Bi-Literacy Strategies for Second Language Learners
Dr. Gomez, Summer 2014, UST
Activity # 1, Elements of Weak and Strong Bilingual Programs in the US In the actuality, there are many programs that have been implemented to work and try to meet the needs of English Language Learners (ELLs) in the United States. As far as what Bilingual Education refers to, there has been extensive research done in the last couple of years, proving the effectiveness or inefficiency of the different programs that have been implemented to support bilingual students. Some programs change certain aspects to accommodate the schools or districts demands, but in general, the bilingual programs that are being used in the United States are: Early-Exit Bilingual (Transitional), Late-Exit (Maintenance/Developmental), Dual Language (One-Way, Two-Way), Structured English Immersion (SEI), and ESL (different models). Although SEI and ESL are not exactly bilingual programs in essence, they are included in this discussion, with the purpose to compare and contrast the different elements of the main programs used in the US to support ELLs.
Strong Bilingual Programs Program Characteristics Two- Way Dual Language Students Participating: ELLs or minority language students and English native speakers Program Nature: Enrichment and Additive Program Length: Long term, six or more years Language Outcomes: Full proficiency in English and another language Other Features: Builds bilingualism, bi-literacy, and biculturalism; fully closes achievement gap; different models Sofia Monzon Bi-Literacy Strategies for Second Language Learners Dr. Gomez, Summer 2014, UST according to initial language instruction: 90/10, 80/20, and 50/50; serves both, language minority and majority students. One-Way Dual Language Students Participating: ELLs or minority language students Program Nature: Enrichment and Additive Program Length: Long term, six or more years Language Outcomes: Full proficiency in English and another language Other Features: Builds bilingualism, bi-literacy, and biculturalism; fully closes achievement gap; different models according to initial language instruction: 90/10, 80/20, and 50/50. Late-Exit (Maintenance/ Developmental) Students Participating: ELLs or minority language students Program Nature: Enrichment and Additive Program Length: Long term, four to six years Language Outcomes: Full proficiency in English and partial to full proficiency in another language Other Features: Builds bilingualism and bi-literacy; almost closes the achievement gap.
Weak Bilingual Programs Program Characteristics Early-Exit (Transitional) Students Participating: ELLs or minority language students Program Nature: Remedial and subtractive Program Length: Short term, two or three years Language Outcomes: Minimal proficiency in English Other Features: The early nature of this program does not allow sufficient time for the student to develop academic language. The students in this program do not benefit from possible transfer of language skills from native to second language. Structured English Students Participating: ELLs or language minority students with different backgrounds Sofia Monzon Bi-Literacy Strategies for Second Language Learners Dr. Gomez, Summer 2014, UST Immersion (SEI) Program Nature: Remedial and subtractive Program Length: Short term, one to two years Language Outcomes: Minimal proficiency in English Other Features: English only orientation, not specific ESL instruction. Teachers are ESL certified but not required to be Bilingual. Use of first language (if available) may be used for clarification purposes only. Sheltered English Immersion Students Participating: ELLs or language minority students with different backgrounds Program Nature: Remedial and subtractive Program Length: Short term, one to two years Language Outcomes: Minimal proficiency in English Other Features: English only orientation; instruction focuses on content rather than language. ESL Content/ Sheltered Instruction Students Participating: ELLs or language minority students with different backgrounds Program Nature: Remedial and subtractive Program Length: Short term, two to three years Language Outcomes: Minimal proficiency in English Other Features: English only orientation. Different models with different strategies: ESL Pull Out, ESL Class or Period, and/or ESL Resource Center; no academic support in native language.
Sofia Monzon Bi-Literacy Strategies for Second Language Learners Dr. Gomez, Summer 2014, UST
References
Rennie, J. (1993, September). ESL and Bilingual Programs. Center for Applied Linguistics, CAL. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/rennie01.html
Roberts, C. A. (1995). Bilingual Education Program Models: A Framework for Understanding. The Bilingual Research Journal. 19, 369-378. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.us/files/rcd/be021127/bilingual_education_program.pdf
Thomas, W. P., Collier, V. P. (2012). Beginnings. Defining dual language education. Chapters 2 and 3. Dual language education for a transformed world. Albuquerque, NM. Fuente Press.