Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
OLJ
UK
16 de mink- mink m ar ugy megszoktuk eztet
17 Mari: h at az [(- - -)]
18 Kati: [(- - -) amikor] Gigi hoz- hozz ank ker ult az valahogy
19 n alunk volt nem vagy egy evig vagy kett oig itthon voltak
20 (.) mink nem besz elhett unk magyarul hogy o o- o ne ertse hogy
21 mit besz el unk nem?
22 Mari: h at
C
The author 2008
Journal compilation
C
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008
680 LAIHONEN
23 Kati: h at akkor en hogy ertem mag at ha en mondjuk besz elek n emet ul
24 nem? es maga nem ert egy sz ot sem es valahogy nehez ere esik
25 IR: nem j ol erezn em magam
26 Kati: igen persze gy megszoktuk ugyhogy n alunk ez nem-
27 Mari: igen mert n ez mint o o van o o a XXn al rozik a ek (- - -) is
28 Kati: igen igen
29 Mari: NA J
italics
an utterance in Rumanian
C
The author 2008
Journal compilation
C
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008
690 LAIHONEN
4. Auer (1984: 57) uses the term heteroglossic lexical item. From a CA perspective
suchelements cannot beuniversallydefinedas code-switching solelyonalinguistic
basis. This is because the bilingual speakers repertoire may in some cases not make
a distinction between the two languages. The definitions of code-switching should
be made on the basis of detailed sequential analysis of a particular interaction (do
the participants treat the element as code-switching?), thus traditional approaches
and terms for describing code-switching must be rejected here (see Auer 1984:
2627.) For reasons of space and clarity I use mainly nontechnical terminology for
code-switching. The terminology applied CA uses (Auer 1984; Li Wei 2002) differs
greatly from mainstream traditions, and it is unnecessary to introduce it in detail
here.
5. Pure or non-pure Hungarian and mixed are terms used by the informants.
REFERENCES
Antaki, Charles and Sue Widdicombe (eds.). 1998. Identities in Talk. London:
Sage.
Auer, Peter. 1984. Bilingual Conversation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John
Benjamins.
Barna, G abor and Bo L onnqvist. 2000. The lost future die expatriierte kultur.
Schweizerisches Archiv f ur Volkskunde 96: 121143.
Briggs, Charles. 1986. Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role
of the Interview in Social Science Research. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Briggs, Charles. 2007. The Gallup poll, democracy, and the vox populi: Ideologies of
interviewing and the communicability of modern life. Text & Talk 27: 681704.
Cicourel, Aaron. 1988. Elicitationas aproblemof discourse. InUlrichAmmon, Norbert
Dietmar and Klaus Mattheier (eds.) Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the
Science of Language and Society. Second volume. NewYork: Walter de Gruyter. 903
910.
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage. 2002. Questioning presidents: Journalistic
deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan.
Journal of Communication 52: 749777.
Dersley, Ian and Anthony Wootton. 2000. Complaint sequences within antagonistic
argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 375406.
Drew, Paul. 1998. Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on
Language and Social Interaction 31: 295325.
Edwards, Derek. 1999. Emotion discourse. Culture and Psychology 5: 271291.
Gal, Susan. 1987. Code-switching and consciousness in the European periphery.
American Ethnologist 14: 637653.
Gal, Susan. 1993. Diversity and contestationinlinguistic ideologies: Germanspeakers
in Hungary. Language in Society 22: 337359.
Gal, Susan. 2001. Linguistic theories and national images in nineteenth-century
Hungary. In Susan Gal and Kathryn Woolard (eds.) Languages and Public: The
Making of Authority. Manchester, U.K.: St. Jerome Publishing. 3045.
Gal, Susan. 2006a. Language, its stakes andits effects. InRobert E. GoodinandCharles
Tilly (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford
University Press. 376391.
C
The author 2008
Journal compilation
C
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008
LANGUAGE IDEOLOGIES: A CA APPROACH 691
Gal, Susan. 2006b. Migration, minorities and multilingualism: Language ideologies
in Europe. In Patrick Stevenson and Clare Mar-Molinero (eds.) Language Ideologies
and Practices. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillian. 1327.
Gal, Susanand JudithIrvine. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How
ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62: 9671001.
Gal, SusanandKathrynWoolard. 2001. Constructinglanguages andpublics. InSusan
Gal and Kathryn Woolard (eds.) Languages and Public: The Making of Authority.
Manchester, U.K.: St. Jerome Publishing. 112.
Hannonen, Pasi, Bo L onnqvist and G abor Barna (eds.). 2001. Ethnic Minorities and
Power. Helsinki, Finland: Fonda Publishing.
Heller, Monica. 2007. Distributed knowledge, distributed power: A sociolinguistics of
structuration. Text & Talk 27: 633653.
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity
Press.
Heritage, John. 1985. Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for
an overhearing audience. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis
vol. III. London: Academic Press. 95117.
Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles and
Applications. Oxford, U.K.: Polity Press.
Irvine, Judith. 1998. Ideologies of honorific language. In Bambi Schieffelin, Kathryn
Woolard and Paul Kroskrity (eds.) Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford,
U.K.: Oxford University Press. 5186.
