Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
max
can be derived.
F
h
L
(1)
b
For case 1(uniform width)
6FL
max
bh
2
4FL
max
Ebh
3
b
(7.3.1)
(2)
uniform
strength
Fig.7.3.1
Where, E is the Elastic modulus of the spring material.
Version 2 ME , IIT Kharagpur
b
For case 2(non uniform width)
6FL
max
bh
2
6FL
max
Ebh
3 (7.3.2)
In the second case it is observed that instead of uniform width leaf, if a leaf of
varying width (triangular one as shown in the figure) is used, the bending stress
at any cross section is same and equal to
max
. This is called as leaf of a uniform
strength. Moreover, the tip deflection being more, comparatively, it has greater
resilience than its uniform width counterpart. Resilience, as we know, is the
capacity to absorb potential energy during deformation. However, one should
keep
in mind that in order to withstand the
shear force the tip has to have some
uniform
width. This is shown as a red zone in the strength
figure. In one way non uniform width leaf
is a better design than a uniform width
leaf.
Leaf spring of simply supported beam type is shown in the Fig. 7.3.3, for which
the stress and deflection equation are also given as in the case of cantilever.
For case 1(uniform width)
3FL
max
bh
2
2FL
max
Ebh
3
support
(7.3.3)
reaction
F
h
L
(1) b
For case 2(non uniform width Lozenge-shape)
3FL
max
bh
2
b
(2)
Fig. 7.3.3
uniform
strength
3FL
max
Ebh
3 (7.3.4)
One of the applications of leaf spring of simply supported beam type is seen in
automobiles, where, the central location of the spring is fixed to the wheel axle.
Therefore, the wheel exerts the force F (opposite to the direction shown in the
figure), on the spring and support reactions at the two ends of the spring come
Version 2 ME , IIT Kharagpur
3
3
Fig. 7.3.2
3
from the carriage. The diamond shaped leaf, shown as case 2, is named as
Lozenge shape and it is again a beam of uniform strength.
7.3.2 Design theme of a leaf spring
Let us consider the simply supported leaf of Lozenge shape for which the
maximum stress and maximum deflection are known. From the stress and
deflection equations the thickness of the spring plate, h, can be obtained as,
max
L
des
L
E
max
E
des
(7.3.5)
2 2
h
The
max
is replaced by design stress
des
. Similarly,
max
is replaced by
des
. E
is the material property and depends on the type of spring material chosen. L is
the characteristic length of the spring. Therefore, once the design parameters,
given on the left side of the above equation, are fixed the value of plate
thickness, h can be calculated.
Substitution of h in the stress equation above will yield the value of plate width b.
3FL
(7.3.6)
des
h
2
In the similar manner h and b can be calculated for leaf springs of different
support conditions and beam types.
7.3.3 Laminated Springs
One of the difficulties of the uniform strength beam, say Lozenge shape, is that
the value of width b sometimes is too large to accommodate in a machine
assembly. One practice is that instead of keeping this large width one can make
several slices and put the pieces together as a laminate. This is the concept of
laminated spring. The Fig.7.3.4 shows the concept of formation of a laminated
spring.
4
3
2
1
2
3
4
Fig. 7.3.4 Laminated Spring
The Lozenge shaped plate is cut into several longitudinal strips, as indicated in
the figure. The central strip, marked 1 is the master leaf which is placed at the
top. Then two pieces, marked 2 are put together, side by side to form another
b
leaf and placed below the top leaf. In the similar manner other pairs of strips,
marked 3 and 4 respectively are placed in the decreasing order of strip length to
form a laminated spring. Here width of each strip, b
N
is given as,
(7.3.7)
b
N
N
, Where N is the number of strips
In practice, strips of width, b
N
and lengths, say equal to strip1, strip2 etc., as
shown in the example, are cut and put in the laminated form. The stress and
deflection equations for a laminated spring is,
pFL
max
Nb
N
h
2
and
qFL
max
ENb
N
h
3
(7.3.8)
Where, constants p and q are given as,
p q
Simply supported beam : 3 3
Cantilever beam : 6 6
It is to be noted that the ends of the leaves are not sharp and pointed, as shown
in figure. In fact they are made blunt or even made straight to increase the load
bearing capacity. This change from ideal situation does not have much effect on
the stress equation. However, small effect is there on the deflection equation.
