Data Analysi Green MGT

Data analysis
Q.1 Explicit definition of environmental policy

Data Sheet 1
RATINGS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE (%)
1 0 0
2 2 4.8
3 10 23.9
4 18 42.3
5 12 28.6

Graph 1

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis, a major 42.3% of the respondents rated 4 on the scale, i.e., they have
clear defined definition of the environmental policy of their store. 28% have explicitly defined
their policy and 23.9% have an average idea about the policy. Only 4.8% of people have unclear
idea regarding the policy, and none of the respondents (0%) have rated 1, i.e., dont have any
environmental policy at all. This shows that there are hardly any or a very few retailers these
days who ignore their responsibility towards the environment and frame policies to ensure a
sustainable development.

Q.2 Clear objectives and long term environmental plans

Data Sheet 2
1 3 7.1
2 1 2.4
3 2 4.8
4 17 40.5
5 19 45.3

Graph 2

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis maximum no. of respondents (45.3%) have an absolutely clear cut idea
about the objectives and long term environmental plans for their business. An encouraging
40.5% of retailers also have a good idea about the short term and long term plans. Only a mere
7.1% of respondents dont have any concrete objectives and plans regarding the environment,
and rest 2.4% and 4.8% of respondents have poor to average have a lucid plan for the same.

Q.3 Well-defined environmental responsibilities

Data Sheet 3
1 3 7.1
2 2 4.8
3 2 4.8
4 24 57.2
5 11 26.2

Graph 3

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis, a maximum of 57% of retailers admitted to have a very clear cut idea
about their environmental responsibilities whereas only 7% of retailers admitted to have no
environmental responsibilities at all. Retailers with an excellent idea of such responsibilities
comprised of 26% which is an encouraging sign.

Q.4 Full-time employees devoted to environmental management

Data Sheet 4
1 20 47.7
2 3 7.1
3 1 2.4
4 11 26.2
5 7 16.7

Graph 4

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis a disappointing majority of 48% of retailers dont have specialized
employees for environmental management, even though a considerable percentage of
respondents have projected to show concern about sustainability. Further 26% of respondents
have full-time employees devoted to this department and 16% of retailers have an excellent
group of employees working for the same.
Q.5 Natural environment training programmes for managers and employees

Data Sheet 5
1 20 47.7
2 2 4.8
3 15 35.8
4 5 12
5 0 0

Graph 5

Data Interpretation
Again from this analysis, we have deduced that a majority of 48% respondents dont have any
environment training programmes for managers or employees. Sadly there are no respondents
(0%) who have regular and effective workshops or programmes regarding environment
sensitization of the employees. Nearly 5% of respondents have sporadic or poor system for
training and only 12% have a good training system in hand.

Q.6 Systems for measuring and assessing environmental performance

Data Sheet 6
1 11 26.2
2 10 23.9
3 15 35.8
4 6 14.3
5 0 0

Graphs 6

Data Interpretation
From this analysis, we deduced that majority of respondents (36%) have a fairly average system
for measuring and assessing environmental performance and 24% of respondents have poor
control system. Sadly 26% of respondents have no such system at all and none of the
respondents have any dedicated environmental control system.
Q.7 Environmental emergency plans

Data Sheet 7
1 25 59.6
2 4 9.6
3 9 21.5
4 4 9.6
5 0 0

Graphs 7

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis a majority of respondents (60%) dont have any environmental
emergency plans at all. Around 10% of respondents have insufficient and fairly good plans for
tackling with such emergencies alike. Also disappointingly none of the respondents had any
clear-cut or articulate emergency plan
Q.8 Environmental criteria in supplier selection

Data Sheet 9
1 10 23.9
2 3 7.1
3 9 21.5
4 17 40.5
5 3 7.1

Graph 8

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis 24% of respondents dont consider environmental criteria in selecting
their supplier. Around 7% of respondents give both negligible though as well as well as have a
strict environmental criteria for selecting supplier. Around 40.5% of the respondents have a good
concern for supplier selection and about 21.55 of respondents have an average criteria for
supplier selection.
Q.9 Periodic elaboration of environmental reports

Data Sheet 9
1 22 52.4
2 4 9.6
3 13 31
4 2 4.8
5 1 2.4

Graph 9

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis a majority of the respondents rated 1 on the, i.e., dont undergo
periodic evaluation of environmental reports at all. 31% of the retailers evaluate the
environmental reports time and again. About 10% of the retailers rarely evaluate such reports
and about 5% of the retailers undergo consistent evaluation. Only a minority of 2% of
respondents undergo rigorous periodic evaluation of environmental reports.
Q.10 Environmental arguments in marketing

Data Sheet 10
1 20 47.7
2 2 4.8
3 8 19.1
4 9 21.5
5 3 7.1

Graph 10

Data Interpretation
According to the evaluation a majority of respondents (48%) dont go for environmental
arguments in green marketing, i.e., green marketing. Around 21% of the retailers put forth a
rather strong environmental argument while marketing their products or schemes. About a 19%
of the retailers use green marketing to a fairly good extent and about 5% of the retailers draw on
green marketing rarely. Only 7% of respondents use excessive green marketing techniques for
their retail outlets or franchises.

Q.11 Shipments consolidation

Data Sheet 11
1 12 28.6
2 1 2.4
3 16 38.1
4 11 26.2
5 2 4.8

Graph 11

Shipments consolidation

Data Sheet 11
1 12 28.6
2 1 2.4
3 16 38.1
4 11 26.2
5 2 4.8

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis, about 38% of the respondents considered environmental factors
during shipment consolidation averagely. About 29% of the respondents didnt consider any
environmental concerns over shipment consolidation and about 26% of them had some serious
concern over shipment consolidations. Only about 5% of the respondents confirmed to have
strict criteria over shipment and a minority of about 2% admitted to have very slight
considerations over shipment consolidation.

