average basis weight Estimated fiber cost savings - $210,000/yr Fines/Ash Management: PCT-20 On-line Charge Control Optimizingfines/ashretentionandwet strengthresinefficiency Optimizing fines/ash retention and wet strength resin efficiency Improved fines/ash retention resulting in reduced fiber consumption Closed-loop control to optimize cationic polymer dosage rate Refiner Energy Reduction: DRT-5500 On-line Freeness Control Identified and verified refiners were working the fiber Expert analysis refiners undersized for process Modify refining strategy and/or install additional refiner Closed-loop refiner control to minimize energy consumption Improved Sheet Quality: High Performance Creping Blades Reduced bulk variation Reduced lost time vs. steel blades blade life 60+ hrs vs. 12 hrs I d i d bilit k d d 11 11 BTG 2010 Improved winder runnability no cracked edges Summary Su a y Understanding wet-end variability is the first step in process improvement R b Remember, if you dont measure it, how can you improve it? Improved wet-end stability more uniform sheet to the Yankee improved creping performance reduced MD and CD variation More uniform sheet to the rewinders and convertingg more quality cases/day out the door significant overall mill profitability improvement 12 12 BTG 2010 Latest Technology Developments atest ec o ogy e e op e ts Global economy corrections BTG continued to invest The latest solutions technology The latest solutions technology Fiber Cost Optimization E C t R d ti Energy Cost Reduction Chemical Cost Savings 13 13 BTG 2010 Complete Process Optimization Fiber Cost Optimization be Cost Opt at o RET-2501 and 2502 Optical technology for the most accurate measurement Optical technology for the most accurate measurement RET-2502 measures total and ash consistency Reduce consistency variation RET-5503 Optical technology for non-pressured applications Measures total and ash consistency Install at white water chest for a fines/ash management program to optimize tissue softness and absorbency Benefits Benefits Reduced process variation Reduced basis weight variation With the high cost of fiber a 0 1gsmreduction in BWvariation saves 14 14 BTG 2010 With the high cost of fiber, a 0.1gsm reduction in BW variation saves $100,000+/year in fiber Fiber Cost Optimization be Cost Opt at o MEK-3000 TwinTorgue TM Designed for the most demanding applications Designed for the most demanding applications Handling consistencies from 1 16% Reduce consistency variation Small and lightweight for easy handling and exceptional installation flexibility MBT-2500 Moving Blade Transmitter f f % Active type unit for measuring consistencies from 1.5 8% Excellent choice for less demanding applications B fit Benefits MEK-3000 is a very versatile unit capable of accurately controlling consistency of various pulp types over a broad range of consistencies 15 15 BTG 2010 g MBT-2550 is the best overall value for your money Fiber Cost Optimization be Cost Opt at o BT-5400UV Brightness Meter BT-5400UV Brightness Meter Measure five wavelengths Blue, green, red IR IR NIR or optional UV Measure values Measure values Brightness Color (L*, a*, b*) ERIC (Effective Residual Ink Benefits Chemical dosage optimization Count) Fluorescence (OBA) Fiber brightness optimization Fiber blending optimization 16 16 BTG 2010 optimization Energy Cost Reduction e gy Cost educt o DRT-5500 Freeness Meter On line freeness measurement On-line freeness measurement Closed-loop refiner control Minimize refiner energy by: Optimizing consistency control Controlling fiber freeness level to optimize sheet properties Benefit More uniform sheet properties 17 17 BTG 2010 Reduced energy consumption Chemical Cost Savings C e ca Cost Sa gs PCT-20/TSS-71 On-line charge Benefits Eliminate unexplained g measurement Mutek PCD-04 technology Up to 4 sample points Eliminate unexplained upsets Fines/ash management WSR Optimization Thick and thin stock WSR Optimization Improved Yankee coating control I d h t lit Improved sheet quality 18 18 BTG 2010 Complete Process Optimization Co p ete ocess Opt at o TTC (Total Tissue Capabilities Program) Identify pain points and bottlenecks Identify pain points and bottlenecks Develop control strategies to eliminate and/or minimize upset conditions Yankee creping optimization High Performance Creping Blades Benefits Reduce process variation Shift Target = $$$ Reduce process variation Highest quality, most uniform sheet to converting Optimize converting process 19 19 BTG 2010 Optimize converting process Maximize number of cases per day out the door