Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2007\2008
Raise the awareness level about complications of incomplete
dental treatment in patients attending the clinics in Al-quds
university dental school
Introduction
The difference between the reality and the hopes always exist. That you will never see
that both reality and hopes are identical. As a dentist you work hardly to get your
patient healthy but you'll be shocked when you find your patient is careless about his
problem firs and his treatment plan. Whom you do your optimum to make him
healthy.
Actually you must not be shocked because your patient is not the only one who
doesn’t respond well to his treatment plan. According to many dentists and to our
experience as dental students of the 2nd clinical dentistry year in AL-QUDS dental
faculty, it's found that significant member of patients are barely complaint to their
treatment plan …
In this study we'll try to look for the causes that make some patients poorly aware to
their treatment plan, WHY DO THEY DO SO???? .
Also to discuss what can be done to improve the compliance of the patients? What
roles does the dentist have to do improve this compliance???
Finally this study conducted for 40 students in AL-QUDS dental school for the
patients they had seen in the past year. It showed that 50 % of the patients came to our
faculty clinics are not fully compliant fro the treatment. That they don’t return
anymore to our clinics after his complaints ends up.
Goals
Objectives
Epidemiology
3
For the purpose of our project we conducted a simple and small survey that involved
40 students in the fifth – clinical – year of our faculty. Randomly chosen subjects
were asked to answer three simple questions about their experiences with patients in
this last semester (September 2007- January 2008).
These forty students have treated the amazing number of 719 patients. We may expect
that over 1000 patients come to our clinics by semester.
patients
patients abandoned
complete treatment
treatment 15.85%
84.15%
4%
6% 1
36% 2
31% 3
4
22%
5
This numbers show a simple sample that has to be revised if it is to be used for
purposed of a major study, since the probabilities of error and the chances of patients
being mentioned twice as being treated by several students may influence the results.
Although simple, it is very informative in finding out the number of patients that
attend to our faculty for treatment and the main reasons they may abandon treatment
for.
Mentioned as an entertaining point in our findings, male students faced being dumped
by their patients more frequently than female students. So stop giving them credit for
being active, and give us some credit for holding to what they have left for us.
Theory
From the conclusions we obtained after our quick survey we notice that there is a
relatively fair number of patients which have chosen not to complete treatment as
planned for several reasons which include; financial issues (36%), inadequate
appointments of treatment (31%), and most important of all what we have
5
The first idea involves the development of new student attitudes to enlighten the
problems patients have and increase their awareness about their chief complaint.
This chief complaint and/or problems should be fully discussed with the patient in a
way that includes their respective complications, treatment options and prognosis.
The patient should not leave the diagnostic clinic without the determination to follow
up his treatment. The second proposal is to prepare brochures explaining several
treatments, to be given to patients after receiving treatment.
These brochures may help answer several questions the patient was not able to ask
intraoperatively and also prepare for following sessions. Their importance increase
due to the fact that they might be a factor influencing the patient to come back since
there are complications that may arise or for the mere purpose of fulfilling their need
to know more about the treatment they have received.
The last proposal is directed to the long term change of attitudes in the community
since it is designed to aware people that dental disease is no different than any other
systemic disease or condition , and that it may worsen with time even to become life
threatening. Therefore dental treatment is no different than other types of treatment.
This type of awareness and response can only be achieved by allowing people to
discuss with professionals the issue of dental disease. Conferences, presentations,
open days are the activity of choice for this purpose. Within these several options may
be adjunct to serve the purpose of each activity.
This first part accounts for only 22% of our patients. Therefore there are still other
reasons that make patients refuse treatment.
The second approach for this program is the encouragement of people to follow their
respective treatment plan by facilitating all possible factors impeding it.
6
For this part we have to look at the other reasons that impede our patients from
following their treatment. The first reason is inadequate times of some clinics. Many
people have to work during the day, especially in the morning hours. A fair solution
may be designating some clinics which most concern our patients into the late hours
of the day such as conservative and endodontic clinics. Other suggestion is related to
pediatric clinics. They may be re-scheduled in the afternoon period or in weekends;
but will it truly solve the problem.
An important addition would be to clarify the role of the students undergoing the
post graduate or excellence training period at our clinics. They should have clear
schedules and working times that are most acceptable to patients; that is the late hours
of the day. In this way we may fill that gap of the lack of a permanent clinic
appointment at these times without interfering with any of the undergraduate clinics.
It is impossible to come out with a schedule that pleases all patients but we believe
that it can be much better with some little improvements.
The second reason is out of any type of debate or discussion. We have all faced cases
in which the patient refuses to come to a clinic because of its expenses. Here we are
absolutely discussing clinics that provide services along with the laboratories that we
are in company with. Well there is nothing we can do, unless we work ourselves all
the orthodontic and prosthodontic lab work. The idea of a permanent lab technician
affiliated only to the faculty’s work would be good but maybe not enough. The
problem stands in the unavailability of funding for such kind of work. The need of a
sponsor or some kind of donation program may be helpful. As another thought for
limiting the problem, we have came with the idea that some treatments may be
charged such as endodontic treatments or composite restorations. As a theoretical
example; if 100 patients were to receive endodontic treatment per semester, and other
100 were to receive conservative restorations, a sum of about one thousand NIS could
be raised for the purpose of lowering bridge costs if only 5 NIS were the designed
cost for treatment. This simple example shows that a budget can be raised and since
relatively small amounts of money are the cost, people may feel unbothered to pay
and maybe even encouraged to come back since they have spent money. Sometimes
we face patients unwilling to go get an x-ray. Maybe in the near future we may found
a center in cooperation with the faculty of health professions and the department of
medical imaging that will allow us to provide this service in the university. Until then
the issue of these patients who can’t afford treatment remains unclear since it is
somewhat unethical for a undergraduate health institution to charge their patients for
treatment, as it is unacceptable for such an institution to remain without a permanent
stable budget and funding for these kind of treatments. The financial issue will be of
increasing concern in the following years as the faculty keeps growing along with the
growing demands of larger amounts of students and less patients.
Other reasons that raised our alertness-from the patients’ point of view- was that the
clinics ambient was not favorable, or that the instruments were not clean, and even
some patients complained about the attitudes of some doctors, including both sides of
the equation, students and instructors. In this little survey 6% of the patients that
abandoned treatment had something to say to us. this matter should be of most
importance since we can’t afford to lose this percentage of patients just because it was
somebody’s fault to burn out trays or instruments, or because some careless student
left his clinic as a ‘war zone’. As students we do not have the authority to make rules
to punish those who have been involved in such act, but we have the right to ask from
7
Indicators
8