Q.12 Selection of cleaner transportation methods

Data Sheet 12
1 1 2.4
2 2 4.8
3 12 28.6
4 18 42.3
5 9 21.5

Graph 12

Data Interpretation
About a majority of respondents (42%) rated that they take selection of cleaner transportation
pretty seriously and about 29% of the respondents take the selection generally. About 21% of the
respondents take special care and are extra cautious about selection on transportation method and
about 5% of them gives it very little thought. Only about 2% of the respondents dont bother for
energy efficient and cleaner mode of transportation at all.
Q.13 Recyclable or reusable packaging or container in logistics

Data Sheet 13
1 3 7.1
2 2 4.8
3 9 21.5
4 22 52.4
5 6 14.3

Graph 13

Recyclable or reusable packaging or container in logistics

Data Sheet 13
1 3 7.1
2 2 4.8
3 9 21.5
4 22 52.4
5 6 14.3

Data Interpretation
According to the analysis

Q.14 Ecological materials for primary packaging

Data Sheet 14
1 8 19.1
2 3 7.1
3 4 9.6
4 23 54.8
5 4 9.6

Graph 14

Q.15 Recuperation and recycling system

Data Sheet 15
1 4 9.6
2 6 14.3
3 10 23.9
4 15 35.8
5 7 16.7

Graph 15

Q.16 Acquisition of clean technology/equipment

Data Sheet 16
1 0 0
2 8 19.1
3 11 26.2
4 18 42.3
5 5 12

Graph 16

Q.17 Sponsoring of environmental events/collaboration with ecological organization

Data Sheet 17
1 28 66.7
2 5 12
3 3 7.1
4 3 7.1
5 3 7.1

Graph 17

Q.18 Regular voluntary information about environmental management to customers and
institutions

Data Sheet 18
1 19 45.3
2 9 21.5
3 7 16.7
4 5 12
5 2 4.8

Graph 18

Q.19 Substitution of polluting an hazardous materials/parts

Data Sheet 19
1 6 14.3
2 3 7.1
3 23 54.8
4 7 16.7
5 3 7.1

Graph 19

Q.20 Designs focused on reducing resource consumption and waste generation during production
and distribution

Data Sheet 20
1 9 21.5
2 5 12
3 13 31
4 12 28.6
5 3 7.1

Graph 20

Q.21 Design focused on reducing resource consumption and waste generation in product usage

Data Sheet 21
1 9 21.5
2 5 12
3 17 40.5
4 6 14.3
5 5 12

Graph 21

Q.22 Design for disassembly, reusability and recyclability

Data Sheet 22
1 11 26.2
2 5 12
3 17 40.5
4 4 9.6
5 5 12

Graph 22

Q.23 Preference for green products in purchasing

Data Sheet 23
1 10 23.9
2 3 7.1
3 10 23.9
4 11 26.2
5 8 19.1

Graph 23

Q.24 Responsible disposal of waste and residues (separation and preparation)

Data Sheet 24
1 4 9.6
2 6 14.3
3 7 16.7
4 15 35.8
5 10 23.9

Graph 24

Q.25 Emission filters and end-of-pipe control

Data Sheet 25
1 23 54.8
2 2 4.8
3 10 23.9
4 7 16.7
5 0 0

Graph 25

Q.26 Process design focused on reducing energy and natural resources consumption in
operations

Data Sheet 26
1 5 12
2 2 4.8
3 13 31
4 9 21.5
5 13 31

Graph 26

Q.27 Product planning and control focused on reducing waste and optimization materials
exploitation

Data Sheet 27
1 12 28.6
2 0 0
3 4 9.6
4 19 45.3
5 7 16.7

Graph 27

Q.28 Adopt green store design for energy conservation and utilization

Data Sheet 28
1 9 21.5
2 3 7.1
3 10 23.9
4 14 33.4
5 6 14.3

Graph 28

Q.29 Enhance water and energy conservation

Data Sheet 29
1 2 4.8
2 0 0
3 5 12
4 20 47.7
5 15 35.8

Graph 29

Q.30 Reduces green house gas emission

Data Sheet 30
1 7 16.7
2 7 16.7
3 7 16.7
4 11 26.2
5 10 23.9

Graph 30

Q.31 Adopts green store design for waste reduction

Data Sheet 3
1 9 21.5
2 6 14.3
3 6 14.3
4 15 35.8
5 6 14.3

Graph 31

Q.32 Adopts green human resource development practices

Data Sheet 32
1 6 14.3
2 4 9.6
3 9 21.5
4 11 26.2
5 12 28.6

Graph 32

Q.33 Supplier and NGO cooperation in carbon labeling

Data Sheet 33
1 21 50
2 3 7.1
3 11 26.2
4 5 12
5 2 4.8

Graph 33

Q.34 Green procurement

Data Sheet 34
1 11 26.2
2 2 4.8
3 10 23.9
4 18 42.3
5 1 2.4

Graph 34

Q.35 Green packaging

Data Sheet 35
1 1 2.4
2 3 7.1
3 7 16.7
4 21 50
5 10 23.9

Graph 35

Data Analysi Green MGT

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Data Analysi Green MGT

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Data analysis

Q.1 Explicit definition of environmental policy

Potrebbero piacerti anche