Irvine, Judith and Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation.
In Paul Kroskity (ed.) Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities. Santa
Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press. 3583.
Jaffe, Alexander. 1999. Ideologies in Action: Language Politics on Corsica. Berlin,
Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Karhu, Anna. 1995. Murrehaastatteluvuorovaikutustilanteena. Murteiden Matkassa.
Studia Carelica Humanistica 6. Joensuu, Finland: Joensuun yliopiston
humanistinen tiedekunta. 92109.
Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context
sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22: 193216.
Kroskrity, Paul. 2000. Regimenting language. In Paul Kroskrity (ed.) Regimes of
Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of
American Research Advanced Seminar Series. 134.
Laihonen, Petteri. 2001. Multilingualism in the Banat: Elite and everyday language
ideologies. InPasi Hannonen, BoL onnqvist andG abor Barna(eds.) Ethnic Minorities
and Power. Helsinki, Finland: Fonda Publishing. 1145.
Laihonen, Petteri. 2005. Multilingualism and language ideologies in the
Romanian Banat. Unpublished licentiate thesis. University of Jyv askyl a, Finland.
thesis.jyu.fi/06/URN_NBN_fi_jyu-2006326.pdf
Last accessed on 12 January 2007.
Laihonen, Petteri. 2007. Die Banater Schwaben und Ideologien uber die
Mehrsprachigkeit. Ungarn-Jahrbuch 28: 91110.
Lerner, Gene and Tomoyo Takagi. 1999. On the place of linguistic resources in the
organization of talk in interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese
grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 4975.
Li, Wei. 2002. What do you want me to say? On the Conversation Analysis approach
to bilingual interaction. Language in Society 31: 159180.
C
The author 2008
Journal compilation
C
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008
692 LAIHONEN
Mazeland, Harry and Paul ten Have. 1996. Essential tensions in (semi)open research
interviews. Last accessed on 2 May 2008. www2.fmg.uva.nl/emca/ET.htm
Mishler, Elliot. 1997. The interactional construction of narrative in medical and life-
history interviews. In Britt-Louise Gunnarson, Per Linell and Bengt Nordberg (eds.)
The Construction of Professional Discourse. London: Longman. 223244.
Moerman, Michael. 1988. Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Myers, Greg. 2004. Matters of Opinion: Talking About Public Issues. Cambridge, U.K.:
Cambridge University Press.
Potter, Jonathan and Alexa Hepburn. 2005. Qualitative interviews in psychology:
Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology 4: 281307.
Puchta, Claudia and Jonathan Potter. 2002. Manufacturing individual opinions:
Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of evaluation. British
Journal of Social Psychology 41: 345363.
Robinson, Jeffrey. 2004. The sequential organizationof explicit apologies innaturally
occurring English. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37: 291330.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. 2 vols. Edited by Gail Jefferson with
introductions by Emanuel Schegloff. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics
for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696735.
Schaeffer, Nora and Douglas Maynard. 2005. From paradigm to prototype and
back again: Interactive aspects of cognitive processing in standardized survey
interviews. Hedwig te Molder and JonathanPotter (eds.) Conversation and Cognition.
Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 114133.
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1987. Betweenmacroandmicro: Contexts andother connections.
In Jeffrey Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, Richard M unch, Neil J. Smelser (eds.) The
Micro-Macro Link. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. 193
207.
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided
defence of intersubjectivityinconversation. American Journal of Sociology97: 1295
1345.
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1996. Confirming allusions: Towards an empirical account of
action. American Journal of Sociology 104: 161216.
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1997. Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society 8: 165
187.
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson and Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-
correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361382.
Schieffelin, Bambi and Elinor Ochs. 1986. Language socialization. Annual Review of
Anthropology 15: 163191.
Silverstein, Michael. 1998. The uses and utility of ideology: A commentary. In Bambi
Schieffelin, Kathryn Woolard and Paul Kroskrity (eds.) Language Ideologies: Practice
and Theory. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. 123148.
Tainio, Liisa. 2000. Pariskuntapuhe ja kokemusten rajat. Viritt aj a 1: 2345.
ten Have, Paul. 2004. Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology.
London: Sage.
Tsui, Amy. 1994. English Conversation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Widdicombe, Sue and Robin Wooffitt. 1995. The Language of Youth Subcultures. New
York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wolf, Josef. 2004. Development of Ethnic Structure in the Banat 18901992. Vienna,
Austria:
Osterreichisches Ost- und S udosteuropa-Institut.
C
The author 2008
Journal compilation
C
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008
LANGUAGE IDEOLOGIES: A CA APPROACH 693
Woolard, Kathryn. 1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In
Bambi Schieffelin, Kathryn Woolard and Paul Kroskrity (eds.) Language Ideologies:
Practice and Theory. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. 347.
Address correspondence to:
Petteri Laihonen
University of Debrecen
Department of Finno-Ugrian Studies
H-4010 Debrecen Pf. 103.
Hungary
petlai@cc.jyu.fi
C
The author 2008
Journal compilation
C
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008