In the following section we will discuss about few more constructional details of a
laminated leaf spring.
b
3
7.3.4 Laminated semi-elliptic spring
eye
master leaf
rebound clip
span 2L
camber
central clamp
graduated leaves
Laminated semi-elliptic spring
Fig 7.3.5
The Fig 7.3.5 shows a laminated semi- elliptic spring. The top leaf is known as
the master leaf. The eye is provided for attaching the spring with another
machine member. The amount of bend that is given to the spring from the central
line, passing through the eyes, is known as camber. The camber is provided so
that even at the maximum load the deflected spring should not touch the
machine member to which it is attached. The camber shown in the figure is
known as positive camber. The central clamp is required to hold the leaves of the
spring. However, the bolt holes required to engage the bolts to clamp the leaves
weaken the spring to some extent. Rebound clips help to share the load from the
master leaf to the graduated leaf.
7.3.5 Materials for leaf spring
Materials for leaf spring are not as good as that for the helical spring.
Plain carbon steel, Chromium vanadium steel, Chromium- Nickel- Molybdenum
steel, Silicon- manganese steel, are the typical materials that are used in the
design of leaf springs.
7.3.6 Standard sizes of leaf spring
Width (mm)
Thickness (mm)
: 25-80 mm in steps of 5mm
: 2-8 mm in steps of 1mm, 10-16 mm in steps of 2mm
In order to carry heavy load few more additional full length leaves are placed
below the master leaf for heavy loads. Such alteration from the standard
laminated leaf spring, what we have learnt above, does not change the stress
value, but deflection equation requires some correction.
c
qFL
max
ENb
N
h
3
(7.3.9)
Where, correction in deflection,
c
is given as,
1.0 4m 2m
2
{1.5 ln(m)}
c
(1.0 m)
3
where,
m
N
N
f
Number of full length leaves
N Total number of leaves in the spring
7.3.7 Stresses due to support hinges
The master leaf of a laminated spring is hinged to the supports. The support
forces induce, stresses due to longitudinal forces and stresses arising due to
possible twist. Hence, the master leaf is more stressed compared to other the
graduated leaves. Methods to reduce additional stresses could be,
1. Master leaf is made of stronger material than the other leaves.
2. Master leaf is made thinner than the other leaves. This will reduce the
bending stress as evident from stress equation.
3. Another common practice is to increase the radius of curvature of the master
leaf than the next leaf.
The last method is explained through Fig 7.3.6.
Initial bent created through
fixing bolt during assembly
Larger radius
of curvature
U ipping of leaf spring
Fig 7.3.6
3
f
N
N
The master leaf has a larger radius of curvature
compared to the additional leaf that is placed below
so obviously a gap will be created between the two
leaves as indicated in the figure. Now, an initial
bent is created during assembly by tightening the
central bolt. Therefore, some amount of compressive
stress will be produced at the inside curvature of
the master leaf. Similarly, at the outside curvature
of the master leaf tensile stress will be produced.
Both these stresses are initial stresses in the master
leaf. However, by such operation of tightening the
central bolt, the additional leaf that is placed beneath
the master leaf has a tendency to flatten out and as a
result the stress pattern of the additional leaf will be
reverse of that of the master leaf, tensile stress is
produced at the inner curvature and compressive
stress is produced at the outer curvature. Hence,
when the spring is loaded, for both the master leaf
and the additional leaf, tensile stress will be
produced at the inner curvature and compressive
stress will be produced at the outer curvature.
Therefore, due to opposite nature of initial stress and
loading stress, the master leaf will experience
lesser stress on both the surfaces. However, due to
same nature of initial stress and loading stress, the
additional leaf is stressed more compared to the
master leaf. But, it is to be noted that the higher
stress on the additional leaf is actually shared
between all other leaves than the master leaf. This
practice of stress relief in the master leaf is known
as Nipping of leaf spring. As a matter of fact, all the
leaves of a laminated leaf spring do have certain
amount of nipping, so that there will be gaps between
the leaves, as a result the stresses will be uniformly
distributed and accumulated dusts can also be
cleaned.
Sample problem
Design a leaf spring to carry a load of 3400N and
placed over a span of 800 mm. The spring can
deflect by 50mm. Consider, allowable bending
stress for the spring material as 350 MPa and E=2
(10)
5
MPa.
Let us consider the design to be based on uniform
strength beam. Then from section 7.3.2 we find that,
Leaf thickness,h
des
des
210
5
50
5.6mm
6mm
Leaf width, b
3F
L
2
3
3
40
0
40
0
3
24
mm
des
It is observed that the width is too large to
accommodate as a machine member. Hence, if we
consider, say 6 springs, then width of each spring
becomes 54mm.
2 2
L
E
350400
2
h 35050
Suspension Mechanisms
The suspension is what links the wheels to the vehicle body and allows rela-
tive motion. This chapter covers the suspension mechanisms, and discusses
the possible relative motions between the wheel and the vehicle body. The
wheels, through the suspension linkage, must propel, steer, and stop the
vehicle, and support the associated forces.
8.1 Solid Axle Suspension
The simplest way to attach a pair of wheels to a vehicle is to mount them
at opposite ends of a solid axle, such as the one that is shown in Figure
8.1.
FIGURE 8.1. A solid axle with leaf spring suspension.
The solid axle must be attached to the body such that an up and down
motion in the z-direction, as well as a roll rotation about the x-axis, is
possible. So, no forward and lateral translation, and also no rotation about
the axle and the z-axis, is allowed. There are many combinations of links
and springs that can provide the kinematic and dynamic requirements. The
simplest design is to clamp the axle to the middle of two leaf springs with
their ends tied or shackled to the vehicle frame as shown schematically in
Figure 8.1. A side view of a multi-leaf spring and solid axle is shown in
Figure 8.2. A suspension with a solid connection between the left and right
wheels is called dependent suspension.
456 8. Suspension Mechanisms
FIGURE 8.2. A side view of a multi-leaf spring and solid axle suspension.
The performance of a solid axle with leaf springs suspension can be
improved by adding a linkage to guide the axle kinematically and provide
dynamic support to carry the non z-direction forces.
The solid axle with leaf spring combination came to vehicle industry from
horse-drawn vehicles.
Example 299 Hotchkiss drive.
When a live solid axle is connected to the body with nothing but two leaf
springs, it is called the Hotchkiss drive, which is the name of the car that
used it rst. The main problems of a Hotchkiss drive, which is shown in
Figure 8.2, are locating the axle under lateral and longitudinal forces, and
having a low mass ratio = m
s
/m
u
, where m
s
is the sprung mass and m
u
is the unsprung mass.
Sprung mass refers to all masses that are supported by the spring, such
as vehicle body. Unsprung mass refers to all masses that are attached to
and not supported by the spring, such as wheel, axle, or brakes.
Example 300 Leaf spring suspension and exibility problem.
The solid axle suspension systems with longitudinal leaf springs have
many drawbacks. The main problem lies in the fact that springs themselves
act as locating members. Springs are supposed to ex under load, but their
exibility is needed in only one direction. However, it is the nature of leaf
springs to twist and bend laterally and hence, ex also in planes other than
the tireplane. Leaf springs are not suited for taking up the driving and brak-
ing traction forces. These forces tend to push the springs into an S-shaped
prole, as shown in Figure 8.3. The driving and braking exibility of leaf
springs, generates a negative caster and increases instability.
Long springs provide better ride. However, long sprigs exaggerate their
bending and twisting under dierent load conditions.
Example 301 Leaf spring suspension and exibility solution.
To reduce the eect of a horizontal force and S-shaped prole appearance
in a solid axle with leaf springs, the axle may be attached to the chassis by a
longitudinal bar as Figure 8.4(a) shows. Such a bar is called an anti-tramp
8. Suspension Mechanisms 457
(a) Acceleration
(b) Braking
FIGURE 8.3. A driving and braking trust, force leaf springs into an S shaped
prole.
bar, and the suspension is the simplest cure for longitudinal problems of a
Hotchkiss drive.
A solid axle with an anti-tramp bar may be kinematically approximated
by a four-bar linkage, as shown in Figure 8.4(b). Although an anti-tramp
bar may control the shape of the leaf spring, it introduces a twisting angle
problem when the axle is moving up and down, as shown in Figure 8.5.
Twisting the axle and the wheel about the axle is called caster.
The solid axle is frequently used to help keeping the wheels perpendicular
to the road.
Example 302 Leaf spring location problem.
The front wheels need room to steer left and right. Therefore, leaf springs
cannot be attached close to the wheel hubs, and must be placed closer to
the middle of the axle. That gives a narrow spring-base, which means that
a small side force can sway or tilt the body relative to the axle through a
considerable roll angle due to weight transfer. This is uncomfortable for the
vehicle passengers, and may also produce unwanted steering.
The solid axle positively prevents the camber change by body roll. The
wheels remain upright and hence, do not roll on a side. However, a solid
axle shifts laterally from its static plane and its center does not remain on
the vehicles longitudinal axis under a lateral force.
458 8. Suspension Mechanisms
(a)
M
A
N
B
(b)
FIGURE 8.4. (a) Adding an anti-tramp bar to guide a solid axle. (b) Equivalent
kinematic model.
A
M
M
N
B
N
A
B
(a) (b)
FIGURE 8.5. An anti-tramp bar introduces a twistng angle problem. (a) The
wheel moves up and (b) The wheel moves down.
8. Suspension Mechanisms 459
FIGURE 8.6. A solid axle suspension with a triangulated linkage.
A solid axle produces bump-camber when single-wheel bump occurs. If
the right wheel goes over a bump, the axle is raised at its right end, and
that tilts the left wheel hub, putting the left wheel at a camber angle for the
duration of deection.
Example 303 Triangular linkage.
A triangulated linkage, as shown in Figure 8.6, may be attached to a solid
axle to provide lateral and twist resistance during acceleration and braking.
Example 304 Panhard arm.
High spring rate is a problem of leaf springs. Reducing their stiness
by narrowing them and using fewer leaves, reduces the lateral stiness and
increases the directional stability of the suspension signicantly. A Panhard
arm is a bar that attaches a solid axle suspension to the chassis laterally.
Figure 8.7 illustrates a solid axle and a Panhard arm to guide the axle.
Figure 8.8 shows a triangular linkage and a Panhard arm combination for
guiding a solid axle.
A double triangle mechanism, as shown in Figure 8.9, is an alternative
design to guide the axle and support it laterally.
Example 305 Straight line linkages.
There are many mechanisms that can provide a straight line motion.
The simplest mechanisms are four-bar linkages with a coupler point moving
straight. Some of the most applied and famous linkages are shown in Figure
8.10. By having proper lengths, the Watt, Robert, Chebyshev, and Evance
linkages can make the coupler point C move on a straight line vertically.
Such a mechanism and straight motion may be used to guide a solid axle.
Two Watt suspension mechanisms with a Panhard arm are shown in
Figures 8.11 and 8.12.
460 8. Suspension Mechanisms
FIGURE 8.7. A solid axle and a Panhard arm to guide the axle.
FIGURE 8.8. A triangle mechanism and a Panhard arm to guide a solid axle.
FIGURE 8.9. Double triangle suspension mechanism.
8. Suspension Mechanisms 461
C
(a) Watt linkage
C
(b) Robert linkage
C
C
(b) Chebyshev linkage (d) Evans linkage
FIGURE 8.10. Some linkages with straight line motion.
FIGURE 8.11. A Watt suspension mechanisms with a Panhard arm.
462 8. Suspension Mechanisms
FIGURE 8.12. A Watt suspension mechanisms with a Panhard arm.
FIGURE 8.13. A Robert suspension mechanism with a Panhard arm.
Figures 8.13, 8.14, and 8.15 illustrate three combinations of Robert sus-
pension linkages equipped with a Panhard arm.
Example 306 Solid axle suspension and unsprung mass problem.
A solid axle is counted as an unsprung member, and hence, the unsprung
mass is increased where using solid axle suspension. A heavy unsprung mass
ruins both, the ride and handling of a vehicle. Lightening the solid axle
makes it weaker and increases the most dangerous problem in vehicles: axle
breakage. The solid axle must be strong enough to make sure it will not
break under any loading conditions at any age. As a rough estimate, 90%
of the leaf spring mass may also be counted as unsprung mass, which makes
the problem worse.
The unsprung mass problem is worse in front, and it is the main reason
that they are no longer used in street cars. However, front solid axles are
still common on trucks and buses. These are heavy vehicles and solid axle
8. Suspension Mechanisms 463
FIGURE 8.14. A Robert suspension mechanism with a Panhard arm.
FIGURE 8.15. A Robert suspension mechanism with a Panhard arm.
464 8. Suspension Mechanisms
FIGURE 8.16. A solid axle suspension with coil springs.
suspension does not reduce the mass ratio = m
s
/m
u
very much.
When a vehicle is rear-wheel-drive and a solid axle suspension is used
in the back, the suspension is called live axle. A live axle is a casing that
contains a dierential, and two drive shafts. The drive shafts are connected
to the wheel hubs. A live axle can be three to four times heavier than a
dead I-beam axle. It is called live axle because of rotating gears and shafts
inside the axle.
Example 307 Solid axle and coil spring.
To decrease the unsprung mass and increase vertical exibility of solid
axle suspensions, it is possible to equip them with coil springs. A sample
of a solid axle suspension with coil spring is shown in Figure 8.16. The
suspension mechanism is made of four longitudinal bars between the axle
and chassis. The springs may have some lateral or longitudinal angle to
introduce some lateral or longitudinal compliance.
Example 308 De Dion axle.
When a solid axle is a dead axle with no driving wheels, the connecting
beam between the left and right wheels may have dierent shapes to do
dierent jobs, usually to give the wheels independent exibility. We may
also modify the shape of a live axle to attach the dierential to the chassis
and reduce the unsprung mass.
De Dion design is a modication of a beam axle that may be used as
a dead axle or to attach the dierential to the chassis and transfer the
driving power to the drive wheels by employing universal joints and split
shafts. Figure 8.17 illustrates a De Dion suspension.
8. Suspension Mechanisms 465
FIGURE 8.17. Illustration of a De Dion suspension.
8.2 Independent Suspension
Independent suspensions is introduced to let a wheel to move up and down
without aecting the opposite wheel. There are many forms and designs
of independent suspensions. However, double A-arm and McPherson strut
suspensions are the simplest and the most common designs. Figure 8.18
illustrates a sample of a double A-arm and Figure 8.19 shows a McPherson
suspension.
Kinematically, a double A-arm suspension mechanism is a four-bar link-
age with the chassis as the ground link, and coupler as the wheel carrying
link. A McPherson suspension is an inverted slider mechanism that has
the chassis as the ground link and the coupler as the wheel carrying link.
A double A-arm and a McPherson suspension mechanism on the left and
right wheels are schematically shown in Figures 8.20 and 8.21 respectively.
Double A-arm, is also called double wishbone, or short/long arm suspen-
sion. McPherson also may be written as MacPherson.
Example 309 Double A-arm suspension and spring position.
Consider a double A-arm suspension mechanism. The coil spring may
be between the lower arm and the chassis, as shown in Figure 8.18. It is
also possible to install the spring between the upper arm and the chassis, or
between the upper and lower arms. In either case, the lower or the upper
arm, which supports the spring, is made stronger and the other arm acts
as a connecting arm.
Example 310 Multi-link suspension mechanism.
When the two side bars of an A-arm are attached to each other with a
joint, as shown in Figure 8.22, then the double A-arm is called a multi-link
mechanism. A multi-link mechanism is a six-bar mechanism that may have
a better coupler motion than a double A-arm mechanism. However, multi-
466 8. Suspension Mechanisms
Upper A-arm
Steer arm
Kingpin
Lower A-arm
FIGURE 8.18. A double A-arm suspension.
Coil spring
Shock absorber
Strut
Steer arm
Kingpin
Lower A-arm
FIGURE 8.19. A McPherson suspension.
8. Suspension Mechanisms 467
FIGURE 8.20. A double A-arm suspension mechanism on the left and right wheels
FIGURE 8.21. A McPherson suspension mechanism on the left and right wheels.
468 8. Suspension Mechanisms
FIGURE 8.22. A multi-link suspension mechanism.
FIGURE 8.23. A swing arm suspension.
link suspensions are more expensive, less reliable, and more complicated
compare to a double A-arm four-bar linkage. There are vehicles with more
than six-link suspension with possibly better kinematic performance.
Example 311 Swing arm suspension.
An independent suspension may be as simple as a triangle shown in Fig-
ure 8.23. The base of the triangle is jointed to the chassis and the wheel
to the tip point. The base of the triangle is aligned with the longitudinal
axis of the vehicle. Such a suspension mechanism is called a swing axle
or swing arm.
The variation in camber angle for a swing arm suspension is maximum,
compared to the other suspension mechanisms.
Example 312 Trailing arm suspension.
Figure 8.24 illustrates a trailing arm suspension that is a longitudinal
8. Suspension Mechanisms 469
FIGURE 8.24. A trailing arm suspension.
FIGURE 8.25. A semi-trailing arm suspension.
arm with a lateral axis of rotation. The camber angle of the wheel, supported by a trailing arm, will not
change during the up and down motion.
Trailing arm suspension has been successfully using in a variety of front-wheel-drive vehicles, to
suspend their rear wheels.
Example 313 Semi-trailing arm
Semi-trailing arm suspension, as shown in Figure 8.25, is a compro-mise between the swing
arm and trailing arm suspensions. The joint axis may have any angle, however an angle not too
far from 45 deg is more applied. Such suspensions have acceptable camber angle change, while they
can handle both, the lateral and longitudinal forces. Semi-trailing design has successfully applied to a
series of rear-wheel-drive cars for several decades.
Example 314 Antiroll bar and roll stiness.
Coil springs are used in vehicles because they are less sti with better